1 December 2010 A. Ball, N. Jen, A. Sterk, K. Wiersma Calvin College Senior Design Project and Team Refresher Scheduling Overview Accomplishments Tasks In Progress Expected Status Obstacles Summary (Left to Right) Amy Ball, Kendrick Wiersma, Nathan Jen, and Avery Sterk Make power usage information more available ◦ Measure the consumption of individual building circuits. ◦ Display power information as it becomes available. Make metering and maintenance remote ◦ Transmit the total building power usage directly to the power company. ◦ Allow the power company to connect and disconnect power by sending a signal rather than a technician. Stewardship ◦ Promote awareness of power consumption ◦ Empowers users to identify their high-use devices and habits. Transparency ◦ Reliably allow power delivery ◦ Do not interrupt power without request or expectation Integrity ◦ Reliably provide accurate measurements ◦ Present these measurements in an intuitive interface Focus on individual subsystems ◦ Working in the little picture ◦ Still allows for big-picture design Current focus: solid-state breakers ◦ Design ◦ Prototyping External deadlines Met with Consumer’s Energy ◦ Smart Home demonstration ◦ Contacts for advice Researched product competition ◦ Smart power meters ◦ Smart solid-state breakers Defined budget and per-subsystem estimates Selected features for inclusion Established rough requirements Investigated design possibilities ◦ Researched existing designs ◦ Performed rough simulations Selected metering device for prototype Identified unforeseen constraints ◦ Data throughput ◦ Part specifications Solid-state breaker design ◦ Understanding how other designs work ◦ Producing or picking a design to use Component testing ◦ Waiting for parts to arrive ◦ Designing/building testing devices Big-picture design ◦ Evaluating design decisions and assumptions ◦ Defining subsystems and controllers Big-picture ◦ Requirements and subsystems fully defined ◦ Project budget defined Solid-state breakers ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Circuit designs tested and selected Testing plan defined Device prototyped and tested Prototype refined after testing Part availability ◦ Testing requires current transformers, which just arrived. Breaker design finalization ◦ Prototyping requires parts. ◦ Part selection depends on design. Other deadlines ◦ Graded deadlines trump internal deadlines Initial research and investigation is complete. Overall system requirements are still in flux. ◦ Those critical to current work will be finalized. Solid-state breaker work is behind. ◦ Work intensity will increase. ◦ Deadlines will be handled more effectively. Other subsystems are on hold (as planned). The project is still feasible, but behind schedule. Clarifications? Curiosity? Comments?