Metrics and the Cost of Quality Chapter 18 Why Metrics! A strategy without metrics is just a wish. And metrics that are not aligned with strategic objectives are a waste of time. – Emery Powell Be careful what you measure -- you might just get it. If you don’t keep score, you’re only practicing. – Tom Malone You get what you inspect, not what you expect. The Real Bottom Line: Mission and Measures One of the most powerful management disciplines, the one that more than any other keeps people focused and pulling in the same direction, is to make an organization’s purposes tangible. Managers do this by translating the organization’s mission – what it, particularly, exists to do – into a set of goals and performance measures that make success concrete for everyone. This is the real bottom line for every organization – whether it’s a business or a school or a hospital. Its executives must answer the question, “Given our mission, how is our performance going to be defined?” – Magretta & Stone, Management. 2002, p. 129 Why Metrics Now! The “never satisfied” customer. Managing the “total” supply chain. Shrinking product life cycles. More (not necessarily better) data. Profit margin squeezes. Presence of an increasing number of alternatives. So What Surviving in this new environment means working with: – – – – Less lead time Less inventory Less cost More reliance on the supply chain Surviving means having “better” metrics. What are Metrics? A verifiable measure stated in either quantitative (e.g., 95% inventory accuracy) or qualitative (e.g., as evaluated by our customer,we are providing above average service) terms. A metric is intended to close the gap between value, strategy, and specific activities. Metrics – Measure, direct, teach. Metrics – The Firm’s Instrument Cluster Metrics Categories Metrics – Individual measures. Metrics Set – Number of metrics used to evaluate the performance of an individual or unit. Metrics System – System for integrating, coordinating and alignment metrics, objectives, and plans. TYPES OF METRICS Individual vs. Systems Operational vs. Financial – Utilization vs. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) • Traditional focus - financial – Critical issue • Operational improvements do not always result in financial results Output vs. Process Internal to the firm vs. supply chain metrics Types of Metrics Product/Output metrics – Measure results, not the performance of the processes that gave rise to this performance. Process metrics – Pertains to the performance of the process – Typical measures -- cost, time, quality, agility (the ability to adapt), capacity, variability Output vs. Process Metrics You have to drive to Detroit. You would like to leave by no later than noon. You need to arrive at no later than 3:00 pm. Output metric - 3 PM arrival time met Process metrics – departure time - 1:00 PM – average speed - 65 mph Importance of Process Metrics Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again and again - and again. Process metrics enable you to recognize a potential mistake before you make it. Key Point Output metrics - critical to top management Process metrics - critical to those working in execution Metrics Process I - Intent (what you want to achieve and why?) D - Deployment (how do you want to achieve this goal?) A - Assignment (who will be held accountable?) S - Standard (how will you measure achievement?) • Issues of form, source, feasibility, appropriateness. E - Evaluation and Reward I.D.A.S.E. Process in Detail Intent – Desired outcome – What is it that we are trying to measure? – Why is it that we are measuring this? – How does this process/outcome support our objectives at the functional level? At the corporate level? – What would happen if we were to fail on this dimension? – Who are the “champions” for this outcome? I.D.A.S.E. Process in Detail Deployment – How are we going to achieve this outcome? – What type of data do we need to effectively and – – – – accurately implement this metric? Do we have this data? If not, what proxy data can we use? Impact of the proxy data? Will this be implemented as a predictive or outcome metric? Impact of the metric on the metric set? Is this metric similar to any others currently in use? I.D.A.S.E. Process in Detail Assignment – Recognize that there are two different people involved in a metric • Those who monitor the outcomes • Those who manage the processes that create the outcomes – There are different behaviors • Scanners -- large number of metrics-- looking for gaps • Searchers - deal with fewer metrics -- interested in problem solving I.D.A.S.E. Process in Detail Standard – The basis of comparison – Defines what is acceptable (and unacceptable) behavior – Different types of metrics – Can be generated from the benchmarking process – Can and should be dynamic Standards Absolute – EPA – Few in number Relative – Relative to our performance • Past performance • Best possible future performance • Pros and cons Standards - 2 Relative – Relative to best within group • • • • Need to develop appropriate group Best within the group teach others Worse within the group learn from others Group membership must be viewed as dynamic – Relative to a “benchmark” • Best in firm • Best in industry • Best in class FAC Critical Traits of Standards F - Feasible A - Appropriate C - Comparable An Example of Metrics in Action OEE – Operational Equipment Effectiveness – Availability * Performance * Quality – Note what we are measuring • Quality • Uptime • Cost – Note what we are not measuring • On-time delivery Metrics Set The set of measures that we use to monitor or evaluate the performance of a specific person or function or activity. Metrics set brings together two elements – Set of metrics • Load – Capacity to interpret or act on the measures • Capacity Metrics set recognizes that the process is capacitated. Metrics Set Ideal number of measures – 5 +/- 3 If we overload the manager, then we get: – Frustration – Confusion – Satisficing – Negotiation – Cherry picking Metrics System Metrics System – Total system responsible for coordinating and aligning metrics • Alignment – Top to bottom • Coordination – Across functions – Why are Alignment and Coordination so important? • The lessons of the “telephone” game. Alignment and Coordination Alignment occurs first – Coordination follows Alignment involves a translation problem – Restating higher order objectives into supporting activities for the lower levels – As we go from top to bottom, objectives narrow and level of details increase Challenges – Translation gets “messed” up – Multiple bosses Attaining Alignment Approaches – Bill of Material Approach – Balanced Scorecard Approach – Theory of Constraints Approach – Strategic Profit Impact Model Approaches for Managing the Metrics System Bill of Material approach – Explosion of metrics from the top down – Converting each higher level outcome into a series of lower level outcomes that must be achieved to ensure that the higher level outcome is met. – Problems Balanced Scorecard – Approach – Problems Balanced Scorecard Approach Approaches for Managing the Metrics System Theory of Constraints Approach – Must look at the entire system and identify the constraint – Now measure the performance of the constraint – The constraint drives the performance of the: • Firm • Supply chain – Constraint must always be working • Measure this Approaches for Managing the Metrics System Theory of Constraints - continued – Elements • • • • Profit (P) Operating Expenses (E) Throughput Time (T) Inventory (I) Strategic Profit Model Recent Findings Metrics are a source of fear Different groups perceive metrics differently – Resolution strategies: • Negotiation (group optimization) • Satisfaction of minimum targets (order qualifiers) • Decompose the problem into sub-problems (silo management) • Treat everything as important (cope as you can) • Find new metrics we can agree upon • Ignore most and focus on what I can do well • Seek divine guidance Recent Findings Metrics must be managed as a system Metrics for motivation and those for process control are different – Global vs. local Metrics explosion Ceteribus Paribus Metrics Framework Metric Type Output Focused Aggregate Process Line of Control Point Control Dimensionality Multidimensional Motivation Embedded Line of Monitoring Traits of Effective Metrics – Focused on the critical few, not trivial – – – – – – many Linked to value Measure directly Appropriate display Appropriate frequency of updating Acceptable time lags between generation of metric and report Appropriate standard used The “Cost of Quality” Metrics Types of Quality Costs – Prevention – Appraisal – Internal Failure – External Failure Classifying Quality Costs 1-10-100 Rule Theory Says: – Prevention – 1 – Inspect and Prevent – 10 – Given to Customer – 100 1-10-100 Rule Practice Shows: – IBM Rochester: A400 Server • 1-13-92 (hours work required) – Corning Glass: Glass pressings • 1-80-400 ($ cost) – Texaco: Refinery • 1-10-100 ($ cost) Cost of Customer Defections – Companies can boost profits 25 – 85% by decreasing defections 5% Cost at Points in the Process Use of a Cost Basis Why? – Allow comparison across different periods Typical Bases – Internal failure as a percent of total production costs – External failure as an average percent of net sales – Procurement appraisal costs as a percent of total purchased material costs – Operations appraisal costs as a percent of total production costs – Total quality costs as a percent of production costs Quality Cost Basis Example January February Cost Category Product A Product B Product A Product B Prevention $2,000 $4,000 $2,000 $4,000 Appraisal $10,000 $20,000 $13,000 $21,000 Internal Failure $19,000 $106,000 $16,000 $107,000 External Failure $54,000 $146,000 $52,000 $156,000 Total $85,000 $276,000 $83,000 $288,000 Standard Direct Labor Costs 35,000 90,000 28,000 86,000 Quality Cost Basis Solution Use of the System Categorizing costs Estimating true external failure costs Application of cost bases Tracking improvement ROQ