Lessons from the eurozone crisis Dr Constantinos Alexiou Senior Lecturer in Economics Lessons from the Eurozone crisis T he economic crisis has ushered in an era of economic stagnation and social misery across much of the EU region. As a result, governments in the recession-stricken Eurozone struggled to find viable ways out of what is perceived to be the worst economic predicament since the establishment of the EU. The finger of blame is pointed by many at the reckless spending by the relatively poorer Mediterranean countries. But, the economic collapses of both Ireland and Iceland were down to failures of their national banks. The widespread dogmatic adoption of neoliberal attitudes towards banks by the contemporary gurus of policymaking in both the EU and US, had a devastating impact on the respective economies. Speculative behaviour that had been 22 Management Focus | Autumn 2012 nurtured for many decades in the womb of the financial system, precipitated the collapse of the banking system; whilst at the same time irresponsible governments were expected to bail out the banks using taxpayers money. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the fundamental weaknesses of the structure of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) experiment were exposed. Policymakers in the EU aided and abetted by global economic facilitators, otherwise known as the IMF, desperately tried to conjure up policies which were structural in nature, to deal with the crippling effects of recession. The novel austerity packages offered to Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain, could be regarded as a set of hastily constructed rules that cut wages in both the public and private sectors considerably, governance and risk management that has resulted after lengthy periods of unscrupulous toxic trading and rapid growth. For many commentators, regulation in the financial system has been conspicuous by its absence, whilst for others the existing regulatory system has simply failed to deliver. Either way, a regulatory mechanism should always be in place to ensure that any forthcoming ‘ill-driven’ practices are kept at bay and effectively neutralised. However, the question that still begs an answer is ‘who regulates the regulators?’ Resolving this question will settle the debate about the significance of stringent and anti-fragile regulation. alongside a reassessment of labour rights, thereby undermining the existing democratic processes in the respective countries. Observers, both inside and outside the troubled countries, have argued that the bailout packages were destined to fail, weakening further the already decimated economies. Paradoxically, the new policies call for more austerity and more misery for the people of the troubled countries. History tells us, that after a war or a natural disaster people learn from their mistakes. If there is a lesson to be learnt from the on-going economic crisis, it is with regard to the activities carried out by the banking sector. The banks must stop financing Ponzi (pyramid selling) type schemes and instead focus on financing productive investment. It is well documented that the bulk of the financial sector’s market activities are bound up by speculative bubbles. When society is unable to resist the temptation of instant wealth, then the accumulation of debt is inevitable which in turn leads to a crash. British economist John Maynard Keynes articulately argued that mediocre growth, financial instability and unemployment are caused by the fetish for liquidity. What the pundits are failing to recognise is the dramatic failure of corporate In all likelihood, economic instability in conjunction with global trends will play an “The question that still begs an answer is who regulates the regulators?” instrumental role in affecting businesses in the long-term. The world is becoming increasingly more intricate and the inherent frailty of the emerging business environment creates new challenges for all players in the market system. Antiquated, gut-instinct management approaches are not sustainable and need to be superseded by fresh ideas tailored to achieve efficiency and flexibility in a highly volatile environment. Adaptation is the key to success. In the words of British biologist Charles Darwin: “it is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change.” MF For further information please contact the author at constantinos.alexiou@cranfield.ac.uk Management Focus | Autumn 2012 23