Madison Public Schools
REPORT ON 2013-2014 STATE ASSESSMENTS
Matthew A. Mingle
Director of Curriculum and Instruction
Presented to Board of Education, November 4, 2014
District Factor Groups (DFG)
2
y Designed to allow comparisons among like districts
based on census data
y Considers
{
{
{
{
{
{
% of adults with no high school diploma
% of adults with some college education
Occupational status
Unemployment rate
% of individuals in poverty
Median family income
y Last updated in 2000 due to phase out
District Factor Groups (DFG)
3
A
J
y Madison is an “I” district
{ Boonton, Denville, Florham Park, Hanover, Kinnelon,
Montville, Morris Plains, Long Hill, Randolph, Rockaway,
Washington Township, West Morris Regional
y Harding is a “J” district
{ Chatham, Mendham Boro, Mendham Township, Mountain
Lakes
A = 40
FG = 92
B = 67
GH = 76
CD = 68
I = 103
DE = 83
J = 25
NJ ASK (Grades 3-8)
4
y Sections
{ English Language Arts
Reading
Ù Writing
Ù
{
{
Mathematics
Science (Grades 4, 8)
y Scoring
{ 250-300 = Advanced Proficient
{ 200-249 = Proficient
{ 199 and Below = Partially Proficient
NJ ASK (Grades 3-8)
5
y New for 2014: Measured Common Core State
Standards within NJASK blueprint for all grades and
courses
{
Previously ELA (grades 3-8) and math (grades 3-5 only)
NJASK 3 English Language Arts
6
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
77.3
83.8 84
75.4
66.5
61.2
District
DFG
State
34.4
16.2 16.1
Partially
Proficient
6.5 8.6 5.3
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 3 English Language Arts
7
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
80.7
87.5
85.4
83.8
84
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 3 Mathematics
8
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
87.5 89.3
75.5
58.4
52.4
35.1
35.8
30.9
District
DFG
State
39.7
24.5
12.4
10.7
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 3 Mathematics
9
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
94.7
84.1
87.5
85.3
89.3
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 4 English Language Arts
10
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
78.6 79.9
69.5 72.1
59.8
56.2
40.2
21.4 20.1
9.1 7.8
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
3.6
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
District
DFG
State
NJASK 4 English Language Arts
11
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
86.2
80.3
78.6
79.9
72.0
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 4 Mathematics
12
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
85.6 88.9
74.9
District
DFG
State
53.4
48.7
36.9 35.5 39
35.9
25.1
14.4
11.1
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 4 Mathematics
13
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
98
86.9
85.6
88.9
76.0
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 4 Science
14
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
96.8 96.5
88.6
68.366.8
District
DFG
State
47.5
41.1
28.5 29.7
11.5
3.2 3.6
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 4 Science
15
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
93.3
98.3
100
96.8
96.5
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 5 English Language Arts
16
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
81.6 81.9
59.7
65.7
62.3
54.1
37.7
21.9
16.2
18.4 18
8.2
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
District
DFG
State
NJASK 5 English Language Arts
17
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
89.8
80.2
81.6
76.8
81.9
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 5 Mathematics
18
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
87.5
91.7
79.8
District
DFG
State
56.4
53.2
41.7
34.3 35.3
38.1
20.2
12.4
8.3
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 5 Mathematics
19
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
93.9
84.4
87.5
87.5
91.7
Percent Passing
CAS
KRS
TJS
-
District
DFG
NJASK 6 English Language Arts
20
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
86.9
66.1 68.2
85.1
66.9
District
DFG
State
58.1
33
20.8
16.9
13.1 14.9
Partially
Proficient
8.8
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 6 Mathematics
21
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
94.5
91.1
79.3
66.8
District
DFG
State
52.8
44.1
38.3
35.2
27.7
20.7
5.4 8.9
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 7 English Language Arts
22
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
89.8
83.7
64
55.8
51.6
48.9
38.2
36
27.9
10.2
15.1
16.3
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
District
DFG
State
NJASK 7 Mathematics
23
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
89.2
83.9
66.8
District
DFG
State
51.4
33.3
37.8
43 41.6
40.9
25.2
10.8
16.1
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 8 English Language Arts
24
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
92.1 92.9
79.8
70
60.8
67.2
District
DFG
State
31.3
22.9
20.2
12.6
8.0
7
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 8 Mathematics
25
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
88.2 86.9
71.5
65.0
District
DFG
State
52.4
28.5
34.535.9
35.6
23.2
11.9 13.1
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
NJASK 8 Science
26
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
94.9
92.6
78.9
59.9
51.8
47.3
District
DFG
State
45.3
35.0
27.1
21
5.1 7.4
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
HSPA (Grade 11)
27
y HSPA Sections
{ English Language Arts
Reading
Ù Writing
Ù
{
Mathematics
y Scoring
{ 250-300 = Advanced Proficient
{ 200-249 = Proficient
{ 199 and Below = Partially Proficient
This image cannot currently be display ed.
HSPA 11 Language Arts Literacy
28
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
98.1 98.2
93.2
60.4
37.2
1.9 1.9
60.9
55.1
District
DFG
State
43.1
32.8
6.7
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
HSPA 11 Mathematics
29
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
92.3 91.8
78.9
46.4
49.7
41.8
45.9
District
DFG
State
50
29.2
21.1
7.7 8.2
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Advanced
Proficient
Passing
Class of 2015 (Current 12th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
30
100
95
92.5
90
92.4
93.8
92.2
91.3
82.7
85
80
75
85.8
86.1
85.3
85.3
92.7
98.2
98.1
93.2
82.1
District
DFG
State
77.9
70
69.8
69.2
65
60
63.2
61.9
55
59.9
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 11
Class of 2015 (Current 12th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
31
100
95.7
95
90
92.4
93.9
91.7
88.8
88
85
85.8
81.9
84
80
78.9
79.5
75
70
87.2
86.4
72.8
68.7
76.4
71.5
70.9
65
92.3
91.8
64.3
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 11
District
DFG
State
Class of 2017 (Current 10th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
32
100
95
96.9
94.2
90
90
85
86
86.9
81.7
80.2
80
94.5
93.6
80
82.6
84.9
80.4
81.9
District
DFG
State
75
70
66.7
65
60
63
63
Grade 4
Grade 5
61
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Class of 2017 (Current 10th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
33
100
97.5
95
95
90
85
86.7
87.8
91.2
91.1
87.8
80
84.9
77.4
73
72.9
70
87.4
80.9
78.8
75
89.2
89.8
69.3
65
63.2
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
District
DFG
State
Class of 2017 (Current 10th graders)
Percentage Passing Science
34
100
96.4
95
90
90
96.7
93
85
80
81.5
75
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 4-8
79
District
DFG
State
Class of 2018 (Current 9th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
35
100
92.9
95
90
85
80
87.9
85.2
79.3
75
80.8
85.3
81.5
80.2
82.7
92.1
84.7
79.8
77.1
70
65
60
64.5
62.7
59.6
65.2
60.9
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
District
DFG
State
Class of 2018 (Current 9th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
36
100
95
90
85
80
75
87.8
85.2
75.2
88.9
80.8
91.9
81.5
80.6
77
90.9
90.6
78.8
88.2
86.9
81.2
81.6
71.5
70
65
63.5
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
District
DFG
State
Class of 2019 (Current 8th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
37
100
95
89.8
90
85
85.2
83.4
80
75
85
85.9
84
80
83.7
80.4
District
DFG
State
75.9
70
66.2
65
60
59.7
62.7
62.1
64
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Class of 2019 (Current 8th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
38
100
95
90
92.9
90.5
90
90.7
85
80
75
94.8
93.2
93.3
90.3
83.9
83.3
78.1
79.3
89.2
78.9
70
66.8
65
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
District
DFG
State
Class of 2020 (Current 7th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
39
100
95
85.6
90
85
80
87.3
83.5
78.9
75
86.9
85.1
79.6
76.2
70
65
60
66.9
63
58.5
61.3
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
District
DFG
State
Class of 2020 (Current 7th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
40
100
95
90
92.8
90.9
91.6
90.3
94.5
92.7
91.7
91.1
79.9
79.3
85
80
78.9
75
77.4
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
District
DFG
State
Class of 2020 (Current 7th graders)
Percentage Passing Science
41
100
95
90
85
80
District
DFG
State
75
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 4
Grade 8
Class of 2021 (Current 6th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
42
100
95
90
85
80
75
82.2
79.1
78.6
76.5
81.9
81.6
70
65
66.7
60
59.4
62.3
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
District
DFG
State
Class of 2021 (Current 6th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
43
100
95
91.1
91
90
85
80
88.3
78.4
87.7
78.3
91.7
87.5
79.8
75
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
District
DFG
State
Class of 2022 (Current 5th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
44
100
95
90
85
80
83.8
82.8
79.9
78.6
75
70
65
66.4
60
59.8
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
District
DFG
State
Class of 2022 (Current 5th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
45
100
95
90
85
90.7
89.7
85.6
80
75
88.9
77.7
74.9
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 3
Grade 4
District
DFG
State
Class of 2022 (Current 5th graders)
Percentage Passing Science
46
100
95
90
85
80
District
DFG
State
75
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 4
Class of 2023 (Current 4th graders)
Percentage Passing English Language Arts
47
100
95
90
85
80
District
DFG
State
75
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 3
Class of 2023 (Current 4th graders)
Percentage Passing Mathematics
48
100
95
90
85
80
District
DFG
State
75
70
65
60
55
50
Grade 3
In Summary…
49
y Madison students perform on par with DFG “I”
cohort on NJASK/HSPA tests.
{
Average is +0.6%
SAT and AP Performance
50
y % of students participating in SAT
y % of students participating in PSAT
y % of students scoring above 1550 on SAT
y % of students taking at least one AP test in
English, Math, Social Studies, or Science
y % of AP tests in English, Math, Social Studies,
or Science with Score 3 or Greater
SAT Scores – 25th to 75th Percentile
51
Year
Critical Reading
Writing
Math
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
480-620
480-640
500-630
490-630
490-620
480-620
490-620
480-640
480-630
510-670
500-640
520-650
520-670
500-650
490-640
510-660
510-670
490-630
480-620
480-640
490-650
520-650
490-620
490-640
500-640
490-660
490-640
Advanced Placement
52
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
# of subject
areas
14
20
16
22
20
21
20
23
21
# tests
189
225
300
296
281
371
365
447
414
(+19%)
(+33%)
(-1%)
(-5%)
(+32%)
(-2%)
(+22%)
(-7%)
# students
in
graduating
class
166
216
189
208
181
210
203
179
219
(+30%)
(-14%)
(+10%)
(-15%)
(+16%)
(-3%)
(-13%)
(+18%)
% scoring
3+
85
82
89
89
84
89
90
85
85
Exam
5
4
3
2
1
Biology
Calculus AB
Calculus BC *
Chemistry
Computer Science *
English Language
English Literature
Environmental Science
European History *
French Language
2
14
2
53
7
1
11
10
1
0
3
4
6
0
8
0
6
8
7
0
2
1
6
0
2
1
1
3
13
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
8
1
0
0
1
1
0
7
0
0
2
0
0
Government and Politics US
4
5
7
5
0
Macroeconomics *
Microeconomics *
Physics B
1
1
33
1
0
11
0
1
4
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
14
5
10
20
1
0
19
10
15
19
0
0
25
2
13
6
0
0
11
0
7
6
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism *
Physics C: Mechanics *
Psychology
Spanish Language
Statistics
US History
World History *
Exam
# exams
% passing
National % passing
Biology
Calculus AB
Calculus BC *
Chemistry
Computer Science *
English Language
English Literature
Environmental Science
European History *
French Language
Government and Politics US
Macroeconomics *
Microeconomics *
Physics B
7
27
3
54
17
11
19
21
31
1
7
21
2
4
50
100%
96%
67%
100%
18%
95%
100%
68%
0%
100%
76%
100%
50%
88%
64%
59%
81%
53%
61%
56%
55%
47%
60%
75%
51%
58%
66%
61%
Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism *
2
100%
71%
Physics C: Mechanics *
Psychology
Spanish Language
Statistics
US History
World History *
2
73
17
42
51
1
100%
79%
100%
79%
88%
100%
78%
66%
85%
60%
52%
55%
School Performance Reports
55
y NJ was granted a waiver from Annual Yearly
Progress (AYP) provisions of NCLB
{
{
{
{
Priority, Focus, Reward Schools (2012)
New educator evaluation system (2013)
Common Core State Standards implementation (2013)
PARCC assessments (2015)
y AYP replaced by Performance Targets
School Performance Report
56
y State-determined targets in three areas:
{ Academic Achievement
{ College and Career Readiness
{ Student Growth
y 2014 reports (using 2012-13 data came out in April)
y 2015 reports will be available in April 2015 (approx)
This image cannot currently be display ed.
School Performance Report
2011-2012
57
CAS
KRS
TJS
83%
100%
MJS
MHS
80%
100%
Academic
Achievement
100%
College and
Career
Readiness
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Student
Growth
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
This image cannot currently be display ed.
School Performance Report
2012-2013
58
CAS
KRS
TJS
MJS
MHS
Academic
Achievement
83%
100%
75%
80%
100%
College and
Career
Readiness
100%
100%
0%
50%
100%
Student
Growth
100%
100%
100%
100%
--
Graduation
and PostSecondary
--
--
--
--
100%
*Torey J. Sabatini School was recognized
by the NJDOE as a “Reward” school due
to “High Performance” in 2012-13.
This image cannot currently be display ed.
In Summary…
59
y Madison students perform on par with DFG “I”
cohort on NJASK/HSPA tests.
{
Average is +0.6%
y Madison students outperform the NJ mean in all
areas of the SAT.
y Madison students outperform the national cohort in
all AP areas we offer.
What Are We Doing?
60
y Complete implementation of Math in Focus (3-5)
y Ongoing professional development for elementary
literacy and mathematics instruction
y Implement new high school math and ELA curricula
y Increased support for struggling students
{
{
{
{
Before-school tutoring (K-5)
Study Island (K-12)
Examination of entire basic skills program (K-12)
Summer bridge classes, seminar course, double Algebra (9)
y Outreach to immigrant/ELL students’ families
Looking ahead…
61
y “A Walk in the PARCC” - Monthly
y PARCC Assessments (Spring 2015)
{ Performance-Based Assessment – March
{ End-of-Year – April-May
y School Performance Reports (~ April 2015)
Madison Public Schools
REPORT ON 2012-2013 STATE ASSESSMENTS
Matthew A. Mingle
Director of Curriculum and Instruction
Presented to Board of Education, November 4, 2014