LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST
for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013
Submitted to the
Governor’s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy
and the Legislative Budget Board
by
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON
DOWNTOWN
Date of Resubmission
October 18, 2010
University of Houston – Downtown
Request for Legislative Appropriations
Table of Contents
1.A. Administrator’s Statement ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.B. Organizational Chart ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
2.A. Summary of Base Request by Strategy ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8
2.B. Summary of Base Request by Method of Finance ............................................................................................................................................................ 11
2.C. Summary of Base Request by Object of Expense ............................................................................................................................................................. 15
2.D. Summary of Base Request Objective Outcomes ............................................................................................................................................................... 16
2.E. Summary of Exceptional Items Request ........................................................................................................................................................................... 19
2.F. Summary of Total Request by Strategy ............................................................................................................................................................................. 20
2.G. Summary of Total Request Objective Outcomes .............................................................................................................................................................. 23
3.A. Strategy Request
Operations Support .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Staff Group Insurance ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30
Workers’ Compensation Insurance ............................................................................................................................................................................ 32
Texas Public Education Grants .................................................................................................................................................................................. 33
E & G Space Support ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement............................................................................................................................................................................. 37
Community Development .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 38
Institutional Enhancement......................................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Exceptional Item Request ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
Research Development Fund .................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
4.A. Exceptional Item Request Schedule
Science & Technology Building TRB ...................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Expansion of UHD Scholars Academy ..................................................................................................................................................................... 46
4.B. Exceptional Item Strategy Allocation Schedule
Science & Technology Building TRB ...................................................................................................................................................................... 47
Expansion of UHD Scholars Academy ..................................................................................................................................................................... 48
4.C. Exceptional Item Strategy Request
Science & Technology Building TRB ...................................................................................................................................................................... 49
Exceptional Item Request - UHD Scholars Academy ............................................................................................................................................... 50
i
Table of Contents
Page 2
6.A. HUB Supporting Schedule ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51
6.H. Estimated Total of All Funds Outside the GAA ............................................................................................................................................................... 53
6.I. Allocation of the Biennial 10 Percent Reduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 54
8.A. Schedule 1, Other Educational and General Income ......................................................................................................................................................... 57
8.B. Schedule 2, Grand Total Educational, General and Other Funds ...................................................................................................................................... 60
8.C. Schedule 3A, Staff Group Insurance Data Elements ......................................................................................................................................................... 62
8.D. Schedule 4, Computation of OASI.................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
8.E. Schedule 5, Calculation of Retirement Proportionality and ORP Differential .................................................................................................................. 66
8.F. Schedule 6, Capital Funding .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 67
8.G. Schedule 7, Current and Local Fund Balances.................................................................................................................................................................. 69
8.H. Schedule 8, Personnel ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70
8.I. Schedule 9, Expenditures Associated with Utility Operations .......................................................................................................................................... 73
8.J. Schedule 10A, Tuition Revenue Bond Projects ................................................................................................................................................................ 74
8.K. Schedule 10B, Tuition Revenue Bond Issuance History................................................................................................................................................... 75
8.L. Schedule 11, Special Item Information
Tuition Revenue Bond Debt Service........................................................................................................................................................................ 76
Community Development ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 77
Institutional Enhancement........................................................................................................................................................................................ 78
Science & Technology Building Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement ..................................................................................................................... 79
Expansion of the UHD Scholars Academy to all UHD Colleges ............................................................................................................................ 80
8. M. Schedule 12A, Reconciliation of Formula Strategies to NACUBO Functions of Cost ................................................................................................... 81
8.N. Schedule 12B, Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO ............................................................................................................ 82
ii
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
6
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Board Members
RAY, Carol Robertson
WILSON, Welcome W.
WISE, Jim P.
MOSBACHER, Mica.
BLAIR, Nelda Luce
MONTY, Jacob
BERRY, Nandita V.
FERTITTA, Tilman J.
HOLLINGSWORTH, Jarvis V.
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 2:29:34PM
PAGE:
of
1
Term Expires
8-31-2011
8-31-2011
8-31-2011
8-31-2013
8-31-2013
8-31-2013
8-31-2015
8-31-2015
8-31-2015
Hometown
Houston
Houston
Houston
Austin
Houston
Houston
Houston
Houston
Sugar Land
Administrator‟s Statement
Overview
Promoting student access and success have been the core components of the university‟s mission since its founding in 1974. Through flexible scheduling of courses, innovative use
of technology and distance learning opportunities, and comprehensive support services for the under - prepared, UHD provides educational opportunities for many who might not
otherwise be able to pursue a college degree.
Evidence of the university‟s commitment to both access and success can be found in its steadily growing enrollments. A variety of factors can influence where an individual
chooses to go to have his or her educational needs met, but chief among them are an institution‟s reputation for quality programs and its responsiveness to marketplace demands.
Enrollment also is a measure of the university‟s success in expanding educational access to higher education by developing new markets among groups not currently being served
by any institution.
UHD's total enrollment has increased by 46% over the past ten years and now stands at 12,742. Further, the 2,207 students who earned a degree from UHD in FY 2009 represented
a 105% increase over the 1,074 who graduated ten years earlier. Under-served minority graduates have increased at an even greater rate - from 539 to 1,246 for the same time
frame, an increase of 131 %. UHD leads its institutional peers in the production of bachelor-level STEM graduates. As the university prepares for the new biennium, its highest
priority will be to continue providing those programs and support services that enable students to achieve their academic objectives and become productive, contributing members
of society. UHD‟s student body is 37% Hispanic, 29% African-American, 22% White, and 10% Asian and closely mirrors the population of Houston (43% Hispanic, 23%
African-American, 27% White, and 5% Asian). UHD remains the most ethnically diverse university in the state. The average UHD student is 28 years old, works more than 30
hours per week, commutes to campus, and attends the university on a part - time basis.
As a university strongly committed to the state's Closing the Gaps goals, UH - Downtown has focused on expanding educational access and promoting student success. One
element of accessibility is cost, and UHD has long been among the best values in Texas public higher education. In FY2009, a student at UHD taking a 15-hour undergraduate
load paid $2,624 in tuition and mandatory fees, 10% below the state average of $2,914 for Master‟s-level universities. UHD's continuing ability to keep its costs well below the
state average for its peer group is particularly impressive considering that its FY 2009 appropriations-per-FTSE funding from the state was $4,612,
1
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 2:29:34PM
PAGE:
of
2
6
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
which was 53% below the $9,954 average of its Master‟s-level peer group.
Significant Changes in Policy
UHD is in the process of developing automatic admissions standards designed to ensure that students who are admitted to the university have a reasonable chance to benefit from
its programs. For many years the university has admitted any applicant with either a high school diploma or a GED. Legitimate questions have been raised regarding whether
this policy of “open admissions” has benefitted all students as intended. In rethinking its admissions policies, the university is proud of and affirms its long-standing commitment
to access and success. But, we recognize that community colleges provide a less expensive alternative and are better equipped than UHD to serve the educational needs of those
students who require extensive remediation. The legislature and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board are increasingly emphasizing first-time-in-college (FTIC)
six-year graduation rates to define institutional success. THECB rules have been adopted limiting the amount of time under-prepared students have to prepare themselves for
college-level work. On the national level, the federal government has tied federal financial aid to "ability to benefit," and recently established language that requires institutions to
return funds awarded to students who failed to complete their courses. These changes have caused many open-admission universities to reexamine their policies and has resulted
in many of them adopting admission criteria based on the “ability to benefit” principle.
Significant Changes in Provision of Service
The basic mission of the university remains unchanged but a number of actions have been taken in the past two years to expand and improve the services that it provides, including
the development of a revised and more concise mission statement. A new Bachelor of Business Administration degree program has been added in Insurance and Risk
Management along with two new Bachelor of Applied Arts and Sciences (BAAS) programs in Applied Administration and Information Technology. These BAAS programs are
specifically designed for students holding an Associate of Applied Sciences degree (AAS) from a community college to more easily apply that degree toward the completion of
a baccalaureate degree .
UHD continues to work with area community colleges to facilitate the transfer process of their students who desire to earn a baccalaureate degree. Examples of this include
articulation agreements and joint-admissions programs and the offering of selected degree programs on-site at community college facilities. The most significant expansion of
service this past year has been the opening of UHD - Northwest. The northwest region of the Houston metropolitan area is among the largest under-served regions in the state in
terms of access to baccalaureate and master's degrees offered by senior-level institutions. More than 1.5 million people live in the region with about 250,000 enrolled in regional
school districts. The University of Houston System signed a five - year lease agreement with Lone Star College for instructional space at LSC‟s new University Park location,
located off State Highway 249. By the end of 2010-2011, UHD will be offering 16 baccalaureate and 2 master‟s degrees at this site, with programs from each of its four
degree-granting colleges.
The university is creatively implementing new ways of delivering its programs in response to changing population patterns in the Houston metropolitan area. Between 2000 and
2009 the City of Houston grew by approximately 9% while surrounding counties like Fort Bend and Montgomery were growing by more than 40%. To better serve the region's
outward growing population, UHD has increased the number of courses available online and at various off - campus sites. The dramatic increase in the last five years in the
number of UHD students taking courses online and off - campus demonstrates the importance of distance education in providing convenient access to higher education for both
new and currently enrolled students. In spring 2010, 20% of UHD‟s students were taking at least one course online, and 27% of its students were taking at least one course online
or at one of UHD‟s off-campus locations. Another action taken to reduce student travel time and expense includes the scheduling of
2
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 2:29:34PM
PAGE:
of
3
6
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
more „hybrid‟ courses, a blend of face-to-face and on-line which meet just once per week . The 107 hybrid sections that the university offered in the spring 2010 semester
enrolled a total of 2,098 students.
UHD has a long tradition of working with inner city schools and community organizations and will continue to do so, but as it has added more programs and developed a
reputation for quality education, it has attracted even larger numbers of students from the metropolitan area's outlying regions. A zip code analysis of its current students revealed
that 50% of them lived outside the beltway, 35% lived inside the beltway but outside the 610 loop, and only 15% lived inside the loop . While UHD is clearly an institution
serving the entire metropolitan region, the „Downtown‟ part of its name suggests a much more limited service area. The university is currently reviewing alternative names for
UHD reflective of the fact that we serve the entire city of Houston and surrounding areas. We expect to be able to go to the legislature in early 2011 with a name change proposal.
Significant Externalities
The contribution that the university is able to make to the state‟s priority educational goals in the years ahead will be affected by a number of external factors.
The demand for higher education will increase as the population grows. Harris County continues to be the nation's third most populous county with an estimated 4.1 million
residents (June 2009), and remains one of the fastest growing counties in the United States, with a population increase of 19% since 2000 and 46% since 1990. Educational
forecasts suggest that 2010 will produce the greatest number of high school graduates in the nation's history, with sustained high numbers for several successive years as a result of
the baby boom echo. While the traditional white, middle-class 18-22 year old group is declining in size, the number of minority students and older returning students will be
increasing. The university anticipates continued enrollment growth, as those fast growing segments of the college-going population are groups that the university has served
effectively in the past.
While UHD has been able to keep its costs significantly below the state average, many students would be unable to attend UHD without substantial financial aid. Changes in state
and federal student aid programs have a significant impact on UHD's student body, over 80% of which is currently receiving some form of financial aid. Of particular concern are
the recent recommendations of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) that would raise the eligibility requirements for the Texas Grant program. At the
federal level, the Department of Education‟s proposed „Program Integrity‟ rules will tie federal financial aid more stringently to satisfactory academic progress, which would have
an adverse impact on UHD students, many of whom are capable - but - underprepared first-generation college students. These new DOE rules will be effective July 1, 2011.
UHD has a similar concern over the recent recommendation by the THECB that the legislature fund only completed hours. UHD serves many students who attend on a part-time
basis while holding full-time jobs and raising families. Changed work schedules or family crises often result in some students withdrawing from courses before the end of a
semester, but the cost of offering these courses will remain the same whether students withdraw from them or not .
Another factor that will affect how UHD carries out its mission is the academic preparation of its incoming students. The performance of students on the Texas Assessment of
Academic Skills (TAAS) exit-level test has shown some improvement in recent years . UHD has traditionally had a disproportionate number of students requiring some form of
remediation but is now seeing some decrease in the number of students entering with academic deficiencies. Of the new freshmen admitted last fall, 80% required some
remediation, a decline of 5% from what it had been five years earlier. The continuation of this trend would permit UHD to reduce the resources it must now commit to
developmental education.
3
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 2:29:34PM
PAGE:
of
4
6
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
Several new rules and reporting requirements have significant compliance costs and have placed additional pressure on university resources. These include the provisions of HB
2504 that require universities to post and maintain faculty curriculum vitae and course syllabi on their web sites. The new categories for reporting student race and ethnicity have
required extensive reprogramming and have created significant challenges for comparing data over time.
Approach Taken in Preparing for a 10 percent Baseline Budget Reduction and Assessment of the Reduction‟s Impact
The most significant action taken to absorb the 5 percent general revenue appropriation reduction in FY2010 was to cancel mid-year pay raises that had been scheduled to go
into effect on March 1, 2010. UHD‟s FY2011 budget includes a $1.3M set-aside for meeting another 5 percent reduction in general revenue, should it occur. The funds for this
reserve were provided in part through a series of cuts and reallocations identified during the budget development process, including disengagement from two distance education
sites, the elimination of vacant staff positions, and the reduction of Maintenance and Operation budgets in selected areas.
Early in FY2010 the university established a broadly representative Budget Reduction and Efficiencies Task Force whose charge was to identify areas of opportunity for trimming
the university budget. The report that the task force produced is serving as a resource for the university leadership as it works to develop a comprehensive plan for dealing with
the cuts projected for FY2012/2013. The goal is to identify reductions and efficiencies that will save more than will be required to accommodate reduced general revenue support.
The additional savings will provide the resources necessary to fund new initiatives focused on student success, including initiatives that support UHD‟s recently adopted strategic
priority of assuring that all students have a „high impact educational experience‟ during their time at UHD. These „high impact‟ experiences can range from internships to
community service to hands-on undergraduate research.
Purpose of Any New Funding Being Requested
UHD urges that efforts continue to provide for Texas‟s economic future through investment at all levels of the state ‟s educational system. Continued support for the state‟s
formula funding system will be necessary if Texas universities are to compete effectively with institutions from other states and, increasingly, institutions from around the world.
The formula system has provided state universities with a degree of funding stability and predictability that is necessary for effective planning. In the area of non-formula
funding, it is important that state leaders continue to make clear their commitment to fund future debt service on all outstanding tuition revenue bonds.
The university urges that every effort be made to reverse the recent trend of shifting an increasing share of the cost of higher education to the individual student. The impact of
this change has been greatest on lower - income Texans, but as the Closing the Gaps plan recognizes, the state as a whole will suffer if it fails to develop the educated workforce
needed to remain competitive in today‟s information economy. An educated citizenry is a public good and should be recognized as such.
The university also strongly supports the Incentive Funds program that was approved during the 80th session of the Legislature and urges that this program be continued.
Institutions that have had the greatest success in helping the state achieve its higher education goals should be provided additional support so that they can continue with and
expand those efforts. The university requests that the legislature consider institutionalizing Incentive Funds in a manner similar to what is done with HEAF. The one drawback
to the Incentive Fund program as currently constructed is that there is no assurance that it will carry forward from one biennium to the next. As a result, universities are reluctant
to build this state support into their base budgets, which then limits the institutions in how the funds can be applied.
In addition to seeking greater overall support for higher education through the formula system, UHD is seeking special funding for the following institution - specific special
item requests.
4
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 2:29:34PM
PAGE:
of
5
6
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
Tuition Revenue Bonds and Exceptional Items
UHD is submitting one TRB request and one Exceptional Item request to the 82nd Legislature for consideration. These are:
Science & Technology Building Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
The university is requesting authority to issue tuition revenue bonds to fund the construction and equip a state - of - the - art 120,000 sq. ft. classroom/lab building to serve as the
home of the College of Sciences and Technology, one of four degree - granting colleges at the university. The college is home to all STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering,
and Mathematics) academic programs and provides opportunities for under - represented groups to work for and attain degree goals in STEM areas. The funding requested would
provide for the projected debt service costs associated with the bond issue described.
As the university‟s STEM programs have grown in size and recognition, the deficiencies in existing science and technology classroom and lab space have become an increasing
challenge. At present, science and technology labs are located in the original UHD structure, the One Main Building, which was never designed for this purpose.
In the fall of 2009, UHD operated with an overall space deficit of over 346,000 sq. ft. (assignable), with most of that coming in the areas of Teaching and Research. As the
institution matures, it is requiring more „special-use‟ as opposed to „general use‟ space. A dedicated Science & Technology Building will be the first step in that direction.
Expansion of the UHD Scholars Academy to all UHD Colleges
Over the past decade UHD has developed a true „center of excellence‟ with its nationally recognized Scholars Academy. The UHD Scholars Academy, previous winner of the
THECB‟s STAR Award, was cited in President Bush‟s 2007 budget request for NSF funding as a model program in science preparation at the collegiate level. The current UHD
Scholars Academy is a multi-faceted program designed to prepare high school students and college freshmen for the rigors of college - level science curriculum. UHD proposes
establishing the same successful programmatic and pedagogical strategies, mentoring, tutoring, and undergraduate research opportunities across all disciplines of the university.
While external funding has provided much of the resources needed for the activities of the STEM - focused Scholars Academy, securing external funding sufficient to support a
university - wide Scholars Academy is unlikely, as there are not as many grant opportunities for the non - STEM disciplines. This special line item will provide critical funding
for the development of these “centers of excellence” university-wide.
Plans for Programs/Activities that had been Supported with ARRA Funding
In the FY2010/2011 biennium the university received ARRA funds in three forms, as (1) general revenue (GR) replacement, (2) as Incentive Funds, and (3) as pass-through
Community Development funds. The loss of ARRA funds to support the community development programs will have no direct impact on the university. If Incentive Funds are
eliminated as ARRA funding falls away, the university would be impacted, as it would have less funds to allocate to those programs that were successful in graduating at-risk
students. However, because the University has never built Incentive Funds into its base budget, that loss could be managed without significant operational disruption. The
greatest challenge to UHD would be in the area of GR replacement. The general revenue funds that were replaced by ARRA funds in this current biennium are critical operating
dollars that support base operations. The likely loss of such funding, along with the strong possibility of deeper cuts due to reduced state revenue, drives our efforts to develop a
comprehensive budget reduction plan for FY 2012/2013.
5
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 2:29:34PM
PAGE:
of
6
6
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
Conclusion
The University of Houston-Downtown is an institution that is deeply committed for 36 years to the state‟s goal of providing “an affordable, accessible, and high quality system of
higher education that prepares individuals for a changing economy and workforce . ” Demographic projections indicate that there will be 500,000 new students coming through
the educational pipeline over the next decade. Many will be first-generation college students and a disproportionate number of them will be minorities. As the most ethnically
diverse institution in the state, UHD will play a major role in providing access to this group. It has already made major contributions to meeting the “Closing the Gaps” goals and
can make even greater contributions in the future.
While the current trends for UHD appear positive, it recognizes that the future is never certain. In the years ahead, UHD‟s contribution to the state‟s priority educational goals
will be affected by a number of external factors, ranging from state funding levels to changing demographics to changes in the way students approach the post-secondary education
experience. To assure its continued success, the university recognizes that it must be a responsive institution, not tied to past practices but ready to make the necessary changes to
meet new challenges as they arrive. UHD is proud to be a public, urban university whose purpose is to serve the educational needs of the people of Texas.
6
FY 2009
Chairman
UH System Board of Regents
Chancellor
UH System
President
FTE: .24
Vice President & Provost
Academic Affairs
FTE: 445.58
Academic Affairs
Vice President
Administration & Finance
FTE: 104.86
Administration &
Vice President
Student Services & Enrollment
Management
FTE: 31.2
Finance
Scholarships & Financial
College of Humanities &
Budget & Procurement
Aid
Social Sciences
Business Affairs
Student Health Services
College of Public
Compliance
Student Services
Service
Community Relations
College of Sciences &
Facilities Management
Technology
Information
Technology
Police Department
Professional
Development
Library
Benefits
Enrollment Management
College of Business
Continuing Education &
Vice President
Employment Services &
Operations
FTE: 13.62
Campus Relations
Executive Director
University Advancement
FTE: 7
Advancement Services
Executive Director
Public Affairs
FTE: 0
Creative Services
Public Relations
Compensation
Employment
Payroll
Records
Risk Management &
Compliance
Sponsored Programs
University College
Legend:
FTE figures reflect UHD employees paid on state funds in FY09
August 2009
7
DATE:
TIME:
2.A. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY STRATEGY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/2010
2:52:42PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Goal / Objective / STRATEGY
1
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
29,972,817
30,926,500
32,209,927
0
0
1,034,728
1,217,364
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
18,104
59,052
100,000
201,338
201,338
1,894,534
1,989,132
2,101,712
2,101,712
2,101,712
$32,920,183
$34,192,048
$35,811,639
$3,703,050
$3,703,050
1 E&G SPACE SUPPORT
1,957,473
2,212,337
2,238,744
0
0
2 TUITION REVENUE BOND RETIREMENT
6,221,235
6,196,105
6,195,968
6,194,460
6,192,117
$8,178,708
$8,408,442
$8,434,712
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
382,500
632,500
363,375
363,375
363,375
377,336
375,956
374,576
2,384,564
2,384,564
0
0
0
0
0
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1 OPERATIONS SUPPORT
3 STAFF GROUP INSURANCE PREMIUMS
4 WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
6 TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION GRANTS
TOTAL, GOAL
1
Provide Infrastructure Support
2
1
Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
TOTAL, GOAL
2
Provide Special Item Support
3
3
Public Service Special Item Support
1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4
Institutional Support Special Item Support
1 INSTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT
5
Exceptional Item Request
1 EXCEPTONAL ITEM REQUEST
8
DATE:
TIME:
2.A. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY STRATEGY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/2010
2:52:42PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Goal / Objective / STRATEGY
TOTAL, GOAL
3
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
$759,836
$1,008,456
$737,951
$2,747,939
$2,747,939
86,925
56,984
56,984
56,984
56,984
$86,925
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
225 Research Development Fund
1
Research Development Fund
1 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FUND
TOTAL, GOAL
22
TOTAL, AGENCY STRATEGY REQUEST
TOTAL, AGENCY RIDER APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST*
GRAND TOTAL, AGENCY REQUEST
$41,945,652
9
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$0
$0
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
DATE:
TIME:
2.A. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY STRATEGY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/2010
2:52:42PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
Goal / Objective / STRATEGY
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
28,613,524
27,951,817
29,092,716
9,200,721
9,198,378
$28,613,524
$27,951,817
$29,092,716
$9,200,721
$9,198,378
704 Bd Authorized Tuition Inc
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
70,668
13,261,460
66,205
14,249,612
74,137
15,874,433
0
3,501,712
0
3,501,712
SUBTOTAL
$13,332,128
$14,315,817
$15,948,570
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
0
1,398,296
0
0
0
$0
$1,398,296
$0
$0
$0
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Revenue Funds:
1 General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL
General Revenue Dedicated Funds:
Federal Funds:
369 Fed Recovery & Reinvestment Fund
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
*Rider appropriations for the historical years are included in the strategy amounts.
10
2.B. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY METHOD OF FINANCE
DATE:
TIME:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/201
2:55:13PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name:
784
METHOD OF FINANCING
University of Houston - Downtown
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
$0
$(1,148,296)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$30,287,365
$30,340,156
$9,200,721
$9,198,378
$0
$(1,145,037)
$(1,205,092)
$0
$0
$(28,637)
$(42,215)
$(42,348)
$0
$0
$28,613,524
$27,951,817
$29,092,716
$9,200,721
$9,198,378
$28,613,524
$27,951,817
$29,092,716
$9,200,721
$9,198,378
GENERAL REVENUE
1 General Revenue Fund
REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS
Art XII, Sec 30, GR Reductions
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table (2008-09 GAA)
$28,642,161
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table (2010-11 GAA)
LAPSED APPROPRIATIONS
Five Percent Reduction (2010-11 Biennium)
Lapsed TRB
TOTAL,
General Revenue Fund
TOTAL, ALL GENERAL REVENUE
GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED
704 GR Dedicated - Estimated Board Authorized Tuition Increases Account No. 704
11
2.B. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY METHOD OF FINANCE
DATE:
TIME:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/201
2:55:13PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
METHOD OF FINANCING
Agency name:
University of Houston - Downtown
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
$423
$8,354
$16,286
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$57,851
$57,851
$0
$0
$74,137
$0
$0
$138,600
$1,739,260
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,111,012
$14,135,173
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
$(968,542)
$0
$0
$0
$0
GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED
REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS
Adjustment - Revised Receipts
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table (2008-09 GAA)
$70,245
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table (2010-11 GAA)
$0
TOTAL,
GR Dedicated - Estimated Board Authorized Tuition Increases Account No. 704
$70,668
$66,205
770 GR Dedicated - Estimated Other Educational and General Income Account No. 770
REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS
Adjustment - Revised Receipts
$1,101,670
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table (2008-09 GAA)
$13,128,332
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table (2010-11 GAA)
UNEXPENDED BALANCES AUTHORITY
UB- Unexpended Authority
12
2.B. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY METHOD OF FINANCE
DATE:
TIME:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/201
2:55:13PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name:
784
University of Houston - Downtown
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
$14,249,612
$15,874,433
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
$13,332,128
$14,315,817
$15,948,570
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
TOTAL, ALL GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED
$13,332,128
$14,315,817
$15,948,570
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
$42,267,634
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,148,296
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,398,296
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,398,296
$0
$0
$0
METHOD OF FINANCING
Exp 2009
Est 2010
GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED
TOTAL,
GR Dedicated - Estimated Other Educational and General Income Account No. 770
$13,261,460
TOTAL GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED - 704, 708 & 770
TOTAL,
GR & GR-DEDICATED FUNDS
$41,945,652
FEDERAL FUNDS
369 Federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Fund
REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS
Art XII, Sec 25, Stimulus funding allocation
Art XII, Sec 30, GR Reductions
TOTAL,
Federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Fund
TOTAL, ALL FEDERAL FUNDS
13
2.B. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY METHOD OF FINANCE
DATE:
TIME:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/201
2:55:13PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
METHOD OF FINANCING
GRAND TOTAL
Agency name:
University of Houston - Downtown
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
Req 2012
Req 2013
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
582.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
524.0
524.0
558.0
558.0
19.8
84.5
49.5
0.0
0.0
602.5
608.5
573.5
558.0
558.0
0.0
0.0
FULL-TIME-EQUIVALENT POSITIONS
REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table
(2008-09 GAA)
Regular Appropriations from MOF Table
(2010-11 GAA)
UNAUTHORIZED NUMBER OVER (BELOW) CAP
Unauthorized Number Over (Below) Cap
TOTAL, ADJUSTED FTES
NUMBER OF 100% FEDERALLY FUNDED
FTEs
0.0
0.0
14
0.0
2.C. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST BY OBJECT OF EXPENSE
DATE:
TIME:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
10/18/201
2:58:01PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
University of Houston - Downtown
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
$11,393,219
$11,489,241
$12,437,850
$1,249,266
$1,249,266
$418,585
$365,000
$464,990
$0
$0
$20,335,750
$21,717,536
$21,977,391
$1,192,282
$1,192,282
2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES
$385,628
$632,500
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
2004 UTILITIES
$232,371
$0
$0
$0
$0
2008 DEBT SERVICE
$3,576,467
$6,196,105
$6,195,968
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$5,603,632
$3,265,548
$3,601,712
$3,703,050
$3,703,050
OOE Total (Excluding Riders)
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
OOE Total (Riders)
Grand Total
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
OBJECT OF EXPENSE
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
1005 FACULTY SALARIES
15
Date :
Time:
2.D. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency name:
Agency code: 784
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
1
KEY
KEY
KEY
Exp 2009
10/18/2010
2:56:36PM
University of Houston - Downtown
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
11.86%
12.66%
2 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
12.82%
13.48%
13.53%
6.69%
7.75%
3 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
8.63%
9.60%
10.69%
14.26%
14.76%
4 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
15.28%
15.82%
16.38%
6.37%
8.41%
5 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frshmn Earn Deg in 6 Yrs
8.49%
8.58%
8.66%
16.57%
16.43%
6 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
16.60%
16.76%
16.93%
2.25%
1.63%
7 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
1.62%
1.62%
1.63%
1.16%
0.80%
8 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
0.82%
0.84%
0.86%
2.73%
1.70%
9 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
1.72%
1.74%
1.76%
1.54%
0.69%
10 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
0.71%
0.73%
0.75%
2.88%
3.23%
11 Persistence Rate 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh after 1 Yr
3.25%
3.27%
3.29%
60.94%
59.00%
12 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh after 1 Yr
60.00%
60.00%
61.00%
54.66%
57.66%
60.40%
57.75%
52.00%
16
Date :
Time:
2.D. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency name:
Agency code: 784
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
Exp 2009
10/18/2010
2:56:36PM
University of Houston - Downtown
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
13 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh after 1 Yr
67.91%
63.00%
14 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh after 1 Yr
63.54%
64.08%
64.62%
51.69%
53.00%
15 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh after 1 Yr
53.65%
54.31%
54.97%
55.45%
16 Percent of Semester Credit Hours Completed
62.00%
62.50%
63.00%
63.50%
92.36%
17 Certification Rate of Teacher Education Graduates
92.55%
92.74%
92.94%
93.13%
95.00%
94.25%
18 Percentage of Underprepared Students Who Satisfy a TSI Obligation
95.00%
95.75%
96.50%
75.18%
75.93%
76.69%
KEY
73.88%
74.44%
19 % of Baccalaureate Graduates Who Are 1st Generation College Graduates
62.94%
64.02%
65.12%
66.23%
KEY
64.31%
20 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 4 Years
54.71%
21 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 2 Years
57.09%
58.76%
60.48%
62.24%
KEY
24.58%
24.58%
22 % Lower Division Semester Credit Hours Taught by Tenured/Tenure-Track
25.66%
27.77%
28.41%
KEY
44.69%
47.67%
50.85%
KEY
43.57%
41.90%
28 Dollar Value of External or Sponsored Research Funds (in Millions)
0.46
0.47
29 External or Sponsored Research Funds As a % of State Appropriations
0.52
0.57
0.63
1.60%
1.60%
30 External Research Funds As Percentage Appropriated for Research
1.76%
1.94%
2.13%
832.37%
840.70%
849.10%
KEY
527.60%
824.13%
17
Date :
Time:
2.D. SUMMARY OF BASE REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency name:
Agency code: 784
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
10/18/2010
2:56:36PM
University of Houston - Downtown
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
14,958.63
8,260.65
7,760.65
7,260.65
6,760.65
46 Value of Lost or Stolen Property
47 Percent of Property Lost or Stolen
0.14%
0.12%
48 % Endowed Professorships/ Chairs Unfilled All/ Part of Fiscal Year
0.12%
0.11%
0.11%
0.00%
49 Average No Months Endowed Chairs Remain Vacant
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME : 2:58:38PM
2.E. SUMMARY OF EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
2012
Priority
Item
2013
GR and
GR/GR Dedicated
All Funds
$0
$0
$800,000
$800,000
$800,000
$800,000
$800,000
$800,000
1 Science & Technology Building TRB
2 UHD Scholars Academy
Total, Exceptional Items Request
GR and
GR and
GR Dedicated
All Funds
$3,765,175
$3,765,175
2.5
$800,000
$800,000
2.5
$4,565,175
$4,565,175
$800,000
$4,565,175
$800,000
$4,565,175
FTEs
Biennium
FTEs
GR Dedicated
All Funds
$3,765,175
$3,765,175
2.5
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
2.5
$5,365,175
$5,365,175
$4,565,175
$5,365,175
$5,365,175
$4,565,175
$5,365,175
$5,365,175
Method of Financing
General Revenue
General Revenue - Dedicated
Federal Funds
Other Funds
Full Time Equivalent Positions
2.5
2.5
Number of 100% Federally Funded FTEs
0.0
0.0
19
DATE :
TIME :
2.F. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Goal/Objective/STRATEGY
10/18/2010
University of Houston - Downtown
Base
2012
Base
2013
Exceptional
2012
Exceptional
2013
Total Request
2012
Total Request
2013
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1 OPERATIONS SUPPORT
3 STAFF GROUP INSURANCE PREMIUMS
4 WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
6 TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION GRANTS
TOTAL, GOAL 1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1,400,000
1,400,000
0
0
1,400,000
1,400,000
201,338
201,338
0
0
201,338
201,338
2,101,712
2,101,712
0
0
2,101,712
2,101,712
$3,703,050
$3,703,050
$0
$0
$3,703,050
$3,703,050
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,194,460
6,192,117
0
3,765,175
6,194,460
9,957,292
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
$0
$3,765,175
$6,194,460
$9,957,292
363,375
363,375
0
0
363,375
363,375
2,384,564
2,384,564
0
0
2,384,564
2,384,564
0
0
800,000
800,000
800,000
800,000
$2,747,939
$2,747,939
$800,000
$800,000
$3,547,939
$3,547,939
2 Provide Infrastructure Support
1 Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
1 E&G SPACE SUPPORT
2 TUITION REVENUE BOND RETIREMENT
TOTAL, GOAL 2
3 Provide Special Item Support
3 Public Service Special Item Support
1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
4 Institutional Support Special Item Support
1 INSTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT
5 Exceptional Item Request
1 EXCEPTONAL ITEM REQUEST
TOTAL, GOAL 3
20
DATE :
TIME :
2.F. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Goal/Objective/STRATEGY
10/18/2010
University of Houston - Downtown
Base
2012
Base
2013
Exceptional
2012
Exceptional
2013
Total Request
2012
Total Request
2013
225 Research Development Fund
1 Research Development Fund
1 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FUND
TOTAL, GOAL 225
TOTAL, AGENCY
STRATEGY REQUEST
$56,984
$56,984
$0
$0
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$0
$0
$56,984
$56,984
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
$800,000
$4,565,175
$13,502,433
$17,265,265
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
$800,000
$4,565,175
$13,502,433
$17,265,265
TOTAL, AGENCY RIDER
APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST
GRAND TOTAL, AGENCY REQUEST
21
DATE :
TIME :
2.F. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Goal/Objective/STRATEGY
10/18/2010
University of Houston - Downtown
Base
2012
Base
2013
Exceptional
2012
Exceptional
2013
Total Request
2012
Total Request
2013
General Revenue Funds:
1 General Revenue Fund
$9,200,721
$9,198,378
$800,000
$4,565,175
$10,000,721
$13,763,553
$9,200,721
$9,198,378
$800,000
$4,565,175
$10,000,721
$13,763,553
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,501,712
3,501,712
0
0
3,501,712
3,501,712
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
$0
$0
$3,501,712
$3,501,712
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
$800,000
$4,565,175
$13,502,433
$17,265,265
558.0
558.0
2.5
2.5
General Revenue Dedicated Funds:
704 Bd Authorized Tuition Inc
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
Federal Funds:
369 Fed Recovery & Reinvestment Fund
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS
22
560.5
560.5
Date : 10/18/2010
Time: 2:59:47PM
2.G. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
BL
2012
1
1
KEY
BL
2013
Excp
2012
Excp
2013
Total
Request
2012
Total
Request
2013
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
1 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
13.48%
13.53%
13.48%
13.53%
9.60%
10.69%
15.82%
16.38%
8.58%
8.66%
16.76%
16.93%
1.62%
1.63%
0.84%
0.86%
1.74%
1.76%
2 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
9.60%
10.69%
3 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
15.82%
16.38%
4 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs
8.58%
8.66%
5 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frshmn Earn Deg in 6 Yrs
16.76%
KEY
16.93%
6 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
1.62%
1.63%
7 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
0.84%
0.86%
8 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
1.74%
1.76%
23
Date : 10/18/2010
Time: 2:59:47PM
2.G. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
BL
2012
BL
2013
Excp
2012
Excp
2013
Total
Request
2012
Total
Request
2013
9 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
0.73%
0.75%
0.73%
0.75%
3.27%
3.29%
60.00%
61.00%
57.66%
60.40%
64.08%
64.62%
54.31%
54.97%
63.00%
63.50%
92.94%
93.13%
95.75%
96.50%
10 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs
3.27%
KEY
3.29%
11 Persistence Rate 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh after 1 Yr
60.00%
61.00%
12 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh after 1 Yr
57.66%
60.40%
13 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh after 1 Yr
64.08%
64.62%
14 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh after 1 Yr
54.31%
54.97%
15 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh after 1 Yr
63.00%
63.50%
16 Percent of Semester Credit Hours Completed
92.94%
KEY
93.13%
17 Certification Rate of Teacher Education Graduates
95.75%
96.50%
24
Date : 10/18/2010
Time: 2:59:47PM
2.G. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
BL
2012
BL
2013
Excp
2012
Excp
2013
Total
Request
2012
Total
Request
2013
18 Percentage of Underprepared Students Who Satisfy a TSI Obligation
75.93%
KEY
65.12%
66.23%
62.24%
60.48%
62.24%
28.41%
27.77%
28.41%
47.67%
50.85%
0.57
0.63
1.94%
2.13%
840.70%
849.10%
22 % Lower Division Semester Credit Hours Taught by Tenured/Tenure-Track
47.67%
KEY
66.23%
21 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 2 Years
27.77%
KEY
76.69%
20 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 4 Years
60.48%
KEY
75.93%
19 % of Baccalaureate Graduates Who Are 1st Generation College Graduates
65.12%
KEY
76.69%
50.85%
28 Dollar Value of External or Sponsored Research Funds (in Millions)
0.57
0.63
29 External or Sponsored Research Funds As a % of State Appropriations
1.94%
2.13%
30 External Research Funds As Percentage Appropriated for Research
840.70%
849.10%
46 Value of Lost or Stolen Property
7,260.65
6,760.65
7,260.65
25
6,760.65
Date : 10/18/2010
Time: 2:59:47PM
2.G. SUMMARY OF TOTAL REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Goal/ Objective / Outcome
BL
2012
BL
2013
Excp
2012
Excp
2013
Total
Request
2012
Total
Request
2013
47 Percent of Property Lost or Stolen
0.11%
0.11%
0.11%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00
48 % Endowed Professorships/ Chairs Unfilled All/ Part of Fiscal Year
0.00%
0.00%
49 Average No Months Endowed Chairs Remain Vacant
0.00
0.00
26
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Operations Support
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Output Measures:
1 Number of Undergraduate Degrees Awarded
2 Number of Minority Graduates
3 Number of Students Who Successfully Complete
Developmental Education
4 Number of Two-Year College Transfers Who Graduate
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
B.3
Age:
BL 2013
2,175.00
1,245.00
655.00
2,333.00
1,350.00
707.00
2,503.00
1,465.00
764.00
2,686.00
1,588.00
825.00
2,881.00
1,723.00
890.00
922.00
986.00
1,053.00
1,126.00
1,204.00
Efficiency Measures:
KEY 1 Administrative Cost As a Percent of Operating Budget
16.48 %
16.00 %
16.00 %
16.00 %
16.00 %
Explanatory/Input Measures:
1 Student/Faculty Ratio
19.40
19.43
19.46
19.48
19.51
2 Number of Minority Students Enrolled
8,094.00
8,810.00
9,128.00
9,446.00
9,764.00
3 Number of Community College Transfers Enrolled
4,827.00
5,115.00
5,419.00
5,742.00
6,085.00
4 Number of Semester Credit Hours Completed
111,352.00
117,911.00
119,755.00
123,355.00
127,063.00
5 Number of Semester Credit Hours
121,312.00
125,981.00
131,319.00
135,266.00
139,332.00
12,283.00
12,742.00
13,125.00
13,520.00
13,926.00
$9,527,963
$9,118,433
$10,024,811
$0
$0
$386,151
$365,000
$464,990
$0
$0
$20,044,077
$21,443,067
$21,720,126
$0
$0
6 Number of Students Enrolled as of the Twelfth Class Day
Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
1002
OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
1005
FACULTY SALARIES
2001
PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES
2009
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$3,128
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,498
$0
$0
$0
$0
$29,972,817
$30,926,500
$32,209,927
$0
$0
$19,576,438
$18,802,758
$19,798,069
$0
$0
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
27
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Operations Support
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
Method of Financing:
704 Bd Authorized Tuition Inc
Exp 2009
$19,576,438
Est 2010
$18,802,758
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
B.3
BL 2013
$19,798,069
$0
$0
$70,668
$66,205
$74,137
$0
$0
$10,325,711
$11,023,747
$12,337,721
$0
$0
$10,396,379
$11,089,952
$12,411,858
$0
$0
Method of Financing:
369 Fed Recovery & Reinvestment Fund
84.397.000 Stabilization - Govt Services - Stm
$0
$1,033,790
$0
$0
$0
CFDA Subtotal, Fund
$0
$1,033,790
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,033,790
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
770
Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS -
369
SUBTOTAL, MOF (FEDERAL FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$29,972,817
$30,926,500
$32,209,927
$0
$0
553.4
560.3
525.2
509.7
509.7
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
The Operations Support formula provides funding for faculty salaries, departmental operating expense, library, instructional administration, research enhancement, student services, and
institutional support . These funds are distributed to the various departments in accordance with the priorities established by the University Planning Council .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
28
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Operations Support
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
B.3
BL 2013
Operations Support funding is driven by both enrollment growth and enrollment mix .
The university continues to expand its Table of Programs . New degree programs have made the institution more attractive to a wider variety of students . Over the past decade UHD has
seen a dramatic increase in community college transfer students . UHD has developed strong ties to the 2-year institutions through articulation agreements, joint admission programs, and
co-location. The latest of these is UHD-Northwest, located in leased space at Lone Star College’s University Park site on SH 249, where UHD began offering instruction in Summer
2010.
The state economy is recovering slowly and the legislature will face a budget shortfall as it convenes . State universities returned an adjusted 5% of their general revenue appropriation in
FY2010, and are expecting to have to do so again in FY2011. Deeper cuts are anticipated for FY2012/2013 as the legislature deals with lagging tax revenues and the loss of federal ARRA
funds . UHD is currently engaged in a review of all operations and is developing a plan for dealing with state budget cuts of varying levels .
Past support from the legislature in the form of TRBs and HEAF has enabled UHD to develop a modern urban campus . While there are challenges ahead, the university believes that with
its expanded programs, strong community college partnerships, quality facilities, and commitment to affordability, it is well - positioned to help the State of Texas meet its higher
education goals.
29
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
3
Staff Group Insurance Premiums
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
BL 2013
Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$1,034,728
$1,217,364
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$1,034,728
$1,217,364
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$1,034,728
$1,217,364
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS -
$1,034,728
$1,217,364
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$1,034,728
$1,217,364
$1,400,000
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
This strategy deals with the cost to the university of paying the proportional piece of group health insurance premiums for those employees paid from state funds .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
30
B.3
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
3
Staff Group Insurance Premiums
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
B.3
BL 2013
In 2007 the 80th Legislature provided nearly full funding of the state portion of group health insurance premiums for higher education agencies, a dramatic increase over prior years .
Prior to this, the university would have to use significant amounts of Other E&G funds (tuition revenue) to cover group health premiums for state - funded employees. A concern now is
that as the state applies the 5% reduction to HEGI funds, universities will see a return to those times when the agencies had to bear more of these costs .
A key external factor is the cost of health care, which continues to rise at a rate in excess of the CPI . The administrators of the ERS have done a commendable job of managing costs and
premium increases have slowed, but with costs continuing to climb and the state facing a budget shortfall, universities are now seeing more cost shifting to employees through higher
co-pays and higher out-of-pocket maximums .
The primary internal factor impacting this strategy is the growth of the institution . As the university enrollments grow, so does the number of faculty and staff needed to support that
growth. Growing institutions generally run behind the curve in terms of funding, including funding for group health insurance premiums .
More of the university’s base operations are being covered by local rather than state funds . The benefits – both health and retirement – provided to employees paid from local funds are
borne entirely by the institution . This has become a significant cost driver for Texas state universities .
31
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
4
Workers' Compensation Insurance
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
19
Income: A.2
Bud 2011
BL 2012
2
0
B.3
Age:
BL 2013
Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$18,104
$59,052
$100,000
$201,338
$201,338
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$18,104
$59,052
$100,000
$201,338
$201,338
$12,171
$39,683
$65,000
$201,338
$201,338
$12,171
$39,683
$65,000
$201,338
$201,338
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$5,933
$19,369
$35,000
$0
$0
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS -
$5,933
$19,369
$35,000
$0
$0
$201,338
$201,338
$201,338
$201,338
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$18,104
$59,052
$100,000
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
This strategy deals with the costs incurred when an employee is injured on the job .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
This strategy is impacted internally by the implementation and enforcement of a sound safety program . A key external factor is the escalating cost of health care .
32
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
6
Texas Public Education Grants
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
BL 2013
Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$1,894,534
$1,989,132
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$1,894,534
$1,989,132
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$1,894,534
$1,989,132
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS -
$1,894,534
$1,989,132
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
$2,101,712
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$1,894,534
$1,989,132
$2,101,712
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Institutions are statutorily required to set aside a portion of gross tuition collections (15 percent of resident tuition, 3 percent of non-resident tuition) in order to fund this grant program for
students in financial need .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
33
B.3
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Instructional and Operations Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
6
Texas Public Education Grants
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
BL 2013
This strategy is impacted by enrollment growth, the mix of resident / non-resident students, and the current $50 cap on state-mandated undergraduate tuition. Enrollment growth and the
resident / non-resident mix are effected by internal factors, including program offerings, marketing / recruiting efforts, and overall affordability.
The $50 cap is a relatively new external factor, as until FY2007 the state had been adding $2/year to the state-mandated tuition rate. Since the cap, TPEG revenue has grown at a slower
pace relative to enrollment . TPEG scholarship funds are increasingly being replaced by TEXAS Grant funds and designated tuition set - aside scholarship dollars.
Another external factor is the growing number of students in need of financial assistance . While financial assistance is often available to students with need, the increase in available aid
has not kept pace with increases in tuition and fees .
Critical federal and state grant programs, such as Pell and the TEXAS grant, remain under - funded. As grant programs become a diminishing piece of the financial aid pie, students
increasingly turn to loans, which leave many in a position of beginning their work careers burdened by considerable personal debt . This is particularly troublesome for those students
who attend a college or university for a period of time but do not complete a degree . Many of those students end up with the personal debt that is too often part of the college/university
experience without the higher earning power that comes with the degree .
34
B.3
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
2
Provide Infrastructure Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Educational and General Space Support
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
10
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
B.3
Age:
BL 2013
Efficiency Measures:
1 Space Utilization Rate of Classrooms
31.30
32.31
33.31
34.31
35.31
2 Space Utilization Rate of Labs
25.89
24.00
25.40
25.00
25.50
$1,692,668
$2,212,337
$2,238,744
$0
$0
$32,434
$0
$0
$0
$0
$232,371
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,957,473
$2,212,337
$2,238,744
$0
$0
$1,956,919
$2,097,831
$2,238,744
$0
$0
$1,956,919
$2,097,831
$2,238,744
$0
$0
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$554
$0
$0
$0
$0
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS -
$554
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$114,506
$0
$0
$0
$0
$114,506
$0
$0
$0
$0
$114,506
$0
$0
$0
Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
1002
OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
2004
UTILITIES
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
Method of Financing:
369 Fed Recovery & Reinvestment Fund
84.397.000 Stabilization - Govt Services - Stm
CFDA Subtotal, Fund
369
SUBTOTAL, MOF (FEDERAL FUNDS)
35
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
2
Provide Infrastructure Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Educational and General Space Support
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
10
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
B.3
Age:
BL 2013
$0
$0
$1,957,473
$2,212,337
$2,238,744
$0
$0
40.5
40.5
41.0
41.0
41.0
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Funding for this strategy is driven by the predicted square feet for the university's E&G activities produced by the Space Projection Model developed by the THECB . These funds are
used for facilities maintenance and utilities .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
The enrollment growth experienced by UHD over the past decade has presented challenges in terms of providing and maintaining high quality facilities, but those challenges are being met.
The State of Texas has been very supportive in providing the bonding authority / debt service funding needed by UHD to expand its facilities . Between 1997 and 2007 UHD added
400,000 gsf of new construction, largely in the form of academic / instructional space, bringing the UHD campus to a total of approximately 1 million gsf. Continued E&G Space
Support funding is needed to maintain these facilities to the high standard expected by the state and by UHD ’s students and faculty.
Two years ago much of the focus of this narrative was on the high cost of electricity and high volatility of electricity prices . At this time that market has stabilized and the UH System
has been able to benefit from locking in relatively low fixed rates. . At this time UHD asks only that the recommendations of the Infrastructure Formula Study Committee be reviewed and
considered.
Overall, the evolution of UHD’s physical campus from a dense, highly-efficient one building vertical campus to a more conventional, inevitably less efficient horizontal model has
resulted in higher per-square foot maintenance and utilities costs .
36
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
2
Provide Infrastructure Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
2
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
Service:
CODE
DESCRIPTION
Objects of Expense:
2008 DEBT SERVICE
2009
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
10
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
B.3
Age:
BL 2013
$3,576,467
$6,196,105
$6,195,968
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
$2,644,768
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,221,235
$6,196,105
$6,195,968
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
$6,221,235
$6,196,105
$6,195,968
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
$6,221,235
$6,196,105
$6,195,968
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
$6,194,460
$6,192,117
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$6,221,235
$6,196,105
$6,195,968
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Continuation of this special item provides funds for debt service on tuition revenue bonds issued for UHD ’s three classroom buildings – the 147,000 gsf Academic & Student Services
Building (Fall 1998), the 90,000 gsf Commerce Street Building (Fall 2003), and the 132,000 gsf Shea Street Building (Fall 2007). This item also provides funds to service debt on bonds
issued in 1999 for implementation of Phase II of the UHD Campus Development plan .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
In the recent past, during a period of budgetary challenges for the state, the decision was made to provide less than full funding for these fixed obligations . Full funding was later
restored but as the state and national economies begin to slow down, the possibility of the legislature providing something less than full funding for these bonds again becomes a concern.
From the university’s perspective, it is imperative that the state continue to provide the funding needed to fully meet the commitments that have already been made .
37
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
3
Provide Special Item Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
3
Public Service Special Item Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Community Development Project
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
15
Income: A.2
2
0
B.3
Age:
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
Objects of Expense:
2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES
$382,500
$632,500
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$382,500
$632,500
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
$382,500
$382,500
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
$382,500
$382,500
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
Method of Financing:
369 Fed Recovery & Reinvestment Fund
84.397.000 Stabilization - Govt Services - Stm
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
CFDA Subtotal, Fund
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
$363,375
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
369
SUBTOTAL, MOF (FEDERAL FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$382,500
$632,500
$363,375
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
This strategy provides continued funding for community development activities on the near north side of Houston . These funds serve as seed money for community-based efforts to
revitalize two separate economically depressed north side neighborhoods - the predominately African-American Acres Homes subdivison and the largely Hispanic area bound by
downtown, I-45N, 610 Loop North and Highway 59N.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
The individual projects include a variety of economic development and community enhancement programs . Each project must provide semi-annual progress reports to the university
leadership.
38
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
3
Provide Special Item Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
4
Institutional Support Special Item Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Institutional Enhancement
Service:
CODE
DESCRIPTION
Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
1005
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
FACULTY SALARIES
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
Exp 2009
19
Income: A.2
2
0
B.3
Age:
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
$85,663
$101,487
$117,311
$1,192,282
$1,192,282
$291,673
$274,469
$257,265
$1,192,282
$1,192,282
$377,336
$375,956
$374,576
$2,384,564
$2,384,564
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
$377,336
$375,956
$374,576
$2,384,564
$2,384,564
$377,336
$375,956
$374,576
$2,384,564
$2,384,564
$2,384,564
$2,384,564
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$377,336
$375,956
$374,576
$2,384,564
$2,384,564
7.3
7.0
6.6
6.6
6.6
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
UHD requests continuation of the Institutional Enhancement funding that was first approved by the 76th Legislature. This funding supports UHD’s Academic Support Lab, as well as a
number of other initiatives that impact student services and academic excellence . The funds that were added to this item in later sessions have been used primarily to meet basic operating
needs, which is why most of the expenditures relating to Institutional Enhancement actually show in the Operations Support strategy .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
39
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
3
Provide Special Item Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
4
Institutional Support Special Item Support
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Institutional Enhancement
Service:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
19
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
BL 2013
UH-Downtown has experienced steady growth over the past decade as it has expanded its Table of Programs and its physical campus . Regrettably, over this period state formula funding
support as a percentage of total revenue has been trending steadily downward . The funding provided through the Excellence Funding strategy, like the funding provided through the
Institutional Enhancement special item, is used primarily to meet basic operating needs . However, without this funding the university would have reduced capacity to develop its centers
of excellence, such as its Learners Community program and the UHD Scholars Academy – a nationally recognized program and one - time winner of the prestigious Texas Higher
Education Star Award .
With so much of the cost of attending a Texas public university having been shifted to the student, it is critically important that the funding provided through this strategy remain at least at
the current level.
40
B.3
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
3
Provide Special Item Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
5
Exceptional Item Request
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Exceptional Item Request
Service:
NA
Income: NA
2
0
NA
Age:
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Objects of Expense:
1005 FACULTY SALARIES
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CODE
2009
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
Est 2010
Bud 2011
BL 2012
BL 2013
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
41
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
225
Research Development Fund
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Research Development Fund
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Research Development Fund
Service:
GOAL:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
21
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
B.3
Age:
BL 2013
Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
$86,925
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$86,925
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$86,925
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$86,925
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
Method of Financing:
1
General Revenue Fund
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$86,925
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
$56,984
1.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
The Research Development Fund was established to provide funding to promote increased research capacity at eligible general academic teaching institutions . Funds are apportioned
among the eligible institutions based on the average amount of restricted research funds expended by each institution per year for the three preceding state fiscal years.
The Research Development Funds monies that come to UHD are used to support its Office of Sponsored Programs . This office assists faculty and staff in obtaining sponsored project
funding and in the successful completion of sponsored projects – a full range of pre-grant, in-grant, and post-grant support services.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
42
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
DATE:
TIME:
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
225
Research Development Fund
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1
Research Development Fund
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1
Research Development Fund
Service:
GOAL:
CODE
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
DESCRIPTION
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
21
Income: A.2
BL 2012
2
0
Age:
B.3
BL 2013
While a general academic teaching institution, UHD recognizes the importance of research activity for faculty and student development and is able to provide motivated students with
high-quality undergraduate research opportunities . The university has been recognized at both the state and national level for the success of its Scholars Academy program, an
academically competitive program in the College of Science and Technology that promotes scholarship and student success for undergraduate student majoring in Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Scholars participate in academic seminars, fieldtrips to research sites, and research internships . The university hopes to build on the success of
this program with the STEM exceptional item that is being requested, and move toward better satisfying the state ’s accountability goal of increasing the number of graduates in science and
mathematics .
A significant external factor for UH-Downtown is that as a Minority-Serving (MSI) and Hispanic-Serving (HIS) institution, it has access to federal research funds set aside for such
designated institutions. UHD is working to strengthen its Research Office and look for more opportunities to partner with the University of Houston, which has adopted a very aggressive
research agenda as it moves toward Tier I status .
43
3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
TIME:
10/18/2010
3:00:24PM
SUMMARY TOTALS:
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
METHODS OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS):
METHODS OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS):
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
$41,945,652
$43,665,930
$45,041,286
$12,702,433
$12,700,090
602.5
608.5
573.5
558.0
558.0
44
4.A. EXCEPTIONAL ITEM REQUEST SCHEDULE
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE:
TIME:
10/18/2010
3:01:00PM
Agency name:
University of Houston - Downtown
CODE
DESCRIPTION
Excp 2012
Excp 2013
0
3,765,175
$0
$3,765,175
0
3,765,175
$0
$3,765,175
Science & Technology Building Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
Item Name:
Item Priority:
1
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
Includes Funding for the Following Strategy or Strategies: 02-01-02
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2008
DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
METHOD OF FINANCING:
1
General Revenue Fund
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:
The University of Houston - Downtown (UHD) requests special line item authority to issue up to $41,429,000 in tuition revenue bonds to fund the construction and equip a state - of the - art 120,000 sq. ft. Science & Technology building . An attached mutli - level parking facility , projected at $ 10,000,000 and to be funded through issuance of auxiliary revenue
bonds , will be a part of this overall project . The new building will serve as the home of the College of Sciences and Techonology , one of four academic units at the university . The
college is home to all STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) academic programs and provides opportunities for underrepresented groups to work for and attain
degree goals in STEM areas . The funding requested would provide for the projected debt service costs associated with the bonds issued for funding construction .
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS:
As the university’s STEM programs have grown in size and recognition, the deficiencies in existing science and technology classroom and lab space have become an increasing
challenge. At present, science and technology labs are located in the original UHD structure, the One Main Building, which was never designed for this purpose. Beyond the design
and functionality of the space, there are safety issues when laboratory facilities are located in a building that increasingly serves primarily as academic, administrative, and student support
space.
In Fall 2009 UHD operated with an overall space deficit of over 346,000 sq. ft. (assignable), with most of that coming in the areas of Teaching and Research. As the institution matures,
it will increasingly need more ‘special-use’ as opposed to ‘general use’ space. A dedicated Science & Technology Building will be the first step in that direction .
45
4.A. EXCEPTIONAL ITEM REQUEST SCHEDULE
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
DATE:
TIME:
10/18/2010
3:01:00PM
Agency name:
University of Houston - Downtown
CODE
DESCRIPTION
Excp 2012
Excp 2013
169,500
630,500
169,500
630,500
$800,000
$800,000
800,000
800,000
$800,000
2.50
$800,000
2.50
Expansion of the UHD Scholars Academy to all UHD Colleges
Item Name:
Item Priority:
2
Exceptional Item Request
Includes Funding for the Following Strategy or Strategies: 03-05-01
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
1005
FACULTY SALARIES
2009
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
METHOD OF FINANCING:
1
General Revenue Fund
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS (FTE):
DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:
The current UHD Scholars Academy is a multi-faceted program designed to prepare high school students and college freshmen for the rigors of college - level science curriculum. While
to this point in its history the Scholars Academy has had a STEM focus, there is no reason to believe that the same programmatic and pedagogical strategies - mentoring, tutoring, and
undergraduate research opportunities – can’t be applied across all disciplines. While external funding has provided much of the resources needed for the activities of the STEM-focused
Scholars Academy, securing external funding sufficient to support a university-wide Scholars Academy is unlikely, as there are not as many grant opportunities for the non-STEM
disciplines. This special line item will provide critical funding while UHD seeks new external funding. Ultimately the university’s goal is to institutionalize the funding for the Scholars
Academy using hard dollars. This request focuses on three key components for student success beginning in high school:
(1) Preparation of high school students entering college-level programs: START Summer Program, START Teacher Institute ($200,000/yr);
(2) Mentoring of college freshmen via a faculty and peer mentoring system: Freshman Workshop, College Success Program, Tutoring & Mentoring ($200,000/yr); and
(3) Early and frequent independent research opportunities: Summer Undergraduate Research Program, Academic-Year Research Program, Student Research Conference ($400,000/yr)
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS:
Over the past decade UHD has developed a true ‘center of excellence’ with its nationally recognized Scholars Academy. The UHD Scholars Academy, previous winner of the THECB’s
STAR Award, was cited in President Bush’s 2007 budget request for NSF funding as a model program in science preparation at the collegiate level. By taking the lessons learned
through its STEM-focused Scholars Academy and applying them across the university, UHD believes that similar ‘centers of excellence’ can be developed in the arts, business, and
public service.
46
4.B. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY ALLOCATION SCHEDULE
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
DATE:
10/18/2010
TIME: 3:28:00PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Code
784
Agency name
University of Houston - Downtown
Description
Item Name:
Excp 2012
Excp 2013
Science & Technology Building Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
Allocation to Strategy:
2-1-2
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
DEBT SERVICE
2008
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
47
0
3,765,175
$0
$3,765,175
0
3,765,175
$0
$3,765,175
4.B. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY ALLOCATION SCHEDULE
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
DATE:
10/18/2010
TIME: 3:28:00PM
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
Code
784
Agency name
University of Houston - Downtown
Description
Item Name:
Excp 2012
Excp 2013
Expansion of the UHD Scholars Academy to all UHD Colleges
Allocation to Strategy:
3-5-1
Exceptional Item Request
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
FACULTY SALARIES
1005
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
2009
TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS (FTE):
48
169,500
630,500
169,500
630,500
$800,000
$800,000
800,000
800,000
$800,000
$800,000
2.5
2.5
4.C. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency name:
DATE:
TIME:
University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
2 Provide Infrastructure Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
1 Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
2 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
Service: 10
CODE
10/18/2010
3:30:49PM
DESCRIPTION
Income:
2 - 0
A.2
Age:
B.3
Excp 2012
Excp 2013
0
3,765,175
$0
$3,765,175
0
3,765,175
$0
$3,765,175
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2008 DEBT SERVICE
Total, Objects of Expense
METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund
Total, Method of Finance
EXCEPTIONAL ITEM(S) INCLUDED IN STRATEGY:
Science & Technology Building Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
49
4.C. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY REQUEST
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency name:
DATE:
TIME:
10/18/2010
3:30:49PM
University of Houston - Downtown
GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support
Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
OBJECTIVE:
5 Exceptional Item Request
Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1 Exceptional Item Request
Service: NA
Income:
2 - 0
NA
Age:
NA
Excp 2012
Excp 2013
1005 FACULTY SALARIES
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
169,500
630,500
169,500
630,500
Total, Objects of Expense
$800,000
$800,000
800,000
800,000
$800,000
$800,000
2.5
2.5
CODE
DESCRIPTION
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund
Total, Method of Finance
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS (FTE):
EXCEPTIONAL ITEM(S) INCLUDED IN STRATEGY:
Expansion of the UHD Scholars Academy to all UHD Colleges
50
6.A. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS SUPPORTING SCHEDULE
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency:
Date:
Time:
10/18/2010
3:31:24PM
University of Houston - Downtown
COMPARISON TO STATEWIDE HUB PROCUREMENT GOALS
A. Fiscal Year 2008 - 2009 HUB Expenditure Information
Statewide
HUB Goals
11.9%
26.1%
57.2%
20.0%
33.0%
12.6%
Procurement
Category
Heavy Construction
Building Construction
Special Trade Construction
Professional Services
Other Services
Commodities
Total Expenditures
% Goal
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
HUB Expenditures FY 2008
% Actual
Actual $
Diff
0.0%
0.0%
$0
18.3% 18.3%
$502,652
0.7%
0.7%
$18,558
0.0%
0.0%
$0
7.5%
7.5%
$317,086
39.9% 39.9%
$3,477,184
23.6%
$4,315,480
Total
Expenditures
FY 2008
$0
$2,753,805
$2,596,548
$37,664
$4,217,276
$8,716,149
$18,321,442
% Goal
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
0.0 %
HUB Expenditures FY 2009
% Actual
Actual $
Diff
0.0%
0.0%
$0
45.2% 45.2%
$384,196
4.2%
4.2%
$107,599
78.0% 78.0%
$47,699
7.0%
7.0%
$323,598
40.3% 40.3%
$2,625,322
23.9%
$3,488,414
Total
Expenditures
FY 2009
$0
$849,317
$2,540,956
$61,179
$4,643,978
$6,517,157
$14,612,587
B. Assessment of Fiscal Year 2008 - 2009 Efforts to Meet HUB Procurement Goals
Attainment:
The agency attained one of the five applicable statewide HUB procurement goals in FY08 in the Commodities category, but in FY09 UHD attained three procurement goals in
the following categories: Building Construction, Professional Services and Commodities .
Applicability:
All of the six categories of eligible expenditures are relevant to a university, although some are more ongoing than others . In any given year the university will have
considerable expenditures in both the Commodities and Other Services categories . Expenditures in the Construction and Professional Services categories are generally tied to
building projects, which require extraordinary funding and occur intermittently .
Factors Affecting Attainment:
UH-Downtown strives to live up to the spirit of HUB laws by making efforts to engage Black and Hispanic owned businesses . In FY2008, 34% of HUB volume was with
Black and Hispanic owned businesses. In FY 2009, Black and Hispanic owned businesses accounted for almost 38% of the total. In the past a number of large volume businesses
(office supplies, computer equipment) have established third-party arrangements that have enabled state agencies to improve their HUB participation rates .
"Good-Faith" Efforts:
The University made the following good faith efforts to comply with statewide HUB procurement goals as stated by Goals 20.13 TAC 20 Section Chap. 20.11 through 20.28.
*Sponsor four HUB fairs to promote HUBs to university departments and within community .
*Sponsor annual Economic Opportunity Forum .
*Include Purchasing training information regarding the use of HUBs .
*Exhibit at HUB procurement expos sponsored by the Houston Minority Business Council (HMBC).
51
6.A. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS SUPPORTING SCHEDULE
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency:
University of Houston - Downtown
*Attend HUB discussion meetings with other UHS components to keep up with new HUB rules and regulations .
*Encouraged HUBs to become state certified by mailing letters and meeting with owners to review the application .
52
Date:
Time:
10/18/2010
3:31:24PM
University of Houston - Downtown
Estimated Funds Outside the GAA
2010-11 Biennia and 2012-2013 Biennia
2009 - 2010 Biennium
FY 2011
Biennium
Revenue
Total
FY 2010
Revenue
Percent
of Total
2012 - 2013 Biennium
FY 2013
Biennium
Revenue
Total
FY 2012
Revenue
Percent
of Total
APPROPRIATED SOURCES (INSIDE THE GAA)
State Appropriations
$
State Grants and Contracts
Research Excellence Funds (URF/TEF)
Higher Education Assistance Funds
Available University Fund
Tuition and Fees (net of Discounts and Allowances)
Federal Grants and Contracts
Endowment and Interest Income
Local Government Grants and Contracts
Private Gifts and Grants
Sales and Services of Educational Activities (net)
Sales and Services of Hospitals (net)
Other Income
Total
34,695,152
56,984
9,548,995
16,473,197
20,000
60,794,328
$
34,892,674
56,984
7,435,238
17,507,289
20,000
59,912,185
$
69,587,826
113,968
16,984,233
33,980,486
40,000
120,706,513
$
44.3%
34,892,674
56,984
7,435,238
17,507,289
20,000
59,912,185
10,022,509
81,026,959
47,400,515
3,022,746
2,592,000
2,875,600
4,747,358
151,687,687
55.7%
5,600,944
43,209,062
27,506,157
1,505,857
1,273,000
1,609,600
2,427,378
83,131,998
272,394,200
100.0%
$
34,892,674
56,984
7,435,238
17,507,289
20,000
59,912,185
$
69,785,348
113,968
14,870,476
35,014,578
40,000
119,824,370
41.9%
11,201,888
86,418,124
55,012,314
3,011,714
2,546,000
3,219,200
4,854,756
166,263,996
58.1%
286,088,366
100.0%
NON-APPROPRIATED SOURCES (OUTSIDE THE GAA)
4,421,565
37,817,897
19,894,358
1,516,889
State Grants and Contracts
Tuition and Fees (net of Discounts and Allowances)
Federal Grants and Contracts
Endowment and Interest Income
5,600,944
43,209,062
27,506,157
1,505,857
1,273,000
1,609,600
2,427,378
83,131,998
Local Government Grants and Contracts
1,319,000
1,266,000
2,319,980
68,555,689
Private Gifts and Grants
Sales and Services of Educational Activities (net)
Sales and Services of Hospitals (net)
(net)
Professional Fees (net)
Auxiliary Enterprises (net)
Other Income
Total
TOTAL SOURCES
$
129,350,017
$
143,044,183
$
53
$
143,044,183
5,600,944
43,209,062
27,506,157
1,505,857
1,273,000
1,609,600
2,427,378
83,131,998
$
143,044,183
$
6.I 10 PERCENT BIENNIAL BASE REDUCTION OPTIONS
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:50:42PM
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
REVENUE LOSS
Item Priority and Name/ Method of Financing
2012
2013
TARGET
REDUCTION AMOUNT
Biennial Total
2012
2013
Biennial Total
1 Community Development
Category: Programs - Service Reductions (Other)
Item Comment: The Community Development special item is funded entirely with general revenue funds and will be subject to the 10 percent reduction. These funds
support community-based initiatives. The impact will be fewer service learning opportunities for UHD students .
Strategy: 3-3-1 Community Development Project
General Revenue Funds
1 General Revenue Fund
$0
$0
$0
$18,169
$18,169
$36,338
General Revenue Funds Total
$0
$0
$0
$18,169
$18,169
$36,338
Item Total
$0
$0
$0
$18,169
$18,169
$36,338
$10,067
$20,134
FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
2 Workers Compensation
Category: Administrative - Operating Expenses
Item Comment: The Workers Compensation strategy deals with the costs incurred when an employee is injured on the job .
Strategy: 1-1-4 Workers' Compensation Insurance
General Revenue Funds
1 General Revenue Fund
$0
$0
$0
$10,067
General Revenue Funds Total
$0
$0
$0
$10,067
$10,067
$20,134
Item Total
$0
$0
$0
$10,067
$10,067
$20,134
FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
3 Hiring Freeze Institutional Enhancement
Category: Programs - Service Reductions (FTEs-Hiring Freeze)
54
6.I 10 PERCENT BIENNIAL BASE REDUCTION OPTIONS
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:50:42PM
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
REVENUE LOSS
Item Priority and Name/ Method of Financing
2012
2013
REDUCTION AMOUNT
Biennial Total
2012
2013
TARGET
Biennial Total
Item Comment: A freeze in faculty and staff hiring will result in a decrease in service provided to the university community and students . It will also mean that faculty
and staff workloads will increase without any added compensation . Various funding sources are impacted by this reduction . Expenses will be reallocated so that general
revenue funds can be returned to the state .
Strategy: 3-4-1 Institutional Enhancement
General Revenue Funds
1 General Revenue Fund
$0
$0
$0
$119,228
$119,228
$238,456
General Revenue Funds Total
$0
$0
$0
$119,228
$119,228
$238,456
Item Total
$0
$0
$0
$119,228
$119,228
$238,456
FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
4 Community Development
Category: Programs - Service Reductions (Other)
Item Comment: The Community Development special item is funded entirely with general revenue funds and will be subject to the 10 percent reduction. These funds
support community-based initiatives. The impact will be fewer service learning opportunities for UHD students .
Strategy: 3-3-1 Community Development Project
General Revenue Funds
1 General Revenue Fund
$0
$0
$0
$18,169
$18,169
General Revenue Funds Total
$0
$0
$0
$18,169
$18,169
$36,338
Item Total
$0
$0
$0
$18,169
$18,169
$36,338
FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
5 Workers Compensation
Category: Administrative - Operating Expenses
Item Comment: The Workers Compensation strategy deals with the costs incurred when an employee is injured on the job .
Strategy: 1-1-4 Workers' Compensation Insurance
55
$36,338
6.I 10 PERCENT BIENNIAL BASE REDUCTION OPTIONS
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:50:42PM
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
Agency name: University of Houston - Downtown
REVENUE LOSS
TARGET
REDUCTION AMOUNT
2012
2013
Biennial Total
2012
2013
Biennial Total
1 General Revenue Fund
$0
$0
$0
$10,067
$10,067
$20,134
General Revenue Funds Total
$0
$0
$0
$10,067
$10,067
$20,134
Item Total
$0
$0
$0
$10,067
$10,067
$20,134
Item Priority and Name/ Method of Financing
General Revenue Funds
FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
6 Hiring Freeze Institutional Enhancement
Category: Programs - Service Reductions (FTEs-Hiring Freeze)
Item Comment: A freeze in faculty and staff hiring will result in a decrease in service provided to the university community and students . It will also mean that faculty
and staff workloads will increase without any added compensation . Various funding sources are impacted by this reduction . Expenses will be reallocated so that general
revenue funds can be returned to the state .
Strategy: 3-4-1 Institutional Enhancement
General Revenue Funds
1 General Revenue Fund
$0
$0
$0
$119,228
$119,227
$238,455
General Revenue Funds Total
$0
$0
$0
$119,228
$119,227
$238,455
Item Total
$0
$0
$0
$119,228
$119,227
$238,455
$294,928
$294,927
$589,855
$294,928
$294,927
$589,855
FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
AGENCY TOTALS
General Revenue Total
Agency Grand Total
$0
$0
$0
Difference, Options Total Less Target
Agency FTE Reductions (From FY 2012 and FY 2013 Base Request)
56
$589,855
DATE: 10/18/2010
Schedule 1A: Other Educational and General Income
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Name:
TIME: 3:51:52PM
PAGE: 1 of
3
University of Houston - Downtown
Gross Tuition
Gross Resident Tuition
Gross Non-Resident Tuition
Gross Tuition
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
13,497,678
2,689,708
16,187,386
13,607,988
2,712,156
14,306,939
3,785,400
18,092,339
14,306,939
3,785,400
18,092,339
14,306,939
3,785,400
18,092,339
(500,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
Less: Remissions and Exemptions
(476,427)
16,320,144
(458,922)
Less: Refunds
Less: Installment Payment Forfeits
Less: Board Authorized Tuition Increases (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
54.008)
(81,580)
(106,599)
(85,263)
(165,004)
(78,058)
(101,993)
(78,058)
(101,993)
(78,058)
(101,993)
(70,668)
(74,760)
(74,137)
(74,137)
(74,137)
Less: Tuition increases charged to doctoral students with hours in excess
of 100 (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.012)
0
0
0
0
0
Less: Tuition increases charged to undergraduate students with
excessive hours above degree requirements. (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
61.0595)
(138,612)
(163,440)
(200,000)
(200,000)
(200,000)
Less: Tuition rebates for certain undergraduates (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 54.0065)
(3,000)
0
0
0
0
Plus: Tuition waived for Students 55 Years or Older (TX. Educ. Code
Ann. Sec. 54.013)
0
0
0
0
0
(780)
(194,061)
(200,000)
(200,000)
(200,000)
0
0
0
0
0
15,309,720
15,178,694
16,938,151
16,938,151
16,938,151
Less: Transfer of Tuition to Retirement of Indebtedness: 1) Skiles Act
0
0
0
0
0
Less: Transfer of funds for Texas Public Education Grants Program
(Tex. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 56c) and for Emergency Loans (Tex. Educ.
Code Ann. Sec. 56d)
(1,894,534)
(1,989,132)
(2,101,712)
(2,101,712)
(2,101,712)
Less: Transfer of Funds (2%) for Emergency Loans (Medical School)
Less: Transfer of Funds for Repayment of Student Loans of Physicians
(Tx. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 61.539)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Less: Statutory Tuition (Tx. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.051) Set Aside
for Doctoral Incentive Loan Repayment Program (Tx. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 56.095)
0
0
0
0
0
Less: Tuition for repeated or excessive hours (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 54.014)
Plus: Tuition waived for Texas Grant Recipients (TX. Educ. Code
Ann. Sec. 56.307)
Subtotal
Less: Other Authorized Deduction
57
DATE: 10/18/2010
Schedule 1A: Other Educational and General Income
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Name:
TIME: 3:51:52PM
PAGE: 2 of
3
University of Houston - Downtown
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
13,415,186
13,189,562
14,836,439
14,836,439
14,836,439
0
0
99,000
0
0
82,000
0
0
95,000
0
0
95,000
0
0
95,000
13,514,186
13,271,562
14,931,439
14,931,439
14,931,439
36,620
0
17,212
0
20,000
0
20,000
0
20,000
0
Other Income (Itemize)
UB- Unexpended Authority
(968,542)
0
0
0
0
Subtotal, Other Income
(931,922)
17,212
20,000
20,000
20,000
12,582,264
13,288,774
14,951,439
14,951,439
14,951,439
Less: O.A.S.I. Applicable to Educational and General Local Funds
Payrolls
(727,720)
(749,235)
(811,198)
(811,198)
(811,198)
Less: Teachers Retirement System and ORP Proportionality for
Educational and General Funds
(627,010)
(645,114)
(767,520)
(767,520)
(767,520)
(1,034,728)
(1,217,364)
(1,400,000)
(1,400,000)
(1,400,000)
Total, Other Educational and General Income (Formula Amounts for
General Academic Institutions)
10,192,806
10,677,061
11,972,721
11,972,721
11,972,721
Reconciliation to Summary of Request for FY 2009-2011:
Plus: Transfer of Tuition for Retirement of Indebtedness - Skiles Act
Plus: Transfer of Funds for Texas Public Education Grants Program
and Emergency Loans
0
1,894,534
0
1,989,132
0
2,101,712
0
2,101,712
0
2,101,712
0
0
0
0
0
Net Tuition
Student Teaching Fees
Special Course Fees
Laboratory Fees
Subtotal, Tuition and Fees (Formula Amounts for Health-Related
Institutions)
OTHER INCOME
Interest on General Funds:
Local Funds in State Treasury
Funds in Local Depositories, e.g., local amounts
Subtotal, Other Educational and General Income
Less: Staff Group Insurance Premiums
Plus: Transfer of Funds for Cancellation of Student Loans of
Physicians
Plus: Organized Activities
Plus: Staff Group Insurance Premiums
Plus: Board-authorized Tuition Income
Plus: Tuition Increases Charged to Doctoral Students with Hours in
Excess of 100
0
0
0
0
0
1,034,728
70,668
1,217,364
74,760
1,400,000
74,137
1,400,000
74,137
1,400,000
74,137
0
0
0
0
0
58
DATE: 10/18/2010
Schedule 1A: Other Educational and General Income
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Name:
TIME: 3:51:52PM
PAGE: 3 of
3
University of Houston - Downtown
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
Plus: Tuition Increases Charged to Undergraduate Students with
Excessive Hours above Degree Requirements (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 61.0595)
138,612
163,439
200,000
200,000
200,000
Plus: Tuition for repeated or excessive hours (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 54.014)
780
194,061
200,000
200,000
200,000
Less: Tuition Waived for Students 55 Years or Older
0
0
0
0
0
Less: Tuition Waived for Texas Grant Recipients
0
0
0
0
0
13,332,128
14,315,817
15,948,570
15,948,570
15,948,570
Total, Other Educational and General Income Reported on Summary
of Request
59
Agency Code:
784
Agency Name:
Schedule 2: Grand Total Educational, General and Other Funds
DATE: 10/18/2010
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
TIME: 3:52:18PM
PAGE: 1
of 2
University of Houston - Downtown
Act 2009
Act 2010
2,101,294
1,198,150
998,000
0
0
445,046
0
357,984
0
157,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28,642,161
0
30,287,365
0
30,340,156
0
11,439,465
0
11,437,122
0
(28,637)
0
(42,215)
0
(42,348)
0
0
0
0
0
Less: ARRA Formula Swap
0
(1,148,296)
0
0
0
Other (Itemize)
5% Reduction
0
(1,145,037)
(1,205,092)
0
0
28,613,524
27,951,817
29,092,716
11,439,465
11,437,122
13,332,128
14,315,817
15,948,570
15,948,570
15,948,570
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,148,296
0
0
0
41,945,652
43,415,930
45,041,286
27,388,035
27,385,692
0
41,715
0
63,957
0
63,957
0
0
0
0
Transfer from Coordinating Board for Professional Nursing Shortage
Reduction Program
0
0
0
0
0
Transfer of GR Group Insurance Premium from Comptroller (UT and
TAMU Components only)
0
0
0
0
0
Less: Transfer to Other Institutions
Less: Transfer to Department of Health, Disproportionate Share State-Owned Hospitals (2009, 2010, 2011)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Balances as of Beginning of Fiscal Year
Encumbered and Obligated
Unencumbered and Unobligated
Capital Projects - Legislative Appropriations
Capital Projects - Other Educational and General Funds
General Revenue Appropriations
Direct Appropriations
Transfer from Office of the Governor Deficiency and Emergency Grants
Less: General Revenue Appropriations Lapsed
Plus: Additional General Revenue through Budget Execution
Subtotal, General Revenue Appropriations
Other Educational and General Income
Other Appropriated Funds Income
Health-related Institutions Patient Income (medical, dental, other)
Interagency contracts
Tobacco - Related Funds
ARRA Formula Swap
Other (Itemize)
TOTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
General Revenue Transfers
Transfer from Coordinating Board for Advanced Research Program
Transfer from Coordinating Board for Texas College Work Study
Program (2009, 2010, 2011)
60
Agency Code:
784
Agency Name:
Schedule 2: Grand Total Educational, General and Other Funds
DATE: 10/18/2010
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
TIME: 3:52:18PM
PAGE: 2
of 2
University of Houston - Downtown
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
27,500
3,043,196
39,054
2,881,920
80,292
5,469,729
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,112,411
2,984,931
5,613,978
0
0
5,946,205
7,203,778
6,960,104
6,900,000
6,900,000
0
0
0
0
0
Increase Capital Projects - Educational and General Funds
Transfer from Department of Health, Disproportionate Share State-owned Hospitals (2009, 2010, 2011)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Transfers from Other Funds, e.g., Designated funds transferred for
educational and general activities (Itemize)
0
0
0
0
0
Transfers from Other Funds, e.g., Designated funds transferred for
educational and general activities (Itemize)
0
0
0
0
0
Transfer from Coordinating Board for Incentive Funding
ARRA Article XII Section 25 Special Item Appropriations
0
0
0
250,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
53,550,608
55,410,773
58,770,368
34,288,035
34,285,692
(1,198,150)
(998,000)
(998,000)
0
0
(357,984)
0
(157,000)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Grand Total, Educational, General and Other Funds
51,994,474
54,255,773
57,772,368
34,288,035
34,285,692
Designated Tuition (Sec. 54.0513)
22,842,278
25,610,130
27,851,218
27,851,218
27,851,218
212,670
321,322
580,780
580,780
580,780
Other (Itemize)
Other: Fifth Year Accounting Scholarship
Texas Grants
Less: Transfer to System Administration
B-on-Time Program
Subtotal, General Revenue Transfers
General Revenue HEF for Operating Expenses
Transfer from Available University Funds (UT, A&M and Prairie View
A&M Only)
Other Additions (Itemize)
Other (Itemize)
Other Deductions (Itemize)
Decrease Capital Projects - Educational and General Funds
Other (Itemize)
Total Funds
Less: Balances as of End of Fiscal Year
Encumbered and Obligated
Unencumbered and Unobligated
Capital Projects - Legislative Appropriations
Capital Projects - Other Educational and General Funds
Indirect Cost Recovery (Sec. 145.001(d))
61
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:53:01PM
Page: 1 of
3
Schedule 3A: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (ERS)
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Code:
University of Houston - Downtown
E&G Enrollment
GR Enrollment
GR-D/OEGI
Enrollment
1a Employee Only
2a Employee and Children
3a Employee and Spouse
4a Employee and Family
5a Eligible, Opt Out
6a Eligible, Not Enrolled
300
75
53
68
9
18
204
51
36
46
6
12
96
24
17
22
3
6
300
75
53
68
9
18
144
41
20
25
5
15
Total for This Section
523
355
168
523
250
4
0
3
3
1
1
3
0
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
3
3
1
1
9
3
3
2
2
52
12
9
3
12
71
535
364
171
535
321
Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G
GR & GR-D Percentages
GR %
GR-D %
Total Percentage
68.00%
32.00%
100.00%
FULL TIME ACTIVES
PART TIME ACTIVES
1b Employee Only
2b Employee and Children
3b Employee and Spouse
4b Employee and Family
5b Eligble, Opt Out
6b Eligible, Not Enrolled
Total for This Section
Total Active Enrollment
62
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:53:01PM
Page: 2 of
3
Schedule 3A: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (ERS)
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Code:
University of Houston - Downtown
E&G Enrollment
GR Enrollment
GR-D/OEGI
Enrollment
1c Employee Only
2c Employee and Children
3c Employee and Spouse
4c Employee and Family
5c Eligble, Opt Out
6c Eligible, Not Enrolled
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total for This Section
0
0
0
0
0
1d Employee Only
2d Employee and Children
3d Employee and Spouse
4d Employee and Family
5d Eligble, Opt Out
6d Eligible, Not Enrolled
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total for This Section
0
0
0
0
0
Total Retirees Enrollment
0
0
0
0
0
1e Employee Only
2e Employee and Children
3e Employee and Spouse
4e Employee and Family
5e Eligble, Opt Out
6e Eligible, Not Enrolled
300
75
53
68
9
18
204
51
36
46
6
12
96
24
17
22
3
6
300
75
53
68
9
18
144
41
20
25
5
15
Total for This Section
523
355
168
523
250
Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G
FULL TIME RETIREES by ERS
PART TIME RETIREES by ERS
TOTAL FULL TIME ENROLLMENT
63
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:53:01PM
Page: 3 of
3
Schedule 3A: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (ERS)
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Code:
University of Houston - Downtown
E&G Enrollment
GR Enrollment
GR-D/OEGI
Enrollment
1f Employee Only
2f Employee and Children
3f Employee and Spouse
4f Employee and Family
5f Eligble, Opt Out
6f Eligible, Not Enrolled
304
75
56
71
10
19
207
51
38
48
7
13
97
24
18
23
3
6
304
75
56
71
10
19
153
44
23
27
7
67
Total for This Section
535
364
171
535
321
Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G
TOTAL ENROLLMENT
64
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:53:37PM
Page: 1
1
of
SCHEDULE 4: COMPUTATION OF OASI
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code: 784
Agency:
University of Houston - Downtown
Actual
Salaries &
Wages 2009
Actual
Salaries &
Wages 2010
Budgeted
Salaries &
Wages 2011
Estimated
Salaries &
Wages 2012
Estimated
Salaries &
Wages 2013
Gross Educational & General Payroll - Subject to OASI
FTE Employees - Subject to OASI
$30,735,683
558.1
$30,605,808
592.0
$33,137,388
558.0
$33,137,388
558.0
$33,137,388
558.0
Average Salary (Gross Payroll / FTE Employees)
$55,072
$51,699
$59,386
$59,386
$59,386
$4,213
558.1
$3,955
592.0
$4,543
558.0
$4,543
558.0
$4,543
558.0
$2,351,275
$2,341,360
$2,534,994
$2,534,994
$2,534,994
Proportionality Percentage Based on Comptroller
Accounting Policy Statement #011, Exhibit 2
% to Allocation of
Total
OASI
% to Allocation of
Total
OASI
% to Allocation of
Total
OASI
% to Allocation of
Total
OASI
% to Allocation of
Total
OASI
General Revenue (% to Total)
0.6905
$1,623,555
0.6800
$1,592,125
0.6800
$1,723,796
0.6800
$1,723,796
0.6800
$1,723,796
Other Educational and General Funds (% to Total)
0.3095
727,720
0.3200
749,235
0.3200
811,198
0.3200
811,198
0.3200
811,198
Health-related Institutions Patient Income (% to Total)
0.0000
0
0.0000
0
0.0000
0
0.0000
0
0.0000
0
1.0000
$2,351,275
1.0000
$2,341,360
1.0000
$2,534,994
1.0000
$2,534,994
1.0000
$2,534,994
Employer OASI Rate 7.65% x Average Salary
x FTE Employees
Grand Total, OASI
Grand Total, OASI (100%)
65
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
SCHEDULE 5: CALCULATION OF RETIREMENT PROPORTIONALITY AND ORP DIFFERENTIAL
DATE:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
TIME:
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
10/18/2010
3:54:09PM
of 1
1
University of Houston - Downtown
Description
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
31,654,375
31,392,628
36,758,993
36,758,993
36,758,993
Employer Contribution to TRS Retirement Programs
1,092,047
1,087,147
1,250,500
1,250,500
1,250,500
Employer Contribution to ORP Retirement Programs
933,833
928,833
1,148,000
1,148,000
1,148,000
Proportionality Amounts
Gross Educational and General Payroll - Subject To Retirement
Proportionality Percentage
General Revenue
69.05 %
68.00
%
68.00 %
68.00 %
68.00 %
Other Educational and General Income
30.95 %
32.00
%
32.00 %
32.00
%
32.00 %
0.00 %
0.00
%
0.00 %
0.00
%
0.00 %
Health-related Institutions Patient Income
Proportional Contribution
Other Educational and General Proportional Contribution
(Other E&G percentage x Total Employer Contribution to Retirement Programs)
627,010
645,114
767,520
767,520
767,520
0
0
0
0
0
5,695,385
5,662,418
5,824,176
5,824,176
41,576
51,528
53,000
53,000
HRI Patient Income Proportional Contribution
(HRI Patient Income percentage x Total Employer Contribution To Retirement Programs)
Differential
Gross Payroll Subject to Differential - Optional Retirement Program
Total Differential
66
5,824,176
53,000
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:54:38PM
Page: 1
of 2
Schedule 6: Capital Funding
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evalutation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Agency Name: University of Houston - Downtown
Activity
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,553,564
0
0
0
1,749,330
0
0
0
1,399,464
0
0
0
1,049,598
0
0
9,548,995
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,548,995
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,435,238
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,435,238
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,435,238
0
0
0
0
0
6,249,872
6,196,105
6,195,968
6,468,217
6,465,974
$15,798,867
$17,298,664
$15,380,536
$15,302,919
$14,950,810
1,957,904
312,386
445,707
356,428
2,619,569
254,211
2,049,226
0
0
0
0
6,249,872
2,095,592
280,000
661,295
356,428
3,264,891
248,972
1,446,051
1,000,000
0
0
0
6,196,105
2,269,151
270,000
566,453
0
3,530,000
74,500
825,000
250,000
0
0
0
6,195,968
2,450,683
270,000
566,453
0
3,348,468
74,500
825,000
250,000
0
0
0
6,468,217
2,450,683
270,000
566,453
0
3,348,468
74,500
825,000
250,000
0
0
0
6,465,974
$14,245,303
$15,549,334
$13,981,072
$14,253,321
$14,251,078
I. Balances as of Beginning of Fiscal Year
A. PUF Bond Proceeds
B. HEF Bond Proceeds
C. HEF Annual Allocations
D. TR Bond Proceeds
II. Additions
A. PUF Bond Proceeds Allocation
B. HEF General Revenue Appropriation
C. HEF Bond Proceeds
D. TR Bond Proceeds
E. Investment Income on PUF Bond Proceeds
F. Investment Income on HEF Bond Proceeds
G. Investment Income on TR Bond Proceeds
H. Other (Itemize)
TR Bond Proceeds
GR Approriations for TRB Debt Service
III. Total Funds Available - PUF, HEF, and TRB
IV. Less: Deductions
A. Expenditures (Itemize)
HEAF - Library
HEAF - Research
HEAF - Departmental support
HEAF - UH System support
HEAF - Information Technology
HEAF - Campus security
HEAF - Renovation/MR&R
HEAF - New initiative - NW campus
B. Annual Debt Service on PUF Bonds
C.1. Annual Debt Service on HEF Bonds - RFS Commercial Paper
C.2. Annual Debt Service on HEF Bonds - RFS Bonds, Series 2001
D. Annual Debt Service on TR Bonds
E. Other (Itemize)
Total, Deductions
67
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 3:54:38PM
Page: 2
of 2
Schedule 6: Capital Funding
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evalutation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
784
Activity
V. Balances as of End of Fiscal Year
A.PUF Bond Proceeds
B.HEF Bond Proceeds
C.HEF Annual Allocations
D.TR Bond Proceeds
Agency Name: University of Houston - Downtown
Act 2009
Act 2010
Bud 2011
Est 2012
Est 2013
0
0
1,553,564
0
$1,553,564
0
0
1,749,330
0
$1,749,330
0
0
1,399,464
0
$1,399,464
0
0
1,049,598
0
$1,049,598
0
0
699,732
0
$699,732
68
Agency code:
784
SCHEDULE 7: CURRENT AND LOCAL FUND (GENERAL) BALANCES
DATE:
10/18/2010
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
TIME:
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
3:55:45PM
of 1
1
Agency name: UH DOWNTOWN
Actual
Actual
2009
2010
Budgeted
2011
Estimated
Estimated
2012
2013
1..
Balance of Current Fund in State Treasury
$311,266
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
2..
Unobligated Balance in State Treasury
$357,984
$157,000
$0
$0
$0
3..
Interest Earned in State Treasury
$36,620
$17,212
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
69
DATE:
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Schedule 8: PERSONNEL
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
TIME:
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
10/18/2010
3:56:27PM
1 of 3
UH DOWNTOWN
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Budgeted
2011
Estimated
2012
Estimated
Educational and General Funds Faculty Employees
307.6
357.5
296.4
296.4
296.4
Educational and General Funds Non-Faculty Employees
250.5
234.5
261.6
261.6
261.6
Subtotal, Directly Appropriated Funds
558.1
592.0
558.0
558.0
558.0
Incentive Funding - Transfer from THECB
44.4
16.5
15.5
0.0
0.0
Subtotal, Other Appropriated Funds
44.4
16.5
15.5
0.0
0.0
Subtotal, All Appropriated
602.5
608.5
573.5
558.0
558.0
Non Appropriated Funds Employees
337.5
389.8
575.6
591.1
591.1
Subtotal, Non-Appropriated
337.5
389.8
575.6
591.1
591.1
GRAND TOTAL
940.0
998.3
1,149.1
1,149.1
1,149.1
2013
Part A.
FTE Postions
Directly Appropriated Funds (Bill Pattern)
Other Appropriated Funds
70
DATE:
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Schedule 8: PERSONNEL
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
TIME:
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
10/18/2010
3:56:27PM
2 of 3
UH DOWNTOWN
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Budgeted
2011
Estimated
2012
Estimated
2013
Part B.
Personnel Headcount
Directly Appropriated Funds (Bill Pattern)
Educational and General Funds Faculty Employees
Educational and General Funds Non-Faculty Employees
349.0
288.0
396.0
282.0
374.0
266.0
374.0
266.0
374.0
266.0
Subtotal, Directly Appropriated Funds
637.0
678.0
640.0
640.0
640.0
Incentive Funding - Transfer from THECB
55.0
20.0
18.0
0.0
0.0
Subtotal, Other Appropriated Funds
55.0
20.0
18.0
0.0
0.0
Subtotal, All Appropriated
692.0
698.0
658.0
640.0
640.0
Non Appropriated Funds Employees
471.0
544.0
772.0
790.0
790.0
Subtotal, Non-Appropriated
471.0
544.0
772.0
790.0
790.0
1,163.0
1,242.0
1,430.0
1,430.0
1,430.0
Other Appropriated Funds
GRAND TOTAL
71
DATE:
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Schedule 8: PERSONNEL
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
TIME:
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
10/18/2010
3:56:27PM
3 of 3
UH DOWNTOWN
Actual
2009
Actual
2010
Budgeted
2011
Estimated
2012
Estimated
2013
PART C.
Salaries
Directly Appropriated Funds (Bill Pattern)
Educational and General Funds Faculty Employees
$20,335,750
$22,588,999
$22,019,737
$22,019,737
$22,019,737
Educational and General Funds Non-Faculty Employees
$11,811,804
$11,854,241
$12,902,840
$12,437,850
$12,437,850
Subtotal, Directly Appropriated Funds
$32,147,554
$34,443,240
$34,922,577
$34,457,587
$34,457,587
Incentive Funding - Transfer from THECB
$2,518,181
$1,133,118
$1,023,600
$0
$0
Subtotal, Other Appropriated Funds
$2,518,181
$1,133,118
$1,023,600
$0
$0
Subtotal, All Appropriated
$34,665,735
$35,576,358
$35,946,177
$34,457,587
$34,457,587
Non Appropriated Funds Employees
$17,334,186
$19,987,502
$23,227,646
$24,251,246
$24,251,246
Subtotal, Non-Appropriated
$17,334,186
$19,987,502
$23,227,646
$24,251,246
$24,251,246
GRAND TOTAL
$51,999,921
$55,563,860
$59,173,823
$58,708,833
$58,708,833
Other Appropriated Funds
72
DATE:
SCHEDULE 9: EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH UTILITY OPERATIONS
TIME:
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
784
Agency name:
Item
ENERGY COST
(1) Purchased Electricity (KWH)
(2) Purchased Natural Gas (MCF)
University of Houston - Downtown
Consumption
Cost
19,206,790
$1,577,554
9,109
$78,548
$0
(3) Purchased Thermal Energy (BTU)
WATER/WASTE WATER
(4) Water (1,000 gal.)
(5) Waste Water (1,000 gal.)
PAGE:
23,310
$85,484
23,310
$103,644
UTILITIES OPERATING COSTS
(6) Personnel
$60,994
(7) Maintenance and Operations
$171,721
$0
(8) Renovation
UTILITIES DEBT SERVICE
(9) Revenue Bonds
$0
(10) Loan Star
$0
(11) Performance Contracts
$0
(12)
TOTAL
$2,077,945
73
10/18/2010
3:58:03PM
OF 1
1
Schedule 10A: Tuition Revenue Bond Projects
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
DATE: 10/18/2010
TIME: 3:59:07PM
PAGE: 1 of 1
Agency Name: University of Houston - Downtown
784
Priority Number:
1
Project Number:
1
Name of Proposed Facility:
Science & Technology Building
Project Type:
New Construction
Location of Facility:
Houston, Texas
Type of Facility:
Parking Facility
Project Start Date:
09/01/2011
Project Completion Date:
09/01/2014
Gross Square Feet:
120,000
Net Assignable Square Feet in
Project
120,000
Tuition Revenue
Bond Request
$ 41,429,000
Total Project Cost
$ 51,429,000
Cost Per Total
Gross Square Feet
$ 345
Project Description
The University of Houston-Downtown (UHD) requests special line item authority to issue up to $51,429,000 in bonds to fund the construction and equip a state-of-the-art 120,000 sq. ft.
building and attached multi-level parking facility to serve as the home of the College of Sciences and Technology, one of four academic units at the university . The college is home to all
STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) academic programs and provides opportunities for underrepresented groups to work for and attain degree goals in STEM
areas. The funding requested would provide for the projected debt service costs associated with the bond issue described .
74
SCHEDULE 10B: TUITION REVENUE BOND ISSUANCE HISTORY
82nd Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 784
Authorization Date
1993
1997
2001
2006
Agency name:
Authorization Amount
$22,400,000
$7,500,000
$18,232,500
$31,626,000
Issuance Date
Date:
Time:
Page:
10/18/2010
3:59:36PM
Page 1 of 1
University of Houston - Downtown
Issuance Amount
Apr 18 1995
$22,400,000
Subtotal
$22,400,000
Feb 10 1999
$7,500,000
Subtotal
$7,500,000
Oct 9 2010
$18,232,000
Subtotal
$18,232,000
Feb 15 2010
$31,626,000
Subtotal
$31,626,000
75
Authorized Amount
Outstanding as of
08/31/2010
$0
$0
$500
$0
Proposed Issuance
Date for Outstanding
Authorization
Proposed Issuance
Amount for Outstanding
Authorization
SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION
82ND REGULAR SESSION
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code: 784
Special Item:
Agency:
1
(1) Year Special Item:
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 4:00:26PM
of
5
Page: 1
University of Houston - Downtown
Tuition Revenue Bond Debt Service
1988
(2) Mission of Special Item:
Pay debt service on bonds issued by the UH System . Per its current mission statement, the University of Houston-Downtown is a predominately undergraduate academic institution
authorized by the legislature of the State of Texas to serve the needs of higher education and the Houston area . Appropriate facilities are needed if the university is to carry out its
mission . Over the past 15 years UHD 's effectiveness has been significantly enhanced with the addition of three new academic / classroom buildings funded through tuition revenue
bonds .
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
Continued payments toward retirement of outstanding debt issued to finance construction of buildings .
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
Tuition Income
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
None
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
The University would struggle to provide the funds necessary to service its outstanding debts .
76
SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION
82ND REGULAR SESSION
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code: 784
Special Item:
Agency:
2
(1) Year Special Item:
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 4:00:26PM
of
5
Page: 2
University of Houston - Downtown
Community Developement
2000
(2) Mission of Special Item:
These funds serve as seed money for community-based efforts to revitalize two separate economically depressed north side neighborhoods - the predominately African-American Acres
Homes subdivision and the largely Hispanic area bounded by downtown, I - 45N, 610 Loop North and Highway 59N. Projects in both areas have their own boards that oversee a variety
of economic development and community enhancement efforts. These boards, which are required to provide periodic status reports to the university leadership, operate with a high
level degree of autonomy.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
The individual programs in these two areas have enhanced various community development activities including educational, business, and social support programs which increase the
economic viability of these areas. In FY2010 the university was able to leverage the community development funds to provide service learning opportunities for serveral UHD students
.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
Development of new programs and expansion of programs being successfully implemented .
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
Unfunded
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
None
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
An opportunity to lift these economically depressed neighborhoods wouild be lost , as would the opportunity to provide community developement service learning opportunities to UHD
students .
77
SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION
82ND REGULAR SESSION
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency:
Agency Code: 784
Special Item:
3
(1) Year Special Item:
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 4:00:26PM
of
5
Page: 3
University of Houston - Downtown
Institutional Enhancement
2000
(2) Mission of Special Item:
This item was first created by the 76th Legislature when all previously funded special items categorized as "untrue items" were rolled together and supplemented with a $1 million per
year add-on. For UHD the annual amount has been in the $ 2 - 2.5 million year range since inception . The 81st legislature increased Institutional Enhancement but simultaneously
eliminated Excellence Funding, which more than offset the increase to Instituional Enhancement .
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
UHD uses its Institutional Enhancement money to support the initial special items, most notably its Academic Support Lab . The majority of the funds are used to support general
operations .
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
Operation of Academic Support Lab plus general operations support .
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
The Academic Support Lab and CEC were separately funded special items prior to the establishment of Institutional Enhancement . The other items were either unfunded or
underfunded.
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
None
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
As with most institutions of higher ed in Texas, UHD uses Institutional Enhancement funds to support many of its core operations . Loosing this funding would have the effect of an
across - the - board decrease in state support .
78
SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION
82ND REGULAR SESSION
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency:
Agency Code: 784
Special Item:
4
(1) Year Special Item:
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 4:00:26PM
of
5
Page: 4
University of Houston - Downtown
Science & Technology Building Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement
2013
(2) Mission of Special Item:
The University of Houston - Downtown (UHD) requests special line item authority to issue up to $41,429,000 in tuition revenue bonds to fund the construction and equip a state - of the - art 120,000 sq. ft. Science & Technology building . An attached mutli - level parking facility , projected at $ 10,000,000 and to be funded through issuance of auxiliary revenue
bonds , will be a part of this overall project . The new building will serve as the home of the College of Sciences and Techonology , one of four academic units at the university . The
college is home to all STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) academic programs and provides opportunities for underrepresented groups to work for and attain
degree goals in STEM areas . The funding requested would provide for the projected debt service costs associated with the bonds issued for funding construction .
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
Unfunded
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
As the university’s STEM programs have grown in size and recognition, the deficiencies in existing science and technology classroom and lab space have become an increasing
challenge. At present, science and technology labs are located in the original UHD structure, the One Main Building, which was never designed for this purpose. Beyond the design
and functionality of the space, there are safety issues when laboratory facilities are located in a building that increasingly serves primarily as academic, administrative, and student
support space.
In Fall 2009 UHD operated with an overall space deficit of over 346,000 sq. ft. (assignable), with most of that coming in the areas of Teaching and Research. As the institution matures,
it will increasingly need more ‘special-use’ as opposed to ‘general use’ space. A dedicated Science & Technology Building will be the first step in that direction .
79
SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION
82ND REGULAR SESSION
Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency:
Agency Code: 784
Special Item:
5
(1) Year Special Item:
Date: 10/18/2010
Time: 4:00:26PM
of
5
Page: 5
University of Houston - Downtown
Expansion of the UHD Scholars Academy to all UHD Colleges
2012
(2) Mission of Special Item:
While to this point in its history the Scholars Academy has had a STEM focus, there is no reason to believe that the same programmatic and pedagogical strategies - mentoring,
tutoring, and undergraduate research opportunities – can’t be applied across all disciplines. While external funding has provided much of the resources needed for the activities of the
STEM-focused Scholars Academy, securing external funding sufficient to support a university-wide Scholars Academy is unlikely, as there are not as many grant opportunities for the
non-STEM disciplines. This special line item will provide critical funding while UHD seeks new external funding. Ultimately the university’s goal is to institutionalize the funding for
the Scholars Academy using hard dollars. This request focuses on three key components for student success beginning in high school:
(1)Preparation of high school students entering college-level programs: START Summer Program, START Teacher Institute ($200,000/yr);
(2)Mentoring of college freshmen via a faculty and peer mentoring system: Freshman Workshop, College Success Program, Tutoring & Mentoring ($200,000/yr); and
(3)Early and frequent independent research opportunities: Summer Undergraduate Research Program, Academic-Year Research Program, Student Research Conference ($400,000/yr)
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
The current UHD Scholars Academy is a multi-faceted program designed to prepare high school students and college freshmen for the rigors of college - level science curriculum.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
Unfunded
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
Over the past decade UHD has developed a true ‘center of excellence’ with its nationally recognized Scholars Academy. The UHD Scholars Academy, previous winner of the
THECB’s STAR Award, was cited in President Bush’s 2007 budget request for NSF funding as a model program in science preparation at the collegiate level. By taking the lessons
learned through its STEM-focused Scholars Academy and applying them across the university, UHD believes that similar ‘centers of excellence’ can be developed in the arts, business,
and public service.
80
Schedule 12A: Reconciliation of Formula Strategies to NACUBO Functions of Cost
81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Agency Name: University of Houston - Downtown
Agency Code: 784
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
SUMMARY OF REQUEST FOR FY 2009-2011:
1
2
A.1.1 Operations Support
B.1.1 E&G Space Support
$
$
29,972,817
1,957,473
$
$
30,926,500
2,212,337
$
$
32,209,927
2,238,744
3
Total, Formula Expenditures
$
31,930,290
$
33,138,837
$
34,448,671
Instruction
Research
Academic Support
Student Services
Institutional Support
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
$
21,364,289
56,127
2,973,361
1,329,180
4,249,860
29,972,817
$
$
$
$
$
$
22,139,906
61,219
3,169,760
1,414,828
4,513,167
31,298,880
$
$
$
$
$
$
23,294,276
62,084
3,214,563
1,434,826
4,576,958
32,582,707
7
Operation and Maintenance of Plant
Utilities
Subtotal
$
$
$
1,725,102
232,371
1,957,473
$
$
$
1,839,957
1,839,957
$
$
$
1,865,964
1,865,964
8
Total, Formula Expenditures by NACUBO Functions of Cost $
31,930,290
$
33,138,837
$
34,448,671
RECONCILIATION TO NACUBO FUNCTIONS OF COST
4
5
6
9
0
check = 0
81
0
0
Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost
81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Agency Code: 784
Agency Name: University of Houston - Downtown
Exp 2009
Est 2010
Bud 2011
SUMMARY OF REQUEST FOR FY 2009-2011:
1
A.1.1 Operations Support
Objects of Expense:
a) 1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
1005 Faculty Salaries
2001 Professional Fees & Services
2009 Other Operating Expense
Subtotal, Objects of Expense
check = 0
4
B.1.1 E&G Space Support
Objects of Expense:
c)
1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
2004 Utilities
Subtotal, Objects of Expense
check = 0
$
29,972,817
$
30,926,500
$
32,209,927
$
$
$
$
$
9,527,943
386,151
20,044,097
3,128
11,498
$
$
$
$
$
9,118,433
365,000
21,443,067
-
$
$
$
$
$
10,024,811
464,990
21,720,126
-
$
$
29,972,817 $
(0) $
30,926,500
-
$
$
32,209,927
-
$
1,957,473
$
2,212,337
$
2,238,744
$
$
$
1,692,668
32,434
232,371
$
$
$
2,212,337
-
$
$
$
2,238,744
-
$
$
1,957,473
-
$
$
2,212,337
-
$
$
2,238,744
-
$
21,364,289
$
22,139,906
$
23,294,276
$
$
$
$
1,208,463
185,745
19,968,780
1,301
$
$
$
1,288,584
198,069
20,653,253
$
$
$
1,306,797
200,868
21,786,611
RECONCILIATION TO NACUBO FUNCTIONS OF COST
6
Instruction
Objects of Expense:
d) 1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
1005 Faculty Salaries
2009 Other Operating Expense
82
Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost
81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
Subtotal
check = 0
Research
Objects of Expense:
e)
1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
Subtotal
check = 0
Academic Support
Objects of Expense:
f)
1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
1005 Faculty Salaries
2009 Other Operating Expense
Subtotal
check = 0
Student Services
Objects of Expense:
g) 1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
2001 Professional Fees & Services
$
$
21,364,289
-
$
$
22,139,906
-
$
$
23,294,276
-
$
56,127
$
61,219
$
62,084
$
$
51,999
4,128
$
$
56,719
4,500
$
$
57,521
4,563
$
$
56,127
-
$
$
61,219
-
$
$
62,084
-
$
2,973,361
$
3,169,760
$
3,214,563
$
$
$
$
2,835,729
61,921
75,317
394
$
$
$
3,023,634
65,931
80,195
$
$
$
3,066,372
63,781
84,410
$
$
2,973,361
-
$
$
3,169,760
-
$
$
3,214,563
-
$
1,329,180
$
1,414,828
$
1,434,826
$
$
$
1,293,433
32,620
3,128
$
$
$
1,376,769
34,663
3,396
$
$
$
1,396,229
35,153
3,444
83
Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost
81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1
$
$
1,329,180
-
$
$
1,414,828
-
$
$
1,434,826
-
$
4,249,860
$
4,513,167
$
4,576,958
$
$
$
4,138,319
101,738
9,803
$
$
$
4,379,126
107,865
26,176
$
$
$
4,441,022
109,389
26,547
$
$
4,249,860
-
$
$
4,513,167
-
$
$
4,576,958
-
$
1,725,102
$
1,839,957
$
1,865,964
$
$
1,692,668
32,434
$
$
1,805,365
34,592
$
$
1,830,884
35,080
$
$
1,725,102
-
$
$
1,839,957
-
$
$
1,865,964
-
Utilities
$
232,371
$
-
$
-
Objects of Expense:
j)
2004 Utilities
$
232,371
$
-
$
-
$
$
232,371
-
$
$
Subtotal
check = 0
Institutional Support
Objects of Expense:
h) 1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
2009 Other Operating Expense
Subtotal
check = 0
8
Operation and Maintenance of Plant
Objects of Expense:
i)
1001 Salaries & Wages
1002 Other Personnel Costs
Subtotal, Objects of Expense
check = 0
Subtotal, Objects of Expense
check = 0
84
-
$
$
-