\DOC PEXISTS_UNIQUE_CONV \TYPE {PEXISTS_UNIQUE_CONV : conv} \KEYWORDS conversion, quantifier, existential, unique. \LIBRARY pair \SYNOPSIS Expands with the definition of paired unique existence. \DESCRIBE Given a term of the form {"?!p. t[p]"}, the conversion {PEXISTS_UNIQUE_CONV} proves that this assertion is equivalent to the conjunction of two statements, namely that there exists at least one pair {p} such that {t[p]}, and that there is at most one value {p} for which {t[p]} holds. The theorem returned is: { |- (?!p. t[p]) = (?p. t[p]) /\ (!p p'. t[p] /\ t[p'] ==> (p = p')) } where {p'} is a primed variant of the pair {p} none of the components of which appear free in the input term. Note that the quantified pair {p} need not in fact appear free in the body of the input term. For example, {PEXISTS_UNIQUE_CONV "?!(x,y). T"} returns the theorem: { |- (?!(x,y). T) = (?(x,y). T) /\ (!(x,y) (x',y'). T /\ T ==> ((x,y) = (x',y'))) } \FAILURE {PEXISTS_UNIQUE_CONV tm} fails if {tm} does not have the form {"?!p.t"}. \SEEALSO Conv.EXISTS_UNIQUE_CONV, PairRules.PEXISTENCE. \ENDDOC