Sociology of Education 104 Sociology 104a: The Sociology of Education Brandeis University Fall 2012 Mitra K. Shavarini, Lecturer Class Meeting: Tuesdays and Fridays 12:30-1:50 Office: Rabb 107 Office Hours: By appointment E-mail: shavarini@brandeis.edu Schools are the primary institution for instructing, training and socializing the next generation. School attendance or equivalent instruction is mandatory in this country, and the subjects and methods of instruction have been hotly debated. This course will explore sociological research and theories that are useful for examining the roles of educational institutions and practices in the United States. We will critically examine the place and role of schools and schooling in the wider society, both through a brief historical overview as well as modern perspectives and current debates on the role and function of schools. Class participants will investigate the ways in which schools reinforce, and/or challenge prevailing social, economic, and political relationships. Issues to be discussed include: the purpose of schooling, the structure and organization of schools, curriculum development, social reproduction, family/school relationships, and the role of teachers. The meaning of culture, race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, disability, sexual orientation and identity will also inform our investigations into these topics. We will examine the school as a society within itself, with its own dominant system of values, ideology, and relationships of power and authority. We will also examine the interpersonal relationships within schools: the types of interaction that occur, and the opportunities for learning and development. Course Requirements This course requires you to complete each week’s reading before the week’s first class session, attend class, and participate in discussions and exercises. Attendance is required, and I will pass around a sign-IN sheet during each class session. In general, I do not excuse absences unless you have a serious problem. If such a problem occurs, you need to let me know. During class sessions, you should feel free to ask questions, challenge ideas, and respond to me and to your classmates. I insist that participation be appropriate to the topic and respectful of everyone, but you are otherwise free to express your views. You need not agree with everything you read. You need not even understand all of the reading. Class discussions will, ideally, answer questions, foster critical engagement, and explore areas of disagreement. You are welcome to contact me between class sessions and during times outside my office hours. If you are working on an assignment or concerned about some aspect of the reading, please do not hesitate. You need not hesitate anyway. I usually check my email more than once a day, and I try to respond promptly. I’m on campus on a regular Sociology of Education 104 basis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, and I’ll be happy to make an appointment when I am available. I will calculate grades as follows: Attendance and participation/presentations: 30 percent First (short) assignment: 5 percent Second AND third assignments: 20 percent each Take-home final/paper: 25 percent Due dates are noted in the course outline. Instructions for assignments will be distributed in class. Written Assignments Final versions of written assignments are due in hard copy on the deadlines listed. Written work should be typed, double spaced, with margins on all four sides of the page. I expect hard copies, but please keep your electronic files for back-up until the semester is over. Please be sure to refer specifically to the class readings. Please use the ASA style guidelines for references and citations. Articles Students should check news sites such as newspapers, magazines, the Internet, and radio, for articles and reports on issues relating to the sociology of education. If possible, please e-mail the article or information about the article to me in advance. If not, please be sure to notify me at the start of class. Please briefly present the main argument of the article in the context of the themes of the course and the article’s source. These presentations will contribute to your class participation score. Student Accountability Accountability includes a number of classroom norms: class attendance and punctuality, timely submission of assignments, and attention to the class sessions without diversion from texting or web surfing. These elements of normative accountability will be part of your grade. Recognizing that unanticipated problems do occur, I will consider occasional extensions for assignments if asked before the deadline passes. I do, however, review patterns of lateness and other elements of accountability. A pattern that violates these norms more than occasionally will result in a lower grade. Please turn off phones and other devices during all class sessions. Texting in class is not only rude but also disruptive; please refrain from all electronic communication. I expect not to have to ask you again at any time during the semester. If I do have to ask, I will consider it a breach of accountability. Sociology of Education 104 Laptops are emphatically discouraged and require permission for note taking. If I grant permission, laptop users must occupy the front rows of the classroom during each class session. Please think carefully before asking for permission to use a laptop in class. If several people seek permission, I will ban laptop use entirely. ***Please hand a printed hard copy AS WELL AS electronic copy of each paper. *** Academic Accommodations If you are a student who needs academic accommodation because of a documented disability, please contact me and present your letter of accommodation as soon as possible. Undergraduates and graduate students with questions about documenting a disability should contact the Director of Disabilities Services and Support Office of Academic Services, 6-3470. Letters of accommodation should be presented at the start of the semester to ensure provision of accommodations. Accommodations cannot be granted retroactively. Academic Integrity Academic integrity is central to the mission of educational excellence at Brandeis University. Each student is expected to turn in work completed independently, except when assignments specifically authorize collaborative effort. It is not acceptable to use words or ideas of another without proper acknowledgment of the source. This means that you must use footnotes and quotation marks to indicate the source of any phrases, sentences, paragraphs, or ideas in published volumes, on the Internet, or created by another student. Violations of university policies on academic integrity, available at http://www.brandeis.edu/studentaffairs/srcs/ai/index.html, may result in failure in the course or on the assignment, and could end in suspension from the University. If you are in doubt about the instructions for any assignment in this course, be sure to ask for clarification. Course Readings Class readings will be available on-line in Latte or as handouts in class. It will not be necessary to purchase any additional books. Course Outline PART 1: THE ROLE OF THE SCHOOL IN AMERICAN SOCIETY WEEK 1: Introduction, Sociological Themes and Perspectives, the Origins of Public Schooling in the U.S. (1) Course Overview: What is Sociology of Education? Introduction to course Friday, August 31 Sociology of Education 104 Raising sociological questions: themes of the course (2) Historical overview I: The Common School Tuesday, September 4 Read: - Kaestle, C.F. 1983. "Prologue: The Founding Fathers and Education." Pp. 3-12 in Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780-1860. New York: Hill and Wang. Film (in class): Mondale, Sarah and Sarah Patton. 2001. School: The Story of American Public Education. Part I: The Common School: 1770-1890. Boston: Beacon Press. For reference only (not required), written companion to film: Kaestle, Carl. 2001. “Part One: 1770-1900 The Common School.” Pp. 1-58 in Mondale, Sarah and Sarah B. Patton, eds.. School: The Story of American Public Education. Boston: Beacon Press. WEEK 2: The Origins of Public Schooling in the U.S: Models of School Structures, Aims and Ideals of Education (3) The Administrative Progressives: A Factory Model of Schooling Friday Sept 7 Read: -Tyack, David. 1974. “Some Functions of Schooling” and "Inside the System: The Character of Urban Schools" Pp. 72-77, 177-198, 229-254 in One Best System: A History of American Urban Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Read: - A Walker in the City by Alfred Kazin pp. 5-51. Also read Gina Bellafante’s recent NYTimes book review of the book on Latte. OPTIONAL: (not required, discusses the effect of school size on various educational factors): -Lee, V. E. 2000. “School Size and the Organization of Secondary Schools.” Pp 327-344 in Handbook of the Sociology of Education. M.T. Hallinanan, editor. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. (4) John Dewey: A Democratic Model of Schooling Tuesday, September 11 Read: - Dewey, John. 1916. "Education as a Social Function.” Pp. 10-22 in, Democracy and Education. New York: The Free Press. (Optional and suggested : " Aims in Education." pp. 100-111.) OPTIONAL (Discusses the limits of what schools can really do): -Sizer, Theodore. 1994,1985. Prologue, Chapter 2: Setions 2, 4 and Chapter 1: Section 4. Pp. 9-21, 8498, 109-115, 53-58 in Horace's Compromise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. PAPER 1 DUE: Explain John Dewey’S quote, "Education is life." Sociology of Education 104 PART 2: PERSPECTIVES ON THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF SCHOOLS WEEK 3: Perspectives on the Aims and Ideals of Education (5) Sociological Themes and Perspectives: on the Sorting Function of Schools Friday Sept 11 Read: -Durkheim, E. 1961. “On Education and Society.” Pp. 23-34 in Sociology of Education: A Critical Reader. A.R. Sadovnik, editor. New York: Routledge. (NOTE: Reading called “Sadovnik & Durkheim in Cicada—this is the second reading). OPTIONAL (Good reference, overview of field): -Sadovnik, A.R. 2007. “Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education.” Pp. 3-20 in Sociology of Education: A Critical Reader. A.R. Sadovnik, editor. New York: Routledge. (6) Theoretical Perspectives on the Social Function of Schools Friday, Sept 21 Read: -Parsons, T. 1959. “The School as a Social System.” Harvard Educational Review 29:297-318. OPTIONAL-McMannon, Timothy. 1997. “The Changing Public Purpose of Education and Schooling.”Pp. 1-40 in Goodlad, John and Timothy McMannon. The Public Purpose of Education and Schooling. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. WEEK 4: On Schooling and the Social Order: Social Class, Social Reproduction, Cultural Capital (7) Privilege, Inclusion and Opportunity: Social Class, Social Reproduction, Cultural Capital I Tuesday, Sept 25 Read: -Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis. 1976,1977. "Education and Personal Development: The Long Shadow of Work." Pp. 125-150 in Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books. -Lareau, A. 2000. “Why Does Social Class Influence Parent Involvement in Schooling?” Pp. 97-120 in Home Advantage, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield (8) Privilege, Inclusion and Opportunity: Social Class, Social Reproduction & Cultural Capital II Friday, Sept 28 Sociology of Education 104 Read: -Bourdieu, Pierre. 1973. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction.” Pp. 473-486 in Karabel, J. & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and Ideology in Education. New York: Oxford University. -Granfield, Robert. 2008. “Making it By Faking It: Working-Class Students in an Elite Academic Environment.” Pp. 114-127 in Ferguson, Susan. Mapping the Social Landscape: Readings in Sociology 7. New York: McGraw-Hill. WEEK 5: Privilege, Inclusion and Opportunity in Education II: The Tracking Debate, Language and Immigration (9) On Schooling and the Social Order II: The Tracking Debate Tuesday Oct 2 Read: -Oakes, Jeannie. 1985. “Tracking.” Pp. 1-13 in Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press. -Hallinan, Maureen T. 1994. “Tracking: From Theory to Practice.” Sociology of Education. 67: 78-90. -Oakes, Jeannie. 1994. “More than Misapplied Technology: A Normative and Political Response to Hallinan on Tracking.” Sociology of Education. 67: 84-91. (10) Privilege, Inclusion, Opportunity: Language, Immigration, Cultural Legacy Friday Oct 5 Read: -De La Luz Reyes, Maria. 1992. “Challenging Venerable Assumptions: Literacy Instruction for Linguistically Different Students.” Harvard Educational Review 64(4): 427-266. Listen: -AUDIO SEGMENT: Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo and Carola. “Immigrant Children in America.” February 21, 2010 on On Point. National Public Radio. http://onpoint.wbur.org/2008/02/21/immigrant-children-inamerica . SECOND PAPER DUE @ NOON: For Topics see Latte WEEK 6: Privilege, Inclusion and Opportunity in Education III : Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religion, Disability (11) Privilege, Inclusion, Opportunity: Gender, Sexual Orientation Friday Oct 12 Read: -Marvin Hoffman. 1993. “Teaching ‘Torch Song: Gay Literature in the Classroom.” The English Journal. 82(5): 55-58. Read: “Family forced out of Lexington, MA” ALSO read the “Opposition” segment of Wikipedia regarding the book King & King. Sociology of Education 104 -Mead, Sara. 2006. “The Evidence Suggests Otherwise: The Truth About Boys and Girls”(Pamphlet) Washington, DC: Education Sector. (You do not need to remember every detail, but try to get a sense of the main points) -“How Schools Shortchange Girls” – the AAUW Report pp. 35-54. OPTIONAL: -Webpage of Project 10East, a program for LGBT support in high schools. http://www.project10east.org/about/main.php. (About schools dealing with gay and lesbian families) -Lipkin, A. 1999. “Gay and Lesbian Families.” Pp. 218-229 in Understanding Homosexuality: Changing Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. (12) Privilege, Inclusion and Opportunity: Religion & Disability-Federal Regulations in Education Tuesday, Oct 16 Read: -Artiles, Alfredo J. 2003. “Special Education’s Changing Identity: Paradoxes and Dilemmas in View of Culture and Space.” Harvard Educational Review, Summer 73: 164-202. (Focus on p. 164 to the top of 179.) -Nord, W. A. & Haynes, C. C. 1998. Pp. 1-33 in Taking Religion Seriously Across the Curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. OPTIONAL: “Why Education in Public Schools Should Include Religious Ideals” Ruyter & Merry. http://uva.academia.edu/MichaelMerry/Papers/833104/Why_education_in_public_schoo ls_should_include_religious_ideals 2008 WEEK 7: Busing and Racial Desegregation of Boston’s Schools (13) Case Study: Separate but Unequal? Busing and School Desegregation in Boston Friday, Oct 19 Read: -Willie, Charles Vert. 1983. “School Desegregation and Public Policy: The Boston Experience” pp. 163-174 in Race, Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: A Theoretical Analysis of Their Interrelationship. Bayside, NY: General Hall. Read: Klugar, Richard. 1975. “Together Let Us Sweetly Live” pp. 3-26 in Simple Justice Vintage Books: New York. OPTIONAL: Goldsmith, Pat Rubio. 2009. “Schools or Neighborhoods or Both? Race and Segregation and Educational Attainment.” Social Forces 84(4):1913-1920. Video in class on busing from “The Keys to the Kingdom: 1974-1980” in Eyes on the Prize 1990, 2006. Blackside/PBS Productions. (14) Separate but Unequal? What Now? Critical Race Theory and Education Sociology of Education 104 Tues Oct 16 Read: -Dixson, Adrienne and Celia Rousseau. 2006. “And We Are Still Not Saved: Critical Race Theory in Education Ten Years Later.” Pp. 31-56 in Critical Race Theory in Education: All God’s Children Got a Song. Dixson, Adrienne and Celia Rousseau, eds. New York: Routledge. Read: G. Ladson-Billings & Tate, W. “Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education” pp. 1-29 in in Critical Race Theory in Education: All God’s Children Got a Song. Dixson, Adrienne and Celia Rousseau, eds. New York: Routledge. Note: In Latte, both these articles are scanned into one entry. -Vasnis, James. 2010. “Area School Segregation Called Rife.” The Boston Globe, September 20. P. B-1. OPTIONAL: -The JBHE Foundation. 2006/2007. “The Expanding Racial Gap on the SATII Tests.” The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 54:30-32. PART 3: TEACHING AND AUTHORITY IN EDUCATION WEEK 8: Authority Patterns in Schools, Racial Exclusion, Cultural Dissonance (15) Authority Patterns in Schools: Racial-Ethnic Exclusion Friday Oct 19 Read: -Szasz, Margaret Connell. 2005. “I Knew How to Be Moderate. And I Knew How to Obey”: The Commonality of American Indian Boarding School Experiences, 1750s1920s. American Indian Culture and Research Journal. 29(4):75-94. -Miller, Kara. 2010. “Do Colleges Redline Asian-Americans?” The Boston Globe. February 8. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/201 0/02/08/do_colleges_redline_asian_americans/ . (16) Authority Patterns in Schools, Cultural Dissonance Between Students and Teachers Tues Oct 23 Read: -Delpit, Lisa. 2006. "The Silenced Dialogue.” Pp. 5-9, 21-27 in Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom New York: New Press, W. W. Norton. -Ballenger, Cynthia. 1992. "Because You Like Us: The Language of Control." Harvard Education Review, Summer 1992, 62(2): 199-208. WEEK 9: Transmission of Norms and Values: What Gets Taught in School and Who Decides? PART I (17) Perspectives on the Transmission of Culture and Values: The Culture of the School Sociology of Education 104 Friday Oct 26 Read: - Lightfoot, Sara Lawrence.1983. "St. Paul's School: Certainty, Privilege and the Imprint of History" and "George Washington Carver High School: Charismatic Leadership: Building Bridges to a Wider World." Pp. 221-245, 29-55 in The Good High School: Portraits of Character and Culture. New York: Basic Books. (18) The Textbook Industry & Curricular Standards Debates Tuesday, Oct 30 Read: -Spring, J. 1996. Chapter 10, “The Politics of Curriculum, Instruction, and Textbooks.” Pp. 230-254 in American Education. New York: McGraw-Hill -Eisner, E. 1997. “Who Decides What Schools Should Teach.” Pp. 337- 341 in D.J. Flinders & S.J. Thorton (Eds.) Curriculum Studies Reader. New York, NY: Routledge. -Ravitch, Diane. “Education after the Culture Wars.” 2002. Pp. 5-21 in Daedalus MIT Press/American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 131(1):5-21. OR -Ravitch, Diane. 2002. “Diversity, Tragedy and the Schools” The Brookings Review 20(1):2-3. Paper 3 Due @ NOON: For Topics see LATTE WEEK10: Transmission of Norms and Values: What Gets Taught in School and Who Decides? PART II (19) The Panopticon: Are Schools Going Too Far? Friday Nov. 2 Read: -Foucault, Michel. 1979. “The Means of Correct Training.” Pp. 170-228 in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books. -Vander Schee, Carolyn. 2009. “Fruit, Vegetables, Fatness and Foucault: Governing Students and their Families Through School Health Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (5): 557-574. -Recent Articles on current debates in education (Articles to be selected from current news sources during the semester. Likely to relate to issues such as regulating school lunches, sex education, etc. (20) Standardization Debate/Market Approaches to Education Reform Tues Nov 6 Read: -Ravitch, Diane. 2010. “The Trouble with Accountability. Pp. 149-167 in The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education New York: Basic Books. OPTIONAL: Borman, Kathryn M. and Bridget A. Cotner. 2008. “No Child Left Behind: The Federal Government Gets Serious about Accountability.” Pp. 245-250 in Schools Sociology of Education 104 and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education. 3rd ed. Ballantine, Jeanne H. and Joan Z. Spade, eds. Los Angeles, CA: Pine Forge Press. OPTIONAL: -Renzulli, Linda A. and Vincent Roscigno. “Charter Schools and the Public Good.” Pp. 363-369 in Ballantine, Jeanne H. and Joan Z. Spade, eds. 2008. Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Pine Forge Press WEEK 11: What Gets Taught in School? Who Decides? PART III (21) Perspectives on the Transmission of Culture and Values: Power and Authority Friday, Nov 9 Read: -Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner. 1969. "Crap Detecting" and "The Medium is the Message, Of Course" Pp. xi-xv, 1-25 in Teaching as a Subversive Activity. New York: Dell. - Illich, Ivan, 1970. “Why We Must Disestablish School” Pp. 529-536 in Deschooling Society. New York: Harper and Row. OPTIONAL: in Illych (above) “Phenomenology of School” Pp. 37-48. (22)Homeschooling Tuesday Nov 13 Read: “Does Homeschooling Pose a threat to Public Education?” http://www.examiner.com/article/does-homeschooling-pose-a-threat-to-public-education Read: “Why Are Pulbic School Proponents So Afraid of Homeschool Kids?” http://buehlereducation.com/homeschool/indianasportsbill/ WEEK 12: Power & Authority, Classroom Roles & Relationships (23) “Race to Nowhere” – Film we’ll watch in class Friday Nov 16 (24) Interactions Between Students, Student Culture Friday, Nov 30 Read: -Milner, Murray Jr. 2006. “Fitting In, Standing Out and Keeping Up.” Pp. 39-60 in Freaks, Geeks and Cool Kids: American Teenagers, Schools and the Culture of Consumption. New York: Routledge. Skim: -Olweus, Dan. 1993. Bullying At School. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. (Read pp. 1-39). WEEK 13: Interpersonal Relationships in Education: Relationships Between Teachers, Students & Parents (25) Between Teachers and Students Tuesday Dec 4 Sociology of Education 104 Read: - Gracey, Harry L. 2008. “Learning the student role: Kindergarten as academic boot camp.” Pp. 131-136 in Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education (3nd ed.). J.H. Ballantine & J.Z. Spade, editors. New York: Thomson Wardsworth. Read: - Lampert, Magdeline. 1987. “How Do Teachers Manage to Teach" Pp. 106-123 in Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (26) Between Parents and Teachers Friday, Dec 7 Read: -Lawrence-Lightfoot, Sara. 2003. Introduction and “Natural Enemies.” Pp. xiii-xxx, 42-75 in The Essential Conversation: What Parents and Teachers Can Learn from Each Other. New York: Random House. Optional: -Flanagan, Caitlin. “Cultivating Failure” 2010. Atlantic Magazine http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/01/cultivatingfailure/ 7819/3/. WEEK 14: IDEAS ON THE GROUND: Schools and Communities, Looking at Teachers in Action (27) Between Communities and Schools Tuesday Dec 11 Read: (Skim) Schutz, A. 2006. “Home is a Prison in the Global City: The Tragic Failure of School-Based Community Engagement Strategies Review of Educational Research, 76(4): 690-743. Listen: -Audio segment :The Kitchen Sisters. “For Traveler Women in Ireland, Life is Changing” April 29, 2010 on Morning Edition . National Public Radio.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125907642 OPTIONAL: -Epstein, Joyce L. 1995. “School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the Children We Share.” Phi Delta Kappan, 76: 701-712 Film: Guggenheim, Davis. 2004. The First Year: Five Teachers. 180 Days. Our Children’s Future. New Video Group. Summary of due dates: 3 Five- to Six-PAGE PAPERS Due at the start of class on the following dates: Paper 1: Tuesday, September 11th Paper 2: Friday, October 5th Paper 3: Tuesday, October 30th Final due: Friday, December 14th @ NOON (since there is no class, please deliver to my office – Rabb 107)