1920s/30s Culminating Activity – Group Radio Show Evaluation
Student Name: _______________________________________________
Option 1: Group Radio Show
Criteria
Grade
Level 0
49% or Below
(-5)
Level 1
50% - 55%
(5 – 5.5)
Level 2
60% -65%
(6 – 6.5)
Level 3
70% - 75%
(7-7.5)
Level 4
80%-100%
(8-10)
Quality of
Information/
Content
(Knowledge)
Individual Mark
based on portion
contributed.
Organization/
Interpretation and
Analysis
(Thinking)
Individual Mark
based on portion
contributed.
Did not meet
expectations.
Limited knowledge of
20s/30s society
demonstrated through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates limited
personal insights and
historical accuracy.
Satisfactory
knowledge of 20s/30s
society demonstrated
through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates
satisfactory personal
insights and historical
accuracy.
Considerable
knowledge of 20s/30s
society demonstrated
through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates
considerable
personal insights and
historical accuracy.
Superior knowledge
of 20s/30s society
demonstrated through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates
exceptional personal
insights and historical
accuracy.
Did not meet
expectations.
Poor sense of
audience and
purpose. Little
evidence of careful
planning and
organization. Limited
ability to use critical
thinking skills to
select relevant
criteria to the 20s/30s
topic.
Fair sense of audience
and purpose. Some
evidence of careful
planning and
organization.
Satisfactory ability to
use critical thinking
skills to select
relevant criteria to the
20s/30s topic
Good sense of
audience and
purpose.
Considerable
evidence of careful
planning and
organization. Good
ability to use critical
thinking skills to
select relevant
criteria to the 20s/30s
topic
Excellent sense of
audience and
purpose. Much
evidence of careful
planning and
organization.
Superior ability to use
critical thinking skills
to select relevant
criteria to the 20s/30s
topic
Did not meet
expectations.
Poor use of “Extras” to
enhance presentation
(i.e. music, video clips,
sound effects)
Presentation limited in
authenticity of program.
Poor Presentation skills
(voice, intonation, lack of
energy). Limited ability
to synthesize information
on handout.
Some use of “Extras” to
enhance presentation
(i.e. music, video clips,
sound effects)
Presentation somewhat
authentic. Satisfactory
Presentation skills (voice,
intonation, lack of
energy).
Satisfactory ability to
synthesize information on
handout.
Good use of “Extras” to
enhance presentation
(i.e. music, video clips,
sound effects)
Presentation
considerably authentic.
Good Presentation skills
(voice, intonation, lack of
energy).
Good ability to
synthesize information on
handout.
Exceptional use of
“Extras” to enhance
presentation (i.e. music,
video clips, sound
effects)
Presentation extremely
authentic. Superior
Presentation skills (voice,
intonation, lack of
energy).
Exceptional ability to
synthesize information on
handout.
Creativity and Audio
Presentation
(Communication)
Group member
contributed minimally
to overall effort.
Group member
somewhat contributed
to overall effort.
Group member
contributed to overall
effort.
Group member
contributed
significantly to overall
effort.
GROUP MARK – ALL
MEMBERS IN THE GROUP
WILL RECEIVE THE SAME
MARK BASED ON FINAL
PRESENTATION AND
PROGRAM SYNTHESIS.
Peer Evaluation
(Application)
_____ + _____ + _____ +
_____ + _____ + _____ =
_____ / ______ = _____
See Criteria on Individual
Peer Evaluation Sheet.
Did not meet
expectations.
Mark
/10
/10
/10
/10
1920s/30s Culminating Activity – Group Newspaper Evaluation
Student Name: _______________________________________________
Option 1: Group Newspaper
Criteria
Grade
Level 0
49% or Below
(-5)
Level 1
50% - 55%
(5 – 5.5)
Level 2
60% -65%
(6 – 6.5)
Level 3
70% - 75%
(7-7.5)
Level 4
80%-100%
(8-10)
Quality of
Information/Content
(Knowledge)
Individual Mark
based on Articles/Ads
contributed.
Did not meet
expectations.
Limited knowledge of
20s/30s society
demonstrated through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates limited
personal insights and
historical accuracy.
Satisfactory
knowledge of 20s/30s
society demonstrated
through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates
satisfactory personal
insights and historical
accuracy.
Fair sense of audience
and purpose. Some
evidence of careful
planning and
organization.
Satisfactory use of
language conventions
in terms of spelling
and grammar.
Considerable
knowledge of 20s/30s
society demonstrated
through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates
considerable
personal insights and
historical accuracy.
Good sense of
audience and
purpose.
Considerable
evidence of careful
planning and
organization. Proper
use of language
conventions in terms
of spelling and
grammar.
Superior knowledge
of 20s/30s society
demonstrated through
understanding of
topic chosen.
Demonstrates
exceptional personal
insights and historical
accuracy.
Organization/
Mechanics
(Thinking)
Individual Mark
based on Articles/Ads
contributed.
Did not meet
expectations.
Poor sense of
audience and
purpose. Little
evidence of careful
planning and
organization.
Improper use of
language conventions
in terms of spelling
and grammar.
Did not meet
expectations.
Incorporates a
limited degree of
style and imagination
to create a simple
undeveloped
newspaper layout.
Ideas are presented
with limited degree of
understanding.
Displays limited use
of visual strategies.
Incorporates some
imagination and style
to create a newspaper
layout. Ideas are
presented with some
degree of
understanding.
Displays adequate
use of visual
strategies.
Incorporates a degree
of style and
imagination to
develop a newspaper
layout with
complexity. Ideas are
presented with a
considerable degree
of understanding.
Displays effective use
of visual strategies.
Incorporates a high
degree of style and
imagination.
Develops ideas fully
to reflect a deep
understanding.
Displays highly
effective use of visual
strategies,
incorporating
imaginative elements.
Aesthetics and Visual
Presentation
(Communication)
Did not meet
expectations.
Group member
contributed minimally
to overall effort.
Group member
somewhat contributed
to overall effort.
Group member
contributed to overall
effort.
Group member
contributed
significantly to overall
effort.
GROUP MARK – ALL
MEMBERS IN THE GROUP
WILL RECEIVE THE SAME
MARK BASED ON FINAL
PRODUCT.
Peer Evaluation
(Application)
_____ + _____ + _____ +
_____ + _____ + _____ =
_____ / ______ = _____
See Criteria on Individual
Peer Evaluation Sheet.
Excellent sense of
audience and
purpose. Much
evidence of careful
planning and
organization.
Superior use of
language conventions
in terms of spelling
and grammar.
Mark
/10
/10
/10
/10
1920s/30s Culminating Activity Group Self Evaluation (Application) – GROUP RADIO SHOW/NEWSPAPER (Circle One)
Instructions: Write each group members name down in the corresponding box on the graph. Assign a mark from 0-5 for each criterion. An average of all the group
members marks will be used to establish a mark for this section. Include yourself in the marking and give yourself a mark from 0-5 according to each criterion. Make
sure to write comments on the back of the sheet using the questions as a guide. Please be thorough with your assessments and be genuine with your comments.
Group Members:
#1) ________________________________________
#2) ________________________________________
#3) ________________________________________
#4) ________________________________________
#5) ________________________________________
#6) ________________________________________
The marks you assign and your comments are completely
Anonymous and will not be revealed to anyone else.
Criteria
Answer the following Questions on the back of this sheet:
1) What was your group particularly effective at doing?
2) What did I like about this project?
3) What have I learned?
4) WHO DID NOT PULL THEIR OWN WEIGHT ON THIS
PROJECT? PLEASE LIST EXAMPLES…
5) Who did more than their fair share of the work on this
project? Please list examples…
Mark Breakdown: 5 = Always
4 = Usually
3 = Sometimes
1 = Never
0 = Did not contribute/submit/attend for section
#1
1)
Contributed ideas and suggestions to the group and brainstormed together.
2)
Shared ideas with the group and encouraged one another to be involved.
3)
Worked cooperatively with one another.
4)
Used time wisely and effectively. Stayed on task.
5)
Listened to the ideas of all the group members and were respectful to each other.
6)
Helped to make our decision and stated exactly what we were going to do.
7)
Contributed materials to the final product.
8)
Solved problems in a positive way.
9)
Was patient when explaining difficult material to members of our group.
2 = Rarely
Assign a Mark of 1-5 based on the Criteria.
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
10) Shared the workload among all members of the group. Took responsibility for
completing work.
Total (add all marks together to get a mark out of 50):
/50
/50
/50
/50
/50
/50
Your mark for the APPLICATION section will be determined by finding the average mark of what your peers assigned you , then dividing that mark
by 5 to get a mark out of 10. Class time will be given to complete this evaluation. Do not complete ahead of time.