Professional Education Unit Program Assessment Plan – Advanced Preparation

advertisement
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 1
Professional Education Unit
Program Assessment Plan – Advanced Preparation
Name of Preparation Program: Alternative Certification - Instructional Leader - School
Principal (All Grades)
Date Completed: February 15, 2009
Date Submitted: February 15, 2009
Submitted By:
Dr. Gayle Ecton
Dr. Christopher R. Wagner
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 2
WKU PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT WIDE CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT MATRIX - ADVANCED PREPARATION
Component 2:
Course Based Assessment
Data
REQS
Critical Performances
Component 3:
Clinical Experiences Data
Component 5:
Exit and Follow Up Data
Exit
Survey
Alumni
Survey
Employer
Survey
Content Knowledge
X
X
X
X
X
Designs/Plans
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Implements/Manages
Assessment/Evaluation
Technology
Reflection
Collaboration
Professional Development
Leadership
Dispositions
Field Experiences & Clinical
Practice
Diversity
Aligned to Kentucky Teacher and
Learned Society Standards
Capstone Assessment
Learning Climate
Early Clinical
Experiences
Component 4:
Culminating Assessment
Data
Final Clinical
Experience/Evaluation
Various Data Required by Graduate Studies and/or Program
Conceptual Framework
Standards/Values
Component 1:
Admission Data
X
X
X
X
X
X
Impacts P-12 Student Learning
DATA MAINTAINED BY:
X
OTS
Faculty
CEBS ACCSYS
CEBS ACCSYS
DATA REPORTING CYCLE:
Semester
DATA REVIEWED BY:
Program
DATA HOUSED IN:
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Program
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Yearly
Biannually
Faculty/Programs/PEC
Program
Program
Program/Dean
Program
Program
Program
1: Program
2: Admission to Culminating Assessment
Admission
*Each advanced program must identify forms or associated questions/rubric items for each X.
Transition Points:
X
(May be part of TP 2
or 3)
3: Program Exit
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 3
How Data Fit and Are Used Within the Electronic Accountability System
DEMOGRAPHICS
WKU Professional Education Unit Electronic Accountability System Components
COMPONENT 3
COMPONENT 1
COMPONENT 2
Admission Data
Electronic
Portfolio System
Early Clinical
Experiences
Final Clinical
Experience
Culminating
Assessment
Data
Certification &
Praxis
Follow Up
Surveys
INITIAL
PREPARATION
Data entered by
Office of Teacher
Services after
Student
Orientation
Course Based
Critical
Performances
uploaded by
candidates and
scored by
faculty
Data entered by
Curriculum &
Instruction staff
after candidates
submit
Fieldwork
Summary Form
Data entered by
Office of
Teacher
Services
Teacher Work
Sample Scores
entered
electronically by
faculty & Ed
Technology
Data entered by
Office of Teacher
Services
Electronic
survey data
merged into
Accountability
System
ADVANCED
PREPARATION
Data entered by
Office of Teacher
Services after
Graduate
Admission
Course Based
Critical
Performances
uploaded by
candidates and
scored by
faculty
Data currently
housed by each
program
Course Based
Critical
Performances
uploaded by
candidates and
scored by
faculty
Data entered by
Office of Teacher
Services
Data currently
housed by each
program
TRANSITION
POINTS
1: Program
Admission
Data currently
housed by each
program
2: Admission to Culminating Assessment and/or
Final Clinical Experience
*Italics indicates data currently housed elsewhere that will be added to Accountability System in the future.
(Overlap in some
AP Programs)
COMPONENT 4
REPORTS
3: Program Exit
COMPONENT 5
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 4
Courses
Critical Performance Assessment Alignment Matrix (Current: Fall 2008)
Advanced Preparation Professional Education Program Critical Performance Assessments
(Instructional Leader - School Principal (All Grades)
Learned Society Standards (ISLLC)
I
II
III
IV
V
Visionary Leader
EDFN 500
PSY
510/511/519
EDFN 576
EDAD 585
EDAD 588
EDAD 594
EDAD 597
EDAD 677
EDAD 682
EDAD 683
EDAD 684
EDAD 690
Alignment
Curricular Leader
Managerial Leader
Collaborative Leader
Ethical Leader
VI
Political Leader
School. Budget Analysis
Professional Growth Plan
School Policy Analysis
Sch. Com. Partnership Plan
Prioritize Curriculum.
Ethics Case Study
7,9
1,2,3,5
4,6
8
Kentucky Teacher Standards
10
10
*CLARIFICATION: This matrix for the Instructional Leadership – School Principal All Grades has been included as part of this program assessment as students enrolled in
other certification programs will complete some of these experiences since some of the same courses identified in the matrix are also required for other certifications. There are incourse experiences and assessments in all courses required for other certifications that address standards, however, some of the formal data collection that is done for the school
principal program has not been developed and utilized in the other certification areas. The process of developing and using this new approach to formal data collection for the
existing principal program has helped the department to identify issues that need to be fixed as part of the redesign process. Upon completing the new state requirements to
redesign the principal preparation program, the department will then redesign all other certification programs building on the new principal program to have the same common core
of experiences, assessments, and data collection points for all students. In addition, appropriate formal experiences and assessments will also be developed for the certificationspecific courses in other certifications.
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 5
Delineation of Unit/Program Transition Points – Advanced Preparation (Draft)
Instructional Leadership – School Principal (All Grades)
Transition Point 1: Admission to Graduate Studies and Research
Data Reviewed
Minimal Criteria for Admission
Review
Cycle
Reviewed By
Unit Level Data:
 Admission Application
 Undergraduate Degree
 GAP Score (UG GPA x GRE)
 Teaching Certificate




Completion of application
Each
Evidence of degree
Month
Gap Score 2200+
Evidence of certificate
Transition Point 2: Admission to Department: Instructional Leadership –
School Principal (All Grades)
Review
Data Reviewed
Minimal Criteria for Admission
Cycle
 Department Admission Application
 Written Personal Statement
 Three Professional Recommendations







Completion of application
Completion of statement
Satisfactory recommendations
Approval by department
Candidate signature on program
Transition Point 3: Program Exit
Data Reviewed
 GPA
 Field Experiences
 Dispositions
 Critical Performances
 Portfolio
 Transcript
Minimal Criteria for Exit




3.0+ GPA
Satisfactory completion of field work
All dispositions average “At Standard”
Satisfactory completion of all Critical
Performances
 Satisfactory performance on all ISLLC
standards
 Completion of all required courses for credit
Graduate
Studies
Reviewed By
Department
Faculty
Each
Term
Review
Cycle
Office of
Teacher
Services
Reviewed By
Department
Faculty
Each
Term
Office of
Teacher
Services
Remediation Opportunities:
TP 1: Candidates who do not qualify for the MAE, may choose Rank II or I options.
TP 2: Candidates may request additional instruction from faculty and may resubmit Critical Performances in
order to improve their scores.
TP 3: Candidates may request additional instruction from faculty and may resubmit…
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 6
Other Key Data Collection Matrix
Preparation Program: Instructional Leadership - School Principal (All Grades) (Advanced Preparation)
Program Level Data Collection Points (Courses)
CF Values
Unit-Wide Assessment
1
2
Dispositions
Dispositions Form
EDAD 677
EDAD 682
Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Early Clinical Experience Summary Information
EDAD 677
EDAD 682
Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Final Clinical Experience Summary Information
EDAD 690
ISLLC/Impacts P-12 Educational
Leaders
Capstone Assessment
EDAD 690
ISLLC/Dispositions
Final Clinical Experience Evaluation
EDAD 690
ISLLC Standards
Exit Survey
EDAD 690
Diversity*
Early/Final Clinical Experience Summary Information
EDAD 594
EDAD 677
3
4
5
EDAD
683
EDAD
683
EDAD
682
*Please indicate the course or experience your program uses to guarantee that all candidates work with diverse students.
*CLARIFICATION: This matrix for the Instructional Leadership – School Principal All Grades has been included as part of this program
assessment as students enrolled in other certification programs will complete some of these experiences since some of the same courses identified in
the matrix are also required for other certifications. There are in-course experiences and assessments in all courses required for other certifications
that address standards, however, some of the formal data collection that is done for the school principal program has not been developed and utilized
in the other certification areas. The process of developing and using this new approach to formal data collection for the existing principal program
has helped the department to identify issues that need to be fixed as part of the redesign process. Upon completing the new state requirements to
redesign the principal preparation program, the department will then redesign all other certification programs building on the new principal program
to have the same common core of experiences, assessments, and data collection points for all students. In addition, appropriate formal experiences
and assessments will also be developed for the certification-specific courses in other certifications.
WKU Principal (Alt Cert) Page 7
Annual Program Assessment Report Outline (Due September 15)
Academic Year __________
1. Present your continuous assessment results in the following areas:
a. Admission Data
b. Course Based Assessment Data
c. Clinical Experiences Data – Be sure to include dispositions assessment results,
P-12 student diversity statistics, and results of efforts to ensure all candidates
work with diverse students.
d. Culminating Assessment Data – Be sure to include impact on P-12 student
learning data.
e. Exit and Follow Up Data
2. Summarize the above results by Kentucky Teacher (Initial Programs) OR Program
Standards (Advanced Programs) AND other key Conceptual Framework values. Be sure
to describe what the results tell you about your candidates’ progress toward/proficiency
on each standard/CF value.
3. Summarize your efforts to report and disseminate your results (Unit/College-wide
meetings, department/program level meetings, written reports, presentations, etc.).
4. Summarize key discussions and/or decisions made based on assessment results:
a. Describe any assessment or data collection changes you have made/will make
based on your assessment results.
b. Describe any program curriculum or experience changes you have made/will
make based on your assessment results.
c. Describe any decisions about group/individual student progress you have
made/will make based on your assessment results.
Download