Vision 20/20 11/5/14 Committee Q&A Notes Neighborhood v. grade level concept v. single building? Bradley Road is on all options. I thought that was not in the discussion with its environmental problems. o City put in culvert to help drain it out from year to year. Frees up 25 good acres of land to use. Numbers of students attending PK-4 would mean more students than the high school. Would Bradley Road be able to accommodate the traffic? o Relying on the experts. General rule of thumb is 10 acres for an elementary building with an additional acre for every 100 kids. Bradley Road would cover it. We have 3 different access points onto that property. o Any PK-4 building would be two main structures. With different concepts, is there a chance we may have vacant school buildings? Wouldn’t that make it open to charter schools? o There are some laws that deal with it – they have to exist in our boundaries already. It can’t be an outside school coming in. if we’re not using some of the resources we own, do they become viable opportunities for city or other partnerships? Nothing is written in stone. This is a fluid process. Bradley Road is our most attractive asset to the city and others. Do we have more current survey information about the population? This will tie into overall good will the community feels toward the schools. Coverage of our neighborhood schools reveals support for operating levies. Has there been thought to catering this to create more good will to avoid continual ballot issues? o We need to do this. These buildings are community buildings. We have to get the best read of the community to serve their needs. There will be more 20/20 meetings, more community updates. We need to communicate. We have non-scientific feedback survey going on now. Demographics on east end are older, long-time generations. Most younger families on the west end. Look at the real estate values. Real estate values don’t do well with one elementary building. What about socialization of our kids? Most kids in our area went to Dover. My kids are surrounded by kids they don’t go to school with. o That’s a big part of the Citizen Advisory Committee’s task. They are expecting at the next Board meeting to give some updates. This has never been an easy topic for any community. It’s a challenging topic, one where we need a lot of input and hear the people out and let voices be heard. We know there are real benefits in neighborhood schools, and benefits in consistency in curriculum and instruction with grade-level configuration. Is there research about what’s better for the kids? I think neighborhood schools have a lot of developmental advantages, but I don’t know. o At our next meeting we should have some of that feedback from the CAC. One of the IB visitors was impressed with the 4th graders helping kindergartners. On the other end you can focus your culture more age appropriately in a building. Doubt there will be one answer. Depends on the feedback from this community. Bradley Road – does the city share a property line? o Golf course is a back property line. I would like to see the schools reach out to the city to work cooperatively to maximize our taxpayer dollars. I came back to Westlake because I believe in the schools. o We have reached out to additional city officials to be a part of the process. We’ll continue to do that and have ongoing conversations. Gyms and cafeterias are crowded. One large school doesn’t serve us well. o There are a variety of things you can do. We need to look at it as what’s best for our students. Is there a core unit that shows cost efficient number of students to have in a physical plant? o Ohio has the Ohio School Facilities Commission that has specific guidelines that set the framework from which everyone works from. How many gymnasiums, cafeterias, music rooms, art rooms would be needed to accommodate all of our elementary students? Can we get data on the pros & cons of different configurations for kids? Assets/Partnership Opportunities? Empty buildings have to be offered to any community/charter school within Westlake. There is only one on the Ohio Department of Education website. They have 60 days to indicate interest. You have to offer at market value and have an appraisal. If no interest can do an auction or offer to another public entity. Could you raze the facility and use it for recreational opportunities? o Yes. Years ago the city bought the old Kmart property to use as athletic fields. Wouldn’t the sale of Bradley Road exceed the value of going to Hilliard or another school and building? o If the concept does not include using Bradley Road, could consider using funds toward another project. Don’t give assets up until you know you don’t need them. What about eliminating Dover? o We think that gives us ways to address traffic issues and ease up Bassett traffic. What is our obligation to upgrade unused buildings? Millage Drop? A lot of other things came onto tax bills with the bond issue. With this drop, are we able to time it when there won’t be additional things on the ballot? o It’s hard to predict when other entities will be on the ballot. You try to monitor that. We try to avoid being on when others are on. We have to do what’s best for kids. We need to do what pumps out the best educational product. If you pick the most educationally sound option, the community will buy into it. Teachers want to get together more often and collaborate. Right now it’s a challenge. Operating before Phase II? It’s a crapshoot no matter how you do it. If you do the operating levy before Phase II, if it’s voted for, Phase II will never pass. If you do it together, one might drag the other down – or not. o We’ve been able to stretch our financial issues. We’re getting to a point where we can’t do that. Ballot fatigue is a real issue. How long would a bond and PI last from an operating perspective? o Bond would address building new facilities. If we continue to operate the way we are, it would extend our operating budget. Depends on how much you get with a PI levy. Opposition says the schools are sitting on significant reserves. You don’t want to be irresponsible and operate out of your reserves. Investing those reserves in productive capital as part of Phase II would allow building out what you wanted and build more PI into that drawback. o Spending down cash reserves to facilities, we’ve been doing that and eliminating staff and programs. We don’t have an abundance of cash reserves. There is value to the packaging and making sure the message is there. We are in tough times and doing everything we can to be responsible with tax dollars. We are not flush with cash. Comments 1. We need to do a thorough job of detailing the benefits of grade-level configured schools. Concurrently, you must address the logistics of managing a large population of young children. Parents want specifics, such as reassurances that lunch times won’t start at 10:30am or go to 1:30pm to accommodate the population. Drop off and pick-ups need to be thought out since staff is very careful about making sure students are picked up by a designated parent/guardian. That can be a very big concern for parents if the campus has 1,400 students. I think two campuses may help with these kinds of logistics, even on one site. 2. We exist for one word = learning. Our planning for everything from instruction to facilities should be based upon the goal of helping kids learn. This means giving priority to keeping teachers of the same grade level in the same building for teaming and planning purposes. We also seek to minimize transitions from building to building when possible. 3. Bradley Road should not be built. Shift the new buildings to Holly Lane or Hilliard. 4. Traditionally, the city government has not supported the schools – plans there? 5. We need concise communications with the community that considers their perspectives. We know but do they believe it? 6. The plan that I favor is the single elementary building on one site. This limits the number of transitions students will have to make between buildings. It also allows for sharing of staff resources. It will also allow staff to collaborate and better meet the needs of students by sharing resources, personnel and ideas. My second choice would be the neighborhood schools. This builds community. It makes the school the center of a neighborhood. It will also limit the number of student transitions between buildings. 7. Keep the plan of three neighborhood schools as an option. Research what concept is most educationally sound. 8. What about visiting Avon’s 4-5, 6-7 combination school? See how they did it.