~~

advertisement

1119 M3in Administr3tion Building

College Park, Maryland 20742-5031

301.405.5252 TEL 301.405.8195 FAX

OFFICE OF THE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST

July 13,2012

MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM:

Darryll Pines

Dean, A. James Clark School of Engineering

Elizabeth Beise

~~

Associate Provost for Academic Planning and Programs

SUBJECT: Proposal to Modify the Curriculum of the B.S. in Fire Protection Engineering

(PCC log no. 11052)

At its meeting on April 6, 2012, the Senate Committee on Programs, Curricula, and

Courses approved your proposal to modify the Bachelor of Science in Fire Protection

Engineering. A copy of the approved proposal is attached.

The change is effective Fall 2012. The School should ensure that the change is fully described in the Undergraduate Catalog and in all relevant descriptive materials, including the program's four-year plan (contact Lisa Kiely at lkiely@umd.edu for more information), and that all advisors are informed.

MDC/

Enclosure cc: David Salness, Chair, Senate PCC Committee

Sarah Bauder, Office of Student Financial Aid

Reka Montfort, University Senate

Erin Howard, Office of Information Technology

Donna Williams, Institutional Research & Planning

Anne Turkos, University Archives

Linda Yokoi, Office of the Registrar

Robert Gaines, Undergraduate Studies

William Fourney, A. James Clark School of Engineering

Jim Milke, Fire Protection Engineering

;

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK

PROGRAM/CURRICULUMIUNIT PROPOSAL

• Please email the rest of the proposal as an MSWord attachment to pcc-submissions(oJumd.edu.

IPCCLOGNO.

Please submit the signed fonn to the Office of the Associate Provost for Academic Planning and Programs, 1119 Main Administration Building, Campus.

11 052

College/School:

Please also add College/School Unit Code-First 8 digits: 01203200

Unit Codes can befound at: https://hypprod.umd.edulHtml Reports/units.htm

DepartmentlProgram:

Please also add Department/Program Unit Code-Last 7 digits: 1321301

Type of Action (choose one):

X Curriculum change (including informal specializations) 0 New academic degree/award program o

Renaming ofprogram or formal Area ofConcentration 0 New Professional Studies award iteration o

Addition/deletion offormal Area ofConcentration 0 New Minor o

Suspend/delete program 0 Other

Italics indicate that the proposed program action must be presented to the full University Senate for consideration.

Summary of Proposed Action:

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED

=======~===========================================================================

APPROVAL SIGNATURES Please print name, sign, and date. Use additional lines for multi-unit programs.

1. Department

Commi~fhair

_ _

='---'-'-=..:....:...:..::~=-----T~~....Io.<::~~IL=::.p"'-~ r-_O=---'I'------=-'3_0_1_2_

2. Department Chair

4. Dean

5.

6. Chair, Senate PCC

12

7. University Senate Chair (if required)

- - - - H . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ­

¥

~----LT/-(3-J--I{-Z--

8. Senior Vice President and Provost

Revised curriculum in Fire Protection Engineering (FPE).

The exit interviews, teaching evaluations individual conversations with our students and feedback from the department Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) provided the motivation for this curriculum revision. Based on this feedback, a recurring theme emerged: the need for more experiences involving the Fire Dynamics Simulator software (FDS, developed at NIST for modeling fire events).

The faculty ofthe department discussed this issue at length and concluded that the use of

FDS without significant knowledge of the fundamentals of fire dynamics and modeling would be a misleading activity within the curriculum. An attempt to model a fire scenario without significant expertise in the fundamentals of fire dynamics and some basic understanding of modeling was not going to be part of the curriculum. On the other hand, the need for more experiences with FDS was recognized as a legitimate aspiration and requirement for the curriculum, especially after the decision of the Society of Fire Protection

Engineers to emphasize performance-based design.

To provide the needed training within the framework of adequate fundamental preparation, the curriculum required a substantial overhaul. This revision involved a staged implementation to avoid disruption of the course plan for students moving through the program. Five major elements were considered key in this revision:

• In the second semester of the senior year, a new course dedicated to FDS would be introduced, and a performance-based design experience would replace the existing capstone design experience. The capstone design is taught by instructors with relevant background under the coordination of the chair and associate chair of the department.

• The fundamentals in fire dynamics and fire modeling would be moved to the first semester of the senior year supported by the thermo fluid engineering fundamental courses, while preserving a rational flow of prerequisites. As a result of this change, thermodynamics and fluid mechanics are moved to the second semester of the sophomore year to allow for heat and mass transfer to be offered in the first semester of the junior year and the fire assessment methods and laboratory in the second semester of the junior year.

• The suppression, detection and alarm sequence also needed a complete revision in part to make room for the adjustments in the sophomore year for the thermodynamics and fluid mechanics courses.

• An introduction of smoke control systems is included in the senior year following the encouragement of the CAC given changes in the field.

• An overview of evacuation and tenability analyses is included in the senior year following the encouragement of the CAC given changes in the field.

Moving thermodynamics and fluid mechanics into the sophomore year also implied that a more targeted offering of these topics had to be implemented. All of these courses had to be reorganized. With this new approach, students would have an opportunity to absorb the fundamentals and be ready for a constructive and well-grounded experience in modeling and

analysis of fire scenarios in the senior year. The details of this plan were discussed at great length by the faculty and with the CAC on several occasions and resulted in the following plan.

A major review of the curriculum was performed between 2006 and 2008 leading to the following changes and subsequent implementation of the changes.

1. Reorganization of the Engineering Fundamental Sequence in Thermal Science

Starting in fall 2011, Thermodynamics is offered by the Keystone Program as ENES 232. The treatment of first and second law will be complemented with applications to processes relevant to fire, including gas mixtures, combustion, liquid-vapor equilibrium, and liquid mixtures.

Fluid mechanics is offered within the department as ENFP 300. More emphasis is placed on hydraulic network computations" A first experience with MATLAB is proposed in the midterm take-home exam, in which a sprinkler hydraulic system is designed. Classic fundamentals, as well as applications, are balanced in this offering, ensuring that students have a clear understanding of the elements that will be recurrent in their FPE professional environment.

Heat and mass transfer (ENFP 312) will be augmented with a significant computational experience with MATLAB in preparation for similar activities in fire dynamics (ENFP 415) and in fire modeling (ENFP 425 and 426) to follow. The course content will be streamlined and focused to those applications relevant to the fire problem. Issues associated with sprinkler thermal activation, structural fire protection, water-fire-plume interactions, and other relevant applications will be covered. To date, only fluid mechanics and heat transfer are offered within the department.

As part of the thermal science sequence and the increasing use of MATLAB in these courses, a required MATLAB course is also proposed for the sophomore year so that students will have an introduction to the use of the software prior to entry into the thermal science sequence of courses provided by the department.

2. Extension and Reorganization of Fire Alarm and Suppression System Topics

Two courses in suppression will be offered. Aqueous-based fire suppression is currently offered as sprinkler design (ENFP 310). The current fire alarm and special hazards course will be offered for the last time in spring 2011 and will be replaced in spring 2013 with advanced suppression (ENFP 410), which will focus on non-aqueous agents in addition to providing advanced insight to complement the sprinkler design course. The alarm portion of the course will be moved to a new course in smoke management that will be offered starting in spring 2012 as ENFP 489M, and in spring 2013 as ENFP 440.

3. Introduction of Additional Fire Modeling Experiences

New course content has been implemented for the former capstone design course, which now focuses on the utilization of industry standard code for fire modeling. Presently students are engaged in the solution of fire protection, design-based problems utilizing the NIST FDS

software. This course was first offered in spring 2010. The new course is labeled ENFP 426.

The former capstone design course was offered for the last time in spring 2009 and has been replaced with the performance-based design course, called Risk-Informed Performance Based

Design, ENFP 411.

4. Reorganization of the Capstone Design Course, ENFP 411

Starting in spring 2010, ENFP 411 has become the capstone design course. This course addresses in detail performance-based design processes for the fire protection engineering profession. To provide the most credible experience, students are led through the capstone design experience by professionals with top credentials in this area.

4. Incorporation of an advanced :life safety course, ENFP 413

An advanced life safety course has been offered in the past as an ENFP 489 course (in the spring of2012 the course is listed as ENFP 489G). A recent survey of professional engineers has identified that life safety analyses comprise a significant segment of fire protection engineering.

As such, the department's CAC recommended that this course be included as a required course rather than as an elective. This course includes aspects of evacuation analyses, tenability analyses and human behavior. The course will include a combination of assignments, including the use of state-of-the-art computer simulations and a project (as well as two examinations).

The present and proposed curricula for fire protection engineering are provided on the following two pages. Two versions of the proposed curriculum for fire protection engineering are provided, one including the CORE requirements, and the other reflecting the new general education course requirements.

Current Curriculum,

FIRE ])ROTECTION ENGINEERING

, Freshman Year

CORE

CHEM 135

MATH 140, 141

ENES 100

ENES 102

PHYS 161

ENFP 108 (optional)

CORE Program Requirements

Genercll Chemistry for Engineers

Calculus I, II

Introduction to Engineering Design

Mechanics I

General Physics: Mechanics and Particle Dynamics

Hot Topics in Fire

Total

Sophomore Year

CORE

MATH 240/MATH 241

MATH 246

PHYS 260,261

PHYS 270, 271

ENES 221

ENES 220

ENFP 250

ENFP 255

CORE ProQram Requirements

Linear AIQebra or Calculus III

Differe:ntial Equations

General Physics: Vibration, Waves, Heat, Elect. ..

General Physics: Electrodynamics, Light, Relativity ...

Dynamics

Mechanics II

Introduction to Life Safety Analysis

Fire Alarm and Special Hazards Design

Total

Junior Year

CORE

ENES 232

ENFP 300

ENFP 310

ENFP 312

ENFP 320

ENFP 350

Approved Elective

Elective

CORE Program Requirements

Thermodynamics

Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics

Water Based Fire Protection Systems Design

Heat and Mass Transfer

Fire )I.ssessment Methods and Laboratory

Professional Development Seminar

Approved Electives (STAT, ENFP, ENXX)

General Elective - see advisor for details

Total

Senior Year

CORE

ENFP 405

ENFP411

ENFP 415

ENFP 425

ENFP 416

Approved Elective

CORE Program Requirements

Structural Fire Protection

Fire Hisk Assessment

Fire Dynamics

Fire Modeling

Problem Synthesis and DesiQn

Approved Electives (STAT. ENFP, ENXX)

Total

Fall

3

3

4

3

4

3

3

1

14

3

4

17

3

3

3

3

16

3

3

3

3

3

15

Spring

6

4

3

3

16

3

3

4

3

3

16

4

1

3

3

16

3

3

3

3

3

6

12

Proposed Curriculum, FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING

(with CORE requirements)

Freshman Year

ENGL 101

CORE

CHEM 135

MATH 140, 141

ENES 100

ENES 102

PHYS 161

ENFP 101 (optional)

English Composition

CORE Program Requirements

General Chemistry for EnQineers

Calculus I, II

Introduction to EngineerinQ DesiQn

Mecharnics I

General Physics: Mechanics and Particle Dynamics

Hot Topics in Fire

Total

Fall

3

3

4

3

1

14

Sophomore Year

CORE

MATH 246

MATH 240/MATH 241

MATH 206

PHYS 260, 261

ENES 232

ENES 221

ENES 220

ENFP 250

ENFP 300

CORE Program Requirements

Differential Equations

Linear AIQebra or Calculus III

IntrodUiction to MATLAB

General Physics: Vibration, Waves, Heat, Elect. ..

Thermodynamics

Dynamics

Mechanics II

Introduction to Life Safety Analysis

Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics

Total

3

3

1

4

3

3

17

Junior Year

CORE

ENFP 310

ENFP 312

ENFP 320

ENFP 350

ENFP 440

Approved Elective

Elective

CORE Program Requirements

Water Based Fire Protection Systems DesiQn

Heat and Mass Transfer

Fire Assessment Methods and Laboratory

Professional Development Seminar

SmokE~ ManaQement and Fire Alarm Systems

Approved Electives (STAT, ENFP, ENXX)

General Elective

Total

3

3

3

3

3

15

Senior Year

ENGL 393

ENFP 405

ENFP 411

ENFP 413

ENFP 415

ENFP 425

ENFP 426

ENFP 410

Approved Elective

Technical Writing

Structural Fire Protection

Risk-Informed Performance Based DesiQn

Advanced Life Safety Analysis

Fire Dynamics

Enclosure Fire ModelinQ

Computational Methods in FPE

Advanced Fire Suppression

Approved Electives (STAT, ENFP, ENXX)

3

3

3

3

3

Total 15

Spring

6

4

3

3

16

3

4

3

3

3

6

15

4

1

3

3

14

3

3

3

16

3

Proposed Curriculum, FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING

(with General Education requirements)

I

Freshman Year

ENGL 101

Gen Ed

CHEM 135

MATH 140, 141

ENES 100

ENES 102

PHYS 161

ENFP 101 (optional)

English Composition

General Education Requirements

General Chemistry for Engineers

Calculus I, II

Introduction to Enqineerinq Desiqn

Mechanics I

General Physics: Mechanics and Particle Dynamics

Hot Topics in Fire

Total

Fall

3

3

4

3

1

14

Sophomore Year

Gen Ed

Gen Ed

MATH 246

MATH 240/MATH 241

MATH 206

PHYS 260, 261

ENES 232

ENES 221

ENES 220

ENFP 250

ENFP 300

General Education Requirements

Oral Communication

Differential Equations

Linear Algebra or Calculus III

Introduction to MATLAB

General Physics: Vibration, Waves, Heat, Elect. ..

Thermodynamics

Dynamics

Mechanics II

Introduction to Life Safety Analysis

Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics

Total

3

3

1

4

3

3

17

Junior Year

Gen Ed

ENFP 310

ENFP 312

ENFP 320

ENFP 350

ENFP 440

Approved Elective

Elective

General Education Requirements

Water Based Fire Protection Systems Design

Heat and Mass Transfer

Fire Assessment Methods and Laboratory

Professional Development Seminar

Smokl~ Management and Fire Alarm Systems

Approved Electives (STAT, ENFP, ENXX)

General Elective

Total

3

3

3

3

3

15

Senior Year

ENGL 393

ENFP405

ENFP411

ENFP 413

ENFP 415

ENFP 425

ENFP 426

ENFP 410

Approved Elective

Technical Writinq

Structural Fire Protection

Risk-Informed Performance Based Design

Advanced Life Safety Analysis

Fire Dynamics

Enclosure Fire Modeling

Computational Methods in FPE

Advanced Fire Suppression

Approved Electives (STAT, ENFP, ENXX)

3

3

3

3

3

Total 15

Spring

6

4

3

3

16

3

4

4

1

3

3

14

3

3

3

6

15

3

3

3

16

3

A listing of the fully implemented new curriculum follows. This list includes only the courses offered within the department.

Freshman year

ENFP108 Hot Topics in Firt~ Protection

Sophomore year

ENFP250 Introduction to Liife Safety Analysis

ENFP300 Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics

Junior year

ENFP310 Water Based Fire Protection System Design

ENFP312 Heat and Mass Transfer

ENFP320 Fire Assessment Methods and Laboratory

ENFP350 Professional Development Seminar

ENFP440 Smoke Management and Fire Alarm Systems

Senior year

ENFP405 Structural Fire Protection

ENFP410 Advanced Fire Suppression

ENFP411 Risk-Informed Performance Based Design

ENFP413 Advanced Life Safety Analysis

ENFP415 Fire Dynamics

ENFP425 Enclosure Fire Modeling

ENFP426 Computational Methods in FPE

The implementation of these chcmges spans a period of five academic years to enable moving a number of courses from one semester to the other, instituting changes within existing courses and creating new courses. In tht~ initial transition years, the principal change involved altering the semester in which some courses were offered (ENFP undergraduate courses are offered once per academic year given the faculty resources available).

The changes in existing courses have transpired in small steps. An outline of these changes in

ENFP 411 and 416 is included in the following two bullets:

• ENFP 411 previously addressed hazard and risk analysis concepts such as are used in performance based design. The change was first made to make the emphasis of the course performance-bast:d design, and then secondly to identify the class as the capstone course.

• ENFP 416 was initially altered to make the capstone design experience one that included the use of advanced computer modeling. Once the capstone label was moved to the

ENFP 411 course, the emphasis of ENFP 416 was placed on modeling. ENFP 416 now is proposed to be renumbered as ENFP 426.

In summary, a timeline for the implementation of the changes follows:

Academic year 2008-09: The old curriculum is fully implemented

ENFP411 Fire Risk Assessment is offered for the last time with the old content

ENFP416 Problem Synthesis and Design is offered for the last time as capstone design experience

ENFP425 Fire Modeling is offered in the spring for the last time

Academic year 2009-10: First transition year

ENFP3l2 Heat and Mass Transfer is offered for the last time in the spring

ENFP320 Fire Assessment Methods and Laboratory is offered for the last time in the fall

ENFP4l1 Fire Risk Assessment is offered for the first time as capstone design experience

ENFP416 Problem Synthesis and Design is offered for the first time as fire modeling experience

ENFP425 Fire Modeling is offered in the fall for the first time

Academic year 2010-11: Second transition year

ENFP255 Fire Alarm and Special Hazard is offered for the last time

ENFP300 Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics is offered for the last time in the fall

ENFP310 Water Based Fire Protection Systems Design is offered for the last time in the sprIng

ENFP320 Fire Assessment Methods and Laboratory is offered for the first time in the spring

Academic year 2011-12: Third transition year

ENES232 Thermodynamics is offered for the first time

ENFP300 Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics is offered for the first time in the spring

ENFP312 Heat and Mass Transfer is offered for the first time in the fall

ENFP489L Advanced Fire Suppression is offered for the first time

ENFP489M Smoke Manag(~ment and Fire Alarm Systems is offered

Academic year 2012-13: Fourth transition year

Moving forward, the new curriculum is fully implemented, with

ENFP 489L to become ENFP 410

ENFP489M to become ENFP 440

ENFP 416 to become ENFP 426

ENFP 413 offered

Changes were initiated prior to the formal submittal of the proposal because of an unexpected retirement of one faculty and another decreasing his involvement to half-time.

The new program will apply to all freshmen students entering in the fall 2012 semester. New benchmarks will be established for all freshmen students entering in the fall 2012 semester as follows:

Fire Protection Eng;ineering Benchmark Statement (Proposed)

The goal of the Student Academic Success-Degree Completion Policy is to promote undergraduate student success. Engineering students requesting major changes within the Clark School of Engineering will be required to satisfy benchmarks and demonstrate completion of the new degree in a timely manner prior to having their major changed.

Failure to satisfy any of the academic benchmarks will result in students having to change their major for not complying with the Student Academic Success Policy.

;;·tBe..

~ltm~~k

... t'kisgafew.y revl.w will be comp;leted by thte Office of

t.;~dw$l8lg·6 d~~tlfadm:iill~d

.

Acadenti",",PPol't

to . .¥rili. fromlligh scho(!)~.

Clre reviewed for k~l'5 U1iJ:iversity .(!).fMaryl,ndcr~it~;.

, grade with a minimum grade of2.0

• F a l Studies English

• One Distributive Studies course fh>m the Humanities or Social Sciences

• .·N ()re than one repeat of any of the courses above (a 'W' [withdrawal) counts as attempt)

Minimum Grade Point Average of 2.0

ftd

Tw

Bellchtpark - This review will be completed by tke Fire Protection DepartDlept

. after students are initially reviewed for the 45 credit review

2ft. two students trans1er int· Clark School of Engineering (as an internal or students must havcompleted the following:

3 rd

Benchmark - Tkis revie1'V will be completed by t·be Fire Protection Departntent

Two semesters after students are initially reviewed for the 2 nd benchmark, students must have completed the foUowilig:

ENFP310, ENFP312,

AND

ENFP320

For all freshmen students enrolled in the fall 2012 semester and later and for external and internal transfer students entering in fall 2014 or later, the following policies will be applied. For existing students and all internal and external transfer students until fall 2014, they will be given the opportunity to switch to the new set of requirements. For any student interesting in switching

to the new curriculum who has allready taken PHYS 270 and 271 or ENFP 255, these courses will be counted as Approved Elel~tives.

Alternatively, students will be permitted to remain in the existing curriculum and be able to enroll in the new ENFP courses, ENFP 410, 413 and 440 as approved electives. For the new course content of these courses (including the portion of old ENFP 255 course) will be instituted in the 2013-2014 academic year. Until then, the courses will be taught following past syllabi for these courses which have been stand-alone upper level electives taught in the department with the ENFP 489 course designation. Students have already been taking the ENFP 411 and ENFP

416 courses with the revised course content, so no transition is needed for those proposals. For students remaining in the existing curriculum, the Benchmarks are presented on the following page:

Fire Protection Engineering Benchmark Statement (Current),

The goal of the Student Academic Success-Degree Completion Policy is to promote undergraduate student success. Engineering students requesting major changes within the Clark School of Engineering will be required to satisfy benchmarks and demonstrate completion of the new degree in a timely manner prior to having their major changed.

Failure to satisfy any of the academic benchmarks will result in students having to change their major for not complying with the Student Academic Success Policy.

~BC"'JJ1'~"~'lti$gail~~.'I'l~Vi~~Wi.lI

beeQmpleted b,tbeOl'l1ce

ot

from high school are reviewed for ark at 45 University of Maryland credits.

Socia he courses above (a 'W' [withdrawal] counts

Point Ave:rage of2.0 pleted

by

the FiJ!e Protection Department llyrev'ieVived for the 2

nd

benchmark, stu<tents must

• ENFP300, ENFP31 0, ENFP312, AND ENFP320

FALL 2011

UNIVERSIT.Y OF

MARYLAND

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS

Mathematics Building

College Park, Maryland 20742-4015

301-405-5047

TEL

301-314-0827

FAX http://wvw.math.umd.edu/

27 Jan 2012

Prof. Peter Sutherland

Director of Undergraduate Studies

Department of Fire Protection Engineering

University of Maryland

College Park, MD 20742

Dear Prof. Sunderland,

The Department of Mathematics supports and is prepared for the addition of MATH206 to the Fire Protection Engineering major requirements beginning Fall 2012. We have discussed eventual additional enrollment of 35 students per academic year due to this change, and with your help we will ensure that your students have access to the course.

Good luck with your proposal.

Sincerely,

Brian R. Hunt

Professor and Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies

Phone: 301-405-5056

Email: bhunt@umd. edu

Print vpac proposal http://www.vpac.umd.edu/Proposal/printtable.cfm?Year=12&LogNo=84...

Return to VPAC Menu

University of Maryland Course Proposal Form

Department/Program: ENFP

College/School: ENGR

Action: add

VPAC log no.: 1284249

Date initiated: 01/10/12

Unit Code:012025001250101

ACAF log no.:

Course Prefix and Number: ENFP410

Title: Advanced Fire Supression

Transcript Title: Advanc. Fire Suppression

Credits: Minimum 3 Maximum 3 Repeatable to a maximum of 0 if content differs

Hour commitment per week: Lecture: 3 Internship: Discussion: Laboratory: Seminar:

Can this course be waived through an AP exam?No

Has this course been approved to fulfill a CORE distribution requirement? No

Grading Method: Regular (R) Formerly:

Prerequisite(s): ENFP 250; ENFP 255; ENFP 300; ENFP 310; ENFP 312

Corequisite(s):

Recommended course(s):

Restrictions: Permission of department required.

Crosslisted with:

Shared with: ENFP 653

Credit will be given for only one of the following courses: ENFP 410 or ENFP 653

Will this course be offered at another location or through an alternate delivery method?No

Catalog Description: Analysis of application and theory of fire suppression systems. The key elements of fire suppression systems will be discussed along with how they interact for effective fire suppression design.

Physical mechanisms for a variety of fire suppression approaches will be discussed including hose streams, sprinklers, water mist, foam, clean agents, and chemical agents.

Reason for proposal/comments: New course as part of comprehensive curriculum change.

Proposal affects degree requirements? Yes If so, has PCC proposal been submitted? No

Early Warning Grades: No

Academic Integrity / Honor Pledge: Yes

Inclement Weather Procedures: No

Accomodations for students with disabilities: No

Learning Outcomes: Study fundamental principles, design criteria and installation requirements for fire suppression systems (including detection and alarm); Understand current design procedures and criteria for the above systems, in context of NFPA standards; Learn about computer-aided design software used in design and analysis of fire suppression systems.

Assessment Policy: (2) exams, assignments and project will be required.

Text/Resource Materials: Cote, A.E. (Editor-in-Chief), Fire Protection Handbook (20th edition), National

Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2008.

SFPE Handbook of FIre Protection Engineering (4th Edition), Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda,

MD, 2008.

Course Pedagogy and Format: Mechanisms of fire extinguishment, evaluation of the fire extinguishing agents, extinguishing agent system applications; Types of systems and applications, design methodology, design criteria, calculations, design problems; foam systems; Halon systems; clean agent systems; water mist systems; dry-wet chemical systems.

1 of 2 3/28/2012 11:04 AM

_,_ ...

~ Page lof2

Return to VPAC Menu

University of Maryland Course Proposal Form

Department/Program: ENFP

College/School: ENGR

Action: add

VPAC log no.: 1284869

Date initiated: 01/25/12

Unit Code:012025001250101

ACAF log no.:

Course Prefix and Number: ENFP413

Title: Advanced Life Safety Analysis

Transcript Title: Adv Life Safety Analysis

Credits: Minimum 3 Maximum 3 Repeatable to a maximum of 0 if content differs

Hour commitment per week: Lecture: 3 Internship: Discussion: Laboratory: Seminar:

Can this course be waived through an AP exam?No

Has this course been approved to fulfill a CORE distribution requirement? No .

Grading Method: Standard Undergraduate Formerly:

Prerequisite(s): ENFP 250

Corequisite(s):

Recommended course(s):

Restrictions: Permission of the Department

Crosslisted with:

Shared with: ENFP 613

Credit will be given for only one of the following courses:

ENFP

~'"3 n (

f

N:fP (pI"?:>

Will this course be offered at another location or through an alternate delivery method?No

Catalog Description: Fractional effective dose (FED) methods for predicting time to incapacitation and death of fires for use in fire safety calculations. Physiology and toxicology of the fire effluent components, decomposition chemistry of common materials, standard experimental approaches. Predictive models of material production rates. People movement characteristics related to building evacuation. Formulation and application of evacuation models. Human behavior factors affecting response of people to fire situations.

Reason for proposal/comments: l'Jew course as part of comprehensive curriculum change.

Proposal affects degree requirements? Yes If so, has PCC proposal been submitted? \/

~S

Early Warning Grades: No Inclement Weather Procedures: No

Academic Integrity / Honor Pledge: Yes Accomodations for students with disabilities: No

Learning Outcomes: 1. Provide a review of the mechanisms whereby people are affected by exposure to toxic effluent components, common fire scenarios causing death and injury to building occupants, examination of individual incidents through fire investigation, trends in fire injury and death statistics, the decomposition chemistry or common materials, standard small and large scale experimental approaches and standards. 2. Review the derivation and application of fractional effective dose (FED) methods for predicting time to incapacitation and death in fires for use in fire safety engineering calculations. 3. Review the formulation and application of evacuation models. 4. Review trends in human behavior and factors which affect the behavior of people in fire situations.

Assessment Policy: :2 @)(sR=liAatisAs; 1 I"lF9ject aRe! A'liseeliaFleel:JS assi€lFlA'leFlts. s.u...

Su

ll~.Joc...e.s

Text/Resource Materials: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 4th Edition, P.F. DiNenno (ed.)

QUincy: NFPA, 2008 SFPE Engineering Guide to Predictin 1st and 2nd degree skin burns.

Course Pedagogy and Format: http://www.vpac.umd.edu/Proposal/printtable.cfm?Year=12&LogNo=84869&RevisionNu...l/25/20 12

Print vpac proposal Page 2 of2

SeniorVice President & Provost me, sign, date)

~P(ILl--

ForUse by the Registrar's Office Only

Effective Term:

- - - - - - - - - - -

RepeatTable:

Prereqpop-up: _

Entered/date:

Verified:

Effective Term http://www.vpac.umd.edu/Proposal/printtable.cfm?Year=12&LogNo=84869&RevisionNu...1/25/20 12

ENFP 413 (3 credits) COURSE SYLLABUS

Instructor:

Jim Milke, Room 3104F, 301-405-3995, milke@umd.edu

Course Description: Fractional effective dose (FED) methods for predicting time to incapacitation and death of fires for use in fire safety engineering calculations. Physiology and toxicology of fire effluent components, decomposition chemistry of common materials, standard experimental approaches. Predictive models of material production rates. People movement characteristics related to building evacuation. Formulation and application of evacuation models.

Human behavior factors affecting response of people to fire situations.

Learning Outcomes:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Provide a review of the mechanisms whereby people are affected by exposure to toxic effluent and heat in fires, including toxicology of fire effluent components, common fire scenarios causing death and injury to building occupants, examination of individual incidents through fire investigation, trends in fire injury and death statistics, the decomposition chemistry or common materials, standard small and large scale experimental approache~s and standards.

Review the derivation and application of fractional effective dose (FED) methods for predicting time to incapacitation and death in fires for use in fire safety engineering calculations.

Review the formulation and application of evacuation models.

Review trends in human behavior and factors which affect the behavior of people in fire situations.

Texts:

SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 4 th

Edition, P.J. DiNenno (ed.), Quincy:

NFPA,2008.

SFPE Engineering Guide to Predicting 1st and 2nd Degree Skin Burns

Grading System: Semester gr;ades will be determined according to the following relative weights:

Item

Exam 1

Exam 2

Exam 3

Project

Total

Proportion (%)

25

25

25

25

100

Grade % Points

A

B

C

D

90-100

80-89

70-79

60-69

All assignments are expected to be submitted on or before the announced due date.

Assignments submitted late will be penalized, with exceptions granted if requested before the due date.

Any student with special needs, including extensions for assignments, should see me as soon as the problems or needs arise.

Project:

The deliverable for the 429 projects will be a written report. Reports are due by the beginning of class on May 3. Examples of topics include:

• Review of past fire incident which involved multiple fatalities

• Review of toxicity analysis method, basis for correlations, LC so values

• Review of case study (either actual or hypothetical)

All project topics need to be pre~approved.

Preliminary Outline:

9

10

11

12

13

14

Week

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Topics

Course overview; Introduction to life safety concepts

Characteristics of people movement: movement on stairs, level walkways, through doorways, stair design, ergonomics considerations of egress system design

Evacuation time analysis: Components of evacuation time, Transitions, Queues

Basis of evacuation models

Evacuation models: formulation, basis of existing models, evacuation plans

Evacuation models

Exam #1

Perfonnanc~based design concepts; Human behavior: decision-making, response to alarm systems and early fire cues

Spring Break

Reading

SFPE, Ch. 3-12,

3-13

SFPE, Ch. 3-17

Human behavior: wayfinding, factors affecting response SFPE, Ch. 3-11

Physiological and toxicological effects of combustion products: derivation ()f predictive calculation models

PhVsiological and toxicological effects: continued

Tenability analysis methods: FED approach, toxic potency, n-gas mode~1

Hazard calculations

Project presentations

Project presentations

SFPE, Ch. 2-6

2

Print vpac proposal Page

J

of2

Renu:n

to VPAC

Menu

University of Maryland Course Proposal Form

Department/Program: ENFP

College/School: ENGR

Actfon'

.

add

Cours. Prefix and Number: ENFP426

VPAC log no.: 105626t

Date Initiated: 04/07/10

Unit Code:012025001250101 rOh'\()()t

Mr fh

In +it'p

ITranscrlpt·TltI.: COmp Methods In FPE

~fi'ft

Tlti.: Computational Methods In Fire Protection

Credits: MInimum 3 Maximum 3 IRepeatable to a maxImum of 0 If content dlff....

Hour commitment per week: Lecture: 3 Intemshlp: Discussion: LBboratory: SeminaI':

CIIn this COUr8e be waived through an AP exam?No

He. this cou.... been approved to fulfill a CORE distribution requirement? No

Gradlna Method: Standard Undergraduate

Prerequl.'teCs):

Corequfsftees}:

ErJFP ....25

Form.rly:

Recommended cou...'s):

Restrictions: Permission of the Department (Pt'. I J • ( "

Craul'sted with: u

• •red with: d

Credit will be alven for only one of the rollowlng cou.....: E..l\ I FP \.l2l.

nr

B1FP 4-, L

Will this course be offered at another location or throuah en alternate delivery method?No

CIItIIlog Description: Introductln to computer-based fire modeling: zone modeling and Computational fluid DYnamics CCFO); documentation of Input data, validation and verification tests.

Reason for proposal/comments: ENFP 426 will be the new required course and will replace ENFP 416,

In the uate curriculum.

Proposal affects degree requirements? Yes_. If so, has PCC proposal- been submitted?

J

.

'1ES

-:.....­

Early Warning Grades: No Inclement Weather Procedures: No

Academic Integrity / Honor Pledge: Yes Accomodatlons for students with disabilities: No

Learning Outcomes: Understanding zone and CFD modeling approaches used by professional engineers to simulate fire phenomena; use some of the leading fire modeling software products used by professional engineers to simulate fire phenomena; develop analytical skills for vertification and validation (V&V) of simulation results from fire modeling software; Develop analytical skills for interpretation of simulation results from fire modeling software.

Assessment Policy: 2 examinations, project, miscellaneous assignments.

Text/Resource Materials:

\(,()ri~~Sl1') P->.)

OJV)....

Ql.t.jt"-hu

p

~

{1

~hrLDSAAH_

fir, "­

Course Pedagogy and Format: Introduction t~omputer-based fire modeling and c mparison between the zone modeling and CFD modeling approaches; verification and validation testing; introduction to zone modeling software used by professional engineers (CFAST); Introduction to CFD modeling software ~ professional engineers (FDS); Series of case studies using zone and CFD models to simulate different representative fire problems, including configurations featuring smoke transport, fire spread, flashover nd under-ventilated fires, thermal radiation transport, fire detection and sprinkler activation.

J)y"

crLC,

~

LLC

2-W·

;y i f\-}e.N~O)~:r '[~)I

SFP'I:

hAl\d..h~IL l>~ Fd e. ?

(l)

oft

c:A"0I\

~~

&"h

~

(' l0~~

':>IV A-l FP

Ac:.~~·4"'b:4

Q4o{.

(I\) (...,

~ ~

2

I

http://www.vpac.umd.edu/Proposal/printtable.cfm?Year=12&LogNo=84049&RevisionNum...1/4/2012

Print vpac proposal Page 2 of2

~~OOI

PCC Chalr(prln It ~-~~.~-~fC----.L~~

Dean (print name, sign, date)

For Use by the Registrar's Office Only

Effective Term:

- - - - - - - - - -

RepeatTable:

Prereq pop-up: _

Entered/date:

Verified:

SeniorVice President & Provost Effecttve Term http://www.vpac.umd.eduIProposai/printtable.cfm?Year=12&Lo~No=84049&RevisionNum...1/4/20 12

ENFP426 Computational Methods in Fire Protection

Instructor.

Syllabus

Arnaud Trouve

Department of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland

Office: JMP 3104D I Tel: xS-82091 Fax: xS-9383

Email: atrouve@ umd.edu I Web: http://www.fpe.umd.edu

Pre-requisite ENFP 425

Course objectives: ComputationalMetnods in Fire .ltotection Engioeedng

An introduction to computer-based fire modeling: zone modeling and Computational Fluid

Dynamics (CFD); documentation of input data, validation and verification tests.

• Introduction to computer-based fire modeling and comparison between the zone modeling and

CFD modeling approachl~s.

• Verification and Validation testing.

• Introduction to zone modeling software used by professional engineers (CFAST).

• Introduction to CFD modeling software used by professional engineers (FDS).

• Series of case studies: the students use zone and CFD models to simulate different representative fire probll~ms, including configurations featuring smoke transport. fire spread, flashover and under-ventilated fires, thermal radiation transport, fire detection and sprinkler activation.

Course matedai

General material

• Karlsson. R, and Quintiere, J.G., Enclosure Fire .Dyoamic4 CRC Press LLC, 2000

• DiNenno, PJ. (Ed.). S.FPE Haodbbox ofFire .ltotection Engineen'og(4 th

Fire Protection Association. Quincy, MA, 2008.

Edition), National

• Additional j oumal articles. hand-outs

• Power-Point slides used in class

CFAST

• http://fast.nist.gov

• Peacock, R. D., Jones, W. W., Reneke, P. A., Forney G. P. (2008) "CFAST - Consolidated

Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport (Version 6) - User's Guide", NIST Special

Publication 1041.

FDS

• http://fire. nist. gov/fds

• McGrattan, K.B., Mc Dermott,

R,

Hostikka, S., and Floyd, J.E., "Fire Dynamics Simulator

(Version 5) - User's Guide," National Institute of Standards and Technology Report NIST

Special Publication 1019-5, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2010.

• "Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5) Technical Reference Guide, Volume 1:

Mathematical Model; Volume 2: Verification; Volume 3: Validation; Volume 4: Software

Configuration Management Plan" National Institute of Standards and Technology Report

NIST Special Publication 1018-5, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2010.

Course gradinG Weekly Assignments (take home computer projects presentations 20%) plus class participation (5%)

50% and in-class plus Final Exam (25%).

Student teams (total 01'19 teams)

Students are asked to self-organize in teams of 2. These teams are formed at the beginning of the term: students will send an email to the instructor to inform him of their decision and formalize the formation of a team (the deadline for sending an email is Tuesday January 31). Note that teams cannot be changed during the term, unless special circumstances are invoked and after consulting with, and permission of the instructor. The 2 students in each team will work together and perform the weekly assignments, submitting joint reports and performing joint in-class presentations.

ABETStudent Outcomes:

• S04: Demonstrated ability to perform in multi-disciplinary or multi-tasking teams.

• S07: Demonstrated ability to communicate effectively through written reports and technical presentations with fire protection engineers and with other relevant professional constituencies

(ARJ. architectural firms, etc).

ABETStudent Outcomes Assess~rnent:

S04: The course provides an introduction to zone modeling and CFD modeling software. It is also a team-based computer-project course that exposes the students to a range of leading fire protection engineering software products and a range of applications to different representative fire problems. The assignments related to the different computer projects are completed collectively (in teams of 2 students) and student performance in Program Outcome (S04) will be determined from the students' ability to formulate a team project plan and collectively execute that plan. Student performance will be quantified by the grades obtained in the team­ based computer projects.

S07: The course provides an introduction to zone modeling and CFD modeling software.

Weekly assignments include both written reports and in-class oral presentations of results obtained in computer projects. Student performance in Program Outcome (S07) will be determined from grading the quality of presentation of the weekly assignments. Achievement level will be quantified using these grades.

Print vpac proposal Page 1 of2

Return to VPAC Menu

University of Maryland Course P."oposal Form

Department/Program: ENFP

College/School: ENGR

Action: add

VPAC log no.: 1284269

Date initiated: 01/10/12

Unit Code:012025001250101

ACAF log no.:

Course Prefix and Number: ENFP440 Transcript Title: Smoke Mgmt & Alarm Syst.

Title: Smoke Management and Fire Alarm Systems

Credits: Minimum 3 Maximum 3 Repeatable to a maximum of 0 If content differs

Hour commitment per week: Lecture: 3 Internship: Discussion: Laboratory: Seminar:

Can this course be waived through an AP exam?No

Has this course been approved to fulfill a CORE distribution requirement? No

Grading Method: Standard Undergrraduate Formerly:

Prerequisite(s): ENFP 300

Corequlslte(s):

Recommended course(s):

Restrictions: Permission of the department required.

Crossllsted with:

Shared with: ENFP 640

Credit will be given for only one of the following courses: PI\.iFP:'4<:fQ rX'

ENF\'=> t"lf'l ....

Will this course be offered at another location or through an alternate delivery method?No

Catalog Description: Analysis of h,azard posed by smoke in buildings. Performance characteristics of smoke management systems. Review of analytical design aids. Functional analysis and design of fire detection and alerting systems. Examination and evaluation of code criteria, performance specifications and research.

Reason for proposal/comments: New course as part of comprehensive curriculum change.

Proposal affects degree requirements? Yes If so, has PCC proposal been submitted?

YP

S

Early Warning Grades: No Inclement Weather Procedures: No

Academic Integrity / Honor Pledge: Yes Accomodations for students with disabilities: No

Learning Outcomes: Review methods to assess the hazard of smoke in buildings; Review smoke management methods, including smoke control systems and smoke exhaust systems employing natural or mechanical methods; Study current technologies associated with fire alarm and detection systems; Explore fundamental concepts of fire detection and alarm systems design; Review engineering tools to assess the performance of smoke management systems and fire detection and alarm systems.

Assessment Policy: 6ee. A{\ tl..

r.h p rt

Text/Resource Materials: Problem of smoke; Design objectives; Smoke management design approaches; Smoke movement forces; Buoyancy, gas expansion, wind, influence of building systems; Air movement analysis: Leakage and air movement paths in buildings; Network analysis/CONTAM; Smoke management in large spaces; Mechanical venting. natural venting; Fire signatures, detection concepts and principles; Review of current technologies associated with fire detectors; Performance characteristics of heat, smoke and flame detection; alarm system classifications, components, design criteria; Performance characteristics of alerting devices; Fire detection and alarm system evaluation.

Course Pedagogy and Format: http://www.vpac.umd.eduIProposallprinttable.cfm?Year=12&LogNo=84269&RevisionNu...1/10/2012

Print vpac proposal

SeniorVlce President & Provost

Page 2 of2

For Use by the Registrar's Office Only

Effective Term:

-----------

RepeatTable:

Prereq pop-up: _

Entered/date:

Verified:

Effective Term http://www.vpac.umd.edu/Proposal/printtable.cfm?Year=I2&LogNo=84269&RevisionNu...I/IO/20 12

ENFP 440 Smoke Management and Fire Alarm Systems

Course catalog description: Analysis of hazard posed by smoke in buildings.

Performance characteristj(~s of smoke management systems. Review of analytical design aids. Functional analysis and design of fire detection and alerting systems.

Examination and evaluation of code criteria, performance specifications and research.

Prerequisites: Fire Protection Fluid Mechanics (ENFP 300)

Permission of department required.

Textbooks: Klote, J.H. and Milke, J.A., "Principles of Smoke Management," Atlanta:

ASH RAE, 2002.

Learning Outcomes:

• Review methods to ,assess the hazard of smoke in buildings

• Review smoke mam:lgement methods, including smoke control systems and smoke exhaust systems employing natural or mechanical methods.

• Study current technologies associated with fire alarm and detection systems

• Explore fundamental concepts of fire detection and alarm systems design

• Review engineering tools to assess the performance of smoke management systems and fire detection and alarm systems.

Topics covered:

Problem of smoke, Design objectives, smoke management design approaches

Smoke movement forces: Buoyancy, gas expansion, wind, influence of building systems

Air movement analysis: Leakage and air movement paths in buildings, Network analysisiCONTAM

Stairwell pressurization systems and zoned smoke control systems: Means of pressurization, analysis of performance via hand computations and CONTAM

Smoke Management in Largle Spaces: Mechanical venting, natural venting

Fire signatures, detection c01ncepts and principles

Review of current technologies associated with fire detectors

Performance characteristics of heat, smoke and flame detection

Alarm system classifications, components, design criteria

Performance characteristics of alerting devices

Fire detection and alarm system evaluation

Grading Procedure

Examination # 1

Examination #2

Project

Homework

Total

25%

25%

20%

30%

100%

Michael D Colson

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

James A. Milke

Thursday, March 29, 2012 1:16 PM

Michael D Colson

Jenna Dolan

FW: Fire Protection PCC Proposal

 

Mike,  

 

Please   see   the   response   from   Physics,   below.

   Please   let   me   know   if   you   need   any   additional   information.

   

Jim   Milke,   Ph.D.,   P.E.

 

Professor   and   Chair  

Room   3104B,   JM   Patterson   Building  

Department   of   Fire   Protection   Engineering  

University   of   Maryland  

 

College   Park,   MD   20742  

301   405   3995  

From: Drew Baden [ mailto:drew@physics.umd.edu

]

Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:57 PM

To: Jenna Dolan

Cc: Robert L. Infantino; Andrew R. Baden; James A. Milke; Richard F. Ellis; Thomas Gleason; Thomas D. Cohen; Anne

Suplee

Subject: Re: Fire Protection PCC Proposal

Hi Jenna,

Thanks for letting us know about this change. Please let us know if there's anything we can do to help, but this seems completely sensible. Fire away (oops, sorry, no pun intended).

Thanks,

Drew

On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Jenna Dolan wrote:

Dear   Dr.

  Infantino   and   Dr.

  Baden,  

   

The   Department   of   Fire   Protection   Engineering   recently   submitted   a   PCC   proposal   to   modify   their   undergraduate   degree.

   The   proposal   requests   the   removal   of   PHYS   270/271   from   their   degree   requirements   starting   this   fall   for   the   incoming   class.

 

   

Mike   Colson   would   like   to   place   this   PCC   proposal   on   the   April   agenda,   but   he   recommended   we   speak   with   you   first   to   determine   the   impact,   if   any,   to   your   enrollment.

   Do   either   of   you   oppose   this   change?

   

   

The   total   undergraduate   enrollment   of   the   Fire   Protection   department   currently   stands   at   125.

  The   juniors   and   seniors   have   already   completed   PHYS   270/271   so   the   estimated   impact   to   your   enrollment   would   be   a   reduction   of   20 ‐ 30   students   each   year.

 

   

Dr.

  Milke,   Chair   of   the   FP   department   has   been   copied   on   this   email   if   you   have   additional   questions.

 

1

   

Thank   you,  

Jenna   Dolan  

Director  

Undergraduate   Advising   &   Academic   Support  

A.

  James   Clark   School   of   Engineering  

2

Download