QC Review
2009 - 2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
Interim Performance Report
In March 2009, the Kentucky General Assembly passed Senate Bill 1 (SB1) that was subsequently signed into law by
the Governor. SB1 calls for a significant overhaul of the state's assessment and accountability system. The new
assessment system begins in the spring of 2012. The school years of 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 are
described in SB1 as an interim period. This three-year period allows Kentucky to develop the new assessment system
and to carry on state andd federal testing requirements.
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
00 - 05
The Interim Performance Report includes the Kentucky Core Content Test (KCCT) in Reading (grades 3-8 and 10),
Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11), Science (grades 4, 7 and 11), Social Studies (grades 5, 8 and 11) and Writing
On-Demand (grades 5, 8 and 12). The KCCT is based on the Kentucky Core Content for Assessment (Version 4.1)
and contains multiple choice and open response questions. The Writing On-Demand test uses writing prompts that
require students to craft a piece of writing in a 60 minute period.
The KCCT is developed under the direction of content advisory committees of Kentucky educators who draft, review
and select test questions. All test items are reviewed by a bias review committee to enhance the fairness of items for all
Kentucky students.
CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT
The KCCT continues to fulfill the requirements of the federal statue known as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
A separate accountability report for No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is published by the Kentucky Department of
Education.
The Interim Performance Report focuses entirely on the five state-required content areas and provides data for schools
or districts. The data in this report is not used directly for state accountability; although, these results can fulfill the
requirements of Senate Bill 168 from 2002 and may be used by schools or districts for their own accountability needs.
Performance standards are based on descriptions of Novice, Apprentice, Proficient and Distinguished (NAPD) student
performance levels specific to the content area and grade being assessed. The performance standards, in conjunction
with Kentucky's Core Content for Assessment, should allow instruction to better focus on the content area to be taught
and on how well students must demonstrate achievement in each content area.
Reporting Changes Began in 2009
Elementary
Academic Trend Data
Reading Results
Mathematics Results
Science Results
Social Studies Results
Writing Results
29161922-
8
15
18
21
24
Based on SB1, Kentucky will not be reporting state accountability and academic indices as in the past. The report does
have several familiar pages with performance level (NAPD) trend, core content and disaggregation data per content
area. Districts and schools will still see distributions of how students scored in the Novice (with sublevels), Apprentice
(with sublevels), Proficient and Distinguished performance levels.
Confidentiality Changes
Due to federal regulations around the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), the numbers of students
have been removed. Though there is a need to report as much data as possible, there is also a paramount need to
maintain the confidential aspects of individual scores. When scores are reported in what is commonly called "amall
cells" where very few students may be categorized, there is the possibility of revealing individual scores when numbers
are reported. Numbers are reported to each district in a confidential report that accompanies the public Interim
Performance Report.
For more information, refer to the 2010 Interim Assessment Interpretive Guide on the
Kentucky Department of Education Web site (www.education.ky.gov).
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING TREND DATA
Performance Level Percents
Novice Low
2007
2008
0.64
6.37
2008
8.43
2009
0.50
10.05
2010
20
40
60
80
100
0
25
Novice - Medium
2007
0.68
2008
0.64
2009
2010
75
100
0
25
2007
2008
1.91
2008
2.41
50.68
64.33
54.22
2009
3.52
2010
25
50
75
100
59.80
0
25
Apprentice - Low
2008
2009
2010
0
3.82
2008
5.42
2009
3.02
2010
50
75
100
13.01
2007
25
50
Distinguished
7.53
2007
50
Proficient
2.05
0
100
10.05
2010
2007
2010
75
16.27
2009
1.51
Novice - High
2009
100
14.65
2.41
50
75
16.44
2008
25
50
Apprentice - High
2007
0
QC Review
8.90
2007
0
Page
Apprentice - Medium
0.68
2009 0.00
2010
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
Elementary
75
100
7.64
10.84
11.56
0
The horizontal bar represents the percent of students scoring at a performance level within a particular year. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
25
50
75
100
2007
2009
2008
2010
2
QC Review Page
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20%
40%
60%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
80%
3
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
03
100%
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Total
6
21
64
9
72.86
Female
8
24
59
8
67.57
Male
3
18
70
9
78.79
8
White (Non-Hispanic)
4
21
66
9
74.63
9
African-American
Asian
6
21
64
9
72.86
11
28
58
3
61.11
20
40
40
0
40.00
Tested Students
Tested
6
Accountable
6
Tested
21
8
Accountable
64
19
24
9
9
66
9
59
20
63
Hispanic
Tested
3
18
70
9
Accountable
3
18
70
9
Tested
4
21
Accountable
5
18
***
Other
Title I
66
9
68
Migrant
9
***
Identified LEP
Tested
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
***
Gifted/Talented
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Disability
Accountable
***
Alternate Assessment
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
6
19
66
9
75.00
Tested
Female
9
20
63
9
71.43
Accountable
Male
3
18
70
9
78.79
White (Non-Hispanic)
5
18
68
9
76.92
6
19
66
9
75.00
11
28
58
3
61.11
20
40
40
0
40.00
Tested
African-American
Accountable
Hispanic
***
Asian
Tested
11
28
58
3
Other
Accountable
11
28
58
3
Title I
Migrant
***
Tested
20
40
40
0
Identified LEP
Accountable
20
40
40
0
Extended Sch Services
***
Gifted/Talented
***
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
Alternate Assessment
***
QC Review Page
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20%
40%
60%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
80%
4
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
04
100%
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Tested Students
Tested
8
24
52
16
Accountable
8
23
53
16
Tested
10
Accountable
9
23
22
45
47
8
24
52
16
68.25
10
23
45
23
67.74
Male
6
25
59
9
68.75
23
White (Non-Hispanic)
8
22
53
17
69.49
22
African-American
***
Hispanic
***
8
24
52
16
68.25
18
35
47
0
47.06
9
24
68
0
67.65
Total
Female
Tested
6
25
59
9
Accountable
6
25
59
9
Asian
Other
Title I
Tested
8
22
53
17
Accountable
8
22
53
17
Migrant
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Accountable
Disability
***
Alternate Assessment
***
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
8
23
53
16
68.75
Tested
Female
9
22
47
22
68.75
Accountable
Male
6
25
59
9
68.75
White (Non-Hispanic)
8
22
53
17
69.49
8
23
53
16
68.75
18
35
47
0
47.06
9
24
68
0
67.65
Tested
African-American
***
Accountable
Hispanic
***
Asian
Tested
9
24
68
0
Other
Accountable
9
24
68
0
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
***
Alternate Assessment
***
QC Review Page
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20%
40%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
60%
80%
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Total
3
28
58
10
68.66
Female
0
18
63
18
81.58
Male
7
41
52
0
51.72
3
29
58
11
68.18
3
28
58
10
68.66
4
43
46
7
53.57
3
38
59
0
58.97
Tested Students
3
28
58
10
Accountable
3
27
60
10
Accountable
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
05
100%
Tested
Tested
5
0
18
63
18
White (Non-Hispanic)
0
18
63
18
African-American
Hispanic
Tested
7
Accountable
7
41
52
38
0
55
Asian
0
***
Other
Title I
Tested
3
Accountable
3
29
58
27
11
59
Migrant
11
***
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Disability
Accountable
***
Alternate Assessment
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
3
27
60
10
70.15
Tested
Female
0
18
63
18
81.58
Accountable
Male
7
38
55
0
55.17
White (Non-Hispanic)
3
27
59
11
69.70
3
27
60
10
70.15
3
41
48
7
55.17
3
36
62
0
61.54
Tested
African-American
Accountable
Hispanic
Asian
Tested
3
Accountable
3
38
36
59
62
0
Other
0
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
***
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
Alternate Assessment
***
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
03
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Std.
Err.
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
School
-State
Mean
02 .x.x
Developing Understanding
1
68
0
4
26
54
13
1
1.8
0.1
50,684
0
3
19
56
18
3
2.0
-0.2
03 .x.x
Interpreting Text
1
68
0
6
28
51
12
3
1.8
0.1
50,684
0
5
23
54
15
3
1.9
-0.1
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Items
No.
Observations
MULTIPLE CHOICE
Correct
Incorrect
No.
Observations
Omit/Mult
Correct
Incorrect
Omit/Mult
01 .x.x
Forming a Foundation
26
395
85
15
0
0.85
0.02
303,851
85
14
0
0.85
0.00
02 .x.x
Developing Understanding
98
1,800
80
20
0
0.80
0.01
1,334,918
82
18
0
0.82
-0.02
03 .x.x
Interpreting Text
23
326
72
28
0
0.72
0.02
236,694
75
25
0
0.75
-0.03
05 .x.x
Critical Stance
25
330
81
19
0
0.81
0.02
253,110
82
18
0
0.82
-0.01
6
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
04
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Items
No.
Observations
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Std.
Err.
No.
Observations
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
School
-State
Mean
02 .x.x
Developing Understanding
5
102
0
3
22
56
18
2
1.9
0.1
83,783
0
3
14
58
21
3
2.1
-0.2
03 .x.x
Interpreting Text
6
167
0
2
17
53
25
3
2.1
0.1
134,034
0
3
10
54
27
5
2.2
-0.1
Correct
Incorrect
17
227
78
23
0
0.78
0.03
184,794
82
17
0
0.82
-0.04
109
1,588
76
24
0
0.76
0.01
1,289,482
80
20
0
0.80
-0.04
15
207
72
28
0
0.72
0.03
167,373
80
20
0
0.80
-0.08
4
93
68
32
0
0.68
0.05
75,317
74
26
0
0.74
-0.06
MULTIPLE CHOICE
01 .x.x
Forming a Foundation
02 .x.x
Developing Understanding
03 .x.x
Interpreting Text
05 .x.x
Critical Stance
Correct
Incorrect
Omit/Mult
Omit/Mult
7
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
READING CORE CONTENT
SCHOOL
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
05
STATE
Percents
OPEN RESPONSE
02 .x.x
Developing Understanding
03 .x.x
Interpreting Text
No.
Items
8
No.
Observations
201
3
146
MULTIPLE CHOICE
Percents
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
0
5
23
54
15
2
1.9
Std.
Err.
0.1
0
3
18
57
18
3
2.0
0.1
106,776
Correct
Incorrect
No.
Observations
148,041
Omit/Mult
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
School
-State
Mean
0
4
20
53
19
5
2.0
-0.1
0
2
16
54
22
6
2.1
-0.1
Correct
Incorrect
01 .x.x
Forming a Foundation
23
301
79
21
0
0.79
0.02
230,317
79
21
Omit/Mult
0
0.79
0.00
02 .x.x
Developing Understanding
79
1,377
84
16
0
0.84
0.01
1,020,160
84
16
0
0.84
0.00
03 .x.x
Interpreting Text
27
424
81
19
0
0.81
0.02
303,927
82
18
0
0.81
0.00
05 .x.x
Critical Stance
15
174
71
29
0
0.71
0.03
123,231
71
29
0
0.71
0.00
8
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS TREND DATA
Performance Level Percents
QC Review Page
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
Elementary
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
Apprentice - Medium
Novice - Low
8.22
0.68
2007
2007
3.18
0.64
2008
2008
5.42
3.01
2009
2009
6.03
3.02
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - Medium
60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100
Apprentice - High
2.74
13.01
2007
2007
2.55
5.73
2008
2008
2.41
10.24
2009
2009
9.55
3.02
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - High
Proficient
2.74
32.88
2007
2007
0.64
42.68
2008
2008
3.01
37.35
2009
2009
3.52
41.21
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Apprentice - Low
Distinguished
8.90
2007
30.82
2007
3.82
2008
40.76
2008
5.42
2009
33.13
2009
7.04
2010
26.63
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
The horizontal bar represents the percent of students scoring at a performance level within a particular year. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
20
40
60
80
100
2007
2009
2008
2010
9
QC Review Page
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
20%
40%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
60%
80%
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
03
100%
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Total
10
27
40
23
62.86
Female
16
27
38
19
56.76
Male
3
27
42
27
69.70
9
27
40
24
64.18
10
27
40
23
62.86
14
39
33
14
47.22
30
50
20
0
20.00
Tested Students
Tested
10
27
40
23
Accountable
9
28
40
24
Tested
16
Accountable
27
14
29
38
19
White (Non-Hispanic)
37
20
African-American
Hispanic
Tested
3
27
42
27
Accountable
3
27
42
27
***
Asian
Other
Title I
Tested
9
27
40
24
Accountable
8
28
40
25
Migrant
***
Identified LEP
Tested
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
***
Gifted/Talented
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Disability
Accountable
***
Alternate Assessment
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
9
28
40
24
63.24
14
29
37
20
57.14
Male
3
27
42
27
69.70
White (Non-Hispanic)
8
28
40
25
64.62
9
28
40
24
63.24
14
39
33
14
47.22
30
50
20
0
20.00
Total
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
10
Tested
Female
Accountable
Tested
African-American
Accountable
Hispanic
***
Asian
Tested
14
39
33
14
Other
Accountable
14
39
33
14
Title I
Migrant
***
Tested
30
50
20
0
Identified LEP
Accountable
30
50
20
0
Extended Sch Services
***
Gifted/Talented
***
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
Alternate Assessment
***
QC Review Page
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20%
16
Accountable
16
Accountable
60%
80%
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
04
100%
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Total
16
25
37
22
58.73
Female
16
26
45
13
58.06
Male
16
25
28
31
59.38
13
White (Non-Hispanic)
15
22
39
24
62.71
13
African-American
***
Hispanic
***
16
25
37
22
58.73
24
53
24
0
23.53
21
29
35
15
50.00
Tested Students
Tested
Tested
40%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
11
25
37
27
16
26
16
22
36
22
45
28
44
Tested
16
25
28
31
Accountable
16
25
28
31
Tested
15
22
39
24
Accountable
15
22
39
24
Asian
Other
Title I
Migrant
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Accountable
Disability
***
Alternate Assessment
***
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
16
27
36
22
57.81
Tested
Female
16
28
44
13
56.25
Accountable
Male
16
25
28
31
59.38
White (Non-Hispanic)
15
22
39
24
62.71
16
27
36
22
57.81
24
53
24
0
23.53
21
29
35
15
50.00
Tested
African-American
***
Accountable
Hispanic
***
Asian
Tested
21
29
35
15
Other
Accountable
21
29
35
15
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
***
Alternate Assessment
***
QC Review Page
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20%
40%
60%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
80%
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Total
4
13
48
34
82.09
Female
5
11
39
45
84.21
Male
3
17
59
21
79.31
5
14
48
33
81.82
4
13
48
34
82.09
7
21
50
21
71.43
8
18
54
21
74.36
Tested Students
4
13
48
34
Accountable
4
13
48
34
Accountable
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
05
100%
Tested
Tested
12
5
11
39
45
White (Non-Hispanic)
5
11
39
45
African-American
Hispanic
Tested
3
17
59
21
Accountable
3
17
59
21
Asian
***
Other
Title I
Tested
5
14
48
33
Accountable
5
14
48
33
Migrant
***
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Disability
Accountable
***
Alternate Assessment
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
4
13
48
34
82.09
Tested
Female
5
11
39
45
84.21
Accountable
Male
3
17
59
21
79.31
White (Non-Hispanic)
5
14
48
33
81.82
4
13
48
34
82.09
7
21
52
21
72.41
8
18
54
21
74.36
Tested
African-American
Accountable
Hispanic
Asian
Tested
8
18
54
21
Other
Accountable
8
18
54
21
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
***
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
Alternate Assessment
***
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
03
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
No.
Observations
148
01 .x.x
Number Prop Oper
0
14
26
29
9
22
2.0
0
14
25
29
13
19
2.0
0.0
03 .x.x
Geometry
3
89
0
16
43
22
16
3
1.5
0.1
67,527
0
9
24
31
26
11
2.1
-0.6
04 .x.x
Data Analysis & Probabilit
2
29
0
17
24
31
14
14
1.8
0.2
17,017
0
11
27
25
19
18
2.1
-0.3
05 .x.x
Algebraic Thinking
3
35
0
11
6
31
29
23
2.5
0.2
25,405
0
8
11
26
27
27
2.5
0.0
Correct
Incorrect
31
913
70
30
0
0.70
0.01
684,161
78
22
0
0.78
-0.08
3
204
86
14
0
0.86
0.02
152,052
91
9
0
0.91
-0.05
MULTIPLE CHOICE
01 .x.x
Number Prop Oper
02 .x.x
Measurement
03 .x.x
Geometry
04 .x.x
Data Analysis & Probabilit
05 .x.x
Algebraic Thinking
B
0
1
2
Correct
Incorrect
3
4
Mean
No.
Observations
109,804
School
-State
Mean
Std.
Err.
0.1
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Items
3
Omit/Mult
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Omit/Mult
19
554
77
23
0
0.77
0.01
413,870
86
14
0
0.86
-0.09
6
241
57
43
0
0.57
0.03
177,495
65
35
0
0.65
-0.08
14
332
84
16
0
0.84
0.02
244,994
84
16
0
0.84
0.00
13
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
04
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
No.
Observations
93
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
01 .x.x
Number Prop Oper
0
25
22
24
24
6
1.7
0
19
17
30
19
15
1.9
-0.2
02 .x.x
Measurement
2
21
0
62
10
5
19
5
1.0
0.3
16,810
0
44
10
10
20
15
1.5
-0.5
03 .x.x
Geometry
1
62
0
5
53
21
13
8
1.7
0.1
50,249
0
5
41
20
22
12
1.9
-0.2
05 .x.x
Algebraic Thinking
4
93
0
5
12
18
53
12
2.5
0.1
75,355
0
3
9
17
52
19
2.8
-0.3
MULTIPLE CHOICE
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Correct
Incorrect
No.
Observations
75,392
School
-State
Mean
Std.
Err.
0.1
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Items
4
Correct
Incorrect
01 .x.x
Number Prop Oper
24
765
57
43
Omit/Mult
0
0.57
0.02
619,798
69
30
Omit/Mult
0
0.69
-0.12
02 .x.x
Measurement
11
267
60
40
0
0.60
0.03
217,721
68
32
0
0.68
-0.08
03 .x.x
Geometry
16
373
65
35
0
0.65
0.02
301,398
78
22
0
0.78
-0.13
04 .x.x
Data Analysis & Probabilit
12
332
57
43
0
0.57
0.03
267,959
64
36
0
0.64
-0.07
05 .x.x
Algebraic Thinking
12
331
70
30
0
0.70
0.02
268,055
78
22
0
0.78
-0.08
14
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
MATHEMATICS CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
05
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
No.
Observations
92
01 .x.x
Number Prop Oper
0
1
12
23
36
28
2.8
0
4
14
21
28
32
2.7
0.1
02 .x.x
Measurement
1
11
0
45
27
18
0
9
1.0
0.4
8,247
0
39
23
13
11
14
1.4
-0.4
03 .x.x
Geometry
2
79
0
1
19
19
30
30
2.7
0.1
57,429
0
2
19
20
28
31
2.7
0.0
04 .x.x
Data Analysis & Probabilit
2
78
0
3
6
35
41
15
2.6
0.1
57,647
0
6
18
29
36
11
2.3
0.3
05 .x.x
Algebraic Thinking
2
21
0
5
19
33
19
24
2.4
0.3
16,494
0
11
16
26
14
33
2.4
0.0
MULTIPLE CHOICE
B
Correct
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Incorrect
No.
Observations
65,837
School
-State
Mean
Std.
Err.
0.1
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Items
3
Omit/Mult
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Correct
Incorrect
01 .x.x
Number Prop Oper
27
859
70
30
0
0.70
0.02
633,287
68
32
Omit/Mult
0
0.68
0.02
02 .x.x
Measurement
11
233
70
30
0
0.70
0.03
172,575
66
34
0
0.66
0.04
03 .x.x
Geometry
19
436
84
16
0
0.84
0.02
320,853
78
22
0
0.78
0.06
04 .x.x
Data Analysis & Probabilit
8
312
73
27
0
0.73
0.03
230,211
65
35
0
0.65
0.08
05 .x.x
Algebraic Thinking
9
324
76
24
0
0.76
0.03
238,488
69
31
0
0.69
0.07
15
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
SCIENCE TREND DATA
Performance Level Percents
1.72
0.00
2007
2007
2.33
0.00
2008
2010
2008
0.00
0.00
2009
3.13
0.00
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - Medium
60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100
Apprentice - High
0.00
6.90
2007
2007
6.98
0.00
2008
2008
0.00
3.28
2009
2009
7.81
1.56
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - High
Proficient
1.72
41.38
2007
2007
9.30
0.00
2008
2008
50.82
0.00
2009
2009
39.06
4.69
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Apprentice - Low
Distinguished
0.00
2007
48.28
2007
0.00
2008
81.40
2008
1.64
2009
44.26
2009
3.13
2010
0
16
Apprentice - Medium
Novice Low
2009
Page
Carlisle County Elementary School
QC Review
Carlisle County
095060
Elementary
40.63
2010
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
The horizontal bar represents the percent of students scoring at a performance level within a particular year. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
40
60
80
100
2007
2009
2008
2010
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
SCIENCE DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
20%
40%
60%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
80%
QC Review Page
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
04
100%
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Tested Students
Tested
6
13
40
41
Accountable
6
14
39
41
Tested
13
Accountable
10
13
42
13
34
Tested
0
16
38
47
Accountable
0
16
38
47
13
40
41
80.95
10
42
35
77.42
Male
0
16
38
47
84.38
White (Non-Hispanic)
7
8
41
44
84.75
6
13
40
41
80.95
0
29
59
12
70.59
9
18
38
35
73.53
Female
35
41
6
13
Total
African-American
***
Hispanic
***
Asian
Other
Title I
Tested
7
8
41
44
Accountable
7
8
41
44
Migrant
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Accountable
Disability
***
Alternate Assessment
***
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
6
14
39
41
79.69
13
13
41
34
75.00
Male
0
16
38
47
84.38
White (Non-Hispanic)
7
8
41
44
84.75
6
14
39
41
79.69
0
29
59
12
70.59
9
18
38
35
73.53
Total
Migrant
17
Tested
Female
Accountable
Tested
African-American
***
Accountable
Hispanic
***
Asian
Tested
9
18
38
35
Other
Accountable
9
18
38
35
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
***
Alternate Assessment
***
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
SCIENCE CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
04
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Items
No.
Observations
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
Std.
Err.
No.
Observations
B
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
School
-State
Mean
01 .x.x
Physical Science
1
62
0
11
11
35
34
8
2.2
0.1
50,249
0
9
16
35
32
8
2.1
0.1
02 .x.x
Earth Space Science
3
83
0
0
19
45
35
1
2.2
0.1
66,998
0
4
21
43
27
4
2.1
0.1
03 .x.x
Biological Science
5
103
1
3
21
31
33
11
2.3
0.1
83,749
0
7
27
25
27
13
2.1
0.2
Correct
Incorrect
01 .x.x
MULTIPLE CHOICE
Physical Science
20
568
Correct
83
Incorrect
17
Omit/Mult
0
0.83
0.02
460,574
80
20
Omit/Mult
0
0.80
0.03
02 .x.x
Earth Space Science
17
487
83
17
0
0.83
0.02
393,600
79
21
0
0.79
0.04
03 .x.x
Biological Science
24
609
82
18
0
0.82
0.02
494,192
79
20
0
0.79
0.03
04 .x.x
Unifying Concepts
13
392
89
11
0
0.89
0.02
318,184
79
21
0
0.79
0.10
18
Page
Carlisle County Elementary QC
School
Review
Carlisle County
095060
Elementary
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
SOCIAL STUDIES TREND DATA
Performance Level Percents
Apprentice - Medium
Novice Low
4.44
2.22
2007
2007
3.70
0.00
2008
2009
2010
2008
6.52
2.17
2009
2.99
0.00
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - Medium
60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100
Apprentice - High
4.44
17.78
2007
2007
0.00
27.78
2008
2008
8.70
23.91
2009
2009
1.49
25.37
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - High
Proficient
6.67
51.11
2007
2007
1.85
51.85
2008
2008
8.70
39.13
2009
2009
7.46
50.75
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Apprentice - Low
Distinguished
4.44
8.89
2007
2007
11.11
3.70
2008
2008
6.52
4.35
2009
2009
5.97
2010
0
19
2010
20
40
60
80
100
0
5.97
20
The horizontal bar represents the percent of students scoring at a performance level within a particular year. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
40
60
80
100
2007
2009
2008
2010
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
SOCIAL STUDIES DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
20%
9
Accountable
9
Accountable
60%
80%
QC Review
100%
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
36
49
34
6
51
6
Total
9
36
49
6
55.22
Female
8
32
53
8
60.53
10
41
45
3
48.28
9
35
50
6
56.06
9
36
49
6
55.22
18
29
50
4
53.57
15
41
41
3
43.59
Male
8
32
53
8
White (Non-Hispanic)
8
32
53
8
African-American
Hispanic
Tested
10
Accountable
10
Tested
9
Accountable
9
41
45
38
3
48
Asian
3
***
Other
Title I
35
50
33
6
52
Migrant
6
***
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Disability
Accountable
***
Alternate Assessment
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
9
34
51
6
56.72
Tested
Female
8
32
53
8
60.53
Accountable
Male
10
38
48
3
51.72
9
33
52
6
57.58
9
34
51
6
56.72
17
28
52
3
55.17
15
38
44
3
46.15
White (Non-Hispanic)
Identified
LEP
Page
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
05
Tested Students
Tested
Tested
40%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
Tested
African-American
Accountable
Hispanic
Asian
Tested
15
Accountable
15
41
38
41
44
3
Other
3
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
***
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
Alternate Assessment
***
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
SOCIAL STUDIES CORE CONTENT
Carlisle County Elementary School QC Review Page
Carlisle County
095060
05
STATE
SCHOOL
Percents
Percents
01 .x.x
Government & Civics
No.
Items
2
02 .x.x
Cultures & Societies
2
19
OPEN RESPONSE
No.
Observations
79
0
1
2
3
4
Mean
0
5
30
62
3
0
1.6
Std.
Err.
0.1
0
11
47
42
0
0
1.3
0.2
16,532
B
No.
Observations
57,427
B
0
1
2
0
10
29
0
10
33
School
-State
Mean
3
4
Mean
54
6
1
1.6
0.0
45
10
1
1.6
-0.3
-0.1
03 .x.x
Economics
3
145
0
19
35
41
6
0
1.3
0.1
106,939
0
15
37
39
8
1
1.4
04 .x.x
Geography
1
12
0
8
25
42
25
0
1.8
0.3
8,224
0
11
32
39
16
2
1.7
0.1
05 .x.x
Historical Perspective
2
80
0
25
29
44
3
0
1.2
0.1
57,613
0
19
33
39
8
1
1.4
-0.2
Correct
Incorrect
01 .x.x
MULTIPLE CHOICE
Government & Civics
15
444
Correct
76
Incorrect
25
Omit/Mult
0
0.75
0.02
329,083
70
30
Omit/Mult
0
0.70
0.05
02 .x.x
Cultures & Societies
11
353
78
22
0
0.78
0.02
255,092
76
24
0
0.76
0.02
03 .x.x
Economics
12
414
81
19
0
0.81
0.02
304,162
79
21
0
0.79
0.02
04 .x.x
Geography
15
390
71
29
0
0.71
0.02
287,802
71
29
0
0.71
0.00
05 .x.x
Historical Perspective
24
767
69
31
0
0.69
0.02
567,475
70
30
0
0.70
-0.01
21
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
ON-DEMAND WRITING TREND DATA
Performance Level Percents
Page
Carlisle County Elementary School
QC Review
Carlisle County
095060
Elementary
Apprentice - Medium
Novice Low
24.44
2.22
2007
2007
11.11
0.00
2008
2009
2010
2008
17.39
0.00
2009
14.93
0.00
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - Medium
60
80
100
60
80
100
60
80
100
Apprentice - High
2.22
13.33
2007
2007
0.00
29.63
2008
2008
10.87
19.57
2009
2009
0.00
31.34
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Novice - High
Proficient
11.11
22.22
2007
2007
1.85
48.15
2008
2008
6.52
41.30
2009
2009
4.48
34.33
2010
2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
Apprentice - Low
Distinguished
13.33
11.11
2007
2007
7.41
1.85
2008
2008
2.17
2.17
2009
2009
13.43
2010
0
22
2010
20
40
60
80
100
0
1.49
20
The horizontal bar represents the percent of students scoring at a performance level within a particular year. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
40
60
80
100
2007
2009
2008
2010
2009-2010
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
WRITING ON-DEMAND DISAGGREGATION
Performance Level Percents
0%
All
Students
Female
Male
White (NonHispanic)
AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Asian
Migrant
Identified
LEP
Free/
Reduced
Lunch
Approved
Disability
20%
40%
60%
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
80%
100%
4
60
34
1
Accountable
4
60
34
1
Accountable
Page
23
N%
A%
P%
D%
P+D%
Total
4
60
34
1
35.82
Female
3
45
50
3
52.63
Male
7
79
14
0
13.79
5
59
35
2
36.36
4
60
34
1
35.82
7
71
21
0
21.43
8
69
23
0
23.08
Tested Students
Tested
Tested
QC Review
Carlisle County Elementary School
Carlisle County
095060
05
3
45
50
3
White (Non-Hispanic)
3
45
50
3
African-American
Hispanic
Tested
7
79
14
0
Accountable
7
79
14
0
Asian
***
Other
Title I
Tested
5
59
35
2
Accountable
5
59
35
2
Migrant
***
Identified LEP
Extended Sch Services
Tested
Gifted/Talented
Accountable
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Tested
Disability
Accountable
***
Alternate Assessment
Tested
Accountable
NCLB Accountable Students
Total
4
60
34
1
35.82
Tested
Female
3
45
50
3
52.63
Accountable
Male
7
79
14
0
13.79
White (Non-Hispanic)
5
59
35
2
36.36
4
60
34
1
35.82
7
72
21
0
20.69
8
69
23
0
23.08
Tested
African-American
Accountable
Hispanic
Asian
Tested
8
69
23
0
Other
Accountable
8
69
23
0
Title I
Migrant
Tested
Identified LEP
Accountable
Extended Sch Services
Gifted/Talented
Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. "***" indicates unreportable populations with fewer than 10 students
or populations where all students score at the same performance level.
***
***
***
F/R Lunch Approved
Vocational/2 Credits
Disability
Alternate Assessment
***
School:
District:
Code:
Grade:
2009-2010
KENTUCKY PERFORMANCE REPORT
WRITING ON-DEMAND CORE CONTENT
Page
Carlisle County Elementary School
QC Review
Carlisle County
095060
05
SCHOOL
State
Percents
Percents
No.
Observations
B
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Mean
B
0
1
2
Content
25
0
0
4
20
20
32
12
12
0
0
3.64
0
1
1
Structure
25
0
0
0
20
28
36
12
4
0
0
3.52
0
2
2
Convention
25
0
0
0
12
24
44
8
12
0
0
3.84
0
0
Content
23
0
4
4
17
17
39
17
0
0
0
3.35
0
Structure
23
0
0
13
9
22
48
9
0
0
0
3.30
0
Convention
23
0
0
0
26
13
39
22
0
0
0
3.57
Content
19
0
0
0
26
26
47
0
0
0
0
Structure
19
0
0
16
16
26
42
0
0
0
0
Convention
19
0
0
0
37
16
37
11
0
0
0
WRITING PROMPT
Mean
School
-State
Mean
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
9
35
21
19
4
1
4.41
-0.77
9
11
40
19
13
3
1
4.15
-0.63
0
10
11
38
21
16
3
1
4.35
-0.51
2
2
11
12
35
18
16
3
1
4.16
-0.81
3
3
12
15
36
17
11
2
1
3.90
-0.60
0
0
0
14
13
38
17
13
3
1
4.14
-0.57
3.21
0
1
2
11
13
43
16
12
2
1
4.01
-0.80
2.95
0
2
3
12
15
46
14
7
1
0
3.78
-0.83
3.21
0
0
0
13
15
44
17
9
1
1
4.00
-0.79
Persuade
Inform
Narrate for a purpose
Editing
34
487
71
29
0
0.71
Std.
Err.
0.02
0
0.73
-0.02
Writing Process
52
804
72
28
0
0.72
0.02
592,164
73
27
0
0.73
-0.01
Revising
18
317
73
27
0
0.73
0.02
230,445
74
26
0
0.74
-0.01
MULTIPLE CHOICE
Correct
Incorrect
Omit/Mult
Correct
Incorrect
361,719
73
27
Omit/Mult
24