Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) RIETI BBL Seminar Handout October 7, 2014 Speakers: Mr. Didier HOUSSIN & Mr. HATTORI Takashi http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/index.html Energy, Climate Change and Environment: 2014 Insights Didier Houssin Director, Sustainable Policy and Technology Directorate, IEA Takashi Hattori Head, Environment and Climate Change Unit, IEA 7 October 2014 © OECD/IEA 2014 IEA publication series © OECD/IEA 2014 Goes deeper into selected technical issues Each year chooses a special thematic focus Presents regional energy and emissions data © OECD/IEA 2014 The emissions context Global energy demand, energy CO2, and ESCII (CO2 intensity of global energy supply) in the 6DS scenario 120 1200 CO2 emissions (Gt CO2) 100 1000 Projected Historical 80 800 60 600 40 400 20 200 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Total primary energy demand (EJ) ESCII (2011=100) ESCII Energy demand CO2 0 2050 © OECD/IEA 2014 The emissions challenge Getting to the 2DS will rely heavily on energy efficiency and renewables initially, but all technologies play a role. Near‐term Impacts Longer‐term Needs © OECD/IEA 2014 © OECD/IEA 2014 Different energy futures… The 2DS will require energy conservation and also significant transformation of the global energy mix. Total Primary Energy Supply (EJ) 1 000 Coal Oil 800 Natural gas 600 Nuclear 400 Other renewables 200 Hydro 0 6DS 2011 2DS Biomass and waste 2050 © OECD/IEA 2014 A cleaner energy mix The carbon intensity of energy supply will need to decrease rapidly in the future. ESCII (100 = 2010 carbon intensity) 120 6oC 100 80 4oC 60 40 2oC 20 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 © OECD/IEA 2014 14 months to Paris IPCC synthesis report COP 20 ADP negotiating session IEA OCT NOV DEC Negotiating INDCs by text fixed for Q1 2015 translation June UNFCCC session COP 21 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC COP 20 activities CCXG ETP 2015 Energy, Climate Change and Environment 2014 WEO Special Climate Report CCXG COP 21 activities Energy, Climate Change and Environment 2015 © OECD/IEA 2014 IEA messages for COP 20 in Lima Short term action pays off: emissions can be kept on a 2C pathway to 2020 Energy sector decarbonisation actions are not solely driven by emissions goals Power sector decarbonisation is particularly critical in the period 2020 to 2030 Action on investment and technology is needed now to set the conditions for long‐term energy sector transition The energy sector needs to prepare for the impacts of climate change © OECD/IEA 2014 Outline of ECCE: 2014 Insights Policies and actions to “unlock” existing high‐emissions assets The new landscape of emissions trading systems Energy metrics: A useful tool for tracking decarbonisation progress The air pollution‐GHG emissions nexus: implications for the energy sector (this year’s special focus) Trends in energy and emissions data © OECD/IEA 2014 Chapter 1: Policies and actions to “unlock” high‐emissions assets © OECD/IEA 2014 “Lock‐in” of 2 degree emissions 2017 Gt 35 30 Other 2 °C trajectory 25 Transport 20 15 Room to manoeuvre Industry 10 Lock‐in of existing infrastructure 5 Power generation 2011 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Planned fossil fuel infrastructure through 2017 will generate all energy emissions under 2DS through 2035 © OECD/IEA 2014 “Un‐locking” high emission assets Unlocking action Policy Options Direct regulations Retirement of ‐ ownership decision coal plant Price ‐ fleet‐wide emissions performance standard ‐ Renewables regulation ‐ demand reductions ‐ fuel tax changes ‐ carbon pricing ‐ preferential renewables tariffs ‐ “clean‐first” dispatch ‐ priority dispatch of renewables ‐ fleet‐wide emissions performance standard ‐ fuel tax changes carbon pricing ‐ removal of fossil fuel subsidies ‐ targets for plant retrofit rates ‐ fleet‐wide emissions performance standard ‐ carbon pricing ‐ removal of fossil fuel subsidies ‐ regulated lifetime limits ‐ CCS mandates ‐ CCS trading schemes ‐ fleet‐wide emissions performance standard ‐ carbon pricing ‐ preferential tariffs for CCS generation ‐ lifetime limits ‐ phase‐out Change dispatch of existing power plant fleet Efficiency retrofit of coal plant Retrofit of coal plant for CCS Supply/demand balances © OECD/IEA 2014 The energy trilemma Secure Energy Affordable Sustainable © OECD/IEA 2014 Chapter 2: The new landscape of emissions trading systems © OECD/IEA 2014 Current status of ETSs worldwide © OECD/IEA 2014 Interaction between ETSs and the energy sector Key issues include: The challenges of implementing an ETS in energy systems of a more regulated nature The need to understand and address the impact of carbon prices on electricity prices The importance of incorporating policy flexibility to respond to external influences such as other energy and climate policies © OECD/IEA 2014 Some conclusions from recent ETS experience ETSs may be implemented in highly regulated electricity systems, though additional measures may be needed to ensure propagation of the carbon price signal. Compensating those groups affected by rising electricity prices (driven by the carbon price) may achieve better outcomes than preventing the price rise. Improved integration of ETSs and complementary energy policies can ensure each set of policies meets its their respective objectives. © OECD/IEA 2014 Chapter 3: Metrics for tracking progress in energy sector decarbonisation © OECD/IEA 2014 Other criteria can drive energy sector actions Energy Sector Actions Are critical for achieving GHG targets Are not the only (or primary) driver of Other criteria: e.g., air quality road congestion © OECD/IEA 2014 Typology of metrics Type I metrics • • • Total annual GHG emissions GHG per unit of GDP GHG per unit of energy supply GHG goals SHORT‐ TERM LONG‐ TERM Non‐ GHG goals Type II metrics • • • Energy efficiency Renewable energy Low‐carbon energy deployment goals Type III metrics • • Tracking R&D of key technologies Emissions intensity of new electricity investment © OECD/IEA 2014 Type I and Type III metrics for the electricity sector To achieve the 2DS, the average emissions intensity of new generation must be lower than that of natural gas before 2020, and only 10% of today’s levels after 2020. 700 6DS new build 4DS new build 2DS new build 6DS Average Emissions Intensity (gCO2/kWh) 600 500 400 4DS Average 300 2DS Average 200 Historical 100 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 © OECD/IEA 2014 Chapter 4: The air pollution‐GHG emissions nexus: Implications for the energy sector © OECD/IEA 2014 Concerns about local air quality are rising © OECD/IEA 2014 Air pollution control and GHG emissions linkages Climate Change Air Quality Energy GHG abatement Public health benefits © OECD/IEA 2014 The air pollution‐GHG emissions nexus Individual sections examine: GHG co‐benefits of air quality controls of large stationary sources China’s air quality constraints: Implications for GHG mitigation in power and key industry sectors The regulatory approach to climate policy in the United States © OECD/IEA 2014 Plant‐level compliance options and impacts on GHG emissions Air pollutants controlled • SO2 • NOx • Primary PM/black carbon • CO • Hg (mercury) Plant‐level compliance options • Retrofit for pollution control • Improve operating efficiency • Fuel switching • Plant closure Impacts on other pollutants • GHG emissions co‐benefits © OECD/IEA 2014 Regional experience European Union Large Combustion Plant (LCP) Directive Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive Canada Air quality regulation and multi‐pollutant objectives Caps on mercury emissions for each province United States Cross‐State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) or “Transport Rule” Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) © OECD/IEA 2014 East Asia Japan has some of the cleanest and most efficient coal plants in the world, and most are installed with flue gas technologies for SO2 and NOx. South Korea is gradually moving towards a more efficient power fleet by upgrading and replacing the existing plants with the new and more efficient ones. China currently has the fastest installation rate of flue‐gas desulphurisation (FGD) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) anywhere in the world. © OECD/IEA 2014 Importance of multi‐pollutant approach Reduction in pollutant emissions Ozone SO2 Sulphate PM2.5 Acid deposition Mercury CO2 /global warming NOx Primary PM – black C CO Hg CO2 © OECD/IEA 2014 China case study Heavily industrialised growth model => air quality concerns in major urban areas Short‐term measures: Beijing Olympics (2008) Shanghai World Expo (2010) Severe air pollution episodes e.g., Beijing in January 2013 © OECD/IEA 2014 China: key national pollution control regulations Five‐Year Plans Pollution control mandates Closure of small, inefficient power plants Energy/carbon intensity targets “War on Pollution” policies PM2.5, PM10 Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan PM, SOx, NOx Coal cap policies Additional forced retirements © OECD/IEA 2014 Regional measures: Beijing Keep coal use below 65% of TPES by 2015 Cap coal consumption at 10 Mt by 2017 (a 13 Mt reduction) Reduce power capacity by one‐third Ban construction of new oil refining, steel, cement and thermal power plants Reduce cement production by 50% Upgrade 300 polluting firms in 2014 © OECD/IEA 2014 Some strategic considerations China’s air pollution controls can lead to significant GHG reductions, provided that they are structured to achieve these dual objectives Areas for consideration: ‐ Emissions shifting to unregulated/remote regions ‐ Ambitious syngas developments are significantly energy‐ and carbon‐intensive more Continued improvement of air quality statistics, accounting, and enforcement measures will be needed © OECD/IEA 2014 The emerging contours of the US regulatory approach Electric power Industry Transportation © OECD/IEA 2014 Regulating GHGs from electric power plants GHG standards for new power plants Uniform national standards for coal and gas Coal units would need CCS; NGCC meets the standard already GHG standards for existing power plants State‐specific carbon intensity goals Projected to reduce emissions by 30% in 2030 relative to 2005 Built around the application of four “building blocks” Will allow use of market mechanisms such as cap‐and trade © OECD/IEA 2014 Some quick take‐aways from the U.S. GHG regulations Standards for new power plants are likely to have little effect on US GHG emissions By 2020, power sector emissions will already have declined 13% since 2005; thus, standards expected to reduce emissions an additional 17% over the following decade In 2030, natural gas would be the dominant fuel (33%), but coal would still produce a significant share of electricity (31%) CO2 intensity of US electricity generation projected to fall 19% from its 2012 fleet‐wide rate, i.e. to that of typical NGCC plant Mobile source rules for new cars and trucks are also important and may yield more reductions by 2030 © OECD/IEA 2014 Non‐CO2 benefits are significant $93 billion $55 billion © OECD/IEA 2014 Chapter 5: Data: Energy and Emissions Data © OECD/IEA 2014 Selected indicators Regional coverage 35000 World OECD Americas OECD Asia Oceania OECD Europe Africa Non‐OECD Americas Middle East Non‐OECD Europe and Eurasia Asia (excluding China and India) China India 25000 20000 1990 = 100 160 15000 10000 140 5000 0 1971 1976 1981 Coal/peat 1986 Oil 120 1991 1996 2001 Gas 2006 2012 100 Other 80 60 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 CO2 emissions GDP/population CO2/GDP million tonnes of CO2 million tonnes of CO2 30000 35000 100% 30000 90% 2005 2008 2012 Population CO2/TPES (ESCII) 80% 25000 70% 60% 20000 50% 15000 40% 10000 30% 20% 5000 10% 0 1971 0% 1981 1991 Electricity and heat Manuf. ind. and construction Residential 2001 2012 1990 2012 Other energy ind. own use Transport Other © OECD/IEA 2014 Outline of 2014 edition Policies and actions to “unlock” existing high‐emissions assets The new landscape of emissions trading systems Energy metrics: A useful tool for tracking decarbonisation progress The air pollution‐GHG emissions nexus: Implications for the energy sector (this year’s special focus) Trends in energy and emissions data © OECD/IEA 2014 IEA messages for COP 20 in Lima Short term action pays off: emissions can be kept on a 2C pathway to 2020 Energy sector decarbonisation actions are not solely driven by emissions goals Power sector decarbonisation is particularly critical in the period 2020 to 2030 Action is needed now to set the conditions for long‐term energy sector transition The energy sector needs to prepare for the impacts of climate change © OECD/IEA 2014 Thank you ありがとう © OECD/IEA 2014