Western Kentucky University
Stormwater Utility Survey
2008
C. Warren Campbell
Darren Back
i
Preface to the 2007 Survey
This survey began as a project for my Fall 2006 CE Floodplain Management class at WKU. Early
in the work, I sent out an email to all of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) state coordinators
telling them of the survey and soliciting their help in spreading the word that this work was under way.
From this initial step, we received many responses, all but one of them positive. The negative comment
came from an executive at a well-known water resources company. His concern was that Black and
Veatch already had been doing a survey for many years and that we might over-saturate stormwater
officials with requests for information and cause problems for the older survey. Since I also received
strong encouragement from the foremost flood mitigation planner in the U.S. and the foremost expert
in the U.S. in helping communities develop storm water utilites (SWUs), I was not overly discouraged.
However, I decided to have a minimum of contact with the SWU communities.
Since we would not be sending out questionnaires for the survey, we focused our efforts on
locating SWUs via the Internet. This was our prime source of information. My students and I looked at
hundreds of city and county web sites and municipal codes on-line. This method has the advantage of
convenience and speed, but the data can be out of date or even inaccurate. The best sources were online municipal codes or city fee schedules. However, we also found references to other SWUs in state
utility organizations or in documents published by communities trying to establish SWUs who would
describe nearby communities and the fees they charged.
In the end, we found more than 600 SWU communities in the U.S. It is difficult to estimate how
many SWUs there are in the U.S. However, based on my find rate, I would guess there are at least 800.
Before coming to Western, I was the city hydrologist for Huntsville, Alabama, a community
interested in setting up a SWU. The data in this document would have been invaluable to us. Also, the
lack of completeness of previous surveys motivated this study. Please use this data, but be aware of its
limitations. As a user of the data, you assume all responsibility for any inaccuracies in our data.
If you find errors or are aware of a SWU we missed, please contact me at
warren.campbell@wku.edu. The intent is that this be a living document freely available to the
floodplain management and stormwater community. Also, be aware that we have an on-line
questionnaire that can be accessed at www.wku.edu/swusurvey.
Warren Campbell
Bowling Green, Kentucky
August 26, 2007
ii
Preface to the 2008 Survey
The goals of this survey have changed slightly since the 2007 survey, and our approach was
modified slightly this year to include more contacts with community officials involved in stormwater
utilities (SWUs). One of my students was able to locate enough SWUs that I felt compelled to include
him as an author on this survey. This is not to denigrate the participation of my other students who are
recognized in the acknowledgements. The floodplain management class worked very hard on this
survey in different capacities.
We originally envisioned this survey as a living database with SWUs added as they were enacted.
Consequently, we called our first 2007 survey Version 1.00 and updated it later as Version 1.01. In
practice, we have found that updating requires significant time and resources and is impractical. Also,
we only had about 300 hits to the website in the first year. This is enough interest to continue providing
the survey, but not enough to keep it continually updated. The 2008 survey has no version number.
The decision to continue providing the survey depends on the interest in the stormwater
community. Please share this web site with colleagues with an interest in stormwater financing. We
have tried to avoid errors, but the methods used to identify stormwater utilities often frustrate that
effort. If you find errors, please contact me by email at warren.campbell@wku.edu. In particular, it is
hard to locate information on court challenges to stormwater utilities. If your community has been
challenged, I would welcome information on the challenge and the outcome.
Warren Campbell
Bowling Green, Kentucky
May 30, 2008
iii
DISCLAIMER
The main goal of this survey was to identify as many U.S. Stormwater Utilities (SWUs) as possible.
Because many stormwater professionals do not have the time to respond to questionnaires, our primary
method of identification was Internet searches. We searched on key terms such as “stormwater utility”,
“stormwater fee”, and “drainage fee”. We scoured on-line municipal codes such as Municode, AmLegal,
Municipal Codes by LexisNexis, and others. We went through many city web sites trying to find utilities.
The approach used is prone to errors and we hope the readers of this document will help us correct
them.
In some cases, it is difficult to tell whether the community has a stormwater utility or not. Some
communities have enacted the right to charge a stormwater user’s fee, but it is not clear whether they
have actually enacted a fee or not. If the right to charge a recurring fee dedicated to stormwater was
enacted, we counted it as a SWU. When one of our students contacted a community official, she said
they did not have a SWU but wished they did. However, they did charge a stormwater fee of $ 0.55 per
month. This raises the question of the definition of a SWU. By our definition, a SWU is a funding
approach requiring residents to pay a recurring charge that supports the community stormwater
initiatives. The fee is dedicated to the maintenance, design, construction, and administration of the
stormwater system.
The opinions expressed in this document are those of the lead author (Campbell). They are not
official opinions of Western Kentucky University, its administration, or any other individuals
associated in any way with the University. The lead author is an engineer so that any opinions
expressed should not in any way be construed by any individual or organization as sound legal advice.
The use or misuse of any of the data and information provided herein is the sole responsibility of the
user and is not the responsibility of Western Kentucky University, its employees, students, or any
organization associated with the University.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following students contributed to the 2008 survey:
Darren Back, CFM
Robert Dillingham, CFM
James Edmunds
Scott Embry, CFM
Clint Ervin
Catie Gay, CFM
Sean O’Bryan, CFM
Casey Pedigo
Broc Porter
Kelly Stolt, CFM
Ben Webster, CFM
Darren Back’s contribution to this survey was so significant, that I elected to include him as a coauthor on this paper, however, each of the other students made significant contributions to this
document.
We are also indebted to AMEC for sharing their list of stormwater utilities with us. Scott Embry had
the foresight to ask them for it and they obliged. We continue to have a good relationship with AMEC.
We thank Tricia Harper for proofreading this document. Any remaining errors and typos occurred
because we overwhelmed her with them. These errors are the responsibility of the lead author.
Finally, we have borrowed data from the other stormwater utility surveys cited in the references. In
some cases, we have updated data such as fees, and any mistakes should be considered primarily the
fault of the lead author of this document.
v
Introduction
Lawlor et al. (2005) state the following:
While local governments may have authority and a duty to manage stormwater runoff,
it is fundamentally the responsibility of individual property owners to insure that any
adverse consequences resulting from the development of their properties, or activities
conducted thereon, are not transferred to downstream or adjacent property owners. In
much the same way that raw sewage disposal, control of foul air emissions, or
abatement of noise are responsibilities of those generating such impacts, owners of
developed property have a measure of responsibility for flood protection and
preservation of the environmental quality of water courses and riparian corridors.
County-delivered stormwater management services, therefore, help fulfill owner
responsibilities for mitigating the adverse impacts of stormwater runoff.
This is an excellent justification for stormwater utilities and it would be a major advance if the public
in communities attempting to establish SWUs would accept it. The authors refer to DeKalb County,
Georgia but the statement applies to any community.
The main goal of the Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility (SWU) Survey has been to
provide as complete a data set on SWUs as possible. For comparison, the most recent Black and Veatch
Survey (Black and Veatch, 2007) included data from 71 SWUs. The smallest of these served a population
of 12,000. We have identified 923 SWUs in 38 states and the District of Columbia and included
communities with populations in the hundreds. This survey is up from the 635 identified in the 2007
WKU Survey (Campbell, 2007). Figure 1 shows the locations of SWUs and Figure 2 shows the number of
SWUs identified by state in the 2007 and 2008 surveys. The greatest growth in the survey occurred in
Minnesota which along with Florida now has more than 100 SWUs. Since the 2007 survey, Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia) has joined the ranks of states with a stormwater utility. Currently, at least five states have
more than 50 stormwater utilities and at least 15 have more than 20.
Other stormwater utility surveys of note are those of Florida SWUs (Florida Stormwater Association,
2005) and the southeast survey (Southeast Stormwater Association, 2007). We have included data from
each of the surveys mentioned, but updated fees where appropriate.
1
Figure 1. U.S. stormwater utilities (SWUs)
2
Figure 2. Stormwater utilities by state in the 2007 and 2008 WKU surveys.
Challenges to Stormwater Utilities
Stormwater utilities have been frequently challenged in court and Black and Veatch (2007) indicate
that 2 of the 71 utilities in their survey were challenged between 2005 and 2007. Another strategy by
SWU opponents is emerging. Opportunistic politicians are running on platforms of promising to repeal
stormwater utilities. Recently, Colorado Springs has had to face this kind of challenge. Some of these
politicians may prosper until the next major flood.
The poster children for SWU community nightmares are those of Atlanta, Georgia and Durham,
North Carolina (Smith, 2006). Fulton County taxpayers challenged the city’s stormwater utility and the
decision was a landmark for SWUs. The court ruled that the fee based on parcel area and on
development intensity, was assessed more like a tax. As such, the proper procedure for enacting a tax
was not followed by the city. Further, the benefit derived from the utility was not proportional to the
fee and was calculated to raise money as opposed to addressing the real stormwater needs of the
community. From this decision, the recommended approach for developing a SWU is to determine the
legitimate stormwater needs of a community and to set the fee accordingly. Atlanta had to refund all
stormwater fees collected to that point. The Durham stormwater fee was declared invalid and the city
3
was required to return the fees collected with interest. Figure 3 shows the map of utilities challenged
and the outcomes to date that we were able to identify.
Figure 3. Stormwater utility court challenges and outcomes.
The legal challenge that a SWU is a tax is most common. Rulings against SWUs, in addition to those
for Atlanta is that the fee is mandatory. That is, a property owner cannot avoid it even if no stormwater
is discharged from the parcel. In several states, this is another justification for the legal view that a
stormwater fee is a tax. In these states, providing exemptions proportional to the alleviation of the
burden on stormwater systems is advisable. Another argument that has been used is that the fee is
collected even in years with little rain.
Of the utilities in the 2007 Black and Veatch Survey, (B&V, 2007) 24 % had been challenged in court.
Of those challenged, 62 % had the fee sustained, and only 4 % had the challenge sustained. The
remainder are either pending or a settlement was reached. In the Florida survey (FSA 2005), 15 % of
fees were challenged in court. Of those challenged, 45 % were sustained and 9 % were not sustained.
In the southeast survey (Southeast Stormwater Association, 2007) 18 % faced a legal challenge. 62 %
had the fee sustained, and none had their fee not sustained.
4
Legal challenges have been the primary problem for maintaining SWUs, but political challenges
occur as well. Colorado Springs enacted a stormwater utility in 2005, but politicians running on a
platform of repealing the “rain tax” now endanger the fee. Another approach is being tried in Florida,
the state with the most stormwater utilities (Florida Stormwater Association, 2008). Some voters have
proposed an amendment to the Florida constitution requiring all new taxes and fees to be voted on.
This bill would limit home rule powers in Florida and move the state toward Dillon’s Rule. Dillon’s Rule
is the principle that a community is created by the state and cannot assume powers not specifically
granted by the state. Home rule is the opposing principle that a community can enact any ordinance not
specifically prohibited by the state.
Legally, a stormwater utility fee for a given parcel should be based on the burden placed on the
stormwater system by that parcel (New England Environmental Finance Center, 2005). This begs the
question of how a burden should be measured. Depending on whether a SWU is set up predominantly
to handle stormwater quality or quantity, burden could be related to flooding, to water pollution, or to
both. For SWUs concerned with flooding, typically it is taken as the volume of runoff from a parcel.
However, most stormwater systems are based on the peak flow for a design storm or storms. Further,
most damage to stormwater systems occurs during floods. This might imply that burden should be
measured as peak flow, but peak flows vary from point to point. The effects of a large shopping center
can be felt in storm sewers and streams for miles downstream and calculating the impact on all of these
downstream systems could be prohibitively expensive. For smaller parcels, the runoff burden would be
significant only in the storm sewer or curb and gutter immediately downstream. Debo and Reese (1992)
address the issue and conclude that downstream effects should be determined to a point downstream
in the watershed where the size of the development comprises only 5 – 10 percent of the watershed
area. Similar information is provided by Debo and Resse (2003) in a more accessible form.
Ultimately, the use of volume of runoff as a measure of water quantity burden may be most
appropriate. The assumption is that volume is correlated with the economic impact of designing,
constructing, and maintaining stormwater management systems. For water quality burden, there are
measures of the impact of different land uses on water quality that correlate watershed impervious
percentage to stream water quality impairment. The part of the SWU fee devoted to water quality
should be apportioned according to the pollution burden caused by a given land use.
The ideal stormwater utility should be easy to sell, implement, administer, and should meet a
community’s stormwater needs while being bulletproof in court. The fee charged should be
proportional to the services rendered and to the burden placed by any property on the stormwater
system, and it should not place a disproportionate burden on any individual or group, i.e. it should be
fair.
5
Analysis
The preceding section discussed the methods being used by opponents of stormwater utilities. This
section is devoted to the analysis of SWU data. We update the 2007 survey to include data from the
additional SWUs that were identified this year.
We were able to identify 448 SWUs that use the Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) method. An ERU
is usually defined as the average number of square feet of impervious surface for a single family
residential parcel in the SWU community. Other properties (commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.)
have fees proportional to the number of ERUs on the parcel. We identified 156 SWUs that used a
method other than the ERU such as tiers based on the land use or on the number and size of water
meters for a property. The methods used by the remaining 319 SWUs have not yet been identified.
ERUs ranged from 500 square feet of impervious surface up to 25,000 square feet. The average ERU
was 2983 square feet and the median was 2650 square feet. The size of the ERU is very important to
the distribution of cost to different land uses. Single family residential properties typically pay a base
fee. Commercial properties pay the base fee multiplied by the number of ERUs on the parcel. If the ERU
is very small, then commercial properties would supply a larger percentage of the annual revenue from
the SWU. Conversely, large ERUs place a larger burden on residential properties. Figure 4 shows the
distribution of ERUs across the U.S. The small, uncolored symbols in the figure indicate that either an
ERU-based fee structure was not used, or that an ERU could not be determined for the community. For
example, many of the symbols are seen in Minnesota where the Residential Equivalent Factor (REF)
method is commonly used. This can be seen more clearly in Figure 5.
ERUs greater than 10,000 square ft. impervious seem highly unlikely except in very wealthy
communities. A large ERU places a large burden on residential properties, and if the community is not
comprised of very large homes, it seems that these communities might be vulnerable to court
challenges by residents. Conversely, communities with very low ERUs might be challenged by
commercial and industrial interests because they may be bearing a disproportionately large percentage
of the SWU fee burden. It seems that the best policy is to accurately measure the average impervious
area of single family residential properties and use this as the ERU. Attempts to placate either
commercial interests or residential voters may be legally misguided.
The monthly fee for a single family residential property ranged from $0.00 to $35 dollars per month.
At least one community appears to have enacted a stormwater utility without a fee. Fees were
determined for 780 SWUs. The average of these monthly fees was $4.00 and the median $3.50. Figure
6 shows that high or low fees do not appear to congregate and each state with more than a few SWUs
has both high and low monthly fees. In this figure, the small, red symbols are used if the fee is below
$1.00 or if no fee has been determined for the utility.
We were able to identify 923 SWUs in this survey. Adding up the populations served according to
the 2000 census, approximately 80,0000,000 Americans live in SWU communities. This means that
approximately 28 percent of Americans currently pay a stormwater fee. Stormwater utilities serve 56
percent of the residents of Minnesota and 60 percent of Floridians. Though it is difficult to estimate
6
because of overlapping city and county SWUs, our current best estimate is that 95 percent of the
residents of the state of Washington pay stormwater fees. These estimates may be slightly high, but all
three states surely have more stormwater utilities than we were able to find so these actually may be
low.
Figure 4. Distribution of monthly Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs) across the U.S.
7
Figure 5. Minnesota and Wisconsin distributions of ERUs.
From Figures 1 and 5, it is apparent that stormwater utilities have a tendency to cluster. This is
particularly apparent in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area and around Seattle. As one community develops
a utility, other nearby communities can easily observe the benefits causing a desire to create a SWU of
their own. It is interesting that there is a belt of stormwater utilities across the center of the Florida
peninsula, which is the area of the U.S. that experiences the highest number of thunderstorms. SWUs
also cluster around coastal areas for obvious reasons. Also, Florida has the highest number of SWUs
partly because of a very high flood risk. However, the role played by the Florida Stormwater Association
cannot be overlooked. By serving as a clearinghouse of information on stormwater utilities, it has
encouraged the development of SWUs in that state. Part of the purpose of this document is to provide
information that will be useful to U.S. community officials trying to develop stormwater utilities.
8
Figure 6. Distribution of stormwater utility fees across the U.S.
Figure 7 shows the growth in the number of SWUs by year. Local peaks in growth rate occur in 1993
and in 2003. Figure 8 shows the peaks more clearly. The peak in 1993 may be related to the Midwest
flooding and Hurricane Andrew in 1992. The peak in 2003 shows growth in SWUs in smaller
communities and is influenced by the effective date of EPA Phase II rules. Figure 8 shows a decline in
the rate of formation of SWUs in 2008. This decline is probably not real and occurs for two reasons: 1)
the survey is being published in June, and 2) recent SWUs are more difficult to find.
9
700
600
500
Cumulative 400
SWUs by
300
Year
200
100
0
1970
1980
1990
2000
Year
Figure 7. Number of stormwater utilities by year
10
2010
70
60
50
40
SWUs by
Year
30
20
10
0
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Year
Figure 8. Formation of stormwater utilities by year.
Summary
The 2007 Survey (Campbell, 2007) identified 635 stormwater utilities. This survey identified 923
with much of the growth coming in the state of Minnesota which now has at least 106 utilities. Thirtyeight states and the District of Columbia have at least one stormwater utility. The new state this year is
Pennsylvania as a new utility was formed in Philadelphia. Two states (Florida and Minnesota) now have
more than 100 SWUs, 5 have more than 50, and 15 states have more than 20 stormwater utilities. More
and smaller communities are forming utilities to deal with more stringent water quality requirements.
The growth in the number of stormwater utilities continues and today, our best guess is that that there
are more than 1,000 stormwater utilities in the U.S. alone. Communities in Canada are also beginning to
form them, though these are not covered here.
Stormwater water utilities continue to face legal and political challenges. Politicians are elected on
the promise of repealing the “rain tax.” SWUs are challenged in court by parties who assert the fee is a
tax, or that the fee is not fair, or for other reasons. SWUs that survive these challenges generally follow
several guidelines. These include, but are not limited to the following:
1. The legitimate stormwater needs of a community are identified.
2. Fees are structured to equitably spread the fee burden across the community.
11
3.
4.
5.
6.
Fees are proportional to the benefit provided to the community.
Fee amounts for a given parcel are correlated with the volume of runoff from that parcel.
Demonstrable benefits accrue because of the SWU.
SWUs are enacted in accordance with state law.
References
Black and Veatch (2007). “2007 Stormwater Utility Survey,” 15 pp.
Black and Veatch (2005). “2005 Stormwater Utility Survey,” 10pp.
Campbell, C. Warren (2007). “The Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2007,”
www.wku.edu/swusurvey, Bowling Green, Kentucky.
Debo, Thomas N. and Reese, Andrew J. (2003). Municipal Stormwater Management, 2nd Ed., Lewis
Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 93 – 95.
Debo, T.N., and Reese, A. J. (1992). “Downstream Impacts of Detention,” Proceedings of NOVATECH 92,
Lyon, France, Nov. 3 – 5, 1992.
Florida Stormwater Association (2008). “Summary of Legislative and TBRC Priorities,”
http://www.florida-stormwater.org/pdfs/LegisSum40408.pdf, 3pp.
Florida Stormwater Association (2005). “Stormwater Utilities Survey 2005,” Tallahassee, FL, 36pp.
Lawlor, Bridget, Mohajer, Alex, Rothstein, Eric (2005). “Stormwater Utility Implementation Using GIS, “
Proceedings of the 2005 Georgia Water Resources Conference,
http://cms.ce.gatech.edu/gwri/uploads/proceedings/2005/LawlorB-GWRCpaper.pdf, 4pp.
New England Environmental Finance Center (2005). “Stormwater Utility Fees: Considerations & Options
for Interlocal Stormwater Working Group (ISWG),”
http://efc.muskie.usm.maine.edu/docs/StormwaterUtilityFeeReport.pdf, 62 pp.
Smith, Joshua (2006). “Stormwater Utilities in Geogia,”
http://www.law.uga.edu/landuseclinic/research/stormwater_utilities_2006_smith.pdf
Southeast Stormwater Association (2007). “2007 Southeast Stormwater Utility Survey,” Tallahassee, FL,
49pp.
12
Raw Data Tables
The following data tables provide the information collected on 924 stormwater utilities. The
communities whose names are highlighted in yellow appear to have appealed the ordinances enacting
their stormwater utilities. Communities with an “x” in the ERU column use the tier system so that no
ERU is used. The ERU column is blank when neither an ERU nor a determination can be made if an
alternate system was used.
13
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Community
Stormwater Management
Authority
State
ERU
x
Flagstaff
AL
AZ
Mesa
AZ
x
Oro Valley
AZ
Peoria
Albany
AZ
CA
Arcata
CA
Berkeley
Carlsbad
Carmel
Chino
Citrus Heights
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
4000
Contra Costa County
CA
5,000
Davis
CA
Del Mar
CA
Dixon
CA
Elk Grove
CA
Escondido
Folsum
Fortuna
CA
CA
CA
Galt
CA
Hollister
Los Angeles
Modesto
Monterey
Oceanside
Ontario
Palo Alto
Poway
Rancho Palos Verdes
Richmond
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
Sacramento
CA
Sacramento County
Salinas
San Bruno
San Diego
San Jose
San Marcos
Santa Clarita
Santa Cruz
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
1500
x
Monthly
Fee
$0.42
$1.84
$1.50
$2.90
$0.75
$3.47
$1.96
Date
Created
1995
2003
2006
2007
1995
1992
2001
1991
$1.95
$8.77
$5.54
$2.50
$4.83
$3.00
$3.77
$5.84
$2.10
$0.55
$2.43
1997
1990
1993
$1.92
$5.44
$1.00
2,500
3,804
$10.55
$4.36
$7.17
2004
1997
2005
2005
$11.31
$5.85
$3.85
$1.95
$4.53
$1.77
$2.00
$1.77
14
1994
1990
1982
1974
1994
1994
Population
662,047
52,894
447,541
29,700
108,364
16,444
16,651
102,743
78,247
4,081
67,168
85,071
948,816
64,000
4,389
20,000
59,984
133,559
70,835
10,497
21,300
34,413
3,694,820
188,856
29,674
161,029
158,007
58,598
48,044
41,145
99,216
407,018
1,223,499
151,060
40,165
1,223,400
894,943
54,977
151,088
54,593
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Community
Santa Monica
Santa Rosa
South San Francisco
Stockton
Tracy
Vallejo
Vista
Woodland
Arapahoe County
Arvada
Aurora
Boulder
Canon City
Castle Rock
Colorado Springs
Denver
Englewood
Federal Heights
Fort Collins
Fountain
Golden
Greeley
LaFayette
Lakewood
Littleton
Longmont
Louisville
Loveland
Northglenn
Parker
Pueblo
Westminster
Woodland Park
Washington
Wilmington
Alachua County
Altamonte Springs
Apopka
Atlantic Beach
Auburndale
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
DC
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
ERU
2,776
Monthly
Fee
$1.96
2,347
3,140
2,458
2,848
3,000
1,944
x
2001
$3.20
$2.22
$4.27
$1.98
$2.00
$7.13
$2.00
$8.30
$2.00
$5.00
$3.50
$1.50
$2.00
$0.58
$11.94
1997
2001
2007
1998
1986
1984
2006
1987
2004
1999
2003
2001
1995
x
$6.25
1989
1,790
x
$4.00
$0.75
1991
3,738
x
15
$2.10
$1.20
$1.97
$1.80
$0.48
$5.00
$4.30
$3.83
$8.45
$4.00
$6.61
$7.52
$5.81
$1.39
$3.15
$14.26
Date
Created
Population
1995
84,084
1996
147,595
1994
60,552
243,771
56,929
116,760
89,857
52,519
2006
487,967
2001
102,153
2002
276,393
1974
94,673
2004
15,431
2002
20,224
2005
360,890
1980
554,636
2006
12,065
137,177
15,197
17,159
79,930
23,197
144,126
40,340
71,093
18,937
50,608
31,575
23,558
102,121
100,940
6,515
572,059
72,664
217,955
41,200
26,642
13,368
11,032
No.
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
Community
Aventura
Bartow
Bay County
Bay Harbor Islands
Belle Glade
State
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Belle Isle
FL
Boca Raton
Boynton Beach
Bradenton
Bradenton Beach
Brevard County
Callaway
Cape Canaveral
Cape Coral
Casselberry
Charlotte County
Clearwater
Clermont
Cocoa
Cocoa Beach
Coconut Creek
Collier County
Coral Gables
Daytona Beach
DeBary
DeLand
Delray Beach
Deltona
Dundee
Dunedin
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Eagle Lake
FL
Edgewater
El Portal
Eustis
Florida City
Fort Lauderdale
Fort Meade
Fort Myers
Fort Pierce
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Frostproof
FL
ERU
1,548
2,520
Monthly
Fee
$2.50
$3.75
$3.33
4,087
2,837
1,937
$4.00
$2.90
$5.00
2,500
$8.33
$3.00
2,074
2,309
x
1,830
3,154
2,166
2,900
2,070
1,661
2,560
4,900
2,502
2,495
1,708
2,027
2,187
1,250
x
x
$6.00
$7.00
$6.00
$4.50
$5.00
$1.00
$4.50
$4.00
$6.00
$3.00
$2.90
$4.25
2,931
2,186
16
$6.25
$2.90
$3.00
$8.65
$5.00
$3.00
$5.00
$2.65
$2.50
$3.00
Date
Created
Population
1997
25,267
2005
16,278
2005
148,217
1996
5,146
1998
14,906
5,531
1993
74,764
1993
60,389
1996
49,504
2004
1,482
1990
476,230
1991
14,233
2003
8,829
2002
102,286
1993
22,629
141,627
1990
108,787
1990
9,333
1992
16,412
2003
12,553
2004
43,566
1991
251,377
1993
42,249
64,112
15,559
1991
20,904
1990
60,020
2002
69,543
2003
2,912
2007
34,012
2,496
18,668
2,505
1997
12,967
2000
7,843
1992
152,397
5,691
1999
48,208
2005
37,516
2,975
No.
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
148
147
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
Community
Gainesville
Golden Beach
Griffin
Gulf Breeze
Gulfport
Haines City
Hallandale Beach
Hernando County
Hialeah
Hialeah Gardens
Hillsborough County
Holly Hill
Hollywood
Homestead
Indian Creek Village
Indian Harbor Beach
Jacksonville Beach
Jupiter
Key Biscayne
Key West
Kissimmee
State
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Lake Alfred
FL
Lake Mary
Lake Worth
Lakeland
Largo
Lauderdale Lakes
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Lauderdale-by-the-Sea
FL
Leesburg
Leon County
Longwood
Malabar
Manatee County
Marathon
Margate
Medley
Melbourne
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Melbourne Beach
FL
Miami Beach
Miami Shores
FL
FL
ERU
2,300
8,000
2,200
4,450
2,300
1,935
958
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
1,664
1,267
1,800
2,050
$2.50
$2.00
$1.00
$6.00
2,000
$3.18
2,500
1,541
2,651
1,083
1,400
2,400
$3.00
$5.00
$3.85
4,576
1,748
5,000
2,257
2,133
4,472
2,000
2,723
2,898
2,500
2,328
2,500
2,500
791
2,466
17
Monthly
Fee
$6.95
$35.00
$2.95
$3.50
$2.87
$2.00
$2.17
$5.00
$6.50
$2.00
$3.00
$2.90
$2.00
$3.57
$3.50
$3.00
$1.67
$3.00
$3.00
$5.00
$2.30
$1.50
$5.80
$3.25
Date
Created
Population
1989
95,447
1997
919
2006
1995
2003
1998
1996
1989
1997
1993
1992
1999
1990
1993
1993
2001
1989
1993
1989
1997
1994
1994
1992
1991
1993
1991
1999
2000
1996
2000
5,665
12,527
13,174
34,282
130,802
226,419
19,297
998,948
12,119
139,357
31,909
33
8,152
20,990
39,328
10,507
26,500
37,000
3,890
11,458
35,133
78,452
69,371
31,705
2,563
15,956
239,452
13,745
2,622
264,002
10,255
53,909
1,098
71,382
3,335
87,933
10,380
No.
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
Community
Miami Springs
Miami-Dade County
State
FL
FL
Milton
FL
Minneola
Miramar
Mount Dora
FL
FL
FL
Mulberry
FL
Naples
Neptune Beach
New Port Richey
New Smyrna Beach
Niceville
North Bay Village
North Lauderdale
North Miami
North Miami Beach
North Redington Beach
Oakland Park
Ocala
Ocoee
Oldsmar
Opa-Locka
Orlando
Ormond Beach
Oviedo
Palm Bay
Palmetto
Panama City
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
ERU
Monthly
Fee
1,548
$4.00
3,619
2,500
$2.00
$4.25
1,934
3,164
2,629
1,818
7,500
2,415
2,138
1,760
1,800
1,687
1,503
1,948
2,054
2,550
$11.40
$3.00
$3.36
$5.00
$2.65
$2.25
$3.00
$4.65
$3.70
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
2,000
3,000
2,464
$6.88
$6.00
$4.00
1,342
$7.06
Pasco County
FL
Pembroke Park
Pensacola
Pinecrest
Plant City
Polk City
Pompano Beach
Port Orange
Port Saint Lucie
Redington Beach
Riviera Beach
Rockledge
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
2,890
1,548
2,575
1,548
2,280
$3.92
$5.50
$4.40
$3.00
$4.12
$1.50
$3.00
$6.25
$8.51
$2.50
$4.50
$3.00
$6.00
$5.00
$5.00
$3.50
FL
x
2,880
3,050
2,280
18
Date
Created
Population
1993
13,712
2004
362,470
2008
7,045
2001
5,435
1998
72,739
9,418
3,230
1994
20,976
2002
7,270
2001
9,916
1995
20,048
2004
11,684
1994
6,733
1995
32,264
1998
59,880
40,786
1,474
1989
30,966
1988
45,943
24,391
1998
11,910
14,951
1989
165,000
1987
36,301
1993
26,316
1991
79,413
1999
12,571
1991
36,417
2007
344,765
1996
6,299
2001
56,255
2002
19,055
2004
29,915
2003
1,516
78,191
45,823
1988
88,769
1,539
2003
29,884
2000
20,170
No.
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
Community
Safety Harbor
Saint Augustine
State
FL
FL
Saint Cloud
FL
Saint Johns County
FL
Saint Petersburg
Sanford
FL
FL
Sarasota
FL
Sarasota County
Satellite Beach
South Daytona
South Miami
Stuart
Sunny Isles Beach
Sunrise
Surfside
Sweetwater
Tallahassee
Tamarac
Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Tavares
Tequesta
Titusville
FL
FL
FL
Treasure Island
FL
Venice
Volusia County
West Melbourne
West Miami
West Palm Beach
Wilton Manors
Winter Garden
Winter Haven
Winter Park
Winter Springs
FL
FL
FL
2,719
2,126
3,153
3,000
2,000
Monthly
Fee
$5.00
$6.50
$6.45
$4.00
$7.55
$6.70
$3.00
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
3,707
1,548
1,884
1,300
$2.65
1,990
$6.93
1,945
$3.00
$5.65
$3.00
x
x
3,300
9,489
2,775
2,500
$2.32
$5.57
$3.36
$2.98
$2.50
FL
Atlanta
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
Austell
GA
Canton
GA
Cartersville
GA
Chamblee
GA
Athens - Clarke County
ERU
1,865
2,000
2,664
2,171
3,460
4,077
2,324
2,123
2,682
$6.04
$3.50
$4.00
$2.62
$4.00
$3.25
$3.50
$1.00
3,000
3,000
19
$3.75
Date
Created
Population
1991
17,203
2002
11,592
2007
20,074
123,135
1989
248,232
1991
38,291
54,942
325,957
1997
9,577
1989
13,177
10,741
2000
14,633
1999
15,315
1997
85,779
4,909
14,226
1986
150,624
1993
55,588
2002
303,447
1992
21,003
9,700
5,273
1990
40,670
7,450
17,764
1992
443,343
1992
9,824
5,863
82,103
1992
12,697
14,351
1998
26,487
24,090
1992
31,666
2004
101,489
416,474
5,200
7,709
15,925
2004
9,552
No.
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
Community
Clayton County
Columbia County
Conyers
Covington
Decatur
DeKalb County
Doraville
Douglasville-Douglas County
State
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
Evans
GA
Fairburn
Fayetteville
Gilmer County
Griffin
Gwinnett County
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
Henry County
GA
Hinesville
GA
Loganville
Peachtree City
Rockdale County
GA
GA
GA
Smyrna
GA
Stockbridge
GA
Stone Mountain
GA
Valdosta
GA
Warner Robbins
GA
Woodstock
GA
Ackley
Ames
Bettendorf
Boone
Buffalo
Burlington
Carroll
Cedar Rapids
Clive
Coralville
Davenport
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
De Witt
Des Moines
Dubuque
Forest City
ERU
x
x
2,600
2,900
3,000
3,000
Monthly
Fee
$3.75
$2.63
$3.33
$3.23
$5.00
$4.00
$4.00
$3.50
3800
$2.95
2,200
4,779
2,635
3,000
4,600
3,420
3,900
$3.57
$2.26
$3.32
$4.25
$4.00
$3.95
$3.39
$2.10
3,704
$2.50
$4.20
2,500
3,000
x
25,000
x
3,667
x
2,600
2,349
2,917
20
$2.60
$1.50
$2.00
$2.00
$2.00
$3.00
$3.19
$3.25
$1.25
$1.60
$2.50
$6.42
$2.50
$5.00
Date
Created
Population
2006
236,517
1999
89,288
2002
10,689
2005
11,547
1999
18,147
2003
665,865
9,862
92,174
17,727
5,464
2004
11,148
23456
1998
23,451
2005
588,448
2006
119,341
30,392
5,435
31,580
70,111
2007
40,999
9,853
7,145
2006
43,724
2006
48,804
2006
10,050
1,809
1994
50,731
2003
31,275
12,803
1,321
26,839
10,106
120,758
2005
12,855
2005
15,123
98,359
5,049
198,682
2003
57,686
4,362
No.
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
Community
Garner
Hiawatha
Iowa City
Sioux City
State Center
Storm Lake
Waukee
West Des Moines
Coeur D'Alene
Pocatello
Aurora
Bloomington
State
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
ID
ID
IL
IL
ERU
Highland Park
IL
Moline
Morton
Normal
Rock Island
Rolling Meadows
Tinley Park
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
Albany
IN
Anderson
IN
Bargersville
IN
Batesville
IN
Berne
IN
Bloomington
Brownsburg
Centerville
IN
IN
IN
Chandler
IN
Chesterton
IN
Cicero
IN
Clarksville
IN
Connersville
IN
Cumberland
IN
Dyer
IN
4,343
Fishers
IN
3,318
Fort Wayne
Fortville
Greendale
Greenfield
Griffith
IN
IN
IN
IN
2,500
3,129
x
2,750
2,973
4,000
3,000
x
x
x
3,300
3,200
2,800
3,604
Monthly
Fee
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$2.00
$2.75
$2.75
$4.00
$2.44
$3.45
$4.35
$4.00
$3.75
$4.74
$4.60
$3.62
$2.76
x
2,500
x
3,585
$12.40
$3.50
$9.46
$2.00
$10.00
$2.70
$5.00
$8.50
$4.00
$5.00
$2.95
Date
Created
2000
2004
1990
2004
1998
2004
2000
2005
2006
2002
2001
1983
2002
2005
2005
1998
2004
2004
2,662
3,000
2,250
IN
x
21
$6.00
$5.20
$3.65
$8.00
$4.39
$2.00
$7.50
2007
1991
2005
2005
Population
2,922
6,480
62,220
85,013
1,349
10,076
5,126
46,403
34,514
51,466
170,617
70,970
31,614
42,916
15,757
45,386
38,442
23,682
58,595
2,368
59,734
2,120
6,033
4,114
69,291
14,520
2,624
3,500
11,139
4,303
21,400
15,411
5,500
13,895
37,835
205,727
3,444
4,296
14,600
17,334
No.
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
Community
Indianapolis
Jasper
Jeffersonville
Logansport
Marion
McCordsville
State
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
ERU
2,800
5,000
Middletown
IN
Muncie
IN
New Albany
IN
New Castle
IN
New Haven
IN
North Manchester
IN
Peru
IN
Plainfield
IN
Plymouth
IN
Richmond
IN
Shelbyville
Valparaiso
Vincennes
IN
IN
IN
3,500
Washington
IN
2,558
Westfield
IN
Andover
KS
Arkansas City
KS
Bonner Springs
KS
x
Coffeyville
KS
x
Eudora
KS
Fairway
KS
Lawrence
KS
Lenexa
KS
Manhattan
KS
Mission
KS
Olathe
KS
Overland Park
KS
Parsons
KS
Pittsburg
Shawnee
Topeka
Wichita
KS
KS
KS
KS
Winfield
KS
Danville
KY
2,250
x
2,500
x
Monthly
Fee
$2.25
$2.00
$3.50
$5.00
$7.50
$6.00
$0.95
$3.17
$6.00
2,534
3,497
12,000
2,980
x
$3.00
$2.75
$3.00
$2.50
$2.50
3,200
2,366
2,485
2,485
x
2,018
2,139
22
$4.00
$4.00
$2.05
$3.00
$6.00
$3.00
$5.00
$4.00
$5.00
$1.10
$4.00
$3.75
$2.00
$1.00
$2.97
$3.00
$3.62
$2.00
$1.00
$1.50
Date
Created
Population
2001
791,926
2003
12,100
27,362
19,684
31,320
2005
1,134
2,357
2005
118,769
2005
37,603
17,780
12,406
1994
5,932
12,994
18,396
9,840
39,124
17,951
1998
27,428
18,701
2004
11,380
2008
9,293
2005
6,698
1993
11,963
7,093
2006
10,387
4,307
3,952
2000
80,098
40,238
1992
44,831
2004
9,727
114,662
2001
149,080
2008
11,514
2003
19,243
2004
47,996
1996
122,377
344,284
1991
11,900
2007
15,385
No.
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
Community
Henderson
Hopkinsville
Lexington/Fayette County
Louisville, Jefferson Co.
Murray
Radcliff
Sanitation District 1
Warren County
Chicopee
State
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
MA
ERU
3,000
3,350
Newton
MA
3,119
Reading
MA
2,552
Annapolis
Charles County
Montgomery County
MD
MD
MD
Rockville
MD
Silver Spring
MD
Takoma Park
Augusta
Lewiston
Ann Arbor
Berkely
Detroit
Lansing
Marquette
MD
ME
ME
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
Albert Lea
MN
Alexandria
MN
Andover
MN
Anoka
MN
Apple Valley
MN
Arden Hills
MN
Ashby
MN
Austin
MN
Baxter
MN
Belle Plaine
MN
Bemidji
MN
Blaine
MN
Bloomington
MN
Brainerd
MN
x
Brooklyn Center
MN
x
Brooklyn Park
MN
x
2,500
3,000
2,800
2,600
x
2,000
x
2,406
2,330
1,228
2,700
x
2,600
Monthly
Fee
$2.00
$5.02
$1.50
$4.00
$4.02
$4.00
$3.33
$2.08
$3.32
$1.83
$2.00
$1.06
$4.65
$3.93
$2.39
$3.44
$2.50
$6.92
$3.35
$4.18
$2.50
$2.06
$1.76
$3.98
$2.88
x
3,750
x
23
$2.00
$2.75
$5.62
$1.75
$4.53
$4.29
$8.00
Date
Created
Population
1998
27,373
2006
30,089
260,512
1987
693,604
2004
14,950
2003
21,961
1998
326,071
2007
43,226
1999
54,653
2006
83,829
24,145
2003
35,838
120,546
2002
873,341
2008
47,388
76,540
1996
17,299
18,560
2006
35,690
1984
114,024
2001
15,531
951,270
1995
119,128
19,661
2005
18,356
2005
8,820
2003
30,222
2003
18,076
1988
45,527
1993
9,815
2005
472
23,314
2006
5,555
1999
4,854
11,917
2007
44,942
1988
85,172
2007
13,684
1991
27,371
2002
69,942
No.
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
Community
State
ERU
Buffalo
MN
x
Burnsville
MN
x
Carver
MN
x
Centerville
MN
Chanhassen
MN
Circle Pines
MN
Columbia Heights
MN
Coon Rapids
MN
Cottage Grove
MN
x
Crystal
MN
x
Deep Haven
MN
Delano
MN
Duluth
MN
Eagan
MN
Eden Prairie
MN
x
Edina
MN
x
Elko New Market
MN
Excelsior
MN
x
Fairmont
MN
x
Falcon Heights
MN
Faribault
MN
Farmington
MN
x
Fergus Falls
MN
x
Fridley
MN
x
Golden Valley
MN
x
Grand Rapids
MN
x
Hopkins
MN
Hutchinson
MN
Jordan
MN
Lake Elmo
MN
x
Lakeville
MN
x
Lauderdale
MN
Long Lake
MN
Loretto
MN
Mahtomedi
MN
x
Mankato
MN
x
Maple Plain
MN
x
Maplewood
MN
Mayer
MN
x
Mendota Heights
MN
x
x
x
Monthly
Fee
$5.90
$3.33
$1.67
$3.00
$2.46
$2.85
$3.50
$3.10
$5.00
$3.75
$2.55
$1.00
$4.80
$4.50
$2.66
$3.25
24
$2.83
$4.00
$1.12
$7.33
$5.35
$4.50
$1.75
$3.09
$2.50
$5.25
$2.50
$3.60
$5.50
$3.51
$3.00
$2.97
$4.12
$0.67
$1.67
Date
Created
Population
1986
10,097
1992
59,321
2004
2,512
1997
3,765
20,321
2005
5,418
1999
17,969
2002
61,607
2001
32,969
1991
22,698
1994
3,694
3,837
1998
86,918
1990
63,557
1994
54,901
1985
47,425
2000
3,168
1999
2,276
1987
10,889
1986
5,438
2001
20,818
1989
18,207
13,471
1985
27,449
1992
20,281
2004
8,337
1989
16,704
13,080
1995
5,312
2003
7,590
1994
43,128
1994
2,196
1999
1,842
2003
617
2001
8,016
32,427
2005
2,066
2003
35,484
2005
1,323
1992
11,339
No.
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
Community
Minneapolis
State
MN
ERU
1,530
Minnetonka
MN
Minnetrista
MN
x
Moorhead
MN
x
Mora
MN
x
Mound
MN
x
Mounds View
MN
x
New Brighton
MN
x
New Hope
MN
x
New Prague
MN
x
North Saint Paul
MN
Northfield
MN
Norwood Young America
MN
Oak Park Heights
MN
x
Oakdale
MN
x
Orono
MN
Osseo
MN
x
Plymouth
MN
x
Prior Lake
MN
Ramsey
MN
Richfield
MN
x
Robbinsdale
MN
x
Rochester
MN
Rogers
MN
x
Rosemount
MN
x
Roseville
MN
x
Saint Anthony
MN
x
Saint Bonifacius
MN
x
Saint Cloud
MN
x
Saint Louis Park
Saint Paul
MN
MN
x
Saint Paul Park
MN
Savage
MN
Shakopee
MN
x
Shoreview
MN
x
Shorewood
MN
x
South Saint Paul
MN
Stillwater
MN
x
Thief River Falls
MN
x
Tonka Bay
MN
x
x
25
Monthly
Fee
$9.77
$4.05
$3.00
$1.25
$2.16
$2.75
$4.88
$6.11
$2.64
$5.35
$2.11
$1.00
$1.00
$1.67
$3.26
$3.00
$4.33
$12.00
$2.60
$3.30
$3.95
$3.00
$3.15
$3.75
$5.05
$4.33
$5.00
$2.10
$3.83
$4.82
$2.67
$5.88
$2.81
$3.63
$6.72
$2.50
$1.50
$2.50
$1.13
Date
Created
Population
2005
382,618
2003
51,301
1992
5,726
2005
32,177
2005
3,193
2001
9,435
1993
12,023
1994
22,206
1991
20,873
1992
6,759
1990
11,293
1986
17,147
2003
3,473
1999
4,051
2002
26,653
2001
7,538
2007
2,434
2001
65,894
1993
22,674
2000
18,510
1985
34,439
1985
14,123
2003
85,806
2002
3,588
1992
20,468
1984
33,690
1992
7,754
2004
2,326
2003
59,107
2000
44,126
1986
287,151
2007
5,070
1994
27,292
1985
20,568
1991
26,726
1993
7,400
2003
20,167
1996
17,781
8,410
1993
1,545
No.
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
Community
State
ERU
Vadnais Heights
MN
x
Vadnais Lake Water Mngmt. Org.
MN
x
Victoria
MN
x
Waconia
MN
x
Watertown
MN
x
Wayzata
MN
West Saint Paul
MN
White Bear Township
MN
Woodbury
MN
Worthington
MN
Arnold
MO
Columbia - Boone County
Kansas City
Saint Louis
Billings
Great Falls
Helena
Whitefish
Asheville
Bessemer City
Burlington
Carolina Beach
Chapel Hill
MO
MO
MO
MT
MT
MT
1,750
x
3,000
10,000
MT
Clemmons
Concord
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Cornelius
NC
Cumberland County
NC
Dallas
NC
Davidson
NC
Durham
Elizabeth City
Fayetteville
Forsythe County
Gastonia
Greensboro
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Greenville
NC
High Point
NC
Huntersville
NC
Indian Trail
NC
Charlotte
x
Monthly
Fee
$3.00
$2.20
$3.33
$5.47
$1.75
$3.33
$3.08
$2.00
$5.50
$3.00
$3.75
$1.15
$3.00
$0.24
$2.69
$7.26
$1.84
2,442
x
x
500
2,000
2,613
3,952
3,120
2,613
2,266
x
2,613
2,400
x
2,266
2,650
2,543
2,000
2,588
2,613
x
26
$2.34
$2.07
$2.00
$6.50
$5.51
$3.70
$4.30
$4.03
$1.00
$2.08
$1.85
$4.50
$3.00
$1.00
$2.75
$2.70
$5.70
$2.00
$4.03
$3.50
Date
Created
Population
1992
12,525
1997
1992
2005
1991
2006
1992
1992
2004
2006
1993
1992
1989
1988
2006
2004
2005
2002
2004
1994
1993
2005
1996
1997
2006
2004
2006
2001
1994
2007
6,203
6,814
3,029
4,113
19,405
11,293
54
11,056
20,766
135,454
441,545
1,400,000
89,847
56,690
25,780
5,032
68,889
5,398
44,917
4,701
48,715
695,454
13,827
55,977
11,969
302,963
3,402
7,139
187,035
17,188
121,015
306,067
66,277
223,891
60,476
85,839
24,960
11,905
No.
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
Community
Jacksonville
State
NC
ERU
2,850
3,250
2,980
Kannapolis
NC
Kernersville
Lowell
Lumberton
Matthews
Mecklenburg County
Mint Hill
Mount Holly
Oak Island
Oxford
Pineville
Raleigh
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Rocky Mount
NC
Spring Lake
NC
Stallings
NC
Washington
NC
x
Whitakers
NC
x
Wilmington
Wilson
NC
NC
Winston-Salem
NC
Winterville
NC
Wrightsville Beach
NC
Bismarck
Grand Forks
Sante Fe
Carson City
Sparks
ND
ND
NM
NV
NV
Ada
OH
Ashland
Barberton
OH
OH
Bellefontaine
OH
Broadview Heights
OH
Butler County
OH
Canal Winchester
OH
Chillicothe
Cincinnati
Columbus
OH
OH
OH
Cuyahoga Falls
OH
Dayton
OH
x
2,613
2,613
2,613
x
x
2,368
2,613
2,260
2,519
2,266
Monthly
Fee
$4.00
$4.00
$3.29
$2.50
$4.03
$4.03
$4.03
$2.50
$2.50
$2.00
$4.03
$4.00
$3.75
$2.50
x
$4.20
$3.25
$5.00
$2.94
$4.25
$2.00
$0.00
x
$2.90
2,500
2,585
x
2,000
x
x
3,052
8,668
2,400
4,000
4,000
2,000
3,000
x
27
$1.50
$3.50
$5.00
$4.00
$1.08
$1.00
$1.00
$2.70
$3.32
$2.00
$4.28
Date
Created
Population
2006
66,715
36,910
2006
17,126
2,662
20,795
22,127
695,454
14,922
9,618
6,571
8,338
3,449
2004
276,093
2003
55,893
8,098
2007
3,189
2002
9,583
799
2004
75,838
2002
44,405
185,776
2007
4,791
2,593
55,532
1988
49,321
2003
62,203
2003
52,457
66,346
2004
5,582
2006
21,249
2006
27,899
2001
12,808
2007
15,967
2004
332,807
2005
4,478
1997
21,796
1985
331,285
1994
711,470
2004
50,272
1997
166,179
No.
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
Community
Delaware
Forest Park
State
OH
OH
Gahanna
OH
Galion
OH
Greenville
OH
Hamilton
OH
Hamilton County
OH
Hudson
Ironton
OH
OH
Kent
OH
Lake County
Lancaster
OH
OH
Lebanon
OH
Loveland
Marion
OH
OH
Marysville
OH
Mason
Medina
OH
OH
Middletown
OH
Milford
OH
Monroe
OH
Montpelier
Mskngm Watrshd Cnsrvncy Dst
Newark
OH
OH
OH
Painesville
OH
Pickerington
OH
Ravenna
OH
Reynoldsburg
Sheffield
Sheffield Lake
Sidney
OH
OH
OH
OH
Tallmadge
OH
Toledo
OH
Trenton
OH
Troy
OH
Union
Upper Arlington
Wadsworth
Wooster
Zanesville
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
ERU
2,773
3,064
2,650
2,800
2,536
x
3,000
1,963
3,050
2,600
2,615
2,500
2,778
2,700
2,716
2,814
2,400
x
3,300
2,600
2,500
2,530
2,750
2,530
2,500
2,275
2,500
x
3,000
Monthly
Fee
$2.50
$3.00
$2.71
$3.00
$2.95
$5.50
$3.00
$14.55
$2.30
$0.80
$4.64
$3.50
$4.50
$4.16
$2.75
$3.00
$2.25
$3.25
$5.50
$3.00
$1.00
$4.50
$2.75
$1.50
$3.00
$1.25
$2.50
$4.85
$0.30
$2.00
$3.16
$2.60
$3.50
$3.00
$4.50
$4.80
28
Date
Created
Population
2002
25,243
1988
19,463
2004
32,636
2001
11,158
2007
13,037
2002
60,690
845,303
22,439
2005
11,211
2001
27,906
2003
227,511
2004
35,335
2004
16,962
2003
11,677
1997
35,318
2004
15,942
2001
22,016
2003
25,139
2005
51,605
2004
6,284
2003
7,133
1986
4,320
2,000,000
2005
46,279
2002
17,503
2001
15878
2007
11,771
1996
32,069
2004
2,949
1999
9,371
1994
20,211
16,390
1999
313,619
2003
8,746
2007
22,331
1987
5,574
1990
33,686
2005
18,437
1985
24,811
1987
25,586
No.
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
Community
Broken Arrow
ERU
2,650
Monthly
Fee
$3.00
2,650
$1.00
$3.40
$4.63
Edmond
State
OK
OK
Lawton
OK
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
OK
OK
Adair Village
OR
Ashland
OR
3,000
Beaverton
OR
Bend
OR
2,640
3,800
Cannon Beach
OR
Central Point
OR
Clackamas County
OR
Clatskanie
OR
Corvallis
Cottage Grove
OR
OR
2,750
Dundee
OR
Estacada
Eugene
OR
OR
Fairview
OR
Florence
OR
Forest Grove
OR
2,500
2,500
1,000
2,500
1,000
2,640
Forest Park
Gresham
Hillsboro
Hood River
OR
OR
OR
OR
2,500
2,640
2,500
Hubbard
OR
Keizer
OR
Lake Oswego
Medford
Milwaukie
OR
OR
OR
Newburg
OR
Ontario
OR
Oregon City
OR
Philomath
OR
Portland
OR
Reedsport
OR
Roseburg
OR
Saint Helens
OR
OR
OR
Salem
Sandy
3,000
3,000
3,030
3,000
2,706
$3.68
$6.00
$4.00
$3.50
$5.00
$2.50
$4.98
$3.20
$5.00
$5.15
$8.69
$6.42
$6.00
$4.00
$7.65
$4.00
$2.50
$4.25
$2.70
$6.64
$4.40
$9.15
$1.16
$2.00
1977
1997
1998
1994
1994
2005
1990
1994
2007
1992
1994
1994
2,194
$16.82
1993
1999
1999
2,500
$3.35
$4.54
2003
2,750
$3.00
2001
x
29
Date
Created
Population
2002
74,859
1994
68,315
92,757
1995
506,132
1986
393,049
536
1994
19,522
1989
85,560
2007
52,029
1996
1,588
2005
16,550
367,040
49,322
8,445
2,598
2,371
137,893
7,561
7,263
17,708
90,205
70,186
5,831
2,483
32,203
35,278
63,154
20,490
18,064
10,985
25,754
3,838
529,121
4,378
20,017
10,019
136,924
5,385
No.
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
Community
State
ERU
Scappoose
OR
Sheridan
OR
Springfield
OR
Talent
Tigard
Troutdale
Tualatin
OR
OR
OR
OR
Washington County
OR
West Linn
Wilsonville
OR
OR
Philadelphia
PA
Aiken County
SC
Anderson
SC
Beaufort County
Charleston
SC
SC
Charleston County
SC
Columbia
Conway
Dorchester County
Easley
Florence
Georgetown
Greenville
Greer
Horry County
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
Mount Pleasant
SC
North Augusta
North Charleston
North Myrtle Beach
SC
SC
SC
Rock Hill
SC
x
Spartanburg County
SC
x
Summerville
SC
Aberdeen
Brookings
Sioux Falls
Alcoa
Chattanooga
Collierville
Dyersburg
Franklin
SD
SD
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
Monthly
Fee
$3.50
$8.63
$1.41
$4.00
$3.24
$4.00
2,914
2,750
2,500
x
4,906
2,200
2,454
2,700
14,520
5,000
2,500
2,389
14,520
3,500
$3.25
$4.00
$9.12
$3.22
$4.00
$3.70
$6.00
$3.00
$3.95
$5.25
$2.43
$2.00
$3.50
$1.75
$1.80
$2.45
$1.50
$4.00
2000
2007
2005
2001
2006
2002
2003
1981
1993
1995
2002
2000
2002
$6.00
$2.40
$4.00
$3.00
2005
1996
1982
x
x
x
1,500
2,714
30
Date
Created
$4.00
$3.00
$2.25
$1.00
$4.00
1993
2003
Population
4,976
3,570
52,864
5,589
41,223
13,777
22,791
445,342
22,261
13,991
1,517,550
28,000
25,514
120,937
96,650
309,969
116,278
11,788
96,413
17,754
30,248
8,950
56,002
16,843
196,629
47,609
17,574
79,641
10,974
49,765
253,791
27,752
24,658
18,504
123,975
7,734
155,554
31,872
17,452
46,416
No.
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
Community
Hamilton County
State
TN
ERU
3,500
3,315
3,181
2,400
3,147
3,470
Johnson City
TN
La Vergne
Maryville
Memphis
TN
TN
TN
Murfreesboro
TN
Signal Mountain
Tullahoma
Abilene
Allen
Arlington
Austin
Azle
Baytown
Bedford
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
Burkburnett
TX
Colleyville
TX
Corinth
TX
Dallas
TX
Denton
TX
El Paso
TX
Euless
TX
x
Flower Mound
TX
x
Fort Worth
Gainesville
Garland
TX
TX
TX
Grand Prarie
TX
Highland Village
TX
Houston
Irving
TX
TX
Killeen
TX
Laredo
Lubbock
McKinney
Mesquite
North Richland Hills
Plano
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
Rowlett
TX
Saginaw
TX
San Antonio
TX
x
x
x
2,800
x
1,500
1,979
2,727
3,500
x
3,900
2,000
2,600
1,895
1,000
2,400
x
2,343
x
31
Monthly
Fee
$3.00
$2.25
$3.50
$3.97
$2.18
$3.25
$2.50
$0.00
$2.45
$2.75
$2.00
$7.15
$3.00
$1.71
$3.50
$1.50
$7.00
$5.00
$4.75
$2.50
$1.50
$2.90
$2.00
$2.40
$2.50
$4.91
$2.00
$2.16
$5.00
$2.25
$4.99
$1.00
$3.00
$2.00
$3.00
$3.68
Date
Created
2007
2005
2003
2006
2007
2002
2003
1993
1994
1982
2000
2003
2002
2007
1993
2002
2007
1990
2003
2006
1993
1991
1993
2006
2003
2001
1993
2002
2005
1997
Population
11,530
55,469
18,687
23,120
650,100
68,816
7,725
17,994
115,930
43,554
332,969
656,562
9,600
66,430
47,152
10,927
19,636
10,843
1,188,580
80,537
580,000
46,005
50,702
534,694
15,538
215,768
127,427
8,842
1,953,631
191,615
86,911
176,576
199,564
54,369
124,523
55,635
222,030
44,503
12,374
1,144,646
No.
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
Community
San Marcos
State
TX
Southlake
TX
Stephenville
TX
White Settlement
TX
Wichita Falls
TX
Bountiful
UT
Centerville
UT
Draper
UT
Farmington
UT
Logan
Midvale
UT
UT
Murray
UT
Nibley
UT
North Logan
UT
North Ogden
UT
Ogden
UT
Orem
UT
Payson
UT
Provo
UT
Riverdale
UT
Salt Lake City
Sandy
UT
UT
Santa Clara
UT
Spanish Fork
UT
Springville
UT
West Valley
Hampton
UT
VA
VA
VA
James City County
VA
Newport News
Norfolk
Portsmouth
Prince William County
VA
VA
VA
VA
Richmond
VA
Staunton
Suffolk
Virginia Beach
South Burlington
Aberdeen
VA
VA
VA
VT
WA
Arlington County
Chesapeake
ERU
6,000
Monthly
Fee
$3.21
$8.00
$3.00
x
3,500
3,828
3,600
3,000
x
3,000
3,000
4,700
1,500
2,700
2,600
2,500
2,816
3,500
3,200
3,500
2,830
2,762
2,112
2,429
3,235
1,777
2,000
1,877
2,059
2,600
3,200
2,269
2,700
x
32
$1.75
$4.00
$4.00
$6.00
$3.50
$3.25
$3.55
$4.00
$4.00
$2.14
$4.50
$5.00
$4.10
$3.00
$5.00
$4.51
$3.00
$3.96
$4.00
$2.17
$2.55
$3.60
$4.90
$3.10
$7.85
$5.00
$1.50
$2.70
$3.95
$5.43
$4.50
$6.08
Date
Created
Population
2004
34,733
2006
21,519
2002
14,921
2005
14,831
2000
104,197
41,301
2007
14,585
2001
25,220
2003
15,540
2005
42,670
2004
27,029
2006
46,558
2,045
2007
6,163
1987
15,026
77,226
1996
84,324
16,748
105,166
2005
7,656
1991
181,743
88,418
2004
4,630
20,246
2007
25,998
2001
108,869
189,453
1992
199,184
1994
146,437
2007
48,102
1993
180,150
1996
234,403
1992
100,565
1994
280,813
2006
197,790
23,853
2005
63,677
1993
425,257
2005
15,814
1999
16,461
No.
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
Community
Algona
Anacortes
Arlington
Auburn
Battle Ground
Bellevue
Bellingham
Blaine
Bonney Lake
State
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
Bothell
WA
Bremerton
Burlington
WA
WA
Camas
WA
Centralia
WA
Chehalis
WA
Chelan County
WA
Clark County
WA
Des Moines
WA
Douglas County
WA
Duvall
East Wenatchee
WA
WA
x
Edgewood
WA
x
Edmonds
WA
Everett
WA
Federal Way
WA
Ferndale
WA
Fife
WA
Friday Harbor
WA
Gig Harbor
WA
Issaquah
Jefferson County
WA
WA
Kelso
WA
Kent
WA
King County
Kitsap County
Lacey
Liberty Lake
Longview
Lynnwood
Marysville
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
ERU
x
2,000
6,000
2,600
3,000
3,000
x
3,000
4,600
2,400
2,750
2,750
3,000
x
2,000
2,000
2,000
3,000
Monthly
Fee
$4.75
$3.00
$3.45
$11.50
$7.00
$4.16
$6.00
$6.46
$7.45
$3.10
$6.00
$5.47
$5.50
$2.75
$6.82
$2.92
$16.92
$2.92
$3.33
$7.78
$10.50
$6.59
$2.00
$10.25
$7.20
$5.17
$3.10
x
2,500
x
4,200
x
3,160
2,500
2,900
3,200
33
$9.25
$4.78
$6.75
$0.51
$2.25
$4.25
$8.00
Date
Created
Population
2004
2,460
1999
14,557
2006
11,713
1991
40,314
1982
9,296
1974
109,569
2001
67,171
3,770
9,687
1994
30,150
1994
37,259
1994
6,757
1989
12,534
2004
14,742
1992
7,057
2008
38,760
1980
345,238
1990
29,267
1998
32,603
1981
4,616
1999
5,757
1996
9,089
1998
39,515
2004
91,488
1990
83,259
2006
8,758
2004
4,784
1993
1,989
6,465
1988
11,212
25,953
1993
11,895
1992
79,524
1986 1,737,034
1993
231,969
1986
31,226
2003
4,660
1999
34,660
1991
33,847
1999
25,315
No.
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
Community
Mercer Island
State
WA
ERU
3,471
3,000
Mill Creek
WA
Milton
WA
Monroe
WA
Montesano
WA
Mountlake Terrace
Mukilteo
Normandy Park
WA
WA
WA
North Bend
WA
Oak Harbor
Olympia
WA
WA
Orting
WA
Pierce County
WA
Port Angeles
WA
Port Orchard
WA
Port Townsend
WA
Puyallup
WA
Redmond
Renton
Richland
San Juan County
Seattle
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
Sedro-Woolley
WA
Shelton
WA
x
Skagit County
WA
x
Snohomish
2,500
Spokane
WA
WA
Spokane County
WA
3,160
Steilacoom
WA
Sumner
WA
Tacoma
WA
Thurston County
WA
Toppenish
WA
Tukwilla
Tumwater
WA
WA
x
University Place
WA
x
Vancouver
WA
Walla Walla
WA
Wenatchee
WA
West Richland
WA
2,500
2,282
2,500
3,100
2,920
2,500
2,528
2,500
2,640
4,000
3,000
2,800
2,000
x
3,000
x
x
2,400
6,000
3,600
2,000
3,250
2,500
3,000
3,000
34
Monthly
Fee
$13.00
$15.50
$9.00
$2.00
$5.83
$7.85
$10.00
$12.36
$7.70
$3.00
$9.00
$6.67
$3.00
$7.20
$10.24
$16.56
$5.72
$2.60
$3.85
$11.34
$8.50
$3.06
$3.25
$1.75
$1.75
$13.75
$2.50
$11.59
$1.67
$1.00
$5.17
$5.70
$6.00
$4.00
$3.28
$5.50
$2.80
Date
Created
Population
1995
22,036
2001
11,525
5,795
1996
13,795
3,312
1999
20,362
1988
18,019
2003
6,392
2001
4,746
1997
19,795
1986
42,514
1997
3,760
1991
700,820
2003
18,397
7,693
1987
8,334
33,011
1988
45,256
1987
58,360
1998
38,708
2005
14,077
1988
563,374
8,658
1995
8,442
1994
102,979
2005
8,494
2005
195,629
2004
451,200
1994
6,049
8,504
1984
193,556
2002
207,355
1991
8,946
1989
17,181
1987
12,698
1995
29,933
1994
157,493
30,945
1995
27,856
2006
8,358
No.
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
860
858
859
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
Community
State
Woodinville
WA
Yakima
Yelm
WA
WA
Allouez
WI
Altoona
WI
Appleton
Baraboo
WI
WI
Barron
WI
Bellevue
WI
Beloit
WI
Brown Deer
WI
Butler
WI
Cambridge
WI
Chetek
WI
Chippewa Falls
WI
Cudahy
WI
De Forest
WI
De Pere
WI
Delafield
WI
Denmark
WI
Eau Claire
Elm Grove
Fitchburg
WI
WI
WI
Franklin
WI
Garner's Creek
Glendale
Grand Chute
WI
WI
WI
Grantsburg
WI
Green Bay
Greendale
Greenville
WI
WI
WI
Harrison
WI
Hobart
WI
Holmen
WI
Howard
WI
Janesville
WI
Kenosha
WI
Kimberly
WI
Lake Delton
WI
Lancaster
WI
ERU
3,600
x
Monthly
Fee
$7.09
$4.17
$2.50
3,663
x
2,368
2,379
10,850
3,221
3,347
3,257
3,032
2,700
3,000
6,235
3,700
2,964
3,623
2,609
3,283
3,000
3,941
4,510
4,000
3,550
3,301
3,200
2,477
2,762
1,685
3,400
35
$3.00
$9.07
$3.91
$2.00
$4.00
$2.00
$7.65
$5.50
$2.33
$2.25
$3.00
$4.00
$4.50
$3.33
$2.42
$3.92
$5.46
$4.35
$3.00
$8.00
$3.50
$4.00
$1.50
$4.60
$6.00
$5.00
$8.00
$6.00
$4.08
$3.67
$2.28
$5.00
$8.00
$1.50
Date
Created
Population
1993
9,194
2004
71,845
1999
3,289
2006
15,443
2007
6,698
1995
70,087
2005
1,828
2005
3,250
2002
11,828
2006
35,775
2004
11,895
1999
1,881
2005
1,101
2005
2,180
2005
13,374
2001
18,429
2004
7,368
2003
20,560
2004
7,820
1,958
1997
61,704
2004
6,249
2002
20,501
29,494
1998
1996
13,367
1997
18,392
2004
1,397
2004
102,313
2004
14,405
1999
6,844
1998
5,800
2007
5,694
2007
7,594
2005
15,774
2003
59,498
2007
90,352
2006
6,146
1993
1,982
2007
4,070
No.
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
Community
Little Chute
WI
ERU
2,752
Madison
Manitowoc
WI
WI
3,167
Marshfield
WI
McFarland
WI
Menomonie
WI
Milwaukee
Monroe
Neenah
New Berlin
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
New Richmond
WI
North Fond du Lac
WI
Oak Creek
WI
Onalaska
WI
Oshkosh
WI
Pleasant Prairie
WI
Poynette
WI
Racine
WI
Raymond
WI
River Falls
Sheboygan
WI
WI
WI
Shorewood Hills
WI
Slinger
WI
South Milwaukee
WI
Sun Prarie
Superior
WI
WI
Sussex
WI
Vernon
WI
Washburn
WI
Watertown
WI
Waupun
WI
Wauwatosa
West Allis
West Salem
WI
WI
WI
Weston
WI
Whitewater
WI
Wisconsin Rapids
WI
Beckley
WV
Monona
Saint Francis
State
3,000
1,610
3,550
2,844
$2.67
$6.85
$5.00
$5.00
$4.67
$5.00
$2.39
$4.67
$3.00
$2.17
$4.07
$1.25
$4.17
$6.00
2,500
2,215
$1.96
$4.00
$3.00
x
2,728
3,138
4,000
12,632
3,123
2,964
x
2,817
x
4,300
2,964
1,907
3,897
6,904
3,204
2,174
1,827
2,400
3,338
3,850
2,620
x
36
Monthly
Fee
$8.00
$3.75
$6.00
$5.50
$3.00
$5.00
$5.90
$5.00
$2.67
$4.00
$1.33
$6.46
$3.50
$4.95
$3.98
$3.33
$1.79
$3.75
Date
Created
Population
1998
10,830
2001
208,054
2007
34,053
2004
19,220
2007
6,416
2007
14,937
2006
596,974
2004
8,018
2004
10,843
2003
24,507
2001
38,220
2004
7,726
2007
4,557
28,456
2006
16,186
2003
62,916
18,000
2006
2,266
2004
81,855
2006
3,884
1998
12,560
2001
8,662
2001
50,792
2007
1,641
2007
3,901
21,256
2003
20,369
2007
27,368
2005
8,828
2006
7,227
2005
2,280
2005
22,824
2005
10,720
1999
47,271
1997
61,254
2007
4,540
2004
12,736
2007
13,432
2008
18,435
16,828
No.
Community
921 Fairmont
922 Morgantown
923 Oak Hill
State
ERU
Monthly
Fee
Date
Created
WV
$5.00 2003
$2.50 2003
WV
WV
37
Population
19,097
28,292
7,589