Minnesota and the New Normal Tom Stinson, State Economist July 2011

advertisement

Minnesota and the New Normal

Tom Stinson, State Economist

Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer

July 2011

State Revenues Lost to a Recession Are

Never Regained

$ (millions

)

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

2008 2011

5,000

-

2006 2008

Source: MMB estimate

2010 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020

$5.028 Billion Deficit Was Forecast for FY 2012-13

($ in millions)

Beginning Balance

Revenues

Spending

Reserves

Forecast Balance

FY 2010-11 FY 2012-13

$447

30,662

$938

33,330

30,171

275

39,021

275

$663 ($5,028)

One-time Federal Stimulus and Payment

Shifts Distort Spending Comparisons

$ billions

$41.0

$39.0

$37.0

$35.0

$33.0

$31.0

$29.0

$27.0

$25.0

$34.3 billion

9.6%

K-12 Shift Savings

$1.9

Federal Stimulus

$2.3

29%

$30.2

$39.0 billion

$1.4

K-12 Shift Buyback

$1.9

Replace K-12 Shift

Savings

$2.3

Replace Federal

Stimulus

$33.5

FY 2010-11 FY 2012-13 Forecast

Minnesota Has a Significant Structural

Budget Deficit

($ in millions)

Revenues

FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

16,198 17,132 17,323 18,007

19,952

*

19,070 19,668 20,061 Spending

Difference ($3,754) ($1,938) ($2,345) ($2,054)

Est. Inflation 339 673 1,122 1,611

*FY 2012 Spending includes $1.382 billion current law school shift buyback

If State Health Care Costs Continue Their Current

Trend, State Spending On Other Services Can’t Grow

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

9%

8%

7%

6%

5%

3.9%

8.5%

0.2%

Revenue Health Care Education & All

Other

General Fund Spending Outlook, presentation to the Budget Trends Commission,

August 2008, Dybdal, Reitan and Broat

$5 Billion Shortfall is 13% of FY 2012-13

Projected General Fund Spending

Total Spending $38.6 Billion

Property Tax

Aids &

Credits,

$3.5B, 9.1%

Health &

Human

Services,

$11.9B,

30.9%

K-12

Education,

$15.6B,

40.5%

Debt

Service,

$1.1B, 2.9%

All Other,

$3.5B, 9.1%

Higher

Education,

$2.9B, 7.5%

Recent Economic and Demographic

Events Have Changed the Outlook for as Far as We Can See

This Recovery Will Continue to Be

Slower than Those in the Past

Percent Change from Quarter

Preceding NBER Recession Call

24%

20%

16%

12%

8%

2007-2009

1990-1991

2001

1980-1982

4%

0%

-4% 1Q 2011

-8%

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Quarters After NBER Recession Call

U.S. Employment Is Not Expected to

Reach Pre-Recession Levels Until 2013

U.S. Payroll Employment

156

148

140

132

124

116

108

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

Jobs Unemployment

2010 2011 2012

U.S. Unemployment

Rate (Percent)

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

2013

Total U.S. Wages Fell in 2009

Quarterly Year-Over-Year

Percent Change

15%

10%

5%

0%

-5%

-10%

1970 1975 1980

History Fcast

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Household Wealth Fell by 25 Percent, More

Than $17 Trillion

$ Trillions

80

65.8

60 56.4

55.0

48.8

40

20

0

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

The Age Distribution Has Changed

10

0

30

20

% of Population

Over Age 20

50 47.0

40 37.8

20-40

7.6

10.0

40-45

1980 2007

7.2

10.4

45-50

21.6

24.5

50-65

16.6

17.3

65+

Population Growth Rates Have Converged

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

-1%

-2%

Suburban

Exurban

Mn

Ramsey

Hennepin

Minnesota Saw a 30 Percent Jump in Workers

Turning Age 62 in 2008

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0

7/05 to

7/06

7/06 to

7/07

7/07 to

7/08

7/08 to

7/09

7/09 to

7/10

Year Turning Age 62

7/10 to

7/11

7/11 to

7/12

2005 ACS

From 2010 to 2020, Minnesota Will

See Large Increases Age 50s and 60s

85+

80-84

75-79

70-74

65-69

60-64

55-59

50-54

45-49

40-44

35-39

30-34

25-29

20-24

15-19

10-14

5-9

0-4

-42,310

-63,650

-30,680

-2,680

-9,980

Source: Minnesota State Demographic Center, rev 2007

Numbers are rounded

16,500

8,440

41,400

54,240

61,920

47,950

5,050

47,330

36,190

20,150

91,370

112,540

102,960

After a Decade of Little Change, Minnesota K-12

Enrollments Will Begin to Grow More Rapidly

Source: Mn Dept of Education, Minnesota State Demographic Center projection

Change In K-12 Enrollments 2000-01 to

2009-10

In 2009-10, 14.55 of Eastern Carver enrollment was minority students. Minority students

Comprised 41% of enrollment growth 2000-01 to 2009-10

Labor Force Growth Is About To Slow Sharply

1.6%

1.4%

1.2%

1.0%

0.8%

0.6%

0.4%

0.2%

0.0%

1.52%

1.12%

0.75%

0.43%

0.10%

0.13%

0.27%

1990-

2000

2005-10 2010-15 2015-20 2020-25 2025-30 2030-35

60% Of Minnesota K-12 Teachers

Are Over Age 40

2008 ACS

Minnesota Will Grow More Diverse; Remain

Less Diverse Than The Nation

60

50

40

Minnesota Total

United States Total

Ramsey County

Twin Cities (7 cou)

30

20

10

20

14

23

16

26

19

0

2005 2010 2015

State Demographer & Census Bureau projections

2020

29

20

2025

31

22

2030

33

23

2035

35

25

The Old Normal

+ The Great Recession

+ Long Run Demographic Changes

= The New Normal

The “New Normal” Probably Means

• Higher interest rates

• Labor and talent will be the scarce resources

• Slower economic growth

• A single-minded focus on productivity

• Increasing numbers of retirees

• A more diverse population

• More uncertainty about the future

More 65+ Than School Age by 2020

1,400,000

1,200,000

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

0

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

Census counts & State Demographer projection, revised 2007

18-24

65+

5-17

Health Care Spending Jumps After 55

U.S. Health Care Spending By Age, 2004

$12,000

$10,000

$9,017

$9,914

$8,000

$6,000

$4,000

$2,000

$1,855

$1,074

$1,445

$2,165

$2,747

$3,496

$6,694

$3,571

$0

<5

5-

14

15

-24

25

-34

35

-44

45

-54

55

-64

65

-74

Source: Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey,

75+ ge

Av era data for per capita spending by age group in the Midwest. Excludes spending for long-term care institutions.

The “New Normal” Probably Means--2

• A shift in the balance between private and public sectors

• Chronic government deficits & cuts in service

• Worries about how to pay for past promises

• Creative destruction/disruptive innovation will change the way we deliver services

• A whole new set of opportunities

Minnesota Faces a Fiscal Trap

1.

The issue is a long run, structural one— short run solutions will not solve the problem

2.

Trend growth alone will not be sufficient.

Fundamental changes are necessary

3.

Revenue growth will slow. Efforts to increase it will be met with resistance

4.

Spending pressures will increase driven largely by issues of aging and health

5.

State spending will shift its focus from education, infrastructure and higher education to care and support of the aging

The Great Recession Has Been Blamed for

Raising the Level of Social Angst

But What Is Really Happening

Is That We Have Entered A

“ N e w N ormal”

Grieving For The “Old Normal”

Denial “This is not happening.” “Just wait, things will return to normal.”

Anger -- “Who is to blame?” Rage and gridlock rule and anyone who symbolizes life, energy, progress, success, happiness, etc. is treated with resentment and mistrust.

Bargaining “I’ll change if this just goes away.” Somehow, we can get back to the old normal if we just return to good, ole fashioned

(conservative/liberal) values.

Depression (emotional, not economic) “What’s the point in trying?” “We are all doomed anyway.” The certainty/finality of events is finally recognized.

Acceptance “It’s going to be okay.” Looking for opportunities begins.

But Why Fear The New Normal?

It Plays To Our Strengths!

Future economic growth will depend increasingly on increasing productivity and less on labor force size

Education has been the key to Minnesota’s productivity and prosperity

Future productivity increases will depend on decisions and the investments we make now

Public Sector Productivity Growth Will Be

Essential

Productivity Is Not Just

Producing at a Lower Cost

Increasing Productivity Also

Means

Making things better

(improved quality)

Making better things

(innovation, new products)

Focusing Just On Expenditure

Cuts May Be Short Sighted

Long term cost saving may require investments which increase short term expenditures

“Making Things Better” May Offer the Greatest Potential

Cost cutting efforts have focused on transactional jobs

Largest future productivity gains are likely to come from investments that lead to better outcomes

Lower lifetime health care costs, reduced recidivism rates, improved graduation rates

Adapting service delivery plans to meet the needs of the “New Normal”

3 R’s of Opportunity

• Restructure government costs

• Replace retiring government workers wisely

• Re-engage the growing retiree population

3 More R’s Of Opportunity

• Restructure government revenues

• Research to solve problems—for example improved graduation rates

• Restore entrepreneurship, initiative, invention in the private and public sectors

Education Is The Key To Productivity

Minnesota High School Graduation Ratio

2007-08 Mn Dept of Education 5 year graduation rate. Percent of 9 th graders who graduate within 5 years

The Fiscal Catch-22

If we don’t make the necessary public investments in human capital, research and infrastructure, then we won’t have the productivity gains needed to provide the resources to make those investments.

“If something can't go on forever, it will stop.”

Herbert Stein, Chair President Nixon’s

Council of Economic Advisors

“I skate to where the puck will be, not to where it has been.”

Wayne Gretzky

Famous Canadian Philosopher

Download