EU Copyright and Cross-Border Access to Content BT’s view on copyright BT supports the protection of copyright as an important incentive to the creation of content by ensuring creators and rights-holders are fairly rewarded - We believe this is best done by industry actors collaborating as they have in the UK under the recently announce Creative Content (VCAP) alliance between ISPs and rightsholders Territoriality is the cornerstone of value creation, jobs and growth the European audiovisual industries. There is no clear rationale for harmonisation of copyright laws across the EU and there is no rationale for an EU-wide license Commercial agreements can already assign multi-territorial or even EU wide rights. The issue is lack of demand EU-wide licensing would result in less choice for consumers and ultimately the creation of less European content. Enabling existing subscribers to access their services when travelling for short periods is a logical market evolution. Enabling or requiring cross border sales is highly problematic, if anything more so than pursuing a single EU copyright title. Enabling true competition in the acquisition of key rights is essential in ensuring consumers get best value (and reducing territoriality will have the reverse effect). However, sensible copyright evolution that reflects changing technology and consumer demand should be considered – such as exceptions for private copying in the cloud EU Digital Single Market and Copyright Reform BT shares the European Commission’s vision of a more effective Digital Single Market, but we would like to warn of the unintended consequences – in terms of reduced retail competition, undermining the strength of the creative industry and impeding innovative business models – through harmonisation of copyright arrangements, up to and including a single EU copyright title. The markets for many types of content are likely to remain national for a variety of reasons, with limited cross-border demand (EC commissioned research by Plum Consulting “The economic potential of cross-border pay-to-view and listen audiovisual media services” 2012 supports this view). In the few instances where there is sufficient demand, commercial arrangements have arisen to provide an effective solution. Investments in content made by market players such as BT (in sports rights for example) reflect innovation and convergence, helping drive the Commission’s own Digital Agenda goals for take-up of high-speed networks. As observed by Enders Analysis “The value of territorial licensing to the EU”, any action that prevents rights owners from following a market-led approach to the monetisation of these rights “could disturb the foundations of the edifice of value that has been established over time”. Restructuring these markets along pan-European lines would lead to dominance by those few players already positioned in several national markets. This would undermine competition, narrow the range of content on offer to EU consumers and ultimately destroy much of the investment in original European content. BT does not believe that legislation is necessarily needed to achieve ‘portability’ of existing subscribers services for short periods of travel, although the Commission will want to keep up pressure on rights holders to offer sensibly priced rights extensions to the market. The rights market will very likely respond to measures enabling or requiring cross border sales by selling only European wide licences in order to maintain prices and investment returns in their primary key markets. This will price out local operators such as BT and favour (mainly non-European) operators such as Google / YouTube, Amazon and Netflix. Operators will focus on content which has the largest possible audience / market and will result in increased prices and decreased choice for European consumers. Enabling true competition in the acquisition of key rights is essential in ensuring consumers get best value. We would be very concerned about strong interventions designed to ensure content rights are sold on a pan-EU basis and which go beyond eliminating territorial protection clauses which may restrict competition. Our primary concern is that rights should be sold in a manner that promotes retail downstream competition in PayTV markets, with new entrants accorded the ability to outbid incumbents. BT Group plc 4 Feb 2015