1989
USDA-ARS
HOP
RESEARCH
J
1
*,
14
I
1989
Annual Research Summary
HOP BREEDING, GENETICS,
CHEMISTRY
US Department of Agriculture
Oregon State University
Department of Crop and Soil Science
Alfred Haunold, Research Geneticist
USDA-ARS
Gail B. Nickerson, Chemist
Oregon State University
Ulrich Gampert, Research Assistant
Peggy Whitney, Research Assistant
These are preliminary data.
permission
Not for publication without the author's
Page
Virus Data of Various Hop Genotypes Grown at Corvallis in 1988 ....
59
Virus Data of Crosses 8301, 8302, 8303, and 8309, 1988 Season
61
Early Impressions of the 1989 Oregon Hop Crop
Field, 1989- •_••.• Oregon Commercial Off-Station Plots
68
72
Computer Printouts of 1989 Hop Analyses
1989 Male Lupulin Analyses
1989 Off-Station Maturity Samples
1989 Females, Bale and Cone Analyses
75
82
83
98
100
104
:
Hop Genotypes in the USDA Clonal Germplasm Repository
Wild American Hop Collection by R. 0. Hampton, Trip Report
1989 Wild American Hop Collection, Quality
HOP CHEMISTRY
1989 Quality of Triploid Hallertauer Off-Station Plots by State ...
Diploid Off-Station Plots, Quality
Diploid Off-Station Plots, Oil Composition
1989 Off-Station Plots, WA, OR, ID, Official Analyses
Oregon Triploid Off-Station Plots, Maturity Series, Alpha and Oil .
1988 Hop Storage Trials
1989 Triploid Off-Station Plots, Production and Price per Bale ....
Quality of European Hops Grown in Oregon, 1975-85
105
107
108
109
110
Ill
Coanalogs of Zero Alpha Hops, 1989 Crop
Mt. Hood, USDA 21455, Oil Composition, 1987 Crop
Alleged Decline of Willamette Yield and Quality
114
115
117
112
113
USDA RESEARCH REPORTS AND PLANS
1989 USDA CRIS Report
119
1989 State CRIS Report, Oregon
ARF Report, Project 3618, Hop Research Council
ARF Report, Project 3625, Oregon Hop Commission
ARF Report, Project 3634, Miller Brewing Company
ARF Report, Project 4520, Miller Brewing Company
ARF Report, Project 4522, Hop Research Council
1989 Prosser USDA CRIS Report
Quarterly Progress Report, Prosser, 1/1-3/31, 1989
Quarterly Progress Report, Prosser, 4/1-6/30; 1989
Quarterly Progress Report, Prosser, 7/1-9/30, 1989
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
132
137
Quarterly Progress Report, Prosser, 10/1-12/31, 1989
Hop Field Day, Prosser
USDA Cooperative Agreement No. 58-91H2-8-136, Prosser
138
143
144
MISCELLANEOUS
Mt. Hood, a New Noble Aroma Hop (ASBC Newsletter, Abstract)
Soil Mix for Greenhouse Planting
U.S. Recipients of the International Order of the Hop, 1967-1988 ..
The Order of the Hop, Description
151
152
153
154
IHG Congress, Leon, Spain, August 1-3, 1989
IHGC Technical Commission, July 31-Aug. 3, 1989, Leon, Spain
156
165
Microbreweries in Oregon
Old World Hop Developed Here
New Hop Variety Available
Hop Stringing, Photograph
Radio News, New Hop Variety
Hop Genotypes Sent to Australia in 1981
167
•• 168
169
170
171
172
HOP GROWERS OF AMERICA, INC.
ANNUAL STATISTICAL REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1. 1988 TO AUGUST 31, 1989
PRESENTED:
JANUARY 18, 1990
34TH ANNUAL HGA CONVENTION
PORTLAND, OREGON
HOP GROWERS OF AMERICA, INC.
ANNUAL STATISTICAL REPORT
198&/89
PRESENTED:
JANUARY 18, 1990
34TH ANNUAL HGA CONVENTION
PORTLAND, OREGON
TABLE OF CONTENTS
U.S. Hop Production
By State and Variety,
1987 - 1989
U.S. Hop Acreage And Yields By State and Variety,
Page 1A
1987 - 1989...Page IB
U.S./World Hop Production, 1971 - 1989
Page 2
Leaf And Stem Content,
Page 3A
1974 - 1989
1989 Hop Inspection Report - USDA/FGIS
Page 3B
Dispostion Of Production/Brewery Usage, 1979/80 - 1988/89
Page 4
Breakdown Of Brewery Consumption And Exports,
Summary of U.S.
Hop Exports/Imports,
1978/79 - 1988/89.Page 5
1987/88 And 1988/89
Page 6
Breakout Of U.S. Hop Exports By Type,
1981/82 - 1988/89
Page 7
Breakout of U.S. Hop Imports By Type,
1981/82 - 1988/89
Page 8
September 1 U.S.
Hop Stocks,
Supply And Disposition,
World Beer Production,
1972 - 1989
Page 9
1981/82 - 1988/89
1983
Page 10
- 1988
Page 11
1989 Sold Ahead Survey Indications
Page 12
Pr.epared By:
Hop Growers of America,
Post
Office
Box
9218
Yakima, Washington 98909 U.S.A.
Telephone: (509) 248-7043
Inc.
HOP GROWERS OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES HOP ACREAGE SURVEY
STRUNG FOR HARVEST 1989, 1988, 1987
VARIETY
ACREAGE CHANGE
ACRES STRUNG FOR HARVEST
1988 TO 1989
1989
1988
Aquila
467
300
In Other
+ 167
Banner
465
339
In Other
+ 126
1,297
1,560
6,862
1,012
1,283
8,552
1,723
1,190
10,101
+277
-1,690
Eroica
822
939
1,282
-117
Puggle
801
835
859
-34
Galena
6.451
3,519
5,501
3,086
5,093
2,748
+950
279
293
315
-14
1,064
2,941
6,299
1,905
930
2,670
* 5,873
2,041
454
670
2,803
1,493
+ 134
34,732
* 33,654
28,731
Cascade
Chinook
Cluster
Nugget
Olympic
Perle
Tettnanger
Willamette *
Other **
Total*
12SZ
+ or-
+285
+433
+271
+426
-136
+ 1,078
Reflects correction to 1988 Willamette totals.
Other Includes: Idaho: Cascade, Hallertauer, Hersbrucker, Mt. Hood, Nugget, Perle, Talisman, Tettnanger, Willamette & Experimentals.
Oregon: Aquila, Banner,Bulllion, Cascade, Chinook, Cluster, Hallertauer, ML Hood,and Experimentals.
Washington: Hallertauer, Hersbrucker, Fuggle, Mt Hood, and Experimentals.
Total acres strung for production in the United Statesfor 1989equals 34,732 acres. Thisreflectsan increase of 1,078
acresfrom 1988. Aroma acreagerose to slightly less than 15,000acresor 43% of the U.S.total.
Acreage Increases were noted in the varieties Aquila, Banner, Cascade, Chinook, Galena, Nugget, Perle, Tettnanger,
and Willamette. Cluster, Eroica, Fuggle, Olympic, and'Other* acreage decreased from 1988to 1989.
Detailedacreage and varietyinformationfor Idaho, Oregon,and Washingtonisenclosed on thefollowing tlireepages.
Any questionsregarding the acreage survey and its reporting may be directedto HopGrowers of America- (509)2487043.
Prepared:
Source:
June 12, 1989
Hop Growers of America
P.O. Box 9218
Yakima, WA 98909
(509) 248-7043
HOP GROWERS OF AMERICA
WASHINGTON HOP ACREAGE SURVEY
STRUNG FOR HARVEST 1989, 1988, 1987
VARIETY
ACRES STRUNG FOR HARVEST
ACREAGE CHANGE
1988 TO 198")
1989
1988
J 987
Aquila
356
300
In Other
Banner
356
339
InOlher
H7
1,297
1,269
6,402
1,012
1,061
8,059
1,723
1.019
9,541
+285
Cascade
Chinook
Cluster
+ or
+56
+208
-1,657
472
560
795
R8
Galena
5,75f.
4,827
4,277
+929
Nugget
2,241
+ 534
liroica
1,707
1,403
Olympic
279
293
315
-14
Perle
779
592
216
+ 187
2,410
2,507
2,246
2,093
605
In Other
+415
261
198
414
•48
24,385
23,287
20,308
+ 1,098
Tettnanger
Willamette
Other »
Total **
-
+ 164
* Other Includes: Hallertauer, Hersbrucker, Fuggle, Mt. Hood, and Experimentals.
** California data included in Washington total to avoid disclosure of individual producer information.
Compiled by Washington Hop Commission from figures provided by individual growers.
Total acres strung for production in the state of Washington for 1989 totals 24,385 acres. This reflects an increase of
1,098 acres from 1988. Washington has the largest planting of hops in liie United States with 70% of the total U.S.
acreage.
1989 acreage increases for Washington are noled in the varieties Aquila, Banner, Cascade, Chinook, Galena.
Hallertauer, Mt. Hood, Nugget, Perle, Tettnanger, and Williimette. Acreages decreased for the vnriclies Cluster,
Eroica, Olympic, and 'Otlier*. Cluster, the single largest U.S. variety by acreage and production in 1988, dropped
1,657 acres or 21%.
Washington productionfor 1988totaled 39,979,610 pounds produced on 23,287 acres for an average per acre yield
of 1,716.82 pounds. This compares to a 1987 harvest of 36,883,242 pounds produced on 20,309 acres for an average
yield of 1,816.10 pounds per acre.
In 1989aroma hop varieties account for 32%of the total Washington hop acreage. Washington accounts for 52%of
the total aroma hop acreage in the United States for this growing season.
HOP GROWERS OF AMERICA
OREGON HOP ACREAGE SURVEY
STRUNG FOR HARVEST 1989, 1988, 1987
VARIETY
ACRES STRUNG FOR HARVEST
ACREAGE CHANGE
1988 TO 1989
1289
1988
1987
+
or -
Fuggle
801
835
859
Galena
149
146
251
+3
Nugget
1,278
1,379
1,345
-101
-34
Perle
285
338
238
-53
Tettnanger
531
424
65
+ 107
2,803
+ 12
503
+41
6,064
-25
Willamette *
3,792
Other *♦
Total
576
7,412
3,780 *
535
7,437 *
♦
*
• Reflects correction or 1988 Willamette totals
** OtherIncludes: Aquila, Banner, Buillion, Cascade, Chinook, Cluster, Hallertauer, Mt. Hood,and Experimentals.
Total acres strung for production in the state of Oregon for 1989 totals 7,412 acres. This reflects a decrease of 260
acres from 1988 in the variety Willamette. This is caused by the correction of an earlier reporting error which
erroneously indicated 1988 Willamette acreage of 4,040. The CORRECT 1988 figure should read 3,780 acres.
Taking thiscorrection into account, Oregon hop acreage for 1989 declined by only 25 acres compared to the 1988
totals. Decreases werenoted in the varieties Fuggle, Nugget,and Perle. Galena,Tettnanger, Willamette, and 'Other*
posted slight increases for 1989.
Oregon productionfor 1988equaled 10,832,460 pounds produced on 7,437 acres (correctedfigure)for an average
per acre yield of 1,456.56 pounds. This compares to a 1987 harvest of 8,355,371 pounds coming from 6,064 acres
for an average yield of 1,377.86 pounds per acre.
In 1989 aroma hop varieties account for nearly 80% of the total Oregon hop acreage. Oregon accounts for 39% of
the totalaroma hop acreage in the United Statesfor tillsgrowing season.
Prepared: June 12, 1989
Source: Hop Growers of America
P.O. Box 9218
Yakima, WA 98909
(509) 248-7043
HOP GROWERS OF AMERICA
IDAHO HOP ACREAGE SURVEY
STRUNG FOR HARVEST 1989, 1988, 1987
VARIETY
ACRES STRUNG FOR HARVEST
ACREAGE CHANGE
1988 TO 1989
1989
1988
1987
+ or-
Aquila
111
In Other
In Other
In Other
Banner
109
In Other
In Other
In Other
Chinook
291
222
171
+69
Cluster
460
493
560
-33
Eroica
350
379
487
-29
Galena
546
528
565
+ 18
Other *
1,068
1,308
576
-240
Total
2,935
2,930
2,359
+5
.
* OtherIncludes: Cascade, Hallertauer, Hersbrucker, MLHood,Nugget, Perle, Talisman, Tettnanger, Willamette, andExperimentals.
Total acres strung for production in the state of Idaho for 1989 totals 2,935 acres. This reflects an increase of 5 acres
from 1988. For the third straight year, the category 'Other* comprises the single largest variety.
1989 acreage increases for Idaho are noted in the varieties Chinook and Galena. Acreage decreased for Cluster,
Eroica, and 'Other*.
Idahoproductionfor 1988totaled 3,745,151 pounds producedon 2,930 acresfor an averageper acreyield of
1,278.20 pounds. This compares to a 1987 harvest of 3,703,600pounds produced on 2,358 acresfor an averageyield
of 1,570.65 pounds per acre.
In 1989aroma hop varietiesaccount for 38%of the totalIdaho hop acreage. Idaho accountsfor 9%of the totalaroma
hop acreage in the United States for this growing season.
Prepared: June 12, 1989
Source:
Hop Growers of America
P.O. Box 9218
Yakima, WA 98909
(509) 248-7043
U.S. HOP PRODUCTION BY STATE AND VARIETY
:
1987. 1988 & 1989
STATE
PRODUCTION
AMD
1987
VARIETY
California 2/
1988
1989
1,000 POUNDS
IDAHO
Aquila
182.6
Banner
Chinook
—
234.3
•275.4
• . 338.8
389.4
Cluster
963.9
896.7
Eroica
984.9
778.8
692.3
574.0
979.2
951.6
853.2
37.0
62.4
815.7
978.2
072,2
3,850.0
3,920.0
4,090.6
Galena
Willamette
Other Varieties
TOTAL
OREQOH
Fuggle
581.6
926.5
Qalena
961.2
275.0
nugget
282.0
265.2
2,940.0
2,998.8
2,594.3
155.0
369.6
436.1
517.0
573.5
4,090.0
4,958.0
6,029.3
758.4
973.1
999.4
8,800.0
11,025.0
11,859.0
Perle
Tettnang
Willamette
Other Varieties
TOTAL
WASHinaTOM
Aquila
Banner
487.0
825.9
561.0
847.3
Cascade
3,168.0
1,831.0
Chinook
2,568.0
1,352.0
1,990.0
2,385.7
19,382.0
Cluster
Eroica
16,100.0
1,242.0
13,003.0
1,475.0
Qalena
7,574.0
9,252.0
11,011.2
2,618.0
2,916.0
4,347.5
501.0
545.0
493.8
Perle
226.0
603.0
Tettnang
919.2
540.0
Nugget
Olympic
%
Willamette
Other Varieties
TOTAL
U.S.
939.3
1,958.0
2,506.4
2,091.0
3,284.2
562.0
175.0
37,398.0
39,751.0
43,376.8
50,048.0
54,696.0
59,326.4
245.3 •
1/ Estimates include hops lost by fire. j(
'
•
II Combined with Washington to avoid disclosure of Individual operations.
Prepared January 1990
Hop Growers of America, Inc.
Source: ttASS
Page IA
U.S. HOP ACREAGE AND YIELDS BY STATE AND VARIETY
1987, 1908 &r 1989
STATE
AREA HARVESTED
YIELD
AMD
VARIETY
1007
1980
1900
1907
1909
rovnos//]
ACRES
CALIfORrilA 2/
1900
IDAHO
Aquila
110
Banner
1.660
110
Chinook -'-
2.130
100
220
220 '
Cluster
1.530
1.540
1.770
510
490
490-
Eroica
1.09O
1.030
440
2.010
430
Oalena
350 ....
1.770
1.610
400
1.640
520
540-
2,040
1.030
1,500
740
400
Willamette
50
130
540
1.010
900
1.510
970
890
2,200
2,000
2,000
1,750
1,400
1.461
' Tuggle
920
850
001 -
Oalena
210
150
149 —
1,450
1,470
210
330
205
470
531
Other Varieties
TOTAL
orccaori
Hugget
Terle
Tettnang
Willamette
2,695
Other Varieties
TOTAL
1.278 _
3,700
3.792 —
630
1.090
1,200
1.310
1.000
1.700
2.030
2.040
2.030
740
1.120
1.530
1.520
1.100
1,000
1.340
1,590
515
530
576
1.470
1,840
1,740
6,000
7,500
7.412
1.470
1.470
1,600
WASHinQTOM
Aquila
320
356
1.520
2.320
340
356
1.650
1,650
2,300
920
1,297
1,920
1.990
1,900
800
1.000
1,269 -
1.990
9.900
1,880
7,950.
6,374 -
1,690
1,960
2.030
2,040
1,990
Banner
Cascade
Chinook —
Cluster —
Eroica
Oalena
nugget
Olympic
750
640
472-
2,020
1.940
4,050
1,400
4,900
5.735--
1.870
1.090
1,920
1,800
2.241 —
1.870
1.620
1.940
1.770
Perle
tettnang
230
270
279
2,180
2.020
200
580
779
1,130
1.040
1.180
650
2,200
2.410
830
890
1,040
1.020
1.310
261
1.150
1.350
940
Willamette
2,050
Other Varieties
2.507-
490
130
TOTAL
20,100
23,100
24.336
1.860
1.721
1.782
U.S.
28,300
33,400
34,548
1.770
1.638
1.717
.
-
1/ Estimates Include hops lost by fire.
2/ Combined with Washington to avoid disclosure ofIndividual operations.
Prepared January 1990
Hop Orower j of America. In?.
Source: fMSS
Page IB
1989 US Hop Production by Variety
Total Acres
Variety
s trung
Yield
harvested
lbs/A
Total Production
lbs
Aquila
467
466
2164
1,008,500
Banner
466
466
2321
1,081,600
Cascasde
1297
1297
1980
2,568,000
Chinook
1560
1489
1864
2,775,100
Cluster
6862
6837
2046
13,987,900
Eroica
822
822
1841
1,513,300
Fuggle
801
801
1200
961,200
Galena
6451
6424
1888
12,129,600
Nugget
3519
3519
1981
6,969,800
279
279
1770
493,800
Perle
1064
1064
1274
1,355,300
Tettnanger
2941
2941
1047
3,079,900
Willamette
6299
6299
1479 '
9,313,500
Other*
1905
1817
1165
2,116,900
34,733
34,521
Olympic
United States
1,719
59,354,400
*includes Bullion, Hallertauer, Saazer, and various experimentals in each
state (e.g. 21455, 21456, 21457, 21459, 21490, 21491, 21496, 21497, 21120)
10
U.S./ WORLD PRODUCTION - 197 1 TO DATE
U.S.
W. GERMANY
OTHER WORLD
TOTAL WORLD
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
(Million Pounds)
1971
19'2
1973
49.7(25%)
51.3(22%)
54.8 (20%)
53.4(25%
65.9(20%
84.9(32%
^74
57.0(73%)
73.9 |307o
1975
55.9(22%)
71.5(29%
57.8(25%)
54.8 (21%)
55.1 (23%)
54.9 (21%)
75.6 (29%)
79.1 (28%)
78.6(25%)
68.1 (24%)
56.2 (207o)
49.7 (18%)
'49.0(19%)
50.0 (19%)
54.7 (21%)
59.3 (227o)
62.6(26%
81.6 (327o
66.9 (28%
68.8 (27%
59.3 (23%
74.3 (26%
93.7(29%
81.2 (26%
78.3 (207o
78.5 (287o
75.2 (297o
68.2 (27%
66.2 (257c,
70.1(267,
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988 '
1989*
230.6
120.0
(5t7o)
(50%)
(4 07p)
268.5
(IOOTo)
(100%)
(100%)
1 in.4
|4 77,.)
2 4P.3
100%)
122.9
(49%)
107.0
112.4
210.1
100'%,)
(100%)
259.5 (1007o)
239.4 IOOTo)
260.9 100%)
257.9 100%)
286.1 1007o)
317.2 100%)
287.2 100%)
282.7 100%)
275.5 1007o)
250.9 100%.)
259.6 100%)
266.4 IOOTo)
266.9 (1007o)
250.2
(497o)
123.5 (47%)
117.4 (49%)
137.2 (53%)
123.0 (40%)
132.7 (467o)
144.9 (467o)
137.9 (487o)
148.2 527o)
147.4 (547o)
134.7 (527o)
141.4 (54%)
145.5 55%)
137.5 52%)
115.0
238.1
• rlgures for 1989 are estimates.
• Totals may not add due to rounding.
\J.S. Hop Production 1971 -
1939
FRG
Hop Production 1971 - 1989
1—III!—I
1971
1973
1975
I
I
1977
I
I
I
1979
I
1901
I—I—I
1983
I
1985
I
I—h-
1987
1989
Crop rrw
• HIT.H<prm>)tllon
Other World Hop Production 197 I - (90 9
Total V/orld Hop Production 1971 - 1959
330
1 297_
261
19(1
I65_
132
-J
1971
I
1973
I
1
I
1975
I
1977
1
1
1979
I
I
1991
1
1
1903
I
I
1905
I
1
1907
|
I1909
•I • I
1971
I
1973
I
I
1975
Crop Year
* Oirw World Production
I
I
1977
1—I
1979
1
I
1981
I
I
1903
I
I
1905
I
I
1907
I
H
1909
Crop tear
• Total Wcrld Product Ion
Prepared January 1990
Hop Orowers of America, Inc.
Source: r\S. USDA. HO A
Page 2
11
U. S. HOP STATISTICS
LEAF & STEM CONTENT (%)
Crop Year
WA.
1974
1.95
1975
OR.
ID.
1.57
1.02
.56
1.72
1.75
1.24
.97
.65
1.53
1976
1.23
1.43
1.16.
.88
1.24
1977
1.46
1.91
1.15
.90
1.49
1978
1.38
2.19
1.34
1.07
1.48
1979
1.92
2.32
1.38
1.83
1.93
1980
2.57
2.19
1.84
1.66
2.43
1981
1.93
2.49
1.60
2.73
2.01
1982
1.13
1.80
1.24
1.24
1.26
1983
1.25
1.44
1.20
1.20
1.28
1984
1.07
1.77
1.27
1.26
1.18
1985
1.25
1.56
1.16
0.06
1.16
1986
0.95
0.92
0.73
0.46
0.93
1987
1.14
1.55
1.28
0.45
1.23
1988
0.92
1.28
1,01-
0.00
1.00
1989
0.96
.0.83
1.20
••
CA.
.
,
U. S. Average
0.95
U.S. Leaf And Stem % 1974 - 1989
3.0
P
e
2-4
r
2.1.
c
1.8
e
n
1.5
L
'•2.
a
g
e
* *.-.*
0.9_
. •.\ *.•.
0.6
0.3
:vy-:J K-fV'-i \-'-m lf-y'4
P1 fry?!
VTA f^vl
f-f fo-'-vl fov-v-l ]•:<•>:
0.0
1974
=P
¥
19751976197719781979 1980 1981 1982 1983 198419851986 1987 19881989
Year
Prepared January 1990
Mop Growers of America. Inc.
Ppnf*
Oregon [%)
36,020(1.77)
42,289 (1.56)
43,672 (0.92)
43,705 (1.55)
55,716 (1.28)
63,000 (0.83)
Wash- (%)
221,295 (1.07)
184,134(1.25)
179,603 (0.95)
186,248 (1.14)
200,584 (0.92)
216,188 (0.96)
88,516
29.6%
Total
% of Total
51.1%
152,846
29,539(47)
12,558(63)
110,749(51)
1%
1%
285,628 (1.18)
252,348 (1.16)
248,602 (0.93)
248,864 (1.23)
275,327 (1.00)
299,069 (0.95)
Total [%)040
15.3%
45,536
34,268(16)
7,457(12)
3,811(19)
2%
3.4%
9,918
6,319(3)
2,388(4)
1,211(6)
3%
0.6%
1,894
12(0)
153(4)
1,729(1)
4%
0%
219
19(0)
0
200(0)
5%
0%
111
0
0
111(0)
6%
0%
29
0
29(0)
0
Over 6%
100.0%
299,069
216,188(100)
63,000(100)
19,881(100)
Tota|
47.7%
% of Total
27.9%
83,367
10.9%
32,479
0
21,634(10)
10,845(17)
2%
4.4%
13,109
0
8,862(4)
4,247(7)
3%
2.0%
6,137
0
3,403(2]
2,734(4)
4%
1.6%
4,520
0
3,313(5)
1,207(0)
5%
1.2%
3,868
0
2,37.5(4)
1,493(1)
6%
4.37o
12,929
0
12,312(19)
617(0)
Over 6%
100.0%
299,069
19,881(100)
63,000(100)
*216,188(100)
Total
' Does not Include 192 bales of Oregon grown hops that were Inspected for seed only by the State of Washington.
•ll
Jh
""
spected by the Federal-State hop Inspection service each year. The above tables give the final results as of Hov. l&? 198^.
ing of Agriculture, Federal Grain Inspection Service, Is reporting information taken from officially certificated hops In
At the request of the hop growers' organizations, state agencies, and other interested parties, the United States Depart
HOTE: Approximately five acres of hops were grown In California but were not harvested for commercial purposes.
142,660
19,881(100)0
114,271(53) 64,701(30)
8.508(14) 18,666(30)
0%
Total
Idaho
Oregon
none
(0.46)
(0.45)
(0.00)
952 (1.26)
(0.06)
330
26
31
35
Calif. (%]
Table 3 - Number of Bales in Each Seed Category - Percent of Total in Parenthesis
23,434(37)
2,270(12)
Oregon
Idaho
0%
62,812(29)
Wash.
18.880(1.28)
18,992 (1.01)
19,881 (1.20)
25,595 (1.16)
25,301 (0.73)
27,361 (1.27)
Idaho (%)
Table 2 - number of Bales In Each Leaf & Stem Category - Percent of Total in Parenthesis
'
Wash.
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
Table 1 - Total Plumber of Bales Inspected - Weighted Average of Leaf & Stem In Parenthesis
Portland, Oregon
USDA, Federal Grain Inspection Service
Prepared by
1989 HOP INSPECTION REPORT
Total
42,289
43,672
43,705
55,716
63,000
(1.56)
(0.92)
(1.55)
(1.28)
(0.83)
(1.27)
(1.16)
(0.73)
(1.28)
(1.01)
(1.20)
Idaho (%)
27,361
25,595
.25,301
•18,880
18,992
19,881
None
Calif. (%)
952 (1.26)
330 (0.06)
26 (0.46)
31 (0.45)
35 (0.00)
• 2%
34,268(16)
7,457(12)
3,811(19)
45,536 .
15.3%
3%
6,3190)
2,388(4)
1,211(6)
9,918
3.4%
4%
1,894
0.6%
12(0)
1,729(1)
153(4).
219
0%
HI
0%
0
0
19(0)
0 .
6%
111(0)
5%
200(0)
29
_0
1%
2%
3%
13,109
4.4%
32,479
10.9%
83,367
27.9%
4%
6,137
2.0%
0_
3,403(2)
2,734(4)
5%
4,520
1.6%
0
1,207(0)
3,313(5)
6%
3,868
1.2%
0_
1,493(1)
2,375(4)
12,929
4.3%
0
12,312(19)
Oyer 6%
617(0)
Total
299,069
100.3%
*216,188(100)
63,000(100)
19,881(100)
Total
216,188(100)
63,000(100)
19,881(100)
299,069
100.0%
Approximately five acres of hops were grown in California but were not harvested for commerlcal purposes.
0
8,862(4)
4,247(7)
0
21,634(10)
10,845(17)
0_
18,666(30)
64,70T(30)
0%
29(0)
0
Over 6%
Table 3 - Number of Bales in Each Seed Category - Percent of Total in Parenthesis
1%
110,749(51)
29,539(47).
12,558(63)
152,846
51.1%
(1.18)
(1.16)
(0.93)
(1.23)
(1.00)
(0.95)
Total (%)
285,628
252,348
248,602
248,864
275,327
299,069
"Does not include 192 bales of Oregon grown hops that were inspected for seed only by the State of Washington.
by the Federal-State hop inspection service each year. The above tables give the final results as of November 15, 1989.
At the request of the hop growers' organizations, state agencies, and other interested parties, the United States Department
of Agriculture, Federal Crain Inspection Service, is reporting information taken from officially certificated hops inspected
Note:
Wash. 114,271(53)
Oregon
8,508(14)
Idaho
19,881(100)
Total 142,660
% of Total
47.7%
0%
29.6%
' 88,516
% of Total
Oregon (%)
36,020 (1.77)
Table 2 - Number of Bales in Each Leaf & Stem Category - Percent of Total in Parenthesis
Wash. (%)
221,295 (1.07)
184,134 (1.25)
179,603 (0.95).
186,248 (1.14)
200,584 (0.92)
216,188 (0.96)
Table 1 - Total Number of Dales Inspected - Weighted Average of Leaf & Stem in Parenthesis
0%
Wash.
62,812(29)
Oregon • 23,434(37)
Idaho'..,
2,270(12)
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
Box 3837
Portland, Oregon 97208
P.O.
USDA,. Federal Grain Inspection Service
Prepared by
1989 HOP INSPECTION REPORT
41.965
43.725
34.742
1981-82
22.168
26.091
28.362
35.427
47.494
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88 .
1988-89
Domestic
12,600
14,050
7,016 .
2,364
(8,300)
490
(320)
(10,630).
866
(8,239)
(8,798)
(15.820).
(4,354)
2,673
3,098
(1,892)
2 Total usage less imports adjusted for year'end inventory changes.
1981-32
o U.5. Hods
1979-80
0
3500
7000
10500
1983-84
1985-86
1987-88
Source: TA5. USDA
Year
d Foreign Hops
20000
S
3
24,870
31,322
34,965
29,159
22.168
26,691
29,195
26,689
24,493
28,346
(72%)
(59%)
.(66%)
(59%)
(65%)
(65%)
(64%)
(55%)
(67%)
(76%)
i
o Hop Usage
1961-82
i
i i
i
i
i
i
,
Year
1983-84
i
i
i
i
i
i
^>~
1985-86
—-
1—
~~~->
(28%)
(45%)
(33%)
(24%)
(41%)
(34%)
(41%)
(35%)
(35%)
(36%)
3S
1987-88
1
12.302
11,138
14.626
18.039
14.774
15.677
17,346
14,349
14,601
17.595
Mo
Fore 3"
r u t u sage
(1,000 lbs.)
U.S. 1 ops
«ct u sage
U.S. BREWERY USAGE
ToLaI Hop Usa9c: u-5- Brewers
(100%)
1979-80
0
5000
10000.
u 15000.
o
p 25000.
14000
17500
35000
0 30000
21000
0
40000_
0
24500
28000
50000
•54,696
49,615
48.962
50.964
67.995
56.053
1 45000
Prepared January 1990
Mop Growers of America. Inc.
s
n
u
0
p
u
0
0
U.S. Brewery Usage
78,926
78,154
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
Procluct
Sala ble '
54.757
74,411
31500
35000
5 5 million pounds minus adjustment to reflect more accurate export figure.
1
(-)
1,520
(4.470)
Stocks
2,580
(2,380)
(+)
(Decrease) In
1 Total production less fire loss and reserves not yet sold in normal outlets.
34,965
31.322
29.159
26.691
25,700
32.181
31.352
24.493
26.609
20.346
24,870
1984-85
1
(1,000 lbs.)
Difference
Usage of '
u.s. Hops
(+
1983-84
1982-83
36.373
(+)
1980-81
ports
1979-80
Ex
(Minus)
Unaccountable
Net Domestic
DISPOSITION OF PRODUCTION
1/
15000
36,894
34,341
36,220
34,476
35,078
35,451
34,617
35,331
34.644
35,582
32,632
'
9,209
9,283
5,590
7,567
6,294 3/
• 6,014
7,195
6,562
6,883
7,616
7,321
(Hop Equivalent)
Aa Extract
46,103
43,624
42,465
42,947
41,839
41,038
41,372 3/
41.465
40,207
43,787
39,953
Total
BREWERY CONSUMPTION
Aa Hopa
11,998
21.254
7,803
8,960
10,740
10,068
21,713
16,817
17,045
19.605
17,336
Aa Hopa
23,432
26.240
19.400
18,288
17,925
21,441
21.284
22.012
22.360
19,692
15,207
•^i.
w
%VvY
Scones/Pellets
^Extract
Year
S
U.S. Hop Exports Dy Form
Q Cones/Pellets
HExtract
Year
1978-79 1980-81 1982-83 1984-85 1986-87 1988-89
0
5000.
2 10000.
u 15000.
0 20000.
p 25000.
0 30000.
0 40000.
0 35000.
1 45000
50000.
Includes 3.5 million pounds minus adjustment to reflect more accurate domestic extract consumption
figure.
11
(Hop Equivalent)
As Extract
EXPORTS
ed byTreasury Department. Export Conversion Factor Is based on USDA Hop Market Mews Service.
5 million pounds minus adjustment to reflect more accurate export extract figure.
ip ^r
^
1978-79 1980-81 1982-83 1904-85 1906-87 1988-89
0
5000.
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
4.0-1
Export
Domestic Conversion Factor Is based on actual pounds ofhops used In production of extract as report
1/
U.S. Brewery Hop Consumption Dy Form
Prepared January 1990
S
2 10000.
Y
o 20000,
p 25000.
0 30000.
0 4O000I
0 35000.
45000
5.4-1
1987-88
1988-89
50000
6.6-1
1985-86'
1986-87
II
3/
5.6-1
1984-85
5.3-1
5.1-1
4.7-1
1983-84
1982-83 •
4.4-1
5.0-1
3.5-1
1980-81
'
4.4-1
1081-82
4.4-1
1978-79.
•
Domestic
1979-80
Year:
Marketing
FACTOR
EXTRACT CONVERSION
BREAKDOWN OF BREWERY COriSUMPTIOIX AfXD EXPORTS - [In 1,000 lbs.]
•
35,427
47,494
28,360
26,091
31.352
32,181
34.742
43,725
41,965
36,737 11
32,543
Total
Hop Growers of America Inc.
Increased
export
activity
coupled
16
August 1989
with
subdued
import, activity
will continue to put downward pressure on the United States hop
stocks further enhancing their recent declines.
Import/Export Total 9-1 to 3-31, 1980's
50000_
P
45000_
o
u
n
d
40000_
35000.
30000_
25000_
20000_
15000_
0
0
0
]0000_
5000_
0
1980/81 1981/821982/83 1983/841984/851985/861986/871987/881988/89
Year
o Export
d Import
Additional pressure will be placed on the domestic market if
variables such as the Russian purchases continue for any length of
time, if U.S. or European producers have difficulty filling
contracted deliveries due to lower yields and pest damage, the
enhancement of U.S. export markets, or a rebound in the domestic
brewing arena.
Average
Prices:
The
season
average
price
received
by United
States hop growers entered the decade of the 80's at $1.51.
average for 1988 was $1.34, down 11% from the 1980 level.
The
For the same period inflation average 5.1% per year.
All
variables being equal, a $1.51 contract signed for five years in
1980 would have to increase to 1.59, 1.67, 1.75, and 1.84 over the
life of the contract to avoid a net decrease in earnings.
1988's $1.34 average price is the lowest reported throughout the
decade.
SUMMARY OF UNITED STATES EXPORTS BY COUNTRIES &REGIONS OF DESTINATION - IN 1.000 LBS.
1581-49
5.4?0
t.OM
7.500
Miakd
' No. Arrwicj
17
1987-88
[rlr.rt
Hf
|.<] -
£.»r.
Irul
3.0W
10,474
7.296
1.549
540
195
78-1
2.973
2
. S7
17.770
1.651
537
1.7CO
1.896
6.800
7.584
6.S99
9.372
772
1.554
6.216
9.304'
2.376
CmU Rkj
Jitr.cl
2
8
!
22
SI
M
116
El SjrVJ<30T
Guatemala
121
66
49
115
20
90
110
Honduras
13
52
52
Panama
24
96
96
13
214
365
152
Central America
6l\
EUharruj
7
28
21
53 .
212
377
Barbados
57
160
165
Haiti
Jamaica
53
4
16
IS
79
315
391
7
9
36
36
2
Lwward & Windward
Trinidad-Tobago
2
2
8
10
2
8
15
55
2
*2
430
Chili
Colombia
2'
8
10
52
7
9
9
36
52
909
27
"223
134
536
7B5
123
71
36
230
2B4
284
629
•3.316
8.731
1.380
348
1.392
7.417
139
556
556
15
1J3
732
747
9
3.757
9
.
2.760'
'690
71 •
3.486
937
49
3.748
196
267
16
4
16
. 15
16
20
13
60
784
60
9
36
36
819
183 .
732
754
Ecuador
71
16
Guyana
Netherlands Antilles
Paraguay '
15
196 .
Surinam*
7
25
28
52
7
52
28
28
Uruguay
15
36
53
2
11
29
13
2
24
9
Veneiuela
116'
71
129
284
321
9
22
e?9
55
5.463
220
1.964
251
7.856
14.195
1.609
4.771
I.J97
7.5S8
13.968
170
680
742
So. America
Belgium-Luxembourg
62
.
108
Denmark
108
France
Ireland
1.004
Italy
Netherlands
M.08I
101
II
44
121
625
15
-
16*
Portugal
Spain
United Kingdom
Germany, Fed. Rep. of
European Community
476
1.904
2.103
15
15
1.540
24
96
96
435
10)
80
673
267
128
2.175
512
803
235
944
592
1.177
4.708
1.228
1.651
148
2.352
4.412
9.122
801
3.204
1.820
5.027
2
2
8
8
7
23
5
a
7
28
28
13
52
52
Czechoslovakia
• U.S.S.H.
20-
661
Eastern Europ*
Togo
28
661-
13
52
260
75
300
20
SO
80
198'
51
204
8
8
4
16
16
792
964
267
1.068
1.068
!2
22
150
55
22
Zaire
Wojlern Alrlca NEC
Africa
72.
220
2
M
72
55
Mauritius
172
13
661
661
Cameroon
Ghana
South Africa
1.500
1.292
2.062
Other European
Nigeria
40
15
Finland
275
1.100
2
8
Australia
1.484
51
33
132
11
44
29
115
116
483
1.932
1.987
44
175
176
15
60'
8
Bangladesh
9
China
13
Hong Kong
Indonesia
Japan
Korea, Rep. of
Malaysia
20
80
89
IS
72
72
267
2
a
335
456
60
11
104
18
46
225
22
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Seychelles
Singapore
31
124
124
'401
1.604
1.608
15
119
227
Sri Lanka
Taiwan
Tiuliand
7
7
150
150
7
Asia Oceania
5.85
92
2.344
2
Middle East
-
2
French Pacific Island
Others
2
2
GRANO TOTAL
4.310
15.944
6.560
8
•
7
51
2.961
265
••
.
8
8
8
8
9
51
522
.2.083
84
75
300
359
CiechostovakU
761
591
384
47.494
5.293
5.S55
OF ORIGIN
.23.420
1,000 POUNDS
Eflncl
/Equrr
.:
tm>i
.•!?:..
C»rv*e
7-nt.ti
-7
H.p
Equrt
[•41 -
• Teul
7
7
24
4'..-: 359
97
97
.2
France
•.
.
Gualtnula
4
'$".' 761
•If'
.1.166
591
' " 5.779
Leeward-Wlndnard |i.
Mexico
New Zealand
..
26
60
...
YuoHlovakll
GRANDTOTAL
. 1.041
»,
•
'
^:v26
••$.'V
201
148
liift-.i- 349
501
Source: USDA. January 1990
Nolo: Tolals may rioi agree with aOOItion ol individual llems tweause olroundino.
;
44
9.005
.
60 '.
11.793
fWeed
11
4
2
• Som«. M lest than 1.000 1M.
7
8.794
:>• 1.041
.:•• ' S i t
4
401
7
.287
4
1.158.
401
• '*!.''...
G*fmany,:F»d. flip.
Wand
UnllKfKingdom '
2.970
1987-88
|x4) .
24
Canada
CotomWa
Cos!) RlCa
160
8
26|240
J
BilolunvluxtrnOourg
•160
617
Eilricl
Auslralla
40
384
1985-89
TMkili
1.420
8
8
SUMMARY OF UNITED STATES HOP IMPORTS BY COUNTRIES AND REGIONS
C»r*l
22.
355
9
Iraq
Israel
60
639
52
202
Pakistan
"
10
275
52
Ffencn West Indies
Paw
414
8
248
660
108
4.985
220
2
62
13
Argentina
fira:il
20
165
Caribbean
Bolivia
398
190
9
CJominkan Republic
T«jl
!"] -
C1..:'2.302
.
.
31
.320
\
320
1
7
.
'•' "
10.792
302;
.. M
11.138
U.S. EXPORTS or HOPS. PELLETS Be MOP EXTRACT (l.OOO lbj.)
MOFS
1981-63
1.318
813
3.384
4.728
1982-63
1.129
308
1.184
2.313
1983-84
770
126
168
1.043
1984-83
2.090
1983-86
994
360
ill}* 67
2.0O4
99
• 1907-68.
1988-89
498
0
044
81
0
1.073
17.339
176
22
1.882
221
197
720
10
0.632
462
0
1.298
130
00
C83
101
0
303
O
77
203
4.102
0
436
134
39
627
3.430
.
.0
0
0
64
0
39
336
1.360
1.049
430
960
3.102
9
340
392
230
02
434
163
101
1.220
322
80
40
1.293.
770
4.706
1 17
2.%3
4
420
3.290
133
4.310
260
4.977
PELLETS
1901-82
2.486
308
0
13
74
1982-83
3.938
44
324
0
30
23
1.119
343
630
4.149
1983-84
613
0
1.602
882
313
0
78
1.711
43
869
13
8.163
323
23
180
392
12
1984-83
1.978
394
0
137
38
1.637
832
212
3.934
1983-88
338
1.882
0
O
0
O
0
431
906
496
348
3.900
624
0
0
0
131
484
1988-87
1.213
1987-88
4.643 '
1988-89
4.983
1981-82
4.002
4.363
300
0
391
474
677
0
97
11
0
13
79
340
623
O
3..981
436
40
0
132
31
739
6.700
287
37
2.178
176
104
632
16.944
31.713
1.080
661
8,420
388
HOPS (Including Pellets)
1.323
2.364
4.744
73
1.236
93
3.143
1982-83
3.087
1.130
1.184
603
112
3.634
1.616
630
791
1983-84
22
2.372
l.OOS
2,194
297
168
239
2.736
1,309
23
16,817
988
23
1.478
273
142
1.307
212
10.740
639
0
303
308
699
10.008
1984-83
4.068
1.092
0 .
3.323
0
1983-88
2.878
360
0'
1.411
412
683
1986-87
0
3.217
399
233
0
1.449
160
1.212
1,010
7.803
1.069
1987-88
220
8.023
99
73
447
0
198
2.189
878
8.938
639
141
1.228
434
33
1.139
11.998
327
77
3.468
946
384
784
21.334
22.012
1988-89
3,413
1.080
661
7.388
9
728
436
EXTRACT-HOP EQUIVALEMT (Actual x 4)
1981-62
1.338
4,330
0
263
1982-83
633
718
3.832
838
2.331
0
1.823
3.714
908
2.664
1983-84
468
738
3.708
1.192
2.132
0
860
1.128
3.133
6.364
17.923
312
1.012
7.036
1.818
2.280
0
1.248
3.828
708
2.388
21.441
316
500
2.743
21,284
1984-83
4.497
1983-88
1,972
4.668
0
1.132
3.127
660
3.0CO
1988-87
0
2.798
8,138
364
880
0
1.112
1.346
3.432
336
238
724
1.276
1.420
4.892
19,404
484
392
2.128
1,932
3.372
23.432
1.004
944
3.764
l.lOO
4.040
26.240
746
1987-88
1.392
1988-89
3.318
1981-82
3.339
6.800
6.218
0
0
784
3.088
3,748
2.760
TOTAL (Including Hop Equivalent of Extract)
3.833
2.364
3.009
4.370
1.237
18.288
1982-83
3.803
3.984
4.982
3.336
1,134
4,342
1,937
3,314
7.330
43.723
1983-84
792
490
3,128
3.386
2.429
168
1.091
3.884
6,729
6,389
34.742
986
337
3.294
2.333
0
3.233
3.6O0
639
316
0
2.071
3.412
683
1984-83
3.080
4.718
8,128
1983-88
4.848
3.028
3.333
32.181
2.743
1.660
3.828
31,332
1.113
1.272
4.644
26.091
438
797
1.723
1.618
3.770
28.362
623
1.820
2.382
1.987
6.731
33.430
4.412
4.710
1,484
4,824
47,494
6.013
8,333
0
2.003
2.338
1.069
1987-88
7.417
8.899
0
3,973
3.737
639
661
10.474
3.488
333
1.081
1988-89
8.731
7,298 •
Mote: ToUle mey not agree with addition of Individual Heme because of rounding,
* 3 million pounds plus idj luetment to reflect more accurate export figure.
Prepared January 1990
"r.r- !->— *.,... „r «
1,,
1,390
903
1.020
0
1988-87
19
U.S. IMPORTS OF HOPS, PELLETS cV HOP EXTRACT [1.000 Ibs.l
Mktfl. Tte
1961-83
33
W.Otf.
Clech.
i i.wa
2.864
roUnd
1.638
370
1982 83
93
9,770
1.887
1.360
*oo
131
13.3PO
1983-84
303
10.353
3.003
640
2tO
127
14.0*00
198V83
139
11.333
1.603
320
340
10*
1 4.366
370
13.729
31
1985-88
87
13*22
3.713
4*0
1986-8?
1 13
7.330
3.07 1
937
260
M
13,766
1987-88
97
8.79*
1.166
320
«01
14
10.792
1988-89
339
8.779
761
1.041
591
30
11.793
301
3
17.212
TCLLET3
"I «3
t'Jiii n*
198*81
0
1983-86
560
8
38 7
198687
0
+43
1987-88
0
164
196889
0
367
231
O
135
«l 1
1)
/37
0
1
660
0
40
404
190
0
148
0
BIS
104
860
37
302
66
301
n o r s A71D EELLETS
33
11,828
3.864
1.638
373
320
1982-83
93
10;388
1.909
1.260
123
400
38
14.337
1983-84
204
11.4O0
3.013
646
3 40
138
13.660
1984-83
139
11.893
1.606
520
360
144
14,770
1983-85
73
14.009
3.741
440
320
109
18.03O
19B6-87
113
7.773
5.358
957
260
113
14,625
1987-88
97
8.962
1.168
320
88
401
31
11,094
198889
339
9.066
761
1.041
349
391
96
12,294
1981-82
12
17,344
EXTRA CT-HOr EQUIVALEriT (Actual x 4)
198182
4.0-1
19S2-B3
4.0-1
1993-84
4.6-1
1984-83
4.0-1
1985-88
4.0-1
1986-87
4.0-1
1987-68
4.0-1
1988-89
4.0-1
TOTAL (Including Mop Equivalent of Extract)
1981-82
23
11.829
3.864
1.658
373
1982-63
93
10.369
1.909
1.360
123
1983-64
204
11.410
3.013
640
1984-85
139
11,897
1.606
320
1983-86
•73
14.009
2.741
440
1986-87
115
7.773
3.538
957
360
0
1987-86
97
9.000
1.166
330
401
7
31
11.139
1906-69
339
9.074
761
1.041
391
7
96
12.302
0
330
13
17,346
400
77
40
14.349
340
0
130
13.072
360
61
143
160
118
16.039
1)3
14.026
320
242
320
14.774
note: Total may not agree With addition ot Indh 'dual It cm j due to rounding.
* Leas than 300 lb».
jp^jg
1
Total U.S. Imports 1981-82- 1988-09
Cone Hop Imports 198 1-82 - 1988-89
160O0
0
16000
0
InoOOl
ijoool
p
10000
0
8000
u
6000
n
d
s
0000
2000
0
t
1981-821982-83
1964-83
1986-87
I98I-B2I982-63
1968-89
Tear
♦ Total Imports To U.S.A.
|000
1
. Cone Imports
Pellet Imports 1981-02 - 1968-89
I0O.
900
90
0
800
60.
0
700
70
0
p
600
60
500.
50.
0
-400
u
300.
n
d
s
1900-89
40
3°.
20.
'200_
10*
100
0
Extract Imports 1981-82 -
.
.
.
1951-821982-83
.
.
I964-8S
i
1986-67
.
1986-89
1981-821982-83
Year
• Pellet Imports
Prepared January 1990
Mop Orowers of America, Inc.
f-eurzr: TA5. U5DA
1984-BS
1986-87
1988-69
Tear
♦ Extract Imports
Page 8
20
HOP STOCKS
September 1 U.S. Hop Stocks (1,000 lbs.)
Stocks
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
Growers
1.380
1,360
1,400
1,390
1,620
1,750
3/
Dealers
3,000
6,256
10,930
8,930
6,580
9,160
8,500
Brewers 56,700
60,4-80
58,130
60,630
62,430
49,090
43,200
TOTAL
68,096
70,460
70,950
70,630
60,000
51,700
61,080
3/ Included In dealer stocks to avoid disclosure of Individual operations.
Total Stocks 1972 - 1989 (1,000 lbs.]
28,770
1972
1980
32,800
1973
30,280
1981
34,430
1974
33,720
1982
47,030
1975
1976
-
42,170
1983
61,080
50,400
1984
68,096
1977
50,480
1985
70,460
1978
47,540
1986
70,950
1979
38,290
1987
70,630
1988
60,000
1989
51,700
I
,
75000
67500
U.S. September 1 Stocks 1972 -
1989
0 60000^
0 52500
0 45000
37500.
30000^
22500
15000.
7500
0
Year
o 28770
I '75000 Grower/Dealer/Brewer Stocks 1983- 1989
, 67500
0 60000'
0 52500
0 45000^
p 37500
0 30000'
U
22500
n
15000
d
s
7500
6'
September 1/Year
OGrowers
Prepared January 1990
Mop Growers of America, Inc.
Ipealers
K Brewers
21
SUPPLY AMD DISPOSITION 1981-82 TO DATE (In 1.000 lbs.)
•SUPPLY
1981-02 1982-03 1903-04 1904-05 1905-06 1900-07 1907-00 1980-09
Carryin Stock '
34,430
47,030
61.080
60,096
70.460
70,950
70.630
60,000
Salable f'rod. *
78,926
78.154
67,995
56,053
49.615
48.962
50,964
54.696
17,346
14.349
15.672
14,774
18,039
14,626
11,138
12.302
130.702
139,533
144.748
138,923
138.114' 134,538 132.732
126.998
Imports
TOTAL
DISPOSITION
Brewery Usage
41.839
41.038
41,372 3
.41.465
40.207
43,787
Exported .
Carryout Stocks '
46.-103
43,725
34,742
32,101
31.352
26,091
28,360
35.427
47,494
47.030
61.080
68,096
70.460
70.950
70,630
60,000
51,700
Balancing Item
TOTAL
43.624
(1,892)
2,673
3.098 3
(4.354)
866
(8,239)
(8,798)
(15.020)
130,702
139.533
144.748
138.923
138.114
134.538
132,732
126,998
.212
.211
.214
.208
.224
.233
.220
Hopping Rate
.213
' Brewer, dealer and grower stocks as of Sept. 1
2 Production less fire loss and reserve hops not solid In normal outlets.
3 Includes 3.5 million pounds minus adjustment to reflect more accurate domestic extract consumption figure.
50O0O
1
US- Drewcry Usage 1981/82 - 1908/09
U.S. Hopping Ratio 1981/82 - 1988/89
0.30
13000
0.27
0
10000
0
35000
0.21
30000
0.21.
0
p
0
u
—
,
25000.
0.18.
20000
0.15.
15000.
n
0
s
0.12.
10000
5000
0.09.
0
0.06_
1981-321982-63
1984-85
1986-87
0.03.
1988-89
Ytar
0.00
♦ HoosUsea
1981-821982-83
1984-83
• rtopplrvj Ratio
Sqqqq
1
0
0
0
U.S. Hop Exports 1981/82 - 1988/89
20000,.
1
15000
10000,
16000
30000
12000
25000
a
20000
0
8000
IT
15000.
u
6000.
10000
p
n
d
1988/89
14000
P
. s
Imports 1981/82 -
18000
0
0
35000
US- H°0
Ytar
I0OO0
5000
o '
40O0
s
2000
.
0
0
1981-821982-83
; H984-85
Tear
I986-B7
1988-89
'a.,'
• Exports •
t:
Prepared January 1990
Hop Qrowers of America. Inc.
Source: USDA. ATI*. Department of Commerce
.
1981-821982-83
;.'„.
:••*;'
1984-85
Ytar
♦ Imports
1986-87
1988-89
22
Season Average Price - 1900':i
'*/«
£
0
2.1_
c
2.0_
p
e
r
P
I-9..
_
I.0_
1.7_
0
u
(I
l.6_
'•5_
1.4
0
r
1.3
i
1
1980
H
0
1982
•1983
1984
Year
P
s
1981
1
«
Average
1985
1986
1987
1980
23
WORLD BEER PRODUCTION 1983 - 1988
^ «~* "
1903
1904
1905
.1907
1906
1900
•(•/-%
00 vs. 07
I.OOO llcctollt
AMEHICAS
United States
DrJZll
230.331
220.490
220.023
230.543
229,297
231.500
79,000
20.350
30,250
13.760
47.500
• 17.000
Mexico
23,611
23,002
27.392
29.207
31.537
34.131
Canada
22,399
23.012
22,120
22,015
23,111
23.037
Colombia (est.)
11.760
14.500
15,000
10,600
17,600
10.000
Venezuela
11.709
11.820
10.300
11.200
12.100
13.000
Other
23,109
24.173
23.923
31.056
32,021
30.909
332,339
353.427
350.616
305,263
393,772
399,257
SU5 TOTAL
+ 1.4
WESTERd EUROFE
West Oermany
United Kingdom
91,900
92,200
93.294
94,100
92,711
92,039
01,700
61.470
62.500
39.165
59.097
00.200
Trance
22,000
20,200
20,002
24.126
19,091
19,959
Spain
22,002
21.032
23.353
20.055
25.000
20.579
17.526
Motherlands
17.327
17.040
17,529
17.908
17.517
Belgium
14.020
14.976
14,500
13.715
13.990
13.792
Other
32,014
51,050
53,003
54.618
56,301
50.230
203,609
279,560
203,041
204,300
205.453
209.033
54.000
SUD TOTAL
f
1.3
EASTERN EUROPE
USSR (estimated)
Cast Oermany (est.)
60,000
00,100
60,000
33.000
50,000
25,300
20,000
23.500
24.300
25,000
24.400
Czechoslovakia
24,938
23.700
22.334
22,703
22,220
22,670
11.000
Yugoslavia
12.370
13.600
10,305
10,500
11,790
Romania (est.)
11,300
11,300
11,500
11,000
10.000
13.000
Poland
10,078
9,060
10.001
11.300
11.644
12,257
13.412
Other
163,022
SU5 TOTAL
•
13.312
164,132-
14,372
10.322
10.600
16.500
155,032
153,283
147,262
153.907
+ 4.5
TAH EAST
Japan
49.323
48,609
47.401
49.980
53,500
57,490
China (est.)
Phllllplnes
16,600
20,000
32,000
40.000
50,000
55.000
0,700
9,230
0,100
B.300
10,200
12.400
South Korea
7,070
7,000
7.907
0,063
8,000
10.420
Taiwan
2,999
3.071
3,353
3,537
3.064
3,907
Other
9,531
9,930
9.032
0,690
9,443
9.703
96.720
100,653
110,572
133.009
149,168
12,000
13.000
13,500
14,500
10.000
19,200
10.000
9,000
10.000
6,040
7,000
7,300
5.500
5,059
SUB TOTAL'
94,223
•
+ 9.8
APRICA
South Africa
'nigerja
.
Cameroon
' 4,100
4,729
4.-900
Zaire (est.)
2,949
3,027
3,000
5.400
3,200
Kenya
2,300
2,400
2.700
3,200
'
13,762 '
14,336
15,300
45,191
46,492
49,400
14.864
40.004
Turkey
3,300
2,625
2,200
Other
1.601.
1.473
1.461
4.901
4.098
3,601
19.350
10,949
10,503
3.8O0
3,039
9,940
811
861
862
23.901
23,649
972.388
000.098
Other
SU8 TOTAL
•
4.310
4,014
3,500
3,600
15.033
16.497
54,143
55,670
2,200
2,500
2.650
1.443
1,445
1.372
3,613
3,945
4,022
18,170
18,765
19,500
3,924
4.087
4.100
082:
927
916
22,976
23.779
24.516
+ 3.1
1.016.111
1,044.163
1.O7S.073
+ 3.0
+ 2.8
NEAR EAST
SUB TOTAL
+ 2.0
OCEArilA
. Australia
Mew Zealand-
Other
SU5 TOTAL
WORLD TOTALS
23,305 •
903.024
-
Prepared January 1990
Hop Growers of America, Inc.
Source: Earth Report, July 1989
ATI" Data
Conversion: 1.000 Hectolitres equals 28,418 gallons
Page 11
24
U.S. HOP STATISTICS
HGA Survey of Quantities of Hops Sold Ahead with Prior Years' Comparisons
1984
1985
1986
1987
Survey
Survey
Survey
Survey
1989*
1988
Survey
Survey
%
of
1988
Crop
1989
5.1
16.9
13.2
32.7
43.8
1990
1.8
12.8
7.2
25.4
1991
0
0
1.4
18.0
-
-
13.7
1992
1993
-
-
-
-
'
'
-
1994
-
'
49.7
91
38.3
.44.5
82
28.7
35.5
65
24.2
25.1
46
13.7
4.7
9
1.2
2
-
Response from 70% of Growers
50
n
l
1
i
0
45.
40.
35.
30
n
* 25
P
0
u
20_
15
n
d
s
10_
5_
0
1991
1992
Crop Year
o49.7
W
Prepared January 1990
Hop Orowers of America. Inc.
Pxnr 1 ?
% Change '87-'88
8.7
7,469
86,203
mac 1987 Total
Change *87-'88
93,672
IHQC 1988 Total
5,572
13,645
Poland
USA
7,878
Yugoslavia
395
- 1.8
(1,090)
61,268
60,178
20,267
321
0
828
351
857
France
Hungary
5,617
5,510
3,904
3,966
49
Spain
United Kingdom
220
29,528
East Qermany
18,824
30,057
West Qermany
Czechoslovakia
0
1,161
1,186
Bulgaria
714
2,681
ALPHA
319
0
AROMA
Belgium
Australia
COUNTRY
1988 ACREAGE (In Acres]
4.3
6,379
147,471
153,850
33,912
5,893
7,878
1,223
1,208
3,953
9,583
5,730
29,528
48,881
2,347
1,033
2,681
TOTAL
-10.3
(10,492,684)
102,095,246
91,602,562
38,776,599
429,897
0
1,157,084
548,945
3,574,759
6,210,138
6,726,014
0
27,122,532
1,046,524
884,375
5,125,695
ALPHA
3.6
7,011,952
196,201,794
203,213,746
54,557,126
6,283,110
10,582,080
1,406,094
1,727,855
3,580,932
10,836,822
6,959,812
33,884,702
65,211,076
1,731,714
1,326,728
5,125,695
TOTAL
Paris, France - March 10, 1989
Prepared: HQA March 1989
Source: IHQC Economic Committee Meeting
18.6
17,504,636
94,106,548
111,611,184
15,780,527
5,853,213
10,582,080
249,010
1,178,910
6,173
4,626,684
233,798
33,884,702
38,088,544
685,190
442,353
0
AROMA
PRODUCTION (In Pounds]
231
-4.5
(284)
6260.2
5976.1
2200
127
304
32.8
35.3
121.7
394.2
226.7
614.8
1601.2
42.9
44.5
0
1.1
1,008
93,673
94,681
14,144
5,683
7,660
358
971
25
4,045
124
29,528
30,888
897
358
- 1.0
(605)
60,181
59,576
19,768
371
0
815
339
3,879
5,814
5,461
0
18,533
1,161
754
2,681
ALPHA
en
IX)
0.3
403
153,854
154,257
33,912
6,054
7,660
1,173
1,310
3,904
9,859
5,585
29,528
49,421
2,058
1,112
2,681
TOTAL
(In Acres]
AROMA
(In Tons]
Tons
1989 ACREAGE ESTIMATES
ALPHA PRODUCTION
& 1989 Acreage Projections
1988 IHGC Acreage and Production Recap
395
Hungary
321
20,183
59,953
61,268
- 1,315
5,572
13,469
93,629
86,203
Poland
USA
IHQC Total
IHQC 1987
Change 1987-1988 ± 7,426
± 6,111
147,471
153,582
33,652
5,893
7,878
1,223
1,208
3,953
9,583
5,732
29,528
48,881
2,347
1,033
2,671
TOTAL
'
± 17,964,876
94,106,548
Prepared by: Hop Qrowers of America - August 1989
SOURCE: IHQC/HQA Reports August 1989
-9,912,311
102,095,246
92,182,935
112,071,424
429,897
0
1,157,084
548,945
3,574,759
6,210,138
6,726,025
0
38,671,219
5,853,213
10,582,080
249,010
1,178,909
6,172
4,626,684
233,831
33,884,702
27,949,368
1,046,524
15,892,961
.•
685,190
884,375
6,260.2
196,201,794
- 264.3
5,995.9
204,254,359
± 8,052,565
2,200
127.1
304
54,564,180
6,283,110
10,582,080
32.8
35.3
1,727,854
1,406,094
121.7
394.2
3,580,931
10,836,822
226.7
614.8
33,884,702
6,959,856
1,621
42.9
41.3
234.1
1988
ALPHA TOMS
Alpha
66,171,841
1,731,714
1,326,728
5,198,447
4,984,601
213,846
442,353
TOTAL
ALPHA
1988 Production - lbs.
AROMA
38,222,473
* Columns may not add due to rounding.
0
7,878
Yugoslavia
828
351
857
France
5,617
5,512
3,904
3,966
220
49
Spain
United Kingdom
East Qermany
0
29,528
Czechoslovakia
1,161
18,824
1,186
Bulgaria
714
30,057
319
Belgium
2,538
ALPHA
1988 Acres
West Qermany
133
AROMA
Australia
Country
August 1, 1989 - Leon, SPAIN
IHGC ECONOMIC COMMITTEE REPORT
Sold
1989 90%
183,372,786
49,707,998
6,283,110
5,210,572
1,488,105
1,432,990
4,640,683
8,818,400
± 1,080
153,585
154,665
r\3
en
± 2,082,770
204,254,360
206,337,130
56,499,930
5,731,960
5,861
34,661
9,952,667
7,917
1,477,082
1,681,008
1,300
1,075
4,749,811
3,842
10,912,770
6,959,812
5,584
9,686
29,762,100
29,528
33,884,702
6,959,812
69,996,050
1,843,596
1,288,368
49,296
2,058
'
57,705,405
1,731,713
1,107
5,451,976
2,750
5,151,048
358,248
POUNDS
ACRES
1989 Indications,
1989
POUNDS SOLD
Sold Ahead
0
3,830
301
1,460
370
19,899
59,381
31,443
29,528
220
3,966
12
996
264
6,457
5,491
14,762
94,594
93,631
963
1.03
West Qermany
Czechoslovakia
East Qermany
United Kingdom
Spain
Prance
Hungary
Yugoslavia
Poland
USA
IHQC Total:
IHQC 1988
+ /- 89 v.s. 88
+ /- % 89 v.s. 88
Source: IHQC and HQA figures
17,823
897
Bulgaria
390
0.25
(572)
(.95)
(2.45)
(2,740,428)
112,071,392
153,585
59,953
1.45
1,333,563
92,182,923
93,516,486
109,330,964
462,966
2,028,232
153,975
4,938,304
7,120,858
1,150,140
438,936
4,739,890
5,349,241
6,726,014
0
27,337,040
1,243,394
888,564
5,202,856
37,949,213
34,661
5,861
7,917
171,959
1,225,096
1,297
1,089
9,921
4,312,198
233,908
26,904,938
42,769,240
600,202
698,748
249,120
3,842
8,859
5,740
29,528
49,266
2,058
1,107
2,750
20,096,472
825
4,893
5,520
1,161
680
427
Belgium
2,619
131
Alpha
Aroma
Alpha
Total
Hop Production 1989
1989
Australia
Aroma
Country Hop Acreage
MM
(•7)
(1,406,866)
204,254,316
202,847,450
58,045,685
5,401,270
9,149,090
1,322,099
1,664,032
4,749,811
9,661,439
6,959,922
26,904,938
70,106,280
1,843,596
1,587,312
5,451,976
Total
1989
(.05)
(3.1)
5,995.9
5,992.8
2,200
128.8
280
36.2
27.6
182.7
346.5
226.7
427.1
1,797
48.3
44.5
247.4
Tons
Average
Yield/Acre
' 1989
Alpha
Production
911.12
1,989
1,317.41
1,674.67
921.56
1,155.63
1,214.05
1,282.99
1,236.29
1,090.58
1,212.53
% 90 v.s.89
+ /-90 v.s.89
+/ -
•'
1,423.02
895.82
. 1,433.89
1,982.54
vlbs.
-V
0.8
757
94,594
95,351
14,826
5,560
6,457
185
1,070
12
3,613
220
29,528
32,432
897
420
131
Aroma
(1.26)
(750)
59,381
58,631
20,262
395
1,460
828
269
3,830
4,737
5,513
0
16,865
1,161
692
2,619
Alpha
0.00005
7
153,975
153,982
35,088
5,955
7,917
1,013
1,339
3,842
8,350
5,733
29,528
49,297
2,058
1,112
2,750
Total
Estimate of 1990 Acreage
1989 Hop Acreage, Production, Alpha Production, Average Yield, and 1990 Intentions
December 7, 1989 - Munich, Federal Republic of Qermany
SUMMARY OF REPORTS
International Hop Qrowers Congress - Economic Committee
IX)
1988 U.S. Kop Exports
Top $68 Million
The value of exported hops, and hop products In
the form of pellets/extract/lupulin, totaled
$63,942,000 for calendar year 1988 according to
the recently released agricultural export data from
the Washington Agricultural Statistics Service.
Export of cone hops equaled 5,273,000 pounds,
pellets 8,240,000, and extract/lupulln 6,393,000.
The average dollar per-pound equivalent for all pro
ducts was $3.21.
Export poundage, value, and per-pound average
price by country of destination was as follows:
(Information Continued on page 3)
TOP 10 EXPORT COUNTRIES 1988
(By $ Dollar Amount)
COUNTRY
$ VALUE OF HOP
EXPORTS (x $1,000)
1.
Mexico
14,724
2.
Canada
11,683
3.
Brazil
.7,229
4.
Colombia
5,358
5.
Philippines
3,550
6.
West Qermany
3,766
7.
Metherlands
8.
Nigeria
9.
Japan
1,373
Peru
1,282
10.
2,359
1,626
29
1988 U.S. Hop Exports Top $68 Million [Continued from page 2)
Country Of
Destination
U.S. Met U.S. net Avg.»
quantity
$Value.
Per
Exported (x ♦ l.OOO) Pound
(x l.OOO lbs.)
3.364
2.989
5.880
1.75
Brazil
4.829
1.62
Japan
475
883
1.86
Colombia
387
883
2.28
Dominican Rep.
Iraq
194
454
2.34
83
283
3.41
Mexico
96
259
2.70
Philippines
84
122
1.45
Bolivia
66
111
1.68
United Kingdom
68
109
1.60
South Africa
70
98
1.40
Ireland
32
97
3.03
Argentina
69
84
1.22
Jamaica
CI Salvador
40
83
2.08
49.
78
1.59
Venezuela
21
77
3.67
Quatemala
30
73
2.43
Netherlands
31
67
2.16
Panama
13
60
4.62
Peru
22
33
1.50
Uruguay
11
29
2.64
South Korea
13
25
1.92
Pakistan
18
22
1.22
Bangladesh
8
15
1.88
Sri Lanka
3
6
2.00
Haiti
2
5
2.50
Other
1
2
2.00
TOTAL:
8,240
14,666
1.78
HOPS, OTHER
Canada
1.619
3.638
2.25
West Qermany
1.262
2,021
1.60
Brazil
1,006
1,415
1.41
Colombia
340
856
2.52
United Kingdom
359
534
1.49
Japan
176
323
1.84
Ecuador
71
240
3.38
Ireland
99
167
Jamaica
29
136
4.69
Metherlands
39
127
3.26
El Salvador
66
117
1.77
Argentina
66
78
1.18
Thailand
55
56
1.02
1.69
Italy
16
52
3.25
Venezuela
10
32
3.20
Taiwan
10
31
3.10
Quatemala
21
25
1.19
4
13
3.25
South Africa
8
8
1.00
10
7
0.70
South Korea
1
7
7.00
Dominican Republic
5
7
1.40
Other
3
7
2.33
5,273
9,898
1.88
Pakistan
Barbados
TOTAL:
U.S. net Avg.$
quantity $ Value
Per
Exported (x Sl.OOO) Pound
Destination
(x l.OOO lbs.)
HOPS. EXTRACT 01 LUPULin
HOFS. PELLETS
Canada
U.S. net
Country Of
Mexico
Colombia
1.495
1,086
14,465
9.60
3,619
3.33
Philippines
344
3.428
9.97
Canada
562
2,165
2,165
3.85
6.25
6.00
6.12
Metherlands
393
West Qermany
279
5.51
Nigeria
239
1,745
1,626
Peru
204
1,249
Brazil
355
985
2.77
Ireland
157
909
5.79
Ecuador
Cameroon
Belgium
Togo
Mong Kong
Malaysia
United Kingdom
Chill
49
829
16.92
117
713
6.09
78
618
7.92
33
599
18.15
45
592
13.16
91
469
5.15
86
456
5.30
125
421
3.37
Iraq
76
292
3.84
Bolivia
66
291
4.41
Jamaica
84
244
2.90
Qhana
44
225
5.11
Japan
95
167
1.76
South Korea
11
139
12.64
Costa Rica
29
123
4.24
Prance
12
98
8.17
Spain
Dominican Rep.
18
96
5.33
54
94
1.74
Czechoslovakia
14
73
5.21
5.07
Honduras
14
71
Singapore
33
63
1.91
8
50
6.25
5.00
Paraguay
8
40
20
36
1.80
3
35
11.67
Trinidad
14
34
2.43
Finland
6
33
5.50
Netherlands Antilles
9
19
2.11
Belize
2
15
7.50
Argentina
2
13
6.50
Surinam
7
12
1.71
St. Lucia
5
12
2.40
Bahamas
3
11
3.67
Martinique
5
10
2.00
Mew Qulnea
6
9
1.50
Australia
1
6
6.00
Other
8
17
2.13
6,393
39.378
6.16
Indonesia
Uruguay
Mauritius
TOTAL:
Source: Washington /Igrlcullural Exports;
WASS. riovcmber 1989
<Ho&'dau~
Q/ieetmgs!
53 SO
"O
~1—
10
5<!
Cor*r* trtieJ. ~&toclc
WHrUry
jj>">
(I2S0jobrrh)
'o7/tW f<5K 7
Mi
-?*
€i
•10
-2^7
5- 3o
&
—!
0
1
1
iM)Juriiri J ,)
(
&& wpl**M
frtphM
^•TSo Ttmtk
«^ *
ra^illi
SO
l-fenfe-
S-
St*
July 14. 1989.
1—
^
prepared for Oregon Hop Field Day
1101: USDA- OSU Main Hop Jarrf: frames
SO
ST
31
Table 1.
Hop Germplasm distributed in 1989.
Recipient
Alexander,
Dr. Albert
Univ.
de Moncton
Mouv.
Brunswick
Date
Variety or
sent
selection
March 28
21193, Nugget
21182,
21220,
56013,
21041,
Canada
May 17
Brooks, Dr. S.N.
Cortez, CO
81321
Amount
Reason
and remarks
rhizomes, basic research with hops
Galena
Eroica
Cascade
Willamette
56013, Cacade
rhizomes, hobby gardening (Dr. Brooks
first selected Cascade in 1956 at Oregon
State U.)
Butsch, Jeff, 4-B Farms
Mt. Angel, OR
Crosby, Kevin
Woodburn, OR
June 9
21484
Feb.
19010M
20
19036M
20
19039M
20
19040M
20
2500
97362
27
97071
March 24
Dixon, Dan M.
19170M
20
19172M
20
21087M
20
21090M
20
21131M
20
21347M
20
64035M
20
19058M
15
19060M
15
19061M
15
19085M
15
21089M
15
64032M
15
64033M
15
64037M
15
July 15
21484
April 12
21041, Willamette
21193, Nugget
10
10
64100, Bullion
10
21496, Tettnanger-A
10
21497, Tettnanger B
10
650
Greenleaf Farms
Greanleaf, ID
83626
Dobmeier, Daniel
St. Francis, MN 55070
Haas, J.I.
(picked up
by K. Barth)
Independence, OR
97351
May 23
potted softwood cuttings; new off-station
trial for Hop Research Council
'
rhizomes, dipl. males as pollinators
for Nugget
potted softwood cuttings for new
off-station trial at Gem Hop Co. (Doug
Batt Farm) in Idaho
rhizomes, hobby gardening
shoot tips for virus testing and meristem
tip culture
shoot tips for virus testing and meristera
tip culture
32
Table 1.
continued
Recipient
Hays, Chuck
Corvallis, OR
Date
Variety or
sent
selection
Apr. 21
21455, Mt. Hood
Feb 1
21484
Amount
rhizomes, hobby gardening
97330
Kenny, Dr. S.T.
rhizomes, for propagation to establish a
IAREC, P.O.Box 30
Prosser, UA 99350
Russel, Dr. Inge
Labatt Brewing Co.
Reason and remarks
new off-station trial at the Ken Camache
farm for the Hop Research Council
June 13
21484
640
May 11
21455, Mt. Hood
Jan 22
21525, Osvald 72Y
Jan 22
21527, Blato
21528, Lucan
21529, Klon 31
21530, Klon 114
21531, Universal
7
potted plants for HRC off-station trial
demonstration planting in Canada
London, ONT, Canada
Skotland, Dr. C.B.
P.O. Box 30, IAREC
Prosser, UA 99350
Jan 23
21484,
50
potted plants, virus testing and cleanup
10
potted plants, virus testing and cleanup
10
10
10
10
PN Ap HM I1L AmllL
loc 16:62
used for off-station
test increase
1*
63
1
64
1
65
.66
Jan 31
rhizomes, virus testing:
-
+
1*
1*
67
1*
68
1*
69
1*
70
1*
71
1*
72
1
73
1*
74
1*
75
1*
76
1*
77
1*
78
1*
79
1*
21484, loc 204:23
1 "
24
1
25
1
26
1
27
1
March 13
21525, Osvald 72Y
25
April 3
Cross 8303
143
seedlings for virus testing
Cross 3109
39
seedlings for virus testing
April 7
21193, Nugget
1
1
May 23
Sept 29
1
4
1
5
7
11
8303
89
8309
15
70
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
loc. 237:1, virus testing
2,
3,
8302
+
potted plants, virus testing and cleanup
1
Cross 8301
21532, Osvald 72C
+
resampled seedlings for virus testing
potted softwood cuttings for virus
cleanup
33
Table 2:
Germplasm received at Corvallis in 1989.
Supplier
Date
received
Darby, Dr. Peter
Dept. Hop Res., Wye
College, England
Amount
Dec. 6,
1988
Variety or
Pedigree
tetraploid Saazer
Remarks
colchicine doubled Saazer,
very similar to USDA 21077
(diploid Saazer); USDA
Ace.
Goschie, Herman
Silverton, OR
Dec.
13
97381
No.
Minnesota Wild
collected Sept. 1989 near
American Hop
Thief River Falls, MN.
USDA Ace.
Hampton, R.H., USDA,ARS
Dept. Bot. & Plant
Pathology
Oregon State Univ.
Dec.
15
52
21534
seeded cone
samples
No.
21605
collected Aug. 1989 from
the Souris River Basin in
N. Dakota, Saskatchewan
and Manitoba, Canada
Corvallis, OR
Skotland, Dr. C.B.
June 6
P.O.Box 30
virusfree
by heat treatment and
meristem tip culture
(virusfree)
IAREC
Prosser, WA
21535,
Osvald 72Y
99350
21525 obtained
(Prosser meristem numbers
1013, 1014, 1016, 1017,
1020)
US Dept. Agriculture,
June 28
Native North American Hops
Collected by R.O. Hampton,
USDA-ARS, between 1984-
H
489 , USDA 21549
ARS,
H
491 , USDA 21551
National Clonal Germ-
H
494 , USDA 21554
Plasm Repository
H
497 , USDA 21556
1987 In Iowa,
Corvallis, OR
H
500 , USDA 21559
Dakota and Montana.
H
501 , USDA 21560
H
505 , USDA 21563
97333
3
each
H
509 , USDA 21566
H
510 , USDA 21567
H
513
H
516
USDA 21571
H
520
USDA 21574
H
523
USDA 21576
H
526
USDA 21579
H
528
USDA 21581
H
USDA 21584
H
537
538
H
542
USDA 21587
H
543
USDA 21588
H
544
USDA 21589
H
545
USDA 21590
USDA 21591
USDA 21568
USDA 21585
H
546
H
547
USDA 21592
H
USDA 21595
H
550,
552,
555,
H
556,
USDA 21600
H
USDA 21596
USDA 21599
Missouri, N.
34
Table 3.
New accession numbers assigned in 1989.
Acces
1989 Loca-
sion No.
tic"
21535
Greenhouse
:
Source
Name or Pedigree
Prosser, WA meristem tip cultured
21525 (Osvald 72Y) Saazer
. originally from Yugoslavia'1
21536
231:28-32
7003-154
65009 x 19046M
(BG x EG-XS) x LCS-Fuggle
21537
21538
21539M
25:47-48
Prosser
123:1-2
7006-370
21532
Remarks
virusfree , cleanup work
at Prosser, WA.
a 8-12; j3 8-9, CoH 41,
good yield potential
65009 x 64035M
compact cone,
(BG x EG-XS) x Zattler
a 10, p 10, CoH 23, High
seedling
a+p, high oil
Osvald 72C}Saazer
origninally from Czecho=
easy pick
heat treated at Prosser
to remove viruses
Slovakia
8303-18M
21397 x 64035M
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
x Zattler seedling
early flowering triploid
pollinator, Q* res. to
Downy mildew, v. good
pollen producer, low
cohumulone, terminal
marker cones at sidearms
21540M
114:3-4
8303-106M
21397 x 64035M
medium-early flowering
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
triploid pollinator, if1
x Zattler seedling
res. to Downy mildew, v.
good pollen producer,
low cohumulone; terminal
marker cones on sidearms
21541M
120:5-6
8308-27M
21397 x 21362M
early-flowering triploid
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f,
pollinator,^ strongly<?
x (Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
res. to Downy mildew; v.
good pollen producer,
low cohumulone; marker
cones on sidearms
21542M
122:5-6
8308-41M
21397 x 21362M
early flowering triploid
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f,
x (Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
pollinator, y, resistant
to Downy mildew; faint
red stripes on main
stem, v. good pollen
producer, low cohumu
lone; terminal marker
cones on sidearms
21543M
123:5-6
8308-47M
21397 x 21362M
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
x (Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
medium early flowering
triploid pollinator, if" ,
resistant to Downy mil
dew, some red stripes on
main stem, v. good pol
len producer, low cohu
mulone, terminal marker
cones on sidearms
35
Table 3.
Access-
sion No.
21544M
continued
1989 Location
125:5-6
Source
8308-57M
Name or Pedigree
Remarks
21397 x 21362M
early flowering tripl.
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
x (Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
pollinator, ^r , resist
ant to Downy mildew,
some red stripes on main
stem, v. good pollen
producer, low cohumu
lone , terminal marker
cones on sidearms
21545M
126:5-6
8308-67M
21397 x 21362M
early flowering tripl.
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
x (Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
pollinator,^, resistant
to Downy mildew, faint
red stripes and reddish
hue on main stem, v.
good pollen producer,
low cohumulone, terminal
marker cones on sidearms
21546M
114:9-10
8309-03M
21397 x 21381M
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
(Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
very early flowering
tripl. pollinator,©=»,
resistant to Downy mil
dew, green stem, v. good
pollen producer, low co
humulone, terminal mar
ker cones on sidearms
21547M
115:9-10
8309-04M
21397 x 21381M
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
x (Cas x 65009 -64035M)
medium early flowering
triploid pollinator, rf ,
resistant to Downy
mildew, v. good pollen
producer, low cohumu
lone, terminal marker
cones on sidearms
21548M
116:9-10
8309-18M
21397 x 21381M
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
x (Cas x 65009 - 64035M)
medium early flowering
triploid pollinator, g7,
resistant to Downy
mildew,
reddish hue on
main stem, v. good pol
len producer, low cohu
mulone, terminal marker
on sidearms
21549
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 489
21:41-44
Wild American
Nebraska 1
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton along the Mis
souri River near Browns
ville, Nebraska
21550
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 490
Wild American
Nebraska 2
21551
G.P.Repos.
22:41-44
Hum. 491
Wild American
Nebraska 3
Table 3.
Accesssion No.
21552
continued
1989 Location
G.P.Repos.
Source
Hum. 492
Name or Pedigree
Remarks
Wild American
collected 1983 by R.O.
Nebraska 4
Hampton along the Mis
souri River near Browns
ville, Nebraska
21553
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 493
Nebraska 5
21554
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 494
Nebraska 6
23:41-44
21555
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 496.
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton along the Mis
Wild American
Missouri 1
souri River
in Missouri
across from Rulo,
Nebra
ska .
21556
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 497
Missouri
2
3
24:41-44
21557
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 498
Missouri
21558
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 499
Wild American
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton along the Mis
souri River near Craig,
Missouri 4
M0-.
21559
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 500
25:41-44
21560
G.P.Repos.
Missouri
Hum. 501
26:41-44
21561
G.P.Repos.
Wild American
5
Wild American
Missouri 6
Hum. 503
Wild American, Iowa 1
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton along the north
side of the Turkey River
near Millville,
21562
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
504
21563
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
505
Iowa 3
Wild American,
Iowa 2
27:41-44
21564
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
506
Iowa 4
21565
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
507
Iowa 5
21566
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
509
Iowa 6
Hum.
510
Iowa 7
28:41-44
21567
G.P.Repos.
29:41-44
Iowa.
37
Table 3.
Accesssion No.
21568
continued
1989 Location
G.P.Repos.
Source
Hum. 513
30:41-44
Name or Pedigree
Remarks
Wild American
collected in 1983 by
R.O. Hampton along the
North Dakota 1
Souris River near Minot,
North Dakota.
21569
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
514
21570
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
515
, N. Dak.
3
21571
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
516
, N. Dak.
4
Wild American, N. Dak. 2
31:41-44
21572
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
517
, N.
Dak.
5
21573
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
518
, N. Dak.
6
21574
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
520
Wild American, N. Dak. 7
32:41-44
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton along railroad
tracks near Minot, N.
Dakota
21575
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 522
21576
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 523
, N. Dak.
8
Wild American,' Montana 4
33:41-44
collected in 1983 by
R.O. Hampton above the
flood plain of the Belt
Creek near Belt, Mon
tana.
21577
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
524
, Montana 5
21578
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
525
, Montana 6
21579
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
526
, Montana 7
34:41-44
21580
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
527
, Montana 8
21581
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
528
, Montana 9
35:41-44
21582
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 534
Wild American
collected 1983 by R.O.
Missouri 7
Hampton along the Mis
souri River, near Craig,
Mo.
21583
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 536
Wild American
collected 1983 by R.O.
Montana 10
Hampton above the flood
plain of the Belt Creek
near Belt, Montana.
38
Table 3.
continued
Access-1989Locasion No.
21584
tlon
G.P.Repos.
Source
Hum. 537
Name or Pedigree
Remarks
Wild American,
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton on the west side
of the Mississippi River
Iowa
36:41-44
near Millville,
21585
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 538
.Montana 11
Iowa
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton along the Belt
37:41-44
Creek,
2.4 mi north of
Belt, Montana
21586
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 541
Wild American, Mont 12
collected 1983 by R.O.
Hampton above the flood
plain of the Belt Creek
near Belt,
21587
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
542
Hum.
543
Hum.
544
Hum.
545
II
It
, Mont 16
Hum.
546
II
tl
, Mont 17
Hum.
547
H
It
, Mont 18
Montana
Mont 13
38:41-44
21588
G.P.Repos.
If
tl
, Mont 14
39:41-44
21589
G.P.Repos.
, Mont 15
40:41-44
21590
G.P.Repos.
41:41-44
21591
G.P.Repos.
42:41-44
21592
G.P.Repos.
43:41-44
21593
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
548
21594
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
549
21595
G.P.Repos.
Hum.
550
, Mont 21
Hum.
552
Wild American, Utah 11
, Mont 19
II
II
, Mont 20
1:39-40
21596
G.P.Repos.
2:39-40
collected in 1982 by
R.O. Hampton along both
sides
of the
river
in
Logari Canyon, near
Logan, Utah
21597
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 553
Wild American, Mont 22
collected in 1983 by
R.O. Hampton above the
flood plain of the Belt
Creek near Belt, Montana
39
Table 3.
Accesssion No.
21598
continued
1989 Location
Germplasm
Repository
Source
Hum. 554
Name or Pedigree
Remarks
Wild American
obtained in 1983 by R.O.
Hampton from Mr. Dixon,
father of Idaho hop
New Mexico
grower Dan Dixon who
collected in the wild,
Feb.
1990
- lost at
Germplasm Repository
21599
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 555
Wild American, Utah 12
3:39-40
collected in 1982 by
R.O. along both sides of
the river in Logan
Canyon, near Logan, Utah
21600
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 556
it
II
, Utah 13
4:39-40
21601
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 569
Wild American, Mont 23
collected in 1983 by
R.O. Hampton above the
flood plain of the Belt
Creek near Belt, Montana
21602
G.P.Repos.
Hum. 570
21603M
116:19-20
7702-23M
"
56013 x
, Montana 24
19008M
Cascade x (Semsch Sdlg x
8-2 BYd)
v. early, vigorous, good
sidearms, v. good pollen
parent, a 42, /? 35,
CoH 30
21604M
124:23-24
7722-14M
56013 x
60026M
Cascade x
Colo 2-1
v. early, vigorous, good
sidearms, v. good pollen
parent, a 31, fi 38,
CoH 34
21605
Greenhouse
Minnesota
Wild American
collected Sept. 1989
Minnesota 1
near Thief River Falls,
MN by Mr. Herman Go-
schie, OR hop grower
21606
G.P.
Hum.
571
Sel. 27/57/264
Repository
originally obtained in
1983 by R.O. Hampton
from Wye College, Eng
land.
Vert,
21607
G.P.
Hum.
572
Sel.
Int.
Hum.
574
Wild American
Resistant to
wilt
30
Repository
21608
G.P.
Repository
North Dakota 9
collected in 1983 by R.
0. Hampton along the
Souris near Minot, N.
Dakota
40
Table 4.
Hop genotypes discarded in 1989.
Accession
1989
No.
Location
21126
Name or Pedigree
7:47-48
19005 x
19046M
Reason
poor, vigor, yellow fleck
virus, crinkled leaves,
late maturity
21244
39:
"
Klon 34
poor vigor, few cones
21206
50:
"
Yugoslavian Wild 26 P03
poor cone type, very late
21008
42:49-50
19137 x Ut523-19041M
poor vigor, weak, few
cones
21458
203:23-27
II
20:62-82
tl
P. Serres,
Woodburn,
21397 x
64037M
weak sidearms, poor cone
type, poor picking
OR
"
no HRC or
grower interest in
off-station test
21180
F.
Fobert
65009 x
19046M
Hubbard, OR
21181
discontinue off-station
test at request of Miller
Brewing Co.
Annen Bros.
Mt.Angel,OR
- " -
discontinue offstation test
as requested by the Hop Res.
council.
21456
Carl Weathers 2^397 x 64035M
Salem, OR.
21202 *
Annen Bros.
Mt. Angel, OR.
65102 x 64037M
lack of interest by brewer
members of the Hop Res. Council
discontinue off-station test
as requested by the Hop Research
Council.
* discarded at the end of the 1987 season (spring
1988)
41
Table 5:
Seed collection (OP crosses) in 1989 from Wild American hops
(collected by R.O. Hampton, August 1989).
No.
Cross
(Seed
Lot)
Source
Collec tion site
, Manitoba,
S.E.
Cone
No.
weight
seeds
8901
H-01
Souris
8902
H-02
Logan, N.D., NE of town
03
H-03
8904
H-04
05
H-05
.
»
.
06
H-06
-
"
07
H-07
-
08
H-08
-
09
H-09
10
H-10
-
"
11
H-ll
-
'*
8912
H-12
ND, W of RR
158
26
13
H-13
-
"
-
295
139
14
H-14
-
"
-
108
32
15
H-15
-
"
-
122
61
16
H-16
-
"
-
49
0
17
H-17
-
M
-
220
83
-
Nursery
Seed
color
SeedlIngs
Remarks
mostly well filled
94
185
428
280
59
257
72
242
194
269
92
-
221
92
"
2 ;•
"
-
201
105
"
0
"
-
192
57
"
181
52
"
tiny immature
-
157
35
"
small seeds
-
208
50
'•
M
Minot, ND,
-
E
it
Burlin gton,
bl ue-black
tan
large cone
0
0
"
„.
0
0
0
cones
0
0
brown-blue
0
»
tan
0
••1
dwarf?
0
»
tiny immature
cones
"
0
17 '
18
H-18
-
"
-
237
461
»
19
H-19
-
"
-
132
11
»
20
H-20
- " -, pond S of tra cks
89
13
••
0
21
H-21
220
87
ti
3
8922
H-22
W
119
118
23
H-23
-
"
-
163
189
24
H-24
-
n
-
231
67
25
H-25
-
n
-
85
17
26
H-26
_
M
.
49
6
»
27
H-27
-
"
-
70
0
"
28
H-28
55
55
i»
Mohall , ND,
Northg ate, ND, E
H-29
30
H-30
31
H-31
-
"
-
165
13
32
H-32
-
"
-
186
10
211
60
M
It
174
1
99
9
0
0
oily, rich
16
10 •
»
tan
ti
8929
• 46
small cones
„
bl ue-black
tiny Immature
.
»
cones
.
0
0
0
it
0
brown
0
brown-blue
0
1
tan
0
"
33
H-33
34
H-34
-
"
-
109
35
H-35
-
"
-
40
36
H-36
-
"
-
74
47
ii
37
H-37
-
"
-
80
42
"
0
38
H-38
-
"
-
78
95
»
0
8939
H-39
Glen Ewing, Sask., S.
H-40
Okbow,
8940 r..
Sask, S
6.
37
46
blue
oily rich
0
tan
"
0
tiny cones
0
29 :
blue
132
22
"
H-41
117
13
"
42
H-42
117
11
••
10
»
10
41
',•
43
H-43
155
22
44
H-44
158
31
45
H-45
316
243
tan-blue
8946
H-46
Midale, Sask., W
111
112
blue-black
8947
H-47
Indian Head
137
140
48
H-48
120
145
49
H-49
193
168
blue
147
633
tan
142
117
180
92
H
-
»
50
H-50
M
51
H-51
N
52
H-52
n
Sask,
N
Total No. of seedlings In 1990. nursery (planted June 1990):
V
0
16
7
2
tan
insect res.
nice cone
26
12
tan
0
0
"
12
compact cone
5
"
7
t,
0
328,
Location
RowrHill
207
208
209
212
21514
8301-47
21499
8401-41
"
21397 x 64035M
Nugget
65009 x 64035M
Galena
SuperAlpha
AlphAroma
tetr. Fuggle
21397
21397
tetr.
21397
21397
21397
236:
237:
238:
239:
240:
241:
243:
8303-66
21194
21182
21405
21406
21003
8401-76
8303-77
21397
8303-88
8404-113
8303-94
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
242:
x 19172M
x 64035M
Hallertauer m.f.
x 64035M
x 19172M
x 64035M
Blisk
234:
21193
19105 x 19058M
21397 x 19172M
232:
233:
64007
8401-70
21238
231.
230
8401-68
21404
20
18
8
18
1
18
18
6/30
3
3
10
6
6/28
10
24
5
20
18
Sticklebract
21397 x 19172M
Green Bullet
Ba x (Groe Bel2xNB-0P)
229
18
21397 x 19172M
Willamette
6/28
8
6/28
20
18
10
10
18
1
3
10
10
18
6
3
18
18
227
228
21397 x 64035M
19185 x 21267M
19185 x 21268M
Perle
-
10
24
July
26
24
24
24
10
26
28
8
14
18
18
16
8
26
8/2
16
26
8/2
26
8
18
3
30
28
20
30
30
8
14
18
18
24
18
14
28
24
8/2
20
Most
Flowering
First
226
21403
21520
8401-65
21041
225
224
218
-20
8020-32
8021-11
217
221
216
8303-37
19185 x 21266M
Herbrucker-8
21397 x 64035M
215
8019-03
21515
8303-17
Banner
Styrian Golding
213
21397 x 19172M
Zenith
21397 x 19058M
Hersbrucker-6
Bullion 10A
21397 x 19172M
214
220
-
tetr, Atlas x (NB x SavG •TG)
Yeoman
•
21049
21227
May 5.
tetr. Atlas x (NB x SavG -TG)
Name or Pedigree
trained
21287
21056
205
206
203
204
8401-04
21370
201 1-5
202
21368
21369
21498
No.
or Sel.
;
14
14
14
14
14
8/29
13
13
13
13
12
8/24
8/24
8/24
13
13
8/24
13
8/24
8/24
13
8/24
13
8/24
Sept.
Date
Harvest
lOOOe
1212
lOOOe
200e
lOOOe
1018
200e
3140
1817
2000e
1322
2000e
lOOOe
2594
lOOOe
1237
2764
1348
2227
800e
1237
995
469
1433
717
589
1058
lOOOe
400e
1391
520
1032
1246
400e
lOOOe
400e
2000e
800e
768
600e
759
939
lbs/A
Yield^/
3.8
6.0
3.7
3.4
4.8
5.7
3.9
10.9
11.5
8.0
16.0
16.3
5.0
13.0
4.8
2.4
11.4
7.5
13.1
4.6
6.7
5.7
6.7
10.5
5.2
12.0
5.8
6.6
4.4
9.6
5.4
11.3
4.1
10.4
4.5
5.3
6.5
6.3
11.1
12.5
12.3
12.8
5.3
2.6
3.8
3.6
3.4
2.8
4.5
1.9
6.6
4.1
4.4
7.4
5.6
4.0
5.2
5.7
6.3
5.6
3.6
2.6
6.1
4.1
4.8
2.5
3.8
3.4
4.5
4.8
3.8
4.1
5.2
3.1
6.4
4.8
3.9
4.7
4.7
3.3
5.8
6.7
4.4
6.1
59
61
49
52
63
56
67
73
63
65
69
75
55
71
46
28
67
65
68
64
65
54-
73
73
60
73
55
54
62
65
64
64
.46
73
49
53
66
52
71
65
68
70
ratio
%
CoH
20
23
20
25
23
28
27
27
38
42
28
27
12
35
30
33
42
28
45
38
34
24
27
42
23
31
19
25
18
38
31
34
25
22
23
19
41
26
31
25
33
33
Quality
1.45
1.53
1.44
1.21
2.89
2.51
1.76
0.93
2.11
0.94
1.15
0.80
1.08
1.13
1.09
1.11
0.93
2.17
0.86
baby, ruf. cones
early
v. early
picked too late
nice pick, irregular
baby
picked too late
& , yellowish leaves
baby
nice pick
baby
triploid, late
hard pick
triploid
triploid, picked green
Remarks
baby
baby
triploid
nice pick
lg. ruf. cones, early
' very late
ml/100 g
Oil
Hop Varieties and selections grown in the Seedless Observation Nursery (Smith Yard), Corvallis. 1989.
Pruned April 10
Accession
Table 6.
4^
64035M
19172M
64035M
21397 x
21397 x
21397 x
201 6-10
202
203
204
8303-104
8401-132
8303-119
-121
Saazer-38 v.f.
19058M
21397 x
21397 x
21397 x
208
209
210
211
212
21521
21522
8401-145
8301-57
8401-158
Lubelska v.f.
21397
21397
233
234
235
236
8303-124
8405-39
8303-142
8405-84
Banner
245
246
247
248
249
21407
8406-38
21408
8304-12
21483
21397 x
65009 x
21397 x
Cascade
244
21287
OP
64037M
63012M
21361M
x
16
5
12
5
5
3
8
20
21361M
243
64037M
21397 x
241
8304-67
8406-04
21397 x
18
240
-103
10
5
12
8
5
3
18
1
1
22
6.7
5.3
lOOOe
870
1290
26
14
20
12
14
12
18
14
2410
8/29
lOOOe
589
2000e
1200e
2400e
1254
14
1.9
4.9
13.3
4.9
10.1
11.7
7.3
5.7
6.7
790
14
1200e
6.7
6.4
1312
8/29
14
6.1
2538
14
24
9.4
14
26
7.3
800e
5.0
4.5
6.1
3.9
4.4
6.5
3.5
6.5
3.0
4.0
3.9
3.6
4.6
3.5
5.2
4.1
4.4
4.0
6.6
5.8
828
lOOOe
2.9
4.5
4.4
3.4
4.9
5.3
5.3
3.7
4.0
5.1
4.5
4.4
4.5
4.5
5.0
200e
400e
5.7
7.0
7.0
4.7
6.1
11.6
8.6
1365
8/29
14
18
16
18
16
18
16
24
8
10
8/2
200e
1126
600e
8
6/28
8/29
400e
8/2
8/2
22
22
600e
14
28
5
18
1672
7.7
14
7.7
1418
1200e
8/29
10
1
10
20
785
8/29
12
7.2
5.0
887
14
1041
8/29
6.1
30
5.0
4.0
6.2
5.1
4.3
3.6
lOOe
12
1
2.6
6.3
200e
5.3
3
239
21337M
64035M
21337M
64035M
21268M
21337M
19172M
2022
18
4.7
lOOOe
24
14
3.8
800e
26
3.9
18
8
18
18
800e
lbs/A
YieldV
5.9
8
Sept.
Date
Harvest
lOOOe
28
20
6/28
July
Most
Flowering
First
-101
21397
21397
21397
19185
228
230
21397 x
Nadwislanska v.f.
8405-38
225
-196
"
19172M
Saazer 36 + .38 mixture
21397 x
Hersbrucker-9
8021-40
224
8401-192
221
21521/22
223
220
222
219
21518
8401-175
21523
"
218
21517
21524
Hersbrucker-alpha
"
217
21516
"
Hersbrucker-redstem
"
216
21485
SoB x (Ha-0Px(Saazer x Ha-OP)
21397 x
8303-122
19172M
64035M
21397 x
213
215
8401-163
19172M
Saazer-36 v.f.
19172M
21397 x
205
8301-01
19058M
Name or Pedigree
Location
Row:Hill
No.
or Sel.
continued
Accession
Table °.
59
21
28
22
23
27
52
69
56
70
64
68
47
64
62
63
64
60
63
65
64
57
62
53
61
56
61
67
55
47
68
68
65
31
24
52
21
42
36
23
24
21
22
23
27
27
25
40
26
25
28
25
23
26
29
20
21
18
19
22
27
28
29
63
28
62
1.99
1.53
1.60
1.60
1.32
0.90
1.59
1.79
1.41
0.69
1.26
ml/100 g
%
'53
60
56
51
53
52
48
Oil
CoH
23
24
Quality
ratio
downy mildew, 0*
nice pick
early
early
early
early
hard pick, baby
baby
baby
early, strong aroma
baby
sparse, hard pick, baby
sparse, hard pick, baby
early
nice pick
sparse set, baby
sparse set, baby
early
nice pick
nice pick, early
small cones, nice pick
Remarks
CO
44
(1)
to
a
o.B
O
M
o
"U
t>
u
O
>>
U
i>
>H
00
U
rt
rH
O. o
O £.
U
a
trj
vo CM
cm in cm vo
CO v£> rH <t
o
o
O
CM
O
OJ
U
i-H
CM CM
co n
t-l CM
cocM<f0^or^<3"cr\cM
H
r-l i-H
coff>oojin4o\H<fin
Mi^a>nnvDi/)mN4
i-ICMOrHVOCOf-ir^r^
oo us r - en
vo >J H
i-l O
CM
CM
OCMOrHCMi-tf-*CMi-H^-t
r-i CM t-l
vomOrHrHincMysmco
CMCMr",CMflCM<fCMCMCM
vor-^vor-ir-coco^j-cM
CM<JCMCM<ft-ICMmCMCM
mmvovovommvo
N<tmiOHOMMnN
inv£>tn<tvor-r-.r-*invo
c^tno<tr^cor^r^.oco
^fNyjin^vTsfiriinin
NO<tCONOtniO
CMi-l-tfr-ICOO-tfCM
<to>cN<joco\ooy3n
CM^rHOOrHr^CMvOO>
<t<tr^<tm\oiocO'
vomvovoinvo<f.m
mCMCMCICMCMCMcO
CMCMCMCMcOCMcMcM
cr»inn<frr-^cor-*.o
i-H
CON rl n
\o OOO
inin-^-vococor^.com<t^
Or-Ir-IOCMVOCOCOVOCO
in<frvoor-*voa\cM
mH<finrsvonco
o\>d-r-iocomrHo<tr^
Or"-.co<f<fro<l'co
vor^oo>o^r^.\or^
momvoMnvoNChoo
v£> <t CM CM v£> O
O
cm a» co m <j o
i-i
o
cm «n i-i cm oo m
nr*eo<t^o\co<oMN
mcMor-N.voinr>-voo^
f-^^-^-Oi-itHcoini-i-j
HfOHsfvONvOOiOfl
cM^ino>r^mmr^.<tvo
rnl
oi
xovomroominr-r^i-i
r^r^cMro-j-mrocMO^
r^fO<*<tvomvcirif-io
in
CMCMvOO**vOeOvOO"tinCTv
CM
in l-H
p.
bO
4->
to
c
o
ininmminmcomco
r-~inr~r~r~r~r--i-»r~cD
cocooooococococo
u-j
N"S™Nrl»SHH
NriHHMrlHrl
N"««
tonuiwNHNcooon
vo o oo co o o> in oo
co co g g oo co oo oo o o
CM CM CO CM CM
i-t
h h in
incominvovDvovovoiD
HMP1H
NMHH
<U
3
O
.-I
«
M
^
r-*
CM
CM i
oo
o
VO
\o
"^n"Hffl°CH
CO
3
^^
t/1
a
a
a
a
a
a
x
a
r4 co r^ oo r-i r~
\ooor*cocooooco
cococmoOi-icoo
rHrHrH^-tfrHrH^l
CMCMCMVOVOCMCMVO
XXXXXXXX«
r-^r^ror'-i^inr^r^
CACftrlCftCftl/lCfttT*
X
i
c
r-l
o
r-l
•H
U
33
rt
o
a
!»
o
a
a
co oo
23
a
CM
CM CM CM CM
X
X
=
X
X
i
X '
co r-- co r-*
r-l 0\ fH CT*
r-l
r-l
1
CM
CM
t
r~
o
O
CO
o\
CO
,-HrHvOrHrHrHrHrH
vO
VO H > f l H
in cm in cm
CM
in
O
X
X
*
•
r-l
Nrn^ir,vor>-o>H
^HM<tm^M^OH
i-tCMCMCMCMCMCMCMncn
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
vocmcmcovo
in vo
r*
co o
O
O
O
O
i
n
r-l
v^.
CM
a
a
a
a
in
o
in
rH o
CO
rH
ro
00
CO
r-l
CM
1
a
a
CO
a
CO
CO rH o
rH ,-* <r
vo CM CM vo
l-l o
o
<r rH - t
VD
CM
a
a
in
co
O
CO
a*
f-i
X
X
r^
rH
CO
X
•
Tl
cocoococoococo
CO
00
CO
CO
co CO
HPIHrl
rH i-l r-l i-l
co
i—<
CMCMinCMCMCMCMCM
•H
a
a
*-*
r-^
CM
i-<
1CM
M
X
V)
=
o
X
X
r~ r ^
in
o-»
CO
i/i
in
00
CM
X
X
X
X
CO
r-.
a>
m
in
cr.
CO
o
CO
X
(J
=
o
m
u
r-»
r-l
O
<U On
.O CO
m
O r-l
CQ CM
M
Vi
1
Pj
CQ
o
r-l
CM
o
4J VO
r-l rH rH rH rH rH
a
CM
in
<tCOO\OrHCMCO-d-mvO
OOOrHrHrHrHrHrHrH
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CM
CM
CM
CM
i
X
rH rH
o
04
CM
(00iOfO<finr-tociO
iHrHCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCO
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
o
c
a
o
•ri
VI
VI
01
H
,-h
01
«
i>
o
Vl
<!
o
r^ <f
-j-r^mr^
<ti-«Oi-ir-i
omr-i-i
'
i
CO^rlffiOlOOO
i-l
0*i
CJ* CTv O** CX»
OOCOOr-ICMOrH
CO
o
<t O
OOCOCOCOCOCMCOCO
co
i
i
i
i
i
O
'
'
'
^
t
in
i
<f o
CO
HfOHPI
CO
CM
CO
CM CO
<f
i-l CM
i
i
CO
CO
<tcn l o o o c o ^ m i
oonoioiio^iomion
>*CMO<t-*CMCMCM-*CO
r^t~tC^T-ir-ir-4r-*r^T-\0
CMCMOOCMCMCMCMCMCMOO
00
vo <f
o
rH
CM
vf) r^
in ON
in m
in -*
o> o \
NO
o
<f CM <t o
cm m
o
VO
r~
1
CM CM CM 00 CM 00
'
rH
C^
-* <t
45
>,
hH
w
-M
O
a.
U
^N
N
cj
a
r-H
a
a
u
0)
a)
C
C
O
o
o
o
o
p.
u
u
H
t)
O.
O
u
o
r»N m
p-
r-l r-l
U
a
01
tl)
01
trj
>-, >-,
fi
r-l
u
H
a, M
<n
01
O
O
o
o
rl
13
01
U
CO
O
a>
1H
p.
o
a>
01
01
u
U
13 nj
0) rH
o
rl
u
IT)
C
>>
o
01
rH
rH
0)
o. u
o
to
TJ
a)
o
p. u
m
n)
4J rH
a
U
rH
01
1H
b0
•^
O
\o VO
r-l r-l O
CO
r-i en <t ^o o
m
<t o
co m
•XX.
cr»vocr*r^-inujcoo*-oro
mcocomr-icr»cMcr*cop^
CMfOCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCMCMCMcOCM<fCM<T
^CMCMCM<tCM<tCMCMrO
r-*.ineococotncrvinm<t
<tvocoin<fvominvovo
com\o<j,cor-vocor>-cr*
vovovoNvoijiniNin^
vOinOvO-^O-^CMCMO
in<fininvo^or-vx>vor-
r--rHCMa\roinvorovoco
<f^vomHvoncoHo>
\ovosjtoineo«3H
myxfojHNincoHO
<tr^covDincoin<r<fto
<t^nN<fo\covoiniri
\oNcoinminina>
p-»vovo<j,vo<finin<j'co
NOCOlfltOnOtNNVO
OxtnNNMONNCOn
^(OlOtXtOOOiOCOVO
cocor-»r--cocoocovoco
ri rH
O
vi
0)
o
0)
o
o
O
o
•^CACTsfOrHCOCMrHO^CO
VOCMO^OO^Or^r-ICM-JCT*incOOrO<tCOOOCMrH
r-l rH r-l rH CM
rH rH
O
O
rH rH
rH r-l CM
r-l rM
rH rH
CM CM
mincococorHi-Hin
HH\S\
at
tl)
comincor-*focr*m
voHyjnvoov^in
cococococomincoco
CO CO <f -3s <t CO CO
a
vo^mcMOroo^ocoin
(MnvoinHvomcovoco
a)
mO^OvOCMCMOrHCMO
vo<j-o*r*coo^cMcocoo
irtOO><.OMNO»n<f
rH rH
H
H
rl r.
rHCM
OGMnincochCMoon
cOfOrHrHvOfOi-l<teOrH
CM CM i-l
Hrlrl
rH
•rl .Q
H4HNM<tNvD
CftOCftN^<fSH
•
Q)
OSON(OH^O\Om
V)
rO <J" rO
CM rH rH ,
iNO<t4nmnonin
0)
01
cr. in cm
O
CO
rH \
co
vO <J
m
r» r - in r-* o
rH rH rH rH O
00
00 00 00 OO CO
Q
CO
inrHrHinrHrHrHrHrHr-
rH
OO
33
0000-^VOOOOM3<tOCM
bfl in
q
CMrHCMCMCOrHCMCMCMrH
q
OOOO^vOCOOO
ONMOO^\ffllO<t
CMCMrHCMCMCMOOCMrHCM
COCOrHrHCMCMrHCO
<M 4 <t N O U>M CNIXO
CMrHrHOOCMrHCMCMOOCM
3
CMOOCMCMOOOONOincO
OOCMCOCOinCMCMOCOO
rH
rH CM CM
rH
eia
a
CO
NO
CO
O
00
o
<j
in
- t rH
NO
NO o
3
CM
X
X
CO
X
X
ON
co
i-H
c
o
r-l
rH
•rl
•rl
U
X
S
•rl
o
o
o
O
r-l
3
(1
a
o-
CO
rH CO
X
X
rH
rH rH
a
rH
.
rH rH •M
CM CM
a
o
rH
X
in
r^
C7N
o
CO
o
rH rH
CM CM
u
w
rH
rH
cMcocoNoomcMm-^o
rH
CM rH
rH
CM rH
VO
a
s
vO
CO
CO
CO
<f
o
rH
CM
cr*
rH
a
OO
00
CO o
rH <r
CM NO
m
ON
1
O
1
=
X
X
cr*
cr*
r*
CTN
CO
r-»
o-.
CO
rH rH
rH
X
X
r-.
ON
r-
VI
CO
n)
CM
CM
r
=
tD
VI
rH U
«
•
tl
Tl
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
m
ON <t CO O
no
r-l
CM 00 00 ON O
CA
l
o
o
in
NO
<_> CM
•
s
s
O
rH
CO vO
CO CO
X
CM CM CM
X
X
CM
CM
X X
X
O
CO O
CO CO O
in i-l r~* rH f-i r-t
\D CM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
a
O
rH
i cr* r^* m
r-» r- in
o
cr* in cr* cr* in
o
o
oco^-mNor-^cocM
cococococococo-tf
a
CT\ rH t-i t-4 r-A i-l
X
X
s
CO
CO
i rH
rH
X
rH
s
CO
rH
CM rH CO rH CM CO
rH
CJN
X
X
1
no I— eoONcMco-^inooON
rHrHi-HrHCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
rlNinNOClOrlNrn<t
OOOOOrHrHrHrHrH
CM
>
On
tD
rH til
CM (J
a)
a
NO
00
X
r~ r~
ON ON
CO CO
VI
tJ
=
a
o
o
CM CM O
tr)
ON
a
as
a
o
CO X
CM
ooinmooOrHcM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
<fr\£>cr»rHCM<rm*x>r«>co
OOOrHrHrHiHrHrHrH
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
c
o
0
o
c
6!
o
NO
r-l
•8
•rl
rH
n
VI
0)
01 W
o
t)
<
I CO
O
<t r-l O
o m m
rH
•
»
'
'
<t NO
o o
Iso
)H
CO rH rH rH CO -tf
<f
O
O0
CO
CM CM
O
m
•
CM OO
OO
'
m
r^ m
co
cm co
in rH
<*
I I 00 I I CM CM rH I O
cMinvoocomr^cM
r-*
O
<t
cMCMCMincOCMOCM
rHOOi-HrHrH-tfrH
OO
CMOOOOCMCMCMOOCM
00
O
CM --r
rH O
O
cn rH o
CM
NO O
CM
1
O
OO-*
i-H <f CO
CM CM
00 CO
o
rH
1
r^
r-
i
i
-d-
O
-*
CM
O
-*
ON
r1
00 ^
r-~
i
00 00
ON
rH
rH O
rH -*
CM O
o
rH O
rH -tf rH <t
CM
CM
- f rH
00
CM
CO
0O CM
•
00 00 -*
00 00
o
-t
CM
•
NO
NO
00
46
01
Ol
c
bO 00
u
u
t3 10
o
o
01
r-l r-l
u
o
01
u
t3
a
r-> >-. O
rH i-H
•u
H
IH
U
td
o
o
t3
t3
o
01
01
u
r-l rH
cr* vo
o
o
p.
O
U
-
ID
D.
i
<t CM i
rH rH CM
P.
rH in
U)
O
rH
CO
rH <j- cm m
r-»
CO CM in rH <t
rH
O
cr»p^corHcom^'CMin-^cM
COCMCO-J-CMCMCMCOCMCMCM
<r
CO
LO
rH
rH
CM
m
o
cm
in
01
11) rH
u
u
tO
u
to
u
tO
tO
to
rH rH
0)
r-l
01
0)
r-l
U
CMCOincO<trHin*.OrH
CO <f rH
, KO CO <t
OvONOnHNHvO
CMrHOCMCMrHCMrHrH
rH rH CM rH
cocM<j-comcovovo
CMCOCMCOCMCMCMCM
CM
CMcOCO^-CMOvOCOr^r-l
COfOr^CMCMr^COCMrHO
COCMCOCMCMCOCMCOCMCO
CM^CMCMinCMcOfOvJ-rO
ooocMcr«inovocr%oo
r-.vovovo-j-oiofNsjir,
o\cor-rHcr»tncMCMcoin
«)o\moONNPimcoN
vou)r».vDin-NNt<t\oinriin
C\<JvOvN(N<fChOO
cor-icMCMr^<t->tvococovo
ocMcnvocnocoo
r-*coco<tcMcocMa\vocM
MJinrofOrHrocorH^cr*
<rrocor*mr>>in\o\oin<t
ror**roinco<ttnin
n
<f
r*»cocoinvocovocM<r<f
iHcr»r-*rs*r-.r^r*-.tHvocoo\
cM<j-r-*>.vo<tcovoo
mrH».oinoococoroco
cMr*vocococMcMrs-r-co
covoo\Oinvo<J-rHr-»ro<f
^tcor^-vfvor^r^r^.
co[N\oin<t(7*iNininin
p^rHvocooovovoc^inin
inoominvor^rHocovo
cor-»incr*r*incocMin*N3'
rHinmrHr>.rs.cr»inoin
<fvOCr*rHCMvOrHOOCMCM
COin^OOrOr^rHvOr-l
r-*o\0<rcoincr*i—I o\ co
<j,incocor*-vocr»cr**.ovo
mm*.or-»vovc>min
<jinvovomvor-cor>.in
<o.
r}•o
<:
a)
rH \
Ti .•
JX rH
rH rH rH rH
VI
-cf n
^
<r u, <f m
a)
CMCMcOcOC\<rrHOr^OO
cj.nmcA*jcovo<rooo
hom-NtMnm^OvOvo
01
4
a>
rH CM
rH CM rH
m
rococMcr»inrococooo
Cr*CMOi-lr-ICOr^r-ICOO
rH rH
rH
m
COCOCMCOCOCMCOCOCO
COCO^OVOCMCMrHrHrH
OOCOrHrHrHcMrHrHrHCM
V)
<fo<rcMooo<tcooo
\ < f VO CO OCOCMCOCOCO
<f«x>ovo<j-<rcocMcoO
<tO00ONNflvO\OO<t
o
S
CMCMCMCMCMrHcOCMCMCMcO
COCMCMrHCMCMCMCMrHrH
CMrHCMCMrHrHrHCMrHfO
CMCMrHCMCMrHcMCMCMCM
OOCMOCOCMOCMCOCMO
rHrHrHrH
\
CM rH rH rH CM
<rCMCOCMCOOOCMrHO
CMrocMcommoococM
CMU5rOO«3COCOOCMO
rHrH
i~t r-i
rHCMrHrH
X
bO
C
•rl
M
r-l
rH
01
S
JJ
3
o
10
•->
X
X
r-.
co r - co
co <J cq m
X
a
rH i n rH o
NO ro NO CO
CO ro
CO a
CO o
rH r^. rH •cr rH i-H
CM CO CM NO CM CM
o
o
rH o
O
rl ON rH ON vt
01 rH CM rH NO
bl
C
tit
tO
c
C
o
4J
o
H
X
r-*-> ON
X
X
a
X
M
C
CMrHrH
in
co in ro
01
u
o
o
X
CMrHrHrH
X
a
a
a
rH
a
a
r-~ r -
a
a
a
rH
m
NO
00
CO
rH CM
r^. NO
o
CM
ro
rH
rH
r-~
CM
rH rH
rH
00
ro
CM
CM
CM
X
X
X
X
X
•
rH rH -.1
CM
10 NO
r^.
rH ON ON
ON
4J CO o
CO CO
01 rH NO rH rH
H CM m CM CM
ro
rH
CM
X
r-^
CT\
ON
o
ro
<1 rH
r- CM
<••>
in
NO
r~
en
r-~
ON
CO
CM
a
a
a
boa
boa a
m
rH
CO
rH
NO
C
00
<T
01 00
C oo i n CO rH
tO CM CO (.J 00
CO
CO
O
C
c
CO
<r rH
rH
CM
Ol
t-i rH
u
CM
u
rH
CM
CO
o
rH
I
NO
a
CM
rH
•rl
c
i
CO CO
rH rH
CM CM
X
r~
01
r^
ON
ON
4J
CO
c
rH
CM
o)
u
rH
ro
u
01
0)
C
c
X
NO
CO
a
CM
CO
rH
CM
X
ro
X
r^.
X
CO
X
X
*
o
o
M
X
r^
O
O
r~
ON
c
ON
O
ON
o
o
CO
C }
CO
rH ro •rl CO
»-t rH <t rH
- t rH .c rH
CM
NO
CM
NO
CM
u
X
H
X
H
X
CM
X
a
a
i-H co
rH r-l
CM CM
X
X
CO
rON
NO
i
X
CO
r-l
CM
CTN
O
O
in
NO
rH
v> -T - t
VI ON •rl
VI 1/1 i n
•rl ro
3 •rl CM CM
3 rH cr s rH rH
CO CM <
to CM CM
VI
r~
m
r--
in
CTN
ro
o
rH r-l
CM CM
C rH
u
-o
3
X
10
o
3
o
o
_l a!
rHcM-j-invor^cocnrHcMro
cocococococococo<t<r<f
r-cocrtOcMco^finvor-*.
OOOrHrHrHrHrHrHrH
COO\OrHCMCOinvOr-»CO
rHrHCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
cr*rHCMco<tmcocr*rHcM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
bO
o
c
?;
o
•rl
-O
tO
H
01
CO
CO
00
mvovor*»ovOr-icom
oocr*cr»r>-cor^r>.r**
inm^<j<t<f<j-<t<t
cr* cm
m
o
i
CO m
n
n
in
\o <r* o
<
t
r^-
CO
4i
cm r*. r-i
^
o
w
u
rHrHrHrHrHrHr-lrHrH
<fcMOrHOO
rHrH>^rH<J-0-
^m^rHrHrH
o
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CMCMCOCMCOCO
CMCMCM
o
t]
<
N<f
O
ro <t
to
rH
0)
V)
O
CM CM
vo
m
<t
CM
rH CM
<f
O
r—
co
i cr*
i
i 4
i vo
i
i
ooooov
cococMcrtco
momo
coocmoo
rHcOrHcO
H
^
H
CO <T
CMCOCMCO
CMCOCMcOCO
C
a>
0)
O'sOr-»rOCMr*-rHCMv0
'
cr*roo\cr*cMcr»rHrH<j-a\
<tmrH<J-CMrHinmCMO
1-lrHrHrHrHrHrHrHrHrO
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCO
u
to
^
47
Table y: Agronomic and quality data of hops grovm In the Seeded Hop Variety World Collection, Corvalll3, 1989.
Pruned April 7; trained May 10.
Accession
No.
Flowering
Location
Row:Hill
Name
First
Ju
1-4
Host
iy
19001
1
21403
2
"
Stlcklebract
21404
3
"
Green Bullet
18
21185
21011
4
"
Hersbrucker-G
20
5
"
20
21179
6
"
21014
7
"
21015
21016
48209
8
"
9
"
10
56001
11
»
56002
12
"
56013
13
"
"
Brewer's Gold
.
Hallertauer
- Backa
Cascade
Yleldi/
Date
Aug.
lb/A
12
20
9-
8
1927
12
24
9-15
2506
26
9-15
1610
8-2
9-
8
384
9-
8
1621
Late Cluster Sel. .L-16
16
Hersbrucker-E
24
Hallertauer m.f.
6-28
Tettnanger
Fuggle-N
Fuggle-H
Oualitv
Harvest
a
P
«
%
9.0
11.7
10.6
5.3
7.8
21
235
2.3
10
21
569
4.8
3
18
21
213
4.4
3
12
21
533
5
14
21
736
6.2
5.8
.
6
16
21
512
4.7
20
30
21
270
6
12
21
875
3.2
6.4
11.0
Hybrid-2
Yugoslavia Goldlng
Savlnja Goldlng
Swiss-Tettnanger
20
30
3
15
21
436
3
21
608
14
15
24
21
256
Comet
12
20
21
1642
5.2
5.7
5.5
11.4
Spalter
Tardif de Bourgogne
10
18
16
24
8
18
21167
14
"
61019
17
"
61020
61021
62013
21186
21169
18
"
19
"
20
"
22
"
24
"
21170
25
-
Elsasser
21406
26
"
AlphAroma
21187
28
"
Southern Brewer
10
21188
29
"
21284
30
"
21173
31
"
N.P. 2/55
Bramllng
Strlsselspalt
21227
32
"
Perle
21405
33
"
SuperAlpha
21498
34
"
Yeoman
21499
35
"
Zenith
9-
8
583
114
4.1
9-
8
1072
5.0
20
9-
8
1280
24
9-15
3397
18
9-
8
939
10
18
9-
8
960
18
26
9-
8
331
4.6
9.4
9.9
5.9
6.3
8
16
9-15
416
4.1
12
18
21
715
18
26
9-15
5
12
21
12.1
10.2
11.8
18
28
9-
8
608
11.1
9-
15.8
6.6
21
1450
256
21193
36
-
Nugget
8
18
8
1056
21225
37
"
Olympic
10
18
21226
38
"
Chinook
10
18
9-
8
944
Bullion
5
14
9-
8
10
20
21
18
18
21
16
22
16
8-3
64100
3 5-8
64107
4
"
Northern Brewer
65102
6
"
Yakima Cluster, 2-1
21196
7
"
Bullion 6A
21182
8
"
Galena
1
5
1
66051
9
"
Progress
5
66052
10
"
Pride of Rlngwo&d
24
ratio
CoH
«
4.2
68
40
5.5
68
44
4.8
69
42
6.8
44
25
4.8
3.5
3.6
3.4
62
44
3.1
2.8
4.2
5.1
4.3
6.0
2.6
2.6
oil
Remarks
ml/100 g
moderate shatter
1.22
compact cone
mod. shatter
0.60
0.50
very late
heavy shatter
picked green
40
25
57
20
0.77
57
23
0.17
67
67
27
0.74
26
0.77
light shatter
53
20
38
20
60
38
0.69
0.13
0.28
picked green
picked green
red stem
65
32
66
25
0.48
68
27
0.92
light shatter
3.5
61
20
0.50
reddish stem
4.0
74
40
0.69
picked green
2.8
6.0
59
46
21
21
6.1
43
27
3.4
74
27
mod.
4.0
71
42
red stem
3.7
2.5
2.5
62
27
71
27
62
31
0.87
4.4
73
66
70
76
24
0.49
5.2
5.1
3.5
shatter
1.07
like llersbr.?
38
24
1.19
early
red stem
23
4.8
77
72
25
36
12.9
2.6
3.8
77
34
red stem
1195
9.0
4.2
68
46
pink stem
498
9.9
4.1
71
24
1.10
pink stem, green
1792
2602
0.19
63
42
50
42
picked green
heavy shatter
picked green
21
782
6.3
3.4
4.2
5.2
4.4
62
2464
5.5
8.9
9.0
59
30
21
437
7.8
2.7
74
30
31
9-
569
-.
8
continued next page
68
1.14
0.62
red stem, £*
red stem,
green
48
Table J:
Accession
No.
con eluded
Location
Flowering
Harvest
Row:!llll
Name
66050
12 :5-8
Alliance
10
18
21183
13
Eroica
20
28
68052
17 •. "
6
12
10
18
8
15
9-
5
15
8
18
30
30
First
Host
July
21043
18 I "
Pethom Goldlng
Wye Challenger
21044
19 :
Wye Northdown
21049
20
21238
21040
21041
23 *. m
24 '. "
Columbia
20
Willamette
20
21213
25
Aromat
24
21215
27:
28:
"
Croene Bel
29:
"
Star
30:
"
31:
"-
32:
•
33:
"
21216
21217
21097
21220
21197
21055
21050
21052
21053
"
Styrian Goldlng
22
*
Blisk
Nordgaard 1478
3
15
22
HQller Bitterer
16
24
Eroica (virusfree)
16
26
St-1 (Swiss Tettnanger?) 3
16
Comet x (BCxFu-Colo2- 1)
Aurora
21051
4
-
Apolon
21081
5
*
Dunav
21082
21083
21080
21079
6
™
*
8
"
9
Neoplanta
Vojvodlna
Backa
Blue Northern Brewer
21093
21056
12
"
13
"
21092
21116
15
"
16
-
21112
21239
Ahll
Atlas
14
Northern Brewer,vir.f .
Bullion 10A
Cascade, virusfree?
Brewer's Gold, vir.f.
Wye Target
Yleld^
Aug.
lb/A
21
2.2
74
30
4.9
72
42
9-
8
1056
6.7
2.1
76
32
9-
8
341
8.3
4.3
66
22
8
256
8.5
4.5
65
491
8
1738
715
1259
6.2
11.2
8.5
6.6
4.0
2.6
4.2
4.1
21
99-
8
9-
8
22
"
Bobek
10
18
22
*•
Lublin
12
18-
22
19
••
Nadwlslanska
21115
20
*
21078
21
"
21240
Buket
Early Prolific
22.
21276
23:
•
21277
24:
•*
•Pocket Talisman
Record
Early Promise
Keyworth's Early
18
39
65
33
60
22
1.16
1.7
66
24
0.36
1162
1642
7.4
7.7
49
27
1.06
8
4.3
71
41
0.82
2.9
4.5
69
25
0.53
939
10.8
6.5
14.4
76
47
597
9.0
299
608
9.4
11.2
1493
1568
668
971
224
9.6
9.0
9.9
448
8
53
373
1226
341
9-11
9-11
8.7
4.8
5.2
11.2
3.7
3.9
4.0
71
3.7
4.2
3.6
3.5
72
36
73
19
2.0
4.0
74
1.28
red stem
68
46
1.80
red stem
71
55
39
70
42
0.98
2.40
mod.
6.0
68
37
1.97
red stem
5.7
63
24
3.0
59
23
0.56
2.7
53
66
29
54
0.30
76
31
2.53
15
22
22
1205
11.8
4.7
72
22
1.17
8
18
9=11
352
4.3
1.9
70
23
0.69
20
619
6.4
1.7
78
29
0.61
256
8.7
74
34
-
30
30
9-11
9-11
10
18
9-11
103
9.4
3.1
6.5
59
39
Sunshine
18
24
9-11
192
7.7
2.9
73
30
1
14
7.4
4.7
61
25
15
22
22
299
1
128
213
1.8
7.1
2.5
3.7
42
65
33
26:
*
21281
21283
21396
28:
30:
32:
w
Wye Viking
"
Tolhurst
21520
39:
Ba ll/72-19a
1/,Green weight per 4-hill plot x 0.10665
picked green
3.2
3.7
20
25:
0.90
1.04
0.63
1.13
28
73
12.9
9.7
4.3
3.1
4.0
12.6
1.99
36
27
27
27
22
1.9
4.0
4.0
1237
1493
299
149
711
864
9-11
Fuggle type
68
48
1162
27
poor picker
73
5.3
8.5
4.0
8.7
29
71
Keyworth's Hidseason
21278
21279
••
30
8
67
1.09
9-11
20
light shatter
2.65
0.91
1.11
32
31
17
0.73
37
30
22
18
26
73
70
12
16
71
red stem
59
8
20
red stem
3.4
26
20
2.28
3.2
15
12
8
16
8
23
7.6
22
22
22
9-11
9-11
22
22
9-11
9-11
9-11
28
picked green
5.0
3.4
22
20
0.78
75
128
Remarks
ml/100 g
480
21
9-
3.6
2.6
oil
8
21
31
9-
21113
21114
•*
85
21
9-
18
12
20 •
22
6-28
%
6.3
16
18
%
CoH
12.3
16
16
»
ratio
526
8
20
12
8
0
2165
8
10
a
8
9-
21
10
10
1:9-12
2: "
3: •
7
6-28
Ouali tv
Date
33
shatter
g*" , shatter
heavy shatter
yellow leaves
1.21
red stem
171:25
25
58
8601-
-
8602-
47
46
n
X
"
„
„
„
„
„
„
,,
„
„
x
x
y
8309- 32M
8309 -26M
8309 -26M
x 21381M
x 21381M
9/9
26
26
9/2
9/1
9/2
9/2
9/2
9/7
9/7
30
30
29
25
24
24
24
24
23
23
9/8
22
9/8
23
lb/A
Aug.
2176
469
426
1258
1877
1280
1450
1493
1109
1493
1493
3327
1920
1450
1237
1280
1834
1664
1962
1493e
1536
2686
1706
1578
1280
2000e
Yield-/
Date
Harv.
(tetraploid)
(tetraploid)
20
20
20
20
30
20
30
20
20
20
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
No.
Chrom.
- visual estimate
ME, ML, L - very early, early, med. early, med. late, late
8309-26M - tetrapl . Hall ertauer m.f.
8309-32M - tetrapl . Hallertauer m.f.
2/ e
E
E
E
E
ML
ME
ME
E
ME
E
L
ME
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
ity y
Matur-
SoBx[(Ha-0P)x
L
Saazer x (Ha-OP)]
Tettnang sr-B
Tettnang er-A
61021
61021
61021
P ed Lgree
^61021 - Swiss Tettnanger (diplo id)
195:
21485
-564
195:
193:52
195:29
-481
21497
191:23
-346
45
44
-314
195:
190:18
-288
21496
189:15
-232
183:02
-578
39
179:47
19
42
47
-300
-305
-411
- 97
20
-278
- 77
177:16
-274
186:15
176:02
-207
73
37
8603-
175:10
-162
174:20
-119
-189
42
173:09
35
- 55
172:05
Row:Hill
Location
Selectior
No.
9.1
4'.0
3.4
6.2
8.2
9.9
6.5
4.0
6.9
7.0
6.0
6.6
7.2
10.1
6.7
8.7
8.1
12.3
6.5
6.8
8.1
7.6
8.4
8.4
5.3
9.2
a
Planted May 18-20, 1987; pruned Apr. 7; trained May 7-10, 1989.
4.5
3.4
3.7
2.9
4.9
3.6
4.7
3.9
3.5
5.3
4.7
5.0
3.6
4.1
2.5
4.0
3.1
3.2
5.8
2.0
3.5
2.7
4.2
3.0
2.2
3.3
e
1988
67
54
48
68
62
73
58
51
57
66
56
57
64
73
74
69
73
79
53
78
70
74
67
74
70
74
ratio
18
24
25
24
22
20
24
21
22
24
23
26
25
25
21
25
25
23
22
17
24
23
23
24
25
23
CoH
1.40
0.77
0.77
0.85
1.19
1.32
1.49
0.85
1.07
0.66
0.89
0.94
0.70
0.87
0.87
0.86
0.79
1.13
0.63
0.54
1.16
0.42
0.82
0.68
•oil
31
29
29
31
30
30
30
29
29
29
25
31
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
Aug.
date
Harv.
938
512
427
2133
1536
1578
1792
2688
3114
1962
1792
3285
2943
2133
2474
2090
1834
2090
2005
2645
3285
2560
2261
2389
1749
3754
lb/A
Yield-/
Table 8: Two-year data of female selections from the 1987 nursery (diploid x tetraploid Tettnanger-type) crosses
10.6
6.0
5.4
8.3
9.4
10.3
6.6
6.0
10.7
11.0
6.8
8.0
10.6
9.9
11.1
8.4
10.6
12.5
9.5
9.2
9.0
8.3
8.5
9.4
7.0
10.2
Q
5.4
5.2
5.1
3.9
5.4
3.7
5.7
5.2
6.5
4.2
5.3
5.5
5.1
5.1
3.3
5.3
3.9
3.8
7.3
3.2
3.5
4.2
3.5
4.2
3.0
4.3
0
1989
66
54
52
68
64
74
54
54
62
72
56
60
67
66
72
67
73
77
56
74
72
66
71
69
70
71
ratio
17
24
23
23
21
19
24
21
22
25
24
28
23
25
18
24
23
24
21
17
25
30
24
23
24
23
CoH
66
64
0.74
1.04
0.71
0.61
1.01
0.91
0.86
1.52
0
0.66
1.22
0.64
0.72
0.64
0.69
0.59
0 47
0
0.25
0.41
0.52
0.61
0.68
0.44
0.60
oil
low CoH
shatter
triploid •
hard pick
triploid
triploid
Remarks
4>.
109-
110:
- 54
- 58
- 62
106:
108:
- 23
- 42
- 08
21-22
102: 23-24
103:
108
- 49
03
107
- 45
8407-
104
106
- 30
102
103
16
- 26
- 27
8406-
108
- 24
13
106 19-20
107
8405-
112
-129
- 79
105
-112
111
104
-111
- 72
102 17-18
103
- 86
110
112
- 41
- 63
111
- 07
21397 x 21380M
21397 x 21361M
21397 x 21337M
21397 x 21090M
110
8403- 03
107
109
-136
109
108
- 23
10
107
- 99
-106
8404- 06
8
105
106
- 80
- 93
3
12
12
12
10
8
8
8
6
8
10
10
10
3
5
10
8
10
11
12
103
104
10
9-1
31
24
24
24
9-12
24
9-11
24
24
24
9-11
24
24
9-11
24
9-11
Augus t
July
Harvest
Date
First
Flowering
- 68
21397 x 21088M
21397 x 21087M
Pedigree y
- 45
102
101 15-16
- 36
8402- 21
Location
Row:Hill
Sel. No.
April 5; trained May 16.
960
1386
1088
2560
1408
1322
2261
960
2495
1408
1536
1493
1088
1600
1088
960
2048
1813
2197
2090
1578
1962
1813
2112
1749
2346
2026
1301
1280
1472
1088
1514
981
1408
555
768
lbs/A
Yield^
6.7
7.8
5.8
5.5
8.3
6.3
5.5
5.2
7.3
7.1
6.8
7.4
6.0
5.6
6.8
5.0
4.4
5.1
4.6
5.3
4.2
4.7
3.8
3.7
4.5
5.3
3.8
5.8
5.9
5.4
6.1
5.9
5.8
5.3
6.1
5.5
a
3.3
4.1
3.7
3.1
4.0
3.7
4.2
2.9
3.2
3.8
3.4
4.5
3.6
3.0
3.3
3.9
3.9
3.7
3.6
3.8
3.2
3.7
3.7
2.8
3.7
3.7
4.0
3.2
3.4
2.8
2.7
2.7
3.0
3.6
3.1
2.9
fi
67
66
61
64
67
63
57
64
69
65
67
62
63
65
67
56
53
59
56
58
57
56
51
57
55
59
49
63
65
67
. 67
68
67
63
63
65
ratio
Quality
27
25
23
22
25
25
23
CoH
26
26
28
22
21
22
21
24
27
30
27
25
24
26
26
19
17
20
18
20
19
21
26
41?
21
18
22
22
.25
Female Hallertauer-type triploid selections grown in 2-hill plots, Corvallis, in 1989.
Pruned:
Accession or
Table 9
low CoH
low CoH
low CoH
early
top crop
weak arms
large cones
early
v.
v.
late
early
early
late
v.
late
early-
Remarks
on
o
105
- 47
21381M
First
21397 x 2138LH
n
21397 x 19058M
ti
n
21381M -
2/,Green weight of 2 hill plot x 0.21329
19058M - Early Green x OP
64037M - Zattler Seedling
- " - " -
21380M -
21337M - No. Brewer x 64035M
21361M - Cascade x 65009-64035H
21087H - Yugoslavian male 3/3
21088M "
'•
5/9
21090M "
"
12/17
y2X2,91 - tetraploid Hallertauer m.f.
109
110
21492
103
21493
- 25
102 29-30
112
- 96
8301- 21
109
110
- 69
106
8410- 52
105
-119
102 27-28
-106
-125
112
103
111
- 89
- 92
104
110
82
-
-115
1
109
- 80
-114
1
108
- 79
8
10
10
12
10
3
5
12
10
3
6
1
1
10
10
106
107
8
6
8
1
1
3
1
6
July
Flowering
- 63
21397 x 64037M
21397 x
Pedigree-y
- 51
- 46
- 31
112
102 25-2.6
103
104
- 18
111
- 12
- 30
110
- 11
109 23-24
Sel. No.
8408- 06
Location
Row:Hill
Accession or
Table 9 : continued
9-6
9-5
9-1
August
Date
Harvest
939
2282
1642
1706
1536
1152
672
1301
1994
1493
1344
811
1514
1749
1130
1194
1920
1792
1173
2325
1120
1408
1194
1173
1493
619
1237
lbs/A
7.0
7.3
7.9
8.2
4.3
4.9
3.9
5.7
5.9
4.7
5.0
7.0
6.2
6.1
8.4
6.7
7.2
5.7
7.8
' 7.3
7.1
8.6
7.1
5.6
7.8
7.8
7.7
Yield^/ .
4.6
5.4
4.9
5.4
5.7
5.7
5.8
4.2
5.4
4.9
6.9
6.4
4.0
4.7
5.0
5.2
5.2
4.4
3.8
5.1
5.4
6.4
5.8
6.0
4.6
6.9
5.0
P
61
57
62
60
46
43
40
51
58
59
42
42
60
57
63
52
58
60
66
61
57
57
49
54
63
53
60
ratio
Quality
22
24
' 32
22
25
22
23
23
23
24
28
27
22
26
25
24
23
29
24
24
25
24
27
28
23
22
25
CoH
large cones
large cones
variegated leaves
large cones
early
early
early
early
early
large cones, early
early
early
early, large cones
large cones, early
early
Remarks
3:
4:
5:
6:
7
8
21471
21473
21474
21475
21476
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21479
21480
21481
'21482
21483
21484
21455
21456
21457
tt
It
tl
It
.
.
.
.
tl
tl
II
tt
tl
tl
tt
It
II
It
It
II
II
ll
It
tt
21362M
64035M
EG x XS
-/green weight of 5 hill plot x 0.08532
L
ME
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
L
E
ity-/
Matur
- E, ME, L = early, medium early, late
21362M = Cas x (BG-19058M x 64035M)
Saazer x OP
-
- "
64037M =
21237M =
- " -
64035M =
64033M = Zattler seedling
19058M -
i'21397 - tetraploid Hallertauer m.f.
21397 x
-
21237M
_
64037M
_
_
64035M
64033M
_
19058M
Hood
21397 x
Mt.
21397 x
-
21397 x
-
-
-
-
-
-
II
II
-
_
It
II
21397 x
tl
tt
II
21397 x
.
.
21397 x
Pedigree—'
It
tt
135 :2-6
11
21478
21459
9
10
21477
21472
2:
21470
tl
1: 62-66
Row:Hill
Number
21469
Location
Accession
6
49
55
5.9
4.4
5
12
24
15
5
5
5
15
15
5
15
14
14
14
14
1.75
1.42
1.39
0.85
24
22
23
61
44
3.7
5.6
4.9
5.0
5.8
4.4
2.4
6.4
7.5
845
674
687
896
751
691
1.10
1.33
1.34
1.60
1.03
25
24
25
25
24
56
53
47
62
59 .
6.7
4.8
3.5
3.7
4.3
5.8
5.4
879
1015
33
1.32
23
59
5.3
7.6
738
1.91
26
24
59
5.1
1369
4.3
1.77
1.03
22
22
6.3
53
1.01
22
22
5.7
5.0
60
48
4.0
6.0
4.6
1.54
21
25
1.11
1.70
0.59
0.72
oil
22
21
23
CoH
853
811
1113
5.4
5.8
•
896
5
5
1049
4.7
4.1
1638
5
47
43
5.5.
4.1
1084
5
•60
5.6
8.5
1698
5'
49
49
ratio
Oualitv
956
5.0
5.0
4.8
1792
4.8
%
%
lbs/A
P
a
Yield^
5t
5
22
16
16
20
18
22
15
18
20
15
18
18
15
20
16
10
20
24
16
Sept
Date
Harvest
6
6
6
8
8
12
6
6
8
4
8
6
8
8
6
1
10
15
Most
July
First
Flowering
Table ±ryt Agronomic and quality data of advanced triploid female Hallertauer seedling selections
grown in the Main Yard. 1989. Pruned: April 6; trained: May 12.
en
53
Table 11:
Female diploid selections for high-yield germplasm development grown in a 2-hill Observation Nursery,
Corvallis.
1989.
Pruned Apr. 5; trained May 10.
Location
Sel.
No.
Row:Hill
First
Pedigree y
Flowering
Sept.
8411- 15
111 31-32
Harvest
Date
lbs/A
64007 x 21337H
Quality
Yield^ '
0
%
%
ratio
CoH
%
7
2197
8.8
4.3
67
"
1514
8.8
3.4
72
27
12
**
1408
8.2
3.1
73
26
102
10
"
211
7.8
3.1
71
26
- 40
103
12
"
1514
7.1
3.7
66
29
- 42
104
12
"
1386
9.0
3.7
71
30
- 49
105
12
1067
6.7
3.2
68
28
- 64
106
2112
- 25
112
- 27
101 33-34
- 29
- -
-
"
Remarks
24
8.6
4.0
68
33
- 75
107
12
"
981
7.6
3.3
70
24
-135
108
10
"
1664
7.8
4.3
65
29
-150
109
10
"
1621
6.7
4.0
63
27
-157
no
12
"
1536
6.2
3.7
62
32
large cones
-170
in
-201
112
-204
101
-229
102
-262
103
8412- 02
104
-
1770
9.4
- 10
105
"
1941
9.0
- 12
106
"
1472
6.4
4.7
58
20
- 16
107
**
1706
9.0
3.9
70
30
- 19
108
1589
10.3
4.0
72
26
1344
10.6
7.8
58
27
compact cones
1824
7.0
4.4
61
31
compact cones
"
2122
8.9
4.3
67
31
"
1322
10.3
8.6
3.7
73
27
4.0
68
25
- 22
109
- 25
110
- 34
111
12
35-36
"
10
"
10
"
64007 x 21361M
12
n
- 46
112
- 51
101 37-38
10
768
6.7
3.4
66
23
red stem
1152
1088
6.5
3.9
63
25
mod.
shatter
9.7
8.1
4.4
69
22
1365
3.5
70
35
1365
9.3
4.5
67
30
mod.
shatter
5.9
62
40
vert,
6.6
58
38
1088
- 58
102
12
-
2346
9.8
5.1
66
23
- 75
103
12
"
1536
10.2
3.4
75
24
- 77
104
3.0
64
25
105
1632
1514
5.4
- 79
6.2
4.6
57
33
"
rt
10
- 88
106
-101
107
-121
108
"
-125
109
-135
110
-138
111
12
1578
8.0
3.3
71
24
2112
1888
8.0
4.5
64
22
8.3
5.2
61
39
"*
1514
63
29
red stem
1386
8.7
6.1
11.2
5.2
It
4.3
4.9
58
70
44
26
high alpha
1077
112
101 39-40
-166
102
-183
103
12
-188
104
10
"
-196
105
12
"
-199
106
107
108
-222
109
-225
110
111
-234
171
9.4
4.1
70
1002
4.8
4.6
51
33
2037
1653
8.8
6.4
58
24
10.2
4.6
69
28
"
"
n
112:
"
64007
17: 49-50
64007
232: 1-5
SoB x [Ha-0Px(Saaz x Ha-OP)J
19105 x 19058M; control
- " -
; control
8
- (LGpS x Fu-FuS) x EG-XS
21337H - NoB x 64035M Zattler seedling
21361M - Cascade x 65009-64035H
ViGreen wt. per plot x.21329 (2 hills); x 0.08532 (5 hills)
1664
nice compact cone
9.2
6.1
60
30
10.2
5.1
67
39
E, "
10.6
5.5
66
26
75
70
24
nice compact cone
nice compact cone
nice compact cone
65
24
1685
9.0
1557
8.7
"
960
8.1
3.0
3.7
4.4
"
1514
9.2
4.3
68
27
med. sm. comp. cones
1216
7.7
4.0
66
42
Q* , red stem
16^2
11.5
5.2
69
19
2000e
3.0
6.5
32
31
2764
2.4
6.3
28
33
»
12
10
2688
nice compact cone
"
it
21485
Vi64007
-
13
"
12
cones
"
-139
-207
nice sm.
"
-150
-214
wilt
13
26
II
II
It
II
tl
21285 x
it
21285 X
21285 X
"
"
64037M
64033M
2/Green weight of 2-hill plot x 0.21329
64037M =
64033M = Zattler seedling
19172M - Cat's Tail x Fu-FuS
M
II
19172M
-
tl
tl
Hersbrucker x OP
Pedigree^
It
II
"
"
"
II
II
BOR 704
110
-267
21285
109
-253
1 /
108
-165
106:
-229
107
105:
8253-138
8254-142
104:
103
-274
8252-115
102
101 31-32
-237
-264
112
-230
=
111 29-30
8154-212
tl
Row:Hill
Location
1
8
6
6
6
8
8
3
10
8
8
II
11
tl
II
II
7
7
II
II
II
II
6
Sept.
July
10
Date
Harvest
Flowering
First
427
640
533
213
320
800
875
928
1120
555
1130
704
lbs/A
Yield^
4.3
3.6
3.4
• 5.1
2.7
5.3
7.2
10.2
9.1
7.4>
8.6
6.6
%
a
4.4
5.6
8.0
5.8
3.9
4.6
4.5
5.0
4.8
3.5
4.5
2.6
%
1$
44
44
31
47
.41
54
61
66
67
68
66
72
ratio
Oual ity
.
23
18
21
22
25
18
27
23
18
18
21
21
%
CoH
poor pick, early
yellow fleck
v. large cones
large cones
large cones
early
weak arms
moderate shatter
Remarks
12: Aroma selections from Prosser, Wa grown in 2-hill plots in the Seeded Hop Yard at Corvallis
in 1989. Pruned April 5; trained May 10.
Sel. No.
Table
55
Table
13 . Triploid genotypes from diploid x tetraploid Tettnanger crosses
made in 1988, planted in the 1989 Nursery, May 15-18, 1989.
Selection
Location
No.
Row: Hill
Pedigree-1/
136:04
61021 x
8309-26M
14
43%
Greenhouse cross
61021 x
8309-32M
68
90%
Greenhouse cross
801-4
-05
05
-07
07
-10
10
-12
12
-13
13
802-02
136:16
-03
17
-04
18
-05
19
-06
20
-07
21
-08
22
-09
23
-10
24
-11
25
-12
26
-13
27
-14
28
-15
29
-16
30
-17
31
-18
32
-19
33
-20
34
-21
35
-22
36
-24
38
-25
39
-26
40
-27
41
-28
42
-29
43
-30
44
-31
45
-32
46
-33
47
-34
48
-36
50
-37
51
-38
52
Tot.
No.
seedlings
Tri-
ploids
Remarks
NO
IT)
Q)
•rl
r*
cd
U
E
Pi
01
-rl
bO
W
!h O
H rH
P.
•
w
w
o
o
u
Pn
en
w
o
o
rJ
w
a>
o
0)
<u
u
S
r-CM
g
m
i
CM
CO
in
dP
rH
g
i
VD
CM
o
CM
CM
CN
CO
ON
CO
00
<U
Q)
W
O
• Tj
On.
o
rH
o
C
e; -h
O
CO
CO
0)
rHrHCMCMCMCMCMCMCOCOCOCO
NO(»ocNiri4iONoninNOON
ON
ON
co
co
r~o\
0)
O
00
rHrHCMCMCMCOcOcO
OOONOrHOOOrH<]-
O
r^
rH
X
o
rH OO
CM
O
•rl
On
rH
CO CO <f <f <f
m
rH
00
CO
<f <f<t<j-<i-<t<t<t<tLntnu~iinu-iinmininm^ON^)N£iNX3N£ivoNO
O
CO
CO
r-~
CO
njd rH co
•P
O
•H
co
O
pr,
••
O
CO
cMcoinvor-coo\OrHcMco<ftnNor^- OOa\OrHCMCO<tmoOO\0
O O O O O O O r H r H r H r H r H r H r H r H r-HrHCMCMCMCMCMCSICMCMCO
•d
•P
H
o
c
C
•H
•U
ij
cd
rH OS O
rH O0 CO
O
O
rH rH rH CM
O
in
rJ CtJ
<t
O
o
o
rH rH rH
CM
oo
oo
rHco<fir^vor^ooc^OrHcsico<finN£)r-~oocAOrHcsicONr)r^co
O
o
CO
CO
00
00
00
cd
H
rO
57
Table
13
concluded
Selection
Location
No.
Row:Hill
8805-35
40
-36
41
-37
42
-38
43
-39
44
-40
45
-42
47
-43
48
-44
49
-45
50
8806-01
138:51
-02
52
-03
139:01
-05
03
-06
04
-07
05
-08
06
-09
07
-10
08
-11
09
-12
10
-13
11
-14
12
-15
13
-16
14
-17
15
-18
16
-19
17
-20
18
-21
19
-22
20
-23
21
-25
23
-26
24
-27
25
-28
26
-29
27
-30
28
-31
29
^61021
21497
Tot.
Pedigree1/
21497 x
No.
Tri-
seedlings ploids
Remarks
8309-32M
2n=31
21497 x 8309-26M/32M mix
31
Swiss Tettnanger; diploid
Tettnanger B; diploid
8309-26M = [Cas x (BGxEG-XS) x ZaS]; tetraploid
8309-32M = [Cas x (BGxEG-XS) x ZaS]; tetraploid
90%
Greenh.
cross
r--n—
<•'-">"
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
2.4
1.4
3.6
3.3
3.5
2.4
3.3
size
6
36
43
8
2
8
16
40
35
34
24
24
v
before harvest.
**Chem. analysis from OSU plots (Smith Yard).
&
y
1459
lbs/A
510
1660
2071
787
439
652
2187
2187
2072
1925
1980
Yie Id
No.
Bales
Tot.
Nauuuj.e te-compressea sample;
Annen Bros.
Annen Bros.
J.I. Haas, Alluvial
Goschie
Weathers
Serres
"
Weathers
Stauffer
Coleman
Weathers
Goschie
Grower
Plot
* Chem. analysis of regular sample from last maturity sampling 3 days
(8% moisture basis).
-
19005 x 19046M
21120
•
Banner
21287**
.
Aquila
21222**
'
Tettnanger B
21497
-
Tettnanger A
21496
..
21397 x 21337M
_
21491*
21490, lot B
M
21397 x 21381M
21490, lot A
_
21397 x 21362M
Tt
21459
21457
21397 x 64035M
21456
Hood
Mt.
21455
Name or
Pedigree
Lon
number
Access
Oregon.
Table 14. Yield and quality data of 1989 experimental off-station plots in
1.5
11.3
8.8
4.7
4.2
5.9
3.7
3.7
4.4
4.6
3.4
5.7
a
9.0
6.4
6.1
5.2
5.2
5.4
6.8
6.8
3.8
3.3
5.0
6.6
0
Qual
14
34
59
48
45
52
35
35
54
58
41
46
ratio
ityi/
68
64
52
24
22
23
24
24
27
26
27
26
CoH
ti
it
n
Busch
Miller
Ann.
Hop Res. Council
Stroh
n
n
rt
Hop Res. Council
Hop Res. Council
Brewer interest
on
Co
59
Table 15.
Virus data of various hop genotypes grown at CorvnlLis, OR in 1988;
sampled Jan. 1989;
ELISA tests by C.B. Skotland, Prosser, WA.
Access,
or
Location
Sampling
Sel. No.
Row:Hill
Name or Pedigree
21484
204:23
21397 x 212
24
PNRV
virus type y
ApMV
HMV
1/26-89
"
25
n
26
tt
27
21484
Date
"
16:62
HLV
+
++
+
++
+
++
+
++
++
AmIILV
++
n
63
"
64
"
65
"
1
-
+
ft
66
67
"
68
.
«
tt
69
70
"
71
"
72
"
73
tt
74
It
75
tt
76
tt
tt
77
78
"
79
"
21532
Czechoslov.
21484
Greenhouse,A
Osvald-72 C
21397 x 21237M (leaves)
3/15/89
B
21534
Greenhouse; A
.
21533
tetrapl. Saazer (leaves)
+
++
++
++
+
++
++
++
C
+
++
-H-
++
D
+
++
++
++
B
Greenhouse.A
Zlatan (leaves)
B
21455
Goschie
+
++
++
++
+
++
++
++
C
+
++
++
+4
D
+
++
++
++
E
+
++
++
++
Mt. Hood,
commercial 1
2
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
++
++
++
++
60
Table 15 - continued
Accession
Sel. No.
Location
Row:Hill
Sampling
Name or Pedigree
21535
Ghs HT 1013
Osvald 72Y, virusfree
"
HT 1014
"
"
HT 1016
virus typey
Date
PNRV
ApMV
HMV
HLV
8/9/89
AmHLV
+
+
+
HT 1017
+
21549
"
HT 1020
"
HT cuttg 3
Greenhouse
++
Wild American H 489
21581
H
21560
21563
21584
21588
21193
237:1
528
H
501
H
505
H
537
H
543
Nugget
++
++
4/11/89
2
3
4
5
21397
38:85
21456
16:25
21457
07:33
'r
11:13
21475
17:25
21476
23:25
21477
04:29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
tetrapl. Hallertauer m.f.
+
21397 x 64035M
++
21478
06:29
21479
14:29
21480
21:29
21481
06:30
21490
35:85
21397 x 21381M
21469
11:13
21397 " 19058M
21470
18:13
3/28/89
+
21471
19:17
+
21455
i/pNRV
ApMV
HMV
HLV
10:13
Mt Hood, "
+
Prunus Necrotic Ringspot Virus
Apple Mosaic Virus
Hop Mosaic Virus
Hop Latent Virus
AmHLV - American Hop Latent Virus
+ _ positive;
- - negative
++ = strongly positive
6
61
Table 16:
Virus data of crosses 8301, 8302, 8303, and 8309 from the '84-
Nursery, grown at Corvallis, 1988. Sampled March-April 1989
prior to pruning. ELISA analyses by C.B. Skotland, Prosser, WA.
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel. No.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
8301-01
1
-02
2
13
21397 x
PNRV
virus type-1/
A£MV
HMV
HLV
19058M
-03
3
++
-04
4
++
-05
5
-06
6
-07
7
-08
8
-09
9
21455
10
21469
11
8301-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
21470
18
8301-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
24
-25
25
-26
26
-27
27
-28
28
-29
29
-30
30
-31
31
-32
32
-33
33
-34
34
-35
35
-36
36
-37
37
-38
38
-39
39
-40
40
Mt.
13
21397 x
Hood
19058M
AmHLV
62
Table 16:
continued
virus type1/
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
41 13
21397 x
8301-41
No.
-42
42
-43
43
-44
1
-45
2
-46
3
-47
4
-48
5
-49
6
-50
7
-51
8
-52
9
-53
10
-54
11
-55
12
-56
13
-57
14
-58
15
-59
16
-60
17
-61
18
21471
19
8301-63
20
-64
21
-65
22
-66
23
-67
24
-68
25
-69
26
-70
27
-71
28
-72
29
-73
30
-74
31
-75
32
PNRV
ApMV
HMV
HLV
AmHLV
19058M
17
++
++
63
Table 16:
continued
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
33 17
21397 x
8302-01
No
-02
34
-03
35
21472
36
8302-05
37
-06
38
-07
39
-08
40
-09
1 21
-10
2
-11
3
-12
4
-13
5
-14
6
-15
7
-16
8
-17
9
-18
10
PNRV
virus type—'
ApMV
HMV
HLV
64033M
+
++
AmHLV
64
Table 16:
continued
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
21397 x
No.
21473
11 21
8303-02
12
-03
13
-04
14
-05
15
21474
PNRV
virus type y
ApMV
HMV
HLV
64035M
16
8303-07
17
-08
18
-09
19
-10
20
-11
21
-12
22
-13
23
-14
24
-15
25
-16
26
-17
27
-18
28
-19
29
-20
30
-21
31
-22
32
-23
33
-24
34
-25
35
-26
36
-27
37
-28
38
-29
39
-30
40
-31
1 25
-32
2
-33
3
-34
4
-35
5
-36
6
-37
7
-38
8
-39
9
-40
10
-41
11
-42
12
-43
13
-44
14
-45
15
+
+
++
AmHLV
65
Table 16:
continued
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
21397 x
No
21456
16 •25
21475
17 •25
8303-48
18 :25
19
.
20
>
tt
-51
21
.
tt
-52
22
.
tt
-49
-50
virus type—'
ApMV
HMV
HLV
64035M
+
It
tt
21476
23
8303-54
24
it
-55
25
tt
-56
26
tt
-57
27
tt
-58
28
tt
-59
29
tt
-60
30
tt
-61
31
tt
-62
32
tt
-63
33
tt
-64
34
tt
-65
35
11
-66
36
tt
-67
37
tt
-68
38
ft
-69
39
tt
-70
40
tt
-71
1 29
-72
2
-73
3
tt
21477
4
tt
8303-75
5
tl
21478
6
tt
8303-77
7
tl
-78
8
tt
-79
9
tt
-80
10
It
-81
11
tt
-82
12
II
-83
13
tt
21479
14
tt
8303-85
15
tt
-86
16
tt
-87
17
tt
-88
18
tt
-89
19
it
-90
20
ti
tt
21
ti
- 92
22:
ii
- 93
23:
tt
21480
PNRV
-H-
++
AmHLV
66
Table 16:
continued
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
24 33
21397 x
8303-
94
No.
- 95
25
- 96
26
- 97
27
- 98
28
- 99
29
-100
30
-101
31
-102
32
-103
33
PNRV
1/
virus type—'
ApMV
HMV
HLV
64035M
++
4 +
-104
34
-105
35
-106
36
-107
37
-108
38
-109
39
+
-110
40
+
-111
1
-112
2
-113
3
-114
4
-115
5
+
plants lost - no analysis
33
21481
6
21457
7
33
8308-118
8
33
-119
9
-120
10
-121
11
-122
12
-123
13
-124
14
-125
15
-126
16
-127
17
-128
18 33
-129
19
-130
20
-131
21
-132
22
-133
23
-134
24
-135
25
-136
26
-137
27
-138
28
-139
29
-140
30
-141
31
-142
32
-143
33
AmHLV
+
67
Table 16:
concluded
1/
virus type—7
Accession
Location
Name
or Sel.
Row:Hill
or Pedigree
29 81
21397 x
8309-01
No
PNRV
ApMV
30
-03
31
-04
32
+
+
-05
33
+
+
-06
34
35
-08
36
-09
37
-10
38
-11
39
-12
40
-13
41
-14
42
-15
43
-16
44
-17
45
-18
46
-19
47
-20
48
-21
49
-22
50
-23
21 85
-24
22
-25
23
-26
24
-27
25
-28
26
-29
-30
27
28
-31
29
-32
30
-33
31
-34
32
-35
33
-36
34
21490
35
8309-38
36
-39
37
1/ PNRV
ApMV
HMV
HLV
AmHLV
AmHLV
++
++
+
++
= Prunus Necrotic Ringspot Virus (cherry type)
= Prunus Necrotic Ringspot Virus (apple type)
= Hop Mosaic Virus
= Hop Latent Virus
= American Hop Latent Virus
+ slight to moderate infection
++ heavy infection
HLV
21362M
-02
-07
HMV
- - negative
68
Early Impressions of the 1989 Oregon Hop Crop
and of the Oregon Off-Station Commercial Trials
June 20, 1989
Alfred Haunold, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
USDA 21490. Weathers.
Salem. OR.
All plants are 2-3 ft over the wire
and beginning to arm out. Some basal downy mildew spikes are beginning to dry
up; no problems for the crop. Vine growth is even, arm development is nice
from about 6 ft up; most plants have a reddish-brown stem and are very even in
development. If growth continues as it has thus far this will be an excellent
crop, probably 10 bales or more.
Perle. adjacent to USDA 21490. Growth substantially behind 21490, most
plants are reaching the top wire or are within 2-3 ft. Most plants are now
beginning to arm out but are fairly even in development. Growth at this stage
is similar to what it has been in previous years and I expect a similar
production level in 1989.
USDA 21456. Excellent development of all plants in this plot. Most
plants are 2-4 ft over the wire, sidearm development is excellent, 2-3 ft and
still growing.
Plants have a reddish-brown stem but sidearms have a green
color and no pigmentation. Thus far there is only occasional bloom, perhaps
of early-trained plants. This will be an excellent hop if development
continues as it has thus far. If warm weather should set in, this variety
will probably be in full bloom in late June or early July. There are no signs
of downy mildew and the basal growth looks very healthy and even.
Tettnanger A. USDA 21496. Plot is being irrigated today, so I cannot
walk into the field. The older planting looks acceptable but not very strong.
The younger planting, about two thirds of the 3-acre plot looks weak like a
baby crop, but there are only a few missing hills. Of the older planting most
plants are at or above the top wire; plants have a conspicuously red stem in
contrast to the adjacent "Swiss Tettnanger" (?) planting which has green
stems. Side-arms are well developed and are still growing. There is little
sign of bloom.
Yield will probably be moderate, perhaps 6 bales/acre in the
older planting. There is also some basal "browning on the bottom leaves, which
seems to be of physiological origin. A few Tettnanger plants have started to
bloom, but the side-arms are short, only about 12-20 inches long and only
about 2-4 blooms on each node on the side arms. Yield will probably be
marginal, maybe 5 bales/acre on average.
Coleman. Gervais. Oregon:
USDA 21457.
Similar development of the
plants here as in 21456 at Weathers. However, plants are somewhat behind as
compared to 21456. Most plants are 1-2 ft over the wire. An occasional plant
has started flowering. Side-arms are well developed, 2-3 ft long, and are
still growing for the most part. Plant development is even, stem color is
reddish-brown like in 21456. No signs of downy mildew. Judging from the
plant development and the beginning of bloom, this selection appears to be
about as early as 21456. It would be difficult to distinguish between the
two in a field planting based on plant growth and visible characteristics. If
plant development continues as well as it has thus far, yields should approach
10 bales/acre.
69
Stauffer. Hubbard. Oregon:
USDA 21459.
Excellent development; all
plants over the top wire by 2-4- ft and still growing vigorously.
Side-arms
still growing 2-4 ft in length, no sign of bloom. Healthy plants, no signs of
downy mildew. Yield potential at this stage is judged to be comparable to
that of previous years, 10-11 bales/acre.
Paul Serres. Woodburn. Oregon: USDA 21491. The original 3-acre plot
near the picker had to be removed because of chlordane damage dating to a
previous strawberry crop on this ground. Chlordane is nearly identical to
Heptachlor and this portion of the farm will probably never be in hops again.
USDA 21491.
Second planting east of Monitor.
Nice and even development
of these plants. Nearly all are to the top wire and some are 2-4 ft over the
wire but still growing vigorously. Thus far there is little side-arm develop
ment. An occasional plar\t is showing signs of bloom. Main stems have a
faintly reddish color but not as red as 21456 or 21457. Yield potential this
time is hard to judge, depending on the future side-arm development but it
should be a fair yield, perhaps 7-8 bales/acre. There are no signs of downy
mildew and the plot is well taken care of. The adjacent Willamette plants
have been trained on a single string in order to create an alley for picking.
There should be no danger of varietal mixtures at harvest time since the alley
is quite wide and the two plots are well separated.
good.
Adjacent Willamette planting: further ahead in development, looks very
But these plants are also one year older.
Annen Farm. Mt. Angel. Oregon: USDA 21120. This planting, slightly
above 2 acres, is on new ground that previously had not been farmed (brushland). The ground is in excellent shape, good garden-type soil. The plot was
established last year from essentially a single plant of 21120 that had been
virus tested and, consequently, this year there are missing hills and the
growth is quite uneven. Some plants are at the top wire but most are only
two-thirds to the wire. Since this is a late-maturing variety, it is expected
that there is still substantial growth ahead and a fair crop could be
expected. It will, however, not be representative of the yield potential of
this selection. Plants have a purple, deep-red colored stem, and the side-
arms have a reddish hue at the point of branching from the main stem. Most
plants are just beginning to arm out slightly and are growing quite well.
Toward the bottom portion of this nearly square plot, plants are substantially
weaker since these were the latest plantings. Some were planted in the spring
of '89 into missing hills, and these baby plants are just beginning to climb
the string. It will be at least another year before this plot produces a
representative crop. Earlier in the season this plot was very weak but these
problems have been taken care of by now and the hop plants have every chance
of excellent development. The crop in 1989, however, will be essentially a
baby crop at best, probably only a few bales/acre.
Butsch Farm (formerly Louis Berning Farm). Mt. Angel. Oregon:
USDA 21484. This is a new planting from softwood cuttings made from virusfree plants. First planting went in in mid-May, and the second planting,
about 1.5 acres, was planted in the first week of June. Excellent plant
development, no missing hills, at this stage plants are about a foot long,
have nice shoots and are growing vigorously.
They will be put on 3-ft stakes.
70
At the present time a field crew is in there hand-hoeing and cultivating with
a tractor between the rows. There is about a 20-ft space between USDA 21484
and the adjacent baby Willamette planting, an excellent buffer for harvesting
purposes. Plants have been ringed lightly with 18-18-18 fertilizer and look
very healthy. This is a rectangular plot in nearly flat ground with 26 hills
running east and west and 95 hills running north and south. The grower has
started putting 4-ft stakes in there (about 1" square cut stakes) and plants
are being trained up. This should make an excellent plot for good development
of the plants throughout the season.
Annen Brothers Farm. Mt.
Angel.
Oregon:
Banner, USDA 21287.
Nice and
even development of most plants. Nearly all plants are at or over the wire,
and side arms are coming out nicely but some plants are behind in development.
Some plants also show peculiar yellow flecks symptoms, like Hop Mosaic,
particularly on bottom leaves. This is visible on about 5% of the plants
throughout the plot. Last year and also this year Banner showed extremely
heavy infection with Downy Mildew, not only on basal shoots but also on shoots
that had been trained and turned into spikes 6-8 ft up.
I had advised the
grower to go through regularly and pick off infected spikes and shoots prior
to irrigation, which was done. The plants also received repeated Ridomil
treatment and copper (febcide) dusting.
Nevertheless many bottom spikes are
still visible throughout the plot. This will be the source of additional
infection and hopefully, if the weather turns dry from here on, there will not
be any great danger to the crop. This, however, could be an excellent mildew
breeding nursery, which would infect adjacent plantings and be a threat to
other hops in the area. The grower advised me that the adjacent Willamette
planting had little or no mildew infection thus far.
It appears that Banner is too susceptible to mildew to be grown success
fully in Oregon without extraordinary control measures.
I will, therefore,
advise the Hop Research Council that Banner should be removed from further
consideration in Oregon. Since Anheuser-Busch was the primary mover and 300
acres of Banner are already planted in the Yakima Valley and another 60 or 80
acres in Idaho, this should be of no great consequence.
Thus far there is little sign of bloom, even on plants that had fully
armed out, although an occasional terminal flower has started to burr out.
The plot will probably be in full bloom in"about two weeks, depending on
weather conditions.
It is difficult to judge the yield potential of this plot at this stage
of development. Should side-arms develop from here on as I expect they will,
this could be a good crop.
Goschie Farms, Silverton. Oregon:
development.
Tettnang B. USDA 21497.
Nice
Most plants over the wire, a few plants have started to bloom.
Side-arms are short to medium-short, particularly plants that were trained
earlier and have now started flowering. Conspicuously red stem coloration in
contrast to the adjacent Tettnangs (Swiss Tettnangs?) which have green stems.
Yield potential now is somewhat difficult to judge but will probably be
between 5 and 6 bales/acre at best.
The adjacent green-stemmed Tettnang are
at least 1 bale/acre better than the Tettnang-B.
anywhere throughout the plot.
No downy mildew visible
If the weather stays cool, side arm development
should continue, leading to a respectable crop.
Should it turn hot, plants
71
may go into an early bloom, which would probably huft the yield.
A few insects, primarily aphids, are beginning to show up in the hop
fields, but nothing serious; there are just one or two insects on an
occasional leaf.
USDA 21455. Mt. Hood. Original planting, looks nice and even but about
10 days behind in development as compared to the other three triploid Haller
tauer selections from the '84 Nursery (21456, 21457, 21459). Side-arms are
about 1 ft out, maybe 20" at the most, but still developing nicely. No sign
of bloom. An occasional plant again shows yellow fleck symptoms on bottom
leaves but very faintly and less pronounced than in past years. On previous
tests that was found not to be a virus but probably physiological in origin.
Judging at this stage of development, yield will probably be comparable or
slightly better than last year.
New Mt. Hood planting, 4 acres: This plot is on the string for the
first time, very nice and even development of all plants. They look almost as
good as the original Mt. Hood Planting, except for an occasional missing hill
and some baby plants that were replanted this spring. The yield will probably
not quite match that of the original plot but should be respectable. Thus far
the production from this new field has not yet been sold although several
dealers have shown some interest which, however, has not led to a contract
yet.
(July 10:
crop now sold for 3 years starting in 1989).
General impressions of the Oregon crop.
Since Willamette is the most
widely grown variety in Oregon, it was primarily Willamette yards that I saw.
Development generally is good to excellent, most plants are over the wire. An
occasional yard, particularly if it was picked early last year, is behind in
development but it looks like it is going to be a very good Willamette year as
far as production and growth of the plants is concerned.
Fuggle, on the other hand, is generally weak and considerably behind
last year in development. Yields will probably be down; signs of early bloom.
Tettnangs are very good in development but not as good as they were last
year.
Nugget:
Very good growth and good yield prospects.
All fields that I have seeH are clean and show excellent growth.
There
is hardly any mildew that shows on either bottom growth or vines that have
been trained. An occasional small pocket' of aphids has shown up and growers
have started to apply control measures to prevent population buildup. At this
stage the crop looks very healthy and is progressing very well.
72
July 19, 1989
Field Notes, Oregon Commercial Off-station Plots
Al Haunold, Research Geneticist, USDA-ARS
Weathers, Salem, OR:
Willamette.
This approximately five-year-old Willamette yard is again
beginning to show signs of Verticillium wilt similar to 1981.
Vascular
browning, basal swelling and some dead leaves. I am afraid it will progress
from here and might get as bad as it was last year. I don't expect any plants
to die but it could be having an effect on production. Most plants in the
field still look healthy. Some aphids are coming in and the field has just
been sprayed with Omite.
Perle.
This two-acre plot is in full bloom now.
Side-arms are about one foot
long and cones are beginning to develop. This field will probably mature
about as early as last year, about August 15-18. Yield potential at this
stage is about between 7 and 84 bales, but it could be better, depending on
the size of the cones. The plants have not been stripped; there is a lot of
bottom growth but plants look healthy. No signs of Verticillium wilt.
USDA 21490. across from Perle. Excellent development; plants are in full
bloom and probably have been so for one week. This variety seems to be almost
as early as Perle but it will probably be harvested in late August or early
September. Yield potential is at least 10 bales. Plant development is very
even. The field has just recently sprayed with Des-I-Cate because of some
bottom downy mildew spikes. Some spikes were still visible but at this stage
are probably not infective due to the Dec-I-Cate spraying. The five-acre plot
is even, and it should be an excellent crop.
USDA 21456.
Excellent development.
Very heavy crop, probably 9-10 bales.
Most plants are past full bloom now and are coning out. Harvest will probably
be about the 25th of August if development continues as well as until now. No
downy mildew spikes, but some aphid infestation.
The yard will be sprayed
with Omite in the near future.
USDA 21496. Tettnanger-A. (reddish stems) This plot is very uneven. Some
plants are fully coned out and almost ready for harvest, others are just
blooming. There is a lot of bottom bronzing, which is like the well-known
Fuggle bronzing, and it is probably of physiological origin. A substantial
number, perhaps 20 percent of replants which are essentially babies this year
will not have any production. This field will average 3-4 bales/acre at best.
The adjacent Swiss-Tettnanger (green stems) looks much better but is also
relatively uneven; some plants are fully coned out, others are just blooming.
Yield in this plot will probably be about 6 bales.
73
Coleman Ranch, Gervais, OR.
USDA 21457. Very nice and even growth. Plants are just past full bloom and
are beginning to cone out. Plants are about 4 days later in development than
USDA 21456 at Weathers; very nice and even growth. Most of the crop is in the
top one third, a typical top crop. There should not be any problem with
harvesting.
The plot has recently been sprayed with Kocide to control downy
mildew although no mildew spikes or signs of infection were evident.
Yield is
probably going to be between 9 and 10 bales/acre, but could be higher depend
ing on cone development.
Stauffer, Hubbard, OR.
USDA 21459.
Excellent development.
Plants are in full bloom now.
Some
indication of a top crop since flowers are set from about half way up the
wire. Long side-arms and. excellent secondary laterals. No signs of insect
problems or downy mildew. Production will likely be in excess of 10 bales/
acre. The variety seems to be late judging from the flowering time.
Annen Farm, Mt. Angel, OR.
USDA 21120.
Very nice development, much better than the last time I saw it
one month ago. The older plants, about one third of the yard, are over the
wire, nicely armed out, 2-4 ft arm length, and blooming quite well but have
not yet reached full bloom.
Full bloom will be in about one week.
A few
bottom spikes of downy mildew are showing but pose no big problems. The
plants have typically red stems; yield in the older planting will probably be
5 bales/acre but could be more depending on cone development. The younger
planting on the lower portion of this 2-acre plot is somewhat behind but could
still make a contribution to the yield, probably 2-3 bales/acre best. All
plants have been hilled up heavily in preparation for expanded planting
(perhaps 10 acres) in 1989. There should be plenty of strong roots (rhizomes)
for expanding this experimental plot.
Paul Serres, east of Monitor, OR.
USDA 21491.
All plants have reached the top wire.
Most are past blooming,
and about 20% are nearly fully coned out. This is surprising since I thought
this was a relatively late maturing hop. Plants are moderately armed out,
cone set is near the top, and side-arms are relatively short, which will
result in a lower than expected production. The cones are nice, compact, egg-
\f
j,
shaped, and should be a pleasure to pick. Some other plants, however, are
still in full bloom, and therefore this will be a rather uneven production.
It may well be that this plot needs another year in order to reach its full
production potential. Some plants show partially dried leaves which could
either be from mechanical damage or the beginning Verticillium problems.
However, no basal swelling or vascular browning was observed, but at this
stage it might be too early for symptoms to show. The plot and the adjacent
Willamettes recently have been sprayed with Des-I-Cate and all hills look
excellently clean and healthy, except for some dead leaves that are found on
occasional plants. There are no obvious signs of Verticillium wilt. Pro
duction potential is somewhat difficult to judge at this time but it looks
like the yield will probably be 5 bales/acre or less.
74
Butch Farms, Silverton, OR.
USDA 21484. All plants (babies, planted May and early June 1989) have been
staked with 4-ft stakes; the older ones have been trained up, the younger ones
are just beginning to climb. There are virtually no missing hills. All
plants are healthy, vigorous and are developing very well. The plot has
recently been irrigated and there are no signs of any fertility problems.
This will be an excellent yard in 1990, the first year on the string.
Herman Goschie Farms, Silverton, OR.
USDA 21497. Tettnanger-B. Most plants have reached the top wire and show good
overhang. Main stems have a reddish color. Side-arms are well developed and
many plants are nearly fully coned out, an indication of early bloom. Some
plants, however, are just blooming now or are past bloom, and this will result
in a relatively uneven production. The yard looks similar to what we had at
Weathers with 21496 (Tettnanger-A), but somewhat stronger in development.
Many plants show typical bronzing, particularly in the older leaves, similar
to symptoms that are indicative of Verticillium Wilt.
I doubt, however that
it is Verticillium Wilt since there is no vascular browning or stem swelling.
There is secondary growth coming on, late growth of either shoots that have
trained themselves or lower side-arms that have started climbing. This,
however, will not contribute to production in any significant way. Yield is
somewhat difficult to judge but it will probably be in the 4-5 bale range at
best. About 20% of the plot on the south side seem to be babies or replants,
and they will probably not contribute to production in any significant way.
They are also later and are just now in full bloom. Overall the plot is very
uneven, which is a disappointment since the planting is now in its third year.
Realistically, however, it is more like a good baby crop in the older plants
and a young baby crop on the replants. The adjacent "Swiss" Tettnangs (green
stems) look much better, are more even, have a much better set, 6-7 bale
range. About 20% of the plants are also coned out now, the others are rapidly
developing. This will be a much more even yard with better production
overall.
Mt. Hood. USDA 21455. Older planting. Nice and even development of the
plants. Most are in full bloom right now. Some indication of a top crop,
similar to what was observed in 21490 ana 21457. Little indication of yellowfleck symptoms on bottom leaves and no signs of Verticillium. Side-arms aie
nice and long, yield will probably be in the 7-8 bale range but could be
better depending on cone size.
Mt. Hood. USDA 21455. new planting. This nearly 4-acre planting is in its
first production year (first year on the string). Very nice and even
development of most plants; almost all are over the wire, are past full bloom
and are beginning to cone out. This plot looks almost better than the
original Mt. Hood planting, which now is in its fifth year (fourth production
year). However, there is still some unevenness, especially in the lower part
of the plot which will probably depress the yield. I estimate a yield of
between 5 and 6 bales, but it could be higher depending on cone size. No
disease or insect problems were noticed in this yard.
75
*Agricultural Chenistry Departnent»*Oregon State Uni uersi ty»*flgri cultural Research Service*«U S Dept Agriculture**Corualli5, Oregon*
IW2
Recession
Harvest
or
Date
t
'. X
1 Alpha Alpha
Crush
Alpha Beta * Beta Ratio CoH
Hurserv Ho
Identification
Location
1900511
LC x OP
001:53-51
07/18/89
7.6
1900611
Hybrid 3 or 1
002:53-51
07/20/89
1900711
Br Fan x OP
003:53-51
07/20/89
19008H
1900911
1901 OH
Safe
Perries -
72.1
10
31 0.19 0.00
( .00
( .00
17.1
63.0
80.1
21
13 0.18 0.00
0.00
C.00
17.0
58.6
75.7
23
21
0.20 0.00
C.00
( .00
Sensch x OP
001:53-51 07/20/89 15.9 31.1
77.0
60
30 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
Fu x Fu-S
005:53-51 07/18/89
55.3
77.8
29
33 0.20 0.00
0.00
E.00
RedU x Fu-S
006:53-51
07/21/89 31.0 31.6
65.6
17
27 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
22.6
19036H
LC x Fu-S
007:53-51 07/18/89 13.2 60.5
Fu-S x RedU-S
008:53-51
07/18/89 19.6
51.1
Calculated
Serial
HSI (3 hr) Period bility HSI6no Renain H/C Hunber
61.8
19037H
0.00
159
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
216
0.00
0
0.00
209
0.00
0
0.00
208
0.00
0
0.00
111
0.00
0
0.00
231
73.7'
18
32 0.19 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
157
73.6
27
27-0.19 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
150
1903911
Fu-S x RedU-S
009:53-51
07/18/89 13.1
31.0
77.1
56
11' 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
115-
1901011
Fu-S x Fu-S
010:53-51
07/20/89 39.9 38.6
78.5
51
28 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
219
1901111
EGr x OP
011:53-51
07/21/89 21.5 56.0
80.5
30
53 0.18 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
221
1901311
BelgBur x Fu-S 012:53-51 07/20/89 26.2 50.1
76.5
31
23 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
211
37.2 38.2
75.5
19
23 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
269
68.7
11
53 0.18 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
153
0
0.00
116
0
0.00
12
0
0.00
213
0
0.00
118
1901111
Fu x Fu-S
013:53-51
07/25/89
19016(1
LC-S x Fu-S
011:53-51
07/18/89
9.5
1901711
Elsasser x Fu-S 015:53-51 07/18/89
38.0
39.8
77.9
19
36 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
O.00
1901811
Fu-S x RedU-S
016:53-51 07/10/89 11.2
36.2
77.1
53
28 0.23 0.31
0 00
0.00
0.00
29
20 0.18 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
32
39 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
59.2
19058(1
Ea Gr x OP
018:53-51
07/20/89 21.5 52.0
73.5
19060(1
EKG.x Bau-S
019:53-51
07/18/89 23.3 18.8
72.1
1906111
LGp x Fu-S
020:53-51 07/20/89 17.8
1906211
EKG x Bav-S
021:53-51
61.1
81.9
22
28 0.18 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
212
07/20/89
11.7
37.2
81.9
55
27 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
215
33.1
19.6
83.0
10
27 0.19 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
201
07/06/89 25.7 12.7
68.3
38
31 0.23 0.32
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
8
Catslailx1900911021:53-51
07/06/89
36.3
29.7
66.0
55
21 0.26 0.36
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
1
025:53-51
07/19/89
28.8
51.5
80.3
36
23 0.19 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
189
08/02/89
39.1
301
1908511
Land x(GCxFu-S) 022:53-51 07/20/89
19170(1
OP x 51-17
1917211
1917311
Striessx73-28
023:53-51
19182)1
Bu x 59-11
026:53-51
32.1
71.8
55
29 0.25 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
1913311
Tux 118
027:53-51 07/06/89 35.3 32.2
67.6
52
26 0.26 0.35
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
1
2100911
6735-00211
028:53-51 07/20/89
53.3
25.1
78.7
69
20 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
206
2101711
6220-00911
029:53-51
12.3
37.3
79.6
53
11 0.23 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
191
2101811
6321-00111
030:53-51 08/02/89 23.6 52.5
76.1
31
29 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
305
21058(1
6305-00811
011:57-58
07/06/89
28.1
11.1
72.8
39
33 0.22 0.12
0. 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
18
21059H
6321-010(1
012:57-58
07/19/89
16.0
60.2
76.3
21
26 0.19 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
181
2106011
6321-01111
013:57-58 07/11/89
21.9
16.3
71.2
35
27 0.21 1.88
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
109
21061(1
6322-010(1
011:57-58
11.2
58.7
73.0
20
21 0.20 0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0
0.00
253
21061(1
6611-002(1
023:57-58 07/19/89 21.1
55.3
76.8
28
38 0.19 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
185
07/19/89
07/21/89
2106511
6616-013M
012:57-58
07/19/89
16.9
20.3
67.2
70
12 0.27 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
181
2106711
6616-05111
010:57-58
07/21/89
17.8 31.7
79.5
60
11 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
251
2106911
6618-03711
016:57-58
07/12/89
15.9
28.5
71.1
62
23 0.26 0.31
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
75
21070H
6618-01311
017:57-58 07/25/89
57.1
23.1
80.5
71
31
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
261
0.21 0.00
2107111
6618-01611
018:57-58 08/02/89 51.8 26.2
78.0
66
31 0.210.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
311
2107211
6620-02811
019:57-58
77.2
56
12 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
266
219
07/25/89
13.1
31.0
2107611
6806-11511
020:57-58 07/21/89
19.5
31.0
80.5
61
37 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
21087«
Yugo 3/3
Vugo 5/10
Yugo 12/17
015:57-58 07/12/89
13.8 19.5
63.3
69
22 0.27 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
71
2108911
2109011
2110811
»l
1989 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 1990
7006-030H
017:57-58 07/21/89 19.6
25.1
75.0
66
11 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
262
018:57-58 08/02/89 39.7
33.1
72.8
55
11 0.25 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
311
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
210
239
017:53-51 07/20/89
19.8
33.3
83.1
60
23 0.23 0.00
0. 00
2110911
7006-091(1
008:55-56 07/21/89 56.1
23.7
80.1
70
18 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
2111011
7007-018(1
010:55-56 07/20/89 52.3 29.2
81.1
61
23 0.210.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
217
2111711
Nat Wisconsin
019:57-58 07/21/89 30.9 11.3
75.2
11
38 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
237
211181
6667-025M
020:55-56
07/18/89 25.0 13.5
68.5
36
23 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
160
2111911
7001-05011
021:57-58 07/21/89
75.7
1
55 0.19 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0
0.00
257
2.9
72.8
76
-.
.
- 2-
*Agricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State University»*Hgricultural Research Seruice**U S Dept Hgriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1939 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 19
Accession o
Harvest
r
t Alpha Alpha
Crush
Pernea-
Calculated
Serial
Identification
Location
Date
21129H
6803-09011
022:57-58
07/21/89
10.0
36.5
76.5
52
12
0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
21130(1
6903-02111
030:57-58
07/10/39
16.0
62.1
78.1
20
27 0.18 2.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
36
21132(1
6903-23111
032:57-58 07/21/89 37.9 17.5
85.1
11
26 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
215
2113311
6906-098(1
015:57-58 03/02/89 50.2 26.2
76.1
66
23 0.28 0.00
0;00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
312
21131(1
7005-121(1
013:55-56
30.3
75.3
60
30 0.25 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
258
2113511
7006-1130n
039:57-58 07/06/89 38.0 35.5
73.5
52
22 0.210.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
21
2113611
7006-32311
011:57-58 07/19/89 37.2 12.5
79.7
17
21
0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0
0.00
187
21137H
7006-31011
013:57-58 07/19/89 31.8 19.1
80.9
39
18 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
176
2111111
6222-001H
011:57-58
16.1
72.1
36
39 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
267
21181H
Hale Conet?
016:55-56 07/21/89 50.3 29.8
80.1
63
36 0.210.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
210
21231(1
S. flfr. HP2/55 026:57-58 08/02/89 17.1 15.0
32.1
53
21 0.31 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
310
2123511
S Af PH 2/16
027:57-58 08/02/89 38.2 31.2
72.1
53
16 0.25 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
313
07/21/89
07/25/89
Alpha Beta <• Beta Ratio CoH
Safe
Nursery Ho
15.0
26.3
HSI (3 hr) Period bility
HSI6no Renain H/C Hunber
261
2123611
S flf PH 2/155
028:57-58 08/02/89 29.2 32.8
62.0
1?
20 0.26 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
302
2123711
S Af PH 1/10
029:57-58 07/21/89 33.2 28.9
62.2
53
21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
263
0.210.00
21237H
S Af PH 1/10
029:57-58 08/02/89 32.0 23.1
55.1
58
18 0.27 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
306
2126211
7302-095(1
038:53-51
17.8
73.5
76
28 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
226
21263(1
7302-10511
039:53-51 07/19/89 52.7 22.3
75.0
70
32 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
193
2126111
7302-18811
051:53-51 07/06/89 52.9 18.6
71.5
71
22 0.25 0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
12
2126511
7303-105H
031:55-56 07/21/89 53.3 22.2
75.5
71
21 0.25 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
260
21266H
7303-135(1
032:55-56 07/21/89 62.1 19.0
81.1
77
29 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
233
2126711
7303-13811
033:55-56
20.1
82.3
75
30 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
212
21268(1
7306-013(1
018:55-56 07/06/89 52.9 20.2
73.2
72
27 0.25 0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
10
21269(1
7307-02111
051:55-56 07/18/89 57.7 22.6
80.3
72
17 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
151
21270H
7307-035H
052:55-56
07/21/89
51.3
23.3
77.6
70
11 0.210.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
222
2127111
7308-00911
053:55-56
07/21/89
52.7
19.8
72.5
73
21 0.26 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
256
2127211
7308-03711
002:59-60
07/19/89
17.2
31.1
78.6
60
19 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
165
21273(1
7311-12211
013:59-60 08/02/89 62.3 15.8
78.1
80
32 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
307
2127111
7311-11111
015:59-60 07/19/89 56.6 21.5
81.1
70
33 0.210.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
179
2127511
7313-01711
028:59-60 07/19/89 51.7 19.9
71.6
73
30 0.26 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
163
21300(1
7006-08111
115:13-11 07/18/89 17.0 35.3
82.3
57
18 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
132
07/21/89
07/21/89
55.7
61.8
2130211
7006-18711
117:13-11 07/10/89 15.2 31.7
76.9
59
23 0.210.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
37
2130311
7007-02111
118:13-11 07/13/89 39.7 38.3
73.0
51
22 0.22 0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
96
2130111
7007-252M
119:13-11
31.3
81.6
62
25 0.21 0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
92
21305(1
7007-278(1
121:13-11 07/13/89 16.1 35.9
07/13/89
50.3
82.2
56
21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
130
0.20 0.00
21306H
7613-02511
118:15-16 07/18/89 52.5 17.6
70.1
75
31 0.21 0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
118
21307H
7613-01211
119:15-16
81.2
73
21 0.27 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
286
07/26/89
59.6
21.6
2130811
7613-011(1
123:15-15
07/21/89
60.9
17.9
78.8
77
19 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
235
2130911
7613-105H
121:15-16
07/21/39
51.1
21.5
78.9
69
19 0.210.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
231
21310(1
7613-128H
113:17-18 07/11/89 53.7 20.2
73.9
73
31
0.26 0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
56
2131111
7611-108(1
118:17-18 07/26/89 57.3 20.2
77.5
71
25 0.27 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
295
323
21311(1
7611-1OEM
118:17-18 08/02/89 50.9 17.9
68.8
71
25 0.26 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
21313H
7302-036(1
031:53-51 07/06/89 52.7 21.3
76.9
68
25 0.25 0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
7
2131111
7302-063H
036:53-51 07/12/89 58.2 23.9
82.1
71
21 0.23 0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
78
21315H
7302-125(1
010:53-51 07/10/89 52.6 22.1
75.1
70
29 0.25 0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
18
2131611
7302-12711
011:53-51 07/06/89 10.8 27.8
68.6
59
30 0.28 0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
11
21317(1
7302-15311
013:53-51 07/19/89 58.9 19.6
78.5
75
28 0.210.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
183
21318(1
7302-15511
011:53-51 07/06/89 17.1 22.9
70.3
67
29 0.28 0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
2
21319(1
7302-166H
015:53-51 07/10/89 61.3 19.0
80.3
76
29 0.210.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
17
2132011
7302-17111
016:53-51 07/19/89 56.5 21.5
78.0
72
26 0.26 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
191
2132111
7302-17111
017:53-51 07/25/89 51.8 27.2
79.0
66
32 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
268
77
- 3-
*Agricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State Universitv**Agricultural Research Seruice»«U S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 1990
Accession
Nursery Ho
Harvest
or
Identificatior
Location
Date
X '. X
X Alpfc Alpha
Crush
Safe
Pernea-
Serial
Calc ulated
Alpha Beta ♦ Beta Rati o CoH HSI (3 hr) Period bility HSI6no Rwain H/C Hunber
21322(1
7302-18311
018:53-51
07/11/89
13.8
26.9
70.8
62
2?
0.25 0.12
C.00
[ .00
c.00
0
[ .00
21323M
7302-181(1
018:53-51
07/11/89
52.0
21.1
76.1
68
22 0.23 0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
51
21321(1
7302-18611
050:53-51
07/19/89 18.0
9.1
27.1
66
27 0.27 0.00
0.00
c .00
c.00
0
c .00
180
2132511
7303-009M
052:53-51
07/20/89 59.1
21326H
7303-119(1
031:55-56 07/21/89
2132711
7303-15911
2132811
2132911
2133011
101
22.2
81.1
73
31 0.21 0.00
0.'00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
201
52.1 20.2
72.6
72
27 0.26 0.00
0.00
c.00
c.00
0
0.00
255
036:55-56
07/06/89 17.5 20.5
68.1
70
33 0.28 0.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
3
7303-16511
037:55-56
07/10/89
52.5
23.3
75.8-
69
31
0.25 0.17
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
39
7301-08511
038:55-56
07/12/89
51.9
20.8
75.7
72
22 0.25 0.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
76
77.9
71
30 0.21 0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
71
0.00
0
0.00
68
155
7301-105M
010:55-56
07/12/89
55.0 22.9
2133111
7301-12311
011:55-55
07/12/89
55.3 19.5
71.9
71
23 0.26 0.31
0.00
0.00
21332H
7301-11811
012:55-56
07/18/89
53.3 21.8
75.1
71
27 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
21333(1
7301-197(1
016:55-56
07/06/89 18.5 20.1
68.9
70
27 0.26 0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
9
213331
7308-023(1
055:55-56
07/12/89. 51.9 17.8
69.7
71
26 0.25 0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
70
2133611
7309-001H
003:59-60 07/06/89 18.1 18.8
66.9
72
23 0.26 0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
22
2133711
7309-031(1
001:59-60 07/06/89 13.1 22.2
65.3
66
18 0.26 0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
27
2133811
7309-01511
005:59-60
07/06/89 36.6 11.8
51.1
71
25 0.29 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
23
21338(1
7309-01511
005:59-60 07/21/89 51.5 17.6
72.2
76
21 0.25 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
220
21339H
7311-012tT
008:59-60
07/11/89 18.2 22.7
71.0
68
33 0.27 0.35
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
107
2131011
7311-02011
009:59-60 07/25/89 55.6 22.1
77.8
72
33 0.25 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
270
21312(1
7311-11111
012:59-60 07/19/89 50.6 18.3
68.9
73
21 0.28 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
171
223
18.9
73.6
71
35 0.26 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
22.2
73.7
70
30 0.28 0.11
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
31
017:59-60
07/11/89 52.9 20.3
73.3
72
21 0.27 0.31
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
55
7312-02811
018:59-60
07/10/89 52.5
21.9
71.5
71
31
0.26 0.33
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
33
7312-03311
020:59-60
07/06/89
25.2
65.1
61
31 0.28 0.36
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
17
7312-01311
021:59-60 07/21/39 18.6 22.1
71.1
68
29 0.26 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
216
2131311
7311-135H
011:59-60
21311(1
7311-112H
016:59-60 07/10/89
07/21/89 51.7
2131511
7312-01711
2131611
21317(1
2131811
51.5
39.9
2131911
7312-07911
022:59-60
07/19/89
56.5 22.5
79.0
72
29 0.25 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
167
21350(1
7312-088(1
023:59-60
07/11/89
51.3
71.0
69
29 0.25 0.33
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
100
22.7
2135111
7313-015(1
026:59-60
07/11/89 17.5 26.7
71.2
61
27 0.26 0.32
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
102
2135211
7311-001(1
030:59-60
07/19/89 51.9 21.1
76.3
68
30 0,25 0.00
0. 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
173
21353(1
7311-01911
031:59-60
07/21/89
51.9 19.6
71.5
71
29 0.25 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
221
21351(1
7311-023(1
032:59-60
07/19/89
51.5
79.1
69
31 0.21 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
171
2135511
7311-018H
033:59-60
07/21/89 57.7 19.6
77.1
75
30 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
211
7311-08611
031:59-60 07/19/89 56.0 22.2
78.2
72
31 0.210.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
172
21356(1
21.9
2135711
7311-10911
036:59-60
07/19/89 52.2
22.6
71.8
70
37 0.25 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
168
21358(1
7315-03111
037:59-60
07/19/89
27.1
75.6
61
35 0.26 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
188
18.6
2135911
7315-051H
038:59-60
07/19/89
51.9
25.1
80.3
68
33 0.21 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
161
2136011
7506-03511
011:59-60
07/11/89
15.2
31.5
79.7
57
26 0.22 0.27
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
105
2136111
7506-207(1
050:59-60
07/12/89 13.2 31.0
71.2
58
20 0.21 0.12
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
69
21362H
7505-235(1
051:59-60
07/13/89
39.9 37.5
77.1
52
28 0.22 0.31
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
38
2136311
7507-107(1
052:59-60
07/12/89 10.3 28.6
68.9
58
29 0.21 0.32
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
65
26 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
218
22 0.20 0.21
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
20
0
0. 00
119
21363(1
7507-10711
052:59-60 07/20/39 50.3 29.7
80.0
63
21361H
7507-117(1
053:59-60 07/06/89
77.5
35
27.5 50.0
21371H
7308-020(1
051:55-56 07/18/89 13.2 28.3
71.1
60
27 0.25 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
2137S1
7501-01011
050:57-58 07/21/89
38.6 12.6
81.1
18
22 0.20 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0, 00
230
21376(1
7501-10111
052:57-58 07/19/89 21.9 53.3
75.3
29
25 0.20 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
178
2137711
7501-12111
053:57-58 07/19/89 22.0 27.5
19.6
11
28 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
186
21378H
7506-01111
055:57-58 07/19/89 55.8 22.1
78.0
72
28 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
195
07/11/89 35.1 33.2
21379H
7506-05711
011:59-60
2138011
7506-10011
016:59-60 07/11/89 18.2
32.1
68.7
52
28 0.21 0.31
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
103
80.5
60
28 0.22 0.29
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
101
♦Agricultural
Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State Oniversity**Agricultural Research Service**0 S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1939 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 1930
Accession
Nursery Nc
Harvest
or
Identificatio i Location
Date
X\
t
X Alpha fllph a
Crush
Alpha Beta * Beta Rati o CoH
Safe
Pernea-
Calculated
Serial
HSI (3 hr) Period bility HSI6no Renain H/C Hunber
21381H
7506-182(1
019:59-60 07/13/89 27.3 52.9
80.2
31
21
0.20 0.27
( .00
LOO
0.00
0
LOO
32
2111511
7003-068(1
113:13-11
81.0
66
13 0.22 0.31
C.00
C.00
[ .00
0
c.00
91
120
07/13/89
55.1
28.6
2111611
7007-275(1
120:13-11
07/18/89
11.8
35.2
76.9
51
23 0.21 0.31
£.00
i .00
( .00
0
[ .00
21117H
7610-11211
113:15-16
07/10/89
56.7
18.1
71.8
76
31 0.21 0.33
0.00
C.00
c.00
0
c.00
31
21119(1
7613-00111
117:15-16 07/26/89 51.0 27.5
78.5
65
30 0.25 0.00
C.00
I .00
t .00
0
[ .00
291
2112011 •
7611-02611
111:17-28 07/20/89 19.6 22.9
72.5
68
30 0.25 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
196
21121(1
7611-01711
115:17-18 07/20/89
58.2
21.3
79.5-
73
23 0.23 0.00
0.00
C.00
c.00
0
0.00
202
2112211
7611-05211
116:17-28
59.2
21.3
80.5
71
28 0.25 0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
318
07/11/89
21123(1
7615-15111
122:17-18 08/02/89 12.9 27.7
70.6
61
27 0.25 0.00
2112111
7701-032H
113:19-20 07/18/69 29.5 11.0
70.5
12
35 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
117
2112511
7702-00911
111:19-20 07/20/89 30.2 51.2
81.1
37
19 0.19 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
207
2112611
7703-03111
120:19-20 07/11/89 13.0 36.9
79.9
51
20 0.23 0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
58
2112711
7701-01211
122:19-20 07/11/89 18.5 19.9
38.1
18
20 0.27 0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0
0.00
50
2112811
7706-010(1
115:21-22 07/20/89 36.6 11.1
80.7
15
30 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
197
2112911
7710-03311
119:21-22 07/21/89 27.7 53.3
81.0
31
25 0.19 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
238
21132(1
7715-015(1
115:23-21
11.8
77.5
16
21 0.20 0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
51
21133(1
7717-01911
117:23-21 07/06/89 39.7 33.7
73.5
51
26 0.22 0.30
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0
0.00
26
2113111
7717-022H
118:23-21 07/06/89 31.2 39.3
73.6.
17
20 0.22 0.55
0 00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
28
07/11/89
35.7
2113511
7721-019(1
123:23-21 07/11/89 51.9 26.6
81.5
67
16 0.23 0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
19
2113611
7722-01911
113:25-26 07/13/89 56.8 21.6
81.3
70
11 0.23 0.32
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
81
21137(1
7727-001(1
115:25-26 07/11/89 50.0 21.7
71.7
67
31 0.23 0.31
0 00
0 .00
0.00
0
0 00
S3
21138(1
7727-03611
117:25-26 07/06/89 29.1 16.1
15.8
61
28 0.26 0.50
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
15
2111111
7302-01611
033:53-51
07/12/89
51.6
25.7
77.3
67
32 0.25 0.85
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
77
21115(1
7305-09211
039:55-56
07/12/89
51.6
20.1
75.0
73
36 0.25 0.32
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
81
07/11/89
37.2
2111611
7310-00711
007:59-60
29.8
67.0
56
31 0.21 0.38
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
60
21116H
7310-00711
007:59-60 07/19/89 18.2 30.2
78.1
61
30 0.23 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
166
2111711
7313-098(1
029:59-60 07/19/89 19.3 25.8
75.1
66
30 0.25 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
162
2111811
7506-08111
013:59-60 07/19/89 18.5 35.9
81.1
58
25 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
170
21119(1
7506-09611
015:59-60
75.6
60
33 0.23 0.33
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
15
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
13
0
0. 00
198
13
07/10/89
15.3
30.3
21161H
7613-089(1
122:15-16 07/10/39 53.3 22.6
76.0
70
39 0.26 0.36
2116211
7703-00511
118:19-20 07/20/89 16.1 36.0
82.1
56
31 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
21163(1
7717-00711
116:23-21
30.6
71.1
57
23 0.23 0.28
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
21161M
7727-03311
116:25-26 07/13/89 21.2 56.2
77.1
27
29 0.19 0.15
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
99
21165(1
7301-181(1
032:53-51 07/19/89 15.8 25.9
71.7
61
29 0.25 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
190
07/06/89
10.5
21166(1
7302-05211
035:53-51 07/10/89 60.8 21.1
82.0
71
21 0.23 0.32
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
11
2116711
7302-111(1
012:53-51
79.7
63
30 0.21 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
211
07/20/89
50.1
29.5
21168H
7302-02811
053:53-51
07/06/89
15.5
27.9
73.1
62
29 0.26 0.31
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
5
2118711
7711-032M
121:21-22
07/11/89
33.1
32.1
65.9
51
27 0.23 0.33
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
61
2118811
7506-16111
017:59-60 07/10/89 39.2 39.2
78.1
50
20 0.21 0.36
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
11
2118911
7611-108(1
051:59-60
55.2
56
11 0.26 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
29
07/06/89
30.7
21.5
2118911
7611-108H
051:59-60
07/21/89
16.9
23.7
70.6
66
35 0.25 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
229
2153911
8303-01611
123:01-02
07/17/89
37.7
32.7
70.1
51
20 0.21 0.11
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
111
21510H
8303-10611
111:03-01 08/02/89 39.8 31.8
71.6
53
21 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
335
2151111
8308-02711
120:05-06 07/18/89 32.9 39.5
72.1
15
21 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
136
21512(1
8308-0110
122:05-06 07/18/89 28.1 36.7
61.8
13
21 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
137
2151311
8308-017(1
123:05-06 07/18/89 31.7 37.0
71.7
18
23 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. DO
111
21511(1
8308-057(1
125:05-06 07/13/89 38.3 33.3
71.7
53
26 0.23 0.29
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
85
21516(1
8309-00311
111:09-10 07/18/89 22.1 11.9
67.0
33
23 0.20 0.00
0. 00
0. DO
0. 00
0
0. 00
126
21517(1
8309-001(1
115:09-10 07/12/89 29.1 11.9
71.1
39
16 0.21 0.80
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
73
8309-01811
116:09-10 07/12/89 30.7 11.8
75.5
11
21 0.21 0.31
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 10
79
21518H
79
*Rgricultural Chenistry Oepartnent»»0regon State University**Agricultural Research Service**0 S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 1990
Accession or
Nursery Ho Identification Location
Harvest
Date
Serial
l.X
X Alpha Alpha
Crush Safe Pernea- Calculated
Alpha Beta ' Beta Ratio CoH HSI (3 hr) Period bility HSI6no Renain H/C Hunber
2160311
7702-023(1
116:19-20 07/11/89
35.0
76.6
51
30 0,23 0.28
2160111
7722-011(1
121:23-21 07/06/89 30.6 37.6
63.2
15
31
51060H
219-5
002:55-56
07/21/89
11.1
67.7
78.9
11
31
0.17 0.00
5106111
219-1
003:55-56
07/21/39
33.1
17.3
80.1
11
19
0.19 0.00
5110111
221-2
001:55-56 08/02/89
51111(1
221-1
11.6
16.9 19.2
66.1
26
26 0.22 0.00
005:55-55 07/12/89 18.1 50.0
68.1
27
25 0.22 0.30
60.6
76.2
20
31 0.18 0.00
07/21/89 12.2 57.1
69.6
18
27 0.22 0.00
52010(1
19160 x OP
006:55-56 07/21/89 15.6
5201511
19063 x OP
009:55-56
5811111
BB 321-1,5
011:55-55 07/21/89
23.5 51.3
77.8
30
0
0.21 0.35
00
00
0
00
0 00
63
00
16
00
235
00
232
00
303
0 00
67
00
251
00
259
0.19 0.00
00
211
65 0.21 0.00
00
218
29
60013(1
Ariz 1-2
015:55-56 07/21/89 39.7 31.0
70.3
56
6001311
Ariz 1-2
015:55-56 08/02/89 13.9 29.1
73.3
60
61 0.25 0.00
00
0,
60023H
Colo 1-1
017:55-56 08/02/S9 32.0 39.6
71.6
15
16
0.21 0.00
00
0,
00
00
301
00
308
Colo 2-1
018:55-56 07/06/89 37.6 31.1
69.0
51
63
0.25 0.32
00
0,
00
6
Colo 2-3
019:55-56
30.2
73.1
59
19 0.21 0.37
00
0,
00
72
0 00
0
07/12/89
13.0
63011(1
19012 x 19011H 022:55-56 07/18/89 20.0 51.1
71.1
27
28 0.21 0.00
63012(1
BG x 58015(1
023:55-56 07/11/89 58.8 23.2
82.0
72
16
630131
BG x 5801511
021:55-56 07/18/89 11.9 31.9
73.7
57
50 0.23 0.00
63015H
BGCBG x 1906211) 026:55-56 07/18/89 53.5 25.3
78.8
68
27 0.23 0.00
00
0.25 0.33
0 00
0
0
0 00
161
0
0, 00
106
0
0 00
151
0
0 00
152
0
0 00
225
00
0, 00
0
0, 00
108
0
0 00
00
0,
0
0, 00
0
0 00
175
00
156
0.23 0.00
6301611
BG x 58015(1
28.1
82.3
66
51
6301711
BGCBG x 19062(1) 028:55-56 07/11/89 38.7 30.7
69.5
56
29 0.25 0.39
6102711
BG(BG x 19062(1) 033:57-58 07/10/89 12.0 31.8
73.8
57
31 0.21 0.33
61028H
BG<BG x 19062(1) 031:57-58 07/11/89 38.5 32.8
71.3
51
21 0.27 0.35
61031(1
BG(BG x 19062(1) 037:57-58 07/19/89
12.2 36.2
78.1
51
35 0.23 0.00
6103211
Zattler 2L1180P 029:55-56 07/18/89 18.1 53.1
71.7
26
27 0.20 0.00
61033(1
Zattler 2L1180P 030:55-56 07/18/89 31.1
71.5
12
20 0.22 0.00
00
158
00
252
027:55-56 07/21/89 51.1
13.3
00
0
6103611
Zattler 7K1910P 003:57-58 07/21/89
28.1
19.7
77.3
35
19 0.19 0.00
6103711
Zattler 7K1910P 001:57-58 07/12/89
29.5 19.6
79.1
37
20 0.20 1.95
00
00
61105M
Uye
Uye
Uye
Uye
Uye
37.7
71.8
17
52
0.22 0.00
65031H
HaCHa x 1901011) 038:57-58 07/19/89 26.9 17.3
71.1
36
19
0.21 0.00
65037(1
Ha(Ha x
08/02/89 15.3 32,2
77.5
58
23 0,23 0.00
6110111
61102H
61103(1
6110111
Ho. 15
Ho. 321
08 79
11/56/288
15/56/118
76.0
59
21
33.9
72.8
53
39 0.23 0.29
0 00
0
0
0 00
007:57-58 07/06/89 12.2 35.5
77.7
51
11
0.21 0.30
00
0
0
0 00
21
11.9 20.0
61.9
63
36 0.26 0.00
0
0 00
228
0
0 00
192
00
177
006:57-58 07/06/89 38.8
008:57-58
07/21/89
009:57-58 07/19/89 31.1
010:57-58
7301-00811
031:53-51 07/20/89 56.0 25.9
81.9
68
32 0.21 0.00
7303-052(1
055:53-51
23.0
73.3
69
31
7713-019(1
80
169
11.7 31.1
005:57-58 07/19/89
0.23 0.00
16
110
07/12/89 50.1
113:23-21 07/06/89 39.7 26.1
65.8
60
0,
00
00
0.26 0.33
00
309
00
205
00
66
00
29 0.23 0.30
0
11
0 00
25
52
7718-018H
120:23-21
07/11/89 32.9 36.2
69.1
18
27 0.22 0.33
8301-00311
126:03-01 08/02/89 36.2 37.0
73.2
19
20 0.25 0.00
0
0 00
321
0
0, 00
279
0
0 00
285
0
0, 00
299
0
0 00
339
116
00
8301-01111
113:01-02 07/25/89 27.2 18.6
75.8
36
20 0.20 0.00
8301-03111
118:07-08 07/25/89 29.6 15.3
71.9
39
16 0.22 0.00
8301-07311
116:01-02 07/26/39 29.7 17.0
76.7
39
21
0.21 0,00
8302-00111
117:01-02 08/02/89 30.1 11.9
75.3
10
21
0.22 0.00
00
0
8302-00311
118:01-02 07/17/89 20.9 12.7
63.6
33
23 0.21 1.15
00
0
0 00
8302-00711
119:07-08 07/18/89 23.9 13.2
67.2
36
26 0.20 0.00
00
0
0 00
125
8302-009H
119:01-02 07/21/89 30.9 11.7
72.6
13
20 0.21 0.00
00
0
0 00
250
8302-017(1
120:01-02 07/20/89 32.6 16.7
79.3
11
19 0.21 0.00
00
0
0 00
200
76.0
12
20 0.21 0.00
00
0
0 00
217
00
0
0, 00
336
0
0, 00
199
8303-002(1
121:01-02 07/21/89 31.7 11.3
8303-01111
122:01-02 08/02/89 26.2 37.1
63.5
11
20 0.21 0.00
8303-02111
121:01-02 07/20/89 27.6 18.1
75.7
36
20 0.21 0.00
80
- 6-
»Agricultural Chenistry Departnent**Oregon State University**flgricultural Research Seruice**U S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 1990
Harvest
Accession or
Nursery Ho
Identificatio
X.
flloha
X
Beta
Calculated
X fllph 3 Alpr a
Crush
Safe Pernea♦ Beta Rati o CoH HSI (3 hr) Period bility HSISno Renain
Serial
Location
Oate
8303-03111
125:01-02
07/26/89
28.2 11.1
72.6
39
21
0.22 0.00
( ,00
LOO
0.00
0
( .00
298
8303-031ft
125:01-02
03/02/89
26.8
67.1
10
20 0.21 0.00
C.00
t ,00
c .00
0
[ .00
333
10.6
H/C Hunber
8303-01811
121:07-08
08/02/89
39.3
29.8
69.1
57
20 0.21 0.00
( .00
( .00
c .00
0
C.00
319
8303-051(1
127:01-02
07/17/89
28.9
13.2
72.0
10
20 0.21 0.92
C.00
C.00
0.00
0
0.00
112
8303-079(1
128:01-02
08/02/89
12.1
29.3
71.7
59
22 0.26 0.00
[ .00
r. .00
c .00
0
[ .00
330
8303-080(1
113:03-01 07/17/89
10.1 31,1
71.2
56
23 0.23 0.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
111
22 0.23 0.00
8303-138(1
123:07-08 08/02/89
29.5
13.9
73.1
10
0301-001(1
115:03-01
21.7
16.5
71.1
35 •23
0.22 2.02
07/17/89
0 .00
c .00
0.00
0
0.00
329
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
115
8301-01311
117:03-01
07/18/89
19,1
52.0
71.1
27
25
0.21 0.00
0.00
c .00
0.00
0
0.00
131
8301-02111
119:03-01
07/25/89
29.7
39.7
69.1
13
13 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
283
8301-033(1
120:03-01
08/02/89
30.1
11.1
71.8
12
19 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
332
8301-036(1
121:03-01
07/26/89
32.1
13,9
76.0
12
22 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
296
8301-03611
121:03-01
08/02/89
31.7
11.2
75.9
16
20 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
D.00
328
8301-0S2H
122:03-01
08/02/89
30.0
12.5
72.5
11
20 0,22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 .00
333
8301-07611
123:03-01 07/17/89
31.1 36.0
67.1
17
22 0.26 0,71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
113
8301-088(1
121:07-08
27.6
73.6
38
23 0.21 0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0
0 00
123
07/13/89
15.9
8305-00311
126:03-01
07/26/89
32.1
35.1
67.8
18
22 0.23 0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0
0 00
300
8305-006(1
121:03-01
08/02/89
30.3
36.0
66.1
16
22 0.27 0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0
0 00
331
8305-02311
127:03-01
07/26/89
25.7 15.9
71.5
36
19 0.22 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0 00
297
8305-023(1
127:03-01
08/02/89
21.6
19.5
71.1
33
20 0,21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
337
8306-00SI1
126:07-08
07/25/89
10.8
32.3
73.1
56
19 0.23 0.00
0 00
0 .00
0 00
0
0 00
281
8307-00211
111:05-06 07/18/89
36.5 38.1
71.6
19
20 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
139
8307-001(1
115:05-06
07/18/89
38.1
31.2
72.3
53
22 0.23 0.11
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
121
8303-01011
117:05-06
07/25/89
38.5
30.2
68.7
56
20 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
282
8308-01111
118:05-06
08/02/89
37.1
35.6
73.0
51
19 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
331
8308-01111
119:05-06
07/18/89
31.0
36,5
70.5
18
25 0.22 0.50
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
122
8308-051(1
127:07-08
07/13/89
31.0
37.7
71.8
17
21 0.23 1.11
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
97
25.7
62.8
59
21 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
326
278
8303-056H
121:05-06
08/02/89
37.0
8308-06ai
127:05-06
07/25/89
13.1
31.8
75.1
58
19 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0 00
8309-02011
113:07-08
07/13/89
39.5
35.1
71.9
53
36 0.22 0.32
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
93
8309-025(1
111:07-08
08/02/89 31.9
38.7
70.6
15
21
0.23 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0, 00
325
8309-026(1
115:07-08
07/13/89
21,1
39.6
63.7
38
27 0,23 0.19
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
8309-02811
116:07-08
07/13/89
27.1
19.1
76.3
36
26
0.20 0.66
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0. 00
8309-032(1
117:07-08
07/13/89
31.5
11.1
75.6
12
2?
0.21 0.30
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
86
8101-09311
118:09-10
07/16/89
19.9
13.5
63.1
31
22
0.21 1.60
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
117
8101-105(1
119:09-10
08/02/89
19.5 18.0
8102-089(1
121:09-10
07/18/89 10.7
8102-092(1
122:09-10
07/13/89
8102-121(1
121:09-10
07/25/89
8102-172(1
125:09-10
8103-01SM
126:09-10
8103-027(1
87 _
83'
67.5
73
25 0,26 0,00
0. 00
0, 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
320
33.8
71.5
55
19 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
121
39.6
25.1
61.7
61
28 0.21 0.33
0. 00
0. DO
0. 00
0
0. 00
90
37.1
31.3
68.8
51
20 0.26 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
280
07/18/89
38.1
30.6
68.9
56
23 0.21 0.11
0. 00
0, 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
123
08/02/89
30.1 15.9
76.0
10
20 0,21 0.00
0. DO
0. 00
0. 00
0
0, 00
322
127:09-10 08/02/89 11.7 30.6
75.3
59
17 0.22 0.00
0. 00
0, 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
321
8103-028(1
128:09-10
8103-072(1
113:11-12 07/18/83
07/25/89
8103-11511
111:11-12
8101-033t1
115:11-12 07/25/89
07/25/89
29.1
75.9
61
17 0.21 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
271
33.1 31.1
16.1
67.5
50
20 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. DO
0. 00
0
0. DO
127
32.2
69.0
53
16 0.21 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
273
15.2 28.5
73.7
61
11 0.21 0,00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
271
10
17 0.23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
272
0. 00
275
36.9
8101-07511
117:11-12 07/25/89
28.1
12.1
70.5
8101-092
118:11-12 07/25/89
21.1 51.8
76.0
32
19 0.20 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
8101-128H
119:11-12 07/25/89
12.2 32.8
75.1
56
11 0,23 0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 00
277
8105-013(1
120:11-12
33.1
73.3
16
22 0.23 0.00
0. OO
0. 00
0. 00
0
0. 30
110
07/18/89
39.9
81
- 7-
*Agricultural Chenistry Departnent»*Oregcn State Dniversity**Agricultural Research Service**!) SDept flgriculture*»Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Lupulin Sunnary as of October 1, 1990
Harvest
Accession or
Hursery Ho Identification Location
Date
x :
x
X Alpha Alphcj
Alpha Beta t Beta
Crush
Ratic CoH
Safe
Pemea
Calculated
Serial
HSI (3 hr) Period bility HSI6no Renain H/C Hunber
8106-006(1
122:11-12
07/25/89
16.1
27.6
73.7
63
16 0.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0
0.00
276
8106-023(1
121:11-12 07/13/89
32.1
37.0
69.1
17
25 0.23 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
112
8106-03211
125:11-12 07/25/89
15.5
29.2
71.6
61
17 0.23 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
281
8106-03711
126:11-12 07/18/89
36.0 36.0
72.0
50
22 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
133
8106-060H
127:11-12 08/02/89
38.7
23.6
67.3
58
19
0.25 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
315
8106-073H
128:11-12
07/18/89
13.0
37.0
80.0
51
18 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
129
8108-03511
125:13-11
07/18/89
31.8 38.2
73.0-
18
22 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
131
8108-051(1
126:13-11
07/26/39
10.3
73.0
55
17 0.25 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
293
8108-1 ion
127:13-11
07/26/89
21.1 18.2
12.3
57
19 0.29 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
289
79.8
19
18 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
227
32.7
8103-129(1
128:13-11
07/21/39
38.7
11.1
8108-129(1
128:13-11
07/26/89
31.9 11.2
76.1
12
20 0.21 0,00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
292
37
20 0.22 0,00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
327
15
19 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
290
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
238
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
316
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
203
0
0.00
317
8109-011(1
125:15-16
08/02/89 27.3 17.1
71,6
8109-017(1
126:15-16
07/26/89
31.1 12.2
76.6
8109-061(1
127:15-16
07/26/89
12.8
33.7
76.5
56
17 0.21 0.00
8110-088H
125:17-18
08/02/89
21.9 15.8
67.7
32
21 0.21 0.00
8110-09011
126:17-18
07/20/89
25.8
51.0
76.8
31
21
0.20 0.00
8110-12111
127:17-18
08/02/89
32.0
11.2
73.2
11
21
0.23 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
8111-001(1
128:17-18
07/21/89
39.1 11.9
81.3
18
25 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
213
0.00
95
8111-021(1
125:19-20 07/13/89 22.1 51.3
76.7
29
21
0.20 0.50
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
8111-06911
126:19-20
07/10/89
37.0 32.0
68.9
51
22 0.21 0.37
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
38
8111-08611
127:19-20
07/18/89
36.7 10.6
77.3
17
19 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
113
8111-09311
128:19-20
07/10/89
39.5 12.9
82.1
18
21 0.21 0.27
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
35
8111-09911
125:21-22
07/13/89
21.8 23.3
18.0
52
23 0.21 0.31
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
O.DO
89
8111-10111
126:21-22
07/13/89
39.6
78.8
50
25 0.21 0.29
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
91
39.2
8111-17111
127:21-22
07/18/89
11.5
36.0
80.5
55
22 0.22 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
133
8111-203(1
128:21-22
07/10/89
15.2
28.9
71.1
61
22 0.21 0.31
0 00
0 00
0 DO
0
0.00
32
8111-215(1
125:23-21
07/10/89
11.1
31.1
75.5
58
23 0.23 0.32
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
10
8111-21711
126:23-21
07/13/89
18.3 33.8
82.1
59
30 0.21 0.28
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0,00
98
8111-23611
127:23-21
07/06/89
10.3
33.2
73.1
55
22 0..25 0.25
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
19
8111-260(1
128:23-21
07/18/89
12.1 31.5
76.6
55
20 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 DO
0
0.00
135
3111-263(1
118:25-26
07/10/89
13.7
31.7
78.1
56
30 0.22 0.27
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
30
9112-007(1
119:25-26
07/13/89
10.7 31.7
75.5
51
25 0.22 0.37
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
119
8112-01111
120:25-26
07/26/89
11.0
39.9
80.9
51
23 0.23 0.00
0 CO
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
287
78.8
51
21 0.21 0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
291
8112-057(1
121:25-26
07/26/89
39.9 38.9
8112-11811
122:25-26
07/11/89
31.0
36.5
70.5
18
29 0.21 0.35
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
59
13
22 0.23 0.39
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
61
51
19
0.21 0.39
0 00
0 00
0 00
0
0.00
57
8112-119(1
123:25-26
39.8
69.9
8112-19811
121:25-26 07/11/89 37.6 32.5
70.1
07/11/89
30.1
82
1988 Certified Hop Analys i 5
Pin p i c u 11 u r s 1 C h e ro 1 5 i p v
0 prn nn
S13 16
Copvallis
Q en 3r tn sn t
U n i v 5 p 5 i tv
0r5non
97331
Samples Submitted by: USDA-ARS, Dr. Alfred Haunold
c/o Crop Science Dept. , Oregon State University
1989 Off-Station testsCorval ]-is . Oregon 97331
MATURITY SAMPLES
Sanple Description
"SDH 21157 Maturity, Colenan
USDfl 2H58 Maturity, Serres
USDfl 21156 Maturity, Ueathers
USDfl 21190 Maturity, Ueathers
Perle Maturity, Ueathers
USDfl 21155 Maturity Sanple, Goschie
21159 Maturity, Stauffer
21155 Maturity, Goschie
21156 Maturity, Ueathers
21158 Maturity, Serres
21157 Maturity, Colenan
21190 Maturity, Ueathers
21157 Maturity, Colenan
21159 Maturity, Stauffer
21156 Maturity, Ueathers
21190 Maturity, Ueathers
21155 Maturity, Goschie
21158 Maturity, Serres
21157 Harvest, toose Cones
21158 Harvest, Loose Cones
21156 Maturity, Ueathers
21155 Maturity, Goschie
21159 Maturity, Stauffer
21190 Maturity, Ueathers
21181 Maturity, flnnen
Harvest lettnanger B, Goschie
Oregon 21158
Oregon 21159
Uashington 21155
80-211-R
j.
3
Bs Is Basis
Date
Bale:
Or" y?!nht Bssi
Beta
Alpha
Beta
HSI
CoH Oil"
LabNo
2.31.
3.13
3.17
3.73
0.29
22
88080
11.15
1.71
1.15
1.89
1.81
0.27
23
0.00
88081
17.80
1.71
3.31
1.89
3.60
0.28
2?
0.00
88032
Dtl/nc
8/18/88
0 15.73'
8/18/88
0
8/18/38
0
Alpha
0.00
8/18/88
0
11.35
1.17
1.17
1.27
1.85
0.26
26
0.00
88083
8/18/88
0 21.65
8.55
3.65
9.29
3.97
0.30
28
0.00
88081
8/18/83
0 18.85
1.11
3.02
1.51
3.28
0.25
25
0.00
88085
8/25/88
0 15.15
2.39
3.60
3.21
3.91
0.27
23
0.00
88091
8/25/88
0
19.60
2.51
5.07
2.76
5.51
0.21
21
0.00
88095
8/25/88
0
11.75
2.82
1.70
3.07
5.11
0.26
26
0.00
88096
8/25/88
0
18.35
1.62
3.73
1.76
1.05
0.26
25
0.00
88097
8/25/83
0
17.30
1.67
3.91
5.08
1.25
0.29
28
0.00
88098
8/25/88
0
15.10.
2.23
5.87
2.12
6.38
0.21
22
0.00
88099
9/01/38
0
18.90
1.51
3.68
1.91
1.00
0.29
23
0 00
88106
9/01/88
0
15.10
2.97
3.63
3.23
3.91
0.33
26
0 00
88107
9/01/83
0 16.95
2.71
1.68
2.93
5.08
0.28
27
0 00
88108
9/01/88
0
17.60
2.23
6.21
2.13
6.75
0.25
22
0 00
88109
9/01/88
0
16.80
5.15
8.01
5.60
8.70
0.21
29
0 00
83110
9/01/88
0
17.15
2.07
1.51
2.25
1.93
0.28
26
0 00
88111
9/07/88
0
10.15
1.38
3.72
1.88
1.11
0.29
21
1 02
88115
9/07/88
0
9.10
2.31
1.22
2.58
1.61
0.30 27
0 52
88116
9/08/88
0
18.90
2.78
1.17
3.02
1.86
0.26
28
0 00
88129
9/08/88
0
19.30
1,11
7.15
1.80
7.78
0.21
21
0 00
88130
9/08/88
0
16.10
3.27
3.61
3.56
3.93
0.30
21
0 00
83131
9/08/83
0
19.10
2.67
7.00
2.90
7.61
0.23
21
0. 00
88132
9/08/88
0
21.15
6.85
6.81
7.15
7.11
0.21
10
0. 00
88133
9/20/88
0
8.10
3.93
1.10
1.29
1,80
0.29
25
0, 32
88151
9/28/88
0 10.55
3.21
3.68
3.62
1.12
0.31
25
0. 92
88170
9/28/88
0
7.80
1.92
1.33
2.08
1.69
0.31
2?
1. 00
88171
9/28/88
0
10.55
3.11
5.15
3.51
5.76
0.29
23
0. 80
88172
9/28/88
21
10.00
5.39
7.66
5.99
8.51
0.26
22
0. 00
88175
Oregon 21191
10/01/88
0
8.80
3.83
3.19
1.19
3.50
0.33
32
0. 56
88183
1987 Gernan Hallertau Pellets
11/01/88
0
8.80
1.55
3.31
1.99
3,63
0.37
33
0. 70
88225
1987 USDfl 21155 Pellets
11/01/88
0
8.60
2.87
5.10
3.11
5.58
0.55
23
0. 70
88226
1987 Uashington 21159 Pellets
11/01/89
0
8.10
1.98
2.92
2.16
3.18
0.55
28
0. 30
88227
Results for rep 1 on dry weight basis for green naturity sanples
Average of 2 analyses on dry weight basis for green naturity sanples
ftL/100 g, results on dub for green hops, as is basis for dried sanples.
83
•Agricultural Chenistry Departnent**Oregon State l!niversity«Agricultural
Jesearch Service
*U S Dept flgriculture**Corvallis, Oregc n*
1989 Bale and 5-Cone Analyses et 33! Moisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basis(5-Cone)
Accession
\C[Qq ry
or Nursery
Hunber
1 1U \ bf.
Identification Type Location
as o
f October 3, 1990
Oi1
Harvest Yield Alpha
Bate
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Alpha Beta Alpha
3!
X
Ratio
6 do
CoH
HSI
HSI
ZfltB
flyr
Htii
Serial
H/F (X)
(X)
Nunber
nil
Renain lOOq H/C
Breuers Gold
Bale 001:01-01 09/08/39 1927
173
9.0
1.2
63
10 0.29
1.06
30
2.20
1.92 111 .02 70.61
7.55
19027
Fu x Fu-S
Cone 033:19-50 09/13/39 1600
20
1.3
2.5
31
10 0.28
0.71
50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
c .00
239
19023
EGr x EC-S
Cone 031:19-50 09/13/39 1800
62
3.5
6.1
36
11 0.21
0,63
56
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
215
19105
LEp-S(Fu Fu-S) Cone 001:19-50 09/18/39 1100
Belg 31-S OP
Cone 002:19-50 09/13/39 800
23
19
1.7
1.0
29
37 0.26 1.09
30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
319
6.1
1.2
59
58 0.21 0.37
81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
360
3.1
73
29 0.26
0.37
82
1.21
0.60
15.15 11.89
3.05
185
11.01 37.92
3.30
12
0.00
0 .00
359
19001
19110
305
19120
Sunshine-S
Bale 003:19-50 03/23/83 608
52
8.6
19137
Sunshine-5
Bale 001:19-50 03/23/89 610
60
9.3
3.0
75
31 0.26
0.31
83
1.00
0.57
19151
Fu-RedU-OP
Cone 005:19-50 09/18/89 1100
33
2.3
3.7
39
56 0.29
0.82
13
0.00
0.00
19185
LGpFuRedHP
Bale 006:19-50 03/23/39 1103
37
3.3
2.3
59
13 0.25 0.17
71
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
0.31
86
0.00
0.00
0•DO
0.00
0 .00
353
0
1.23
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
57
0.00
0.00
0 .00
127
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
263
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
661
19200
Orbann x LC-S
Cone 007:19-50 09/18/89 1000
57
5.7
1.7
55
11 0.21
21001
Fu R-2
Hand 031:19-50 08/23/89 256
15
5.8
3.9
60
38 0.28 0.00
21003
Fu 11
Cone 212=01-05.09/19/89 200
8
3.9
1.9
67
27 0,29
0.59
59
0.00
0.00
21007
6735-005
Cone 011:19-50 09/13/89 1000
26
2.6
2.2
51
10 0.29 0.59
59
O.Dfl
0.00
0.00
Bale 005:G1-01 09/08/89 1621
127
7.8
1.8
62
11 0.23
0.31
76
0.50
0.00
21011
Mlallertau (IF
Bale 007:01-01 08/21/89 569
27
1.8
3.6
57
20 0.29
0.68
50
0.77
3.37 810.26 38.96 32.77
501
21015
Bale 008:01-01 08/21/89 213
Bale 009:01-01 08/21/89 533
9
33
1.1
3.1
57
23 0.27
0.00
0
0.17
3 .05
1.56 26.13 21.88
187
21016
Tettnanger
Fu H, OF
6.2
3.1
67
27 0.28
0.11
72
0.71
3.06
7 75 10 25 28 29
31
21023
6532-011
Cone 029:51-52 09/18/89 100
16 11.1
5.7
67
31 0.28
0.50
6?
0.00
0.00
0 00 0 00 0 00
379
21011
L-16
21030
6616-019
Cone 021:51-52 03/18/89 800
81 1D.5
7.6
58
12 0.25 0.33
13
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
353
21010
Colunbia
Bale 023:05-08 09/08/39 715
61
8.5
1.1
67
39 0.26 0.11
76
0.91
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
581
21011
Uillaiette
•r^illanette
Bale 021:05-08 09/08/89 1259
Bale 227=01-05 09/12/89 1237
83
83
6,6
3.6
65
33 0.27 0.00
0
1.11
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
582
21011
6.7
3.6
65
31 0.29
0.52
69
1.15
2 95
3 71 55 19 17 57
717
21012
6769-002
Bale 108:13-11 09/15/89 1952
121
6.1
5.1
51
27 0.23
0.65
11
0.65
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
189
21013
Bale
Bale
Bale
Bale
Bale
Bale
Bale
311
28
256 22
191
30
0
0
597 53
1193 113
608
68
8.3
1.3
66
22 0.27
0.51
59
1.32
0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
302
8.5
1.5
65
23 0.27
0.00
0
2.28
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
533
629
21053
Uye Challenger
Uye Northdoun
Styrian, Yugo
Styrian, Yugo
Ahil, Yugo
Apolon, Yugo
Aurora, Yugo
21051
6806-067
21011
21019
21019
21050
21051
018:05-08
019:05-08
020:05-08
211:01-05
001:03-12
001:09-12
003:09-12
03/08/89
09/08/89
08/21/89
03/21/89
09/08/89
08/22/89
08/22/89
6.2
2,6
71
26 0.28
0.00
0
0.73
2 95
6 51 11 89 26 67
5.1
3.1
61
31 D.29 0.52
65
1.11
3 27
5 70 51 11 20 92
177
9.0
3.7
71
29 0.28
0.87
39
1.99
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
317
9.6
3.7
72 . 2? 0.25 0.51
63
0.90
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
31
11.2
1.0
73
85
0.61
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
135
Bale 013=17-18 08/22/89 1152
137 11.9
1.2
135 11.1
1.5
21055
6806-080
Bale 033=05-08 08/21/89 939
21055
6806-080
Bale 011:17-18 08/23/39
21056
21057
Bullion, 10A,UF Bale 013:09-12 09/11/89 1226
Bullion, 10A.UF Cone 206:01-05 09/18/89 2000
PrRinguood Sel Cone 036=19-50 09/13/89 2000
311
55 16.1
105
131
181
8,5
19 0.25
0.35
71
12 0.28
0.17
69
1,27
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
627
76
17 0.29 0.38
85
1.18
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
138
1.3
77
19
0.28
0.38
77
1.19
1 78
1. 81 55 50
9 70
9
1.0
68
16 0.27
0.98
31
1.80
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0 00
585
137
6.5
3.3
66
11 0,25
0.61
57
0,00
2 73 168. 18 60. 66 15, 50
9.0
1.7
66
12 0,21
0.33
86
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
260
21062
6512-021
39
1.9
2,1
70
17 0.27
1.01
32
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0, 00 0. 00
363
21077
Saazer, Czech Hand 021:05-08 08/21/89
0
0
Record, Belg
Bale 021:09-12 09/11/39 861 109
Blue (I.B., Belg Cone 008:51-52 09/18/89 100
8
3.9
3.2
55
21 0.25 0.00
12.6
1.0
76
31
21056
21078
21079
Cone 013=51-52 09/18/89 800
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
316
21 0.28
0.19
67
5.2
0
Cascade OF
Bale 011:09-12 09/11/89 311
11
21093
N. Breuer UF
Bale 012:09-12 08/22/89 373
12 11.2
21085
528
27 0.31 O.DO
21092
21081
0. 00 0, 00
72
21086
21083
59
0. 00
73
3
11
110
66
85
33
20
12
21082
0. 00 0. 00 0, 00
0. 00
2.9
53
221
1S68
668
971
180
600
600
21080
08/22/89
09/11/89
08/22/89
08/22/S9
09/11/89
08/23/89
09/13/89
09/13/89
0. 00
2.53
1.9
Hand
Bale
Bale
Bale
Bale
Bale
Cone
Cone
21081
009:09-12
008:09-12
005:09-12
006:09-12
007:09-12
037:19-50
039:19-50
010:19-50
0.00
18
7.7
Blue H.B., Belg
Backa, Yugo
Dunav, Yugo
Heoplanta, Yugo
Uojvodina, Yugo
Yugo 10/12
Yugo UII/23
Yugo UIII/27
21079
0
0.29 0.80
0. 00
0,61 2. 52 19. 93 57. 08 13. 16
19
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
526
1.8
5.3
18
27 0.21 0.00
0
0.63.
0. 00
3.0
1.2
63
28 0.26 0.11
77
1.01
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
168
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
628
517
9.9
3.6
73
36 0.25
0,33
87
0.63
0. 00
8.7
3.5
71
27 0.28
0.11
79
1,13
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
6.9
1.8
59
21
0.21 0.10
72
0.18
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
13
3,1
2.3
60
21
0.23 0.51
66
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
257
7.0
1.9
59
21
0.21 0.55
62
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
217
1.0
3.2
55
39 0.29 0.69
57
0,98
2. 30
2. 38 72. 76 6. 69
518
1.0
71
22 0.25 0.38 82
1.28
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
631
84
.-
.
- 2-
•flgricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon Stale Uniuer5ity*»flgricultural Research Service**0 S Oept flgricullure**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bale and 5-Cone Analyses at U Moisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basis(5-Cone) as of October 3, 1990
Accession
Oil
or Hursery
Hunber
Harvest
Identification
Type Location
Date
Yiel; filphc Alph; Beta
Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Ratio
X
r
6 Ho ZA»B
CoH
HSI
HSI
nL/
Renain
iOOq H/C
1/F
(1 >r
nun
Serial
(,")
( ')
Hunber
21091
6303-112
Cone 009:19-50 09/13/39 1000
55
5.6
3.2
63
36 0.22
0.11
73
.00
100
[ .00
.00
J.00
361
21095
6903-259
Cone 010:19-50 09/18/89 1200
63
5.8
1.3
57
39 0.21
0.78
16
.00
.00
I .00
LOG
LOO
356
21097
Huller Bitterer Bale 030:05-08 03/31/69 1162
36
7.1
7.7
19
27 0.26 0.60
53
.06
.23
21098
6913-069
Bale 112:03-01 09/15/89 3391
306
9.0
1.9
65
28 0.27
1.01
29
2.02
I .00
21112
Uye larget
Lubelska, Pol
Bale 016:09-12 03/31/89 1237
Hand 018:09-12 08/22/89 299
160 12.9
21113
21111
Hadwislanska
Hand 019:09-12 09/11/89
21115
Pocket lalisnan Bale 020:09-12 09/11/89
Brewers Gold OF Bale 015=09-12 09/11/39 1162
711
[ .00
.36
558
( .00
( .00
115
127
6.0
68
37 0,25
0.63
51
I .97
2.01 155.81 6E.13
' .12
13
1.3
3.0
59
23 0.28
0.00
0
C.56
C.00
0 .00
[ .00
( ,00
16
5
3.1
2.7
53
29 0.28
0.00
0
0.15
C.00
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
330
28
1.0
2.0 • 66
51 0.28 0.15 72
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
c .00
660
101
8.7
3.7
70
12 0.28 1.09 28
2.10
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
588
0.91
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
287
70.18 56.16
5.85
713
293
119
21116
5C .16 1 .25
21120
7001-013
Bale 001:17-13 09/13/39
768
11
1.1
7,1
17
68 0.25
21121
7001-039
Bale 002:17-18 09/13/89
683
5
0.7
6.1
10
67 0.38 1.73 13
0.92 1 .60
21122
7001-017
Bale 003:17-18.09/13/89 373
10
2,7
3.6
12
51
0.71
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
21123
7001-051
Bale 001:17-13 09/13/89
576
5
0.9
5.9
13
56 0.26 1.51
12
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
291
21125
7001-067
Bale 006:17-18 09/13/39
180
7
1.1
2.2
38
13 0.30
68
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
696
21127
7001-081
Bale 008:17-18 09/13/89
725
6
0.8
5.1
13
70 0.30 1.19
13
1.0?
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
290
21128
7001-123
Bale 009:17-18 09/13/89
191
5
1.1
1.9
36
15 0.10
1.01
35
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
678
21138
6701-051
Bale 016:19-50 08/23/89 1173
29
2.1
2.1
50
30 0.32
0.1?
70
0.35
3.52
21139
6701-138
Cone 021:19-50 09/13/89 2100
13
1.8
2.7
10
52 0.22
0.36
82
0 00 0.00
21113
6028-001
Cone 050:51-52 09/18/89 1800
89
1.9
2.5
67
30 0.28 0.72
19
21111
6185-001
Cone 051:51-52 09/18/89 1600
80
5.0
5.1
18
12 0.27
1.01
29
0.28 0.61 51
0.16
0.79 15
0 00
53 87 31 93 36 79
0 00
0 00 0 00
11
261
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
391
0 00 0 GO
0 00 0 00 0 00
389
388
21115
6305-001
Cone 052:51-52 09/18/89 1100
68
1.9
1.1
51
38 0.23
0.50
67
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
21119
6616-002
Cone 018:51-52 09/13/89 1800
172
9.6
6,6
59
17 0.21
0,93
37
0 00 0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
371
21150
6616-010
Cone 019:51-52 09/18/89 2000
95
1.7
1.0
51
37 0.29 0.75 18
0 00 0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
393
166
8,3
5.7
59
11 0.27 0.89 39
0 00 0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
376
18
3.0
1.0
13
30 0.29 1.01
D 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
332
350
21151
6616-020
Cone 030:51-52 09/18/89 2000
21152
6618-002
Cone 022:51-52 09/18/89
600
32
D 00
0 00
21156
6806-091
Cone 009:51-52 09/18/89 1300
119
6.6
2.6
72
13 0.30 0.89 39
0 00 0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
21158
6806-099
Bale 019:19-50 08/23/89 1152
113
9.8
3.3
75
38 0.26
0.81
10
1 87 0 00
0 00
0 00
5
21159
6818-013
Cone 010:51-52 09/18/89 1100
73
5.2
8.2
39
29 0.22
0.65
51
0 00 0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
312
153
7.6
7.2
51 .29
39
1.9
5.0
50
0 00
21160
6901-110
Cone 051:19-50 09/13/89 2000
21161
6903-226
Cone 039:51-52 09/18/89
21162
6903-263
Cone 010:51-52 09/13/89 2000
109
5.1
1.2
57
32 0.23
0.39
78
0. 00 0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
368
21163
6907-058
Cone 052:19-50 09/13/89 2000
231 11.7
7.3
61
30 0.23
0.39
79
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
251
21161
6907-077
Bale 055=19-50 08/23/89 2210
125
5.6
8.2
10
31 0.22
0.11
71
0. 35 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
181
21167
61 11.0
6.0
65
32 0.25
0.16
61
0. 68 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
319
0
1.2
3.1
55
22 0.25 0,00
0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
21169
Hybrid 2, India Bale 011:01-01 09/08/89 583
Prec d Bourg
Hand 023=01-01 03/21/89
0
lardif d Bourg Bale 021:01-01 09/08/89 1072
51
5.0
6.0
16
20 0.23
0,53
63
0. 69 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
328
21170
Elsasser
Bale 025:01-01 09/03/89 1280
59
1.6
6.1
13
27 0,25
0.11
77
0, 72 3. 67 811. 07 51. 01 21. 55
320
21172
0
1.2
3.3
56
23 0.26
0.00
0
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
1?
1.1
2.5
62
31
0.73
51
0. 8?
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
21179
Landhopfen
Hand 027:01-01 08/21/89
0
Strisselspalter Bale 031:01-01 09/15/39 116
Hersbrucker Eng Hand 006:01-01 03/21/89 235
5
2.3
3.5
10
25 0.37
0.00
21180
7003-113
Bale 212:12-16 09/15/89 2525
292 11.6
9.1
56
30 0.26
0.63
51
0.51
21168
21173
800
0.23
0.13
71
0 00
21 0.21
0.17
69
0 00 0 00
0.31
0
0 00
0 00
211
0. 00 0 00 0 00
0 00
0 00
36?
0. 00
0. 11 3. 51 25, 96 9. 59 28. 56
2. 50 0. 00
0. 00
55
56
517
15
0. 00 0. 00
118
377
21180
7003-113
Cone 031=51-52 09/18/89 2000
167
8.1
5,9
59
30 0,21
63
D. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0, 00 0. 00
21181
7003-213
Bale 201=17-21 09/15/39
961
92
9.6
7.5
56
15 0.21 0.55 53
0. 98 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 0D
180
21181
7D03-213
Cone 035:51-52 09/18/89
600
11
7.3
5.6
57
15 0.25
69
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
371
21182
Galena (13-16) Bale 008:05-08 08/22/89 2161
221
9.0
5.2
63
12 0.26 0.39 77
0. 62 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
197
21182
Galena (13-16) Cone 239:01-05 09/19/89 1318
1D8
8,0
1.1
65
12 0,21 0.10 77
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. DO
0. 00
128
266 12.3
1.9
72
12 0.25 0.19 62
0. 55 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 3D
671
0. 60 3. 07 227. 18 53. 99 21, 31
673
21183
Sroica (31-5)
21185
-Hersbrucker Ger Bale 001:01-01 09/08/89
Bale 013:05-08 03/08/89 2165
0.18
381
20
5.3
6.8
11
25 0.23
0.15
65
Hand 022:01-01 08/21/89 111
5
1.1
2.8
59
21
0.31
O.DO
0
93
9.9
1.0
71
12 0.25
0.36
78
21186
Spalter
21187
Southern Brewer Bale 028:01-01 09/08/89
939
0, 32 3. 59
1. 51 18. 15 15. 50
50
0. 1
0. 00 0. 3D
0. 10
653
0. 00
•.
.
- 3-
gricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State Oniversity**Hgricultural Research Service**!! S Oept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bale and 5-Cone Analyses at 81 Moisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basi5(5-Cone) as of October 3,
Accession
Oil
or Hursery
Hunbe r
21188
21193
21193
Harvest
Identification
lype location
S.Af. HP2/55
Bale 029=01-01 09/03/39
r—Hugget
Hugget
Date
Yield Alpha Alphe Beta fllphe
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
I
3!
6 do
Ratic
CoH HSI
HSI
aA»B
nt/
(1 yr
Hin
Serial
Renain
lOOq H/C
( X)
(X)
Hunber
H/F
960
57
5.9
3.7
62
27 0.27
0.78
11
1.07
0.00
0.00
O.CO
0.00
Bale 036=01-01 09/03/39 1056
167
15.8
1.8
77
25 0.26
0.11
72
2.10
0.00
0.00
O.CO
LOO
321
Bale 237=01-05 09/12/89 2000
326 16.3
5.6
75
27 0.25
0.15
70
2.51
?.13 111.98 60.0! 1 Z.17
311
212 16.0
7.1
69
28 0.26-1.09
25
2.89
LOO
0.00
0.00
LOO
116
71 12.1
6.1
67
26 0.26
0.91
38
0,00
LOO
0,00
0.00
.00
372
21191
7005-311
Bale 238=01-05 09/11/89 1322
21191
7D06-311
Cone 032:51-52 09/18/89
6D0
662
21191
7006-311
Cone 017:51-52 09/18/89
100
16 16.0
1.9
77
23 0.25
0.71
50
0.00
( .00
0.00
0.00
LOO
369
21195
7006-108
Bale 210:28-32 09/11/89 1195
175 11.6
5.6
72
33 0.28
0.50
68
2.15
[ .00
0.00
0.00
I .00
522
21195
7006-108
Cone 036:51-52 09/18/89 2000
262 13.1
5.1'
72
28 0.30
0.17
70
0.00
[ .00
0.00
0.00
[ .00
380
21196
Bullion 6A
Bale 007:05-09 09/08/89 2602
230
1.2
68
50 0.26
0.82
39
1.55
C.00
0.00
0.00
c .00
322
21197
Bale 032;05-08 08/21/89 118
29
6.5
2.9
69
25 0.29
0.13
71
0.53
C.00
0.00
0.00
c.00
632
Bale 232:28-32 08/25/89
802
53
6.6
3.3
6?
27 0.28
0.19
70
0.75
0.00
0.00
LOO
0.00
212
21197
lettnang? OF
lettnang? OF
lettnang? OF
Bale 235:28-32 08/25/89
683
12
6.2
3.3
65
27 0.28
0.50
66
1.11
0.00
0,00
LOO 0.00
215
21198
7003-038
Cone 010:17-18 09/12/39 2200
155
7.1
5.6
56
33 0.23
0.39
79
0.00
0.DO
0.00
LOO 0 .00
235
21199
7001-003
Bale 212:17-21 09/01/89 1391
153 11.0
6.1
61
11 0.21
0.68
19
2.18
0.00
0.00
LOO
0.00
117
21197
8.9
21201
7005-070
Bale 016:17-18 08/23/89 2090
239 11.1
7.9
59
35 0.2?
0.15
73
1.19
0.00
0.00
LOO
0.00
507
21202
6903-107
Bale 208:28-32 09/18/89 1578
132
8.1
7.2
51
32 0.25
0.10
83
1.21
0.00
0.00
LOO
0.00
611
21203
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Cone 017:17-18 09/13/89 1600
21201
21205
21206
21207
21208
21209
21210
21211
21212
20P11
21P01
21P07
26P03
27P01
32P02
33P13
33P1
10P19
11P36
Cone 018:17-18 09/13/89
31
1.9
1.1
59
15 0.21
0.10
77
0.00
0.00
0.00
( .00
0.00
268
200
3
1.6
3.3
33
27 0.21
0.12
75
0.00
0,00
0.00
( .00
0.00
266
267
Cone 019:17-18 09/13/89 2200
5?
2.6
2.7
19
20 0.25 0.11 73
0.00
0.00
0.00
c.00
0.00
Cone 050:17-18 09/13/89 1100
72
5.1
5.5
18
19 0.21
0.37
81
0.00 0.00
0.00
[ .00
0.00
275
Cone 051:17-18 09/13/89 2000
90
1.5
3.8
51
20 0.25
0.97
35
0.00
0.00
0.00
c,00
0 00
270
0.00
0 00
0.00
[ .00
0 00
265
0.00
0.00
0 00
256
Cone 052:17-18 09/13/89 2000
38
1.9
2.9
63
18 0.22
0.36
83
Cone 053:17-18 09/13/89 1600
55
3.5
2.1
59
16 0.29
0.37
81
0.00
0 00
Cone 051:17-18 09/13/89
800
21
3.0
3.0
50
18 0.23
0.38
80
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
255
Cone 055=17-18 09/13/89 2000
73
3,9
2.3
63
10 0.21
0.33
87
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 .00
0 00
251
Cone 003:51-52 09/18/83 1600
17
1.1
0.9
55
20 0.31
0.16
71
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
355
21215
Aronat, Yugo
Hand 025=05-08 03/21/89
Siren, Yugo
Hand 026:05-08 08/21/89
Horgard 1178, Y Hand 027;05-08 08/21/89
75
6
7.6
3.2
21216
Groene Bel
Bale 028:05-08 09/08/89
180
21
5.0
3.1
21217
Star, Belg
Bale 029:05-08 08/21/89
128
1
3.1
1.7
21218
7005-119
Cone 015:17-18 09/13/89 2000
308 15.1
1.5
21213
21211
85
3
1,0
2.6
60
22 0.31
0.00
0
0.35
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
18
0
0
3.8
3.1
55
22 0.26
0.00
0
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
17
70.
32 0.27
0.00
0
59
30 0.26
0.61
51
66
21 0.33
0.00
0
0.36
3 16 10.65 31 .50 37. 09
113
77
11 0.23
0.18
68
0.00
0. 00
269
1.09 2 90 12.06 18.71 22 10
11
0 00
659
1.16
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
21219 " — 65009 UF
Cone 008:19-50 09/18/89 1600
175 1D.9
7.2
60
37 0.21
0.66
51
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0 00
0. 00
317
21220 .._. Eroica OF
Bale 031:05-08 09/08/89 1612
177 10.8
1.3
71
11 0.25
0.51
53
0.82
0, 00
0.00
0 00 0. 00
656
21220
Eroica OF
Cone 229:12-16 09/19/89 2100
320 13.3
5.9
69
13 0.21
0.17
70
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0 00 0. 00
106
21222
Bale 231:28-32 09/18/89 1715
150
8.8
6.1
59
52 0.25
0.81
10
2.31 0. 00
0.00
0 00 0, 00
611
38
21225
Aquila
Olynpic
21226
Chinook
Hand 037:01-01 08/31/89
569
6.6
2,6
72
36 0.27
0.71
18
1.11
1. 05 298.61 73 19 5. 33
151
Bale 038:01-01 09/08/89
911
122 12.9
3.8
77
31 0.28
0.56
61
1.17
0. 00
0 00 0. 00
323
Dale 226:28-32 09/12/89 1118
0.00
21226
vXhinook
176 15.8
1.9
76
38 0.25
0.60
53
2.11
2. 31 60.51 53 79 11. 09
312
21227
Perle
Bale 032:01-01 08/21/89
715
87 12.1
1.1
73
21 0.25
0.31
85
0.19
0. 00
0 00 0. 00
503
303
0.00
21227
Perle
Bale 220:01-05 09/13/89
589
71 12.0
1,5
73
31 0.26
0,52
65
1.13
3, 05 519,06 62 22 11, 10
21228
Ha (IF? OF
Bale 218:12-16 08/30/89
990
72
7.2
3.6
66
29 0.28
0.73
13
0.71
3. 18
1.12 69 21 11. 16
719
21232
Jap 69K-8H66
Jap 70K-SH6
Blisk, Yugo
Blisk, Yugo
Bobek, Yugo
Bobek, Yugo
Buket, Yugo
Buket, Yugo
Bale 031:17-18 08/22/89 1152
116 10.1
1.7
68
10 0.28
0,55
55
1.92
2. 13
1.27 68 39 6. 88
506
12 0.25 0.18 65
1.18
3. 28 331.25 57 73 22. 53
112
0. 00 0. 00
65?
21233
21238
21238
21239
21239
21210
21210
Bale 035:17-18 08/22/89 853
85 10.0
5.8
63
Bale 022:05-08 09/08/89 1738
191 11.2
1,2
73
37 0.27 1,22
Bale 231:01-05 03/29/39 2591
336 13.0
5.2
71
35 0.21 1.06 22
1.76
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0. 30
702
Bale 017:09-12 08/22/89 1193
111
5.7
63
21 0.25 0.10 73
0.63
0. DO
0.00
0. 00 0. 30
621
3. 31
9.7
19
2.65 0. 00
0.00
Bale 208:23-27 09/05/89 267
28 10.1
5.9
61
25 0.25
0.18
65
1.22
7.19 63. 19 13. 19
716
Bale 022:09-12 08/22/89 1205
112 11.8
1.7
72
22 0.27
0.11
71
1.1? 0. 10
0.00
0. 00 0. 10
636
Bale 212:23-27 09/05/89 819
109 13.3
5.8
70
25 0.26 0.83 10
2.73
0.00
0. 00 0. 10
701
0. 10
86
•Agricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State liniversity**Rgricultural Research Service**U S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bale and 5-Cone Analyses at 81 Moisture Ccntent(Bale) or As Is Basis(5-Cone) as of October 8 1990
Hccess. on
or Hur: ery
Harvest
Oate
Yield
Aloha Alpha Beta Alpha
lb/Ac Lb/ac
6 tlo
Identification
Type Location
21211
Pel Hon 12
Bale 036:17-18 03/22/39
320
15
1.3
2.1
66
29
21212
Pol Klon 13
Hand 037=17-13 08/22/39
152
9
1.9
3.2
60
23
21213
Pol Klon 30
Hand 038=17-18 08/22/89
576
18
3.3
2.8
75
30
78
11
Hunbf r
3!
I
Ratio
CoH
HSI
0.27
0.29
3!fi*B
0.13
81
H/C
M
1.10
Hun
Serial
(X)
Hunber
00
27
0.71
51
1.19
53
610
0.00
0
0.27
0.15
75
1.61
0.26
0.16
71
0.00
223
0.39 79
1.15
288
0.25 0.37 81
0,00
21216
7311-032
Bale 211:28-32 09/18/89 1630
256
15.7
1.1
21216
7311-032
Cone 023:17-18 09/12/83 2000
239
11.9
2.8
21217
7311-068
Bale 215:17-21 09/01/89 2372
377
15.9
5.5
21217
7311-068
Cone 021:17-18 09/12/89 1600
203
12.?
3.3
79
11
21218
7311-095
Bale 218:17-21 09/07/89 1113
211
13.5
8.0
70
37 0.29
0.57
60
2.51
21218
7311-095
Cone 027:17-18 09/12/39 2000
267
13.3
5.6
71
11
0.28
0.13
71
0.00
12 0.25
71
(lyr
nil
Renai n IQOq
222
00
280
230
21250
7311-152
Bale 002=09-12 08/22/89
299
28
9.1
3.9
71
36 0.26
0.19
67
0.76
615
21250
7311-152
Bale 029=17-13 08/22/89
150
169
11.7
3.2
79
27
0.28
0.37
81
0.91
625
553
21250
7311-152
Bale 226=17-21 09/07/89
217
11.0
1.8
71
31
0.27
0.15 71
2.16
21251
7312-009
Bale 225=12-16 08/31/89
179
18.2
6.8
73
10
0.26
0.13
67
2.16
21251
7312-009
Cone 028:19-50 09/13/83
11
11.1
5,3
68
36 0.30
0.17 70
0.00
0,36
172
6Z
91 73 56
66
152
210
21252
7312-036
Bale 010:17-18 08/22/89 1193
196
13.1
3.2
80
33 0.28
83
0.71
21253
7312-011
Bale 213:23-2? 09/05/89 1681
271
16.1
1.6
78
12 0.27 0.12 77
1.11
21253
7312-011
Cone 011:17-18 09/13/89 1000
152
15.2
5.5
73
38 0.27
0.39
78
0.00
272
21251
7312-083
Bale 211:23-27 09/18/89
956
162
17.0
5.0
77
26 0.30
0.17 71
2.97
613
21251
7312-083
Cone 053:51-52 09/18/83
600
21255
7312-131
Cone 012:17-18 09/13/89 1600
0.00 0
27?
639
82 13.6
206
12.9
1.2
76
23
0.31
0.13
71
2.2
85
12 0.28
0.12
75
111
29 81 01 60 05
711
396
21256
7312-032
Bale 219:23-27 09/18/89 2132
392
16,1
5.1
75
17 0.23
0.57
62
2.79
0
21256
7312-032
Cone 051:51-52 09/18/89 800
120
15.0
1.1
77
39
0.29
0.15
72
0.00
0
2125?
7313-083
Bale 221:23-2? 09/06/89 1766
28?
16.2
8.0
67
11
0.23
0.69
50
2,35
1 12 127 99 60 61
21261
7003-075
Bale 230:12-16 09/15/89 1698
151
9.1
6.6
58
23
.26
0.67
19
1.60
0
185
21276
IS
1.3
1.9
70
23 0.31
57
65
0.69
0
520
39
6,1
1.7
78
29 0.30
61
63
0.61
0
586
21278
Early Prolific Bale 023=09-12 09/11/89 352
Early Pronise Bale 021=09-12 08/11/89 619
Keyuorths Early Bale 025:09-12 09/11/89 256
22
8.7
3.1
71
31
0.00
0
1.77
0,
635
21279
Keyuorths (lids Bale 026:09-12 09/11/89 1818
121
21230
Pride of Kent
21277
Bale 027:09-12 08/22/89
103
0,23
6.7
2.8
71
50 0.28
0.61
51
1.01
0,
10
9.1
6.5
59
39 0.26
0,31
10
1,85
0
0.00
21281
Sunshine
Bale 028:09-12 09/11/89
192
15
7.7
2.9
73
30 0.28
21283
Uye Uiking
Brailing
Bale 030:09-12 08/22/83
299
22
7.1
1.7
61
25
0,27
Bale 030:01-01 09/08/39
21281
391
8 58
202
58?
00 0
0
1.61
0,
00 0
.13 67
1.21
2,
70 18 70 13
630
331
21
6.3
2.5
71
2?
3.27
.15
70
1.09
0
00
Id sel BOR 701 Bale 231:12-16 08/31/89 1979
Id sel E0R 701 Cone 002:51-52 09/18/89 600
5?
2.9
3,1
16
11 L26
.60
52
0.73
3,
26 31 00 38, 28
129
11
1.9
2.1
11
9
0.82
13
0.00
0
00 0 00
351
21237 •.^Banner, Id13-11 Bale 213:01-05 08/21/89 1032
117
11.3
6.1
61
31
.25 0.52 58
1.09
2 80 190 71 59 35 15, 26
21287
Banner, Id13-11 Bale 211=06-10 08/29/89 2110 283 11.7
6.5
61
36
.73 11
21285
21285
.26
0 00
0
0,
321
15
712
21289
7312-053
Cone 012=19-50 09/13/83
600
59
9.8
2.8
78
22 0
.63
56
213
21290
7312-057
Cone 015=19-50 09/13/89 1100
157
11.2
2.8
80
35
.39
79
212
21292
7312-081
Bale 020=19-50 08/23/89 1813
195
10.8
2.7
80
33 0
.36 82
21293
7312-081
Cone 021:19-50 09/13/89 1200
171
11.2
1.1
76
23 0 ,30 0.38 80
250
21291
7312-106
Cone 022:19-50 09/13/89 1800
226
12.5
3.6
78
12 0 ,27 0,55 62
219
21295
7312-115
Bale 023:19-50 03/23/89
896
111
12.3
3,3
79
26 0 27
0.36 88
1.11
21296
7312-128
Bale 032:19-50 08/23/89
59?
79
13.2
3,5
79
33
0,32 89
0.66
21298
7315-035
Cone 038:19-50 09/13/89
600
61
10.7
3.3
76
28 0, 28 0.60 58
252
21299
7315-103
Cone 013:19-50 09/13/39 1200
7?
6.1
1.6
80
12 0, 27 0.62 5?
258
21368
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
Yugo
939
115 12.3
5.3
70
33 0, 23
Cone 031:17-18 09/13/89 1600
196 12.2
5.1
71
35 0, 21 0,52 65
21368
21369
21369
21370
88/150
88/150
88/187
88/187
88/201
Bale 201:01-05 08/21/89
Bale 202:01-05 09/13/89
759
Cone 032:17-18 09/13/89
Bale 201:01-05 08/21/89
768
0 26
.73
0.60 19
39
29
00
186
26
0.00
271
97 12.8
6.1
68
33 0, 25 0.82
10
2.17
301
10.2
6.3
62
31 0, 25 0.56 61
0.00
276
85 11.1
1,1
71
31
0.93
19
0. 25 0.51
58
87
•Agricultural Chenistry Departnent**Orego.n State L'niversity**Agricultural Research Service**U S Dept figriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bale
and 5-Cone Analyses at 83! Hoisture Content(Bale) cr fls Is Basis(5-Cone) as of October 8, 199
0 1
Accessi on
Harvest
or Nurs ery
Hunber
21370
21371
Identi ficatior
Yugo 38/201
Type Location
Date
Yield Alpha Alpha Beta Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Cone 033=17-18 09/13/89 2000
7003-066
Cone 011=17-18 09/12/69 2000
Ratio
331 16.7
109
5.5
3.6
66
1.2
56
6 Ho JM
CoH
HSI
35 0.23
HSI
0.76
31 0,23
0,55
nil
Renain
1?
62
lOOg H/C
0.00
0.00
0.00
( .00
H/F
dyr
Hun
Serial
(X)
(3!)
Hunber
t .00
I .00
0.00
261
I .00
[ .00
0.00
Z33
225
21372
7006-061
Cone 020=17-18 09/12/89
800
9.I
1.3
87
2? 0.29
0.59
59
0.00
[ .00
t .00
C.00
0.00
21373
7006-393
Cone 026=17-18 09/12/89
800
121
15.1
1.1
7?
19 0.23
0.39
79
0.00
C.00
C.00
C.00
0.00
228
21382
7501-113
Bale 221=12-16 09/15/89 1220
131
10.7
8,3
56
23 0.28
0.62
56
1.05
C.00
C.00
0 .00
0.00
618
21381
7007-175
Bale 223:28-32 08/25/89 1536
133
0.00
0.00
220
21396
lolhurst Uye
Hand 032:09-12 03/22/89
21397
•wJJallertsu (IF 11 Bale 195:37
73
9.0
1.8
65
30 0.26
0.12
62
D.63 0.00
0.00
1.8-
2,5
12
33 0.32
0.00
0
0.12
2.52
1.16 20.77 26.65
58
11
3.1
3.1
52
21 0,2?
0.63
56
0.71
3.36 110 .88 31.00 39.16
118
7
3.7
3,1
52
25 0.21
0.57
60
0.00
0.00
0,00
0 .00
0.00
116
291 11.7
5.5
68
11 0.26
0,13
75
1.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
152
128
2
08/31/89 309
21397
Hallertau HF 11 Cone 215:01-05 09/19/89 200
21103
Sticklebract
Bale 002:01-01 09/15/89 2506
21103
Sticklebract
Bale 229:01-05 09/13/89 2227
291
13.1
6.1
68
15 0.25
0.10
77
0.91
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
166
21101
Green Bullet
Bale 003:01-01 09/15/89 1610
171
10.6
1.8
69
12 0.25
0.38
78
0.70
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
183
21101
*Ojreen Bullet
Bale 231:01-05 09/13/83 1237
111
11.1
5.6
67
12 0.21
0.39
68
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
552
Bale 033:01-01 09/15/83 1150
119 10.2
5.2
66
38 0.25
0.10
75
1.3? 0.00
0 ,00
0.00
0.00
182
65I
Superalpha
««,Superalpha
21105
Superalpha
21105
HlphaArona
21106?
21106? 'v.AlphaArona
21105
Bale 236:23-32 09/18/89 1237
155 12.5
6.9
65
33 0.21
0.13
63
1.59
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
Bale 210:01-05 09/11/89 1817
209 11.5
6.6
63
38 0.25
0.39
78
1.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
150
Bale 026:01-01 09/15/89 3397
318
9.1
3.1
71
2? 0.27
0.11
71
0.63
0.00
0.00
0 00 0.00
185
1.1
73
27 0.26
0.15
71
1.11
0.00
0.00
0 00 0.00
515
10.1 ' 1,1
70
12 0.25
0.77
16
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
117
115
Bale 211:01-05 09/11/89 3110
313 10.9
Cone 215:06-10 09/19/89 2100
213
21107
Id 51-8A
21108
U102-19
Cone 217:06-10 09/19/89 2000
265 13.3
6.1
69
52 0.22
0.67
53
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00
0,00
7003-081
Bale 233:12-16 09/15/89 1135
118 10.1
7.6
58
33 0.26
0.68
1?
1.77
0 00
0 00 0 00
0.00
515
191
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
231
21109
21109
7003-081
Cone 012:17-18 09/12/89 2000
9.6
5.8
62
25 0,21
0.19
68
0,00
21139
7701-007
Bale 011:19-50 08/23/89
768
31
1.1
1.8
18
23 0.23
0,50
69
0.79
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
199
21110
7701-038
Bale 015:19-50 08/23/89
118
39
8.6
3.6
71
17 0.25
0.15
71
0.61
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
36
21111
7710-031
Bale 018:13-50 08/23/89 1311
71
5.5
6.1
18
10 0.25
0.51
60
0.15
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
30
21112
7713-021
Bale 053:19-50 08/23/89
1.8
72
36 0.25
0.59
58
1.29
0 00
0 00
0.00
I83
21113
7727-011
Cone 017:51-52 09/18/89 1100
90
6.5
3.1
68
22 0.27
0,10
78
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.0D
339
21150
7301-107
Cone 023:51-52 09/18/89 1000
97
9.7
2.8
78
29 0.26
0.72
50
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
21151
7306-193
Cone 025:51-52 09/18/89 1600
80
5.0
1.1
78
32 0.30 0.16 71
0.00
0 00
0 00
21152
7311-028
Cone 026:51-52 09/18/89 1100
193 13.8
1.8
71
37 0.27
0.38
31
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00 0.00
378
21153
7311-033
Cone 027:51-52 09/18/39 1200
161 13,7
1.9
71
30 0.27
0.5?
61
0.00
0 00
0 00
0. 00 0.00
381
0. 00
0. 00
960
116 12.1
0 00
0 00 0.00
331
381
21151
7007-339
Cone 033:51-52 09/18/89 1000
90
9.0
1.9
65
13 0.29
0.59
59
0.00
0. 00
0.0D
375
21155
lit Hood
Bale 017:71-79 09/05/89
751
59
7.9
7.1
53
25 0.25
0.81
39
1.98
2. 21 936. 18 16. 91 25.29
689
21155
—Jit Hoed
21156
Bale 215:23-2? 09/05/89
512
18
9.1
7.6
55
25 0.26
0.72 11
1.27
2, 17
0. 00 19, 15 25.20
718
8303-016
Bale 018:78-82 09/05/89
691
29
1.3
1.8
17
25 0.28
0.65
1.31
3. 10
0. 00 16. 70 29.39
685
59
21156
8303-016
Bale 218:23-27 09/05/89
213
11
5.0
5.2
19
26 0.25
0.61
52
0.88
3. 18 531. 56 61. 51 19.21
697
21157
M303-117
Bale 019:62-82 09/05/89
879
51
5.8
3.5
62
25 0.26
0.78
13
1,60
3. 30
0. 00 51. 58 21.95
191
21157
""-8303-117
Bale 220:23-27 09/05/89
510
31
6.1
1.1
60
21 0.26
0.59
5?
0.90
3. 39 158. 51 16. 39 27.71
719
21159
8308-066
Bale 135:02-06 09/12/89 1015
55
5.1
3.7
59
21 0.28
0.69
19
1.03
3. 69
3. 75 51. 12 15.82
297
0.00
0
0.81
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
601
0.26 0.38 80
0.66
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
513
373
21159
8308-066
Bale 207:28-32 09/18/89
185
8
1.2
3.0
59
23 0.29
21160
S flfr HP1/86
Bale 211:23-27 09/15/39
619
13
7.8
5.0
61
31
21160
S Afr HP1/86
Cone 011:51-52 09/18/89 1600
89
5.6
3.9
59
32 0,25
0,39
78
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
21169
8301-011
Bale 001:62-66 09/05/89 1792
87
1.8
5.0
19
23 0.25 0.71
15
0,72
0, 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
711
21169
8301-011
Bale 229:23-27 09/06/89 1159
81
5.6
5,6
50
21 0.26 0.91 28
1.71
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
195
21170
8301-018
Bale 002:62-68 09/05/89
16
1.8
5.0
19
21
0.59
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
698
21170
8301-018
Bale 238:23-27 09/11/89 1561
73
1.7
5.1
17
21 0.25
0.81
39
1.01
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 O.DO
530
21171
8301-062
Bale 003:62-67 09/05/89 1698
115
8.5
5.6
60
22 0.21 0.51
57
1.11
0. 00
0. 00 0, 00 0.00
691
21171
8301-062
Bale 211:23-27 09/11/89 1007
77
7.6
6.3
55
25 0.21 0.83 38
1.16
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
581
21172
8302-001
Bale 001:62-66 09/05/89 1081
11
1.1
5.5
13
25 0.27 0.95
33
1.70
3. 20 168. 09 51. 61 23.70
713
21173
8303-001
Bale 005:62-66 09/05/89 1638
68
1.1
1.7
17
21
29
1.51
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
203
956
0.21 0.51 53
0.27
1.07
^Agricultural Chenistry Deporlnent^Oregcn State University^Agricultural Research Serviced SDopt Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Gale
and 5-Cnne Analyses at 33! Hoist ure Content(Dole)
or Rs Is 3<isis(5-Cone)
as o
October
22, 1990
Oil
Accession
Harvest
or Hursery
__Hiinbex_ .Jdenlificotior_J.V:pe^Location
Oate
Yield Alpha Alpha
Dela
Alpha
6 Ho 3!n<3
tlyr
nil
Hun
j.b/J.L[,b/ac _.L _.L... Mi?. CpH_.H3I._K^L_ &§.JL.M<L.Jld_JkX„.<XLJAL.
21173
8303-001
Cone 212:23-2? 03/19/39 600
20
3.3
5.3
33
21
0.22
0.61
55
0.00
0.00
0.00
21171
9303-006
Sale 006=63-63 09/05/39
896
52
5.3
5.9
19
22
0.25
1.23
23
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.03
0.00
21175
8303-017
Bale 007=62-6? 09/05/89 1019
56
5.1
1.1
55
22 0.28
0.62
58
1.13
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
21175
3303-017
Cone 213:27-27-03/19/89
600
30
1.9
1.5
52
22 0.21
0.55
63
0.00
0.00
O.OO
0.00
0,00
21176
8303-053
Bale 003:67.-67 09/11/89 1113
67'
6.0
1,0
60
22 0.28
0.71
51
1.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21177
8303-071
Bale 009:81-69 09/11/39
3?
1.6
5.0
13
22
0.28
0.35
35
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
2117?
8303-071
Gate- 101=29-30 09/05/89 1280
51
1.2
1.9
- 16
23
0,28
0.82.
39
0.83
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
21173
8303-076
Bote 010=63-67 09/11/83 1369
78
5,7
5.1
53
25
0.27
0.00
0
1.91
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,3
1.3
53
21 0,27
0.61
59
1.32 0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
311
21179
8303-031
Bale 011:62-66 09/11/89 853
51
21179
8303-081
Bote 105:29-30 03/05/89 1152
69
6.0
1.1
59
23 0,27
0.62
55
1.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
21100
3303-09!
Bale 012:62.-68-.09/15/89 738
56
7.6
5.3
59
23 0.29
0.83
10
1.75
0 00
0.00
0 00 0.00
21131
3303-116
Bate 013:77-82 09/05/89 815
19
5.8
3.7
61
21 0.28
0.75
•18
1.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.1
60
21 0.27
0,80
10
1.21
3.11 165.01 1? .93 27,73
5.6
11
22 0.30
0.90
39
1.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
11
0.85 0.00
0.00
0 00 0.00
0,00
0.00
21181
8303-116
tele 217:28-32 09/12/89 516
36
6.6
21182
830H68
Bate 011:62-68 03/15/89 671
30
1.1
O.OO
0.00
21183
830H75
Bate 015:61-69 09/15/89 687
1?
2.1
1.9
33
23 0.30 D.91
21183
8301-075
Cone 219:06-10 09/19/39 1000
19
1.9
5.0
27
21
0.21
0,69
52
0.00
0.00
65
1.10
3 33 131.91 38 82 31.80
0.81
3 28
0.00 10 28 31,69
0 00
0,00
0 00
0.00
0 00 0.00
0 00 0,00
21181
21181 _
21185
21185
8305-017 '
83U5-017
S.Bf. RF5/51
S.flf. RF5/51
Bale 016:73-78 09/05/89 896
57
6.1
5.0
56
25 0.23
0.52
Bate 201:23-27 09/15/89 213
13
5.9
5.1
52
25 0.27
0.75 13
Bale 112:39-10 03/13/89 1G12
Bate 135:17
08/31/89 338
188 11.5
83 10.6
5.2
5.1
69
66
19 0,25
17 0.23
0.51
0.10
62
73
1.72
0.71
0.00
0 00 0,00
21135
S.Af. RF5/51
Bale 216:06.-10 09/11/891672
191 11.6
5.3
68
19 0.26
0.63
52
1.79
0 00
0.00
21185
S.Af. RFS/51
Cone 019:17-18 09/12/89 2000
215 10.8
5.1
83
19 0.25
0.75
17
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00 0.00
21186
7507-109
Bate 239:23-2? 09/11/89 2110
271 11.1
6.6
63
32 0.26
0.78
10
1.85
0 00
0.00
0 00 0.00
21130
3JW-03?
Bale 210:23-27 09/05/89
6.0
7.1
13
21
0.23
0.83
37
1.01
3 61 87.78 18 62 25.93
21190
21491
301
51
8309-037
Bate 229:28-32 09/18/89 1193
108
7.2
7.6
19
23 0.21
1.09
25
2,02
2 80 7G1.50 66 15 13,76
8105-026
Bale 230:23-2? 09/06/39 1193
102
6.8
1.9
58
22 0.26
1.05
28
1.15
0 00
0,00
21192
0108-022
Bate 109:29-30 09/05/83 2282
16?
7.3
5.1
57
21 0,27
0.90
3?
1.18
0 00
O.OO 0 00 0.00
21192
8108-022
Bate 215:28-32 09/11/39 520
35
7.0
5.0
53
26 0.26
0.75 11
1.07
0 00
0.00
0 00 0,00
21193
8103-096
Bate 110:29-30 09/06/89 939
66
7.0
1.6
61
22 0.25
0.87
10
1.95
0 OO
0,00
0 00 0.00
21193
8108-036
Mi 233:23-32 09/18/89 1313
110
8.3
5.3
61
22 0.26
0.71
13
2.03
0 00
0.00
0 00 0.G0
21191
7506-123
Bate 231:17-21 09/00/09 1382
113 10.1
6.1
62
21
0.75 12
2.18
0 00
0,00
0. 00 0.00
21195
7505-131
kite 236:17-21 03/03/39 1216
Bale 236:23-27 08/25/89 219
121
3.7
5.8
63
38 0.21
0.59
51
1.37
0 00
0.00
0 00 0.00
11
5.7
5.7
5D
23 0.26
0.37
35
1.11
3. 33
1.13 55. 01 13.28
letinaiigcr
tettnanger
21136
tettnanger
21197
21197 - tettnanger
21196
21190
fl
A
B
B
0.21
0 00 0.00
Hand 135:15
03/29/89 127
23
5.1
5.1
52
23
0.26
0.00
0
1.37 3 62
1,17 17. 17 16.33
Bale 195:16
08/29/89 512
31
6,0
5.2.
51
21 0.21
0,00
0
1,01
2. 81
1.30 58, 79 12.38
0.00
0. 00 0,00
Bate 237:23-2? 08/25/89
381
26
6.7
7.1
17
25 0.21
0.85
36
1.19
0. 00
Yeonan
Bate 031:01-01 03/21/89
256
30
11.8
5.1
70
21 0.26
0.38
82
1.19
3. 22 22.1.92 38. 28 25.87
Cone 203:01-05 09/18/83 600
75 12.5
6,7
65
25 0.29
0.52
65
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0.00
Bate 035:01-01 03/00/83
68 11.1
3,5
7G
23 0.29
0.16
72
1.92 0. 00
0,00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
21198
Yeonan
21195
^Z-eni th
21199
Zenith
Cone 209:01-05 09/18/89 100
11 10.1
3.9
73
22 0.26
0.12
?6
0.00 0. 00
0.00
7501-026
Bate 205:12-16 08/30/89 2150
310 15.8
3.2
33
21 0.21
0,38
71
0,55 3. 26
t.59 63. 71
21501
7501-031
Bale 206:12-16 09/11/39 1152
110
9.5
6.9
58
21 0.23
0.72 13
1.39
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0.00
21502
7501-111
Bate 223:12-16 09/15/89 1792
153
8,5
9,6
17
36 0.23
0.82
39
1.73
0. 00
0,00
0, 00 0,00
0.70
13
1.01
3. 05
3,28 68. 8? 8,92
21SCO
608
7.07
21503
7501-137
Bate 231:12-16 03/31/89 2155
221
9.1
9.1
52
35 0.21
21505
0036-083
Bate 231:23-27 09/06/8.91553
150
9.7
3,2
75
33 0,28 0.56 61
1.26
0. DO
0.OB
0. 00 0.00
21506
7507-062
Sale 235:23-27 03/06/89
0 10.7
7.2
60
11 0.30
1.01
28
2.17
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0.00
215DS
8037-068
Bate 218:28-32 09/12/89 731
3.7
70
32 0.26
0.70
19
1.58
0, 00
0.00
0. 00 O.OO
0
21509
0037-OSD
Hale 220:23-32 09/12/89 1019
21511
7610-101
Bale 238:28-32 09/18/89
21511
7610-101
Cone 015:17-18 09/12/39 1800
973
63
8.5
69
6.6
1.3
60
38 0.27
0.6?
52
1.21
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0.80
158
16.2
6.3
72
33" 0.28
0.18
70
2.75 0. 00
0,00
0. OO 0.00
206 11.1
3.0
73
19 0.23
0.37
81
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00 0.00
•Agricultural Chenistry Oepartnent*»0regon State yniversity**flgricultural Research Service«*U SDept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bate
and 5-Cone Analyses at BX Hoisture Co ntent(Bate) sr As Is Basis(5-Cone) as of 0c tober 8, 1990
Oi1
Accession
Harvest
or Hurser
Hunber
21512
Identification
7611-025
Type Location
Oate
Yield Alpha Alpha Beta Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Bale 018=17-18 08/22/S9 1002
7,3
3!
1.6
Ratio
82
6 Ho
CoH
HSI
23 0.31
HSI
0.12
nil
Renain
30
lOOq H/C
0.51
0.00
H/F
0.00
(lyr
Ku n
Serial
(3!)
a )
(limber
0.00
0.03
131
555
9.7
2.1
82
32 0.32 0.15
73
I .16
0.00
0.00
0.G0
0.00
311 13.0
?.!
65
30 0.21 0.11
71
0 .55
3.52
3 .31 59.60
9.91
775
5.3
1.7
53
13 0.22 0.15
71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
133
0 .00
0.00
0.00
132
0.00
O.OO
0.00
101
0.00
O.CO 0,00
103
0.00
0.00
0.00
131
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
131
0 62 0.00
0 .00
0,00 0,00
329
89
21512
7611-025
Bate 233 28-32 09/18/33
21513
7501-001
Bale 202=12-16 08/30/89 2397
21511
Hersbrucker-6
Cone 207:01-05 09/18/S3 100
21515
Hersbrucker-8
Cone 216:01-05 03/18/89
100
18
1.1
3.8
51
18 0.22 0.51
63
0.00
0.00
21516
Hersbrucker-9
Cone 217 06-10 03/19/89
600
28
1.7
5.3
17
18 0.21 0.38
80
0.00
0.00
21517
Hersb red sten
Cone 218 06-10 09/19/89 100
21
6-.1
1.9
55
21
0.21 0,92
33
0.00
0.00
21518
Hersb alpha
Cone 219 06-10 09/19/89
600
12
7.0
3.1
67
20 0.22 0.37
81
0.00
0.00
21520
Ba 11/72-198 Yu Cone 228 01-05 09/18/89
800
37
1.6
2.6
61
38 0,27
0.61
57
0 ,00
21520
Ba 11/72-19H Yu Hand 039 09-12 09/11/89 213
15
7.1
3.7
65
33 0.26 0.00
0
21521
Saazer-36
Cone 203 06-10 09/19/83
100
6
6.2
5.0
56
23 0.22 0 13 71
0.00 D.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
109
21521-522
5aa:er-36
Cone 221 06-10 03/19/89 200
11
5.7
1.5
56
26 0.25
0 51 63
0 00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
122
21522
Saazer-38
Cone 203•06-10 09/19/89
200
12
6.1
1.0
60
21 0.21
0 57 61
0 00 0.00
0 .00
0.00 0.00
119
uf 21113
Cone 222 06-10 09/19/89
100
18
1.1
2.9
61
23 0.27
0 11
76
0 00 0.00
0 .00
O.DO
0.00
110
0 00 0.00
0 00 0.00
0.00
105
0 00 0.00
0 00 0.00
0 00
519229
21523
913
73
V
21521
vf 21111
Cone 223 06-10 D9/19/83 200
21531
11 Saazer
Cone Greenh
07/27/89
0
21
10
5.0
1.5
53
25 0,25 0 11 73
0
2.1
3.6
11
13 0.32
0 00
0
21536
7003-151
Bate 231 28-32 03/18/83 2528
235 11.7
8,5
58
13 0.2?
0 00
0
1 69 0.00
0 00 0.00 0 00
21537
7006-370
Cone 025 17-18 03/12/83 1000
117
11.7
7.8
60
26 0.2I
0 80 15
0 00 0.00
0 00 0,00
0 77 3.20
7 29 11.71 27 15
0 00
18209
Fuggle H
Bale 010 01-01 08/21/83
736
13
5,8
2.3
6?
26 0.32 0 00
0
0 00
1„
28
238
50021
BB 301-2
Cone 011 19-50 09/13/89 1800
157
8.7
3.1
72
15 0.23 0 38 80
0 00 0.00
0 00 0.00
5O01O
BB 301-1
Cone 016 19-50 09/13/83 1600
85
5.3
5.0
52
39 0.23
0 62 57
0 00 0.00
0 00 0.00
0 00
259
0 00
216
0.00
0 00
262
0 00 0.00
0 00
253
0 00
0 00
383
50075
BB 101-2
Cone 01? 13-50 03/13/89 1100
72
5.2
3.7
59
16 0,29
0 5? 60
0 00 0.00
0 00 0.00
52013
81-S, BB 215-2 Cone 050 19-50 09/13/89 1600
17
3.0
2.3
50
36 0.23
0 19 68
0 00 0.00
0 00
51002
BB 501-3
Cone 051 19-50 09/13/83
800
30
3.8
1.5
72
38 0.23
0 55 62
0 00 0.00
0.00
51093
BB 501-2
Cone 031 51-52 09/18/89
0
0
6.7
3.2
68
58 0.26
0 53 61
0 00 0.00
56001
Hallertauer
Bate 011 01-01 08/21/89 512
21
1.7
1.2
53
20 0.31
0 57 61
0 69 3.26 520 83 38.12 33 85
32
56002
Backa
Bate 012 01-01 08/21/89
270
3
3.2
5.1
38
20 0.21 0 00
3.33 216 37 26.77 38 33
626
56008
08 826
Bale 013 19-50 08/23/83 1322
95
7.2
5.7
56
15 0.27 0 89 35
56012
73-S
Cone 011 19-50 09/13/89 2000
73
3.6
1.7
58. 28 0.23 0 11 73
Cascade
Bale 013 01-01 03/21/89
56
6.1
1.3
60
38 0.29
0 18 70
0 28 2.72
2 80 55.51 11 75
133
50016
Otah 526-5
Bate 018 19-50 08/30/89 311
17
5.1
2.2
70
23 0.27
0 10 81
0 19 2.53
38 03 17.35 22 70
125
58112
0B 835
Cone 019 19-50 09/13/83 1600
110
6.1
2.2
71
11 0.26
0 12 75
0 00 3.00
60020
tltl 2-1
Hand 025 19-50 08/30/89
12
3.0
1.5
10
55 0.23
0 15 72
2 17 0.09
60021
H(1 3-1
Cone 001 11-11 09/18/89
0
0
3.3
1.2
11
63 0.21 0 35 81
0 00 0.00
HH 3-1
Hand 026 19-50 08/23/89
67
5
7.0
2.0
78
68 0.2?
D.00
0
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
13
60021
H (lex 2-1
Cone 003 11-11 09/18/89
0
0
3.2
3,5
18
53 0.23
0. 31 35
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
386
60021
Colo 1-2
Cone 006 11-11 09/18/89
0
0
5.3
3.6
60
61 0.25
0. 51
63
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
390
Colo 1-2
Hand 027 19-50 08/23/89
221
12
5,5
3.9
58
53 0.28
0, 00
0
0. 89 1.18
21. 13 72.97
2. 12
11
60027
Colo 2-2
Bate 029 19-50 09/11/89
576
16
2.8
3.9
12
60 0.23 0. 65 51
0. 71
36. 50 57,77 3. 98
170
60027
Colo 2-2
Cone 008 11-15 09/18/88
0
0
1,8
3.9
55
60 0.22
0. 81 11
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
387
2.1
55
5? 0.25 0. 55 62
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
395
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
51
0. DO
0.00
0. 00
352
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
392
-5S013
60021
60021
60023
60029
Colo 3-1
Colo 3-1
Cone 010 11-11 09/18/83
Hand 030 19-50 08/23/83
875
381
0
109
0
8
3.0
7.2
1.2
63
0
0
0 U
1 73 D.00
0 00 0.00
0 00
3?
0 00 0.00
0 00 0.00
0 00
218
1.11
69 0.27
D. 00
0. DO
0. 00 0.00
0.00
0 DO
211
39. ?2 15.93 1 55
0. 00 0.00 0 00
153
0 00 0.00
385
60032
Colo 5-1
Cone 001 51-52 09/18/89
600
13
2.2
D.9
71
53 0.28
0. 11 73
60032
Colo 5-1
Cone 011 11-11 09/18/89
0
0
2.2
1.0
69
51
0. 36 82
60035
Colo 7-2
Cone 001 51-52 09/18/89
100
2
1.7
1,3
56
50 0.28 0. 56 61
0. 00 D.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
311
60037
Cone 005 51-52 09/18/83
0
0
7,3
1.1
61
17 0.21 0. 33 86
0. 00 0,00
0. 00 0.00 0, 00
318
Cone 012 11-15 03/18/89
0
0
3,8
2,3
62
15 0.27 0. 32 88
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00 0. 00
397
60038
Uyo 2-1
Uyo 2-1
Uyo 3-1
Cone 006 51-52 09/18/83
100
3
0.7
1.6
31
11 0.36 0. 60 58
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
35?
61008
Pol C2/66
Cone 037 51-52 09/18/89
300
17
5.6
3.1
62
22 0.21 0. 62 5?
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
382
61011
Pol P/KI
Cone 038 51-52 09/18/89 100
26
6.6
3.7
61
25 0.25
0. 55 62
0. 00 0.00
0. 00 0.00 0. 00
366
60037
0.26
90
•Agricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State Oniversity**flgricultural Research Service**U S Dept Hgriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
Bate and 5-Cone Analyses at S3! Hoisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basis(5-Ccne) as of October 8,
Accession
Oil
or Hursery
Harvest
X
fllphc
J!
Ratic
6 Ho
ZfltB
nil
Renain
lOOq H/C
Hyr
Hn
Serial
(X)
(3!)
Hunber
Type Location
61017
USSR MB
Cone 012:51-52 09/13/89
200
15
7.1
1.3
60
21 0.21 0.65
55
( .00
( .00
( .00
61019
Bale 017:01-01 08/21/89
136
22
5.2
2.6
66
25 0.31
70
[ .18
: .03
t .10 31.17 3 .2?
33
Bale 018:01-01 08/21/89
608
31
5.7
2.6
68
27 0.31 0.11 81
[ .92
C.00
C,00
0.00
217
61021
Yugo Golding
Sav Golding
tettnanger
Bate 013:01-01 08/21/89
256
11
5.5
3.5
61
20 0.25
0.00
0
[ .53
I .78
1.17 11.91 IE .1?
500
62013
Conet
Bale 020:01-01 08/21/83 1612
187
11.1
1.0
71
10 0.28 0.11
72
[ ,69
C.00
C.00
637
62051
Janus
Hand 021:01-01 08/21/89
0
0
5.9
2.1
71
29 0.27
0
0.00
0.00
C.DO
0.00
[ .00
52
63008
H18-8
Cone 011:51-52 09/13/89 1100
80
5.7
1.9
51
11 0.28 1.08 30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33?
85
310
61020
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Beta
Identification
Hunber
Date
Yield Alpha fllphc
CoH
HSI
HSI
0.16
0.00
/F
0.00
0.00
0.00
[ .00
[ .00
362
63018
N 17-35
Cone 012:51-52 09/18/89 1800
1.7
1.3
53
26 0.28 0.81 12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
63013
N 17-10
Cone 013:51-52 09/18/83 2000
202 10.I
5.0
67
35 0.25 0.51
66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
313
63020
H 17-12
Cone 011:51-52 09/18/89 1600
172
5.2
67
36 0.28
0.50
67
0.00 0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
351
0.25 0.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
335
338
10.8
63021
H 18-1
Cone 015:51-52 09/18/83 2000
50
2.5
6.6
27
51
66
0.00
63027
BG x 19010(1
Cone 016:51-52 09/18/83 2000
88
1.1
7.0
39
50 0.26 0,82 13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
63032
BG x 58015(1
Bate 035:13-50 08/23/83
63
9.5
5.0
66
61
0.26 0.16 61
0.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
7
61003
19105 x 19173(1
Cone 018:51-52 09/18/89 2000
12
2.1
1.1
32
33 0.21 0.71 18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
315
61007
19105 x 1905811
Bale 232:01-05 09/13/83 2761
66
2.1
6.3
28
33 0.28 0.91 36
0.93
0.00
0 .00
O.DO
0.00
503
6100?
19105 x 19058(1 Cone 017:19-50 09/13/83 2000
60
3.0
6.5
32
31
53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
237
61008
Zattler 2L1180P Cone 019:51-52 09/18/89 1000
68
6.8
3.7
65
18 0.25 0.11 73
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
331
61003
Zattler 7K1910P Cone 020:51-52 09/18/89 200
8
1.0
2.0
67
20 0.29
0 00 0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
336
661
0.21
0.6?
0.15
71
71
61010
Zattler 7K1910P Cone 021=51-52 09/18/39
600
27
1.6
3.6
56
22 0.26 0.16
61020
Backa x 1906211 Cone 011:51-52 09/18/89 800
37
1,6
2.1
69
29 0.30 0.55 62
61026
BG x 19182(1
Cone 015:51-52 03/18/83 1200
63
5,7
1.1
57
33 0.27 0.11
61100
Bullion
Bale 003:05-08 09/08/83 1195
107
9.0
1.2
68
Uye 22/56/2
Cone 016:51-52 09/18/83
100
- Horthern Breuer Bate 001:05-08 08/21/83
0
61106
61107
65003
BG x 19058H
0 00 0.00
0 00
333
0 00 0.00
0 00
361
73
0 00 0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
370
16 0.28 1.01 32
1 60 0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
651
0 00 0.00
0 00
365
1.5
69
25 0.25 0.75 17
0 00 0 00
1.1
71
21 0.25
0.10
78
1 10 3 07 265 59 50.53 21 97
38
Bale 028:51-52 08/31/33 2069
230 11.1
9,0
55
36 0.23 0.81
36
1 57 1 71 121 1? 57.63 11 08
156
181 10.8
8.2
57
38 0.2?
19
3.1
62
12 0.23 0.31 83
0
65009
BG x 19058(1
Bale 228:23-27 09/06/S3 1706
Cluster (LI)
Bale 006:05-08 08/21/89 1792
66050
Alliance
Bate 012:05-08 08/21/85
66051
7003-176
Cone 013:17-18 09/12/83 2000
7003-281
Cone 011:17-18 09/12/89 1800
97
7005-010
Cone 016:17-18 09/12/89 2000
195
7005-087
Cone 017:17-18 09/12/89 1600
129
8.1
2.5
7006-095
Cone 005:17-18 09/12/83 2000
196
9.8
5.3
66052
0 00 0 00
0 00 0 00
9.9
10 10.2
65102
6S052
0.00
1.26
2 51 0 00
0 00
206
0 19 1 69 102 03 11.12 15 20
633
0 00 0.00
99
5.5
526
33
6.3
2.2
71
30 0.30 0.38 87
0 78 0 00
0 00
631
Progress
Bate 009:05-08 08/21/88 782
Pride Ringuood Bale 010:05-08 08/21/89 137
Pethan Golding Bale 017:05-08 09/08/89 1056
19
6.3
1.1
59
30 0.32 0.15 63
0 09 3 51 110 93 16.09 30. 8?
135
31
7.8
2.7
71
30 0.28
81
0. 69 0. 11 150. 31 16.86 1. 36
137
71
6.7
2.1
76
32 0.30 0,67
55
1 50 0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
318
87
1.1
3.3
57
19 0.20 0.51
63
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0, 00
231
5.1
7.5
12
12 0.20 0.80 11
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
221
9,8
1.2
70
36 0.22 0.53 61
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
232
77
12 0.21 0.85
11
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
226
65
38 0.25
0.76 17
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
236
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
116
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
271
0.38
7006-278
Bate 021:17-18 08/22/89 1216
130
10.7
3.6
75
31 0.28 0.00
7006-108
Cone 028:17-18 09/13/89 1900
259 13.6
5.7
71
30 0.27
7006-155
Cone 030:17-13 09/13/83 1200
130 10.8
1.0
7313-027
Cone 007:51-52 09/18/89 1600
153 10.0
3.5
7611-113
Bate 022:17-18 08/22/89 1066
107 10,1
7611-113
Cone 213:28-32 09/19/89 200
8019-003
0
0 00 0.00
0.32
88
73
30 0.26 0.11
76
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
273
71
33 0.30 0.57 60
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 O.DO
0. 00
311
0. 00
3.3
76
25 0.29 0.00
0. 78 2, 18 13. 15 56,20 17. 12
501
3
1.3
1.3
77
29 0.31 0.53 61
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
107
Bate 215:01-05 09/13/89 1391
133
9.6
5.2
65
38 0.30 0.00
0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
296
171
0
8020-032
Bale 221:01-05 08/25/89 1133
151
10.5
3.8
73
12 0.27 0.00
0
1. 30 0. 00
0. 00 0,00
0, 00
8021-011
Bale 225:01-05 08/21/89
169
32
6.7
2,5
73
27 0.28 0.00
0
0, 80 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
21
8021-010
Bale 230:06-10 08/29/89 1365
128
9.1
5.2
65
10 0.26 0,00
0
.0. 90 3. 6? 195. 12 61.37 16. 20
729
770
8025-057
Bale 219:12-16 08/31/89 1176
106
7.2
2,5
71
27 0.28 0.00
0
0. 76 3. 65 60. 19 51.91 16. 57
8026-152
Bate 222:12-16 08/31/89 1032
90
8.7
1.1
68
25 0.25
0.00
0
I. 50 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0, 00
133
8031-002
Bate 222:17-21 09/07/89 1125
119 10.5
1.7
69
33 0.25 0.00
0
0. 82 0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
577
8031-171
Bate 231:17-21 09/08/89 1011
3.5
70
36 0.29 0.00
0
0. 91 0. DO
0. 00 0,00
0. 30
572
86
8.2
91
•Agricultural Chenistry Oepartnent*»0regon State yniversity*»flgricultural Research Service**U S Dept figriculture**Corvallis, Oreg
1989 Bate and 5-Cone Analyses at 83! Moisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basis(S-Cone) as of October 8,
Accession
0il
Harvest
or Hursery
Hunber
Identification
Ivpe Location
Oate
Yield Alpha Alpha Beta Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
X
X
6 Ho ZH'B
Ratio
CoH
HSI
HSI
nil
Renain IDOq H/C
M
Ayr
Hun
Serial
(X)
( :)
Hunber
8033-031
Bate 216=23-27 09/18/39
917
52
3.7
1.3
6?
23 0.27
O.DO
0
1.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
LOO
638
8036-081
Bale 232=23-27 09/18/89 1032
71
6.9
3.1
63
27 0.28
LOO
0
1.19
LOO
LOO 0.00
LOO
612
8151-212
Bate 111:29-30 09/06/89
701
1?
6.6
2.6
72
21
0.30
1.00
0
0.00
LOO
LOO
LOO
679
8151-238
Bate 112:29-30 09/06/89 1130
97
S.6
1.5
66
21
0,25
LD0
0
1.18
'.59 10 .75 55.8? 13.82
201
8151-237
Bate 101:31-32 03/06/89
11
7.1
3.5
68
18 0.23
( .00
0
0.00
LOO
681
555
8151-261
Bate 102:31-32 09/06/89 1120
8151-271
Bale 103:31-32 09/06/89
928
5.0
67
18 0.21
t .00
0
1.81 2.25
9.1-
1.8
66
23 0.26
[ .00
0
2.19
111 10.2
85
( .00
LOO
0.00
0.00
LOO
8 '.86 59.10 I LSS
201
( ,00
205
569
( .00
0.00
8252-115
Bate 101:31-32 09/07/89 675
63
7.2
1.5
61
27 0.23
C.00
0
0.00
[ .00
f .00
0.00
( .00
9253-133
Bale 105:31-32 09/07/89
300
12
5.3
1.6
51
18 0.25
0.00
0
0.00
C.00
[ .00
0.00
c .00
580
8253-229
Bale 106:31-32 09/07/89
320
3
2.7
3.3
11
25 0.26
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
C.00
0.00
L.00
187
8251-112
Bate 107:31-32 09/07/89
213
11
5.1
5.8
17
22 0.25
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
531
8251-165
Bate 108:31-32 09/07/89 533
13
3.6
3.0
31
21
0.23
0.00
0
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
579
8251-16?
Bale 225:23-2? 09/06/83
367
28
7.6
8,1
18
17 0.23
0.00
0
1.61
2.99 110.21 11.23 26.61
177
8251-211?
Bale 227:23-21 03/06/89
367
25
6.8
7,7
17
23 0.21
0.00
0
1.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
161
8251-253
Bale 103:31-32 03/07/89
610
22
3.1
1.1
11
18 0.28
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
571
8251-267
Bale 110:31-32 09/07/89
127
18
1.3
5.6
11
23 0.27
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
169
8301-001
Bale 205:06-10 09/11/83 2022
107
5.3
5.1
51
33 0.33
0.00
0
1.12
3,55 100.76 50,50
3.67
151
8301-D05
Bate 232:17-21 09/08/85 2026
132
6.5
6.2
51
23 0.26
0,00
0
1.66
0.00
0.00
535
0.00
0.00
8301-021
Bale 102:29-30 09/05/39 1706
110
8.2 ' 5.1
60
22 0.28
0.00
0
1.59
2.10 no .50 37.63 26.85
8301-025
Bale 103:29-30 09/05/89 1612
130
7.9
62
32 0.27
0.00
0
0.65
0.00
1.9
0.DO
0.00
0 00
178
686
8301-017
Cone 208:01-05 09/18/89 1000
15
1.5
1,7
13
23 0.26
0 67 53
0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
111
8301-057
Bate 211:06-10 09/11/89
11
5.0
1.1
53
29 0.26
0 00
0.69
0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
151
0 00 0.00
0 00
135
887
0
8303-017
Cone 217:01-05 09/18/89 1000
66
6.6
1.1
62
25 0.23
0 51 63
0.00
0 00
8303-020
Bale 218:01-05 D8/21/89 1058
61
5.8
1.8
55
19 0.21
0 00
0
0.51
3 63 589 21 29.17 36 53
25
8303-037
Bale 221:01-05 09/13/85
37
5.2
3.1
60
23 0.25
0 00
0
1.08
0 00
0 00
163
717
0 00 0.00
8303-066
Cone 236:01-05 05/18/85 1000
50
5.0
1.0
55
12 0.22
0 72 19
0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
136
8303-077
Cone 211:01-05 09/19/83 1000
18
1.3
2.8
63
23 0.30
0 55 63
0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
125
8303-081
Bale 106:23-30 03/05/89
191
32
6.5
3.6
61
23 0.2?
0 00
0
0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
700
8303-088
Cone 216:01-05 09/19/89 1000
31
3.1
3.6
19
20 0.25
0 63 55
0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0 00
113
8303-091
Cone 218:01-05 09/19/89 1000
38
3.8
2.6
59
20 0.26
0 60 58
0.00
0 00
0 DO
0.00
0 00
121
8303-101
Cone 201=06-10 09/19/33
300
31
3.3
2.6
59
23 0.25
0 56
62
0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0. 00
113
8303-119
Cone 203=06-10 03/19/89
800
30
3.8
3.6
52
28 0.2?
0 69 52
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
100
8303-121
Cone 201=06-10 09/19/89 1000
17
1.7
1.3
53
21
0. 51
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
120
0. 00 0.00
0, 00
111
0.21
63
8303-122
Cone 215:06-10 09/19/89 1200
92
7.7
3.7
63
22 0.25
0. 55 62
0.00
0. 00
8303-121
Bate 233:06-10 09/11/89 2538
155
6.1
3.5
63
25 0.27
0. 00
0
1.32
3. 51 131. 79 11.25 30. 71
8303-112
Bale 235:06-10 09/11/89
51
6.1
3.6
61
27
0.29
0. 00
0
1.60 0. 00
0. 00 0,00
0. 00
181
0
181
790
510
8301-012
Bale 218=06-10 09/11/89
589
29
1.9
1.5
52
31 0.28
0. 00
1,13 0. 00
0, 00 0,00
0. DO
8301-015
Cone 201=12-16 09/19/89
800
33
1.2
1.7
17
22 0.23
0. 61 55
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
112
8301-029
Bate 209:12-16 09/11/89
683
33
1.8
5.3
18
23 0.27
0, 00
1.11
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
113
0
8301-06?
Cone 211:06-10 09/10/89 1200
69
5.7
6.5
17
21 0.23
0. 66 51
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
121
0301-090
Bale 236:12-16 03/31/89 1617
69
1.2
5.5
13
23 0.22
0. 00
0
0,13
0. 00
0. 00 0,00
0. 00
118
279
8301-120
Bale 237:12-16 09/01/89
913
10
1,1
5.8
13
21
0,22
0. 00
0
0.90
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
8301-126
Bate 108:29-30 05/06/89
992
33
3.8
5.2
13
28 0.2?
0. 00
0
1,31
0. DO
0. 00 0.00
0, 00
200
8306-083
Bate 231:23-27 09/18/89 1792
115
8.1
1.3
66
39 0.29
0. 00
0
1.10
0, 00
0. 00 0.00
0. oo
608
8308-020
Bale 219:28-32 08/25/83
956
68
7,1
1.8
60
23 0.25
0, 00
0
1,05
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 00
198
8308-011
Bate 207:23-27 09/15/89
273
18
6.5
3.8
63
22 0.28
0. DO
0
1.01
0, 00
0. 00 0.00
0. 30
511
8308-011
Bate 217:17-21 09/01/89 1229
81
6.8
1.1
62
23 0.23
0. 00
0
0,51
0, DO
0, 00 0.00 0. 30
236
8308-016
Bate 219:17-21 09/07/89 776
61
8.2
1.6
61
27 0.25
0, 30
0
1.36
0. OO
0. DO
171
0,00
0, 10
8303-001
Bate 227:17-21 09/07/89 1635
76
1.7
5,2
17
26 0.21 0. 10
0
1.12
0. 30
0. 10 0.00
0. 30
176
83O9-0D5
Bate 227:29-32 09/12/83 1962
101
5.3
5.6
19
27 0.26
0
1,18
3. Z7
9. 39 51.99 19. 13
737
0. 10
92
•Agricultural Chenistry Departnent»»Oregcn State Umversity*»Agricultural Research Service**0 S Dept Agriculture»*Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bate and 5-Cone Analyses at SZ Hoisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basis(5-Cone) as of October 8, 1990
Oil
Accession
Harvest
or Hursery
Hunber
8309-006
Identification Type Location
Date
Yield Alpha Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Bate 233=17-21 09/08/89 1291
8309-00?
Bale 235=17-21 03/03/39 1152
8309-003
Bale 223=23-27 09/05/39
917
91
X
7.1
Beta
Alpha
I
Ratio
5.1
58
6 Ho ZH*B
CoH
HSI
23 0.2?
HSI
0 .80
Renain lOOq H/C
50
Hy r
Hun
Serial
H/F (X)
(3!)
Hunber
nil
1.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6?0
0 .00
0.00
532
0.00
0.03
692
0.00
193
109
9.5
6.1
61
28 0.26
0.00
0
1.86
0.00
0 .00
66
7.0
6.0
51
26 0.26
0.00
0
1.32
0.00
0.00
8309-008
Bale 237:17-21 09/08/89 1800
138
7.6
6.0
56
25 0.25
0.00
0
2.13 0.00
0,D0 0.00
8309-010
Bate 239:17-2109/08/83 1510
95
6.3
1.1
58
29 0.21 0.00
0
1.91
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
665
8309-012
Bate 221:28-32 09/12/83
101
22
5.5
3.1
62
21 0.29
0.00
0
1.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
311
8309-022
Bale 222:28-32 08/25/33
802
32
1.0
1.2
13
22 0.29
0,00
0
0.77
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
667
8309-021
Bale 211:17-21 09/08/83 2112
165
7.8
5.2
60
25 0.27
0.00
0
2.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
571
8309-031
Bale 209:23-27 09/15/89
618
33
5.1
1.2
55
30 0.39
0.00
0
1.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
518
8309-036
Cone 212:28-32 03/19/83
600
35
5.8
1.9
55
30 0.21
1.00
31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
399
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
110
1.23 3 56 133 51 39.62 23.81
167
8101-001
Cone 205:01-05 03/18/89
800
51
6.3
5.8
52
26 0.23 0 85 11
8101-011
Bale 212:01-05 09/13/83 1216
51
1.1
1.8
16
25 0.28
0 55 90
8101-065
Bate 226:01-05 08/21/89
995
5?
5.7
1.8
51
21 0.27
0 00
0
1.29
0 00
0 00 0.00
17
8101-063
Bale 230:01-05 09/13/89 1318
101
7.5
1.1
65
28 0.28
0 8? 39
2.11
2 85 171.25 52 00 21.9?
162
8101-070
Cone 233:01-05 03/13/85 1000
13
1.8
5.7
16
30 0.23 0 66 53
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
133
8101-076
Bale 213:01-05 09/11/89 1018
58
5.7
1.5
56
28 0.27
0 81 10
1.53
3 61 190 89 50 50 17.91
191
0 00
8101-113
Bate 217:01-05 09/11/89 1212
72
6.0
3.8
61
23
0.29
1 02 30
1.15
3 58 151 11 19 62 11.13
511
8101-132
Cone 202:06-10 09/19/83 1000
59
5.9
6.3
18
22 0.23
0 67 53
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00
102
8101-115
Bate 210:06-10 08/29/89 1011
75
7.2
1.5
62
28 0.27 0 00
0
1.26
3 18 137 8132 31 26.71
759
8101-158
Bale 212:06-10 08/29/89
785
70
8.9
5.1
63
28 0.27 0 00
0
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
715
8101-163
Bate 213:06-10 03/29/89 1118
109
7.7
1.0
65
27 0.27 0 51 66
1.11
3 10 22? 21 12 01 23.63
728
8101-175
Bate 220:06-10 08/29/83 1126
73
7,0
1.1
61
29 0.25
0 33 31
1.25
3 27 216 18 55 79 12.97
8101-192
Cone 221:06-10 03/13/85 1000
66
6.6
1.0
62
28 0.21
0 71
50
0.00
0 00
0 00
8101-196
Bate 225:06-10 09/11/89
18
5.8
1.1
57
25 0.33
0 00
0
1.59
0 00
0 00 0 00 O.OO
161
316
828
0 00
0.00
0.00
767
130
8102-021
Bale 101:15-16 09/11/89
555
31
5.5
2.9
65
23 0.23
0 00
0
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
8102-036
Bate 102:15-16 08/28/89
763
17
6.1
3.6
63
25 0.28 0 00
0
0.00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
622
0 00
0 00
0 00 0.00
620
0 00
0 00 0 00 O.CO
609
8102-015
Bale 103:15-16 08/28/89 1103
981
71
57
5.3
5.9
3.1
2.8
63
67
25 0.23 0 51 65
22 0.23
0 00
0
1.2?
0.88
8102-068
Bate 101:15-16 08/28/89
81D2-080
Bale 105:15-16 03/28/83 1511
83
5,3
2.7
68
0 65 57
1,05
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
616
8102-033
Bale 106:15-16 08/28/89 1083
59
5.1
2.7
67
25 0.31 0 18 77
1.11
0 00
0 00 0 00 O.DO
617
8102-099
Bale 107:15-16 08/28/89 1172
30
6,1
3.0
67
27 0.28 0 58 96
0.73
0 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
618
8102-106
Bale 108:15-16 08/28/83 1280
76
5.9
3.2
65
25 0.25
1.12
D 00
0 00 0 00 0.00
611
0. 00
.23
0,31
0 62 53
0102-136
Bale 109:15-16 08/28/83 1301
76
5.8
3.1
63
22 0.29 0 67 69
0.68
0 00
0.00
613
8103-003
Bate 110:15-16 08/28/89 2026
77
3.8
1.0
19
22 0.25 0 66 53
0.71
3 62 11. 58 30. 90 38.71
166
8103-00?
Bate 111:15-16 03/23/89 2316
121
5.3
3.7
53
18 0.25
0 55 58
0.51
3 56 909. 18 38. 31 35.16
8103-011
Bale 112:15-16 09/11/89 1719
79
1.5
3.7
55
21
0. 81 15
1.39
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
683
8103-015
Bale 101:17-18 03/11/89
127
26
6.0
1.1
57
21 0,26
0. 75 19
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0.00
652
8103-086
Bate 102:17-18 08/28/89 2112
78
3.7
2.8
57
11 0.30
0, 67 69
0,63
3. 63
0. 00 26. 61 11.32
755
0. 00
0. 00 0, 00 0.00
10
8103-111
Bate 103:17-18 08/28/39 1813
68
3.8
3.7
51
0.29
26 0.26
0. 70 50
0.81
0. 00
621
8103-129
Bate 101:17-18 09/08/89 1962
92
1.7
3.7
56
21
0. 70 18
1.10
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
325
8103-129
Bate 105:17-18 08/28/89 1578
67
1.2
3.2
57
19 0.23 0. 61 58
0.60
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
612
8101-003
Bale 106:17-18 08/23/89 2018
75
3.6
3.5
51
22 0.31 0. 75 53
0.58
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
615
8101-018
Bale 108:17-18 09/11/39 128
6
1,7
5,7
15
21
0.27 0. 00
0
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
523
8101-023
Bate 109:17-18 08/28/89 2197
102
1,6
3.7
56
18 0.27 0. 53 61
0.11
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
751
8101-059
Bate 112:19-20 09/12/89 853
17
5.5
3,6
61
21 0.29 0. 00
0
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
306
0.27
8101-063
Bate 110:17-18 09/11/89 1813
93
5,1
3.6
53
20 0.27
0. 69 52
0.81
3, 22
5. 71 15. 32 22.73
591
8101-072
Bate 111:17-18 08/28/89 2018
90
1,1
3.9
53
17 0.26 0. 61 51
0.13
3. 21
5. 33 31. 97 31.72
753
8101-079
Bate 112:17-18 09/12/89 960
18
5.0
3.9
56
19 0.27
0. 00
0
0.00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 O.DO
196
19 0.29
0. 66 55
0.56
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0.00
619
17 0.26 0, 50 73
0.33
3. 80 12. 18 20. 97 16.25
758
8101-088
Bale 101:19-20 08/28/89 1536
60
3.9
1.5
16
8101-089
Bate 102:19-20 08/28/89 1108
52
3.7
3.2
51
-11-
93
'Agricultural Chenistry Departnent**Oregcn State Oniversity**Agricultural Research Service**U S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1988 Bale and 5-Cone Analyses at 8Z Hoisture Content(Bale) or As Is Basis(5-Cone> as of October 8, 1990
Accession
or Hursery
Hunber
Oil
Harvest
Identification
lype Location
Oate
Yi.eld fllphe Alphe
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
X
Beta
Alphe
Z
Ratic
6 Ho
CoH
HSI
HSI
ZA'B
Hyr
Hun
Serial
H/F (Z)
(3!)
Hunber
nil
Renain 100a H/C
8101-106
Bate 103=19-20 09/11/39 1152
73
6.3
1.5
59
22 0.25
0.70
50
1.35
3.73
7.62 50.71 23.33
519
8105-002
Bale 101=18-20 08/28/39 1002
16
1.6
3.1
57
23 0,26
0.13
73
0.35
0.00
0.00
623
8105-010
Bale 105:19-20 09/11/89 1021
65
6.3
3.8
62
2? 0.30
0.82
13
2.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
529
8105-013
Bale 106:19-20 03/28/89 1088
71
6.8
3.3
67
26 0.26
0.51
62
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
610
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8105-021
Bate 107:19-20-03/23/89 1600
85
5.6
3,0
65
25 0.30
0.57
61
1.21
0.00
611
8105-02?
Bate 108:19-20 08/23/89 10S8
65
6.0
3.6
63
21 0.26
0.52
70
0.97 3.56 119.31 51.25 25.79
757
8105-031
Bale 103:19-20 08/23/89 1172
8105-038
Cone 228:06-10 09/19/89
23 0.26 0.17 72
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
D.00
752
26 0.22
0.50
67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
129
60
27 0.25
0.71
17
1.72
2.89 255.70 17.16 27.10
597
66
26 0.26
0.66
51
1.17
0.00
0.00
11
66
27 0.25
0.00
0
1.56
2.77 226.86 16.31 28.13
756
3.9
63
23 0.21
0.63
55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
126
1.0
62
22 0.28
0,00
0
1.60
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
516
508
110
7.5
1.1
63
800
55
7.3
1.1
• 61
8105-033
Bale 231:06-10 08/29/89 1312
88
6.7
1.6
8105-015
Bale 110:19-20 08/28/83 1191
7?
6.1
3.3
8105-052
Bate 111:19-20 08/28/89
896
63
7.0
3.6
8105-081
Cone 236:06-10.09/19/89 1000
67
6.7
8105-101
Bate 239:06-10 09/11/89
53
6.7
870
0,00
0.00
8105-103
Bale 210:06-10 09/11/89 1290
68
5.3
3.0
61
21 0.31
0.68
63
1.53
3.70 220.13 57.11 19.81
8105-101
Bate 101:21-22 08/31/89
717
53
7.1
1.5
61
26 0.21
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
8106-001
Bate 209:28-32 09/11/89 555
13
7.7
3.9
66
21 0.28
0.57
62
1.52
8106-001
Bale 213:06-10 09/11/89 1251
92
7.3
3.5
68
23 0.29
0.61
59
1.99
8106-006
Bate 107:17-18 08/28/83 2090
111
5.3
3.8
58
20 0.28
0.12
89
0.51
3.72
8.83 31.63 39.36
751
8106-016
Bate 102:21-22 08/31/89 1193
110
7.1
1.5
62
25 0.25
0.65
52
1.19
0.00
0.00
566
8106-026
Bale 103:21-22 08/31/89 1536
101
6.8
3.1
67
27 0.26
0,19
70
1.11
3.38
21.60 18.11 28.05
561
8106-030
Bate 101:21-22 08/31/89 1108
100
7.1
3.8
65
30 0.2?
0.60
58
1.38
3.11
22.06 53.58 21.82
591
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
589
3.70
5.38 60.33 16.60
119
0.00
0.00
567
8106-D38
Bate 212:28-32 09/11/89
776
50
6.1
3.9
62
25 0.26
0.76
11
1.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
592
8106-038
Cone 216:06-10 09/19/39 1200
59
1,9
3.9
56
21
1.01
32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
0.00
0.00
0.00
600
0.27
8106-011
Bale 105:21-22 08/31/89 1108
101
7.2
3.5
67
23 0.25
0.51
66
0.75
0.00
8106-015
Bale 106:21-22 03/31/83 2195
183
7.3
3.2
69
27 0.27
0.85
18
1.21
3.12
8106-013
Bale 107:21-22 08/31/89
50
5.2
2.9
61
21 0.32
0.00
0
0.00
0,00
D.13 69
0.71
3.62
0.19
0.55
0.00
960
8106-051
Bale 108:21-22 03/31/89 2261
121
5.5
1.2
57
21
8106-058
Bate 109:21-22 09/31/83 1322
81
6.3
3.7
63
22 0.27
0.23
69
0.26 0,56 62
23.36 15.65 28.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
12,16 13.88 25.03
593
122
151
565
0.00
O.DO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
556
11.68 38.51 31.33
123
8105-062
Bale 110:21-22 03/13/83 1108
116
8,3
1.0
67 .21
8106-065
Bale 111:21-22 03/01/85 1536
83
5.1
3.1
61
8106-079
Bale 112:21-22 05/01/83 1002
79
7.9
3.5
69
21 0.26
0.61
56
1,25
3.66
6.92 53.62 22.67
599
8106-081
Bale 210:12-16 03/11/39 1391
88
6,3
3,5
65
25 0.29
0.69
51
1.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
117
8106-085
Bate 101:23-21 09/01/89 1568
115
7.3
3.6
67
21 0.27
D.55 61
1.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
603
8106-088
Bate 211:12-16 08/30/89 1191
95
8.0
5.6
59
23 0.25
0.60
1.06
3.52
12.31 51.67 22.19
730
19 0.25
0.59
55
53
1.89
0.00
0.88
3.79
8106-090
Bale 212:12-16 08/30/89 1159
76
5.2
1,3
55
20 0.27
0.18
69
0.58
3.38
7.51 53.77 22.53
731
8107-001
Bale 102:23-21 09/01/89 2560
111
5.5
3.1
61
22
0.27
0.12
79
0.15
3.51
8.62 28.38 37.12
560
108
8107-006
Cone 213:12-16 D9/19/89
800
69
8.7
1.6
65
23 0.21
0.81
11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8107-008
Bale 103:23-21 09/01/89 1088
63
5.8
3.7
61
28 0.25
0.11
76
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
559
8107-015
Bate 101:23-21 09/01/89 1108
101
7.1
3.7
67
2?
0.69
61
1.16
3.01
7.88 50.66 23.09
598
8107-020
Bale 211:12-11 08/30/89 1135
75
6.6
3.8
61
25 0.27
0,72 13
0.96
2.70
6.32 59.71 15.67
763
8107-022
Bate 105:23-21 09/01/89 1013
79
7.8
1.1
61
25 0.22 0.19 62
0.81
3.76
8.05 11.11 28.38
119
1.1
66
26 0.26
0.18
68
1.00
0.00
0.00
289
0.53
65
1.11
3.31 173.15 13.13 31.23
0.25
8107-023
Bate 106:23-21 09/01/89 1386
108
7.8
8107-026
Bale 216:12-16 08/30/89 1565
139
8.9
1.1
63
23 0.25
8107-035
Bate 213:28-32 08/25/33
75?
55
7.3
1.0
61
23 0.27 0.19 75
8107-035
Bate 217=12-16 08/30/89 1019
8107-038
Bate 107:23-21 09/01/89
0.16 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
731
179
87
8.3
1.1
65
26 0.25 0.51 62
1.03
3.12
6.39 52.63 20.73
733
0
0
8.1
1.3
65
29 0.25
1.35
0.00
0.00
O.DO
0.00
281
0.00
0,69
50
8107-012
Bale 108:23-21 09/01/89
960
61
6.7
3,3
67
26 0.28 0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
561
8107-013
Bate 211:28-32 09/11/89
981
71
7.6
5.3
59
26 0.26 0.00
0
1.81
0.00
0.00 0.00 0,00
525
1.76
2.80
1.86 55.58 19.31
721
1.96 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
157
8107-013
Bale 228:12-16 08/31/89 1382
95
6.8
5.1
57
26 0.27
Bate 235:12-16 08/31/89 1318
101
7.7
5.8
57
26 0.21 0.86 37
0.99
30
-12-
•flgricultural Chenistry Departnent**Oregon State Oniversity»»flgricultural Research Service»*0 S Dept flgriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1983 Bate and 5-Cone Analyses at BZ Hoisture Content(Bale) cr As Is Basis(5-Cone) as of October 8, 139
Accession
Oil
or Hursery
Hunber
Harvest
Identification
lype Location
Oate
Yield Alpha Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
X
Beta
Alpha
Z
Ratio
6 Mo
CoH
HSI
HSI
ZfitB
Hyr
Hun
Serial
H/F (Z)
(Z)
Hunber
nil
Renain 100a H/C
8103-001
Bale 233:12-16 09/01/89 2119
183
7.7
5.6
53
30 0.25
1.06
28
1.95
8103-006
Bate 109=23-21 03/01/39 1237
95
7.7
5.0
60
25 0.23
0.71
15
1.85 3.91
1' .28 55.22 23.21
111
8103-012
Bate 111:23-21 09/01/89 1193
116
7.3
1.6
63
23 0.27
0.61
61
1.33
3.51
9E .63 17.69 22.61
602
0.00
f .00
0.00
0.00
273
8108-D18
Bale 112:23-21 09/01/89 1173
83
7.1
6.0
51
27 0.23
1,03
28
2.28
1.26
T .15 61.60 18.03
120
8103-019
Bale 101:25-26' 09/01/89 1152
56
1.9
3.1
59
13 0.25
0.18
78
0.19
3.58
25.59 33.16 33.11
601
8108-030
Bate 102:25-26 09/01/89 1181
67
5.6
5.8
19
28 0.28
1.05
31
1.68 3.62
11.38 66.78 13.65
568
8108-031
Bale 103:25-26 09/01/89 1108
121
8.6
6.1
57
21 0.25
0.97
25
1.10
3.79 130.77 17.75 21.32
536
8108-016
Bale 101:25-25 09/01/89 1120
79
7.1
5.1
- 57
25 0.25
0.81
10
2.19
3.68
8108-016
Bate 225:28-32 39/12/89
75
7.8
5.2
60
26 0.26
0.61
63
1.81
0.00
971
10.16 61.13 17.61
113
0.00
0.00
313
D.00
8108-017
Bate 105:25-26 09/01/89 2325
182
7.3
5.1
61
21 0.23
0.67
51
1.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
D.00
121
8108-051
Bate 106:25-26 03/01/89 1173
85
7.3
3.8
66
21 0.27
0.59
55
0.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
562
555
8108-063
Bale 107:25-26.09/01/89 1792
120
6.7
1.1
60
29 0.27
0,56
62
1.36
3.17 19.52 16.92 28.21
8103-066
Bale 206:17-21 09/01/89
529
29
5.1
6.6
15
23 0.21
0.79
15
1.65
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
295
8108-070
Bale 209:17-21 09/01/89 1399
92
6.5
6.1
50
28 0.23 1.16 21
2.21 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.292
81D8-072
Bate 211:17-21 09/15/89 1003
52
5.2
1.2
56
25 0.28 0.52 69
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
516
8108-071
Bate 211:17-21 09/01/83 1108
88
6.3
1.2
60
29 0.25
1.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
285
0 00 O.OO
0.86
11
8108-071
Bale 228:23-32 09/18/89 1312
76
5.8
1.2
58
31 0.29
0.51
61
1.52
0.00
0.00
607
8108-079
Bale 108:25-26 09/01/39 1920
138
7.2
5,2
59
23 0.26
0.81
38
1.61
3.72
12 05 55.11 19.37
606
8108-080
Bale 109:25-26 09/01/39 1191
68
5.7
5.2
52
21 0.2?
0.81
10
1,17
3.71
10 73 52.6? 21.08
563
8108-082
Bale 110:25-26 09/01/85 1130
35
8.1
5.0
63
25 0.28
0.69
51
1.71
3.51 118 02 52.32 13.93
557
8103-089
Bale 111:25-26 09/01/89 1719
109
6.2
1.7
57
26 0.27
1.11
26
1.31
3.93 111 22 72,61 10.57
232
8108-392
Bate 112:25-26 09/01/89 1511
92
6.1
1.0
60
22 0.21
0.77
11
1.55
0.00
0 00 0.00
0.00
281
8108-106
Bate 102:27-28 09/05/89 1311
63
1.7
6.1
12
2? 0,23
0.62
70
1.11
0.00
0 00 0.00
0.00
710
8108-108
Bale 216=17-21 09/01/83
65
8.0
5.0
62
29 0.23
0.71
18
1.32
0.00
0 00 0.00
0,00
130
1.82
0,00
0 00 0.00
0.00
158
811
8108-111
Bale 110:23-21 09/01/89
0
0
7.8
6.9
53
22 0.23
0.69
18
8108-111
Bate 103:27-28 09/05/83
811
10
5.0
6.9
12
28 0.26
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
691
8108-115
Bate 101:27-28 03/05/89 1193
105
7,0
1.9
53
21 0.23
0,79
13
1.75
3.67
15 95 51.21 22.15
693
8108-119
Bate 105:27-28 09/05/89 1991
117
5.9
1.2
58
23 0.26
0.50
68
0.56
3.58
20 73 15.11 27.11
708
8108-125
Bale 106:27-28 09/05/89 1301
71
5.7
5.1
51 .23
0.60
61
1.32
3.66
15 93 11.66 29.56
690
8109-018
Bale 221:17-21 09/07/89 1133
106
7.1
1.0
65
25 0.27
0.71
53
1.78
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
190
8110-0116
Bate 225=17-21 09/07/89
610
23
3,6
7.1
33
26 0.62
1.13
30
2.12
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
165
699
0.27
0 00 0.00
8110-028
Bate 108:27-23 09/05/83
832
10
1.9
5.7
16
25 0.23 0,00
0
1.50
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
8110-052
Bate 109:27-28 09/05/89
672
26
3.9
5.8
10
23 0.26
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
701
8110-057
Bate 229:17-21 09/07/89 1527
55
3.6
6.0
33
25 0.21
1.25
21
1.31
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
171
8110-069
Bale 110:27-28 09/05/89 1152
50
1.3
5.7
13
22 0.23
0.83
36
1.69
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
703
8110-075
Bate 230:17-21 09/07/89 1107
51
1.9
5.5
17
21 0.26
1.2?
19
1.91
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
578
8110-086
Bate 111:27-28 09/05/89 1815
59
3.2
1.6
11
23 0.25
0.99
31
1.07
0.00
0, 00 0,00
0.00
709
8110-096
Bale 112:27-28 09/05/89 1536
75
1.9
5.7
16
25
0.25
1.31
19
1.66
3.61 182. 21 16.10 29.31
736
8110-102
Bate 101:29-30 09/05/89
53
6.2
5.1
55
21 0.27
0,00
0
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0.0D 0.00
175
2.75 193. 52 17.13 21.87
573
853
8111-015
Bate 111:31-32 09/07/89 2197
191
8.8
1.3
67
21 0.26
0.39
77
0.85
8111-025
Bale 112:31-32 09/07/89 1511
133
8.3
3.1
72
27 0.27
0.11
78
1.56
2.88 155. 11 10.59 26.99
575
S111-027
Bale 101:33-31 09/07/89 1108
116
8.2
3.1
73
26 0.28
0.18
76
1.16 3,03 198. 01 11.81 26.31
192
8111-029
Bale 102:33-31 09/07/89
16
7.8
3.1
71
26 0.27
0.00
0
0,00
513
8111-010
Bate 103:33-31 09/07/89 1511
107
7.1
3,7
66
29 0.26
0.11
81
0.95 0.00
0. 00 0.00 0.00
510
8111-012
Bale 101:33-31 09/07/89 1386
125
9.0
3.7
71
30 0.28
0.15
65
1.56
0. 00 0.00
0.00
661
8111-019
Bale 105:33-31 09/07/89 1067
71
6.7
3.2
68
28 0.30
0.15
77
1.07 2.71 310. 55 51.71 19.89
576
8111-061
Bate 106:33-31 09/07/89 1067
91
8.6
1.0
68
33 0.25
0.15
71
1.13
0.00
0. 00 0.00 0.00
505
8111-075
Bale 107:33-31 09/08/89 981
71
7.6
3.3
70
21 0.27 0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0. 00 0.00
0.00
195
8111-135
Bate 108:33-31 09/07/89 1661
130
7,8
1.3
65
29 0.26
0.97
0.00
0. 00 0,00
0.00
198
8111-150
Bale 109:33-31 09/07/83
0
6.7
1,0
63
27 0.28 0.12 78
0. 00 O.DO 0.00
570
211
0
0.56
62
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.31 0.00
0. 00 0.00
95
-13-
*Agricultural Chenistry Departnent**Oregon State Oniversity*»Agricultural Research Service»*U S Dept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
Accession
or Hursery
1989 Bate and 5-Cone Analyses at 3Z Hcisture Ccntent(Bale) or As Is Basis(S-Cone) as of October 8, 1990
OiL
6 Ho ZA»B
Hyr
Harvest Yield Alpha Alpha Beta Alpha
nil
Serial
(Z)
Hunber
H/C
8111-157
Bate 110:33-31 09/07/39
0
0
6.2
3.7
62
32 0.23
0.55
66
1.07
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
663
3111-170
Bale 111:33-31 09/07/89
763
51
6.7
3.1
66
23 0.28
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
539
8111-201
Bate 112:33-31 03/07/89 1152
75
6.5
3,9
63
25 0.28
0.51
69
1.35
2.72
8111-201
Bate 101:35-36 09/07/33 1083
105
9.7
1.1
69
22 0.27
0,12
77
0.87
0.00
Hunber
Identification lype Location
Oate
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
X
Ratio
CoH
HSI
HSI
Rena n lOOq
Hun
H/F
X
(Z)
19,91 52.06 20.28
O.DO
0.00
0.00
511
502
8111-229
Bale 102:35-36 09/07/89 1365
111
3.1
3.5
70
35 0.27
0.18
71
1.03 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
156
8111-262
Bale 103:35-36 09/07/89 1365
127
9.3
1.5
67
30 0.21
0.13
78
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
512
8112-002
Bale 101:35-36 09/07/89 1770
167
3.1
5.9
62
10 0.21
0.18
70
1,15
3.39
3.78 55.55 11.72
533
8112-010
Bate 105:35-36 09/07/89 1911
171
9.0
6.6
- 58
38 0.25
0.11
76
1.22 .3.39 17.79 65.69 13.50
536
8112-012
Bate 106:35-36 09/07/89 1172
95
6.1
1.7
58
20 0.26
0.11
73
0.78
8112-016
Bate 107:35-36 09/07/89 1706
151
9.0
3.9
70
30 0.26
0.13
77
1.18 2.71
2.76
11.20 59.15 11.85
538
2.69 62.96
8.51
537
0.00
0.00
308
30.90 17.17 25.06
521
8112-013
Bale, 109:35-36 09/12/89 1589
163 10.3
1.0
72
26 0.27
0.51
66
1.19
0.00
8112-022
Bale'109:35-36-09/12/89 1311
112 10.6
7.8
58
27 0.26
0.10
65
1.10
3.57
8112-025
Bale 110;35-36 09/12/83 1821
127
7,0
1.1
61
31
0.27
0.51
63
1.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
590
8112-031
Bale 111:35-36 09/12/89 2122
189
8.9
1.3
67
31 0,28
1.03
25
1.82
2,08
2.03 60,12
8.07
309
8112-016
Bale 112:35-36 09/12/83 1322
136 10.3
3.7
73
27 0.26
0.11
73
1.63
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
315
8112-051
Bale 101:37-33 03/12/89 1088
93
8.6
1.0
68
25 0.29
0.59
65
2.02
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
327
8112-058
Bale 102:37-38 09/12/89 2316
231
9.8
5.1
66
23 0.27
0.71
18
1.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
310
156 10.2
3.1
75
21 0.28
0.55
68
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
326
5.1'
3.0
61
25 0.28 0.51 68
0.99
2.62
2.70 59.73 11.57
739
0,00
8112-075
Bate 103:37-38 09/12/83 1536
8112-077
Bate 101:37-38 09/12/89 1632
8112-073
Bale 105:37-38 03/12/89 1511
93
6.2
1.6
5?
33 0.28
0.69
51
1.21
0.00
0.00
8112-088
Bale 106:37-38 03/12/33 1578
126
8.0
3.3
71
21 0.28
0.52
69
1.25
3.15
6.27 56.32 17.07
711
300
89
0.00
0.00
298
8112-101
Bate 107:37-38 03/12/85 2112
169
8.0
1.5
61
22 0.27
0.50
66
0.80
2.32
9.00 58.95 12.09
8112-121
Bate 108:37-38 09/12/89 1888
15?
8.3
5.2
61
39 0.28
0.00
0
1.01
3.06
17.01 61.38 13,23
712
8112-125
Bate 103:37-38 09/12/85 1511
132
8.7
5.2
63
29 0.26
0,37
82
1.22 2.73 168.18 60.66 15.50
173
81
6.1
1.3
58
11 0.29
0.59
57
0.81
3.39
3.86 71.21
7.52
291
210 11.2
1.9
70
26 0.26
0.13
75
1.57
0.00
0.00
O.DO
O.DO
687
8112-135
Bate 110:37-33 09/12/89 1386
8112-138
Bale 111:37-38 09/12/89 1877
8112-138
Bale 112:37-38 09/12/83
8112-150
Bate 101:39-10 09/13/89 1002
171
16
9.1
1.1
70
27 0.28
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
738
18
1.8
1.6
51
33 0.28
0.13
80
0.81
2.62
3.88 76.68
1.61
711
.21 0.26 0.53 61
8112-166
Bale 102:39-10 09/13/89 203?
179
8.8
6.1
58
8112-183
Bale 103:39-10 09/13/89 1653
168 10.2
1.6
69
28 0.27
8112-188
Bate 101:39-10 09/13/83 2688
218
8112-196
Bale 105:33-10 03/13/89
0
0.61
56
1.17
3.51
8.15 52.D3 13.27
512
2,10
3.09
6.31 53.90 16.38
716
9,2
6.1
60
30 0.25
0.33
71
1.52
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
158
0 10.2
5.1
67
39 0.29
0.61
60
1.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
155
8112-199
Bate 106:39-10 09/13/89 1661
176 10.6
5.5
66
26 0.28 0.17 72
1.63
3.19
3.57 60.17 12.89
299
8112-207
Bate 107:39-10 09/13/89 1685
151
3.0
75
21 0.27
0,98
0,00
0.00
175
8112-211
Bate 108:39-10 09/13/89 1557
8112-222
Bate 109:39-10 09/13/89
9.0
0,13
78
0.00
0.00
135
8.7
3.7
70
26 0.29
0.55
61
1.11
3.03
3.17 56.71 12.93
553
960
78
8.1
1.1
65
21 0,26
0.00
0
0.98
0.00
0.00
178
8112-225
Bate 110:39-10 09/13/89 1511
110
9.2
1.3
68
27
0.28
0.96
28
0.89
0.00
8112-231
Bate 111:39-10 09/13/85 1216
91
7.7
1.0
66
12 0.27
0,38
81
1.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
159
0.00
0.00
0.00
168
8601-025
Bale 171:25
08/23/83 3751
385 10.2
1.3
71
23 0.26 0.13 71
0.60
3.11
1.33 31.1122.59
8
8601-032
Bale 171:32
08/31/83 1661
161
3.8
72
23 0.25
70
0.81
2.83
5.00 13.52 21,87
119
6
9.8
0.11
8601-058
Bate 172:05
08/23/89 1719
122
7.0
3.0
70
21 0.28 0.55 62
0.11
3.31
2,15 25.83 21.56
8602-035
Bale 172:12
08/23/89 2389
225
9.1
1.2
69
23 0.30
0.51
67
0.68
0.63
1.23 18,82 17,30
2
8682-055
Bale 173:09
08/23/89 2261
191
8.5
3.5
71
21 0.32
0.58
58
0.61
3.08
1.92 16.19 16.39
3
8602-065
Bate 173:19
08/21/89 1103
119 10.5
3.1
76
23 0.28
0.12
76
0.79
2.80
60.15 10,73 21,12
21
8602-095
Bate 173:19
08/31/89 1179
116
9.3
3.7
72
39 0.26 0.56 60
1.06 3.16
1,71 39.70 22.63
155
8602-097
fete 173:51
08/21/89 1322
111
8.1
3.3
72
27 0.29
0.51
62
0.85
3.21
5.07 18.37 19.12
23
8602-102
Bate 171:03
08/21/89 725
61
8.8
3.6
71
23 0.26
0.00
0
0.36
0.00
0.00
O.Cfl
20
8602-119
Bale 171:20
08/21/89 2560
213
8.3
1.2
65
30 0.27
0.16
73
0.52
2.77 285.97 30.98 36.89
171
0.57
61
0.25
3.65
2.07 12.09 21.15
22
0.69 3.21
9.01 33.92 31.88
193
8602-162
Bale 175:10
08/21/89 3285
296
9.0
3.5
72
25 0.30
8602-165
Bate 175:13
08/21/89 3839
277
7.2
5.6
56
26 0.27 0.51 65
0.00
96
-11-
gricultural Chenistry Oepartnent**0regon State Oniversity»»flgricultural Research Service**U S Oept flgriculture**Coruallis, Oregon*
1983 Bate and 5-Cone flna yses at 8Z Hoisture Content(Bale)
or fls Is Basis(5-Cone) as of October 8,
Accession
Oil
or Hursery
Hunber
990
Harvest
identification
lype Location
Oate
Yield
Alphe Alphe
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
Z
Beta
Alphe
Z
Ratic
CoH HSI
HSI
6 Ho ZA'B
Hyr
Hun
Serial
H/F (Z)
(Z)
Hunber
nil
Renain lOOq H/C
8602-169
Bale 175:17
03/21/83 1536
123
8.0
3.6
69
23 0.30
0.62
52
1.57
3.11
2.59 25.25 30.00
16
8602-189
Bale 175:3?
08/21/83 2615
211
9.2
3.2
71
17
0.23
0.11
78
0.11
3.38
2.13 29.97 27.37
219
8602-20?
Bale 176:02
08/21/85 2005
190
9.5
7.3
56
21 0.25
0.18
63
0.66
3.11 131.16 31.99 33.18
218
8602-208
Bale 176:03
08/21/83 1661
113
6.8
3,7
65
28 0.28
0:51 63
0.80
3.00
1.12 10.38 20.53
191
8602-236
Bale 176:31
08/21/89 1109
101
3,1
3.8
71
23 0.26
0.15
65
0.81
3.37 110.51 31.56 35.70
169
8602-21?
Bale 176:12
08/21/89
127 12.9
1.7
73
26 0.26
0.00
0
0.69
2.59
2.10 30.31 26.00
170
31
0.71
13
981
8602-265
Bate 177:07
08/21/89 2316
118
6.3
5.5
53
8602-272
Bale 177:11
08/21/89 1108
125
8.9
3.6
• 71
8602-271
Bate 177:16
08/21/89 2090
262
12.5
3,8
77
21
0.27
0.37
85
8602-273
Bale 177:20
08/21/89 1831
191 10.6
3.9
73
23 0.29
0.59
61
8602-300
Bate 177:12
08/25/83 2030
231
11.1
5.3
67
21 0.25
0.11
71
8602-305
Bate 177:17
•08/25/83 2171
207
8.1
3.3
72
18 0.27
0.56
71
8602-320
Bate 178:03
08/31/89 2730
232
8.5
5.2
62
27 0,25
0.57
51
1.09
3.09
7.58 51.21 21.27
115
8602-318
Bate 178:37
08/25/89 2301
170
7.1
1.2
61
18 0.26
0.60
51
0.71
3.11
3.78 17.93 20.93
213
0.32
25 0.30
0.15 68
0.81 3.39
1.38 35.21 22.11
181
3.29
52.31 31.60 31.57
182
0.1?
2.50
1.16 16.18 21.20
18
0.59
3.19
1.86 21.88 21.99
192
0.69
3,55
1.83 11.33 19.70
209
1.11
2.91 150.33 26.88 29,17
216
0.68
8602-353
Bale 178:12
08/31/89 2176
132
6.0
3.1
66
33 0.26 1.10 32
0.82 2.89 11.06 53.86 20.52
115
8602-357
Bate 178:16
08/25/89 1536
72
1.7
6.3
13
23 0,26
0.57 62
0.52
3.15
1.53 16.18 11,85
188
8602-339
Bale 179:35
08/25/39 1536
112
9,2
3.6
72
21 0.26
0.15
73
0.77
3.10
1.70 10.78 13.51
208
8602-111
Bate 179:17
03/25/89 2133
212
9.9
5.1
66
25 0.26
0.51 13
0.61
3.00
.95 37.20 15.62
173
8602-115
Bate 179:51
03/25/89 1109
119 10.7
1.3
71
22 0.25
0.18
66
0.17
3.13
3.33 19.90 20.51
211
8602-165
Bale 180:18
08/25/85 1528
166
6.2
58
28 0.21
0.13
67
0.13
3.10
10.53 31.61 33.07
675
8.7
8602-565
Bale 132:12
08/25/89 2218
253 11.1
3.7
75
30 0.26
0.11
78
0.58
3.12
92.32 22.21 36.28
190
8602-578
Bale 183:02
08/25/89 2913
311
10.6
5.1
67
23 0.26
0.55
61
0.61
3.59
.78 17.93 12.13
167
8602-653
Bale 181:21
08/25/89 2090
211 10.3
3.2
76
2? 0.26
0,39
76
0.16
3.26
2.13 23.15 33.18
189
6602-659
Bale 181:30
08/25/89 1322
100
7.6
2.1
78
26 0.27
0.10
77
0.15
3.05
1.07 37.35 16.51
666
8603-005
Cone 181:53
09/01/89
3
5.9
3.8
61
21
0.26
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
160
8603-031
Bale 185:26
08/25/89 2303
216 10.7
3,8
71
28 0.26
0.53
61
0.11
2.71
1.21 38.56 18.79
211
110
6.6
5.1
56
22 0.27
0.71
33
0.62
3.22
61.81 26.67 38.52
172
8
2.1
1.7
58
27 0.30
0.00
0
0.65
3,20
2.68 33.02 28.31
163
13
8603-033
Bate 185:23
08/25/89 1661
8603-063
Hand 186:05
09/01/89
311
0,00
8603-073
Bale 186:15
08/31/89 3285
261
8.0
5.5
60
8603-077
Bate 186:19
08/25/89 1792
123
6.8
5.3
56
8603-083
Bale 186:25
08/25/89 1578
125
7.9
6.1
55
25 0.21
0.56
51
0.19
2.22
79.93 38.28 29.82
210
8603-095
Bale 186:37
08/29/89 2133
191
9.0
3.0
75
21 0.26
0.10
76
0.82
2.12
11.09 11.38 25.93
762'
3.61
0.26
0.59
59
1.22
3.16 225,58 33.16 36.77
121
21 0.23
0.60
51
0.66
1.91
1.10 33.79 19.16
180
.28
8603-097
Bate 186:39
08/29/89 1962
215 11.0
1.2
72
25
0.21
0.17
68
0.61
1.0? 12.57 19.11
765
8603-105
Bate 186:17
09/01/89 1322
110
1.0
68
27 0.25
0.51
58
1.03 3.31 717.60 37.75 31.15
283
8.1
1.16 36.88 19,06
722
2.85 826.91 25.10 13.83
727
8603-136
Bate 187:25
08/29/89 1066
61
6.0
2.6
70
25 0.26
0.69
11
1.03 3.13
8603-110
Bale 187:29
08/29/85 1365
85
6.2
2.8
69
31 0.28
0,18
69
1.38
8603-152
Bate 187:11
08/29/B9 1831
153
8.1
3.8
69
28 0,26
0.17
68
8603-185
Hand 188;21
09/01/89
17
6.0
5.2
51
26 0.26
0.00
0
290
0.71 2.87 711.30 63.10 17.05
773
0.00
162
1.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
8603-183
Bate 188:21
08/29/89 2018
139
6.8
5.1
57
27 0.25
0,50
63
0.10
2.02
3.83 35.05 21.30
777
8603-189
Bate 188:25
08/29/89 2132
198
8.2
2.5
76
28 0,26
0.12 75
0.62
2.73
2.28 31.66 28.55
723
8603-196
Bate 188:32
08/29/89 1193
110
7.1
3.1
68
25 0.25
0.61
0,95
3.21
2.16 36.99 26.81
769
8603-221
Hand 189:01
09/01/89
85
5
6.1
5.8
53
26 0.26
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
161
8603-231
Bale 189:11
08/29/89
896
87
9.7
1.3
69
20 0.21 0.00
0
0.71
2.23
1.02 32.63 18.70
779
1.52 3.20 89.10 11.28 25.21
1.00 12.96 16.06
761
2.3?
.6? 17.33 10.91
771
51
3603-232
Gate 189:15
08/29/89 3111
332 10.7
6.5
62
22 0.21 0.80 38
8603-213
Bale 189:26
08/29/89 1920
112
7.1
1.6
62
21 0.26 0.61 50
0.5? 2.88
8603-251
Bate 189:31
08/29/89
0 12.0
5.0
71
27 0.26
1.22
0
0.61
51
0.00
776
8603-262
Bate 189:15
08/31/89 1536
111
7.1
1.1
65
27 0.27
0.16
68
1.02 2.96
2.19 11.52 21.65
126
8603-265
Bate 189:18
08/29/89 1831
125
6.8
2.2
75
23 0.28
0.31
85
0.63 1.98 301.15 20.97 36.23
725
8603-277
Bale 190:0?
08/29/89 2090
182
8.7
3.3
72
28 0.25
0.13
72
0.80 1.90 567.75 26.25 31.07
705
8603-288
Bate 190:18
08/29/89 1792
108
6.0
5.2
51
21
0.25 0.79 29
0.86 2.73 138.10 32,92 31.28
717
gricultural Chenistry Departnent*»Oregon State Oniversity**Bgricultural Research Service**0 SDept Agriculture**Corvallis, Oregon*
1989 Bale and 5-Cone Analyses at 8Z Moisture Content(Bale) or As
Is Basis(S-Cone)
as o
October 8, 1990
Oil
Accession
Harvest
or Hursery
Hunber
Identification
Ivoe Location
Oate
Yield Alpha Alpha Beta Alpha
Lb/Ac Lb/ac
X
X
Ratio
6 Ho
CoH
HSI
HSI
ZA*B
Hyr
Hun
Serial
H/F (X)
(Z)
Hunber
nil
Renai n lOOq
H/C
8603-299
Bate 190:29
08/29/89 1920
173
9.0
3.1
72
30 0.2?
0.17
67
1.00
2.81
1.12 52.1113.02
720
8603-301
Bale 190:31
03/30/83 1713
112
8.1
3.9
67
26 0.25
0.51
70
1.13
3.1?
31.39 26.37 10.88
676
8603-311
Bale 190:11
03/30/88 2688
178
6.6
5.7
51
21 0.26
0.65
51
0.91
3.21
1.78 23.60 23,55
772
8603-326
Bale 191:03
08/30/88 1782
115
8.1
2.8
71
22 0.26
0 .78
39
0.62 2.30
1.71 19.21 28.77
713
8603-332
Bale 191:09
08/30/89 2301
213
9.2
3.7
71
21 0.26
0.16
70
1.10 3.11872.5112.56 21.13
707
8603-337
Bate 191:11
08/30/89 1792
115
8.1
3.1
71
30 0.27
0.11
71
0.16
2.57
2.69 12.15 23.31
750
8603-316
Bate 191:23
08/30/89 1578
162 10.3
3,7
71
19 0.26
0.62
21
1.01
1.93
1.17 10.61 15.70
760
8603-351
Bale 191:28
08/30/89 1621
105
6.5
2,5
' 72
22 0.28
0.11
71
0.65
2.23
1.70 10.11 20.73
706
8603-100
Bale 192:21
08/30/89 1792
161
9.0
1.1
63
23 0.26
0.71
15
1.02
3.28 11.80 53.07 21.87
761
8603-103
Bate 192:27
08/30/89 1661
121
7.3
1.7
61
21 0.27
0.59 57
0.60 3.20 359.03 33.98 31.83
768
51
5.1
1.7
51
23 0.25
0 00
0
0.65 3.01 131.61 38.71 31.32
721
19
29 0.32
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
165
11
21 0.11
1 15 27
0.75
2.83
2.21 31.71 20.39
771
161
Bate 192:15
08/30/89
938
8603-132
Hand 193:03
-.09/01/89
13
1
3.2
3.1
8603-111
Bale 193:15
08/30/89 1661
81
5.0
6.5
8603-121
0.00
8603-157
Hand 193:28
09/01/89 1981
137
6.9
6.0
51
29 0.21
0 00
0
0.91 3.63 111.11 38.03 23,11
8603-158
Bate 193:29
08/30/89 1981
125
6.3
3.1
67
28 0.29
0 50 63
0.96 2.73 156.89 12.11 31.22
726
60.12 50.28 20.80
112
8603-161
Bale 193:35
08/30/89 981
105 10.7
1.1
72
20 0.26
0 00
8603-181
Bate 193:52
08/30/89 1536
115
9.1
5.1
61
21
0 55 60
0.61 3.61
1.59 25.26 21.71
732
8603-185
Bate 191:03
09/01/89
0
0
7.7
5.2
60
2? 0.28
0 00
1.31
0.00
0.00
159
8603-198
Bate 191:16
08/30/89 1150
96
6.6
3.7
61
28 0.26
0 56 61
0.93 2.66 280.26 37.03 32.51
150
1.77 31.11 21.61
117
0.26
0
0
0.85
2.79
0.00
0.00
8603-501
Bate 191:22
08/30/89 1661
79
1.7
1.3
52
22 0.28
0 67 51
0.16 2.68
8603-521
Bate 191:12
08/31/89 2018
112
7.0
1.8
59
22 0.21
0 57 59
1.11
3.53
.80 51.16
3.18
131
8603-539
Bate 195:01
08/31/89 1536
85
5.5
7.7
12
22 0.23 0 59 55
0.87
3.21
1,0161.21
5,33
128
8603-518
Bale 155:13
08/31/89 1962
161
8.2
2.6
76
28 0.26
0 15 70
1.11
1.82
1.1139.18 18.21
111
8603-561
Bate 195:29
08/31/89 2133
178
8.3
3.9
68
23 0,26
0 18 66
0.71
3.23
1.17 38.28 21.13
110
8808-021
Cone 139:50
10/05/89
0
0.1
5.3
7
61 0.25
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
791
0
0
0.00
8808-022
Cone 139:51
10/05/B9
0
0
1.1
9.0
11
17 0.20
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
787
B808-023
Cone 139:52
10/05/89
0
0
0.7
5.6
11
52 0.25
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
792
62 0.35
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
789
0.10
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
788
9
31 0.35
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
793
10
15 0.21
0 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
781
26
55 0.23
0. 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
780
15
13 0.21
0. 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
786
8308-078
Cone 111:03
10/05/89
0
0
0.1
2.1
16
8808-125
Cone 111:50
10/05/89
0
0
1.0
3.1
21 .62
8809-028
Cone 113:09
10/05/89
0
0
0.3
3.1
8809-071
Cone 113:52
10/05/89
0
0
0.7
6.3
8309-099
Cone 111:28
10/05/89
0
0
1.3
3.8
6.9
8810-011
Cone 116:01
10/05/39
0
0
1.3
8810-011
Cone 116:07
10/05/89
0
0
0.7
5.8
11
62 0.22
0. 00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
782
17
10 0.22
0. 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
783
8810-031
Cone 116:21
10/05/89
0
0
1.0
1.9
8810-036
Cone 116:29
10/05/89
0
0
1.1
1,6
23
33 0.22
0. 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
790
8810-010
Cone 116:33
10/05/89
0
0
1.1
5.3
20
15 0.21
0. 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
785
8811-012
Cone 116:16
10/05/89
0
0
1.7
5.6
21
15 0.26
0. 00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
791
3.1
2.5
58
35 0.26
0. 00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
781
8811-016
Cone 116:50
10/05/89
0
0
98
A mi if
Page No.
03/01/89
NCGR
LOCAL GEN PLAN!
NAME
HUMUtUS
INVENTORY LIST
GENDER VI
OTHER NUMBER
DONOR DAIFREC
FORM
AMI
SHIOCATE
SIVIO AVAIl
8 HUH
Colorado 2-1 (Wild American)
M
U
60026
HAUN1
19820325 PI
0 08-01-02
2 YES
9 HUM
Colorado 2-3
M
I
60028
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-01
2 YES
11 HUH
late Cluster Seedling
23 HUH Colorado 4-1
M
I
19005
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-08
2 YES
H
T
60031
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-05
2 YES
2 YES
25
HUH
H. lupulus
H
T
21130
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-03
46
HUH
Colorado 1-1 (WiId American)
H
F
60023
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-06
2 YES
T
19173
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-02-08
2 YES
I
60013
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-02-04
2 YES
I
63015
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-07
2 YES
53 HUH H. lupulus
60
HUH Arizona 1-2 (Wild American)
64
HUH
H. lupulus
72 HUH Utah 526-5 (Wild American)
F
58016
HAUH1
19820325 PL
0 08-02-03
2 YES
B1 HUH Wyoming 2-3 (Wild American)
U
60037
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-02
2 YES
84 HUH New Mexico 2-4 (Wild American)
U
60020
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-10
2 YES
91
HUH Wyoming 3-1 (Wild American)
U
60038
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-02-01
2 YES
92
HUH
New Mexico 1-3 (Wild American)
U
60016
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-07
2 YES
Colorado 6-1 (WIId American)
u
60033
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-10
2 YES
U
60027
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-06
1 YES
106 HUH Colorado 3-1 (Wild American)
u
60029
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-09
2 YES
112 HUH Colorado 7-2 (Wild American)
U
60035
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-03
2 YES
115 HUH Colorado 1-3 (Wild American)
U
60025
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-02-05
2 YES
123 HUH Arizona 1-4 (Wild American)
U
60015
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-05
2 YES
126 HUH Hueller Bitterer
F
21229
HAUN1
19810630 PL
0 08-02-06
2 YES
127 HUH Fuggle H
T
48209
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-02-07
2 YES
98 HUH
99 HUH H. lupulus
123 HUH Willamette
r
21041
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-04
2 YES
129 HUH Styrian
T
21049
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-09
2 YES
130 HUM Brewer's Gold
T
21116
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-03-11
2 YES
132 HUH
1
21056
HAUN1
19820325 PL
0 08-01-04
2 YES
134 HUH Eroica
T
21220
HAUN1
19810681 PL
136 HUH H. japonicus seed
U
J-31
SHIH2 19830607 SO
125 none
0 YES
U
K-21
WESI2 19830607 SD
50 none
0 NOT
U
60024 male?
HAUN1
19830506 PL
0 08-03-08
2 YES
F
1
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 none
0 NOT
Bullion 10A
137 HUH
japonicus seed
344 HUH
lupulus
48fl HUH
lupulus
489 HUH
M
0 08-02-02
2 YES
lupulus
F
3
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-06-05
2 YES
490 HUH H. lupulus
F
5
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-05-08
2 YES
491 HUM H. lupulus
F
6
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-04-03
1 YES
492 HUH H. lupulus
F
7
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-06-04
2 YES
F
8
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-04-07
2 YES
F
9
HAMP1
19831206 PL
0 08-06-08
2 YES
O
493 HUH H. lupulus
HUH
H. lupulus
495 HUH
494
H. lupulus
F
10
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0
496 HUH H. lupulus
F
12
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-09-09
497 HUH
H. lupulus
F
13
HAMP1
19831206 PL
498 HUH
H. luputus
F
14
HAHPl
19831206 PL
499 HUH H. lupulus
-
none
NOT
2 YES
0 08-08-05
2 YES
0 08-05-05
2 YES
F
15
KAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-08-03
1 YES
500 HUH
H. lupulus
F
16
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-04-08
2 YES
501
H. lupulus
F
20
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-08-07
2 YES
502 HUH H. lupulus
F
21
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 none
0 NOT
503 HUH
H. lupulus
F
22
HAMP1
19831206 PL
0 08-08-08
2 YES
504
H. lupulus
F
25
HAMP1
19831206 PL
0 08-05-01
1 VFS
505 HUH H. lupulus
F
27
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-03-10
1 YES
506 HUH
H. lupulus
F
28
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-0809
? YES
507 HUM
H. lupulus
F
29
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-04 09
? YES
HUH
HUH
REAS
99
Page No.
2
03/01/89
NCGR HUHULUS
LOCAL
GEN PLANT
INVENTORY LIST
GENDER VI OTHER NUHBER
NAME
DONOR DATEREC
FORM
AMI
SHLOCATE SllNO AVAIL REAS
none
0
NOT
508 HUH H. lupulus
HAMP1
19831206 PL
0
509 HUM H. lupulus
HAHPl
19831206 PI
0 08-08-10
1 YES
2 YES
510 HUM H. lupulus
F
33
HAMP1
19831206 PL
0 08-04-04
511 HUH H. lupulus
F
34
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-08-11
2 YES
512 HUH H. lupulus
F
37
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 none
0 NOT
513 HUH H. lupulus
F
38
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-07-02
1 YES
514 HUH H. lupulus
F
39
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-05-10
2 YES
515 HUH H. lupulus
F
41
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-03-01
2 YES
516 HUH H. lupulus
F
42
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-04-01
2 YES
517 HUH H. lupulus
F
43
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-03-06
1 YES
518 HUH H. lupulus
F
45
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-07-03
2 YES
519 HUM H. lupulus
F
46
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0
0 NOT
520 HUH H. lupulus
F
50
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-07-05
none
521 HUH H. lupulus
F
51
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-07-08
1 YES
F
52
HAMP1
19831206 PL
0 08-07-06
2 YES
523 HUH H. lupulus
F
54
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-07-07
2 YES
524 HUH H. lupulus
F
57
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-07-11
1 YES
525 HUH H. lupulus
F
58
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-07-10
1 YES
526 HUH H. lupulus
F
59
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-04-11
2 YES
527 HUH H. lupulus
F
60
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-05-11
2 YES
528 HUH H. lupulus
F
61
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-06-01
2 YES
529 HUH H. lupulus
F
62
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-06-03
2 YES
530 HUH Perle
F
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-08-02
2 YES
531
F
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-08-01
2 YES
532 HUH Record
F
HAHP1
19831206 PL
0 08-09-05
2 YES
533
F
HAHPl
19831206 PL
0 08-09-11
2 YES
19
HAHPl
19840723 PL
0 08-08-06
2 YES
U
35
HAHP1
19840723 PL
0 none
0 YES
U
63
HAHP1
19840723 PL
0 08-06-02
2 YES
537 HUH H. lupulus
F
36
HAHP1
19840824 PL
0 08-07-01
2 YES
538 HUH H. lupulus
F
55
HAHP1
19840824 PL
0 08-09-07
2 YES
539 HUH H. lupulus
F
56
HAHPl
19840824 PL
0 none
0 YES
540 HUH H. lupulus
F
47
HAMP1
19840824 PL
0 08-07-04
2 YES
541
lupulus
U
011
HAMP1
19841011 PL
0 08-09-10
2 YES
542 HUH H. lupulus
U
17
HAHPl
19860306 PL
0 08-04-05
2 YES
543 HUH H. lupulus
U
BC1
HAHPl
0 PL
0 08-06-09
2 YES
544 HUH H. lupulus
U
BC2
HAMP1
0 PL
0 08-05-06
2 YES
545 HUH H. lupulus
U
BC3
HAHP1
0 PL
0 08-05-07
2 YES
546 HUH H. lupulus
U
6C4
HAMP1
0 PL
0 08-06-07
2 YES
547 HUH H. lupulus
U
BC9
HAHP1
0 PL
0 08-05-03
2 YES
548 HUH H. lupulus
549 HUH H. lupulus
U
BC13
HAHP1
0 PL
0 08-06-06
1 YES
U
BC14
HAHPl
0
0
2
550 HUH H. lupulus
U
BC17
HAHP1
0 PL
HUH Cascade
U
534 HUH H. lupulus
535 HUH H. lupulus
536 HUH H. lupulus
HUH H.
U
U
PL
08-05-04
PROP
PROP
2 YES
522 HUH H. lupulus
HUH Southern Brewer
PROP
YES
0 08-06-10
2 YES
2 YES
551 HUH H.
lupulus
U
LC4
HAMP1
0
PL
0 08-09-08
552 HUM H.
lupulus
U
LC20
HAHP1
0
PL
0 08-05-02
1 YES
553 HUH H.
lupulus
U
BC 16
HAHPl
19860308 PL
0 08-08-04
1 YES
554 HUH H. lupulus
U
NH-1
HAHP1
19860308 PL
0 08-09-06
2 YES
555 HUH H. lupulus
U
LC 17
HAMP1
19861216 PL
0 none
0 NOl
PROP
556 HUH H. lupulus
U
LC 19
HAHP1
19861216 PL
0 none
0 NOT
PROP
569 HUH BC-16 Hontana
U
HAHPl
19870821 PL
0 none
0
NOT
PROP
570 HUH BC-11 Hontana
U
HAHP1
19870821 PL
0 none
0 NOT
PROP
571 HUH 27/57/264 EngUnd
U
HAHPl
19870821 PL
0 none
0 NOT
PROP
572 HUH Int. 30 England
U
HAHPl
19870821 PL
0 none
0 HOT
PROP
573 HUH Selection 38
U
HAHPl
19870821 PL
0 none
0 NOT
PROP
574 HUH Selection 47
U
HAHP1
19870821 PL
0 none
0 NOT
PROP
U
U
HAHP1
19880506 SO
1 none
0 NOT
LOU
U
U
HAHPl
19880506 SO
15 none
0 NOT
LOU
577 HUH Tug Fork * 8 SEED
U
U
HAHPl
19880506 SO
10 none
0 NOT
LOW
578 HUH Tug Fork # 9 SEED
. U
U
HAHPl
19880506 SO
15 none
0 NOT
LOU
579 HUM Tug Fork » 11 SEED
U
U
HAHP1
19880506 SO
25 none
0 NOT
LOW
580 HUH Tug Fork f 12 SEED
U
U
HAHP1
19880506 SO
25 none
0 NOT
LOW
575 HUH Tug Fork : Unknown source
576 HUH Tug Fork * 3 SEED
SEED
V/
/
'6U+^
1 G.S/Z
100 '
Note from Dick Hampton: Seeds obtained from all cone
4 September 1989
To:
samples': seeds are in cold storage now.
Dr. Paul Hoskins, Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc.
From:
R. 0. Hampton, Consultant. Busch Agric Resources
Subject:
Trip report,
cone col 1ections,- native North American
Humulus lupulus, Souris River Basin, southwestern Manitoba^ north-?
central North Dakota? and southeastern Saskatchewan', 25 August to
3 September 1989.
Itinerary:
25 August.
Departed Portland Airport 0700 hr; arrived Winnipeg
1435 hr; drove rental car southwest into designated watershed area;
searched Boyne River and documented principal flora in vicinity of
Carman, Man.; no Humulus observed.
o/n at Carman.
26 August.
Searched Tobacco Creek and Shannon Creek, south of
Carman; briefly toured Canada Agriculture Research Station^Morden;
searched Pembina River east of La Riviere and Badger Creek east and
west of Cartwright, and Pembina R. tributary south of KiHarney;
searched Souris River at intersection with Road #346,
Margaret;
surface
no Humulus
water
for
observed.*
Terrain too
Humulus-favoring
habitat;
north of
flat •with too much
decision
to
move
directly to upstream position on Souris River south of Willow City,
ND.
o/n at Bottineau,
27 August.
ND.
Searched Souris River*at access points, Willow City to
Velva and Logan, ND',
in driving rainstorm, with extensive search
of river-border area southwest of Towner. Found first reproductive.
Humulus plants, near river, NE of Logan; sampled 10 or more
representative
cones
from
two
plants;
marked
these
and
all
subsequently sampled female plants to document precise locations.
Observed numerous reproductive plants near thickets east of Minot,
in area located during 1983 trip; sampled cones from eight plants,
in very stormy weather; returned cones to motel (infra red lamp)>
for drying.
o/n at Minot.
28 August.
Searched west side of '.river north of Minot and found
numerous reproductive Humulus plants' along railroad tracks north
of Burlington; sampled cones from 10 plants (pictures of leaves and
cones). Searched unsuccessfully for unique "high-plains Humulus"
plants located in 1983 in the McGregor-Stanley, ND area. Searched
Souris River west of Mohall, ND; found and sampled cones from seven
plants. Examined habitat around Lake Darling (dammed section of
Souris R.); found no Humulus.
o/n at Minot.
29 August. Re-searched Battleview-McGregor-Appam-Tioga area, for
high-plains plants; very disappointed in not re-locating these
interesting plants that would have occupied a distinct watershed
(Missouri River) and possibly represented a different genetic stock
of Humulus.
Searched the Souris River east of Northgate, ND; found
A
•101
Trip Report,
R. Hampton,
Itinerary, p. 2.
and sampled cones from 10 reproductive plants along road west of
river (very appealing diversity of cone size-shape-compactness at
this location). Ratio of non-cone-bearing plants to cone-bearing
plants
was
estimated
at
50:1.
Decision
to
limit
remaining
collections to Souris River and possibly other watershed areas of
southeastern-'-Saskatchewan*
Consolidated observations of habitats
supporting largest populations- of Humulus.
o/n at Carnduff, Sask.
30 August. Extensively searched loop of Souris R., south of Glen
Ewen;*found six non-flowering plants and sampled cones from one
flowering plant; all were near edge of bank and in very poor
condition; plants confined to very narrow micro-habitat (pictures
taken). These and many other Humulus plants in marginal 'ni^ches*
were
preferentially
defoliated
by
chewing
insects
(perhaps
grasshoppers). Explored Moose Mountain Creek (Souris R. tributary)
west of Oxbow; plants often accompanying Humulus ("habitat
companions") were present and habitat seemed favorable, but no
Humulus occurred in area of a 3-mile search.
Explored Souris-Rv
souths of Oxbow; abundant assortment of Humulus (estimated >500
plants found on north side; perhaps 15 were reproductive females);
most plants were in poor condition; very characteristic
distribution of plants from river bank across 40-M-wide natural
terrace; sampled cones from six plants (pictures taken). A few of
these plants inadvertently received sprinkler irrigation at the Bow
Valley Regional Park, and were in luxuriant condition,, growing into
park trees (box elder and choke cherry) to a height of.3 to 4 M,
and producing excellent cones.
sustained
One plant, 4 M from river edge, had
much-less-than-average
damage
from
chewing
insects
(possible insect-resistant genotype), and produced beautiful,
large,
bright-green,
compact,
pointed,
lupulin-rich cones.
Examined books at Estevan City Library on Saskatchewan flora.
at
Estevan.
31
August.
Searched upper Souris R.
o/n
in area of Midale and
Goodwater, in down-pour of rain, on muddy roads; found an abundance
of non-flowering Humulus plants ^in poor condition, typically on
terrace above high, steep banks; very difficult to find one plant
with cones; sampled poor cones from a single plant, as the farthest
northwest location of the Souris River Basin sampled.
Searched
nearby watershed of the Moose Jaw River (west of Milestone and
Corinne), in very wet, stormy weather; no Humulus observed.
Traveled to Regina and searched Regina University library for
literature on distribution of Humulus in Saskatchewan; proved to
be an unsatisfactory resource. o/n at Indian Head.
1 September.
Searched Qu'Appelle River southeast of Katepwa Lake.;
after 40-min search in box elder/choke cherry thickets, found the
largest collection of luxuriant, reproductive Humulus plant* ever
observed in a natural habitat (pictures taken).
Many of these
Trip Report,
R.
Hampton,
Itinerary,
p. 3.
plants produced large cones with wide-spread, 'fluffy' bract's,
typical of wild plants, but some produced large, compact; pointed
cones that'were superior to all plants sampled, with the exception
of one plant described from Oxbow-south.
Cones were sampled from
six plants.
Drove to Brandon, Man.; searched south side of
Assiniboine River in vicinity of Brandon; no Humulus observed, o/n
at
Brandon.
2 September.
Returned to lower-Souris River, to search for Humulus
southeast of Souris, Man.; after 90-min search across three river
terraces, Humulus^wa's" 1ocated in shrub/tree •-< thicketsi at both the
proximal and distal- edges of the third terrace above the river.
Of some 150 plants scattered over a 5-10-acre area, only one
produced cones (pictures taken).
Collection of cones from this
plant provided representation of Humulus genotypes from a 300-mile
stretch of the Souris River (e.g., Souris, Manitoba, through North
Dakota,
to Goodwater,
Saskatchewan).
o/n at Portage la Prairie.
3
September.
Attended
pancake
breakfast,
exhibition
of
agricultural equipment, and interacted with Manitoba farmers and
agricultural engineers, at Portage la Prairie. Returned rental car
to Winnipeg Airport, 1500 hr; departed Winnipeg for returned to
Portland,
1700
hr;
arrived Corvallis
Personal
Comments,
arrived
Portland
2050
hr,
flight
NWA
#379;
2350 hr.
R.
Hampton
1) It was a distinct pleasure to observe and select native Humulus
plants in August, at cone maturity.
This approach facilitated
selections based on plant fruitfulness and cone phenotype and is
probably unprecedented.
Cones were selected from plants growing
in
natural
micro-habitats,
with the
intention of
later returning
for propagation of plants exhibiting unique cone biochemistry. The
effort should provide analytical data that otherwise would have
required collecting and propagating 10 or 20 times as many plants,
and subsequently growing them over a 2- to 3-year period.
2) The observed abundance of native Humulus in this north-central
region of North America*verifies that it is not only the richest
remaining resource of Humulus on the continent, but that enormous
germplasm diversity still exists there.
examine
native
Humulus
in
Although I still hope to
northeastern
North
Dakota
and
northwestern Minnesota, it seemed wiser mid-way thjbugh the allotted
period to omit that portion of the planned exploration, on this
trip.
3) Access to the rivers through private property causes lost time
in arranging permission and remains a major obstacle to properly
103
Trip Report, R. Hampton, Comments, p. 4
sampling existing plant/fruit phenotypes:
Canoe travel along
selected stretches of waterways would greatly facilitate access to
prime habitats.
4) There were many "variations on the theme", but Humulus was most
often found on terraces 2 to 10 M above the river surface.
In some
cases, Humulus plants greatly benefitted from supplemental water
(e.g., natural springs at Northgate-east; water-entrapping contours
at Minot-east; inadvertent irrigation at Oxbow-south). The most
luxuriant natural Humulus habitat observed (with most productive
plants) was the Qu'Appelle River.
The Qu&Appel le River-- Basin- (SE
Saskatchewan) would be prime habitat for further exploration.-
5)
Plants most often sharing habitats with Humulus, though much
more widely adapted than Humulus, were:
a) shrubs: wild rose and snowberry
b) trees:
6)
box elder, choke cherry, hawthorn; rarely green ash
Non-companion species, i.e., species found in similar
ecosystems not supporting Humulus, were:
a) shrubs: silver-leaf willow, wolf willow
b) trees:
willow, poplar, aspen, white oak
7) As a measure against possibly introducing insects parasitic to
hops and not indigenous to the Pacific Northwest, cone samples were
frozen at -30 C, for five days.;
This control measure has proven
very satisfactory and precludes insecticide residues in the cones.
8)
Arrangements are being made for photographic documentation of
the size-morphology of cone samples from 52 Humulus plants.
Likewise, arrangements have been made for chemical analyses of cone
samples at Oregon State University (Al Haunold and Gail Nickerson),
for the purpose of characterizing chemical profiles of collected
genotypes.
Data from this study should be appropriate for
publication under joint authorship in a journal such as the Journal
of American Brewing Chemists
(acknowledging support by Busch
Agricultural Resources, Inc.).
9)
Another publication, combining information from Humulus-plant
explorations since 1980 and outlining current knowledge
on natural
distributions and habitats of native North American
Humulus, may also be appropriate. Such information could either
be published in Brewer's Digest or in an "outside journal" such as
the American Journal of Botany
10) The titles of these papers might be:
(a) "Native Humulus lupulus of the Souris River Basin
(Manitoba, North Dakota, Saskatchewan):
cone morphology and
biochemistry", by R. Hampton, A. Haunold, and G. Nickerson — and
(b) "Native Humulus lupulus of the Souris River Basin
(Manitoba, North Dakota, Saskatchewan): observations and theory
on distributions along alluvial micro-ecosystems", by R. 0. Hampton
and W. M. Hampton.
104-
Bale and 5-Cone firalysesa'
•/J ATable 2.
\AM ntyycM'yC-^^ (LblU^H^.
......
Content (Bale) or Rs Is Basis (5-Cone) as of September 22, 1969 <n = 52)
0? rtoisture
f
Accession
or Hursery
fiUX /-o/Ur Ivoe location
Hunber •
Cone Hanpton
H-01
H-02
H-03
H-01
H-05
H-OS
H-07
2So
25?
2.4Z.
2to<?
12.1
-L.O 1
H-03
tfl
H-09
(51
H-IO
(S?
H-ll
2cg,
H-12
H-13
158
z<\s
H-11
loS
H-15 _
\zz
H-lfi
4<?
H-17
2.1a
H-18
H-19
H-20
H-21
H-22
H-23
H-21
H-25
2i?
1^2.
&<7
•Zlo
at
(io3
23i
S:>
H-26
¥\
H-27
Id
H-23
H-29
H-30
H-31
H-32
H-33
H-31
H-35
Harvest
SS
17 4q^
Oate
09/05/89
field Alpha Alpha Beta
b/Hc Lb/flc
0
0
X
3.8
X
1.6
filph.3
6 no rfl'E
Ratio. CoH HSI
70
HSI Renain
36 0.25 0.00
Cone Hanpton
09/05/89
0
0
5.1
1.0
56
17 0.33
0.00
0
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
09/05/89
0
0
5.5
3.9
59
55
0.00
0
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Cone Hanpton
Cone Hanpton
09/05/89
09/05/89
0.28
60
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
61
.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
63
62
0.29
0.00
0
0.00
0
2.3
65
56
0.26
0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00
1.2
51
52 0.30
0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
2.9
15
60
0.27 0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
66
2.7-
38
53 0.26 0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
67
53
12 0.28
0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0 00
0 00 0.00
0.00 0.00
09/05/39
0
0
1.9
09/05/89
0
0
2.1
09/05/89
0
0
1.7
09/05/89
0
0
2.0- 1.1
09/05/89
0
0
0.8
l.l
13
09/05/89
0
0
2.3
2.6
17
17 0.28
0.00
0
0.00 0.00
0.00
0
0 00 0.00
0 00 0 00 0 00
09/05/89
0
0
0.9
1.3
10
53 0.13
0.00
09/05/89
0
0
3.2
2.6
56
67 0.21
0.00
0
0.00
0 00 0 00
0.00
0.0
1.2
0
50 1.01
0 00
0
2.5
1.7
60
50 0.25
0.00
0
0 00 0.00
0 00 0 00 0 00
71
0
0 00 0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
75
09/05/89
0
0
O'.O
l.O
0
09/05/89
0
0
2.6
2.2
51
55
1.28 0 00
60 0.25
0.oo' 0
0 00
0.00
0 00 0 00 0 00
75
0 00 0 00 0 00
77
0 00
09/05/89
0
0
I.2
2.5
32
12 0.23
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
09/05/89
0
0
2.1
3.1
11
53 0.26
0 00
0
0 00 0.00
0 00
09/05/89
-0
0
3.0
3.1
50
52 0.27 0 00
0
0 00
09/05/89
0
0
1.0 '3.6
52
56 0.25 0 00
0
0 00 0 00
7.3
5.1
59
63 0.21
0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
09/05/89
7.0
3.1
67
61
0.21
0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
09/05/89
0
0
1.5
6.1
12
57 0.23
0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
0
0
1.5
3.5
56
56 0.30 0 00
0
0 00 0 00
2.0
57
53
0.21 0 00
0
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
85
3.8
51
60
0.35
0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00
0 00
86
C7
9.27 0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
87
09/05/39
0
0
2.6
09/05/89
0
0
1.1
0 00
09/05/89
0
0
1.6
2.5
33
09/05/89
0
0
1.6
2.7
63
63 0.26
0 oo
0
0 00 0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0 00
0 00
loq
4o
Cone Hanpton
0 00
3.2
2.6
55
78 0.23
0 00
0
0
6.5
1.8
58
73 0.22
0 00
0
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.28 0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0 00
0. 00 0 00
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
91
0 00 0 00
0 00 0. 00 0 00
55
09/05/89
0
0
2.3
2.6
17
70
09/05/89
0
0
'1.3
1.8
13
68 0.25
0
3.2
2.1
60
68 0.25
0 00
0
H-37
0
0
3.2
2.0
62
70 0.25
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0
0 00
09/05/89
0
0
1.2
2.3
Hanpton 09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/83
Hanpton .09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/89
Hanpton 09/05/89
0
0
1.2
2.8
0 00
0 00
92
93
0 00 0 00 0 00
96
0. 00 0. 00
97
0 00
09/05/89
0
0
3.2
2.1
60
71
0.26 0 00
09/05/89
0
0
3.5
.3.9
1?
61
0.37
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0 00 0. 00 0 00
98
31
13 0.22
0. 00
0
0. 00 0 00
0. 00 0. 00
0 00
99
30
17 0.26
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0 00
0. 00 0. 00
H-19
l<?"5>
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
H-50
14-"X
Cone Hanpton
H-5I
14-Z.
igo
Cone Hanpton
09/05/89
0
0
3.7
3.1
55
0.22 0. 00
67 0.2S 0. 00
Cone Hanpton
09/0S/89
0
0
3.9
3.7
52
73 0.22
H-52
50
51
0
0
lio
0 00 0 00
0
09/05/89
H-18
0 00 0 00 0 09
0 00
88
89
0
09/05/89
(5.7-
0 00
09/05/89
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
H-17
0 00 0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
81
09/05/89
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
in
82
83 *
65 0.21
H-15
80
81
0
63
H-15
0 00
0
09/05/89
78*
79
0 00
0
61
?tu
0 00
0
3.1
is8
0 00
09/05/89
2.3
H-11
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
0 00
5.5
1ST?
0 00
0
Cone Hanpton
H-13
72
73
0 00
0
3.6
n-?
0 00
0 00 0 00 0 00
0
74
H-12
70
71 ^
09/05/89
0
H-11
63
69
O9/0S/89
0
[Z7.
61
65 v
0
0
(I-?-
0.00 0.00
19 0.36 0.00
0
H-10
0.00 0.00 0.CO
62 *
63
2.6
09/05/89
4-6
0.00
1.2
go
H-39
Serial
Nu-iber
1.1
09/05/89
"?8
Hin
(I)
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
H-35
H-38
(X)
0
Cone
Cone
Cone
Cone
Z.U
H/r
0
Cone Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
Hanpton
H/C
0
59 0.27 0 00
l6S~
iBk
0
tlyr
nil
lOOo
03/05/89
0. 00 0 00
0. 00
100 "^
101
0
0
1.1 . 2.0
36
17 0.23
0. 00
0
0. 00 0 00
0
0
1.5
36
17 0.20
0 00
0
0 00 0 00
0 00 0. 00 0 00
102
0. 00
0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
103
76 0,20 0 00
0
0. 00
2.6
0
0
3.6
6.3 - 37
0
0
3.6
5.9
38
71
0.23
0 00
0 00
0. 00
0 00
101
105
0
0
5.1
3.3
65
53 0.21 0. 00
0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0
0
3.1
1.3
12
61 0.22
0 00
0
0. 00
0 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
106*
0. 00
107
0
0
3.9
3.9
50
70 0.22
0. 00
0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00 0. 00
0
0
7.1
6.1
51
69 0.21
0 00
0
0. 00 0 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
108
0
0
S.3 (1.3
55
0
0. 00 0. 00
0. 00
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
110
0. 00 0. 00 0. 00
111 &
-71
0. 00
0
0. 00 0. 00
0 • 0.00
0.00
0. 00 0. 00
109 *~
* Bright green toluene extracts (Hallertauer type); ** Emerald green extract.
HOP CHEMISTRY SECTION:
Gail B. Nickerson
=
, chemist II
Peggy Whitney, Research Assistant
105
Chemical Analyses of 1989 Experimental Varieties (11/29/89)
Hop Chemistry/BIOANALYTICAL SERVICES
KC^>OL«C=» ?V » ^/*
Agricultural Chemistry Department
Oregon
uregon State
oiaxe University
university
;/
f^> [£
%
\ -i
&
•.
'"
'\ "
(\DO~% mO|>fl>e CO^l^J
Corvallis, Oregon 97331-G502
Commercial samples:
C\l_
^
Hallertauer Triploids
of each variety were composited and two 250g
samples were steam-aisxixiea for oil content and oil composition.
About 200g of
-the composited sample was ground for spectrophotometric and HPLC analyses.
Duplicate extractions were analyzed
A*
Results on As Is Basis^
7. Moisture
State
Variety
Content
% Alpha
% Beta
Acids
h\^
4/
Acids JHSI
mk PJJL
CoH
J_00 a Lab t
Idaho
Mt Hood
.
2145G
21457
21459
21490
9.7
«,
3.9
3.8
8.85
10.25
9.45
8.15
G.0
5.9
0.37
0.37
24
25
1.48
1.44
89299
2.0
1.9
0.33
28
1.00
89300
1.9
3.8
0.32
29
1.00
2.9
3.0
0.33
26
1.08
2.9
3.1
0.33
27
1.00
3.1
3.2
0.31
30
0.80
3.0
3.2
0.33
32
0.60
2.6
B.I
0.39
25
0.84
2.5
6.1
0.39
24
0.84
5.7
6.6
0.33
26
1.48
5.6
6.6
0.32
27
1.28
3.4
5.0
0.39
27
1.12
3.5
5.1
0.38
27
0.96
4.6
3.3
0.40
26
1.04
4.6
3.3
0.39
26
0.84
4.4
3.8
0.34
28
1.12
4.5
3.9
0.33
27
1.00
6.9
0.33
24
1.00
6.7
0.32
24
1.00
89298
89301
89302
Oregon
Mt Hood
21456
21457
21459
21490
10.1
10.0
9.0
9.9
9.35
3.7
3.7
<1>
-
89311
89309
89313
89310
89312
106
Chemical Analyses of 1989 Experimental' Varieties (11/Z9/89 )
Results on As
Variety
Basis
% Alpha
7. Moisture
State
Is
CC/v-t
%
mL Oil
Beta
Content
Acids
Ac ids
12.35
3.G
5.5
3.5
5.5
sHisi
t
CoH
100 q
Lab
0.37
25
1 .04
89306
0.37
26
1 .04
^ashingtp^
•' ffl[ Hood
,-,'••••<^*:t
far &%w-
—7 3.8
9.4
21456
9.15
21457
10.0
21459
•.
9.5
21490
10.95
21491
S~.& HP o.ZT-
2(*
|.o9
1 .6
3.1
0.43
32
0.68
1 .5
3.2
0.42
31
0.72
3.3 -
3.0
0.3G
27
1 .12
3.2
3.0
0.36
26
0.84
3.1
3.8
0.31
27
0.80
3.1
3.8
0.31
29
0.80
2.1
5.4
0.33
23
0.56
2.1
5.3
0.34
22
0.40
2.5
3.7
0.31
25
0.84
2.5
3.6
0.32
25
0.80
89304
89303
89308
89305
89307
Hop Oil Composition of Hallertauer Triploids
Area_%_(Not corrected for Relative Response)
State Variety
Nr
Peak Ratios
H/C
34.8
12.7
0.04
29.3
2.3
30.9
1 1 .8
0.04
39.0
3.1
29.3
12.0
0.05
40.8
3.2
21457
33.9
10.5
0. 13
35. G
3.5
21459
36.2
8.2
6.70
26.3
3.2
21490
14.0
9.4
0.05
35.4
3.8
25.2
13.2
0.05
37.5
2.8
20.5
12.7
0.09
42.5
3.3
15.1
13.7
0.15
47.5
3.5
21457
21 .1
12.1
0.07
40.4
3.3
21459
31 .3
8.2
6.89
26.4
3.2
21490
29.9
10.3
0.04
34.2
3.3
Mt
Hood
21456
0R%
% Mvrcene % Caryophvl lene % Farnesene % Humulene
Mt
Hood
2145G
<2>
H/F
C/F
3.9
1.2
3.8
1.2
107
Chemical Analyses of 1989 Experimental Varieties (11/29/89)
Area_%_(Not corrected for Relative Response)
Mt
WA
Hood
0.06
11.6
38.9
Peak Ratios
2.4
28.1
>
21.2
13.5
0.05
45.5
3.4
19.0
13.8
0.07
46.5
3.4
21457
30.0
10.9
0.06
37.1
3.4
21459
33.6
6.95
27.9
4.4
21490
16.3
12.7
0.03
41 .5
3.3
21491
46.9
1 1 .0
0.17
27.1
2.5
2 1456
6.3-
Other Experimental Varieties
Four brewers inspection samples of each variety were analyzed,
The mean and
standard deviation are given below.
-p., i , ,
/ /
Results on As Is Basis
%
State
Moisture
Content
Varietv
% Alpha
Acids
%
Beta
HSI
Acids
CoH
mL Oil
100 3
Washington
Hersbrucker E
Hersbrucker G
Tettnanger A
mean
9.53
4.8
0 .27
28.0
1.52
sd
0.09
0.1
0.1
0 .00
0.8
0.23
mean
8.58
2.9
5.4
0
27
28.5
0.68
sd
0.13
0.1
0.2
0 .01
0.6
0.00
mean
9.49
3.9
4.3
0
26
23.6
0.52
0.21
0.1
0.1
0
01
0.4
0.10
mean
9.70
4.9
4.9
0
26
25.6
0.50
sd
0.06
0.1
0.1
0
01
0.4
0.17
mean
8.76
6.4
6.2
0
26
17.3
1 .00
sd
Tettnanger B
8254-167
8254-244
sd
0.27
0.2
0.2
0
01
1 .0
0.03
mean
9.36
5.0
5.8
0. 27
22.9
0.92
sd
0.09
0.1
0.1
0. 01
0.5
0. IB
10.49
4.2
5.2
0.27
22.3
0.44
0.14
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.5
0.03
mean
8.91
4.7
5.2
0. 28
24.0
0.51
sd
0.20
0.1
0.1
0. 01
0.0
0.04
Oregon
Tettnanger A
mean
sd
Tettnanger B
<3>
108-'
Chemical Analyses of 1989 Experimental Varieties (11/29/89)
Hop Oil CompositionArea Percent
(l\ ot
State
Varietv
Correc ted For "Relative
%Mvrcene
%Carv.
%Fa'rn.
Response >
%Hum.
Peak Ratios
H/C
H/F
C/F
Lab
#
Washington
Hersbrucker E
53.2
4.6
0.50
10.0
2.2
89321
Hersbrucker G
48.3
8.6
0.10
26.9
3. 1
89317
Tettnanger A
m
M
13.0
\**
2-5*
M
o-s
Tettnanger B
57.4
3.4
10.1
3.0
0.9
0.3
8254-167
30.9
11.3
0.21
35.0
3.1
8254-244
yo,e>
(o, 4
2/1
n.z
3.1
ill
/M
Id
3f>/
3-3
JL2 *<* ?f?58
V.f 3J fffil
10.6
2W2.
89345
89333
Oregon
Tettnanger A
37.5
7.9
12.9
23.4
3.0
1.8
0.6
89329
Tettnanger B
40.6
6.7
12.5
20.1
3.0
1.6
0.5
89325
H
O
D
Ul W
Ui
h3
t-» H* H» r-» H*
in ui in ui in in en
U1
•-3
>
td
O
r-1 M
Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul ui ui
Ul LH
lO LO LQ LD LO
10 vj en ui ©
CD -J en co to h* <S
|_»(_»r-.|_.(-'l-*r-'r-'l-'r-*l-'r-'
H»M©©®®®®<3©®®
(-'©IDOOvlaiUliC'COtOr-'®
tr1
o
.-3
o
in
r+
v"*1* I-1 M r-» r-> M H r->
H* H1 l-» H*
,tk |T> ^> f>
O v to to to to to to to
to to to to to
r-»
{•
LTI Ul Ul Ul W3
lo -j m
ui S
Jv, rfv ,p> ip» ,£> .P> ifi
id id »o ui in in ui
, en ® -J id -J en ui
tococotototoWKtototoro
H W M I - ' l - ' H l t rt> M H> r-* r->
^ U l U l ^ r f i ^ r l h i& >t» it* if*
Ul * A Ul Ul Ul M M 10 <£ VO lO
en
i
i
viwuitTLTSp^tri
C
- en >t>
i-i
h* to
-J *>
-h»
HO P
8 P 8 r-'-!-' r-* l-»
H
lO .£. ©
i-l
P
<
>
r0
H
ri
>-3
jP. ©
ui i-1
to Co en
M
I-1
M
t-"
©
(-•
H"
M
H»
oo
r-»
(T>
10
ft)
3
ro
o
td Q
-h
fD
ft)
rt
M
©
©
©
©
©
Ul
-J oo
-~i
Ul
en
n
o
H
r-*
-o
kJ
no
a
o
\
Q
U0 ©
tr1
O
r+
CL
U
M
Co
.p> .p. in oi >P> ci
r-*
Ul
ID CO (71
CO
ui -J ui >P» u) ui vi
co co >p» en «-j
U) ip» ~J to to Co en
K
vj Ol W
Ul W
U
it»
en •>p»
CO
CO
•P»
-4 M
to
to
.p» *»
>
i-1
^0
00 OJ Ct)
>p> £>
CO 00 <e> en —1
CO ©
rs
0)
3
a
w
iis
H
Q
>
f
K
>
0J
<t)
c+
to to to to to to to
U
i^ Ol Ol vl Ul *
vl Ul it> CO vl CO Ul
to to to to to
o> en ui co U
W vl 10 O) H
it» *i
vj ,p»
to co en
f> H
en
en
en
©
co
h-'
iP> 01 Ul Ul en co Ul Ul
©
Ul
©/uo
vj Ul
>p» H1
CD
td
H
Ul O
M
Ol
Ui
'cotOtOCOtotOrOtOtOrOtOtO
«P> >P» CO
toi-'totototototoi-'toroto
IDUlHUIOlLOvlvllOrO^LO
H* tO tO IO IO tO
ID CO to Ul Ul ui
.MO W
to
to
>P»
*> U
W
Ul
to to
vj -J
to
©
in
en
co
co" &•
co
.e» U)
m
t->
©
Ul
01
©
CO to Ul
©
l£)
H
1
-n
in
CO
in
O
O
3
-<
co
en
co] 'en
CO >p>
to
>p>
|e> CO
KO
en
Ml
pj
Z-
PJ
H-*
10
fD
o
ro
o
•?
ro
>o
a
X
•n
m
»
H
M
a
'=r
o
-s
c+
r+
•<
c
fD
—i
O
ft)
~3
O-
o
•3
D)
N
ft)
O.
—'•
TT
*:
H
«<
=r
U3
>
n
td
a
lO
td no
"S
lO
^-^
o
rr
o
13
na
x
©
<<
to
ft)
X
w
co to to *> CO
CO en to >p> CD co
r-»
H1
en h*
to u) •vl to Ul
O
r»j
<->
ri
o
X
o
o
lO
/
OvjiPCOvivljf'pSuaiw
vl Ul Ol Ul U) CO S
H* rf* CO CO CO to CO
Ol CO © 03 © M CO
10 U> 10 CO to Ul
ID ID vl <l W
CO M
=r
tH
<
fD
>
K
H
.U1iP>Ulr-4UlvJ01iP«IOUlUlUl
(DlDlDOlUllJl-'>D01WPUl
**
CO CO to CO iP>
Co *>. co LO en
S
b
o
>
»
•<;
r-»
CO H
£» en i-» ui -J.
r*
M
td
ft>
-h
r+
ro
•*?
cr
«<
S
>
f
<
>
W
H
td
)-3
H
td
Ui
CO
•
fD
L'J
*^r
©
00 00 ©
H» ©
M
to
®
©
co to to to CJ *> U)
CO U5 Ul iP> <D Ol Ul
to CO •£• to to
v! Ol in ID vl
Ol H
H*
-J r-» H*
(3 ©
CO O
H*
©®*»®C0®j©©©©U10D
......(.
U
P
U
M
H
.....
h-'UlUltOfOr-'kntOr-'LJCOUl
co
<-+•
3
>
fD
rrJlQ
T
'M
"zU
td
ro
ro
~i
M
3
M
n
•-v
cd
ui vl iP» U3
en
!-• Ul H
H
P
A
00
•P.
CO CO co to, to
L •P*
.p. uo co en -J, co
I—'
I—'
jl-' Co CO
Ol
01Pv|Q(S)|01v||Ovl ivl -J <X>
•x
c
•x
c.
<r>
Cd
CD
LO
td
601
0s"
110
<2>
.1989 Maturity Studies
Oregon Off-Station Trials
Results
Dry
Variety
Z«1$5S
Date
mg
7.
cone
Alpha
8 X Moisture Content
iL_oil
%
Beta
r
HSI
CoH
•100
q
0.24
Z7
0.48
%_in_ Oil
Mvrcene
Ratios_
Hum H/C
Z7.8
44.4 3.BZ
38.0 3.B2
8/11
12.8
•52
3.3
B.Z
8/IB
13.0
B3
3.7
B.3
0.21
Z8
1.ZZ
3B.3
7.0
0.Z4
Z9
1.99
51.8
ZG.9
Z9
1.74
51.1
ZG.5 3.59
8/23
8/30
}W$r**i^*i<yU}\/£f
Z L457
Matter
at
8/11
13.9r
15.9
71
70
4.3
7.0.
0.-Z5
3.70
^fffumm5~' 1*"*0*3f*6*17****»•/;&
%>0
11.3
4.2
H/F
52
l.l
3.1
0.31
ZZ
0.40
IB.8
49.9 3.55
11.0
54.B 3.59
39.4
34.B 3.63
53.3
Z5.0 3.73
4G.9
Bl
5.0
4.1
0.Z3
Z4
0.55
.74
7.0
5.3
0.Z5
Z4
1.B1
8/15
14.0
8/23
1Z.4r
Cfry>)w&(
8/30
14.5
24459
"Af
<\\-0
8/11
12.75
52
1.5
Z.Z
0.3Z
Z3
trace
13.3
8/IB
12.9
B3
Z.I
Z.7
0.ZB
Z4
0.Z4
B.5
8/Z3
12. 1r
7B
5.2
4.8
0.ZB
ZB
1.Z7
ZZ.1
8/30
14.3
81
5.7
5.1
0.Z4
ZB
1.08
55.1
18.3 3.BB 3.B
9/07
14.G
B9
5.9
5.0
0.Z5
Z7
1.B8
5B.7
IB.5 3.78 3.5
.9/13
18.4
112
B.8
4.5
0.Z1
Z7
Z.07
BZ.Z
13.1
&(M?Wte('> /|/*1
4143®
C^fu^
<)0.)
0.Z5
Z.1Z
5.Z
7.3
Z5/
Mtfft£*«&** 3*3 •- u$3<fistfaut sOrff-*
3.54 6.B
43.Z 3.70 4.2
34.5 3.B8 3.7
Z.80 3.1
/p,$3»8Bi*3 /Q*«>/?>**#7«»»/^g*
57.B 3.B7
8/11
13.B
39
1.B
5.0
0.Z5
24
0.17
Z.7
8/IB
12.7
B3
2.0
5.Z
0.Z1
Z3
0.41
14.3
52.1
3.BZ
3.7
8.0
0.Z3
Z4
1.13
39. B
33.1
3.7Z
8/30
13.Br
15.8
71
8B
5.0
8.7
0.21
ZZ
0.B0
50.7
ZB.B 3.7Z
9/07
IB.4
88
4.7
8.5
0.ZZ
Z3
Z.14
B4.0
1B.0 3.80
8/23
21431
63
't.
t?>>7«:i>ij;<'i O'O
90,1
1B.3
1 IB
5.1
5.3
• o,33„ &•
0.Z4
21
0.94
51. Z
ZB.1
1.54
48.Z
Z7.7 3.04
Z.58
B1.7
18.3 Z.83
8/IB
1B.0
122
5.9
5.7
0.Z3 - Z1
8/23
15.8r
147
5.9
5.4
0.Z4
^^pM^ y^
y* H" /^
<1>
J'OO*
" Z3
3.07
Ill
HOP
Table 5.
CHEMISTRY
1988 Storage Trial of Commercial Varieties and Promising Selections.
Ranked by Hop Storage Index After Six Months of Ambient Temperature
Storage.
RANKING
(Percent.Remaining)
GOOD (80-89%)
Pride of Ringuood
Gceea_Bullet ( NZ)
'p'erTr
nTperAlpha (NZ)
Sticklebract. (NZ)
FAIR
(70-79%)
(60-69%)
Willamette
Galena
Chinook
Z1459
Fuggle H
Styrian
Fuggle N, vf
Z1484
Cascade, vf
Z145G
Uye Target
Z1457
Aquila
Tettnanger B
POOR (50-59%)
(40-49%)
Banner
Mt
Z1490
Bullion,
VERY POOR (<40%)
B5009
U415-90
vf
Hood
112
TRIPLOID HALLERTAU VARIETIES
1989 CROP
Price Per
.Variety
State
Mt. Hood
ID
Dixon
OR
21456
.
21459
21490
2H91
Bales
October 2, 1989
Bate
3,485
$ 416
Goschie
24
4,814
312
WA
Carpenter
32
5,965
234
ID '•
Dixon
14
2,766
535
24
23
4,753
4,651
312
326
9
1,680
833
.Weathers
Haas
ID
Dixon
OR
WA
Coleman
Gamache
34
15
6,739
3,074
220
500
ID
OR
Dixon
Stauffer
}}
35
2,051
6,838
681
214
WA
ID
OR
WA
Brulotte
Gooding
Weathers
Morford
25
24
40
14
5,114
4,914
7,821
2,718
300
468
403
803
WA
Morford
7
1,267
1,607
TOTAL COST
Paul H. Hoskins
Pounds
'; 13
OR
WA
21457
Grower
$8,164
}wt« £lwri
113
>-fv
CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF EUROPEAN VARIETIES GROWN
IN OREGON
1975-1985
At
Alpha
Variety
G.0
4.1
S.I
Hersbrucker E qvfcjf 733
5.
G.
46
Hersbrucker Gj\v/j, 77G -.
5.
7.
40
4.3
3.
acka (5600^^986
(21080)
#/<ft SPalter
84:
205
Content
G mo %
Rat io CoH Remain
4.8
490 '
%^ler*-eauecwMF|g^ 559
9/C577 Saazer
J
Acid
Alpha
48
52
Backa
21171
Acid
8% Moisture
4.3 ^4.6
Hallertauer(fW;
•%yf
Lb/Ac
Beta
21
20
4G
54
44
25
40
25
Oil
%
7.
mL/100g Myrc Humu
H/C
H/F
0.73
0.80
44.5 32.1" 3.47.
31.7 39.7 3.45 -\y^
67
0.G3
40.0 33.8 3.28^—
66
0.60
55.7 21.0 2.80
23
55
0.68
44.4 30.0 3.22
25
6K
0.63
49.9 25.$ 3.18
37.1 22.7 3.37 1.85 ^
45.4 17.2 3.43 1.44^
^Z&f- 24
51
0.62
251 S,1^T'
4.
55
23
49
0.62
y
Tettnang(21015)
234
4.
3.
55
24
61
0.5G
41.6 21.4 3.45
ftfhi Tettnang(.G1021 )
412
4.
4.
49
22
57
0.G6
45.2 21 .2 3.41 1AsS
Fuggle H
Fuggle N VF
85G
5.
2.
66
26
73
0.91
42.7 26.9 3.13 5.70^
955
5.
3.
65
2G
71
1 .02'
43.8 27.0 2.98 5.62 1/
Styrian
1228
5.
3.
65
28
71
0.92
44.3 28.5-s4#7.S0 */
Golding Yugo
Golding Sajvin.
1104
5.5
2.
66
27
73
0.90
44.0 28.2 2.93 5.91 >*
896
5.G
2.
67
27
74
0.91
49.8 25.4 2.87 6.53 ,/
ZlOlb
Mil
Sffol N- Breuer
2.^*7 Hul ler Bitter
*M1 Perle
G88
9.5
4.0
70
26
75
1 .61
54.0 22.9 2.72
1004
9.0
4.9
64
27
68
1 .31
50.9
G77
10.4
4.2
71
0.94
35.0 35.3 3.03
9.0 2.02
1.71 <-"
114
Hop Chemistry:
Jan. 24, 1989.
COANALOGS IN ZERO ALPHA HOPS
HPLC analysis:
(1989 Crop)
4000 mg hops/L ,
5/jL injected, absorbance at 324 nm
integrator counts proportional to absorbance.
„
-1%
Compound
^cm
at 324 nm
(absorbance of 1% solutuion in 1 cm cuvette)
cohumulone & colupulone
202
humulone, adhumulorie, lupulone
arid
% Co
=
1. 06
(1.
Ace.
06
a
dlupulone
^14
—
x 100
CO
J
+ rest)
f
integrator ca nts
No
CoH
Alpha+ Adhum
Co
lup
21120
11 ,094
5,611
122 ,080
21121
64463
3,361
121
,050
100
,660
21123
6,026
trace
21127
3,903
1,738
21128
3,663
4,748
*L>
87 ,305
28,2>35
beta
+ adlupy
CoH
49. 5
287/89
9
743/89
52. 1
291/89
6
290/89
45 0 44 7
678/89
131 ,780
6
67. 7
,190
4
67. 1 54.
98 ,180
/v4
,890
3
105
101
36, 979
11
LabNo
CoL
?
70. 4 47
115
/f/,Hood,
USDA
2 1455,
1 3 8 V C t~ o p
Oil Composition, Area 7. of Volatiles
Hal] ertau
I* tnang
•.
I daho
Da: hington
Oregon
CofiDound
Init.
6no PI
init.
6no PI
Hersb
Initial
6no 21F
Initial
6no21F
Initial
6no21F
Myrcene
35.18
11.72
52.30
18.55
18.96
56.76
38.83
18.18
13.03
27.91
31.15
0.18
0.12
0.20
0.21
0.18
0.19
0.16
0.18
-.0.81
0.71
0.77
3.28
3.03
Lincnene
0.11
0.13
0.18
I.S.
1.92
1.05
1.50
5.88
1.87
0.67
Linalool
0.11
'• 0.50
0.33
0.19
0.08
0.82
0.91
0.61
0.58
0.19
0.33
0.31
0.26
0.38
0.35
10.28
13.71
12.91
0.21
0.03
0.10
31.11
Undecanone-2
0.61
0.26
0.51
2.91
1.75
0.29
0.69
Carycphyllene
10.32
12.37
5.08
5.76
7.11
8.37
9.65
9.95
0.20
a. CI
farnesene
0.10
0.09
11.60
8.97
0.02
0.11
36.25
13.33
17.21
29.18
19.19
19.61
23.56
26.20
27.20
35.21
Cadinene/tluurolene
0.58
0.97
0.17
1.08
1.16
0.39
0.61
0.16
0.57
0.67
0.75
Cadinene/Muurolene
0.32
0.19
0.16
0.53
3.93
0.20
0.30
0.21
0.29
0.35
0.39
Cadinene/Selinene
1.61
2.19
0.81
2.22
0.71
1.17
1.87
1.37
1.69
1.87
1.99
Cadinene/Selinene
0.93
' 1.52
0.12
1.05
0.77
0.71
1.09
0.85
0.99
1.16
1.20
Geranyl acetate
Beranyl isobutyrate
0.27
0.08
0.26
0.17
0.10
0.15
0.07
0.15
0.05
0.15
0.05
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.16
1.05
0.13
0.35
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.19
Geraniol
0.00
0.39
0.08
0.37
0.05
0.01
0.22
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.38
Hunulene
Caryophyllene oxide
Hunulene nonoepoxide I
Hunulene nonoepoxide II
Hunulene nonoepoxide III
.
0.21
0.82
0.01
0.53
0.11
0.21
0.82
0.25
0.38
0.59
0.81
0.13
1.10
0.11
0.88
0.35
0.10
0.11
0.11
0.20
0.35
0.13
0.88
3.83
0.17
2.65
1.26
0.51
2.15
0.65
1.08
1.93
2.11
0.00
1.31
0.00
0.13
0.12
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.02
Hunulol
0.39
0.52
0.31
0.69
0.62
0.12
0.16
0.16
0.11
0.22
0.13
Eudesnol(s)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.15
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hunulenol II
0.17
2.17
0.07
1.78
0.16
0.09
0.65
0.11
0.25
0.21
0.00
0.07
0.09
0.01
0.11
0.10
0.03
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.09
0.66
0.12
0.80
0.38
0.10
0.12
0.11
0.05
0.05
0.25
83.11
70.82
86.18
62.17
15.67
81.79
72.21
81.35
80.71
77.92
78.87
2.12
3.82
1.08
0.95
Hunulene diepoxide
Hunulene triepoxide
Group
Group
Group
Group
1, Major Hydrocarbons
2, Oxidation Products
3, floral-Estery
1, Citrus-Piney
Total Accounted For:
1.98
10.53
0.90
7.62
1.25
3.73
1.11
1.18
0.71
1.55
0.68
1.19
1.28
1.11
1.55
0.79
1.03
0.61
3.56
5.59
2.07
5.07
9.98
' 2.70
1.12
3.10
3.72
1.21
1.51
89.39
88.50
89.82
76.35
60.66
89.89
82.31
89.72
87.59
86.59
88.10
.
3.501
3.389
5.061
2.589
2.316
2.112
2.631
2.617
2.637
2.666
Hunulene/Farnesene
99.000 . 99.000
1.181
3.251
99.000
33.000
99.000
99.000
99.000
99.000
86.136
Caryophyllene/Farnesene
99.000
30.587
0.138
0.61Z
65.822
93.000
17.371
39.000
18.975
99.000
32.307
Hunulene/Caryophyllene
3.511
116
/|/,Hood ,
USDA 21455,
1 3 3 ~7 " C r-o p
Oil Composition, nL/g hops (as is basis)
Hall ertau
Conoound
tlyrcene
Linonene
I.S.
Linalool
Init
2295.725
8.012
Sno RT
Init
667.111 1013.231
1.917
13.558
Washington
Oregon
Idaho
.Tett nang
6no21F
Initial
bno 21F
383.109 1011.518 8121.278 1776.932 6718.351 5561.075
819.717
1029.326
23.372
1.732
6.022
100.000
10.837
Sr,o PI
3.769
Hersbruck
b. jji
Initial
30.271
6no 21F
25.366
Initial
21.691
120.773
183.721
116.279
121.359
100.000
100.000
100.000
100.000
100.000
100.000
27.165
22.637
25.668
3.878
1.230
121.021
111.985
89.237
75.337
11.807
31.061
13.371
81.280
13.260
93.825
60.719
118.922. 395.310 1211.829 1185.863 1393.102 1328.112
27.119
1.979
21.711
3.589
185.230
6.022-
11.182
11.695
118.125
126.191
0.793
13.201
Undecanone-2
10.058
11.799
11.675
Caryophyllene
650.039
550.309
392.623
Farnesene
5.721
13.318
896.700
Hunulene
2282.333
1963.107
1330.155
602.272
1025.319
2913.907
Cadinene/Muurolene
36.316
13.971
36.331
22.307
238.339
57.509
Cadinene/tluurolene
19.813
22.350
12.160
10.913
210.311
29.335
36.707
31.062
37.593
11.060
12.995
101.295
112,922
61.532
15.836
37.833
173.852
230.252
192.160
218.592
56.768
65.752
Cadinene/Selinene
58.516
68.976
32.773
21.887
10.981
109.763
131.715
118.151
127.730
35.275
39.512
Geranyl acetate
17.222
3.335
20.109
9.768
5.236
22.665
8.896
21.527
6.918
1.606
1.531
Geranyl isobutyrate
0.000
26.981
0.000
3.311
55.959
19.782
12.619
0.000
29.720
0.000
6.281
Geraniol
0.000
17.802
6.381
7.537
3.116
5.126
26.891
0.000
21.007
0.000
12.630
Cadinene/Selinene
Caryophyllene oxide
Hunulene nonoepoxide I
Hunulene nonoepoxide II
Hunulene nonoepoxide III
Hunulol
2897.971 3570.123 3511.931 1103.118 1137.120
21.661
20.381
73.101
63.815
79.232
15.088
36.918
3.365
10.957
23.381
31.950
100.305
31.326
19.013
21.113
26.728
8.371
19.831
8.829
18.200
18.688
11.120
51.165
11.835
26.311
10.793
11.031
55.217
173.652
13.173
51.955
67.190
79.556
261.321
91.367
139.697
58.878
80.585
0.000
2.611
6.533
0.000
8.151
0.000
3.755
0.000
0.805
11.221
33.050
17.112
19.611
22.978
11.165
6.567
1.155
0.000
0.785
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
21.778
60.811
23.390
26.116
Eudesnol(s)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
111.373
Hunulenol II
10.985
98.523
5.223
35.673
21.603
13.116
81.558
15.872
32.931
7.216
0.000
2.632
9.237
0.000
9.938
0.000
11.501
18.963
7.903
1.868
8.331
Hunulene diepoxide
Hunulene triepoxide
Group
Group
Group
Group
1, Major Hydrocarb
2, Oxidation Produ
3, Floral-Estery
1, Citrus-Piney.
Total Accounted For:
1.150
1.217
2.711
2.919
5.292
11.600
5.853
29.819
9.107
16.595
20.520
15.125
5231.818 3209.175 6563.008 1289.532 2113.198 12580.602 8885.507 11813.855 10131.266 2372.383 2606.112
69.128 157.209 199.316 186.178 515.583 207.578 271.108 116.102 131.716
121.713 177.223
31.339
19.113
68.571 168.895 190.121 110.763 133.012
21.197
52.158
70.809
11.687
223.952
253.139
159.655
101.717
533.915
1001790
506.303
133.516
130.996
128.276
118.955
5628.199 1010.317 6911.219 1575.986 3215.031 13336.167 10128.811 12565.712 11319.382 2635.175 2321.183
117
Department of
Agricultural Chemistry
College of
Agricultural Sciences
Oregon
..S.tale .
University
Corvallis.
Oregon
97331-6502
<5B3) 754-2386
January 11,
1989
MEMO
TO:
A. Haunold
FROM:
G.
Nickerson
SUBJECT: Alleged decline in Willamette yield and quality.
The data below shows that the yield and quality of OSU Willamette has not
decreased over the years. The year to year variation is quite large, but
there is not
a downward'trend.
Smith
Year
lbs/acre %Alpha
Main
Yard
%Beta
lbs alpha/ac
1652
8.4
4.6
197S
1446-
5.8
4.0
84
1977
2483
5.4
3.4
134
1978
1834
5.9
3.8
108
1979
2052
5.3
4.0
108
1980
2235
6.0
3.1
134
7.1
3.4
123
1740
1982
2534
6.7
3.7
169
1983
2184
7.3
3.6
159
1984
1484
6.7
3.6
99
1985
2830
5.0
4.7
141
1987
1553
avg
sd
n
6.7
4.3
6.4
3.5
%Beta
lbs alpha/ac
100
4.9
3.0
7.4
3.8
21 12
7.6
3.2
161
1901
5.7
4.4
108
6.9
3.5
93
4.5
3.0
2048
1344
198B
1988
Y ard
139
1975
1981
lbs/acre %Alpha
104
2002
6.36
3.82
125
1851
6.50
3.58
116
456
0.98
0.49
25
349
1 .16
0.55
31
5
5
12
13
13
Max
2830
8.4
4.7
Min
1446
5.3
3.1
4
12
4
169
21 12
7.6
4.4
161
84
1344
4.5
3.0
93
118
TD
D)
to
>
ro
+
o
CD
"O
CD
1
in
r_
ro
(U
P
>-
o
CD
^
u
LO
y-
r
CD
o
1
—i
1
CD
u
r—
OJ
t
duj %b }e spiov-eqdiv %
<
>
+
ro
o
TD
CO
en
-a
LO
CD
1
in
'CD
r_
ro
cu
>o
'CD
in
o
o
CD
O
O
T
O
o
o
CM
OJ
OJ
o
o
CD
O
O
OJ
ajoe/sqi 'PT3TA
o
o
CD
O
O
PAGE:
02/27/90
1
ANNUAL RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT
119
Report of Progress (AD-421)
Accession: 0141065
Year: 89
Mode Code: 5358-05-00
STP Codes: 2.2.04.1.n 100%
Title:
Project Number: 5358-22000-001-00 D
USDA-d^r^///<
IMPROVED HOP GERMPLASM, VARIETIES, AND
PRODUCTION PRACTICES
From:
Period Covered
01/89
To:
12/89 .
Progress Report
The two USDA selections 21180 and 21181 were discontinued after the 1988
season because of insufficient brewer interest. The triploid aroma
selection USDA 21458 was also eliminated because of arm breakage at
harvest. USDA 21455 was released for commercial production in March and
named Mt. Hood. The other 5 triploid aroma selections (21456, 21457,
21459, 21490, 21491) were harvested from 3A plots in Oregon, Washington,
and Idaho. Commercial brewing trials are in progress. The first
commercial crop of the 2 German Tettnanger clones A and B (USDA 21496 and
21497) brought disappointing yields but satisfactory quality. Brewing
trials are in progress. Evaluation of the '87-Nursery (diploid x
tetraploid Tettnanger-type crosses) was completed, but few triploid
selections were obtained.
Identical crosses made in the greenhouse in
1988 gave a large number of triploid seedlings which were field planted in
the '89-Nursery and also in replicated plots. Banner (USDA 21287) was too
susceptible to downy mildew for commercial production in Oregon and will
be discontinued.
Aquila (USDA 21222) will be retained for further
testing. The first crop of the special aroma hop USDA 21120 produced 1020
lbs (510 lbs/acre). Brewing trials are in progress. Another 4-5 acres
will be planted in 1990. The triploid aroma selection USDA 21484 was
established in 3A plots in the 3 Pacific NW states. A virus-free
tetraploid Saazer was obtained from England by germplasm exchange.
Publications:
01. HAUNOLD, A. 1989. Unprecedented changes in hops. The New Brewer 6:14-17.
02. NICKERSON, G.B., WILLIAMS, P.A. and HAUNOLD, A. 1989. Composition of male
hop oil.
J. Amer. Soc. Brewing Chemists 46:14-17.
03. HAUNOLD, A. 1989. Detailed explanation of the triploid hop breeding
program. Brewer's Digest 63:40-41.
Approved:
DANIEL A. NIFFENEGGEft
Title:
ASSISTANT AREA DIRECTOR
Date:
02/90
120
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGFtlCULTUHE
RESEARCH WORK UNIT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION • PROGRESS REPORT
120
_.17_0CT 39
U.S. DEPT. OF AGI1ICULTUHE, STATE ACRICULTUHAL EXPtlllMCNT STA TIONS AND OTHr.U INSTITUTIONS
. ACCESSION
AGENCY IDENTIFICATION NO
NO.
GENETICS,
PATHOLOGY,
CHEMISTRY
AGRICULTURAL
OREGON STATE
CORVALLIS
INVlSlK'.ATOn NAMKfS,
I. HAUNOLD
SCIENCE
EXPER.
UNIV
I
AND CULTURE OF HOPS
I?
PDirORMING ORGANIZATION
CROP
fin.
HATCH
ORE00036
tttM-Cti+fah,
BREEDING,
8
0000
CSRS
0025152
Nf
5, WORK UNIT/PHOJIXT NO
A
STATION
.v
30. CSTIMATEO TERMINATION
97331
OREGON
n
30
JUN
92
«v p r o g r e s s r e p o r t
USDA 21181 was discontinued by the Hop Research Council because of insufficient interest by
brewer members. Miller Brewing Co. discontinued USDA 21180 because alpha acids content was
below expectations. The triploid aroma selection USDA 21458 was discontinued because of
agronomic problems. USDA 21455 was named Mt. Hood and released for commercial production.
The other five triploid selections (21456, 21457, 21459, 21490, 21491) produced excellent
yields in 3-acre commercial plots. Brewing trials are in progress. The first commercial
crop of Tettnanger A and B (USDA 21496 and 21497) brought below average yields but satis
factory quality. The new triploid aroma selection 21484 was established in a 3-acre commer
cial plot near Mt. Angel.
Evaluation of the '87-Nursery (diploid x tetraploid Tettnanger-
type crosses) was completed but few triploid selections were obtained. Identical crosses
made in the greenhouse in 1988 produced from 22 to 90% triploids per cross. Seedlings were
field planted and triploids were also established in 4-hill yield plots.
Banner (USDA 21287)
was discontinued because of mildew susceptibility, but Aquila (21222) will be retained for
further testing. The first commercial crop, of the low-alpha special aroma hop USDA 21120
near Mt. Angel produced 1020 lbs (510 lbs/acre). An additional 5 acres will be planted
in 1990.
A virus-free tetraploid Saazer for future polyploid breeding was obtained from
England.
Over 650 females, 300 males and over 130 essential oil samples were analyzed in
support of the hop breeding program-.
SJ. PUBLICATIONS
NICKERSON, G.B., WILLIAMS, P.A.,*and HAUNOLD, A. 1988. Composition of male hop oil. J. Am.
Soc. Brewing Chemists 46:14-17.
HAUNOLD, A. 1988. Detailed explanation of the triploid hop breeding program. Brewers
Digest 63:40-41.
HAUNOLD, A. and NICKERSON, G.B. 1989. Mt. Hood, a new American noble-aroma hop. Am. Soc.
Brewing Chemists Newsletter 49:17. (Abstract)
HAUNOLD, A. 1989. Unprecedented changes in hops. The New Brewer 6:14-17.
NICKERSON, G.B. AND BURKHARDT, R. 1989. Hop analysis check service. J. Am. Soc. Brewing
Chemists 47. (in print)
APPROVED ISiRnalurv)
Director
Agricultural Experiment Station
121
..JSS-S9 ANNUA!. RK.'ORT FORM
ACCOUNT: 36IS
AsricnMnrMM^r^^
US Hop Research Council
PROJECT LF.ADFR: Hannnld
DL: PARTM I: NT: Crop Science
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION:
25,31'!.OS
77'o00.00
(6'l!93I.S9)
0.00
(3.S50.00)
33,532.19
Beginning Balance (July I, I9SS)
Contributions (Check donor list below.)
Disbursements
Transfers (from one ART account to another)
Bookkeeping
finding Balance (June 30, I9S9)
Contributions:
S'12,000.00
Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc.
S35ioOO.OO
Hop Research Council
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
2.2
Limit your report to no more than 100 words.
„„,„„,
ir „n funds were
Describe the account highlighting accomplishments and explain how funds were spent. If no funds
spent, describe the purpose of the account.
. , ,,
Our drrice is required to report to the Board or D.rcctors on all accounts for the I9SS-S9 Frscal -.ear.
including those accounts with low balances and no activity.
A.
5.
c , .,„, -,,: to<!0
Return to: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Snell Hall,.„_,,
.37, before September
.6, I9S9.
If you have any questions, please call x7-322S.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Please type):
This project has become more diversified in 1989 with the addition of increased funding
through Busch Ag. Resources. The two phases of research will be discussed separately.
1
Hop Research Council: Ht.Hood (USDA 21455) was released as a new aroma hop. Five
additional Hal lertauer-derived aroma selections were harvested from 3-acre commercial plots.
Anew seedling nursery (diploid Tettnanger x tetrapoid males) was field planted. Nearly
2/3 of all seedlings were cytologically confirmed as triploids. Over 700 selections and
controls were machine harvested.
•:•••
Potential benefits : develop additional aroma hops for domestid use and exports.
Use of funds: Pay salary of field technician, hourly help,and purchase of supplies.
2 Busch AG Resources Inc: This funding, appearing as a lump-sum- is for 2 separate areas
a) Study of Native North American hop germplasm: About 15 native American hop genotypes
from the USDA hop germplasm collection were established in 4-hill plots. Another 4U
native hops from the USDA germplasm repository were increased in the greenhouse for
field planting in the fall of 1989.
Use of funds: Pay salary of newly appointed Research Assistant (25,000)
Benefits: Characterize agronomic and genetic potential of native hops .identify new .genes.
b) Pesticide testing and evaluation in Oregon ($ 17,000)
Three miticides, three aphicides and one herbicide were field tested this year.
Residue samples were collected for future analyses. This work is being done on a contract
basis with Western Biochemical Consulting Inc. (Dave Anderson) of Beaverton, OR.
122
9S8-89 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
ACCOUNT: 3625
Agricultural Research Foundation
'
Oregon Hop Commission
PROJECT LEADER: Haunold
DEPARTMENT: Crop Science
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION:
3,655.50
7^500.00
(9,148.84)
0.00
(375.00)
1,631.66
Beginning Balance (July 1, 1988)
Contributions (Check donor list below.)
Disbursements
Transfers (from one ARF account to another)
Bookkeeping
Ending Balance (June 30, 1989)
Contributions:
$ 7,500.00
Oregon Hop Commission
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
2.
3.
Limit your report to no more than 100 words.
Describe the account highlighting accomplishments and cxpla.n how funds were spent, ir no runds were
spent, describe the purpose of the account.
y
Our office is required to report to the Board of D.rcctors on all accounts for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year,
including those accounts with low balances and no activity.
4. Return to: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Snell Hall 537, before September 26, 19S9.
">.
If you have any questions, please call x7-3228.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Please type):
Mt.Hood (USDA 21455) was released for commercial production. USDA 21180, 1118, ana
21458 were discontinued. The triploid Hallertauer-derived aroma selection USDA 1484
The other 5 Hallertauer-derived triploid seedling selections (USDA 21456, 21457. "JbJ,
21490 21491) were harvested frcm commercial 3-acre plots for brewing trials, me two
virus-free German Tettnanger selections Aand Bwere harvested from 3-«re commercial
plots. Tettnanger Bseems to be the better one of the two. Avirus-free tetraploid
was increased from virus-free stock and planted in a 3acre commercial plot, near "t-^'Saazer (USDA 21534) was obtained from Wye College, England for future polyploid breeding.
Potential benefits: Develop additional aroma hops' for Oregon growers.
Use of funds: Pay hourly help, purchase supplies.
/'*
123
,.;>SS-S9 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
ACCOUNT:
3634
Agricultural Research Foundation
Miller Brewing Company
PROJECT LEADER: Haunold
DEPARTMENT: Crop Science
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION:
10,591.81
5,000.00
(14,500.00)
0.00
(250.00)
841.81
Beginning Balance (July 1, 1988)
Contributions (Check donor list below.)
Disbursements
Transfers (from one ARF account to another)
Bookkeeping
Ending Balance (June 30, 1989)
Contributions:
$ 5,000.00
Miller Brewing Company
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
2.
Limit your report to no more than 100 words.
Describe the account highlighting accomplishments and explain how funds were spent. II no tunds were
spent, describe the purpose of the account.
3. Our office is required to report to the Board of Directors on all accounts for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year,
including those accounts with low balances and no activity.
, ,, ....
4. Return to: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Snell Hall 537, before September 26, 19S9.
5.
If you have any questions, please call x7-3228.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Please type):
USDA 21180 was discontinued. The special aroma hop USDA 21120 (very low alpha,high beta),
harvested from a 2-acre commercial plot,produced 6 bales (1020 lbs total), sanewhat below
earlier estimates.
Commercial bale samples of Hallertauer-derived triploid selections
were pelletized and evaluated as aroma hops in commercial brewing trials. About 350
seedlings of crosses between low-alpha/high beta genotypes were field planted in the spring
as potential back-ups of USDA 21120.
Potential benefits: Develop a special-application aroma hop and broaden the base of the
Oregon hop industry.
Use of funds:
Hire temporary help, purchase supplies.
124
Agricultural Research Foundation
1988-89 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
ACCOUNT:
4520
PROJECT LEADER:
Miller Brewing
Nickerson
DEPARTMENT:
Agricultural Chemistry
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION:
184.62
11,000.00
(11,367.94)
733.32
(550.00)
(0.00)
Beginning Balance (July 1, 1988)
Contributions (Check donor list below.)
Disbursements
Transfers (from one ARF account to another)
Bookkeeping
Ending Balance (June 30, 1989)
Contributions:
511,000.00
Miller Brewing Company
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Limit your report to no more than 100 words.
Describe the account highlighting accomplishments and explain how funds were spent. If no funds were
spent, describe the purpose of the account.
Our office is required to report to the Board of Directors on all accounts for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year,
including those accounts with low balances and no activity.
Return to: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Snell Hall 537, before September 26, 1989.
If you have any questions, please call x7-3228.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Please type):
The major objective of the hop chemistry project is the chemical evaluation of hop
quality. Genotypes from the hop breeding program are analyzed. Varieties that Miller
Brewing Company is interested in are tested under off-station commerical conditions.
125
Agricultural Research Foundation
1988-89 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
ACCOUNT: 4522
Hop Research Council
PROJECT LEADER: Haunold/Nickerson
DEPARTMENT: Agricultural Chemistry
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION:
12,167.36
36,925.00
(44,242.50)
(733.32)
(1,846.25)
2,270.29
Beginning Balance (July I, 1988)
Contributions (Check donor list below.)
Disbursements
Transfers (from one ARF account to another)
Bookkeeping
Ending Balance (June 30, 1989)
Contributions:
$36,925.00-
Hop Research Council
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
2.
3.
Limit your report to no more than 100 words.
Describe the account highlighting accomplishments and explain how funds were spent. If no funds were
spent, describe the purpose of the account.
Our office is required to report to the Board of Directors on all accounts for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year,
4.
including those accounts with low balances and no activity.
Return to: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Snell Hall 537, before September 26, 1989.
5.
If you have any questions, please call x7-3228.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Please type):
This project provides funds for the chemical evaluation of hop genotypes developed by
the hop breeder.
Analyses of commercial varieties from the germ plasm collection
supply characteristics used in the selection of new varieties to replace imported hops.
0
PAGE:
1
02/27/90
ANNUAL RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT
Report of Progress (AD-421)
Accession: 0142752
Year: 89
Mode Code: 5358-05-00
STP Codes:
Project Number: 5358-22000-001-02 S
2.2.04.1.n 100%
Title: DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURE OF HIGH QUALITY HOPS
Period Covered
From:
01/89
125
To:
f)
nPsyr-C4tik.tty®njt'
/
/
12/89
Progress Report
USDA selections 21455 (now Mt. Hood), 21456, 21457, 21459, 21490, and
21491, Tettnanger clones USDA 21495 and 21497, and Washington selections
415-90, 8254-167 and 8254-244 were tested in large trials in Washington.
Yield and alpha acid content were 2230 kg/ha and 4.2%, 1740 and 1.2, 1150
and 3.2, 1910 and 3.0, 1015 and 2.2, 475 and 2.5, 550 and 3.7, 460 and
4.7, 1815 and 12.2, 610 and 5.8, and 757 and 4.6, respectively. Those
selections with yields'below 1000 kg/ha were established from softwood
cuttings during 1988. USDA selection 21484 was established in a large
trial. Cones from 445 seedlings representing crosses made to produce new
aroma hop selections were collected to evaluate brewing quality
potential.
For all seedlings, the average alpha acid content was 5%, A:B
ratio near 1.5 and cohumulone ratio near 30.
A field trial to evaluate
host-plant resistance to two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae,
with four replicates of 450 seedlings representing 21 half-sib families
was established during the summer. A diallel cross between plants showing
high or low host-plant resistance to hop aphid, Phorodon humuli, was
made. To increase germplasm available with moderate alpha acid levels and
low cohumulone ratio, additional crosses between aroma cultivars and aroma
males were made.
Publications:
01. KENNY, S.T. and ROHRBACH, J.F. 1989. Photosynthesis measurement in hop.
Agronomy Abstracts 1989. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, WI, p. 114.
Approved:
DANIEL A. NIFFENEGGER
Title:
ASSISTANT AREA DIRECTOR
Date:
02/90
; i
Washington
State University
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center,
Prosser, Washington 99350-0030
509-786-2226
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 14, 1989
TO:
A. Haunold
THROUGH:
L. R. Faulkner
FROM:
S. T. Kenny
SUBJECT:
QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 1/1/89 TO 3/31/89
. FOR C/A NO. 58-91H2-8-136
Essential oil analyses of the 1988 crop year harvest were completed and
summarized. Complete analytical results for 1988 bale samples are
attached.
USDA 21484 was obtained from the USDA hop breeding program at Corvallis for
propagation to establish a three-acre commercial trial in Washington.
Seedlings from crosses on females identified as having laboratory
resistance to two-spotted spider mite were established to provide material
for a progeny test field trial.
127
129
130
127
29
I3l
U7
L28
U9
132
111
LIS
L21
21
116
66
33
1
5
118
21?
101
218
tOS
65
35
9
8
11
017/39-10
012/18-20
007/21-22
008/15-17
LUB 010/39-11
NRD 011/39-11
P
T 011/01
B G 01O/21-26
B G 016/15-1?
011/16
010/12
011/26
9-6-88
839.1
9-6-88
727.9
9-2-88
735.0
1177.7
9-6-88
8-31-88
357.5
8-31-88
391. 1
9-20-88 2117.1
9-12-88 1668.
9-12-88 1273.
8-31-83
823.
9-2-88
155.
9-2-88
12;
3-31-88 1309-13-83
783.5
9-13-83 1753.1
9-2-88
752.6
8-31-83
327. 1
9-12-88
739.9
9-6-83
132.8
9-2-88
117.2
9-2-83
181.8
1.95
1.12
3.01
1.51
1 . 12
2.1?
3. 19
3.20
l . lO
2. 92
1.55
10.09
6. 11
1.87
6.9?
8.51
0.215
0.233
0.266
0.230
0.250
(3.267
3.00
3.08
2.33
1.03
2.21
3.6?
0.2?5
0.3IQ
0.275
0.258
0.252
0.217
0.213
0.231
0.218
0.260
0.212
0.223
0.223
0.261
0.229
0.251
0.270
0.221
0.253
0.235
0.233
0.227
0.229
0.226
0.216
0.220
0.252
0.216
0.325
0.213
0.23-1
0.260
0.25?
0.25B
0.229
0.219
0.229
0.261
0.260
0.253
0.257
0.23I
0.257
0.291
0.27?
0.328
.230
.318
.281
.335
.215
.230
1 . 10
1.66
1.12
1 . II
2.88
5.06
1.23
5.26
5.16
.62 6 . 8 0
,32 7.79
.77 3 . 10
, 11 1 . 9 0
,06 1 . 5 6
,78 1 . 60
51
1.10 1.31
3.11 2 . 2 2
2.82 3.80
1 . 7 7 1.18
3.09 3.61
3.50 1.31
6.93 5 . 6 0
1.58 1.67
3 . 0 0 3.91
1.22 1.52
2.36 1.83
1 . 6 1 3 . 11
2.08 2 . 3 1
2.92
3
1 . 6 6 6.83
1 . IS 6 . 7 6
7 . 7 5 5.27
9.55 1.5B
3.10 1.77
2.89 1.30
6 . 8 5 3.67
1 . 3 2 3.G7
5. 15 1 . 18
0 . 8 3 6.12
1.00 2.11
3 . 7 ? 1.91
2.60 7 . 8 2
1.98 6 . 5 3
3.35 5.17
3.80 5.60
2.95 3.92
1.69 S.56
1.31 1 . 8 6
3.01 2 . 9 ?
1.22 1.31
8.13 6.16
6. 17 6 . 5 3
6^61 6.95
YIELD FlLPHR BETR
CLB/fli
Q BH Q 8.-I HSI
01O/19-20
010/15-16
010/05-06
010/13-11
P
B 006/39-11
T B 007/39-10
21170 ELS 006/36-38
21173 STR 006/27-29
21179 HEE 006/3O-31
21180
BRU
21180
O26/03-01 9-13-88 1691.1
21181
BRU
21181
027/03-01 9-13-88 1118.8
21182 GRL 018/30-32 9 - 1 2 - 8 8 1132.0
21182 GRL 011/18-20 9 - 1 2 - 8 8
831.8
21183
011/11-12 9 - 1 3 - 8 8 1612.2
21185 HER 005/3O-32 8-31-88
630.0
21186 SPR 005/27-28 8-31-88
231.2
21193 NUO 018/33-35 9-12-88
312.3
21193 NUG 011/12-11 9-12-88
660.7
21196 B6R 009/23
9-12-83 1971.0
21198
010/17-18 9 - 2 - e a
1186.6
21199
011/17-18 9-6-88
933.3
21200
010/15-16 8-31-83
703. I
21203
010/25-26 9-28-88
353.8
21201
012/23-21 9 - 2 8 - 8 8
506.9
2I205
011/11
9-2-88
511. 7
21206
012/21-22 9-28-83
519.6
2120?
011/06
9-20-88
637.3
21208
012/09-10 9 - 2 0 - 8 8
351. 1
21209
012/11
10-3-88
250.8
2L211
012/13-11 10-3-83
608.6
21212
012/07-03 10-30-68 206.2
21213 RRO 0I0/36-3? 8-31-813
119.5
55 21010
16 21010
15 21011
19 21011
38 21019
56 21019
320 21077
319 2107?
59 21092
I-l. 21092
11 2109?
l? 21112
30 21113
10 21111
31 2U15
2? 2I116
51 2IU6
123 2U20
110 21128
121 21115
L13 21152
112 21159
109 21160
111 21162
12 21168
16 21169
2I039
2I039
2101S
2I015
2I016
19
51
6
37
21
53
HRRVEST
DRTE
9-12-88 2028.9
8-31-83
713.3
8-31-88
353.8
8-31-88
316.9
1138.6
9-12-88
155.8
9-6-38
1039.5
9-6-88
819.1
9-6-83
9eo.2
9-6-88
1105.3
011/28-29 8-31-88
563.7
017/15
8-31-88
550.5
011/38
011/36
009/03-01
016/18
005/31-35
011/21-26
009/13
017/31-32
017/10-11
012/21-26
012/21-23
016/09-11
21011
J
L16
TET
TET
FUN
G S
G S
COL
COL
WIL
MIL
STY
STY
SRR
SRR
CRS
ens
H
B
TRR
LOC.
BHLE ORTR
RSCtt
388
DRY
11
63
63
15
29
50
39
n:i
IS!
53
10
11
1.3
2i"i
17
50
51
57
67
6lJ
13
19
613
59
50
65
50
51
11
2?
21
20
21
21
20
27
29
21
10
36
3Q
35
20
27
36
20
13
65
36
63
10
lO
10
53
51
62
63
63
35
3:3
SO
31
33
39
3rd
33
3U
31
27
26
30
30
1Q
6U
51
113
35
36
39
30
72
1iJ
68
62
63
57
57
52
51
12
12
50
51
15
63
68
11
53
50
65
28
30
12
37
37
3-1
32
28
25
36
36
27
11
17
35
16
13
33
28
22.90
23. 90
21 .35
23 .51
21.15
19.33
23.11
23.33
23.26
23.11
25.92
30.81
21. 1?
3UI.38
23.53
28. 12
21. 3 0
32.18
28.0?
27. 1?
23.62
20.39
9.96
21.77
23.96
26.0?
23. 10
21.65
26.56
21.35
23. 15
19. ?0
19.80
21.62
20.98
23.20
21.71
27". 60
23. 12
25.52
23.62
22.31
25.15
30. 16
27.70
21.81
21.13
20.91
23.63
23. 20
25.36
25.80
20.75
26.71
26.51
21.30
22.18
COH COL NATTER
y.
6. 68
3.66
8.51
1.80
Rvw.
Cc.no
OIL
MED
l.Ol
0.35
0.63
0.1^2
1.12
1.06
0.63
O. 10
0.26
ERR
1.18
0.75
77
2?
80
6?
6?
1.29
0.70
1.62
0.50
1? 0.16
2.62
0.09
0.18
0.09
l.O?
1.02
0.85
0.93
0.77
0.26
0.28
0.61
0.89
1.39
1. 13
0.18
0.30
0.66
1.73
0.90
0.9?
1.3?
0.1?
0.23
0.88
0.13
0.58
0.57
17
07
0.9?
l . 0?
l .28
l . 1 I
0.25
1.35
0.91
0.69
0.79
0.10
0.1?
1.97
1.5:
1.08
10..17
H31.60 0.91
56.,13
11., 13
2.38
1.33
13 0.62
00 0.51
2.31
60..60
5:
0?
80
102 1?
111 20
113 83
9? 03
92 63
101 60
110 60
59 80
65 63
61 90
I5l
152
136
?5
73 0.71
117 7? 0.71
97
121
111
?9
63
.??
.83
.53
.10
.9?
.9?
131, .33
10? .S3
119 .00
120 .3?
103 .1?
81 .20
67 23
92
78
105
99
88
53
96
108 .3?
97 9?
103 30
103 .93
123 .13
72 .0?
89 .9?
?U .8?
78
?5 .80
72 . 13
109 ,50
87 00
90 .90 1.07
53 .50 0.70
61 .5?
8'l .20
11.6
15. 01
33. 92
11
12
55
36
35
29
17
27
93
16. 1
l;RR
1 1 1 . 8
57.9
37.0
133.7
1 18.5
113.7
222.0
18.5
97.0
21.0
1.0S
13.21
33. £13
33
61
69
71
01
63
71
61
06
12 1?
21.9 17 13
51.3 51 68
97.8
316
ERR
71
8
21
7
36
39.
13.
50.
18.
16.
39.
12.
11.
11.
11. 13
81
01
1.3
30, 33
23, 19
20 ,69
73
09
20
'«3
63
O. 17
15.r:i2
17. 75
2?
30
30
1
O
28
22
20
33.25
22
72
60
69
?o
91
IB
16
98
33
09
60 20 .92
05 22 ,93
95 28 82
72 2? 12
73 2? 56
98 27, 09
13 06 17. 67
•11 21 21. 56
11.3 SI 59 16. 62
61.0 61 79 12. 60
61.8 30 5?
9. 39
22.0 53. 70 12. 61
ERR
16. 76 17. 00'
ERR
13, 51 20. 3S
25.5 53, 50
5. f'i'J
38.0
1? 17. 50
31.1 55, 55 19. 12
70.5 20. 09
6. 20
85.0 12. 63 36 09
13.1 10, 93 1? 12
109. 1 63, 61
09
150.2 17, 11
11
29.0 33. 06 39 8?
190.2 11, 96 20 23
ERR
13. 71 20 09
207.6 12. 22 1? 16
190.0 31. 83 35 70
62.8 31. 21 35 69
31.3
8? 12 6-1
31
23
00
57.3
11.6
11. 1
11. 1
16.3
50.1
10.1
62.9
16.2
ERR
ERR
1G.9
ERR
XHUM
I .1
I. II
I . 96
1 . l'j
:ri.S2
2. 01
:3.09
1.S3
3.23
Li. 70
2. 1 1
0. 1 9
3.00
3.35
0.03
2. 16
1 . 72
1 . 98
2. 31
l .52
:•. 02
2. 78
2.30
3. 36
3. --U3
2.05
3.30
2.1?
2.56
17
U.93
2.82
2. 10
u
': r\3
1 • 1 : CO
HKP
rj6.'-":. 3 i
l.S.O
1 O: :. 9
• i. 1
I r::. 9
153.2
212.5
3.1
313.3
621 . 7
1 . 1
151.1. 1
13:'.'J
1 li.:..9
2.-1
106. 7
ERR
I7.IVP
P.ff.
-I5:-!.'i
-4'j:>.7
12:=!
1 .71
I
12 .0
ERR
I .0
97.9
27.2
17.9
65. 3
Fik'P
12!-.U
1 .?.
1 .0
75.3
ERR
2.U
2.5
I .0
3.13
2.75
2.56
1.91
l.Ol
3.10
3.11
•-I. 3
3.18
5.8
^.8
3.3
3 . ,;3
-1.0
ERR
5.9
1 . 1
?U. CI
i'.. 2
RRT
H/F
3.02
2.37
3.08
2.88
2.27
2.19
2.75
2.0?
3.11
3.05
2.33
3. 09
RHT
H/C
FRESH OIL ORTR
MVR/ '
Ratio USX Weight 6000 I-8UT JJHYR
5.63 1.53 0.51
6.62 0.71 0.51
3.25 1. 19 0.11
6.73 0.85 0.50
7.81 0.81 0.75
12.53 1.21 1. 19
9.25
98 1.01
6.91
77 l.Ol
8.71
93 1.21
1.19
29 0.11
18 0.73
7.7?
1.39
90 0.11
5.92 0.9? 0.'55
11.50 0.68 0.76
10.95 0.62 l. 12
13.01 1.17 1.66
11. 13 2.09 I. 19
8. 1? 0.71 0.68
7.20 0.67 0.69
10.52 1.8? 0.78
8. 19 I. 12 1. 12
9.32 1.23 1.22
7.25 O. 13 0.17
3.11 0.11 0. 17
8.68 0.77 0.35
10.12 0.33 1.26
8.51 0.30 0.63
8.32 0.61 0.68
9. 39 0.68 0.S3
6.07 0.75 0.6?
7.26 0.30 0.93
6. 1? 0.2? 0.33
5.98 1.U2 0.56
5.52 0.2S 0.25
11. 38 1.31 2.3?
12.70 0.9S 1.01
13.59 0.96 1.31
9.'16 0.91 0.51
16.13 1.11 0.82
19. 11 1.1S 1.20
9.8? 2. 18 0.62
6.00 0.23 0.31
7.62 0.6? 0.72
16.16 2.52 1.65
11.32 2.39 1.2?
11.39 1. 17 1.31
10.32 0.O9 0.55
11.39 1.58 1.72
12.65 2.00 1.1?
5.30 1.02 0.25
6.61 0.31 O. '11
2.76 0.66 0.20
7.29 0.73 0.20
6.20 1.0? 0.69
7.20 1.31 0.25
8.71
R+B
ML/
R/B lOOg
21211
28
120
122
75
31
215
216
139
138
135
76
13?
13
7?
2129?
151
21293
21299
21371
21372
119 21373
125 21381
015 21397
001 21397
022 2139?
7
21103
98 21155
222 21155
20 "1 21155
60 21155
221 21155
227 21155
69 21155
99 21156
70 21156
205 21156
223 21156
6? 21156
223 21 -156
71 21157
21290
21291
21292
21296
153
151
ISO
158
SIR
DRTR
H1X
H1X
STK
H1X
21219
21220 ERO
21220 ERO
21220 ERO
21220 ERO
21222
21223
21225
21225 OLY
21226
21226 CHI
21226 CHI
21227 PER
21227 PER
2122? PER
21231
21233
21238 BLI
21211
21212
21213
21251
21257
21258
21261
21285
21285
21288
21283
110
111
112
152
111
159
13
115
113
126
lOS
107
15
213
211
136
131
23
133
155
IS7
RSCtt
1
2121?
BRLE
388
-
ORTE
VI ELD
<U3/R>
01S/12-11 9-6-88
ID
019/12-11 9 - 6 - 8 8
HR
019/07-08 9 - 6 - 8 3
023/35-36 9-12.88
019/09-11 9-6-88
Mabton
9-13-88
Wfl
OR
936.7
663.0
711.2
931.8
H06.0
951.7
8-31-88
219.8
8-31-88
663.9
011/27-28 9-2-88
1363.9
019/31-32 9-20-88 l l l l . O
011/15-17 9-20-83
?66.?
010/01-02 9-28-88 1408.0
011/02
10-3-88 1725.2
012/37-38 9-2-88
1569.7
012/35-36 9-6-88
371.8
012/29-30 9-13-88 2279.3
019/33-3S 9-12-83 2260.9
012/33-31 9-2-88
2281.1
012/15-17 9 - 6 - 8 8
1570.2
019/39-11 9-6-8B
1917.9
007/21-26 8-31-88
101. I
Nabton
9-13-88
818. 1
Mabton
9 - I 3 - B 8 1067.9
012/31-32 8-31 -88 10O2.2
012/27-28 9-2-8B
1187.8
009/27-28 9-27-88
B90.3
012/25-26 8-31-88
710.1
013/35-36 9-2-88
289.8
013/11-12 8-31-83
385.6
037/18
9-6-88
H20.9
037/23-21 9-13-38 2?60. I
013/03-01 9-2-83
1032.5
012/15-16 9 - 2 - 8 8
1039.5
012/05-06 8-31-88
?39.7
016/03-OS 9-6-83
629.5
013/17-13 9-13-88
503.2
012/1?
8-31-88
607.0
012/39
9-6-S3
181.S
012/11-12 8-31-63
632.3
012/13-11 B-31-88 1561.8
013/21-22 9 - 2 - 8 8
1751.9
013/25
8-31-83 1652.3
013/23-21 9 - 2 - 8 3
1038.3
013/19-20 8-31-88 2110.7
013/17-18 9-13-B3
916.3
013/15-16 9 - 2 - 8 8
639. I
013/16
9-2-68
1091.?
012/03-01 '8-31-83 685.2
030/35
9-7
005/22-23
018/068,08 9-2
005/39
9-12-83 1612.5
023/33-31 9-12-88
971.3
ID
Mabton
9-13-88
872.0
017/13
9-6-83
1013.6
010/33-35
011/20
LOC.
HRRVEST
2.69
5.61
25
1i.l
21
22
25
25
31
29
36
31
31
33
•41
16
17
15
15
5?
1?
1-1
13
11
15
26
11
12
26
66
11
12
25
26
11
26
2.71
5.60
3.65 7.76
1.87 7.32
2.38 5.37
3.55 7.27
3.11 5.00
3 . 6 9 1 . 9?
1 . 0 3 2 . 58
1. 11 2 . 1 ?
1.85 5.31
1.66 3.35
3.82 1.23
3.9?
3.36
51
0.270
0.206
0.310
0.231
0. 192
0.251
0.27U
0.211
0.21:3
0.211
0.329
0.353
0.2113
0.33U
0.239
1rj
10
19
35
21
0.232
0.306
51
55
SO
6S
63
61
59
62
55
55
23
57
"-*?
61
51
lO
SO
19
12
19
65
73
61
57
59
5?
55
55
53
57
56
50
68
60
65
67
66
1S
57
39
COL
32
2'J
1i.i
25
31
30
30
35
36
19
35
3171
20
22
31
37
39
32
27
3R
36
16
33
13
1-1
12
13
5l
33
33
35
31
32
33
31
37
37
37
27
26
COH
0.219
0.29:'!
0.25:3
0.285
0.251
0.292
0.269
0.2?9
0.260
0.253
0.253
0.210
0.251
0.215
0.250
0.212
0.253
0.32?
0.316
0.23O
0.262
0.255
0.313
0.282
0.293
0.281
0.265
0.27U
0.217
0.256
0.267
0.277
0.271
0.301
0.27O
0.303
0.261
0.231
8.261
0.258
HSI
2.97
1.09
2
37
6.73
3.33
3.06
1.60
5. Si
2-60
1.06
1.93
2.59
2.32
2.13
2.90
3.22
5.13
6.59
3.55
1.65
2.58
3.20
3.65
2.6?
1.68
3.71
3.99
1. 12 7 . 7 1
6.20
1.58
1.33
5. 15
7.01
9.51
1.03
2.8
6^20
7.77
8.69
7.35
10.86
6.33
6.99
3.35
9.31
I . 38
1.55
1.35
6.60
6.39
3.51
2.91
5.53
11.83
12. 12
10.91
1 . 12 3 . 2 1
2.61 1.75
1 . 11
1.32
3.70
1.37
3.5?
1.07
2.51
3.73
3.23
2.13
7.38
3.09
1.01
1.03
2.69
1.87
ey.
BETR
a
s;:
2.98
2.12
7.95
7.10
7.38
5.30
6.23
1.29
1.28
6.83
9.01
10.09
11.33
10.17
5.71
Q
RLPHR
DRY
23.59
25.13
23.17
23.69
21. 03
26. 13
21.71
"2X.i. 37*
17. 77
23.32
23. 18
23.83
21.67
23. 15
27.23
21.79
23.63
22.67
23.1?
22.58
26.36
21.31
25.73
2 1 . 11
21.55
20.86
25.21
27. 16
27. 11
25.22
25.01
21.71
20. 16
26. 13
30. 11
23.31
20.16
23. 11
22.70
22.31
26.35
23.23
21.60
26.13
28.17
21.39
23.01
23.97
23.51
20. 1?
26.89
22. 10
MATTER
y.
1.U3
0.71
0.90
Ratio
1.31
o.eo
3.55
3.0?
2.82
2 . 1-1
3.35
3.12
8.05
5.01
10. 19
0.90
0.50
0.91
0.88
9.3? 3 . 0 1
16.26 1 . 1 2
7.86 1.05
6.39 0.68
1 . 29 0 . 5 8
1.30 0.15
10.19 1 . 5 5
11.86 0.53
9.62 0.70
8.9? 0.60
11.10 0 . 1 ?
12.70 0 . 6 2
8.25 0.51
10.82 0 . 1 9
8.15 0.69
8.65 0.71
6.61
1.5?
3.61 0 . 1 6
10.33
13.92
7.81
9.95
12.75
10.09
11.11
21
16
38
10
92
13
29
9l
6T
17
66
72
19
60
66
96
15
ll
51
12
98
08
11
91
12
10
8?
31
61
50
30
56
13
01
09
80
89
19
22
10
ll
01
l . 10
l
I
0
l
0
l
l
0
l
I
l
l
l
0
0
0
0
I
l
0
0
0
I
l
l
l
0
60
51
81
59
12
51
81
31
90
73
0. 98
0 59
6.56
8.75 1.72 0
17.26 2 . 18 I
18.71 1 . 8 1 A.
11.19 3.08 0
9.50 1.01 0
1 . 13 0 . 6 0 0
1.5? 0.13 0
12.21 3 . 2 2 0
8.75 2.61 0
8.92 3.62 0
6 . 13
10.61
7.73
01
0. 65
0. 60
I . 16
0. 76
I28X
lOOg
ML/
2.39
2.28 I.
2 . IS 0.
8.75 2 . 1 3 0.
8.01 1. 15 0.
8 . 6 0 0 . 9 9 0.
10.53 1 . 0 1 0.
13.83 1 . 0 5 I.
13.66 2 . 8 3 I.
15.39 2 . 7 9 I
11.61 2 . 5 3 l
10.58 1. 17 I
6.70 1.19 0
7.36 1 . 2 ? I.
7 . 3 9 0 . 5 6 0.
11.28 1.11 I
10.11 1.71 2
15.33
10.19
5.11
7.01
R+B
R/B
0.13
0.95
GOOD
OIL
MED
05.6?
98. 23
70.53
82.90
113.1?
106.93
0.75
0.59
0.88
0.70
0.99
1 . 02
0.62
0.53
0.76
O.S9
116.70 0. 17
113.33 0 . 3 8
161.13 0.31
106.77 0.6-3
170.73 0 . 8 3
913. 17 0 . 2 0
1 3 3 . 1 ? 0.61
92.33 0 . 8 2
116.60 0 . 3 2
80. 1? 0 . 1 5
0.83
0.71
0.75
119.0? 0 . 5 0
130.1? 0 . 3 9
0.63
121.5? 0 . 1 0
136.3? 0 . 1 1
136.83 0 . 1 6
117.60 1 . 3 1
11-1.03 l . 11
105.19 I . 21
133.18 1. 19
112.6? 1.02
131.10 0 . 6 3
151.60 0 . 5 2
150.1? 0 . 2 6
18LI.33 O.US
163.6? 0 . 9 1
136.23 0 . 8 1
63.10 0.71
80.03 0.5?
77.0? 0 . 6 5
113.87 0 . 0 5
16-1.20 0 . ID
135.3? 0 . 0 5
99. 13 0 . 1 3
12O.07 O.01
15U.10 0 . 5 9
195.93 0 . 3 8
255.33 0 . 5 1
197.0? 0 . 5 1
93.73 1.17
91.30 0.60
91.1? 0.51
163.03 0 . 5 8
75.30 1 . 62
9 9 . 6 3 0.35
107.70
98.33
Height
Ave.
Cono
FRESH
65
31
15
18. 17
26. 91
11
'113
103. 1
53.5
23.0
17. 1
169. 7
83.1
77.7
13.3
27.3
1 19.9
60.5
38:3.3
1 10.0
135.2
105.5
21.5
lOl . 0
53.6
79.7
150.1
63.1
70.3
103. 1
77.0
83.0
16.3
77.6
39
23
52
16
28
35
36
-11
2?
32
16
50
'19
36
55
1 1
18
11
19
59
-17
-11
62
56
53
-16
62
120.3 36
17.0 53
10.9
32. 1
35
1 1
32
85
81
01
90
9?
86
99
11
32
76
56
38
79
?0
-1?
71
97
30
83
03
71
06
'17
01
0?
38
56
03
76
1 i
30
27
5:1
51
0?
6?
76
31
90
23
28
76
29
'-,,
rrj
.;.
-.
S
3
X
|
r.
tj
0
1
1
1
i.i
1
3
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
35
'12
20
13
38
10
3?
30
38
39
1-3
) 2
10
0 1
58
05
15
50
.i!
-.
o
*-ri
5
X
o
i>
33
•1-4
13
39
73
23
1 i
53
58
75
3?
20
15
20
. -3
33
36
33
'17
55
13
16
31
33
59
70
5 I
35
65
53
11
91
0:2
8:;
36
30
20
67
69
0-3
?:'
13
20
87
'
'
!
1
i
!
'
t
liVR
•
^O'.". 7'-
a:?-;-1, i ;
(:RR '•
II PR
IIRR
l:RR
3-11 . -ll
IE.RR
llf'.P.
I:RR
tIRR j
tiRR
2. 1 1
i£PR
HRR
IiRR
'11 !.S. >'_,
-"-1. 1
1.' 1 . s"! '•
3*3.7;. *? I
l'l. 1 ;
3. 1
i£RR
• 1. *l
1 . U '
1 . 3
•A 1 . Z'. 1
1 . "I
EPR
22-1. ') ;
9 7 -1 i
50. 2
l.?i.i. 1
ERR
3.9
3. 2
5.6 I
EkP.
I
0.1 I
27-1.7
ERR
ierp:
liRP
213.7
91.2,
27ii. 7
226.8
1 31.1. 1
1 17.1
6. 7
13
16
13
1
2
7.1
113
u
13. 1
ERR
11 . 1
6.7'
233.9
I. J
RHT
11/1"
0
0. 03
0. 01
u . (1-1
X
36 29
21
28
2?
53
l l
19
50
27
1 i
29
21
95
51
73
07
1. 00
0
15
20
3
12
7
11
19
77
1 . SO
•->
3 . 39
RRT
11/•c
01TIO
18. 77
XHI.1M
OIL
11
0. 63
96
0. 59
1 2 . 1 17. S2
0. 50
0. 67
1 5 . 3 -15. 71
190. 1 1?. 59
0. 71
3 9 . 9 57 79 13. 83
3 5 . 8 62. 18 10. 01
2 7 . 3 513 51 20. 39
15.0 33 17 21. 33
1 6 . 1 3? 08 2i3. -17
17. 5 36 11 21 5?
129.9 36 21 37 13
1 9 . 5 25. 96 12 33
1-1.9 25 66 '12. 0-1
15.9 33. 19 21. -10
1 1 . 2 5 8 . 61 20. 06
6 1 . 1 53. 60
9
19
56.9 10. 26 25. 23
7 7 0 . 0 13. 22 17. 82
73.8 1 5 . 1-1 25 03
1 3 . 7 59 1 6 15 8?
20.1 53 26 10 63
11.8 36 65 21
3 6 . 9 31 99 15 89
2 1 . 9 13 -19 50 21
28. 9
19 05 1 7 1 3
ERR
11.
1 1 1 . 7 16.
2 5 . 0 50.
6 2 . 9 55.
6 2 . 1 56.
I-BUT ;:myr
MYR/
RSC»
21157
21157
21157
21157
21157
N
229
68
221
100
206
230
N
6110?
65009
BUL
B
CRS
SHI
SHI
YUG
SRV
STE
URL
65009
65009
65101 TRL
65101 TRL
65102 L - l
65102 L - l
57 65103 E-2
7 1 65101 L - 8
3
1?
160
9?
32
61
63
20
39
50
10
22
52
18
002
53
18209
18209
56001
56013
60012
60012
61019
61020
61021
61100
FUH
FUH
115-090
12
115-90
106-057
115-09O
IU6
133
219
36
61
1O1-0O6
91
21159
21159
203 21170
78 21170
79 21171
81 21172
32 21173
83 21171
210 21171
31 21175
85 21176
36 21177
90 21178
91 21179
92 21130
211 21181
93 21131
95 21182
102 21183
212 21131
96 21-181
2
21198 YEO
I
21199 ZEN
226
208
21158
225 21153
101 21158
20? 21158
72 21158
73 21159
231 21159
BRLE DR1R
3138
ID
020/11-12 8 - 3 1 - 8 3
020/21-22 9-6-88
020/23-21 9-12-83
020/25
9-12-83
Mabton
9-13-83
020/11-12 9 - 6 - 8 8
020/13—11 9-6-38
020/16
9-6-88
022/03-01 S - 3 1 - 8 8
022/05-06 9 - 6 - 8 8
022/10
9-6-33
Mabton
9-13-83
022/13-11 9 - 6 - 8 8
022/15
9-6-88
023/13-11 9 - 6 - 8 8
Mabton
9-13-83
023/16
9-12-80
005/iS-16 9 - 6 - 8 0
005/12-11 9 - 6 - 8 8
022/25-26 9 - 6 - 8 8
020/25-26 9-12-33
025/212,26 9 - 6 - 8 8
012/12-11 9 - 6 - 8 8
HU
011/21-23 8 - 3 1 - 3 8
013/03-05 8 - 3 1 - 8 3
005/38
9-2
016/39-11 9-6-88
008/12—11 9-12.88
016/30-32 9 - 1 2 - 8 8
011/33&35 8 - 3 1 - 8 8
016/15-17 8 - 3 1 - 8 3
006/33-31 8-31-83
009/26
9-12-83
005/21-26 9-2-88
015/38
9-12-83
019/03-01 9 - 1 3 - 8 8
023/19-20 9 - 1 2 - e s
011/06-07 9 - 2 0 - 8 3
013/26
9-20-83
018/18-20 9 - 6 - 8 8
009/06-08 9 - 6 - 8 8
017/13
9-2—88
019/21-26 9 - 2 0 - 8 8
Mabton
020/09
Mabton
9-1 3-8:3
9-13-83
9-12-83
2331.8
995. 1
2170.7
523.5
927.5
361. 1
956.7
1033.2
1171.3
2009.0
1730.9
2551.0
933.5
1257.9
1078.8
305.3
911. I
690.6
275. 1
1125.5
911.6
1<166.0
639.3
1056.8
533.2
6UO-6
757. 1
1696.7
971.3
577.3
2136. 1
1173.0
2032. 1
1391.6
1156.6
56?.?
883.1
312.0
736.1
1358. 1
711. 1
822.8
950.0
651.1
1111.3
908.3
019/18-20 9-12-83
UR
657.9
619.3
101.6
171.3
797.9
102.9
YIELD
CLB/R3
9-6-88
9-13-83
9-12-83
ID
023/39
Mabton
019/16
018/15-1? 9 - 6 - 8 8
113
023/37-38 9 - 1 2 - 8 3
Mabton
9-13-83
UR
MR
LOC.
HRRVEST
DRTE
a
sy.
BETR
1 . 11
2.71
3.26
7.17 1.16
8 . 7 2 6.71
?. 38 6 . 3 8
8. 11 6 . 5 ?
1.60 2.93
3 . 77 2 . 7 3
6.31 5 . 0 2
6.81 1.60
6 . 7 6 -1.70
3 . 7 0 1.21
3.03
3. 1? -1.58
5.52 5.56
1.12
3.23
3.16
2.81
3.39
1. 6-1
2.31
3.15
7.0I
3.70
9i11
3.65
3.69
2.29
3.72
2.31
1.15
5.33
1.132
5.71
5.71
3.53
3.89
9.37
1. is
12.11
3.53
1.27
2.79 3.01
2.51 3.25
3.08 1.25
2.55 5.1?
5.09 5.96
1.31 5.05
1.53 1 . 9 5
2.36 5.67
1 . 5 7 2.99
3.31 1 . 9 9
2 . 5 5 1.21
1 . 0 5 5.31
1.33 5. 13
3.05 1 . 9 6
3 . 3 3 5.19
1.97 2.71
3.29 1.28
1.35 1.89
1 . 0 8 5.06
1.71 3.51
2.76 1.82
2.00
3.59
3.95
1.37
1.10
2.26
1.95 1.71
1.71 1.17
3 . 0 2 5. 13
3.76 3 . 0 0
1.01 1.38
3 . 1 0 3. 10
3.93 1 . 5 5
2.18 2.7I
RLPHR
Q &y.
31
72
70
65
5i J
6-1
65
ID
15
0.2I7
0 . 21H
65
1:3
11
19
SO
53
53
57
6U
13
13
13
69
69
SO
11
53
51
S3
SO
50
70
53
51
3U
3-1
31
35
30
29
31
31
1?
29
35
32
2-1
36
13
31
31
13
32
•i r
~17
28
2:3
32
11
13
37
10
13
13
11
12
33
39
11
13
11
33
3?
13
11
11
15
13
33
11
12
10
33
3Q
10
37
12
16
17
13
13
COL
39
29
31
29
29
26
31
3U
2?
27
311
20
30
22
26
23
26
32
20
32
31
32
26
31
29
21
27
23
25
29
con
0.239
0.212
0.237
0.213
0.236
0.253
0.255
0.231
0.252
0.238
0.216
0.256
0.236
0.280
0.288
0.285
0.297
0.151
0.251
0.223
0.215
0.261
0.220
0.293
0.275
0.22?
0.251
0.219
0.251
0.227
0.263
0.263
0.296
0.260
0.235
0.22S
0.226
0.223
0.213
0.226
0.23O
0.223
0.212
0.22S
0.236
0.213
0.229
0.329
0.253
0.276
0.230
0.299
0.231
0.292
0.271
0.271
0.229
HSI
11.51
7.92
19.69
1 I .11
1 1.82
6.50
23.73
21.23
22.77
2 3 . 18
7.53
11.71
23.97
15.13
11.93
12.35
12.07
3.91
6.52
5.76
11.15
6. 10
7.5?
5.99
7.15
7.75
H.08
13.13
11.01
15. 1 I
0.88
1.11
1.19
1.36
1.38
1 . 5-1
I . 21
1.25
1.63
l .30
1.10
1.32
0.6?
0.63
0.87
0.81
1.21
1.16
0.69
0.99
2.31
2.57
l.O?
2.31
l . 63
5.35 0.36
7 . 11 0 . 1 6
5 . 5 2 CI. 5?
7.86 0 . 3 1
5.30 0.92
5.78 0.78
7.31 0 . 7 2
7.72 0.19
11. 05 0 . 8 5
6.36 0 . 2 6
6.19 0.31
8.03 0.12
1.56 0 . 5 2
8.30 0 . 6 6
6 . 7 6 O.t.O
7.16 0.35
6.96 0.36
8.01 0.61
8.86 0.62
1.71 0.72
7.57 0.77
6.21 0.23
6. 11 0.21
5.23 0.19
7.53 0.57
16.56 2 . 9 9
12.11 2.IJ2
1-1.35
23.51
ML/
n/B lOOq
R a t i o ti8?J
OIL
MED
600D
1.37
91.5? 0 . 6 8
1.25
83.5? 0 . 9 6
35.83 1.00
0.S5
0.85
99.60 0 . 6 0
llsfigtit
Ave.
Curio
0 . 32
0 . 35
0.61
3.56
0.10
0.61
2.12
103.27
I2l.73
l19.I0
127.30
110.60
96.73
96.93
1 . 06
1 .69
1.31
1 . 32
1 . 55
1 .-10
0.35
83.6? 0 . 3 6
0.71
l.Ol
10O.93 0 . 6 9
0.62
76.80 0.58
1.00
0.70
0.83.
0.71
0.83 106.6? 0 . 7 6
ERR
96.8? 1.62
0.61
13U.10 0 . 9 7
0.75 I2l.13 2.31
0 . 8 6 112.87 0 . 1 6
0 . 8 2 1013.10 0 . 9 8
1. 15 103.13 0 . 5 0
90.13 0.71
0.70
0 . 9 6 100.73 0.31
0.79
77.03 0.71
0.91
100.23 0 . 5 1
0.80
33.50 0.67
0.99
99. '10 0.52
1.01 112.2? 1. 13
0 . 9 5 100.0? 0 . 6 1
l . 19 115.70 0.56
89.00 0.51
0.73
0.66
86.13 0.5?
0.89
39. 13 0.56
97.77 0.13
1.09
1.90 111.93 0 . 0 3
99.37 l.na
1.72
0 . 8 5 121.50 0 . 3 1
1.26 126.30 O.-IO
2 . 32 227.20 0. IS
2 . 0 9 203.31 0 . 15
1.6?
0.11
0.18
59.90 0 . 7 9
0.90
32.20 0.6-1
0.61
1. 12
0 . 9 6 109.9? 0 . 2 3
76.9? 0.63
0.52
0.66
83.13 0.60
0.75
73.03 0.61
1.21
85.03 0.19
0 . 8 3 103.00 0 . 8 5
1.53 113.2? 0.11
2 . 0 3 115.6? 0 . 3 1
1.97 12:3.57 0 . 1 6
2 . 2 3 129.33 0 . 2 1
1.22 0 . 9 6
0.92 0 . 7 1
6.51 1. 10 0 . 9 a
8 . 1 3 0 . 3 6 1. 18
5.19 0.91 1.07
6.66 0.11 0.96
6.21 0.39 0 . 7 5
0.15 0.59 0 . 8 9
6.81
8.39
R+8
25.27
23.10
27.31
21.23
31.21
21.60
25. 76
21.99
26.7?
26.08
2-1.13
25.33
21.25
23.99
23.31
20.22
23. 30
21.56
23.32
27.10
29.51
25.37
25.87
28.93
27.33
21.71
22.26
23.35
2U.57
23.82
21.25
22. 36
28.28
22.81
22.53
25.0?
21.21
22.36
22.23
22.59
20.56
22.82
25.2?
21.93
2S. 18
y. ORY
MRTTER
88
36
08
11
75
82
9.0
23.1
12. 1
12.2
55.3
26. 1
21.3
26.0
17.5
16.2
16 . 9 ?
-16 . 8 3
50 .5-1
19 . 9?
19 .6-1
56 . 22
51 . 15
56 . 15
50 .05
58 . 0 0
16. 02
° 2 06
35. 10
15. 10
19 . IS
19 . 5?
16 . 6 6
IS . 0 0
6 .91
6 . 33
IS . 5 8
11 . 71
25 . 2 5
11 . 35
II/I--
ERR
3. 35
.31
-10
33
72
01
03
66
73
13
0?
92
35
30
33
13
13
30
92"
.52
. '1.2
>' . 6 1
..
2 . 16
v
l .03
I . 20
l . IB
l . '11
l .-11
2 .6?
2 .01
3
2
2
2
2
3
-?
3
2
2
2
0
o
3
3
2
31
3
3
33
•J
31
11
3
3
ERR
i
-,
,
:
h—'
lv-i.'.'ii
70. 1 ;
313: : 1 ' °°
3n'.'.n:
r;i:R
IIRP
1 6 1 . r<
233. -l
200.6
F.F'.P
1.2'
l:':.. )
10.1
' -i! Z•
—>*>-,
23-1.2
2.2
ERR
5.-1
5. 7
ERR
5-1.?
12: i . J
10.1
183. -1
lO::.-i
111 :P
ERR
•I6i I.'.'. '
EF:R
3-1.2 I
;
2 1 . i> !
200. -1
i:f:p
•161.1.5
3. 31
3. 33
3
•10
21.U !
3. 33
1
EK'P
3. -10
50;--.''. I
P.i.:i
176.(1
3 . 31
73
60;;. ':>
3. 0 3
•n
679.9
35^.9 !
21O.0 ;
2011.1! !
l-:. 7
3.1
•'.:. n
f:. (!
i;i:R
3. 3 1
2 . 76
2. 31
2. 7^
3. 13
:3. 31
3. •1.2
3. 21
139.8
3. 10
3. 50
•n
33
3. 38
2. 95
ERR
ERE
13.2
13 1 . 3
ERR
ERR
3. 50
3. 3?
3. 32
'160. Ll i
ROT
3. 35
3. 39
ll/C
RflT
OR'I'f
31. 07
36. 85
3 5 . 50
35. 66
;:hum
Oil.
50. 03
66.9
117.7
10. 19
186.7 23. 71 16. 91
6U.9 36. 28 36. 06
123.3 1 1 . 93 26. 17
189.2 •10. r j r t 26. 01
99. 1 31. 76 26. 89
20:3.6 32. 77 29. 76
ERR
0. 65 56. 91
193. 1 3 9 . 21 3 2 . 99
7 3 . 0 2 0 . 05 39. 31"
9 6 . 6 32. 61 1 1 . 5-1
9 9 . 1 31. 51 36. 31
6-1.1 33. 03 3 9 . 1?
77.6 22. 11 16. 76
60.1 -II. 50 33. 1?
8 7 . 7 31. 29 39. -10
3 1 . 6 30. 7*5 •11. 16
3 9 . 8 23. 16 •II. 3-1
9IJ.5 11. 27 35. 57
120.6 12 62 32 31
97.7 30 67 11. '11
72.8 31 10 33 79
EF:R
17 15 50 08
95. 1 29 32 33 35
OO
133.0
3-1 1? 70
131.3 30 91 -12 73
9 . 1 3? 93 21 "07~
3 0 5 . 3 -17 63 20 62
10.7 36 ?-l 26 n,r
11.9 6 3 3D
0
39
~7
51.8 75 31
52
y
19.9 71 62
56
17.3 53 91
11 71
5 6 . 1 35 95 31 95
6 5 . 0 •16 90 26 16
l 18.6 11 80 32 12
60.1 58 13 11 75
1 5 . 8 15 58 20 9?
15.8 1 7 73 21 33
6 5 . 7 13 39 21 26
57.3 15 55 27 57
ERR
15 .8? 13 12
12.0 51 57 18 1-1
35.
31.
61.9 35.
83.8 39.
96. 1 37.
118.3 22.
63.1
66. 5
FP.r SH
MYR/ .
I-CUT ;:ivi P.
RSCtt
I
LOC.
HRRVEST
DRTE
L-8
PRI
191 8151-053
189 8153-081
138 8153-097
165 8153-127
166 8151-212
167 8151-23?
168 8151-271
169 3151-237
190 8252-115
170 8253-017
26 65101
13 66052
1 . 18
5.11
0.250
0.269
0.212
0.263
0.25-1
0.231
0.231
0.237
0.286
3.95
5.56
1.07
3.91
81
38
53
90
96 6 . 5 5
3.18
5.51
8.55
5.51
5.70
6.2?
6.92
9.27
10.35
1.39
5 . 1?
3.93
2.38
3.16
5.21
2 . 18 2 . 3 0
5.87 5.05
8.21 1 . 12
1 . 5 1 S . 12
7.72 3 . 5 9
9.05 2.60
2.80 1.65
8.21 5 . 3 8
6.11
5.76
3.55
1.55
1.89
3.73
7.08
8.57
6.73 3 . 0 9
7 . 18
23
53
31
0.232
0.235
37
16
33
32
50
12
0.211
0.213
0.213
0.222
25
0.312
63
15
35
73
82
17
59
63
57
5?
72
15
67
61
72
61
11
11
10
19
62
51
13
17
16
22
30
31
21
25
26
1-1
50
21
36
31
36
23
39
33
10
10
39
30
39
11
31
32
33
1U
39
32
12
27
30
21
30
21
20
->->
36
35
13
30
3?
18
22
23
2-1
26
22
27
36
36
11
23
10
33
13
33
12
31
55
11
36
13
11
65
50
COL
23
21
26
21
22
25
23
22
21
IS
33
21
38
1S
COH
0.286
0.231
0.21-1
0.23O
0.231
0.252
0.219
0.236
0.253
0.226
0.253
0.227
0.231
0.251
0.200
0.21O
0.251
0.2O1
D.255
0.260
O.,266
O. 212
O.,283
o . ; 236
Q.28D
0.233
1. IS
3.75
5.19 6 . 5 3
3.85 5.72
6.70 6.03
1 . 0 0 -I. 28
0.91 3 . 5 3
1. ll 1.68
l.O? 3 . 6 0
3.52 5.79
1. 63 1 . 9 1 ,
2.23 1.02
1 . 3 3 6.-15
1.71 1 . 1 0
2.15 1.96
6.60 3.16
S.89 3.03
0.212
0.237
0.273
0.269
0.235
0.237
0.217
0.222
0.223
0.270
0.233
0.251
0.256
0.257
0.266
3.72 3.67
7 . 0 1 5.50
6.2? 1 . 6 ?
1 . 19 5 . 2 9
6.66 1.50
0.63 2 . 2 9
3.0? 3 . 6 9
1.18 5.90
3.32 3. SI
3.28 3 . 6 1
1.90 1.95
1. l l 1.82
1.80 1 . 6 2
1.01
6.28
YIELD RLPHR BETR
CLB/R3
Q By. Q GZ HSI
010/06-08 9-20-83 1751.5
006/15-16 9-20-83
718.1
526.3
067/29-30 8-31-88
067/05-06 8-30-83 101O.5
596.9
067/03-01 8-30-88
065/068.10 8-30-83 1323.5
793.9
065/11-12 8-30-S3
065/15-16 8-30-83 1000.5
9-2-88
1121.1
065/228.26
678.2
065/23-21 9-2-88
067/21-22 8-30-88 11Q1.9
439.3
065/31-32 8-31-88
065/35-36 8-31-83 1060.6
171 8253-028
701.2
065/38B.12 8-31-83
172 8253-016
8-30-83
771. O
065/11
173 8253-106
650.8
06-4/03-01 8-30-83
161 8253-138
761. 1
061/07-08 8-30-83
162 8253-175
592. 9
061/11-12 8-30-83
163 8253-229
662.9
061/13-11 8-30-83
161 8253-239
8-30-88
332. 3
066/11-12
171 8251-162
772.3
066/13-11 8-30-88
175 8251-165
066/15-16 8-30-83 1391.1
176 8251-167
H17.8
066/17-18 92-83
177 8251-181
66 I. 3
178 8251-196
066/21-22 8-30-88
923.6
179 8251-213
066/23-21 8-30-83
066/25-26
9-2-88
856.2
8251-211
UJO
960.6
131 8251-233
066/23-30 8-31-33
850.6
066/31-32 8-31-33
132 8251-211
593.8
066/33-31 8-31-88
183 8251-211
T11.7
1S1 8251-253
066/35-36 0-31-e3
867. 8
066/37-33 8-31-83
135 8251-253
066/11-12 8-30-88
537.8
106 8251-267
137 8251-263
066/13-11 8-30-83
922.1
813. I
192 8251-323
067/37-38 8-31-83
215/013
9-2-83
517.2
193 8111-013
215/028
9-2-88
681.8
191 8111-028
195 8111-039
215/039
9-2-8B
1215.0
9-2-88
891.3
196 Bl11-013
215/013
215/060
9-2-83
791.6
197 8112-060
9-13-eS 1571.5
198 8551-051
213/051
9-13-88
218/082
701.6
199 8551-082
216/021
9-2-88
631.6
200 3552-222
6151. 1
201
9-2-88
216/051
216/067
9-2-Q8
887.0
202 8553-067
9-2-83
622. 1
203 8553-323
215/123
531.3
25 CRLFCLUST 010/03105 9-20-88
968.6
013/07-03 9-2-68
116 CBS-19
B58.5
9-2-88
117 CBS-23
O13/10
013/ll
9-2-88
118 CBS-30
1113. I
HU
220 CFJ-1
100.7
156 CHBRVET-6 013/37-38 8-31-68
021/lQ-ll 9-20-88 1207.1
Q? 131-llH
020/15-I6 9-12-88 1032.5
SO I33-06
678.3
11 113-llBRr-l 012/06-08 9-12-83
609.8
62 113-11BRN 013/1541? 9-12-83
9-12-88 1093.7
021/15
OB 113-1IX
1891.3
9-6-88
83 113-11Y
021/16
BRLE OHTH
33B
DRY
11.69
10.3B
7.16
7.93
5.76
6.93
23.1?
21 .90
25.3?
22.89
23.65
21.61
20. 89
22. 17
1. 02
1. 27
1 31
O 79
l. 13
O. 28
O. 33
O. 76
O 86
O. 'O
O '16
O. 25
O 37
O. 18
1.12
0.36
0.51
0.59
0.11
0.56
0.85
0.53
0.68
0.61
0.66
l.I1
1.22
1. 13
1.63
2. 51
0.72
2.0:3
1.23
1.23
0.32
1.32
.15 0.23
11.66 3 .13
1.15 l 70
13.58 1 .53
9.56 1 . 18
11.97 1 .63
17.21
1 . 75
12.16 0 .00
11.0? I 55
11.31
Rvo.
Cono
MED
OIL
MYR/
o.ai
102.17
:l.16
15.
33.
36.
0.55
0.13
0.15
0.89
l. 15
0.18
1.9?
0.71
0.86
0.68
1.31
0.66
1.01
0.73
0.79
0.33
0.95
1.02
1.23
1.32
0.63
1.18
0.11
0.77
6
6
2
1
3
5
16
->~>
.30
56 . 71
59 . 70
.50
.25
.65
.10
.33
:o
.95
15 .3?
21 .31
oo
O. 06
U. 16
2. 10
23
3.
33
19
70
28. 25
10. 10
Tr.. 6
2.(!5
367.
ERR
ERR
233. 1
15 . 9 •
7.0 :
2. 63
0.30
2. 1 •
1.11
203. O :
15. 3
1 07. 6
37.6
6-1.0 i
201..-1 ;
2-1.3
F.RP
l-PR
1 .-' I . 3
1?.9
0. 13
2.21
1 . 72
1. 55 (1.70
16. 19 1 . 83
i. 10
11. 12
23.
15.
n.13
2.32
l-.RR
ERR
3 P.311.0
ERR
30.
2. B3
il..:16
2.-15
50.
15
12
5? -23.
29.
99 21.
00
22-1. 3
3.52
113.0-1
10
16
:":.11
'
El'-R
:':.19
ERR
l*.l !
2d. O ;
3.50
10.
'12.
-17.
IS.6 I
17. 6
"S.-I6
3.60
620.2
9.0
3.-16
13.3
:1.13
13.
13.
33.
33.
17.0
:i.-16
:-:.-1?
367. 1
:-..-l3
13.
11
-11. 39
22,
12
33.
12
13U.2 57 . 16
29.O 51 70
35.7
13. 1
165
239
7*5
15
10
12
19
l I, 5
15.2
91.5
22.2
66. 1
17.9
11.1
277.
6u.
77.
29.
22.
25.
35. 1
153. 6
21 12
31. 60
23, 56
22, 03
25
38
37. 08
14.B 23
19 01
27. 38
28. 60
313.
:1.13
ERR
1-1.5 .
ERR
:-3.16
37.
'
-II.
ERR
ERP
ERR
y.33
3.17
36.
1.31
0.31
O. 12
0.2?
i
ERR |
2 ?n. 3
501 . 1
31
28.
59.0 ?-?
62.9
135. 3
•ID. 39
57.
ERR
J5-.I.9
•1?.
7
0.91
0.33
157.0
•1-13.5
•). 6
131. 0
16
O.ll
33.3
3U.7
30.3
H/F
PUT
:3. 31
J.13
19
a?
13. 57
1?. 06
1?
17.
:':.13
16. 85 .3. 21
52. 33
22
16.6 17
52.5
25.6
61.0
17.2
31.7
29. 6
32.7
16. 36 2.'13
1. 00 11. 11
30. 10 2.03
30. 61 2.-10
17. 65 2.23
13
33.
?o.?
95.0
0.31
132.53 0.16
19-1.33
92.33
130.20
162.90
93.37
89.37
118.23
110.93
95.53
91.7?
78.3?
35.80
131.80
153.20
113.6?
HO.83
121.0?
121.60
10B.9O
101.6?
103.03
179.60
101.93
93.73
113.1?
120.70
132.33
89.10
92.90
120.17
160.3?
110.1?
112.83
111.93
167.8?
77.30 0.79
0.21
1.52
1.35
1.36
9O.03 0.15
67.13 0.10
89.73 l.2l
O. 12
0.60
79.00
83.93
18
16
1-1
55
ROT
ll/C
ERP
96
26 61 13. 71 3.15 70H.0
ERR
27 65 38. 51 2.21
liRP
16.70 27; 73 ;-.\S3
ERR
17.99 23. 65 2.01
ERR
22. 90 I . 79
53.
19,
10
S?
265
19.2 31
11.7 23.
35. 1 33.
3V.6
111.9
191.3
111.2? 0.63 133.0
97.33 0.2? 519.7
61.9
163.10 0.61
76.10 O. 12
31.9
10.3
138.20 0.5?
103.10
O. 15
90.5? 0.31
77.50 0.11
93.23 0.32
79.10 l.Ol
90.90 1.11
111.03 0.96
73.23 0.35
;:H0M
.FRESH OIL 0(11 PI
Ratio QW,'. Uoight'GOOO I-BUT 7.MYR
31.76
27.62
7.60
5.81
20.67
21. 02
7.50 0. 15 0.11
27.01 12.02 0. 81 0.96
26. 20
9.57 0. 6? 0.71
29.76 12.79 1. 10 1.05
25.97
5.28 O. 23 0.51
25.35
1.15 0. 26 0.12
30.02
8.79 O. 08 0.90
1.66 0, 30 0.65
30.2?
29.01
9.31 O, 61 0.96
27.61
6.58 O 33 0.63
31.19
6.21 O 56 0.83
3U.25 10.77 O 6? 0.83
25.91
6.11 O 10 0.60
26. 13
7.11 O 19 0.62
25.65 10.06 1 31 0.93
27.39
3.93 1 91 1. 16
21.11 10.66 2 06 1.00
23.8?
9.0? 2
19 0.93
21.28 12.35 2 27 1.16
25. 2S 13.19 O 91 1. 10
9.69 l 1? 0.81
20.77
22.31
6.12 1 23 0.71
22.63
5.01 O 15 O. ?5
18.13 10.13 0 93 0.80
23.33
1.99 O 78 0.13
22.99 10.92 1 .16 0.60
23.63 12.33 1 .93 0.83
20. 12
9.62 O .88 0.13
31.69
25.61
27.11
23.78
ML/
R/B lOOg
0.13
8.23 O.
I. 16 1. 11
6.92 O 90 O .52
3.85 0 9? O . 11
8.92 O 85 O .65
6.12 0. 39 0..60
R+B
7.39
12.51
23.66 10.91
9.18
29.31
23. I? H.16
29.06
2.92
32.21
6.76
23.68
27.98
28.09
26.13
30.12
25.21
28.19
21.11
MATTER
y.
132
Washington '
State University
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center,
Prosser, Washington
99350-0030
509-786-2226
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
July 19, 1989
TO:
A.
Haunold
THRU:
L.
R.
FROM:
S. T. Kenny
SUBJECT:
QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 4/1/89 TO 6/30/89
Faulkner
FOR C/A No. 58-91H2-8-136
Table 1, attached, lists the results of the brewing quality analyses and six
month storage analyses of the 1988 crop year samples. The storage analyses
were completed during this report period.
Off-station trials of USDA 21456, 21457, 21459, 21490 and 21491, Washington
selections 8254-167 and 8254-244, and Tettnanger A and B selections were
observed in off-station trials. The plantings showed normal growth.
Selection 8254-167 has a tendency to produce yellow-white leaves that
gradually turn green. The two Tettnanger selections were trained very late.
Propagation of USDA selection 21484 for an off-station trial continued.
A trial to examine differences among plants for host plant resistance to
twospotted spider mite was partially established. Seedling materials should
be completely established by late summer and the border rows by early spring
1990.
133
Table 1. Agronomic and brewing quality analysis and six months storage analysis of hops grown in the 1988 crop year.
Hop Chemistry Program, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State Um'versity-Pross(
BREWING QUALITY - FRESH
AGRONOMIC
Cone
Selection
21011
21015
21015
21016
L16
TET
TET
FUN
21039
21039
21040
21040
G S
G S
COL
COL
location
009/03-04
005/34-35
Yield
lb/A
2029
Wt. Alpha
mg
X
84
4:40
Hop Acids
HSI CoH a/0
Beta
% Ratio
_%_
Essential Oil
ml/
Myr
Hum
100g
_%
JL
45.0
44.5
4.34
0.230
43
1.0
0.35
0.281
0.318
0.335
28
0.7
1.5
35-
0.51
0.51
0.41
38.9
40.0
354
91
2.82
3.80
016/18
713
3.41
317
1.77
2.22
1.48
1439
76
,09
3.64
.245
46
0.50
43.3
456
72
.50
4.34
.230
47
50.1
42
0.75
1.04
41
1.19
46.0
48.6
1.01
1.24
42.7
21179 HEE
21180
011/24-26
009/43
017/31-32
012/24-26
017/10-11
012/21-23
016/09-11
011/28-29
017/15
011/36
011/38
012/18-20
017/39-40
007/21-22
008/15-17
010/39-41
011/39-41
011/04
010/24-26
016/45-47
041/46
040/12
041/26
040/19-20
040/15-16
040/05-06
040/13-14
006/39-41
007/39-40
006/36-38
006/27-29
006/30-31
026/03-04
62
54
21180
BRU
21041 WIL
21041 WIL
21049 STY
21049 STY
21077 SAA
21077 SAA
21092 CAS
21092 CAS
21097
21112
21113
21114
21115
21116
21116
21120
H B
TAR
LUB
NAD
P T
B G
B G
21128
21145
21152
21159
21160
21162
21168 P B
21169 T B
21170 ELS
21173 STR
21181
027/03-04
21181
21182
21182
21183
21185
21186
BRU
GAL
GAL
HER
SPA
21193 NUG
21193 NUG
21196 B6A
21198
21199
21200
21203
21204
21205
:>
21206'
21207
21208
011/18-20
018/30-32
041/11-12
005/30-32
005/27-28
011/12-14
018/33-35
009/23
040/47-48
041/47-48
040/45-46
040/25-26
042/23-24
041/14
042/21-22
041/06
042/09-10
042/11
21209
continued...
4.67
5.60
.257
.231
.294
33
819
87
.58
1090
110
.93
980
79
90
.00
3.91
.22
4.52
71
2.36
4.64
1.83
3.14
2.92
3.00
2.08
2.31
6.76
6.83
.219
.229
36
7.75
9.55
3.40
2.89
6.85
5.27
4.58
.229
.261
.77
.30
.67
.260
0.253
0.234
4.32
.87
.18
1485
564
550
728
839
735
1178
358
394
72
123
104
108
98
104
92
1669
79
106
1278
100
823
88
2117
4.18
4.66
5.15
0.83
455
59
1.00
422
97
3.77
1307
784
131
108
2.60
1.98
.42
2.44
4.91
7.82
6.53
37
40.0
37
0.9
34
1.3
1.5
0.41
0.73
44.7
42.0
25
1.0
0.55
41.2
28
0.9
0.44
1.12
36
0.6
0.7
27
38.
1.5
0.76
1.66
2.1
1.19
43.1
61.8
51.6
50.6
53.8
28
0.7
29
50
0.7
1.9
0.68
.69
.78
0.260
39
1.1
.12
0.257
0.258
40
1.2
48
0.1
.22
.47
.277
0.328
0.257
32
46.8
43.5
58.5
59.5
0.325
30
0.4
0.17
55.6
28.1
12.6
0.218
35
0.8
0.260
36
0.212
30
0.3
0.3
0.35
1.26
0.68
40.9
63.6
47.4
1753
149
3.35
30
0.6
0.68
120
3.80
5.47
5.60
0.223
753
0.223
31
0.53
33.1
45.0
327
740
103
81
2.95
1.69
3.92
5.56
0.261
0.229
27
26
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.67
0.93
43.7
42.2
0.251
0.270
33
0.3
0.33
34.9
30
1.0
0.56
34.2
0.3
0.9
0.25
33
15.9
42.0
483
67
1.31
4.86
417
80
3.01
2.97
185
1694
64
97
1.22
6.17
4.31
6.53
8.43
1149
142
118
4.51
6.64
125
152 11.32
151
9.62
6.46
4.95
6.95
7.79
6.80
0.229
40
1.4
136
76
3.10
4.90
0.246
0.220
43
2.2
32
4.56
0.252
661
102
114 10.09
4.23
342
144 11.78
6.14
832
1482
1642
630
231
6.77
1.11
3.06
0.221
0.235
0.253
0.227
31
40
'0.51
0.233
0.226
39
40
1.34
1.20
AFTER SIX MONTHS STORAGE
Essential Oil
Hop Acids
ml/
H/C HmeB
H/C a Remain HSI
lOOg Ratio
X
Ratio
%
19.8
85.3
18.4
31.0
84.2
23.2
20.7
22.9
20.9
28.8
27.4
27.6
27.1
21.6
3.08
0.32
0.321
330
0.43
3.10
0.60
89.1
82.0
304
0.60
2.51
2.40
382
378
0.58
3.12
85.9
0.59
3.22
91.2
0.373
0.26
3.32
66.9
76.3
0.507
2.96
3.10
2.28
3.43
17.7
12.6
16.6
9.4
12.6
17.0
20.3
5.7
17.6
19.4
3.48
2.56
6.2
0.93
2.75
1.96
2.10
36.1
2.82
17.1
2.17
15.1
17.1
39.9
2.47
2.56
85.6
0.445
0.333
87.2
0 363
86.0
78.3
0 433
0.40
0.41
0.89
0.60
0.28
0.30
0 277
0.49
0 428
2.05
3.46
3.61
93.7
66.2
74.3
0 530
0.39
1.42
2.36
0.490
0.47
2.49
2.05
20.1
17.2
35.8
3.40
2.30
86.5
73.1
0.391
0.341
0.31
0.48
3.63
3.36
2.78
80.7
86.3
78.2
88.2
0.353
0.18
0.36
3.72
0.369
0.331
35.7
42.6
4.13
3.40
0.65
0.74
3.63
3.71
0.66
5.47
5.10-
3.30
20.2
2.82
0.291
2.58
3.63
1.96
4.17
3.48
6.00
1.62
11
67
27.2
2.34
36.2
36.5
34.3
26.0
27.9
1.52
82.2
0.372
40
1.75
1.98
92.0
0.306
32
3.02
29.2
1.72
81.8
0.388
80
1.81
3.36
42.3
16.7
2.01
90.8
0.271
74
2.13
0.82
36.3
18.7
2.16
97.0
0.272
55
2.33
0.64
0.78
0.62
49.4
0.6
0.03
0.2
0.31
39.7
3.35
70.4
0.72
18.1
3.37
80.0
27
2.4
47.4
22.9
4.68
28
2.5
38
1.2
52.
54,
20.1
19.6
2.22
2.18
.231
.218
1.27
1.65
1.34
94.3
88.6
81.6
0.295
0.309
0.367
3.64
2.37
2.35
2.26
4.18
0.248
.246
0.21
0.21
0.83
6.80
0.7
0.339
0.392
3.71
28
27.5
45.4
0.55
24.
1.0
1.01
2.37
1.99
1487
93
4.87
35
0.9
933
102
6.97
4.42
.252
36
1.6
.72
39.
28.2
703
111
8.54
2.1
2.92
1.55
24
29
1.0
0.3
38.7
40.6
53.0
22.6
20.0
0.7
542
62
1.10
27
0.7
19.7
4.9
70
550
52
0.275
0.245
0.233
0.8
24
24
1.1
1.3
.69
.25
37.7
37.6
32.3
30.2
52
61
4.10
3.00
3.08
23
637
854
23
1.83
3.09
251
41
3.19
3.20
4.12
2.47
.47
.25
.44
.20
.28
1.31
60
66
0.247
0.258
0.275
0.318
40
354
507
4.11
2.88
5.06
1.66
2.33
0.266
20
1.1
97
79.0
81.2
85.4
3.02
5.26
5.46
1974
2.59
3.62
3.41
3.37
2.96
93.1
86.6
30.3
0.23
0.26
0.23
0.20
0.277
0.411
0.394
0.417
0.336
30.1
27.7
0.12
1.93
11
19
1.01
0.66
0.69
0.68
2.26
134
Table 1 continued.
AGRONOMIC
ml/
H/C HmeB
100q Ratio
X
Yield
Location
lb/A
609
56
206
40
419
21226 CHI
21227 PER
042/13-14
042/07-08
010/36-37
010/33-35
041/20
041/27-28
011/15-17
019/31-32
040/01-02
041/02
042/37-38
042/35-36
042/29-30
019/33-35
042/33-34
012/15-17
019/39-41
007/24-26
21227 PER
21227 PER
Habton
Mabton
21231
21233
Selection
21211
21212
21213 ARO
21214 SIR
21217
21219
21220 ERO
21220 ERO
21220 ERO
21220 ERO
21222
21223
21225
21225 OLY
21226
21226 CHI
21238 BLI
21241
21242
21243
21251
21257
21258
21261
21285
21285
21288
21289
21290
21291
21292
21296
21297
21298
21299
21371
21372
. 21373
21384
21397 H4X
21397 H4X
21397 H4X
21403 STK
21455
21455
21455
4.03
0.230
0.250
33.8
17.8
27
1.1
0.6
0.26
2.24
0.10
4.0
• 8.2
1.15
3.01
3.67
0.267
28
0.8
0.63
48.2
15.8
3.32
79.9
0.451
0.26
250
105
108
2.98
4.03
0.258
0.7
0.65
3.39
82.9
0.412
0.33
3.72
3.64
98
2.42
7.95
7.38
7.40
5.30
6.23
2.69
7.38
0.264
0.231
0.9
0.60
137
33 .
1
1.16
44.6
46.3
50.1
18.8
664
1364
27
26
2.77
1.50
3.23
0.269
0.264
44
2
1.04
57.0
43
2
0.76
55.4
92.6
86.6
0.279
0.260
42
2
0.48
0.43
0.26
0.04
0.21
0.27
43
2
0.49
0.60
0.339
0.328
0.322
2.51
45.7
26.9
18.2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.341
0.39
0.20
0.17
0.20
0.54
0.34
3.73
0.253
51
1
0.66
4.32 .0.258
38
1.0
3.70
0.240
0.254
33
35
1.8
1.8
69.5
0.455
0.72
2.06
3.01
0.245
0.250
34
32
2.8
0.72
0.66
1.47
1.29
.19
90.9
0.323
1.13
2.34
,00
,22
2.89
88.1
0.343
87.1
1.02
0.78
2.39
3.14
767
114
1111
118
1408
105
133
1725
1570
372
131
4.29
4.28
2279
2261
2281
1570
152
158
6.83
9.01
4.87
180 10.09
3.57
164 11.33
136 10.47
68 5.71
07
14
87
69
24
0.242
0.258
33
0.327
0.316
37
2.5
1.2
1.5
37
1.3
1918
404
143
3.09
2.43
21
34
2.8
1.91
1.61
1.13
0.59
0.73
43.2
45.1
59.5
59.3
042/31-32 1002
042/27-28 1188
009/27-28
890
042/25-26
740
043/35-36
290
386
043/41-42
037/18
1121
037/23-24 2760
043/03-04 1033
042/45-46 1040
630
016/03-05
790
042/05-06
043/47-48
503
607
042/47
482
042/39
633
042/41-42
042/43-44 1565
043/21-22 1752
043/25
1652
043/23-24 1098
043/19-20 2141
946
043/17-18
114
164
2.64
6.60
4.75
4.68
0.230
0.262
37
46
0.6
135 6.39
99 3.51
128 2.91
150 5.53
196 11.83
3.74
2.67
3.65
3.22
5.43
0.255
0.313
36
1.7
1.3
0.284
37
1.7
2.2
256 12.12
6.59
0.265
39
1.8
2.34
197 10.94
94 4.85
3.55
4.65
3.20
0.278
0.217
34
3.1
22
1.0
0.267
19
0.4
0.34
0.59
0.54
0.256
20
0.6
0.42
0.277
0.271
35
30
3.2
2.6
0.81
043/45-46
043/16
042/03-04
005/22-23
018/06&08
030/35
005/39
017/43
019/07-08
023/33-34
91
1.38
91
163
1.55
9.34
6.33
2.58
2.90
2.43
21456
continued.
.20
37.2
42.4
42.0
21.4
20.9
.87
69
67
20
2.80
86.4
86.6
0.329
0.378
0.384
0.67
0.83
2.85
2.66
.30
.64
.28
.57
2.36
51.5
0.674
0.58
2.69
4.79
9.5
25.3
17.8
25.0
3.02
2.94
15.9
2.44
2.82
10.7
1.53
36.6
32.0
24.4
15.9
2.77
1.65
19.0
47.1
3.28
83.8
0.447
0.33
3.50
5.60
13.5
50.2
3.35
82.0
0.375
0.21
3.57
6.06
44.0
40.6
19.8
14.5
1.51
2.58
36.4
7.5
0.70
53.9
62.8
53.5
12.2
8.3
20.1
1.59
1.72
2.34
46.1
15.9
1.33
62.7
1.0
0.13
87.1
62.3
61.1
0.339
0.600
0.598
53.3
42.3
51.8
0.613
1.93
0.301
36
3.6
2.59
0.278
35
3.4
7.77
8.69
2.32
4.06
0.303
0.254
34
38
3.3
1.04
2.1
107 7.35
171 10.86
2.60
3.06
1.60
5.84
0.292
0.258
38
25
2.8
3.6
1.11
1.10
'1.22
0.285
0.219
40
3.9
0.49
56.8
1.0
0.16
32
0.9
0.89
41.8
29.5
2.82
2.55
90
6.20
133
5.15
639
92
7.04
2.32
0.298
29
3.0
80
47.3
21.7
1095
147
9.54
1.4
01
60.0
11.8
1.47
80
4.03
0.232
0.306
19
685
6.73
3.83
35
26
1.1
09
27.3
3.27
0.6
61
49.7
18.7
49.3
3.36
0.4
50
11.8
53.2
0.7
0.43
50.8
25
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.90
1.40
1.44
25
0.5
1.56
29.1
30.5
27.3
0.7
0.6
1.34
14.5
55.4
46.1
45.0
49.3
36.8
50.6
3.38
3.39
2.14
2.37
2.58
2.45
2.20
2.20
33.0
36.3
38.4
33.3
38.1
3.00
37.4
3.11
1.58
1.33
2.80
1643
1044
1106
149
136
113
6.20
3.65
3.55
974
130
4.12
2.71
2.97
4.09
3.99
7.76
7.27
2.88
018/42-44
019/09-11
023/35-36
21.4
20.5
21.6
872
663
932
955
122
98
83
107
4.85
3.69
3.44
26
24
0.270
0.192
,211
206
.310
44
24
26
231
26
7.82
0.251
5.37
5.34
4.97
0.270
0.243
0.241
5.00
0.248
22
25
31
29
34
4.62
3.57
1.18
6.99
WA
21455
21456
21456
0.13
2.46
8.85
4.87
21455
0.7
13.8
10.0
20.4
100
OR
Habton
0.03 102.7
0.03 71.6
117
113
164
3.97
3.36
ID
21455
1.90
0.04
0.04
0.54
0.60
0.96
76
7.74
5.64
5.60
21455
0.8
33.5
37.1
48.3
77
0.282
0.293
62.5
50.5
0.98
1068
4.01
4.12
32
27
30
47.6
57.8
0.38
1.16
2.24
0.92
1.10
83
1.4
47.8
36.1
36.2
26.0
25.7
33.5
58.6
53.6
818
-
2.04
4.51
1.42
0.6
87
42
0.5
91
0.9
0.7
11
98
27.9
42.5
36.0
0.7
1.12
35.9
11.9
28.8
24.7
2.75
2.58
3.20
2.50
2.83
1.45
0.699
0.45
0.56
0.57
0.53
0.58
0.32
62.9
0.635
0.67
3.21
6.32
64.8
91.8
88.4
79.0
0.638
0.364
0.401
0.54
0.68
0.57
0.64
2.96
3.21
3.47
3.25
6.55
0.849
0.397
3.02
6.67
5.96
2.92 6.56
2.72 10.68
2.54 6.99
2.64
4.12
3.49
135
Table 1 continued.
•
Yield
Location
21456
ID
21456
Habton
21456
WA
21457
018/45-47
019/12-14
023/37-38
21457
21457
21457
21457
Habton
21457
WA
21458
21458
019/16
023/39
21458
ID
21458
21458
Habton
21459
019/18-20
21459
ID
lb/A
Wt.
Alpha
mq
X
Habton
21459
WA
1.66
3.35
0.330
4.03
2.58
4.95
0.329
0.359
0.213
3.82
4.23
0.239
89
3.93
4.55
3.10
798
36
3.40
2.48
2.71
3.08
402
658
109
2.26
100
1.14
2.47
1358
108
1.53
937
86
472
649
89
933
1114
77
107
61021 STE
64100 BUL
64107 N B
65009
65009
65009
65101 TAL
continued...
38.0
3.35
81.2
81.6
68.7
3.32
46.9
45.4
3.38
3.40
2.00
3.53
0.268
3.01
0.296
32
28
0.6
2.79
0.9
0.62
0.68
3.24
3.48
2.54
3.25
0.8
70.0
4.27
5.17
4.25
5.96
0.260
0.268
28
3.59
2.55
26
0.8
26
0.5
23
0.7
22
39
0.9
0.3
0.75
0.86
20.0
32.6
27
0.9
0.71
34.8
39.4
41.5
36.8
31
0.4
33.0
39.2
3.08
1.57
5.05
4.38
5.67
2.99
4.99
0.229
0.225
0.235
0.226
0.228
0.230
0.226
0.290
0.228
0.4
22.9
0.61
39.2
0.7
2.81
70.5
0.388
56.9
2.75
2.76
64.7
0.380
73.2
80.6
81.8
0.427
0.412
0.5
0.7
22.4
46.8
41.5
33.5
34.3
30.8
41.5
39.4
3.35
3.23
3.40
3.33
79.9
5.86
7.25
3.67
8.25
6.56
3.71
0.43
3.53
3.60
3.66
4.97
5.69
0.51
5.17"4.90
41.8
3.31
3.38
70.1
75.7
0.497
0.46
3.60
0.383
0.51
3.67
5.03
27
0.6
1.04
42.6
32.3
3.40
76.5
80.5
86.6
0.383
0.403
0.413
0.407
0.483
0.51
0.66
3.65
4.66
1.19
34.5
39.8
3.41
30.7
30
0.95
0.73
17.1
41.4
50.1
3.34
3.38
5.06
0.245
33
0.2
0.66
29.8
39.9
3.34
0.220
0.261
0.293
31
0.6
30.9
42.8
3.34
79.6
80.5
28
0.5
22.3
47.8
3.40
73.8
28
3.0
1.09
0.89
1.90
27
32
43
31
2.5
1.6
2.09
20.6
26.4
0.9
7.6
2.92
3.30
2.43
1.1
2.3
37.9
47.6
36.9
69.4
74.6
24.9
0.275
0.227
0.254
0.251
0.249
31
2.3
2.32
75.8
7.5
1.67
0.48
53.9
35.9
46.9
11.7
2.35
41.0
32.0
3.07
2.92
87.6
90.1
73.0
145 12.41
3.54
4.15
100
8.89
3.53
122
126
9.37
5.71
8.65
9.41
5.74
4.02
8.69
3.39
0.454
29
2.6
2.29
0.297
0.285
35
3.72
1.64
2.81
1.4
1.3
2.31
3.45
32
24
933
110
4.45
7.01
0.216
36
1258
77
83
2.84
3.46
3.26
48
4.11
0.256
0.236
0.7
0.6
1.72
0.85
1.26
• 0.90
0.64
41.8
26.5
32.4
72.8
8.25
3.56
0.55
3.58
5.10
5.64
88.9
1.02
3.27
0.67
89.7
84.1
0.357
0.378
0.87
0.57
3.59
2.71
1.53
1.60
2.30
59.7
0.626
0.59
2.80
2.52
2.43
58.2
0.626
0.58
2.91
3.08
1.031
0.62
2.49
0.382
0.376
0.35 ' 3.34
2.93
3.02
0.52
3.20
1.95
0.459
0.39
3.09
3.45
0.332
0.312
0.351
0.413
0.423
0.409
0.30
2.90
0.36
0.40
2.97
3.26
2.43
2.10
0.58
3.11
0.39
0.70
3.57
2.31
0.75
2.88
1.80
0.85
0.92
0.73
1.74
1.78
1.65
0.32
1.47
3.07
2.10
3.07
1.00
0.38
3.49
2.73
0.96
58.4
14.8
0.52
0.66
45.6
21.0
21.3
2.66
305
73
3.28
2.71
0.288
31
1.2
0.75
50.0
24.3
3.04
85
4.42
3.03
0.283
31
1.5
1.24
45.6
27.6
2.72
86.7
523
103
118
3.17
5.52
4.58
5.56
0.252
0.238
29
38
0.7
1.0
0.83
927
1.53
45.9
54.6
19.1
18.4
3.33
2.04
1.7
1.3
2.03
50.0
54.5
25.2
14.3
15.6
14.7
6.4
2.67
58.0
56.2
56.2
77.4
82.1
91.5
57.6
4.46
0.284
30
6.71
6.57
6.38
0.237
0.236
0.243
34
35
34
1.2
1.3
1.97
2.42
2.23
2.98
0.258
50
1.5
0.61
6.15
6.08
3.66
0.9
0.8
47.7
4.64
3.77
3.60
0.61
944
47
3.70
0.40
0.41
0.26
0.375
0.415
0.366
79.6
81.0
89.4
2009
0.56
0.48
3.02
3.64
35.6
0.8
7.98
4.60
0.27
0.51
0.48
28.2
0.7
0.3
8.14
3.99
4.77
41.3
28
1172
2.94
2.96
0.99
30
1033
0.82
0.46
0.80
0.329
0.223
7.47
8.72
4.60
0.4
0.250
116
3.60
0.6
2.74
4.89
129
97
129
97
0.46
27
4.28
364
5.05
8.34
27
3.29
957
3.92
0.243
100
1079
3.47
0.236
116
82
0.31
0.49
0.91
640
60
5.53
8.21
0.79
1057
275
691
3.67
3.82
0.3
0.229
227
0.48
0.45
0.6
5.49
2032
7.86
26
3.38
5.33
3.70
0.419
0.358
5.33
3.79
31
112
209
0.367
0.483
0.398
3.57
0.242
0.225
1466
4.82
0.406
0.497
0.447
0.572
0.433
3.31
1.83
1.74
0.51
0.46
3.42
3.05
2.76
0.347
0.428
26.0
33.0
99
89
6.33
29.8
99
98
6.64
3.22
32.8
736
915
1697
757
974
578
2436
1173
1425
0.54
0.60
3.69
0.389
40.3
29
0.65
8.05
1.00
29
4.52
4.64
3.28
6.39
0.83
69.3
81.8
62.8
3.65
3.62
3.38
26.5
3.39
3.34
3.18
0.60
3.60
26.9
1.15
0.70
0.96
0.33
0.51
41.9
3.34
X
0.58
34.8
4.21
5.31
5.13
4.96
312
1.08
016/15-17
006/33-34
009/26
005/24-26
015/38
023/19-20
049/03-04
011/06-07
1.07
23.7
86
61020 SAV
0.9
0.4
89
61019 YUG
29
31
26
539
60042 SHI
3.50
0.292
35.5
35.4
4.71
601
56013 CAS
35.1
3.95
022/45
60042 SHI
• 0.98
1.40
1.95
21483
56001 HAL
1.1
79.5
73.6
56.9
76.3
65.6
21482
48209 FUH
28
3.50
1.97
1.35
HU
0.299
0.459
0.418
0.333
0.556
0.505
0.505
50.0
2.55
1.85
011/21-23
018/03-05
005/38
016/39-41
008/42-44
016/30-32
011/33&35
3.03
3.38
3.37
40.5
77
108
48209 FUH
35.5
35.7
16.0
883
415-090
39.3
39.1
32.1
3.31
415-90
0.9
1.10
1.18
0.89
90
101
406-057
415-090
0.9
0.234
25
25
0.75
0.74
0.96
1157
568
005/15-16
005/12-14
022/25-26
028/25-26
012/12-14
025/24X26
3.39
0.4
020/41-42
020/43-44
020/46
022/03-04
21499 ZEN
404-006
49.0
36.8
32
Habton
21498 YEO
16.9
34.5
0.274
0.254
0.274
21474
Habton
0.54
0.82
4.47
21475
21484
0.5
72.2
62.4
HmeB
9.63
2.56
0.45
0.65
0.3
73.2
H/C
3.70
2.90
0.585
0.391
24
81.9
78.6
ml/
100q Rati 0
31
1.74
95
21484
2.73
3.02
103
023/43-44
023/16
25.1
28.8
2.95
3.33
1392
Habton
76.5
83.5
1.15
1.08
34.1
36.1
403
21481
3.44
0.5
1.6
36.3
020/23-24
020/25
21481
42.1
•40.6
29
36
35.7
21472
21473
21474
022/10
022/13-14
X
1.01
5.09
1.31
4.01
2.36
022/05-06
Ratio
0.96
823
21479
21480
H/C
X
1.2
020/11-12
020/21-22
21478
Hum
X
0.5
0.6
21471
21477
Hyr
100q
24
020/09
21476
ml/
Ratio
29
26
Habton
741
alP
X
0.276
21470
130
97
121
113
CoH
0.227
21470
651
950
Hop Acids
a Remain HSI
4.87
5.13
3.76
-.
HSI
%
71
WA
21459
Beta
714
ID
Essential Oi I
Hop Ac ds
Cone
Selection
AFTER SIX MONTHS STORAGE
Essential Oil
• BREWING OUALITY - FRESH
AGRONOMIC
2.83
1.41
1.48
1.41
1.20
65.0
73.5
91.4
0.357
0.565
0.525
0.452
0.317
2.49
3.17
3.11
2.58
136
Table 1 continued.
BREWING QUALITY -
AGRONOMIC
Yield
Location
Selection
lb/A
Wt.
mq
Alpha
X
HSI
Beta
%
AFTER SIX MONTHS STORAGE
FRESH
Essential
Hop Ac 'ds
Cone
Hop Acids
Oil
HSI
Essential Oil
ml/
H/C
HmeB
CoH
alp
ml/
Hyr
Hum
H/C
cr Remain
%
Ratio
100q
%
%
Ratio
%
1.03
2.46
96.6
0.316
0.23
1.66
84.5
0.238
0.45
2.66
1.05
86.5
92.5
93.3
94.0
0.273
0.35
2.70
1.44
0.250
0.23
0.300
0.300
0.26
0.24
2.65
2.81
2.78
1.80
36.3
0.305
0.61
0.63
100 g Ratio
%
_
65101 TAL
65102 L-1
65102 L-1
65103 E-2
65104 L-8
65104 L-8
66052 PR I
8151-053
8153-084
8153-097
8153-127
8154-212
8154-237
8154-274
8154-297
8252-115
8253-017
8253-028
8253-046
8253-106
8253-138
8253-175
8253-229
8253-239
8254-162
8254-165
8254-167
8254-181
8254-196
8254-213
8254-214
8254-239
8254-241
8254-244
8254-253
8254-258
8254-267
8254-269.
8254-328
8411-013
8411-028
8411-039
8411-043
8412-060
8551-054
8551-082
8552-222
8552-254
8553-067
8553-323
CALFCLUST
CBS-19
018/26
009/06-08
018/18-20
017/18
010/06-08
019/24-26
006/45-46
067/29-30
067/05-06
067/03-04
065/06&10
065/11-12
065/15-16
065/22S26
065/23-24
067/21-22
065/31-32
065/35-36
065/38&42.065/44
064/03-04
064/07-08
064/11-12
064/13-14
066/11-12
066/13-14
066/15-16
066/17-18
066/21-22
066/23-24
066/25-26
066/29-30
066/31-32
066/33-34
066/35-36
066/37-38
066/41-42
066/43-44
067/37-38
215/013
215/028
215/039
215/043
215/060
218/054
218/082
216/021
216/054
216/067
215/123
010/03&05
043/07-08
1731
111
3.77
2.73
0.255
49
1.4
0.40
49.6
6.9
2335
149
6.84
4.60
43
1.5
127
6.81
44
1.4
50.5
50.0
122
79
108
6.76
4.04
3.70
5.02
4.78
4.18
0.64
0.56
16.7
2554
995
0.242
0.239
0.35
0.43
0.32
46.8
18.0
19.6
49.2
47.0
16.9
19.1
91
111
73
103
6.28
3.28
.1.14
57.5
1.1
4.11
30.4
30.6
17.6
1.80
799
91
78
1.95
4.82
4.62
3.72
3.67
1000
93
7.01
5.50
1121
678
114
97
163
6.27
4.19
6.66
4.67
5.29
4.50
1752
2171
718
526
1011
597
1324
1102
1061
3.07
704
79
4.48
774
651
761
89
3.32
3.75
1.81
1.38
3.53
593
663
382
772
1394
1118
661
924
77
94
113
129
132
89
93
851
594
160
140
712
113
868
115
168
96
538
922
813
1.90
0.96
5.49
3.85
6.70
1.00
0.91
4.11
1.07
3.52
1.63
2.29
3.69
5.90
3.84
4.18
3.95
5.56
4.07
3.94
6.55
6.53
5.72
6.09
4.28
0.222
0.228
0.270
0.233
40
1.4
45
1.0
45 • 0.9
33
1.2
21
38
0.9
0.52
31.1
1.0
0.14
22
0.9
23.5
54.0
2.42
2.43
2.64
0.14
80.9
0.342
0.35
2.31
0.437
0.32
2.62
2.29
75.0
71.0
0.443
0.18
2.70
2.08
2.40
0.254
0.256
25
0.4
0.65
0.60
26.6
43.7
0.66
27.7
38.5
78.9
90.3
0.37
1.0
3.45
2.21
0.363
23
0.333
0.39
3.61
2.40
0.257
0.266
22
24
1.3
1.11
27.8
2.58
87.7
0.306
0.63
2.74
1.3
1.22
0.242
0.237
18
0.8
24
1.5
1.13
1.42
46.8
48.0
53.8
0.273
0.269
26
23
0.3
0.8
0.36
0.54
0.235
0.237
21
0.8
23
0.233
0.250
0.269
0.242
0.263
0.254
0.234
0.231
1.73
1.86
0.31
3.60
4.86
5.55
6.11
2.63
0.80
23.7
2.04
85.5
0.361
0.71
2.33
1.36
1.79
3.24
81.1
0.369
0.51
2.24
3.03
33.5
22.9
16.9
74.6
0.471
0.89
3.52
1.16
52.9
47.1
52.3
3.43
3.43
84.8
87.1
0.388
0.20
0.39
3.53
3.59
0.59
13.8
17.2
17.4
3.32
86.8
0.320
3.47
. 0.9
0.41
19.9
0.294
3.60
3.41
0.9
0.5
0.56
0.85
93.6
0.302
0.333
3.51
3.58
2.67
3.75
33
0.2
3.38
3.45
24
0.9
0.53
0.68
27.6
7.2
16.7
3.42
3.38
3.34
82.1
22
27
45.6
40.4
57.6
47.8
0.41
0.37
6.36
3.19
4.38
34.9
36.2
3.47
3.60
4.72
1.88
28.1
37.3
3.46
4.16 -
22.4
17.4
41.2
45.7
39.7
36.5
3.43
26
0.5
29
0.1
0.8
0.61
0.44
0.96
0.7
0.71
19.0
1.1
1.05
0.51
27.4
28.6
18
0.237
0.286
22
23
33
0.2
3.53
0.280
31
0.3
0.42
37.1
4.68
0.234
19
0.9
0.90
22.3
3.60
5.79
0.252
0.219
36
23
0.3
0.6
0.65
0.96
39.0
0.319
83.7
90.3
88.6
0.346
0.37
0.41
0.38
0.307
0.50
79.7
75.5
0.352
0.522
0.20
3.64
0.32
3.69
7.49
3.61
3.61
2.14
4.30
8.36
3.43
3.46
3.47
76.0
0.386
0.81
0.50
85.8
73.7
0.337
0.551
0.69
0.24
3.67
3.82
0.25
0.56
3.72
3.66
0.41
0.64
3.71
3.64
3.46
2.10
7.30
3.43
64.5
0.550
3.46
85.6
43.2
3.60
3.46
69.2
82.9
0.34
3.84
6.96
0.47
0.90
0.30
3.79
4.80
3.52
3.78
4.86
4.70
33.2
43.4
38.6
3.02
2.26
3.54
4.94
0.236
24
0.3
0.63
23.4
24.4
31.6
71.9
0.253
24
0.6
0.83
29.6
40.2
43.0
3.50
3.49
83.2
4.33
1.74
4.02
6.45
4.40
0.226
0.253
24
0.7
0.4
0.83
22.0
22.4
47.5
49.7
3.41
30
3.52
85.0
89.2
0.306
0.358
0.343
0.418
0.360
0.331
0.332
2.45
6.60
4.96
0.227
21
0.5
0.62
12.1
50.3
3.36
83.8
0.357
0.43
3.53
3.46
0.231
24
1.9
"0.98
33.4
30.9
2.45
92.2
0.277
0.64
2.63
1.73
0.254
27
1.9
1.16
42.6
28.4
2.76
93.9
0.296
0.71
2.98
0.82
82.9
92.8
0.301
0.278
0.65
3.01
0.60
0.91
0.85
93.6
0.282
0.348
2.57
2.93
0.57' 0.22
0.48
1.03
71.2
81.7
94.0
0.325
0.344
0.355
0.297
0.338
0.45
0.43
0.45
0.23
2.25
3.43
2.42
0.45
3.19
4.06
1.36
0.83
93.7
0.276
0.36
2.49
0.79
2.23
0.60
2.28
135
159
114
119
5.89
3.08
7.18
3.48
0.280
26
2.1
1.00
41.4
29.7
2.83
891
795
124
6.78
3.09
0.240
25
2.2
0.93
47.0
122
8.57
2.3
1.16
40.0
109
34
0.9
1.10
48.0
702
102
104
6.41
5.76
3.93
0.251
0.204
0.255
24
1571
3.78
7.08
24.9
28.8
38
2.83
3.46
0.260
0.266
41.2
28.2
180
3.55
1.55
105
95
4.89
2.18
5.24
2.80
0.242
0.288
31
1.5 • 0.84
0.74
1.2
0.4
0.75
0.80
0.9
2.45
2.82
0.13
0.86
45.4
45.3
23.3
22
0.8
0.49
40.2
4.5
78
96
5.87
5.05
0.236
44
1.2
0.60
53.0
8.21
4.12
47
2.0
0.88
49.4
14.4
4.6
4.51
63
0.9
0.43
36.0
16.2
7.72
5.12
3.59
0.244
0.230
0.231
45
2.2
0.29
10.1
1.72
9.05
2.60
0.286
35
3.5
1.23
37.1
36.6
28.3
2.21
93.9
0.340
0.69
2.36
0.96
93
2.80
25
1.7
8.21
42
50
1.5
1.2
0.32
1.32
1.23
59.2
54.5
55.8
0.13
0.30
81.7
88.7
85.8
0.373
0.321
0.344
0.17
0.67
0.78
1.86
0.66
0.72
1.94
0.16
0.49
0.243
32
1.6
2.08
56.7
3.8
0.7
1.5
19.8
1.14
89
0.312
0.241
0.248
2.60
78.2
0.429
0.90
2.89
2.23
2.82
547
682
1215
635
6451
887
622
531
969
CHARVET-6
043/37-38 401
021/10-11 1207
020/15-16. 1083
012/06-08
678
I43-11Y
67
90
120
HU
I43-11BAN
I43-11X
90
856
CFJ-4
I43-11BAN
102
961
043/10
043/11
I31-11A
133-06
0.63
76
138
439
CBS-30
CBS-23
1.90
4.21
5.41
3.64
0.217
0.247
0.248
2.52
2.37
858
1143
018/15&17 610
1094
021/15
1894
021/16
119
148
130
5.17
1.65
5.38
4.39
163
9.27
5.70
19
22
24.3
2.0
14.3
33.8
2.10
3.28
2.22
0.16
2.26
81.0
81.1
34.8
0.71
0.95
0.23
0.91
0.70
1.88
194
92
0.95
5.54
6.27
0.222
33
1.7
6.92
0.232
46
0.8
2.51
0.72
59.7
57.5
20.2
2.50
2.52
80.3
89.6
0.403
0.291
1.05
0.38
2.74
2.24
1.44
133
8.55
5.51
0.235
37
1.6
1.63
51.7
23.4
2.85
77.5
0.391
0.72
3.15
3.06
18.2
137
Washington
State University
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center
Rt. 2 Box 2953-A
Prosser, WA 99350-9697
509-786-2226/FAX 509-786-3454
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 12, 1989
TO:
A.
THROUGH:
L. R. Faulkner
FROM:
S. T. Kenn
SUBJECT:
QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR 7/1/89 TO 9/30/89 FOR COOPERATIVE
Haunold
AGREEMENT No. 58-91H2-8-136
USDA selection 21484 was established in a field nursery for transplanting into
a trellised hop yard in early spring 1990.
Additional 21484 plants were
provided to the Idaho Hop Growers Association for planting and to the
Washington Hop Commission for a certified nursery planting.
Commercial plantings of USDA selections 21455 (Mt. Hood), 21456, 21457, 21459,
21490, 21491, 21496 (Tettnanger A), and 21497 (Tettnanger B) and Washington
selections 415-90, 8254-167 and 8254-244 were monitored for agronomic
characteristics.
Growth problems were not observed in any field.
Yield and
brewing quality data will be available during the next quarter.
Work to establish the trial to determine differences among plants for host
plant resistance to twospotted spider mite continued on schedule.
Crosses were made to broaden the germplasm base for aroma selection and for
selection of host plant resistance to aphids.
A report on the success of the
crosses will be available during the next quarter.
138
Washington State University
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center
Rt. 2, Box 2953-A
Prosser, WA 99350-9687
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
January 9, 1990
TO:
A. Hau'nold
THROUGH:
L. R. Faulkner,
FROM:
S. T. Kenn
SUBJECT:
fax sotyle-IS
QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR 10/1/89 TO 12/31/89 FOR COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT No. 58-91H2-8-136
Table 1 summarizes the yield and brewing quality data for experimental hop
selections grown in commercial trials.in Washington in 1989. Selections
21455, 21456, 21457, 21459, 21490 and 21491 are triploid Hallertauer
selections from the USDA hop breeding program. Selections 21496 and 21497 are
Tettnanger clones imported from Germany. Selections 415-90, 8254-167 and
8254-244 are from the Prosser hop breeding program. The latter two selections
are aroma hop selections while 415-90 is a high alpha acid hop selection.
Table 2 summarizes the hop acid properties, determined by cone sample
analysis, of twenty full-sib families. The 1989 results will be compared to
the 1988 results (January 1989 quarterly report) and the seedlings with the
best characteristics will be transferred to the advanced nursery.
The
pedigrees and purposes of the crosses for these families were described in the
December 1986 or the July 1987 quarterly report.
Table 3 lists the pedigrees and purposes of crosses made at Prosser during
1989.
89
88
87
89
88
87
89
88
87
Granger
Habton
Toppenis h
Toppenish 89
21455 Mt.
Hood
21456
21457
21459
544
511
Mabton
Prosser
Toppenis h 89
Toppenis h 89
21497 Tet B
415-90
8254-167
8254-244
1 NA - Not Available
1.621
1,900
1,726
2.085
1,580
89
88
87
86
85
Habton
89
89
411
488
422
21496 Tet A
89
Harrah
21491
906
1,704
1,740
1,400
NA
NA
1.025
4.60
5.81
12.16
12.60
12.6
9.7
10.6
4.66
3.67
2.53
2.19
3.04
3.59
3.93
3.19
3.76
3.38
1.24
1.14
2.31
1,550
1,060
1,000
910
4.23
2.88
3.27
1,988
2,020
Harrah
89
%
Alpha
%
Beta
6.14
6.49
4.90
4.50
4.51
3.7
5.4
5.54
.247
.257
.268
.250
.252
.287
.284
.248
.251
.282
3.85-'
4.77
.310
.299
.268
.243
.318
.276
.271
.420
.359
.287
.280
.270
.239
HSI
6.19
4.20
4.27
4.05
3.15
3.08
3.23
2.88
2.47
3.24
6.33
5.37
5.42
(lb/A) (at 8% Ho isture)
21490
88
87
Yr
Location
Yield
24
18
29
29
29
30
29
27
25
27
24
29
26
27
28
24
28
30
31
29
26
25
25
%
CoH
0.75
0.89
2.48
2.80
2.79
2.62
1.96
0.84
0.77
0.66
0.35
0.73
0.84
0.97
1.01
1.22
1.05
0.43
0.46
0.71
0.67
0.54
0.60
Ratio
A/B
1.40
1.22
1.67
1.48
1.36
NA
1.46
0.56
0.66
0.83
0.49
0.90
1.00
0.79
1.11
0.96
0.77
0.52
0.54
0.85
1.32
0.91
0.73
100 q
ml oil/
30.8
27.4
60.3
53.9
49.5
66.8
NA
54.7
47.6
37.2
17.3
38.5
40.3
24.2
34.3
35.7
21.8
19.5
16.9
18.1
27.9
24.5
37.8
%
Hyr
4.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
NA
14.9
16.8
0.2
0.0.
7.5
6.8
9.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
Farn
%
38.4
40.8
11.3
11.7
13.1
8.0
NA
13.2
17.5
36.2
44.7
27.6
26.0
32.1
38.6
34.1
43.6
48.3
49.0
45.8
33.7
38.4
41.4
%
Hum
3.47
3.45
2.58
2.35
2.30
2.55
NA
3.32
3.32
2.68
3.38
3.34
3.42
3.14
3.47
3.35
3.31
3.67
3.39
3.25
2.45
2.58
2.43
Ratio
H/C
•
41.0
55.0
52.2
NA
NA
64.4
81.2
73.0
85.9
NA1
64.8
32.9
Remaininq
% Alpha
1.031
0.614
0.702
NA
NA
0.511
0.505
0.490
0.555
NA
0.874
0.638
HSI
0.62
0.53
0.58
NA
NA
0.43
0.54
0.37
0.46
NA
0.54
0.45
100 q
ml oil/
2.49
2.89
2.74
NA
NA
3.75
3.63
3.69
NA
3.75
2.92
2.96
Ratio
H/C
2.93
4.33
3.12
NA
NA
7.60
6.64
6.77
NA
9.25
6.55
8.22
HMEB
%
After Six 1Months Room Tempera ture Stc)raqe
Yield and chemical analysis data for experimental hops in Washington commercial trials.
Selection
Table 1.
CO
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
7003-081 x Number
OP
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
64007 x
21337M
65104 x
OP
21163 x
OP
21227 x
21088M
8411
8551
8552
8853
8655
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Statistic
8
13
1.12
3.05
1.86
0.59
3.33
2.47
0.60
6.93
3.69
1.79
13
1.38
6.77
3.77
1.31
9
1.37
1.43
4.50
3.24
0.99
•'
21
0.96
3.68
2.10
0.77
12
1.49
3.13
2.14
0.42
13
20
35
27
4
9
18
48
32
11
8
21
45
27
8
21
25
54
37
7
12
23
43
33
7
13
0.93
3.34
2.21
0.91
9
0.88
2.63
1.49
0.60
1.54
0.76
8
0.36
2.72
21
0.56
3.33
1.78
0.74
12
0.75
2.56
1.89
0.52
Beta CoH A/B
%
%
Ratio
9
1.45
8
1.08
9.52
4.96
2.88
21
1.29
7.06
3.45
1.37
12
1.52
5.93
3.98
1.12
%
Alpha
Prosser, WA in 1989.
404-006 x
21337M
21170 x
21088M
21170 x
19173M
21170 x
19060M
21227 x
8154-244M
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Std. Dev.
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Number
Statistic
tabl e continuec1
8681
8659
8658
8657
8656
Family Pediqree1
4.57
1.27
17
2.75
7.76
14
0.75
4.25
2.20
1.24
20
2.32
5.87
3.89
1.13
27
1.08
6.17
3.30
1.29
8
0.82
8.44
6.11
2.42
%
Alpha
17
1.09
4.38
2.42
0.99
3.75
2.75
0.61
14
1.82
20
1.87
4.75
3.05
0.73
27
0.76
4.74
3.13
0.90
2.38
0.66
8
1.25
3.53
17
22
46
34
8
14
17
37
27
5
7
20
24
43
32
27
22
50
35
8
8
29
48
36
6
17
0.96
3.14
2.09
0.61
14
0.20
1.67
0.86
0.51
1.27
0.19
20
0.93
1.81
1.12
0.43
27
0.31
2.11
8
0.43
3.78
2.62
1.02
Beta CoH
A/B
%
%
Ratio
Summary of alpha and beta acid characteristics of cone samples from selected families grown at
Family Pediqree1
Table 2.
-p*
o
Number
Minimum
Maximum
6
2.32
10.95
Mean
5.30
Std. Dev.
2.80
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
406-057 x
21272M
406-057 x
21337M
406-057 x
21361M
21373 x
19047M
8684
8685
8686
8692
Dev.
17
2.42
8.98
5.42
1.69
11
2.50
7.51
4.97
1.52
36
1.49
7.17
4.66
1.23
17
0.90
6.89
2.31
1.38
11
1.20
3.95
2.42
0.69
5.20
3.18
1.04
1.50
. 36
6
1.21
2.78
1.98
0.51
17
14
49
31
11
11
18
51
41
9
36
23
54
36
8
8
6
27
53
39
23 ' 23
1.26
22
3.70 46
2.30
35
0.59
8
17
0.70
4.38
2.77
0.95
11
0.91
2.83
2.00
0.62
36
0.40
3.31
1.70
0.74
1.92
3.94
2.53
0.69
6
23
0.45
2.83
1.64
0.69
Beta CoH A/B
%
%
Ratio
8697
8696
8695
8694
8693
21373 x
8165-056M
21373 x
8153-032M
21373 x
21337M
21373 x
21088M
21373 x
19170M
Family Pediqree1
1 Complete pedigree information is contained in earlier reports.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Std.
Maximum
Mean
Number
Minimum
Std. Dev.
23
0.79
7.47
3.65
1.67
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
404-006 x
8153-065M
8683
%
Statistic
Alpha
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Number
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Dev.
Std. Dev:
Maximum
Mean
Number
Minimum
Statistic
5
0.52
3.49
2.16
0.99
9
3.17
8.16
4.91
1.57
10
1.13
7.19
4.33
1.96
8
3.33
5.46
4.35
0.71
6
4.21
8.45
6.29
1.35
%
Alpha
5
1.59
2.69
2.09
0.37
9
1.21
3.69
2.50
0.79
10
0.88
3.74
2.09
0.90
8
1.34
4.08
2.73
0.90
0.78
6
2.22
4.16
2.95
%
5
20
33
26
4
8
9
20
45
33
10
19
40
27
6
8
20
44
30
7
6
23
42
32
7
%
Beta CoH
5
0.27
2.19
1.08
0.62
2.22
0.98
3.98
9
0.92
3.68
2.23
0.92
10
1.08
8
1.15
2.80
1.79
0.67
6
1.35
3.14
2.24
0.63
Ratio
A/B
Summary of alpha and beta acid characteristics of cone samples from selected families grown at
Prosser, WA in 1989. Concluded.
Family Pediqree1
Table 2.
8693-043M
64036M
8657-017M
8658-039M
8659-xxxM
8685-xxxM
21116
65102
60033
58016
60038
21170
8254-xxx
21090M
21234M
21235M
21237M
60026M
60028M
8693-043M
8657-017M
8658-039M
8659-023M
8659-045M
8685-014M
8685-063M
Parents
21090M
21234M
21235M
21237M
60026M
60028M
64036M
Male
Table 3.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
60033
58016
X
X
60038
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8254-167
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8254-181
X
X
X
X
X
X
8254-244
21170 [Elsasser] x 19060M [East Kent Golding (EKG) x (Bavarian x OP) (BxOP)]
21170 [Elsasser] x 19173M [Striesselspalt x (Late Cluster x OP)]
21170 [Elsasser] x 21088M [Yugoslavian male 5/9]
W406-006 [65009 (Brewer's Gold (BG) x (Early Green (EG) x OP) x 63015M (BG x (BG x (EKG x
(BxOP))))] x 21337M [Northern Brewer x 21111M (Bullion x 64035M (ZaS))]
21373 [65009 x 64035M (ZaS)] x 19170M [Unknown x (EKG x (EG x (Kent Golding x OP)))]
ZaS
Colorado 2-1 (Denver)
Colorado 2-3 (Denver)
Hallertauer x OP
Hallertauer x OP
Saazer x OP
Yugoslavian male 12/17
21285 [Hallertauer x OP] x 64037M [English x German --Zattler Seedling (ZaS)]--Aroma Study
X
X
X
X
X
X
Female Parents
21170
8254-146
The X's in the grid indicate crosses made,
Brewer's Gold--Genetics Study
Ll Cluster—Genetics Study
Colorado 6-1 (Buckhorn Canyon)--Genetics Study
Utah 526-5 (Logan Canyon)--Aphid Study
Wyoming 3-1 (Sherman Mountains)--Aphid Study
Elsasser--Aroma Study
65102
21116
Crosses made in 1989 at Prosser, Washington.
ro
note:
143
my own observations are typed in.
Experimental Hop Varieties Tour August 9, 1989
:_:k
Dr. STephen Kenny, IAREC, Prosser, UA.
99350
Green Acre Farms:
21491 (west) established spring and summer 88, 60% rhizomes remainder softwood
cuttings.
89 is
first year of commercial
Experimental plot yield above 1500 lbs/acre.
production
at this
location.
Alpha acid 8%, beta acid 4%, coh
21%, H/C 2.4.
Estimated yield in 1989 of both plots. 1-2 b/A if cones develop properly.
21490 (east) established spring 88 from rhizomes. 89 is first year of commercial
production at this location. Experimental plot yield above 1500 lbs/acre. Alpha
acid 5%, beta acid 4%, cohumulone (coh) 20%, humulene/caryophyllene ratio (H/C)
•terrible location, up on a hill, like a wind tunnel, severe mite infestat ion,
have been sprayed but,too late, leaves are like sandblasted, cones probably will
Ken^W^atV^aTOhlf:^' 14 hy 7 n sPac1n9. couble planting 1 ft apart, twostrung each.
21457 (west) established spring 88 from rhizomes. In 88, 288 pounds produced
from the three acre planting. Yield in other states above 1600 lb:;/acre. Alpha
acid 3.7%,. beta acid 2.8%, coh 30%, H/C 3.0.
8254-244 (middle) established August 88 from softwood cuttings. Experimental
plot yield above 1600 lbs/acre. Alpha acid 4%, beta acid 5%, coh 22%, H/C 3.4.
8254-167 (east) established August 88 from softwood cuttings. Experimental plot
yield above;1300 lbs/acre.
Alpha acid 5%, beta acid 6%, coh 17%, H/C 3.4.
21484 wilt be established August 89.jTam softwood cuttings. Experimental plot
yield above 1500 lbs/acre.' Alpha acid 4%, beta acid 4%, coh 24%, H/C 3.3.
Very poor care of all three plots, weeds 3-4 ft tall, many missing hills, moderate
insect problem, yield marginal, perhaps 4 b/A expected
Brulotte Farms:
•:•••••
21459 50% established summer 86 from softwood cuttings and the remainder from
rhizomes in spring 87. The 88 yield was 1700 lbs/acre. Alpha acid 3%, beta acid
3%, coh 27%, H/C 3.2.
Excellent plot, very few weeds, no insect problems.
Hop is late, about Sept.10,
should give very good yield, over 1800 lb/A
Tom Carpenter, Jr.:
Mt. Hood (21455) established summer 86 from softwood cuttings. Thn. 88 yield was
2000 lbs/acre.
Alpha acic- 3%, beta acid 5%, coh 23%, H/C 2.5.
Excellent plot, clean field.no insect problems, genotype a bit earlier here than
in Oregon. Yield probably 10 b/A like last year. Will be picked later (about Sept.10)
L.Oi Gannon & Son:
'
21496 (south) (Tettnager A or clone 4) and 21497 (north) (Tettnacer B or clone
14) established August 88 from softwood cuttings. Trained the first week of June
89. No estimate of yield potential available. Alpha a,cid 4%, beta acid 4%, coh
24%, H/C 3.0.
Baby crops* first year on the string (planted Pug. 1988), very good development, no
missing hills Mclean field, no pest problems, yield about 2 b/A or more, early
John I; Haas:
21456 30%. established summer 86 and the remainder from softwood cuttings in
spring 87. " The 88 yield was 1100 lbs/acre.
Alpha acid 1%, beta acid 2%, coh
30%, H/C 3.3.
Excellent development, no weeds or pests, very good set, a bit top crop, yield
probably 7-8 b/A but grower says the cones weigh light, expects 6-7 b/A, med.early.
144
800 Buchanan Street
Pacific West Area
Agricultural
United States
u\
Albany, California
Research
Department of
X^as^ Agriculture
94710
Service
September 18, 1989
&?/
o
Mr. J. J. Wills, Associate Direc.tor^^
Washington State University-'''''^
Office of Grant^Rgsearch Development
The Graduate^Schcol
Pu-Hman, WA 99164-1030
Dear Mr. Wills:
Enclosed for your files are too fully executed copies of the amendment listed
below.
i
;58-91H2-8-136 "'#
Agreement No.:
Amendment No. One
Title-
^incrpalfMTe^BgafcOTS
Development and culture of high quality hops.
vI ^LdndseyvR^ Faulkner V
If you should have any questions regarding this amendment, contact Janet
Tsukahira or myself at 415/559-6018.
Sincerely,
JACK C. NELSON
Authorized Departmental Officer
Enclosure
cc:
; A. Haunold, ADODR, Corvallis, OR
K. Kowalczyk, Corvallis, OR
NFC - Accounting Operations, New Orleans, LA
P. Inouye, Albany, CA
L. Rolle, Albany, CA
145
/72> 33/? -2^/6
UM.TCO JTATCS DEPARTMENT O, AC«,CUl.TO»E
TYPE or »IS(*»CM AGREEMENT
RESEARCH AGREEMENT
SPECIFIC COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
agreement WO.
TYPE OF ACTION
58-91H2-8-136
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE
™
Amendment No. One
perioo of agreement
PACIFIC WEST AREA
May T/ 1988
800 Buchanan Street
Albany, CA
ihm April 30, 1993:'
'EOERAL, OBLIGATION
ANCCIM ftUtBALOBUCAtlOn
94710
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION (Nam,and addrx,.)
m
•
D-s ?70?632^
c m s no..
AurnoHiiV
5358-22000-001-02S
Washington State University
.
Agricultural Experiment Station
7 USC 3318
OBUCATIOn OISTRIOUTION
Pullman, WA
8015358136
9015358050
r"WCIf"- '"VHTIOIOH Warn, andaddr,*,}
Lindsey R. Faulkner
71,345
70,632
""*"« opp.ee ICompl.U m.,l,ng JjJ„u;
Irrigated Agriculture Research and
Accounting Operations Section
Extension Center
P. 0. Box 30
Prosser, WA 99350
NFC-ARS
P. 0.
Box 53326
New Orleans, LA
70153
title or project
Development and culture of high quality hops.
Alfred Haunold
Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit
3420 SW Orchard Avenue
Corvallis, OR 97730
This Airtcmcm Includes ihc following
Lj
LJ
O
LJ
BASIS FOR AWARD
Statement of Woik; or
Project Summiry; or
Proposil; and
General Provisions
Q '«« 501$. 5„bw,i uIS, .ele.encel
Q fOKM ARS-IS2
LJ Spcchl Provisions
D Submil• Techniul Reports,
CIFiscil Reooru
fv\ rTl
KC"oni-
1X1 Oihef ISptdfy):
1.
.
.
.
«« Amho""d Depjrtmenul Officer's
Designated Representative
Added funds in the amount of $70,632.00.
2. Debarment and Suspension Regulation, Appendix A and Drug-Free Workplace Regulation;
Appendix C, are hereby incorporated into said Agreement.
3. Except as provided above, all other Terms and Conditions shall remain the same.
AUTHORIZED DEPART MENT AL OFFICCH
FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
frrrco name
"
oate
JACK C.
S~
ISimatur, olp<r,on aulnoi
NELSON
FOR THE PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
» >*<»' ,°~rnir., bod, ., ,n,„„orm,nt or,anl.a„on ,. „w„
|typeo NAME ANOTITLE
VINCENT HU7NAK
niUNCE OFFICER /SPONSORED PROSSJUIS
*AME AND TITLE
Fo.n.AHS45,
(•'«()
SEP 2 0 1989
obligation!)
JOATC
SEP
0
I 1989
146
APPENDIX A
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT. SUSPENSION AND
OTHER PJZSPONSIBILTTY MATTERS - PRIMARY COVERED'TRANSACTIONS
Instructions for Certification
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary
participant is providing the certification set out below.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below
will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered
transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation
of why it cannot provide the certification set out -below. The
certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the
department or agency's determination whether to enter into this
transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary participant
to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such
person from participation in this transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact
upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency
determined to enter into this transaction.
If it is later deterrriined
that the prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an
erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to
the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this
transaction for cause or default.
4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written
notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is submitted
if at any time the prospective primary participant-learns that its
certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by
reason of changed circumstances.
5. The terms "covered transaction", "debarred", "suspended",
"ineligible", "lower'tier covered transaction", "participant",.,
"person", "primary covered transaction", "principal", "proposal", and
"voluntarily excluded", as used in this clause, have the meanings set
out in the Definitions and coverage sections of the rules implementing
Executive Order 12549. You may contact the department or agency to
which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a
copy of those regulations.
6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal
that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it
shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with
a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction,
.unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this
transaction.
147
7. The prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this
proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification"
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion
- Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or
agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification,
in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for
lower tier covered transactions.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification
of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that
it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification
is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by
which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each
participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List
(Tel. #).
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require
establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith
the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and
information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is
normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of
business dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these
instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly
enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is
suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies
available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may
terminate this transaction for cause or default.
148
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT. SUSPENSION. AND OTHER
RESPONSIRTT.TTY MATTERS - PRIMARY COVERED TRANSACTIONS
1.
The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its
knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
(a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment,
declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered
transactions by any Federal department or agency;
(b) have not within .a three-year period preceding this proposal been
convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for
commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or perfornrLng a public (Federal,
State, or local) transaction or contract under a public
transaction; violation of Federal or.State antitrust statutes or
commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, making false statements,
or receiving stolen property;
(c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civicly
charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with
commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1) (b)
of this certification; and
(d)
have not within a three-year period preceding this
application/proposal had one or more public transactions
(Federal, State, or loca) terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any
of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant
shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
149
APPENDIX C
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
Instructions for Certification
1.
By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the
grantee is providing the certification set out below.
2.
The certification set out below is a material representation of fact
upon which reliance was placed when the agency determined to award the.
grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered
an erroneous certification, the agency, in addition to any other
remedies available to the Federal Government, may take available
action.
3.
For grantees other than individuals, Options I applies.
4.
For grantees who are individuals, Option II applies.
OPTION I
The grantee certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:
(a)
publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a
controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and
specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for
violation of such prohibition;
(b)
establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees
about:
(1)
the dangers of-drug abuse in the wrkplace;
(2)
the grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
(3)
any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance program; and
(4) the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug
abuse violations;
(c) making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the
performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement
required by paragraph (a);
150
(d)
notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a)
that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employees
will:
(1)
abide by the terms of the statement; and
(2)
notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction
for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than
five days after such conviction;
(e)
notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under
subparagraph (d) (2) from an employee or otherwise receiving
actual notice of such conviction;
(f)
taking one of the following actions with respect to any employee
who is so convicted:
(1)
taking appropriate personnel action against such an
employee, up to and including termination; or
(2)
requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a
drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for
such purpose by a Federal, State, or local health, law
enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
(g)
making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug free
workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c),
(d), (e), and (f).
OPTION II
The grantee certifies that he or she will not engage in the unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a
controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant.
151
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREWING CHEMISTS
TITLE OF PAPER:
Mt.Hood, a new American Noble-Aroma Hop
ASBC
Newsletter 49 (2): 17. 1989
AUTHORS
Underline name ol speaker
Alfred Haunold and Gail B. Nickerson
w r*
;
Complete Business Mail Address
Lisl address only once il all authors a. same address
Dept. of Crop Science, OR. State University
Work done al:
Corvallis, OR.
USDA-ARS and Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
97331
97331
abstract TITLE OF PAPER Authors' Names. Addresses with Zip Code. One-LineSpace. Abstract. Singlespace typing. Use lull
width ol ruled area below. For legible reproduction use electric typewriter preferably with carbon ribbon. Manual typewntcrs are
not recommended. Submit this orginal lorm together with one photocopy.
PLEASE.MAIL THE ABSTRACT
HT. HOOD, A NEW AMERICAN NOBLE-AROMA HOP.
UNFOLDED.
Haunold and Gail B. Nickerson, Dept. of Crop
Alfred
Science and Dept. of Agricultural Chemistry, Oregon
State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.
CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE
Mt. Hood, a triploid naturally seedless aroma hop
Particulars concerning the acceptance
resulted from a cross between a tetraploid Haller
tauer mittelfrueh and the male germplasm line USDA
19058H made in 1983 at Corvallis, OR. Genetically,
ol titles and abstracts and subsequent
publication ol manuscripts are specilied
under "Editorial Policy" and "Inslructions
to Authors" as published in the Spring
issues ol the Journal ol the American
Society ol Brewing Chemists. Titles may
be submitted only by one ol the authors
and only if one of the authors definitely
will present the paper. Titles and
abstracts must not be submitted if the
work, in part or as a whole, has been
Mt. Hood is 2/3 Hallertauer mittelfrueh, 1/6 Early
Green, an old English aroma hop, and 1/6 unknown.
The seedling selection was first tested in nursery
plots near Corvallis, OR, starting in 1984. In
1986, 3-acre commercial plots were established in
the major hop growing areas of Oregon, Washington
and Idaho to produce bale quantities for commercial
published previously or presented •
brewery evaluation.
elsewhere. The one1exception applies lo
at least twice that of Hallertauer mittelfrueh, its
papers that are identified as reviews.
Advance publicity on the content ol the
manuscript to be presented at the
Annual Meeting may be released only by
the ASBC, not by individual authors. The
Program Committee's criteria for accept
ance are the relevance and the quality of
the work as shown in the abstract, and
once a submitted paper has been
accepted by the committee, it cannot be
withdrawn.
This paper is:
an original work ( )
Mt. Hood's yield potential is
cone type and size are similar to Hallertauer but
Mt. Hood matures about one week later. Mt. Hood
resembles Hallertauer mittelfrueh in major quality
characteristics such as alpha and beta acids,
cohumulone content, and storage stability, has a
slightly lower ratio of humulene:caryophyllene and
sometimes produces slightly more beta than alpha
acids, similar to the German Hersbrucker. Prelimi
nary pilot plant and commercial brewing trials by
interested brewers have been favorable. Mt. Hood
will be released for commercial production by the
US Department of Agriculture in cooperation with
the Oregon, Washington and Idaho Agricultural
Experiment Stations in early 1989.
a review ( )
Sionalurn
152
./fe^^
United States
Agricultural
Department of
Agriculture
Research
Pacific West Area
Service
p;CO;
Sept. 29, 1989
To:
Mark Nelson
IAREC, PO Box 30
Prosser, WA. 99350
From: Al Haunold, USDA-ARS
Corvallis, OR.
Subject:
97331
Soil mix for greenhouse planting.
The basic soil mixture provided by greenhouse operations is as follows:
1/3 field "(top) soil, shredded and screened
1/3 pumice, moderately finely ground
1/3
peat moss,
shredded
The ph is not adjusted, so the basic mixture is about pH 5
1 use the following additions:
to each of 12 heaping shovelsy i.e. a pile of soil consisting of 12 heaping
shovels of basic greenhouse mix ( about equivalent to 24 1-gal containers of
soil') add the following:
(wt6MjJfir'6.>fa. ^Sf^A^)
2 heaping tablespoons of hydrated lime , raises pH to about 5.5 to 6 at the most
one full small dixie-cup of slow-release 14-14-14 Osmocote fertil\zer-*kti{&0c,
2/3 of a small dixie-cup of triple 18 commercial fertilizer, MQufcS'fl'bo^,
Mix well by shoveling once completely over and then use as is (^sterilizing).
After plants have grown about 2 month^ I use a liquid trace element addition:
Mix 2 heading tablespoons'ftiracle grow7in a sprinkling can (about 2% gal water),
plus one tablespoon ammonium sulfate. Add about 1-1% cups of liquid to
each 1-gal can of soil.
I rarely keep plants in smaller containers for longer than 2 months._ I either
transplant them to larger containers 0* move them to the field. It is too
difficult to water-plants properly and then there is also the problem of good
rootsystem development and overcrowding.
After 3-4 months in a 1-gal container, even softwood cuttings develop strong
woody stems with good root development and basal buds near the soil surface.
That is a sign of a HAPPY HOP PLANT.
153
U.S.
Recipients of the International Order of the Hop
HOF GROWERS OF AMERICA
INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE HOF
RECEFIENTS THROUGH THE YEARS
1983-
Blll Qassellng
1967 -
Ronald Riel
1972 -
P.F. Westerberg
1973 -
Chas. Massoth
1974 -
P.O. Batt
1984-
Qene Smith
1976 -
V.A. Bloxham
1986-
Joe Qasseling
1977 -
Virgil Qamache
Dr. C.B. Skotland
Dr. Robert Romanko
Robert Coleman
Ernie rietter
Emll Nelson
Harlan Shlnn
Bob Stauffer
Florian Dauenhauer
J.R. Qooding
1978 -
Harvey Kaser
1979 -
Ben Charvet
A.V. Signorotti
1981 -
Herman Qoschie
1982 -
Qeorge Signorotti
Ronald Rlel (2nd Degree)
1988 -
Ray Kerr
Scientific Commission
1977 -
Dr. C.E. "Jack" Horner
1979 -
Dr. Sam Likens
1983 -
Dr. Al Haunold
154
In keeping with the spirit of the awarding of the International Order of the Mop at
the upcoming IHQC In Spain, It Is appropriate that we'pass along the following
historical review of the honor, and a listing of those U.S. citizens who have received
it over the years. (Shown on page 2)
THE ORDER OF THE HOP
(Mumbers in parentheses allude to reference at foot)
Among the many sovereign princes ofthe fifteenth century who founded great orders of chivalry
was John the Fearless, Duke ofBurgundy, cousin of the mad King Charles VI ofFrance, and ruler of
vast domains from 1404 to 1419. His institution of L'Ordre du Houblon Indicates that the noble
hop plant was already held In high esteem (1). We may assume that the knights ofthe Order were
proud to bear this distinctive insignia, which was no doubt prominent at the Battle of Agincourt
where the duke and the Burgundians fought on the side of the English. Indeed,Henry Vof England
and John of Burgundy were closely allied In all the continental intrigues of the time, and
Shakespeare casts the duke In the role of Henry's counselor in the matterofhis subsequent woo
ing of the Dauphlne (2).
Through his mother, John the Fearless inherited further great domains In the north when he
succeeded as the 27th Count of Flanders (3).. There he evidently encouraged the hop planters. To
this day, he Is portrayed as the central character in thecolorful pageant at the annual hop festival
at Poperlnghe. As the Burgundlan territory included Alsace, and as his brothers-in-law were the
reigning dukes of Bavaria and Austria, his influence embraced nearly all the then hop growing
regions of the world. Small in stature and undistinguished In appearance he Is said to have been
deficient In eloquence and grace (4), but he was intelligent, cunning and courageous.
In 1396 he led an unsuccessful crusade, and for several months fell a prisoner among the Turks.
The story of his Intrigues and constant strife within the French realm against the Armagnacs fills
many volumes (5), and at one time he was virtually master of France.
He was also a great dandy (grand amateur de luxe) who loved to powder his eyes and deck
himself out in the richest of most flamboyant costumes and Jewelry. Assoon as he had taken up
the reins of government he provided himself with fantastlcaiy costly regalia which has been Inute-
ly described (6). This included a sash loaded with golden'ornaments, the sash itself embroidered
with hop cones worked in gold thread and enriched with 40rubles, 47 saphires and 309 pearls. He
had also a tippet or shoulder-cape executed in the same manner, with golden hop cones alter
nating with rubies. Of his appointments to the Order of the Hop little is known.
As the Order was ofBurgundlan origin and did not emanatefrom the Crown ofFrance, the usual
works of reference are silent (7), but we can guess that it included Flemish knights who owed
allegiance to their Count. John the Fearless lived In violent times. Though he may have earned his
surname "sans Feur" he was not, like Bayard a century later, "sans Rcproche". In 1407 he was
undoubtedly responsible for the murder ofhis cousin and bitter rival Louis, Duke ofOrleans, the
king's brother, who was slain by a band of armed men as he was riding on his mule In the Rue
Barbette humming a tune. So it was perhaps appropriate that John himself should die by an
assassin's hand on the bridge at Montereau after a heated quarrel with the Dauphin, sometwelve
years later (8). The little warrior prince was buried at Dijon amid scenes lamentation and
vengeance.
The royal founder could not have guessed thatthe Order of the Hop would be revived more than
five hundred years afterhis death, and adapted to the twentieth - century needs ofthesuccessors
of the hop-growers over whom he ruled. Hor could he have dreamed that Itwould ever be bestowed
on the subjects-of a descendant of his friend and ally Henry Vof England. For in 1956 the Euro
pean Hop Qrowers Convention at Its annual conference, held that year atStrasbourg in the former
ducal domain, decided to resuscitate this ancient Order and to confer it upon individuals of the
member countries who had rendered service to the Interests of hop growers in the International
field. Awards have been made at each subsequent annual conference.
(Cont. on page 4)
155
The Order of the Hop (Cont. from page 3]
The badge of the Order shows the arms ofJohn the Fearless nanked and headed by Qothic In
itials and encircled by a wreath Of hops, with a quatrefoll drop composed ofhop leaves. For those
Interested In heraldry I quote the Blazon (9):
Quarterly: 1st and 4th France within a bordurc compony, argent and gules; 2nd and 3rd Burgundy
(bendy ofsix, or and azure, within a bordure, gules); over all an escutcheon ofpretence. Flanders (or. a lion
rampant, sable, armed and langued, gules).
The Initials are those of the awarding authority in each of.its principal languages:
European Hop Qrowers Convention
Europaisches Hopfenbauburo
Comite' European de la Culture du Houblon
Symbol now oftheco-operation ofEuropean hop growers who meet together for the exchange of
Information, scientific, technical and commercial, the Order ofthe Hop owes its origin toJohn the
Fearless, historical patron of hop growers, under whose rule they wereunited more than five hun
dred years ago. With Shakespeare we may say of him:
"As a branch and member of this royalty.
By whom this great assembly was contrived.
We do salute you, Duke of Burgundy."
King Henry the Fifth. Act 5. Sc. 11.
REFERENCES
(1). E. Qross, Hopfen. 1899.
(2). W. Shakespeare, King Henry the Fifth. Act 5, Sc. II.
(3). Cornellle Martin, Genealogies des Forcstlers et Comtes dc Flandres.
(4). U. Plancher, Hlstolre generale et partlcullere de Bourgogne. 1739.
(5). Bruglere de Barante, Hlstolre des dues de Bourgogne. 1835.
(6). Albert van Zuylen van rlyevelt (Baron), Episodes de la Vie des Dues de Bourgogne.
[7). H. Leduc. Hlstolre de Decorations en France. 1890. ADaguln, Ordres de Chcvalarlc. 1894.
(8j. J. Louis Bazln, Bourgogne. 1898.
(9) Henri Jongla de Morenas, Grand Armorial de France. 1934
Nonprofit <
HOP GROWERS
U. S. POST
OF AMERICA
PAID
Yakima. \
P.O. Box9218
Permit No.
Yaklma.WA 98909
509/248-7043
FAX 509-248-7044
Dept. of Crop Science Alfred
OSU
Corvallis , OR 97331
USA
Haunold
156
Report of
Leon,
International
Hop
Spain - August
Crnwc 1::
I -
2
-
3,
Congr e:
1') I) 'J
•tsywNuiuiu J"B'Strt!»
INTRODUCTION.
The following Is a report of the information I was able to gather at
the 37th International Hop Growers Congress (I HOC) which took place ,n
Spain in August 19(19. I have attempted to be brief, however
believe that completeness is more important than brevity A:,
have
stated in previous reports, some of the information contained here,,,
is not substantiated. There may be rumor:, or information Iron, ..ingH
hf> twt>
sources, and In some cases, there are obvious con trad, c .ons
;toral
various sources. This report does not attempt Lo be ad ; ol l.ho
thesis, but ir. a.report of all the information, regardle
source .which .I was able: to obtain as one of the Amor ic..m
representative:- to the 1HCC.
•The two «H^(?ffl^TMniW"«Ulwtorrir^i6toiw}i»ee«M were:
worldwide;
1
7.. «ww*whefljdiewi»>»e»bcb«iirai wliich ate worl
, yrpvwMiniT"rrriT-e?
Iwi'lo.
In
this
reoort I will be discussing various hop statistics f, „in th, oughoul
the
S a we 1 as projections, pesticide information, and v.r.nu,
observations which 1 have made. Alcld Roy will be presenting ,
written-report on the technical subject of the Hop Congress:
gp.MMrally sprav technology
thirteen members of the IIICSC, .Uolvo..woicuifci-ml;.
0£
the
Germany
was missing.
only t-
lvll.
,
Those that
that were
were present were Australva, hr,. •,
SulqarL West Germany, Czechoslovakia, United Kingdom, Spa .n, >'- •'< <•.
Hungary Yugoslavia, Poland, and the USA. The number n. ,nd,v,do ,1,
"U,g each
member country varied from one from Aust, a ,a ,, JPP'-/"
'25 from the United Kingdom. A total nt 00 to ^rhan., .0
mately
from
people
all
of
of Hop
Assocj
were present at the majority of the meetings.
A so pi... ..i ni. -i i.
the meetings and functions was JJohannjiii_Ha ise c, the l"^-1"''"1
Union! as well, as being preside^ut_ the Kuropean. Hop... Her ehanl,.
)|nP .?TTl)ATION IN SPAIN.
A hop grower In Spain currently has but on^potontial buyer for stale
hops. The buyet-Ts-aT. organization whicHTis appro* i U•! 20 ,
hi r,
owned and 80% brewer owned (The breweries be, ng the five
r .-. x
al
larqest ones in Spain). Although the growers only have on, pot enti
Spai n.
,
the buyer must c»^J>tlxJmja]L„oX^SL,Jj°P^f°<^-, \ "• appa""So this monopoly Is a'd^uble-edged sword. This situal on will n i t y
ently continue until the opening of the European Economy Commu
(EEC) in .1992. Currently the average price received by h s a
may
hop grower, equates to approximately 51,7.V^l?r Pound -Al th ugh ethat
sound good to us, that is considerably lower than they hav rec ived
in the past and, therefore,. they are not a happy group. hey h
that the opening of the markets in 1992, or perhaps soon,, w 11 a 1 low
then to sell to more parties and, hopefully, then allow them to 4,0 Oil,
e higher prices. Spain currently produces approximately,ipl ier.
n i sh
ope
7n~^fTraae of 1.5 acr" P*r grower.
-
1
Many ot cue nop
gardens
are
•'•
••'ij^i:-;;'
157
much less than trie 1.5 acre average.
as four rows wlde'by 150 feetlorig.
Some of the gardens ar e
average yield was 4 1/2 bales' per acre.
known as:-H-*3 and H-7;
as
small
In 1988 the Spanish gro wers
The two primary var ieties
are
but not "Super-alpha ." Spain
bitter varieties,
is
in the;process>o£lconverting some of these acres to either A roma or
Super-alpha;with;financial backing from the EEC. (More on that re.conversion-.'program later.) We were able to view two plcker/d ryer opera"
tlons and many'hop gardens.
The two operations we viewed we re self-
,contained, ••That' is;'they had their own very small Delgian-madie
hop picker,
and they had'a'very small jone room_dryer; the drying room be ing approxi-
mately1'12 '^-12 ;'feet' and located in one corner of the barn. One of
farmers1 burned Wood and the other appari^tly_bju_rned _oil_. The hops
handled by-.'scoop •.shovel bocTn in and out ol" the kiln and" once
the
are
dry are put
'into sacks-which kre then moved to the one buyer that they h ave
where
they are either, pressed or pelletized. The hop3 are strung by a man on
the ground using a long pole which has a 3implc mechanism wli ich allows
'the;personj&b^tiet the; string at the top wire without using any
type of
^Icrowsit'hesMjBJJhen^the string is tied to a jioLlzriritfil vJlxs. which
•Jtull length^?? the row along the "ground.
All o£ the string
runs
which
we
a
the
saw
%aa "nf•a'jyl hn. type .'' The comment was made that thin type of string will
Quickly lead;ltb/an ecological problem (i.e. no decomposition ), but apparently Spalh'.has! not experienced that as yet.
The trellis system
the Span'ishjemployed 'is not much different from that seen in
which
Amer ica,
^although'orrmucht smaller scale. Row width varied from six £eet
to
nine
/.feet and plant'density down the row also varied. Generally there was
"/one plan.tj.verv four to five feet wlth_£lye_ or.. s__lx_3tr 1wjsc oming_from
each piant^ahd^three vlne3 "going up each string. The plant
V
roots were
or six
allowed, td^.spread, along the length of each row so that the five
'strlngs'ifrorajeach^plant would be spread out over a distance
;four ;£eet'alohg the.'row. The'strings did not all come into
of three or
one tie-down
'point i/.The/ihops^ which we viewed, were all under a flood irri gat ion
system
The water
with'thevs6urce of water being streams coming from reservoir
which,they.'Used was unlike ours in that it was absolutely crystal clear
and evidently.is: a renowned area for trout fishing. The clea nliness
Ithe irrigation' stream is partially maintained by allowing no runoff
of
of
I'lrrigation.water whatsoever.
%HE WORLD HOP SITUATION
acres of nlogs, under production
That is an' increas e_of~7/10 of one percent
tln;,,1989^thete^ are- approximately .154, 600
4n"the IHgHI countries i"
over^.1988 •which followed a 4%: increase of
1908 over 1987, and a 1.2%
increase'1 o£^(i987 over,1986." The estimated production for 1989 is
^om^jn i^rth. pp^nijg, which would he an'incre nse over 1908 of approximately.l%i^.t.Th6 complete production number s
for 1908 show that the
'Aroma,varieVieis production! by Weight was up 19%, however, the Alpha
varieties.productlpn by weight"was.down 9. 7%.
The world beer production
for,1989. is^expected to,increase by approx imately 2% over i^~88.
The"""'"'
average beer production,increase has been 1.5% annually over the last
.sevenjyears'i.*,Although, there are various
stimates for the hopping ratio
for beer,vthe estimate^of Dr.'Cetina, the secretary general of IHGC, is
that the hopping ratio, has,declined worldw ide by approxi-mately 2.9% over
the,last'seyen yearsc(0:4% annually).
The hopping ratio is a very dlffl-
cult number*! to,establishi• Eveh;,the Eastern
2
-
Bloc countries admitted that
158
they could not get this information from their breweries
There fore
these numbers remain subject of much discussion.
are the sold_ ahead_n u m b e r s
hop
product ion, t he "foil ow ing
For the IHGC countries, based on
year's
crop that i s curre ntly
ive
are the percentage of the respect
7
4%;
199
2 a nd bey ond - s mailer
91
sold: 1989 -_9JL%; 199_0_:_8_4.%; 11
Also, difficult numbers to get ac cura tely
.
1988
percentages.
alculated as suming that t he
s .
Mos t of the
s old through thos e .year
to the USA, w ith the
position
as
old.
s
Spa 1 n which are in str onger s old
The above numbers are
Eastern Bloc countries are 100%
IHGC countries are in a similar
possible exception of France and
ahead positions. A brief recount
of
c
each countri es
hop number s
and
hop situation is as follows:
Australia. Of course the 1989 crop is "in." Approximately 2,700
acres of hops' were harvested with an average of approximately
10% Alpha*.
Belqium.
"•.'•''
Has only a little more than 1,100 acres of hops for
198? out is in the process of a.l^OO.acre.conyer^.p.n program
which Sill take place-nrT59-(Tind~is partially funded by the EEC.
ps of which
Bulgaria. Has/a little more than 2,000 acres of ho program. They
500
are
in'
a
low
trellis
experimental
approximately
have a dry year but expect a normal crop.
Expects greater yields than they ach ieved in 1988
vimately
50,000 acres, however, they have sustained
on their appro
one in May and
significant ha 11 damage as a result of two storms, ct to have 5%
ter
part
of
July.
Even
so,
they
expe
one ,in;the lat
p was lower
increase in thielr crop over the 1988 crop (1988 cro ey have approxThe
West
Germans
pointed
out
that
th
than average).
West Germany,
imately the sa me
year ago,
number of
number of acres under production as they had 15
n within
hove ver, they are undergoing consolldatio ovi ng,
hop growers. ' The Germans see prices impr
Aroma varieties and they are quit e optimistic
able to achieve their exports to the United
especially in the
that they will be.
States
The
the
this ye ar.' :
of Europe, have experienced especials
year. However, they seem to have
aphid problems thi
or
export with the chemicals which the
ntrol
those
f
to co
German s,
ly severe
been able
USA allows
as
well as-most
Th ose
hops that are not destined for the United
interpret
it
as
Czechoslovakia.
have
prayed many times with other chemi-
been s
States, ho
1 the aphid with limited success,
cals in an atte mpt-'to contro
radictory to me, however, that
(The above para graph is^'cdnt provided by various sources.
Please
ion--that'.was
is the'-'inf ormat
wever
you wish':')'
Has'approxi mately 30,000 acres, expects their
production to be down consid erably, as much as 10% from 1988;
1988, however, was a record production year.
159
Spain. I mentioned before has approximately ___Q0_0_ acres.. of hops;
expects some improvement in production this year to approximately
six bales
France.
per acre.
In 1989 has approximately J_i29JL_2£ie-2 of hoVs> verv
well sold into the next few years.
Hungary. Has approximately J^xJJDJL.acxes of hops. Expects
improvement in yield this year over 1988 and, of course, is 100%
sold into the future. They have reduced their acreage by 12%
since 1988 with the majority of that being taken out being Aroma
varieties.
Yugoslavia.
Does no t show a significant change in acreage from
1988 and is maintain ing
7
approximately _8_,J).Q.0_acrea_whlch virtually
They have had relatively unfavorable growing
throughou t the spring and, therefore, they expect
A/f all_a_rji_Jix.oina_.typ.e_,
i
conditions
their hop harvest yi eld to be below average.
United Kingdom.
Has somewhat lej_s_bhan 10, Q..QJl__a_cre s_ of hops split
They
approximately 60% Al pha varieties and 40% Aroma varieties.
-jf
have had an extremel y
dry, warm year.
They expect a good crop in
1989.
They have exp erienced above average problems with aphids,
in that their primar y product to control the same 13 a soil drench
They rely upon rain for
which requires water for incorporation.
this Incorporation, but they haven't had it, therefore, their
control of the aphid has been quite difficult.
•Poland.
Expects bje^w^jiiej_a.ge..y.Lelds,.on their approximate 6,000
acres of hops due to very dry spring and poor growing conditions.
United States.
(If you haven't read our numbers in the past) the
1989 acreage is approximately 2jlv5-6_L_which is up approximately 3%
,.
from 1988. -Our varietal breakdown is approxlmately_6p% Alpha _and_.
40%_Aroma. ; We expect an average crop in 1989.
^There is certainly a consensus among European countries that 1989 has
Heen quite dry. However, agreement ends there as some say the heat
has damaged their crops and others expect average to above average
crops.1
Only harvest will tell.
DISCUSSION OF HOP PRICES WORLDWIDE
The dominant discussion of the IHGC was the low prices which virtually
everyone in the world is receiving. The USA andthe_yKL_V£Xe._p.a.rtj,cu-_
larly vocal about__ahe-JLaM--prJLc£-i.^-.however, no country is excluded from
"that'sTtuatlon. Some of the comments made included: discount' selling .
JtifiD-,. especially
being the root of the problem; excess__AIp.
that which is not sold at a commensurate pre mlum for the amount of
Alpha contained is the root of the problem; French representatives
said that some _Aroma hops in the.ljL-_aLeia__3.re. now belng„so 1d_ on an_Aip_ha
_basj_s. Gejim_ui__gx.awj_xs stated that more and more of. their people are
sj£iJ:ch.ijr__LJ-a-^^
varieties because th ey are easier to grow and
they can achieve greater yields thereby gett ing more return per acre
160
than they can with Aroma types.
A researcher from one of the
Eastern Bloc c__4ntrJ.es reported that there are ongoing breeding pro-
-|iim_£Tirwhi_hThops with an average of 15 to 10$. a_pha..are being
developed. It was further s<tTEe_HrKiTrvIrEua 11y all European hop
institutes are .vnerUnentlna with the American Superalpha .var^t^g
as well as any ^h^v"iT_T_tles they may obEiln. The comments of the
United States were basically that our prices are too low-and that we
are attempting to resist sales at less than the cost of production
Tnere was a lengthy discussion concerning the possibility of studying
beer trends, hopping ratios, varietal changes vo.ld hop stocks and
beer production as a possible solution to our low Prices. Perhap.
with more Information we could more readily adapt to the market and
ootain higher-prices. Several individuals *fV^^rA-oha We
such numbers before. We have studied Aroma. We have studied Alpha. We
have a fairly good'idea of beer production and that further research
of numbers wJuld not be necessary. The Czechoslovak!^ group stated
that even in their own country they don't know many of the statistics
including hopping ratios, hop stock, or beer trends. They also stated
the Aroma hops; going up and so we should not "have nearly as much con
that tney believe that the de.m._nd_Jp.r_thje_Alpha_h^ps_is.going down and
cern with the 'Alpha as we currently are.
The Czech representative
fur.her^alS that he believes, that the Alpha numbers are no correct
and that, therefore,^ they are not much use In any case *»>«" «™
ments were contrasted by the G_xman_comments. The Germans place a
great deal of emphasis on the^lpjiajrjoduction in the worldI and re
gardless of the demand for Aroma going up belleye that jOsh^A^ |£j_l_l_
ulllngjhe market down,. The United States P°sitJ°n *" ^?^Sto
Hh"o7Twlhri:hVti 1. We have difficulty getting a satisfactory answer co
own domestic hop stocks, 2. We do not have a ^isfactory method
at present of collecting our own domestic alpha production and 3
Although we have a fairly good idea of what the h°PP*?9 "tio is in
this country, it Is partly based on extract ratios which all countries
appear to be unsure of; Therefore, all numbers are suspect.
The
most significant comments,
lnjgy estimation, concerning the hop
ine m-_- oivj
r-heS-f'vr-EZtsresentatlve present at the IHGC
me t_nrs0blore -«rU\TtrlU^^^^^^ he!p their member
::?
on'g.owe": overcome'low hop prices is known a. a^"j^jjj™
program:- This program allows £or a 2,500 ECU per hectare (n^J P«
|_?lrB;ntr_butiongto
each grower In the conversion Pf°9J™ (»J *°UB
approximately 2,000 acres per EEC member country and up to a maximum
7 S00»acres in-all o£ the EEC) to convert from bitter hops to eitner
l_oma!or Supe.-aipha varieties prior to 1992. The national govern
ments of the member countries of the EEC may contribute ^ditlonal
monies to the; growers within their country which particlpat* £^5
conversion program. It has: further been proposed, but not amoved
within the-EEC,
J;^^,?...^
that a program cmnbJj^JjejJ^^^
further convers on of
-JrZ^^f^^baxxs-Jm^^U^XiSlSiSi of hop acreages should be ^P^*1^
to the total oripproximately 7,500 acres. This program, as it was
P_opose_° would provide compensation to the Individuals Participating
in the oroaram. The goal of the program would be to increase the
Prices of hops The proposal, however, was not approved because of
theSellef within the EEC that without a similar program in the USA
and the Eastern Bloc countries, that the USA and the Eastern Bloc
161
countries would take advantage of
the prog ram and
increase
a
creage . 11
was pointed out in the EEC proposal that t here has been a re duction in
the number of hop growers within the EEC f rom approximately 9,250 In
1982 to approximately 7,000 growers today (a decrease of app roximately
7.5%).
Of
further.note
from this EEC prop osal
is the figure given as
the average return for hop producers in th e EEC for 19 00: th e average
return was $2,248 per acre.
Furthermore, The EEC program wh ich I believe affects the American grower more tha n any other is the i r
aid paid to producers in order to hold pro ducer income stead y.
direct:
In
1988 this direct aid ranged from $150 per acre to $175 per a ere
depending upon variety.
By the EEC's own admission the curr e n t p r o duction aid encourages the European grower 3 to' keep poorly d emanded
varieties in production because aid 13 pal d based on the mon etary
return of the varieties, that i3, a_c.r_o.p_w Lth—a —ko w-_r.eJ-Unn__x eceives
hlgherJaJLd-J-hart_a_C-.pp-_<Lth„a.-hLqh-r.e.tux.QJ. thereby, discoura ging the
removal of undemanded varieties.
And a qu ote which I take d 1 r e c 11 y
from an EEC report dated 20 April 1989, sa ys that "This (pro gram) will
Remain sO> ltv the forseeable future."
y«3v
'
**_h my estimation
ton the__three_most
the_^jnree_mgsc. signlEicant
sign irlean \ l.t.ems._af feeting the hop
~
''
'e-EEC's
~
'3_to producers,OL.J The EEC's
^markettoday are:(Y^sTh
direct
aid
.l.-1 The Eastern Blocs desire
recently Instituted reconversion programs'
to gain hard rnrrppcy using the export of. the^r_hops_to Western Bloc
.n sight to any of these
nations.
Unfortunately, there is no end ir
programs.
''•'•
As far as studying various beer trends, hop ratios, etc., I
beli eve
that the Hop Growers of America should take a closer look at extract
ratios and hopping ratios and we should consider obtaining o11r own
Alpha production figures (Currently our reported Alpha produ ctlon Is
a
number which the dealers are kind enough to provide us with)
REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION (i.e. PESTICIDE DISCUSSION)
..As
ha s
been prevlo usly s tated in prior reports,
t consl dered
lscien tific
3 beha 1 f of
to
be
m ore
po
litical than scientific.
commiss ion of the IHGC reported
the IHGC attem p11ng to harmonize
the £e^tlcjje_issue is
However,
the
on their activities on
pesticide _tp.lej_ance.s_. and
Basically that scientific commission
regis trations with in the IHGC.
They are quite frustrated in trying to
has hiad very.'llttl e succ ess.
work with various govern mental entities and they are also quick to
admit that not onl y are our tolerances gr.Q_.sJLy. di ffftr.Ra___,_ojn__cQuntry
to co untry, but th at our methodology ^p gnltp dissimilar and we
As with prior discussions of
have a long ways to go 1n this respect.
this nature,'' a' gre at dea I of time was spent discussing the
A
ecology/"Greehs" m ovemen t in all of the industrialized countries.
unique proposition howe ver, was made by a Jjrjjjjih gpjqtleman who
stated that oiir pi ant br eedlng programs should begin to look not at
Aroma varieties,
varieties .
n ot at
Super-alpha varieties, but at pest resistant
it is be lief 1 s that we may face a time In which sales of
hops may not .depend
but strictly ,wheth er
at a
II on the variety, the aroma, or the alpha,
the y
can pass very stringent residue analysis
and, perhaps, stri ctly o n whether they can survive pests without using
any chemicals what soever
162
The EEC is continuing its attempts to get harmonization within its own
community. They have proposals on residue thresholds and registration
programs within the EEC, but admittedly are far from completion of
such programs.
As wa3 expected, the United States received many inquiries concerning
our position with respect to the IHGC and Import tolerances, harmon
ization, etc. We were allowed to present a fairly lengthy and detailed
explanation of the problems within our own country; We discussed
our dlf£lcultl_g.__y.l.th..Alar„ as well as several other examples of
"crisis" pesticide problems in this country. We were also allowed
to explain that the EPA was no more lenient on US hop_grpwers_than_gn„
any others in the world. We were allowed to explain that we have far
fewer chemicals registered for hops in this country than does any other
country in the world. We explained to the members of the IHGC the de
cision that was made by the HGA in May of this year concerning our
willingness to work together on pesticide products, methodology, efficacy,
residues, and to educate one another on legal and bureaucratic tangles for
our various chemical registrations. We also emphasized, however, that
each country must remain free to choose its own products which it wishes
to pursue. We outlined the basic program which is being sp_ear-headed_by_
Anheuser-Busch with meetings taking place in February, May and October of
This yeari' This comment in Itself generated considerable controversy as
many nations.were unaware of this program and quite obviously those
particular countries feel as i£ they may be .le£J:_out of the. United States
m_i________ With the exception of those countries which knew nothing of the
program spear-headed by Anheuser-Busch, the members of the IHGC were quite
pleased for once to hear the report of the American hop grower in relation
to pesticides. Those countries which were not aware, Cz.echp.sJ. ova kla In
particular> were concerned about the direction that this harmonization
program_may be taking.
The.US delegation promised the president of the
"IHGC that we wouTa'Tnform them of the harmonization process as it con
tinues. However, it is a program spear-headed by Anheuser-Busch and it Is
not a program spear-headed by IHGC, or the EPA, or the HGA.
RECIPIENTS OF ORDER OF THE HOP
Twenty-four individuals from throughout the world received Order of
the Hop for 1989. Three of those were from the United States. Those
three are Ray Obendorf, Howard Eismann and Robert Eaton,
congratulations go out to all of them.
Our
1990 INTERNATIONAL HOP GROWERS CONGRESS
All American hop growers are heartily _nylted_tg_the 38th Annual IHGC
which will' take place in England fr_omCAuaust 6th - 10th)L_l99Crj' The
Congress will take place in the Hereford hop growing area approximately
150 miles west of London.
More information will be made available.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION
The following information is composed of assorted items which are
perhaps the most interesting of the entire trip.
7
-
However, much of
163
this information is unsubstantiated and. would require further research
before being accepted as fact.
I was told
of 5 to.
that most of Europe dries their hops down to a moisture level
But, then most are rehi^dmed_by the buyer to approxi-
Along the same llneT l was also told that the brewers in
Europe accept moisture levels, of.up to 15%
ma_tej.y__l_.%-.
As I mentioned In the report"of the world hop situation, <gj>H7d- are a
very large problem in Europe this summer. They are apparently the
European hop growers' largest problem. The most interesting comment, I
believe, was the one which I previously referred to as being illogical,
I.e., aphlds'are being controlled fairly well on the Jlop^desUned_f or_
TUedj_ta-_3, but on those not destined for the UnltddStates then
li-lTgreat deal of insecticide being applied In efforts to control the
aphids.
*_n a lengthy discussion with a Yugoslavian researcher, I was told that
manner.
Further, the Yugoslavian individual told me that their basic
planting is approximately 7 1/2 feet wide with plants every 3 1/2 feet
down the row. The string pattern from each plant alternates In a 1 „ 1 -
1-2 fashion.
I was further informed by this individual that they had
experimented vlth_overhead sprinklers with very little success. ProbT¥m_"created by the sprinklers including mildew, pests,"and add itiona
labor, outweighed any advantages.
They are currently exper menting with
fairly large volume, low trajectory traveling sprinklers which pull
their own hose down through the row and have a sprinkling radius of
approximately 28 feet.
The following bits of information come from two reports published by
-the EEC on the production and marketing of hops.
One of them was
'dated 20 April 89, and the other one was dated 21 April 89: -Compared
kwith 1979, the most sub_Lt_U_J-lai--_£Creas_e_s. 1n the hop growing areas of
""'the EEC have occurred in the United Kl_j,.do.m ,wh.ch..js. down ,32%, Be_gi_m
only 6.4 bales per acre, a record low Invest. The quantities of Alpha
perac.e vere^fiF^rhl-tor ically low levels in 1988 1987 was also a
poor crop in EEC, however, in spite of two successive low harvests,
there were only small price increases.
sold ahead
-Not only
does West Germany do a
surve y with respect to the pounds sold, they also Include In
of the various contracts sold ahead. For instance,
that survey the price
pr
lertau in
is listed at approximately
a forward contract for Hallertau
in 1989
1989 Is
».
,. , rr, iqqi
."_. per poundrHB1^7_rrt"Kriiame
variety forward contracted to 199 3
.Hi"
the
-_uT__TTny^rrs-ted at only approximately $1.51 per pound. -Six o t
ven hop.growing
member ....
states of EEC have
submitted plans for the
u-f yf.
.
-of those, United Kingdom is
$1
T_
se
variety conversions previously discussed.
In
leading the way in submitting varietal conversion programs. In
Portugal, which Is not a member of the IHGC, plans are to conveirt
8
-
its
164
entire hop growing area mainly to Super-alpha..yarieties_. -The inability
Of Cz.e.C.b.o_sJj_.yakla to export to the United States some 4,400,000 pounds,
which were scheduled for export to the United States in 1988, caused a
great deal of discount selling within the EEC.
-The EEC's goal, since
the inception "oTTfieHEEC hop progra"in~lrr-19 71; is to insure that growers
within the EEC receive an appropriate Income so that they may continue
to raise hops in the future.
(If production aid is needed annually to
support grower's Income then so be It.)
-82_%oftheJrotal world, harvest,
in 1987 vas produced by just seven countrifi-^ Five of which are members
of the IHGC: West Germany - 26%, USA - 19%, Czechoslovakia - 10%, USSR
- 9%, United Kingdom - 4 1/2%, Yugoslavia - 4 1/2%, and China estimated
at 4%. The IHGC plus the USSR, China, Japan and Rumania together grow
over 94% of the world's hops, with the Hallertau..and ...the. .Yakima Valley
_J*J_nr"» arrnnnHnq for roughly 40% of the'world production.
These EEC reports are most enlightening 33 to the attitude of the
European hop growing community. There is little question that without
their programs, the world hop market would be significantly different
today than It is.
However, it does not appear that their programs will
change in the near future. If anything, I believe their aid programs
will Increase. They have supported their member countries' hop growers
for such a long period of time that to discontinue at this stage would
create a great deal of upheaval in the European hop growing community.
CONCLUSION
I hope that thl3 report provides you with an additional understanding
of the world hop market. If you have any questions concerning this
report, please give me a call.
Sincerely yours,
Norm Batt
165
Report of Technical Commission of I.H.G.C.
July 31 - August 3, 1989
Because
of
the
insects and diseases,
many
problems
Leon, SPAIN
facing
growers
in fighting
the Technical Commission at the March meeting
in Paris, chose as its theme
for
the
Hop Congress
in, Spain
"Spraying Machines and Spraying Techniques for the Control of Pests
_ and Diseases in Hops."
Four research workers prepared papers and delivered lectures
on the results of tests and studies made on sprayers over the
last
ten years.
Those four were:.
DR.
A. MATON, Director
of
the
National Institute of Agricultural
Engineering in Merelbeke, Belgium."
the Technical
Dr. Maton is, also, Chairman of
Commission.
PROF. VACLAV FRIC, University of Prague, Czechoslovakia.
DR. T. ZAORSKI, lecturer/researcher
at
Nawozenzia Gleboznawstwa, Pulawy, Poland.
the
Institute
Uprawy
DR. M. KAC, researcher
at the Institute for Hop and Beer Research,
Zalec, Slov., Yugoslavia.
Five different...sprayers, were used in these tests.
Three which
are axial fan sprayers that produce high air volumes at low air
speeds.
These were Platz, Berthoud and Fantini.
The other two are
classified as atomizers.
They are radial fan machines that produce
low air volumes at high air speeds.
These machines were Douven and
Kinkelder._.
The
Kinkelder
was, also, tested with an electrostatic
charger.
Rather than test these sprayers in an actual hop
field where
conditions would be changing, simulated
fields were set up in
large hanger so that all the machines could be tested under similar
conditions.'L/
Two methods of testing were used.
The first method consisted
of weighing blotting paper strips suspended at heights of 2, 3, 4,
5, and 6 meters before and after spraying.
From the difference
in
weight, the amount of liquid reaching the strips at various heights
can be
determined.
The
strips
solution
second
were
with
method
was
placed, also, at
more sophisticated.
2
through
a coloring agent was used.
6
Black polythene
meters.
A
spraying
The agent leaves yellow
stains on the plastic strips which can be analyzed by an image
analyzer coupled to a computer. The computer then calculates the
number of droplets per square inch, the average diameter of the
drops, the diameter of the largest and smallest drops, and the
percentage of coverage of the leaf.
166
These tests were conducted at many different speeds and
different pressures and volumes
of
water.
All
four
researchers
ended
up
with
fairly
similar
conclusions.
The
best
spraying
results were
obtained
at
speeds
of 3.75 km. per
hour.
This
converts
to
2.34 mph which is pretty close to the speed that most
American hop farmers run.
At this speed the best volume ' rate
was
around 2,000 liters per ha., which is about -193 gallons per acre.
One of the things that was taken into' consideration on. these
tests was the effect of the pesticides, to the environment.
It was
determined that droplet
sizes played a large part
in this.
Droplets that were too small in diameter were the worse
ones
for
drifting
in slight breezes.
This is one reason why they felt that
the
Kinkelder
with
the . electrostatic
charger
was
the
least
efficient.
Of course, it was stressed that spraying should be done
in
calm weather conditions.
This is more critical in European hop
areas because of the many small yards that very often border
homes
and gardens.
Dr. Zaorski
of
Poland
was
the
only
one who presented any
results from, modified sprayers.. His test included a sprayer with a
tower boom about ten feet in height.
The sprayer did
show better
coverage on
the
top half of the vines
than the conventional
sprayers.
It was, also, stated by all the researchers that tractors with
cabs -should be used for the protection of the workers."
This is a very brief report of the proceeding of the Technical
Commission.
If anyone is interested in more
information on this
subject, the book, containing many charts and graphs of the entire
proceedings is available at the Hop Growers of America office.
Respectfully submitted,
Alcid Roy
167
1989:
Microbreweries in Oregon (see last paragraph)
FOOD & DRINK
^wXwSwm^W^^
WWWttWM*W*<frfV4n^^
Brewskis,
Up Close
and Personal
Oregon's "hopheads" are turning out products
wmm®&*m ••<?$&'"%•
maw®''-
both distinctive and delicious.
BY MATT KRAMER
lthoush wine gets most of the
hoopla and all the glory, the fact
. Is that Northwest beers are bet
ter than Northwest wines. This Is to say
lng units. These are the number of parts
per million of the hop resin that Imparts
the bitter taste. For example, a bottle of
that you find beers from here that rival
Budwelser has about 10 bittering units:
Mlchelob has 14; Coors has 15; and so on.
some of the best from elsewhere. The rea
All of America's Impersonal beers are in
son for this also explains why wine U
more magical than been You can make
this numerical neighborhood.
But the personal beermakers are an
great beer. You can only tind great wine
embittered bunch. At the low end Is
Bridgeport Ale at 26. Owner Dick Ponzl.
ofwlnemaking fame. Is a sweet-tempered •
guy. Wldmer Alt from Widmer Brewing
Co., In Portland, steps smartly up the
scale and rates a 45, as does Pyramid Ale
five years, the Northwest — and, above from Kalama, Wash. Then you get to the
all, the Portland area — has witnessed a category called stout, and you soon
proliferation of what can only"be called understand how It got its name. BridgePort's stout sports a 55 rating; Grant's
personal beers.
Imperial Stout, from Yakima, steps up to
The term "personal beer" Is useful in
understanding how beer is made. You the plate with a walloping score of 80.
have your choice of various hops, for "Don't worry, be hoppy" clearly Is the
example. You decide which ones you motto of this crowd.
As you might Imagine, these are beers
want to use and how much and, apart
from an informing personal vision, hops for every taste, which is precisely the
— and then refine what you've found.
This is why wine gets the glory.
Still, a great beer is an accomplish
ment And the level of accomplishment
hereabouts is extraordinary. In the past
are the key flavoring element The fact
that Oregon and Washington supply the
world with hops lends the local personal
beers a mathematical elegance: The cir
cle of production is squared as economic
ally as possible.
Originally, hops were used like spices:
to mask the taste of bacterially spoiled
beer. This was 1,000 years ago. Between
then and now, beer drinkers everywhere
discovered that they liked the taste.
Today, the mass market Impersonal
beers have reduced their hop content
steadily, resulting in bland beers pro
duced ever more cheaply.
The personal beermakers are real
"hopheads." They choose carefully, yet
extravagantly. First, you've got the
choice between the aromatic hops and
the so-called bltterlng hops. Oregon
grows the aromatic hops, which give the
beer much of its smell and taste.
Washington raises bittering hops, which
do just what the name suggests: They add
an edge of bitterness to a beer. You need
both.
The local personal beers are bitter, as
idex Just as there are chardonnays for
every taste, so, too, are there beers for all
seasons and reasons. The tide of ever
more personal beers has reached the
flood stage. It's easy to be transfixed by
the phenomenon.
For instance, there's the phenomenon
of the brothers McMenamin, Mike and
Brian. I met the McMenamlns years ago
when they first began as wholesale wine
distributors. Wine, didn't work out for
them, but they have clamped on to beer
with a ferocious grip. They run no less
than 21 pubs, eight of which also are
breweries in Portland. Salem, Eugene
and Lincoln City. You skip into one of
these brew pubs, as they are called, and
are confronted with a beer made on the
spot. The beers range from the basic to
the bizarre. How else do you describe
something called a Raspberry Termina
tor? Or a smoked beer? Beer doesn't get
any more personal than that
This business of using fruits In beer
took me by surprise. Yet The Oregonlan's
beer columnist, Fred Eckhardt, a genial
well as aromatic. In fact, the beer folk
fellow who Is gripped by the subject,
reports that beers flavored with fruits
even measure it in what are called bitter-
and other exotica are not at all unusual.
22 Northwest Magazine
The aforementioned McMenamlns regu
larly offer a raspberry-Infused beer —
ale, really — with the delightful name of
Ruby Tuesday and another version
called by the cute Rogue 'N" Berry. Eck
hardt reports that blueberries get tossed
in, as do blackberries, pineapples and ap
ples. I don't want to hear any more whin
ing from the beer crowd about how com
plicatedand exotic the wine world Is.
The installment of brew pubs is one of
the unheralded delights of the Oregon
food scene.-Judging from appearances, it
seems to be a popular success. The
Heathman Hotel restaurant spinoff
called B. Moloch Bakery and Pub in
downtown Portland has its patrons wolf
gularly a personal visionof the beermaking. no beverage is more local. Wine is
constrained by climate and saddled with
the limitations of the local soil. Given
decent water, a becrmaker can import all
the necessary ingredients. You can have
as many beers as you have makers, if not
drinkers.
Locally, the count Is nine personal
breweries — if you lump together the
ever-growing McMenamin empire:
Widmer Brewing Co., Hood River Brew
ing Co., Bridgeport Brewing Co.. Port
land Brewing Co. (which is licensed to
produce Grant's ale and stout), the
McMenamin breweries, Deschutes Brew
ery, Oregon Brewing Co., Rogue River
ing down pizzas amid the stainless steel
brewing vats of one of Widmer Brewing
Brewing Co. and Oregon Trail Brewery.
Each of them offers multiple lagers, ales,
largest "personal brewer." Last year it
into the hundreds.
sold almost 20,000 gallons of various
beers In Oregon. That may sound like a
lot. but keep in mind that Widmer"s sales
Germany has 4,000 breweries, with the
Bavaria region alone boasting 986 of
Co.'s two breweries. The other is a soon- stouts, fruit ales, wheat beers, oatmeal
to-be-completed restoration of an 1890s stouts, amber ales, golden ales, brown
brick structure in the Albina district of ales,porters andI don'tknowwhatother
Northeast Portland. Widmer is Oregon's categories. The number of offerings runs,
were just 2.6 percent of what Blitz-Weinhard sold in Oregon last year. Now you
know why they call them "micro
breweries."
As with wine, the fascination of these
personal beers lies in the variety. And
again, as with wine, to the outside
observer it seems too mucH of a good
thing. Yet it's not Becausebeer is so sin
You think beer is personal here? West
them. And each of them is good for at
least a half-dozen different brews. As
President Bush likes to say, "It's a vision
thing."
^
MATT XXAMEX it MPortlandfooi ond »u*
writtr. ROSS HAMILTON U Northern Mora-
z/W'j ilofffholoirooktr. CAROLYN SHIRMACHER CEROULD It the orI director. Bttr
ondltaiui eourttsy o/J/illtidePub.
168
fco jfa.
f&ulUtf-
^^^^^^^^aMais lere _s_d_i afield test in 1984, and Haunold
f ByLAURA JOHNSTON
V'*vtr-** .found the results (encouraging.
-^MW^eh- w •••••'"' '
(for the Baroiheter^
- - - *?%$!**•,
'<J^^r> •' .-'_ ;*'5Forty-five of his best plants goUn! eh'th'usiastic-.reception
Anew hob variety developed atOSU could significantly boost ' from brewers at;a 1985 research meeting. Five..of those .were
theOregon economy by replacing imported hops used by Amer- chosen fpr.cpn^erciarpn^u^
ica's largest beer breweries.'"' Wf'Z *.':\T hTK^VTdV.A- Idaho/'•••'- • > '•-*-"•;""••*'••"••
and
Al Haunold, an OSU plant geneticist,* has,.produced a. npP;o,h«'Th'ey had never seen something that was the result of across
variety, known as Mount Hood hop, which has^'noble aroma*.,.; ^
_ame sp dose to what th^y- thought.was'their ideal," he
an essential elementin beer which until.now was av^Htf^yj.._^d..; -^ j ^^;; [';^! "J.';^*^,:V.%.'" \ :
in imported hops.
'
' " ' .' Cft't„';„^
ll_SS_^^
^.r-¥!
He decided to proauce a nop wmi _« <u_ia.iuti.__. *- _>..,:
German liapertaller variety that;would grow^in toe .more «-.. . c
_,_.„_
...... . .
treme clirpatic conditions of the Pacific Northwest. Vr., ^^ , .^_Ke much to get amillion dollars into the economy directly.
_s!_Sfis«s;s.s
»
• 'l
i
!
-A,.' I :-.,.--.,.,.v ..-•
• .-^__s.tiX^.-„-. • •
•
.«'<•
,7_...k_
>--':- J;,>-'v.
—%••_**«
•'
*"^*,vV,v.",,'-i;.
'•<''"'^^>v'
by major breweries around the world . Haunold said. "How those hops per
because of low yields, around 1,000, on Pacific Northwest hops," he said.
"That forced European hop grow
is now available to growers in the form at the brewery remains to be; . pounds per acre. Haunold began;
Pacific Northwest.
seen. If the brewers like them, more : research in 1983 on a new hop cul: j ers to control mildew with treatments
Named Mt. Hood, the new variety Mt. Hood hops will be grown. It may • tivar that would have "noble aroma".,; U.S. growers haven't had to ask
was developed as a substitute for the take up to five years for the Mt, Hood and yield well, up to 2,000 pounds'; , approval for.
"Aphids are another example,"
German Hallertauer mittlefrueh hop, variety to become firmly established per acre, in the Pacific Northwest.
, which though popular with brewers, >• in the market."
climate.
'•'.', ;'..'
:•'• ; said Haunold. "Both we and the
Europeans have to control aphids in .
i has become steadily scarcer on the
Brewers usually use a blend of hop
world hop market in recent years.
varieties in the beers they make.•.,,•
:; hops, but they use a product called
PRIOR TO his work on the Mt.
Lannate.which has no label for use on
The noble aroma is valued for the
"All of the big breweries, located
Hood hop, Haunold developed a hop
hops here."
primarily in Germany, Japan and the variety named Willamette, which last spicy, robust smell it gives certain
The answer to these difficulties,
United States, are looking for a hop year earned $14 million for Northw
beers.
Haunold said, is establishment of
with the noble aroma, especially since est hop growers.
international standards on pesticide
A FACTOR that may work in Mt.
Hallertauer mittlefrueh is no longer
All U.S. hop production is in the
use
in hops. But until that happens the •
Hood's
favor
is
current
USDA
import
available," said Al Haunold, OSU
Pacific Northwest, led by Washing
Mt. Hood variety may be able to fill
restrictions on European hops treated
plant geneticist whose five-year ton with more than 20,000 acres, fol
research program produced the Mt. lowed by Oregon with 7,000 to 8,000 with chemicals not registered for such some of the domestic demand for
European hops that now cannot meet
Hood variety.
acres and Idaho with just over 3,000 uses in the United States.
U.S. import restrictions for pesticide
, "Samples of imported hops taken
"Mt. Hood hops may become a/ acres of hops.
.
significant Northwest agricultural
Hallertauer mittlefrueh hops are in the last few years revealed residues residues.
Haunold is a scientist on the staff of
. commodity for export and domestic disappearing from the hop market of pesticides and fungicides that either;
the USDA's Agriculture Research
use, depending on how well the new because of their high susceptibility to are disallowed for use on hops in the
Service.
He is stationed in the OSU
United
States
or
applied
in
amounts
variety is accepted by growers, brok
a soil-borne fungus disease that has
department
of crop science.
exceeding
USDA
limits,"
Haunold
ers and brewers in the next few
spread throughout hop yards in Ger
CORVALLIS, OR — A new hop years," said Haunold.
./• many over the last_3Q years; accord-,! said, '-i^ ^' ,V. •. Ji'-m.-:."For example, powdery mildew is
variety developed byan Oregon State
/J:
"Some growers have signed con •ing to Haunold.;,; „,w<:\.-.•..•.'.>>.•••-...,
University researcher to possess the . tracts with brokers to grow small
Pacific Northwest hop producers'. a significant problem in central Euro
highly valued "noble aroma" sought acreagesof Mt. Hood hops this year," can grow Hallertauer hops but don't . pean hop yards, but is not a problem /.
I ••'*•'rx*'Sfej!'*'.;:
:; AGRI-TIMES NORTHWEST, Friday; Marcrt5,J989 Page 7
New hop variety availaBle
.'••_•
V^;*:.'..
A-3-,:>*l.
•-i.*_*:'s ••'"•''
'"••••:•"»•
'.'-•..U;p. "-i
i.VHUjf
,'-V,v7
1:
'*£__«
%
cn
_>
'
/
170
I \
t
ERIC LARSEN/7f>e Daily Barometer
High wiring for hops
Resident USDA geneticist, Dr. Alfred Haunold, strings wire for his hops to climb at the
agricultural research fields just across the river from ;I >v n •Corvallis.
" "" Haunold h;
developed and refined sc\•rel strains of hops well suite,! t-><<
lyused by regional growers.
_
The f' '" Parometfr "••-."sri?"
*•!!<*
st c( ntiitionsand w;d.
„._._.„)
171
UP*",University
RADIO NEWS
WEEKDAYS, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
TOLL-FREE .
IN OREGON'
DEPT. OF INFORMATION
(AFTER HOURS CALL 754-2543)
(503)754-4611
1-800-462-3287
Ask for Extension
2543
Available 2-10-89 through 2-13-89
NORTHWEST AROMA
AL HAUNOLD 754-2964
Total Running Time: :70
Lead:
A NEW VARIETY OF HOP -- A KEY INGREDIENT IN MOST BRANDS OF BEER -- HAS JUST BEEN
RELEASED BY A RESEARCHER AT OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY.
AND IT COULD BECOME THE MOST
SOUGHT-AFTER HOP AMONG BREWERS AROUND THE WORLD.
Announcer:
MUCH OF THE DISTINCTIVE FLAVOR AND AROMA OF YOUR FAVORITE GLASS OF BEER COMES
FROM SMALL AMOUNTS OF AN HERB CALLED HOP.
BREWMEISTERS COMBINE HOPS WITH OTHER
INGREDIENTS DURING THE BEER-MAKING PROCESS.
Actuality:
Hops basically provide the flavor--the spice, if you will--to beer.
And
without hops you would have a flat beverage.
(:09)
Announcer: THAT' S AL HAUNOLD, A PLANT GENETICIST AT OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, WHO HAS
DEVELOPED A NEW VARIETY THAT COULD BECOME THE MOST POPULAR HOPS USED BY THE WORLD'S
MAJOR BREWERS. .HAUNOLD"S HOP, A SUPER AROMA-TYPE CALLED MOUNT HOOD, AND SEVERAL
OTHERS STILL IN THE LAB, COULD BRING ABOUT SIGNIFICANT GROWTH FOR THE U.S. HOP
INDUSTRY, LOCATED RIGHT HERE IN THE NORTHWEST.
Actuality:
If one of these other ones that are still in tests will go, and the largest
brewers in the world--who have indirectly indicated that they will very likely expect
that one of these varieties will be part of their brewing blend sometime in the
future--it could be worth several millions of dollars initially and probably tens of
millions of dollars to the U.S. hop industry within the next ten years.
Announcer:
AT OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY IN CORVALLIS, I'M JOHN SULZMANN.
•30-
»
(:23)
172
/^--S\ United States
Agricultural
i\Lhw Department of
ResearcH
Agriculture
To:
Pacific West Area
Service
June 21, 1989.
Hop Breeding Co. of Australia
RD 873, Tonganah, TAS 7254
Australia
FAX #
003-522714
Dr.
Al Haunold
From:
Corvallis, OR.
Subject:
97331, USA
"Copies" of overseas hop material acquired by Ken Davey in 1981
from the USDA Hop Research Project at Oregon STate University.
I assume your word "copies" means ve>getatively propagated materi al of the
varieties (cultivars and germplasm) listed in your lettercof June 1 , 1989
as follows:
(please note spelling)
•
Cascade
Savinja Golding
61020
Styri an
21049
Perle
21227
Bobek
21239
Blisk
21238
Buket
21240
Ahil
21050
Aurora
21053
Hersbrticker-G
21185
Eroica
21220
Swiss Tettnanger
61021
Vojvodina
21083
Zattler seedling GP 2( male)
64032M
Zattler seedling GP3 (male)
64033M
seedling GP4 (male)
64037M
High-alpha female GP5
21055
Hybrid-2
21167
Galena
21182
Willamette
21041
Nugget
21193
attler
USDA Acc.
No.
There is no objection by the US
USDA ACC.
56013
21170
Els_sser
No
Department of Agriculture for you to propagate
the above named genotypes for any use you may desire. Please be aware that they
may carry viruses, notably American Hop Lfctent Virus. You stauld only propagate
virus-free material.