ON THE COVER
WILLAMETTE FALLS FISHWAY
A long cherished dream of Oregon conservationists moved a big step closer
to realization during this biennium when construction was started on the new
Willamette Falls fishway.
To be sure, there has been a fish ladder of sorts at the falls since 1904, but
except for periods when the water level was just right, it has been a far from
satisfactory installation. Spring chinook have been able to pass the barrier with
some degree of success, as have steelhead, but for fall chinook and coho the
situation has been all but hopeless.
When the new fishway is completed, hopefully in the not too distant future,
vast reaches of prime upriver spawning and rearing area will become readily
accessible to salmon and steelhead. This should eventually mean a several fold
increase in the Willamette runs.
Planning and construction of the new fishway is under the direction of the
Fish Commission with the federal government, through the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, providing 84 per cent of the cost and Portland General Electric
Company making up the balance.
As this biennium ends, Phase A, the cul-de-sac leg of the structure, is being
built. When the rest of the fishway will be constructed depends on the availability of federal funds. But the long awaited project is underway, and that is
great news to all who are interested in the well-being of Oregon's rich salmon
and steelhead heritage.
BIENNIAL
REPORT
JULY 1, 1964-JUNE 30, 1966
TO THE
Governor and the Fifty-Fourth
Legislative Assembly
FISH COMMISSION
OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
HERMAN P. MEIERJURGEN, Chairman, Beaverton
EDW. G. HUFFSCHMIDT, Portland
LEONARD N. HALL Charleston
ROBERT W. SCHONING, State Fisheries Director
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Organization Chart
2
From The Director's Desk _
4
Regulatory Action By The Commission
6
Administration Division
7
Engineering Division
9
Fish Culture Division
11
Research Division
14
Suggestion Awards Program
19
Service Recognition Program
19
In Memoriam
20
Retirements
21
Financial Statement
22
TABLES
21
Licenses Issued
25
Egg Take
Fingerling Liberations
26
Foodfish & Shellfish Landings
28
[3]
In its first season of operations off the Oregon-Washington coast the Soviet fishing fleet took more than 20 million pounds of Pacific Ocean
Perch and over 300 million pounds of hake. In the photo above, a Russian side trawler, or SRT, is shown alongside a factory vessel.
FROM THE DIRECTOR'S DESK
Umatilla and Warm Springs tribes have adhered to
their agreement with the commission to refrain from
commercial gill netting in the Columbia, the Yakimas,
and to a lesser degree the Nez Perce, have fished
commercially in violation of state fishing regulations.
the fisheries management
Beginning early in 1966,
and enforcement agencies of Oregon and Washington,
in cooperation with the county courts and some district
attorneys, launched a concerted effort to enforce state
conservation laws on Indians and non-Indians alike
The effort was notably effective.
Trawl fishery landings reached an all-time high
in 1965 when 33 million pounds were unloaded at
Oregon ports. This exceeded the previous high catch
of 1962 by more than 1.5 million pounds. Pacific
Ocean perch led with 13.8 million pounds.
Even as the trawl fishery gained momentum, the
traditional grounds off Oregon and Washington were
invaded by a sizeable Russian trawl fleet early in
1966. Efforts of the Soviets were first centered on
Pacific Ocean perch, a species for which a U. S. fishery
had rapidly expanded during recent years. Russian
trawling soon skimmed the readily available perch
stocks and the invading fleet turned its main attention
to hake. Hake have long been considered a trash fish,
but a U. S. fishery on the species for reduction to meal
and oil was developing. Concentration of Russian
effort on hake seriously hampered these plans. It is
During the 1964-66 biennium the operations of
the Fish Commission
Com
were m a r k e d with a heartening
hea
num
number
o successes tempere d with u n reso l ve d con of
flicts and problems. Some of these matters will be
discussed briefly. Their variety merely hints at the
wide scope of commission activities. The management
of Oregon's foodfish resource is a complex pursuit,
fraught with myriad problems involving conflicting
interests and demands.
During this biennium, the department was again
most fortunate in having as policy makers Commissioners Meierjurgen, Huffschmidt, and Hall. From their
busy schedules they have given much time and effort,
not infrequently at considerable personal expense.
Guidance from these able men has been the foundation of many of the accomplishments of the agency
during this report period.
The problem of an unregulated commercial fishery
on the Columbia River by certain Indians has caused
much concern during recent years. During the 1965
season, more than a million pounds of salmon and
steelhead were put on the market by the tribesmen.
There were indications that the Indian catch would
increase in subsequent years. This large and relatively
unregulated harvest poses a serious threat to management of the Columbia River runs. Although the
[4]
REGULATORY ACTION OF THE COMMISSION
further study. Commission meetings are open to the
public and are advertised well in advance to give those
who are interested the opportunity to attend and participate. It is gratifying to note the amount of interest
in the affairs of the commission. Most meetings are
well attended.
With ever more dams being constructed in the
Columbia River system, the loss of suitable spawning
and rearing areas for salmonids has become critical.
Adding to the situation are unfavorable conditions
for passage of upstream-bound adults and downstream
migrating smolts. The situation has become especially
critical for summer run chinook. For the first time in
the history of the Columbia River fisheries, the summer season was completely closed in 1965 to protect
small chinook and sockeye salmon runs. This closure
climaxed a trend toward shorter summer seasons. The
summer commercial fishing season was decreased from
50 days in the early 1940's to around 25 days by the
early 1960's. This season was drastically reduced from
24 days in 1963 to 5 days with gear restrictions in
1964, and finally to no season in 1965. In support of
this move, the Oregon Game Commission and the
The establishment of regulations to protect, enhance, and perpetuate the foodfish resources of the
state is a primary responsibility of the Fish Commission. Before any regulation is adopted, a public hearing
on the matter must be conducted. In keeping with the
law, during the past biennium the commission held
sixteen public hearings during which foodfish regulations were discussed and acted upon. Ten other regular monthly meetings of the commission were conducted during the two-year period.
Joint meetings with the Washington Department of
Fisheries regarding Columbia River commercial fishing
regulations were conducted a number of times each
year, starting with the regularly scheduled January
meeting. At this and other meetings where regulatory
matters are considered, staff members present pertinent biological background and make recommendations
regarding fishing seasons. Comments on the matter
under discussion are invited from the floor. The commissioners may then set seasons, adopt new regulations, change existing ones, or table the matter for
An estimated 550 people were on hand at the January 1966 meeting of the Oregon Fish Commission and the Washington Department of
Fisheries in Portland's Memorial Coliseum. Discussion centered on Columbia River commercial fishing regulations.
Division of Fish and Game in enforcing a quota on the
catch from a large bed of shrimp off their northern
coast adjacent to the Oregon border. In the past, after
the California quota was reached, fishermen continued
to fish the bed and land the shrimp in Oregon., defeating the purpose of the regulation. Adoption of the
Oregon regulation made the California regulation effective.
Two areas from which commercial fishing was
excluded but sport fishing was allowed to continue
were reviewed at the request of commercial trollers.
These areas, at the mouth of the Umpqua River and
the entrance of Coos Bay were closed to commercial
fishing in 1953 and 1956 respectively. This action was
taken to alleviate the sport-commercial problem involving sport fishermen who were buying commercial
fishing licenses in order to circumvent the personal
use possession limit, and selling fish through other
than regular commercial channels. Revision of both
sport and commercial fishing regulations since that time
precludes the need of the closures. Since conservation
was no longer the basis for the regulations, the commission acted to remove the closures.
Washington Department of Fisheries closed the Columbia River to salmon angling from June 21 to July
29, with an extended closure to August 20 above
Bonneville Dam. Sport fishing closures in Idaho further
protected the Salmon River portion of the summer
chinook run. In 1965 the only significant harvest of
summer chinook or sockeye salmon in the Columbia
River occurred in the Indian set-net fishery above
Bonneville Dam from June 14 to July 24.
A general order was adopted by the commission
to legalize commercial fishing for herring with a herring jig. This relatively recently introduced method of
securing bait fish for offshore salmon angling is a
source of income for numbers of school-age Oregonians who are situated near one of the bays where
herring occur in quantity. A subsequent change in license requirements provides for issuance of free commercial herring jigging licenses to youngsters 17 years
and younger.
Regulations were amended to provide an annual
closed season on shrimp from October 31 to March 1
in cooperation with the State of California. The basis
of this change was a problem faced by the California
[6]
WATER RESOURCES SECTION
Demands on the water resources of the state continue to increase with each passing year. Requirements
of water user groups representing hydro-electric power, agriculture, flood control, navigation, logging and
related industries, recreation, mining, and others come
increasingly into conflict with the fishery resources
of Oregon.
The water resources section was created to insure
that fish life is given proper consideration in water
use planning and development. As encroachment of
civilization makes itself ever more apparent, the function of the section becomes increasingly more important.
Among the projects receiving attention from the
section during the biennium were: (1) Participation as
a lead agency in determining the future demands for
fish in the comprehensive multi-agency Willamette
Basin Review Study; (2) Continued development of
criteria for minimum streamflows required to maintain
fish life; (3) Development and implementation of procedures for calculating potential flow benefits for fish
and multi-purpose water development projects; (4) A
greatly expanded program to resolve fish passage problems at small dams and other small obstructions; (5) Review of major dam projects affecting anadromous fish
throughout Oregon to insure that adequate mitigation
for fish losses is obtained at each project; (6) Represent
the agency on two interstate fishery technical cornmittees; (7) An accelerated program of pollution investigation and resolving fishery related problems; and
(8) A statewide investigation of deficiencies which
have become apparent in current gravel removal laws
and recommendation of corrective measures.
Visitors view one of interpretive signs at Bonneville Hatchery's new selfguided tour.
INFORMATION AND EDUCATION SECTION
It is the function of this section to inform the
people of the state what the commission is doing to
manage the foodfish and shellfish of Oregon and to
provide educational material regarding this important
natural resource. The methods of eccomplishing this
are many. Activities of the I&E section during the biennium included: (1) Preparation of news releases
which were given wide distribution to newspapers,
radio and television stations, and key individuals; (2)
Talks to sportsmen's clubs, service groups, school
classes, technical gatherings and others on a variety
of subjects connected with the agency's work; (3)
Handling quantities of correspondence and telephone
requests for information regarding commission activities and the foodfish and shellfish under its jurisdiction; (4) Development of information material in
response to recurring requests for certain information
on such subjects as personal use crabbing, identification of salmonids, and the value of the yearly harvest of foodfish; (5) Still photography to supply illustrative material for reports, brochures, informational
publications, newspapers, magazines and displays; (6)
Movie photography for television news reports and
information or technical films; (7) Preparation of commission meeting minutes, staff meeting reports, and
an interdepartmental news letter; (8) Development and
manning of public displays such as the joint efforts
with the Game Commission at the State Fair in Salem
and the Pacific International Livestock Exposition in
Portland; (9) Development of a major permanent display—a self-guided tour—at Bonneville Hatchery; and
(10) Representing the agency at numerous meetings
of sportsmen and others.
With dwindling salmon and steelhead spawning and rearing areas,
damage to remaining tributaries, as shown in this view of a logging
operation, become increasingly serious.
[
8]
ENGINEERING DIVISION
developed Burrows type which provide improved
water circulation and are self-cleaning. Heath egg incubators utilizing stacked fiberglass trays will be used
instead of the conventional hatching troughs. In addition, this will be the first Oregon hatchery to use a
pumped water supply instead of conventional gravity
flow. The capacity of the new hatchery will be one
million yearling coho plus one million 90-day fall
chinook with provision for future expansion.
In addition to major new construction during the
biennium, important maintenance tasks were faced
by the engineers. Few Fish Commission field stations
escaped damage during the December 1964-January
1965 floods. This damage ranged from slight inconvenience at some stations to complete restriction of
operations at others.
Water associated facilities received the brunt of
the flood's wrath. Domestic and hatchery water supply
systems were damaged extensively at Cascade, OxBow, Willamette, Marion Forks, Trask, Bonneville, and
Alsea Hatcheries. The flood waters deposited large
amounts of silt and gravel at many stations. This further complicated the repair operations. Buildings on
some stations were damaged by inundation. The South
Santiam station sustained extensive damage. Lesser inundation at the Clackamas laboratory required refurbishing and redecorating of parts of that facility.
In addition to playing havoc with Commission
facilities, the flood left the engineers with extensive
stream improvement work throughout the state. This
The engineering division consists of office and
field groups and is headquartered in the commission's
Portland offices. It provides engineering services for
the other divisions in construction and maintenance
of hatcheries, fishways, and related facilities and conducts stream clearance and improvement projects.
A major development during the biennium was the
award of a contract for the construction of Phase A,
the cul-de-sac leg of the Willamette Falls fishway on
the lower Willamette River at Oregon City. Planning
was conducted by a Portland consulting firm in cooperation with commission engineers. Late in the biennium construction was started on Phase A. A commission construction inspector is assigned full time
to the project, although the work is being done by
a private firm which was awarded the job on the
basis of competitive bidding. Hopefully, federal funds
which will cover about 84 per cent of the total cost
of the fishway installation, will be forthcoming during
the next biennium.
Another engineering milestone during the biennium was the design and letting of the contract for
construction of the new $375,000 salmon hatchery
on the North Fork of the Nehalem River. In addition
to designing the new facility, commission engineers
surveyed and cleared the site prior to letting the
construction contract. The most modern fish cultural
innovations were incorporated into the design of the
new hatchery. The rearing ponds will be the recently
A massive log jam on Wiley Creek, a South Santiam River tributary near Foster, blocked fish passage. Jam was removed under Fish Commission
direction with cooperation of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and local authorities.
[9
l
work included the removal of a huge log jam on
Wiley Creek, removal of 14 log jams in Clatsop, Columbia, and Linn Counties, assistance to Clackamas
County authorities in removal of several log jams,
and major repairs to five coastal fishways. Federal
funding under Public Law 875, state restoration funds,
and other contracts provided approximately $192,000
for the stream repair work and approximately $172,000
for the hatchery rehabilitation.
Stream improvement work during the biennium,
unrelated to the winter flooding of 1964-65, included
the construction of laddering facilities on two tributaries of the Wallowa River. A three-sill fishway was
constructed at Sheep Ridge Dam on the Lostine River.
On the Minam River, provisions for passage, including
installation of stream-width log sills, were completed
over a falls, a cascade, and a splash dam.
Two small fish ladders were constructed on Drift
Creek, a tributary of the Alsea River. A natural rock
dam was breached on the East Fork of the South Fork
of the Trask River and a rock cut fishway was constructed on the Little North Fork Santiam River.
In combating the perennial problem of log jammed
streams, the engineers removed two log jams on
Dewey Creek in the Siletz River system and two others
on Oak Ranch Creek in the Nehalem system. The removal of 35 log jams on Little Sheep Creek in the
lmnaha River drainage opened up eight and one-half
miles of prime spawning area.
In other construction during the biennium, the
1,250-foot, 20-inch main water supply line at Alsea
Hatchery was replaced with a steel line. A 25-ton capacity refrigeration building was constructed at the
hatchery to replace a portable unit. At Big Creek
Hatchery, 18,000 feet of 30-inch concrete pipeline
was installed to replace the main water supply line.
At Cascade Hatchery, a staff residence and housing
for a government surplus standby generator were constructed. The capacity of Trask Hatchery was increased
with the construction of four Burrows type recirculating ponds, and one residence was enlarged and
remodeled. At Sandy Hatchery, a metal garage 24 by
45 feet was erected.
General maintenance and improvements at all stations were carried out during the biennium. Improvements were made in the holding, handling, and releasing facilities at Klaskanine Hatchery. The Clackamas
station was repainted. Roads were repaved at Marion
Forks Hatchery. Several buildings were re-roofed at
Big Creek Hatchery and the auxiliary pump at Cascade
Hatchery was overhauled.
Research-oriented activities included coordination
with Portland General Electric Company on the establishment of a Pelton Experimental Hatchery, and contract construction of experimental holding facilities
near the mouth of the Deschutes River. A vaned conduit concept of fish passage was explored, designed,
FISH CULTURE DIVISION
New techniques in handling adult and fingerling
fish, .further refinements in the Oregon pellet, and
better methods for detecting and treating fish diseases
were-among the advances made in hatchery operations
during this biennium. Results of the general up-grading
of hatchery practices during recent years continue to
be reflected in the increased returns of adults to
hatcheries despite heavy commercial and sport harvests.
The commission operates 14 hatcheries and one
pilot facility. These stations produce fall and spring
chinook, coho, and chum salmon and steelhead trout.
Four of the commission's Columbia River hatcheries
are included in a comprehensive fall chinook evaluation program which also involves Washington state
and federal hatcheries located in the system. Large
numbers of fall chinook fingerlings produced at these
stations in four successive seasons were fin-clipped.
Marking was concluded in the spring of 1965. Early
returns indicate many Columbia River fall chinook
are taken off the west coast of Vancouver Island, at
least some are taken in California and Alaska waters,
and substantial numbers are landed in the commercial
and sports fisheries off Oregon and Washington and in
the Columbia River.
An evaluation of hatchery coho production by the
States of Oregon and Washington and the Fish and
Wildlife Service was started in 1966. This study includes hatcheries in other parts of the two states as
well as in the Columbia River system. The Fish Commission's participation is financed partially with federal
funds. The project began with marking of yearlings
early in 1966. The first returns of marked adults to the
hatcheries will be in the fall of 1967.
The proportion of hatchery-reared fish taken in
the sport and commercial fisheries is a measure of
hatchery success. Coho fishing has been exceptionally
good for both sportsmen and commercial fishermen
during the past few years. The coho sport catch at the
mouth of the Columbia River has increased steadily
from the estimated 34,600 landed in 1960. In 1961
the catch was 85,500, in 1963 it was 116,000, in 1964
some 134,000 and in the 1965 season 247,000. In
1965 both the Oregon ocean troll and the Columbia
gill-net landings for coho were the best in 30 years.
Indications are that Fish Commission hatcheries have
made a substantial contribution to this upsurge. The
current hatchery evaluation program will indicate more
precisely the extent of this contribution.
Other species show less spectacular gains than
coho, although results are encouraging. Table 1 shows
that, except for fall chinook and chums, there are
many more fish returning to the hatcheries now than
during the early 1960's. The Columbia River gill-net
fishery appeared to take a larger number of hatchery
produced fall chinook in 1965 than in previous years,
which may account in part for the decline in the number returning to the hatcheries. The chum run, which
Top: Coho eggs from Klaskanine Hatchery being prepared for shipment to federal hatchery at Abernathy, Washington.
Center: Fin-clipping young salmon in hatchery evaluation study.
Bottom: More than 38,000 adult coho, surplus to hatchery needs,
were transplanted from hatchery traps to other areas.
1
involves the Big Creek Hatchery only, has remained
relatively stable over the past six years.
TABLE 1
HATCHERY RETURNS OF ADULT SALMON
AND STEELHEAD
Year
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
Spring
Chinook
1,734
1,496
3,829
8,988
8,274
8,701
Cohn
Fall
Chinook
Chums
3 year
2 year
7,945
7,548
8,135
17,198
15,875
8,571
189
296
249
202
125
228
11,316
22,544
36,107
44,840
94,901
90,090
21,072
26,635
59,518
31,462
68,847
67,936
Steelhead
®
286
949
516
3,321
2,929
5,407
0 Includes Marion Forks and Willamette Hatcheries
O Includes Big Creek and Marion Forks Hatcheries
During recent years available eggs have far exceeded the rearing capacity of Fish Commission facilities. Because of this, it has been possible to provide eggs to other agencies including the U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Oregon Game Commission, and
the conservation departments of California, Colorado,
Idaho, Michigan, and Washington.
Release of large numbers of unfed fingerling salmon continued during this biennium. The emphasis
was switched from coastal lakes to smaller tributaries
along the coast as well as in the Columbia and
Willamette systems. In 1965 unfed fingerlings totaling
20.5 million coho and 1.4 million spring chinook were
released. In 1966, 15.7 million coho and 2.6 million
spring chinook unfed fingerlings were stocked. There
were some liberations in areas recently made available
to anadromous fish by stream clearance or laddering,
or in waters that were accessible but supported no
natural runs or only remnant runs. Other plants were
made above impassable falls or other obstructions
which otherwise prevent utilization of good rearing
areas. Adults derived from fry liberations in these
latter sites will be unable to return to their nursery
areas for spawning, but provide additional fish for
both the sport and commercial fisheries. Preliminary
indications are that these releases may be a worthwhile
means of utilizing fingerlings hatched in excess of regular fish cultural requirements.
Faced with returning spawners far in excess of
hatchery needs, a program of transplanting adult coho
from Fish Commission hatcheries was conducted during
the 1965 season. In cooperation with the Game Commission, more than 38,000 of these adult coho were
trucked from hatchery traps to Willamette, Columbia,
and coastal tributaries and allowed to spawn naturally. Smaller numbers of adult steelhead were transplanted from the Marion Forks and Big Creek Hatcheries.
The commercial fishery in Young's Bay, re-established in 1961 and supported almost entirely by coho
A portable stamina tunnel developed to measure vitality of
salmon and steelhead.
.oduction of the Klaskanine Hatchery, continued during this biennium. Commercial landings and hatchery
returns are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
YOUNG'S BAY
COMMERCIAL CATCH OF COHO
Numbers
Season
Adults
Jacks
Total
Pounds
5,377
1961
459
131
1962
2,056
663
20,000
1963 4,074 2,166 42,000
1964 11,114 7,986 151,316
1965 21,068 6,050 234,859
KLASKANINE HATCHERY
RETURNS
Adults
Jacks
6,813
3,323
4,086 15,234
6,796
5,612
8,865 20,301
8,431 18,169
Total
Run
10,726
22,039
18,648
48,266
53,718
Each year since 1961 commercial fishing regulations on Young's Bay have been liberalized, allowing
greater numbers of fish to be taken. Despite these increased landings and a substantial sport harvest, hatchery returns continue to grossly exceed fish cultural
requirements at the Klaskanine Hatchery.
The program of providing carcasses of returning
fish to state and county institutions and certain Indian
groups was continued. During 1964, public institutions
received 28,079 fish and the Indians 6,017. In 1965,
distribution was 14,564 and 6,626 fish respectively.
Most of the fish involved were spawned during hatchery egg-taking operations; however, some in excess of
hatchery requirements were distributed in the round.
The production of fingerling salmonids at commission hatcheries during the biennium reached 1,037,000
pounds for the first year and 1,032,000 pounds
during the second. Production of this general
magnitude is considered maximum with current facilities. The completion of the new North Nehalem
River Hatchery and the use of Wahkeena Pond for
[ 12 ]
rearing coho, should result in increased production
during the next biennium.
The Oregon pellet continued to be the basic hatchery ration. Because of production problems with small
pellets, it is still necessary to start spring and fall
chinook on a meat diet. Coho are started on the Oregon pellet and steelhead on a commercial dry food.
Oregon pellets are now ordered on an annual
basis rather than more frequently as in the past. Although fish food prices have gone up from 12.50
cents per pound in 1965 to 13.07 cents per pound in
1966, a better conversion kept food cost per pound
of fish produced to 24.8 cents, the same as the previous biennium. The average conversion for all species
was 1.9 pounds of food per pound of fish during
1964-66 compared with 2.1 during the 1962-64 period.
A number of improvements in fish cultural technique were put into operation during the past two
years. Rearing fish to larger size before liberation was
one. Within limits, the larger young fish are when
they are released, the higher the rate of survival.
move to the ocean. At this stage scales are loose,
and excessive scale loss frequently resulted from some
of the earlier methods of handling. To minimize this
scale loss fingerlings are now weighed before they
smolt. At liberation it is necessary to handle only a
sample lot to determine the amount of growth and
this figure is applied to the total. At other stations,
weight of fingerlings is determined by displacement
of water in a tank. This technique also minimizes handling of the young fish.
Some preliminary work on the use of anesthetics
to ease the chore of sorting adult fish prior to spawning offers considerable promise and will be more fully
explored during the coming biennium.
One of the two adult holding ponds at Dexter
Dam on the Middle Willamette River was used to rear
spring chinook fingerlings. This gave much needed
additional rearing space. In 1964-65, 767,000 yearlings averaging 11.7 fish per pound were reared. In
1965-66 the 963,000 yearlings reared averaged 13.6
fish per pound.
Diet experiments continued during the biennium in an effort to
further improve the Oregon pellet, the standard ration at commission
hatcheries.
Despite record sp ort and commercial catches of coho, spawners
such as these jumping at the commission's Alsea Hatchery water
supply dam, returned to hatchery streams far in excess of fish
cultural requirements.
Growth rate was improved substantially at the Bonneville Hatchery when warmer Columbia River water was
mixed with the regular hatchery water from Tanner
Creek which is quite cold during spring and early
summer.
By reviewing water temperature records at all
hatcheries it was noted that the highest water temperature was reached during late afternoon. Feeding
schedules were adjusted to take advantage of this
period of increased fish activity to gain maximum use
of the food.
Improved methods of weighing and counting fingerlings prior to release were adopted during the past
two years. At the time of release the fingerlings are
usually "molting." This is a physiological condition
which occurs shortly before the fish are ready to
Outbreaks of fish diseases caused concern on a
number of occasions during the two-year period. Furunculosis and columnaris were the two most common.
Both are controlled by feeding medicated pellets but
significant losses occurred before control measures became effective. Ceratomyxa appeared for the first time
at several hatcheries. This disease about which little
is known appears to be associated with large impoundments such as those on the Columbia River. It
poses a serious threat to the hatchery program. Hopefully, a method of overcoming the threat will be forthcoming in the near future.
summarizes the principal projects underway during
fiscal years 1965 and 1966.
Biometrics
Statistical services involving design and analysis of
experiments are provided by this section to the various investigations of the Research Division. Computers
at Oregon State University Computer Center have been
utilized at an increased rate for this analysis. In addition, a federal contract to process data from the Columbia River fall chinook hatchery evaluation study
continued during the period. Planning aspects for a
similar program involving coho hatcheries were completed.
A spring chinook clears a step in the old Willamette Falls fishway
as Fish Commission counter records passage.
RESEARCH DIVISION
The Research Division conducts research studies
and investigations to obtain data and information upon
which to base a sound management and conservation
program for the food fishes of Oregon. This includes
recommending regulations to the Commission for their
consideration dealing with commercial fishing for all
species and recreational fishing for shellfish. Laboratories and field stations are maintained at strategic locations throughout the state. The headquarters is at Clackamas and other laboratories are maintained at Astoria,
Newport, Charleston, and Sandy. Field offices for special projects are currently located at Gold Beach, Redmond, Carmen-Smith spawning channel, Cougar, Elgin,
and Enterprise. Cooperative projects are also conducted
with Oregon State University at Corvallis and Astoria.
The division is divided into sections, or investigations, each headed by a project leader. The following
Coastal Rivers
Selected key index areas on coastal streams continue to be monitored to enumerate spawning salmon
populations. The numbers observed provide an index
of relative abundance needed to assess the condition
of the spawning stocks and establish population trends.
Of particular interest were continued low spawning
ground counts of chum salmon entering Tillamook Bay
tributaries. Changes in abundance were expected following the commercial fishing closure in 1962. Age,
length, and sex ratio data were collected to provide
additional information on stocks which have remained
at a low level of abundance.
Surplus coho salmon adults and fry from coastal
hatcheries were planted into selected streams in cooperation with the Game Commission. The fish were
generally released above natural barriers or in streams
having less than optimum numbers of wild fish.
Studies on lake rearing of coho salmon were conducted in Hall Lake and Camp Creek Pond. Investigations at Hall Lake are designed to determine the
optimum number and size of fish to plant in coastal
lakes for maximum survival and yield. Camp Creek
Pond is a small potential production facility built by
the Bureau of Land Management and operated by the
Fish Commission.
Surveys for location of fish passage obstructions
were continued with recommendations for removal
made where justified. A helicopter was used in locating barriers, in addition to the conventional means
of surveying streams. Close alliance was maintained
with various public and private agencies whose work
affected stream environments. Potential damage to
the fishery resource was reduced and, where possible,
passage and rearing facilities were improved by agreements between the agencies.
Commercial landings of shad and striped bass were
monitored on the Siuslaw, Smith, Umpqua, Coos, and
Coquille Rivers. Data collected from the shad fishery
included size, sex, and age composition of the catch.
Similar data were collected from the striped bass fishery in Coos River. Log books maintained by cooperative fishermen were analyzed for catch and effort data
to provide information on relative abundance. Investi-
gation of the various fisheries led to adjustment of
fishing seasons and mesh regulations.
Studies on the ecology of fall chinook salmon in
the Elk and Sixes Rivers were continued by examining
factors influencing the length of fresh-water residence
in the streams. The field work is supplemented by
laboratory studies of fish behavior in observation
troughs. Findings suggest that aggressive social behavior may cause early downstream movement of fry
and that many of these fish take up residence in the
brackish estuary area of these streams for the summer
months. Studies of juvenile coho populations in index
Important activities of the section include close
monitoring of the Columbia River fisheries to obtain
complete catch statistics and biological data such as
age, size, and sex of the fish caught. This information
is used in conjunction with predictions of run sizes
in regulating the fishery to allow a harvest while
achieving the desired escapement necessary to perpetuate the resource. Run predictions are based on
studies concerning escapement and subsequent production, test fishing, and early season catches.
One biologist is now investigating the early life
history and factors affecting production of spring-run
Biologists seine Wallowa County tributary in study of early life history of spring chinook.
areas were continued to determine annual fluctuations
in abundance and to relate these to numbers of spawners, numbers of returning adults, and environmental
conditions.
Coastal Rivers Investigations was merged with
Pelagic Fisheries Investigations to form Coastal Rivers
and Pelagic Fisheries Investigations in May 1966.
chinook salmon in Lookingglass Creek in northeastern
Oregon. This study began in November 1964.
Columbia River Watershed Development
Data collection for the federal hatchery evaluation
program under an Appraisal of Project Results contract
continued during the biennium. The work includes
extensive sampling of the commercial ocean troll fishery, the Columbia River gill-net fishery, and the hatcheries for fin-marked fall chinook salmon. In conjunction with the evaluation study, intensive spawning
ground surveys were conducted on Big and Plympton
Creeks to determine the presence of hatchery-produced
fall chinook in these streams.
Operational Studies (Bureau of Commercial Fisheries contracts) presently being conducted by the section consist of Wahkeena Pond and coho jack projects
The first study has to do with the growth and sur-
Columbia River
This investigation is jointly responsible with a
similar group from the State of Washington for management of Columbia River commercial fisheries.
Biological information provided by staff members from
both state agencies is used to manage important runs
of salmon, steelhead trout, sturgeon, shad, and smelt.
Research studies provide the basis for management
recommendations given at public hearings and these
findings are reported in publications.
[ 15 ]
vival of juvenile coho salmon in a natural rearing pond.
The pond is stocked at different rates and treated somewhat differently each year. In fiscal year 1966 the
pond was fertilized and in fiscal year 1967 it will
be stocked with one million juvenile coho which will
be fed a standard hatchery feed. The other study is to
determine if methods can be found to reduce the large
number of coho salmon which return to the hatcheries
as jacks (two-year old fish) by somehow keeping them
at sea until they are ready to return on the spawning
run as "normal" three-year fish. Methods being explored are irridation, hormones, and size at time of
release. The use of female hormones appears to show
promise as a means of achieving the objective.
A short-term contract study with the U. S. Army
Engineers was conducted in 1965 to determine if the
race of fall chinook spawning in the section of the
Columbia River to be inundated by the John Day Dam
could be identified. This identification was deemed
necessary in order to artificially propagate these fish
for mitigative purposes. The study showed that stocks
destined for upper Columbia River spawning areas
(above McNary Dam) could be afforded maximum protection by removing for propagation purposes fish
of dark skin coloration that migrate during and after,
but not before, the migration peak.
A section biologist continued to serve as consultant to the Engineering Division in investigating and
evaluating possible habitat improvement projects. This
work has included reviewing plans of the proposed
Willamette Falls fishway and surveying and evaluating
of Fifteen Mile Creek and Hot Springs Fork of the
Collawash River where fishways have been proposed.
Counts of the 1964, 1965, and 1966 spring chinook,
coho, and steelhead escapements past Willamette Falls
were obtained.
in salmonids at Fish Commission hatcheries and in
selected major watersheds.
Fish Passage
This section conducts contract studies, financed by
other agencies and private industry, pertaining to the
passage of adult and juvenile anadromous salmonids
at dams. Of the three studies in progress at the beginning of the report period, two were concluded.
The evaluation of fish passage facilities at North Fork
Dam on the Clackamas River, conducted jointly with
Portland General Electric Company, resulted in the
judgment that passage was successful. A study conducted at North Fork Reservoir and Pelton and Round
Butte Reservoirs on the Deschutes River, contracted by
the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, resulted in the
determination of, the limnology and behavior of juvenile anadromous fish in these impoundments. Many
activities of the fish were found to be related to specific features of their environment. Evaluation of the
Carmen-Smith spawning channel on the upper McKenzie River, financed by the Eugene Water and Electric Board, continued.
Four studies were initiated during the period: (1)
An evaluation of fish passage facilities at Cougar Dam
on the South Fork of the McKenzie River, financed
by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; (2) an evaluation
of fish passage and fish passage facilities at Round
Butte Dam on the Deschutes, conducted jointly with
and financed by Portland General Electric Company;
(3) an evaluation of fish passage and fish passage facilities at River Mill and Faraday projects on the Clackamas River, also conducted jointly with and financed
by Portland General Electric Company; and (4) a study
to determine the timing and behavior of juvenile anadromous salmonids in the Imnaha River, financed by
Pacific Northwest Power Company.
Hatchery Biology
Salmonid nutrition studies included evaluation of
ingredients for use in the Oregon pellet diet; efforts to
develop moist and dehydrated forms of the Oregon
pellet for use as starting diets; and investigations to
determine the effects of storage conditions on diet
quality. Of the various foodstuffs tested, dried skim
milk showed the most promise as a potential ingredient for salmon diets. Research is continuing on the
incorporation of this and other milk products in Oregon
pellet formulation. Modifications of the Oregon pellet
formula resulted in the development of a mash form
of the diet which has produced encouraging results
as a starting ration for chinook salmon. This food
is receiving further testing on a production scale.
Laboratory feeding experiments demonstrated that the
use of improperly stored moist pellets can result in
reduced fish growth, poor health, and increased mortality rates. Studies continued on feeding techniques
to provide information on how better food utilization
and control of fish growth can be achieved. The hatchery feeding program was monitored and the quality
Infectious Diseases
The Infectious Diseases Section was formed in
February 1964 from various subsections of Hatchery
Biology Investigations and is charged with diagnosis
and recommendations for treatment of diseases affecting juvenile and adult salmonids, and to develop,
through research, better methods toward these ends.
Additionally, supervision is maintained over contract
research conducted by personnel of the Department
of Microbiology of Oregon State University.
Fish health was monitored at all Fish Commission
hatcheries and for other fisheries agencies or private
citizens when requested. Chemoprophylactic or chemotherapeutic treatments were recommended as required.
Bacterial, protozoan, and viral research resulted
in: (1) immunological techniques for early detection of
certain bacterial diseases; (2) establishment of stable
fish cell lines necessary for viral studies; (3) isolation
and description of the sockeye salmon virus particle;
and (4) a survey to determine the incidence of
Ceratomyxa (a pathologically important myxosporidian)
[ 16 ]
control program for supervision of Oregon pellet manufacture continued. Modification of components based
on continuing nutritional studies resulted in a desirab[e improvement in the uniformity of pellet sizes.
Research continued on the use of tetracycline drugs
for marking juvenile salmonids. Data concerning drug
efficacy and safety were obtained in cooperation with
the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries and an application was submitted to the Food and Drug Administration requesting clearance to use oxytetracycline as a
method for marking Pacific salmon.
Work continued to define for salmon fingerlings
characteristics which are related to the ability of fish to
survive to adulthood. Laboratory equipment was purchased and preliminary work begun on chemical analyses of fish tissues. Additional controlled-temperature
fish-holding facilities were designed and installed
at the Sandy Laboratory for use in studying effects
of water temperature on various chemical and physical characteristics of fish. A portable apparatus for
measuring fish swimming ability was designed and
constructed for use in evaluating the stamina of fish
produced in nutrition experiments and in production
hatchery operations.
A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the Deschutes River as a potential water source for future
salmon hatcheries and to determine if water reconditioning and reuse systems would be feasible techniques to use in holding adult fall chinook salmon and
incubating eggs. Unexpected operational and technical difficulties were encountered in efforts to obtain experimental fish from the run passing The Dalles
Dam. Many of the fish collected were injured and
infected with columnaris and other diseases. Even
though these factors prevented a clearcut evaluation
of holding techniques and the Deschutes River as a
potential hatchery water source, the experiment demonstrated that water reconditioning systems are physically practical and, with some additional developmental
work, could offer possibilities for increasing utilization of hatchery water supplies.
Approximately three million fall chinook fingerlings from the 1963 and 1964 broods were marked
with fin clips and released from Big Creek, Bonneville,
Cascade, and Oxbow Hatcheries as Oregon's part of
the Columbia River Fishery Development Program
hatchery evaluation. Fin marks were also placed on
approximately one million 1965-brood coho fingerlings
at Fish Commission hatcheries in a program initiated
in cooperation with the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries and the Washington Department of Fisheries to
evaluate production of coho salmon at hatcheries located on the Columbia River, Puget Sound, and coastal
streams of Washington and Oregon.
Trawl Fisheries
This investigation is concerned with research and
management activities on Oregon bottomfish and pink
shrimp resources, harvested mainly by the trawl fish[ 17 ]
More than 112,000,000 salmon and steelhead fingerlings were
liberated into Oregon waters by the Fish Commission during the
1964-66 biennium.
ery. These species are found on or near the ocean
bottom. Studies on fishes in this vast area are necessarily concentrated on species of major commercial
significance. Age and growth studies on Dover sole,
petrale sole, English sole, and Pacific Ocean perch are
conducted at the waterfront by measuring length and
collecting aging structures. Mink food deliveries are
monitored to estimate species composition. Collection
of fishing effort data and monitoring of catch is done
to determine area of catch, changes in area and effort,
and changes in stock status. Waterfront sampling of
pink shrimp yields data on age, sex, size, and growth
of this species.
A tagging study on Dover sole and sablefish off
northern Oregon was concluded in February 1966.
This was part of an Atomic Energy Commission contract to study offshore-inshore movements of groundfish stocks. Two studies were initiated late in 1965
with federal-state matching funds from the Commercial Fisheries Research and Development Act (Public
Law 88-309). One study is designed to define the distribution and abundance of pink shrimp off Oregon
through survey cruises, intensified waterfront sampling,
and sampling-at-sea voyages. Knowledge of the stock
size and limits is essential to sound management of
this resource. The second study is designed to (1) compile and analyze all data collected in the past on bottomfish; (2) determine abundance, distribution, and
recruitment of Dover, English, and petrale sole, and
Pacific Ocean perch, with emphasis on Dover sole; and
(3) to intensify and refine market sampling on these
species.
Pelagic Fisheries
Within the scope of Pelagic Fisheries Investigations
are included research activities on albacore tuna, herring and anchovies, the ocean phase of the salmon's
life history, and monitoring responsibility for seismic
oil explorations. Late in the biennium, this investigation was merged with Coastal Rivers Investigations
creating a new unit.
SUGGESTION AWARDS PROGRAM
The Employees Suggestion Awards Program was
established by the 1955 State Legislature to encourage
and reward state employees for suggestions promoting efficiency and economy in state government.
During the past biennium seven awards were presented to Fish Commission employees.
Archie W. Anderson, Superintendent of Bonneville Hatchery, received $20 for suggesting an improved type of slip-proof coating for hatchery walkways.
Evelyn E. Kalmback, Portland office clerk, received
$100 for developing a form that provides a complete
and accurate record of adult salmonid disposition.
FISH COMMISSION SERVICE
RECOGNITION PROGRAM
In 1960 the Fish Commission inaugurated a program to give official recognition to employees with
extended periods of public service. Since the inception
of the recognition program, 103 service pins have
been presented.
George V. Smalley, Superintendent of Klaskanine
Hatchery, received four employee suggestion awards
during the biennium. These included $65 for suggestions leading to improvements in the hatchery water intake facility, $65 for development of a stationary
aerator for water flows at the hatchery, $150 for developing a portable egg-salting tank and $290 for
inventing and constructing an automatic fish pellet
feeder.
Twenty-four service pins were presented during
the 1964-66 biennium. They represented 270 manyears of public service.
10 YEAR SERVICE AWARD
Robert -J. Ayers
Kerry C. Bennett
Samuel L Brantner
Carl H. Copper
Melvin D. Hopkins
Irving W. Jones
Edward J. Labiske
Henry W. Lightle
Virgil J. Marshall
Donald J. McDonald
Robert K. McQueen
Eugene E. Middaugh
Denzil D. Miller
Keith D. Moore
George W. Nealeigh
James S. Norton
Daniel J. Romey
Roy E. Sams
C. Dale Snow
Luther L. Vanderburg
Joe Wallis
C. Dale Snow, Project Leader for Shellfish Investigations, was awarded a certificate of commendation
for his suggestion to simplify and reduce to walletsize the permit for taking intertidal animals.
Top Suggestion Awards winner George Smalley (right) is congratulated by Commission Chairman Herman P. Meierjurgen as
hatcheryman Otto Bodie looks on. Klaskanine Hatchery superintendent
Smalley has received 8 awards and $805 since start of program in
1955.
20 YEAR SERVICE AWARD
Otto J. Bodie
Mary D. Goetsch
George V. Smalley
[
19 ]
ifn emoriam
On April 19, 1966, the Oregon Fish Commission suffered the loss of two experienced, highly
esteemed employees, Virgil C. Summers and Raymond N. Breuser, in the crash of a helicopter
during a coastal stream survey in Tillamook
County. Also lost in the tragedy was pilot Roger
P. Lamoreux of Lakeview, Washington.
Raymond N. Breuser was employed by the
Fish Commission on June 19, 1951. He was an
aquatic biologist and project leader of the commission's Coastal Rivers Investigations stationed
for several years at Charleston and later at Newport. He received a B.S. degree in Fish and Game
Management from Oregon State College in 1949
and an M.S. degree in Fisheries in 1961.
He served as an Air Force bomber pilot during WW II. He was employed for several months
by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service as refuge
manager at Kodiak, Alaska prior to his employment by the commission.
He leaves his wife, Evelyn Amy, and 3 children.
Virgil C. Summers began his career with the
Fish Commission on October 1, 1949 as a civil
engineer. His experience covered a wide range
of conservation engineering activities with emphasis on fishways and stream improvement. At
the time of his death he was the agency's chief
field engineer. He served as a Navy torpedo
specialist during WW II and attended the University of Portland from 1945-1949. He worked
for the State Highway Department for a short
time before coming to the Fish Commission.
He leaves his wife, Ruth Elizabeth, and 5
children.
* * *
Alton E. Splawn began his employment with
the Fish Commission on March 16, 1963. He
served as administrative assistant at the Clackamas research laboratory until his death in Portland on April 9, 1966, after a short illness.
He operated his own business in the Gresham
area for 15 years prior to accepting a position
with the Public Welfare Commission in Salem in
April, 1961.
He was a veteran of WW II, serving with the
Sea Bees.
He is survived by his wife, Helen, and one
son.
During his short service with the commission
he performed well.
RETIREMENTS
CHARLEY HANSEN
On July 31, 1965 Charley Hansen retired from
the Fish Commission after completing nearly 24 years
in fish culture work with the agency. It was the windup of a second career for Charley for he had worked
for the U. S. Forest Service in and around Wallowa
County for 20 years before taking the job with the
Fish Culture Division.
He began work with the commission in December
1942. In 1946 he became superintendent of the Alsea
Hatchery. In subsequent years he served as superintendent at Bonneville, Willamette, Sandy, Siletz, and
South Santiam Hatcheries. He was stationed at the
latter facility when he retired.
On the occasion of the presentation of his 20-year
service recognition pin some years ago. Commission
Chairman Herman P. Meierjurgen said of Charley, "He
left his mark at each of the stations where he worked.
He has a marked ability to improve the appearance
as well as the operation of each such station, while
staying within the limited budget. A place for every-
thing and everything in its place best describes his
method of operation."
Charley and his wife Carylon have a home at the
Senior Estates in Woodburn and are enjoying a richly
deserved retirement.
EMMETT 0. NORDLUND
Emmett 0. Nordlund was employed by the Fish
Commission at the Klaskanine Hatchery on December
5, 1952. He became foreman at the station on January 1, 1956 and continued in that position until his
retirement on November 30, 1964.
Emmett has been associated with fish and logging
for some 45 years. He has gone to the Bering Sea in
windjammers to fish for salmon and once was reported
lost during a storm while fishing for tuna off the
Oregon coast.
Although officially retired, on occasion he is called
back to work on a part-time basis, giving the state
the benefit of his experience and willing hand.
Emmett and his wife Mildred make their home
near Olney, not far from the Klaskanine Hatchery.
LICENSES ISSUED
BY CALENDAR YEAR
Boat
Boat, Lost License
Buyer
Canner, Fish
_.
Canner, Shellfish
Fishing
Fishing, Lost License
Gillnet, Non-resident
Gillnet, Resident
Retail
Setline
Setnet
Single Delivery
Special Permit (carp)
Wholesale
Total Licenses
1964
1965
1,686
2
68
16
6
2,864
14
38
449
1,132
2
129
63
1
131
1,729
3
77
15
6
3,199
22
26
462
1,160
2
127
302
2
120
6,601
7,252
The license structure was changed in 1963 and further refined during the
1964-66 biennium. Since figures on licenses issued in previous years are not
directly comparable to those of this report period, license figures for earlier years
are not listed here.
[ 21 ]
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OF FISH COMMISSION
July 1, 1964 to June 30, 1966
Unexpended balance of funds at beginning of biennium
$
Appropriations and Receipts:
General Fund Appropriations:
Operation and Maintenance:
1963-1965 Total Appropriation
Less: 1963-1964 disbursements
Amount reverted to State Treasury
$1,737,738.00
864,900.47
3,606.63
1965-1967 Total Appropriation
Less reservation for 1966-1967 expenditures _
Capital Construction:
1963-1965 Trask and Alsea Hatchery
improvements
Less amount reverted to State Treasury
1965-1967 New Nehalem Hatchery Construction
Less reservation for 1966-1967 expenditures _
$2,072,666.00
1,120,383.19
$
869,230.90
952,282.81
$
128,000.00
38,881.77
89,118.23
$
375,000.00
347,096.27
27,903.73
Total Net General Fund Appropriations
for 1964-1966
99,556.69
$1,938,535.67
Receipts from Other Sources:
Schedule "A" Fiscal year 1964-1965
Fiscal year 1965-1966
$1,532,770.60
1,583,801.24
3,116,571.84
Total Receipts—Other Sources
5,055,107.51
Total net appropriations and receipts
Total amount available for expenditures ____
$5,154,664.20
_
Expenditures for period: Schedule "B"
Fiscal year 1964-1965
Fiscal year 1965-1966
$2,344,694.02
2,705,876.59
$5,050,570.61
104,093.59
Total expenditures for biennium
Balance on June 30, 1966
Analysis of Cash Balance of Fish Commission Funds
as of June 30, 1966
Seal
Miscellaneous Receipts
Donation
Salmon Management
8,003.43
3,517.45
35,682.97
56,889.74
____.
____________
_
...
$
Total All Funds—June 30, 1966
[ 22 ]
104,093.59
SCHEDULE "A"
STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS OF FISH COMMISSION
July 1, 1964 to June 30, 1966
Fiscal Year
1964-65
Total for
Biennium
Fiscal Year
1965-66
GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS
•
Licenses:
Boat
Buyer
Canner, Fish
Canner, Shellfish
Commercial Fishing
Gillnet, Non-resident
Gillnet, Resident
Lost License, Other
Retail
Setline
Setnet
Single Delivery
Special Permit (carp)
Wholesale
Total license receipts
Other Receipts:
Poundage fees and interest
Seized and confiscated property sales
Miscellaneous—all other
Total other receipts
Total General Fund Receipts
Less Transfer to State General Fund
DEDICATED FUND RECEIPTS
Coastal stream rehabilitation
Donation fund
Flood damage—Public Law 875
Miscellaneous
__
Salmon management
*Seal fund
U.S. Army Engineers
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Total Dedicated Fund Receipts
$
32,320.00
740.00
1,600.00
300.00
45,180.00
720.00
2,217.50
50.00
11,510.00
10.00
590.00
930.00
3.00
6,100.00
$
36,140.00
770.00
1,500.00
200.00
48,255.00
1,485.00
2,260.00
45.00
11,370.00
10.00
635.00
4,485.00
1.50
7,350.00
$
68,460.00
1,510.00
3,100.00
500.00
93,435.00
2,205.00
4,477.50
95.00
22,880.00
20.00
1,225.00
5,415.00
4.50
13,450.00
$
102,270.50
$
114,506.50
$
216,777.00
$
187,255.99
501.22
2,206.17
$
227,242.85
727.97
1,961.30
$ 414,498.84
1,229.19
4,167.47
189,963.38
$ 292,233.88
292,233.88
229,932.12
$ 344,438.62
344,438.62
419,895.50
$ 636,672.50
636,672.50
$
$
$
155,770.87
57,450.00
8,262.64
123,932.50
1,291.50
387,882.66
899,211.07
16,902.40
228,854.69
130,856.00
16,575.32
197,932.49
2,475.00
562,381.75
1,960,594.19
$1,532,770.60
$1,583,801.24
$3,116,571.84
$
1,015.00
300.00
$
1,085.00
350.00
$
2,100.00
650.00
$
1,315.00
131.50
$
1,435.00
143.50
$
2,750.00
275.00
1,183.50
$
1,291.50
$
2,475.00
16,902.40
73,083.82
73,406.00
8,312.68
73,999.99
1,183.50
224,499.09
1,061,383.12
* SEAL FUND DETAIL
Seal Fund:
Gillnet
Canne
Total
Less tithe transfer to State General Fund
_ _ __
.
Net Seal Fund receipts _
[ 23 ]
0 0 0' CO
0• 0 0 CO 0 07 07
6
6
c6
I. 6 -4 cO
CO 0 .-93 0 03 co
'0, .0 .0 ,- 0, 0 .0
- o: .c> d - co- 4
$3..
03
V N 'I"
-6
E
C9 co V
E
N
0
44
C
ID
C
.0
'9
LL..
t,
_c
8
a
44-
N.
u'i
16 -0
D
0'c
6'
Z
0
7,,,
0
U
tIl
LL
4.)
LU 0
'0
IX
Cr)
i■ 0
13 E
Z '')
LU
0. 0
x LU
1.1.
."46
>-0
7,
9‘ ,
u
43
O 12'
Il■
CI
LU
X
L.)
C
404
44
tel.
0,
N
0
el
c6
N.:
V
'0 03
cn 0
V
N.
6
co
o
J41
N. 93 CO CO
0 0, .
V' II
- 0. .- 6
003003
N.0 .- V
.6 O. C.i. -0.
- co - 0.
v.) CO .-
0, CO CO
CA V" .0
V' 03
N o:
I.
CO
0'
6 4
CO O.
.0 cl
'
0,
N.
0'
"11-0 9CO ..zr en
43
.0
01
04
0
u-)
.-•
0, CO .0
10 N V'
u' "7 03
N 0 07
V' CO .-
V
CO 04
N
V , CI
09 01
O.
V.
.-
N
.6
N
a ..4.
Cl el
- c6
N
.-.
0.:
4
04
40
.-
1
/
.
1
I
I
I
i
I
01
4
40
LI.
.--
,n
.6.4
69
40
4/1 03 07 C) 0 ;
- 0, • 3 .0 0
:
6
N: 4:i 6
V.
43 IN 0
07 CO 0.
0.;
C.
N.
0'
N
04
0
N
0.
0
9-
i
0 '
i 01 i
0 '
c,ii
C.1
[
1
.- •0 N 0
10NNO
0'
...1
N. co a- -4
CO 0 CO CO
d cc; -4 c:,
93 0, • 3 V
04 0,„ 0 "V
co
CO
C.
co
N
U)
4
6
.- - co 0 01
N 0, N. r... .1.
.6 -ti ri of to
4 cr. 0 V 4
93 CI 0, n .--
W •3
0'
CO .- N
o o. .-- co
.--- N-- N.
CO r..: r.: Ni
6 o, -a 4
0. 4 .0 0,
N.: 0' N. 4-
.0
N.
II
03
N
CO
03
9:1
N
N.
IN
oi- co .= N
0,
6
1 'IN
V]
03
co
`4
0,.
ci
V'
0'
II
40
01 .-- .-0; CO .-0 Ni p.
40 N. .tr
.o '0
U.)
..6
. 0 0,2
N. CO 04
to
V
0,
9t.' .0 04 N.
- - 9
3 07 .-. .-
o•
0
40
04
49
04
03
.-
IN 03
.-V
-4
,CO
03 N. 0 .0
.0 0, N 01
-4 .3 N
.0 0 CO N
0 40, 9-. CO
0,-- o• c6- .4
N.. IN ,- V
.-
,
01
CO
.69.
44
44
.0, •0 N. • 0 04 04
N.
03
0 .0 0, .0
0
0,
°3
N.:
CO
93
Ul
.6
N
14.,
t
1
64
0.: 0: .ci
,- 0 •0
"I's 0 0,
(.4 c•-; Lei-
V„
N.:
.o.
o•
.-
VI
04
V
0
N.
...: M
01 V 0 CO
o3
N. N. 04
-
4
49
0 ..1
N. 0, N V
4 ai oZ o:
0 04 9- 0
N.
N. 10 IN
04 ,--
0
6
c6 6
cs
CO 0
No..'
N N
04
CO C. N -.1'
IIN
00
CI '4I'
..-- 0
04 V CO 04
'° Cl. •0 ‘.°
N.
0..
N:
6 ..7)
o: c•
-
40
04
o
co
"
69
1
,
I
1
0
44
■
I
C0
69
.! 0C
1
7,
=,
Izt
.6..
.'
i .1
c
t
. . 1 ,_ 0,
lEc c
c . o 0'.
0 I0 E a
„, 0. 0
"..;
. 02
... fn
''
',.: To ar 7
al > •',,
Ew
-.,
c a0 .1"
6`1 % -0 ,1 .r_
m
% '2
D
--E
0
<
5 c o .E
C
.03
o
c4 o to
73
ro C
.1'. :a '‘.T3
70. E o3
D
0_ 0
.
;,-,
>
ce
8 o u cu .7. •`; •-
2 -.
= ro
,_ 0
- o
0
o -c 2
a .`-'
u D .
_c col I
._,
,_
.
'
_cLi
r
0
-c
iE
re
IT) .
--e
.
°
_c cn -c
. 0 e
7,
.0
'-
.
Y.
8 1' ;3 li
- ,T., ge )> ,
0
_E ,T, ,--.7cc
e
g-._
I-
, ,„
Z v) -5. 1
'al
oe
[ 24 ]
69
69
CO
I.
N.
40
It)
c.)
6
,-
co
'0
oi
N.
I
N.
0
.3
C.
.3
69.
N
.7
..N
04
1
,
I
1
ei
c6
•3
c‘i
4
40
In
4
1...
co
ui
0
N.
0.69
0 0
N.
04
cc;
"
•0
C.t
.0
ci
0
0:
64
44
.4:
.-.
.-.
IT
,„_
494
0
01
CD
•0
6-
40
0 0,
N
CO
,
"
43...
cs,
co
.0 CO O.
0'
N.
43
-4 oi
VCo 0
66. I.
CO CO 04
44
69
,f)
04 0'
.0 V
04
m
6
07
0,,
CO
CI It
CO I.
.0' ..-
N
'V
04
1
1
N.
N. '- c•-,
sr N. 0,
N6
6
.- 04 CO
V
I .-.
I 0,
' .9
N
CO co
U-i. .-93 0
.-
410
'0
RIB
VN
°:.
to
01
I C° .3..
,c; 6 o
,
9-4
1
01
.
.
04
01 04
40 so'
oi oil
N V
07 N.
■()
•6
6.
0
._
•.5 .-
_
69
N.
46
64
69
cl
494.
N
-4.
-,:t
°:.
CO
Ho
16
0
°
.i.
04
01
69
6
43
,-.
I, 53
0
E.
2 ,r) (2>
N O.
m co
i * 3 -E °
: -0 J
++, ,
'5q.■
,
;:,
.
,
1.2 - E
0,
t :15 e
Lo D o c
' E 0- -0 w
>0 I
7„
4-
0
c o_ m % N.
° E E
61 i';'_1 - o' Lc ' E8_ ',13 la -5
,.° D .. ° ..
co in LT- r
.0)'
w
. .9
? 0
E 2
0 , ...
c
-.01,„,
, ,
. ,..,. c,
t 0
mii
, E -0
°
; > c.
0 _
? I .
',21 ' f:
i; =
•
To
2 a.. , c''
.a . z ,- 3 (7)
a-.
no
0
0 0, N
04 V)0
0,
.-;
.0
04
0
4
0'
.0
4.-
.0
V
el
0'
40
'V
CO
69
40
4.04
N
0 0, 01
co 6 o
.0..
..t
ci
II
'‘:
el
0.
.-
N. 0 .0
CO 01 0'
40
07
CI
0,
494
69
40
VI
9.-
1
I
CO
o.
'of
0
i
oi
-
H
w
w
6'
'or
C
4
0'
ol
c0
...
03
:
I
:\,
g a
0- c`?
cn >,
c ,,
'a '6 2
..--; -0 En
O. X ‘03
E
iZ
w
,,,
0.Q a
0
--....,4-2
t.,co
U
O o8 2 . 8- `E, ;
,. . ,.- 1...I ''-E ...7. a
O.
a
,,,
c- o
›- a U
E _E E . 0
o , .. -, 2 u > - , D =''
,
. E '0 . c
'...7.J.., .-0 c.0 .-4,
.-2 , ..-0
2 -5 _c 1 0 , „, . N
. . ... ,y,
. t., x .,_
`4 '4 E = '-'- a, lu.
5 x i 14 E ° 0 E
Li
44
4.9
N.
N.
•
44
0'
V
,01
°
,,_
44
.6 06 N.:
IN 0 ..0
CO N0,
0
n
4' 73
,7„ 01
cc;
C.,
1
04
N.
°...
C9
.9
.7)
CO
'0
0
! --
ti_'
,_D
.
6
-0 >
r7, e2
*
6.4
07
• c
c
2
03 ,2
8 2 ' i'I
E °2
4'
' '2,
16
17
, oe .
. -.=
. tx
..5 2 E ■- .? E u_
,
'`C.1' 't- = - ;
`. g -6, T,
-0.• C
C
12
c
...-I!
I-.
._
.c
E
-0
<
0
•0
c4
,o
a>
49
er
c
0
c
CO
, IN O.
0... 0'
- 6)
co •0
43
,Ni 0'
N. 0
i
1
:
46
0'
4
4
CO
0
N
04
0
V
N4
oi
0
IN
•c?
C.
4
.- .-- C.,
04 0.• N
04
o
'O
03 0
,-
69
93
V"
ci
0 0 • 04
CO N 0
.3
•6 1.4. 6
N. N. .0 N
6-
CO
V
N
6
40 CO
49
69
40
.0 N. N.
en
'''..
oi - o
0 0, 04
co '00 0
ai n: .0 '0
0
.0
o
ci
0:- c,- '- oi
c. 0
.- .-
494
0'
4
0..
.
.0 N CI 93
.43 N. 0„ V
*9
.-
03
N
0, .- N. CO
V' CO V' V
MMo.
40
oi oi cO oi
N
0i
69
40
ci
-.4
co
07
N
64
V
.IN.r
69
1o6
I I....
ci 6
1 -o- ,s.
. .4. ai 0:1
CI
.--
49
.
,- . 0 0
43 OA N
N.
".1.
0
CO
69.
4.9
.0
69
N.:
_
N: oi 0'
N
CO CO N
N
.-
.43
,Ii 46
0,
CO
69
C.
•0
C.
0
6
Lr)
0
"I
'I
6
.•0
6 6
N
N.
-
0. .5
.4.
49
0 01
"It ,_
.,_
..._
ta .0 cr. co
04 0 .0 0
.6
.- N.:
cr. 5.- CO N
' - to CO .0
N.
0
N
-
N
F
0
r. N.:
V) c.) N
c.,
49
: 0
6
I c0
"
; oi
i 0
0. oi
N N.
07 .-
N.
N. .•.-
0
N.
o:
_
0,
CO
oi
CO
V0)- Ncr. co
oi- 4. 0 4 cos
‹, o3
4 oi
N. 04
01 ul
..- 1.0
N 4-
MCI N.
'-
93
4.9
69
0
cci
OD
^
0
It
1.0 0
N.:
'0 N.
N. N. .13
03 N. O'
v
0'
93
vi ai
4
0'
40
40
v
C'
CO 0 CO
CO ..i. N
4 oi ri
0., V 0
434, ..- 0•
04
40
.40
03
43
04
0,
0.,
co
'‘)
.N
.6
-4
07
0 .0 N
V 04 .-
4.9
0 04
CO ,-.
.-
■
40
.9.
9.-
04
-
04
IICOCOV
d ui 0' oi ei
.0 CO II N CO
co - - N,
'47
-
01
V
.6 ci N .5
c., 'V N ,zr
N
- -
.=• ..- wi- 0:
0:-
6
.0
CO
0
.0
.0„
6
0, 0, 93
0,„ II 0,
03
93
- .
04
: V .0 N. CO
CI V '47 93
i a: v) N N.:
I to V .-- .0
I. CI •- CO .0
, 4 cr:- to- 4
. C') 01 .0 N.
4
10 0
.0 'V
6 oi-
CO CO 1.0
V- O. U)
..4. -4 N
0 0' N
CO IN o
0
0,
64
Co
0.
N
0
,.0
cc;
CO
,--
M.5
c6
M.6
'0 .0 IN
6
N.
N. ci, •6 4)
CO V 40 0,
N. 01 0
N CO N
.- 0
0.
N -I
- ..i. 4:!
N.: 4. ci •N V
.0
CO
II
04
•3
07
'0
6
69
NCO
40
04
04
•
0..
....
69.
N.
1.9.
N.- C 7
(I .._
0
0, 0,
0 0,
1
cr. 0,
, 0 c'-'
I ' 07 0:
1 01 0
I 1 .0 Nt.
C./ 04 .0 0,
'V CV CO N.
,-
o.
N.
CO
0-1
.-,_
69
0.4
oi
.0
6
.0 V ,‘C! O'
CO 0' .-04 07 .0
0 4-- "0
-4. N: OD
N. 03 CO
.-
49
.--
.64
ei cr.
I
0 0
01 .11
M .3
N. ....
.0 .0
6 N.
to . el N
0
.0
40
...9.
1
.6 .6
u)
,-
V7
07
N
._
N.
CO 0' cci
4 0 ."I N "I'
4 6 4"i. •.0 '0
N
-
..1
It)
...t
N .0
'0
.0 IN
40 01
4
.0 CO 904 .- 0
6
N.
0
'91'
03
-4
0
10
43
c'D'
69
6
co co 0 0 CD V
.... CO 93 N 0 CO CO
0, V .- 0
N .0 V .0
W
o c
/
>• s 2
■D
"'
LU
-, g -2
'5 O
Q'
C
I■
0.1
H
li
:
>- - c,
CO
To
■
ir.Y.., '41
10
CI
44
.69
K. 4 6 .co -4 6 0%
90. 14) CO N
N. ei- N vi
07 ._
9- 04 •of
.,-,
0
-
.43
11,
•6
44
7,
.6
0,
co
CO
69
4 O(4- -4 ..0 N 04 'V
.-
0
N.
-- o-,-- Co r:
N.
N
69
10
0
N N.-
co ...I 04
N
0,
.41..
.c
•0
CI 0 01 -0 II N. CO
CO V N. CO V "I 0
-o cO oi a: 6 N N.
N. .0 0 .0 V ,- .0
0 . .- 0, CI .- 03 V'
- N.: N: -I o,' 6 91.
U) CI 04 CO 04 43 N.
-
CO
04
0
•-•
%
CO
0,
0
.-
6
of) c6 4
0N.
•- -I
07 CO V' 0,
4
4
4 cl
01 0 '0 03
.,:r 04 .a. c•-, 0
0, - 0 ,- 0
.9 -4 ai Co 6
03 c-, - 93 0
. 0, CO 10 93 0:.
cO- .5- CO; •-•
co co 4 03
el
0
el.
''
-.,,
Ln
0' 0 CO01 • 3 .0 04
- •6 .6
04 N. N, 0
•3 V 91 .0
...0 N 0
..9
'Z'
,_2' .c
-2 -6-
0 g■
s
t
1
69.
U. .0
V'
0'
6
'0
-4
CO
9
c6
0' N. - NZ
03 CO .0 CD N.
Cs.1 '4T CP 0,
.0
c.i cl,- o di '
,n 0.4 40 .0 93
- N. 07 V .0
9- 93
N
04
co
d.
c 43.
-, o-
=
91'
V 04 04 V
.-
93
9:1
C.
.--
*
0- CO
CO 07
.:i• ei
CO CO
0 .0
0-; .4
03
ai ci N.: Lri 6. - CO
-4. NI ..o N o '07) 0.
0 0 93 CO 04, V 04
.4 4 C') .43 - N N
7
0
$11
!
07
.9
J.-
N.
°...
V
•o
0,
N
6:
CO
N:
V
N
44
0
.
-0
c
N
0
.1
I
1
?
40.
N.
oi
4
r...,
.-.0
co
03
C
0
E
g,i
2
,,,
2,
D
•-•
'5
c
' .-. E
.. 'n a, ro u
t 1' ., -.0
-5 '2"0'7
4-,
4, , i g „c_,
> ›
o xt ii:
'EL 0 --- ■,
E
% -0
- L., 1 10,
-„,- co o , ,t,'
.- di 72 (..)
x
w
7,
4-
a >, .
a_
a,
0
a
E
2
a
a.
~
NUMBER OF EGGS TAKEN AT FISH COMMISSION HATCHERIES
1964-66 BIENNIUM
Year Ending June 30, 1965
Spring
Chinook
Hatchery
Fall
Chinook
Coho
Chum
Steelhead
Big Creek _
------______
Bonneville
Cascade ..
____
Klaskanine __. __
Marion Forks
6,432,937
McKenzie
1,081,785
Total
6,035,260
6,035,260
Alsea
181,896
586,665
7,718,895
3,874,558
3,075,776
8,539,044
7,442,421
15,981,465
7,543,752
7,259,862
14,803,614
267,108
7,085,146
7,352,254
420,918
6,853,855
1,081,785
Nehalem
Ox Bow
Sandy
15,583,487
294,833
15,878,320
332,200
5,590,136
5,922,336
1,755,632
1,755,632
Siletz
__
_____
South Santiam
115,767
Trask
125,623
Total
17,057,035
3,148,921
2,907,531
9,426,546
_
9,426,546
Willamette
36,265,772
41,446,597
181,896
1,007,583
Churn
Steelhead
95,958,883
Year Ending June 30, 1966
Spring
Chinook
Hatchery
Fall
Chinook
Coho
Alsea
Total
3,622,872
3,622,872
359,694
709,054
6,649,903
Big Creek
1,772,903
3,808,252
Bonneville ...
7,106,000
6,051,618
13,157,618
5,788,354
11,506,042
17,294,396
382,991
5,649,548
Cascade
Klaskanine _____
_
Marion Forks
5,807,738
6,032 539
370,200
_
6,177,938
McKenzie
Nehalem
Ox Bow
3,131,405
Sandy ..
—
Siletz _
_
991,486
4,122,891
3,650,707
3,650,707
1,502,496
1,502,496
South Santiam
Trask ___
.
_
.—..
Willamette
Total _____
153,900
807,989
4,954,043
3,992,154
10,143,410
10,143,410
.
16,105,048
18,989,642
[
25 ]
40,775,175
359,694
1,079,254
77,308,813
g0/
t15
g
`.:.,'
m
m
cr
0.
E
t
co)
,
co)
E
`''
'El;
>
1.6
.
E
T.
'E'
i/5
>,
1
E
'-::
E
.3
co>
g
;I,
¢/
...
,,,
3.-
:E
it if7)
t
a,
E
'
E
k
-
M
72
0/
11;
177
,_-
i
,
bi
2
E
,..:
>
i2
c
,.
.0-3
a,
>
zN
=
4,.,.
a,
.3
i'
Ci
ill62
.0,
11
• E
..-',' 2.
co)
.1,
.."
-C
C73
co)
§
ii
i
.3
E2
.6u7 com
'I 3
15
t
E
e '1;,
&
E
;
f.'
8
''.‘4
7:
c , .2
III '''
t
Lt CI i
cu
&
73
73
a. ¢,
.,z
,3 ad
7: %
2
,°,'
> ',.-Nc
.
0C
62
* 2,
:,..,
t
0
t
62
*
,P,
2
?:
,
E.
al
*
a) _,eZ E
co m e 'Eoa
,
_C
E
...= 1"
m
Q.&
c
▪
4 2
t
,_
zo
:13
= E 45
▪
E oE
v■ 2
43
1
r3 4,-''
3
0 , ..cu C
>.
E ,>,', 'ki
.E
Its' iii
,-... !..J ?. g
0.
-0
"30 ..)e
T, E cr5r,--6_
i,Z (-.5
7
a,
.0
c
Y 1 to
z
>
2
.
,
.
:
3
f, 2 L,0 -0
ma, ›.0 2 ,, g., _a
-11 & Li
m
E'
E
:F, ›.
.
.
-0 .;;'
vs
3 c g & . EA
n> 1,'
t; 7 L.) ;
,0 (i) ...; co
E & & 1,
_. -1:1
LC
i . ?
1
21 §
.
a■ ,T, _.,
1.1 1 1 i;-en- c;
2,
0
ii
.
:, .3
_.
ti
w
,. 0 .
0
t
;
z
E ; 8
1i2 f2, . 6 ..: 2 T u '2
;',', L E el -,7,- a,
1-! 6.,!: ,6 6- U cEl EaJu
e2 U .2
5 = ii vi !•
oc
:am (..
:0
'E-rje'E
u
4
2E= :(7,
•
vi 0
g
,
„ 0C
.7.. ? E
E
0/ E 3- 0 0.. E
to n:Z > U1 :E
>.
--- _c 43 .2_ E
E S 3 C 7 0 -E1 E 2 1-6 3 ,%-i .:
a, a)
..• '' 4: -5 1, C ,t
m_L-'
8
8
W,
2 = .3 0 0 % 15 %
.3 i 1
i 1
Z
3-1 1 = Cc
§ 34
1
.
.
6 Z X z t..) *
i
3 4.l
3
co u ›.- ce u i- C.)
u) cura,--..ou0 Z C7 .
N>at
v)
ni
2
D-.
Iti
2
■i3
j -
ix
FE 1
.."7
.c
...,c .
-
r.
;'
1
m
_.
g
-,
,,„
.3e
-.
3
,,?,
8
g
)?.
L
i
,
7,
-
u")
-
l
•I3
0' 0 0 C) 0' CO.- 0. `V 0 .--- .0
ul :1- .0 0, NI 03 NI 0 .13 N. N N N
•
N. 01 0. 0 'V 0 N. CD CO N 0 0 0 ,
70 N N
CC
()...
15 r: 0a
,oci ci 0, pi ai 4 4i - O] r: h: .-0 NNI
N. o. .- P1,.. - 0. - h.
..0 V)
N CO
C)CO
.- 0 N 00 01 4:3 N CO
•
.- vi
.- C)i v.,' u-i O
.
.
....
.. .
,
?
71
:)
24
-
0, N
-
e2
c
-
0
0
al
.1
RS
_C
,
•
,
.
.
.1 ce
N 0
.- N 0 0 0, N.401
0
0.- .-V
N0 .--CI
CO:tN.N.
0 0
C 3 0,
N 03 00 CI
CO' It`VC)"Cl:
..
•
,
.
.
,
,
‘•
.
,
ci c•)Nci - .47 ci ci
h., V
0.0,.0 .cr...LO•- ,3-3
,:r... -,r
.)
.
.-
-
..
oi •0
ci ,i cl:. 0
,0,
0 CO
ln -0, .-,h0
-
.
7
-9
c
23 -
cO C) 0
0'
NI
/ I,/
0i. C
Ci vi
0
0 0 •0
N
.
•
.-- 0 in
r.N. : . U)
r.
0 -a.
V N 0
•0 CO
.
•0 .-
4.2
08
N. .0V
43 el
C*3-
U") 0
0N
Cls
CO '.1".
.0 01
Z
O
N.
N.
0,
0
mi"
O
N
CO `It
OO
W_c
co
.- .4...
.
.--
ei
O
0
6..00
! .-.0 N
els .0 N. co
U.
CO In
03
6 -10
N
01 CO
VI o.
i csi
0-3 O.9
h. NI
N NI NI
0
N 0 0,
1
LI" 1:7,
03
•
71.
C.4 'U
cn
0O
csi
v u-)
0
N.
•0
,r) N.
N. c I
•
-4-
.0
a
.0
ci
Ln
cy,
C
O
i: o_0
S
1 S
,T., = L''' o
E
le 2
`'
[
26 ]
3
22 a3
v
O
-a
cra
co)
E
,0
..=
c
v)
_c ,
"5
o .3
N
I-2
.
3
c
2
i,
E
L.
§
To To
75 73
N. N
-001
0301
N
.6
1-.15 CO
04 N
CO
N
0
co.0
WI
4CO,•-• c..CO
.0 .-0
C)
..V
N
c4
V
co
•
co
03
0.
N.
IN
V
Ot.
CT
N
-
C) COV N
01
•43C003
N.7; 0:.
0.0N
CO 0 1.0
oi - 4
VQ03
410..- 03
V
40
o OD O.
0 CO In
VONOCVN
CO ^
O d 0.3- -0' t: NO 14140.-030.
03
1.0
cp
.0 C) CO CO. 04
0.
.- C.'
C) -
.- N
V
V N
0.
..6
46
g0'
0
N
N-
N
CO 10
C)
0.
e
NO
.-- N
0
,0
...?
40 10 •0 C)
0 O.
V
I., C0 01
0 N 03
.0
4CO
4 V
1.. 4-ri o:
N.40
V .- .- .CO0
[
0
10
•0
CT
"-
E
2
U
.-›...
0
--•
0...
04
01 10
0 CO
N
c..
;
4
g
, N03N.
N
-
LL
8
4
.c7,
1
ii
0. 03
0
N
C) N
44
.'O
'''
4.-..
rl
4g
oi
01
4-
! I,
'
0
.-
1 A
I
i
4-
CO • ■
i
I
'
0
0
1
01
!
I
'4 Flr .7) I I 1z*:. 94
. 7, ."3, I VI V
0'
gf
0' 3 c-,; !
I
V
c0
, 04 c.,
FOI i I 1 i i 0,0
i :i •
a
I 0 N. "
: N. 4-0'
C)
/ / .-1 4 .. N
1
V
11'
CO 01
I `11
0
CT
c, '.[ ..4. N
I I
C)
1
03
V V 0 03
0 N. 141 0 CO
CO
CO V 0 04
ci 40
0, N
40 4
o)
1)
03 -4
N
He; 04
I CO
In
1, 10
,..,
..,, to
0
: 0,1.... r)
1m
.3- 4 !.
1 114
cu;":4 I
1 ''
i
1
I
.0
U
•
i
g
N
F.
.0
8
N.
17
ol
1
I
II
1
i
co,
21
cst
.° :2
C) I I
uy)
N
0
C)
c.0
co..
C)
I
..o
el
10
.0r
M
d
0
,. . .
0
0
N
.-N
co
.--
k '
.
r,
MCI 0, N.-00 N CO
.0 0.
C. 0
V 4.0
10
01 01
O. 43
.- 03
IT C)
N 10
V
-1, .-Po: a: ci
-4.- c-i' r":' .43C00.04.04100
N
N •-• 03
CO V V. 'V N.
0
ic,r3r.'
(-.1
j
I
I
N
1
•
•
.0
CO
V
N
CO
0 CO
N V
C7
0:
0.I
V ..., I
1
N.
0
C)
0:
8
C)
1
E
21,
5
0
I)O9
C
C.
co
u
0
E
C
S
g
Z0
[
27 ]
co
43
0.
" '
C
m
g 1
-
1
CO
0N
O
cn
cql.
O-
an
ul
,
mn
OREGON COMMERCIAL LANDINGS OF FOODFISH AND SHELLFISH
BY CALENDAR YEAR
All Figures in Pounds
1960
1962
1961
1963
1964
1965
Cod (true)
236,443
104,227
18,861
67,179
200,512
191,191
Flounders
382,894
581,503
973,135
524,074
608,004
481,794
Halibut
340,598
350,114
341,648
175,297
85,415
83,876
Lingcod
755,187
706,777
840,420
540,677
785,195
896,103
3,540,336
7,132,161
6,206,370
5,605,442
5,997,218
3,960,920
Pacific Ocean perch
2,784,788
4,566,538
5,805,282
7,994,076
9,569,039
13,677,020
Rockfish
6,201,250
4,935,625
7,183,844
4,919,333
4,420,745
4,370,503
313,829
390,603
270,332
362,533
263,276
222,251
4,312,869
4,309,615
4,505,656
4,766,007
3,986,532
5,169,418
21,302
28,804
28,928
8,963
14,503
4,637
984,398
2,600,923
2,619,918
3,421,340
5,815,544
6,400,962
218,679
Mink food
Sablefish
Salmon and Steelhead:
Chinook
Chum _ _
Coho
Humpback .
62
207
23,640
77
Sockeye __ _
291,445
106,200
33,465
29,919
50,213
11,873
Steelhead
540,352
601,431
557,697
797,479
361,226
416,184
400,008
759,996
1,236,375
1,309,329
784,062
786,387
132,236
183,879
318,385
173,622
326,858
460,638
3,651,907
Shad
.
Smelt
Sole:
Dover
5,330,914
4,076,429
4,491,895
5,396,970
5,614,706
English
2,318,635
1,795,522
2,287,964
1,955,889
1,566,060
1,648,747
Petrale
2,258,441
1,844,598
2,698,412
2,311,801
1,889,079
1,817,161
Other
1,648,442
1,057,163
1,578,422
1,127,670
948,847
746,563
28,670
35,439
53,493
68,798
46,500
41,466
_
Striped bass _
Sturgeon:
Green
44,976
97,481
64,566
40,057
47,472
37,600
White
113,544
109,786
136,152
151,513
112,827
112,646
4,562,595
3,249,763
8,935,314
11,409,254
4,455,274
12,122,434
493,976
258,940
249,091
35,035
56,806
*1,565,609
38,038,190
39,883,724
51,435,625
53,215,897
48,005,990
59,096,569
Bay
82,438
64,697
106,487
84,773
62,682
49,567
Razor_ _
31,865
17,991
26,463
24,100
34,796
73,082
Crabs
9,480,425
9,204,025
5,737,800
4,137,525
3,357,017
7,109,594
Shrimp
1,156,797
1,452,274
2,777,023
3,027,746
5,279,494
1,575,152
8,647,773
7,274,144
8,733,989
8,807,395
60,083,398
60,490,041
56,739,979
67,903,964
Tuna
Other fish
Total fish
Shellfish:
Clams:
Total shellfish
10,751,525
10,738,987
Total
48,789,715
50,622,711
• Hake for 1965 - 1,498,910 pounds.
[
28 ]