International Arbitration – A Practical Guide to November 16, 2010

International Arbitration – A Practical Guide to
Arbitrating in Europe, Asia and Latin America
Ian Meredith, Rich Paciaroni, Wojciech Sadowski, Raja Bose
November 16, 2010
Copyright © 2010 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved.
Presenters
Ian Meredith
Partner
London
Raja Bose
Partner
Singapore
Wojciech Sadowski
Of Counsel
Warsaw
Rich Paciaroni
Partner
Pittsburgh
+44.20.7360.8171
ian.meredith@klgates.
com
656.507.8125
raja.bose@klgates.com
+48.22.653.4201
wojciech.sadowski@klgate
s.com
412.355.6767
rich.paciaroni@klgates
.com
1
Overview
ƒ But I Thought Arbitration Was Supposed to be a
Flexible System?
ƒ Tribunal Selection
ƒ Interim Measures
ƒ Written Advocacy
ƒ Document Production
ƒ The Role of Witnesses in International Arbitration
ƒ The Hearing
ƒ Q&A
2
But I Thought Arbitration Was Supposed to be
a Flexible System?
ƒ To what extent is there now an established best
practice in International Commercial Arbitration?
ƒ The role of the “guidelines”—Do we read too
much into them?
ƒ What happens when the “Arbitration Terrorist”
meets the “Town Elder”?
3
Tribunal Selection
Impartiality and Independence
ƒ UNCITRAL Rules: Disclosure of
circumstances giving rise to “justifiable doubts”
The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in
International Arbitration (May 2004)
ƒ Non-Waivable Red List
ƒ Waivable Red List
ƒ Orange List
ƒ Green List
4
Tribunal Selection – Cont’d.
Selection by different arbitral institutions
ƒ ICC Rules – proposal by National Committee
ƒ LCIA Rules –various factors such as nature
of transaction and dispute; location and
language of parties
ƒ SIAC Rules – no ex parte communication
relating to case
5
Tribunal Selection – Cont’d.
Current Issues
ƒ Lack of perceived impartiality / cultural
sensitivity
ƒ Counsel and arbitrators from same set of
chambers in London
ƒ Jivraj v. Hashwani (CA) –
Employer/Employee relationship; no
discrimination?
6
Interim Measures
ƒ Importance of interim measures from the legal and
business standpoints
ƒ Where to apply:
ƒ State courts and/or arbitral tribunals
ƒ Pros and cons
ƒ Conditions of a successful application
ƒ Available remedies
ƒ How interim is interim or when do the effects of an
interim measure cease
7
Pleadings
ƒ Different jurisdictions, people, approaches
ƒ Primacy of substance above form
ƒ Emergence of lingua franca of int’l arbitration
writing
ƒ Notice of arbitration v. statement of claim
ƒ Further pleadings
ƒ ‘The word is not enough’ or what comes along the
submissions
8
Document Production
ƒ The “Conventional” approach under the IBA Rules
(June 2010 version)
ƒ “documents relied upon” to be produced alongside
submissions
ƒ Requests to Produce – different thoughts on the
application of Article 3(3) test – “… relevant to the
case and material to its outcome”
ƒ The sign says “No Fishing” – What does “… a
narrow and specific requested category” mean in
practice?
9
Document Production – Cont’d.
ƒ Article 9(2) bases for withholding production including
the question of the law under which the Tribunal
should determine privilege - the “closest connection
test” in practice
ƒ The Redfern Schedule
ƒ Electronic documents in International Arbitration
ƒ Third party production (Article 3(9))
ƒ Ancillary proceedings under 28 USC 1781 and its
sister process
ƒ Protecting confidentiality (Articles 3(13) and 9(4))
10
Use of Fact Witnesses in International
Commercial Arbitration
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Informant vs. Witness
Direct testimony usually in written statements
Witness must appear for cross-examination
Typically no US style depositions
IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence – Art. 4
11
Use of Expert Witnesses in International
Commercial Arbitration
ƒ Skeptical view of party appointed experts
ƒ IBA Rules – Art. 5
ƒ Tribunal appointed expert may be appointed
ƒ Rare occasion now, maybe more in the future
ƒ IBA Rules – Art. 6
ƒ No US style depositions
ƒ “Hot tubbing” experts is trendy
12
The Hearing
The Speakers share their thoughts on what parties can
expect at the evidentiary hearing.
13
Questions?
14