The Effects of Strain Variation on Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection and Immunity 13 Sande C1*, Cane P2, Nokes DJ1,3 1.KEMRI/Wellcome 1 KEMRI/W ll T Trustt R Research hP Programme, Kilifi K Kenya 2 2. H Health lth P Protection t ti A Agency, L London d UK 3 3. U University i it off Warwick Coventry Warwick, Coventry,UK UK *Corresponding author address: KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 230 – 80108 Kilifi, Kenya. kemri-wellcome org Email: csande@kilifi csande@kilifi.kemri-wellcome.org Objectives Introduction A, A 3 -5 6 - 17 18+ 0 -2 3- 5 B, A 6 - 17 log (10)) ND50 0 -2 18+ B, B 6 - 17 18+ Infecting: RSV B(2003 B(2003,2008), 2008) Test: RSV B(2008) 3 2.5 2 1.5 3 -5 6 - 17 18+ 0 -2 3- 5 6 - 17 0 -2 18+ 3 -5 6 - 17 18+ 0 -2 3- 5 6 -17 18+ age (months) Acute sera Convalescent sera Acute sera Convalescent sera • Generally, Generally the neutralising antibody response increases with age age. Convalescent titres are significantly higher when the group identity of the test and infecting strain are matched. Fig 5. Acute/convalescent responses from RSV infections arising in the 2000s. (a) sera from RSV A infections between 2005 and 2006 reacted against a 2006 RSV A strain (left panel) and an RSV A strain from 1961 (right panel). (b) sera from RSV B infections in 2008 reacted against a 2008 RSV B strain (right panel) as well as an RSV B strain from 1960 (left panel) •The magnitude of response did not vary despite the temporal distances between test and infecting strains. strains Four fold seroconversion rates in seronegative infants (acute titres < 130) Discussion A, B 500 1 ,000 1,50 00 A, A • We found evidence that RSV antibodies are strongly group specific p a and da are poo poorly y cross o reactive. 41 40 33 31 20 18 16 11 9 10 7 6 5 4 2 1 41 40 33 31 20 18 16 11 9 10 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 0 B A B, B B B, •Supports hypothesis of immune mediated group replacement •Suggests future vaccines based on one strain may alter RSV epidemiology. epidemiology 41 40 0 33 3 31 20 18 8 16 6 11 7 6 5 4 2 1 41 40 0 33 3 31 20 18 8 16 6 11 10 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 0 • Despite over 40 years of antigenic drift, no significant loss of serological recognition was evident. age (months) Notes: ages on X axis represent the mean responses o f all individ uals within that ag e catergor y panel heading p g s represen p t the infecting g group g p and the test gro g up p re spectively p y Acute sera Convalescent sera pan els A,A and A,B represent homologous/heterologo us resp onses in the same sampl e set, simil arly for panels B,A and B,B Fig 2. Seroconversions in seronegative infants/children mainly occurred when the infecting and test groups were matched Effect of the 20 amino acid duplication on the neutralising response Neutralisation of a BA strain by sera from infections with RSV Bs with/without duplication Infecting: RSV B without duplication Infecting: RSV B with duplication • The magnitude of the neutralising 35 3.5 response against an RSV B strain that contained the 20 amino acid duplication did not differ between individuals infected with RSV B strains with or without the duplication. 3 2.5 2 3 -5 6 -17 18+ 0 -2 3-5 6 - 17 Fig 3. Age matched responses against RSV B BA strain (containing the duplication) by infants/children who were infected by RSV B with/without the duplication Neutralising antibody responses in the convalescent phase T t Vi Test Virus G Group neutrralising titre e 6 8 10 Infecting group (conv phase titres) (Titre 95% CI) (Titre, A 4 B P value 0 10 20 30 age (months) 40 50 Fig 4. 4 Relationship between age and neutralising titre A B 6 93 (6.75 6.93 (6 75-7 7.12) 12) 5 78 (5.57 5.78 (5 57-5 5.99) 99) 6 61(6 0-6 6.61(6.0 6.64) 64) 0.026 • The 20 amino acid duplication did not result in loss of serological recognition g 3852 18+ Relationship between neutralsing antibody titre and age •Future vaccines may not need periodic updates. Duration of group/cross specific neutralising responses in i primary i & secondary d infections i f ti Acute sera Convalescent sera Note: th e test virus in both panel s is an RSV B con taini ng the dup lication •Suggests S antigenic i i d drift if iis not a mechanism h i ffor immune escape Ongoing work •This observation was evident in all age classes l ttested t d 2 • Neutralising titres were determined using the Plaque Reduction and Neutralisation Assay as previously described (Coates,1966). W adopted d t d th d tto countt • We the Eli Elispott reader plaques which significantly increased throughput without sacrificing accuracy. •Neutralising eut a s g ttitres t es were e e calculated ca cu ated using us g tthe e Spearman-Karber method (Cohen et al, 2007). 2007) Results are expressed as neutralising dose 50, ND50 (+/- 95% CL) log (10) N ND50 Infecting: RSV B (2003 (2003,2008), 2008) Test: RSV B (1960) Methods Plaque Reduction & Microneutralisation c o eut a sat o Assay ssay 3- 5 3.5 age (months) • A nasal specimen and acute blood were collected from children admitted to KDH with WHO defined severe or very severe pneumonia. Samples were screened for RSV Ag by immunofluorescent antibody test. Convalescent blood was collected from RSV positives. 0 -2 Neutralisation of a contemporary RSV B strain (2008) vs RSV B (8/60 - 1960) Fig 1. Heterologous and homologous neutralising antibody responses across different age classes. 0 -2 Sample set 18+ Acute sera Convalescent sera (b) A, B Panel headings denote infecting group & test group respectively At the population level, immunity to primary i f ti infections will ill be b strongly t l group specific. Responses to contemporary infections will ill be poorly poo l cross c oss reactive against g older strains. We investigated group & strain specific antibody responses following RSV infections in children aged 0 to 47 months during RSV epidemics of 2006, 2006 2007 ((dominated by y RSV A)) and 2003,2008 (dominated by RSV B) in Kilifi Dist District ict Hospital (KDH) (KDH), a rural hospital on the Kenyan coast. 6 - 17 age (months) log (10) RSV ND50 3 -5 age (months) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 0 -2 We W h hypothesized: th i d 0 -2 500 0 1,000 1,500 1.5 3.5 3 5 3 2.5 2 1.5 RSV V ND5 0 2.5 Homologous & heterologous neutralising antibody responses Antigenic drift within attachment and Fusion proteins There are underlying mechanisms through which temporal selection pressures confer a transmission advantage to one group relative to the other at a particular point in time (White ett al, l 05) 05). Decline & extinction of strains is driven by immune pressure A ti Antigenic i d drift ift might i ht b be driven d i by y immunity y 35 3.5 RSV group specific neutralising antibody response Cyclical alterations in dominance between its two main antigenic groups, groups A and B. Emergence and extinction of within-group within group strains & periodically global dominance off recently emergent strains This suggests that : Infecting: 2006 RSV A strains, Test: A2 Results (eg a recent 20amino acid duplication in the G protein of RSV B isolates that has attained global dominance). Infecting: 2006 RSV A strains, Tes t: 2006 GA2 strain 2 10 Neutralisation of a contemporary RSV A strain (2006) vs A2 (1961) 3. Determine the serological effect of the recent 20 amino acid 3 duplication log (1 10) ND50 (a) 3 8 RSV epidemiology id i l iis characterized by: Effect of over 40 years of antigenic drift on the neutralising g response p 2.Determine cross reactivity y between RSV A/B / strains from the 2000s with RSV A/B strains from the 1960s. 9 Neutralising antibodies are directed at two variable surface expressed p g glycoproteins, y p , G and F. 1. Quantify homologous and heterologous group neutralising antibody responses following primary and subsequent infection and estimate cross neutralisation titres 8 g RSV re-infects throughout life despite the development of an effective ff ti b butt ttransient i t neutralizing t li i antibody response. response Results 6 28 (6.11 6.28 (6 11-7 7.1) 1) 0.003 Table 1. Age adjusted homologous and heterologous neutralising antibody titres (titres expressed as natural log) • Age adjusted homologous antibody titres were significantly higher than the heterologous titres in the convalescent phase (Table 1). Analysis of children >5 months (to remove influence of maternal antibody) showed (a) homologous group A titres to be significantly higher than heterologous titres against i RSV A ((p<0.05) 0 05) and d (b) h homologous l group B titres i to b be higher hi h than h heterologous h l titres i ((p value <0.005). • Measurement of RSV A and B neutralising antibodies in a cohort of infants recruited at birth and followed up to 2 years of age •The relative magnitude of RSV A and RSV B specific antibodies at all time points within during follow up p will be tested •The relative duration of these responses following an antigen confirmed fi d iinfection f ti primary and subsequent infections will be measured •Some preliminary data (for RSV A specific antibodies only) are shown on the right. g RSV A Neut ralising ant ibody t it re 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 A A2 ELISA ant ibody 4.3 3.8 33 3.3 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.3 A 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 age (mo nths) 3866 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 4 35 3.5 A 3 25 2.5 2 15 1.5 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 5034 1000 3.3 800 2.8 A 600 2.3 400 1.8 200 0 1.3 0 5 10 15 20 25 Note: o e red ed a arrow o indicates d a es a an a antigen ge confirmed o ed infection. e o ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RSV research group-kilifi, parents/guardians of infants who donated samples, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, The Wellcome Trust for generous support (Grant refs 083085 (PhD Studentship) and 084633 (Programme Grant). 30