1. What is your gender?
61 %
39 %
1
2
2. What is your primary regional perspective?
1. Africa
24 %
2. Asia
22 %
3. Latin America
25 %
4. Europe/ North America/ Australia
29 %
3. What is your primary professional affiliation?
1. Government/Multilateral Organization
40 %
2. Private Sector
8%
3. Civil Society
29 %
4. Research
23 %
4. Which is the most urgent area for agreement in REDD+
negotiations – finance or rules?
1. Mainly finance
15 %
2. Both, but agreement on finance is more urgent
34 %
3. Equally urgent
19 %
4. Both, but agreement on rules is more urgent
26 %
5. Mainly rules
6%
5. What should be the criteria for allocating international
funding – emission reductions or non-carbon benefits?
1. Mainly based on emission reductions
22 %
2. Both, but with emphasis on emissions reductions
30 %
3. Equally important
19 %
4. Both, but with emphasis on non-carbon benefits
24 %
5. Mainly based on non-carbon benefits
5%
6. What is the most important domestic constraint on
REDD+?
1. Lack of clear forest tenure
15 %
2. Lack of institutions for coordination across sectors
20 %
3. Lack of institutions and capacity for MRV
10 %
4. Lack of political will or motivation for action
42 %
5. Lack of institutions for REDD+ finance and benefit-sharing
13 %
6. What is the most important domestic
constraint on REDD+?
Lack of clear forest
tenure
Lack of institutions for
coordination across
sectors
Africa
Lack of institutions and
capacity for MRV
Lack of political will or
motivation for action
0%
10 %
20 %
30 %
40 %
Lack of institutions for
REDD+ finance and
benefit-sharing
6. What is the most important domestic
constraint on REDD+?
Lack of clear forest
tenure
Lack of institutions for
coordination across
sectors
Asia
Lack of institutions and
capacity for MRV
Lack of political will or
motivation for action
0%
20 %
40 %
60 %
Lack of institutions for
REDD+ finance and
benefit-sharing
6. What is the most important domestic
constraint on REDD+?
Lack of clear forest
tenure
Lack of institutions for
coordination across
sectors
Latin
America
Lack of institutions and
capacity for MRV
Lack of political will or
motivation for action
0%
10 %
20 %
30 %
40 %
Lack of institutions for
REDD+ finance and
benefit-sharing
6. What is the most important domestic
constraint on REDD+?
Lack of clear forest
tenure
Lack of institutions for
coordination across
sectors
Europe/
North
America/
Australia
Lack of institutions and
capacity for MRV
Lack of political will or
motivation for action
0%
20 %
40 %
60 %
80 %
Lack of institutions for
REDD+ finance and
benefit-sharing
7. What is the most important international constraint on
REDD+?
1. demand for commodities that convert or degrade forests
21 %
2. insufficient North-South financial transfers
11 %
3. lack of an overall climate agreement and rules for REDD+
44 %
4. availability of finance for activities that convert or degrade forests
10 %
5. lack of a market for forest carbon credits
14 %
8. At what level is increased attention and investment
most urgent and important?
1. national level
26 %
2. jurisdictional level
25 %
3. landscape level
19 %
4. community level
27 %
5. the current allocation is appropriate.
3%
8. At what level is increased attention and
investment most urgent and important?
Government/Multilateral
Organization
0%
national level
landscape level
the current allocation is appropriate.
10 %
20 %
jurisdictional level
community level
30 %
40 %
8. At what level is increased attention and
investment most urgent and important?
Private Sector
0%
10 %
20 %
national level
landscape level
the current allocation is appropriate.
30 %
40 %
jurisdictional level
community level
50 %
60 %
8. At what level is increased attention and
investment most urgent and important?
Civil Society
0%
5%
10 %
national level
landscape level
the current allocation is appropriate.
15 %
20 %
25 %
jurisdictional level
community level
30 %
35 %
8. At what level is increased attention and
investment most urgent and important?
Research
0%
5%
10 %
national level
landscape level
the current allocation is appropriate.
15 %
20 %
jurisdictional level
community level
25 %
30 %
9. What is the highest priority for attention to REDD+
safeguards and synergies?
1. Land tenure and rights
51 %
2. Poverty
26 %
3. Gender equality
3%
4. Biodiversity
8%
5. Food security
12 %
9. What is the highest priority for attention to
REDD+ safeguards and synergies?
land tenure and
rights
poverty
Male
gender equality
biodiversity
Female
food security
0%
20 %
40 %
60 %
10. What is the highest priority for addressing commodity
supply chain impacts?
1. Link to sustainable jurisdictions in forest countries
27 %
2. Commodity-specific roundtables and voluntary certification
10 %
3. Voluntary corporate commitments to responsible sourcing
8%
4. Financiers sensitized to deforestation risk
18 %
5. Demand-side policies in consumer countries
37 %
11. What is the highest priority for action in forest countries?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Link REDD+ to poverty reduction, food security,
and adaptation to climate change
Strengthen transparency of forest-related
information and accountability
18 %
Link REDD+ to transformational change with
respect to tenure, community rights, and gender
22 %
Strengthen rules for
benefit-sharing
4%
Link supply chain and REDD+ metrics at
jurisdictional levels
13 %
43 %
12. What is the highest priority for international action?
1. Commit significant payment-for-performance funding
26 %
2. Accelerate negotiations toward an overall climate agreement
40 %
3. Remove deforestation from global commodity supply chains
21 %
4. Make remotely-sensed data on forests more accessible
3%
5. Create markets for forest carbon credits
10 %