15 January 2015
Practice Groups:
Environmental, Land
and Natural
Resources
Pennsylvania’s Act 162 Creates Alternative to
Riparian Buffers for Compliance with Clean Streams
Law
By David J. Raphael and Brigid R. Landy
In October 2014, the Pennsylvania legislature passed and the governor signed Act 162 of
2014, which amended the Clean Streams Law. Effective December 21, 2014, developers
proposing an earth-disturbance activity near special protection waters now have a new
option for compliance.
The change pertains to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
stormwater construction permits required under 25 Pennsylvania Code Chapter 102 for
earth-disturbance activity occurring within 150 feet of a special protection (high quality or
exceptional value) river, stream, creek, lake, pond, or reservoir. While a riparian buffer used
to be mandatory under these circumstances, a person, in applying for a permit, can now
choose an alternative method as long as they can show that the method is at least as
effective as the buffer. Where the proposed earth-disturbance activity is within 100 feet of
special protection waters, however, an offset requirement is triggered. This means, if the
applicant chooses the alternative method, the applicant may have to offset any reduction in
the buffer zone that occurs within 100 feet of the stream with a replacement buffer elsewhere
along special protection waters in the same drainage list and as close as feasible to the area
of the disturbance. This change impacts permit applications submitted on or after December
21, 2014.
What is a riparian buffer?
A riparian buffer is a strip of land that runs parallel along the edge of a water body with the
goal of helping to shade, protect, and improve the water’s quality by filtering runoff from
activities that take place on nearby land. The strip contains a variety of native plants meant
to secure the bank of the water body from erosion, filter surface runoff, and provide habitat
for birds and other small creatures. The shade from the vegetation can also help to protect
aquatic life by maintaining the natural temperature of the water. Riparian forest buffers are
defined as those that also include native trees and shrubs and provide significant canopy
cover. Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) has promulgated
regulations that establish the minimum requirements for each type of buffer. 1 To qualify as a
forest buffer under the regulations, the buffer must, among other criteria, provide at least
60% uniform canopy cover. 2
1
2
See 25 Pa. Code § 102.14(b)-(c).
See 25 Pa. Code § 102.14(b).
Pennsylvania’s Act 162 Creates Alternative to Riparian
Buffers for Compliance with Clean Streams Law
What was previously required?
Prior to the change, holders of a NPDES stormwater construction permit were prohibited
from conducting earth-disturbance activities within 150 feet of a water body if the project site
was located in a special protection watershed.3 They were also required to “protect any
existing riparian buffer[.]” 4 If there were waters within the watershed that were failing to attain
their designated uses, permittees were required to ensure the existence of a riparian forest
buffer along the banks of the water body by protecting any existing riparian forest buffer,
converting an existing riparian buffer into a riparian forest buffer, or installing a riparian forest
buffer.5 Applicants for a permit may have qualified for an exemption from these
requirements.6
What does the new law say?
Where a riparian buffer or riparian forest buffer had been required in the past, Act 162
creates a new option for developers. A developer can choose another pollution control
strategy if it can be shown to be “substantially equivalent” in effectiveness to the buffer. In
addition, where the developer chooses the alternative option for a project located within a
special protection watershed, and the proposed earth disturbance is within 100 feet of any
stream, lake, or river, the developer must “offset any reduction in the total square footage of
the buffer zone . . . with a replacement buffer elsewhere along special protection waters . . .” 7
The offset buffer must be in the same drainage list and as close as feasible to the area of
disturbance, and at a ratio of one-to-one.8
What does Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection say about
the change?
PADEP has issued an “Implementation Plan” as interim guidance on Act 162 as it considers
a rulemaking to merge the precepts of that statute with existing regulations. According to the
agency, which is responsible for administering the Clean Steams Law, Act 162 only applies
to individual NPDES stormwater construction permitted projects located within 150 feet of a
river, stream, creek, lake, pond, or reservoir designated high quality or exceptional value.
Under the Implementation Plan, a permit applicant can choose to implement a riparian buffer
or riparian forest buffer, depending on which is required under the circumstances, as
described above. Alternatively, the applicant may complete an equivalency demonstration
showing that they will use alternative best management practices (BMP) that are functionally
equivalent to the applicable buffer.
The Implementation Plan, tracking Act 162, also provides that, for projects involving earth
disturbance within 100 feet of a special protection water body, if the applicant chooses a
BMP other than the riparian buffer, they must install an offset, replacement riparian buffer
elsewhere along special protection waters in the same drainage list. The replacement buffer
3
25 Pa. Code. § 102.14(a)(1).
Id.
5
See 25 Pa. Code § 102(a)(2).
6
See 25 Pa. Code § 102.14(d) (exceptions).
7
See 35 P.S. § 691.402(c)(2).
8
35 P.S. § 691.402.
4
2
Pennsylvania’s Act 162 Creates Alternative to Riparian
Buffers for Compliance with Clean Streams Law
must be as close as feasible to the area of disturbance at a ratio of one-to-one. Moreover,
according to the Implementation Plan, the replacement buffer must meet the requirements of
25 Pa. Code § 102.14(g), which address permanent protection of riparian buffers.
The Implementation Plan also stresses that there are no waivers or exceptions from these
“replacement riparian buffer offsetting” requirements.
According to PADEP, other than changing the riparian buffer requirements, Act 162 does not
alter the regulatory framework of Chapter 102.
What is the impact on other types of permits and pre-existing exemptions?
Notably, by its terms, Act 162 does not impact other types of permits issued under Chapter
102, such as erosion and sediment control permits for oil and gas activities, timber
harvesting, and road maintenance. Additionally, to the extent that certain earth-disturbance
activities were previously exempt from the riparian buffer requirements, those exemptions
remain in place under the statute. One such exemption covers activities that do not require
an NPDES permit under Chapter 102,9 such as oil and gas activities involving less than five
acres of earth disturbance. 10 There is likewise an exemption for oil and gas, timber
harvesting, or mining activities that require site restoration pursuant to Chapters 78 and 86–
90 of the Pennsylvania Code. 11
What to watch for:
Applicants for NPDES stormwater construction permits should review the new requirements
and carefully consider their options when their proposed earth-disturbance activities are
within 150 feet of special protection waters.
Authors:
David J. Raphael
dave.raphael@klgates.com
+1.717.231.4574
Brigid R. Landy
brigid.landy@klgates.com
+1.717.231.4573
9
See 25 Pa. Code § 102.14(d)(1)(iii).
See 25 Pa. Code § 102.5(c).
11
See 25 Pa. Code § 102.14(d)(1)(vii).
10
3
Pennsylvania’s Act 162 Creates Alternative to Riparian
Buffers for Compliance with Clean Streams Law
Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Brisbane Brussels Charleston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Doha Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt
Harrisburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Melbourne Miami Milan Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto Paris
Perth Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Francisco São Paulo Seattle Seoul Shanghai Singapore Spokane
Sydney Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. Wilmington
K&L Gates comprises more than 2,000 lawyers globally who practice in fully integrated offices located on five
continents. The firm represents leading multinational corporations, growth and middle-market companies, capital
markets participants and entrepreneurs in every major industry group as well as public sector entities, educational
institutions, philanthropic organizations and individuals. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations,
practices and registrations, visit www.klgates.com.
This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in
regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer.
© 2015 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.
4