Interannual variability of tropospheric water vapour

advertisement
Interannual variability of
tropospheric water vapour
Mark McCarthy (Met Office)
Ralf Toumi (Imperial college, London)
Simon Tett (Met Office)
Thanks to Darren Jackson (etl, NOAA)
1
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Introduction
2
„
Humidity is a critical component of the climate
system.
„
Variability is poorly documented on annual to
decadal timescales.
„
Principle mode of variability is related to ENSO.
„
Look at regional aspects of humidity response to
ENSO by season. Review interpretations of
trends.
„
Caution: we are discussing relative humidity not
absolute humidity.
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Data
„
High-resolution InfraRed Sensor (HIRS)
channel 12 measures 6.7µm water vapour
emission.
„
Sensitive to RH and temperature between
approx. 500hPa and 200hPa - FTRH.
„
Major uncertainties stem from
– Inter-satellite bias.
– Conversion algorithm.
– Cloud clearing.
3
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
HIRS Relative Humidity Climatology − DJF 1979−98
30N
0
30S
0
90E
10
20
180
Relative Humidity %
30
40
90W
50
60
0
70
HIRS Relative Humidity Climatology − JJA 1979−98
30N
0
30S
0
90E
10
20
180
Relative Humidity %
30
40
90W
50
60
0
70
Mean Distribution of FTRH (%) for DJF (top) and JJA (bottom)
4
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
EOF analysis
„
EOF analysis of 20-year time-series of each
season. Only physically identifiable mode is related
to ENSO.
„
DJF:
– Variance explained - 25%
– PC time-series - Niño3.4 r = 0.87
„
JJA:
– Mixed modes (15%, 13% of variance)
– PC1 time-series - Niño3.4 r = 0.75
– PC2 time-series - Niño3.4 (lead 2 seasons) r = -0.72
5
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Composite difference analysis
„
Select strongest +ve and -ve events based on Niño3.4
index of pacific SSTs
„
NCEP re-analysis provides velocity potential, wind vector,
and temperature fields
„
Caution: few strong La Niña in observed period. Two
‘protracted’ El Niño events
El Niño
La Niña
1982/83
1987/88
1991/92
1994/95
6
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
1984/85
1988/89
1995/96
Winter (DJF) Composite
2
0
0
−0
0.5
−1
−3
3
1
0.5
0
.5
0
30N
−0.5
−2
Composite El Nino − La Nina DJF UTRH
5
01.
0
2
0.5
0
180
UTRH (%)
5
−10
−5
−3
−0.5
1
90E
−1
30S
−2
0
−0.5
0
−4
−1
4
0.5
3
1
0
90W
3
5
0
10
Boreal winter (DJF) composite difference map of HIRS UTRH (filled
colour) for significant regions at the 5% level. Over-plotted are 0.2σ
level velocity potential contours, (*106m2/s) solid contours are positive,
dashed contours are negative and vector wind arrows at 300hPa.
7
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Separating Temperature and
Water Vapour
„
Define RH as:
„
We find:
„
ea′ + ea
RH ′ + RH =
es′ + es
es′
RH t′ = − RH
es
and
RH w′ =
Substituting and rearranging:
RH t′RH w′
RH ′ = RH t′ + RH w′ +
RH
8
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
es
RH − RH
es
Estimated temperature component of FTRH composite
3 5
0
−3
−5
−3
−10
−3
30oS
−10
−5
5 5
−5
−10
−5
−3
−3
3
5
3
o
180
Relative humidity (%)
−3
3
5
© Crown copyright
−−35
10
03/0045b
90 E
10
5
10
5
o
3
10
5
3
3
3
3
−5
−5
5
0
9
10
5
53
5
3
5
−10
3
−5
−5
−3
0
−1
−5
5
30 S
3
5
5
5
−−3
o
3
−−35
−3−5
−3
0
−3
0
−3
(b)
−3
3
30 N
90oW
180
Relative humidity (%)
Estimated water vapour component of FTRH composite
3
53
−3
5
3
90oE
0
o
−5
−1 −5
0
−3
(a)
5
−3
30 N
−3
−5 −3
3
o
3
90 W
5
0
10
Upper tropospheric
temperature
„
Estimate sat. vap. press. from NCEP reanalysis
temperatures.
„
50%-70% of RH anomaly in East Pacific can be
explained through temperature changes.
„
30°N-30°S El Niño-La Niña DJF
– Composite difference -0.62 (RHt=-2.4, Rhw=+1.87)
– Extreme events 82/83 (-1.11), 88/89 (+1.79)
dominated by RHt.
10
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Summer (JJA) composite
−0
−1
2
90E
0
180
UTRH (%)
2.5
−10
5
−1
1
0
−1
0
0.
0.5
30S
−5
−3
00.
5
−1 −0.5
2
0
0
11
.5
1
0.5
−1
30N
−0.5
Composite El Nino − La Nina JJA (after peak) UTRH
90W
3
5
0
10
„
Delayed response over Indian and Atlantic
oceans
„
Regions of strong horizontal humidity gradients
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Composite El Nino − La Nina JJA (after peak) SST
.5
30N
5
−0.
−0
0.75
0.5
0.175
0.5
5
0.
0.5
0.75
0
0.5
.75
01
−0.5
0
90E
−1
0.5
0
0.75
1
3
53
−5
30S
0
90E
−10
5
−3
−3
35
−5 −10
3
5
35
3
5
5
−5
10
−5
−3
−5
−10
3
53
35
3
−3
−3
−3
−5
−3
5
180
OLR (W/m^2)
−5
−5
−3
3
−5
−3
5
−3
5
−3
−10
−3
−10
5
3
53
−3
3
−3
−5
3
05
−3
© Crown copyright
−0.5
90W
−3
−3
−0.75
3
30N
180
Temperature (Deg C)
Composite El Nino − La Nina JJA (after peak) OLR
−3
03/0045b
.5
0.5
30S
12
−0
0.5 0
.5
−0.5
90W
5
−5
−3
0
10
Ocean-atmosphere interaction
Correlations
SST (JJA)
Nino3.4
(DJF)
UTH (JJA)
0.60
0.49
Nino3.4 (DJF) 0.72
13
„
Remote ocean warming. ref: Klein et al (April 1999), Xie
et al (April 2002) both J.Clim.
„
Anomalous convection in the Indian ocean.
„
No significant correlation with Indian rainfall data.
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Long-term
Trends
Global UTRH Trends 03/79−08/97
60oN
30oN
(a)
0
30oS
60oS
0
o
−0.2
60oN
−0.1
0
0.1
0.2
Zonal UTRH trends 03/79−08/98
40oN
Latitude
20oN
(b)
0
20oS
40oS
60oS
−0.15 −0.10 −0.05 −0.00 0.05
Trend (%yr−1)
14
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
0
90 W
180
%yr−1
90 E
−0.3
o
0.10
0.15
0.3
„ No significant global
trend
„ Cancellation of
significant regional
trends
„ Stable to removal of
ENSO
Zonal trends
Monthly mean anomalies 10degN to 10degS
UTRH anomaly (%RH)
4
2
0
−2
−4
−6
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
1995
2000
Year
Monthly mean anomalies 25degS to 45degS
UTRH anomaly (%RH)
6
4
2
0
−2
−4
−6
1975
1980
1985
1990
Year
„
15
03/0045b
Intensified Hadley circulation not adequate to describe
time period of zonal mean trends.
© Crown copyright
Model Evaluation
16
„
Comparison with set of HadAM3 simulations
forced with SSTs and greenhouse gases.
„
Overactive hydrological cycle in HadAM3
„
ENSO represents equivalent fraction of model
inter-annual variance.
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Model Evaluation
60oN
HIRS and HadAM3 FTRH trends 03/79−08/98
40oN
„
Model does not
reproduce HIRS12
trends.
„
Small negative
trends at southern
midlatitudes.
Latitude
20oN
0
20oS
40oS
60oS
−0.150
17
03/0045b
−0.075
© Crown copyright
0.000
Trend (%yr−1)
0.075
0.150
Conclusions
„
Simple changes in ENSO and hydrological
cycle are not adequate to describe trends in
tropical UTRH.
„
Issues surrounding ‘trends’:
– Further analysis of inter-satellite calibration
issues. Lessons learned from MSU.
– Uncertainties in temperature trends.
– Potential decadal scale ocean-atmosphere
variations projected onto 20 year time series.
18
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Conclusions
„
„
„
19
HIRS12 useful for diagnosing seasonal to interannual scale variability of FTRH both from
observations and in GCMs.
Further research into temperature-humidity
relationships in the tropical atmosphere on long
time-scales required.
Current and future HIRS instruments place channel
12 higher in the troposphere - compromising the
stability of HIRS12 datasets for use in climate
research.
03/0045b
© Crown copyright
Related documents
Download