Hillsborough County
Canal Dredging Program
Canal Advisory Committee
Canal Distribution Location
Map
•
•
•
•
North Canals
Bayport / Baycrest Area
Bayport / Baycrest Area
Sweetwater Creek Area
Dana Shores Area
South Canals
• Gibsonton
• Apollo Beach
• Ruskin Area
CCDPM Study Approach
{
Develop “ represent at ive canal groups” t hat can
be used t o charact erize t ypical canals
z
z
{
{
{
z
Count y can t hen develop t ypical cross sect ions for
canal groups
Develop t ypical sedim ent charact erist ics
Reduces cost of fut ure perm it t ing of specific proj ect s
Meet wit h cit izens t o isolat e specific choke
point s wit hin canal syst em s ( focus effort s
where t he problem s are)
Develop list of problem areas wit hin each
com m unit y
Work wit h Canal Advisory Com m it t ee t o
develop recom m endat ions for t he final report
Volumes and Cost
Sit e
Volum e CY
( AOCs)
Cost
Tim e
( m ont hs)
Alafia
42,080
$3,858,071
21
Apollo Nort h
9,472
$986,444
21
Apollo Sout h
29,242
$2,515,889
21
Baycrest
15,895
$1,526,912
15
Bayport
15,847
$1,522,997
21
Dana Shores
16,394
$1,571,738
21
Essex Downs
19,576
$1,855,803
21
Ruskin
14,402
$1,393,635
27
Tot al
162,908
$15,231,489
10 / 20 Year Amortization
Cost @ 100% Per Parcel
Site
Volum e
CY
( AOCs)
# of
Waterfront
Parcels
10 Year
Annual
Cost
20 Year
Annual Cost
Alafia
42,080
242
$2264
$1665
Apollo North
9,472
577
$297
$190
Apollo South
29,242
1343
$315
$200
Baycrest
15,895
498
$524
$331
Bayport
15,847
235
$1106
$700
Dana Shores
16,394
434
$618
$390
Essex Downs
19,576
272
$1160
$731
Ruskin
14,402
410
$583
$367
Total
162,908
4011
$627
$391
10/20 Year Amortization Analysis
(per parcel)
Hypot het ical Analyses: 10 Yrs. Vs 20 Yrs. Amort izat ion
CANAL STUDY
Capit al I mprovement Funding From MSBU Annual Assessment
Annual Assessm ent Per Parcel
$3,000
2,664
$2,500
$2,000
1,658
$1,500
1,160
1,106
$1,000
$500
297
186
315
197
Apollo
North
Apollo
South
692
524
327
618
724
386
583
364
627
390
$0
Alafia
Bay Crest
Bayport
Dana
Shores
Essex
Downs
Project s
10-year Amortization Annual Assessment Per Parcel
20-year Amortization Annual Assessment Per Parcel
Ruskin
Composite
10 / 20 Year Amortization
Cost @ 100% Per Linear Foot
Site
Volume
CY
(AOCs)
Linear feet
of
Waterfront
10 Year
Annual
Cost
20 Year
Annual Cost
Alafia
42,080
21,300
$30.27
$18.83
Apollo North
9,472
86,899
$1.97
$1.24
Apollo South
29,242
129,182
$3.28
$2.05
Baycrest
15,895
26,000
$10.04
$6.26
Bayport
15,847
22,155
$11.73
$7.34
Dana Shores
16,394
40,206
$6.68
$4.17
Essex Downs
19,576
15,620
$20.19
$12.61
Ruskin
14,402
45,838
$5.22
$3.25
Total
162,908
387,200
$6.50
$4.04
Hypot het ical Analyses: 10 Yrs. Vs 20 Yrs. Amort izat ion
CANAL STUDY
Capit al Improvement Funding From MSBU Annual Assessment
$40
$35
30.27
$30
$25
$20
20.19
18.83
$15
10.04
6.26
$10
3.282.05
1.971.24
$5
12.61
11.73
7.34
6.68
4.17
6.50
4.04
5.22
3.25
10.35
6.44
5.12
3.19
10-year Amortization Annual Assessment Per Linear Foot
20-year Amortization Annual Assessment Per Linear Foot
po
sit
e
Co
m
Ca
na
l
No
r
th
al
Co
m
Ca
n
h
So
ut
Project s
po
sit
e
po
sit
e
Co
m
Ru
sk
in
ns
Es
se
x
Do
w
es
Sh
or
Da
na
or
t
Ba
yp
Ba
y
Cr
e
st
h
So
ut
o
Ap
oll
Ap
ol
lo
No
r
th
$0
Al
af
ia
Annua l Asse ssm e nt Pe r Line a r Foot
10/20 Year Amortization Analysis
(per linear foot of waterfront)
06%83KDVH,
&LWL]HQVIRUP06%8
&RPPLWWHH
6HOHFW6SRNHVSHUVRQ
6LJQDWXUHV
RU'HHPHG1RW9LDEOH
!
6LJQDWXUHV
/2,9HULILHG$UHD5HILQHG
'HHPHG9LDEOH
3URMHFWFDQFHOHG
/HWWHURI,QWHQW/2,
FROOHFWHGVXEPLWWHG
$VNHGWRUHFRQVLGHU
VFRSH
3URMHFW$UHD'HILQHG
06%83KDVH,,&,3)XQGHG
!
6LJQDWXUHV
)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\'HVLJQ
'HYHORSV+DUG&RVW
,ISHWLWLRQIDLOVWRDFKLHYHDW
OHDVWPXVWZDLW
PRQWKVEHIRUHUHDSSO\LQJ
06%8)LQDO3HWLWLRQ
GD\VZGD\([WHQVLRQ
9HULILHG!RI$IIHFWHG
6LJQDWXUHV
%2&&
$SSURYHV
3DFNHW6HQWWR%2&&IRU
$SSURYDO
%2&&'HQLHV
!
6LJQDWXUHV
3URMHFWLV&DQFHOHG
06%83KDVH,,,%RQG)XQGHG
7UDQVIHUUHGWR3URMHFW
0DQDJHPHQW6HFWLRQ
(QJLQHHUEHJLQVSUHSDULQJ
'HVLJQ&RQVW3HUPLW'RFV
3URMHFWLVOHWWRFRQVWUXFWLRQ
&RQWUDFWRU
3URMHFW$FKLHYHV6XEVWDQWLDO
&RPSOHWLRQ
06%8PHPEHUVVHHILUVW
DVVHVVPHQWRQVXEVHTXHQW
\HDUWD[UROO
%RQGLQJ3HULRG
3RWHQWLDOWLPHODJRIWR
PRQWKVDVVXPLQJQR
YDOLGDWLRQLVVXHV
%2&&$SSURYHV
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Special Challenges due to Project
Characteristics
• Regulatory Permits
• Mitigation Requirements
• Construction Coordination
• Public Outreach
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Regulatory Permits
• Agency Jurisdictions
• Project-triggered private dredging permits
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Project-triggered Private Dredging Permits
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Private Permitting Approach
• Public Permitting Workshop
– Process guidance
– Agency contacts
– Enforcement warning
• Application Processing
– Program window
– Sediment quality data by
reference
– Batch processing
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Mitigation Issues
• Numerous small projects with diverse mitigation and
monitoring
Possible Approach
• Scalable project
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Project Implementation Challenges
Construction Timing
• Strategic coordination and scheduling
• Multiple project bidding
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Public Outreach
Project website
• News updates
• Project overview
• Individual community pages
• Links to reports
• Contact information and links
For additional information and comments:
www:manateepocketproject.com
Hillsborough County
RPS No. S-0165-09(LP)
Questions and Answers