Report Of
COOPC RAT
P intRED1140 PR
T
Division o
Bureau of Plant Industry
United States Department of Agriculbare
and
Oregon Experiment Station
Corvallis, Oregon
to
By
R. R. Fore, Agent
Division of Drug and Related Plants
Bureau of Plant Industry
United States Department of Agriculturo
TAMS OF CONT2,11
List of tables
List of figures
Introduction
1
General review of year
1
heether iota
4
Varietal yields
11
Wild", mates
10
.wiling data
Controlled pollinstiou
21
26
Foreign meiotic, picked for analysis
Pollen shedding period of ales
U
Vasisty trial plot on the floret Ravish
43
Chemioal analysis
61
Analysis of seedling hops
6$
Analysis of foroign varieties
60
Fertilisers and their relation to quality
6$
Stage of maturity toot
Illustrations
76
119T CT TAPLIS
Page
Table 10,
1.
Weather Data.
2.
Late Cluster yields.
12
11.
Early Cluster yields.
14
4.
Fuggles yields.
16
5
Summary of varietal yields..
18
6
Down
7.
raturity notes on **ening* ricked in 1936.
22
Other data en seedlincs ricked in 1936.
25
illeoessful crosses involvinE for* En varieties.
30
Unsuccessful or secs teolving foreign varieties.
31
it.
11
12.
ildew
a
data.
to
Iettessful crosses between oommon varieties and
seedling*.
tnsuceeseful °roma between ec
n varieties end
seedlings
Ccrmcn variety °hoe
p
tieing teed.
17
Foreign variety cheol..s producing seed.
37
16.
KaturW notes on
39
16.
Other data on forelgn varieties.
40
17.
Toiler shedding teriod
42
19.
.Vildew notes or foreign. variety plot, Rorst 'ard, Jut
15.
General notes on forein varieties.
rst Tard
2C
General. not
rst Yard
21.
General nvtes or foreign varlet'
22.
Vildew infoottcn on foreign var
varieties.
f males used in °reeves.
foreign- vartet
t Yard
une
46
a.
41
July 13.
46
August 21
49
t two locations.
SC
LIST OF FlOtRES
Page
1.
I-letting plan of the variety block« 7!orst Yard
44
2.
A ro
76
3.
A
4.
A row of Fuggier*
78
5
A plant of the Early Green varlety
79
6.
A plant of the lavarian variety.
80
7.
flint 04C4
51
8.
Ilant 83-12. A Late Cluster seedling
9*
!lent 32-1C.
A California. Cluster sed1its
83
1C.
Tint 7C-13,
An tarty Cluster seedling.
84
11.
Plant 42*6.
A ruggles seedling*
as
12.
float 49.48o
A ToUggles seedling4
88
13.
Hatt 52-13.
An atrermal seedling.
87
of Late Cluster**
rev of Uri, Clusters.
An tarly Cluster seedling*
77
82
b
Is a
of Agriculture
on a
Plants, and the
Bureau of Plant Industry, Division of Drug and
Farm Crops Department of Oregon State College*
the invest gatiens started by pre
Agents of
The 'miter is continuing
Bremen and L. C. Smith tom',
Division of Drug and Related
Plants.
The heavy lose to the 1936 hop crop caused by downy' mildew further
emphasised the need for the development of resistant varieties.
Downy
mildew was present in the three hop growing states of the Pacific Coast
and caused considerable damage in all affected areas.
Or©; » was particularly
hard hit, the stater average yield of dry hops per acre being reduced to 433
pounds as compared to the normal state average of about 1080 pounds.
The investigations on hop b
C. Smith until :day 11, 1936,
of
Under
house
, r.
carried on
date the vomiter took charge.
Smith's direction considerable hybrid seed was planted in the greenexperimental yard was replanted from the nursery and game plants
were transforTed from the greenhouse to the nursery.
M4oh or the spring work
to the experimental yard such as plowing, hoeing and stringing was taken care
of.
Awn the writer arrived in May the vine. wero )eing trained on the string
for the first time
During May, training in the experimental yard was completed
500 seedlings were transferred from the greenhouse to the nursery*
light rains durin
Several
the month hastened the development and spread of downy
mildew and info
quite L;es
ra1 in the experimental yard, A
ived ft** 10* V. E. Kovalemich Dirostor of
pment of hop roots
Station, Westin.. Researdh Station of Bop Growing
Box NO* 10,
Mitomir,
USiS.R. These roots arrived in good shape and were sot out in the nursery*
The majority of the
survived and produced a fins growth during the summer*
Hybridisation work in the experimental yard was started in June and
ample ted during
July.
from wind-blown pollen.
rohment bags were used to protect the flowers
o
rat the bagged flowers were killed by the hot
The parchment
weather, but a fair percentage of thee survived and set seed.
The
bags seem to be better than glassine but are not entirely satisfaotory
bags prevent circulation of air and the temperature beeemes moh higher
under them. A fine mesh cloth bag might be better for this purpose*
Mildew notes were taken on all plants in the experluental yard at
three different dates*
infestation seemed to be fairly L,maeral over the
yard but more dames occurred near the west side of the yard, which is near
a small patch cf woods and through the lower parts of the yard
probably due to the higher humidity in the
areas*
During August, detailed plant notes were taken on
hybrid plants in the experimental yard.
were discarded as undesirable types.
TLie was
seedling and
About one-third of those plants
Some were discarded because of disease
susceptibility end others because of poor agronomic characters.
The period from August 12 to /A eas spent in oompanymith Mr. Loerner
ip
o the hop growing area near Yakima Weshington*
many yards *sere heavily Infested with the red spider mite*
were spraying but west sprays were not effective*
Sage g
At this time,
Maze growers
rs were using
an oil spray which seemed to be k* ping the spider p .rtially under
but was not entirely satisfactory*
control,
a
Fran ucuet 18 to 20 a trip was taken to Puyallup, Washington in
mmapenywith Mrs Beernerir.
Conferences were held with Mr. A.
Richardson,
ComstrAgent of Puyallup County, Mr. G4, A. Huber, Plant Pathologist at the
western 4ashiagton Experismmt Station, and with several hop growers in the
locality,
Nearly all growers in this section are using the FUg files variety
e yards in this area wore
of hops because of its mildew-resistanee
formerly planted meetly to Late Clusters, but during recent years
mildew has beware a limiting factor with this variety,
downy
Only two Late Cluster
yards were seen in the area and both were ocatpletely destroyed by downy mildew.
at week in August the variety plots of Fu7lee and Early
During
sted.
Clusters were
Fatly Clusters yields were reduced by approximately
two.thirds because of the heavy infestation
of
downy mildew.
Puggles yields
were also depressed somewhat but not to such a great extents
Mt, A. 7, Sievers, Senior Biochemist. Division of Drug art Related
visited Corvallis from August 8 to W.
Mr. Freak Raba k. Associate Biooheriet Division of Drug and Related
Plants visited Corvallis from Auguet 5
to September 1.
During the early part of Zieptemket the variety plate of Late Clusters
and Red Vines were harvested,
lith of these varieties gave fairly :cod
yields i.n spite of the heavy infestation of downy mildew,
The Late Cluster
ppeared to be badly damaged by mildew (tally in the *onion but made a
vigorous late growth after the mildew had been °hooked by airy weather and
consequently produeed a fair yield.
The Red Vine variety seems to have
considerable resistance to mildemrand watt rof seriously damaged at may stage
of development.
Plants
or
the foreign varieties being grown in the yard we
and samples saved for ohemical analysis.
harvested
The majority of thee. foreign
varieties are not very desirable when considered on the basis o
ividual
whole but several of them Wive some
eharasters 'Mich are desirable.
Therefore, they are being used as breeding
stook.
The more promising seedlings in the yard were harvested yields
determined, and samples saved for ohemioal analysis.
All hybrid seed produced by artificial pollination lifts harvested
and threshed.
Seed of **moral varieties produoed by natural cross polling
tion was also saved.
This seed was stored in a *old chamber to break dormancy
and was planted in the greenhouse later
rimental
About one-third of the poorer 100
re discarded and will be ropla
d by seedlia4s
nursery.
A cover crop of crimson clover was seeded in the hop yard on October
Due to-the extremely dry fall' the seed did nat geminate until the
8.
latter part of Novedber,
A hard freeze shortly after the seed germinated
fled nearly all of the young plants.
%pet
b
r t
data are included because of
0
mildew infection during the growing season.
The frequent
during ;Aay and June were responsible for the heavy mildew infestation during
t ow" m%ths
This is duo to the fact that the mildew spores gain
to the plant; by
stomata.
the
winning
throe; h free moisture on the loaf surface to the
They are unable to gain entrance unless there is free moisture an
surface of the leaf.
mildew
entrance
During the latter part of June, the spread of
was °hooked by the dry weather.
practidally no cow infection of mildew.
koclause of the dry fall there was
Tsblo 1
Oregon
51
64
1
2
5
47
4
58
5
48
48
46
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
50
81
53
53
47
47
53
48
47
4?
44
51
56
36
46
48
59
42
42
41
38
33
56
44
1
2
.23
1.02
.11
.51
.31
.21
.36
1.19
1.25
2.63
.44
.37
.11
.42
.13
.13
.03
41
35
36
26
46
56
51
48
47
48
$
=
4
5
6
7
a
3
10
$ 11
I 17
-
25
24
26
Total Precipitation - 10.
Highest Temps Jan. 4
58° P.
Lowest Tamp. Jan. 304. 240 F.
25
21
25
55
43
46
33
45
34
19
28
25
32
34
32
38
45
41
41
55
48
41
t 23
46
44
49
49
4Z4
34
41
39
41
44
s 13
s 14
$ 13
18
17
18
s
19
20
21
1
52
50
27
28
29
30
31
46
46
35
48
37
41
40
45
40
48
40
Agriesxltu ra
s 25
26
s 27
28
29
33
34
34
S5
36
41
sa
53
51
59
63
35
24
21
22
22
23
29
37
43
33
32
33
44
46
44
40
.07
.41
.07
.39
.
.20
.10
.
.02
.24
24
1.36
.89
.20
.13
.48
.17
.16
.22
s * Total Precipitation
5.335 inohes
$ Highest Temp. Feb. 2 - 03°
$ Lowest Temp. Feb, 8
19 0 P.
Iwo
1r4 I-+
ot
iO4
-10
eit
CO NI 1-41
CO
110
WS,
OR
e
V*
--4e'IPIra
et
40
4.0
fat
U. U. eV U. AO
1011.
$
$
U. U.
$
-4
A
VI 14 1.4 C VJ CO -4 th ea dh 01 14 1-4
U. U. U.
0 10 CO -4 CO .31
iseswillesisess
8 aritriO4otl
-4 01 01 ow C4 I*
411*
t3t88
el. 14 Mr
14 NI 04 (a 14
40 4.
8 -4
14 r4 14 robt 00 t1, 14 r4 re KW 1-* 1-A 1.4
10 01 .4 OS 01 1126 GO
P-a
4/J tto -4
*
*
Po
lot
^0
0.4
la 0 0 CA -4 CA 0 Cs 0 AS fa
001 04.
tif388X8
fp'2018 tg
'4 CA CR
b.* Po Owl
s
tn"
22C
«
EtStt48tillt231 t COSS
a
lel Ire 10.4 64 par
0 CA mia CA
sgszst gt; :go:sits
$011114111 1111111
lAga-.4r*
to 0
0op 0
0
CO 0
it
it* Oa I*
1
CD N
1
APE
UM
elk
mar
1
1
1
1
co PO t3 11)
0 0.1 a) 4 CA
Ili
$
1
CRI
00 OF
MN,
it
H $
$
/
1
gi CA (P
a
1
CD
Ci
1
1
1
0.3 03 ea 00 00 0° 0° 0.
at rr 4. OP 01 MR
PS CO 1.4
1110.
01X
1
411,
00 00
CC CC -4 Cb CP IP.
00 04 00
t- t-a
MO
AI*
4 as
1
1
CD
ITA
40
1
/
1
$
1
1
1
1
opo
1
1
1
tie es 1'4
** ss V bit Si or
888 888284
0° 0° 0° IF*
Cie 03 0° 0 40
4101 p Olt
ex,
ea r ca co co -a tal ei 0* ota aa t-0
13 *6 iF
?3C4
tzt02
r4
0.1 OW
NC 66 ea t 46 CC CP
Og OW SC Ce SC 04 VW
S. OP S. ele 40 or *a OP
1PP
*0 OP OP
8141$4111110121g41$111111111111141 11
VI U6 OD CM C6
C*
t­
66 41) C.- 02 C6 C6 r4 44 4, 4P 44 42 4' 42 44 9,
r4 r4 r4 r4 r4r4 04 C4 44 C4 C4 c4 C4 C4 It4 pe
4
1938 leather Data (Cont.)
Precipitation
n inopcs
1
2
5
4
5
67
61
64
61
32
22
32
47
a
28
26
28
27
25
.
.
.
.
.
.
22
14
52
62
28
43
38
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
56
52
66
64
67
82
58
53
42
47
42
4
t
23
60
58
56
50
s
-
57
ld
$
.13
13
43
46
42
44
40
31
34
34
32
26
23
20
32
28
.05
.04
.01
.01
.
.
-
a
s
.
-
.
5
6
7
8
s
9
i
10
t
s
11
12
s
13
14
15
16
17
18
t
1.9
t
s
s
t
s
s
s
s
i
s
.
.
-
1
2
s
s
88
53
58
16
i
44
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
66
50
-
1
s
*
s
s
t
s
20
31
22
23
24
26
26
27
28
29
30
31
44
43
54
63
54
61
52
47
42
46
52
52
50
50
47
67
56
50
62
55
65
50
46
45
40
40
40
40
41
28
33
30
33
41
49
43
41
42
36
35
34
40
42
42
38
.13
.06
«12
.64
.27
.23
48
47
7
.05
43
46
1.21
.84
42
.89
.28
.50
Total Precipitation - .24 intihee
s Total. Precipitation
6.82 inches
RoveMber 24 - 67° F. s Eighect ;romp. Dtwoomber 18
440140 t
570 F
Lowest Temp. Ovember 28 m 20* F. s Lemest Temp. Deoomor 31 m 260 F
11
each plant of Late Clusters,
In Tables 2
ty block are given..
Ea riy Clusters,, end Fucz les
plants varied oonsiderably in yield.
Individual
These variations are probably due
to several causes, some of which were soil vnrietions, mildew infecti
and age of the plants.
everal of the very law yielding plants were
ones that had been replanted in the spring of 1925.
In Table 5 the average yields of the four varieties, Late Clusters,
Early Clusters, Yuggles, and Red Vines are given,
of Early Clusters was due to injury by mildew,.
The lee average yield
The yield in Fkr,gles Was
reduced somewhat by mildew but its comparatively low yield was largely
to the low yielding ability of the variety under the conditions of
this experiment.
For best results
rich soil and considerable moisture.
the
los variety requires a very
In the experimental ynrd moisture
is probably a limiting fluster in this variety.
Tsbls 2.
TIold of ludivids4...W.A
Yield* In Pounds
1.14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.2.5
10.4
5.9
9.6
10.4
12.8
3.36
2.80
2.64
1.59
2.58
2.80
3,44
s 10-14
s
g
s
s
$
s
t
9.7
2.61
s
.91
s
4.2
143
g
.58
s
.
s
1
$
.52
*
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
24
25
26
27
28
15.2
11.7
10.3
12.5
11.2
5.5
4.10
5.15
2.80
3.56
5.01
1.48
.
13.2
5.9
11,8
3.55
1.89
3.17
-
11.4
5.06
15.7
11.6
3.68
5.17
5.7
1.55
s
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
74
134
1.94
5.50
3.8
9.9
7.3
5.5
7.2
1.02
2.67
1.97
1.48
1.94
23
24
25
26
27
28
11.5
7.3
8.4
6.6
12.5
15.4
5.10
1,97
2.26
1.77
4-14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11,6
8.6
17.2
9.0
5.12
22
104
10.7
11.8
10.0
5.7
8.0
546
4.14
241
4.65
2.42
2.70
2.88
3.17
2.70
1,55
2,15
.22
s 11-14
15
s
s
16
s
17
a
18
s
19
s
20
21
t
22
s
25
s
24
s
25
26
s
27
t
s
28
s
s
s
s
I
$
s
s
.8
.6
.16
s
9.3
7.1
11.2
2.50
1.91
5.01
s
s
s
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.5.8
.
12.6
6.4
11.8
7.2
7.4
10.1
74
8.8
114
9.7
13.2
.9
16,2
11.8
20.3
11.3
8.7
8.3
8.9
9.6
10.0
9.9
8.1
114
11.5
5.1
am
3.38
1.72
3.17
1.94
1.99
2,72
1.94
2.57
2,98
2.61
5.55
.24
4.36
3.17
1.91
5.46
2404
2.34
2.23
2.59
2,58
2.69
2.66
2.18
3.0$
3.09
1.37
'fiold of Individual.
4
2.334
429
1.2.4
17
11.5
18
U.S
19
20
11.6
12.5
8.5
6.8
9.5
12.9
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
18
4.1
124
144
12.8
5.33
3.09
3.03
3.12
340
248
1.83
2.55
3.47
1.10
341
3.80
3.44
s
s
i
18
16
17
11.1
9.8
8.9
10.0
6.8
2.98
2.,84
1
2.69
1.85
1.69
.27
s
18
19
24
21
22
25
24
s
28
1.0
6.1
8.0
5.3
10.3
9.9
26
27
28
84
9.3
9.1
200
s 2944
13.9
..
12.7
8.7
3.74
104
2.885
o
s
s
s
s
s
s
t
s
64
2.165
1.5
1.42
277
2.66
2.59
2.45
s
20-14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15.3
6.9
441
13.7
11.7
348
4.5
5.5
ea
1.86
3.15
1.21
1.48
2018
..
13.7
10.0
16.0
8.5
14,2
13.4
348
2.69
4.31
2.28
3.82
3.60
2144
8.0
2as
15
16
17
15.4
13,3
4.14
1.8
9.2
1.1
9.6
14.5
9.2
11.5
19
20
21
22
28
24
25
26
27
28
9.5
8.9
8.6
10,7
9.2
11.4
3.58
2.55
2.47
2.98
2.58
3.90
2.47
3.10
2.39
241
2.86
2.47
346
a
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
26
27
s
33
s
s
t
s
a
a
s
a
a
s
s
s
.2
5.5
.5
3.0
6.5
15.2
10.2
104
16.6
..
342
2.34
.50
1.42
.13
.81
1.75
4.10
2.74
2.93
4.46
11.4 4
346
9.3
2.4
6.4
2.3
11.4
2.60
.64
1.45
.62
3.06
7.8
3.0
2.09
s
*30.14
a
15
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
26
27
t
28
s
t
s
s
a
s
s
a
a
s
s
s
..
64
6.1
7.8
11.1
12.5
94
12.3
..
.81
1.64
1.64
249
2.98
3.36
46
2.42
341
.85
1.01
.78
a
1.68
1029 1.50
*78 .98
146
.54
58
2.07 1.18 1,06
o.
.68
2.0
26 27 26
34 4.0 1.2 2.0 7.2 4.0 5.7
1, 20 21 22 23 24 25
405 2.7
18
1.44
.29
1.06 1.27 1.18 1.21
io
9.2 7.1
2.68 2.04
1.52
.89 .92 .29
...
.78
2.7
8.4
52 35 04
48 4.7
3
2.2 3,8
-
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26
4.0 2.4 3.2 1.0
32+14
28-14
.52 .55
.$8 .89
1.01
.46
54
1.58 145 1.29 2.82 1.04
8.6 3.4 34 3.5 1.6 4.8 4.0 4.6 9.1
1.21 1.47 2.48
64
15 16 3.7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
3.9 1.8 1.9 4.2
1.12
1.44 1.53
542 4.3 6.8
1.50 1.24 1.96 1.90
2
64 24 1.2
5,0 5.3
15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
2.2 3.0 2.5 2.2 302
34344
2444
.49
.26
.9
.81 .58
468
.81 .78 .98
1.47 1.3.2
14,21
2.8 2.0 2.0 2.8 2.7 3.4 5.1 3.9 4.4
15 16 17 18 19 20 23. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
8.2 5.0 74 8.4 1.7
2.36 1.44 2.04 2.42
I1a aa atataa aaattaagagaaaa1aa tta a:a a aataa a aaa
.54
o.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26
5.8 4.1 5.5 2.8 2.0 1.2 5.0 1.0 5.7 4.4 4.1 4.2
2244
11M
Vt
"9 9
tea
91
Lt
91
63
03
38
88
23
9"2
at
94
6'9
a.,
8'9
94
24
'I-a
91
4t
91
61
08
18
38
93
98
44
9'4
94
t
91
Lt
t
at
40T
61
03
13
83
23
art
2.2°I
101
VC
s
21
CPI
$
at
96°1
$
4.3
4,11
$
'as
$
$
s
4
$
99"T
64*
$
tea
*
44°1
s
09't
s
1.9
9.9
0
94
0",
tat
9S
L.a
tat
a"2
9.9
99.1
29'1
Let
96
301
tel
96°
*
69
4,14
9'2
04
14
'Oct
66
TTT
(32.*
ta
etOr
93
6'9
cast
93
43
93
Taft
24
tat
'VII
8'9
$
oa
1
trot
209
902
81
61
$
0901
684'1
11
$
art
re
33
28
At
s
243
04"I
63I
U
1
s
69*
trz
Iaa
91
s
Art
61
03
$
s
/tit
at
at
$
lot
art
lot
6.2
14
s
$
14
4°9
Bat
o
94
0'9
34
64
22
etal
etat
Mal
£3
94
40'T
art
96'3
42°1
at..'
42'I
401.
8'9
4.9
*1 94
sa
4.9
94
93
93
Art
33't
63
32
tag
99"I
Sot
411
94
'Kett
at
ST a
24.1
taa
at
U
APT
93
88
0
33
84
24
tZ
94
93
£3
83
30$
64
29
04
24
tat
124
laa
94
4°
44
1.4
To.
lIaT
I
t
43'1
tea
1/0T
WI
art
11"T
91a
12'3
art
42.1
94°1
11
25,44
15
18
3.7
18
19
7.6
8.7
54
54
44
a
15
a
16
17
1.29
1.07
3.9
23
24
25
26
27
28
...
145
6.1
84
5.0
5.4
4.8
44
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.0
4.9
4,9
4.1
4.2
1.1
2,8
2.6
1.7
4.4
4.2
3.7
3.6
7.7
2744
4.6
3.8
$
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a
...
21
22
3.8
$ 3414
2,21
2.4
20
14
15
16
17
2.811
2
9
.99
...
$
a
a
1.55
1.58
1.27
147
1.22
a
a
$
$
$
2.0
4.3
1.7
1.2
3.7
4.4
...
5.0
5.4
5,6
3.7
34
5.5
6.5
1.3
.51­
1.09
.43
.30
.94
1.11
...
1.27
147
1.42
.94
.79
1.40
1.65
33
2
1.24
.25
144
1.24
1.04
1.06
.28
.71
.66
43
1.11
1.06
3.45
.91
1.95
a 3544
a
a
a
$
a
2
a
a
$
a
a
a
a
a
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
2.6
3.5
3.5
3.0
5.4
6.7
5.8
3.8
5.0
8.9
.*
.66
*89
.89
08
.86
1.45
1.47
.96
1.27
1.50
..
...
54
1.42
1.52
.94
3.0
3,2
.76
.81
1.42
.81
.71
1.11
6.0
3.7
$
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
26
27
28
.
147
4.8
1.22
.99
34
34
4.5
3.9
2.8
1,7
2,7
2.4
4,1
34
5.2
2,2
a 36.44
a
48
1,14
.99
on.
.43
.68
.61
1.04
.76
1.32
46
3.5
a
16
17
18
19
20
a
23.
a
a
a
t
a
a
a
a
$
2
a
22
23
24
26
26
27
28
34
3.2
2.8
4.4
3.4
4.4
1.31
44
144
2,7
3.7
6.0
147
2.5
3.4
3.9
.64
.86
.99
.68
.94
Table 6. VV eti Xis;
Total No.
Total
of plants
167
176
19
green weight
Average green
per plant.
weight
4.47*
226
Total dry weight
Average dry
per plant
12.$1#
5S.Zri
ight
ati
284%
% of dried hops
Average yield per sore
2.82#
O.
523.0
22.7; 4
86304
ring the part
In Table 8,
three years on each individual plant in the experimental hop yard, is given.
It will be noted that mildew infestation is heavier can the west side of the
This is probably due to the fact that the woe, side of the yard is
on lower ground and is bordered by a wood lot.
Home, the humidity in this
section of the yard is higher and conditions are more favorable for mildew
infection.
Several of the plants show no mildew for the three year period covered
by these notes.
Some of these plants are probably resistant to mildew while
others may have escaped infection.
During 1037 the plants that have shown
no mildew will be tested for resistance in the laboratory.
In this way it
will be possible to pick out those which are actually resistant.
IM 1
.
II
4
. .
-
EOOMEMOMMEHMEMOM
MMEMMEMEONWI
MOMEMM
MNIONWWWWWOINMENNMIIMMMEN
anmain
s
nmar
MEM
ENRNNWHEMMEMM
onsmamomommenmnsminom.
MMEIN11111111116111111111110111 NIPM
.
:1
11
MIMMRIII
MM
1111111111111111IMMIIIIIIIIIMMEMEGIMENEME
1119B1111111111111M M II EME
0141ENVANEWINFIIMENMEMPI
1111111111111IIIIIII 111
MAMMEMMOMMEMMMINEMEMMMEMEMMOI
.
EMANNEMEMEMMER ME MEME
MMMMMEMMWMWMMUMEMENWEMEM
IIMMEMMEMME MEEMI EMMEMM
MENEMMEMMMWMEMMEMMEMEM
WWWWWMEMANUMM
MEM
MMWMINIMEMEMMEMMMEMMEM
MEMOMMEE EMEMEMMEMMMEIMM
MEMEMEMIEMEAMEMMEMM
OIMMUIMMEMENMENEMEMMEME
IIMMMWEEMEMIUMMEMMMEMMEMEM
MEMMMMINIMINMEENEMMEIMEMEMM
OMMMWEIMMINUMMUM MMEMM
MIUMMMOMMIMWMNIMMEMMOM
MEMMOMMEMMNINE
ENIUME
IONVIRNME ORMEMOMMINEMEMENUMEMM
MEEWN
MEMEMMWMEMMEMMEM
mummansmigmammonummEmmumm
1111WER11MWEEMMRWMAMMM =MEM
MMAINNOMMEMMOMMIME MON
INIMMIONMOOMMMUMMEMEMMEMMWMEMN
.
p
.
S
;
P.
­
.
.
.
1
1
I
ma
MENEM
CEMIECIIIMINEEMPIENCESIIIIMININIMMI
11111110ECIICKEIICCEECEENCEICIIMIIIIEIMMENIMENIME
IIIMEMEIIIMMEEMEREEZIONIEEMMIENCENE1111111111111111111
11111111111MENIEMIEWIENEEMMINICEIMIIIIIIIMINIE
CIN MIIIIIIIIIINECINCE11111211111111111111111111111E11111111111111
'111EIME111111112111COMENEEMEINECIIIIIEN1111111111111111111111
111MIENCIIIIIIMINCIIIMENIIMERIMICEIMINIIMENIIIIC
IIIRMICIIINCIIIECIEWEEME11111E11111ECIEMEINIEEMINI
YIN1 111111MICEEMIEMEMENEICE11111111111111MEIMIIIIII
E101111112111111111:11ECE11111111111111111MINENC111111111111111
IIMECIECEICIICENECIMEM111111111111111111E111111111
111.1111MEREEEINEINIIIMINNE111111111111111111111E111111111Ele
IlleglellEllinell11.111111111110111001111MMICIIIIIIICE111111
,
.
ft
: .
1111MEMENCEMBIIIIIMECIONIMECIIMENIIIIIIIIMEN11111 AINI
111112111MEMEEINEMINESEMIMIIMMIEMIIEMMEMININIIIIII
1111111110ENNECIIMINNIMMIIIIIMEENNEEEMENIIEREE
111111111111MEINFIEMMINSHINCIIMENIENEEEMEMINE111
1111111EME111111111ENCIIMIONCIEINIMENEEMEMille
111.1111PIENINIERBIERSENI111111111111111111INIMMIENE1111111
111111111MMIIMEM11111111111111111111111111111111111111111MEEM
1111E11111MMENEEMMIMMIN1111111111111111111=1111111111111111111111M
111111111111101101111.11CMINIMMENINEEMEMEMEMIIMMI
IIIMINIMENICEMEIMMICIENEEMININCEMEMIRECIMINE
' INICEINCIIIIMENIIIIMMENCIIMINEMENEVEISIMINEEMEINE
' 1111111EMENIMIIIIMENEIMMEN IIIIIIIMMENCEZEIIIIIE
IIMINEMINEMEINIONIIIIIIIIIIIN 1111111M11111MBIENESE
NEEMMINE1111111111ME11111111111MIIIIIIIMINIMINIIIIIMIE
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111MIIIMMININIIIIMME
,
.
.
, INCEM1111111111EIMI11121112
1111111111111011
11111COMEMEE1111111112MEEINEINEREMEIENNIME
IMMOMMICEMECECSIMEINIMMIERIIIMMEEMICMINIE
MINE E11 IIECEMEECE11 IN=
111121111EMMEM EMEMCEEil3111
MENZECICCEMCENCOMNEM
ME
112
CIEM0 EEIEENCIIIEREEIEE
-
" ' MIEMIECINIIMEMEMINIIIIMEECIERMINI1111
11E111111EIVERIE11=11111111CONC
E
31
111111P1
11
.
ft
1
.
Ni.
.
,.
IMINIZEIMENEREEM11111:11EN=11111MIIEIIIIM AIN
EN11EEle
IIICIECIIME110111=1111
11C
111111
RICEINECII
'
EE119111EMPINIZIONEMMEIMIIIIIIIIIIENEEINIEN
MICEBBIEMIZEINEEMEMBEIEREMEIN 111110
' IMINEEMEINEMEECIMMENEIMMIEMIN
.1E11111111111
I
s
' IFEIREINKINIMIE11121110MEMZEIMIREMINIMIIIIIME
111111EBEESIMENE1111EMENCIMM12 EMEMEN11
-
111111
111.110EEEEMICESEICEN111111ENIENSIIIMENCIMI
. mammemimnimoccommunesiemocumm
11ENIECIIIINIMEIMISIMMINIEN1111111
NIIMEMEN
M
EININICERI91
- IIICEMENEICESIEECISEEMME111
111111MEIIES
01:CECCIMEE IIMMEE21
CECileCIE
CEMEEEEEMEEECIEREiln
a
20
Table 6
DOWNY MILDEW NOTES FOR I954,1935AND 1936
ROW NUMBERS
82 13 144
91 9, 9
135. U. V7 91 119 90
P
3z 2
a z 1,
2
z
2.-
/
2/
3
Z3
I
7
22
/
2
2
2,
/0
3
.2
/
2..
2.
I
73
3 2-,
3
I
33
333
3
3
/
1
/2.
'2'
IG
17
IQ
I
Al
J
23
I
/
/
2,32
30
31
2,
3
Z
3
27
Z
3
3
33
3
z
.2
1
3
I
2
z
)
2
1
A.
.-3
Z
3/3
2.
3
3
12
3
2_
3
I
J
3
.2
,
3
2
3
3
11
3
2 I-
31
5
2.
3
L
3
1,
;I
3
3
.2.
/
2
1
23
2,
I
31
31
3
1
I
.3
32.
1
1.3
k
2
I
3 3
33 31
1
22.
/
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3 -3
3
3
3
II,
1
2,
3
2
1
z
2.3
4,
313
3
3( 3
3
33
8
1
2.2.
1,
3
32.3 3 2,3 2...2
2,
2..
1
33
3
3
3
32-
3
3
al
2 3 3
3
2.
2
­
z
Key far Data
1 = Le a F irfechoyt
Z=
e. P a-td S piKe i fect a. on
3
1
2 3
2,
2,
1
21.3
1
/
/
3
3
3
3
/
31 3 3
3
32..
/
3
z
zl
3
1
3 22 3
/
2,
2.2 3
3 4
z
3
I
1
1
I
_3
.1 3 /
3
2
/,2
I
Z.
I
3
/ 31
1
1
2
f 3"
3
3
i
3
3
32
3
3
I
1
3
.1.4
3
1
2
I
3l
11I
33
A
32,
3 33
33 2
Z
3
3
1
1
3
3
/
3
I
2.-
3
a
3
1
I
.3
3
3
L,3
31
1
2,
1
I
i
A
I
3
3
2..
I
2.
3
Z.
2
I
1
3 2.
3
z
2
3
2.,
I
2
3
3
3
2,
3
3
I
I
3
3
3
2- 3 /
I
I
1
3
3
I_3 3
3
1
2,
3
3
/
3/ 5 i
32.
33
3_. 2.
3
3
?
3 3 2/
i
2,
.3 2­
2.
3
/
3
3
2.
L
3
2/
2 __,Z,
3
3
2.
-1
3
3
22
.3
3
2,
2
32
3
/
32
3
i
1
3
/
2
2
i
3z
3
32- 2
1 2 3
32
Z
3
2
IS
/
3
Z
12 33
3
3
3
Z
1
z
Z
3
1
2,
2,
2,
.2,
3
I
/,
/
..2
2,
33
2,
3
2
t
3
3
Z
3
3
2,0
22
1
-/.
3
2
2
3
3
/
/
Al4
W/ 2
1
3
3 2- 3 z
/9
3
2.
2)
2,
2/
2,
/44
is
I
20
2.,
1
3
3Z /
2.
21
3
2
/
2
3
2,
-1.,
523- 3
3 2.,
1
.2
I,
2
3
2
1
3
3
3
32.
2.
2.
3 3
1
2
3
3
3
3
L
3
2J 2 2 3/
32 31 32 3
2
3
Z
1
33
3
I
2
3
33
2.
2.
1
1
3
/
/
3t132..
2.
2. 2.
2,
3
2
of
/
3
2.
2,
2.,
2.
1,
/
2,
2.
.L
/
3
2,
Z
1
/
3
23z
3
33
3
' -Q
2,
.3
/
2
2
97 5'­
g"
1 q 34 Data
36­
36
"
3
3
/
2.
3
'fable 7
notes
during the latter part of July are givens
These were taken to indicate the stags of maturity of the plants at this
date.
These data were taken on all seedling plants in the experimental
yard but only plants that were harvested are included in Table 7.
Yield data on all seedlings that were harvested as well as other
data of value in determining the merit of these plants are included in
Table
The dhemioal analyses of the plants that were analysed in 1935 are
included so that yields can be correlated with quality.
yielding plants
Some of the high
as for example, plants 2.43 and 4.43, are low in quality
as indicated by the chemical analysis.
These plants will be used as breeding
stook and an, attempt will be made to Gambino, their high yield with high
quality and mildew resistanoe.
Table 7.
turi
Row No
Good plant
2-33
ry vigorous plant, very good yielder but light weight
ly good plant, flair yield and good even size hope.
Fairly good 'plant, fair yield and good even size hope.
Fairly good lent, fair yield and good even size hops.
Good plant and good yield, uneven size hops.
4.33
10-30
14..32
19-33
08c
26 -12
LC
26-32
27.41
524
32-10
32.40
32.41
35-5
F
Cal
F
F
40-13
40-27
43-28
46-4
47 -18
49-28
F
52-31
53-20
F
F
56 -14
F
56-28
56-31
57-25
57-28
57-30
58.4
58-13
58-17
59-21
F
tr
l'e
F
F
F
d but email bones.
Has large hope, good plant, good. yield
Very !Tod set of hops, large plant and even siee. hops.
A very heavy yielder with long arms, rather small hope
lant, good yield, fair sized hops.
od plant, good yield, fair sized hops.
1
Good plant, good yield, fair sized hops.
2
Good plant, good yield, good sized hops.
2
Good plant, good yield, fair sized hops.
1
Good
pleat, very good yield, small sired hops.
0
Good
plant, good yield, good sized hope.
1
Good
plant,
good yield, good sized hops­
3
3 to 2 in hope. Good plot, good yield, very large sized hops
4 to 2 in hops, Good plant,. good yield, large aised hops.
Good plant, good yield, good sized hops.
3
Good plant, good yield, large sired hops.
4
Very !ood plant, good yield, small sired hops
Fair p
lt, fair yield, fair sized hops.
3
Gaud plant, ..Tod yield, uneven sired hops.
3 & be
Aar plant, good yield, cod sized hops.
S
Good plant, good yield, fair sized hops.
1
Good plant, good yield, good sized hops.
1
Good plant, good yield, medium sized hops.
Good plant, good yields good sized hops.
1
Very 7;ood plant, good yield, fair sized hops.
1
Fair yield, good plant, fair stood hops.
1
Good
plant, good yield, good sized hops.
3
1/17
32
7/17
7/17
32
31
32
7/417
32 32
7/17
32
7/17
7/20
7/20
7/20
7
7
7
Maturity Notes on Soedlino Picked in 1936
60.29
61-10
61-24
62.47
86-29
67-9
67-17
68-5
88-8
6941
69-32
70-13
71-4
71-28
72-13
7441
77-13
77-22
77-29
50-15
84-11
86-23
91-30
92-23
93-18
95-24
97 -13
97-21
97.44
97-21
97-31
98-12
9848
LC
F
LC
P
LC
F
LC
LC
F
5
1
2
5 & heyood
2
1
3
I to 2 i.
3
1
1
5
F.
EC
k ire
Good plant, 7ood yield and fair sired hope.
Good plant,
yield and good sized hops.
yield and good sized hops.
Good plant, go
Fair plant, 17ar
--nit plant, poor y..'eld, lari:,e rte hope.
3
fair yield, large sire
-o.,d pla%1
7,00d plant, fair yield, Nil. size hops.
Good plant, good yield, fair size hops.
F
3
2
4
S
S
Good
od
:alr
Fair
plant,
plant,
plant,
plant,
good yieU, good sire hops.
.,0,0e yield, fair sire hops.
F
F
3
good yield,
fair yield,
Y ood plant, good yield
:air plaJt, :air yeld,
Good plant, good yield,
Good plant, :pod yield,
1
Good plant, -Tod yield, fair sire * '-epee
F
3
F
1
F
3
3
2
2
lood
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Cal
LC z 4,
X
F
F
F
F
F
4
5
3
plan:,
plant,
plant,
plant,
plant,
plant,
7/21
7/21
7/21
7/21
7/13.
good yield, hops axe sonsehat mood
4
4
F
hops,
.Poor plant, good yield an o-.1 good sized
lope.
F
F
fair plant, good yield
Peculiar hops, zicely b
Good plant, good yield and good sized hope.
Good plant, good yield and fair 'timid hops.
sir plant, good yield and good sized hops.
-air plaat, good yield and fair sired hops.
Good plant, vury good yield and fair sized hops.
Very good plant, very good yield and fair sized hops.
Good pla,t, ,. ood yield,. Pair situ hops.
Fair plant, poor yield, largo sire hops.
3
F
F
F
F
(Cent )
fair size hops.
good size hope.
*cod sire ilopso
air size :lops.
good size /1014
good size hops.
~ctod yield, fair site
good yield, i;ood size
good yield, !pod sine
cood yiele, good size
good yield, ;god size
od yield, good size
hops.
hops.
hops.
hope.
hops.
hops.
7/21
7/21
7/23,
7/k1
7/21
7
7
7/22
7/22
7,4a2
7
7
7 2
7/22
7/22
7/122
Maturity Notes on Seedlings Picked in 1936, (Cont
te
Oats*
Oirietyl
nt I
98-31
99-17
99-18
100.7
100-8
100.23
100-29
101-15
10132
Tai
7,22
F
good yield. Goad sires ham.
good yield, good siva, lops.
i
good yield, good sine hope.
7
7/22
7/22
F
goo y4id, fair else hops.
good yield, good size hops.
fair yield,. good sine hops.
good yield, fair sive hops.
5
LC
LC
to 3 iu h
3
3
3
Go
a
good yield, good aim hops.
d yield, fair size hops.
liar
Taken
742
7
33
32
32
35
32
32
32
V2
32
25
1
,0$
411
101
1
1
110111 0 111
04
1
1
r4
0)
XNE42
04
3°18228882R
11122
0
0
6
0
r4
04 C4 4.4 PI c4 C4
r4
oa
c4
0)
$
Ilig$011
ti3
vtv
CORR8
*000
r4
ago
xeassa
S2 § Sk8S2R8* Rg248
r.loancr'NNMploNtONtl .40NN
3.
An extensive sontrolled poAination program was undertaken for
the purpose of producing new improved varieties which will e
The principal
good charaeterietice of the now existing varieties.
characters being considered are mildew resistance
the
quality* and yield.
These characters are all inherited in a very complicated manner end
therefore the task of combiniAg them le a difficult one and one that will
take a long time to accomplish.
tion is beinr wade.
No-oiry
definite progress in this direct.
At present* enoui crosses between hop varieties have
been made to give the breeder sox o idea as to which
will produce the
best hybrids With this information at hand it will be possible for the
breeder to concentrate his efforts on the most promtstng parent stock end
hence, he should be able to make more rapid progress.
In 1936, about 390 different crosses mere at
clusters of flowers for each cross were bagged and pollinated, thus makag
* total of over 3000 clusters of flowers upon. which artificial crosses were
attempted.
Of these attempts only about 15 per vent were successful,
This
low per cent of successful crosses man due principally to the Lot that many
of the flowers burned under the bags,
'both glassine and parchment bags were
tried and parchment were found to be most successful.
Nearly all cross,* at­
tempted under glassine bags were unsucoessful as were also a high per cent
under the parehment bags.
At the stage at which they must be bagged* the
flowers are very tender and the higher temperature and lack of air circulation
under the bags causes them to burn quite readily.
In Tables 9, 10, 11 and 12 some data on the crosses attempted
The symbols used in theme tables are explained below*
Symol,' U
Name of Variety
NO" orttattE
Oal.C.
Califernia Cluster
Tett.
Tettnonger Frah
P.K.G.
East Kent Golding
G.
Goldin
M.R.
Millers Resistant
V (J)
Wirt. (Jagger)
Cal
California seedling
El,
Eiassor
A.R.
Auseher Rote
E.O.
Early Green
E044
et Kent
S.
Spalter
S(U)
Salter (Urbann)
.8
3(R)
Spalter (Rhomer)
X
Unknown seedling
S(S)
Spalter (Simon)
Fa
Pules (New Zealand)
L.G.
Late Grape
OSC-S
Oregon State College seeding
Bavarian
F
Pcglss
A.G.
Kent Golding
LC
Late Clusters
A(U)
Algal* (Urnann)
Sam(S)
rambling (Salmon)
L(S)
Landhopten (Simon)
Sp(U)
B(S)
palt (Urbana)
Bergunder (Simon)
Ti e Blandhe
obtained C*Tiorn a root outtlq
*
"seed
Bed Vine
74C,
Early Cluster
Malvertler Grm
Table 9
Sulftssfial Crows Mid, in 1936
X 41
(X-8)
XkShat
914
91-9
91.4
9449
red)
(amid
)
(7KG-8)
(L(.. ) -) X 63-30
Mi).4)
x
89.26
(LO-S)
-3)
(0
(S(R)..2) X 19-8
(LC-R)
X 8-U
(E041)
(F -S)
X 93-13
G-R
X(Shattered)
"-R
(seed)
R
X 93.14
96-30
9640
(G.R )
94-19
98-6
21-5
21-5
214
964
35-10
94-6
27-8
27-8
9548
95-28
28.9
3746
3746
96-21
9641
9641
28.4
39-17
41-6
414
X 10-13
L(S
X 6346
(1.:04)
X 354
(Cal
X
(to
13-33
1740
2
00
00
0/4
7/7
9
so
6
221
172
192
7f 1
76
87
54
3
1-3
1
3
0
0
o
4
so
6Os
/23
0-1
23
q/ts
6/29
7/0
7/0
7/0
04
-
1
0
7/1
0
a
4
7/20
70
(Cheek)
X 1343
0
0
o
0
7/7
7/23
0
') X 73-10
63-.26
7/8
7/0
7 9
7/0
(Cheek)
-R X 86-16
s) -R X 8946
X
93-14
X
107-21
)-R,X 13.43
n)
(Check)
X 73-10
0
OS
X 294
(6
7/8
6/27
6/27
7/8
x 10741
(Tett-R) X 34-8
(Check)
(Tett R)
X 314
( (a
X 44-13
(A(U
X 71 -16
(Cheek)
(G-R
X 10741
48/21
(F4)
7/*
6/29
A/27
7/0
7/6
7/8
7/0
7/9
7/0
7/1
7/0
7/0
7/8
0
0
0
14
1-24
0
.
7/20
7/k0
7
7
o
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
7/29
.
7/29
7/28
a
19
143
83
369
353
4
12
74
70
756
455
13
210
10
94
3
126
32
9
16
3
?abli
10
X
X
X
6340
X
15
(SPO
(SP(441)
X
1-30
22
1-30
09026
6946
(Sp(U)06)
X
37025
(Sp(U) -R)
X
140
3745
3947
(L(9)(440)0R)
X
13053
17 -50
R)
140
40025
40025
40032
42.24
($am(U) -R)
(Ssas(U R
X
X
X
(8ora0
X
73010
09026
(L0)4)
.X
1740
4224
(L(S).R)
42 -28
(L(S)-R)
4246
(7,(0.4)
6302
85-5
65-5
69-12
(8.1C-R)
Ott1,C0R)
X
X
X
X
x
X
69 -12
(1(04)
(7KG4)
91.7
(S-R)
91 -7
(s -a)
92.13
93010
(s-R)
X
X
X
X
9445
311.8)
93-10
93-10
94,5
9405
El.R)
(E10R)
X
X
X
X
X
(ElR)
X
(E1-11)
El-R)
944
(pa.R)
9442
(r2,-.11)
1R9
X
X
X
X
1 a)
X
04012
94-12
94-13
1 R)
9443
94-19
X
X
9549
X
92 -13
.1:
2013
92013
65023
X
X
-s)
'X
6343
73-10
89.26
63.30
104-11
104.11
2908
104 -11
29-8
104011
29-8
8013
314
500
344
(7;c4
(:'(N: )-3)
((G.S)
(1G.R)
)
(
(nr
(ma-1
(t7..0
(1,C-R)
(F4)
(1,::,-)
17C $)
)
7/2
294
843
30 -31
4/,3
AO
8 3
7/8
7/8
7/25
7/6
6/27
6/07
7/25
7/25
7/8
7/8
07
7/8
8/2
8/3
08
7/25
055
7
7 28
7/0
08
7/8
7/8
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/8
08
7/7/8
8
8/,4
7/8
AO
07
,(27
65-34
29-8
8-13
X
42
AO
7
7
7/6
7/8
7/6
7/6
8/29
10741
142
8/3
8/3
3
7/38
34-8
10-13
19-8
72-11
10-13
39-4
1201
03
7/28
8//3
3904
29-8
63-34
7/33
7/33
7/8
7/8
7/6
7/8
7/ 8
31-6
6149
12 -1
(Le-R
73,10
19-4
X
X
X
63023
. NZ)4)
7/0
7/8
7/8
7/0
7/8
7/6
7/2
7/2
7/6
7/6
7/8
7/8
6 27
/2
7/2
(1.4)
'7
)
7
7
0
0
O a
0
8/5
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7
rooms Made In 1916, (Cont.)
142
(TD-R )
x
3-9
3-9
16.8
18-6
(rG.R)
x
X
X
X
x
174
17.2
17.12
17-12
20.4
20.4
2343
(PG...R)
(Be.R)
(8e-R)
(3e-R)
(ft-R)
(Fa-R)
7/6
7/4
7/4
7/6
7/6
7/6
7/6
X
x
(17;-,R)
A(U)-R)
(to-,..,
X
X
x
6
34.33
30.31
13.33
(Sa .(
40
23 43
24-12
24-12
24-13
24-13
28.7
28.8
28-8
28-9
28.9
28.30
28.30
29-2
(Sam
X
17X
(Sass
13.33
(Sam
X
X
(Sara 0 ) -t)
X
1.30
13.33
63-30
83.28
29 -12
(L(3 ) -R)
2942
9546
(se.,-,(g )«.
S)
UR.4)
-S)
(Sam(S)..
(3am(3),R)
(L0-8;
(LO-S)
(La-S)
L ,
95-16
95.17
95.17
98.15
95.19
95.20
(V
(Tett
(Tott-R
(3(s).R)
9540
(S(S).11)
95.21
95.22
95-22
95.30
05-30
95.30
(S(3).)
)°R )
.:;(-4)­
(S(0)..R)
(S(3)..A)
(SO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
x
X
98-31
96-3
96.4
98.4
98.7
96.13
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
A
98.311
96 -31
)
'
x
X
(ERG -S)
(?-S)
(LC.S)
3)
1740
89.26
73.10
102.16
89-26
63.28
63.28
8645
63.30
8.8
73-10
31-6
39-4
10.13
7/7
7/7
7/15
7/15
7/2
7/2
7/2
7/7
7/7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7/7
1(0,..A)
7/23
7/23
7/23
7/20
7/50
7/23
7/23
7/23
7/23
(17,10-.1 )
717
7/7
7/7
7/0
7/0
7/8
7/8
7/2
7/2
7/2
(%c. -i2)
7
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
8/4
8/4
7(117,j4)
r-3)
(F0.8)
(X -.)
(F4,1470.8)
(L0-8)
(LC-4)
(-N
704
1-S)
7/2
7/9
79
7241
/
31-8
34-8
10.15
72.11
19.8
8.8
34-8
39.4
19-8
31.8
73.10
39-4
72.11
7/9
7/0
7/9
7/0
7/9
79
7//9
743
4
4/4
A/4
4/4
79
7/29
7/9
740
7/0
7/99
4
9
9
10.111
7/9
7/9
19.8
31.6
7/0
7/0
9
Uneuseesafat Crouse Nude in
193
OM-4S)
X
X
34-8
39.4
5
(9(s)-R)
X
96.16
(8(0)-R)
(V(J)-*)
X
X
X
1043
7241
1043
7241
(Cal-C)
(LC-R)
(X-S)
(LC-R)
(X.8)
10-13
(LC-)
7241
1043
(X-S)
194
(03C-3)
(x.-)
(030-4)
(LC-R)
(S(S)..R)
974
97-2
98-7
98.7
(V(41)441)
9840
9e.10
(S(R).R)
(s(R)-R)
9640
(S(R)..R)
96-19
98-20
98021
104-8
104-6
(S(/)-R)
(S(R).R)
(6(R)-R)
(kR-R)
(AR-R)
(S(R).R)
X
X
X
X
x
7241
7.
194
X
10.43
X
7241
7340
10246
X
A
(Lc)
(x.,>;)
(' c,$)
0
)
7/9
7/9
7/0
7/9
7/9
7/9
7/0
7/0
7/0
7/9
7/9
7/9
7/*
7/9
7/0
7/9
7
4
8/4
A/4
Ati
A/4
8/4
A/4
4
4
8/4
8/4
7/30
7/30
Varieti, a.
Tab's Its
3.441.ins
Suoaeestu3 Grasses Made in 1936
x
X
X
X
(F.41
P
11
(7C-R)
(F.R)
X
X
X
(r.c.R)
('-R)
2i -12
31-29
14
(LC-8)
)
N
13-4
13-4
13-4
13-9
13-9
13-9
12.2
114
11-2
11-6
11-6
11-6
31.44
X
(Cheek)
31.44
20.34
14-16
31-34
(Cheek)
20-34
31-34
(Cheek)
31-34
X
X
X
X
X
F(8)4)
' -R)
(F
(F-S)
44-13
7146
K
X
F-R)
P.R)
.4)
F-R)
4/18
0
23
6/23 0-1-2
6/18 0-1-2-8
0.4
6/23
ataa 0-1-2
0-14
7/i
0
0/26
7/1
-14­
3 0-1-2
0
6/23
(Cheek)
R)
3149
7/1
x
X
13.4
(Chock)
31.44
(Cheek)
314i4
(Cheek)
x
X
X
X
X
X
7146
20-34
31-34
(x.$)
Czr,Y.$)
(RV
(W-8)
(08C-8)
(M-R)
rites
*
a
e
t
a
*
0.1
6/30
6/29
Vao
(RV.8)
(RV-8)
(Le X F
(08C4i)
(RV-8)
(' -R
19.41
(4-33.8
3.
6
6/17
6/26
6/26
6/18
13/30
6/29
6/29
8
6/29
2-3
2 -5-4
4/29
ao
4/30
6 22
2.4
1-2.4
V22
2-3-4
2
197
389
9
654
18
126
144
176
226
6/29
14
(0=4)
10741
R a Root (slitting
0
6/30
0
4-43.
Seedling t
Oregon State College
niggles. from Woods yard
Early ClusterLate Cluster
Red Vines
Fast Kent Golding
.6 * Seedling
3
(RV.8)
Symbols
3012
0SC
F(N)
r.c.
L.e.
)
6/22
179
60
462
138
34
459
201
168
6
2
66
t
Unsuommsful Grosses tads in 1936
75-17
11-8
1449
24-29
13-7
114
11$
22-29
22-29
24-49
24-29
25.51
25.31
25-31
12-5
12-5
53-9
53-9
r-s)
X
F-R)
(7C-R)
x
X
(rc,R)
X
(i.4)
(F.R)
(F-R)
(FC-R)
X
19
1941
19-31
15-31
19.31
14.16
x
6445
x
20-34
93-14
71-16
44-13
45-30
46-30
X
(BC.11
X
(rc.R )
(7.C.R)
X
x
(20.6)
X
(FrV.S)
0-3)
X
x
X
X
F
)
X
x
4445
20-34
71-16
44-13
44-13
71-16
(RV.,))
3012-6)
(F.3)
(3012.S)
(FC-R)
(LC-4)
(0 C-S)
-6)
LC X iNso
)
)
(F-6)
(X-8)
01
6/16
6/18
6/22
6/22
6/22
648
2
9
9
6/23
6/25
2
043
6/18
6/18
8/22
6/26
6/27
6
OD
(Lc X F­
(x-5)
06
6/27
:3
6/23
(X403 )
6/25
30
6/30
6/30
8/30
(LC
043
440
(o3(:-s)
v_ 1'-3)
?,.r each (moss attempted, unpollinated checks were left.
The
Blusters of flowers left as checks were bagged at the same time as those
to be pollinated and were treated in exaetly the smog manner except that
no pollen was applied,
of the
These checks were left so that the effectiveness
bagging method could be determined.
left and only 12 or 2,22
of these set seed.
A total of 541 checks were
The probable explanation
of the seed produced on these 12 checks is that the flowers were bagred
at too late to stage or that the bags &td not fit tight enough around the
stem to exclude wind blown pollen.
rkers have reported parthenogenesis
in hops, but the author is of the opinion that seed is rarely if ever produced
without fertilisation in the common varieties of hops.
producing seed are given in Tables 13 and 14.
Data on the cheeks
ri
Chet** that Produced Seed
2-4
2642
Cheek
7/1
1.24
ft
VI
0-1-2
U
13-7
11-6
13-4
13-4
ft
7/1
6/23
a
6 3
04.2.34
4/25
2-3
197
178
98
9
16
60
34
a
0-1.2.3
0
Total No, of cheeks that produeed woad
»
7
Total No. of °hooka that did not produce seed - 108
% of checks tat produced seed­
% of Cheoks that did net maws. Reed
*A *0
*Si
93.3;1
Cbeelc Data on 7
Table 14.
Cheoke that Produced Seed
214
3748
-R
AlasoeOrh
4alter(Urbann).R
94-8
Elasear-R
9449
9621
Tettnonger 1ruhm.4
Bert.
n
er(Simoc)-R
1.1
Cheek
"
iv
'I
"
7
0
0
0
0
143
210
12
4
3
Fol.:21ta
Varietie,
In Tables 16 and 16 some plant notes and picking data on the
rietiss
which
were picked for analysis, are recorded*
taken to determine what the character
These
ties of thee* varieties
information is valuable in detenaining the varieties to use
ae parent stook
in
the breeding program.
Table 17 gives
period over which pollen woo
the males used in crosses in 1936.
d by each of
The majority of these males are weed.
These seedlings were used as pollen parents because they appeared
to have better characteriat4ce than the males of the cram en hop variexties.
Table 15.
Sam 3)
MR
LO
3pa(U)
28-30
37-24
39-17
Som(U)
41-24
EKG
63-31
GC
88-8
GC
89-7
94-13
94-17-19-22 Tatt
Tett
95 -14.19
Sem
95-13
V(J)
95 -16-17
Spg(S)
95-22
G
95- 28-29
TB
96-3
Berg
96-27
96-30
98-30
104-6
104-12
SIAM
AR
33
33
33
Maturit
on Foreign
plant, large hops and a good yle
spikes but fairly good plant.
plant and good yield.
plant and good yield.
plant and fair yield.
large plant, large hops and good yield.
r poor plant with low pie
y poor plant with low ytel
y poor plant with a fair yield.
poor plant with a fair yield.
Fair plant with a fair yield.
Fair plant, fair yield hops up to 8/4 in.1
Poor plant with poor yield.
Poor plant with poor yield.
Good plant, good yield end fair site hops.
Poor plants, poor yields and fair rise hope.
Fair plant, poor yield, End fair sire hops.
?air plant, fair yield and fair alto hops.
Fair plant, fair yield and fair arise hops.
Fair plant, poor yield and Pair rise hops.
Fair plant, fair yield, and fair site hops.
Fair plant, flair yield and good sire hops.
Good plant, good yield and good size hops.
Fair plant, poor yield, some oozes are nature
at this date.
Good plant, good yield, :;cod sized hops
Fair plant, poor yield, fair size hops.
Fair plant, fair yield, fair size hops.
7/17
7/17
7/17
7/i7
7/17
7/27
2
2
2
3
1
7
7
7
7
4
7
7
7/22
02
7/22
7422
7/22
2
2
1
1
1
3 and
beyond.
5
2
3
4
1
3
7
7/22
7
2
into 2 in. hops
3
stages
7 2
7
7/22
2
3
3
Pore
3-9
16-6
16-8
17-2
20-4
23-6
23-7
28-30
3744
39-17
41-24
63-31
88-8
89-7
94-13
94-17 1
95-14-19
95-13
95-16-17
95-22
95-28-29
96-3
9647
96-40
98-30
104-6
104-12
3.3
2,5
4,0
2.4
2.3
4.5
EO
NIT
EG
Bair
h(u)
Sion
mn
)
1.1*­
Spa (II )
:Sodium stron,
A('.. )
Very strong
intther strong)
tithe r stronc )
Tett)
Tett)
0 '?,iediem stro
9/19
Sent
V(J)
Ste.
G*
TB
Berg
G*
Spa(R)
AR
ma
L
9/9
9/9
9
9/10
9/9
9/10
9/10
9/10
}nion like
Medium
Medium
2.1
3.6
25
3.2
2.1
1.6
2.5
1.6
1,1 t
2.8
k7eak pleasant
14
lather strong
1,7
Very strong
Iteditst
Very straw, (with
,athor
Rather mild
Rather strong peculiar
.3
3.5
1,0
14
16.
19,
28
25
35
29
28
28
34
16.66
19.17
13.60
16,65
16.20
16.72
1640
20,
17,37
L
28
23
37
25
31
30
60
30
30
14.09
17.21
17,51
154,43
15.16
19.92
15,43
16.92
12.53
14,67
25
28
33
that it is a leaf inftotion
?ler s that it is a stem or spike infection.
* - Means hops were overripe,
Means 25;: of green we -ight was molted used in derivin the dry sea
S
t.
2,72
3.25
7.60
3.48
3,68
649
3.48
6.44
95
2.30
(Solana)
Millers Resistant
Leto Grape
LG
Spa(U) ­
alhopfen
ii
ling (Urbann)
Sais(U)
EKG
Go
palter (Urbarsa)
=
Kent Goldin
Golden Clusters
laassor
Tett
Tettnonger
Sea
Senn*
V(J)
Vorte (Jagger)
Spa(S)
Spalter(3 LIM
0
Goldin
TB
Tics Blanobs
Berg
Bergunder
Spa(R)
Spalter (Ithesser)
AR
Auseher Rots
It)
Lialvertterjruns
*germ
9.09
21-9
11-0T
22-2I
91-10T
12-91
02-41
8-61
12-6T
11-03
9-63
T2-02
9-12
92-12
22-it
22-42
90669
2t0,9
02-29
63-19
H-07
9-01
a7 e9-07
ezJi
9-0a
9-4
H-07
9-090
8-(29-0
9-090
9-AN
9-01
S-a
$-A9
O-S
V-07
C-r00
9-X
s-a
OtJL
60
0-3c.
91.029
020029
s-oa
s-tma
it-19
9-41
910614
9-IX01
9-y
9-02
s-rn
TI-Z4
01°14
91-99
91-10
92-69
9T-26
91-201
4
9-Alt
Sod
0.1
1106,01
1pbern
I3-401
N*41
OTJb
OtfL
Vari
b
variety trial plot was e
near Indeependenees Oregon*
Figure 1.
Horst Hanish
The planting plan of this
Tables. l8, 19,e 20 and 21 give
is given in
be notes that were taken on this
variety plot .at various dates during the summer of 1936*
In Table 22,
comparison of the amount of mildew infection on the foreign varieties
being grown both in the Horst yard and in the ewrinental yard at
Corvallis is given*
At the time these notes were taken nildew infeetion
was slightly heavier in the Horst yard than it was in the Corvallis yard*
TUs was likely
doe to
the fact that the ploat at the Horst awadh is on
los grquid and is surroexaded by trees, +sued hones the humidity in the area
is usually hish*
High humidity favors the spread of d
mildew.
None
of the varieties gro4n in this plot were immune to mildew although some of
them seemed to be more resistant than Late Clusters
No yield de
wore Obtained from this plot due to the fact that the
f the ranch failed to lot us
when those hope would be pioked*
s were pited on, the same day although they varied by as much
as
roe seeks in their date
have one man in Charge of this plot
variety at the proper time*
can be seourod from this pl
If this
turity*
It would be desirable to
t data could be taken o4, eso
done, mush valuable information
0
.........
it . ,
0
34
10­
..... ........
*
OD
4
a -14
0
4
4
r- a­
44
.
4 Ite
3,
....
a
0 x 4 pc
CO
4
1
4
11 X
6,310eNt
w
X
*
a
.
1k.
Ag.
,
0
..
-- --*­
,i(.
3%
2c
Jig
A­
*N. ,
.
se
e.xe
*
4
44-1.
14­
0 jpc X
$4
O
.
Nt"
.........
I .......
0
g
fe
.
IO
,S.
*
,
41­
....
.... ..
e 06
rJ
8
4.2
I
*
* 11144
4,--40-----,
GV
02
1/2
*
*
X
5%
4,
II
L....
4--a a- *
At At At
r-I
*
1
4,
Ala_ WI_
1
1
P-4
.Sri
V
Cd
r4
Sr
$4
E-I
s
d2 °V2
Si
Ea
o 0
0 TO f­
ON
----04-0 /0_ .0_ ......_
l0' 0.0t04 EN
A
$1
czi
40CO
ai
Ed
Ci
CO
co
,o 0
$.
4FJ8
co
---­
DI
CO
1:4
$4
0 0 0 g g -,-4 r-i
0 e0A-,
64 rz-1 0 0 g c.)
b.0 'D
b.0 I
Si Si S Si
ci f=4 04
..H II 4,,A. 4 1 I $ .00 0 0 .0
0 0 0 M M 01 0
b.0'.-­
,
63
$.4
tz)
$.
0 ID
-......­
1
J.-;
0
or,
44-)o
7"'s 49
:61
g8 i : 3 1
C/)
:Li
.
.-42...-.12... XL --0­
I-1 -i r-1 0 g
cd
cd
ai
cd
PI:
.
4:1-eZ 0 rx.
0 MI 40 FAO CD C.) r-1
$4 o fl o o
fa 04 Pa r-i CD 0 ;4 CD Si S-4
CO C/) C/) 14 CD PP c.b 1-4 0 0 PI
CV
4.3 ---,-,f­) (,
si
"
taf)
fZ
lc
CV
se
Z Si rd 'CI r-i
r 0 000
0
....,
r - 4. -I
Si
......1:c1 ,--fx/
0
-f)
GS
cril 0. -1
7 g 0)
'
0 0 bp
0 $.4 ri ri S-I _P
PI r.) 0 f= P4 0 fie
,i;
Z111111111111 11111111111 f
gi r-I CV t0 .44 10 CO C.- co ca 0 ri cv to Nti 10 CO t- CO Cr) 0 r-i CV CO cti
1
r-IHr-If-1 H r-I 1--1
a)
CIO
1:4--­
Hr-I H 02 CV 02 CV 02
ri CV
tI
Vs
Rev 1.
"
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
"
8.
"
O.
" 1O,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
w
"
"
"
11 «
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18,
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
" 24.
t Y
T
Golding URT1CA
Vert' Jagger = 2
Spalter (Stuart) « 2
Tettnanger 7riel
7
Alsace (Urbana) up 6
Saalthg (Salmon)
11
Speller
13
Spalter (Urbana)
17
Spalter (Rohm's.)
20
Elaesar
21
Sense
29
Burgunder (Simon)
"`arty Green Dtaba
Landhopfen (Simon)
3rsaerOs Favourite
3ranerts Gold 121 0,
C. Zone Geldings
'14nt dradings
rly Cluster. . 48
Clusters » 48
74
74
80
California Clusters
Oregon Fagging - 80
Riveraidi Soedlinge
80
Riverside Seedlinge » 80
Oregon Cato Clusters
41
Pugglos NUreary
Notes Taken 6/5/36
Vtnes already auebared sad striped and sons epikim; done
whin (wanted.
Legendt
be 0 blind spike
8 * spikes.
* loaf infection.
le 1, 2 is LI
Rtrsr 2 s
le, 1, 2* be
Hills 1, 2 *
TW-3 s Mlle 1, 2 * LI
Hill 1 *
Row 41
i11a 3. 4 0 0
Hills 1, 2, 5, 4 7 a LI
Hill 5 * S
Hills 1, 6 * 0
Hills 4, 5 e LI
Fills 2, 3 s 3
Hills 1-11
LI
Variety Trial Plot,
rs s Yard
a0
44* 1043
42, 16-17
* 14
LI
LI
S
0 a LI
0
Hills
Fills
ow llt Hills
Bills
Hills
Hills
5,6
barely up
LI
2-4, 7-10, 13-23
2, 5, 17, 26 0 0
LI
3-4, 6-9, 11 -16, 18.25, 27, 29
3-25, 27, 29 a bs
3.4, 7.9, 12-15, 16-21
S
10, 16
Hine 1-29
LI
Hills 9-11, 16-15, 18 -21, 23, 2
0
sill 27
LI
Hills 146, 26.30
All 2 a be
Ulla 4, 22'a $
Row 1
ills 1-14, 16-30
MMIOVXM,
Hills 44, 6, 12
ratter's Favourites
0
Hills 14* 7 -9, 12
LI
Rill 10
S
Hill 10
lug
R
LI
* 16-20
12, 14 s S
7t
R
Row
barely up
0
barely up
6 -15, 1740 s LI
9-15, 17.40 0 S
LI
10.13, 15-20
rely up
0 0 LI
5-6 6-10, 12.14
R
21
huw
3s Hill
barely up
LI
Rills 1.2, 4-5, 7-20
Hills 7.10, 12 -13, 1640
LI
mils 1-20
if 20 .8
S
Row
1
2
8
Variety
I.K0A
Golding
Vert, (Jetgor)
Spate? (S
4
1111
5
Algae* U
6
trill 11 not ty pictal,s Vince vigorous*
Samlinn (Salmon)
amount of leaf infection but no epticea.
Spatter w ".ante have yellow mottled leaves* Appears to be 4
Eenstio character.
13,
ter (Urban) .. Vigorous viuss, Hills 1, $0/14
15
bats freer* stems others are red vine.*
ter (Roa ner) . Vigorous vi s. Rill 13 not typioe
$
Jed leaf infection*
s, Many spikes*
Sees&
- Vines vigorous tau have lots of leaf infect on
Surgunder (S
and spikes.
1,Cir vines but eonsiderable mi dew*
rly .3reen (DU4a
Loodhopron (awn)
VLIes vigorous but considerable nildee*
Brewers' Avorite - Plants just comInc up.
I:arly Clusters - Badly spiked.
rowers' Uold - Only one plant up*
t (loadings - Considerable leaf Leaction, and spi kes*
3. C. Lent Golding* - Considerable leaf InXeetion and spikes.
California (Austere - Bad mildew infeotion*
Ar,gles - Very light leaf tafection. No spies*
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
16
1?
16
1
20
4d
1p ', 6, and 11 red vino* 411s
Avereide Seedltag
4,
50 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 18 14, 13, 16, 17, 10, 19 and 20 green
22
25
24
rly Clusters,
vine - look :much like
rlveraide Soedlilva
Lill* 4, 5, 14 and 17 red vines.; others up
to hill 20 aro Green. Notes only taken to hill 20«
Orogiea Late Clustor »
'iNu7zlee Nursery - Light loaf imeeetion.
Table
T
July 1
R.P.Q.C.A.
2,
Verte Jagger
Red
Groom
inch)
4. Tet
Priih
5. Alia
U. bann)
6. &ruling (Salmon)
Red
Rod
Rod
Red
7. :Ipalter
Axed
Spoil
8, Spalter (Urbana)
9. Spalter (Bobo* )
10. Flaysar
11. Semsoh
1.2. Burgunder (SloOn)
Weak plants dui to mildew.
1
0
0
Vary
Red
Rod
Aod
Red
Hod
I
13. Barl4pr Green (t*ba)
Ireton
14. LandhopPon (Simon)
16 3renero Favorito
Rod
2
2
0
16. Srowers Gold
17, B. Co Kent
18. Oregon Ter1y Cluster
19. California Cluster
20. Oregon cuggles
21. Riverside 3.040
22, Orecoft Late Clustsr
23. Fugclos (11Ursory)
0
Good.
Fair.
Poor,
Good,
Good.
Poor.
Mottled leaves.
Mottled leaves.
Plante­
d and 13 have hops 1 inch
long. others in stage 2.
Good.
Good. test of Spslter types.
0
0
0
Very poor.
Fair. Mottled leaves.
God. Plmnt 4 has 1 inch hops.
it,ry good, Uniform*
Very poor. Plant Nos. 10 2 6
7 and 10 very weak growth.
Others (Wad.
Only one plant growing and it
is very weak.
Green
0
Good. Uniform.*
Green Vary most­ Very poor. Almost total loss
ly Stage S.
duo to mildaho
Green
3
Fair. Mhoh better than Oregon
Clusters,
Groom Vary frma
Fair
uniform.
stage 2 to
1 inch hops.
Reddish
3
Pair to good. Look 1i. red vine
type.
Groom
1,
'air. Are uneven.
Groom
Vary
Fairly good. Uniform.
from 0 to 3,
Stage of Mat
1
2
5
I.
4
bout 4 days earlier than 2.
Table 21.
VoriStilss at the Horst Yard
August 21, 1936
Rirrsi.do
Vary 1n ooze.
piskod
Oregon Fuggles
about August 29. Long pones
California Clusters
no hops.
Brwmars Gold
Brower* Favorite - no hops,
1 good yield, good vino
Picked part of
Landhopfen
growth. Ripe about Au ;u
Very felt hops, uneveca, some rips.
Early Cluster
Early, Orson - Good yield, good median large size cons. Very In maturity
fair yield.
sane. no&rly
Burgunder (Simon)
I inch come.
Small slender poop, fair yield.
flood. vino growth.
',Mature Auliust 2. Vary
Poor y .old mi
Squaro cone. Mature August 27. Vary
Semseh
Fluffy small *one, fair yield, fair vine growth,
rlasear
Mature Auguet SO
Spalter (Rohmer) - Small blunt oone, *air yield.
Smal/ blunt eons, fair yiOld. Mature Augu3t 29.
Spalter (Urbann)
Spalter w. Small blunt cone- pOr yield* Asture August 23.
Samling (Salmon) - Small bast clone, fair yield, rature SeiteMber 4.
(Urbann) - Small clones fair ye/d. Mature, August 2S.
.wain also clone, poor yield, Maialre Ataust
Tettnauger ("''r h.)
ao other : ;palters.
Spalter
)
1 round oono, fair yield. Mature August 29.
S
Verte Jame
W403, poor yield. Mature August 24.
Golding
Table 22.
0aro ri aen of 101.40er,
and
Veri ttss amt the
1, Golding
2
0
3
1
0
2
2. Verte (Jagger)
P.
0
2
0
3
0
0
2
3. Spalter (n um)
2
1
2
0
8
0
3
5
4, Tettnang
6
1
5
0
5
0
0
5
4
2
2
0
7
3
6
2
6. anling (Salmon)
11
0
11
0
10
7
10
0
7. Spelter
11
1
11
0
9
2
2
7
8. Spalter (Urbann)
17
2
13
2
9
4
6
3
9. Spalter (Bator)
20
0
20
0
10
2
4
6
10. glasear
18
0
2
15
6
9
6
11. Seneca
25
18
22
3
9
0
4
5
9
12
29
0
18
2
16
2
13. garly Green (Dube)
29
3
29
0
13
2
8
6
14. Landhopfen (Simon)
30
18
29
1
21
6
19
2
1
1
1
0
20
6
18
1
14
2
6
8
18
14
17
1
10
7
8
2
5. Alsace
ban)
12. Burgunder (s
15. Smarts Favorite
16. 3,0. Kent Golding*
Clusters
Spike
Last infection
26
promising seedling"!
of
the experimental yard at Corvallis. Oregon,
to
soma is Bioehemist Division of Drug
tw
and Related !Amt. Bureau of Plant industry. B.
eulture. Washington. Di C.
Deparbeertt of Agri
Mr. Rabak also analysed hop samples trona
fertiliser trial and frma a stage of maturity experiment senduated by
Dr.
C. Smith.
The reports submitted by Mr. Weak are included verbatim
in the following pages se a matter a record.
l93
These reports are for the
season rather than filer 1936 as they arrived too late to be included
in the 1)58 Annwel Report.
t at
iteowatrdtour awn
Corvallis
vidod into
by Dr
d
three groups a000rdin
Group 1
dlings
seedlinGs. group 2 . 17 seedlings, And
Physical and oheatcal examinAtioas wars
of the hops
of which were grown in 1933 and 1934.
from the various soodlins-
16
results were tabulated in throe- gropo.
The
In group 1 eight soodl:n4s 71oldod
hops containing from 16.03 to 19.71 per sent, four from 14.36 to 15.93 per
The seedlings
cent and four from 11.09 to 12.72 per cent of soft resins.
in thew, thros pereontago ranges of soft rosins may be classsd as
ood
fair wad poor respootivoly.
Those seedlings roarroa,le
content rem as follows:
poodlinps
T
52141
late Clusters
842
6247
73i43
,ADd Vino
364
3.3:11.6
65-31
2-31
19-33
Per cent
1 Soft RO
19.71
19.12
19.06
18.12
17.62
17.16
17.11
16.03
wow
15.00
14.41
14.36
mow
4fto.
*00
ow& ftmow
4wo
.44 4,0W
Fair
i277T
100-8
24-7
77-5
12.45
11.80
11.09
Poor
Five of the sixteen soedlingo grown in 1935 were also
1934.
roma in
In order that a eariparioon of those, five seedlings
13. sa
$8
1
ta
eemor
8010
rr
Mildoleasint
774
Dark green
M ldoleasant
63.21
Yellowle
V
brown
Pale
Mildolessant
Goldin*
owl
variegated
Mild* very
pleasant
Pale green,
brown cones
Strong*
pleasant
ie
Strang.
pleasant
brain
Yellowish trees
Late
Yellowish mean
mild,
*erosible
Cold= yellow
Strong* not
0 ustere
yellow
78
8407
Clean
Yellow rreen with
Cleft
Few
YaWw, flair
16* OS
8.1$
32.45
442
841
8,86
11.09
1078
g
Broken* Meat
Yell,m, fairly
Broken
to large
9.00
13.04
Trace
15
Broken risdbia
840
17,14
0.61
1644
Yellow*
plentiful
rev
1.61
tu
241
17.01
MOS
12.50
Loam yellow,
plentiful
lkd
yellow*
plentiful
a
Claim
Yellow* fairly
plentiful
1542
Broken* ler
1o28
Loam yellow*
200
110414
1000
1700
19400
440
0614
21.11
18.13
004
108
00.00
1.80
10001
$4,01
*40
very p lentigUl
raw
Clean
Leann yellow.
very
r3r
Clete
pleasant
Mild* not
pleasant
Disagreeable
Yellow, airly
plentiful
plentiM
Mild*
scresablo
808
Rod Vine
Per
14.38
pleat/Sul
mild*
not pleasant
Oriel*
74
Broken, masa
Clean
Pale
Trios
7.5*
Yell
27
14o$4
Very
Maur
I
plettiThl
Yellow*
plentiful
6.74
27.11
Yellow, seams.
7084
14041
Dark
to large
38.8E
Ma
green during
ori
total soft resin **Mont of
made.
86-7
63-10
19.453
82-27
2.31
17,95
16.94
18.77
14.93
14.24
18.22
17.10
17.49
1743
53.10) remained feisty eons
total soft resins during the three suooessive years.
Soodl
(1
degreased And seedling (8247) inereassd in 1036 over 1933 end 1934, while
Noodling (2-31) remained fairly oonstant in 1934 and 1936.
In group. 2 only three seadlins yielded hops containing Pram 16 to
16.68 per cent, eight front 13.64 to 15.
12.89 per sent of soft resins,
por cent and six from 11.05 to
The re jority of the soedlinos (14 of the
17 seedlings) in group 2 were poor to fair in quality. Of these 17 Goodlime two Inert, also grown in 1934 and none is 1933.
c'oedl
carTared with
(32-31) and (41-31) with 16.35 and 12.42 por,oent in 1935
.28 and 13,1.3 per oent of soft resins respectively in
1934.
rem* In &moaning ord-r of their
soft resin omLent and elas
fair and poor were as foliages
lie
Vila *gown*
1.51
Tel
Very
fan
!beet
n., noel= be
0.44
17.1$
18.00
pl
bl--6
green tint
00,
°lean
Briett green
Clean
Viildiplesulant Very t
mien with brown
Strmlgo not
pleasant
ran with trona
Pair, mild
40
47
Mild,
11.14
7.50
16.6?
2.74
18.0
Yellow,
84.50
14.95
2.54
12.31
Clean
Yellow, searee
Mt
19.69
Trawl
12.69
Yellow, seam
Yellow,
p art iful
fair1
led um
Draken,
Clean
Yellow, mores
Unbroima, small
7.75
13.64
0.64
13.00
Yellowish moon
Very pleasant
Clean
Yellow, fnirly,
Unbrokon. raedinn
7.68
15.58
Pas
1249
04
11.90
047
11.0$
80
14.96
0.5?
14.39
0.00
14.40
140
13020
16.88
2.63
14.06
Pale green,
1.20
agreeable
Stralts lot
Very few
pleaea
V
Med
plentiful
ly
Yel3xstio soiree
Fairly
Yellow, sow*,
Broken,
Broken,
1.48
°lean
brown cones
to largo
len
Pale yellow i70401
Mild,agreemble Per
Clean
Yellow SWIM
Pale yellow meet
ltild.a.greeable Poe
Clean
Yellowsplentitul lira
7.80
clean
Yellow, seams
748
Pate yellow great
3.00
plentiful
IfildIrros6ble
yellow jre
16.27
S
12.61
Pillow
Few
plentiful
tinted
Dull roam
green
1.66
13.48
en, medium to
b4,00
leen
°ones
Golder ye
11.44
11.61
Golden, eesave
saw brown e,:rumf
Pale gte ou
E,r03
0
Da* green with
Se
40
13x rt ra, tied
Golden tenet*,
Unbroken,
1.07
1.17
0.04
Per suit
Total Soft Resins
5*e61140,
16.68
16.51
16.00
yr,
moo orwr umai !op- OW* OM*
1446
15.35
14.96
14.
274
6243
7.
=O.
14.49
14.40
13.04
,
1 . 9
55015
ea. wimp
.1.0
12.69
12.62
50 -7
WO in .0 WNW
Poor
4141
74-5
36.6
11.90
11.05
In group 3 oonsisting. of 41 seedlins:s
be obssed ts good in quality with perventa3es of soft rosins ranging from
16.01 to 18.961 eight.= as fair with peroentagos from 14.01 to 1607 and
th 11.00 to 13.5
soft resas.
These seedlings of group 3
riew:ed in tha
or,
their soft resin content and etas
od
.areas
fair, and poor are a
Per pint
Total 80
Seed....aua
Late Clusters
36-32
73-12
35,4
164,40
8 -10
16.77
16.76
16.66
16.40
16.33
16.27
16.01
64-8
92-22
47-32
72 -22
63-1
6542
49-28
56-16
14-32
46-4
80-21
Quality
psi
C
18.96
17.75
17.70
17.20
17.00
10142
rm.
woora wow
MO
15.60
15.56
13.53
15.42
15.33
o
wow
a..
wowo.
ow. wows
O..
40j
Wfire.".0109
100011
it140
9113
etgt
91.99
OS-4t
tot 99
09V[
in 9r
fitt-010
9-at
9I.99
102$1
9.94
ten
efrOarki
Ott
atilt
Otbt
Orin
Orin
4
Watt
9.99
19:11.
64.09
1TeCt
11-111
91.91
23.99
00.ST
-0
gen
0931
Wert
140n
93.99
08.40I
91419
91-4.9
gent
YOTIY
am
JO 01%
U011.1 JO
ot2do
wel
WOO 4M5 !WM OW. MOO WOO APO OWO
ul 996t
area
ass% mi. op= ql.p&
9I.99
OT-9
91-99
St.0
gasIs
94.99
63-09
02-01
91.1,9
3124
224
MM
0991
Stet
9
00CTtp
Orgt
MOW MOO *Om VOW MOM WOW
Ptra 40043 uT
tr4
u
UT
MOO
wee4ui.13 3O 6 p00E M1tttt
0
A
49.4l
Nan
909'1
9991
let Er
VeOt
OVOT
9931
Clint
a
11.191
6191
in 06°
99Tt
V
Because the total soft resins
a
t (alpha and beta resin*)
is
ood Wax of type quality, the seedlings were not compared as regards
the above two oceponsnts of the soft resins Usually hops with the highest
soft resin content also contain the hi.ghest alpha and beta resin content.
The gams or hard resin eontent of the seedlings vary oonsidorably and no
rly
attempt was made to compare them with re speet to this eonstituen
all of the seedlings oonteined locs than 2.5 per wont hard resins.
Any
higher pereentages would indicate ,J. usual destruction or ohange of the
desirable constituents from which the hard resins are founds
Frank Robs*
Washington,
July
1956
Varketies
Orogen
Wring the mean of 1955
mere grown at Corvallis, Ore en
Dr.
determining their respeetive
g
and ehemiell composition.
The hops were picked when fully nature*
compressed and cold stored for later physical and ehemisal analysis.
The results of the analysis of the samples were tabulated for
comparison of their
quality.
The color of the samples ran4
golden green
it odor varied considerably as indicated in the table.
Nearly all
of the verietiee from continental Atrope possessed a characteristic *oxidised"
whieh is usually observed in hops grown in Europe.
None were
seedless,
although several varieties contained very few swedes A large number contained
many seeds. Apparently no atteupt was made to eliminate male plants, in
order to produce seedless hops.
It is pocsible that some of the varieties
are low seed producers which accounts fbr their partial seedleisness.
The maples Were in general clean picked being comparatively free
from leaves and stems
in silo as compared with
The stabiles were for the most part small to medium
usual domestic varieties grown in Oregon.
The several varieties which were analysed for their resin content
were arranged in the table in the deo
(=tent
It will be observed that the
order of their total soft resin
ority contained very high percentage
of sot resin ranging from 16 to 20.88 per cent.
Only 8 samples contained
less than 16 per cent and seven of these contained from 14 to 16.99 per cent.
The total soft resin sonteat of mem of the varieties sew etrikiegly
to that found in the same varieties green in 1934.
(See 1934 report)
The alpha resin content of the sem? less ranging from 0.95 to 8,06
per *eat while oonsiderablymere vnriable was nevertheless very similar
in the esme varieties green in 1934 and 1935.
bete resin content.
Th
1.17 to 2.07 per oent
This Worldse is true of the
hard resin content of the 1935 samples ranged frets
compared with 1.24 to 2.08 per cent in the 1934
simples.
The above
are made on basis of resin content of the hops
calculated to the dry basis during both
in
114,040MS.
The pereenteges of resins
1835 samples are calculated on the dry basis while those given in the
1934 report represent samples oontp.ining Pram 8.8 to 8 per amt moisture.
For comparison of each variety during the two seasons it is necessary that
the pereentages of resins in the 1934 samples be osloulated book to the dry
basis.
s oaf the foreign varieties shows remarkable
ivn yeats (1934 and 1935).
interest to ascertain
it will be of
varieties grown this season (1950
will continue to maintain their high quality as regards their content of
beta (total soft resins) and gamma or bard resins.
De C
ser
1034 and 1938 by
d on three varieties) namely, F
Clusters and
u
le+dv in the exporinental yard at Corvallis pith fert­
ilisers 46101iiikix
and combinations,
Cluster, Late
room, phosphorus and potash in varying quantities
In addition to tests with these fertilising element*
te sts wen) Also Aide with auaoulum sulphate* caleium nitrate
nitrate and calcium eye
to ascertain their effeot on the resinous
constitunt* of hope
mom also made on Late Cluster hops on the
Cooley and :7.eavey Plots located BRA
orvallis
using nitrogen, phos­
pherus anti potash fertilisors in dig" erect omMbinationie
)p$ from each of the numerons plots were picked vhen fully
mined by physical examination,
Ze
samples vo
dried.
covreseeds. wrapped and stored Opr subsequent phys eel and
chemical snalyv
The camp lea wbxe analysed sad the results of the analyses. of each
grown on the experioantal plot at C malls and on the Gourley and
lots near Corvallis, nee tab.Atteds
740
110
7.02
to
mill
Drekens medium
Yellqwplentiful
Fairly*lean
Many
net
green
Strenr, plessen
Yellowish
109
13.51
1448
2.00
17.11
344
18.91
7.70
siedbo
1.04
medium
Broken,
to
large
Broken,
fairly
Clean
Marcy
re
Dell
green
Yellgws plentiful
i"1stirl.
Yellow.plentiful
green
Fairly ales*
Many
Strong
Golden
C)
18.74
1.
11.80
3.94
17.00
moditzn
Broken,
hazily
Yellow, plentiful
Clean
green
Strong pleasant
Breanieh
18.04
111
1
947
US
1.90
14.51
LA
very
14.90
-rely
green.
pleasant
Yellows plentiful
Clean
Few
ilex,
Yellowish
6.94
Yellow, *ear*.
not
Mild, pleasant
Golden
Yellow.plentiful
Clean
not
Strong, pleasant
8.88
medium'
Broken,
large
to
Yellow, plentiful
Stron pleasant
1344
green
pleat
Yellow, plentiful
Clem
%my
tti
Yellowish
1548
119
1141640.0
1440
UM
I
1548
117
11).1
19.11
124
1
119
10.71
1.17
.0
imam
Yellows plentiful
C1004
Veiny
Stirringspleasant
19011
1,00
3.311
2041
OS
1.
843
16.
so
17.04
8,00
ins
19
large
to
plentiful
ab
agree
tint
sulphate
Liet yellow
coven
Unbrolveas
medium
8.00
meth
ken.
leasent
Yellow, plentiful
Strong,
18.611
444
1.00
5.74
meant
yel
ve27
Seam nitrate
green
Pat, elms
ly
Lawn.
yellow,lentift./
Drelesn
10.1?
radium
to
18.$3
an
a11
nrok0M4
nitrate.
!Teen
Yellers, plentiful
Colds&
Culotta
*1.61
1.81
734
rol
Lemon
plentiful
very
green
Pairl7 *leen
Yellowish
3120
123
seated
ins
nitrilloas
e
eenteinbac
fertiliser
to
refer
elan
in
0 this
poreolutages
All
NOlEs
*
listed
1
Fertiliser Twits
at
Corvellis
to Clusters ­
he. 16.200
140
green
147
Pale,
yellewie
strong,
pleasant
MI
green
21
*heck
Golden
green
243 2 lbe.1640.0
154
Medium
a
pleasant
lentifal
agreeable
plentiN1
Brit)**
ne.
yellowish agreeable
lb. 16.0.0
Pale, gold.. strong flaw
4112 green agreeable
lb.16
I lb.1
151
150
2
6
colden
green
cheek
640.0
144
Yellowish
moon
able
rairly
clean
Yellowish Mild,
green
agreeable
clean
1 lb.1
Pale.
yellowish pleasant
celdee
green
71
Aeen
pleasant
Palely
sant
Yellowish tax+nr,.
Ky
meat
20-24
1
nunerels 1 toted
-caloium
cyanamid
entiful
large
Yellowafairly Pre
nlentif'ul
refer to fertiliser
1
medium
plentiful
LOMA yellow
lun
18.19
8.84
3.43
5.67
6.50
1.96
22.15
14.16
1.62
15.81
15.0$
1.81
19099
1
2.20
21.52
14.71
2.83
14.52
1.87
Strong,
agreeable
6.92
7.86
*exceed. Bros
agreeab10
20.27
0.76
14.61
1
stick/ to large
yellow
green
7.42
16.49
b:0
Golden
Golden
20.39
Prokena median
Yellow, very T:trokena medium
rreen
nitrate
7.42
1.76
to Ego
plentiful
very plentiful
agreeable
very pale Strong,
golden
,!uch broicea
17.87
clean
nd
st..lptsate
ken, EleKUM
7.28
2.10
:strong.
1142
143
to lar gt
plentiful
p
green
31)-26
4.56
plentiful
Strang,
pleasant
15.44
to large
plentiful
Clem
18.61
Unbroken
Yellowafairly Broken,
-
crown
152
keno =MI
lentifal
F
clean
Lemon, very
sticky
p
O
rtftto medium
7.20
0.37
Drokana small
to :tedium
7.16
6.35
O
14040
1.07
210611
Vertv
127
Yellow
Unclean Golden*
green
agreeab
Deep
green
Strong,
pleasant
Yellow
Strong
green,
7.58
154/
740
11540
19411
$4411
17.19
Few
1940
1.81
7.40
Olive
plentiful
Many
lineleen Yellow. not
plentiful
Pte: large
7.74
Yollow,fair
plentiful
plessfutt
some
dark *ones
1 lb.1840.8
Oo ldem
1b4,14.204
Bright
Strang:
groom
Greenish
°olden
green
10?
101
00
8449
sulphate
3441
Cab:time
Yellowish Strong
Mild
nitrate
Clean
Yellow.
pft4r
Yellow,
0 INA
171entiful
Clean
Yellow,
Pairly
Mild.
pi gamut
Yellowish Mild,
green
nitrate
154$
15.8$
147
19.46
1.89
19.86
2.07
19.41
1.98
1840
11
141411
1
1845
1.8$
MOS
plantliNd
ilda
leasent
Az
assn
yel low
green tint
(694
plentiful
Bra,e 9 India*
7.10
Mai=
6.86
plentiful
3.98
4.88
12.
.84
plentiful
4.10
8.78
12.44
plentiful
ly
Yellow,
6,78
18.78
7.08
17.68
448
fat rly
plentiful
Strew
agrees,
Yellowish Otron
Pea'
Fairly
Yellow.
ploitiful
Yellowafai
eatritu1
7..!nbro,.
to tortillas, rims vented ning niftier**.
1.78
to Urge
to
OL
IONS0 Lt1 peregotages of
refer
* Numerals listed in this ookagn
potash in the order mentioned
17444
Yellow net
Unelaen Yellowosset
groom
idea
17.82
Yellows
Straw:
plenswtt
Green with Pleasant Poe
yellow tint Mowery
114
1.0$
P1
Pale olive Mild, not
plgasent
green
1147
13.07
he
13,27
110
Sas
Id
Pole yellow
mot
Palely
wild pleasant
t
Nadeau
Fes
Yellow,
Yelle r, plenti
Broken, medium
to lune
o
Pala olive
mesa
Clean,
Pale mots
Olean
Fairly
clean
en, sodium
to Urge
Pro pt, sadist
adman
le yellow
mesa
57
Dr
Yell
Yellow, vary
plinti tux
15. TS
7.00
7.55
14.01
3.58
Slag
2670
1.00
00.50
1.0$
10.70
1.00
1040
4000
14.05
5.44
ISOM
1076
Broken, medium
to large
Yellow, vam
mild lagroeab
Yellow green
Mild agreeable
Yellow, very
Broken. naditat
Mild very'
Yellow, very
ken, mediae
1 lb.
30.50
large
Yellow green
Pole'
7.00
pleat iful
plentiful
pleat iful
7.00
Yellow, vvy
plentiful
140
141.
Bright
45
1 ib.
green
Yellowish
groan
Yellow, very
Strong,
pleasant
Citron&
Pal Ay
Mild
Clean
alien
pleasant
ar
plentiful
Milos, very
plant iful
13,61
33ro1oon, meth at
Bra
6.04
0.18
Yellow, very
ent
co_17.uining
nitrogen, phosphorus, sad potash in the order nentimmod.
51000
01
Me mogul
plot at Carvell.t
the most part seit-imp
tor
of total soft resins axe sUgkt27 layer than th
The u pha and beta resin *outset of the
in 1934.
relationship to the 1954 samples.
some es the 1934 sem les.
ably loser
The hard
resin
p
sJ
eontent a' raged *bout the
Teo of the three cheek plots contained consider'
percentages of resins than the fertilised plots.
Cheek plots,
All of the
swirr, contained noticeably higher peroentau, s of hard
then the fertilized plots.
The Zwar plots* as listed 71_the tale,
fertilised
too calcium nitrate, sodium nitrate aa. cloit = cyanamid all produced
ti Lizh
a
ree,e percentazo of hard rosins.
rtfi.lizors 4ew
beta 4 total
7,00 or s.ip,
sof* resins and about the
It is possible that
'se beneficial in Luiz c quality.
tese
special.
71 refore it is ream.
mendol that the tests be duplicated.
Pertilisor tests with Late Clusters w the exportmental plot were act
°spec ,Ily sirttftoent,
A generally high poreøntse of testa soft resins
most samples fetilised with nitroen1 p
althow;h it URA nee- grostl
different
icephorus
*es
I potash rAxtu
Berea that of to cheek plots.
is likewi5e trio with rcspeet t .1 ra, be su: -,;(,v274,, (hard resins)0
this tiablo i
at;
be noted tivet while te c7zok plot -4: 4es
Tt
f.rod
lfttlo fronts too DrribIliser plots* they ware wtrly higher in gamv, o hard
resins.
.
Again. as ,ith the
the fertilleIre action of
y
Clusters the
nim,
ato Clusters responded well to
sodium sm4 calcium salts.
Moto hors
'sere unifOrmly high in Alpha, beta and total soft resins, srsint oansi4or
e1bl higr than the cheek plots.
01417
resins nee
to
rev
percentage of al. pha o r
servative
in thee. maples stile the psrntee of
*lay the 00,MA as in the hope fertilised with
phosphorus and potash
tiro effeet of these 'sari
raijattrase
It will be interesting to note
fertiliser* on the qualikv of the hope produced
he third season,.
The peroen age or alphas 10044 and total loft resins ftt the Pules
ho,.s treated with the same l'ertiliserearma unitmmaly lower than In narly
or
tc Cluster varieties,.
The
es vartetV in usually ernooded to be
lees rieh in lupulin (rosina) thoo. other varieties, grown oa the vent ooaat.
'Mien rertilised with
nium sodium an4 coact = salte
in the table this variety also produoed
o, alphas beta and total soft rosins»
7X)
hops with toily Wth peromtegee
In ooncral all 3a1'.?1,00 or *Acts
hops fro the fertiliser tents oautelaod a =the
resins
:8
en*
hard
conparsd 4th Zer v or Llte Clusters.
10 Clustor' hops l'ren
ti
rtilisor testa o mdueted on the
Soule:, and ncevey plots in 1955 contained unlforaly hih peroentaee of
alpha beta and total set rosins, difilerlac au27
plots.
two
Prom the Check
Tlio c;ama or hard roe= ooatent of the several sloes from these
as van
tal plot
onatehat lovoor than the T.,vte Cluster hops groom on the es*
Corvallis
14o signi Lomat eonolusiona can be drama I'r'on the fertiliser tests
to da
althoth the testa nay possibly thaw the beneficial affeot of
certain fortilivirs after
another
year's observation,.
PartilAzora is not algays iodiato an
The response of
esquire a lmer period to
effect
obtaL
i th ammoni
ean
gut
in view of the multi
dun nitrate and *tieing
t should be iontinusd to aseertain
eyanamids
r tests with these
their effect
improvement of quality
hops*
purpose of obtainiw desired to or
t an on the
ton
ocustituents in hops at different stages of matorttor
an experiment vas eceduotod at the suggestica of the writer b r Dr. U.
C.
lie, Oregon. to UN which now have an important bearing
at C
an the proper time of harvesting hops,
variety were grown
Several vigorous vines of the La
adjacent to ea& other in the experi,nontal yard at Corvaille.
August 10 and.
picked fran these vines at definite intervals beginmi
ending October 44 a total of LI swans bed.nr picked.
.011 pieked..
sing
ite
parts of the vines and made into one
on each date fr
sampl e *lit* r
t Ito hops %ere picked
r enteo! the maturity. of the hops on the particular date
eh oue
WA
rr
ssive picking represented strobiles of gradually.
lug in length rrma 0 to 2 0 inches.
extreMity dried without heat, oampreaped and vTapped
were Immediately placed in cold store e.
Later they we
F eh sampa0
The several samples
torsarded to
4eshington for analysis.
Physical and ehemical analyses vere:'
results tabulated*
e 3a2iiples and the
!rata
r
Very
Bri. ht greet. sore
bwent soars
Bright groan
Siildt
le
tratg
lit
111
Variersited. groat
188
I' swish green
wi few brows conoe
Sept. IS
Sept. $0
18$
Cot. 4
yellow brown
TAR
$41042'00
Few, be*
mature
Yellow, sears*
8.00
9.110
For
Bright yellow
7.40
11. 81
24
18.42
7.60
17,61
fairly plentiful
Fairly el.= Bri
trattg,
0011111
Oro
yea les
plsetl
rollsrei, plentiful
Unbroken,
1 to I inoit
Unbroken, large
pleasant
I to ti inch
Strong*
Broken, ler
9.00
348
10.41
1.80
1441
648
1144
*.4$
10.8$
4.80
1U.8$
x.kS
20.
0.80
14.82
loseent
=pleasant
Strong
di sagreeablo
OTSs All percentages of rosins oaloulated to dry basis
18.70
tTuab brava
largo
Pale browns
Faizly plentiful
Much bra:
large
8.18
1848
p nature end *ver­
b
s.s they progrease
samples pi eked August 10 and 16 were decide
rather unpleasant odor.
The strobilei vere
contained emrparatively little lupulin.
picked
vc,ust 24 was moxe agreeable in odor, with
The sample
etrobi..leee 1
inehes in length and contained noticeably more lupulin than
piened am m
throw h
3eginnin with the piokings on Alvmst 31 and continuing
pte mber 20 the hops vivre fully
ish seen color, strung
2
inches in lent-7th)
ctoristio odors largo s.se of atrObiles (2 to
plentiful lupulin content,
October 4 was distinctly over-ripe
strong disasrees le odor.
tuxe es tndioated by their yellow'
The sample picked.
It 77(1.n brown in color and poasesss
a
The color or to lupulin in this sample was pole
brown instead of lemon ye
pare
in the set
tazes of alp/
*oft resis,
hard resins)
ales picked on the several dates as noted in te
ble, show that
distinet ahan ots in the peroentages of these cotetituents occur as the hops
aavolop,
earL picked samplos (August 1040) show the lowest per*
to ye of al
beta resins and total soft resins,
These samples
cons dared as very tnosturo awl poor in quality bemuse of their extremely
reentag o of alpha rosine.
The alpha resins apparently do not farm in
resat extent until the plants WM maturo
smmpl a ('.0 <;ust 24, 210 Sapi,ember 7 snd 12) are she
superior as reLaras alpha, be
and total soft resins
Tice four suoceedim
to be distinctly
Sample 7, pinked
September 20 coAained the highest Pereentace of beta and total soft
although the alpha resinconbeat of thls almple dropped oonsiderabl
ins,
T is
stiffs
quality
pie picked Ostobir 4
vas
be 4,74uside r+ed aft sit
decidedly over ripe* sect i.t eontainsd
of beta and total soft resins. Its alpha
totally disappeared and thereforethe eagle old not be
high pe
however,
e
sine
soneidered of flood brewing, value.
smnma or hard resins apparently
tu
and
crer»rlpe resohtn a
up
dually as
total of 5,24 per sea
*ample picked October 40
The results in teneral indicate a
as the hops
turo
up-building of soft rosins
lowed by * deoline as they booms over-ripe, The
hard resins, thich are practically of no value, continue to increase up to
and beyond maturity of the hope.
pia
Any information *deb will more definitely establish the proper
- tin) will be of value to the hop grosver, Frequently growers begin
viol n hops before they are fully maturo0
S
early picked hops are poo
in quality and their dry-out ratio is high, tams causing loss to the grower
not ly in quality but in weight* Ferly (skim should therefore be die­
oourarjed.
Careful physical examination of the hope on the v.Intts for sever
days prior tot
regards
usual start of picking should reveal their condition as
lupulin content which determines their maturity.
or confirm the results of the 1985 test which ha
been discussed it is desired to duplioate the experiment in 1936 on the same
variety of hop toad in the sans loeflity (Corvallis* ro on) by picking the
hops on approxlm tely the MIA dates with the came
pi
of
It is eu goats that at least two earlier pies
de before
August 100 ft order to obtain information on the dsvalopomat eI rosimmuS
ocentitusate
rrank Rabak
v=aehingto*0
Juky 1956
ly early lokod ho
76
Figure 2.
A Row of Late Clusters in the Experimental Yard
!Tote the loot arms snc heavy orop of hops.
Fhoto taken Aucust 17, 1936.
77
Row of Uri
Tat* tho look
The poor *audition of the vino
spot*
or °cues.
do*.
4
A Row of ?nese
^rho txpertmental Yard.
!tidal damage slight,
.M soattsred *oust.
Fats is short arms
A Ilasarian nest Otittataed frau an Gra on Yard
This type is *hosting up st.1.1 as parant steak
in orosaes
riGure 1
10, An lest, Cinetiir
t save a geed yt 14
11,408 but
very badly dionset by ticiaw nitdrE In
83
?igure
runt 8342. A Lt o °luster Seedling
ahowint
fairly good
istios in 136.
egronomile °hat-actor­
Plent 3240. A Calltort* ClutorSilleabi
Vote the mill
Figure 10
An Arly ClusUr So 414
e cones.
Ficure 11
A Fuga** Snoning nit% long
?loot 41+4
The
*awls
are long *nd pointed and
arm**
boolly *nattered.
c.
404n2Lis
It
land. set-st V 1011,s4 1uit,040i 44tA
svuao lug 301.4"4 44w4
imIu 4es
vomli **vat
AL Abnormal ?Mules ao ling,
crowing from the stet. of