Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment : Appendices August 2006 © Nancy Sefton
advertisement
Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment : Appendices © Nancy Sefton August 2006 Index to Appendices for the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment Appendix number (corresponds to Chapter numbers) and Title 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion Crosswalk Plant Association Group X Ecological System Rare Plant Community Conservation Targets in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion Rare Estuarine and Wetland Plant Community Conservation Targets in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion PNW Coast Ecoregion Rare Plant Targets PNW Coast Ecoregion Wildlife Conservation Targets 3B Macrohabitat attributes of aquatic systems in the Oregon Coastal, Willamette, Olympic/Chehalis, Lower Columbia, and Puget Sound, and Rogue-Umpqua EDUs Aquatic Conservation Targets, PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E PNW Coast Shoreline Targets PNW Coast Intertidal Vegetation Types PNW Coast Estuarine Conservation Targets Based on Substrates (Area in ha) PNW Coast Ecoregion Fine Filter Marine Targets Building a Benthic Habitat Model as Surrogates for Ecosystem-Scale Targets 5A 5B PNW Coast Ecoregion Protected Areas Numbers of Targets Meeting Goals (by Quartile) in Existing Protected Areas 6A The SITE Selection Algorithm 7A 7B Prioritization of Assessment Units Sensitivity Analysis for Terrestrial HUCs 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 8H Automated Integration of Aquatic and Terrestrial Site Selection Peer Review Comments and Comment Disposition PNW Coast Ecoregion Portfolio Conservation Areas Summaries of Portfolio Sites in the PNW Ecoregion Targets and Goals Summary Site Prioritization Results Lowest Vulnerability Sites--Top 25% Threats Analysis Appendix 2A Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion Crosswalk Plant Association Group X Ecological System PAG # COUNT PAG "Name" (unofficial) NatureServe Ecological System 0 1853108 Area not mapped 17 261 No Name Available North Pacific Oak Woodland 25 27530 No Name Available North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 27 489689 No Name Available North Pacific Maritme Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 28 68227 No Name Available North Pacific Dry Douglas-fir Forest and Woodland 771 24 Rock Outcrop Shrub / Forb / Grassy Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 791 72 Black Hawthorn? Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 801 42 Lodgepole Pine North Pacific Dry Douglas-fir Forest and Woodland 901 538712 Sitka Spruce / Salal North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest 902 6375170 Sitka Spruce / Sword Fern North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest 903 2074477 Sitka Spruce / Salmonberry North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest 1001 60 Ponderosa Pine / Buckbrush Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland 1002 126 Ponderosa Pine - Doug Fir Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland 1101 42313 Ponderosa Pine / Western Wheatgrass Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland 1102 168 Oregon White Oak / Shrubby North Pacific Oak Woodland 1103 154 Oregon White Oak / Bristly Dogstail North Pacific Oak Woodland 1201 957 Jeffery Pine (White Oak) / Idaho Fescue Klamath-Siskyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland 1203 921 Jeffery Pine-Incense Cedar Klamath-Siskyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland 1271 115 Buckbrush Shrublands Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 1301 382 Port Orford Cedar / Oregon Grape North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1302 511 Port Orford Cedar / Rhododendron - Salal North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1303 449 Port Orford Cedar / Sword Fern North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1305 400 Port Orford Cedar / Oval-leaf huckleberry North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1321 465 Port Orford Cedar / Pink Honeysuckle North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1401 30 Doug-fir / Buckbrush / Western Wheatgrass Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1402 2737 Doug-Fir / Kinnikinnick North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1403 56 Doug-Fir / Pinegrass Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1404 296 Doug-Fir / Ninebark - Symphoricarpos Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1405 31 Doug-Fir / Huckleberry Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1406 229642 Doug-Fir / Ocean Spray / Oregon Grape North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1407 1438026 Doug-Fir / Dry Scrub Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1408 343495 Doug-Fir - Canyon Live Oak Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1409 77571 Doug-Fir - Golden Chinquapin Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1411 40 Doug-Fir / Incense Cedar-Jeffery Pine Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1423 7513 No Name Available Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1424 7552 No Name Available Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1425 8361 No Name Available Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1426 9888 No Name Available North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1427 9848 No Name Available Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1428 8383 No Name Available Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1429 8163 No Name Available North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest 1430 7135 Psme-Cade SO OR Rocky Mountain Montane Dry-Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland 1471 4240 Dry grasslands Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe 1481 44 Montane Talus shrub North Pacific Broadleaf Mesic Seral Forest 1491 107 Riparian Shrublands North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 1501 361872 Tan Oak-Doug Fir-Golden Chinqapin Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest 1502 120745 Tan Oak - Doug-Fir/ Oregon grape Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest 1503 31562 Tan Oak / Oregon grape Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest 1504 1448479 Tanoak / Huckleberry Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest 1521 806 Tanoak -Chinqapin Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest 1601 3010 Grand Fir / Ocean-spray Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest 1602 1777 Grand Fir / Oregon Grape Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest 1603 1938 Grand Fir / Vine maple Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest 1604 1377 Grand Fir / Pinegrass Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest 1605 1604 Grand Fir / Huckleberry Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest 1607 35312 Grand Fir / Salal Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2A, page 1 of 3 PAG # 1608 1609 1612 1613 1621 1622 1623 1627 1671 1691 1701 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1914 1915 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1971 1991 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2008 2098 2099 2101 2102 2103 2104 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2271 2291 COUNT 117678 197285 34434 111985 1406 1101 1369 28 84 5750 1362 201043 728945 5181885 491313 339246 12204674 10116696 2670981 3940889 34193 339 13 130736 237064 1008 1907 9165 16483 5937 36077 3269082 58241 4976 2632 481 7842 31539 2448 689 93 2 96 244 286 313 77718 46679 520814 249072 24619 23008 474179 951823 8124 79579 107 PAG "Name" (unofficial) NatureServe Ecological System Grand Fir - CA Laurel Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest Grand Fir / Ocean-Spray - Poison Oak / Sala Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest Grand Fir - Golden Chinqapin / Pacific PeavinNorthern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest No Name Available Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest No Name Available Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest No Name Available Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest No Name Available Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest No Name Available Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest Sagebrush / Fescue Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe Riparain / Wetlands North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland Whitebark Pine-Jeffery Pine Klamath-Siskyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland Western Hemlock / Queens Cup North Pacific Western Hemlock - Western Red Cedar Forest Western Hemlock / Rhododendron-dry North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Salal - Oregongrape North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock /Alaska blueberry North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Vanillaleaf North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Oregon Grape North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Sword Fern - Oxalis North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Salmonberry North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Blueberry - Sorrel North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Western Hemlock / Devils Club North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Skunk Cabbage North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Fools Huckleberry North Pacific Western Hemlock - Western Red Cedar Forest No Name Available North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Rhododendron - moist, soNorth Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Rhododendron - Drier, noNorth Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock - (Incense Cedar, Doug Fir North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Rhododendron -dry North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock - Port Orford Cedar / SorrelNorth Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock-Port Orford Cedar / Rhodo North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock-Tan Oak/ Rhododendron North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest Western Hemlock / Salmonberry North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forest No Name Available Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe Riparian/Wetland Shrub and Herb North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland White Fir - Tan Oak Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland White Fir / Rhododendron Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland White Fir - Grand Fir / Oregon Grape Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland White Fir - Doug Fir / Rosa Symphoricarpos Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland Grand Fir / Salal- Oregon Grape Northern Rocky Mountain Montane Mixed Conifer Forest White Fir / Sorrel Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland White Fir -Shasta Fir / Sweet-After-Death Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest and Woodland White Fir - Brewer Pine Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland Shasta Fir / Prince's pine Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest and Woodland Shasta Fir / Pyrola Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest and Woodland Shasta Fir - White Fir Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest and Woodland Shasta Fir - White Fir Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest and Woodland Silver Fir / Rhododendron - Oregon Grape North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / Oregon Grape North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / Alaska huckleberry North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / Big Huckleberry - Beargrass North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / White Rhododendron - Alaska HucNorth Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / three-leaved coolwort North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / Alaska Huckleberry North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir / Sorrel North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Silver Fir/ Devils Club North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest No Name Available North Pacific Dry and Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland and Meadow Sitka Alder North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2A, page 2 of 3 PAG # COUNT 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2371 2391 2504 2571 2901 3201 3301 6 20701 384423 563956 4807 72379 541 81428 15694 49 421617 30762 PAG "Name" (unofficial) NatureServe Ecological System Mountain Hemlock / Huckleberry/ Beargrass?North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest Mountain Hemlock / Fools Huckleberry? North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest Mountain Hemlock / White Rhododendron - BNorth Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest Mountain Hemlock / Alaska Huckleberry North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest Mountain Hemlock / Devil's Club North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest No Name Available North Pacific Dry and Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland and Meadow Riparian / Wetland Shrub and Herb North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland and Shrubland Subalpine Fir / White Rhododenron - BeargraRocky Mountain Subalpine Dry-Mesic Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland Festuca Grasslands, Sagebrush-grasslands Inter-Mountain Basins Montane Sagebrush Steppe Larix lyalii Parkland Northern Rocky Mountain Subalpine Larch Woodland Mountain Hemlock Parkland wet-mesic-dry North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest Alpine North Pacific Dry and Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland and Meadow PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2A, page 3 of 3 Common name Rank grand fir - Douglas - fir / tanoak / sword fern Noble Fir / Redwood Sorrel Abies grandis - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Lithocarpus densiflorus / Polystichum munitum Abies procera / Oxalis oregana Forest Festuca rubra dune grasslands G1S1 S S L L S L E L S M M L S Patch Size S L W PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 1 of 7 red fescue stabilized sand dunes Calamagrostis nutkaensis - Argentina egedii - Juncus Pacific Reedgrass - Pacific G1S1 balticus Herbaceous Vegetation Silverweed - Baltic Rush Herbaceous Vegetation Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Picea sitchensis / Port Orford cedar - Sitka G1S1 Vaccinium ovatum - Rhododendron macrophyllum spruce / evergreen huckleberry - western Chamaecyparis lawsoniana / Vaccinium ovatum Port Orford cedar / evergreen G1S1 huckleberry dune oldgrowth forest Deschampsia cespitosa - Sidalcea hendersonii Tufted hairgrass G1S1 Henderson's checker-mallow G1S1 E L Sitka spruce / creek dogwood - G1G2S1 Hooker willow tideland Picea sitchensis / Cornus sericea - Salix hookeriana G1S1 W Distribution L Carex (livida, utriculata) / Sphagnum spp. Herbaceous (Livid Sedge, Beaked Sedge) G1G2S1 Vegetation / Peatmoss species Myrica gale / Sanguisorba officinalis / Sphagnum spp. Sweet Gale / Great Burnet / G1?S1? Shrubland Peatmoss species Shrubland Scientific name 13 13 13 25 13 7 25 FESTUCA RUBRA HERBACEOUS CALAMAGROSTIS NUTKAENSIS TIDAL CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST ABIES GRANDIS PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII GIANT ABIES PROCERA FOREST Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 13 MYRICA GALE SATURATED SHRUBLAND 7 CAREX UTRICULATA SATURATED 7 PICEA SITCHENSIS TIDAL WOODLAND Appendix 2B Rare Plant Community Conservation Targets in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion G1S1 G1S1 Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa / Cornus sericea black cottonwood / creek / Impatiens capensis dogwood / touch - me - not white oak / Idaho fescue savanna Greater Creeping Spearwort - G1S1 Sierran Rush - Lakeshore Sedge Herbaceous Vegetation Quercus garryana / Festuca idahoensis var. romeri Ranunculus flammula - Juncus nevadensis - Carex lenticularis Herbaceous Vegetation L L W L E PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 2 of 7 G1S1 pygmy shore pine forest on Blacklock soils Pinus contorta ssp. contorta / Gaultheria shallon Vaccinium ovatum G1S1 shorepine / hairy manzanita L G1S1 Pinus contorta ssp. contorta / Arctostaphylos columbiana L G1S1 S E Picea sitchensis - Tsuga heterophylla / Rhododendron Sitka spruce - western macrophyllum - Vaccinium ovatum hemlock / western rhododendron - evergreen Pinus contorta spp. contorta / Arctostaphylos uva shorepine / kinnikinnick ursi S W Sweet Gale / Sierran G1S1 Brookfoam / Slough Sedge Shrubland Picea sitchensis - Abies grandis / Gaultheria shallon / Sitka spruce - grand fir / salal / G1S1 Polystichum munitum sword fern Li L Li L L L L S W BOG LABRADOR-TEA - BOG- G1S1 LAUREL / BEARGRASS LEDUM GROENLANDICUM - KALMIA MICROPHYLLA / XEROPHYLLUM TENAX SHRUBLAND Myrica gale / Boykinia intermedia - Carex obnupta Shrubland Patch Size S western Labrador tea - sweet G1S1 gale heath Distributi on L Ledum glandulosum - Myrica gale Rank Common name Scientific name 13 13 7 13 25 13 13 PINUS CONTORTA SSP CONTORTA ROUND PINUS CONTORTA SSP CONTORTA ROUND PINUS CONTORTA SSP CONTORTA ROUND POPULUS BALSAMIFERA SSP TRICHOCARPA QUERCUS GARRYANA WOODED CAREX OBNUPTA SEASONALLY FLOODED PICEA SITCHENSIS GIANT FOREST Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 13 LEDUM GLANDULOSUM SATURATED 7 NEEDS NEW: LEDUM GROENLANDICUM 7 MYRICA GALE SEASONALLY FLOODED 25 PICEA SITCHENSIS GIANT FOREST Henderson's checker-mallow Tidal Marsh western hemlock / western Labrador tea / slough sedge skunk cabbage swamp western hemlock / western rhododendron - evergreen huckleberry forest Sweet Gale - Douglas' Meadowsweet / Peatmoss species Shrubland south coast herb dunes Sidalcea hendersonii - Tidal Marsh Tsuga heterophylla / Ledum glandulosum / Carex obnupta - Lysichiton americanum G2S1 Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa / Cornus sericea black cottonwood / creek / Impatiens capensis dogwood / touch - me - not W L Li S L S W W S S S S M M Patch Size S L L L L W L Distributi on L PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 3 of 7 G2S1 seashore bluegrass dunes Poa douglasii ssp. macrantha dunes Pinus contorta spp. contorta / Carex obnupta ROEMER'S FESCUE - FIELD G2S1 CHICKWEED - PRAIRIE JUNEGRASS BOG LABRADOR-TEA G2S1 SWEETGALE / SPHAGNUM SPP. shorepine / slough sedge G2S1 FESTUCA ROEMERI - CERASTIUM ARVENSE KOELERIA MACRANTHA HERBACEOUS VEGETATION LEDUM GROENLANDICUM - MYRICA GALE / SPHAGNUM SPP. SHRUBLAND G2S1 Pacific reedgrass - blue wildrye G2S1 G2?S1S2 G1S1 G1S1 G1S1 Rank Calamagrostis nutkaensis - Elymus glaucus Baccharis pilularis / Artemisia pycnocephala Scrophularia californica Myrica gale - Spiraea douglasii / Sphagnum spp. Shrubland Tsuga heterophylla / Rhododendron macrophyllum Vaccinium ovatum Common name Scientific name 7 13 7 7 13 13 13 13 7 13 BACCHARIS PILULARIS SHRUBLAND CALAMAGROSTIS NUTKAENSIS HERBACEOUS FESTUCA ROEMERI HERBACEOUS NEEDS NEW: LEDUM GROENLANDICUM PINUS CONTORTA SSP CONTORTA SEASONALLY POA DOUGLASII SSP MACRANTHA SHORT - SOD POPULUS BALSAMIFERA SSP TRICHOCARPA TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA SATURATED TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA GIANT FOREST Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 13 Sitka Sedge - Purple Marshlocks Subalpine Fir - (Lodgepole Pine) / Subalpine Arctic Lupine Woodland Anaphalis - aster Arbutus - hairy manzanita Cusick sedge - (bog cinquefoil) fen Carex aquatilis var. dives - Comarum palustre Herbaceous Vegetation Abies lasiocarpa - (Pinus contorta) / Lupinus arcticus ssp. subalpinus Woodland Arbutus menziesii - Arctostaphylos columbiana Carex cusickii - (Comarum palustre) fen Port Orford cedar - western hemlock / western rhododendron - salal Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Tsuga heterophylla / Rhododendron macrophyllum - Gaultheria shallon L L G2S2 G2S2 G2S2 L L L G2S2 G2S2 L W P W W Distributi on W G2S2 G2S2 G2S2 G2S2 G2S2 G2S1? Rank PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 4 of 7 Port Orford cedar - western hemlock / sword fern Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Tsuga heterophylla / Polystichum munitum Port Orford cedar - white fir Douglas - fir / (dwarf Oregongrape) / vanillaleaf Port Orford cedar - white fir / Sadler oak / leucothoe western rhododendron Port Orford cedar - Douglas-fir / (western rhododendron) / beargrass Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Port Orford cedar - Douglas-fir Lithocarpus densiflorus / Gaultheria shallon / tanoak / salal Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Abies concolor Pseudotsuga menziesii / (Mahonia nervosa var. nervosa) / Achlys triphylla Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Abies concolor / Quercus sadleriana / Leucothe davisiae* Rhododendron macrophyllum Chamaecyparis lawsoniana - Pseudotsuga menziesii / (Rhododendron macrophyllum) / Xerophyllum tenax Anaphalis margaritacea - Aster foliaceous Common name Scientific name L L L L L L S S S M Patch Size S 13 13 13 13 13 13 7 3 CAREX CUSICKII SATURATED HERBACEOUS CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA FOREST Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 7 CAREX AQUATILIS VAR. DIVES SEASONALLY 7 ABIES LASIOCARPA WOODLAND 7 G2S2 G2S2 crowberry - salal oceanfront shrubland Empetrum nigrum - Gaultheria shallon Festuca roemeri - Delphinium glareosum Herbaceous Roemer's Fescue - Olympic Vegetation Larkspur red fescue - California G2S2 oatgrass south coast headland or hillslope grassland western Labrador tea - salal / G2S2 slough sedge bog Festuca rubra - Danthonia californica western Labrador tea / G2S2 darlingtonia / sphagnum bog western Labrador tea / burnet G2S2 / sphagnum bog shore pine / western rhododendron - evergreen huckleberry Ledum glandulosum / Darlingtonia californica / Sphagnum Ledum glandulosum / Sanguisorba officinalis / Sphagnum Pinus contorta ssp. contorta / Rhododendron macrophyllum - Vaccinium ovatum L L L L L L L L E W Distributi on W PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 5 of 7 G2S2 western Labrador tea / slough G2S2 sedge / sphagnum bog Ledum glandulosum / Carex obnupta / Sphagnum Ledum glandulosum - Gaultheria shallon / Carex obnupta red fescue - sea-pink coastal headland grassland Festuca rubra - Armeria maritima coastal headland grassland G2S2 Roemer's Fescue - Spreading G2S2 Phlox Festuca roemeri - Phlox diffusa var. longistylis Herbaceous Vegetation G2S2 creeping spikerush - water purslane marsh Eleocharis acicularis - Ludwigia palustris Rank Common name Scientific name L S S S S S S S S S Patch Size S 13 13 13 13 13 13 LEDUM GLANDULOSUM SATURATED LEDUM GLANDULOSUM SATURATED LEDUM GLANDULOSUM SATURATED LEDUM GLANDULOSUM SATURATED PINUS CONTORTA SSP CONTORTA ROUND - FESTUCA RUBRA HERBACEOUS Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 7 ELEOCHARIS PALUSTRIS SEASONALLY 7 EMPETRUM NIGRUM DWARF SHRUBLAND 25 FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS ALPINE 13 FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS ALPINE 13 FESTUCA RUBRA HERBACEOUS DOUGLAS-FIR - WESTERN HEMLOCK / PACIFIC RHODODENDRON DOUGLAS-FIR - WESTERN HEMLOCK / EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY water clubrush bed Douglas spiraea - bog G2S2 blueberry / slough sedge / sphagnum bog blueberry / slough sedge G2S2 shrub swamp bog blueberry / tufted G2S2 hairgrass - slough sedge shrub swamp Idaho fescue - junegrass S1 Shore pine - common juniper hairy manzanita Western redcedar / salmonberry PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII - TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA / RHODODENDRON MACROPHYLLUM - VACCINIUM OVATUM FOREST PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII - TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA / VACCINIUM OVATUM FOREST Spiraea douglasii - Vaccinium uliginosum / Carex obnupta / Sphagnum Vaccinium uliginosum / Deschampsia cespitosa Carex obnupta Pinus contorta var. contorta - Juniperus communis Arctostaphylos columbiana Thuja plicata / Rubus spectabilis Festuca idahoensis - Koelaria macrantha Vaccinium uliginosum / Carex obnupta Scirpus subterminalis Douglas-fir - lodgepole pine / Rhacomitrium Pseudotsuga menziesii - Pinus contorta / Rhacomitrium canescens W L PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 6 of 7 S1S2 S1 W L L L W W G2S2 G2S2 W L Distributi on L G2S2 G2S2 G2S2 Douglas-fir - lodgepole pine / Cladina Pseudotsuga menziesii - Pinus contorta / Cladina Rank Common name Scientific name M L S S S S S M M S Patch Size S 7 13 7 13 13 13 7 7 7 13 SCIRPUS SUBTERMINALIS HYDROMORPHIC SPIRAEA DOUGLASII SATURATED VACCINIUM ULIGINOSUM SSP OCCIDENTALE VACCINIUM ULIGINOSUM SSP OCCIDENTALE PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII - TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 13 L L W W W W W S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 L S2 S2 L Distributi on w S2 S2 Rank PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2B, page 7 of 7 Sitka spruce / salmonberry Very Wet Maritime Sitka spruce / Trisetum Douglas-fir / Douglas maple / Hooker's fairybells Western redcedar / black twinberry Tsuga heterophylla - Pseudotsuga menziesii / Western hemlock - Douglas-fir Kindbergia oregana / Oregon beaked moss Tsuga heterophylla - Thuja plicata / Blechnum spicant Western hemlock - western redcedar / deer fern Tsuga heterophylla - Thuja plicata / Gaultheria shallon Western hemlock - western Moist Maritime 1 redcedar / salal Moist Maritime 1 Picea sitchensis / Rubus spectabilis Very Wet Maritime Picea sitchensis / Trisetum canescens Pseudotsuga menziesii / Acer glabrum / Prosartes hookeri Thuja plicata / Lonicera involucrata Sitka spruce / false lily-of-thevalley Very Wet Hypermaritime 1 Picea sitchensis / Rubus spectabilis Very Dry Maritime Sitka spruce / salmonberry Very Dry Maritime Phlox - moss Phlox diffusa - Selaginella wallacei Picea sitchensis / Maianthemum dilatatum Very Wet Hyperemaritime 1 Common name Scientific name M M M M L M L L L Patch Size S y 7 7 7 13 7 13 13 13 Ecoregion NVCS alliance Goal 7 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2C, page 1 of 3 Appendix 2C Rare Estuarine and Wetland Plant Community Conservation Targets in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion TOTAL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME EL_CODE (#) SAND: PARTLY ENCLOSED, EULITTORAL, EUHALINE SANDY, HIGH SALINITY, LOW MARSH OP (MARSH) OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEB.BB-OP 8 SILTY, MODERATE SALINITY, LOW MARSH MIXED FINE: PARTLY ENCLOSED EULITTORAL, OP POLYHALINE (MARSH) OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEB.BC-OP 13 SAND: PARTLY ENCLOSED, EULITTORAL, MESOHALINE SANDY, LOW SALINITY, LOW MARSH OP (MARSH) OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEB.CB-OP 2 MIXED-FINE AND MUD: PARTLY ENCLOSED, EULITTORAL, SILTY, LOW SALINITY, LOW MARSH OP MESOHALINE OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEB.CC-OP 7 SANDY, MODERATE SALINITY, LOW SAND: PARTLY ENCLOSED, EULITTORAL, POLYHALINE MARSH OP (MARSH) OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEB.DB-OP 4 ORGANIC: PARTLY ENCLOSED, BACKSHORE, POLYHALINE MODERATE SALINITY HIGH MARSH OP (MARSH) OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEC.A--OP 13 ORGANIC: PARTLY ENCLOSED, BACKSHORE, MESOHALINE LOW SALINITY HIGH MARSH OP (MARSH) OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAEC.B--OP 9 ORGANIC, SAND, MIXED-FINE OR MUD: PARTLY TRANSITION ZONE WETLAND OP ENCLOSED, BACKSHORE OLYMPIC PENINSULA CAED.---OP 2 FRESHWATER TIDAL SURGE PLAIN FRESHWATER TIDAL SURGE PLAIN WETLAND OLYMPIC WETLAND OP PENINSULA CAEE.---OP 2 LOW INTERTIDAL HIGH SALINITY SANDY SALTMARSH LOW INTERTIDAL HIGH SALINITY SANDY SALTMARSH CECG000001 1 LOW INTERTIDAL HIGH SALINITY SILTY SALTMARSH LOW INTERTIDAL HIGH SALINITY SILTY SALTMARSH CEDG000001 1 LOW INTERTIDAL BRACKISH SALTMARSH LOW INTERTIDAL BRACKISH SALTMARSH ON SANDS TO ON SANDS TO SILTS SILTS CEFG000001 1 PINCON/CAROBN SHOREPINE/SLOUGH SEDGE CEGL000142 1 COAST WILLOW DEFLATION PLAIN WETLAND SALHOC-MYRCAL CEGL001138 1 FESRUB DUNE GRASSLAND RED FESCUE STABILIZED SAND DUNES CEGL001774 2 LUPINUS LITTORALIS (DUNE COMMUNITY) SEASHORE LUPINE DUNES CEGL001974 1 MID INTERTIDAL BRACKISH FINE SUBSTRATE SALTMARSH MID INTERTIDAL BRACKISH FINE SUBSTRATE SALTMARSH CEJG000001 1 OLD-GROWTH SITKA SPRUCE/CREEK DOGWOOD PICSIT/CORSER TIDELAND SWAMP TIDELAND SWAMP CPVB1PSC01 1 Calamagrostis nutkaensis - Argentina egedii - Pacific Reedgrass - Pacific Silverweed - Baltic Rush Herbaceous CWWA000052 2 Juncus balticus Herbaceous Vegetation Vegetation GOAL (#) 2 4 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SITES _ID 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 Douglas spiraea - bog blueberry / slough sedge / sphagnum coast willow - crabapple / slough sedge - skunk cabbage shrub swamp glasswort - saltgrass - arrow grass - (jaumea) salt marsh black cottonwood / creek dogwood / touch - me - not shorepine / slough sedge Sitka spruce / creek dogwood - Hooker willow tideland Sitka spruce / slough sedge - skunk cabbage western Labrador tea / burnet / sphagnum bog western Labrador tea / darlingtonia / sphagnum bog red fescue stabilized sand dunes western Labrador tea / slough sedge / sphagnum bog tufted hairgrass - Baltic rush salt marsh Lyngby sedge freshwater marsh slough sedge / sphagnum creek dogwood - willow (Hooker willow - Sitka willow) COMMON NAME Pacific reedgrass fen Sitka sedge fen Sitka Sedge - Purple Marshlocks PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2C, page 2 of 3 Vaccinium caespitosum/Sanquisorba officinalis dwarf blueberry/burnet Vaccinium uliginosum / Deschampsia cespitosa bog blueberry / tufted hairgrass - slough sedge shrub swamp - Carex obnupta Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa / Cornus sericea / Impatiens capensis Salix hookeriana - Malus fusca / Carex obnupta - Lysichiton americanum Salicornia virginica - Distichlis spicata Triglochin maritima - (Jaumea carnosa) Spiraea douglasii - Vaccinium uliginosum / Carex obnupta / Sphagnum SCIENTIFIC NAME Calamagrostis nutkaensis Carex aquatilis var. dives Carex aquatilis var. dives - Comarum palustre Herbaceous Vegetation Carex lyngbyei Carex obnupta / Sphagnum Cornus sericea - Salix (Salix hookeriana - Salix sitchensis) Deschampsia cespitosa - Juncus balticus salt marsh Festuca rubra dune grasslands Ledum glandulosum / Carex obnupta / Sphagnum Ledum glandulosum / Darlingtonia californica / Sphagnum Ledum glandulosum / Sanguisorba officinalis / Sphagnum Picea sitchensis / Carex obnupta - Lysichitum americanum Picea sitchensis / Cornus sericea - Salix hookeriana Pinus contorta spp. contorta / Carex obnupta 1 6 ORWETLND19 ORWETLND20 1 69 ORWETLND17 ORWETLND18 8 3 4 8 8 2 9 ORWETLND16 ORWETLND15 ORWETLND14 ORWETLND13 ORWETLND12 ORWETLND11 ORWETLND10 12 ORWETLND09 1 ORWETLND06 8 1 1 5 1 ORWETLND03 ORWETLND04 ORWETLND05 ORWETLND07 ORWETLND08 TOTAL (#) 1 1 EL_CODE ORWETLND01 ORWETLND02 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 143 144 142 139 140 141 SITES _ID 137 138 2 1 1 23 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 2 1 1 1 2 1 GOAL (#) 1 1 SCIENTIFIC NAME Xerophullum tenax-Sanquisorba officinalisSphagnum ORWETLND21 beargrass-burnet sphagnum bog PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2C, page 3 of 3 EL_CODE COMMON NAME 2 TOTAL (#) 157 SITES _ID 1 GOAL (#) Appendix 2D PNW Coast Ecoregion Rare Plant Targets Scientific name Arenaria paludicola Castilleja chambersii Erythronium elegans Lilium occidentale Limbella fryei Common name Swamp sandwort Chamber's paintbrush Coast range fawn-lily Western lily Moss Oenothera wolfii Saxifraga hitchcockiana Whidbeyella cartilaginea Desmarestia tortuosa Empselium rubrum Saxifraga tischii Bryoria pseudocapillaris Wolf's evening-primrose Saddle Mtn. Saxifrage Marine algae Marine algae Marine algae Tisch's saxifrage Lichen Willamette Valley larkspur Bensonia Saddle Mtn. Bittercress Tall bugbane Delphinium oreganum Bensoniella oregana Cardamine pattersonii Cimicifuga elata Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Erigeron salishii Filipendula occidentalis Gilia millefoliata Myriogramme pulchra Phacelia argentea Global Rank G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 Federal Status LE SOC SOC LE SOC Species Distribution E E E E E Target Goal 25 25 25 25 25 G1 G1 G1 G1? G1? G1? G1G2 SOC SOC G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 E E E E E E E 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 G1Q G2 G2 G2 SOC SOC SOC SOC G1 G2 G2 G2 L L E W 13 13 25 7 G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 SOC SOC G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 G2 E E E L L L 25 25 25 13 13 13 G2 SOC G2 E 25 LT G2 G2 restricted to PNC Olympic Mt. Endemic. at the north end of its range Olympic and Vancouver Island endemic Olympic Mt. Endemic P E E 3 25 25 E 25 L 13 E 25 E 25 BC sectional target. Widespread but rare; disjunct from E coast. rare Olympic Mt. Endemic. L 13 D L 13 13 E 25 Sidalcea hirtipes Frigid shootingstar Salish daisy Queen-of-the-forest Seaside gilia Marine algae Silvery phacelia Hairy-stemmed checkermallow Sidalcea nelsoniana Thuretellopsis peggiana Heterodermia sitchensis Nelson's checker-mallow Marine algae Seaside centipede G2 G2 G2G3 Senecio neowebsteri Olympic Mtn. Groundsel G2G3 Arctostaphylos hispidula Hairy manzanita G3 Aster paucicapitatus Olympic Mtn. Aster G3 Campanula piperi Piper's bellflower G3 Chiharaea bodegensis Marine algae G3 Discelium nudum Encalypta brevipes Moss Moss G3 G3 Erigeron flettii Flett's fleabane G3 SOC SOC SOC Justification G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2D, page 1 of 4 Scientific name Common name Global Rank Erioderma sorediatum Lichen treepelt G3 Hollenbergia nigricans Marine algae G3 Hypogymnia heterophylla Minium parvum Seaside bone Marine algae G3 G3 Petrophytum hendersonii Olympic rock mat G3 Poa unilateralis Tayloriella divaricata San Francisco bluegrass Marine algae G3 G3 Viola flettii Erysimum menziesii ssp concinnum Cryptantha leiocarpa Flett's violet G3 Federal Status restricted to PNWC. BC sectional target. Olympic Mt. Endemic. SOC Pacific wallflower Seaside cryptantha G3?T3? G3G4 SOC Sidalcea hendersonii Leioderma sorediatum Plagiochila semidecurrens var alaskana Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Henderson sidalcea Lichen treepelt G3G4 G3G4? SOC Carex pluriflora Cephaloziella spinigera Several-flowered sedge Liverwort G4 G4 Dictyoneuropsis reticulata Marine algae G4 Draba longipes Lasthenia maritima Long-stalked draba Hairy goldfields G4 G4 Limonium californicum Metzgeria temperata Microseris bigelovii Pannaria rubiginosa Western marsh-rosemary Liverwort Coast microseris Lichen G4 G4 G4 G4 Liverwort Smooth douglasia G3G5T3 G3T3 Plantago macrocarpa Pohlia sphagnicola Radula brunnea Alaska plantain Moss Liverwort G4 G4 G4 Senecio flettii Flett groundsel G4 Thelypteris nevadensis Cordylanthus maritimus ssp palustris Artemisia pycnocephala Sierra wood fern G4 Salt-marsh bird's-beak Coastal sagewort G4?T2 G4G5 Justification rare, restricted to NWC and CFM; disjunct in NWC S BC to Mendocino Co. rare grass disjunct in NWC, Olympic Mt. Endemic. Close to the edge, maybe peripheral, Saltmarsh species endemic? restricted to PNC Coast Ranges sectional target possible disjunct in NWC OR sectional target limited to PNC, but G4 Appears to be disjunct offshore rocks N edge of range Endemic to coast. Sectional target for OR/WA only Endemic in Coast Range known from Sooke River, VI. Sectional target. SOC PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2D, page 2 of 4 Species Distribution Target Goal D 13 L 13 L W 13 7 E 25 W W 7 7 E 25 W W 7 7 L E 13 25 E 25 L 13 W W? 7 7 L 13 D L 13 13 W W? L W? 7 7 13 7 L W? W? 13 7 7 E 25 W 7 E L 25 13 Scientific name Sphaerotrichia divaricata Erysimum arenicola var torulosum Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca Triteleia hendersonii var leachiae Arabis furcata var olympica Artemisia furcata var heterophylla Silene douglasii var oraria Anemone oregana var felix Synthyris pinnatifida var lanuginosa Common name Sand-dwelling wallflower G4G5T? Large-flowered goldfields G4G5T2 Leach's brodiaea Olympic Nuttall's rockcress G4G5T2 G4T? G4T1 G4T2 Cut-leaf synthyris G4T2 Least bladdery milk-vetch Moss Federal Status G4T3 G5 G5 Species Distribution W? Target Goal 7 E 25 E 25 L 13 Endemic, T2 E 25 disjunct in NWC P E E 3 25 25 E 25 D 13 D W? 13 7 L 13 D 13 W 7 D 13 D 13 W? W 7 7 D W? 13 7 W 7 E 25 E 25 Justification Known only from alpine, Vancouver Island; SOC G4T? Three-forked mugwort Cascade Head catchfly Bog anemone Draba lonchocarpa var vestita Lance-fruited draba Astragalus microcystis Campylopus schmidii Global Rank G4G5 SOC SOC endemic T2, endemic possible disjunct in NWC. Sectional target. Disjunct from northeastern Washington Cochlearia officinalis Scurvygrass G5 Appears to be disjunct. Sectional target only in OR. Corydalis aurea Golden corydalis Whorled marsh pennywort G5 Disjunct from eastern Washington Hydrocotyle verticillata G5 Orthocarpus imbricatus Mountain owl-clover G5 Pellaea breweri Brewer's cliff-brake G5 Polytrichum strictum Rhynchospora capitellata Hummock haircap moss Brownish beakrush G5 G5 Sparganium fluctuans Tritomaria quinquedentata Water bur-reed Liverwort G5 G5 Stellaria humifusa Creeping sandwort G5? Castilleja parviflora var. Olympica Magenta paintbrush G5?T2T3 Pedicularis bracteosa var. Atrosanguinea Blood red pedicularis G5T? Disjunct in Olympics and Vancouver Island Disjunct from East Cascades Disjunct from Idaho Saltmarsh species uncommon in OR and WA, Olympic and Vancouver Island endemic. Likely Olympic endemic. Sectional target. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2D, page 3 of 4 Scientific name Astragalus australis var olympicus Sidalcea malviflora ssp patula Trillium ovatum var hibbersonii Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus var thompsonii Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus var peregrinus Hedysarum occidentale var occidentale Abronia umbellata ssp acutalata Corallorhiza maculata var. Ozettensis Erythronium quinaultense Teloschistes flavicans Common name Global Rank Federal Status Justification Species Distribution Target Goal Cotton's milk-vetch G5T1 SOC T1 E 25 Coast checker bloom G5T1 SOC L 13 Dwarf trillium G5T1 T1 endemic to Vancouver Island E 25 Pink sandverbena Thompson's wandering daisy G5T2 E 25 E 25 Wandering daisy G5T4 L 13 Western hedysarum G5T5 D 13 E 25 E 25 E W? 25 7 Pink sandverbena Ozette coral-root Quinault fawn-lily Lichen SOC G5T2 G5TXQ T2, endemic. Sectional target in OR and WA. Disjunct from Rocky Mtns in Olympics and Vancouver Island. SOC T2 New species, Olympic endemic New species, Olympic endemic PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2D, page 4 of 4 G5 G5T3 clouded salamander Dunn's salamander Del norte salamander Van Dyke's salamander Cope's giant salamander Olympic torrent salamander Southern torrent salamander Columbia torrent salmander tailed frog western toad northern red-legged frog foothill yellow-legged frog Cascades frog common loon fork-tailed storm-petrel leach's storm-petrel brown pelican double-crested cormorant brandt's cormorant pelagic cormorant great-blue heron brant aleutian canada goose Aneides ferreus Plethodon dunni Plethodon elongatus Plethodon vandykei Dicamptodon copei Rhyacotriton olympicus Rhyacotriton variegatus Rhyacotriton kezeri Ascaphus truei Bufo boreas Rana aurora aurora Rana boylii Rana cascadae Gavia immer Oceanodroma furcata Oceanodroma leucorhoa Pelecanus occidentalis Phalacrocorax auritus Phalacrocorax penicillatus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Ardea herodias Branta bernicla Branta canadensis leucopareia Listed Vulnerable Significant aggregation (wintering) Vulnerable Vulnerable Vulnerable Listed Vulnerable Vulnerable Declining, Vulnerable in OR Declining Endemic sub-pop in WA Vulnerable Imperiled Declining Imperiled Imperiled, Declining Imperiled Imperiled, Endemic Imperiled Imperiled, Endemic Declining Declining Justification W W W W W W W W W W W D W W W L D L E L E W W Species Distribution PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 1 of 7 G5 G5 G5 G5 G4 G5 G5 G4T4 G3 G4 G5 G3 G4 G3 G3 G3 G2 G3 G3 G4 G4 Common Name Scientific Name Global Rank Appendix 2E PNW Coast Ecoregion Wildlife Conservation Targets C C C C C C C I I L L L I L L L L L L L L L L Spatial Pattern 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 5 5 7 7 13 5 7 7 13 20 13 25 13 25 5 7 Target Goal rookeries check bc data marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds Comment G4 G5 G4 G5 G5T3 G4T3 surf scoter common goldeneye barrow's goldeneye bald eagle northern goshawk peregrine falcon blue grouse white-tailed ptarmigan western snowy plover black oystercatcher Black Turnstone Surfbird Rock Sandpiper dunlin western gull caspian tern common murre pigeon guillemot marbled murrelet Melanitta perspicillata Bucephala clangula Bucephala islandica Haliaeetus leucocephalus Accipiter gentilis Falco peregrinus Dendragapus obscurus Lagopus leucurus SAXITILIS Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Haematopus bachmani Arenaria melanocephala Aphriza virgata Calidris ptilocnemis Calidris alpina Larus occidentalis Sterna caspia Uria aalge Cepphus columba Brachyramphus marmoratus Listed Signifcant aggregation Declining Significant PIF score Significant PIF score Signifcant aggregation Significant PIF score Significant PIF score Significant PIF score Vulnerable Listed, Declining Endemic Listed Declining, sub-pop on VI Listed (state), Vulnerable Significant PIF score Vulnerable, Rare Significant aggregation (wintering) Significant aggregation (wintering) Significant aggregation (wintering) Justification W W W W W W W W W W W E W W D W W W W W Species Distribution PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 2 of 7 G3G4 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G4 harlequin duck Histrionicus histrionicus Global Rank Common Name Scientific Name C I C C C C C C C I I I I C C I C C C I Spatial Pattern 50% 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 50% 25 143 20 31 5 3 3 3 5 Target Goal Comment points for US, model for BC marine seabirds marine seabirds nesting areas marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds no data yet marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds from US Recov. Plan. G5T2 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G3 G5T2 G5T1Q G4 tufted puffin band-tailed pigeon Vancouver Island pygmy-owl northern spotted owl vaux's swift rufous hummingbird Allen's hummingbird Red-breasted Sapsucker olive-sided flycatcher western wood-peewee pacific-slope flycatcher streaked horned lark purple martin chestnut-backed chickadee golden-crowned kinglet western bluebird black-throated gray warbler hermit warbler Pacific shrew Common Water Shrew, brooksi subspecies Destruction Island shrew Baird's shrew Fratercula cirrhata Columba fasciata Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Strix occidentalis caurina Chaetura vauxi Selasphorus rufus Selasphorus sasin Sphyrapicus ruber Contopus cooperi Contopus sordidulus Empidonax difficilis Eremophila alpestris strigata Progne subis Poecile rufescens Regulus satrapa Sialia mexicana Dendroica nigrescens Dendroica occidentalis Sorex pacificus pacificus Sorex palustris brooksi Sorex trowbridgii destructioni Sorex bairdi bairdi G5 G5T3 G3T3 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 G5 rhinoceros auklet Cerorhinca monocerata Endemic Endemic to OR Endemic Decliing, Vulnerable Declining Significant PIF score Significant PIF score Declining Significant PIF score Significant PIF score Imperiled, Endemic Declining, mineral springs Endemic Listed Declining, Vulnerable Significant PIF score Significant PIF score Significant PIF W score Declining Declining Significant PIF score Signifcant aggregation Vulnerable Vulnerable Signifcant aggregation Justification E L E L W W W D W W E W E W W W W W W W W W W W W Species Distribution PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 3 of 7 G5 G5 G4 cassin's auklet Ptychoramphus aleuticus Global Rank G4 Common Name Synthliboramphus antiquus ancient murrelet Scientific Name L L L I I I I I I I L I I I I I I C I I I I I I l Spatial Pattern 1 13 4 9 9 5 5 9 5 5 25 21 16 50% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 Target Goal Comment territories marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds marine seabirds mineral springs American Marten fisher Martes americana Martes pennanti Endemic Endemic sub-pop Listed, Endemic Imperiled G4T1Q G5T2Q G3T3 Declining G5T3 G5 L E E? E W? W? PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 4 of 7 Mustela erminea anguinae Ermine, anguinae subspecies Wolverine, vancouverensis Gulo gulo vancouverensis subspecies Odocoileus virginianus leucurus Columbia white-tailed deer Clemmys marmorata marmorata northwestern pond turtle Keystone, Wide-ranging gray wolf Canis lupus Declining E L L Endemic Vulnerable Vulnerable G5 E Endemic W D E E D W L? W W W Species Distribution Disjunct sub-pop. Endemic Endemic Disjunct Fed, Species of Cocern Imperiled Fed, Species of Cocern Declining Fed, Species of Cocern Justification W G5 G5 G2G3 G5 G4G5 G5 Global Rank Vulnerable Olymypic snow mole Yuma myotis keen's myotis long-eared myotis fringed bat long-legged myots Common Name Pacific western big-eared bat G4T3T4 Olympic Yellow-pine Tamias amoenus caurinus Chipmunk G5 Marmota olympus Olympic marmot G3 Marmota vancouverensis Vancouver Island Marmot G1 western pocket gopher- Rogue G4G5T1 Thomomys mazama helleri River T2 Thomomys mazama melanops Olympic pocket gopher G4G5T1 Arborimus albipes white-footed vole G3G4 Arborimus longicaudus red tree vole G3G4 Scapanus townsendii olympicus Myotis yumanensis Myotis keenii Myotis evotis Myotis thysanodes Myotis volans Corynorhinus (Plectotus) townsendii townsendii Scientific Name I C R I C C R I L L I I I I I L I I I I I Spatial Pattern 9 10 2 18 3 3 0 18 13 13 18 9 18 18 5 13 5 9 5 5 5 Target Goal model for WA model for WA extirpated from OR, WA, not target on VI Comment Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found Not found a weevil Bradycellus fenderi Gilbertiola helferi Nebria acuta quileuta Nebria danmanni Nebria meanyi sylvatica Platyceropsis keeni Pterostichus campbelli Pterostichus humidulus Pterostichus lanei Scaphinotus johnsoni Stomis termitiformis Trechus humboldti Trigonoscuta pilosa Cicindela hirticollis siuslawensis Agonum belleri Pterostichus rothi Saldula villosa Lygus oregonae Derephysia foliacea Hesperia comma hulbirti Siuslaw sand tiger beetle Beller's ground beetle Roth's blind ground beetle Hairy shore bug Oregon plant bug Foliaceous lace bug common branded skipper Common Name Scientific Name Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Endemic Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Rare Justification E L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Species Distribution PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 5 of 7 G5T3 G3 G1 G3 G2 G2 ?? Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Not ranked Global Rank L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Spatial Pattern 25 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Target Goal Comment Imperiled G2G3 G4T4 G5T4 ?? G5T1T3 moss elfin obscure elfin (butterfly) Anna's blue greenish blue Disjunct Disjunct Listed, Imperiled Vulnerable Disjunct sub pop ?? ?? G5T1 G5T3T4 ?? G5T2T3 ?? G3T5T4 G4 G5T3 ?? acmon blue mountain blue Oregon silverspot butterfly valley silverspot butterfly arctic fritillary chalcedon checkerspot Edith's checkerspot Vancouver ringlet Vidler's alpine chryxus arctic new Sphagnum bog moth L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Species Distribution PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 6 of 7 Rare Disjunct Disjunct sub pop Endemic Disjunct sub pop Disjunct sub pop Disjunct Boisduval's Blue, blackmorei s G5T2T3 Imperiled Disjunct Endemic on OR Coast Declining in BC Imperiled, Endemic G5T2 Disjunct sub pop Disjunct sub pop Disjunct sub pop Disjunct sub pop ?? Justification ?? ?? G5 woodland skipper - coastal subspecies Ochlodes sylvanoides orecoastus Parnassius smintheus olympiannus Pieris sisymbrii flavitincta Lycaena nivalis browni Lycaena mariposa charlottensis Callophrys johnsoni (Mitoura johnsoni) Incisalia mossii mossii (Callophrys mossii) Callophrys polios maritima (Incisalia p. m.) Lycaeides idas vancouverensis Plebeius saepiolus (all ssp in area) Icaricia icarioides blackmorei Plebejus acmon spangelatus Agriades glandon megalo Speyeria zerene hippolyta Speyeria zerene bremnerii Boloria chariclea rainieri Euphydryas chalcedona perdiccas Euphydryas editha colonia Coenonympha tullia insulana Erebia vidleri Oeneis chryxus valerata Cerastius gloriosum (or Cerastis gloriosa) Global Rank smintheus parnassian spring white nivalis copper Makah (Queen Charlotte) copper Johnson's (mistletoe) hairstreak Common Name Scientific Name L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Spatial Pattern 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 25 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Target Goal Comment Monadenia fidelis Monadenia fidelis pronotis Valvata mergella Fluminicola virens Pomatiopsis binneyi Pomatiopsis californica Pomatiopsis chacei Lanx subrotunda Algamorda newcombiana (subrotunda?) warty jumping-slug Malone jumping-slug blue-gray taildropper crowned tightcoil evening fieldslug Puget oregonian Sisters hesperian redwood hesperian Oregon megomphix (snail) Del Norte shoulderband Pacific sideband(ssp. Canyonville) rockycoast sideband rams-horn valvata Olympia pebblesnail robust walker Pacific walker swamp (marsh) walker rotund lanx Newcomb's littorine snail (periwinkle) sand verbena moth Helfer's Grasshopper Olympic grasshopper a stonefly Haddock's rhyacophilan caddisfly California floater (mussel) western floater Oregon floater western ridgemussel western pearlshell Burrington jumping-slug Copablepharon fuscum Microtes helferi Nisquallia olympica Bolshecapnia gregsoni Rhyacophila haddocki Anodonta californiensis Anodonta kennerlyi Anodonta oregonensis Gonidea angulata Margaritifera falcata Hemphillia burringtoni Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Hemphillia malonei Prophysaon coeruleum Pristiloma pilsbryi Deroceras hesperium Cryptomastix devia Hochbergellus hirsutus Vespericola megasoma Megomphix hemphilli Helminthoglypta mailliardi Common Name Scientific Name Imperiled G1G2 L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Species Distribution PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 2E, page 7 of 7 Rare Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Rare Imperiled Rare Imperiled Imperiled Vulnerable Vulnerable Imperiled Vulnerable Imperiled Rare, Vulnerable Imperiled Imperiled Imperiled Justification G? G?T1 G2 G2 G1 G1 G1 G2 G2 G1 G4 G? G1 G2? G?S1 G? G3 G? G1 G3 G4 G5 G3 G4 G? Not rank G2/G4 G1G2 G2 Global Rank L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Spatial Pattern 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Target Goal Comment <= 0.005 0.005 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.1 0.1 – 0.2 >0.2 Basalt Flows Basalt Flows and Breccias Intrusives Open Water Sandstone/Clastic Sediments Tuffaceous Clastics Unconsolidated Surface Material Gradient3 <.005 .005 - .02 .02 - .04 .04 - .10 .10 - .20 >.20 Alluvium-Colluvium Basalt-Mafic-Extrusive Glacial Drift Granitic-Silicic Quaternary Lakeplain Sandstone Shale Siltstone Ice Eolian Sand, Erodable Volcanics Coarse Outwash Carbonate-Limestone Peat Ultramafic-Serpentine Slate <100 m 100 – 300 m 300 – 1000 m >1000 m Willamette, Olympic/ Chehalis, Lower Columbia, and Puget Sound 0 – 100 km2 100 – 1000 km2 1000 – 10,000 km2 > 10,000 km2 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 3A, page 1 of 2 Basalt Granitic (meta-volcanic) Alluvial Sedimentary (sandstone and shale) Volcanic (ash, tuff and mud) Limestone Water Serpentine (ultramafic and gabbro) < 600 m 600 – 1220 m 1220 – 1825 m > 1825 m <= 100m 100-300m 300-800m Elevation2 Geology4 1 - 1st order 2 – 2nd order 3 – 3rd order 4 – 4th order and higher Oregon Coastal (Southern Areas)* HUCs aggregated to similar size as rest of coast Stream Order Size1 Oregon Coastal (Northern Area) 0 – 100 km2 100 – 1000 km2 1000 – 10,000 km2 > 10,000 km2 Appendix 3A: Macrohabitat attributes of aquatic systems in the Oregon Coastal, Willamette, Olympic/Chehalis, Lower Columbia, and Puget Sound, and Rogue-Umpqua EDUs < .005 .005-.01 .01-.03 .03-.06 .06-.10 >.10 Alluvial Basalt Glacial Granitic Sedimentary Serpentine Non-basalt volcanics Water < 600 m 600 – 1220 m 1220 – 1825 m > 1825 m Rogue-Umpqua 0 – 100 km2 100 – 1000 km2 1000 – 10,000 km2 > 10,000 km2 Oregon Coastal (Southern Areas)* Unconnected Stream/River Lake Reservoir Wetland Glacier Willamette, Olympic/ Chehalis, Lower Columbia, and Puget Sound Unconnected Stream/River Lake Reservoir Wetland Coastal Rogue-Umpqua PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 3A, page 2 of 2 5. USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) at 1:100,000 and British Columbia Watershed Atlas Dataset at 1:50,000. 4. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources at 1:100,000, USGS Geologic map of Oregon (1991) at 1:500,000, Bedrock Geology from BC Ministry of Energy & Mines at 1:250,000, and Surficial Geology from the Geological Survey of Canada at 1:5 million. 3. USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) at 1:100,000 and USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) at 30 m resolution, for Washington and Oregon. British Columbia Watershed Atlas Dataset at 1:50,000, and BC TRIM Dataset at 90 m resolution. 2. USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) at 1:100,000 and USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) at 30 m resolution, for Washington and Oregon. British Columbia Watershed Atlas Dataset at 1:50,000, and BC TRIM Dataset at 90m resolution. 1. USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) at 1:100,000 and USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) at 30m resolution, for WA and OR. British Columbia Watershed Atlas Dataset at 1:50,000, and BC TRIM Dataset at 90m resolution. Key: Data Used Upstream Connectivity5 Downstream Connectivity5 Oregon Coastal (Northern Area) Scientific Name Acipenser medirostris Acipenser transmontanus pop 2 Acipenser transmontanus pop2 Acipenser transmontanus pop4 Catostomus sp 4 Cottus gulosus Cottus perplexus Gasterosteus sp Gasterosteus sp Gasterosteus sp 1 Gasterosteus sp 2 Gasterosteus sp 3 Gasterosteus sp 4 Gasterosteus sp 5 Lampetra ayresi Lampetra ayresi Lampetra macrostoma Lampetra tridentata Lampetra tridentata Novumbra hubbsi Novumbra hubbsi Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta pop 2 Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 G5T3Q G5T3Q G1 G5 G5 G3 G3 G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 G1 G4 Global Rank G3 G4T? G4T? G4T2 G1 T T not warranted not warranted Federal Status PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 3B, page 1 of 4 Common Name Green Sturgeon White Sturgeon (Columbia River Pop) White sturgeon (Columbia River) White sturgeon (Fraser River) Salish sucker Riffle Sculpin Reticulate Sculpin Vananda Creek limnetic stickleback Vananda Creek benthic stickleback Giant Black Stickleback Enos Lake limnetic stickleback Enos Lake benthic stickleback Paxton Lake limnetic stickleback Paxton lake benthic stickleback River Lamprey River Lamprey, West Island ESU Lake Lamprey Pacific Lamprey Pacific lamprey Olympic Mudminnow Olympic mudminnow Cutthroat Trout, East Island ESU Cutthroat Trout, North Island ESU Cutthroat Trout, West Island ESU Pink Salmon, Odd-Year ESU Pink Salmon, East Island ESU Pink Salmon, North Island ESU Pink Salmon, West Island ESU Chum Salmon, East Island ESU Chum Salmon, North Island ESU Chum Salmon, West Island ESU Chum Salmon, Hood Canal Summer Run ESU Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Appendix 3B Aquatic Conservation Targets, PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment Endemic Widespread Endemic Endemic Endemic Endemic Endemic Endemic Endemic Endemic Endemic Distribution 50 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 30 50 0 30 Conservation Goal 0 Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island ESU Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island ESU Steelhead Salmon, North Island ESU Steelhead Salmon, West Island ESU Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island ESU Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island ESU Summer Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Summer Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 30 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 G5T3T3Q G5T3T3Q G5T3Q G5T2Q G5T2Q G5T2Q G5T2Q G4T3Q G4T3Q G4T2Q G4T2Q G4T2Q Global Rank Species of Concern Species of Concern not warranted not warranted T T not warranted not warranted not warranted Species of Concern not warranted T T Proposed T Federal Status not warranted PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 3B, page 2 of 4 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Common Name Chum Salmon, Puget Sound/Strait ESU Coho Salmon, East Island ESU Coho Salmon, North Island ESU Coho Salmon, West Island ESU Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Coho Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Steelhead Salmon, East Island ESU Scientific Name Oncorhynchus keta pop 5 Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 2 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus mykiss Distribution 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 0 30 30 30 30 30 30 Conservation Goal 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 30 Fall Chinook Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Chinook Salmon, East Island ESU Chinook Salmon, North Island ESU Chinook Salmon, West Island ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Summer Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Oregon chub Umpqua Oregon Chub Sand Roller Pygmy Whitefish Millicoma Dace Umpqua Dace Leopard Dace Nooksak Dace Nooksack dace Bull Trout Bull Trout Salmon, Coastal and Puget Sound ESU Dolly Varden Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oregonichthys crameri Oregonichthys kalawatseti Percopsis transmontana Prosopium coulteri Rhinichthys cataractae sp 1 Rhinichthys evermanni Rhinichthys falcatus Rhinichthys sp 4 Rhinichthys sp 4 Salvelinus confluentus Salvelinus confluentus Salvelinus malma G5 G3 G3 G3 G5 G5T3 G3 G2 G3 G5T2Q G5T3Q G5T2Q Global Rank not warranted not warranted not warranted T not warranted not warranted T T T not warranted not warranted Federal Status T PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 3B, page 3 of 4 Common Name Sockeye Salmon, Ozette Lake ESU Sockeye Salmon, East Island ESU Sockeye Salmon, North Island ESU Sockeye Salmon, West Island ESU Sockeye Salmon, Lake Pleasant (portion) ESU Sockeye Salmon, Quinault Lake (portion) ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Scientific Name Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka pop 3 Oncorhynchus nerka pop 4 Endemic Endemic Distribution 50 100 50 30 30 50 30 50 30 30 30 30 0 50 0 Conservation Goal 100 30 30 30 100 100 Myriophyllum quitense (=M elatinoides) Ussurian Water-milfoil Pygmy Waterlilly Fibrous Pondweed Potamogeton oakesiansus Blunt-leaf Pondweed Wolffia columbiana Myriophyllum quitense (=M elatinoides) Myriophyllum ussuriense Nymphaea tetragona Potamogeton fibrillosus Potamogeton oakesiansus Potamogeton obtusifolius Wolffia columbiana G4? G3 G5 G5T2T4 G4 G5 G5 G3 G5 G4 G2Q G2 G3 G3 G2?T2 G2 G2 G1Q G5 G2 G5 G5 G5 Global Rank Federal Status PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 3B, page 4 of 4 Common Name Dolly Varden, East Island ESU Dolly Varden, North Island ESU Dolly Varden, West Island ESU California floater (mussel) River jewelwing Pacific clubtail Willamette floater (mussel) Giant Columbia River Limpet Columbia pebblesnail Western ridgemussel Barren juga (snail) Columbia duskysnail Rotund physa (snail) Nerite ramshorn (snail) Nuttall's Waterweed Water Howellia Whorled Pennywort Hairy Water-fern Cut-leaf Water Milfoil Scientific Name Salvelinus malma Salvelinus malma Salvelinus malma Anodonta californiensis Calopteryx aequabilis Gomphus kurilis Anodonta wahlametensis Fisherola nuttalli Fluminicola columbiana Gonidea angulata Juga hemphilli hemphilli Lyogyrus sp 4 Physella columbiana Vorticifex neritoides Elodea nuttallii Howellia aquatilis Hydrocotyle verticillata Marsilea vestita Myriophyllum pinnatum Widespread Limited? Widespread Widespread Widespread Widespread Widespread Widespread Widespread Widespread Limited Widespread Widespread Widespread Endemic Endemic? Endemic Endemic Widespread Limited Widespread Widespread Widespread Distribution Conservation Goal 50 50 50 Appendix 4A PNW Coast Shoreline Targets LANDFORM EXPOSURE Channel Undefined Channel Protected Undefined Estuary Wetland Exposed Estuary Wetland Protected Estuary Wetland Very protected Estuary Wetland Gravel Beach Undefined Gravel Beach Exposed Gravel Beach Protected Gravel beach Very exposed Gravel beach Very protected Gravel Flat Undefined Gravel Flat Exposed Gravel Flat Protected Exposed High Tide Lagoon High Tide Lagoon Protected Mud Flat Undefined Mud flat Exposed Mud Flat Protected Mud Flat Very protected Rock Platform Undefined Rock Platform Exposed Rock Platform Protected Very exposed Rock platform Rock with Gravel Beach Undefined Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed Rock with Gravel Beach Protected Very exposed Rock with gravel beach Rock with Sand & Gravel Beach Undefined Rock with Sand & Gravel Beach Exposed Rock with Sand & Gravel Beach Protected Rock with Sand & Gravel Beach Very exposed Rock with Sand Beach Undefined Rock with Sand Beach Exposed Rock with Sand Beach Protected Rock with sand beach Very exposed Undefined Rocky Shore/Cliff Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed Protected Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed Rocky Shore/Cliff Sand & Gravel Beach Undefined Sand & Gravel Beach Exposed Sand & Gravel Beach Protected Sand & Gravel Beach Very exposed Sand & Gravel Beach Very protected Sand & Gravel Flat Undefined Sand & Gravel Flat Exposed Sand & Gravel Flat Protected Sand Beach Undefined LENGTH (M) PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4A, page 1 of 2 2,295.9 10,705.2 199,682.8 485,791.9 921,277.4 103,161.7 21,885.9 67,647.0 123,034.7 65,034.0 11,500.4 4,103.4 6,876.1 28,261.5 443.9 9,109.7 20,827.3 2,913.9 30,566.0 9,377.9 126,133.3 328,567.2 18,291.7 23,165.2 105,994.5 219,792.0 661,417.5 10,730.7 99,546.7 454,827.4 457,772.3 2,790.8 10,767.5 192,713.6 66,860.1 12,023.0 393,448.9 420,675.9 806,639.2 81,362.1 38,685.1 78,392.5 228,796.4 120,978.7 7,526.3 89,862.4 25,272.2 262,302.5 68,241.7 GOAL 20% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 30% 30% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% LANDFORM Sand Beach Sand Beach Sand beach Sand Beach Sand Flat Sand Flat Sand Flat Sand Flat Sand Flat Total EXPOSURE Exposed Protected Very exposed Very protected Undefined Exposed Protected Very exposed Very protected LENGTH (M) GOAL 204,142.8 20% 70,027.1 20% 293,473.0 20% 8,148.4 20% 11,234.1 20% 86,530.6 20% 146,369.3 20% 103,328.1 20% 3,971.5 20% 8,465,298.9 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4A, page 2 of 2 Red Algae Red Algae Red Algae Sedges Eelgrass Native High Saltmarsh Native Saltmarsh Surfgrass Bull Kelp Giant Kelp Dune Grasses Taxon Rockweed intertidal, shallow subtidal intertidal 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 20% 30% 20% Conservation Goal 20% G3 G3G4 G3G4 G5 G5 G5 G4G5 G5 Global Rank S1 - rare S1 unknown S1 - rare Not ranked Not ranked S3; not ranked S4S5; not ranked Not ranked Provincial Rank rare unknown rare rare rare rare OR Rank WA Rank PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4B, page 1 of 3 Saltmarsh Eelgrass Saltmarsh Saltmarsh Surfgrass Kelp Kelp Rocky Intertidal Dune Grasses Algal Bed Community ConservaType tion Target intertidal Algal Bed Leymus mollis supratidal shallow Macrocystis subtidal shallow Nereocystis subtidal intertidal, shallow Phyllospadix subtidal supratidal, Salicornia intertidal Triglochin/Salic ornia/Descham supratidal, psia/Distichylus intertidal shallow Zostera marina subtidal supratidal, intertidal Gracilariophila oryzoides low intertidal Herposiphoia verticillata low intertidal Peyssonnelia profunda subtidal Scientific name(s) Fucus GigartinaOdonthaliaMixed filamentous & Prionitisblade reds Polysiphonia Hedophyllum, Egregia, L. setchellii, Eisenia, Phyllospadix Nereocystis, Rocky Intertidal* and rich reds Appendix 4B PNW Coast Intertidal Vegetation Types CDC 2001 CDC 2001 CDC 2001 Rationale x Declining x x x Imperiled x x x x x x x x x Keystone x Endemic low intertidal low intertidal low intertidal subtidal intertidal rocks Postelsia palmaeformis intertidal Sphaerotrichia divaricata low intertidal Dictyoneurum californicum Laminaria longipes Pseudopringsh eimia apiculata Cylindrocarpus rugosus Dictyoneuropsi s reticulata Conservation Goal G4G5 G5 G4G5 G4 G3G4 G3 G4G5 G4G5 G4G5 G1?Q G4 Global Rank S1 - rare common S1 - rare S2 - rare S2 - rare S1 - rare S1 - rare S1 rare/overlo oked S1 - rare S1 - rare S2 - rare S1 - occasional Provincial Rank unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown common unknown rare rare common CDC 2001 CDC 2001 CDC 2001 CDC 2001 CDC 2001 CDC 2001 Rationale rare common rare unknown unknown CDC 2001 M. Dethier CDC 2001 CDC 2001 CDC 2001 occasional CDC 2001 unknown unknown unknown/ overlooke d unknown unknown unknown occasional OR Rank WA Rank PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4B, page 2 of 3 * Habitat type 3 ala Morris 2001. assemblage of lower intertidal algae and mussels Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Green Algae Protomonostro ma undulatum estuaries Green Algae low intertidal subtidal low intertidal intertidal Community ConservaType tion Target Codium ritteri Scientific name(s) Phycodrys riggii Polysiphonia macounii Tayloriella divaricata Green Algae Red Algae Red Algae Red Algae Taxon Declining x x x x x x x x x x Imperiled Keystone nw w w Endemic Total Linear Area in Ecoregion (m) 375,759 3,131,019 208,124 589,115 17,442 982,182 25,646 1,486,065 1,474,546 547,141 22,994 1,210,679 566,136 624,409 Goal 20% 20% 20% 20% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% EST -- estuarine habitat SHR -- shoreline habitat on the outer coasts Conservation Target Algal beds EST Algal beds SHR Dune grass EST Dune grass SHR Rocky intertidal habitat EST Rocky intertidal habitat SHR Kelp EST Kelp SHR Saltmarsh EST Saltmarsh SHR Surfgrass EST Surfgrass SHR Eelgrass EST Eelgrass SHR PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4B, page 3 of 3 Intertidal Habitat Conservation Targets Used in the Assessment PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4C, page 1 of 1 Appendix 4C PNW Coast Estuarine Conservation Targets Based on Substrates (Area in ha) Cape Pt Pt Queen Vancouver Cape Arago Arago Johnstone Grenville Grenville Charolotte Island TARGET Grand Total Goal North South Strait North South Strait Shelf Bedrock 65.3 20% 65.303 Boulder 133.6 20% 132.824 0.739 Cobble/Gravel 182.6 20% 125.864 56.711 Cobble/Gravel Flat 199.5 20% 10.319 189.142 Flat 931.6 20% 861.476 0.686 52.922 16.548 Mud 516.6 20% 505.612 10.954 Mud Flat 30,562.8 20% 1384.129 1.635 27704.663 1472.366 Organics/fines 18,325.0 30% 14161.708 416.051 118.891 301.826 3146.065 180.423 Rock 71.4 20% 70.308 1.074 Sand 26,590.8 20% 26568.068 16.73 6.008 Sand & Gravel Flat 716.9 20% 245.421 471.436 Sand Flat 10,229.4 20% 5790.791 11.759 128.155 2996.887 1301.817 Sand/Mud 4,167.1 20% 4123.497 43.649 Sand/Mud Flat 8,501.8 20% 8458.245 43.592 Shell 16.9 20% 16.894 Unconsolidated 597.7 20% 487.91 109.74 Undefined Beach/Bar 22.1 20% 2.555 3.723 15.808 Wood Debris/Organic 25.5 30% 21.734 3.768 Grand Total 101,856.4 62784.682 907.711 247.046 358.471 33887.053 245.421 3426.042 Enhydra lutris Minke whale Northern rightwhale dolphin Pacific whitesided dolphin Sea otter (Northern) Steller (northern) sea lion Eumetopias jubatus Pacific herring Marine Mammals Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Orcinus orca Killer whale or orca Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Clupea pallasi Hypomesus Surf smelt pretiosus Acipenser Green sturgeon meditostris N Y Y Y G3 G5 ??? G3 G4 FC T T declining population numbers haul outs throughout ecoregion, breeds in BC Breeding areas, regular large concentrations. H Weeks Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. H Weeks extirpated in OR, declining, keystone species JC: consider adding as target N N JC: consider adding as target N breeds in WA and BC, southern resident population in BC listed as endangered by COSEWIC, northern resident population threatened by COSEWIC. JC consider the different ecotypes separately (S and N resident, transient, and offshore) important migration route through ecoregion JC: consider adding as target State listed or candidate. Any occurrence, migration, routes. State listed or candidate. Any occurrence, migration, routes. Regular concententrations in foraging areas and migration routes. important migration route through ecoregion JCalambokidis: consider adding as target Rationale & Comments JC: consider adding as target SC E E Federal Status N G4G5 G3 N N G4G5 G3G4 G3G4 Global Rank N N N N N Data PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 1 of 7 Nearshore (050m) Both Near and Offshore Nearshore (050m) Nearshore (050m) Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Nearshore (050m) Both Near and Harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena Offshore Humpback Megaptera Both Near and whale novaeangliae Offshore Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Eschrichtius robustus Balaenopteridae physalus Analysis zone Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Gray whale Grampus Beaked whale Fin whale or finback whale Common name Scientific name Taxon Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Marine Mammals Appendix 4D PNW Coast Ecoregion Fine Filter Marine Targets Lingcod English sole Copper rockfish Sebastes caurinus Darkblotched rockfish Sebastes crameri Greenstriped rockfish Sebastes elongatus Widow rockfish Quillback rockfish China rockfish Tiger rockfish Bocaccio Canary rockfish Sebastes pinniger Redstripe rockfish Sebastes proriger Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Pacific hake Marine Fish Sebastes paucispinis Sebastes nebulosus Sebastes nigrocinctus Sebastes maliger Sebastes entomelas Parophyrs vetulus Ophiodon elongatus Merluccius productus Rock sole Marine Fish Lampetra tridentata Lepidopsetta (aka Pleuronectes) bilineata Pacific lamprey Common name Scientific name Acipenser White sturgeon transmontanus Pacific Ammodytes sandlance hexapterus Gadus Pacific cod macrocephalus Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Taxon N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Data ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? G5 ??? ??? G4 Global Rank FC SC Federal Status Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. WDFW, OPAC, M. Hixon, overfished. H Weeks, W Wakefield WDFW, OPAC, M. Hixon, overfished. H Weeks, W Wakefield Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. OPAC, M. Hixon, overfished. H Weeks, W Wakefield Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. overfished. H Weeks, W Wakefield Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Food fish. Breeding areas. overfished. H Weeks, W Wakefield Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. declining. H Weeks Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. declining population numbers Rationale & Comments PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 2 of 7 Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Analysis zone Nearshore (050m) Nearshore (050m) Both Near and Offshore Nearshore (050m) Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Fish Marine Fish Marine Fish Uria aalge common murre rhinoceros auklet tufted puffin cassin's auklet Ptychoramphus aleuticus Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata pigeon guillemot Cepphus columba Oceanodroma furcata Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax auritus Phalacrocorax penicillatus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Haematopus bachmani Sterna caspia fork-tailed stormpetrel leach's stormpetrel double-crested cormorant brandt's cormorant pelagic cormorant Black oystercatcher caspian tern Common name Scientific name Y Y Y. PIF 24B, 26W Y Y, colony G5 Y, colony G5 Y, colony G5 Y, colony G5 Y Y Y, colony G5 Y Y Y, colony G5 Y, colony G4 Y, colony G5 Y Y Y, colony G5 Y, colony G5 Y Terrestrial Target Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Food fish. Breeding areas, regular concentrations. Rationale & Comments T.Jagielo: recent assessment by F. Wallace at WDFW resulted in an overfished determination by PFMC; W.Wakefield Y, colony G5 Federal Status SC Federal Status Y Global Rank ??? G5 G5 ??? Global Rank Y, colony G5 Nearshore Data N N N N Data PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 3 of 7 Both Near and Offshore Nearshore (050m) Both Near and Offshore Both Near and Offshore Yelloweye rockfish Marine Fish Sebastes ruberrimus Spirinchus Longfin smelt thaleichthys Thaleichthys Eulachon pacificus Theragra Walleye pollock chalocgrammaco Analysis zone Common name Scientific name Taxon Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds G5 G5 G5 G5 G4 N N N N N Surfbird Sanderling Black Turnstone Arenaria melanocephala Aphriza virgata Calidris alba G5 G5 G5 SC T SC/FC2 LT LE E LT Federal Status Y N. PIF 19W Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y. PIF 16B, 20N Y, PIF 24B, 26W Terrestrial Target PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 4 of 7 N N N G4 G4 N N G5T3 N peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus G5 N brant Branta bernicla aleutian canada Branta canadensis goose leucopareia Histrionicus harlequin duck histrionicus Black scoter Melanitta nigra Melanitta surf scoter perspicillata common Bucephala clangula goldeneye barrow's Bucephala islandica goldeneye Haliaeetus bald eagle leucocephalus G5 G4 N N G3 G5 G1 G5 G4T3 Global Rank great-blue heron Ardea herodias brown pelican N N Phoebastria nigripes Phoebastria immutabilis Pelecanus occidentalis N Phoebastria albatrus Laysan albatros N Gavia immer common loon Short-tailed albatross Black-footed albatross Y Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Nearshore Data western snowy plover Common name Scientific name G5 G5 G3G4 G4 N N N N Gooseneck Barnacles Burrowing Shrimp Pollicipes polymerus rocky intertidal M.Dethier, d. Pitkin, R. Lowe eco engineer declining issues; WDFW conservation issues; UW surveys show decreases N N FCo N N native and threatened by introduced competitors and overharvest Any occurrence ?? N harvest for bait and food Reviewers Comments Ecosystem engineer Federal Status Y Y Y-concentration. PIF 22B, 22W N Y Y N. PIF 20W N. PIF 19W Terrestrial Target N Y Y Global Rank T Federal Status PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 5 of 7 Neotrypaea intertidal, shallow californiensis and subtidal Upogebia pugettensis Marine Native Oyster Ostreola conchaphila intertidal and Invertebrates subtidal Marine Newcomb's Algamorda intertidal and Invertebrates littorine snail newcombiana subtidal Marine Northern (Pinto) Haliotis intertidal and Invertebrates Abalone kamtschatkana subtidal Marine Sand Dollars Dendraster intertidal and Invertebrates excentricus subtidal Marine Green Urchin Strongylocentrotus intertidal and Invertebrates drobachiensis subtidal Marine Invertebrates Marine Invertebrates Community Type Mytilus californianus intertidal and and trossulus subtidal Common name Scientific name Data G5 N Calidris alpina Limnodromus griseus Larus occidetalis Brachyramphus marmoratus Synthliboramphus ancient murrelet antiquus Dunlin short-billed dowitcher Western Gull Marbled murrelet G5 N G5 G5 Rock Sandpiper Calidris ptilocnemis N Global Rank N Calidris mauri Nearshore Data Least sandpiper Calidris minutilla Western Sandpiper Marine Mussels Invertebrates Taxon Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Marine Birds Common name Scientific name Green Algae Green Algae Marine Algae Green Algae Red Algae Red Algae Red Algae Red Algae Red Algae Red Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Taxon Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Common name or group subtidal low intertidal intertidal subtidal low intertidal low intertidal Community Type infralittoral zoneoutercoast intertidal and subtidal N N N N N N N N N Data N N N N N G3 G4G5 G4G5 G4G5 G1?Q G4 G3 G3G4 G3G4 Global Rank S1 - rare S1 rare/overlooked S1 - rare S1 - rare S1 occasional S2 - rare S1 - rare S1 unknown S1 - rare Province Rank ?? located throughout range? Not north of Oregon. D. Pitkin, R. Lowe IUCN B. Menge per. Comm. Patchy distributions and only occur is soft areas between rocks M.Dethier (abundant). S. Rumrill; rare snail, longlived not sure it is in ecoregion?. S. Rumrill: rare long-lived snail PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 6 of 7 Pseudopringsheimi subtidal a apiculata low intertidal Codium ritteri Protomonostroma estuaries undulatum Polysiphonia macounii Tayloriella divaricata Phycodrys riggii Scientific name(s) Gracilariophila oryzoides Herposiphoia verticillata Peyssonnelia profunda Nematostella vectensis Haliotis rufescens Marine Red Abalone Invertebrates Marine Starlet Sea Invertebrates Anemone lives lower in intertidal than black turbin snail Tegula brunnea intertidal, infralittoral fringe midlittoral zone Tegula funebralis Strongylocentrotus purpuratus Black Turban Snail Brown Turban Snail Marine Purple Sea Invertebrates Urchin Marine Invertebrates Marine Invertebrates Taxon Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Marine Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Brown Algae Common name or group low intertidal G4G5 G5 G4G5 G4 G3G4 Global Rank S1 - rare common S1 - rare S2 - rare S2 - rare S1 - rare Province Rank PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 4D, page 7 of 7 N N N N N N intertidal rocks low intertidal Data Community Type Laminaria longipes low intertidal Postelsia intertidal palmaeformis Sphaerotrichia low intertidal divaricata Scientific name(s) Cylindrocarpus rugosus Dictyoneuropsis reticulata Dictyoneurum californicum Appendix 4E: Building a Benthic Habitat Model as Surrogates for Ecosystem-Scale Targets This section describes the first steps in developing and comparing models for mapping offshore benthic habitats in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion. This, like all benthic models, is a work in progress. We utilized a topographic model and existing classifications that characterize depth and benthic substrate to model and generate offshore benthic conservation targets. Use of the benthic habitat model assumes that benthic habitat types can serve as a surrogate or coarse filter for the conservation of the majority of bottom-dwelling species in an ecoregion. The ideal data for mapping marine ecosystems is biological data on the distribution and abundance of species in the water and on the sea bottom. Unfortunately, these data are scarce offshore. Lacking regionally comprehensive biological data along the Pacific Northwest Coast (PNWC), the Conservancy has focused on the use of geophysical data. We predict that many geophysical variables (e.g., temperature, depth and sediment type) can be correlated with the occurrence of different types of species. Geophysical information that is most useful includes sea surface temperature, bottom temperature, depth, bottom sediment type, phytoplankton density (chlorophyll a), currents and bathymetry (underwater topography). Our current model presented here uses bathymetry and marine geology to depict depth, geomorphology or bedforms, and substrate type. It is our hope that the benthic model will be predictive of habitat targets. Output of the model, however, needs to be tested against higher resolution data (i.e., multibeam) and underwater surveys to determine the accuracy of identifying landforms on the seafloor. In addition, these data need to be correlated with biotic assemblages in determining community or habitat types. A recent study used local population density estimates of juvenile demersal finfish from trawl survey data as a meaningful indicator of habitat value (Cook and Auster 2005). We believe associating species data with modeled data on benthic habitats will ultimately give us a more accurate spatial assessment of species-habitat utilization. Lastly, it should be noted that this model cannot be used to predict surface or water column patterns in diversity. Other models are required in examining the pelagic environment. 4E.1 Classification of the Benthic Environment In order to generate a continuous surface depicting the seafloor we used a number of regional bathymetric data sets and examined interpolation techniques. Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of the seafloor are distinct from terrestrial models in that the survey efforts required to produce a continuous surface of depth across a region are often inconsistent temporally, spatially and methodologically. Therefore careful examination of interpolation methods was conducted before an appropriate surface was used to model benthic habitats. After generating a continuous surface depicting the seafloor, we examined several models that classify the benthic environment into distinct geomorphic types. The benthic model presented here has been used for marine ecoregional planning throughout the continental U.S., including the Southern and Northern California ecoregions, the Floridian and Carolinian on the east coast, as well as in the Northwest Atlantic Coastal and Marine region. In addition to developing an initial methodology and data for depicting benthic habitats we have also used the bathymetric source data to determine areas of bottom complexity. Although using the same source data, output from a complexity model complements the identification of benthic habitats and therefore will be addressed separately. Both methodologies were conducted along the outer coasts of Oregon and Washington, part of the Pacific Northwest Coast ecoregion (Figure 4E.3.1). The results of the benthic habitat model described below produce offshore marine conservation targets. This approach to modeling coarse scale habitats provides promise in areas of the world PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 1 of 8 where comprehensive thematic mapping of the seafloor has not occurred. The benthic model combines three parameters: geomorphology, depth and substrate. We initially examined six different geomorphic types to describe the seafloor (basins\canyons, lower slopes, middle slopes, upper slopes, flats, ridges) but later combined all the slope position types into one. We then combined the four geomorphic types (basins\canyons, slopes, flats, ridges) with four depth ranges: Class Inner shelf Mid shelf Mesobenthal Bathybenthal Definition 0-40m 40-200m 200-700m 700-5000m These depth classes were primarily based on Greene et al. 1999 but were also informed by others (Allen and Smith 1988, Zacharias et al. 1998). The modeling produced 16 potential bedforms (combined geomorphology and depth) which represented our initial list of benthic habitat types. The last step incorporated lithology or substrate. For the purposes of developing the benthic habitat model we identified the most common descriptions of bottom induration types: “hard”, determined from rock and boulders classes; “soft”, determined from sand or mud bottoms; or “unclassified”. With this combination of geomorphology, depth, and substrate there were 48 potential benthic habitat types. 4E.2 Benthic Habitats We applied a landscape position model described in Fel and Zobel (1995), and later described in detail by Weiss (2001) for mapping seafloor geomorphology. Since landscape classifications are not based on morphology alone but also on the position of the land surface in relation to its surroundings, Fel (1994) developed a quantitative index of landscape position. Also called Topographic Position Index, or TPI, the basic algorithm compares the elevation of a given cell in a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to the mean elevation of a specified neighborhood around that cell. Positive TPI values represent locations that are higher than the average of their surroundings, while negative TPI values represent locations that are lower than their surroundings. TPI values near zero are flat areas. This model was created to describe landforms in the terrestrial environment, but is easily adaptable to marine data. Topographic position is an inherently scale-dependent phenomenon. Scale of the source data and the landscape context are two important factors to consider when deciding the search radius of a specified neighborhood, or groups of cells evaluated in a specific GIS procedure (see Zeiler 1999 for a good explanation of geospatial terminology). a) Scale of the source data determines the level of detail that the model can depict. For instance, if the search radius is small then features within a small geography will be explicitly depicted given detailed source data; on the contrary, if the search radius is large then features may be missed or dissolved into larger categories. This scenario can also be true if the search radius is smaller than the source data can support. In other words, if the search radius is relatively small for coarse scale data then errors in interpolation may be mistaken for distinct features. To avoid these potential miscalculations it is important to evaluate the scales of the source data and examine different search radii to determine appropriate output models. b) Seascape context determines the position of a distinct feature in relation to its surroundings. For example, a point in a basin may be coded as flat when the search radius is small; with a large search radius that same point may be considered at the bottom of a canyon if the surrounding area contains steep slopes that rise dramatically. Therefore, the nature of the broader land or seascape needs to be considered when setting the search radius in order to accurately represent variation in habitat. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 2 of 8 As a general rule, the continuum of topographic position values sort out along a topographic gradient from depressions and canyon or valley bottoms, through to lower slopes, mid slopes, upper slopes, and up to ridge and hilltops. By determining thresholds for the continuous values they can be classified into distinct slope position categories (Figure 4E.3.2). Many physical and biological processes acting at a given location are highly correlated with the topographic position: a seamount, basin or canyon, ridge, flat plain, upper slope, etc. These processes (i.e., soil deposition, hydrologic balance and response, wind or wave exposure) are often important predictors of vegetation and other biota. Physical processes are difficult to model directly across large areas, but an index of topographic position can be used within a statistical predictive modeling framework as a surrogate variable to represent the spatial variation of these processes. For this exercise we modeled benthic geomorphic types using the same principles and tools developed in terrestrial models (Figure 4E.3.3). In both environments a cell-based DEM is required, with cell values either representing elevation (positive) or depth (negative). Recently marine practitioners have adopted this method for deriving landforms, calling this the Bathymetric Position Index, or BPI (Rinehart et al. 2004). Although the BPI model derives landforms on the seafloor, we have added depth classes (Figure 4E.3.4) and substrate types (Figure 4E.3.5) that further delineate distinct marine formations. These modeling efforts were based on bathymetry data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW), and the Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management (MSRM) in British Columbia, Canada. The main issues to consider when assembling a mosaic of disparate data include scale of the source data and the search radius in depicting seafloor morphology mentioned above. Bathymetry data yields both the benthic geomorphology and depth of that formation. We combined the geomorphology and depth data with lithology on the seafloor. The Oregon and Washington continental shelf geologic data set compiled and mapped by Oregon State University (Goldfinger et al. 2001) and others (Greene et al. 1999), as updated for the Groundfish EFH-EIS process, incorporates available information on seafloor substrate types for the region. In addition, geologic data was available for British Columbia (MSRM 2001). We used a simplified classification of marine substrate types (hard, soft, unclassified) in order to match data across the region. The resultant grid after combining geomorphology and depth with substrate types tracked all potential combinations of inputs resulting in 48 (4 landforms x 4 depth classes x 3 substrate types) unique benthic habitat types for the Pacific Northwest Coast ecoregion (Figure 4E.3.6). A final check was conducted to determine whether all 48 modeled benthic habitat types were present in the ecoregion; a few types were present but at <100 total hectares (inner shelf canyon unclassified (1.2 hectares), inner shelf slop unclassified (53.6 hectares), and mid shelf canyon unclassified (82.2 hectares)). The largest category was bathybenthal flats unclassified (3,725,682.2 hectares); the total area cover was 14,716,641.8 hectares from mean high water to approximately 2,500 meters depth. It should be noted that these categories were also used in the Northern California Coast ecoregion and therefore could be combined to illustrate Pacific west coast-wide coverage (TNC 2005). PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 3 of 8 4E.3 Figures 4 E . 3 . 1 B AT H Y M E T R Y O F F O F O R E G O N , P AC I F I C N O R T H W E S T C O AS T E C O R E G I O N PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 4 of 8 4 E . 3 . 2 T O P O G R AP H I C P O S I T I O N I N D E X ( T P I ) M O D E L S S P E C I F I C L AN D O R B E N T H I C F E AT U R E S AL O N G A G R AD I E N T O F C O N T I N U O U S V AL U E S PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 5 of 8 4 E . 3 . 3 G E O M O R P H I C T Y P E S O N T H E S E AF L O O R F O R H E C E T A B AN K O F F T H E S O U T H E R N O R E G O N C O AS T 4 E . 3 . 4 D E P T H C L AS S E S F O R H E C E T A B AN K O F F T H E S O U T H E R N O R E G O N C O AS T PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 6 of 8 4 E . 3 . 5 S U B S T R AT E T Y P E S F O R H E C E T A B A N K 4 E . 3 . 6 F I N AL B E N T H I C H AB I T AT T Y P E S F O R H E C E T A B AN K PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 7 of 8 4E References Cook, R.R. and P.J. Auster. 2005. Use of Simulated Annealing for Identifying Essential Fish Habitat in a Multispecies Context. Conservation Biology 19 (3): 876-886. Fels, J.E. 1994. Modeling and mapping potential vegetation using digital terrain data: Applications in the Ellicott Rock Wilderness of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Ph.D dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Fels, J.E. and R. Zobel. 1995. Landscape position and classified landtype mapping for statewide DRASTIC mapping project. North Carolina State University technical report VEL.95.1. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Raleigh. Goldfinger, C., Romsos, C., Robison, R., Milstein, R., and Myers B. 2001. Active Tectonics and Seafloor Mapping Labaratory Publication 02-01. Interim Seafloor Lithology Maps for Oregon and Washington, Version 1.0. College of Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Greene, H.G., M.M. Yoklavich, R.M. Starr, V.M. O’Connell, W.W. Wakefield, D.E. Sullivan, J.E. McRea Jr., and G.M. Cailliet. 1999. A classification scheme for deep seafloor habitats. Oceanologica 22:663-678. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management (MSRM) Decision Support Services. 2001. British Columbia Marine Ecological Classification Update. Prepared by AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd. Sidney, BC. 36 pp. Rinehart, R.W., Wright, D.J., Lundblad, E.R., Larkin, E.M., Murphy, J., Cary-Kothera, L. 2004. ArcGIS 8.x Benthic Terrain Modeler: Analysis in American Samoa. Proceedings of the 24th Annual ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA, Paper 1433. The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2005. Northern California Marine Ecoregional Assessment. Prepared by the California Field Office of The Nature Conservancy. Working draft. Weiss, A. D., 2001, Topographic Position Index and Landforms Classification. Indus Corporation. Working draft. Zeiler, M. 1999. Modeling Our World: The ESRI Guide to Geodatabase Design, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 4E, page 8 of 8 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5A, page 1 of 6 Protected Area Size (ha) Managing Agency Arbutus Grove Provincial Park 22.646 BC Provincial Government Artlish Cave Provincial Park 261.595 BC Provincial Government Big Bunsby Provincial Park 559.666 BC Provincial Government Bligh Island Provincial Park 1626.422 BC Provincial Government Brooks Peninsula Provincial Park 38457.707 BC Provincial Government Cape Scott Provincial Park 17556.415 BC Provincial Government Carmanah Walbran Provincial Park 16133.283 BC Provincial Government Catala Island Provincial Marine Park 262.25 BC Provincial Government Claud Elliot Provincial Park 862.174 BC Provincial Government Clayoquot Arm Provincial Park 3564.342 BC Provincial Government Clayoquot Plateau Provincial Park 3124.679 BC Provincial Government Cormorant Channel Provincial Marine Park 132.415 BC Provincial Government Cowichan River Provincial Park 53.571 BC Provincial Government Dawley Passage Provincial Marine Park 0.371 BC Provincial Government Dixie Cove Provincial Park 90.518 BC Provincial Government Englishman River Falls Provincial Park 98.437 BC Provincial Government Epper Passage Provincial Marine Park 53.743 BC Provincial Government Flores Provincial Marine Park 3937.458 BC Provincial Government Fossil Provincial Park 52.8 BC Provincial Government French Beach Provincial Park 312.126 BC Provincial Government Gibson Provincial Marine Park 121.206 BC Provincial Government God's Pocket Provincial Marine Park 576.833 BC Provincial Government Gold Machalat Provincial Park 646.446 BC Provincial Government Gordon Bay Provincial Park 52.231 BC Provincial Government Haley Lake Provincial Park 114.145 BC Provincial Government Hesquiat Peninsula Provincial Marine Park 7393.699 BC Provincial Government Honeymoon Bay Provincial Park 6.365 BC Provincial Government Horne Lake Caves Provincial Park 128.497 BC Provincial Government Juan de Fuca Provincial Park 998.996 BC Provincial Government Kennedy Lake Provincial Park 109.727 BC Provincial Government Klanawa Lake Provincial Park 99.899 BC Provincial Government Koksilah River Provincial Park 260.277 BC Provincial Government Lawn Point Provincial Park 588.2 BC Provincial Government Appendix 5A PNW Coast Ecoregion Protected Areas Section Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Nahwitti Lowlands Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Nahwitti Lowlands North Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Level of Protection 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Protected Area Little Qualicum Falls Provincial Park Loveland Bay Provincial Park Lower Nimpkish Provincial Park MacMillan Grove Provincial Park Maquinna Provincial Marine Park Marble River Provincial Park Misty Lake Provincial Park Morton Lake Park Nimpkish Lake Provincial Park Nitinat Lake Provincial Park Nitinat River Provincial Park Nuchaltlitz Provincial Marine Park Protected Offshore Islands Quatsino Provincial Marine Park Raft Cove Provincial Park Robson Bight Provincial Park Rugged Point Provincial Marine Park San Juan Ridge Provincial Park Santa-Boca Provincial Park Schoen Lake Provincial Park Sooke Mountain Provincial Park Sooke Potholes Provincial Park Spider Lake Provincial Park Sproat Lake Provincial Park Stamp Falls Provincial Park Stamp River-Moneys Pool Provincial Park Strathcona Provincial Park Sulphur Passage Provincial Marine Park Sydney Inlet Provincial Marine Park Tahsish-Kwois Park Taylor Arm Provincial Park Tranquil Creek Provincial Park Tsitika River Provincial Park Vargas Island Provincial Marine Park Managing Agency BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5A, page 2 of 6 Size (ha) 488.932 13.602 232.127 147.988 39.38 1040.737 55.917 62.533 3915.794 70.6 153.735 465.038 10.877 560.984 500.606 5250.852 162.47 89.893 333.207 8912.355 452.561 9.741 60.274 43.17 303.323 233.641 250682.891 1310.358 2001.97 11016.073 83.317 296.023 125.242 1750.509 Section Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Nahwitti Lowlands Lee Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Nahwitti Lowlands Nahwitti Lowlands North Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Wind Isle Mountains Level of Protection 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Managing Agency BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government BC Provincial Government Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5A, page 3 of 6 Protected Area Size (ha) Weymer Creek Karst Provincial Park 309.845 66.107 White River Pocket Wilderness Provincial Pa Woss Lake Provincial Park 6491.582 Bobby Creek RNA 773.796 Cherry Creek RNA 239.231 China Wall ACEC 82.488 Elk Creek Bald Eagle ACEC 856.997 Grass Mountain RNA 285.764 High Peak-Moon Creek RNA 603.192 Hult Marsh ACEC 71.684 Hunter Creek Bog ACEC 291.68 Lake Creek Falls ACEC 21.962 Little Grass Mountain ONA 17.88 Lost Prairie ACEC 24.501 Mary's Peak ONA 55.061 Myrtle Island RNA 9.243 Nestucca River ACEC 263.642 New River ACEC 459.399 North Fork Coquille River ACEC 125.707 North Fork/Hunter Creek ACEC 16.294 North Fork/Hunter Creek ACEC 762.213 North Spit ACEC 293.481 Rickreall Ridge ACEC 72.239 Saddleback Mountain RNA 62.067 Sheridan Peak ACEC 123.679 South Fork Coos River ACEC 16.861 Sutton Lake ACEC 85.068 Umpqua River Wildlife Area (Martin Creek) 315.048 Upper Rock Creek ACEC 190.968 Valley of the Giants ONA 20.806 Walker Flat ACEC 4.258 Wassen Creek ACEC 1373.893 Yaquina Head ONA/ACEC 40.545 42.679 Section Wind Isle Mountains Lee Isle Mountains North Isle Mountains Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Willapa Hills Level of Protection 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Pacific Rim National Park Coos County Park Forest Park South Jetty County Park Olympic National Park South Slough NERR ODF Fund #52 Bastendorff Bog Preserve Bandon Ocean State Wayside Beverly Beach State Park Boiler Bay State Scenic Viewpoint Buena Vista Ocean Wayside Bullards Beach State Park Cape Arago State Park Cape Blanco State Park Cape Kiwanda State Park Cape Lookout State Park Cape Meares State Park Cape Sebastian State Park Carl G Washburne Memorial State Park Devils Punch Bowl State Natural Area Ecola State Park Floras Lake State Park Fogarty Creek State Recreation Area Fort Stevens State Park Humbug Mountain State Park Neptune State Park Netarts Bay State Park Ona Beach State Park Oswald West State Park Protected Area Managing Agency Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Canadian National Park Service County Government County Government County Government National Park Service Oregon Division of State Lands Oregon Department of Forestry Oregon Division of State Lands Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5A, page 4 of 6 Size (ha) 42.894 66.894 237.692 267.914 28964.866 44.235 1443.461 30.141 400241.023 1585.318 65.895 4.803 29.225 65.619 20.218 27.694 570.617 320.562 830.35 53.388 745.326 107.557 450.954 801.726 23.81 1042.382 511.129 68.943 1381.461 693.024 124.005 343.099 81.907 1155.346 Section Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Wind Isle Mountains Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Olympic Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Willapa Hills Level of Protection 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Bandon Marsh NWR Columbia White-Tailed Deer NWR Copalis Rock NWR Flattery Rocks NWR Julia Butler Hansen NWR Lewis and Clark NWR Neskowin NWR Protected Area Otter Point State Wayside Pistol River State Park Port Orford Head State Wayside Robert W Straub State Park Rocky Creek State Wayside Saddle Mountain State Park Samuel H Boardman State Park South Beach State Park Sunset Beach State Park Umpqua Lighthouse State Park William M Tugman State Park Fanno Meadows Preserve Gearhart Bog Preserve Nesika Beach Preserve Onion Peak Preserve Blind Slough Swamp Preserve Bradley Bog Preserve Cascade Head Preserve Copalis River Preserve Cox Island Preserve Ellsworth Creek Preserve Sutton Lake Marsh Preserve Managing Agency Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Private Property Private Property Private Property Private Property The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5A, page 5 of 6 Size (ha) 21.838 179.369 10.284 188.303 23.902 1222.819 220.943 173.453 61.234 65.061 285.09 241.326 103.555 31.299 52.359 353.723 19.328 121.522 111.688 79.639 3232.899 7.163 4.385 8.028 9.03 11.156 41.941 411.221 3401.164 12.013 46.152 458.238 2543.312 168.282 Section Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Coast Range Coast Range Olympic Coast Range Willapa Hills Coast Range Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Coast Range Willapa Hills Olympic Olympic Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Coast Range Level of Protection 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Big Tree SIA Cape Perpetua Cascade Head Scenic Research Area Coquille River Falls RNA Cummins Creek Wilderness Drift Creek Wilderness Flynn Creek RNA Grassy Knob Wilderness Iron Mountain SIA Lobster Grove SIA Neskowin Crest RNA Oregon Dunes NRA Port Orford Cedar RNA Reneke Creek RNA Rock Creek Wilderness Stinking Lake RNA Shipwreck Point NAP Protected Area Nestucca Bay NWR Oregon Islands NWR Quillayute Needles NWR Willapa NWR Managing Agency United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service United States Forest Service Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington Department of Natural Resourc Washington State Parks Washington State Parks PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5A, page 6 of 6 Size (ha) 1357.918 151.942 79.945 6825.822 598.307 52.407 381.395 2735.908 210.019 3667.36 2186.106 256.622 6396.299 714.159 140.407 489.667 2938.083 446.212 107.021 2792.196 101.988 202 86.026 120 934.979 103.173 129.32 371 1242.583 2440.085 242 658.583 852855.994 Section Coast Range Coast Range Olympic Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Coast Range Olympic Olympic Olympic Olympic Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Willapa Hills Level of Protection 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Appendix 5B Numbers of Targets Meeting Goals (by Quartile) in Existing Protected Areas Percent goal met by quartile in protected areas Target Group 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% No Goal set Fine Filter Targets Herptiles 5 1 2 3 1 Birds 6 5 2 1 4 Mammals 6 1 0 1 8 Insects 2 3 1 5 5 Mollusks 6 0 0 1 2 Nonvascular Plants 2 4 0 4 0 Vasc Plants 19 14 3 14 1 Non Salmonid fishes 2 1 0 1 2 Salmon-US 9 6 4 9 3 Salmon-Canada 14 11 1 2 0 Rare Communities 8 0 0 10 0 Oregon Wetlands 5 5 0 10 0 Mineral Springs 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Shore Bird Concentration A % Targets Number of protected Targets in >75% goal Group level 12 18 16 16 9 10 51 6 31 28 18 20 1 1 25 5.6 6.3 31.3 11.1 40 27.5 16.7 29.0 7.1 55.6 50 0 0 Ecological Systems Wetlands Special Habitats Low Elevation Forest High Elevation Forest 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 8 7 6 3 62.5 57.1 0 100 Aquatic Systems Willamette EDU Rogue EDU Puget EDU Olympic EDU Georgia St EDU Lower Columbia EDU OR Coast EDU 22 7 37 17 23 25 19 0 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 7 41 22 23 26 21 0 0 4.9 13.6 0 0 0 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 5B, page 1 of 1 Appendix 6A: The SITE Selection Algorithm 6A.1 Background The selection of conservation areas through the application of systematic procedures has been a research topic for over 30 years (Ratcliffe 1971, as discussed in Justus and Sarkar 2002). The motivation for this research has been and continues to be the realization that protecting every site of biological value is both economically and politically infeasible (Ando et al. 1998, Margules and Pressey 2000). Since the 1980s much research has concentrated on procedures that maximize the representation of biological diversity with the smallest number or smallest total area of conservation sites. The most efficient set of conservation sites, the optimal set, has the smallest area for a given level of biodiversity conservation. Kirkpatrick (1983) and Margules et al (1988) are the earliest examples of using algorithms to address the problem of optimality. These algorithms were heuristic, i.e., they were iterative rulebased procedures. The desire for truly optimal solutions and advances in computer technology motivated the development of more mathematical algorithms (Cocklin 1989, Church et al. 1996). Over the past twenty years many different optimal site selection algorithms, both heuristic and mathematical, have been developed and tested (Bedward et al. 1992, Underhill 1994, Pressey et al. 1996, Pressey et al. 1997, Csuti et al. 1997, McDonnell et al. 2002). Most of these algorithms do not yield a truly optimal solution, only nearly optimal solutions. Nearly optimal solutions are considered satisfactory for the practical purposes of conservation planning. Optimal reserve selection algorithms have been applied to conservation problems in Australia (Pressey and Nichols 1989, Price et al. 1995), Europe (Margules and Austin 1994, Araujo and Williams 2000), the United States (Davis et al. 1996, Polasky et al. 2001, Noss et al. 2002), and in marine conservation (Sala et al. 2000, Leslie et al. 2003). See Pressey et al. (1996), Williams (1998), Possingham et al. (2000), and Cabeza and Moilanen (2001) for an overview of optimizing site selection algorithms and methodologies. TNC has developed considerable experience and expertise in the application of optimal site selection algorithms. TNC has applied the technique to numerous ecoregions including the Southern Rockies (Marshall et al. 2000), Great Basin (Nachlinger et al. 2001), Sonoran Desert (Neely et al. 2001), and Canadian Rockies (Rumsey et al. 2003). All of these ecoregional assessments used the computer software known as SITES. In addition, SITES or algorithms closely related to SITES, have been used for research applications (Andelman and Willig 2002, Noss et al. 2002, McDonnell et al. 2002, Leslie et al 2003) 6A.2 SITES SITES has five main input files (Table 6A.1) and 3 main input parameters (Table 6A.2). One file, BOUND.DAT, informs SITES on the spatial relationships of the assessment units. The COST.DAT file has the suitability index values for every assessment unit. Chapter 6 explains the suitability index. Another file reports the biological contents of every assessment unit, PUVSPR.DAT. That is, it reports the location of every target occurrence by assessment unit. The main function of the PUSTAT.DAT file is to assign certain assessment units a special status. The selection of most assessment units is determined by the algorithm, but some assessment units may be locked into the solution or locked out of the solution with the PUSTAT.DAT file. Chapter 6.2 explains the assessment units that were locked in and out of the SITES analysis. The SPECIES.DAT file contains three pieces of information about every conservation target: goal, minimum area, and penalty factor. The goal is simply a device to select conservation priority areas. The goal is not a statement of what is necessary and sufficient for species survival (see Chapter 2). The goal is expressed as an integer corresponding to the desired number of species occurrences, or hectares which correspond to the amount of ecological system or habitat type that PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 6A,, page 1 of 3 should be captured by the selected assessment units. Goals for all targets are explained in Chapters 2, 3, and 4. Minimum area refers to the minimum amount of an ecological system or habitat type in a cluster of assessment units. However, minimum area does not refer to contiguous area. If several isolated patches occur in a single assessment unit, then they appear to SITES as a single patch. Likewise, if several isolated patches occur in a cluster of adjacent assessment units, then they appear to SITES as a single patch. Therefore, we applied minimum area criteria to our data before inclusion in the SITES tables so that only the patches meeting minimum area requirements were counted towards goals. The penalty factor is applied to conservation targets that do not meet the goal. Every target can be assigned its own penalty factor. The higher a target’s penalty factor, the more the target will influence the solution of the optimization algorithm. The higher a target’s penalty factor, the more likely the solution will meet 100 % of the target’s goal. The penalty factor is used in the calculation of the algorithm’s objective function. For our analysis we set the penalty factor of most targets to 1, the minimum value allowed by SITES. Table 6A.1. SITES Input Files Input File Name Function 1 record for adjacent pairs of assessment units Main data fields common boundary length, unit ID, unit ID COST.DAT 1 record for each assessment unit unit ID, suitability index value PUVSPR.DAT PUSTAT.DAT 1 record for every target occurrence 1 record for each assessment unit SPECIES.DAT 1 record for each conservation target unit ID, target name, amount in unit unit ID, status target name, goal, minimum area, penalty factor BOUND.DAT SITES has 3 main input parameters: the number of iterations, the number of replicates, and the boundary modifier. The number of iterations significantly influences the ability of the algorithm to achieve an optimal or near optimal solution. The number of iterations also determines the execution time of SITES, which for typical applications runs on the order of 30 minutes to 2 hours. We explored a range of iterations from 1 to 10 million and found that solutions generated using different iteration values were indistinguishable above 5 million iterations. Hence, we used 5 million iterations for our analyses. A single SITES run actually entails multiple individual replicates using identical parameter values and input data. An input parameter determines how many replicates comprise a single SITES run. Each replicate yields a near optimal solution somewhat different than the rest. The replicate with smallest objective function is the “best” solution, i.e., the set of assessment units that meets the conservation goals with the greatest suitability. Variation in the solutions (i.e., in the replicate sets of selected units) reflects the degree of flexibility for achieving an optimal solution. Some assessment units will be included in every solution. These assessment units are irreplaceable. Other assessment units will be included in a subset of solutions. With respect to conservation targets and suitability, these assessment units are quite similar to some other assessment units. The frequency with which an assessment unit was selected strongly indicates its importance for biodiversity conservation. We refer to this selection frequency as assessment unit relative importance. The "sum solution" output is the number of times an assessment unit was selected by multiple individual replicates. We ran 10 replicates per SITES run. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 6A,, page 2 of 3 Table 6A.2. Values for SITES Parameters Used in Development of Conservation Portfolio Parameter Algorithm Replicates Iterations Boundary modifier Function Type of optimization routine Number of times to repeat full optimization Number of times to test new combination of assessment units Weighting factor for “cost” of nonadjacent assessment units Species penalty factor “cost” of not meeting a species’ goal Assessment unit status Initial state of each assessment assessment unit Value simulated annealing 10 5,000,000 0.03 1 for all fine filter targets 1 for all coarse filter targets (1 = minimum allowed value) 0 for all assessment units in initial runs. A third input parameter, the boundary modifier, controls the spatial arrangement of assessment units. This parameter can be used to promote clustering (or adjacency) of selected assessment units. Clustering will reduce fragmentation and build larger conservation areas. Clustering will also reduce edge length, and SITES tracks the degree of clustering by calculating the amount of external edge (or boundary length) in the selected set of assessment units. The larger the boundary modifier value, the more important is the clustering of units. If the boundary modifier equals zero, then clustering is not considered in the objective function. Selecting the best value for boundary modifier involves some tradeoffs. If boundary modifier is too low, then selected assessment units may be too isolated. But, if the value is too high, then SITES will select assessment units with low biodiversity value or low suitability just to minimize external edge. We explored a range of values from 0.01 to 1.0, and arrived at a value of 0.03 which had a minimal effect on clustering. Given this low value, boundary length becomes a more influential factor when the algorithm has multiple options for meeting goals. 6A.3 MARXAN For a number of reasons, the marine technical teams decided to use MARXAN instead of SITES. MARXAN was developed as an improved version of SITES. We determined that MARXAN runs faster and accepts more assessment units than previous versions (e.g., SPEXAN and SITES), as was demonstrated in a British Columbia conservation planning process conducted by the Coast Information Team (see Rumsey et al. 2003). Further, there are more options in the selection of heuristic algorithms, iterative improvement, and adaptive annealing, and the input file format has been clarified (see Ball et al. 2000). MARXAN requires that the ecoregion be divided into a set of candidate sites, or assessment units that completely fill the region. These are the basic building blocks for assembling a conservation portfolio. At the core of reserve selection problems is the overall objective of minimizing the area encompassed with the network of reserves (Pressey et al. 1993). MARXAN uses a simulated annealing algorithm to evaluate alternative site selection scenarios, comparing a very large number of alternatives to identify a good solution. The procedure begins with a random set of assessment units, and then at each iteration swaps assessment units in and out of that set and measures the change in "cost." Cost here does not mean dollars for land purchase, but the amount of area selected in the alternative. The algorithm's objective function is a nonlinear combination of the total area and the boundary length of perimeter of the site selection output (Leslie et al. 2003). A boundary length modifier setting in the algorithm's parameters determines the relative importance placed on minimizing the perimeter relative to minimizing area. There is never just one “optimal” solution (e.g., the definitive set of conservation areas) in regional planning, but it is possible to identify those areas that are both essential and representative as part of an ecological assessment. Siting algorithms provide a context for objective representation that is both measurable and spatially explicit. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 6A,, page 3 of 3 Appendix 7A: Prioritization of Assessment Units A conservation portfolio could serve as a conservation plan to be implemented over time by nongovernmental organizations, government agencies, and private land owners. In reality, however, an entire portfolio cannot be protected immediately and some conservation areas in the portfolio may never be protected (Meir et al. 2004). Limited resources and other social or economic considerations may make protection of the entire portfolio impractical. This inescapable situation can be addressed two ways. First, we should narrow our immediate attention to the most important conservation areas within the portfolio. This can be facilitated by prioritizing conservation areas. Second, we should provide organizations, agencies and land owners with the flexibility to pursue other options when portions of the portfolio are too difficult to protect. Assigning a relative priority to all AUs in the ecoregion will inform everyone about their options for conservation. The prioritization of potential conservation areas is an essential element of conservation planning (Margules and Pressey 2000). The importance of prioritization is made evident by the extensive research conducted to develop better prioritization techniques (e.g., Margules and Usher 1981, Anselin et al. 1989, Kershaw et al. 1995, Pressey et al. 1996, Freitag and Van Jaarsveld 1997, Benayas et al. 2003). Consequently, many different techniques are available for addressing the problem of prioritization. None are obviously better than the rest. We used two different techniques – an optimal site selection algorithm and a scatterplot – that together yielded four indices (irreplaceability, utility, and two Euclidean distances) each indicaing relative priorities. Irreplaceability and conservation utility scores were generated for the integrated realms (terrestrial, freshwater, and estuary) and for the terrestrial realm alone. A sensitivity analysis was done for only the terrestrial realm. The terrestrial realm was done separately because: (1) the terrestrial data have a greater influence on the portfolio than the freshwater data; (2) terrestrial environments and species have been more thoroughly studied, and therefore, our assumptions about terrestrial biodiversity are more robust than for estuary or freshwater biodiversity; and (3) the terrestrial portfolio has the greatest potential influence on land use planning and policy decisions affecting private lands. The results of our prioritization should not be the only information used to direct conservation action. Unforeseen opportunities have had and should continue to have a major influence on conservation decisions. Local attitudes toward conservation can hinder or enhance conservation action. Considerations such as these are difficult to incorporate into long-range priority setting, and hence, must be dealt with case by case. 7A.1 Methods 7A.1.1 Irreplaceability and Conservation Utility Irreplaceability has been defined a number of different ways (Pressey et al. 1994, Ferrier et al. 2000, Noss et al. 2002, Leslie et al. 2003, Stewart et al. 2003). However, the original operational definition was given by Pressey at al. (1994). They defined irreplaceability of a site as the percentage of alternative reserve systems in which it occurs. Following this definition, Andelman and Willig (2002) and Leslie et al. (2003) each exploited the stochastic nature of the simulated annealing algorithm to calculate an irreplaceability index. Simulated annealing is a stochastic heuristic search for the global minimum of an objective function. Since it is stochastic, or random, simulated annealing can arrive at different answers for a single optimization problem. The algorithm may not converge on the optimal solution, i.e., the global minimum, but it will find local minima that are nearly as good as the global minimum (McDonnell et al. 2002). The random search of simulated annealing enables it to find multiple nearly-optimal solutions, and an AU may belong to many different nearly optimal solutions. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 1 of 20 The number of simulated annealing solutions that include a particular AU is a good indication of that AU’s irreplaceability. This is the assumption made by Andelman and Willig (2002) and Leslie et al. (2003) for their irreplaceability index. The index of Andelman and Willig (2002) was: n Ij = (1/n) 6 si i=1 (1) where I is relative irreplaceability, n is the number of solutions, and si is a binary variable that equals 1 when AUj is selected but 0 otherwise. Ij have values between 0 and 1, and are obtained from a running the simulated annealing algorithm n times at a single representation level. Irreplaceability is a function of the desired representation level (Pressey et al. 1994, Warman et al. 2004). Changing the representation level for target species often changes the number of AUs needed for the solution. For instance, low representation levels typically yield a small number of AUs with high irreplaceability and many AUs with zero irreplaceability, but as the representation level increases, some AUs attain higher irreplaceablity scores. The fact that some AUs go from zero irreplaceabilty to a positive irreplaceability demonstrates a shortcoming of Willig and Andelman’s index – at low representation levels, some AUs are shown as having no value for biodiversity conservation. We created an index for relative irreplaceabilty that addresses this shortcoming. Our global irreplaceability index for AUj was defined as: m Gj = (1/m) 6 Ijk k=1 (2) where Ijk are relative irreplaceability values as defined in equation (2) and m is the number of representation levels used in the site selection algorithm. Gj have values between 0 and 1. Each Ijk is relative irreplaceability at a particular representation level. We ran SITES at ten representation. At the highest representation level nearly all AUs attained a positive values for global irreplaceability. Gj shall henceforth be called irreplaceability. Many applications of “irreplaceability” have implicitly subsumed some type of conservation efficiency (e.g., Andelman and Willig 2002, Noss et al. 2002, Leslie et al. 2003, Stewart et al. 2003). Efficiency is usually achieved by minimizing the total area needed to satisfy the desired representation level. We too had the selection algorithm minimize the total area of selected AUs. That is, the “cost” of each AU was its area. Consequently, efficiency is indirectly incorporated into our estimates of irreplaceability. Conservation Utility We expanded upon the concept of irreplaceability with conservation utility, invented by Rumsey et al. (2004). Conservation utility is defined by equation (2), but the selection frequency is generated with the AU costs incorporating a suitability index. To create a map of conservation utility scores, AU “cost” reflects practical aspects of conservation – current land uses, current management practices, habitat condition, etc. (see section 6.5) In effect, conservation utility is a function of both biodiversity value and the likelihood of successful conservation. 7A.1.2 Representation Levels Each representation level corresponds to a different degree of risk for species extinction. Although we cannot estimate the actual degree of risk, we do know that risk is not a linear function of representation. It is roughly logarithmic. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 2 of 20 Coarse Filter We based the assumption that there is a logarithmic relationship between the risk of species extinction and the amount of habitat on the species-area curve. The species-area curve is arguably the most thoroughly established quantitative relationship in all of ecology (Connor and McCoy 1979, Rosenzweig 1995). The curve is defined by the equation S=cAz, where S is the number of species in a particular area, A is the given area, c and z are constants. The equation says that the number of species (S) found in a particular area increases as the habitat area (A) increases. The parameter z takes on a wide range of values depending on the taxa, region of the earth, and landscape setting of the study. Most values lie between 0.15 and 0.35 (Wilson 1992). An oft cited rule-of-thumb for z’s value is called Darlington’s Rule (MacArthur and Wilson 1967, Morrison et al. 1998). The rule states that a doubling of species occurs for every 10 fold increase in area, hence z = log(2) or 0.301. We used this relationship to derive representation levels that roughly correspond to equal increments of biodiversity. Coarse filter representation levels specify a minimum area, i.e., hectares, of each habitat type to be captured within a set of conservation areas. Other ecoregional assessments have used representation levels that increased linearly. For instance, Rumsey et al. (2004) set levels at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 percent of the currently extant area of each habitat type. Each of these representation levels captured the same incremental area of habitat, but from the species-area curve we know that each of these representation levels captures smaller increments of total biodiversity. That is, the step from 30 to 40 percent may capture 6 percent of all species but the step from 60 to 70 percent may capture about only 4 percent (assuming z = 0.301). In effect, the first 10 percent of habitat is more important than the last 10 percent. We used the species-area relationship to create representation levels that correspond to equal increments of biodiversity – i.e., each increase in coarse filter area captured an additional 10% of species. The coarse filter representation levels did not increase linearly but rather according to a power function: S = Az. To derive the coarse filter levels, the desired amount of biodiversity was increased linearly (10, 20, 30, . . ., 100 percent) and the corresponding area was calculated for each (Table 7A.1). Table 7A.1. Coarse filter representation levels derived from the species area curve with z = 0.3. Percent species Representation Level (percent extant area) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.05 0.5 1.8 4.8 10 18 31 48 70 100 Fine Filter Fine filter representation levels specify the number of species occurrences to be captured within a set of conservation areas. The relationship between species survival and number of isolated populations is also a power function: Species Persistence Probability = 1 - [ 1 - pr(P) ]n where pr(P) is the persistence probability of each isolated population and n is the number of populations. This equation says, in effect, that the first population (i.e., occurrence) is more important than the second population and much more important than the tenth population. According to this relationship, if we want representation levels to correspond to equal degrees of risk, then fine filter representation levels should not increase linearly but logarithmically. However, the above equation won’t work for our purposes. We don’t know pr(P). Luckily another relationship was available to us – the criteria used by natural heritage programs to rank species. These criteria indicate the degree of imperilment, i.e., the risk of extinction, and follow a PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 3 of 20 logarithmic relationship. For instance, one criterion relates the number of occurrences to degree of imperilment (Table 7A.2) (Master et al. 2003)1. Table 7A.2. Categories for the known occurrence ranking criterion used by natureserve and natural heritage programs to assign species S ranks and G ranks. Condition Status Number of Known Occurrences A 1 to 5 B 6 to 20 C 21 to 80 D 81 to 300 E >300 This system expresses the idea that the first 5 occurrences make about the same contribution toward species rank as the next 21 to 80 occurrences. If we assume equal imperilment intervals and equate A, B, C (a nominal scale) with 1, 2, 3 (an ordinal scale), then the relationship in the above table can be modeled as a power function. We can use the function to interpolate between 1, 2, and 3 to yield multiple regularly spaced steps for the fine filter levels. We did this to give 10 representation levels; the same number as for the coarse filter. Table 7A.3 Representation levels for population or sub-population type element occurrences. Condition Status Regular steps within condition status Representation Level (number of occurrences) A B C D ѿ Ҁ 1 1ѿ 1Ҁ 2 2ѿ 2Ҁ 3 3ѿ - 4 2 3 5 8 13 20 31 49 80 all occurrences Table 7A.3 is to be used for species for which EOs roughly correspond to populations, subpopulations, or populations segments. Fine filter representation levels are complicated because the element occurrences currently in our databases do not have consistent meaning. Some EOs roughly represent a population or population segment (e.g., plant, invertebrates, amphibians). Other EOs may simply represent a nest, a concentration of nests, or a territory (e.g., raptors, marbled murrelets). EOs of this type must be dealt with somewhat differently. We followed the same approach as above but used a different G/S rank criterion that relates the number of individuals in a population to degree of imperilment (Table 7A.4) (L. Master, 2003; unpubl. report). 1 Table2 is a modification of the older system (Master 1994) for species ranking, where G1/S1 equaled 1 to 5 occurrences, G2/S2 equaled 6 to 20 occurrences, and G3/S3 equaled 21 to 100 occurrences. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 4 of 20 Table 7A.4. Categories for the number of individual ranking criterion used by natural heritage programs to assign species S ranks and G ranks. We derived the maximum number of nests or from the number of individuals. Condition Status Number of Individuals Maximum Number of Nests or Dens A 1 to 50 25 B 61 to 250 125 C 251 to 1000 500 D 1001 to 2500 1250 We converted the number of individuals to number of nests simply by dividing by 2. Again, if we assume equal imperilment intervals and equate A, B, C with 1, 2, 3, then the relationship in the above table can be modeled as a power function. We can use the function to interpolate between 1, 2, and 3 to yield multiple regularly spaced steps for the fine filter levels. We created 10 representation levels (Table 7A.5). Table 7A.5 Representation levels for nest or den type element occurrences. Condition Status Regular steps within condition status Representation Level (number of nests) A B C ¼ ½ ¾ 1 1¼ 1½ 1¾ 8 12 18 25 38 55 80 2 2¼ 125 170 2½ - 3 all occurrences We emphasize that even though we used natural heritage program criteria for imperilment, the representation levels should not be interpreted to reflect levels of imperilment. The numbers are just a device for creating a map that shows relative priorities of all assessment units in an ecoregion. We used a power function (or logarithmic scale) in recognition of the fact that risk of extinction is nonlinear. We did not have the resources to estimate the actual risk, but we believe that nonlinear representation levels generated a more useful prioritization of places. 7A.1.3 Comparing Utility and Irreplaceability We compared the utility and irreplaceability maps several ways. First, three similarity measures were calculated: mean absolute difference, Bray-Curtis similarity measure, and Spearman rank correlation (Krebs 1999; pp 379-386). The Bray-Curtis similarity measure normalizes the sum absolute difference to a scale from 0 to 1. Because utility and irreplaceability will be used for prioritizing AUs, rank correlation is a particularly informative because it told us how the relative AU priorities changed. We were especially interested in how the ranks of the most highly ranked AUs would change. To examine this, we also calculated a weighted Spearman rank correlation using Savage scores (Zar 1996, pp. 393-395). Second, we determined whether the difference between utility and irreplaceability was significantly different. This was done by testing the following hypothesis for mean absolute difference: H01: difference between utility and irreplaceability maps is significantly less than the expected difference between the utility map and a random map; PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 5 of 20 HA1: difference between utility and irreplaceability maps is equal to or significantly greater than the expected difference between the utility map and a random map, and for the Bray-Curtis similarity measure and Spearman rank correlation, this hypothesis: H02: similarity between the utility map and irreplaceability map is significantly greater than the expected similarity between the utility map and a random map; HA2: similarity between the utility map and irreplaceability map is equal to or significantly less than the expected similarity between the utility map and a random map. Both null hypotheses mean that there is no significant difference between the utility and irreplaceability maps. If the observed similarity measure is significantly less than (or the distance is significantly greater than) that expected from chance, then the null hypothesis is false, and we can say that the utility and irreplaceability maps are different. For Spearman rank correlation, the alternative hypothesis is equivalent to r 0. The hypotheses were tested using a randomization test (Sokal and Rohlf 1995, pp. 808-810). Random utility maps were generated by reshuffling the utility values among AUs (i.e., random sampling of utility values without replacement). One thousand random utility maps were compared to the real map using the four measures of similarity. The proportion of times that the difference between the utility map and irreplaceability map is smaller (or the similarity is larger) than the difference between the utility map and the 1000 randomly generated maps equals the probability that utility map and irreplaceability map are significantly different. This technique is similar to that employed by Warman et al. (2004). This was a one-tailed test of significance with Į = 0.05. Third, a contingency table analysis was done to compare the utility values and irreplaceability values of paired AUs. The log-likelihood ratio method (Zar 1996; pp. 502-503) was used to test the following hypotheses: H03: AU selection is independent of cost index (area versus suitability) HA3: AU selection is dependent on cost index Paired AUs were considered to be significantly different for P <= 0.05. 7A.1.4 Running the Selection Algorithm SITES produces an output that is equivalent to nIj, i.e., the number of times an AU was selected out of n replicates. We ran 25 replicates at each representation level. Hence, the product m&n equaled 250 for both irreplaceability and conservation utility. For the integrated analysis, the boundary modifier (BM) was set to 0.1 to link the layers in vertical stacking (see section 8.XX). For the terrestrial only analysis, BM was set to zero. When BM is set to zero, neighboring AUs have no influence on the selection frequency of an AU. The algorithm’s objective function says, in effect, minimize cost (or unsuitability) subject to T constraints, where T equals the number of targets. All T constraints are the same – the amount captured must be greater than or equal to the target’s desired representation level. The third term in the objective function imposes these constraints, however, they are soft constraints. “Soft” means that the constraints can be violated. Each constraint’s “hardness” is determined by the penalty factors (PFs) set for each target – the larger the PF, the firmer the constraint. Hard constraints can be established by setting an arbitrarily large PF. However, very large PFs can create discontinuities in the objective function, and discontinuities can wreak havoc with the heuristic search. If PFs are too small, then the algorithm may not come close to meeting the representation level. Clearly, setting PF values is tricky. To address this problem, we used an iterative search to set PF values. We began the search with PF equal to 1 for every target. We ran SITES (5 replicates, 1 million iterations per replicate) and then checked the results of the best solution. SITES reports how much of the representation level was met for each target. If a target’s representation level was not met, we incremented its PF. We repeated these steps until the representation level was met for all targets. The iterative search PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 6 of 20 was done at each of the ten representation levels. Hence, a target could have a different PF at each representation level. For the vast majority of targets, this process found the PF value in a reasonable amount of time. However, finding the PF value that yields 100 % of the desired representation level for every target took too much processing time. Hence, we terminated the PF search when only 96 % of a target’s representation level was met. Other details about running SITES are summarized in Table 7A.6. Table 7A.6. Values for SITES parameters used for irreplaceablity and utility analyses. Parameter Algorithm Replications Iterations Boundary modifier Target penalty factor AU status Suitability Index terrestrial irreplaceability Function Type of optimization routine Number of times to repeat optimization per representation level Number of times to create new combination of AUs Weighting factor for “cost” of AU perimeter. Encourages clusters of AUs “cost” of not meeting a target’s represen-tation level Initial selection state of each AU indicates likelihood of successful conservation at AU utility integrated irreplaceability utility simulated annealing simulated annealing 25 25 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0.1 (same as in Chapter 9) automatically set automatically set 0 for all hexagons (no “lock-ins”) 0 for all hexagons normalized area see Chapter 6 normalized area see Chapter 6 7A.1.5 Irreplaceability versus Vulnerability Scatterplot The irreplaceability versus vulnerability scatterplot was first used by Pressey et al. (1996, as described by Margules and Pressey 2000) and was also recently used by Noss et al. (2002) and Lawler et al. (2003). These studies plotted irreplaceability versus vulnerability for a large number of potential conservation areas. We plotted irreplaceability versus vulnerability for every AU. Irreplaceability has been defined a number of different ways (Pressey et al. 1994, Ferrier et al. 2000, Noss et al. 2002, Leslie et al. 2003, Stewart et al. 2003). Our definition of irreplaceability (see Section 7.1.1) is similar to those of Andelman and Willig (2002) and Leslie et al. (2003). We used the irreplaceability values from the integrated terrestrial and freshwater analysis. Margules and Pressey (2000) defined vulnerability as the risk of an area being transformed by extractive uses, but it could be defined more broadly as the risk of an area being transformed by degradative processes. The broader definition encompasses adverse impacts from invasive species and fire suppression. Vulnerability could also be defined from the perspective of target species – the relative likelihood that target species will be lost from an area. Since target persistence depends on habitat, a vulnerability index would be a function of current and likely future habitat conditions. Future habitat conditions are generally determined by the management practices and policies associated with an area. Our suitability index incorporated factors that reflected both current habitat conditions and management. Therefore, for the purposes of prioritization, we assumed that our suitability index could also be used as a vulnerability index. Recall that the cost index was the weighted geometric mean of AU area and suitability. For the vulnerability index we used only the suitability. The integrated vulnerability index was calculated by averaging the terrestrial and freshwater suitability indices for each AU. Like the suitability index, vulnerability was normalized by dividing all values by the maximum value and multiplying by 100. Margules and Pressey (2000) and Noss et al. (2002) divided their scatterplots into four quadrants which correspond to priority categories: high irreplaceability, high vulnerablity (Q1); high irreplaceability, low vulnerability (Q2); low irreplaceability, low vulnerability (Q3) and low irreplaceability, high vulnerability PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 7 of 20 (Q4). Margules and Pressey (2000) and Noss et al. (2002) believed potential conservation areas in Q1 should be the highest priority and potential areas in Q3 should be the lowest priority. However, this strategy is debatable (Pyke 2005). Some have argued that the highest priorities should be potential conservation areas in Q2 because such places have high biological value and a high likelihood of successful conservation. The purpose of dividing the scatterplot into quadrants is to assign AUs to priority categories. The scatterplot can be divided many different ways; we utilized four. First, as done by Lawler et al. (2003), we divided the scatterplot into 16 sub-quadrants using the quartile values for irreplaceability and vulnerability. Each sub-quadrant corresponds to a priority category. The assessment covered 2442 AUs. Hence, roughly 611 AUs fell into each quadrant of the scatterplot, and average number of AUs in each sub-quadrant was 153. For the purposes of directing conservation action, this may be far too many AUs per category. We were most interested in the small number AUs with the highest irreplaceability and the highest vulnerability. For that reason, we divided the scatterplot at the 99.5, 99, 98, 96, 92, and 84 percentiles for both irreplaceability and vulnerability. This created 36 cells in upper right-hand corner of the scatterplot. The third and fourth ways for subdividing the scatterplot were based on Iso-euclidean distance contours. In theory, the highest priority possible is an AU with both irreplaceability and vulnerability equal to 100. Assuming that the qualities of irreplaceability and vulnerability are equally important for determining AU priorities, the distance between an AU and the upper right-hand corner of the scatterplot would determine its priority for conservation. This distance is calculated with the equation: D = [ (100 - I) 2 + (100 - V) 2 ] 1/2 where I is irreplaceability, V is vulnerability, and D is the Euclidean distance of an AU from the point (100, 100). Our contours corresponded to percentiles – 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 percent of AUs. Some might argue that the highest priorities for conservation should be the AUs with the highest irreplaceability and the lowest vulnerability. These AUs have high biological value and are places where conservation will most likely succeed. Following this strategy, the distance between an AU and the upper left-hand corner of the scatterplot would determine its priority for conservation. This distance is calculated with the equation: D = [ (100 - I) 2 + V 2 ] 1/2 The assumption that irreplaceability and vulnerability are equally important does not hold over the entire scatterplot. For instance, two AUs situated at (100, 1) and (1, 100) are the same distance from the (100, 100) corner of the scatterplot, but certainly the AU at (1, 100) should be a much higher priority. However, in the immediate vicinity of the (100, 100) or (0, 100) corners, the Euclidean distance can be a useful index to sort out priorities. Incidentally, the divisions used by Margules and Pressey (2000) and Noss et al (2002) to divide their scatterplots into quadrants imply that irreplaceability and vulnerability are equally important. Lacking a strong rationale for favoring either axis we followed their convention. 7A.2 Results How should our irreplaceability and conservation utility indices be interpreted? These indices were constructed by running MARXAN at ten representation levels. The first level captured a very small amount of each target and the last level captured everything, i.e., all known occurrences of all targets. Think of the first representation level as the amount of biodiversity to be captured in an initial set of reserves, the second level as a additional amount to be captured by an enlarged set of reserves, the third level as an even greater additional amount, and so on. At each level, MARXAN’s output indicates the relative necessity of each AU for efficiently capturing that particular amount of biodiversity. When the outputs from each level are summed together, the result specifies the most efficient sequence of AU PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 8 of 20 protection for capturing all biodiversity. The sequence in which AUs should be protected is one way to gauge their relative importance. AUs that have the highest irreplaceability or utility scores should be protected first, and therefore, are the most important AUs for biodiversity conservation. 7A.2.1 Terrestrial Only Analysis The utility and irreplaceability maps for the terrestrial only analysis are shown in maps 1 and 2. The utility and irreplaceability scores are displayed two ways: (1) the distribution of nonzero values divided into deciles (10% quantiles); and (2) range of nonzero values divided into 10 equal intervals. The decile map answers the question, where are the AUs with a selection frequency, or score, in the top 10 percent of all AUs. The equal interval map answers the question where are the AUs with a score greater than 90 percent. By coincidence, the number of AUs in the top decile and with a score greater than 90 is about equal – 9.2 and 9.1 percent of AUs had a score greater than 90 for utility and irreplaceability, respectively (Figure 7A.1). AUs with scores equal to 100 are those selected in every replicate at every representation level. Seven percent of AUs had a utility score of 100, 7.1 percent had an irreplaceability score of 100 (Table 7A.7), and 6.5 percent of AUs had both scores equal to 100. This large overlap between utility and irreplaceability at the highest possible score is evident in maps 1 and 2. At the lowest representation level (0.05 percent of the current amount of coarse filter targets, 2 occurrences of population type EOs, and 8 occurrences of nest type EOs), the best solutions for utility and irreplaceability consisted of 252 and 270 AUs, respectively. Perfect scores were attained by 85 percent of the utility best solution and 83 percent of the irreplaceability best solution. The large proportion of AUs with scores equal to 100 demonstrates how little flexibility existed even the lowest representation level. That is, rare targets could only be captured at particular AUs. The distributions of utility and irreplaceability scores were bimodal and skewed-right (Figure 7A.1). The modes were located at the lowest and highest nonzero scores. The high mode corresponds to those AUs that are selected in every replicate at every representation level. The low mode corresponds to the large number of AUs that have nothing special to offer for biodiversity conservation. AUs in between the modes are essentially interchangeable. They are selected at moderate frequencies because they contribute toward meeting representation levels but to the same degree as other AUs. The median and mean of irreplaceability scores (24, 34) are larger than those of utility scores (11, 28). When the cost of AUs is equal to area (i.e., irreplaceability), the selection algorithm prefers smaller AUs. A preference for smaller AUs means that more AUs must be selected to meet the coarse filter representation levels. As expected, the total area of best solutions for irreplaceability is less than the total area of best solutions for utility, but more AUs are needed for irreplaceability solutions. Because the algorithm selects more AUs for irreplaceability solutions than for utility solutions, I and G are larger for irreplaceability. 7A.2.2 Integrated Analysis Recall that the data inputs to the selection algorithm consisted of three different layers: terrestrial, freshwater class 1, and freshwater classes 2 and 3. AU boundaries for terrestrial and freshwater class 1 were the same HUC watersheds, but some freshwater class 1 AUs contained no occurrences. Utility and irreplaceability scores were computed for every AU in each layer. To calculate single scores for each HUC, we added the scores for terrestrial and freshwater class 1 AUs. Freshwater class 1 AUs with no occurrence data were never selected by the algorithm. Utility and irreplaceability scores for the corresponding terrestrial AU were normalized to 100. The utility and irreplaceability maps for the integrated analysis are shown in maps 7.3 and 7.4. The maps show the summed scores of terrestrial and freshwater AUs, including the freshwater AUs for which there were no occurrence data. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 9 of 20 If all AUs in every layer are viewed as separate AUs, then certain results are very similar to those of the terrestrial only analysis (Table 7A.7, Figure 7A.2). The percentage of AUs with high utility and irreplaceability scores and the distribution of scores are about the same as those from the terrestrial analysis. However, when terrestrial and freshwater scores are combined then the proportion of AUs with high scores is much reduced (Figure 7A.3). Table 7A.7. Percentage of AUs with selection frequency equal to 100 percent and frequency greater than or equal to 95 percent. selection frequency number of AUs utility irreplaceability 100 % 95 % 100 % 95 % terrestrial analysis 2707 7.0 8.3 7.1 8.5 all AUs all layers 5343 7.8 8.8 7.9 9.1 integrated analysis combined terrestrial class 1 terrestrial/ AUs; AUs, freshwater; include no terrestrial freshwater layer layer data AUs 2707 2123 2707 7.2 6.7 1.4 8.1 7.4 2.0 7.4 6.5 1.9 8.7 7.4 2.7 combined terrestrial/ freshwater; exclude no data AUs 2123 0.6 1.2 1.0 1.6 7A.2.3 Utility versus Irreplaceability By all similarity measures, the utility and irreplaceability maps in the both the terrestrial only and integrated analyses were similar to a statistically significant degree (Table 7A.8). Utility and irreplaceability maps in the terrestrial only analysis were more similar than those in the integrated analysis, but only slightly. The values for weighted Spearman rank correlation show that differences between maps at high scores are less than differences at low scores. As demonstrated in Table 7A.8, the overall patterns of utility and irreplaceabilty scores are very similar. That is, a side-by-side comparison shows that the maps generally agree. If examined AU by AU, we find that slightly more than 75 percent are different and that slightly more than 40 percent have a significant difference between utility and irreplaceability (Table 7A.9). However, very few significant changes occur at high utility scores. Of all the AUs with significant differences between utility and irreplaceability, only 4 percent have the highest utility scores. Three-quarters of the significant changes are for AUs with utility scores less than or equal to 20. In the terrestrial analysis, 7 percent of AUs had a utility score of 100, 7.1 percent had an irreplaceability score of 100, and 6.5 percent of AUs had both scores equal to 100. The large overlap indicates that suitability had a small influence on which AUs attained scores equal to 100. In other words, target locations greatly determined which AUs attained a perfect score. Such AUs contained rare targets, targets for which we had very little occurrence data, occurrences of multiple targets, or a large number of occurrences per target. In the integrated analysis, 1.4 percent of AUs had a utility score of 100, 1.9 percent had an irreplaceability score of 100, and 1.2 percent of AUs had both scores equal to 100. These percentages are much smaller than those for the terrestrial analysis but the degree of overlap between utility and irreplaceability is about the same. The reason for the smaller percentages is that the scores are the combination of terrestrial and freshwater scores, and very few AUs attain high scores for both freshwater and terrestrial. Table 7A.10 shows that there is low degree of similarity between the freshwater and terrestrial results; all similarity measures are much less those in Table 7A.8. However, null hypothesis was accepted for all similarity measures in Table 7A.10, i.e., the terrestrial and freshwater parts of the integrated analysis are similar. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 10 of 20 Table 7A.8. Similarity measures for comparison of conservation utility and irreplaceability maps. There was no significant difference between the utility and irreplaceability maps for any of the similarity measures (alpha = 0.05). number of AUs mean absolute difference Bray-Curtis measure Spearman rank correlation weighted Spearman rank correlation terrestrial only 2707 8.9 0.855 0.682 integrated realms 5343 9.1 0.845 0.677 0.877 0.842 Table 7A.9. Comparison of conservation utility and irreplaceability maps: percent of AUs that are different between the two maps. Significant differences based on log-likelihood ratio method (alpha = 0.05). number of AUs percent AUs different percent significantly different terrestrial only 2707 77.4 44.9 integrated realms 5343 76.2 42.6 Table 7A.10. Similarity measures for comparison of terrestrial and freshwater class 1 scores. There were no statistically significant difference between the terrestrial and freshwater maps (alpha = 0.05) for any similarity measure. Percent AUs significantly different based on log-likelihood ratio method. number of AUs mean absolute difference Bray-Curtis measure Spearman rank correlation percent AUs different percent AUs significantly different Utility 2123 36.8 0.585 0.368 76.1 Irreplaceability 2123 35.3 0.643 0.321 83.8 59.5 57.1 7A.2.4 Irreplaceability versus Vulnerability Scatterplot The assessment covered 2442 AUs. Hence, roughly 611 AUs fell into each quadrant of the scatterplot. The quartiles defining the sub-quadrants are given in Table 7A.11. The average number of AUs in each subquadrant was 153 but ranged from 112 to 202. The scatterplot is shown in Figure 7A.4 and the same information is shown spatially in Map 7.5. The scatterplot shows a very high density of AUs in the region below the third quartiles of irreplaceability and vulnerability. In effect, AUs in each of these sub-quadrants are very similar and are not distinct enough to warrant different priorities. AUs density decreases as irreplaceability and vulnerability increase. This separation of AUs suggests real differences in AU priorities. Four sub-quadrants contain AUs with irreplaceability values in the top quartile. These four quadrants contain 608 AUs – far too many to be useful for prioritization. The 36 cells based on the 99.5, 99, 98, 96, 92, and 84 percentiles for both irreplaceability and vulnerability contain 102 AUs, a more manageable number. How these AUs are distributed among cells is shown in Table 7A.12. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 11 of 20 The distribution of AUs relative to iso-Euclidean distance contours is shown in Figure 7A.6 and 7A.7. The distribution of Euclidean distances from the (100, 100) corner is skewed (Figure 7A.5). The peak of the distribution corresponds to sub-quadrant with highest AU density – between the first and second quartiles for both irreplaceability and vulnerability. Many of those AUs closest to the upper right-hand corner of the scatterplot can have relatively low values for irreplaceability and utility because when suitability is incorporated into the optimal site selection algorithm, these AUs are a relatively poorer choice for conserving biodiversity (Table 7A.13). For the same reason, utility is usually lower than irreplaceability for these AUs. AUs closest to the upper left-hand corner of the scatterplot have high values for both irreplaceability and utility (Table 7A.14). Table 7A.11 Summary statistics for irreplaceability and vulnerability. The variance was excluded because the distributions were highly skewed. irreplaceability vulnerability minimum 0 0 1st quartile 15.0 7.9 median 24.4 12.5 mean 31.3 16.6 3rd quartile 42.5 22.5 maximum 100 100 Table 7A.12. Irreplaceability versus vulnerability percentile matrix. Matrix shows the number of AUs in each irreplaceability versus vulnerability percentile category. Values for vulnerability and irreplaceability at each percentile are shown in parentheses. Percentile for Irreplaceability 99.5 (100) 99 (100) 98 (95.0) 96 (76.5) 92 (62.8) 84 (53.5) total 84 (28.0) Percentile for Vulnerability 92 96 98 99 (36.7) (41.1) (46.2) (52.0) 99.5 (61.2) total -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 3 1 1 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 1 1 1 1 10 11 7 5 2 0 1 26 15 19 10 4 3 5 56 35 31 17 8 4 7 102 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 12 of 20 Table 7A.13 Assessment units within the 0.5 percentile for Euclidean distance from the (100,100) scatterplot corner. AUs ordered by irreplaceability value. Irreplaceability and utility values are from the integrated freshwater and terrestrial analysis. AU number 1902 1701 1383 1656 2391 2394 1274 2473 1903 1303 2484 2588 2573 mean standard deviation AU Name Orveas Bay Chemainus River Qualicum River Chemainus River Camp Creek Chehalis River, lower Stamp River Hazeldell Sooke River Qualicum River Longview Rock Creek/Tualatin River Clackamas River Irreplaceability 100 100 100 100 84.4 81.2 73.6 62.8 60.0 58.0 56.0 55.2 55.0 75.9 Vulnerability 51.5 42.6 39.9 39.5 66.6 48.9 59.4 68.2 79.2 62.8 94.1 90.2 95.7 64.5 Euclidean distance 48.5 57.4 60.1 60.5 36.9 54.5 48.4 49.0 45.1 56.1 44.4 45.9 45.2 50.2 Utility 100 100 100 98.4 71.0 75.8 73.8 57.4 35.2 55.5 30.0 55.0 55.0 69.8 18.5 19.5 6.8 23.5 Table 7A.14 Assessment units within the 0.5 percentile for Euclidean distance from the (0,100) scatterplot corner. AUs ordered by irreplaceability value. Irreplaceability and utility values are from the integrated freshwater and terrestrial analysis. AU number 2966 1650 2957 1135 239 1939 1709 1426 2945 54 571 2155 1681 mean standard deviation AU Name island in BC island in BC island in Oregon Stamp River Marble River Cape Alava Tzartus Island island in BC Long Island, Willapa Bay Frisherman river Checleset Bay Saghalie Creek island in BC Irreplaceability 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.6 98.6 96 99.6 Vulnerability 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.3 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.8 4.3 2.5 1.0 2.5 Euclidean distance 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.3 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.8 4.4 2.8 4.1 2.8 Utility 100 100 100 100 55 100 100 100 100 100 100 74.6 100 94.6 1.1 1.2 1.2 13.3 7A.3 DISCUSSION The selection algorithm generates a set of AUs corresponding to a local minimum of the objective function. AUs are included in a solution because they serve to minimize the objective function. Therefore, AUs with high utility or high irreplaceability scores are those that (1) contain one or more rare targets, (2) contain a large number of target occurrences, and (3) have a low relative cost. AUs with scores at or near 100 are PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 13 of 20 those that were selected in every replicate at the lowest representation level. To be chosen in every replicate the AU must be unique. That is, the AU contained target occurrences that were found in no other AU, contained a substantially larger number of occurrences than other AUs, or contained targets and had a substantially lower cost than other AUs. Table 7A.15 shows the main targets for the selection of some AUs with high utility scores. In some cases the AU had the only occurrence in the ecosection – AUs 2005, 2232, 2440. In nine of these examples, the AU had one of only two occurrences in the entire ecosection, and because the minimum representation level equaled two occurrences per ecosection, these AU had a selection frequency of 100. In three instances – AUs 2123, 2285, 2341 – the AU had relatively high proportions of more than one target. Three of these example AUs had utility scores less than 100. In each case, the optimal selection algorithm had other AUs where the target could be captured. The other AUs contributed far less toward minimizing the objective function, but nevertheless, due to the random search of simulated annealing, these other AUs were selected a very small number of times. The preceding paragraph explains a surprising result of the analysis. Most AUs in the Olympic National Park, which protect some of the last remaining temperate old-growth rain forests in the United States, had lower utilty and irreplaceability values than AUs in southwestern Washington, which consist mostly of privately-owned, intensively-managed forest with very little old-growth. There are two reasons for this, one proximal and one ultimate. First, the proximal reason is that the target occurrence and suitability index data are rather uniform across the park. Hence, the AUs are essentially interchangeable and very few have a high selection frequency. In contrast, some AUs in southwest Washington stand out as unique because of rare targets or a very high number of target occurrences. Second, the ultimate reason is survey effort. Private forest managers have funded wildlife surveys throughout southwest Washington, in particular for amphibians. This has lead to high data density in southwest Washington; the data density in Olympic National Park is much lower. More surveys in the park might show more heterogeneity among AUs with respect to target occurrences. A similar but opposite pattern is seen on Vancouver Island. Very few AUs on the island have high utility or irreplaceablity scores; they are essentially interchangeable. They appear to be interchangeable because very few surveys have been done on these lands which are leased by timber companies. One cluster of AUs with high scores is located in Strathcona Provincial Park. In this park a small number of AUs contain alpine and sub-alpine communities found nowhere else on Vancouver Island. These rare communities have been intensively surveyed. The results on Vancouver Island and in Washington State call into question the reliability of utility and irreplaceability scores. These AU scores were strongly influenced by the uneven spatial distribution of survey effort. No or low survey may be effectively equivalent to false negatives. That is, according to the data, a species does not exist in an AU when it actually does exist there. As a consequence, the utility and irreplaceability scores do not reflect reality, and we may be missing some places important for biodiversity conservation. A low cost method for overcoming the lack of occurrence data is to use species-habitat models to predict species occurrences (Scott et al. 2002). However, there were a number of reasons we did not use predictive models. First, we did not have any reasonably accurate species-specific habitat models. The ones available to us, (e.g., Cassidy et al. 1997), have low spatial precision and untested accuracy. Second, we did not have the resources needed to develop our own models for a large number of verterbrate species. Third, species-specific habitat models have both false negatives and false positives. False positive errors are a major concern. We don't want to select places for conservation where the species of concern don't actually exist. The prevailing opinion in the scientific literature is that false negatives inherent to survey data are likely to be less damaging than the false positives of habitat models. Freitag and Van Jaarsveld (1996) and Araujo and Williams (2000) recommend using only occurrence data because of the potential for false positives in habitat models. Loiselle, B.A (2003) recommends that species-specific habitat models be used cautiously. Given the lack of readily available models of proven accuracy and our incapacity to develop our own models, we believed the most cautious approach was to use occurrence data (with the exception of marbled murrelets on Vancouver Island). PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 14 of 20 96.5 100 100 100 97 100 100 100 2123 2127 2136 2139 2193 2005 2205 2232 Upper Headwaters Hoh River Elwah River, upper Winfield Creek Hoh River, South Fork lower Quinault River, North Fork middle Elwah River below Lake Mills Hamma Hamma River, middle Quinault River above Lake Quinault 100 100 100 100 100 99.5 100 100 100 2285 2309 2311 2341 2412 2437 2440 2441 2452 Wynocchee River, middle Satsop River, West Fork upper Humptulips River, East Fork lower Wynoochee River below Schafer Creek headwaters, Willapa Bay Rock/Jones South Fork Chehalis Stillman Creek main fork, Grays River 12 11 10 7 8 11 6 6 13 8 12 13 10 7 10 10 15 9 4 6 Number of Targets 100% of mountain hemlock forest 97% of brandt’s cormorant nests 4/9 warty jumping slug occurrences 2/8 Burrington jumping slug occurrences 19% of montane riparian woodland and shrubland 1/3 harlequin duck occurrences 1/2 northern goshawk occurrences 36% montane riparian woodland and shrubland 31% of oak woodland 1/2 northern goshawk occurrences 1/3 harlequin duck occurrences 1/1 Kincaids sulfur lupine occurrences 1/2 Nelson’s checker-mallow occurrences 1/2 valley silverspot occurrences 1/2 frigid shootingstar occurrences 1/1 frigid shootingstar occurrences 1/2 Makah Copper occurrences 1/4 cascades frog occurrences 14% of mesic alpine dwarf-shrubland and meadow 1/2 Tisch’s saxifrage occurrences 1/2 Vaux’s swift occurrences 1/2 Vaux’s swift occurrences 1/4 cascades frog occurrences 1/1 tall bugbane occurrences 1/2 Brewer’s cliff-brake occurrences Main Target for Selection of AU PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 15 of 20 100 100 2263 2264 Humptulips River, East Fork upper Camp/Duck Creek Willapa Hills Ecosection 100 Utility Score 1935 AU number Big River Olympic Ecosection AU name Table 7A.15. Examples of main targets for selection of AUs with high utility scores. Example AUs were randomly selected from Olympic and Willapa Hills Ecosections. Number of occurrences and percentages refer to total amount in ecosection. AU names were taken from the U.S. Geological Service. HUC layer. The integrated portfolio combines freshwater, terrestrial, and estuary AUs through a technique known as vertical stacking. Unlike the terrestrial only analysis, the boundary modifier (BM) parameter was greater then zero, and therefore, AUs were selected not only for their biodiversity value and suitability but also for their adjacency to other AUs. With BM greater than zero the algorithm will select larger contiguous areas, which, in theory, is better for biodiversity conservation. On the other hand, the reasons for AU selection (biodiversity value or AU adjacency) are obscured. The scores for freshwater class 1 AUs and terrestrial AUs were combined to yield a single utility score and single irreplaceability score for each AU. One result was that fewer AUs had scores of 100 relative to the terrestrial only analysis. This should help to further prioritze AUs. AUs that score high for both freshwater and terrestrial should be higher priorities for conservation. When combining the scores for freshwater class 1 and terrestrial AUs we weighted them equally. One could argue that terrestrial AUs should be weighted more heavily because most of the terrestrial data are empirical (i.e., occurrences) as opposed to modeled (i.e., freshwater macrohabitat types). The subjective assignment of weights through expert judgment is one shortcoming of our methods that must be addressed through the development of more rigorous methods and the collection of more empirical data. Utility and irreplaceability scores are different ways to prioritize places for conservation. Irreplaceability has been the most commonly used index (e.g., Andelman and Willig 2002, Noss et al. 2002, Leslie et al. 2003, Stewart et al. 2003), and it assumes that land area is the sole consideration for efficient conservation. Utility incorporates other factors that can effect efficient conservation such as land management status and current condition. Many AUs attained scores of 100 for both utility and irreplaceability. Also, the values for weighted Spearman rank correlation showed that differences between maps at high scores were less than differences at low scores. These results demonstrate that for scores at or near 100 the cost had little influence on selection frequency; occurrence data drove the results. More importantly, it demonstrated that the results are robust. Under two different assumptions about efficiency (area versus. suitability), the highest priority AUs were nearly identical. Utility and irreplaceability scores were significantly different for many individual AUs at the middle and low end of the utility score range (Figure 7A.5). This is useful information for prioritization. AUs at the low end of utility (or irreplaceabilty) typically are unremarkable in terms of biodiversity value. They contribute habitat or target occurrences, but they are interchangeable with other AUs. For these AUs, prioritizing on the basis of suitability rather than biodiversity value makes most sense. If an AU can be distinguished from other AUs because conservation there will be cheaper or more successful, then that AU should be a higher priority for action. For these AUs, the utility score should be used for prioritization. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 16 of 20 40.0 percent of AUs 30.0 utility 20.0 irreplaceability 10.0 0 1-1 0 1120 2130 3140 4150 5160 6170 7180 8190 911 00 0.0 selection frequency (percent) FIG 7A.1: Distribution of AU irreplaceability and utility scores for the terrestrial only analysis. 40.0 percent of AUs 30.0 utility 20.0 irreplaceabilty 10.0 0 110 11 -2 0 21 -3 0 31 -4 0 41 -5 0 51 -6 0 61 -7 0 71 -8 0 81 -9 0 91 -1 00 0.0 selection frequency (percent) FIG 7A.2: Distribution of AU irreplaceability and utility scores for the integrated analysis. Selection frequencies of overlapping terrestrial and aquatic AUs counted separately. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 17 of 20 40 percent of AUs 30 utility 20 irreplaceability 10 0 1-1 0 11 -20 21 -30 31 -40 41 -50 51 -60 61 -70 71 -80 81 -90 91 -10 0 0 selection frequency (percent) Figure 7A.3: Distribution of AU irreplaceability and utility scores for the integrated analysis. Selection frequencies of overlapping terrestrial and aquatic AUs summed together. 100 irreplaceability 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 vulnerability Figure 7A.4. Scatterplot of irreplaceability versus vulnerability. Each point represents a single AU. Plot divided into quadrants using median values (solid lines) and into sixteen sub-quadrants using quartile values (dashed lines). AUs in the upper right-hand sub-quadrant should be considered the highest priority for conservation. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 18 of 20 20 Percent of AUs 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Eucliean Distance Figure 7A.5. Distribution of distance values calculated from the irreplaceability versus vulnerability plot. Distance calculated from the upper right-hand corner of plot: (vulnerability, irreplaceability) = (100, 100). 100 irreplaceability 80 60 0.5% 40 20 8% 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 vulnerability Figure 7A.6. Scatterplot of irreplaceability versus vulnerability showing iso-Euclidean distance contours from the (100, 100) corner. The contours shown are the Euclidean distances that encompass 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 percent of AUs. Plot is also divided into quadrants using median values (solid lines) and sub-quadrants using quartile values, but only the third quartiles are shown (dashed lines). Each point represents a single AU. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 19 of 20 100 irreplaceability 80 60 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 vulnerability Figure 7A.7. Scatterplot of irreplaceability versus vulnerability showing iso-Euclidean distance contours from the (0, 100) corner. The contours shown are the Euclidean distances that encompass 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 percent of AUs. Plot is also divided into quadrants using median values (solid lines) and sub-quadrants using quartile values, but only the third quartiles are shown (dashed lines). Each point represents a single AU. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7A, page 20 of 20 Appendix 7B: Sensitivity Analysis for Terrestrial HUCs 7B.1 Introduction A sensitivity analysis is necessary whenever there is considerable uncertainty regarding modeling assumptions or parameter values. A sensitivity analysis determines what happens to model outputs in response to a systematic change of model inputs (Jorgensen and Bendoricchio 2001, pp. 59-61). Sensitivity analysis serves two main purposes: (1) to measure how much influence each parameter has on the model output; and (2) to evaluate the effects of poor parameter estimates or weak assumptions (Caswell 1989). Through a sensitivity analysis, we can ascertain the robustness of our results and judge how much confidence we should have in our conclusions. Appendix 6 explains the inputs to the site selection algorithm. The input with the greatest uncertainty is the cost index. The cost index is not a statistical model – variable selection and parameter estimates for the index were based on professional judgment. For this reason, our sensitivity analysis focused on the index. Other assessments have incorporated a cost index or something similar into an optimal site selection algorithm (Davis et al. 1996, Nantel et al. 1998, Stoms et al. 1998, Davis et al. 1999, Lawler et al. 2003). Only Davis et al. (1996) and Stoms et al. (1998) investigated the sensitivity of site selection to changes in their index. The sensitivity analysis was done only for the terrestrial portion of the conservation utility maps because: (1) the terrestrial data have a greater influence on the portfolio than the freshwater data; (2) terrestrial environments and species have been more thoroughly studied, and therefore, our assumptions about terrestrial biodiversity are more robust than for estuary or freshwater biodiversity; and (3) the terrestrial portfolio has the greatest potential influence on land use planning and policy decisions affecting private lands. 7B.2 Methods We explored sensitivity to the cost index by altering the index’s parameter values, running the selection algorithm with the new index, and then quantifying the resulting changes in the conservation utility map. Recall that the terrestrial cost index equation is a weighted geometric mean: cost = [suitability a • HUC area b ] ^ [1/(a+b)] (1) where a + b = 1, suitability and HUC area are normalized to a maximum value of 1, and suitability = d • management status + e • %converted land + f • road density (2) where d + e + f = 1; and management status, %converted land, and road density are all normalized to a maximum value of 1. The values for parameters a, b, d, e, f were determined by expert opinion. These values along with the changes used in the sensitivity analysis are given in Table 7B.1. In total, 25 different tests were done. The adjusted parameter value could not exceed 1 and the other parameters were adjusted so that they all still summed to 1. Only the cost index parameters were changed; none of other inputs to the selection algorithm used to produce the original utility map were changed. We changed only a one parameter at a time, and hence, did not investigate interactions between or amongst index parameters. The utility map was generated as explained in Chapter 7. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 1 of 13 Table 7B.1. Cost index parameter values and amount of change used for sensitivity analysis. parameter a b d e f original value 0.75 0.25 0.48 0.30 0.22 incremental changes ± 0.05, ±0.10, ±0.15, ±0.20, ±0.25 ± 0.05, ±0.10, ±0.15, ±0.20, ±0.25, +0.50, +0.75 ±0.10, ±0.20, ±0.30 ±0.10, ±0.20, ±0.30 ±0.10, ±0.20, +0.30, -0.22 Resulting changes in the algorithms output were quantified several ways. First, three similarity measures were calculated to compare the conservation utility maps generated: mean absolute difference in utility, Bray-Curtis similarity measure, and Spearman rank correlation (Krebs 1999; pp 379-386). The Bray-Curtis similarity measure normalizes the sum absolute difference to a scale from 0 to 1. Because utility will be used for prioritizing AUs, the rank correlation is particularly informative. Rank correlation told us how the relative AU priorities changed in response to changes in the cost index. Because we were interested in prioritizing AUs, we also calculated and the mean absolute difference in rank. We were especially interested in how the ranks of the most highly ranked AUs (i.e., AUs with highest utility scores) would change. To examine this, we also calculated: (1) a weighted Spearman rank correlation using Savage scores (Zar 1996, pp. 393-395) with highly ranked AUs contributing more heavily to the rank correlation value; and (2) the mean absolute change in rank for only AUs with original rank equal to 1. When calculating rank correlation, AUs that had tied ranks were given the mean of the ranks that would have been assigned had they not been tied (Zar 1996, p. 150). When calculating mean absolute difference in rank, all AUs that had tied ranks were assigned the lowest rank and the next highest rank was assigned to the next AU that was not tied to these AUs. Each similarity measure gives a single number that indicates the degree of change. They can be used to determine which cost index parameter has the most influence on the utility. Parameters with more influence will cause a larger change in the similarity measures. Second, we determined whether the degree of change caused by altering a cost index parameter was statistically significant. This was done by testing the following hypothesis for mean absolute difference: H01: difference between map X and map Y is significantly less than the expected difference between the map X and a random map; HA1: difference between map X and map Y is equal to or significantly greater than the expected difference between the map X and a random map, and for the Bray-Curtis similarity measure and Spearman rank correlation, this hypothesis: H02: similarity between the map X and map Y is significantly greater than the expected similarity between the utility map and a random map; HA2: similarity between the map X and map Y is equal to or significantly less than the expected similarity between the map X and a random map, where map X and map Y are the original utility map and the altered utility map, respectively. Both null hypotheses mean that there is no significant difference between the original and altered maps. If the observed similarity measure is significantly less than (or the distance significantly greater than) that expected from chance, then the null hypothesis is false, and we can say that the original and altered maps are different. For Spearman rank correlation, the alternative hypothesis is equivalent to r 0. The hypotheses were tested using a randomization test (Sokal and Rohlf 1995, pp. 808-810). Random utility maps were generated by reshuffling the utility values among AUs (i.e., random sampling of utility values without replacement). One thousand random utility maps were compared to the real map using the four measures of similarity. The proportion of times that the difference between the original utility map and PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 2 of 13 altered map is smaller (or the similarity is larger) than the difference between the utility map and the 1000 randomly generated maps equals the probability that original map and altered map are significantly different. This is similar to the technique employed by Warman et al. (2004). This was a one-tailed test of significance with = 0.05. Values for other inputs to the algorithm are given in Table 7B.2. Third, a contingency table analysis was done to compare the utility values of paired AUs from the original and altered maps. The log-likelihood ratio method (Zar 1996; pp. 502-503) was used to test the following hypotheses: H03: AU selection is independent on cost index parameter value HA3: AU selection is dependent on cost index parameter value Paired AUs were considered to be significantly different for P <= 0.05. Table 7B.2. Values for SITES parameters used in all sensitivity analyses of terrestrial conservation utility map. Parameter Function Algorithm Type of optimization routine Replications Number of times to repeat optimization per representation level Iterations Number of times to create new combination of AUs Boundary modifier Weighting factor for “cost” of AU perimeter. Encourages clusters of AUs Target penalty factor weighs “cost” of not meeting a target’s representation level Representation level amount of target the algorithm must capture AU status Initial selection state of each AU Cost Index indicates likelihood of successful conservation at AU value simulated annealing 25 2,000,000 0 automatically set 10 levels, same as Chapter 7 0 for all hexagons equation 1 7B.3 Results Changes to cost index parameters result in changes in AU utility scores (Figure 7B.1). A linear regression shows a significant (p < 0.0001) but weak relationship (r2= 0.20) between change in cost index and change in utility scores – as the AU cost decreases the utility score increases. A regression which includes only AUs with significant change in AU score (according to the contingency table analysis) shows a stronger relationship – r2= 0.32. For 15 percent of AUs the relationship between change in utility and change in cost did not follow the general trend. That is, cost increased and utility increased, or cost decreased and utility decreased. This counter-intuitive result occurs because AU selection is based on relative cost. An AU’s cost and utility can both decrease if many AUs with the same targets have a much greater cost decrease. Parameters a and b, which control the influence of AU suitability relative to AU area, had the largest effect on conservation utility values. For all incremental changes, changes to parameter a (and b) resulted in the largest mean absolute difference (Figure 7B.2), the smallest Bray-Curtis measure (Figure 7B.3), and the smallest Spearman rank correlation (Figure 7B.4). Amongst the suitability index parameters (d, e, and f), equal incremental changes in parameter value resulted in about the same result for each similarity measure but changes to e usually had a smaller effect on the original utility map than the same change to d or f PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 3 of 13 (Figures 7B.2, 7B.3, 7B.4). For all incremental changes to all parameters, the null hypothesis was accepted for all similarity measures. The differences between the original utility map and the altered map were minor for all parameter changes except one: b + 0.75. For this parameter change, the mean absolute difference equaled 23 and the Spearman rank correlation equaled 0.684 but the randomization test accepted the null hypotheses nevertheless. Spearman rank correlations between the original and altered utility maps were greater than 0.925 for all parameter changes except one: b + 0.75 (Figure 7B.4). Greater than 0.925 is an extremely high correlation, and the weighted Spearman rank correlation shows that correlations were even higher among AUs with high rank (Table 7B.3). Upon examining distributions for mean absolute difference in utility, the results for the similarity measures were not surprising (Figure 7B.5). Each was a steep exponential distribution. Changes in parameter a of ±0.25 caused no utility score change in over half of AUs (53% for -0.25, 61% for +0.25), and over 75% of AUs changed utility by ±2.0 or less (77% for -0.25, 81% for +0.25). Even for the largest change in a (0.75), 68% of the AUs changed utility by 10 or less. Table 7B.3. Comparison of Spearman rank correlation and weighted Spearman rank correlation for a subset of suitability index parameter changes. For parameters d, e, and f, changes of smaller magnitude resulted in larger values for rank correlation. parameter change b - 0.25 b + 0.25 b + 0.50 b +0.75 d + 0.3 e + 0.3 f + 0.3 d - 0.3 e - 0.3 f - 0.3 parameter values a = 1, b=0 a = 0.5, b = 0.5 a = 0.25, b= 0.75 a = 0, b=1 d= 0.78, e= 0.127, f= 0.093 d= 0.274, e= 0.60, f= 0.126 d= 0.295, e= 0.185, f= 0.52 d= 0.18, e= 0.473, f= 0.347 d= 0.686, e= 0, f= 0.314 d= 0.615, e= 0.385, f= 0 Spearman rank correlation 0.965 0.964 0.927 0.684 0.985 0.984 0.982 0.973 0.989 0.986 weighted Spearman rank correlation 0.980 0.988 0.970 0.878 0.992 0.992 0.990 0.986 0.996 0.993 According to the similarity measures there was little overall difference between the original and altered utility maps. However, many individual AUs did change and some showed statistically significant changes in utility (Figure 7B.6). A plus or minus 0.25 change in parameters a or b caused 47% of AUs (n=2707) to change utility scores, but only 7.8 percent of AUs had a statistically significant change. When b was changed by 0.75 (a=0, b=1), over three-quarters of AUs change utility score and nearly half (45.8%) had a statistically significant change. Utility scores were much less sensitive to changes in parameters d, e, and f (Figure 7B.7). For the biggest changes in d, e, and f (±0.3), between 33.4 and 39.0 AUs changed utility score, but only between 1.2 and 6.4 percent had significant changes. Utility scores were least sensitive to changes in e. Since utility will be used to prioritize AUs for conservation, the sensitivity of AU rank to changes in the cost index is especially important. We restricted this analysis to AUs that were highly ranked. For AUs with rank greater than 100 (lowest possible rank was 197), changes to a and b produced symmetric results in mean absolute change in rank for changes up to ±0.20 (Figure 7B.8). That is, equal incremental changes in a and b produced nearly the same mean absolute change in rank. Changes to parameters a or b caused bigger changes in rank than those caused by d, e, or f. Amongst parameters d, e, and f, no parameter consistently caused the biggest or smallest mean absolute change in rank, and the relationship between changes in parameter values and change in rank were nonlinear. A -0.3 change to d caused the biggest PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 4 of 13 change in mean absolute rank amongst all changes to d, e, and f. In contrast, the mean absolute change in rank was smaller for a 0.3 change in d than for 0.3 changes to e and f. For AUs with the rank equal to 1 (i.e., utility = 100), equal changes to a and b produced asymmetric results, i.e, the response was nonlinear (Figure 7B.9). Increasing the influence of area and decreasing the influence of suitability (i.e., increasing b, decreasing a) had little effect on mean absolute change in rank up to a change of 0.25, but decreasing the influence of area and increasing had a much greater effect on rank. Changes to d, e, and f resulted in small changes in rank. Mean absolute change in rank was less than 1.0 for all changes except one: -0.3 change to d, which resulted in a value of 1.2. Increases in a (or decreases in b) resulted in mean absolute changes in rank that were 2 to 3 times greater than those produced by comparable changes to d, e, or f. However, most of the change in rank caused by increases in a were due to a small number of AUs undergoing large changes in rank. For instance, a 2.1 mean absolute change in rank was produced by a change in only 11 of 189 AUs (5.8%). In fact, very few AUs with rank equal to 1 changed rank in response to changes in any of the parameters (Figure 7B.10). The greatest number of topranked AUs that changed was 15 of 189 (7.9%) in response to a 0.25 increase in a (0.25 decrease in b). Changes in utility due to changes in the cost index can also be examined spatially. Maps 1 and 2 show changes in utility in response to changing parameter a (and b) plus and minus 0.25, respectively. As expected, changes to AU utility are of opposite sign on maps 1 and 2 in most cases (55%). The objective function of the selection algorithm has two terms – one dealing with AU cost and one dealing with target representation. The map depicts AU sensitivity to the former term. Many AUs (28%) had no change in utility on either map. These AUs are insensitive to this degree of change in a, and, in effect, the targets are the main drivers for selection of these AUs. In Washington, AUs that change utility are mainly concentrated in the Olympic Peninsula. There are two reasons for this, one proximal and one ultimate. First, the proximal reason is that the target occurrence and suitability index data are rather uniform across the park. Changes in relative utility are mostly due to changing the relative importance of the suitability and area factors in the cost index. Second, the ultimate reason is occurrence data. Ecological distinctions among AUs are based mostly on occurrence data, but the data density in Olympic National Park is rather low. In short, for these AUs the cost term of the objective function is dominating the target representation term. Similar but opposite reasoning explain why some AUs did not change utility scores to this degree of a change in parameter a (and b). The sensitivity of rank to changes in cost is nonlinear. A closer look at the relationship between cost, utility, rank, and target occurrences for a subset of AUs (Table 7B.4) reveals the basis for the nonlinear relationship. Some AUs do not change utility or rank regardless of the degree of change in cost. In some cases, such AUs had the only occurrence in the ecosection (AUs 2005, 2232 in Table 7B.4). In four of the examples, the AU had one of only two occurrences in the entire ecosection, and because the minimum representation level equaled two occurrences per ecosection, these AU had a selection frequency of 100. In another example – AU 2285 – the AU had relatively high proportions of more than one target. Some AUs can be highly sensitive to changes in cost. For instance, the normalized cost of AU 2098 changed by 0.4 but its rank went from 61 to 6 (375 AUs had a rank higher than 61, 207 AUs had a rank higher than 6). In contrast, other AUs were insensitive to changes in cost. The normalized cost of AU 2200 changed by 34.4 but its rank changed by 1, from 58 to 59. Some AUs have low cost and relatively rare targets but still have a low rank (e.g., AU 2089). Again, this is due to its cost relative to AUs with an intersecting subset of targets and also the value of its total biological contents relative to other AUs with an intersecting subset of targets. For a small number of AUs (15 percent), changes in cost and utility had the same sign (e.g., AUs 2098 and 2122). Again, this happens because AUs with an intersecting subset of targets had larger increases in cost. The sensitivity of rank to changes in cost is nonlinear but operation of the algorithm is not counterintuitive. As already demonstrated in (Figure 7B.1), the examples in Table 7B.4 show that changes in cost and utility are most often inversely related. Rank nearly always changes in the same direction as utility. AUs with moderate normalized cost and moderately rare targets have moderate rank (AU 2435). AUs with very little biological value had low rank regardless of cost (AUs 2122 and 2455), and AUs with rare targets have high rank regardless of cost (e.g., AUs 1935, 2309, 2452). PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 5 of 13 7B.4 Discussion The basic conclusion of the sensitivity analysis is that AU utility and rank change in response to changes in the suitability index. Similarity measures that compare “before” and “after” utility maps of the entire ecoregion indicate that the overall map is relatively insensitive to changes in suitability index parameters. That is, the average change over all AUs is small. However, the utility and rank of many AUs do change and some exhibit significant changes. The number of AUs that change depends of which index parameter is changed and the amount of change to that parameter. Of the five index parameters, a and b (which are complementary) have the biggest effect on utility. We investigated the sensitivity of the utility map to changes in the cost index because of our uncertainty about the index. The variable selection and parameter estimates for the index were based on professional judgment. The results of the sensitivity analysis have two implications for conservation planning. First, highest priority AUs (about ranks 1 through 10; the top 218 AUs) are rather robust to changes in the suitability index. Therefore, regardless of the uncertainties in the cost index, we can be confident about the most highly ranked AUs. These AUs were selected mainly for their relative biological value, not relative cost. For similar reasons, the lowest ranked AUs (rank less than about 100), tend to be robust to changes in the cost index – they maintain a low rank because they have little relative biological value. Second, the utility of moderately ranked AUs (rank less than 10 and greater than 100; about 319 AUs), is sensitive to changes in the cost index. When choosing among AUs of moderate rank we must explore how our assumptions about cost and suitability affect rank. The results of the sensitivity analysis put extra emphasis on the proper use of SITES or any optimal site selection algorithm. AU priorities are influenced by the cost index, but the cost index relies heavily on subjective judgments. Software like SITES is often referred to as “decision support tools.” Such tools can best support decisions by enabling us to explore the effect of various assumptions and differing opinions. Both Davis et al. (1996) and Stoms et al. (1998) did the equivalent of a sensitivity analysis for their suitability indices. However, they referred to their different indices as “model variations” or “alternatives”; an implicit recognition that different sets of assumptions had equal validity. To address uncertainties in cost indices, AU priorities, especially for moderately ranked AUs, should be derived from several different analyses using different indices. This will enhance the robustness of analytical results and lead to more confident decision making. The other major source of uncertainty in this assessment was the biological data – both the ecological systems map and the target occurrence data. The potential consequences for optimal site selection of incomplete (Freitag and Van Jaarsfeld 1998, Gaston and Rodrigues 2003, Gladstone and Davis 2003) or inaccurate (Flather et al. 1997, Polasky et al. 2000) biological data have been investigated. Not surprisingly, each study found that inaccurate data will substantially alter the results of site selection. However, Gaston and Rodrigues found that incomplete species surveys, that is, surveys with low or zero survey effort in portions of a region, may not substantially alter the results of site selection. This is because biologists bias surveys toward places where they think species will be found and such places tend to have peaks in species abundance. While we are not completely certain about the occurrence data, it is the best information we have. Survey data have errors, but recent data (less than about 5 years old) are more likely to have false negatives than false positives. False negatives are preferred over false positives, because we don't want to select places for conservation where targets don’t actually exist (Freitag and Van Jaarsveld 1996, Araujo and Williams 2000). In short, we have to work with the occurrence data we have, and unlike the cost index, we cannot readily alter the occurrence data in a way that will give us greater confidence in AU prioritization. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 6 of 13 2452 2006 2200 2098 Tacoma Creek Bungalow / Skookum Creek 3.8 2073 Coal Creek 4.3 2123 2089 21.7 2102 Slide Creek 5.6 2005 6.1 10.9 22.8 3.3 7.6 6.0 2232 2160 9.0 2139 25.7 36.6 2309 2285 37.3 AU number 1935 Dosewallips River, middle Hoh River, South Fork lower Quinault River above Lake Quinault Elwah River below Lake Mills Goodman Creek Upper Headwaters Hoh River Elwah River below Lillian Creek Wynocchee River, middle AU name Big River Satsop River, West Fork upper main fork, Grays River original cost, normalized 47.1 0.4 69 70 70 75 86.5 95 96.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 original utility score 100 29* -0.5 -20* -5 -26* -27.5* -10* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 change in utility score 0 61 58 58 51 30 12 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 original rank 1 6 59 104 58 78 61 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 new rank 1 9 13 19 11 13 9 4 19 15 13 10 13 12 6 number of targets 6 PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 7 of 13 34.3 13.2 6.7 22.3 9.8 26.0 36.0 27.7 26.1 26.0 22.8 -14.4 -15.8 change in normalized cost -16.0 1/16 northern goshawk occurrences 1/35 warty jumping slug occurrences 1/59 harlequin duck occurrences 1/8 Boisduval’s blue butterfly occurrences 10% of coastal herbaceous bald and bluff 5/28 peregrine falcon occurrences 1/8 Alaska plantain occurrences 4/51 Cope’s giant salamander occurrences 1/16 northern goshawk occurrences 2% of coastal herbaceous bald and bluff 1/16 northern goshawk occurrences 1/2 mineral spring occurrences 1/4 cascades frog occurrences 14% of mesic alpine dwarf-shrubland and meadow 1/1 tall bugbane occurrences 1/1 frigid shootingstar occurrences 1/2 Vaux’s swift occurrences 1/2 frigid shootingstar occurrences 4/9 warty jumping slug occurrences 2/8 Burrington jumping slug occurrences 19% of montane riparian woodland and shrubland 1/3 harlequin duck occurrences Main Targets for Selection of AU 1/2 Makah Copper occurrences Table 7B.4. Examples of change in cost, change in utility scores, and targets for some AUs. Change in cost index parameter was b+0.75 (a=0, b=1). Example AUs were randomly selected from Olympic and Willapa Hills Ecosections. Number of occurrences and percentages refer to total amount in ecosection. AU names were taken from the U.S. Geological Service. HUC layer. * means statistically significant change ( = 0.05). Lowest rank for original utility map (a=0.75, b= 0.25) was 197. 2091 2213 2296 2414 2225 2124 2202 1936 Village/Beach Creek Quillayute river Elk Creek Fir Creek Smith Creek Twin Peak Creek Alder Creek McDonald Creek Pysht River 36.3 12.2 16.2 14.0 15.3 7.9 73.7 6.4 42.8 27.2 4.6 42.6 1906 Potlatch Creek 49.8 2122 2455 2287 Upper Willapa River 8.1 4.6 2435 Lake Crescent frontal 2097 1976 AU name headwaters Bogachiel River Goldie River Salmon Creek AU number original Cost, normalized 33.9 -33.3 33.5 39.1 -9.0 32.5 -3.8 3.6 -4.2 18.4 -4.3 -33.3 -16.8 32.6 38.8 12 0 21 25 30.5 31 46 44.5 41 40 37 50 53.5 61 66 original utility score 6.5* 18.5* -9* -5 52.5* -1 15.5* -21.5* 33* -20* 19* 34.5* 5 -4.5 -16.5* change in utility score 191 197 168 158 145 143 106 110 119 121 129 96 87 73 66 original rank 182 182 198 178 34 153 75 171 51 178 90 31 83 88 104 new rank 7 1 6 10 6 12 8 5 5 7 6 10 2 15 13 number of targets PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 8 of 13 change in normalized cost no obvious main target 1/176 bald eagle occurrences no obvious main target Main Targets for Selection of AU 8% of riparian woodland and shrubland 3/76 Olympic torrent salamander 5/26 queen-of-the-forest occurrences 7/63 Columbia torrent salamander occurrences 5/52 Dunn’s salamander occurrences 1/19 of mineral spring occurrences 1/16 northern goshawk occurrences 1/59 harlequin duck occurrences 11% of tidal salt march 13% of tidal salt marsh 1/35 warty jumping slug occurrences 1/21 great blue heron colony occurrences 1/34 Burrington jumping slug 4/76 Olympic torrent salamander occurrences 2/51 Cope’s giant salamander occurrences 1/34 Burrington jumping slug occurrences 1/35 warty jumping slug occurrences 1/59 harlequin duck occurrences 12% of tidal salt march Table 7B.4 (continued). Examples of change in cost, change in utility scores, and targets for some AUs. Change in cost index parameter was b+0.75 (a=0, b=1). Example AUs were randomly selected from Olympic and Willapa Hills Ecosections. Number of occurrences and percentages refer to total amount in ecosection. AU names were taken from the U.S. Geological Service. HUC layer. * means statistically significant change ( = 0.05). Lowest rank for original utility map (a=0.75, b= 0.25) was 197. 170 140 change in utility score 110 80 50 20 -90 -70 -50 -30 -10 -10 -40 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 -70 -100 -130 -160 -190 percent change in suitability index Figure 7B.1 Relationship between percent change in cost index and change in utility score for a =0.25, b=0.75. One point for each AU; 2707 total points. Light gray points correspond to AUs with significant change in utility score. Dark line: regression for AUs with change in utility score (r2=0.20, 2 p<0.0001). Light line: regression for AUs with significant change in utility score (r =0.32, p < 0.0001) mean absolute difference 4.0 3.0 a b d 2.0 e f 1.0 0.0 -0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 change in parameter Figure 7B.2 Mean absolute difference between original utility map and map resulting from changes to cost index parameters. Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 9 of 13 1.0 Bray-Curtis measure 0.8 a 0.6 b d e 0.4 f 0.2 0.0 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 change in parameter value Figure 7B.3 Comparison using Bray-Curtis measure of similarity of original utility map and map resulting from changes to cost index parameters. Bray-Curtis values for d, e, and f are nearly the same. Since a+b =1, a change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. Spearman rank correlation 1.0 0.8 a 0.6 b d e 0.4 f 0.2 0.0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 change in parameter value Figure 7B.4. Comparison using Spearman rank correlation of original utility map and map resulting from changes to cost index parameters. Spearman rank correlation values for d, e, and f are nearly the same. Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 10 of 13 1600 number of AUs 1400 1200 a=1 1000 a=0.50 800 a=0.25 a=0 600 400 200 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 absolute difference in utility Figure 7B.5. Distribution of values for absolute difference in utility for four values of cost index parameter a. Original parameter value was a =0.75. Total number of AUs equals 2707. Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. 80 percent of AUs that changed 70 60 50 a b 40 a b 30 20 10 0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 change in parameter value Figure 7B.6. Percent of all AUs with changed utility values as a result of changing cost index parameters a and b. dashed lines: percent of AUs that changed; solid lines: percent of AUs with significant change. Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 11 of 13 percent of AUs that changed 40 30 d e f 20 d e f 10 0 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 change in parameter Figure 7B.7. Percent of all AUs with changed utility values as a result of changing cost index parameters d, e, and f. dashed lines: percent of AUs that changed; solid lines: percent of AUs with significant change. mean absolute change in rank 12 10 a 8 b d 6 e f 4 2 0 -0.30 -0.10 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.70 change in parameter value Figure 7B.8. Mean absolute change in rank in response to changing each cost index parameter; only AUs with rank equal to or greater than 100 (537 AUs; lowest possible rank was 197). Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 12 of 13 mean absolute change in rank 4.0 3.0 a b 2.0 d e f 1.0 0.0 -0.30 -0.10 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.70 change in parameter percent of AUs that change rank Figure 7B.9. Mean absolute change in rank in response to changing each cost index parameter; only AUs with original rank equal to 1 (utility score equal to 100). 189 AUs had original rank equal to 1. Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. 8.0 6.0 a b d 4.0 e f 2.0 0.0 -0.30 -0.10 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.70 change in parameter value Figure 7B.10. Percent of AUs that changed rank in response to changing each cost index parameter; only AUs with original rank equal to 1 (utility score equal to 100). 189 AUs had original rank equal to 1. Since a+b =1, change to parameter a equals the opposite change in b. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 7B, page 13 of 13 Appendix 8A: Automated Integration of Aquatic and Terrestrial Site Selection 8A.1 Introduction Efficiency has emerged as one of the fundamental principles in conservation planning. As planning has evolved, a wider variety of targets (i.e., species and vegetation/habitat types) have been brought into the process. Whereas the earliest conservation plans focused only on imperiled species, later plans have focused on all known species and/or vegetation types, both terrestrial and aquatic. To deal with this complexity, some sort of automated site selection algorithm like SITES or MARXAN is commonly used to create a map of conservation priority areas (Andelman et al. 1999, Ball et al. 2000, Possingham et al. 2000). One challenges to conservation planning is how to efficiently protect both aquatic and terrestrial targets into a single suite of conservation areas. Some plans have analyzed terrestrial and aquatic species and systems separately then attempted to merge the results through expert judgments. Others have analyzed both target types together in one layer of assessment units (AUs) and allowed the computer to find an optimal solution. A third approach is to merely overlay the outputs of a terrestrial and aquatic assessment. These three approaches have serious shortcomings. The expert integration may be feasible for small areas, but large-scale planning efforts often cover millions of hectares. It is simply impossible for humans to synthesize enough information to ensure efficient outcomes. Analyzing both aquatic and terrestrial realms with the one-layer approach pushes some portion of the solution into unsuitable sites for some targets. Site selection algorithms look at the world through the lens of a suitability index which incorporates a combination of factors such as road density, percent land conversion or monetary value. An index crafted for an aquatic species will have little relevance for upland terrestrial systems. Similarly, an index crafted for both realms will tend to mask impacts specific to a single realm. The simple overlay of the independent assessments is perhaps the most robust solution, but often leads to a massive conservation portfolio. As identifying areas where it makes good sense to work on both aquatic and terrestrial systems at the same time is not an explicit criterion, any opportunities for efficiency will be overlooked. For the PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment we used a technique that allows planners to analyze different target types simultaneously by using multiple layers of AUs crafted to match the natural boundaries of the targets being assessed with suitability indices incorporating impacts specific to those targets. This technique, vertical integration, enables planners to identify a conservation portfolio which capture the best locales for each target group, while simultaneously looking for efficiencies by seeking overlap in areas where multiple target types may be effectively conserved at once. 8A.1.1 The Vertical Integration Concept SITES require that all species and ecological system information for a planning area be attributed to wallto-wall coverages of AUs, usually small-scale watersheds or hexagons of several thousand hectares. A computer then examines millions of AU combinations, and chooses the best combination from among them that meet the goals at the smallest cost. The best output of the site selection algorithm then becomes the departure point for human planners to review and modify to craft a final conservation portfolio. This cost is the combination of the sum of the suitability index for all the selected AUs and the sum of penalties for not achieving desired goal levels combined with the sum of the boundary length, a measure of the outer perimeter of all selected AUs. Boundary length is proportional to fragmentation. A conservation portfolio comprised of many small, isolated patches will have a larger boundary length than one comprised of fewer, large patches. One concern of conservation area planning is preserve fragmentation. In order to address this concern, automated assessments utilize the length of the conservation area perimeter to apply a penalty for PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 1 of 10 fragmentation. Groupings of contiguous AUs have a shorter total perimeter, as the edge/area ratio is smaller than in a conservation area comprised of isolated AUs (Figure 8A.1). SITES utilize a “boundary modifier” parameter to control the degree of clustering. This works by altering the penalty for fragmentation. As the computer examines possible AU combinations, the tendency to prefer solutions with contiguous groupings of AUs increases as the boundary modifier is increased. Figure 8A.1: Both of these selections of AUs have the same area. The right hand grouping has a perimeter more than twice as long as the left grouping. In vertical integration, the boundary relations between AUs are used to allow the model to recognize that two or more polygons stacked upon each other are also adjacent. In these situations the model attempts to minimize the length of the total solution boundary by clustering vertically through a stack of AUs (Figure 8A.2). If the boundary modifier is set to 0, the solution will pick the minimum number of AUs from each layer to meet the goals with no regard for adjacency. As the boundary modifier is increased, the importance of clustering, horizontally as well as vertically, is increased. This 3-dimensional approach mimics GIS analysis though no spatial analysis is involved in the selection algorithms. Figure 8A.2: A schematic demonstrating the boundary relations between stacked and horizontally adjacent AUs. Each AU must relate to all other AUs above or below it, and in some cases, from side to side. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 2 of 10 A major advantage of vertical integration is that it frees planners from using the same AU polygons for all targets. It is often quite useful to use polygons which more closely match the natural expression of a target type. Aquatic systems, for example, are often classified as nesting polygons of increasing watershed size. Tributary and headwater drainages (Class 1) nest within small river drainages (Class 2), which in turn nest within large river drainages (Class 3). These classes of watershed can all be represented by polygons depicting their full contributing area. Their nesting is utilized with the vertical analysis so that each polygon is aware of all the polygons contributing to it, or which it contributes to. This larger, landscape scale context is a key advantage of this technique. The selection of the larger watersheds is greatly influenced by their attraction to basins with a greater selected proportion of their constituent tributaries. Techniques which rely on only one layer of AUs will often only select isolated reaches with no regard for their relation to the larger stream network. Multiple AU layers allow specific, relevant information for each target group to be factored into the suitability index. In the one-layer approach, a single suitability value was expected to account for all conditions which may impact any target group. This works well for pristine or heavily degraded AUs with similar degrees of impact to all targets, but fails where impacts are specific to one target group. A fish hatchery, for example, may threaten a wild salmon stock but present no danger at all to a ridgeline plant species. In the one-layer approach several AUs can have similar suitability values, but each may be inappropriate for one target group while well suited for conservation of another. With vertical integration the aquatic suitability index can factor in the hatchery while the terrestrial index is free to ignore it. The majority of AUs for any target group are interchangeable in that many different combinations of AUs can meet similar proportions of goals at similar costs. Vertical integration attempts to maximize the overlap between layers, allowing the site selection algorithm to actively seek efficiencies while maintaining the discrimination to avoid sites where conditions are unsuitable for a specific target group. The outputs from a vertically integrated solution offer more specific information about the conservation portfolio. Where does it make sense to capture all targets or to capture target groups individually? 8A.1.2 The Mechanics of Vertical Integration SITES utilizes a file that contains the lengths of shared boundaries between adjacent AUs to determine how to cluster AUs into conservation areas. This file is the key to the proper functioning of vertical integration. Let’s examine the simplest vertical integration, two spatially identical AU layers: one for aquatic and another for terrestrial targets. The length of each boundary between all adjacent terrestrial AUs is measured. These relations are then stored in the boundary relations file. The aquatic AUs will then be related to the terrestrial AUs they overlap. In this case the aquatic and terrestrial AUs are spatially identical; the length of their shared boundaries could be measured as the area of the polygons, or set at some synthetic value. We will initially set all of the aquatic-terrestrial boundaries at the mean of the terrestrial to terrestrial boundaries, so the model will generally be as likely to clump upwards through the stack as from side to side within a layer. These relations will also be stored to the boundary relations file. Two components will be part of the complete boundary relations file; the traditional boundary relations between the terrestrial AUs, and the relations of the aquatic AUs to the terrestrial AUs they overlap. An iteration of SITES begins with any "locked in" AUs that should be part of any conservation area, and a partial random selection of additional AUs. All selected AUs will then be scored for how well they meet target goals, the total cost of the solution, and total length of boundary. All exposed boundaries of selected AUs are included in the boundary length score. In vertical integration, those exposed boundaries will also include the values relating a selected AU with other non-selected AUs above or below it. For example, we are using 2 layers of AUs stacked in our analysis. If a terrestrial AU and the aquatic unit above it are both selected, there will be no penalty in the vertical plane, while a terrestrial unit selected without any corresponding aquatic AU would accrue a penalty. Similarly, the aquatic AUs would accumulate penalties for the unselected terrestrial AUs beneath them. Solutions which maximize the overlap between AU layers will be favored by the algorithm. However, the algorithm is not forced to select overlapping AUs in all cases. If the costs of an AU are prohibitive, or if the conservation targets in an AU are no longer required to meet goals, the algorithm can choose to forgo its selection even when the unit above or below it has been selected. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 3 of 10 The boundary modifier parameter determines the strength of association between layers. If the weighting is set to 0, AUs required to meet the goals at a low cost are selected without regard for adjacency. At low weightings the effects of clustering will begin to be seen. A high weighting will clump so tightly that virtually every selected terrestrial AU will correspond with a selected aquatic unit, and the patch size of the terrestrial conservation areas will increase dramatically. It is important to remember that as the weighting increases more extraneous AUs will be selected merely to reduce the exposed boundary of the conservation area. Iterative runs, with increasing boundary penalty weightings, will allow the planning team to select the level at which clustering is appropriately balanced with the size of the total conservation area. 8A.2 Methods Targets were broken into several groups, terrestrial, estuarine, freshwater aquatics (3 size classes), and near-shore marine. Assessment units were crafted for each group and separate suitability indices were calculated for each. Each target group was analyzed in a stand-alone fashion to see what the ideal automated solution might be for that group. All target groups were then run in a vertically integrated analysis, the solutions decomposed into their constituent layers and compared back to their original standalone runs to gauge the sacrifices made by any target group to accommodate integration with the others. Iterative runs also allowed us to weight the groups appropriately (by scaling their suitability and boundary values) so no one target group was dominating the outcomes. The final conservation portfolio met goals for virtually every target, with all targets having an influence in the outcome. The terrestrial group was attributed to small-scale watersheds approximately 2,500 ha in size. These were chosen because they cover the full extent of the ecoregion and make ecological sense to many of our partners and reviewers. The aquatic group was represented by three classes of nesting polygonal watersheds, tributary and headwater drainages less than 100 km² (Class 1), small river drainages between 100 - 1000 km² (Class 2), and large river drainages more than 1000 km² (Class 3). These three classes of watershed were all represented by polygons depicting their full contributing area. The Class 3 polygons contain the Class 1 and 2 polygons contributing to them, and the Class 2 polygons encompass the Class 1 polygons which contribute to them. Some watersheds do not drain into others, for example, when a small coastal creek flows directly into the ocean. For the vast majority of watersheds, however, this nesting was a key to the analysis as each polygon was made aware of all the polygons contributing to it, or which it contributed to. The near-shore marine AUs were line segments corresponding to reaches of shore-zone habitat; unique combinations of substrate, wave exposure, and biotic assemblage. Their length of overlap (in meters) with the terrestrial or estuarine polygon they were nearest was used as the length of shared boundary in the boundary file. Estuaries were represented by polygons. In the US portion of the ecoregion, those polygons were defined by salinity zones and estuarine vegetation. On Vancouver Island they were merely polygonal depictions of the extent of each estuary. Vancouver Island estuaries tend to be quite small, as they often occur at the heads of narrow fjords, and are fed by smaller streams. To give our model the context to discriminate between these estuaries the sum of the shore-zone habitats intersecting each was attributed to the polygons. Each of these planning unit layers had suitability information tailored specifically for the targets within them. Each group was run in a stand-alone analysis, with the "best" output of each (10 runs, 5,000,000 iterations each, boundary modifier 0.1) saved as the benchmark to gauge future solutions during the integration process. All target layers were combined into one analysis using the "vertical integration" technique. We had earlier determined that a boundary modifier of 0.1 was optimal to achieve appropriately sized clumps in our terrestrial solution without many extraneous AUs. However, we wished to ensure that the overlap between layers was maximized in the integrated solution without sweeping lots of extraneous AUs into the solution. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 4 of 10 Increasing the boundary modifier would unfortunately have that effect. Instead, we held the boundary modifier at 0.1, and increased the boundary values between layers in the boundary relations file. The initial boundaries between layers were set at the overlap of AU polygons in hectares. Boundary values between the terrestrial and aquatic assessment unit layers were set at 10,000 for run 1 and increased by 20% for each successive run. As the values increased, the overlap between layers also increased to reduce the exposed boundary of the stacked layers. This iterative process was repeated until the costs of one of the constituent solution layers began to spike (Figure 8A.3). The run previous to that spike, in this case the fourth iteration, was then used to identify the integrated conservation area. As the values of the boundaries between layers increased, the area of overlap between layers also increased, while the costs of the solutions remained fairly flat. The solutions were shifting to allow targets, for which multiple combinations of planning units at similar costs could meet goals, to accommodate integration. As a comparison, all targets were attributed to a single layer of AUs for a traditional one-layer analysis. Suitability values for these AUs were set at the average of the corresponding terrestrial and aquatic AU’s suitability scores. All other weightings and settings were held constant. The outputs for both scenarios were compared for the Olympic sub-section of the PNWC assessment. This subsection was chosen at it had the tightest coincidence between the aquatic and terrestrial sub-sectional boundaries (Figure 8A.4). SITES only sees the cost of the total solution, but decomposing the vertical solution into its constituent layers allows the tracking of the costs of all layers in the solution (Figure 8A.3). The costs of the solutions remain fairly flat until the point at which the increased boundaries between layers begin to have a greater influence in the objective function than the suitability values of the assessment units. In this case run 6 represents a local minima with the costs of the aquatic and terrestrial solutions as low or lower than in the stand-alone runs for those realms, followed by rapidly increasing costs as the boundary values begin to overwhelm costs in the Objective function. The overlap between layers will continue to increase as long as the boundary values between layers do, but after run 6 those gains in overlap are more than offset by the increase of the costs of the solution, representing the increasing proportion of sub-optimal assessment units in the solutions to maximize overlap. Run 6 was chosen as the starting point for integration. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 5 of 10 Overlap (hectares) between Aquatic and Terrestrial Solutions 1750000 1700000 Hectares 1650000 1600000 1550000 1500000 1450000 1400000 1350000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 Run Num ber Total Cost Cost of Aquatic Portion of Solution 11150000 11100000 11050000 11000000 10950000 10900000 10850000 10800000 10750000 10700000 10650000 1 2 3 4 5 6 Run Num ber Cost of Terrestrial Portion of Solution 15700000 Total Cost 15600000 15500000 15400000 15300000 15200000 15100000 1 2 3 4 5 6 Run Number Figure 3: Change in “cost” for terrestrial and aquatic portions of “best” solution and increase in overlap of terrestrial and aquatic portions as BM is increased. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 6 of 10 Figure 8A.4: Comparison between vertically-integrated and one-layer automated site selection methods. Area shown is Olympic Peninsula in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoreigon. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 7 of 10 The goals were generally met well by both analyses (Table 8C.1). The combined footprint of the vertically integrated terrestrial and aquatic conservations area within the Olympic Peninsula sub-region was 521,677 ha. The footprint for the one-layer conservation area was 558,202 ha, 7% larger (Figure 8A.4). A better comparison of the performance of the different analysis may be the Elwa River. The vast majority of the Elwa River drainage is within Olympic National Park. The uplands surrounding the river are in exquisite condition with large tracts of old growth forest. Unfortunately, one of the largest dams in the PNWC sits low in the watershed, providing hydropower for the region. 25,000 ha of the Elwa watershed were selected by the one-layer methodology, applying all of the aquatic systems they contained towards the goals. In the vertically integrated approach none of the Elwa appears in the aquatic solution, but large portions are in the terrestrial portion of the solution. This is a classic example of the blindness of a suitability index crafted for all targets to appropriately assess impacts for an individual target group. 8A.3 Discussion Vertical integration, since its inception 2 years ago, has been used by several planning teams in the United States and Canada. Aquatic planning teams, most specifically, have found it beneficial because it has solved the problem of connectivity. In the one-layer approach, no AU is aware of any other AU it does not touch. The one-layer approach is inherently unable to link many contributing watersheds together to form continuous aquatic conservation areas. Because the vertical integration technique, when used with nesting watersheds, creates relationships between larger size classes and all of their smaller contributing watersheds, it is able to build these connections. There are, however, some considerations a team must be aware of when attempting to utilize this technique. An automated portfolio is a mathematical solution for a conservation area design problem. Planners must realize that any automated output only represents the solution with the smallest value of the objective function. The numeric value of the objective function is largely a dynamic tension between the sums of the suitability scores and sums of the boundary penalties. If either factor is weighted too heavily it will dominate the outcome. Therefore, planners are urged to look at the tabular outputs of their analysis, specifically the component values of the objective function. If, for example, a solution has nearly perfect overlap between selected terrestrial and aquatic AUs, the boundary values in the objective function will probably far exceed the suitability scores. In this case, the team may also notice the aquatic targets are also far exceeding their goals. Similarly, AU layers with greatest relative costs will have the largest impact on the value of the objective function, and therefore have the greatest influence on the conservation area design. Therefore, when designing your analysis layers which contain the most robust information, or layers of special conservation interest, may be weighted more heavily to allow them more influence in the outcome. The actual influence a layer has can somewhat be gauged by the cost shift of the other AU layers when compared against their stand-alone runs. In the PNWC analysis, for example, we didn’t want the shore-zone segments to have a very large influence on the conservation area design. Costs were scaled down relative to the terrestrial and aquatic AUs. During the integrated runs, the costs of the aquatic and terrestrial components of the vertical solution showed no significant difference compared to the stand-alone runs for those layers. The shorezone portion of the vertical solution, on the other hand, showed an average 23% increase in costs compared to its stand-alone counterpart. The shore-zone component of the vertical solution was being forced into less favorable areas to accommodate integration with the aquatic and terrestrial layers. The geometries of AUs can also greatly influence the outcome. Hexagons, for example, cluster much more easily, and at lower boundary modifier levels, than irregularly shaped AUs like watersheds. It is important that planners build the terrestrial AU boundaries and experiment with ranges of boundary modifiers and suitability values that will produce reasonable outcomes. Boundary relations and suitability values for other layers may then be based upon the ranges established in the terrestrial analysis. For aquatic analysis it is beneficial to utilize synthetic values for boundary lengths. Because any watershed of a type counts toward goals as much as any other watershed of that same type, area need not be a factor in the boundary relations. Basing aquatic boundary values upon the mean of the terrestrial boundary lengths produces a more robust integrated solution. For example, if the mean of the terrestrial boundaries is 3000, PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 8 of 10 any Class 1 to terrestrial AU, Class1 to Class 2, or Class 1 to Class 3 boundary relation should be set near 3000, Class 2 to Class 3 relations perhaps twice as much. In the stand-alone aquatic solutions, the suitability values can then be scaled up or down until they are appropriately balanced against the boundary values of the objective function. Class 2 and 3 suitability values need not necessarily be the sums of their constituent Class 1s, they can be scaled independently such that the average Class 2 is twice the cost of the average Class1, and the average of the Class 3s three times the cost of the average Class 1. Iterative runs, with careful scrutiny of the objective function constituents and goal attainment of the solutions, will assist the planner in achieving the appropriate balance. Linear features, like the shore-zone habitats used in the PNWC analysis, can also be used as layer in a vertical analysis. As line features have no true area, boundary relations should be proportional to the length of the segment’s intersection with other AU layers, and scaled to be appropriately balanced against those other layers. An early criticism, partially based upon fears that vertically integrated solutions would be less efficient, was that if targets are split between multiple AU layers, the algorithm would only receive credit for that portion of the targets in the selected AUs. In other words, if an area is selected only for terrestrial targets, and conservation resources will be applied to those targets, wouldn’t the aquatic resources there also benefit, and therefore shouldn’t they be counted towards goals as well? As our Elwa example demonstrates, it is not necessarily advantageous to count all targets which occur on the landscape every time an AU is selected. In fact, this is a chief failing of the one-layer methodology; areas are often selected for one group of targets that may be unsuitable for another group. Additionally, the specificity of the vertical outputs is very useful information. The overlap between terrestrial and aquatic solutions is the area where it does make sense to work on both target groups. AUs which appear in only one portion of a solution may have management and conservation strategies applied to them which are specific to those targets. In a world where human and financial resources are tight, tailoring conservation solutions efficiently and appropriately is paramount. Stand alone analysis for terrestrial and aquatic realms are valuable exercises in themselves. They reveal patterns of biodiversity, possible conservation opportunities for targets, and help identify threats to those same resources. If AUs and target data are built with integration in mind, the boundary relations between AU layers is the only additional data required for integration. All other tables can be cut and pasted together with no additional modification. This is much easier than having to rebuild all data from scratch to fit all targets into a single AU layer. Finally, it should be noted that any automated output is only as good as the information the algorithm was given. Data is a snapshot in time, often a snapshot taken 10 years ago. Peer review of any automated output is critical if we wish the conservation area design to truly meet the needs of the targets over time. PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 9 of 10 Table 8C.1. Comparison of goal attainment between vertically integrated, and one layer site selection model for the PNWC Amount Available Goal 9 2 3 1 1 2 8 2 2 19 16 2 670 51 15 28 197 31 33 51 8 2 2 10 13 2 20 3 4 76 5 232 122941 155532 228952 2279730 698498 1953219 4698839 1155963 452456 34400 6107 84075 3092704 1042244 486454 199922 135223 23 22749 295795 195965 241841 3 125003 196807 32 42 40 12 31 9 1 5 2 3 1 1 2 7 2 1 17 9 1 338 8 13 13 67 10 5 4 6 1 1 8 13 1 9 1 4 24 4 119 36882 77766 68686 683919 209549 585966 1409652 346789 135737 34400 6107 84075 927811 312673 145936 99961 67611 3 2275 88739 58790 72552 3 25001 39361 11 14 13 4 10 5 1 Conservation Target Astragalus australis var olympicus Astragalus microcystis Carex pluriflora Cimicifuga elata Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Pellaea breweri Plantago macrocarpa Saxifraga tischii Sparganium fluctuans Synthyris pinnatifida var lanugino Accipiter gentilis Ardea herodias fannini Brachyramphus marmoratus Dicamptodon copei Euphydryas chalcedona perdiccas Falco peregrinus Haliaeetus leucocephalus Hemphillia burringtoni Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Histrionicus histrionicus Icaricia icarioides blackmorei Incisalia mossii mossii Lycaena mariposa charlottensis Oeneis chryxus valerata Parnassius smintheus olympianus Plebejus acmon spangelatus Plethodon vandykei Progne subis Rana cascadae Rhyacotriton olympicus Speyeria zerene bremnerii Strix occidentalis caurina Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Salvelinus confluentus North Pacific Coastal Herbaceous Bald And Bluff North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-mesic Doug Fir-western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-mesic Doug Fir-western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-silver Fir Forest Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low Gradient Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Olympics - Sandstones, High Elevation, High Gradient Olympics - Sandstones, Mid Elevation, High Gradient Puget Lowlands - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Proportion of Goal Captured by "OneLayer" 140.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 114.286 100.000 200.000 105.882 111.111 100.000 126.627 412.500 107.692 146.154 179.104 150.000 300.000 800.000 116.667 200.000 100.000 125.000 100.000 200.000 166.667 200.000 100.000 225.000 125.000 125.210 173.998 40.469 58.846 11.577 81.268 130.269 1.266 146.647 125.869 81.728 99.995 100.000 51.340 122.810 158.147 96.824 160.153 600.000 718.683 124.509 170.906 148.667 100.000 320.145 312.743 63.636 107.143 69.231 275.000 190.000 60.000 100.000 PNW Ecoregional Assessment •Appendix 8A, page 10 of 10 Proportion of Goal Captured by "Vertical Integration" 140.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 114.286 100.000 200.000 105.882 144.444 100.000 111.243 450.000 100.000 146.154 150.746 100.000 240.000 800.000 133.333 200.000 200.000 112.500 100.000 200.000 144.444 200.000 100.000 237.500 125.000 113.445 73.431 34.914 43.953 12.091 47.260 135.326 2.072 157.535 78.464 93.534 99.995 100.000 56.318 145.621 182.357 72.409 168.345 500.000 648.902 133.719 135.374 136.164 66.667 316.606 285.359 54.545 135.714 100.000 300.000 150.000 40.000 100.000 1517 BC 1526 BC 1597 BC 1637 BC 1649 BC 1673 BC 1729 BC 1755 BC 1928 WA 1936 WA 1937 WA 1940 WA 1944 WA 1944 WA 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 3/24/2004 4/4/2004 4/4/2004 Planning State/ unit Prov. 12/18/2003 Date A Chinook, Chum, Coho, Cuthroat, Dolly Varden, Winter Steelhead old growth N N N Y A Y D A A D Y D Y A N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y should be point site occurrence of rare plant community FERO-CEAR-KOMA – Umbrella Creek : very important tributary to Lake Ozette; spawning area for endangered Lake Ozette sockeye; headwaters are in NHP community EO’s for wetlands and bogs; would expand effective area of coastal strip at a key site; public land survey records show the area had some of the highest basal area and biomass recordings known (with a significant portion from grand fir). old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. Taylor's checkerspot Stream from Lake Cowichan one of the most important salmon streams on Vani. – Sekiu River – Physt River Stream from Lake Cowichan one of the most important salmon streams on Vani. Nanaimo River, Identified as priority Lots of logging Lots of logging Lots of logging Lots of logging Nanaimo River, Identified as priority Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 1 of 23 A? A? A A A D D A D D D D Chinook, Chum, Coho, Cuthroat, Dolly Varden, Winter Steelhead Ecological Systems Ecological Systems Ecological Systems Ecological Systems Chinook, Chum, Coho, Cuthroat, Dolly Varden, Winter Steelhead A Chinook, Chum, Coho, Cuthroat, Dolly Varden, Winter Steelhead Targets Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run Appendix 8B Peer Review Comments and Comment Disposition 1950 WA 1951 WA 1959 WA 1965 WA 1992 WA 1998 WA 2003 WA 2023 WA 2030 WA 2032 WA 2038 WA 2043 WA 2059 WA 2059 WA 2064 WA 2068 WA 1/27/2004 4/6/2004 1/27/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 1/27/2004 3/24/2004 1/27/2004 3/24/2004 5/19/2004 1/27/2004 4/6/2004 3/24/2004 3/24/2004 1/27/2004 Planning State/ unit Prov. 4/6/2004 Date A Pacific brant, chinook & chum salmon N A A A N A N N N N Y Y N N A OUT AC2 A A N AC2 N N N Y Y N N added as class 2 # 17157 OUT added as class 2 # 17157 not in ecoregion not in ecoregion Dungeness River, 7 listed or candidate fed. T&E sp. (including Taylor's checkerspot, bull trout) – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. Pat's Prairie; Section 29, T29N, R4W Snow & Salmon Cr. restoration sites Dungeness River, 7 listed or candidate fed. T&E sp. (including Taylor's checkerspot, bull trout) Dungeness River, 7 listed or candidate fed. T&E sp. (including Taylor's checkerspot, bull trout) old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. Dungeness River, 7 listed or candidate fed. T&E sp. (including Taylor's checkerspot, bull trout) – DNR block near Forks – West Fork Dickey Creek Dungeness River, 7 listed or candidate fed. T&E sp. (including Taylor's checkerspot, bull trout) – Lake Pleasant Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run – Crooked Creek – similar to Umbrella Creek in its significance to the Lake Ozette area; also contains old-growth forest stands A and nesting marbled murrelets. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 2 of 23 A? A? A A A? A G A? A A D D A D A old growth Salmon Pacific brant, chinook & chum salmon Salmon special wetland old growth Pacific brant, chinook & chum salmon,Taylor's Checkermallow Pacific brant, chinook & chum salmon,Taylor's Checkermallow Pacific brant, chinook & chum salmon,Taylor's Checkermallow Targets Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2069 WA 2070 WA 2072 WA 2072 WA 2074 WA 2076 WA 2076 WA 2080 WA 2080 WA 2084 WA 2084 WA 2085 WA 3/24/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 3/24/2004 4/6/2004 3/24/2004 4/4/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 Planning State/ unit Prov. 1/27/2004 3/24/2004 3/24/2004 Date old growth old growth old growth Pacific brant, chinook & chum salmon Salmon Salmon Targets N N Y N Y A A A N N A N Y N Y N Y A A A AC2 added as class 2 # 17157 – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. – Maxfield Creek : area of significant importance for potential connectivity between Olympic Mountains and coastal strip; riddled with NHP community EO’s (old-growth forest types, wetlands, bogs), murrelets, and owls; adjacent to important Goodman Creek block of DNR land. – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. southend, continuation of oldgrowth from 2101, 2084 – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. Elk Creek as extremely high quality salmon habitat old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. Dungeness River, 7 listed or candidate fed. T&E sp. (including Taylor's checkerspot, bull trout) Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 3 of 23 A A A? A A A? A A A? A A? A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2085 WA 2085 WA 2085 WA 2087 WA 2087 WA 2087 OR 2091 WA 2092 WA 2092 WA 2092 WA 2101 WA 2141 WA 2153 WA 3/24/2004 3/24/2004 4/4/2004 4/6/2004 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 3/24/2004 4/4/2004 5/19/2004 4/4/2004 Planning State/ unit Prov. 4/6/2004 Date special wetland old growth salmon old growth old growth Targets Y Y Y Y Y N N Y A N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. oldgrowth from 2101, 2084 Devils Lake; Section 36, T27N, R2W, Natural Resource Conservation Area Rare plant associations with G2 forest types – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. – Maxfield Creek : area of significant importance for potential connectivity between Olympic Mountains and coastal strip; riddled with NHP community EO’s (old-growth forest types, wetlands, bogs), murrelets, and owls; adjacent to important Goodman Creek block of DNR land. Bogachiel River - in bad shape - big hatchery Quillayute River old-growth cedar/skunkcabbage, coastal plain oldgrowth – South Fork Calahwah River : one of the most significant population areas for spotted owls on the Olympic Peninsula; owls have the highest population persistence here in models over time; contains USFS roadless area; partly within ONP. old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. old growth species - spow, mamu, harle, amphibs, bats, etc. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 4 of 23 A A A? A A A A D A A A? A? A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2189 WA 2210 WA 2238 WA 2244 WA 2245 WA 2248 WA 2295 WA 2311 WA 4/6/2004 5/19/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 4/6/2004 Planning State/ unit Prov. 4/6/2004 4/4/2004 Date special wetland Targets A Y Y A Y A N Y A Y Y A Y A N Y – Quinalt Indian Reservation (North Boundary) – Some of the largest low-elevation old-growth forest stands remaining outside ONP; contain regionally significant marbled murrelet populations; contains rare plant (Erythronium revolutum) populations; large parcels are currently targeted for a land exchange with the USFS or purchase through LWCF. – Hwy 101 near Humptulips – Upper Humptulips River area – Quinalt Indian Reservation (North Boundary) – Some of the largest low-elevation old-growth forest stands remaining outside ONP; contain regionally significant marbled murrelet populations; contains rare plant (Erythronium revolutum) populations; large parcels are currently targeted for a land exchange with the USFS or purchase through LWCF. – Quinalt Indian Reservation (North Boundary) – Some of the largest low-elevation old-growth forest stands remaining outside ONP; contain regionally significant marbled murrelet populations; contains rare plant (Erythronium revolutum) populations; large parcels are currently targeted for a land exchange with the USFS or purchase through LWCF. Lilliwaup Swamp; Section 12, T23N, R4W, DNR Special Management Area – Queets/Stillwater divide: addition to important low-elevation old-growth forest area; significant area for persistence of marbled murrelets and owls on the peninsula; mostly state lands; populations of rare plant (Erythronium revolutum ). small patch rare plant community FERO-CEAR-KOMA Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 5 of 23 A D D A A A A A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2394 WA 2395 WA 2403 WA 2410 WA 2414 WA 4/4/2004 1/27/2004 4/4/2004 4/6/2004 3/23/2004 2/17/2004 4/4/2004 2370 WA 4/4/2004 Y Y Y N Y N Y Y A Y OUT Y A D N Y N Y A N A Add Protected Point Site OUT added estuary (3161) OUT Add Protected Point Site Long, narrow system with strips of habitat: Long Beach Peninsula 1) Dunes along the ocean dominated by nonnative grasses. Mostly degraded, except for a few small patches. Threats: 2A & 2B along oean beaches, 3F, 4C, 4E ongoing problem in marshes, 7A entire unit, 8A major problem along ocean. 2435 still has 250 acre og remnant on both sides of Ellis Ck, midstream (sect 28). Several rare plant comms in the headwaters. Bone Niawaukum NAPs part of Willapa Site? Final Recommendations: Add 2444, 2435, 2459, 2460, and remove 2417, 2428, 2437, 2467. Largest high quality esturary in WA, Elk River NAP – North River known occ. Site Final Recommendations: Add 2444, 2435, 2459, 2460, and remove 2417, 2428, 2437, 2467. Chehalis Surge Plain NAP or is it part of aquatic "site"? restoration site Carlise Bog NAP- DNR, Copalis Preserve TNC – Copalis River : has connectivity to the upper basin which was selected; is already selected for salmon; contains the Carlisle Bog Natural Area Preserve; contains significant County property; contains Olympic muddminnow population; is centrally located within a significant ecoregional landscape (coastal plain); contains unique forest types; was selected by WAFO as a 3-5 year action area. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 6 of 23 A A 2435 WA 2436 WA D 2428 WA D A D I A? G A A A? mamu Targets 2428 WA 2417 WA 2327 WA Planning State/ unit Prov. 4/6/2004 Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2456 WA 2456 WA 2457 WA 2457 WA 2457 WA 2458 WA 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 4/6/2004 2/17/2004 3/23/2004 3/23/2004 2447 WA 2448 WA 2444 WA 2440 WA 2443 WA 2437 WA 2436 WA 2437 WA Planning State/ unit Prov. 4/6/2004 3/23/2004 4/4/2004 3/23/2004 4/6/2004 Date mamu mamu A listed salmon populations A A A A A A A N Y D Y D OUT A A A AC2 AC2 Y Y N Y Y Y Y OUT Grey's River important restoration site – Bear River : watershed is already selected for salmon and identified as highest quality salmon stream in Willapa Bay; landscape connectivity to surrounding selected Huc’s including Ellsworth Creek; contains significant portion of the Willapa NWR; the city dam and reservoir in this watershed are largely insignificant on a watershed scale. Indian Creek dam has a fish ladder and only a small part of the Bear River watershed affected. (2457) known occ. Site Ellsworth - known occupied site Grays River WA add as class 2 fw #17006 – Naselle River : watershed is already selected for salmon; contains many rare plant EO’s; contains well known old-growth forest patch on Weyco land; provides connectivity to surrounding selected Huc’s; one of the best condition waterhsheds in the Willapa Hills. DNR MAMU reserve add as class 2 fw #17006 OUT 2) Freshwater wetlands important for aquifer recharge & and in some areas (esp. Hines Marsh & Loomis Lake complex) exhibit sheet flow of water during high flow periods. Partially degraded and important.Washington State Parks owns several 100 acres in the Loomis Lake system. – East Fork Chehalis River Final Recommendations: Add 2444, 2435, 2459, 2460, and remove 2417, 2428, 2437, 2467. Rare plant concentration Boistfort, only location in ecoregion of G2 known occ. Site 2444 contains several rare oak woodland types and ~ 30 acres late seral DF. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 7 of 23 I I A G A A A? A A I D A D ? mamu mamu wetlands Targets Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2532 OR 2534 OR 2535 OR 2536 OR 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 salmon salmon salmon salmon 2512 OR 2521 OR 2524 OR 9/30/2003 5/12/2004 2/17/2004 N Y N N N Y Y Y Y D D N N N A A in as Class 2 in as Class 2 in as Class 2 IN N Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Decent for inland stream Humbug Creek (Nehalem) productive Columbia City Decent for inland stream Positive feedback that this is a good site. West of Skamokawa.These 3 units have meadow to oak savannahs or douglas fir woodland sites with a collection of herbaceous vascular plants that reflect the High diversity of the Columbia River Gorge. Locally botanists call them "Lower Gorge plant communities". Final Recommendations: Add 2444, 2435, 2459, 2460, and remove 2417, 2428, 2437, 2467. – East of Elochoman Creek Germany Creek hatchery Fishhawk Creek (Nehalem) productive Positive feedback that this is a good site. in as Class 2 Rock Creek (Nehalem) productive in as Class 2 Rock Creek (Nehalem) productive in as Class 2 Rock Creek (Nehalem) productive Lost Creek (Nehalem) productive OUT OUT OUT OUT 2460 has a lot of late seral removed. Still contains 10 acre occ of old growth Noble Fir.Rubeckia occidentalis occurs with its natural comm and upland bogs. Marsh marigold, Poa laxiflora. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run Final Recommendations: Add 2444, 2435, 2459, 2460, Y and remove 2417, 2428, 2437, 2467. Y 2459 similar to 2460 wo noblr fir. Final Recommendations: Add 2444, 2435, 2459, 2460, N and remove 2417, 2428, 2437, 2467. PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 8 of 23 A A A A G A A G A 2508 OR 2509 OR 9/30/2003 1/27/2004 salmon Saddle Mountain Chinnok, Coho, Steelhead. Saddle Mountain Chinnok, Coho, Steelhead. salmon D D G A A 2467 WA 2468 WA 2474 WA 2496 OR 2497 OR 4/6/2004 1/27/2004 5/12/2004 1/27/2004 G 2460 WA A A 2460 WA 2464 WA A G Targets 2459 WA 2459 WA Planning State/ unit Prov. 2/17/2004 Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2538 OR 2545 OR 2545 OR 2546 OR 2547 OR 2547 OR 2569 OR 2576 OR 2584 OR 2585 OR 2585 OR 2586 OR 5/12/2004 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 5/12/2004 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 2/17/2004 1/29/2004 9/30/2003 Planning State/ unit Prov. 2/17/2004 Date salmon historic snowy plover critical habitat & recovery plan coho, chum, steelhead salmon salmon Chum, Chinnok, Coho, Steelhead Chinook, Coho, Steelhead salmon Chum, Chinnok, Coho, Steelhead Targets N A A Y A N N N A A A N N A A Y N N N N N N N N BayOcean Spit Site should be terrestrial as well as salmon. Contact Fred Seavey USFWS 541-867-4558 x 239 for more info about site. Cedar or Clear Creek, tribs of Wilson River. Priority for Wilson R Bay Ocean Spit adjacent to Tillamook Bay. Coastal sand spit with spruce / shorepine forest, open dunes, tide flats, freshwater lake.Habitat in good condition, but has significant public use (hiking, hunting, horseback riding).Mostly owned by Tillamook County, zoned recreation management.Faces significant development pressure.Area is extremely important for shorebirds and migratory birds. Landscape context: Connected to ocean beach & Tillamook Bay, close to Cape Mears S.P. & NWR.Current conservation work: Area recognized as and "Important Bird Area".Threats: 2A, 2B, 5C, 6A. Little North Fk Wilson River. 75% of chum in Tillamook system found in stream. Best North Coast Stream outside ecoregion in as Class 2 Wolf Creek (Nehalem) productive in as Class 2 Wolf Creek, trib of Nehalem River, good producer North Fork Salmonberry, Better than South Fork, local priority for steelhead particularly Wolf Creek (Nehalem) productive Wolf Creek, Priority multi-species site. trib of Nehalem River, good producer Miami River, Priority multi-species site. Miami River, Priority multi-species site. St. Helens. Landscape context: In some areas these are directly associated with forest areas, grading fomr meadow to savannah/woodland to forest.Threat: 1D, 2A, 2D, 7A, 8A. 2A & 2D are major problems in St. Helens area. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 9 of 23 A A A A A A A A A A A A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2612 OR 2613 OR 2613 OR 9/30/2003 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 2613 OR 2615 OR 1/29/2004 9/30/2003 2613 OR 2613 OR 2596 OR 2596 OR 2602 OR Planning State/ unit Prov. 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 Date I A snowy plover recovery plan, bald eagles Coho, Chinook, Steelhead A Y Y Y N N A N N N Class 2 FW Class 2 FW AC2 Y Y Y N N AC2 Sand Lake Estuary Site should be shown as an estuary as well as terrestrial; she sent John Christy's inventory of the Whalen Island State Nat. Area from May 2001 as well Sand Lake Estuary & Watershed. Relatively pristine estuary and adjacent undeveloped snad spit and state park - salt marsh and freshwater marsh.Landscape context: Part of estuary affected by tidal constriction at tidegate.Current conservation work: OWEB recently purchased land that was turned into a state park.Undeveloped sand spit faces pressure to develop as golf course. As one of Oregon's least developed estuaries, preservation of spit and surrounding areas would preserve ecological integrity.Threats: 2C (golf course, clubhouse, sewage), 3F, 3G, 4F (fertilizer & pesticides), 6A (golf course), 9A Sand Lake Estuary & Watershed. Contains rearing and migration habitat for coho, chum, chinook, steelhead & coastal cutthroat trout.Habitat is largely intact at western edges and si in agricultural use at eastern edge.Esturary should be identified as important salmon streams the same as Sand Lake tributaries. Doesn't make sense. Upper Nestucca would be better. 2626 makes more sense than 2613 from a fisheries perspective. Nestucca River, Good stream, diverse add as class 2 fw # 17320 Nestucca River, Add as class 2 fw #17320 Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run Only 1 creek (Whiskey), with a hatchery - doesn't make N sense for salmon. N Doesn't make sense. Only 1 creek, has hatchery. N Is better for Coho - good production! PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 10 of 23 A A D? Coho Salmon, bald eagle Salmon D A Coho, Chinook, Steelhead Salmon D D A Salmon Salmon Coho Targets Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2618 OR 2619 OR 2621 OR 2623 OR 2626 OR 2626 OR 2628 OR 2635 OR 2635 OR 2640 OR 2640 OR 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 9/30/2003 1/27/2004 9/30/2003 Planning State/ unit Prov. 9/30/2003 Date A coho, chinook, steelhead G Silverspot Butterfly, Fawn Lily, Warty Jumping Slug N Y A N Y Y A A A y IN Class 2 FW Class 2 FW Class 2 FW N Y N Y Y Y AC2 AC2 AC2 Y IN Addition comment. From overall terrestrial species standpoint, Little Nestucca HUCs might be a better selection. Little Nestucca River, hatchery impacts Addition comment. From overall terrestrial species standpoint, Little Nestucca HUCs might be a better selection. Little Nestucca River, hatchery impacts Three River Subbasin--part of Nestucca River Basin. Silverspot Butterfly: Successfully managed site in ridgetop of this HUC.Fawn Lily: Talk to W/FS experts to determine if there is enough difference to make it a target. Warty Jumping Slug: High numbers of identified sites are likely to be associated with alder in uplands and the "young plantations" both of which are unlikely to be retained by FS. Landscape context. This is a highly altered landscape more so than any other HUC around it. Three man-caused fires within 100-year period.Threats to this site (Nestucca River) table, Threat Code #8, Biological. Not a natural condition & not likely sustainable. Nestucca River, diverse fisheries 2626 makes more sense than 2613 from a fisheries perspective. add as class 2 fw # 17320 Nestucca River, diverse fisheries add as class 2 fw # 17320 Nestucca River, diverse fisheries add as class 2 fw # 17320 Nestucca River, Nestucca River, diverse fisheries Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 11 of 23 A D A D A? Salmon A A A Coho, Chinook, Steelhead coho, chinook, steelhead coho, chinook, steelhead A Targets coho, chinook, steelhead Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2650 OR 2650 OR 2650 OR 2663 OR 2664 OR 2665 OR 2670 OR 2677 OR 2706 OR 2713 OR 2718 OR 2720 OR 2721 OR 2767 OR 2777 OR 2790 OR 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 11/19/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/16/2003 2650 OR 2649 OR 2649 OR Planning State/ unit Prov. 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 Date Summer Steelhead Summer Steelhead Summer Steelhead multi-species Smith River, multispecies all salmon, Queen of the Forest salmon salmon coho eelgrass and fisheries Salmon Chum Salmon Targets N N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y N N Y in as Class 2 IN OUT N N A Y N Y N N Y N N N N N N Y Lower Siletz, eelgrass beds - important habitat for salmon Upper N & S Forks of Siletz: great habitat for everything.Plum Creek, Boise Cascade why is this one picked??? Only private, surrounded by private. Drift Creek (Alsea drainage), important fishery Drift Creek (Alsea drainage), important fishery Drift Creek-Siletz. Landscape context. Would be a better selection for aquatic species than Salmon River 5th field.Coho - some of best intact habitat in this portion of the Oregon Coast Range. Current observation work. This HUC is a high priority for fish habitat improvement in Siuslaw National Forest.Threats to this site table, Other. Add aquaculture. Lost Prairie ACEC. Frittilaria camchatka should be a target disjunct pop. Positive feedback that these were picked. No Chum here, or at least very poor habitat. Upper N & S Forks of Siletz: great habitat for everything.Plum Creek, Boise Cascade IN Healthy Stocks Wassen Creek LSR, check management status estuary is in Alsea River. Waterfowl Wintering Alsea River. Waterfowl Wintering Alsea River. Waterfowl Wintering Smith River, Healthy Stocks IN estuary # 3256 is in Make sure ACEC is in. OUT OUT Site Description: Heavily impacted by Salmon River Hatchery; better choice with more diversity would be HUC 2664 - Drift Creek of Siletz. Site Description: Heavily impacted by Salmon River Hatchery; better choice with more diversity would be HUC 2664 - Drift Creek of Siletz. Positive feedback that these were picked. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 12 of 23 A I A A A A G A A A A A A M A I D D A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run A A A A anadromous fish shorebirds old growth forest anadromous fish lg concentration of wintering waterfowl 2811 OR 2817 OR 2817 OR 2817 OR 2819 OR 2819 OR 2825 OR 2827 OR 2832 OR 2840 OR 2842 OR 2848 OR 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 5/27/2004 1/29/2004 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 9/16/2003 9/16/2003 1/27/2004 snowy plover coho, resident cutthroat snpl anadromous fish Chum and coho salmon anadromous fish anadromous fish N Y Y N N N A A N N N Y Y Y in as Class 3 Comment on 7 June SITES run IN IN N Y Y N Y N A A N N N Y Y Y Coquille River mile 1-30 all privately owned and mged as pasture; oppt.: Mike Kiser, Bandon Dunes interested in picking up land for conservation. Coos, Millicoma, Tenmile lake tribs. strongholds for coho, steelhead, searun cutthroat. Elliot Forest streams Sue thought this is probably an important area we didn't capture - just N. end of pu. Tioga Creek N Fk Coquille, add for fish East Fk Millicoma, good habitat and pops CoosBayNorthSpit - Should be terrestrial as well as salmon; most productive site for snowy plovers currently, critical habitat in ESA and ID in recovery plan. Contact Kerrie Palermo, BLM for more info on site (kerrie_palermo@or.blm.org) spawning in Marlow Creek CBNS - need to add - best plover nesting area in the ecoregion. Coos, Millicoma, Tenmile lake tribs. strongholds for coho, steelhead, searun cutthroat. Elliot Forest streams no anadromous fish above barrier in 2817, Millicoma R., good resident cutthroat above barrier Coos, Millicoma, Tenmile lake tribs. strongholds for coho, steelhead, searun cutthroat. Elliot Forest streams Coos, Millicoma, Tenmile lake tribs. strongholds for coho, steelhead, searun cutthroat. Elliot Forest streams Coos, Millicoma, Tenmile lake tribs. strongholds for coho, steelhead, searun cutthroat. Elliot Forest streams Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run IN Dean Creek. restoration site IN Deans Creek ACEC, check on island in Umpqua River PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 13 of 23 A A A A G G A A A 9/15/2003 anadromous fish 2809 OR A 9/15/2003 anadromous fish 2805 OR habitat Targets 9/15/2003 Planning State/ Date unit Prov. 1/27/2004 2794 OR 9/16/2003 2794 OR Suggest-ed Action taken edits to on 7 June SITES SITES run G I 2850 OR 2850 OR 2850 OR 2851 OR 2851 OR 2857 OR 2860 OR 2860 OR 2862 OR 2864 OR 2865 OR 2868 OR 2869 OR 2870 OR 2872 OR 2873 OR 2873 OR 2876 OR 1/27/2004 9/15/2003 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 9/16/2003 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 9/15/2003 1/29/2004 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 9/15/2003 1/29/2004 1/27/2004 9/15/2003 Planning State/ Date unit Prov. 9/15/2003 2848 OR 1/27/2004 2848 OR 9/16/2003 2849 OR A A snowy plover, pink sand verbena, W. lily Snowy Plover N N N N N Y Y N N Y Y N A A A OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT A A A N N N N Y Y N N Y Y N A A A OUT Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run run N N Y PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 14 of 23 G A G A A coho and steelhead coho coho, steelhead coho, steelhead G A snowy plover, pink sand verbena anadromous fish A A A A A A A A A anadromous fish lg concentration of wintering waterfowl anadromous fish lg concentration of wintering waterfowl lg concentration of wintering waterfowl anadromous fish old growth forest Targets marsh Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run G N A N A Y barrier restricts anadromous but resident trout above it. Site should be in portfolio; snowy plover recovery plan (wintering, breeding, foraging), re-introducing sand verbena, restored 50 ac beach habitat, sm. Western lily pop. recently discovered New River, 4 Mile Creek. Why not lower bay? Bandon Site should be in portfolio; snowy plover recovery plan (wintering, breeding, foraging), re-introducing sand verbena, restored 50 ac beach habitat Middle Fk Coquille. In portfolio, many species present. Big Creek. Upper Rock Creek, not in portfolio but has good pops. Searun cutts possible Catching Creek, S Fk Coquille could be added, good producers could be added, good producers Lower Coquille-Bear Creek. Diverse fish pops, in portfolio Coquille River mile 1-30 all privately owned and mged as pasture; oppt.: Mike Kiser, Bandon Dunes interested in picking up land for conservation. Coquille River Coquille River mile 1-30 all privately owned and mged as pasture; oppt.: Mike Kiser, Bandon Dunes interested in picking up land for conservation. Coquille River N Fk Coquille, add for fish Coquille River mile 1-30 all privately owned and mged as pasture; oppt.: Mike Kiser, Bandon Dunes interested in picking up land for conservation. Lampa Creek, good pops, habitat restoration begun Coquille River Comments Beaver Slough above Coquille, OR Coquille River good habitat, in draft portfolio 2876 OR 2877 OR 2883 OR 2887 OR 2888 OR 2891 OR 2891 OR 2895 OR 2896 OR 2896 OR 2900 OR 2901 OR 2922 OR 2925 OR 2934 OR 2934 OR 2936 OR 2936 OR 2945 WA 2977 OR 3158 WA 3158 WA 9/30/2003 11/19/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/15/2003 9/30/2003 11/19/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/30/2003 9/16/2003 9/30/2003 9/16/2003 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 4/4/2004 1/27/2004 Planning State/ unit Prov. 9/15/2003 1/27/2004 Date Queen of the Forest shorebirds, waterfowl various The Sixes, multispecies coho, salmon Elk Creek coho coho The Sixes, multispecies oak habitat The Sixes, multispecies oak habitat coho, salmon rainbow trout The Sixes, multispecies South Fork Coquille various Floras Creek steelhead, coho Snowy Plover Targets A A Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y N N N N N Y in as CLASS 2 OUT Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y A A AC2 N N OUT Migratory birds, shorebird concentration Bowerman Basin Grays Harbor should be included for shorebirds Hemisphere IBA Is this a good enough reason for this site to be picked? South Willapa Bay, intertidal mud flats important for shorebirds & waterfowl. Kevin Kilpatric, USFWS, wants map. Very important in portfolio, above Hunter creek drainage Very important in portfolio, above Hunter creek drainage Very important Upper S Fk Coquille, above Powers Good resident trout. Lobster Creek, strong coho producer Lobster Creek, strong coho producer these 'sheds are not in good shape - why are they picked? Very important Upper S Fk Coquille, above Powers rare occurrences, found above S Fk Coquille Falls add in as class 2 fw # 17348 Good resident trout. these 'sheds are not in good shape - why are they picked? Very important Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run no hatchery plants in Middle Fk Coquille. High gradient OUT stream Y New River, 4 Mile Creek. Why not lower bay? PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 15 of 23 A A D A A A A A A A A A A D A A A A D A G A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 3278 OR 1/27/2004 9/15/2003 3258 OR 1/27/2004 17392 OR 3278 OR 3258 OR 3252 OR Class3, estuary shorebirds Coho Salmon, bald eagle eelgrass and fisheries eelgrass and fisheries lots of eelgrass, historically Brants Caspian Terns 3174 OR/WA 3252 OR shorebirds, waterfowl Targets 3168 WA 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 Planning State/ Date unit Prov. 4/4/2004 3161 WA Y Y Y Y Y Y A A Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Coos Bay estuary Sue thought this is probably an important area we didn't capture - esp. int/ with 2832 Coos River, add to connect Millicoma and S Fk Coos River to estuary - within 2827 Upper Yaquina Bay/estuary Upper Yaquina Bay/estuary Sand Lake Estuary & Watershed. Relatively pristine estuary and adjacent undeveloped snad spit and state park - salt marsh and freshwater marsh.Landscape context: Part of estuary affected by tidal constriction at tidegate.Current conservation work: OWEB recently purchased land that was turned into a state park.Undeveloped sand spit faces pressure to develop as golf course. As one of Oregon's least developed estuaries, preservation of spit and surrounding areas would preserve ecological integrity.Threats: 2C (golf course, clubhouse, sewage), 3F, 3G, 4F (fertilizer & pesticides), 6A (golf course), 9A Sand Lake Estuary & Watershed. Contains rearing and migration habitat for coho, chum, chinook, steelhead & coastal cutthroat trout.Habitat is largely intact at western edges and si in agricultural use at eastern edge.Esturary should be identified as important salmon streams the same as Sand Lake tributaries. make sure East Sand Island is in portfolio for nest shore and seabirds. No goals were set for Caspian Terns (old nesting sites in WA). Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run A Largest high quality esturary in WA, Elk River NAP South Willapa Bay, intertidal mud flats important for A shorebirds & waterfowl PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 16 of 23 A A A A A A A A A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run A A OR BC OR 33084/5/2004 3313? 9/15/2003 all anadromous fish anadromous fish OR OR all fall chinook, steelhead, coho Hatcheries OR 2812, 2806, 9/16/2003 2810 2845, 9/15/2003 2834 2861, 9/15/2003 2855 2962, 11/19/2003 2963? OR 2460 WA 2476 WA 2628, 2596, 1/27/2004 others 1/27/2004 1/27/2004 summer coho IN AS CLASS 2 ? IN IN AS CLASS 2 IN ? OUT Out of Ecoregion West of Tofino, the Estuaries are identified with a RI of Very High for shorebirds, dabbling ducks, and geese in GIS data from Zach and CWS. restoration aimed at chinook and coho salmon Don't see Grand Rhonde ownership on map check ownership, Lake Creek off Umpqua River S Fk Coos River, Tioga & Williams Creeks. Major producer of anadromous fish East Fk Coquille, barrier restricts anadromous, good resident fish fish listed as being released is not correct. 2628 - Cedar Creek does not release Chum. 2596 - hatchery here does release Chum. Elochoman River, restoration site Elochoman River, restoration site Soleduck River, rare summer coho run, Elochoman River, restoration site Calawah River Dickey River Squim, native clam Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 17 of 23 A G I G G I I G G A G A salmon 2064, others 5/12/2004 upstream WA 2070, others 5/12/2004 upstream WA 1/27/2004 2471 WA A salmon 2046, others 5/12/2004 upstream WA Targets G Planning State/ unit Prov. 2037, 1/27/2004 estuary pu WA Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run Planning State/ unit Prov. Columbia Estuary Coos 9/15/2003 River Coos 9/15/2003 River Coquille 9/15/2003 River Coquille 9/15/2003 River Coquille, 1/27/2004 Netarts. Chum salmon anadromous fish OR OR G OR PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 18 of 23 G OR G I G Fall Chinook OR check BLM ownership few present due to lack of gravels in lower river minor estuary, needs rearing habitat, lots of gravels present upstream Columbia River Estuary up to RM 46. This is the zone of salt influence, above RMU 46 is freshwater influence.Many dollars are being spent on salmonoids and estuaries to learn about the linkage fo life histories of juvenile salmonoids. Coos River. strong run. Use large estuary but system is gravel poor upstream due to splash dams concerned that data was only for USFWS refuge this shows up as GAP1 - should it be? I I no areas identified in portfolio - need some! The model has centered on coastal hucs. All estuaries on OR coast should be recognized as top conservation priorities because:1) They are rare - small portion of coastline.2) They are essential landscape features for connectivity between terrestrial, aquatic, and marine ecosystems.3) They are exceptionally productive areas for a wide diversity of species.4) They are essential transition areas for salmon - key component of salmon life history. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run A G A CWTD Salmon Targets OR/WA Columbia Est.Islands Crimms, Wallace, Fisher, 2/24/2004 Lord OR/WA Alsea and 1/27/2004 Siletz OR Camp 11/19/2003 Rilea OR All estuaries on Oregon 2/17/2004 coast. OR Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run OR WA OR OR Islands 1/27/2004 NWR Saddle 11/19/2003 Mtn. General interest here - what is GAP status? USFWS concept plan for waterfowl. management status check Nehalem is only remaining run of summer chinook salmon. Contacts: Paul Burns and John Yogerhorst. salmon All Elwha River system – very important area for salmon recovery and the largest valley system in the Olympic Mountains; probably discounted in suitability index because of the dams; dams are slated to go; heavy focus for conservationists. Dungeness River system – important for salmon; one of the highest environmental gradients in the ecoregion; significant headwaters with numerous rare and endemic plants; significant estuary and spit system at its mouth; focus for conservationists working to protect its lowland riparian areas; slected by WAFO as a 3-5 year action area. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 19 of 23 G OR I AG G G A A Summer Chinook Coho Fritillaria kamchatensis A G A OR OR Dunes 9/16/2003 NRA OR Nehalem 1/27/2004 Mid-coast OR JimmyComeLately Creek, 1/27/2004 WA Lost 1/27/2004 Prairie Elwha 4/6/2004 River WA Grays 1/27/2004 Harbor, WA Humptulip 1/27/2004 River WA A Dungenes 4/6/2004 s River WA Targets A Planning State/ unit Prov. Deer 1/27/2004 Creek WA WA Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 1/27/2004 2/17/2004 OR 1/27/2004 Yaquina OR Yaquina & 1/27/2004 Siletz, OR Coho Spring Chinook Still real strong for Coho. Siuslaw Watershed Council and Mid-coast W.C.: rapid biological assessment. Mid-coast W.C. has website. Comment: Submerged aquatic vegetation habitat types may not be represented on map. Questioned why 2 designations for FWS ownership shouldn't it all be refuges? John Day estuary full of house boats. DEQ in talks to modify water quality regs for them, but houseboaters fighting. Young's Bay has a terminal hatchery for Chinook. CEDC Fisheries runs the hatchery. Native fish returning to streams through Young's Bay must navigate fisherman catching Chinook. These 3 rivers contain remaining stocks of spring chinook salmon on North Oregon Coast. Spring chinook are lumped into the fall chinook ESU although they should not be. Stable over time. need to address this either in site delination or explanation in the report Threats to this site table, Other: add 10A, Aquaculture oyster industry. Concern that sampling is uneven - suggests dropping all animal data. need to check final portfolio against spow concentrations need to check final portfolio against mamu concentrations need to address this either in site delination (blockout urban areas in the landuse or UGBs, or by explanation in the report good site for salmon Salmon River Hatchery shows Summer & Winter Steelhead produced but trucked to other watersheds unreliable. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 20 of 23 G M G A AG A G WA Wilson, Trask Nestucca Rivers OR 1/27/2004 Yaquina OR G WA herps G ridgeline targets (butterflies, WT Ptarmigan) 4/12/2004 various Willapa 1/27/2004 Bay, Willapa 3/24/2004 Hills A spow 5/27/2004 various A mamu M A 5/27/2004 various White Sturgeon G urban areas WA Targets 4/12/2004 various OR Snow Creek, 1/27/2004 WA Planning State/ unit Prov. Salmon 1/27/2004 River Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run OR OR OR OR OR OR WA 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 5/12/2004 1/27/2004 2/25/2004 OR OR OR OR 9/30/2003 11/19/2003 11/19/2003 9/16/2003 9/16/2003 WA OR OR 5/12/2004 Planning State/ Date unit Prov. 2/17/2004 OR Black oystercatcher bats ecological systems salmon late seral Marbled Murrelet Summer Steelhead Summer Steelhead, spring chinook Summer Steelhead Targets call Liz Kelly, ODFW 867-4558. More threatened 3) Strips of old 2nd growth or old growth timber usually Sitka Spruce, but also including Douglas Fir. Only a few timbered blocks remain, are very important now as coastal forest habitat.Current conservation work: Columbia Land Trust is working to aquire foestlands & protet marshes, lakes, & swamps. Also don't see Siletz Tribal lands further south. need more snags Also, what is GAP1 area south of here - Fort Stevens? Siuslaw River, check with Charlie Dewberry, Ecotrust concerned that late seral may not be best represented. Need data from Simpson on amphibs. Also need better Oly mudminnow data. Higher diversity along Willapa and Grays divide, we have too much selected near Willapa Bay. Umpqua, strong runs Siletz, robust runs Necanicum River Salmon River, less important than other streams Nestucca River, better stream for inclusion Contact Marcia Hines,ODF, statewide wildlife biologist, re: habitat management areas. Warrenton has water rights in excess of 100% of Lewis and Clark river flow. Summer flows are a trickle. Soil and Water Cons Service has a comprehensive weed database (GIS) for Clatsop county. Rogue, good runs Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 21 of 23 I G I G I G G G I A A D D A G A Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run G Y D make sure TNC preserve is in as protected 2656 and 2666 are better than 2673 (except for Fanno site Meadow) USFS just purchased upper Alsea Estuary lands of about 1000 ac. Stan Vetterling of the Siletz tribe has lamprey data. Mary's Peak needs to be in - highest point in OR Cascades, etc. Salmon habitat is too clumped - it is not correleated with highe species diversity and productivity. Probably no Umpqua OR Chub in 3262 Comment: Look at watershed basin assessment and prioritization mapping we did at the Siuslaw Watershed Council in 2002-2003. Was more of a presentation of our methods. This type assessment/prioritization map would provide opportunity to observe patterns of landscape health, patterns of opportunity for preservation and restoration, and areas of landscape where conservation attention should be focused. All areas of landscapes have ecological value - reflect this on an eco-regional map rating or prioritizing watershed subbasins on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being best system with biodiversity, and 5 being lowest. Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run Kip Wright and Kerry concerned. Disappearing due to fire suppression and habitat loss Not much real review of assessment. Coquille Tribal lands not represented on map PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 22 of 23 A 2708 D 6/15/2004 D I G G 2673 6/15/2004 G I 6/15/2004 6/15/2004 3262 OR 1/27/2004 6/15/2004 1/27/2004 M G G 1/27/2004 OR M I G I 1/27/2004 bandtailed pigeons Targets M OR OR Planning State/ unit Prov. 1/27/2004 9/16/2003 10/8/2003 1/27/2004 Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run 2632 3260 6/30/2004 6/30/2004 Action taken on 28 Comment June SITES on 28 June SITES run Comments run Red Fir in AUs is probably wrong (as of 6/30, TNC fixed this error). is in portfolio as a class 2 in Nestucca Drainage - not a lot D of highly ranked terrestrial targets Has a Willamette Class 1 system - not need for PNW D Coast A Beaver Creek Estuary is of high value PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8B, page 23 of 23 D A D 2616 6/30/2004 Targets G Planning State/ unit Prov. 6/15/2004 Date Suggest-ed Action taken Comment edits to on 7 June on 7 June SITES SITES run SITES run REALMS Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Large-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Large-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8C, page 1 of 5 Appendix 8C PNW Coast Ecoregion Portfolio Conservation Areas CONSERVATION AREA NAME STATE SIZE (HA) SITE INTEGRATION Adam and Eve River (Marine) 1200 Marine Site British Columbia Adam River 89 Integrated Site British Columbia Alsea Bay-Drift Creek Oregon 8697 Integrated Site Alsea-Five Rivers 35273 Integrated Site Oregon Beaver Creek Marsh 10403 Integrated Site Oregon Beverly Beach State Park 66 Integrated Site Oregon Black River (Freshwater) 14589 Freshwater Site (class 2) Washington Blind Slough Swamp 9797 Integrated Site Oregon Bobby Creek RNA 776 Integrated Site Oregon Boiler Bay State Scenic Viewpoint 20 Integrated Site Oregon Boistfort 25957 Integrated Site Washington Bojo Point (Marine) 2800 Marine Site British Columbia Brads Creek ACEC 67 Integrated Site Oregon Broken Group 3175 Integrated Site British Columbia Brooks Peninsula British Columbia 81141 Integrated Site Campbell River (Freshwater) 2270 Freshwater Site (class 2) British Columbia Campbell-Quadra British Columbia 16709 Integrated Site Cape Arago-South Slough 16009 Integrated Site Oregon Cape Blanco-Elk River 44238 Integrated Site Oregon Cape Elizabeth 5120 Integrated Site Washington Cape Falcon-Lower Nehalem 23754 Integrated Site Oregon Cape Ferrelo 9422 Integrated Site Oregon Cape Lookout-Sandlake 13121 Integrated Site Oregon Cape Scott-Port Hardy British Columbia 118523 Integrated Site Cape Sebastian-Hunter Creek 9262 Integrated Site Oregon Capital State Forest 15262 Integrated Site Washington Cascade Head-Salmon River 19975 Integrated Site Oregon Castle Rock 11601 Integrated Site Washington Chehalis River 30987 Integrated Site Washington Chemainus-Cowichan 59489 Integrated Site British Columbia Chetco River (Klamath Mtns) 400 Integrated Site Oregon China Wall ACEC 82 Integrated Site Oregon Chinook River BLM Site 43 Integrated Site Washington CONSERVATION AREA NAME Clallam Bay - Clallam River (Marine) Clatskanie River Clatsop Plains-Necanicum River Clayoquot-Alberni Clearwater River Cloquallum River Coer d'Alene Creek (Marine) Columbia Mainstem Islands Columbia Refuge Islands Columbia River Estuary Columbia River Mainstem Coos Mtn Coos-Millacoma Rivers Copalis River Copalis River (TNC) Copalis Rock NWR Cougar Creek ACEC Cowichan River (Freshwater) Cummins-Rock Creek Deep Creek - West Twin River (Marine) Devils Punch Bowl State Natural Area Doty Hills Duckabush River Dungeness River (Freshwater) East Fork Hoquiam River East Fork Humptulips River Elk Creek (Umpqua) Ellsworth Creek Elochoman River Fanno Meadows (Conservation Easement) Flattery Rocks NWR Flynn Creek RNA Fogarty Creek State Recreation Area Forest Park SIZE (HA) 2400 8872 17649 176444 21433 8418 400 2903 6253 19170 34216 13135 62395 12155 112 12 117 1778 22034 1200 24 25439 5100 2377 5880 11285 11192 13829 19502 241 446 257 69 1443 SITE INTEGRATION Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Freshwater Site (class 2) Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Freshwater Site (class 2) Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site REALMS Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Large-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Large-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8C, page 2 of 5 STATE Washington Washington Oregon British Columbia Washington Washington British Columbia Oregon/Washington Oregon/Washington Oregon/Washington Oregon/Washington Oregon Oregon Washington Washington Washington Oregon British Columbia Oregon Washington Oregon Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Oregon Washington Washington Oregon Washington Oregon Oregon Oregon CONSERVATION AREA NAME Gold River-Nootka Golden Bar ACEC Goodman Creek Grays Harbor Grays River Hamma Hamma River Hesquiat Hoh River Hoko River (Marine) Hult Marsh ACEC Humbug Mtn-Nesika Beach Juan de Fuca Keogh River (Marine) Lake Crescent Long Beach Peninsula Lost Creek ACEC Lost Prairie ACEC Lower Coquille River Lower Rogue River Lower Umpqua River Luckiamute River Martin Creek ACEC Marys Peak Marys River Mill Creek Milton Creek Mt. Townsend Myrtle Island RNA Nacelle River Naka Creek (Marine) Nanaimo River Nestucca River New River Nimpkish-Tahsish SIZE (HA) 156675 30 9052 29166 11077 8894 57522 23842 1600 72 11563 15504 2400 8406 8762 35 25 21111 21428 18245 17111 66 8826 15069 13885 8017 1114 9 19881 400 40934 31765 21324 126260 SITE INTEGRATION Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site REALMS Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8C, page 3 of 5 STATE British Columbia Oregon Washington Washington Washington Washington British Columbia Washington Washington Oregon Oregon British Columbia British Columbia Washington Washington Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Washington Oregon Washington British Columbia British Columbia Oregon Oregon British Columbia CONSERVATION AREA NAME Nimpkish-Zeballos Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran North Fork Coquille River ACEC North Fork Siletz River North Fork/Hunter Creek ACEC North River Headwaters Olympic National Park Olympic NP-Coastal Unit / Ozette Lake Oregon Islands NWR Point Grenville - Grenville Bay (Marine) Pysht River (Marine) Quilcene River-Dabob Bay Quillayute Needles NWR Quillayute-Sol Duc River Quinault River Rock Creek (Coquille) Rocky Creek State Wayside Saddle Mountain Salmon River Salmon River (Queets) Salmon River plus (Marine) Satsop Watershed Scappoose Creek Scott Islands (Marine) Seal and Sail Rocks (Marine) Sequim Bay Shelton-South Sound Shipwreck Point NAP Siletz Bay-Drift Creek Siuslaw River Skamokowa Skokomish River Smith River (OR) Somas (Marine) SIZE (HA) 33546 93396 126 21475 762 8078 420223 34399 163 800 800 5371 80 6754 12482 7414 24 16870 45965 6921 4800 12270 15226 1600 400 4839 4201 202 10363 157099 8214 7058 46253 1600 SITE INTEGRATION Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site REALMS Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Marine Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Marine Only Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Marine Only PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8C, page 4 of 5 STATE British Columbia British Columbia Oregon Oregon Oregon Washington Washington Washington Oregon Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Oregon Oregon Oregon British Columbia Washington British Columbia Washington Oregon British Columbia Washington Washington Washington Washington Oregon Oregon Washington Washington Oregon British Columbia CONSERVATION AREA NAME Sooke South Beach State Park South Fork Coos River South Fork Coquille River South Yamhill River Strathcona Sutton Lake Tahkenitch-Siltcoos Lakes Tenmile Lake Tillamook Bay-Kilchis River Trask Mountain Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Tsitika-Nimpkish Twin Rocks (Marine) Umpqua Lighthouse State Park Umpqua River tributaries Upper Nehalem River Waadah Island - Neah Bay (Marine) Waatch Point - Waatch River (Marine) West Koitiah Point (Marine) Whale Creek (Marine) Willapa Bay Willapa Hills Wilson River Wreck Creek (Marine) Wynoochee River Yachats River Yaquina Bay Yaquina Head ONA/ACEC SIZE (HA) 6384 573 25384 26463 9446 320854 5799 32851 25012 30007 11997 79892 46389 400 65 16432 56150 1600 1600 800 400 48453 21731 12097 400 30804 11464 1620 41 SITE INTEGRATION Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Marine Site Marine Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Marine Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site Integrated Site REALMS Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Marine Only Marine Only Marine Only Marine Only Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Marine Only Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic Terrestrial,Small & Large Scale Aquatic, Marine Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic Terrestrial, Small-Scale Aquatic, Marine PNW Coast Ecoregional Assessment • Appendix 8C, page 5 of 5 STATE British Columbia Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon British Columbia Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon British Columbia British Columbia Oregon Oregon Oregon Oregon Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Oregon Washington Washington Oregon Oregon Oregon a) G Rank: global rank of species conservation target as determined by NatureServe. b) Abundance: amount of target present at portfolio site. c) % of Total Known: amount of target known at site expressed as a percent of the total amount of the target in the ecoregion. d) Relative Abundance: an area-weighted measure of local target abundance. RA is the percent of abundance of the target in the ecoregion that is found within the site divided by the percent of area of the ecoregion represented by the site. An RA > 1.0 indicates that the abundance of the target is high for an area of this size in this ecoregion. RA < 1.0 indicates that while the target is present at the site, it can be found at higher abundance at other locations in the ecoregion. e) Contribution to Goal: percent of the conservation goal for the target that is captured at the portfolio site. f) Ecoregion Goal: overall ecoregional conservation goal for the target. g) % of Goal Captured by Portfolio: percent of the ecoregional conservation goal for the target that is captured in all portfolio sites in this ecoregion. 100% or above denotes that the conservation goal for the target was fully met in the conservation portfolio. Column Notes: December 2006 Appendix 8D: Summaries of Portfolio Sites in the Pacific Northwest Ecoregion 1,200 ha 2,964 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank a 1052 687 2395 385 m m m m 46 ha 4293 m 326 m Abundance b GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Marine Site Adam and Eve River (Marine) 0.2 % 0.1 % 1.2 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.1 % % of Total Known c 11.9 6.6 90.0 72.1 17.2 21.1 4.3 Relative Abundance d % % % % % 0.5 % 0.3 % 4.1 % 3.3 % 0.8 % 1.0 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Summaries of Portfolio Sites in the Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregion e 193,399 226,193 58,215 11,673 m m m m 5,844 ha 445,946 m 164,143 m Ecoregion Goal f Indigenous: Private NGO % % % % Page 1 of 328 88 102 98 104 105 % 142 % 118 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 89 ha 220 ac 2 ha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Freshwater Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp Estuary Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Plant Communities 4677 6 1838 715 199 m m m m m 365 m 1110 m 4677 m 8 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Marine b Abundance Brachyramphus marmoratus GRank a 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 19 % GAP 4 3 % Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 44 % Water 56 % GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Species Birds Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Adam River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Adam River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 575.1 0.9 239.3 361.5 347.1 1420.4 73.3 311.3 0.5 4.2 Relative Abundance 2.0 % 0.0 % 0.8 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 4.8 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 19 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 239,478 193,399 226,193 58,215 16,881 m m m m m 7,567 m 445,946 m 442,357 m 302,959 ha 147,425 ha f Ecoregion Goal Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 2 of 328 223 88 102 98 144 214 % 142 % 228 % 108 % 110 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 3 % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 1428 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology 0.1 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 1816.7 9226.7 9429.2 3115.4 1428 m Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon, East Island 2122.0 5220.9 0.1 % 1428 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, East Island 0.5 % 0.2 % 526 m 1428 m Salvelinus malma Dolly Varden, East Island 1453.2 492.1 1428 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, East Island 0.1 % 4804.0 4337.9 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 1428 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, East Island 0.3 % 0.2 % % of Total Known 113 m 1428 m Oncorhynchus keta Freshwater Macrohabitats 1428 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Chum Salmon, East Island G5 GRank Chinook Salmon, East Island Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Adam River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.6 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 1.6 % 1.7 % 0.9 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.9 % 0.8 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 128,956 m 441,335 m 86,896 m 85,030 m 153,568 m 377,832 m 551,718 m 166,896 m 184,827 m Ecoregion Goal Page 3 of 328 220 % 253 % 133 % 177 % 56 % 123 % 69 % 122 % 78 % 154 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,697 ha 21,482 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 4 % Abundance Mineral Spring Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities 1 occ 1 occ Cepphus columba Pigeon Guillemot Shorebird Concentration Area 1 occ 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Pelagic Cormorant G4 Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican Species Birds Marine 1 occ 6 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Plant Communities 6 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus 1479 ha 971 ha 5195 ha Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a d 2.6 18.9 3.2 41.2 9.8 5.6 6.2 2.3 5.5 Relative Abundance 4.3 % c 6.3 % 0.9 % 1.1 % % 5.0 % 1.2 % 0.7 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 0.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 81 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 0.3 % 0.3 % 14.3 % 1.6 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 26 % % GAP 2 GAP 3 54 % GAP 4 13 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Alsea Bay-Drift Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Alsea Bay-Drift Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e 16 occ 116 occ 95 occ occ 20 occ 503 occ 880 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Page 4 of 328 119 % 171 % 163 % % 150 % 111 % 116 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 13 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Cobble/Gravel (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Estuary Marine Ecological Systems Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Alsea Bay-Drift Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: ha ha m occ 269 308 1096 18045 2366 572 3604 887 22 4073 1992 546 1040 3010 9 64 1 56 454 16 141 173 29 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 403 ha 21875 m 70 ha 83 76 11609 4 Abundance 0.4 % 1.9 % 0.7 % 3.7 % 2.4 % 100.0 % 3.6 % 1.7 % 2.2 % 7.2 % 20.2 % 0.6 % 4.1 % 1.1 % 4.2 18.9 7.3 37.6 23.8 1003.1 36.7 16.9 22.1 72.7 202.8 5.7 41.2 11.3 52.0 69.6 1.5 1.8 24.9 0.6 13.8 41.8 3.4 38.4 14.9 2.1 3.8 % 1.5 % 0.2 % 5.2 % 6.9 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 2.5 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 4.2 % 0.3 % 7.4 115.6 20.6 54.9 Relative Abundance 0.7 % 11.5 % 2.1 % 5.9 % % of Total Known 1.4 % 6.2 % 2.4 % 12.5 % 7.9 % 332.5 % 12.2 % 5.6 % 7.3 % 24.1 % 67.2 % 1.9 % 13.7 % 3.7 % 17.2 % 23.1 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 8.3 % 0.2 % 4.6 % 13.9 % 1.1 % 12.7 % 4.9 % 0.7 % 2.5 % 38.3 % 6.8 % 18.2 % Contribution to Goal ha ha m occ 19,507 4,933 45,204 144,777 30,025 172 29,625 15,799 304 16,915 2,963 29,156 7,615 80,427 55 279 155 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 3,384 198 169,841 22 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 5 of 328 226 278 218 215 194 333 198 247 334 247 231 255 309 122 282 116 244 287 206 239 224 246 256 238 % 228 % 294 % 330 258 224 250 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation 1 occ 56883 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 46838 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 3621 m 55060 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Alsea Bay-Drift Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 4.5 % 0.7 % 1.1 % 0.6 % 0.2 % % of Total Known 822.9 131.7 202.8 70.5 28.9 Relative Abundance 14.3 % 2.3 % 3.5 % 1.2 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal 7 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 6 of 328 129 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 35,273 ha 87,125 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % ha ha ha ha ha Pacific Sideband(Ssp. Canyonville) Erioderma sorediatum Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater Lichen Treepelt (Erioderma) Nonvascular Plants Monadenia fidelis 1 occ 3 occ 15 occ Invertebrates 77 occ Strix occidentalis caurina 1 occ 1 244 3110 31900 1 Abundance b Brachyramphus marmoratus T3 T4 GRank a Northern Spotted Owl Rana aurora aurora Abundance 16.7 % 60.0 % 1.5 % 4.4 % 1.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 1.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 82 % GAP 4 18 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Alsea-Five Rivers Targets known in this Conservation Area: Alsea-Five Rivers Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 16.9 122.0 6.1 17.8 29.0 0.1 0.3 1.8 8.4 0.0 Relative Abundance 8.3 % 60.0 % 3.0 % 8.8 % 14.3 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.9 % 4.1 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 82 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 12 occ 5 occ 503 occ 880 occ 7 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 7 of 328 42 % 60 % 111 % 116 % 671 % 878 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 18 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment 3 occ 221452 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 121173 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 26608 m 226611 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Alsea-Five Rivers Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5.1 % 2.7 % 2.7 % 2.5 % 1.1 % % of Total Known 236.7 126.5 129.4 71.6 52.3 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 8.9 % 9.1 % 5.0 % 3.7 % Contribution to Goal 18 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 8 of 328 106 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 10,403 ha 25,696 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 1 % Lichen Treepelt (Erioderma) 1 occ Gilia millefoliata Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn)Ledgla / carobn / sphagn Plant Communities Seaside Gilia Pink Sandverbena Vascular Plants Erioderma sorediatum 1 occ Nonvascular Plants 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus 3 occ 7335 ha 417 ha 2488 ha Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus T4 GRank a Marbled Murrelet Rana aurora aurora Abundance 8.3 % 33.3 % 10.0 % 16.7 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 3.1 % 1.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 41 % GAP 4 58 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Beaver Creek Marsh Targets known in this Conservation Area: Beaver Creek Marsh Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 114.9 53.0 30.0 57.4 0.8 0.8 295.4 25.9 0.8 2.2 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 7.7 % 4.3 % 8.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 42.9 % 3.8 % 0.1 % 0.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 40 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 2 Local: Relative Abundance e 6 occ 13 occ 23 occ 12 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Page 9 of 328 117 % 23 % 30 % 42 % 116 % 90 % 671 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 58 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 56112 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Sediment Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment 1 occ 1 occ 18792 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 58971 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha m m m m m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 1261 1020 4164 43 582 42 ha 10 ha 41 ha 2 occ Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Desces - junbal tidal GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Intertidal Salt Marshes (Desces Junbal Tidal) Plant Communities Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Beaver Creek Marsh Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.3 % 6.3 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 0.7 % 1.2 % 55.4 % 4.2 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 3.4 % 0.4 % 25.0 % % of Total Known 1204.0 963.2 108.6 68.0 63.2 9.8 466.1 35.0 0.3 1.8 1.9 28.4 3.3 252.2 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 20.0 % 2.3 % 1.4 % 1.3 % 3.9 % 184.8 % 13.9 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.8 % 11.3 % 1.3 % 100.0 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m 4 occ 5 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 32,500 552 30,025 33,330 80,427 5,499 ha 91 ha 3,169 ha 2 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 10 of 328 200 % 220 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 106 334 194 119 122 206 % 121 % 238 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 66 ha 162 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 92 % Water 5 % Abundance 1326 m 1326 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 57 ha 2 ha 4 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank a 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Beverly Beach State Park Targets known in this Conservation Area: Beverly Beach State Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 407.2 225.2 31.7 0.7 0.5 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: Relative Abundance 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 2,487,321 m f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e 164 % 100 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 11 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 14,589 ha 36,035 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 0 % Abundance GRank a 1 occ Abundance b 100.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 0 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Chehalis Headwater Small Rivers - Outwash, Low Elevation, Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Freshwater Site (cl Black River (Freshwater) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Black River (Freshwater) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d Relative Abundance % % % % % % Contribution to Goal 0 0 0 0 0 Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ f Ecoregion Goal % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 0 % 0 % 0 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 12 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 9,797 ha 24,198 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 14 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 85 % Water 0 % Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 Caraqud Haliaeetus leucocephalus Abundance GRank a occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 19770 m 1 occ 2 occ 5 14 4335 304 1312 62 643 29 Abundance b 5.8 % 100.0 % 0.1 % 41.7 % 0.4 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 57.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 3 % GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 54 % GAP 4 42 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Caraqud) Plant Communities Bald Eagle Species Birds Klamath-Siskiyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Oak Woodland North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Blind Slough Swamp Targets known in this Conservation Area: Blind Slough Swamp Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 593.6 244.0 1.7 609.9 29.3 16.2 0.6 1.2 2054.0 1.5 0.6 Relative Abundance 11.6 % 33.3 % 0.2 % 83.3 % 4.0 % 2.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 280.6 % 0.2 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 54 Local: Relative Abundance e occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 170,194 m 3 occ 839 occ 6 348 195,305 345,702 775,920 22 324,193 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % 133 % 33 % 90 % 117 500 127 116 126 305 236 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 43 % 3 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 13 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 23031 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Lower Columbia Tributary Small Rivers - Sedimentary Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Columbia Estuary Tributaries - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1 occ 1 occ 6118 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 33808 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Blind Slough Swamp Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5.6 % 50.0 % 0.7 % 1.1 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 1022.0 5109.8 115.7 117.5 120.0 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 100.0 % 2.3 % 2.3 % 2.3 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ 1 occ 1,017,511 m 266,114 m 1,440,012 m Ecoregion Goal Page 14 of 328 160 % 100 % 137 % 86 % 117 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 776 ha 1,916 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water Ascaphus truei Tailed Frog 736 m 2464 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 20 ha 146 ha 643 ha Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater T3 G3 Rhyacotriton variegatus Strix occidentalis caurina G3 Aneides ferreus Northern Spotted Owl a GRank Southern Torrent Salamander Birds Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 2.4 % 12.5 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % GAP 3 0 % % GAP 4 GRank Clouded Salamander Amphibians Species Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Bobby Creek RNA Targets known in this Conservation Area: Bobby Creek RNA Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 64.0 10.6 36.8 1320.6 711.1 2641.1 540.3 3.9 157.0 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 14.3 % 7.7 % 28.6 % 5.8 % 0.0 % 1.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 503 occ 7 occ 13 occ 7 occ 348 ha 345,702 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m e 164 % 100 % 111 % 343 % 192 % 86 % 500 % 116 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 15 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 20 ha 50 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 83 % Water 12 % Abundance GRank a 13 ha Abundance b 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Boiler Bay State Scenic Viewpoint Targets known in this Conservation Area: Boiler Bay State Scenic Viewpoint Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 22.9 Relative Abundance 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: Relative Abundance e 195,305 ha f Ecoregion Goal 127 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 16 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 25,957 ha 64,113 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 9 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 90 % Water 0 % Abundance Ascaphus truei Tailed Frog Bald Eagle 1 occ Cimicifuga elata Lathyrus holochlorus Tall Bugbane Thin-Leaved Peavine Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 3 occ g2 Sidalcea nelsoniana Nelson's Checker-Mallow 1 occ T2 3 occ 1 occ Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii Speyeria zerene bremnerii 2 occ Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine Vascular Plants Valley Silverspot Butterfly Invertebrates Haliaeetus leucocephalus 7 occ Plethodon dunni Dunn's Salamander Birds 5 occ Dicamptodon copei 3 occ 6 occ Rhyacotriton kezeri 14497 ha 9263 ha 26 ha Abundance b Cope's Giant Salamander G4 GRank a 14.3 % 6.0 % 2.3 % 11.1 % 8.3 % 0.1 % 5.9 % 10.9 % 5.7 % 7.3 % 1.3 % 0.4 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 100 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Boistfort Targets known in this Conservation Area: Boistfort Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 39.5 118.4 92.1 63.7 21.2 0.7 118.4 276.2 106.2 66.3 11.6 3.3 0.0 Relative Abundance 14.3 % 42.9 % 33.3 % 23.1 % 7.7 % 0.2 % 42.9 % 100.0 % 38.5 % 24.0 % 4.2 % 1.2 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 7 occ 7 occ 3 occ 13 occ 13 occ 839 occ 7 occ 7 occ 13 occ 25 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 324,193 ha f Ecoregion Goal Page 17 of 328 14 % 257 % 267 % 77 % 85 % 90 % 343 % 586 % 415 % 188 % 116 % 126 % 236 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio Indigenous: % Private 100 % NGO % Ecoregion Goal 24196 m 4706 m 27629 m 10447 m 58326 m 63943 m G5 G5 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Lampetra tridentata Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Lamprey Pacific Lamprey Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 81592 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 69768 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Boistfort Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5.0 % 3.3 % 2.6 % 1.9 % 1.7 % 1.0 % 2.7 % 3.0 % 3.0 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 1.7 % 1.5 % % of Total Known 321.4 214.2 175.3 121.2 110.5 64.4 170.4 9.6 49.5 109.3 93.4 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 11.1 % 9.1 % 6.3 % 5.7 % 3.3 % 8.8 % % % 0.5 % 2.6 % 5.7 % 4.8 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 9 occ 11 occ 1,017,511 m 1,017,511 m 312,652 m 312,652 m occ occ 943,067 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 1,440,012 m Ecoregion Goal Page 18 of 328 133 % 133 % 100 % 137 % 137 % 187 % 187 % % % 129 % 129 % 117 % 117 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 2,800 ha 6,916 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a 87 m 470 m 1220 ha 3843 m 3930 m 1717 m 3623 m Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % 6.3 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 1.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Species Fishes Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Marine Site Bojo Point (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Bojo Point (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 0.8 1.5 195.6 8.1 10.1 4.8 40.3 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.2 % 20.9 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 0.5 % 4.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 96,940 m 294,655 m 5,844 ha 445,946 m 363,205 m 337,346 m 84,336 m f Ecoregion Goal 112 % 123 % 105 % 142 % 131 % 132 % 169 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 19 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 67 ha 166 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % Abundance 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 2 ha 24 ha 39 ha Abundance b Marbled Murrelet GRank a 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Brads Creek ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: Brads Creek ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 121.3 127.2 579.8 7.4 5.4 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 880 occ 839 occ 348 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 116 % 90 % 500 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 20 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 3,175 ha 7,843 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance Brachyramphus marmoratus Melanitta perspicillata Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Surf Scoter Haematopus bachmani Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Hairy Goldfields Lasthenia maritima 1 ha 16 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Vascular Plants 1 occ 5 occ 1 occ 4 occ 72 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 1530 27 394 46 Abundance b Bald Eagle Wintering Area G5 GRank a 1.4 % 50.0 % 57.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 7.1 % 3.8 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 40 % GAP 3 22 % GAP 4 14 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Broken Group Targets known in this Conservation Area: Broken Group Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 38.3 173.7 3010.9 0.1 0.0 161.3 193.8 21.3 0.3 2.7 13.6 Relative Abundance 4.6 % 7.7 % 133.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 7.1 % 8.6 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 62 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 108 occ 13 occ 3 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 14 occ 839 occ 162,155 195,305 324,193 7,569 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 159 % 15 % 133 % 108 % 110 % 29 % 90 % 166 127 236 262 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 8 % 5 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 21 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 3070 m 3070 m Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1065 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Chum Salmon, West Island 467 3115 779 14515 5001 449 9797 860 34557 1427 14509 1113 24729 101172 5821 9738 10184 3344 886 m 44 ha 589 ha Chinook Salmon, West Island Fishes Species Freshwater Gravel Beach (Embayment) Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines (Outer Coast) Rock Platform (Embayment) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock With Gravel Beach (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand And Gravel Beach (Embayment) Rock with Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Shoreline Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Marine Ecological Systems Intertidal Habitat Eelgrass (Ha) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Plant Communities Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover 20389 m 13957 m 1 occ Cepphus columba Fishes 4 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Abundance Pigeon Guillemot GRank Pelagic Cormorant Targets known in this Conservation Area: Broken Group Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 7.6 % 28.4 % 19.0 % 9.6 % 10.2 % 99.9 % 7.8 % 42.6 % 33.2 % 100.0 % 14.8 % 10.3 % 2.5 % 26.0 % 16.1 % 51.9 % 14.7 % 5.2 % 5.1 % 3.0 % 3.0 % 7.3 % 1.9 % 0.3 % 1.3 % % of Total Known 71.8 177.0 60.6 210.0 783.5 523.2 265.4 281.1 2746.4 214.7 1172.9 915.5 2755.6 407.4 284.6 69.4 714.8 443.5 1430.9 403.9 142.1 139.9 82.4 83.3 199.8 51.1 7.1 34.8 Relative Abundance 0.5 % 1.1 % 0.4 % 25.4 % 94.8 % 63.3 % 32.1 % 34.0 % 332.3 % 26.0 % 141.9 % 110.8 % 333.4 % 49.3 % 34.4 % 8.4 % 86.5 % 53.7 % 173.1 % 48.9 % 17.2 % 16.9 % 10.0 % 10.1 % 24.2 % 6.2 % 0.9 % 4.2 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 673,874 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 1,837 3,285 1,231 45,204 14,702 135 37,705 606 31,193 428 29,435 3,231 294,655 116,959 10,847 5,624 20,837 19,455 5,233 m 443 ha 5,844 ha 84,336 m 225,517 m 116 occ 95 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 22 of 328 155 % 144 % 176 % 333 158 63 218 34 333 65 142 113 333 65 195 123 119 58 173 57 89 199 % 120 % 105 % 169 % 146 % 171 % 163 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 1976 m Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Sockeye Salmon, West Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 984 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, West Island 130.0 423.9 675.6 2.4 0.8 38.3 0.2 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1393 m 1158 m 1805 m 17 m 3 m 470 m 20.1 0.0 % 67 m 283.8 51.1 70.4 11.3 151.1 43.8 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 2281 m 82 m 984 m 1065 m Salvelinus malma G5 Oncorhynchus clarki Abundance Dolly Varden, West Island GRank Cutthroat Trout, West Island Targets known in this Conservation Area: Broken Group Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 4.3 % 2.7 % 0.8 % 0.1 % 1.8 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.3 % Contribution to Goal 193,048 m 56,327 m 110,483 m 42,081 m 43,046 m 168,906 m 52,799 m 126,642 m 609,198 m 220,095 m 114,095 m 102,560 m 382,902 m Ecoregion Goal Page 23 of 328 265 % 151 % 407 % 141 % 162 % 119 % 132 % 294 % 168 % 191 % 160 % 148 % 102 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 81,141 ha 200,418 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 98 % Water 1 % Abundance occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha 25566 ha 25002 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) 59 occ 14 9 1 1 72 33845 311 1 1187 26357 5127 Haliaeetus leucocephalus 3 occ Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Smooth Douglasia Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Lasthenia maritima Hairy Goldfields Vascular Plants b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) GRank a 37.5 % 50.0 % 4.1 % 8.7 % 3.1 % 3.7 % 2.3 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 6.3 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 1.6 % 13.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 56 % GAP 3 43 % GAP 4 0 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Brooks Peninsula Targets known in this Conservation Area: Brooks Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 20.4 6.8 7.3 15.3 6.2 103.1 88.4 7.4 0.4 1.9 18.4 0.1 9.8 1.4 7.2 59.9 Relative Abundance 23.1 % 7.7 % 8.3 % 17.3 % 7.0 % 116.7 % 100.0 % 8.3 % 0.4 % 2.2 % 20.9 % 0.2 % 11.1 % 1.6 % 8.1 % 67.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 99 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 12 9 12 332 3,273 162,155 195,305 9 76,367 324,193 7,569 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % 62 % 15 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 1833 2956 650 230 878 166 127 1067 375 236 262 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 24 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 14 occ 4 occ Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Surfgrass Estuary Surfgrass Shore Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Shore Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Seashore Lupine Dunes Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover Lupinus littoralis (dune community) 9 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Pelagic Cormorant m m m m ha m m m ha m ha m m occ 22 ha 6352 m 258152 m 18347 375057 7758 43240 69 7861 104468 4631 946 292054 22 32077 45815 1 1 occ 184525 m 1453 m 88210 m 3 occ Oceanodroma leucorhoa Fishes 15 occ Haematopus bachmani Abundance Leach's Storm-Petrel GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Brooks Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.1 29.8 23.0 27.6 % 21.3 % 0.1 % 5.3 12.9 4.0 7.9 5.0 1.5 18.0 19.8 5.2 21.2 0.2 2.3 9.0 32.3 2.5 17.7 0.6 12.6 4.3 3.9 3.1 8.8 4.5 Relative Abundance 4.9 % 12.0 % 3.7 % 7.3 % 4.7 % 1.4 % 16.7 % 18.4 % 4.9 % 19.6 % 0.2 % 2.2 % 8.4 % 14.3 % 2.4 % 16.4 % 0.5 % 11.7 % 4.3 % 3.6 % 2.8 % 8.3 % 4.2 % % of Total Known 0.4 % 92.1 % 71.1 % 16.3 % 39.9 % 12.4 % 24.5 % 15.5 % 4.6 % 55.8 % 61.2 % 16.2 % 65.5 % 0.7 % 7.3 % 27.9 % 100.0 % 7.7 % 54.7 % 1.7 % 39.1 % 13.3 % 12.1 % 9.5 % 27.3 % 13.9 % Contribution to Goal m m m m ha m m m ha m ha m m occ 5,499 ha 6,898 m 363,205 m 112,601 939,089 62,438 176,736 443 169,841 187,323 7,567 5,844 445,946 3,169 442,357 164,143 1 13 occ 337,346 m 84,336 m 225,517 m 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 108 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 25 of 328 206 % 215 % 131 % 179 119 224 109 120 224 146 214 105 142 238 228 118 200 223 % 132 % 169 % 146 % 190 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 159 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Channel Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) High Tide Lagoon Exposed (Outer Coast) High Tide lagoon Protected (Embayment) High Tide Lagoon protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Intertidal Habitat Sand and Gravel Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Brooks Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 976 1319 444 1194 4369 718 701 25595 4578 475 32495 2726 744 37126 1965 45852 1488 28471 1323 26925 205052 566 1272 33226 24010 1014 818 1887 14695 2901 1774 9297 2086 5953 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 3421 m 47 ha 149 ha Abundance 7.5 % 1.2 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 55.2 % 6.6 % 0.1 % 3.2 % 3.7 % 8.1 % 10.1 % 14.9 % 20.9 % 17.2 % 11.7 % 7.1 % 12.7 % 15.7 % 30.5 % 43.1 % 20.9 % 0.6 % 2.4 % 10.3 % 3.2 % 1.8 % 3.7 % 5.5 % 7.6 % 13.0 % 3.2 % 4.5 % 2.1 % 5.6 % 19.6 % 6.5 % 1.5 % % of Total Known 8.1 1.3 107.9 107.9 59.5 7.1 0.2 3.5 4.0 8.7 10.8 16.1 22.6 18.5 12.6 7.7 13.7 17.0 32.9 46.4 22.5 0.6 2.6 11.1 3.4 1.9 4.0 5.9 8.2 14.0 3.4 4.9 2.3 6.0 21.1 7.1 1.6 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 4.1 % 333.7 % 333.7 % 184.0 % 21.9 % 0.5 % 10.7 % 12.4 % 26.9 % 33.5 % 49.7 % 69.7 % 57.2 % 39.1 % 23.7 % 42.3 % 52.4 % 101.7 % 143.5 % 69.6 % 1.9 % 8.1 % 34.4 % 10.6 % 6.0 % 12.4 % 18.4 % 25.2 % 43.3 % 10.5 % 15.1 % 7.2 % 18.6 % 65.4 % 21.8 % 4.8 % Contribution to Goal 3,901 32,500 133 358 2,375 3,276 144,777 239,478 36,906 1,767 96,940 5,487 1,067 64,871 5,027 193,399 3,518 54,295 1,300 18,758 294,655 29,625 15,799 96,577 226,193 16,915 6,602 10,283 58,215 6,697 16,881 61,723 29,156 32,087 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 5,233 m 215 ha 3,069 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 26 of 328 74 106 334 334 227 118 215 223 137 293 112 160 155 114 117 88 186 137 131 216 123 198 247 110 102 247 153 243 98 79 144 94 255 121 199 % 185 % 224 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology 89.2 229.1 77.3 61.4 85.1 106.7 1.2 7.4 % 2.5 % 2.0 % 1.4 % 3.5 % 0.0 % 1004 m 6622 m 877 m 16324 m 29241 m 58 m 26.0 283.9 1.4 % 498.3 25.9 41.4 55082 m 1.3 % 2.0 % 0.8 % 25630 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island 160.8 1685 m 14772 m Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon, West Island 7.8 % 5.2 54.0 4.6 % 29758 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, West Island 0.4 % 2.6 % 58332 m 3255 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, West Island 111.9 76.6 9.1 19.3 1.6 5.4 4.5 19.9 Relative Abundance 16.2 % 58995 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island 5.4 % 3.7 % 8.5 % 17.9 % 1.5 % 5.0 % 4.2 % 18.5 % % of Total Known 4127 m 49620 m Freshwater Macrohabitats 34385 m Oncorhynchus keta m m m m m m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 2633 6968 274 3373 2442 16255 Abundance Chum Salmon, West Island GRank Chinook Salmon, West Island Species Fishes Freshwater Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Brooks Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.2 % 17.3 % 13.8 % 10.0 % 12.5 % 37.2 % 14.5 % 4.2 % 46.1 % 80.8 % 4.2 % 6.7 % 26.1 % 0.8 % 8.8 % 18.2 % 12.4 % 28.2 % 59.7 % 4.9 % 16.6 % 13.9 % 61.6 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m 28,683 m 168,906 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 52,799 m 2,703 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 126,642 m 5,105 m 609,198 m 220,095 m 114,095 m 382,902 m 673,874 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 9,335 11,673 5,586 20,374 17,529 26,382 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % Page 27 of 328 269 % 119 % 459 % 264 % 132 % 330 % 457 % 283 % 294 % 500 % 168 % 191 % 160 % 102 % 155 % 144 % 176 % 278 104 244 125 230 139 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Brooks Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 161.9 102.2 44.0 797.5 24.3 75.2 524.9 61.9 19.7 456.1 277.3 22.4 428.7 18.2 315.2 5.3 % 3.3 % 0.7 % 12.9 % 0.8 % 1.2 % 17.0 % 2.0 % 0.3 % 14.8 % 9.0 % 1.3 % 5.0 % 0.7 % 13.9 % 0.9 % 10.2 % 1.8 % 11304 m 1883 m 9758 m 318101 m 3428 m 99809 m 9301 m 4226 m 3539 m 2044 m 16430 m 12554 m 6447 m 7224 m 21608 m 7270 m 28804 m 17678 m 56.5 153.6 27.0 84.1 1.4 % Relative Abundance 41795 m Abundance % of Total Known 9.2 % 51.1 % 3.0 % 69.5 % 3.6 % 24.9 % 4.4 % 45.0 % 74.0 % 3.2 % 10.0 % 85.2 % 12.2 % 3.9 % 129.4 % 7.1 % 16.6 % 26.3 % 13.6 % Contribution to Goal 193,048 m 56,327 m 246,148 m 31,071 m 199,007 m 25,878 m 287,102 m 36,520 m 2,763 m 110,483 m 42,081 m 10,922 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 43,046 m 306,396 m Ecoregion Goal Page 28 of 328 265 % 151 % 186 % 163 % 240 % 114 % 162 % 129 % 162 % 407 % 141 % 211 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 433 % 211 % 162 % 448 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 2,270 ha 5,607 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 0 % Abundance GRank a 1 occ Abundance b 50.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 0 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Unclassified Class 2 Freshwater System Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Freshwater Site (cl Campbell River (Freshwater) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Campbell River (Freshwater) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 22035.3 Relative Abundance % % % % % 100.0 % Contribution to Goal 0 0 0 0 0 Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 1 occ f Ecoregion Goal 200 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 0 % 0 % 0 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 29 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 16,709 ha 41,271 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 92 % Water 8 % Abundance ha occ ha ha ha Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Species Marine Water Bur-Reed Sparganium fluctuans 399 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) 3244 m 2 occ 3 occ 77 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 6 occ 2922 1 8523 126 1824 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Vascular Plants b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) G5 GRank a 0.3 % 33.3 % 5.7 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 99 % GAP 4 1 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Campbell-Quadra Targets known in this Conservation Area: Campbell-Quadra Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1.5 66.0 64.4 0.6 0.2 3.1 7.7 47.7 4.7 0.7 2.4 Relative Abundance 1.0 % 15.4 % 15.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 1.8 % 11.1 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 99 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha ha 337,346 m 13 occ 20 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 162,155 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 132 % 38 % 105 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 166 1067 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 1 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 30 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats Freshwater Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Shoreline Marine Ecological Systems Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Shore Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Targets known in this Conservation Area: Campbell-Quadra Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 289.5 425.4 1.0 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 29629 m 19443 m 9810 m 4262 m 115.5 35.9 185.6 0.6 % 7329 m 95.4 19.1 0.6 2.7 23.8 3.2 6.8 0.8 19.1 11.2 2.4 3.1 8.6 0.9 1.3 15.8 1.0 5.5 1.0 3.2 93.8 18.2 % 3.6 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 4.5 % 0.6 % 1.3 % 0.2 % 3.7 % 2.1 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 1.6 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 3.0 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 0.3 % m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m m m ha m m m Relative Abundance 11927 m 2679 397 986 629 760 3987 9728 307 2055 4387 177 519 24 986 1548 760 36 15583 2749 3374 Abundance % of Total Known 3.9 % 1.2 % 14.2 % 9.7 % 6.2 % 3.1 % 60.8 % 12.1 % 0.4 % 1.7 % 15.1 % 2.1 % 4.3 % 0.5 % 12.2 % 7.1 % 1.5 % 2.0 % 5.4 % 0.6 % 0.8 % 10.0 % 0.6 % 3.5 % 0.6 % 2.1 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m m m ha m m m 110,483 m 818,034 m 136,816 m 306,396 m 118,230 m 380,781 m 4,409 3,276 239,478 36,906 5,027 193,399 226,193 58,215 16,881 61,723 11,673 26,382 443 169,841 187,323 7,567 5,844 445,946 442,357 164,143 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 31 of 328 407 % 586 % 433 % 448 % 459 % 457 % 124 118 223 137 117 88 102 98 144 94 104 139 120 224 146 214 105 142 228 118 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Campbell-Quadra Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 32.2 40.9 151.7 31.9 210.9 280.4 96.6 0.3 % 0.3 % 1.5 % 0.2 % 1.4 % 1.9 % 0.6 % 2716 m 12474 m 2057 m 1083 m 12079 m 3059 m Relative Abundance 3084 m Abundance % of Total Known 3.2 % 9.4 % 7.0 % 1.1 % 5.1 % 1.4 % 1.1 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 128,956 m 15,371 m 193,048 m 246,148 m 199,007 m 287,102 m Ecoregion Goal Page 32 of 328 220 % 253 % 211 % 265 % 186 % 240 % 162 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 16,009 ha 39,543 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 85 % Water 12 % Abundance 1 occ 2 occ Phacelia argentea Lilium occidentale Silvery Phacelia Western Lily Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities 7 occ 1 occ Cordylanthus maritimus ssp palustris T3 Salt-Marsh Bird's-Beak Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Clemmys marmorata marmorata 1 occ Reptiles 1 occ Progne subis ha occ ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 757 5 49 12501 4 Abundance b Purple Martin G5 GRank a 11.1 % 5.9 % 35.0 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 2.0 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 13 % GAP 3 5 % GAP 4 68 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cape Arago-South Slough Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Arago-South Slough Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 35.8 34.5 125.4 49.8 49.8 0.5 1.7 373.2 0.1 7.2 0.0 Relative Abundance 8.0 % 7.7 % 28.0 % 11.1 % 11.1 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 83.3 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 16 Local: Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha ha 25 occ 13 occ 25 occ 9 occ 9 occ 839 occ 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 72 % 123 % 60 % 122 % 367 % 90 % 127 3850 116 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 69 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 33 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Carobn / sphagn Cepphus columba Pigeon Guillemot Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Rock (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary 1 17 25 27 58 449 3 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 112 ha 35256 m 132 ha Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) ha ha ha m m ha m occ 2 occ 2 occ 88 183 25 20789 425 106 14338 3 Eumetopias jubatus 1 occ 1 occ 11 occ Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Bedrock (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Old-Growth Sitka Spruce/Creek Dogwood Tideland Swamp Picsit/corser tideland swamp Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Mammals Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Pelagic Cormorant Shorebird Concentration Area Western Snowy Plover 1 occ Pelecanus occidentalis 9 occ 6 occ Haematopus bachmani 2 occ 1 occ Abundance Brown Pelican G4 GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / Darcal / Sphagn) Ledgla / darcal / sphagn Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Carobn / Sphagn) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Arago-South Slough Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.8 49.7 14.8 28.1 1.0 13.4 21.8 5.8 13.1 2.2 1.1 % 2.4 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 9.1 % 2.7 % 5.1 % 0.2 % 2.4 % 3.9 % 4.3 151.1 203.1 20.1 9.2 3.0 5.3 491.7 25.2 27.3 10.2 14.9 15.5 15.5 9.1 298.6 149.3 Relative Abundance 0.8 % 27.7 % 38.1 % 3.7 % 1.7 % 0.5 % 1.0 % 100.0 % 4.9 % 5.9 % 4.3 % 7.1 % 2.8 % 2.8 % 14.3 % 1.7 % 22.2 % 100.0 % % of Total Known 1.7 % 30.3 % 9.1 % 17.1 % 0.6 % 8.2 % 13.3 % 3.5 % 8.0 % 1.3 % 2.6 % 92.2 % 123.9 % 12.2 % 5.6 % 1.8 % 3.2 % 300.0 % 15.4 % 16.7 % 6.3 % 9.1 % 9.5 % 9.5 % % 5.6 % 66.7 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal ha ha ha m m ha m occ 40 55 279 155 9,168 5,499 21 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 3,384 198 20 169,841 7,567 5,844 445,946 1 13 occ 12 occ 16 occ 11 occ 116 occ 95 occ occ 108 occ 3 occ 3 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 34 of 328 283 282 116 244 287 206 338 238 % 228 % 294 % 330 258 210 224 214 105 142 300 223 % 217 % 119 % 100 % 171 % 163 % % 159 % 233 % 33 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Exposed (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Shoreline Sand (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Arago-South Slough Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2756 3597 1258 228 2194 61 26702 4958 6728 3305 1487 71 2120 182 439 388 134 6121 141 642 4514 3981 170 4481 213 1938 1634 20107 783 11529 793 1519 133 51 388 5 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha Abundance 4.2 % 21.9 % 2.6 % 4.9 % 75.3 % 0.3 % 5.5 % 0.6 % 6.7 % 2.6 % 25.2 % 0.0 % 9.3 % 5.1 % 4.1 % 3.3 % 1.2 % 6.2 % 0.3 % 63.3 % 1.2 % 5.0 % 0.5 % 7.9 % 2.2 % 1.7 % 48.2 % 20.7 % 3.1 % 4.3 % 23.4 % 8.2 % 0.5 % 1.2 % 4.6 % 1.5 % % of Total Known 23.2 119.5 14.1 26.7 411.5 1.7 30.2 3.4 36.7 14.4 138.0 0.1 51.0 28.0 22.4 18.1 6.4 33.9 1.5 346.3 6.3 27.1 2.6 43.4 11.8 9.5 263.4 113.0 16.9 23.5 128.0 44.6 2.7 6.7 24.9 8.2 Relative Abundance 14.1 % 72.9 % 8.6 % 16.3 % 251.0 % 1.0 % 18.4 % 2.1 % 22.4 % 8.8 % 84.2 % 0.1 % 31.1 % 17.1 % 13.7 % 11.0 % 3.9 % 20.7 % 0.9 % 211.3 % 3.9 % 16.5 % 1.6 % 26.5 % 7.2 % 5.8 % 160.7 % 69.0 % 10.3 % 14.3 % 78.1 % 27.2 % 1.7 % 4.1 % 15.2 % 5.0 % Contribution to Goal 19,507 4,933 14,577 1,401 874 5,894 144,777 239,478 30,025 37,705 1,767 96,940 6,812 1,067 3,219 3,518 3,436 29,625 15,799 304 116,959 24,105 10,847 16,915 2,963 33,330 1,017 29,156 7,615 80,427 1,015 5,586 7,977 1,250 2,550 91 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 35 of 328 226 278 89 263 267 224 215 223 194 65 293 112 102 155 124 186 132 198 247 334 119 129 58 247 231 119 311 255 309 122 280 244 239 246 256 121 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 53844 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Sediment Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment 1 occ 1 occ 34906 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 44492 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Arago-South Slough Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.3 % 6.3 % 0.6 % 0.8 % 0.5 % % of Total Known 782.4 625.9 67.7 82.1 31.0 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 20.0 % 2.2 % 2.6 % 1.0 % Contribution to Goal 4 occ 5 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m Ecoregion Goal Page 36 of 328 200 % 220 % 164 % 173 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 44,238 ha 109,269 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 6 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 0 % Rana boylii Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Strix occidentalis caurina Blue-Gray Taildropper G3 Arborimus longicaudus 3 occ Arctostaphylos hispidula Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 2 occ Sidalcea malviflora ssp patula Hairy Manzanita 5 occ 1 occ 5 occ 7 occ 28 occ 3 occ 8 occ 186 ha 5575 ha 21276 ha Abundance b Coast Checker Bloom Vascular Plants G5 Martes americana Red Tree Vole T3 G4 American Marten Mammals Prophysaon coeruleum Brachyramphus marmoratus Invertebrates a GRank Northern Spotted Owl Abundance 10.7 % 25.0 % 3.3 % 10.0 % 3.0 % 0.7 % 1.6 % 27.3 % 11.1 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 11.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 16 % GAP 2 2 % GAP 3 35 % GAP 4 47 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Plethodon elongatus Del Norte Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cape Blanco-Elk River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Blanco-Elk River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 37.4 24.9 62.3 54.0 62.3 2.3 5.2 69.5 99.7 0.2 1.2 91.1 Relative Abundance 23.1 % 15.4 % 38.5 % 33.3 % 38.5 % 1.4 % 3.2 % 42.9 % 61.5 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 56.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 51 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 2 Local: Relative Abundance e 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 3 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 7 occ 13 occ 195,305 ha 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 92 % 46 % 308 % 133 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 86 % 138 % 127 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 47 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 37 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1 occ 4 occ 3 occ 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Common Murre Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) 435 1641 259 890 775 m m m m m 3 ha 2 ha 13 ha 3574 m 1 ha 1 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Plant Communities 4 occ Haematopus bachmani Brandt's Cormorant 0.9 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 3.4 % 0.0 % 0.8 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 1.0 % 1.3 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 1.8 0.7 0.1 1.4 6.7 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.5 0.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1.9 2.2 54.0 6.5 25.0 % Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Calnut) Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Salhoo Malfus / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) 14.3 % 6.5 24.9 2 occ 1 occ Oenothera wolfii Wolf's Evening-Primrose 5.6 % 11.8 % 54.0 54.0 1 occ Lilium occidentale Western Lily 7.0 6.5 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 14.3 % 2 occ Phacelia argentea Silvery Phacelia 10.0 % 10.0 % % of Total Known 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Pink Sandverbena Plant Communities 1 occ Abundance Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca GRank Large-Flowered Goldfields Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Blanco-Elk River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 3.0 % 1.1 % 0.1 % 2.4 % 11.4 % 0.1 % 2.6 % 0.2 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 3.3 % 2.6 % 3.3 % 4.2 % 3.2 % 3.7 % 33.3 % 33.3 % 33.3 % 4.0 % 4.0 % 15.4 % 4.3 % 4.0 % Contribution to Goal 14,577 144,777 239,478 37,705 6,812 m m m m m 5,499 ha 91 ha 5,844 ha 445,946 m 3,169 ha 30 occ 116 occ 30 occ 95 occ 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 3 occ 3 occ 25 occ 25 occ 13 occ 23 occ 25 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 38 of 328 89 215 223 65 102 206 % 121 % 105 % 142 % 238 % 190 % 171 % 187 % 163 % 168 % 159 % 117 % 33 % 133 % 20 % 72 % 123 % 30 % 40 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 35 m 102969 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 1 occ 1 occ 64703 m 118559 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 71415 m Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU 52523 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 2 m m m m m m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 1054 747 1920 104 22 1940 Abundance Coho Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Blanco-Elk River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1.7 % 4.5 % 0.8 % 22.1 % 0.0 % 2.7 % 34.6 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 0.9 % 3.4 % 1.1 % 0.0 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 62.9 161.8 29.5 834.6 0.5 100.9 783.3 13.2 0.5 1.8 6.7 2.1 0.0 1.4 Relative Abundance 5.6 % 14.3 % 2.6 % 73.7 % 0.0 % 8.9 % 69.2 % 1.2 % 0.9 % 3.1 % 11.4 % 3.5 % 0.1 % 2.4 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m 18 occ 7 occ 2,487,321 m 139,717 m 75,962 m 1,330,438 m 103,258 m 4,496,878 m 116,959 24,105 16,915 2,963 33,330 80,427 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % Page 39 of 328 106 % 129 % 164 % 157 % 91 % 173 % 95 % 100 % 119 129 247 231 119 122 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 5,120 ha 12,647 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 2 occ 3 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Freshwater 1 occ Falco peregrinus anatum 4426 ha 157 ha 484 ha Abundance b Bald Eagle GRank a 6.1 % 0.2 % 5.6 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 GAP 4 100 % GRank American Peregrine Falcon Birds Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Cape Elizabeth Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Elizabeth Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1954.6 5.0 82.4 31.7 0.6 0.9 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 0.4 % 5.9 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 10 occ 839 occ 17 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 120 % 90 % 65 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 40 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 23,754 ha 58,673 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 3 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 92 % Water 4 % Abundance Progne subis 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Castilleja chambersii Senecio flettii Sidalcea hirtipes Saxifraga hitchcockiana Flett Groundsel Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow Saddle Mt. Saxifrage Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 3 occ Silene douglasii var oraria Chamber's Paintbrush 5 occ 4 occ 16 occ Cascade Head Catchfly Vascular Plants G4 G5 Strix occidentalis caurina Purple Martin T3 Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet 1 occ Northern Spotted Owl 2 occ Ardea herodias ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 5 13986 1467 6413 16 Abundance b Great-Blue Heron GRank a 33.3 % 6.7 % 33.3 % 66.7 % 60.0 % 6.0 % 0.4 % 0.9 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 7 % GAP 3 21 % GAP 4 69 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cape Falcon-Lower Nehalem Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Falcon-Lower Nehalem Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 12.1 12.1 12.1 24.1 69.7 167.7 2.4 5.5 33.5 0.7 0.0 21.6 1.3 2.5 0.0 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 4.0 % 4.0 % 8.0 % 23.1 % 55.6 % 0.8 % 1.8 % 11.1 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 7.2 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 27 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 13 occ 9 occ 503 occ 880 occ 9 occ 839 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 12 % 48 % 12 % 12 % 38 % 367 % 111 % 116 % 144 % 90 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 70 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 41 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus 1 occ 5 occ 9 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Common Murre Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Shorebird Concentration Area Tufted Puffin Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Low Intertidal High Salinity Sandy Saltmarsh Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Salhoc-myrcal Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Coast Willow Deflation Plain Wetland Plant Communities 2 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus 5 7 2 1 9 672 44 128 1 412 31232 95 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ ha m ha 16724 m 7 occ 34 ha 134 ha 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 4 occ Haematopus bachmani 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Abundance Brandt's Cormorant T2 GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Mineral Spring Plant Communities Wandering Daisy Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Falcon-Lower Nehalem Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 3.9 % 3.9 % 1.0 % 0.1 % 1.8 % 3.7 % 0.2 % 1.3 % 14.6 14.2 3.6 0.5 6.6 13.5 0.6 4.6 110.5 14.4 7.8 1.1 10.9 35.1 3.0 % 10.3 % 100.0 % 3.9 % 2.1 % 0.3 % 1.1 74.7 110.5 6.9 3.7 8.6 3.7 5.8 7.1 4.1 50.3 15.1 23.2 Relative Abundance 0.3 % 20.3 % 100.0 % 4.3 % 1.1 % 2.3 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 2.0 % 1.1 % 12.5 % 1.6 % 33.3 % % of Total Known 13.2 % 12.9 % 3.2 % 0.4 % 6.0 % 12.2 % 0.6 % 4.2 % 100.0 % 13.0 % 7.1 % 1.0 % 9.8 % 31.8 % 1.0 % 67.6 % 100.0 % 6.3 % 3.3 % 7.8 % 3.3 % 5.3 % 6.5 % 3.7 % 16.7 % 5.0 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal 40 55 60 279 155 5,499 7,977 3,069 1 3,169 442,357 9,868 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ ha m ha 169,841 m 22 occ 3,384 ha 198 ha 1 occ 16 occ 30 occ 116 occ 30 occ 95 occ 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 20 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 42 of 328 283 282 332 116 244 206 239 224 100 238 228 294 224 % 250 % 330 % 258 % 100 % 119 % 190 % 171 % 187 % 163 % 168 % 159 % 117 % 150 % 23 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha 86417 m 60522 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 127187 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 53617 m 166 373 168 394 289 255 687 7045 29975 1494 5288 661 751 278 6891 877 73 741 1359 651 2233 5356 1478 8095 14 31 2 3 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Wood Debris/Organic (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Falcon-Lower Nehalem Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.7 % 1.9 % 1.4 % 2.2 % 1.5 % 0.6 % 6.4 % 2.7 % 1.8 % 0.5 % 14.7 % 4.7 % 6.2 % 0.2 % 5.3 % 2.9 % 6.6 % 7.8 % 7.0 % 1.7 % 7.2 % 0.2 % 1.7 % 1.2 % 2.0 % 5.5 % 5.8 % 3.0 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 11.6 % % of Total Known 51.3 137.0 59.7 156.6 5.6 2.1 23.6 9.9 6.5 1.9 54.1 17.2 22.9 0.7 19.5 10.7 24.1 28.6 25.7 6.1 26.6 0.7 6.2 4.3 7.4 20.3 21.4 11.1 1.3 1.3 2.1 41.6 Relative Abundance 2.4 % 6.5 % 2.8 % 7.4 % 5.1 % 1.9 % 21.4 % 8.9 % 5.9 % 1.7 % 49.0 % 15.6 % 20.7 % 0.6 % 17.6 % 9.7 % 21.9 % 25.9 % 23.3 % 5.6 % 24.1 % 0.6 % 5.6 % 3.9 % 6.7 % 18.4 % 19.4 % 10.1 % 1.1 % 1.2 % 1.9 % 37.6 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 3,285 19,507 788 4,409 4,933 14,577 1,401 45,204 144,777 239,478 30,025 6,812 3,436 1,075 29,625 15,799 304 116,959 24,105 16,915 33,330 29,156 7,615 80,427 1,250 2,550 91 8 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 43 of 328 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % 158 226 90 124 278 89 263 218 215 223 194 102 132 264 198 247 334 119 129 247 119 255 309 122 246 256 121 163 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Falcon-Lower Nehalem Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ Abundance 6.3 % % of Total Known 421.8 Relative Abundance 20.0 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 44 of 328 220 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 9,422 ha 23,272 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 1 % Abundance 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Poa unilateralis Gilia millefoliata Phacelia argentea Oenothera wolfii Pink Sandverbena San Francisco Bluegrass Seaside Gilia Silvery Phacelia Wolf's Evening-Primrose Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Marine Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / sanoff / sphagn) Ledgla / sanoff / sphagn 2 occ 2 occ Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca Plant Communities 1 occ Artemisia pycnocephala 7 occ 3825 ha 857 ha Abundance b Large-Flowered Goldfields GRank a 100.0 % 14.3 % 11.8 % 33.3 % 16.7 % 10.0 % 20.0 % 100.0 % 2.9 % 0.1 % 0.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 4 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 71 % GRank Coastal Sagewort Vascular Plants Species North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cape Ferrelo Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Ferrelo Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 761.0 30.4 117.1 58.5 108.7 33.1 60.9 58.5 887.9 3.8 17.2 Relative Abundance d 100.0 % 4.0 % 15.4 % 7.7 % 14.3 % 4.3 % 8.0 % 7.7 % 116.7 % 0.5 % 2.3 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership % National National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 4 % Local: % Relative Abundance e 2 occ 25 occ 13 occ 13 occ 7 occ 23 occ 25 occ 13 occ 6 occ 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 100 % 20 % 123 % 23 % 86 % 30 % 40 % 8 % 3850 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 71 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 45 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1 occ 5 occ 7 occ 12 occ 16 occ 4 occ Ptychoramphus aleuticus Phalacroscorax auritus Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Cassin's Auklet Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Serpentine Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore m m m m m m m m 1 occ 6796 m 2778 291 481 4987 1407 303 6248 651 2 ha 1 ha 87 ha 9602 m 1 occ Haematopus bachmani Plant Communities 12 occ Branta canadensis leucopareia 2 occ Abundance Black Oystercatcher GRank Aleutian Canada Goose Species Birds Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Ferrelo Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 50.0 % 1.5 % 4.3 % 2.0 % 1.0 % 1.3 % 1.8 % 0.8 % 5.6 % 15.1 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 4.3 % 4.1 % 3.8 % 19.4 % 1.0 % 10.0 % 5.6 % 3.4 % 11.1 % % of Total Known 5317.5 258.7 39.7 18.4 9.2 11.9 16.3 7.8 52.2 140.6 0.1 3.9 4.1 6.0 37.1 38.4 35.2 177.2 9.3 92.8 46.4 30.9 92.8 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 4.9 % 14.2 % 6.6 % 3.3 % 4.3 % 5.8 % 2.8 % 18.7 % 50.5 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 1.5 % 2.2 % 13.3 % 13.8 % 12.6 % 63.6 % 3.3 % 33.3 % 16.7 % 11.1 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m 1 occ 139,717 m 19,507 4,409 14,577 116,959 24,105 10,847 33,330 1,289 5,499 ha 91 ha 5,844 ha 445,946 m 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 30 occ 15 occ 6 occ 108 occ 6 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % Page 46 of 328 200 % 157 % 226 124 89 119 129 58 119 140 206 % 121 % 105 % 142 % 190 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 187 % 200 % 150 % 159 % 133 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 13,121 ha 32,409 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 85 % Water 9 % ha occ ha ha 5 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet 1 occ Cordylanthus maritimus ssp palustris Salt-Marsh Bird's-Beak Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Silene douglasii var oraria Cascade Head Catchfly Vascular Plants Warty Jumping-Slug 1 occ 1 occ Ardea herodias Great-Blue Heron Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa 4 occ Invertebrates 2 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 1 occ 9244 7 311 1311 Abundance b Falco peregrinus anatum T4 GRank a Bald Eagle Rana aurora aurora Abundance 5.0 % 20.0 % 1.4 % 0.3 % 1.4 % 0.2 % 11.1 % 1.0 % 1.4 % 2.9 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 9 % GAP 3 21 % GAP 4 58 % GRank American Peregrine Falcon Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cape Lookout-Sandlake Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Lookout-Sandlake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 21.9 42.0 42.0 3.1 60.7 2.6 64.3 78.1 25.9 637.6 0.5 0.9 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 0.6 % 11.1 % 0.5 % 11.8 % 14.3 % 4.7 % 116.7 % 0.1 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 22 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 7 Local: Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha 25 occ 13 occ 13 occ 880 occ 9 occ 839 occ 17 occ 7 occ 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 60 % 38 % 200 % 116 % 144 % 90 % 65 % 671 % 127 3850 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 58 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 47 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 16 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Shorebird Concentration Area Tufted Puffin marsh op Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Cobble/Gravel (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Estuary Marine Ecological Systems Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Silty, moderate salinity, low Mixed Fine: Partly Enclosed Eulittoral, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) 2 occ 11 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Brandt's Cormorant Plant Communities 7 occ 1 occ Haematopus bachmani ha ha m occ 24 ha 31 ha 141 ha 307 ha 26281 m 401 ha 13 ha 3954 m 1 occ 8 5 12740 10 2 occ 8 occ 1 occ 5 occ 15 occ Branta canadensis leucopareia 1 occ 1 occ 3 occ Abundance Black Oystercatcher GRank Aleutian Canada Goose Species Birds Marine Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn)Ledgla / carobn / sphagn Plant Communities Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Lookout-Sandlake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 12.9 % 3.3 % 27.3 % 85.7 22.0 182.0 19.4 11.9 8.1 0.5 1.8 200.0 0.1 % 0.3 % 100.0 % 2.9 % 1.8 % 1.2 % 0.5 5.2 15.0 90.9 25.0 53.3 40.0 27.6 23.2 0.1 % 0.8 % 2.3 % 14.7 % 8.7 % 8.5 % 6.3 % 4.1 % 3.5 % 36.4 46.7 13.3 6.9 % 2.0 % 5.6 % 32.3 27.8 33.3 91.1 273.2 Relative Abundance 5.0 % 4.2 % 5.6 % 12.5 % 25.0 % % of Total Known 42.8 % 11.0 % 91.0 % 9.7 % 5.9 % 4.1 % 0.2 % 0.9 % 100.0 % 0.2 % 2.6 % 7.5 % 45.5 % 12.5 % 26.7 % 20.0 % 13.8 % 11.6 % 18.2 % 23.3 % 6.7 % 16.1 % 13.9 % 16.7 % 16.7 % 50.0 % Contribution to Goal ha ha m occ 55 ha 279 ha 155 ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 5,844 ha 445,946 m 1 occ 3,384 198 169,841 22 16 occ 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 30 occ 15 occ 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 6 occ 6 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % Page 48 of 328 282 % 116 % 244 % 238 % 228 % 294 % 105 % 142 % 100 % 330 258 224 250 119 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 187 % 200 % 168 % 159 % 133 % 117 % 117 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 14636 m 20101 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment 2 occ 36342 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 18884 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 1434 601 4204 19283 251 279 4344 1240 6720 1221 1433 6360 366 3712 2817 11440 61 368 177 362 220 91 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Lookout-Sandlake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 12.5 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 3.0 % 12.9 % 2.8 % 4.0 % 2.3 % 2.4 % 4.4 % 0.3 % 8.4 % 2.2 % 14.5 % 5.7 % 8.5 % 3.8 % 11.1 % 4.3 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 0.7 % 3.5 % 5.3 % 1.1 % % of Total Known 1527.3 30.9 42.0 30.9 99.8 19.7 85.8 18.6 26.6 15.6 16.2 29.3 2.1 55.8 14.4 96.7 38.2 56.7 25.5 74.0 28.4 1.3 13.4 4.4 23.6 35.3 7.1 Relative Abundance 40.0 % 0.8 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 2.6 % 9.8 % 42.9 % 9.3 % 13.3 % 7.8 % 8.1 % 14.7 % 1.1 % 27.9 % 7.2 % 48.4 % 19.1 % 28.4 % 12.7 % 37.0 % 14.2 % 0.7 % 6.7 % 2.2 % 11.8 % 17.6 % 3.6 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha 5 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 14,577 1,401 45,204 144,777 3,219 3,436 29,625 116,959 24,105 16,915 2,963 33,330 1,289 29,156 7,615 80,427 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 49 of 328 220 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % 89 263 218 215 124 132 198 119 129 247 231 119 140 255 309 122 287 206 239 224 246 256 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 118,523 ha 292,752 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % Abundance occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Fishes Pigeon Guillemot Birds Species 1 occ 48045 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Cepphus columba 3979 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 103 occ 1 11 71837 935 8 26475 8070 4 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Marine b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) GRank a 0.3 % 7.9 % 1.3 % 5.5 % 0.3 % 7.5 % 13.3 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 21.3 % 5.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 16 % GAP 3 81 % GAP 4 2 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Cape Scott-Port Hardy Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Scott-Port Hardy Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 0.2 9.6 1.6 7.4 5.0 55.5 26.8 0.3 0.0 4.9 64.5 20.2 Relative Abundance 0.9 % 15.9 % 2.7 % 12.3 % 8.3 % 91.7 % 44.3 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 8.2 % 106.6 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 97 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ 116 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 12 12 162,155 195,305 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % 171 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 1833 650 166 127 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 2 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 50 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Zalophus californianus G5 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Intertidal Habitat Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Shore Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Surfgrass Estuary Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Sea Lion (California) Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Scott-Port Hardy Portfolio Site Summary, continued: m m m m ha m m m ha m m m m m 3499 688 18235 211 7879 1975 5407 3319 3774 m m m m m m m m m 3180 m 75 ha 25265 57949 7048 9806 83 20952 10152 4205 682 53476 24997 11013 3180 39608 1 occ 1 occ 18291 m 9374 m 34969 m Abundance 17.8 % 6.3 % 2.3 % 0.2 % 2.4 % 10.8 % 2.5 % 0.5 % 2.1 % 18.2 % 0.7 % 6.7 % 1.9 % 3.4 % 1.7 % 5.6 % 3.7 % 1.6 % 16.7 % 3.5 % 3.6 % 1.7 % 2.0 % 13.8 % 3.3 % 13.1 4.7 1.7 0.1 1.8 8.0 1.8 0.4 1.5 13.5 0.5 5.0 1.4 2.5 1.2 4.2 2.7 1.2 12.3 2.6 2.7 1.3 1.5 10.2 2.4 59.4 % 21.0 % 7.6 % 0.6 % 8.1 % 36.0 % 8.3 % 1.7 % 7.0 % 60.8 % 2.5 % 22.4 % 6.2 % 11.3 % 5.5 % 18.8 % 12.3 % 5.4 % 55.6 % 11.7 % 12.0 % 5.7 % 6.7 % 46.1 % 10.9 % % 7.7 % 5.4 % 11.1 % 15.5 % Contribution to Goal 2.4 % 1.7 1.2 2.5 3.4 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 1.6 % 3.3 % 4.7 % % of Total Known m m m m ha m m m ha m m m m m 5,894 3,276 239,478 36,906 96,940 5,487 64,871 193,399 54,295 m m m m m m m m m 5,233 m 3,069 ha 112,601 939,089 62,438 176,736 443 169,841 187,323 7,567 5,844 445,946 442,357 164,143 6,898 363,205 13 occ occ 337,346 m 84,336 m 225,517 m Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 51 of 328 224 118 223 137 112 160 114 88 137 199 % 224 % 179 119 224 109 120 224 146 214 105 142 228 118 215 131 223 % % 132 % 169 % 146 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 85977 m 73703 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Pink Salmon, North Island Sockeye Salmon, North Island Steelhead Salmon, North Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 72607 m Salvelinus malma Dolly Varden, North Island 29.1 % 8.6 % 9.5 % 6.3 % 18907 m 241401 m 54.1 % 99.2 % 46.8 % 32.3 % 41.0 % 46.2 % 42.7 % 19.0 % 3.9 % 4.9 % 2.0 % 1.5 % 25.4 % 10.1 % 0.9 % 29.0 % 2.3 % 1.2 % 5.6 % 5.1 % 5.3 % 0.7 % 4.3 % 21.0 % 6.7 % % of Total Known 954 m 108658 m 2657 m 31350 m Oncorhynchus clarki G5 179455 m Oncorhynchus kisutch 66134 m 506 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Coho Salmon, North Island Oncorhynchus keta 2429 48523 6297 11372 5598 3448 1792 856 1305 2556 5486 5432 1664 256 801 12250 5933 Abundance Cutthroat Trout, North Island Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chum Salmon, North Island GRank Chinook Salmon, North Island Species Fishes Freshwater Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Scott-Port Hardy Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 267.6 199.7 245.7 362.1 761.0 1395.0 658.5 272.6 346.4 649.5 600.5 160.0 2.9 3.6 1.4 1.1 18.8 7.4 0.7 21.4 1.7 0.9 4.2 3.7 3.9 0.5 3.2 15.5 5.0 Relative Abundance 63.4 % 47.3 % 58.2 % 85.8 % 180.3 % 330.6 % 156.0 % 64.6 % 82.1 % 153.9 % 142.3 % 37.9 % 12.9 % 16.5 % 6.5 % 5.0 % 84.8 % 33.5 % 3.1 % 96.7 % 7.7 % 4.1 % 18.8 % 16.9 % 17.8 % 2.2 % 14.3 % 69.9 % 22.5 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 380,781 m 39,958 m 1,638 m 126,642 m 40,876 m 26,010 m 46,536 m 4,114 m 38,200 m 116,598 m 46,478 m 1,334 m 18,758 294,655 96,577 226,193 6,602 10,283 58,215 886 16,881 61,723 29,156 32,087 9,335 11,673 5,586 17,529 26,382 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 52 of 328 457 % 283 % 102 % 294 % 273 % 331 % 207 % 196 % 101 % 192 % 162 % 96 % 216 123 110 102 153 243 98 221 144 94 255 121 278 104 244 230 139 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Scott-Port Hardy Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1039.8 290.6 463.5 563.0 528.5 1085.8 189.7 275.9 496.8 179.4 1003.0 291.1 45.5 1232.3 175.8 32.0 50.4 11.1 656.2 49.3 % 13.8 % 22.0 % 13.3 % 62.6 % 51.5 % 9.0 % 13.1 % 11.8 % 8.5 % 47.5 % 6.9 % 19.0 % 6.9 % 5.4 % 58.4 % 4.2 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 0.5 % 31.1 % 30501 m 36355 m 9674 m 157728 m 3502 m 16347 m 75909 m 18749 m 360673 m 3502 m 28602 m 14942 m 10818 m 94377 m 252 m 10165 m 102417 m 6594 m 97657 m 201 m 30493 m 402.0 146.5 132.1 6.3 % Relative Abundance 3250 m Abundance % of Total Known 155.5 % 2.6 % 11.9 % 7.6 % 41.7 % 292.0 % 10.8 % 69.0 % 95.3 % 34.7 % 237.7 % 42.5 % 117.7 % 65.4 % 44.9 % 257.3 % 125.2 % 133.4 % 109.8 % 68.9 % 246.4 % 31.3 % Contribution to Goal 19,612 m 7,607 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 3,481 m 2,340 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 43,046 m 12,035 m 8,237 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 168,906 m 6,354 m 2,796 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 52,799 m 12,380 m 10,385 m Ecoregion Goal Page 53 of 328 257 % 332 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 301 % 72 % 433 % 211 % 162 % 267 % 415 % 448 % 269 % 119 % 258 % 127 % 459 % 264 % 132 % 279 % 301 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Scott-Port Hardy Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 819.0 384.1 59.5 1288.8 0.8 41.2 33.6 843.6 48.7 0.9 33.5 2.4 103.7 844.1 7.9 122.8 10.7 93.9 825.8 38.8 % 9.1 % 7.0 % 61.1 % 0.0 % 2.0 % 2.4 % 100.0 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 99.3 % 5.3 % 0.1 % 7.4 % 100.0 % 0.4 % 5.8 % 0.5 % 4.5 % 97.8 % 16157 m 100565 m 324 m 18156 m 76 m 3567 m 22827 m 9018 m 2986 m 19 m 15779 m 1958 m 8292 m 21 m 60466 m 4544 m 101 m 16392 m 311 m 42971 m 7302 m 112.6 837.9 277.3 13.1 % Relative Abundance 27648 m Abundance % of Total Known 195.7 % 22.3 % 2.5 % 29.1 % 1.9 % 200.0 % 24.6 % 0.6 % 26.7 % 198.5 % 7.9 % 0.2 % 11.5 % 199.9 % 8.0 % 9.8 % 0.2 % 305.4 % 14.1 % 91.0 % 194.1 % 65.7 % Contribution to Goal 3,732 m 193,048 m 12,283 m 56,327 m 5,369 m 2,272 m 246,148 m 3,681 m 31,071 m 986 m 199,007 m 9,455 m 25,878 m 4,511 m 287,102 m 36,520 m 39,552 m 5,945 m 2,300 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 42,081 m Ecoregion Goal Page 54 of 328 196 % 265 % 125 % 151 % 317 % 200 % 186 % 299 % 163 % 199 % 240 % 116 % 114 % 200 % 162 % 129 % 297 % 307 % 103 % 407 % 331 % 141 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Third Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Scott-Port Hardy Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 26.6 18.7 27.9 35.1 23.3 827.4 59.9 3.2 % 0.9 % 1.3 % 1.7 % 1.1 % 98.0 % 2.8 % 682 m 313 m 1263 m 7128 m 3811 m 13458 m Relative Abundance 29 m Abundance % of Total Known 14.2 % 196.1 % 5.5 % 8.3 % 6.6 % 4.4 % 6.3 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 1,944 m 128,956 m 15,189 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 454 m Ecoregion Goal Page 55 of 328 220 % 196 % 253 % 295 % 239 % 211 % 126 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 9,262 ha 22,878 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 1 % Abundance 1 occ Progne subis 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Arctostaphylos hispidula Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Cochlearia officinalis Hairy Manzanita Pink Sandverbena Scurvygrass 2 occ 1 occ Haematopus bachmani Phalacrocorax penicillatus Black Oystercatcher Brandt's Cormorant Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Branta canadensis leucopareia Aleutian Canada Goose Species Birds Marine 2 occ Sidalcea malviflora ssp patula Coast Checker Bloom Vascular Plants 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus 4991 ha 3109 ha Abundance b Purple Martin G5 GRank a 1.0 % 0.6 % 5.6 % 33.3 % 10.0 % 3.6 % 25.0 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 1.6 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 8 % GAP 3 5 % GAP 4 84 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Species North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cape Sebastian-Hunter Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Sebastian-Hunter Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 9.1 5.2 47.2 59.5 33.7 59.5 119.1 86.0 0.9 5.0 63.6 Relative Abundance d 3.2 % 1.9 % 16.7 % 7.7 % 4.3 % 7.7 % 15.4 % 11.1 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 8.2 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 8 % National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 5 % Local: % Relative Abundance e 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 13 occ 23 occ 13 occ 13 occ 9 occ 880 occ 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 168 % 159 % 133 % 8 % 30 % 92 % 46 % 367 % 116 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 84 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 56 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Tufted Puffin 22743 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range small rivers - serpentine, low to mid elevation 1 occ 11999 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 13033 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 2 m m m m m m m m m Fall Chinook Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU 1768 256 115 1983 147 1377 3278 312 153 9 ha 9 ha Coho Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) 4 ha 1377 m 2 ha 1 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Double-Crested Cormorant Leach's Storm-Petrel Plant Communities 1 occ 1 occ Ptychoramphus aleuticus G4 Pelecanus occidentalis Abundance Cassin's Auklet GRank Brown Pelican Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Sebastian-Hunter Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 50.0 % 4.9 % 4.7 % 6.3 % 2.7 % 9.8 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 1.7 % 3.0 % 7.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 2.9 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 1.1 % 6.3 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 2.8 % 2.0 % 5.6 % 14.3 % % of Total Known 5409.0 880.5 854.4 682.7 25.7 92.1 2.2 3.9 6.1 16.2 27.9 68.5 0.5 0.4 27.9 0.2 0.9 0.1 9.4 56.7 2.4 3.0 25.8 18.9 47.2 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 16.3 % 15.8 % 12.6 % 9.1 % 32.5 % 0.8 % 1.4 % 2.2 % 5.7 % 9.8 % 24.2 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 9.9 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 3.3 % 20.0 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 9.1 % 6.7 % 16.7 % % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m 1 occ 139,717 m 75,962 m 103,258 m 19,507 788 14,577 144,777 6,812 24,105 33,330 1,289 80,427 5,499 ha 91 ha 5,844 ha 445,946 m 3,169 ha 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 15 occ 6 occ occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % Page 57 of 328 100 % 157 % 91 % 95 % 226 90 89 215 102 129 119 140 122 206 % 121 % 105 % 142 % 238 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 200 % 150 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Serpentine Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cape Sebastian-Hunter Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ Abundance 50.0 % % of Total Known 5409.0 Relative Abundance 100.0 % Contribution to Goal 1 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 58 of 328 200 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 15,262 ha 37,696 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 0 % 22693 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Lamprey Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients 2 occ 67798 m 1 occ 77748 m 4990 m 1 occ 9345 ha 5517 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 b Abundance Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 G5 GRank a Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Ascaphus truei Abundance 6.7 % 2.0 % 3.0 % 0.7 % 1.6 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 0.8 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 91 % GAP 4 8 % GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Tailed Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Capital State Forest Targets known in this Conservation Area: Capital State Forest Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 728.6 218.5 78.9 177.0 22.7 67.1 12.7 3.3 Relative Abundance 22.2 % 6.7 % % 2.4 % 5.4 % 0.7 % 14.3 % 2.7 % 0.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 92 Local: Relative Abundance 722,295 m 7 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 9 occ 1,017,511 m occ 943,067 m 1,440,012 m e 133 % 137 % % 129 % 117 % 150 % 343 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 8 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 59 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 19,975 ha 49,338 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 1 % ha ha ha ha ha Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Warty Jumping-Slug Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Nonvascular Plants 1 occ Speyeria zerene hippolyta 1 occ 1 occ Prophysaon coeruleum Oregon Silverspot Butterfly 6 occ Blue-Gray Taildropper T1 Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Invertebrates 3 occ 18 occ 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 2 occ 1 12204 994 5658 135 Abundance b Falco peregrinus anatum T3 T4 GRank a Bald Eagle Rana aurora aurora Abundance 1.4 % 12.5 % 0.6 % 0.6 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 5.6 % 2.1 % 0.0 % 1.9 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 1 % GAP 2 17 % GAP 3 35 % GAP 4 47 % GRank American Peregrine Falcon Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cascade Head-Salmon River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cascade Head-Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 27.6 14.4 27.6 4.3 7.3 1.3 21.1 102.6 0.0 22.4 1.0 2.6 0.1 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 4.0 % 7.7 % 1.2 % 2.0 % 0.4 % 5.9 % 28.6 % 0.0 % 6.2 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 52 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 25 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 17 occ 7 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 200 % 28 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 65 % 671 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 47 % 1 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 60 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 3 occ 1 occ Sidalcea hirtipes Poa unilateralis Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow San Francisco Bluegrass G4 2 occ Erythronium elegans 1 occ Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn)Ledgla / carobn / sphagn 11 occ 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Common Murre Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Bedrock (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Eumetopias jubatus 1 occ Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican Mammals 4 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Brandt's Cormorant ha ha ha m occ 330 ha 13609 m 26 1 0 10713 2 2 occ 2 occ 5 occ 6 occ 7 occ Haematopus bachmani Black Oystercatcher Species Birds 3.1 % 0.9 % 13.7 4.0 1.0 0.4 2.3 8.3 11.9 20.2 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 1.9 % 2.9 % 21.9 4.9 % 4.4 12.5 21.9 8.3 17.0 8.5 59.8 59.8 17.9 119.7 119.7 51.3 43.1 28.7 27.6 51.3 Relative Abundance 5.9 % 1.1 % 2.8 % 5.0 % 1.9 % 14.3 % 4.0 % 2.0 % 8.3 % 12.5 % 1.6 % 100.0 % 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Marine 14.3 % 1 occ 16.7 % 20.0 % 22.2 % 20.0 % 100.0 % % of Total Known Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Salhoo Malfus / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Mineral Spring Caraqud / compal Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Caraqud / Compal) Plant Communities 1 occ Silene douglasii var oraria 1 occ Abundance Coast Range Fawn-Lily Pohlia sphagnicola GRank Cascade Head Catchfly Vascular Plants Moss (Pohlia) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cascade Head-Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 10.4 % 3.1 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 1.8 % 6.3 % 9.1 % 15.4 % 16.7 % 3.3 % 9.5 % 16.7 % 6.3 % % 12.9 % 6.5 % 16.7 % 16.7 % 5.0 % 33.3 % 33.3 % 14.3 % 12.0 % 8.0 % 7.7 % 14.3 % Contribution to Goal ha ha ha m occ 3,169 ha 442,357 m 3,384 198 20 169,841 22 13 occ 12 occ 30 occ 116 occ 30 occ 95 occ occ 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 6 occ 20 occ 3 occ 3 occ 7 occ 25 occ 25 occ 13 occ 7 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 61 of 328 238 % 228 % 330 258 210 224 250 223 % 217 % 190 % 171 % 187 % 163 % % 168 % 159 % 117 % 117 % 150 % 33 % 133 % 86 % 48 % 36 % 38 % 14 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 95613 m 8050 m 51409 m 92845 m 10818 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Volcanic Coastal Ridge Headwaters - Sediment 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 11797 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 41893 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 284 222 1843 2091 5010 7517 1318 3583 1186 372 2855 249 9 7 349 45 1 5 ha Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Seagrass (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cascade Head-Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 6.3 % 16.7 % 50.0 % 0.1 % 1.1 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 0.1 % 1.7 % 0.4 % 1.4 % 3.8 % 1.4 % 1.0 % 7.5 % 0.3 % 4.5 % 2.1 % 1.2 % 11.2 % 0.1 % 6.7 % 0.7 % 1.9 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 501.6 1254.1 2507.6 10.9 93.6 96.9 15.2 53.3 6.6 145.5 1.9 5.9 16.6 6.1 4.5 32.9 1.5 19.5 9.2 5.2 49.3 0.4 29.3 3.3 8.3 0.7 0.1 0.1 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 50.0 % 100.0 % 0.4 % 3.7 % 3.9 % 0.6 % 2.1 % 0.3 % 5.8 % 1.5 % 4.5 % 12.6 % 4.6 % 3.5 % 25.0 % 1.1 % 14.9 % 7.0 % 4.0 % 37.5 % 0.3 % 22.3 % 2.5 % 6.3 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha 5 occ 2 occ 1 occ 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 19,507 4,933 14,577 45,204 144,777 30,025 116,959 24,105 16,915 9,335 7,615 80,427 40 279 5,499 7,977 3,069 9,868 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 62 of 328 220 % 250 % 100 % 164 % 164 % 173 % 173 % 100 % 100 % 150 % 226 278 89 218 215 194 119 129 247 278 309 122 283 116 206 239 224 294 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 11,601 ha 28,655 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 5 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 0 % Abundance Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Tributaries- Sedimentary, Moderate Elevation, Moderate Gradient Lower Columbia Tributary Small Rivers - Outwash 4315.1 50.0 % 1 occ 524.9 43.8 12.9 2.7 1726.1 6.1 % 0.3 % d Relative Abundance 12.5 % 27251 m 0.6 % 0.1 % c Contribution to Goal 100.0 % 40.0 % 12.2 % 1.0 % 2.1 % 0.4 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership % National National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 1 % Local: % Relative Abundance 2 occ 14614 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? 7220 ha 3375 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 b Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU GRank a % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 1 % GAP 4 99 % GRank Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Castle Rock Targets known in this Conservation Area: Castle Rock Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 1 occ 5 occ 224,010 m f Ecoregion Goal 1,440,012 m e 100 % 100 % 46 % 117 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 99 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 63 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 30,987 ha 76,539 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 21 % Developed 3 % Undeveloped 74 % Water 2 % Abundance 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Mineral Spring 24909 m 17429 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 19079 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Species Freshwater 1 occ 2 occ Plant Communities 5 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 160 11661 10921 3 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet T3 GRank a 0.4 % 0.5 % 0.8 % 1.6 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 1.0 % 0.4 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 19 % GAP 4 80 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Chehalis River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chehalis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 19.6 27.9 42.7 11.6 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.2 7.8 3.3 0.0 Relative Abundance 1.2 % 1.7 % 2.6 % 5.0 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 3.4 % 1.4 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 2 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 20 Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha 722,295 m 20 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 195,305 345,702 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal 1,440,012 m 1,440,012 m e % % % % 117 % 117 % 150 % 150 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 127 116 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 79 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 64 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 23550 m 18656 m 29386 m G3 G5 Novumbra hubbsi Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Olympic Mudminnow Pacific Lamprey Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Puget Lowlands - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Puget Lowlands - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 18573 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 12998 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU GRank Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chehalis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 20.0 % 50.0 % 2.6 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 2.3 % 3.0 % 9.1 % 0.6 % 0.4 % % of Total Known 807.8 1615.5 146.8 46.6 29.6 121.7 293.6 31.8 22.3 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 100.0 % 9.1 % 2.9 % 1.8 % 7.5 % % 18.2 % 2.0 % 1.4 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 1 occ 11 occ 1,017,511 m 1,017,511 m 312,652 m occ 11 occ 943,067 m 943,067 m Ecoregion Goal Page 65 of 328 50 % 100 % 100 % 137 % 137 % 187 % % 109 % 129 % 129 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 59,489 ha 146,938 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 2 % Abundance Lagopus leucurus White-Tailed Ptarmigan Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Vancouver Island Marmot G1 Progne subis Purple Martin Marmota vancouverensis Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Mammals 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1248 ha 2 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area occ ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 3 3 5386 276 1 32583 2152 11678 207 Abundance b Bald Eagle Wintering Area G5 GRank a 33.3 % 2.8 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 7.1 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 1.3 % 0.6 % 0.7 % 0.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 99 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Chemainus-Cowichan Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chemainus-Cowichan Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 13.4 4.5 13.4 0.5 8.6 0.3 40.2 1.1 4.0 0.2 13.4 5.1 3.4 4.3 3.3 Relative Abundance d 11.1 % 3.7 % 11.1 % 0.4 % 7.1 % 0.2 % 33.3 % 0.9 % 3.3 % 0.1 % 11.1 % 4.2 % 2.8 % 3.6 % 2.7 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership % National National Other: 1 % National USFS: % % State/Provin Local: % Relative Abundance e occ ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 18 occ 27 occ 9 occ 302,959 ha 14 occ 839 occ 9 332 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % 28 % 100 % 367 % 108 % 29 % 90 % 2956 230 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 1 % 99 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 66 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 128805 m 78814 m 70439 m 195741 m 137777 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Coho Salmon, East Island Cutthroat Trout, East Island Dolly Varden, East Island Pink Salmon, East Island Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 61939 m Oncorhynchus keta 506.4 101.4 1180.1 991.7 105.0 11.4 3.9 14.1 113.1 65.1 2022.2 12.0 % 1.2 % 28.1 % 23.6 % 1.2 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 2.7 % 0.8 % 48.1 % 69.7 % 24066 m 45910 m 14575 m 6269 m 14763 m 38 m 38 m 2833 m 3859 m 23730 m 19810 m 7538 m 2930.3 157.4 487.2 372.9 4.0 385.7 175.4 196.3 312.1 348.1 Relative Abundance 1.9 % 17.4 % 13.3 % 0.1 % 22.9 % 10.4 % 7.0 % 11.1 % 12.4 % % of Total Known 23701 m 409 m 76510 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Chum Salmon, East Island G5 GRank Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chemainus-Cowichan Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 348.5 % 240.5 % 7.7 % 13.5 % 1.7 % 0.5 % 1.4 % 12.5 % 117.9 % 140.3 % 12.1 % 60.2 % 18.7 % 57.9 % 44.4 % 0.5 % 45.9 % 20.9 % 23.3 % 37.1 % 41.4 % Contribution to Goal 2,163 m 8,237 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 168,906 m 8,276 m 2,796 m 118,230 m 5,315 m 10,385 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 126,642 m 237,775 m 441,335 m 85,030 m 153,568 m 377,832 m 551,718 m 166,896 m 184,827 m Ecoregion Goal Page 67 of 328 379 % 415 % 448 % 269 % 119 % 39 % 127 % 459 % 394 % 301 % 457 % 283 % 294 % 125 % 133 % 56 % 123 % 69 % 122 % 78 % 154 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Fourth Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chemainus-Cowichan Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 134.6 43.4 516.2 143.0 425.8 961.5 1305.2 20.1 88.6 31.2 1550.6 1681.8 82.8 355.1 42.7 743.9 1681.3 85.8 1228.2 3.2 % 0.5 % 30.7 % 8.5 % 10.1 % 57.2 % 77.5 % 0.2 % 2.1 % 0.4 % 36.9 % 66.8 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 2.0 % 8.4 % 0.5 % 44.2 % 100.0 % 2.0 % 73.0 % 1818 m 7070 m 1437 m 284 m 5406 m 2191 m 751 m 5873 m 9173 m 30351 m 14028 m 10063 m 3046 m 2590 m 4144 m 3516 m 5607 m 2035 m 1908 m 4038 m 3335 m 1681.6 2807.2 71.9 1.7 % Relative Abundance 3680 m Abundance % of Total Known 146.1 % 10.2 % 200.0 % 88.5 % 5.1 % 42.2 % 9.8 % 200.0 % 200.0 % 333.9 % 184.4 % 3.7 % 10.5 % 2.4 % 155.2 % 114.4 % 50.6 % 17.0 % 61.4 % 5.2 % 16.0 % 8.6 % Contribution to Goal 2,283 m 39,552 m 954 m 2,300 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 42,081 m 1,295 m 1,523 m 3,014 m 7,607 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 484 m 1,916 m 10,676 m 1,668 m 2,340 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 43,046 m Ecoregion Goal Page 68 of 328 146 % 297 % 200 % 103 % 407 % 331 % 141 % 200 % 200 % 488 % 332 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 200 % 114 % 95 % 17 % 72 % 433 % 211 % 162 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chemainus-Cowichan Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 201.7 34.1 2555.1 1681.4 52.9 31.4 130.0 6.5 71.5 47.7 482.0 1682.0 16.7 88.4 144.7 42.9 1139.1 1680.2 1263.2 4.8 % 1.2 % 60.8 % 100.0 % 1.3 % 0.7 % 7.7 % 0.2 % 4.3 % 1.1 % 11.5 % 0.1 % 68.4 % 100.0 % 0.4 % 2.1 % 3.4 % 1.0 % 67.7 % 100.0 % 75.1 % 3675 m 11659 m 9372 m 8695 m 1629 m 7440 m 489 m 18 m 142 m 1761 m 2110 m 1077 m 902 m 6081 m 152 m 5925 m 2113 m 9860 m 6611 m 1691 m 4546 m 1149.1 3.7 21.0 0.5 % Relative Abundance 910 m Abundance % of Total Known 150.2 % 199.8 % 135.5 % 5.1 % 17.2 % 10.5 % 2.0 % 200.0 % 136.7 % 0.4 % 57.3 % 5.7 % 8.5 % 0.8 % 15.5 % 3.7 % 6.3 % 200.0 % 303.9 % 4.1 % 24.0 % 2.5 % Contribution to Goal 3,026 m 846 m 4,880 m 193,048 m 12,283 m 56,327 m 7,664 m 3,040 m 660 m 246,148 m 3,681 m 31,071 m 1,674 m 2,306 m 3,166 m 199,007 m 25,878 m 4,348 m 3,084 m 287,102 m 15,320 m 36,520 m Ecoregion Goal Page 69 of 328 150 % 200 % 200 % 265 % 125 % 151 % 19 % 200 % 200 % 186 % 299 % 163 % 8 % 211 % 135 % 240 % 114 % 200 % 434 % 162 % 145 % 129 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chemainus-Cowichan Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1679.7 6.8 96.2 163.7 1682.0 482.7 1105.3 162.7 4204.9 100.0 % 0.2 % 2.3 % 3.9 % 100.0 % 11.5 % 26.3 % 3.9 % 100.0 % 16.5 % 1155 m 38 m 1106 m 25101 m 7589 m 4378 m 8700 m 18339 m 12992 m 6230 m 694.1 32.4 0.8 % Relative Abundance 592 m Abundance % of Total Known 82.5 % 500.1 % 19.4 % 131.5 % 57.4 % 200.0 % 19.5 % 11.4 % 0.8 % 199.8 % 3.9 % Contribution to Goal 7,547 m 2,598 m 94,768 m 6,618 m 7,627 m 3,794 m 128,956 m 9,667 m 4,738 m 578 m 15,371 m Ecoregion Goal Page 70 of 328 231 % 500 % 220 % 255 % 189 % 200 % 253 % 278 % 239 % 200 % 211 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 400 ha 988 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped % % Water Abundance GRank a 1 occ Abundance b 1.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Chetco River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chetco River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 6958.3 Relative Abundance 5.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 18 occ f Ecoregion Goal 106 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 71 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 82 ha 204 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water Abundance GRank a 1 ha 82 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site China Wall ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: China Wall ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 0.2 9.1 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 72 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 43 ha 106 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water Abundance GRank a 11 ha 11 ha 22 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Chinook River BLM Site Targets known in this Conservation Area: Chinook River BLM Site Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9.3 5.3 4.6 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 73 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 2,400 ha 5,928 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a m m m ha ha ha m ha m m 6 ha 5320 4697 974 30 97 58 6613 0 4697 2887 2887 m 1352 m Abundance b 0.0 % 0.2 % 2.3 % 0.2 % 2.7 % 4.2 % 5.5 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 3.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Estuary Marine Ecological Systems Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Smelt spawn Species Fishes Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Clallam Bay - Clallam River (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clallam Bay - Clallam River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1.2 6.2 82.2 6.0 97.4 152.7 198.9 16.2 0.1 11.6 8.7 9.4 116.4 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.6 % 7.5 % 0.6 % 8.9 % 14.0 % 18.2 % 1.5 % 0.0 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 10.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e m m m ha ha ha m ha m m 5,499 ha 939,089 62,438 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 3,169 442,357 363,205 337,346 m 12,705 m f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % 206 % 119 224 109 168 162 169 142 238 228 131 132 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 74 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clallam Bay - Clallam River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 991 974 4697 1292 m m m m Abundance 0.5 % 0.5 % 8.3 % 0.6 % % of Total Known 16.7 19.6 303.6 22.9 Relative Abundance 1.5 % 1.8 % 27.8 % 2.1 % Contribution to Goal 64,871 54,295 16,915 61,723 m m m m Ecoregion Goal % % % % Page 75 of 328 114 137 247 94 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,872 ha 21,913 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 30 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 66 % Water 2 % Abundance 14161 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 29543 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 2 occ Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU T2 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Fishes Species Freshwater Columbia White-Tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus leucurus 1 occ Mammals 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina ha ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 11 1891 1040 1604 172 5 Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a 2.7 % 0.6 % 11.8 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 11 % GAP 3 33 % GAP 4 57 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Clatskanie River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clatskanie River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 300.5 115.9 95.1 1.6 1.0 26.1 7.8 2.4 1.7 0.4 0.1 Relative Abundance 5.3 % 2.1 % 11.8 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 3.2 % 1.0 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 11 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 33 Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha ha ha 17 occ 503 occ 839 occ 348 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal 266,114 m 1,440,012 m e % % % % % % 86 % 117 % 71 % 111 % 90 % 500 127 116 126 236 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 57 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 76 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Tributaries- Sedimentary, Moderate Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clatskanie River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ 29655 m Abundance 6.3 % 0.9 % % of Total Known 1129.4 164.6 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 2.9 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ 1,017,511 m Ecoregion Goal Page 77 of 328 100 % 137 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 17,649 ha 43,593 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 1 % ha ha ha ha ha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn)Ledgla / carobn / sphagn 1 occ 1 occ Plant Communities 1 occ Carex pluriflora 1 occ 3 occ 5 occ 11 13173 426 3133 9 Abundance b Castilleja chambersii T3 T1 GRank a Several-Flowered Sedge Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii Speyeria zerene hippolyta Haliaeetus leucocephalus Abundance 8.3 % 25.0 % 33.3 % 20.0 % 37.5 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 2.0 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 14 % GAP 3 5 % GAP 4 80 % GRank Chamber's Paintbrush Vascular Plants Pacific Western Big-Eared Bat Mammals Oregon Silverspot Butterfly Invertebrates Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Clatsop Plains-Necanicum River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clatsop Plains-Necanicum River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 67.7 58.0 16.3 81.3 48.8 2.4 0.0 27.4 0.5 1.6 0.0 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 14.3 % 4.0 % 20.0 % 12.0 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 6.7 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 2 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 15 Local: 2 Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 6 occ 7 occ 25 occ 5 occ 25 occ 839 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 117 % 57 % 12 % 40 % 28 % 90 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 81 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 78 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 9 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Pigeon Guillemot Shorebird Concentration Area Tufted Puffin Eumetopias jubatus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Mud (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Estuary Marine Ecological Systems Algal Beds (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Mammals Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus 4 occ 3 occ Common Murre Pelagic Cormorant Western Snowy Plover 5 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus 76 205 640 11553 4161 0 1 0 182 96 69 5 147 4 m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 2 ha 162 ha 16216 m 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 5 occ Haematopus bachmani Abundance Brandt's Cormorant GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clatsop Plains-Necanicum River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.7 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 2.4 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 1.0 % 0.4 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 1.7 % 1.2 % 3.4 2.1 2.1 11.9 2.6 0.9 2.1 0.2 4.9 1.8 3.3 0.6 8.6 6.0 0.1 7.6 5.5 11.4 0.0 % 1.5 % 1.1 % 24.8 2.4 % 13.5 9.3 5.0 5.9 % 7.1 % 4.3 % 1.1 % 11.5 19.8 4.7 4.0 % 0.9 % 2.3 % 24.0 6.9 Relative Abundance 5.0 % 1.4 % % of Total Known 2.3 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 8.0 % 1.7 % 0.6 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 3.3 % 1.2 % 2.2 % 0.4 % 5.8 % 4.0 % 0.0 % 5.1 % 3.7 % 7.7 % 16.7 % 9.1 % 6.3 % 3.3 % 7.8 % 13.3 % 3.2 % 16.1 % 4.6 % Contribution to Goal 3,285 14,577 45,204 144,777 239,478 40 55 155 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 91 m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,384 ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 13 occ 12 occ 11 occ 16 occ 30 occ 116 occ 30 occ 95 occ 31 occ 108 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 79 of 328 158 89 218 215 223 283 282 244 206 239 224 246 256 121 330 % 238 % 228 % 223 % 217 % 100 % 119 % 190 % 171 % 187 % 163 % 168 % 159 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 79126 m 22833 m 43471 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 22618 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 347 309 969 1050 49 1603 694 2987 1008 2936 2336 517 1841 1875 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Embayment) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clatsop Plains-Necanicum River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.5 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 0.9 % 1.5 % 2.9 % 1.0 % 2.0 % 4.8 % 0.4 % 0.9 % 2.7 % 29.7 % 4.5 % 2.4 % 1.7 % 7.3 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 49.6 48.7 49.9 88.9 7.6 14.3 4.9 9.9 23.8 2.0 4.3 13.3 147.4 22.4 11.9 8.2 35.9 3.5 Relative Abundance 1.7 % 1.7 % 1.8 % 3.1 % 5.1 % 9.6 % 3.3 % 6.6 % 16.0 % 1.4 % 2.9 % 9.0 % 99.2 % 15.1 % 8.0 % 5.5 % 24.2 % 2.3 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 6,812 3,219 29,625 15,799 304 116,959 24,105 33,330 1,017 19,455 29,156 9,335 7,615 80,427 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 80 of 328 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % 102 124 198 247 334 119 129 119 311 89 255 278 309 122 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 176,444 ha 435,817 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 6 % Ardea herodias a GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Haliaeetus leucocephalus Great-Blue Heron Abundance occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ 2 occ 123 occ 16 42 2 133 177 1 39114 2865 15 1 2 5166 12049 86355 3573 2 Abundance b 2.8 % 6.5 % 4.3 % 11.0 % 1.4 % 8.0 % 0.5 % 1.0 % 7.2 % 0.4 % 8.8 % 0.4 % 50.0 % 0.2 % 3.2 % 5.3 % 9.4 % 2.6 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 13 % GAP 3 85 % GAP 4 1 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Tidal Salt Marsh North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Clayoquot-Alberni Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9.0 6.0 54.2 189.6 6.8 16.3 2.2 2.0 9.8 0.6 67.7 6.8 9.0 0.3 6.4 10.8 19.2 6.8 Relative Abundance 22.2 % 14.7 % 133.3 % 466.7 % 16.7 % 40.1 % 5.4 % 5.0 % 24.1 % 1.5 % 166.7 % 16.7 % 22.2 % 0.7 % 15.8 % 26.6 % 47.2 % 16.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 98 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ 9 occ 839 occ 12 9 12 332 3,273 29 162,155 195,305 9 6 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 144 % 90 % 1833 2956 650 230 878 407 166 127 1067 3850 44 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 1 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 81 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Lagopus leucurus White-Tailed Ptarmigan 2 occ Erysimum arenicola var torulosum 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ Ptychoramphus aleuticus Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Cassin's Auklet Common Murre Fork-Tailed Storm Petral Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover 28977 201102 16763 39445 119 64020 m m m m ha m 1 occ 47436 m 2939 m 58563 m 1 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Brandt's Cormorant Fishes 3 occ Haematopus bachmani Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine 3 occ Aster paucicapitatus Sand-Dwelling Wallflower 3 occ Olympic Mountain Aster Vascular Plants Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk 1 occ 47336 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus G5 28400 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 7.7 % 6.4 % 8.1 % 6.7 % 8.0 % 11.3 % 2.4 % 4.2 % 1.0 % 7.8 % 1.1 % 6.3 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 1.0 % 7.1 % 2.8 % 5.6 % 1.0 % 0.8 % 50.0 % 60.0 % 8.3 % 1.9 % 7.8 % 9.6 % % of Total Known 3.8 3.2 4.0 3.3 4.0 5.6 1.1 2.1 0.5 3.9 0.5 3.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 3.7 1.4 2.5 0.5 0.4 3.3 4.9 4.5 2.0 6.3 7.8 Relative Abundance 25.7 % 21.4 % 26.8 % 22.3 % 26.8 % 37.7 % 7.7 % 14.1 % 3.5 % 26.0 % 3.3 % 20.0 % 1.7 % 1.1 % 3.3 % 25.0 % 9.1 % 16.7 % 3.2 % 2.8 % 8.0 % 12.0 % 11.1 % 5.0 % 15.6 % 19.3 % Contribution to Goal 112,601 939,089 62,438 176,736 443 169,841 m m m m ha m 13 occ 337,346 m 84,336 m 225,517 m 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 95 occ 30 occ 4 occ 11 occ 6 occ 31 occ 108 occ 25 occ 25 occ 27 occ 20 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % Page 82 of 328 179 119 224 109 120 224 223 % 132 % 169 % 146 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 163 % 187 % 175 % 200 % 150 % 168 % 159 % 16 % 20 % 100 % 105 % 108 % 110 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Lupinus littoralis (dune community) GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Channel Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Intertidal Habitat Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand and Gravel Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Surfgrass Estuary Surfgrass Shore Eelgrass Shore Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Seashore Lupine Dunes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: m m ha m ha m m occ 1625 311 7485 810 1585 22207 47064 20705 8732 2328 27727 228 7801 945 33017 2844 4860 2625 9586 232 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 2948 m 1313 ha 38 ha 61 ha 5275 m 28406 m 52342 5438 491 39268 93 61282 49720 1 Abundance 12.5 % 2.8 % 6.9 % 3.1 % 8.1 % 14.7 % 5.9 % 16.8 % 6.9 % 39.5 % 8.6 % 0.2 % 3.6 % 5.6 % 5.1 % 2.9 % 45.1 % 22.4 % 5.3 % 5.4 % 16.9 % 6.2 1.4 3.4 1.5 4.0 7.3 2.9 8.3 3.4 19.6 4.3 0.1 1.8 2.8 2.5 1.4 22.4 11.1 2.6 2.7 8.4 2.1 0.1 4.2 11.4 1.2 22.9 % 2.3 % 4.3 % 0.2 % 8.5 % 4.2 10.7 1.2 1.3 0.4 2.1 4.5 14.9 Relative Abundance 8.4 % 21.6 % 2.5 % 2.6 % 0.9 % 4.2 % 9.1 % 14.3 % % of Total Known 41.7 % 9.5 % 23.0 % 10.4 % 26.9 % 49.1 % 19.7 % 56.1 % 23.2 % 131.7 % 28.6 % 0.7 % 12.0 % 18.8 % 17.1 % 9.7 % 150.4 % 74.6 % 17.7 % 17.9 % 56.3 % 14.3 % 0.7 % 28.3 % 76.5 % 7.8 % 27.9 % 71.9 % 8.4 % 8.8 % 2.9 % 13.9 % 30.3 % 100.0 % Contribution to Goal m m ha m ha m m occ 3,901 3,285 32,500 7,802 5,894 45,204 239,478 36,906 37,705 1,767 96,940 31,193 64,871 5,027 193,399 29,435 3,231 3,518 54,295 1,300 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 5,233 m 9,168 ha 5,499 ha 215 ha 6,898 m 363,205 m 187,323 7,567 5,844 445,946 3,169 442,357 164,143 1 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 83 of 328 74 158 106 72 224 218 223 137 65 293 112 113 114 117 88 65 195 186 137 131 199 % 287 % 206 % 185 % 215 % 131 % 146 214 105 142 238 228 118 200 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 114160 m 237192 m Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Lampetra ayresi Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Cutthroat Trout, West Island Dolly Varden, West Island Pink Salmon, West Island River Lamprey Sockeye Salmon, West Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 133371 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island G4 332525 m Oncorhynchus keta 134 m 3567 m 23876 m 26424 m 76794 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 140910 m 2788 28915 323 2067 2437 5530 68006 10203 12305 3 7668 14101 9111 4347 11908 1331 2049 1954 3755 5010 5436 Abundance Chum Salmon, West Island G5 GRank Chinook Salmon, West Island Species Fishes Freshwater Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat (Embayment) Sand Flat (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.5 % 11.7 % 15.6 % 100.0 % 6.3 % 12.9 % 17.4 % 14.8 % 8.4 % 15.3 % 4.5 % 2.9 % 0.3 % 3.9 % 0.6 % 1.7 % 9.0 % 29.8 % 6.3 % 0.0 % 13.6 % 6.9 % 14.0 % 4.5 % 11.1 % 3.4 % 60.6 % 24.9 % 5.5 % 8.6 % 6.2 % % of Total Known 7.5 110.4 147.0 945.1 59.3 73.0 98.7 139.9 79.7 144.3 2.2 1.5 0.2 1.9 0.3 0.9 4.5 14.8 3.1 0.0 6.8 3.4 7.0 2.2 5.5 1.7 30.0 12.3 2.7 4.3 3.1 Relative Abundance 2.6 % 38.9 % 51.9 % 333.4 % 20.9 % 25.8 % 34.8 % 49.3 % 28.1 % 50.9 % 14.9 % 9.8 % 1.1 % 13.1 % 2.1 % 5.7 % 30.1 % 99.2 % 21.1 % 0.0 % 45.4 % 22.8 % 46.8 % 14.9 % 37.1 % 11.4 % 201.9 % 83.0 % 18.4 % 28.6 % 20.6 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 5,105 m 609,198 m 220,095 m 1,070 m 114,095 m 102,560 m 382,902 m 673,874 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 18,758 294,655 29,625 15,799 116,959 96,577 226,193 10,283 58,215 20,837 16,881 61,723 19,455 29,156 32,087 11,673 1,015 2,355 20,374 17,529 26,382 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 84 of 328 500 % 168 % 191 % 333 % 160 % 148 % 102 % 155 % 144 % 176 % 216 123 198 247 119 110 102 243 98 57 144 94 89 255 121 104 280 83 125 230 139 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 717.0 161.1 399.3 6.2 23.5 876.7 1.7 662.2 91.0 458.2 46.0 0.4 6.8 455.8 84.6 200.5 13.0 15.8 17.6 50.6 % 5.7 % 28.2 % 0.4 % 1.7 % 61.8 % 0.1 % 46.7 % 3.2 % 32.3 % 8.1 % 1.4 % 10.6 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 32.2 % 3.0 % 14.1 % 2.3 % 2.8 % 1.2 % 23928 m 216380 m 20960 m 59 m 5431 m 6241 m 311 m 8843 m 37945 m 4960 m 179 m 949 m 1508 m 246 m 692 m 8611 m 91455 m 2172 m 118 m 208 m 2141 m 149.6 20.4 9.7 0.3 % Relative Abundance 4350 m Abundance % of Total Known 6.2 % 5.6 % 4.6 % 70.7 % 29.8 % 160.8 % 2.4 % 0.1 % 52.8 % 7.2 % 16.2 % 161.6 % 32.1 % 233.6 % 0.6 % 309.3 % 8.3 % 2.2 % 140.8 % 56.8 % 252.9 % 3.4 % Contribution to Goal 34,571 m 3,746 m 2,578 m 3,072 m 306,396 m 5,356 m 28,683 m 168,906 m 2,857 m 13,157 m 1,106 m 3,069 m 118,230 m 3,786 m 52,799 m 2,018 m 65,517 m 2,703 m 14,882 m 380,781 m 9,461 m 126,642 m Ecoregion Goal Page 85 of 328 341 % 130 % 90 % 277 % 448 % 313 % 269 % 119 % 500 % 399 % 121 % 215 % 459 % 328 % 132 % 309 % 354 % 330 % 233 % 457 % 387 % 294 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 11.6 798.7 247.8 317.9 902.3 17.0 42.5 14.9 10.0 357.3 262.6 459.4 1205.6 2.0 838.1 126.9 97.2 148.4 22.0 0.8 % 56.3 % 8.7 % 22.4 % 63.7 % 3.0 % 3.0 % 0.5 % 0.7 % 25.2 % 9.3 % 31.8 % 0.4 % 81.0 % 85.1 % 0.1 % 59.1 % 4.5 % 17.1 % 26.2 % 1.5 % 1767 m 25826 m 119605 m 3458 m 33835 m 127 m 3734 m 12934 m 3083 m 53255 m 757866 m 47161 m 8981 m 1128 m 17431 m 297 m 22996 m 49462 m 1197 m 1014 m 941 m 12.7 450.3 1324.8 93.5 % Relative Abundance 20487 m Abundance % of Total Known 7.7 % 52.4 % 34.3 % 44.8 % 295.7 % 0.7 % 425.3 % 162.0 % 4.5 % 158.8 % 92.6 % 126.0 % 3.5 % 5.3 % 15.0 % 6.0 % 318.3 % 112.1 % 87.4 % 281.7 % 4.1 % 467.3 % Contribution to Goal 12,156 m 1,937 m 3,490 m 110,483 m 7,778 m 42,081 m 4,099 m 696 m 199,816 m 29,693 m 818,034 m 42,252 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 24,918 m 2,122 m 10,630 m 3,084 m 136,816 m 9,167 m 43,046 m 4,384 m Ecoregion Goal Page 86 of 328 396 % 155 % 91 % 407 % 347 % 141 % 436 % 200 % 680 % 303 % 586 % 408 % 187 % 329 % 385 % 95 % 331 % 314 % 433 % 360 % 162 % 467 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Fourth Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Fourth Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clayoquot-Alberni Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 3.5 73.1 34.3 284.9 6.8 38.6 560.4 133.8 86.9 222.9 1.9 29.1 111.1 142.9 53.1 7.3 154.7 38.9 0.2 % 5.2 % 3.6 % 50.3 % 0.5 % 2.7 % 98.8 % 9.4 % 9.2 % 39.3 % 0.3 % 3.5 % 100.0 % 5.1 % 7.8 % 25.2 % 3.7 % 0.5 % 10.9 % 2.7 % 280 m 10204 m 34719 m 4340 m 625 m 27102 m 4140 m 1254 m 75469 m 2121 m 23 m 947 m 1720 m 274 m 75666 m 1399 m 2880 m 121 m 70355 m 13001 m 566.9 50.0 99.5 17.5 % Relative Abundance 245 m Abundance % of Total Known 13.7 % 54.6 % 2.6 % 18.7 % 50.4 % 39.2 % 10.2 % 200.0 % 17.6 % 0.7 % 78.6 % 30.7 % 47.2 % 197.7 % 13.6 % 2.4 % 100.5 % 12.1 % 25.8 % 1.2 % 35.1 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 128,956 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 2,775 m 193,048 m 2,672 m 860 m 5,369 m 3,434 m 2,698 m 246,148 m 2,657 m 2,094 m 199,007 m 25,878 m 4,318 m 287,102 m 39,552 m 22,746 m 698 m Ecoregion Goal Page 87 of 328 220 % 253 % 239 % 211 % 138 % 265 % 189 % 200 % 317 % 1 % 200 % 186 % 269 % 198 % 240 % 114 % 101 % 162 % 297 % 255 % 88 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 21,433 ha 52,940 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance T3 Brachyramphus marmoratus Accipiter gentilis Strix occidentalis caurina Marbled Murrelet Northern Goshawk Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater G5 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle 5 occ 1 occ 101 occ 4 occ 1 occ Birds 1 occ Rhyacotriton olympicus ha ha ha ha ha ha Dicamptodon copei 26 10390 268 4958 2 5925 Abundance b Olympic Torrent Salamander GRank a 0.5 % 1.9 % 5.7 % 0.2 % 1.3 % 1.1 % 0.1 % 1.6 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.4 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 4 % GAP 3 73 % GAP 4 23 % GRank Cope's Giant Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Clearwater River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clearwater River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 3.3 16.7 38.4 1.6 13.4 25.7 2.6 17.8 0.3 2.1 0.0 6.1 Relative Abundance 1.0 % 5.0 % 11.5 % 0.5 % 4.0 % 7.7 % 0.8 % 5.3 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 1.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 1 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 77 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 503 occ 20 occ 880 occ 839 occ 25 occ 13 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 111 % 105 % 116 % 90 % 256 % 415 % 878 127 116 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 22 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 88 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 28624 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Olympics - Sandstones, Mid Elevation, High Gradient 1 occ 2 occ 2 occ 58986 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 56573 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? 4667 m 137516 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Abundance Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Clearwater River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.4 % 5.0 % 6.7 % 2.5 % 5.7 % 1.8 % 7.4 % 0.2 % % of Total Known 194.6 389.1 518.8 195.6 440.5 140.1 572.8 15.1 Relative Abundance 8.3 % 16.7 % 22.2 % 8.4 % 18.9 % 6.0 % 24.5 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 12 occ 9 occ 341,699 m 312,652 m 943,067 m 560,551 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 89 of 328 133 % 133 % 211 % 123 % 187 % 129 % 109 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,418 ha 20,792 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 0 % Abundance 55625 m 51096 m 24906 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Coastal upland - glacial till, low elevation, low to moderate gradient Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters - Mafic, Mid Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1 occ 1 occ 50971 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 4855 ha 3188 ha 1 ha Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 b Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank a 3.1 % 100.0 % 0.7 % 1.6 % 1.2 % 2.1 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 GAP 4 100 % GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Cloquallum River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cloquallum River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 594.4 145.5 322.1 229.6 419.5 12.0 3.5 0.0 Relative Abundance 10.0 % % 2.4 % 5.4 % 3.9 % 7.1 % 1.4 % 0.4 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 722,295 m 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 37,848 ha 10 occ occ 1,017,511 m 943,067 m f Ecoregion Goal 1,440,012 m e % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 90 of 328 130 % % 137 % 129 % 117 % 150 % 116 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio Indigenous: % Private 100 % NGO % Ecoregion Goal 2,903 ha 7,170 ac 2 occ Ardea herodias Great-Blue Heron T2 Odocoileus virginianus leucurus Columbia White-Tailed Deer Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Sloughs And Tributaries - Flat Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Freshwater T2 Odocoileus virginianus leucurus Columbia White-Tailed Deer 1 occ 2 occ 3 occ 1 occ Mammals 2 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus GRank a 16.7 % 11.8 % 17.6 % 2.8 % 7.1 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Abundance Bald Eagle Wintering Area Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped % % Water GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington/Oregon Integrated Site Columbia Mainstem Islands Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia Mainstem Islands Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 8622.1 290.6 3043.1 548.9 176.4 5.9 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 11.8 % 17.6 % 22.2 % 7.1 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 2 occ 17 occ 17 occ 9 occ 14 occ 839 occ f Ecoregion Goal 200 % 71 % 71 % 144 % 29 % 90 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 91 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 6,253 ha 15,445 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 9 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 61 % Water 28 % Abundance 1 occ 1 occ Transition zone wetland op Organic, Sand, Mixed-Fine Or Mud: Partly Enclosed, Backshore Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Marine Ecological Systems 3 occ Popbalt / corser / impcap Lowland Floodplain-Low Terrace Riparian Forests And Shrublands 5 occ Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Corser Salix) Corser - salix (salhoo - salsit) Plant Communities Marine Columbia White-Tailed Deer T2 1 occ Progne subis Purple Martin Odocoileus virginianus leucurus 1 occ Ardea herodias Mammals 7 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 65 ha 155 ha 249 ha Abundance b Great-Blue Heron G5 GRank a 100.0 % 12.5 % 60.0 % 29.4 % 1.2 % 1.4 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 79 % GAP 3 12 % % GAP 4 GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington/Oregon Integrated Site Columbia Refuge Islands Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia Refuge Islands Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 419.6 209.8 1258.9 337.3 127.4 127.4 9.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 50.0 % 300.0 % 29.4 % 11.1 % 11.1 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 91 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 17 occ 9 occ 9 occ 839 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 100 % 100 % 400 % 71 % 367 % 144 % 90 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 92 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Tributaries -Alluvium/Colluvium Streams, Low Elevation, Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Flat (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Estuary Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia Refuge Islands Portfolio Site Summary, continued: ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 714 m 2 11 2178 2173 733 227 1278 Abundance 14.3 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 11.9 % 8.2 % 7.2 % 5.4 % 15.0 % % of Total Known 4003.0 5.6 3.7 0.5 166.2 114.3 100.2 76.2 210.3 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 0.1 % 0.9 % 0.1 % 39.6 % 27.2 % 23.9 % 18.2 % 50.1 % Contribution to Goal ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 2 occ 1,017,511 m 279 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % Page 93 of 328 50 % 137 % 116 287 206 239 224 246 256 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 19,170 ha 47,350 ac 1 occ 2 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Pigeon Guillemot Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Algal Beds Estuary Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Eumetopias jubatus 3 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Double-Crested Cormorant Pelagic Cormorant 3624 m 1 occ 1 occ 3315 m 3 occ 1 occ Shorebird Concentration Area 2 occ Sterna caspia 1 occ Abundance b Phalacrocorax penicillatus G5 GRank a 1.0 % 2.4 % 2.9 % 0.3 % 13.0 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 6.0 % 25.0 % 2.0 % 1.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 1 % GAP 4 6 % Abundance Caspian Tern Progne subis Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 15 % Water 83 % GRank Brandt's Cormorant Birds Species Marine Purple Martin Species Birds Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington/Oregon Integrated Site Columbia River Estuary Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia River Estuary Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 4.4 10.5 11.4 1.3 25.7 2.4 1.4 27.4 136.9 8.8 41.6 Relative Abundance d 3.2 % 7.7 % 8.3 % 1.0 % 18.8 % 1.7 % 1.1 % 20.0 % 100.0 % 6.5 % 11.1 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership % National National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 1 % Local: % Relative Abundance e 112,601 m 13 occ 12 occ 337,346 m 16 occ 116 occ 95 occ 15 occ 1 occ 31 occ 9 occ f Ecoregion Goal 179 % 223 % 217 % 132 % 119 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 400 % 168 % 367 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 6 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 94 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 77428 m 75365 m 59649 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 68899 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 573 924 279 1244 25 6 772 68 15988 1628 1514 2993 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Sandy, high salinity, low marsh op 691 ha 1 occ Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Embayment) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Rock (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Euhaline (Marsh) Op 1 occ 3 occ Low salinity high marsh op Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Fesrub dune grassland 1 occ Red Fescue Stabilized Sand Dunes 1 occ Popbalt / corser / impcap Lowland Floodplain-Low Terrace Riparian Forests And Shrublands Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) 4868 m 1 occ 1 occ Abundance Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Corser Salix) Corser - salix (salhoo - salsit) Fesrub dune Dune grass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) GRank Coastal Sand Dunes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia River Estuary Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1.8 % 14.2 % 1.6 % 20.2 % 4.9 % 0.9 % 1.5 % 31.6 % 18.4 % 0.0 % 4.2 % 95.1 % 60.1 % 15.9 % 36.3 % 35.2 % 6.5 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 27.3 % 12.5 % 20.0 % 2.3 % 1.5 % 100.0 % % of Total Known 153.1 739.6 140.4 1057.2 22.3 4.3 6.8 144.2 84.3 0.1 19.2 440.1 274.3 72.6 165.8 160.7 29.8 68.4 136.9 102.7 68.4 136.9 10.7 6.2 136.9 Relative Abundance 5.9 % 28.3 % 5.4 % 40.5 % 16.3 % 3.1 % 5.0 % 105.4 % 61.6 % 0.1 % 14.0 % 321.5 % 200.4 % 53.1 % 121.1 % 117.4 % 21.8 % 50.0 % 100.0 % 75.0 % 50.0 % 100.0 % 7.8 % 4.5 % 100.0 % Contribution to Goal m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 1,017,511 m 266,114 m 1,440,012 m 170,194 m 3,518 29,625 5,586 1,181 40 9,168 5,499 21 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 3,169 ha 2 occ 1 occ 4 occ 2 occ 1 occ 62,438 m 22 occ 1 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 95 of 328 137 % 86 % 117 % 133 % 186 198 244 272 283 287 206 338 239 224 246 256 238 % 50 % 100 % 225 % 100 % 400 % 224 % 250 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 34,216 ha 84,514 ac 75482 m 3075 m 44787 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 68063 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 116336 m 1 occ Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow Sidalcea hirtipes Eremophila alpestris strigata Vascular Plants 14 occ Progne subis Purple Martin Streaked Horned Lark 2 occ 1 occ Ardea herodias 18 occ 1 occ Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus G5 G4 GRank a 1.3 % 0.7 % 14.2 % 1.4 % 34.2 % 6.7 % 15.4 % 16.9 % 1.4 % 1.0 % 1.6 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 2 % GAP 4 10 % Abundance Great-Blue Heron Plethodon dunni Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 25 % Water 71 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Dunn's Salamander Species Amphibians Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington/Oregon Integrated Site Columbia River Mainstem Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia River Mainstem Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 64.4 20.1 415.0 69.2 1000.1 8.4 46.6 326.0 23.3 4.5 29.9 Relative Abundance d 4.4 % 1.4 % 28.4 % 4.7 % 68.4 % 4.0 % 22.2 % 155.6 % 11.1 % 2.1 % 14.3 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 3 % National Other: % National USFS: % % State/Provin Local: % Relative Abundance 170,194 m 25 occ 9 occ 9 occ 9 occ 839 occ 7 occ f Ecoregion Goal 1,017,511 m 224,010 m 266,114 m 1,440,012 m e 137 % 46 % 86 % 117 % 133 % 48 % 67 % 367 % 144 % 90 % 586 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 10 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 96 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Columbia Estuary Tributaries - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Lower Columbia Sloughs And Tributaries - Flat Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Lower Columbia Tributary Small Rivers - Volcanics Targets known in this Conservation Area: Columbia River Mainstem Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 22.2 % 33.3 % 2 occ 20.0 % 4 occ 1 occ Abundance % of Total Known 1463.1 1170.4 731.5 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 80.0 % 50.0 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 5 occ 2 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 97 of 328 200 % 160 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 13,135 ha 32,443 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 100 % % Water a G3 Rhyacotriton variegatus 6 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Northwestern Pond Turtle Clemmys marmorata marmorata T3 G3 Arborimus longicaudus Red Tree Vole Reptiles G5 Martes americana American Marten 1 occ 3 occ 2 occ 3 occ Megomphix hemphilli Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Mammals 5 occ Prophysaon coeruleum Blue-Gray Taildropper Invertebrates 4 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Northern Spotted Owl 1 occ 1 occ 2888 ha 9787 ha 356 ha Abundance b Marbled Murrelet T3 T4 Rana aurora aurora GRank Southern Torrent Salamander Birds Abundance 1.3 % 2.0 % 20.0 % 2.9 % 3.0 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 2.4 % 1.0 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 2 % GAP 3 58 % GAP 4 40 % GRank Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Coos Mtn Targets known in this Conservation Area: Coos Mtn Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 60.7 126.0 363.9 126.0 210.0 6.5 2.5 42.0 78.0 4.6 6.9 5.1 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 23.1 % 66.7 % 23.1 % 38.5 % 1.2 % 0.5 % 7.7 % 14.3 % 0.8 % 1.3 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 60 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 9 occ 13 occ 3 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 13 occ 7 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 122 % 308 % 133 % 323 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 192 % 671 % 116 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 40 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 98 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 68742 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment 1 occ 38949 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 83963 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Coos Mtn Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1.7 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 0.9 % % of Total Known 211.9 105.4 111.7 71.2 Relative Abundance 5.6 % 2.8 % 2.9 % 1.9 % Contribution to Goal 18 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m Ecoregion Goal Page 99 of 328 106 % 164 % 173 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 62,395 ha 154,115 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 4 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 87 % Water 5 % a G3 Rhyacotriton variegatus Ascaphus truei Tailed Frog ha ha occ ha ha ha Blue-Gray Taildropper Martes pennanti pacifica Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Pacific Fisher Mammals T2 1 occ 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Prophysaon coeruleum 27 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Invertebrates 38 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Marbled Murrelet 3 occ 6 occ 10 occ 5 occ 1 493 57 6964 45375 1 Abundance b Bald Eagle T3 G4 Plethodon dunni GRank Southern Torrent Salamander Birds Abundance 33.3 % 0.6 % 2.7 % 2.2 % 0.2 % 11.8 % 23.8 % 7.8 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 23.3 % 0.6 % 1.8 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 33 % GAP 4 63 % GRank Dunn's Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Coos-Millacoma Rivers Targets known in this Conservation Area: Coos-Millacoma Rivers Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 38.3 8.8 6.2 5.0 0.4 98.5 88.4 82.1 0.0 0.3 1091.7 2.3 6.7 0.0 Relative Abundance 33.3 % 7.7 % 5.4 % 4.3 % 0.4 % 85.7 % 76.9 % 71.4 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 950.0 % 2.0 % 5.8 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 9 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 24 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha occ ha ha ha 3 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 13 occ 7 occ 3,273 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 100 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 343 % 192 % 586 % 878 127 3850 116 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 63 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 100 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 375215 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 3 occ 1 occ 226879 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 372536 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Pinconc / Carobn) Mineral Spring Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / Darcal / Sphagn) Ledgla / darcal / sphagn 1 occ 3 occ 1 occ 1 occ Plant Communities Lilium occidentale Western Lily 4 occ 7 occ T3 Abundance Cordylanthus maritimus ssp palustris Clemmys marmorata marmorata GRank Salt-Marsh Bird's-Beak Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Reptiles Targets known in this Conservation Area: Coos-Millacoma Rivers Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 25.0 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 5.1 % 4.1 % 25.0 % 4.9 % 11.1 % 5.6 % 35.0 % 5.1 % % of Total Known 602.2 114.7 121.1 136.9 66.5 38.3 17.2 38.3 4.6 32.2 51.1 Relative Abundance 75.0 % 14.3 % 15.1 % 17.1 % 8.3 % 33.3 % 15.0 % 33.3 % 4.0 % 28.0 % 44.4 % Contribution to Goal 4 occ 7 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 3 occ 20 occ 3 occ 25 occ 25 occ 9 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 101 of 328 200 % 129 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 100 % 150 % 233 % 72 % 60 % 122 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 12,155 ha 30,023 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 0 % Abundance GRank a m m ha m ha ha ha ha 3786 m 3890 m 3195 m 8 ha 65 ha 7676 3195 40 3786 1 2620 4097 4571 Abundance b 3.8 % 20.9 % 3.2 % 0.9 % 0.4 % 3.7 % 0.5 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 23 % GAP 4 76 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Plant Communities Marine North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Copalis River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Copalis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 27.2 150.3 23.1 6.5 2.6 26.5 3.9 2.7 1.8 0.0 7.9 7.0 3.5 Relative Abundance 12.6 % 69.6 % 10.7 % 3.0 % 1.2 % 12.3 % 1.8 % 1.3 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 5 Local: 19 Relative Abundance e m m ha m ha ha ha ha 30,025 m 5,586 m 29,817 m 279 ha 5,499 ha 62,438 176,736 3,169 442,357 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % 194 % 244 % 64 % 116 % 206 % 224 109 238 228 166 127 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 76 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 102 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 112 ha 276 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 85 % % Water 1 occ 2 occ 8611 m Abundance GRank a 91 ha 1 ha 19 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 2.4 % 6.1 % 0.2 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 100 % % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Copalis River (TNC) Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 GRank Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Copalis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 8.3 % 20.0 % 0.6 % d 29.9 0.2 1.5 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 343.1 823.4 24.6 Relative Abundance e 133 % 120 % 117 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal Page 103 of 328 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio Indigenous: % Private % NGO 100 % 12 occ 10 occ 1,440,012 m Ecoregion Goal 12 ha 30 ac Smelt spawn Eumetopias jubatus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates 1954 m 4125 m 547 m 547 m 4 occ 4 occ 4125 m 226 m 1 occ Fratercula cirrhata Fishes 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Pelagic Cormorant Tufted Puffin Abundance b 3 occ 2 occ GRank a 1.1 % 7865.5 960.1 676.3 728.2 67257.0 2672.6 3883.7 7286.2 2300.9 21858.5 29144.7 72861.7 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % d Relative Abundance 9.8 % c 3.6 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 30.8 % 33.3 % 1.2 % 1.8 % 3.3 % 1.1 % 10.0 % 13.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 11.8 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 1.1 % 0.3 % 3.0 % 4.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Abundance Phalacroscorax auritus Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 93 % Water 7 % GRank Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Copalis Rock NWR Targets known in this Conservation Area: Copalis Rock NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e 54,295 m 939,089 m 176,736 m 164,143 m 13 occ 12 occ 337,346 m 12,705 m 30 occ 95 occ 30 occ 15 occ f Ecoregion Goal 137 % 119 % 109 % 118 % 223 % 217 % 132 % 140 % 190 % 163 % 187 % 200 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 104 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 117 ha 288 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 96 % Water 4 % 2171 m 843 m 547 m Abundance GRank a 52 ha 64 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 0.7 % 0.8 % 0.6 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cougar Creek ACEC Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Copalis Rock NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 2.2 % 2.6 % 1.8 % d 9.3 5.1 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 4913.5 5740.4 4008.7 Relative Abundance e 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 110 % 121 % 64 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 105 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 96,577 m 32,087 m 29,817 m Ecoregion Goal 1,778 ha 4,392 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 0 % Abundance GRank a 1 occ Abundance b 50.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 0 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Unclassified Class 2 Freshwater System Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Freshwater Site (cl Cowichan River (Freshwater) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cowichan River (Freshwater) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 28132.8 Relative Abundance % % % % % 100.0 % Contribution to Goal 0 0 0 0 0 Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 1 occ f Ecoregion Goal 200 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 0 % 0 % 0 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 106 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 22,034 ha 54,424 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % Ascaphus truei Tailed Frog Haliaeetus leucocephalus Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Haematopus bachmani T1 Speyeria zerene hippolyta Marine T2 Plebejus saepiolus littoralis Oregon Silverspot Butterfly T3 T4 Insular Blue Butterfly Invertebrates a GRank Marbled Murrelet Abundance 8 occ 2 occ 1 occ 8 occ 50 occ 1 occ 1 occ 5 occ 6292 ha 4413 ha 11263 ha Abundance b 2.2 % 25.0 % 100.0 % 0.8 % 2.8 % 0.1 % 2.0 % 5.2 % 1.0 % 0.4 % 0.4 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 31 % GAP 2 4 % GAP 3 60 % GAP 4 5 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Rana aurora aurora Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Cummins-Rock Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cummins-Rock Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 8.8 26.0 46.5 5.2 18.5 0.4 46.5 232.4 10.5 4.2 4.7 Relative Abundance 7.4 % 8.0 % 14.3 % 1.6 % 5.7 % 0.1 % 14.3 % 71.4 % 3.2 % 1.3 % 1.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 91 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 4 Local: Relative Abundance e 108 occ 25 occ 7 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 7 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 159 % 28 % 14 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 343 % 671 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 5 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 107 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 4 occ 7 occ 4 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin 106938 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Volcanic Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Volcanic 1 occ 2 occ 24157 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 102632 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) m m m m m m m m m m 1 occ Oceanodroma leucorhoa Leach's Storm-Petrel 307 1752 843 2883 320 1713 339 75 1023 223 3 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline 4 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Abundance Double-Crested Cormorant GRank Brandt's Cormorant Targets known in this Conservation Area: Cummins-Rock Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 25.0 % 33.3 % 1.3 % 0.5 % 1.1 % 0.6 % 1.4 % 4.6 % 12.7 % 0.0 % 16.0 % 3.1 % 0.0 % 1.3 % 0.2 % 4.3 % 1.8 % 1.3 % 2.8 % 6.0 % 4.0 % % of Total Known 2273.7 2273.7 97.8 41.3 51.9 2.5 5.5 18.3 50.4 0.2 63.4 12.5 0.1 5.1 0.8 15.9 7.2 5.0 10.8 23.8 15.4 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 100.0 % 4.3 % 1.8 % 2.3 % 2.1 % 4.6 % 15.4 % 42.3 % 0.2 % 53.2 % 10.5 % 0.1 % 4.2 % 0.7 % 13.3 % 6.0 % 4.2 % 9.1 % 20.0 % 12.9 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m 1 occ 2 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 14,577 37,705 5,487 6,812 193,399 3,219 3,231 116,959 24,105 33,330 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 15 occ 31 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % Page 108 of 328 100 % 250 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 89 65 160 102 88 124 195 119 129 119 190 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 200 % 168 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 1,200 ha 2,964 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a m m m ha ha ha m m 881 m 1784 m 6017 881 4410 86 133 103 7075 6194 1608 m Abundance b 15.1 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 7.7 % 5.8 % 9.6 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 3.8 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Eelgrass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Smelt spawn Species Fishes Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Deep Creek - West Twin River (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Deep Creek - West Twin River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1103.3 71.9 14.0 10.9 51.5 558.5 420.1 701.9 34.7 37.3 276.7 Relative Abundance 50.5 % 3.3 % 0.6 % 0.5 % 2.4 % 25.5 % 19.2 % 32.1 % 1.6 % 1.7 % 12.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e m m m ha ha ha m m 1,746 m 54,295 m 939,089 176,736 187,323 336 692 320 445,946 363,205 12,705 m f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % 128 % 137 % 119 109 146 168 162 169 142 131 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 109 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 24 ha 59 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 92 % Water 8 % Abundance GRank a 21 ha Abundance b 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Devils Punch Bowl State Natural Area Targets known in this Conservation Area: Devils Punch Bowl State Natural Area Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 31.8 Relative Abundance 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: Relative Abundance e 195,305 ha f Ecoregion Goal 127 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 110 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 25,439 ha 62,835 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 4 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 94 % Water 0 % 23239 m 43356 m 98684 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients 2 occ 80296 m 2 occ 2 occ 12417 ha 11623 ha 3 ha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 b Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 T3 GRank a Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Strix occidentalis caurina Rhyacotriton kezeri Abundance 6.7 % 2.9 % 4.2 % 0.7 % 1.7 % 0.2 % 2.4 % 1.1 % 0.4 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 31 % GAP 4 69 % GRank Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Northern Spotted Owl Birds Columbia Torrent Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Doty Hills Targets known in this Conservation Area: Doty Hills Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 437.1 190.8 272.8 48.5 109.7 1.1 22.5 10.1 4.2 0.0 Relative Abundance 22.2 % 9.7 % 13.9 % 2.5 % 5.6 % 0.4 % 8.0 % 3.6 % 1.5 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 31 Local: Relative Abundance 503 occ 25 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 324,193 ha f Ecoregion Goal 9 occ 1,017,511 m 312,652 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m e 133 % 137 % 187 % 129 % 117 % 111 % 188 % 116 % 126 % 236 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 69 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 111 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Targets known in this Conservation Area: Doty Hills Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2 occ Abundance 5.3 % % of Total Known 357.6 Relative Abundance 18.2 % Contribution to Goal 11 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 112 of 328 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 5,100 ha 12,597 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 1 % Abundance 1 occ 25763 m 6441 m 6108 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Pink Salmon, Odd-year ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 4319 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Chum Salmon, Puget Sound/Strait ESU 19140 m 4319 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Chum Salmon, Hood Canal Summer Run ESU Species Fishes Freshwater 3 occ Strix occidentalis caurina ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 256 1 4242 394 35 Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a 4.4 % 5.0 % 3.2 % 3.8 % 1.9 % 2.8 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 50 % GAP 4 50 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Duckabush River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Duckabush River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1439.1 1643.3 631.9 1258.1 620.2 549.2 2.8 5.0 109.8 0.0 17.3 0.7 0.2 Relative Abundance 14.7 % 16.8 % 6.4 % 12.8 % 6.3 % 5.6 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 7.8 % 0.0 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 41 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 8 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 130,417 m 36,446 m 99,955 m 200,804 m 68,298 m 77,120 m 503 occ 839 occ 3,273 162,155 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 59 % 114 % 38 % 39 % 18 % 15 % 111 % 90 % 878 166 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 50 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 113 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 2,377 ha 5,871 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 0 % 2 occ Abundance GRank a 1 occ Abundance b 20.0 % % of Total Known 4.9 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 0 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Northern Olympics rivers - sandstone, mid to low elevation, mixed gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Freshwater Site (cl Dungeness River (Freshwater) Puget lowland headwaters west - glacial drift, low elevation, low to moderate gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Targets known in this Conservation Area: Duckabush River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 0519.6 Relative Abundance % % % % % 50.0 % Contribution to Goal 0 0 0 0 0 16.7 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 1634.3 Relative Abundance e 2 occ f Ecoregion Goal 150 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 0 % 0 % 0 % 125 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 114 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 12 occ Ecoregion Goal 5,880 ha 14,525 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 1 % Abundance 27459 m 25385 m 26963 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients 4 occ 17042 m ha ha ha ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 2 608 2466 2839 Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 b Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank a 12.1 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.6 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 22 % GAP 4 78 % GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site East Fork Hoquiam River Targets known in this Conservation Area: East Fork Hoquiam River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 3403.8 225.5 229.1 162.3 200.8 0.0 3.8 8.7 4.5 Relative Abundance 40.0 % 2.6 % 2.7 % 1.9 % 2.4 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 0.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 5 Local: 17 Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha 722,295 m 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 10 occ 1,017,511 m 943,067 m f Ecoregion Goal 1,440,012 m e % % % % 120 % 137 % 129 % 117 % 150 % 166 127 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 78 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 115 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 11,285 ha 27,874 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance 5 occ 6 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl 1 occ Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Warty Jumping-Slug Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Freshwater 2 occ Hemphillia burringtoni Burrington Jumping-Slug Invertebrates 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Histrionicus histrionicus 130 1 498 1202 5081 247 4099 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet T3 GRank a 1.4 % 4.8 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 1.8 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 99 % GAP 4 1 % GRank Harlequin Duck Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site East Fork Humptulips River Targets known in this Conservation Area: East Fork Humptulips River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 48.9 97.8 7.6 3.6 127.1 25.3 0.0 1.6 2.2 4.2 2.1 8.0 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 15.4 % 1.2 % 0.6 % 20.0 % 4.0 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 0.3 % 1.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 99 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 5 occ 3,273 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % 200 % 115 % 111 % 116 % 580 % 878 166 127 116 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 1 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 116 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 41353 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients 2 occ 3820 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 20367 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 920 m Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: East Fork Humptulips River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 6.7 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 985.4 180.2 18.0 62.7 5.6 Relative Abundance 22.2 % 4.1 % 0.4 % 1.4 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal 9 occ 1,017,511 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 117 of 328 133 % 137 % 129 % 117 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 11,192 ha 27,645 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % 16527 m 59588 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation 1 occ 50577 m 12 occ 1 occ 423 ha 4233 ha 5706 ha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 b Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 T3 G3 GRank a Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Strix occidentalis caurina Aneides ferreus Abundance 14.3 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 1.2 % 6.3 % 12.1 % 0.4 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 52 % GAP 4 48 % GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Northern Spotted Owl Birds Clouded Salamander Amphibians Species Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Elk Creek (Umpqua) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Elk Creek (Umpqua) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 2238.6 107.3 55.6 50.4 15.3 91.5 778.0 7.8 4.7 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 2.4 % 1.2 % 1.1 % 2.4 % 14.3 % 121.4 % 1.2 % 0.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 52 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 1 Local: Relative Abundance 503 occ 7 occ 348 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 2 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m e 50 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 111 % 86 % 500 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 48 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 118 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 13,829 ha 34,157 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 86 % Water 10 % Abundance 1 occ 5 occ Ascaphus truei Plethodon vandykei Tailed Frog Van Dyke's Salamander Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Burrington Jumping-Slug Hemphillia burringtoni Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Invertebrates Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T3 2 occ 1 occ 30 occ 1 occ 2 occ Plethodon dunni Dunn's Salamander Birds 1 occ G3 2 occ Dicamptodon copei ha ha ha ha ha Rhyacotriton kezeri 40 4127 2154 4724 87 Abundance b Cope's Giant Salamander G4 GRank a 4.8 % 0.1 % 1.7 % 0.1 % 11.4 % 2.0 % 3.1 % 1.1 % 2.4 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 23 % GAP 2 24 % GAP 3 4 % GAP 4 48 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Ellsworth Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Ellsworth Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 79.8 1.0 17.7 0.6 129.6 74.1 148.1 39.9 41.5 0.1 11.0 3.2 3.2 0.1 Relative Abundance 15.4 % 0.2 % 3.4 % 0.1 % 25.0 % 14.3 % 28.6 % 7.7 % 8.0 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.6 % 0.6 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 22 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 6 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 20 occ 7 occ 7 occ 13 occ 25 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 115 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 175 % 343 % 586 % 415 % 188 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 48 % 23 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 119 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 11102 m 19104 m 29706 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient 2 occ 1 occ 31423 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 9164 m 22340 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Abundance Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Ellsworth Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5.0 % 2.5 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.7 % 0.9 % 0.4 % % of Total Known 603.1 301.7 105.7 73.3 27.9 79.0 112.0 45.9 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 8.3 % 2.9 % 2.0 % 0.8 % 2.2 % 3.1 % 1.3 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 12 occ 1,017,511 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 120 of 328 133 % 133 % 137 % 129 % 117 % 117 % 150 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 19,502 ha 48,170 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 5 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 94 % Water 0 % Abundance Valley Silverspot Butterfly Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater 5882 m 1 occ 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Speyeria zerene bremnerii 2 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Invertebrates 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T3 G3 Plethodon vandykei Van Dyke's Salamander 1 occ 4 occ Plethodon dunni Birds 3 occ G4 Rhyacotriton kezeri 34 ha 8819 ha 10135 ha Abundance b Dunn's Salamander GRank a 1.7 % 8.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 6.3 % 3.7 % 0.0 % 0.8 % 0.4 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 39 % GAP 4 61 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Elochoman River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Elochoman River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 88.7 28.3 0.7 0.8 0.4 18.4 210.1 44.1 0.1 9.4 4.8 Relative Abundance 3.5 % 7.7 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 5.0 % 57.1 % 12.0 % 0.0 % 2.6 % 1.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 39 Local: Relative Abundance e 170,194 m 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 20 occ 7 occ 25 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 133 % 85 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 175 % 586 % 188 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 61 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 121 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 56452 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Lower Columbia Tributary Small Rivers - Volcanics Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Columbia Estuary Tributaries - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Lower Columbia Sloughs And Tributaries - Flat Gradient Lower Columbia Tributaries - Volcanics, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Lower Columbia Tributaries- Sedimentary, Moderate Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 513.4 1283.5 641.7 513.4 16.7 % 8.0 % 6.3 % 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1283.5 142.4 230.8 36.3 Relative Abundance 5.6 % 20.0 % 1.7 % 4.5 % 0.4 % % of Total Known 1 occ 1 occ 23930 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 20363 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Elochoman River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 50.0 % 25.0 % 20.0 % 20.0 % 50.0 % 5.5 % 9.0 % 1.4 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 8 occ 5 occ 5 occ 2 occ 1,017,511 m 266,114 m 1,440,012 m Ecoregion Goal Page 122 of 328 200 % 88 % 100 % 160 % 150 % 137 % 86 % 117 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 241 ha 596 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water a T2 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Xerten- Sanoff - Sphagn) Xerten- sanoff - sphagn Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Vaccae / Sanoff) Vaccae / sanoff Erythronium elegans Plant Communities Anemone oregana var felix Coast Range Fawn-Lily Abundance 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 3 occ 25 ha 147 ha 16 ha Abundance b 100.0 % 100.0 % 11.1 % 60.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Bog Anemone Vascular Plants Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Fanno Meadows (Conservation Easement) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Fanno Meadows (Conservation Easement) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9808.9 9904.4 1188.5 3565.6 2.1 5.6 1.4 Relative Abundance 66.7 % 33.3 % 4.0 % 12.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 3 occ 3 occ 25 occ 25 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 324,193 ha f Ecoregion Goal Page 123 of 328 67 % 33 % 36 % 20 % 116 % 126 % 236 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio Indigenous: % Private 100 % NGO % Ecoregion Goal 446 ha 1,102 ac 6 occ 4 occ 2 occ 5 occ Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Fork-Tailed Storm Petral Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Tufted Puffin Mussels and barnacles Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Mammals Eumetopias jubatus 3 occ 1 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Invertebrates 2 occ 17105 m 197 m 4 occ 4 occ 23668 m 2 occ 1 occ 6 occ Ptychoramphus aleuticus Abundance b Haematopus bachmani GRank a 0.5 % 0.0 % 9.8 % 11.8 % 2.1 % 5.3 % 12.5 % 1.0 % 1.9 % 107.2 6.6 1810.3 1961.1 412.8 980.6 2353.4 202.9 371.6 4412.6 534.9 392.2 392.2 326.9 2.0 % 2.0 % 21.4 % 2.8 % d Relative Abundance 1961.1 c 1.8 % 0.1 % 30.8 % 33.3 % 7.0 % 16.7 % 40.0 % 3.4 % 6.3 % 75.0 % 9.1 % 6.7 % 6.7 % 33.3 % 5.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 11.1 % 1.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Abundance Cassin's Auklet Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Flattery Rocks NWR Targets known in this Conservation Area: Flattery Rocks NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e 939,089 m 176,736 m 13 occ 12 occ 337,346 m 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 95 occ 4 occ 11 occ 30 occ 15 occ 6 occ 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 119 % 109 % 223 % 217 % 132 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 163 % 175 % 200 % 187 % 200 % 150 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 124 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 257 ha 634 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water 7465 3809 8481 197 114 171 84 5003 11724 m m m m ha ha ha m m Abundance 1859 m 1959 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 8 ha 248 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank a 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 2.3 % 1.8 % 2.6 % 0.3 % 10.2 % 7.4 % 7.9 % 0.3 % 1.0 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fishes Species Freshwater North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Flynn Creek RNA Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Targets known in this Conservation Area: Flattery Rocks NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 7.7 % 5.9 % 8.8 % 1.0 % 34.0 % 24.7 % 26.3 % 1.1 % 3.2 % d 153.7 80.7 0.7 8.9 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 453.1 345.5 516.6 56.9 1998.4 1452.0 1548.1 66.0 189.9 Relative Abundance 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 2,487,321 m f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e m m m m ha ha ha m m % % % % % % % % % % % % 164 % 100 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 112 114 110 125 168 162 169 142 131 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 125 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 96,940 64,871 96,577 20,374 336 692 320 445,946 363,205 Ecoregion Goal 69 ha 170 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 12 % Undeveloped 81 % Water 3 % Abundance 1346 m 1346 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 47 ha 1 ha 2 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank a 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Fogarty Creek State Recreation Area Targets known in this Conservation Area: Fogarty Creek State Recreation Area Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 393.3 217.6 25.3 0.2 0.3 Relative Abundance 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: Relative Abundance 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 2,487,321 m f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e 164 % 100 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 126 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1,443 ha 3,565 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 0 % Cryptomastix devia Abundance GRank a 1 occ 491 ha 918 ha Abundance b 25.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Puget Oregonian Invertebrates Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Forest Park Targets known in this Conservation Area: Forest Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 382.1 7.1 5.9 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 0.1 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 100 Relative Abundance e 13 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 8 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 127 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 156,675 ha 386,987 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 2 % Abundance occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha occ 33318 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Northern Pygmy-Owl, Swarthi Subspecies 6 occ 18939 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 31 occ 34 37 56 511 20 23807 357 8 20535 26276 65438 728 3 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) G5 GRank a 37.5 % 5.5 % 6.4 % 1.6 % 9.1 % 9.7 % 3.4 % 1.6 % 14.3 % 4.4 % 0.1 % 4.7 % 0.8 % 6.9 % 4.0 % 1.9 % 3.8 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 7 % GAP 3 91 % GAP 4 2 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Gold River-Nootka Targets known in this Conservation Area: Gold River-Nootka Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 15.3 5.0 5.9 1.7 129.7 188.1 7.7 7.1 31.1 6.7 0.1 40.7 1.2 15.7 9.2 4.4 11.4 Relative Abundance 33.3 % 11.0 % 12.8 % 3.7 % 283.3 % 411.1 % 16.9 % 15.6 % 68.0 % 14.7 % 0.2 % 88.9 % 2.6 % 34.4 % 20.2 % 9.6 % 25.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 98 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha occ 18 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 12 9 332 3,273 29 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % 89 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 1833 2956 230 878 407 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 2 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 128 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Erigeron salishii Myotis keenii Lagopus leucurus G2 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Channel Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) High Tide Lagoon protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Shore Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover Species Fishes Marine Salish Daisy Vascular Plants Keen's Myotis Mammals White-Tailed Ptarmigan Targets known in this Conservation Area: Gold River-Nootka Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 278 283 15273 1841 1013 1793 8846 16316 7458 1508 8868 213599 21008 22 8868 72351 43 41604 8846 38320 65684 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m m ha m m m m 48877 m 33194 m 82512 m 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Abundance 2.1 % 10.8 % 14.1 % 7.1 % 12.8 % 16.4 % 1.1 % 13.3 % 2.3 % 8.2 % 2.4 % 6.8 % 3.6 % 1.5 % 1.6 % 11.6 % 0.2 % 2.8 % 0.6 % 7.0 % 5.4 % 4.3 % 11.8 % 11.0 % 25.0 % 50.0 % 2.8 % % of Total Known 1.2 6.0 7.9 4.0 7.1 9.2 0.6 7.4 1.3 4.6 1.3 3.8 2.0 0.8 0.9 6.5 0.1 1.6 0.3 3.9 3.0 2.4 6.6 6.1 1.8 5.1 1.7 Relative Abundance 7.1 % 35.9 % 47.0 % 23.6 % 42.6 % 54.7 % 3.7 % 44.2 % 7.7 % 27.5 % 7.9 % 22.7 % 11.9 % 5.1 % 5.2 % 38.6 % 0.7 % 9.3 % 2.0 % 23.3 % 18.1 % 14.5 % 39.4 % 36.6 % 4.0 % 11.1 % 3.7 % Contribution to Goal 3,901 788 32,500 7,802 2,375 3,276 239,478 36,906 96,940 5,487 112,601 939,089 176,736 443 169,841 187,323 5,844 445,946 442,357 164,143 363,205 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m m ha m m m m 337,346 m 84,336 m 225,517 m 25 occ 9 occ 27 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 129 of 328 74 90 106 72 227 118 223 137 112 160 179 119 109 120 224 146 105 142 228 118 131 132 % 169 % 146 % 16 % 11 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 49990 m 94458 m 29052 m 188842 m Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Sockeye Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, West Island Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 45429 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, West Island 28.0 17.8 0.6 % 7054 m 99.0 21.0 137.0 183.7 127.1 36.0 3.4 14.8 1.2 60.7 41.6 70.5 71.4 67.5 1.8 4.1 2.5 4.5 2.9 4.5 3.9 3.3 2.9 1.6 1.1 2.3 2.9 Relative Abundance 4.4 % 9.3 % 2.0 % 12.9 % 17.3 % 11.9 % 5.6 % 0.5 % 2.3 % 0.2 % 5.7 % 3.9 % 6.6 % 6.7 % 6.3 % 3.3 % 7.4 % 4.4 % 8.1 % 5.3 % 8.0 % 6.9 % 5.9 % 5.2 % 2.8 % 2.1 % 4.1 % 5.1 % % of Total Known 307 m 11578 m 1643 m 17800 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, West Island G5 1437 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, East Island G5 128043 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island Salvelinus malma 71963 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, East Island Salvelinus malma 60350 m Oncorhynchus keta Chum Salmon, West Island Dolly Varden, East Island 61897 m Dolly Varden, West Island 39104 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha m m m m m m m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 7084 47740 8026 5037 51681 25677 52122 1296 10053 5751 2202 1614 4498 Abundance Chinook Salmon, West Island GRank Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Gold River-Nootka Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5.6 % 8.8 % 31.0 % 6.6 % 42.9 % 57.5 % 39.8 % 11.3 % 1.1 % 4.6 % 0.4 % 19.0 % 13.0 % 22.1 % 22.4 % 21.2 % 10.9 % 24.7 % 14.8 % 26.9 % 17.5 % 26.6 % 23.0 % 19.6 % 17.3 % 9.3 % 6.9 % 13.8 % 17.1 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m 126,642 m 3,508 m 609,198 m 441,335 m 220,095 m 86,896 m 114,095 m 102,560 m 153,568 m 382,902 m 377,832 m 673,874 m 551,718 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 184,827 m 64,871 193,399 54,295 18,758 294,655 96,577 226,193 6,602 58,215 61,723 32,087 11,673 26,382 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 130 of 328 294 % 181 % 168 % 133 % 191 % 177 % 160 % 148 % 123 % 102 % 69 % 155 % 122 % 144 % 176 % 154 % 114 88 137 216 123 110 102 153 98 94 121 104 139 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Gold River-Nootka Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 183.7 246.8 36.8 67.1 299.9 7.6 99.6 1.5 169.1 65.3 62.6 1.8 657.7 81.8 4.4 24.7 0.4 111.4 8.5 5.8 % 15.5 % 2.3 % 4.2 % 46.9 % 0.5 % 3.1 % 0.1 % 10.6 % 4.1 % 9.8 % 0.2 % 3.9 % 0.1 % 41.2 % 5.1 % 0.7 % 1.5 % 0.0 % 3.5 % 0.5 % 219103 m 11503 m 312 m 13767 m 956 m 1264 m 36874 m 30 m 1626 m 2692 m 350 m 1317 m 119413 m 67 m 6328 m 8853 m 65 m 3336 m 14 m 47752 m 92 m 124.4 2.5 2.7 0.2 % Relative Abundance 343 m Abundance % of Total Known 2.7 % 34.9 % 0.1 % 7.7 % 1.4 % 25.6 % 206.0 % 0.6 % 39.0 % 0.8 % 19.6 % 20.5 % 53.0 % 0.5 % 31.2 % 2.4 % 93.9 % 21.0 % 11.5 % 77.3 % 57.5 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal 3,481 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 43,046 m 4,733 m 34,571 m 3,072 m 12,035 m 306,396 m 168,906 m 1,785 m 13,157 m 3,069 m 6,354 m 118,230 m 52,799 m 1,018 m 65,517 m 2,703 m 14,882 m 380,781 m 39,958 m Ecoregion Goal Page 131 of 328 301 % 433 % 211 % 162 % 151 % 341 % 277 % 267 % 448 % 119 % 165 % 399 % 215 % 258 % 459 % 132 % 200 % 354 % 330 % 233 % 457 % 283 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Gold River-Nootka Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 94.1 191.5 559.7 47.3 35.3 326.8 170.5 409.2 347.1 201.4 121.4 91.5 73.1 637.7 74.3 146.8 28.7 10.6 55.0 5.9 % 12.0 % 87.7 % 1.5 % 2.2 % 10.2 % 10.7 % 25.6 % 10.9 % 12.6 % 19.0 % 3.9 % 27.7 % 14.3 % 4.6 % 100.0 % 4.7 % 9.2 % 4.5 % 0.7 % 5.2 % 7345 m 16772 m 4530 m 36438 m 9626 m 837468 m 10473 m 38055 m 217247 m 5102 m 265 m 42799 m 1936 m 162 m 2785 m 1179 m 643 m 18188 m 361 m 508 m 49452 m 177.1 123.7 616.8 38.6 % Relative Abundance 5958 m Abundance % of Total Known 17.2 % 3.3 % 9.0 % 46.0 % 23.3 % 199.8 % 22.9 % 28.7 % 55.5 % 38.7 % 38.0 % 63.1 % 108.7 % 128.2 % 53.4 % 102.4 % 11.1 % 14.8 % 175.3 % 60.0 % 29.5 % 193.2 % Contribution to Goal 287,102 m 15,320 m 4,013 m 39,552 m 2,763 m 590 m 12,156 m 566 m 3,490 m 110,483 m 696 m 8,087 m 199,816 m 29,693 m 19,612 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 2,584 m 27,967 m 24,918 m 3,084 m Ecoregion Goal Page 132 of 328 162 % 145 % 197 % 297 % 162 % 200 % 396 % 107 % 91 % 407 % 200 % 339 % 680 % 303 % 257 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 175 % 386 % 385 % 314 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Third Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Gold River-Nootka Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 31.7 72.2 72.1 76.1 387.6 53.8 218.7 246.2 5.4 89.7 281.0 324.7 109.5 2.0 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 7.2 % 60.7 % 8.4 % 34.2 % 15.4 % 0.3 % 5.6 % 44.0 % 27.2 % 11.6 % 20.3 % 6.9 % 9.2 % 2566 m 2137 m 44928 m 58698 m 3276 m 593 m 289 m 4140 m 959 m 54253 m 2443 m 247 m 8940 m 4819 m 44223 m 43809 m 147.6 185.7 173.6 27.3 4.3 % Relative Abundance 146 m Abundance % of Total Known 46.2 % 34.3 % 101.7 % 58.2 % 54.4 % 88.0 % 28.1 % 1.7 % 77.1 % 68.5 % 16.9 % 121.4 % 23.8 % 22.6 % 22.6 % 9.9 % 8.5 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 128,956 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 454 m 2,775 m 193,048 m 56,327 m 5,369 m 422 m 3,518 m 2,698 m 246,148 m 199,007 m 9,455 m 25,878 m 1,710 m Ecoregion Goal Page 133 of 328 220 % 253 % 239 % 211 % 126 % 138 % 265 % 151 % 317 % 68 % 185 % 200 % 186 % 240 % 116 % 114 % 95 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 30 ha 74 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 93 % Water 7 % Abundance GRank a 6 ha 24 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Golden Bar ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: Golden Bar ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 4.1 7.4 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 134 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 9,052 ha 22,359 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Freshwater a T3 GRank Northern Spotted Owl Abundance ha ha ha ha 1 occ 1 occ 24 occ 5994 120 2317 164 Abundance b 3.0 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 52 % GAP 4 48 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Goodman Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Goodman Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 552.8 1.6 21.6 24.3 0.3 2.4 0.4 Relative Abundance 10.0 % 0.2 % 2.7 % 3.1 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 2 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 52 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 10 occ 503 occ 880 occ 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 120 % 111 % 116 % 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 47 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 135 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 29,166 ha 72,040 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 16 % Water 82 % Abundance Sterna caspia Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Caspian Tern Species Birds Marine Makah (Queen Charlotte) Copper T5 Eremophila alpestris strigata Streaked Horned Lark Lycaena mariposa charlottensis 1 occ Progne subis Purple Martin 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 4 occ Invertebrates 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus ha ha ha ha ha Falco peregrinus anatum 1 473 1379 1849 3 Abundance b Bald Eagle G5 GRank a 25.0 % 33.3 % 7.7 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 5.6 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 12 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 9 % GRank American Peregrine Falcon Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Grays Harbor Targets known in this Conservation Area: Grays Harbor Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 90.0 18.9 27.3 27.3 1.2 14.5 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.6 4.0 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 7.7 % 11.1 % 11.1 % 0.5 % 5.9 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 1.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 2 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 11 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 13 occ 9 occ 9 occ 839 occ 17 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 177 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 400 % 15 % 67 % 367 % 90 % 65 % 166 127 116 126 60 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 9 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 136 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Mirounga angustirostris Sandy, moderate salinity, low marsh op op Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Rock (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Seagrass (ha) Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Sandy, low salinity, low marsh 12131 716 1 6 546 ha ha ha ha ha 39.7 % 3.9 % 1.5 % 0.0 % 5.3 % 38.8 % 12764 ha 119.0 11.7 4.6 0.1 16.0 116.4 179.9 20.3 22.6 359.9 6.8 % 7.5 % 50.0 % 100.0 % 239.9 90.0 0.0 12.3 40.4 37.3 3.4 6.1 135.0 120.0 0.8 66.7 % 36.4 % 0.0 % 4.1 % 13.5 % 12.5 % 1.1 % 2.0 % 46.2 % 50.0 % 0.3 % 50.1 6.4 16.9 8.2 13.0 % 7.1 % 16.7 % 2.1 % 1.6 6.0 Relative Abundance 0.5 % 2.0 % % of Total Known 2 occ 716 ha 111177 m 4 occ 8 occ op 4 occ ha m ha m m m occ Moderate salinity high marsh Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op 1 15349 79 25917 6629 11435 6 4 occ 2878 m 46941 m 898 m Low salinity high marsh op Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds Estuary Dune grass (Ha) Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Eelgrass Estuary Silty, low salinity, low marsh op Mixed-Fine And Mud: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Mesohaline Plant Communities Northern Elephant Seal Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Smelt spawn Fishes Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus 3 occ 1 occ 2 occ Cepphus columba Shorebird Concentration Area Western Snowy Plover 1 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Abundance Pigeon Guillemot GRank Double-Crested Cormorant Targets known in this Conservation Area: Grays Harbor Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 132.3 % 13.0 % 5.1 % 0.1 % 17.8 % 129.3 % 200.0 % 22.6 % 25.1 % 400.0 % 266.7 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 13.6 % 44.9 % 41.5 % 3.8 % 6.7 % 150.0 % 133.3 % 0.9 % 55.7 % 7.1 % 18.8 % 9.1 % 1.7 % 6.7 % Contribution to Goal ha m ha m m m occ 9,168 5,499 21 7,977 3,069 ha ha ha ha ha 9,868 ha 1 occ 3,169 ha 442,357 m 1 occ 3 occ 4 occ 3,384 112,601 177 62,438 176,736 169,841 4 3 occ 337,346 m 84,336 m 12,705 m 16 occ 11 occ 116 occ 15 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 137 of 328 287 206 338 239 224 294 % 200 % 238 % 228 % 800 % 400 % 225 % 330 179 333 224 109 224 325 233 % 132 % 169 % 140 % 119 % 100 % 171 % 200 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 7331 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Novumbra hubbsi Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Olympic Mudminnow Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 27645 m 1552 m 5 occ 24797 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 m m m m m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 5732 9378 85455 3318 1241 3051 4765 5539 4387 4861 6629 Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU G3 GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Targets known in this Conservation Area: Grays Harbor Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.0 % 22.7 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 1.0 % 29.2 % 100.0 % 10.7 % 3.3 % 2.4 % 8.9 % 4.9 % 17.8 % 23.6 % 8.3 % 6.7 % % of Total Known 2.6 779.9 13.3 32.9 58.9 87.5 299.9 32.1 9.9 7.1 26.7 14.7 53.4 70.7 25.0 20.0 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 45.5 % 0.8 % 1.9 % 3.4 % 97.3 % 333.4 % 35.7 % 11.1 % 7.9 % 29.7 % 16.3 % 59.3 % 78.5 % 27.7 % 22.2 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m 1,017,511 m 11 occ 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m 5,894 2,813 239,478 30,025 15,799 10,283 29,156 9,335 5,586 17,529 29,817 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % Page 138 of 328 137 % 109 % 129 % 117 % 150 % 224 333 223 194 247 243 255 278 244 230 64 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 11,077 ha 27,361 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 97 % Water 0 % Abundance 2 occ Plethodon vandykei Van Dyke's Salamander Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet 6 occ Filipendula occidentalis Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Freshwater 1 occ Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Queen-Of-The-Forest 27 occ Frigid Shootingstar Vascular Plants Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle 1 occ 1 occ Birds 3 occ Ascaphus truei ha ha ha ha ha Dicamptodon copei 31 360 3908 6357 401 Abundance b Tailed Frog G3 GRank a 20.7 % 33.3 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 4.5 % 2.0 % 3.4 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 23 % GAP 4 76 % GRank Cope's Giant Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Grays River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Grays River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 155.4 25.9 19.9 0.8 64.7 92.5 149.4 0.1 1.2 7.3 5.3 0.8 Relative Abundance 24.0 % 4.0 % 3.1 % 0.1 % 10.0 % 14.3 % 23.1 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 24 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 25 occ 880 occ 839 occ 20 occ 7 occ 13 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 112 % 12 % 116 % 90 % 175 % 343 % 415 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 76 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 139 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 6860 m 25998 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Lower Columbia Tributary Small Rivers - Volcanics Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Tributaries - Volcanics, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 2 occ 1 occ 8222 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 7550 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Grays River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.0 % 20.0 % 0.8 % 1.3 % 0.2 % 2.2 % % of Total Known 1129.8 2259.6 115.5 116.5 25.8 200.5 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 50.0 % 2.6 % 2.6 % 0.6 % 4.4 % Contribution to Goal 8 occ 2 occ 1,017,511 m 266,114 m 1,440,012 m 170,194 m Ecoregion Goal Page 140 of 328 88 % 150 % 137 % 86 % 117 % 133 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,894 ha 21,969 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 1 % ha ha ha ha occ ha ha 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater 2 occ Histrionicus histrionicus 2 occ 346 1 4577 2717 1 106 797 Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus T3 GRank a Harlequin Duck Rhyacotriton olympicus Abundance 0.1 % 0.1 % 1.8 % 0.1 % 2.6 % 1.1 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 81 % GAP 4 19 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Olympic Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Hamma Hamma River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hamma Hamma River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1.6 0.9 161.2 1.9 64.5 85.1 0.0 10.7 2.8 89.6 1.1 2.0 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 0.1 % 20.0 % 0.2 % 8.0 % 10.6 % 0.0 % 1.3 % 0.4 % 11.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 52 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 29 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha occ ha ha 503 occ 880 occ 5 occ 839 occ 25 occ 3,273 162,155 345,702 775,920 9 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % 111 % 116 % 580 % 90 % 256 % 878 166 116 126 100 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 19 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 141 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 6758 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters - Mafic, Mid Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Puget lowland headwaters west - glacial drift, low elevation, low to moderate gradient 1.6 % 4.6 % 4.9 % 5604 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, Odd-year ESU 3.3 % 2 occ 6503 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Puget Sound ESU 1.4 % 6.3 % 9099 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU 2.5 % 3.7 % % of Total Known 2 occ 5663 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 5663 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Abundance Chum Salmon, Puget Sound/Strait ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Hood Canal Summer Run ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hamma Hamma River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 937.1 1124.5 291.4 864.6 365.8 254.8 466.2 412.9 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 20.0 % 5.2 % 15.4 % 6.5 % 4.5 % 8.3 % 7.3 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 10 occ 130,417 m 36,446 m 99,955 m 200,804 m 68,298 m 77,120 m Ecoregion Goal Page 142 of 328 125 % 130 % 59 % 114 % 38 % 39 % 18 % 15 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 57,522 ha 142,079 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 98 % Water 2 % Abundance occ occ occ ha ha ha occ ha ha ha occ 12711 ha 20524 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) 56 occ 1 1 5 15 11314 538 8 1408 37073 826 2 Haliaeetus leucocephalus 2 occ Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Smooth Douglasia Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 4 occ Trillium ovatum var hibbersonii T1 Dwarf Trillium Vascular Plants b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) GRank a 25.0 % 100.0 % 3.4 % 4.3 % 3.0 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 3.4 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.1 % 4.7 % 0.4 % 2.3 % 2.2 % 2.6 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 14 % GAP 3 84 % GAP 4 1 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Hesquiat Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hesquiat Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 19.2 19.9 8.4 10.7 8.3 10.4 13.9 51.9 0.6 8.7 0.3 110.8 2.3 14.3 13.6 20.8 Relative Abundance 15.4 % 16.0 % 6.8 % 8.6 % 6.7 % 8.3 % 11.1 % 41.7 % 0.5 % 7.0 % 0.3 % 88.9 % 1.8 % 11.4 % 10.9 % 16.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 99 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ ha ha ha occ ha ha ha occ 13 occ 25 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 12 9 12 3,273 162,155 195,305 9 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % 62 % 16 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 1833 2956 650 878 166 127 1067 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 1 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 143 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Oncorhynchus tshawytscha GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Chinook Salmon, West Island Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Eelgrass Shore Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning Low Cover Species Fishes Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hesquiat Portfolio Site Summary, continued: m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m m m m 24047 m 5586 309 5528 15761 1258 7241 1018 2528 3635 43614 242 4313 1847 309 72850 6506 14821 13 21701 309 8574 8177 20037 m 40910 m Abundance 2.6 % 5.2 % 0.0 % 4.5 % 4.9 % 6.9 % 1.1 % 1.6 % 0.3 % 1.1 % 5.8 % 1.1 % 2.2 % 0.9 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 1.1 % 2.4 % 0.1 % 1.5 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 0.7 % 1.8 % 5.4 % % of Total Known 75.5 7.8 0.1 6.8 7.4 10.5 1.7 2.5 0.4 1.7 8.8 1.7 3.4 1.4 0.1 3.5 1.7 3.6 0.1 2.2 0.0 2.4 1.0 2.7 8.3 Relative Abundance 8.7 % 17.2 % 0.1 % 15.0 % 16.3 % 22.9 % 3.7 % 5.4 % 0.9 % 3.8 % 19.3 % 3.7 % 7.4 % 3.0 % 0.3 % 7.8 % 3.7 % 7.9 % 0.2 % 4.9 % 0.1 % 5.2 % 2.3 % 5.9 % 18.1 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m m m m 276,806 m 32,500 239,478 36,906 96,940 5,487 193,399 18,758 294,655 96,577 226,193 6,602 58,215 61,723 112,601 939,089 176,736 187,323 5,844 445,946 442,357 164,143 363,205 337,346 m 225,517 m Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 144 of 328 176 % 106 223 137 112 160 88 216 123 110 102 153 98 94 179 119 109 146 105 142 228 118 131 132 % 146 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 9906 m 57673 m Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Dolly Varden, West Island Pink Salmon, West Island Sockeye Salmon, West Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 52986 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, West Island 24.1 1.5 22.3 282.8 309.9 24.0 31.5 188.6 76.8 13.8 10.6 209.7 76.7 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 3.3 % 17.8 % 0.6 % 0.7 % 2.2 % 4.4 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 2.4 % 1.8 % 0.1 % 413 m 116 m 226 m 38454 m 371 m 363 m 1038 m 66450 m 228 m 548 m 139 m 32987 m 272 m 165 m 5.8 275.3 3.2 % 120564 m 113.1 82.3 39.1 80.4 38.6 120.3 87.4 106.2 Relative Abundance 2.6 % 2.8 % 1.4 % 2.8 % 2.2 % 6.9 % 3.0 % 3.7 % % of Total Known 5197 m 10554 m 4550 m 67699 m Oncorhynchus kisutch G5 33357 m Oncorhynchus keta Abundance Coho Salmon, West Island GRank Chum Salmon, West Island Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hesquiat Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.7 % 8.8 % 24.1 % 1.2 % 1.6 % 8.8 % 21.7 % 3.6 % 2.8 % 35.6 % 32.5 % 2.6 % 0.2 % 2.8 % 31.7 % 13.0 % 9.5 % 4.5 % 9.3 % 4.4 % 13.8 % 10.0 % 12.2 % Contribution to Goal 24,918 m 3,084 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 34,571 m 2,578 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 13,157 m 1,042 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 65,517 m 14,882 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 609,198 m 220,095 m 114,095 m 102,560 m 382,902 m 673,874 m 273,258 m Ecoregion Goal Page 145 of 328 385 % 314 % 433 % 211 % 341 % 90 % 448 % 269 % 399 % 96 % 459 % 264 % 354 % 233 % 457 % 283 % 168 % 191 % 160 % 148 % 102 % 155 % 144 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hesquiat Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 278.7 81.1 5.6 389.6 13.1 7.9 59.6 70.0 53.2 113.4 154.3 3.2 % 1.9 % 0.1 % 4.5 % 0.8 % 0.2 % 2.1 % 1.6 % 1.8 % 2.6 % 3.5 % 0.0 % 262170 m 2769 m 1293 m 49496 m 52 m 358 m 19690 m 16026 m 15049 m 700 m 34258 m 52 m 0.5 220.0 5.1 % Relative Abundance 22020 m Abundance % of Total Known 0.1 % 17.7 % 13.0 % 6.1 % 8.1 % 6.9 % 0.9 % 1.5 % 44.8 % 0.6 % 9.3 % 32.0 % 25.3 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 193,048 m 5,369 m 246,148 m 199,007 m 287,102 m 39,552 m 3,490 m 110,483 m 199,816 m 29,693 m 818,034 m 87,042 m Ecoregion Goal Page 146 of 328 220 % 265 % 317 % 186 % 240 % 162 % 297 % 91 % 407 % 680 % 303 % 586 % 187 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 23,842 ha 58,890 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 98 % Water 2 % Abundance 4 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Burrington Jumping-Slug Hemphillia burringtoni Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Invertebrates 2 occ Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck 1 occ 3 occ 64 occ 7 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle Birds 2 occ Rhyacotriton olympicus ha ha ha ha ha ha Dicamptodon copei 3 14829 427 4482 2 3804 Abundance b Olympic Torrent Salamander T3 GRank a 2.4 % 0.3 % 3.6 % 3.6 % 0.4 % 5.1 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 57 % GAP 4 42 % GRank Cope's Giant Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Hoh River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hoh River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 23.1 1.8 21.9 120.3 2.5 48.1 46.3 0.3 22.8 0.4 1.7 0.0 3.5 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 0.6 % 7.3 % 40.0 % 0.8 % 16.0 % 15.4 % 0.1 % 7.6 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 1.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 1 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 57 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 5 occ 839 occ 25 occ 13 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 115 % 111 % 116 % 580 % 90 % 256 % 415 % 878 127 116 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 42 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 147 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 55023 m 36875 m 84992 m G3 G5 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Novumbra hubbsi Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Olympic Mudminnow Pacific Lamprey Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Summer Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Olympics - Sandstones, Mid Elevation, High Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Olympics Small Rivers - Sandstone, Low To Mid Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 48396 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? 3 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 117972 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 39129 m Abundance Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hoh River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 7.3 % 2.5 % 6.7 % 3.0 % 14.3 % 7.5 % 7.6 % 5.3 % 3.0 % 4.5 % 1.5 % 6.3 % 1.6 % % of Total Known 524.7 174.9 466.4 209.9 1049.4 522.0 530.3 369.4 190.8 107.7 441.7 113.7 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 8.3 % 22.2 % 10.0 % 50.0 % 24.9 % 25.3 % 17.6 % % 9.1 % 5.1 % 21.0 % 5.4 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 12 occ 9 occ 10 occ 2 occ 341,699 m 145,936 m 312,652 m occ 11 occ 943,067 m 560,551 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 148 of 328 133 % 133 % 211 % 120 % 100 % 123 % 144 % 187 % % 109 % 129 % 109 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 1,600 ha 3,952 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a m m m ha ha ha m m m 8 ha 10 ha 2460 1852 4272 4 65 16 2460 1852 2460 2460 m 305 m Abundance b 0.8 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.9 % 0.7 % 0.3 % 2.8 % 1.5 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Shoreline Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Smelt spawn Species Fishes Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Hoko River (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hoko River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 46.2 2.9 4.3 48.6 39.6 18.0 155.0 83.5 9.0 6.9 11.1 12.0 39.3 Relative Abundance 2.8 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 3.0 % 2.4 % 1.1 % 9.4 % 5.1 % 0.6 % 0.4 % 0.7 % 0.7 % 2.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e m m m ha ha ha m m m 279 ha 5,499 ha 939,089 62,438 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 442,357 363,205 337,346 m 12,705 m f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % 116 % 206 % 119 224 109 168 162 169 142 228 131 132 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 149 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 72 ha 177 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 93 % Water 7 % 2460 m 1812 m 1852 m Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 GRank a 1153 m 18 ha 38 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 1.4 % 1.7 % 9.9 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Hult Marsh ACEC Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Hoko River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 4.5 % 5.6 % 33.2 % d 179.3 5.2 4.9 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 74.3 92.6 543.7 Relative Abundance 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e 100 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 137 % 121 % 244 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 150 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 54,295 m 32,087 m 5,586 m Ecoregion Goal 11,563 ha 28,561 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 94 % Water 1 % Abundance 4 occ Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Arctostaphylos hispidula Large-Flowered Goldfields 1 occ Hairy Manzanita Vascular Plants Pacific Western Big-Eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii 1 occ Hochbergellus hirsutus Mammals 1 occ Prophysaon coeruleum 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 11 occ 6630 ha 3198 ha Abundance b Sisters Hesperian T3 G5 G4 GRank a 40.0 % 3.6 % 20.0 % 100.0 % 0.6 % 1.2 % 2.0 % 1.4 % 4.5 % 0.3 % 1.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 6 % GAP 3 12 % GAP 4 80 % GRank Blue-Gray Taildropper Invertebrates Purple Martin Progne subis Ascaphus truei Tailed Frog Birds Plethodon elongatus Del Norte Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Humbug Mtn-Nesika Beach Targets known in this Conservation Area: Humbug Mtn-Nesika Beach Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 99.2 47.7 124.0 47.7 47.7 68.9 88.6 47.7 1136.9 5.3 52.4 Relative Abundance 16.0 % 7.7 % 20.0 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 11.1 % 14.3 % 7.7 % 183.3 % 0.9 % 8.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 12 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 6 Local: Relative Abundance e 25 occ 13 occ 5 occ 13 occ 13 occ 9 occ 7 occ 13 occ 6 occ 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 40 % 92 % 40 % 8 % 454 % 367 % 343 % 138 % 3850 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 80 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 151 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 5 occ 3 occ Phacelia argentea Oenothera wolfii Silvery Phacelia Wolf's Evening-Primrose 1 occ Cepphus columba Pigeon Guillemot Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Alluvium Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1 occ 2 occ 35932 m Fall Chinook Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU 10361 m m m m m m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 578 957 97 375 626 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore 4 ha 2518 m 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Pelagic Cormorant Plant Communities 1 occ Haematopus bachmani Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Mineral Spring 1 occ 1 occ Cryptantha leiocarpa Seaside Cryptantha Plant Communities 1 occ Abundance Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora GRank Pink Sandverbena Targets known in this Conservation Area: Humbug Mtn-Nesika Beach Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 50.0 % 12.5 % 7.7 % 4.1 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 1.6 % 42.9 % 29.4 % 50.0 % 10.0 % % of Total Known 4332.7 1733.1 1114.3 591.0 9.0 1.9 0.1 3.5 4.3 0.2 1.3 2.0 2.4 2.1 31.0 74.4 238.5 88.6 27.0 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 40.0 % 25.7 % 13.6 % 4.0 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 1.9 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 0.9 % 5.0 % 12.0 % 38.5 % 14.3 % 4.3 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m 1 occ 5 occ 139,717 m 75,962 m 14,577 116,959 226,193 24,105 33,330 5,844 ha 445,946 m 116 occ 95 occ 108 occ 20 occ 25 occ 13 occ 7 occ 23 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 152 of 328 100 % 220 % 157 % 91 % 89 119 102 129 119 105 % 142 % 171 % 163 % 159 % 150 % 20 % 123 % 29 % 30 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 15,504 ha 38,295 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % Abundance ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities Pelagic Cormorant Birds Species 1 occ 5077 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Phalacrocorax pelagicus 817 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 2 occ 7 2646 35 4 223 247 10878 52 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Marine b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) GRank a 0.3 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 10 % GAP 3 65 % GAP 4 24 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Juan de Fuca Targets known in this Conservation Area: Juan de Fuca Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1.8 7.8 2.6 1.1 9.9 7.5 0.1 205.5 0.1 1.5 15.5 3.2 Relative Abundance 1.1 % 1.7 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 2.1 % 1.6 % 0.0 % 44.4 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 3.4 % 0.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 75 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 95 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 332 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % 163 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 230 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 24 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 153 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m occ m 21067 m 4614 m 4614 m 31016 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Coho Salmon, West Island Cutthroat Trout, West Island Pink Salmon, West Island Sockeye Salmon, West Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology 34709 m 17583 m Oncorhynchus keta Freshwater Macrohabitats 16419 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 6267 m 1057 1355 3946 365 421 1621 1755 614 967 1997 255 351 738 571 5698 91 779 1 355 Abundance Chum Salmon, West Island GRank Chinook Salmon, West Island Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Mid Intertidal Brackish Fine Substrate Saltmarsh Surfgrass Shore Targets known in this Conservation Area: Juan de Fuca Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.7 % 1.5 % 0.6 % 1.2 % 2.8 % 0.8 % 1.8 % 0.7 % 100.0 % 23.3 % 1.2 % 0.4 % 11.8 % 0.7 % 1.8 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 8.6 % 1.6 % 0.7 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 100.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 884.2 164.3 67.6 130.5 177.5 84.2 193.9 73.0 564.3 131.4 6.9 2.0 66.8 4.2 10.1 1.9 1.4 3.5 48.7 8.9 3.9 0.9 1.0 2.6 0.3 169.2 0.2 Relative Abundance 27.4 % 5.1 % 2.1 % 4.0 % 5.5 % 2.6 % 6.0 % 2.3 % 333.4 % 77.6 % 4.1 % 1.2 % 39.5 % 2.5 % 6.0 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 2.1 % 28.8 % 5.2 % 2.3 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 1.5 % 0.2 % 100.0 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha m occ m 126,642 m 609,198 m 220,095 m 114,095 m 382,902 m 673,874 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 317 1,746 96,940 31,193 1,067 64,871 29,435 54,295 116,959 96,577 886 6,697 32,087 112,601 939,089 5,844 445,946 1 363,205 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 154 of 328 294 % 168 % 191 % 160 % 102 % 155 % 144 % 176 % 333 128 112 113 155 114 65 137 119 110 221 79 121 179 119 105 142 100 131 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Juan de Fuca Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 160.0 174.2 360.9 107.3 72.5 49.1 319.9 111.5 133.3 33.4 123.0 9.6 1121.8 223.8 15.9 208.7 12.1 4139.3 6452.7 1.0 % 0.5 % 2.2 % 0.3 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 2.0 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 4.6 % 0.1 % 7.0 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 64.1 % 100.0 % 2619 m 6382 m 18892 m 10187 m 58 m 57 m 4269 m 4727 m 10161 m 8467 m 1605 m 2938 m 8378 m 856 m 8998 m 2156 m 1216 m 3644 m 725 m 4656 m 3420 m 740.1 85.8 153.6 0.5 % Relative Abundance 18127 m Abundance % of Total Known 200.0 % 128.3 % 0.4 % 6.5 % 0.5 % 6.9 % 34.8 % 0.3 % 22.9 % 2.7 % 3.8 % 1.0 % 4.1 % 3.5 % 9.9 % 1.5 % 2.2 % 3.3 % 11.2 % 5.4 % 5.0 % 4.8 % Contribution to Goal 1,710 m 3,629 m 193,048 m 56,327 m 246,148 m 31,071 m 25,878 m 287,102 m 36,520 m 110,483 m 42,081 m 818,034 m 245,882 m 136,816 m 43,046 m 3,746 m 2,578 m 306,396 m 168,906 m 118,230 m 52,799 m 380,781 m Ecoregion Goal Page 155 of 328 200 % 150 % 265 % 151 % 186 % 163 % 114 % 162 % 129 % 407 % 141 % 586 % 329 % 433 % 162 % 130 % 90 % 448 % 119 % 459 % 132 % 457 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 2,400 ha 5,928 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank a c 6.1 % 2008 m m m m ha m 995 m 1441 m 562 10033 1818 614 8530 9173 m Abundance b 0.5 % 3.7 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 3.2 % 0.6 % 1.2 % % of Total Known 68.3 0.4 % 2730 m 30.3 % 2.1 % 15.0 % d 17.6 135.0 5.5 11.7 10.6 114.9 20.9 44.5 Relative Abundance 1.6 % 12.3 % 0.5 % 1.1 % 1.0 % 10.5 % 1.9 % 4.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 978.9 483.9 3.0 % Relative Abundance 2278 m Abundance % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Eelgrass Shore Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Plant Communities Herring Spawning Low Cover Species Fishes Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Marine Site Keogh River plus (Marine) Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Juan de Fuca Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e m m m ha m 61,723 m 11,673 m 112,601 939,089 187,323 5,844 445,946 225,517 m f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 94 % 104 % 179 119 146 105 142 146 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 255 % 253 % 295 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 156 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 6,618 m 128,956 m 15,189 m Ecoregion Goal 8,406 ha 20,762 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 1 % Abundance Several-Flowered Sedge 25591 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 15008 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Fishes Species Freshwater 1 occ 2 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Carex pluriflora 7 occ Vascular Plants 7 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus ha ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 27 1 383 3371 4162 445 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet T3 GRank a 1.4 % 0.8 % 25.0 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 73 % GAP 4 26 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Lake Crescent Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lake Crescent Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 271.8 159.3 121.9 3.4 6.8 7.1 7.0 0.0 1.7 8.3 4.6 1.2 Relative Abundance 4.6 % 2.7 % 14.3 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 19 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 54 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 560,551 m 560,551 m 7 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 3,273 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 109 % 109 % 57 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 878 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 26 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 157 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Juan De Fuca Coastal Streams - Sandstone , Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Juan De Fuca Coastal Streams - Sandstone , Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Puget lowland headwaters north - glacial drift, low elevation, low to moderate gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Lampetra tridentata Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU G5 GRank Pacific Lamprey Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lake Crescent Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 744.1 3.6 % 2.9 % 1 occ 1 occ 595.3 1487.4 105.9 7.1 % 0.5 % 6.1 % Relative Abundance 2 occ 6078 m 2 occ Abundance % of Total Known 10.0 % 12.5 % 25.0 % 1.8 % % Contribution to Goal 10 occ 8 occ 8 occ 341,699 m occ Ecoregion Goal Page 158 of 328 40 % 50 % 50 % 123 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,762 ha 21,642 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 4 % Developed 18 % Undeveloped 66 % Water 4 % Abundance San Francisco Bluegrass Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Mussels and barnacles 1565 m 1 occ Cepphus columba Pigeon Guillemot Invertebrates 1 occ Haematopus bachmani Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine 4 occ 1 occ Eremophila alpestris strigata Streaked Horned Lark Poa unilateralis 2 occ Vascular Plants 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 3 240 4140 1247 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet GRank a 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 66.7 % 7.7 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 9 % GAP 3 10 % GAP 4 79 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Long Beach Peninsula Targets known in this Conservation Area: Long Beach Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 1.4 2.6 2.8 467.6 90.9 1.9 1.0 0.0 1.0 9.8 1.3 Relative Abundance d 0.5 % 0.9 % 0.9 % 57.1 % 11.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 1.2 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 9 % National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 9 % Local: % Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 337,346 m 116 occ 108 occ 7 occ 9 occ 880 occ 839 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 132 % 171 % 159 % 86 % 67 % 116 % 90 % 166 127 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 79 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 159 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Freshwater Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Plant Communities Targets known in this Conservation Area: Long Beach Peninsula Portfolio Site Summary, continued: m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha m m m ha 1 occ 275 1290 452 707 2777 2 10 32 4 16 839 1999 2777 10 Abundance 2.4 % 2.3 % 0.7 % 2.4 % 18.0 % 2.8 % 1.7 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 476.1 23.4 7.1 24.3 179.3 27.9 16.9 0.5 1.2 0.4 1.8 2.2 9.6 4.7 0.9 Relative Abundance 8.3 % 7.8 % 2.4 % 8.1 % 59.9 % 9.3 % 5.6 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 0.7 % 3.2 % 1.6 % 0.3 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha m m m ha 12 occ 3,518 54,295 5,586 1,181 29,817 40 5,499 7,977 3,069 2,550 112,601 62,438 176,736 3,169 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 160 of 328 133 % 186 137 244 272 64 283 206 239 224 256 179 224 109 238 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 35 ha 87 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 97 % Water 3 % 79 m 79 m 1 occ 10 ha 27 ha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 GRank a Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Haliaeetus leucocephalus Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Bald Eagle Birds Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Lost Creek ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lost Creek ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 45.4 25.1 242.3 5.7 7.0 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 839 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m e 164 % 100 % 90 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 161 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 25 ha 61 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water Erythronium elegans a T2 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Anemone oregana var felix Coast Range Fawn-Lily Abundance 1 occ 1 occ 22 ha Abundance b 11.1 % 20.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Bog Anemone Species Vascular Plants North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Lost Prairie ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lost Prairie ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1706.3 1706.3 8.1 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 4.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 25 occ 25 occ 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 36 % 20 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 162 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 21,111 ha 52,144 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 13 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 82 % Water 2 % Abundance Lilium occidentale Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Marine Mineral Spring Plant Communities Western Lily Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Clemmys marmorata marmorata T3 1 occ 4 occ 1 occ 1 occ Reptiles 1 occ Progne subis ha occ ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 1 2 17843 59 Abundance b Purple Martin G5 GRank a 1.6 % 22.2 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.8 % 0.7 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 5 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 95 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Lower Coquille River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Coquille River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 17.0 54.3 37.7 37.7 0.4 0.0 113.2 7.8 0.5 Relative Abundance d 5.0 % 16.0 % 11.1 % 11.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 33.3 % 2.3 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 2 % National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 3 % Local: % Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha 20 occ 25 occ 9 occ 9 occ 839 occ 195,305 6 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 150 % 72 % 122 % 367 % 90 % 127 3850 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 95 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 163 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pincon/carobn Cepphus columba GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Wood Debris/Organic (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Low Intertidal Brackish Saltmarsh On Sands To Silts Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Shorepine/Slough Sedge Plant Communities Pigeon Guillemot Birds Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Coquille River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1425 392 821 139 5343 1500 194 2278 176 1142 2126 3968 155 1 4 2 11 165 7 10 42 41 4 24 12 2841 1 146 5038 5 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m occ ha m ha occ 2 occ Abundance 2.2 % 2.4 % 44.6 % 4.8 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 5.4 % 2.3 % 17.4 % 2.0 % 2.2 % 1.5 % 0.8 % 0.6 % 2.1 % 1.1 % 2.1 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 14.5 % 0.2 % 1.8 % 0.5 % 100.0 % 1.4 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 50.0 % 0.5 % % of Total Known 9.1 9.9 184.9 19.8 4.6 0.8 22.4 9.6 72.2 8.4 9.1 6.1 3.5 2.3 8.5 4.4 8.8 3.7 0.1 0.4 4.2 2.0 58.5 0.9 7.4 2.1 124.3 5.7 1.4 0.1 124.3 2.1 Relative Abundance 7.3 % 7.9 % 148.8 % 15.9 % 3.7 % 0.6 % 18.0 % 7.7 % 58.0 % 6.8 % 7.3 % 4.9 % 2.8 % 1.8 % 6.8 % 3.6 % 7.1 % 3.0 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 3.4 % 1.6 % 47.1 % 0.7 % 6.0 % 1.7 % 100.0 % 4.6 % 1.1 % 0.0 % 100.0 % 1.7 % Contribution to Goal 19,507 4,933 552 874 144,777 239,478 1,075 29,625 304 16,915 29,156 80,427 5,586 40 55 60 155 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 8 3,384 198 169,841 1 3,169 442,357 9,868 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m occ ha m ha occ 116 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 164 of 328 226 278 334 267 215 223 264 198 334 247 255 122 244 283 282 332 244 206 239 224 246 256 163 330 258 224 100 238 228 294 100 171 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 96021 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Sediment 1 occ 68445 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 122676 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 387 m 300 m Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Protected (Embayment) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Coquille River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.3 % 1.2 % 1.5 % 1.4 % 0.7 % 7.5 % % of Total Known 593.3 91.6 122.1 64.7 2.7 31.3 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 3.9 % 5.1 % 2.7 % 2.2 % 25.1 % Contribution to Goal 4 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 17,529 m 1,192 m Ecoregion Goal Page 165 of 328 200 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 230 % 333 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 21,428 ha 52,927 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 1 % Abundance Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Clemmys marmorata marmorata T3 G3 Arborimus longicaudus Red Tree Vole Reptiles G5 Martes americana American Marten 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 10 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl T3 Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Mammals 27 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle 1 occ Rana aurora aurora Northern Red-Legged Frog Birds 1 occ Rana boylii T4 2 occ Plethodon elongatus 7 occ 4755 ha 12739 ha Abundance b Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog G4 GRank a 1.3 % 0.7 % 10.0 % 1.0 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 18.2 % 9.7 % 0.2 % 6.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 1 % % GAP 2 GAP 3 51 % GAP 4 47 % GRank Del Norte Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Lower Rogue River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Rogue River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 37.2 25.7 111.5 6.7 10.3 0.4 47.8 95.6 180.2 2.1 112.6 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 7.7 % 33.3 % 2.0 % 3.1 % 0.1 % 14.3 % 28.6 % 53.8 % 0.6 % 33.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 51 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 1 Local: Relative Abundance e 9 occ 13 occ 3 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 7 occ 13 occ 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 122 % 308 % 133 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 671 % 86 % 138 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 47 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 166 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach (Embayment) Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities 5656 24692 4246 1041 322 598 1222 1340 2678 1886 52 187 1 2 98 10 1 1 2 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m m 1 occ Triteleia hendersonii var leachiae Leach's Brodiaea 31 18 27267 1041 6 occ Arctostaphylos hispidula Marine 1 occ Sidalcea malviflora ssp patula Abundance Hairy Manzanita GRank Coast Checker Bloom Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Rogue River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 92.4 % 38.0 % 25.8 % 2.1 % 0.1 % 16.7 % 1.2 % 78.0 % 4.7 % 1.7 % 28.5 % 93.7 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 1.8 % 0.2 % 2.7 % 21.4 % 12.5 % % of Total Known 377.0 155.0 105.4 8.7 0.3 68.1 5.1 318.6 19.4 6.9 116.2 380.7 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.7 7.5 0.8 25.7 154.4 25.7 Relative Abundance 307.9 % 126.6 % 86.1 % 7.1 % 0.2 % 55.6 % 4.1 % 260.2 % 15.8 % 5.7 % 94.9 % 310.9 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 6.2 % 0.6 % 7.7 % 46.2 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal 1,837 19,507 4,933 14,577 144,777 1,075 29,625 515 16,915 33,330 55 60 279 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 3,384 3,169 442,357 164,143 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m m 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 167 of 328 333 226 278 89 215 264 198 333 247 119 282 332 116 287 206 239 224 246 256 330 238 228 118 23 % 92 % 46 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 50557 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range Small Rivers - Serpentine, Low To Mid Elevation 1 occ 46554 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 13675 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 2 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU GRank Coho Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Rogue River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 33.3 % 10.9 % 18.4 % 6.6 % % of Total Known 2338.5 846.0 1432.9 309.6 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 36.2 % 61.3 % 13.2 % Contribution to Goal 1 occ 139,717 m 75,962 m 103,258 m Ecoregion Goal Page 168 of 328 100 % 157 % 91 % 95 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 18,245 ha 45,065 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 87 % Water 12 % Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Marine Mineral Spring Plant Communities Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Megomphix hemphilli Haliaeetus leucocephalus Invertebrates a T3 G4 GRank Marbled Murrelet Plethodon dunni Abundance ha ha ha ha 3 occ 1 occ 6 occ 12 occ 3 occ 2 occ 3 637 3341 9347 Abundance b 4.9 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 0.7 % 0.2 % 3.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.4 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 68 % GAP 4 25 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Dunn's Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Lower Umpqua River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Umpqua River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 59.0 30.2 4.7 5.4 1.4 112.3 0.4 1.3 3.8 4.7 Relative Abundance 15.0 % 7.7 % 1.2 % 1.4 % 0.4 % 28.6 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 1.0 % 1.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 35 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 34 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 20 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 150 % 323 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 586 % 878 127 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 25 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 169 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) Phalacroscorax auritus GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Wood Debris/Organic (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Bedrock (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Plant Communities Double-Crested Cormorant Birds Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Umpqua River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: ha ha m occ 5741 2856 13410 64026 6928 4853 931 11868 5876 92 377 10418 204 65 2 31 18 83 828 35 13 69 287 6 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 691 ha 65640 m 149 ha 13 16 19970 4 1 occ Abundance 8.8 % 17.4 % 8.9 % 13.3 % 0.9 % 4.8 % 26.0 % 12.0 % 11.2 % 0.0 % 22.0 % 18.5 % 0.6 % 48.3 % 1.0 % 3.4 % 3.5 % 0.3 % 4.5 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 1.7 % 3.4 % 22.9 % 6.5 % 4.5 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 25.0 % 3.5 % 5.9 % 2.0 % % of Total Known 42.3 83.3 42.7 63.6 4.2 23.2 124.5 57.6 53.5 0.1 105.4 88.6 2.8 232.7 4.9 16.2 16.9 1.3 21.7 0.6 0.6 8.0 16.2 107.2 31.4 21.3 2.2 0.5 116.7 16.9 26.1 9.6 Relative Abundance 29.4 % 57.9 % 29.7 % 44.2 % 2.9 % 16.2 % 86.6 % 40.1 % 37.2 % 0.0 % 73.3 % 61.6 % 2.0 % 161.8 % 3.4 % 11.3 % 11.8 % 0.9 % 15.1 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 5.5 % 11.2 % 74.5 % 21.8 % 14.8 % 1.5 % 0.4 % 81.2 % 11.8 % 18.2 % 6.7 % Contribution to Goal ha ha m occ 19,507 4,933 45,204 144,777 239,478 30,025 1,075 29,625 15,799 226,193 515 16,915 10,283 40 55 279 155 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 8 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 3,384 20 169,841 22 15 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 170 of 328 226 278 218 215 223 194 264 198 247 102 333 247 243 283 282 116 244 287 206 239 224 246 256 163 238 % 228 % 294 % 330 210 224 250 200 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 79141 m 20023 m 43194 m 50081 m 59244 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 62366 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 m m m m m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 972 2216 8103 347 5111 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Lower Umpqua River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.7 % 0.6 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 0.7 % 9.8 % 68.7 % 8.3 % 1.4 % 1.9 % % of Total Known 65.4 55.3 89.2 41.3 48.3 38.1 47.2 329.3 40.0 6.6 9.1 Relative Abundance 2.4 % 2.0 % 3.2 % 1.5 % 1.8 % 1.4 % 32.8 % 229.0 % 27.8 % 4.6 % 6.4 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 2,963 968 29,156 7,615 80,427 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 171 of 328 164 % 164 % 173 % 173 % 100 % 100 % 231 229 255 309 122 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 17,111 ha 42,264 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % % Developed Undeveloped 99 % Water 0 % Nelson's Checker-Mallow Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range Headwaters - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sidalcea nelsoniana g2 4 occ 55701 m 1 occ 6 occ Vascular Plants 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina 1 occ 3833 ha 12272 ha Abundance b Brachyramphus marmoratus T3 T4 GRank a Northern Spotted Owl Rana aurora aurora Abundance 12.9 % 8.6 % 2.3 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.3 % 0.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 15 % GAP 4 85 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Luckiamute River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Luckiamute River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1301.0 838.0 139.7 5.0 0.5 59.9 4.6 6.6 Relative Abundance 44.4 % 28.6 % 33.3 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 14.3 % 1.1 % 1.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 11 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 4 Local: Relative Abundance e 9 occ 194,575 m 3 occ 503 occ 880 occ 7 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 67 % 54 % 267 % 111 % 116 % 671 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 85 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 172 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 66 ha 163 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % Abundance 670 m 671 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 8 ha 14 ha 38 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank a 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Martin Creek ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: Martin Creek ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 205.0 113.2 2501.8 4.5 5.3 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 348 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 2,487,321 m f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e 164 % 100 % 500 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 173 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 8,826 ha 21,799 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ Hemphillia malonei Pterostichus rothi Speyeria zerene bremnerii Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Malone Jumping-Slug Roth's Blind Ground Beetle Valley Silverspot Butterfly Warty Jumping-Slug Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Red Tree Vole 1 occ 1 occ Rhyacophila haddocki Haddock's Rhyacophilan Cad Arborimus longicaudus 2 occ Mammals 1 occ Derephysia foliacea 2 occ 8 4798 3802 45 4 Abundance b Prophysaon coeruleum G3 T3 GRank a Foliaceous Lace Bug Strix occidentalis caurina Abundance 0.7 % 1.4 % 8.3 % 66.7 % 50.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 4 % GAP 3 58 % GAP 4 38 % GRank Blue-Gray Taildropper Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Species Birds Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Marys Peak Targets known in this Conservation Area: Marys Peak Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 62.5 62.5 62.5 125.0 62.5 62.5 125.0 62.5 3.2 18.9 11.3 4.0 0.1 0.1 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 15.4 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 15.4 % 7.7 % 0.4 % 2.3 % 1.4 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 62 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 348 345,702 775,920 324,193 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 308 % 200 % 85 % 23 % 8 % 8 % 15 % 454 % 111 % 500 116 126 236 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 38 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 174 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 17777 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 12 m 11808 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Marys Peak Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 40.6 50.4 0.0 Relative Abundance 0.7 % 0.9 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m Ecoregion Goal Page 175 of 328 164 % 173 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 15,069 ha 37,219 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 14 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 85 % Water 0 % Abundance Clemmys marmorata marmorata Arborimus longicaudus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Northwestern Pond Turtle Reptiles Red Tree Vole Mammals Blue-Gray Taildropper T3 G3 Eremophila alpestris strigata Prophysaon coeruleum 7 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Streaked Horned Lark Invertebrates 4 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus occ ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 2 8 4695 7029 31 40 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet T3 GRank a 1.3 % 0.7 % 0.6 % 7.7 % 0.7 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 16.7 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 2.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 35 % GAP 4 64 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Klamath-Siskiyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Marys River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Marys River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 52.9 36.6 36.6 52.9 6.6 2.2 0.6 158.6 11.4 6.5 4.3 0.0 107.2 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 11.1 % 1.4 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 33.3 % 2.4 % 1.4 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 22.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 29 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 6 Relative Abundance e occ ha ha ha ha ha 9 occ 13 occ 13 occ 9 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 6 348 345,702 775,920 324,193 177 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 122 % 308 % 454 % 67 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 117 500 116 126 236 60 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 64 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 176 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range Headwaters - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation Coast Range Headwaters - Volcanics, Mid Elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Spring Chinook Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Species Fishes Oncorhynchus tshawytscha g2 Sidalcea nelsoniana Nelson's Checker-Mallow Freshwater T2 Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii GRank Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine Vascular Plants Targets known in this Conservation Area: Marys River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ 1 occ 5465 m 1 occ 1 occ Abundance 3.2 % 7.7 % 19.7 % 2.3 % 3.7 % % of Total Known 369.3 831.0 158.6 36.6 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 25.0 % % 33.3 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal 9 occ 4 occ m 3 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 177 of 328 67 % 100 % % 267 % 77 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 13,885 ha 34,295 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 18 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 79 % Water 0 % Clemmys marmorata marmorata Icaricia icarioides fenderi Strix occidentalis caurina Ascaphus truei Abundance T3 T1 T3 GRank a ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 1 occ 3 occ 1 occ 2 3 1 6366 4906 4 66 Abundance b 1.3 % 9.1 % 0.3 % 2.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 3.3 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 36 % GAP 4 63 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Reptiles Fender's Blue Butterfly Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Birds Tailed Frog Species Amphibians Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Oak Woodland North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Mill Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Mill Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 57.4 39.7 3.1 73.8 3.5 0.4 0.0 9.5 3.3 82.4 0.1 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 7.7 % 0.6 % 14.3 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 0.6 % 16.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 36 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 9 occ 13 occ 503 occ 7 occ 348 3,273 162,155 345,702 775,920 22 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % 122 % 23 % 111 % 343 % 500 878 166 116 126 305 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 63 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 178 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii T2 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range Headwaters - Volcanics, Mid Elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Mill Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2 occ 21228 m 1 occ Abundance 15.4 % 3.3 % 3.7 % % of Total Known 1803.8 393.6 39.7 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 10.9 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal 4 occ 194,575 m 13 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 179 of 328 100 % 54 % 77 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,017 ha 19,803 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 11 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 89 % Water 0 % Abundance 32693 m Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Tributaries - Volcanics, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient 1 occ 32721 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? 71 ha 3296 ha 3802 ha Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 b Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU GRank a 4.0 % 7.3 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 1 % GAP 4 99 % GRank Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Milton Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Milton Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 780.5 911.3 141.9 0.3 8.5 4.4 Relative Abundance d 12.5 % 14.6 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 1.0 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 1 % National Other: % National USFS: % % State/Provin Local: % Relative Abundance 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 8 occ 224,010 m f Ecoregion Goal 1,440,012 m e 88 % 46 % 117 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 99 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 180 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1,114 ha 2,753 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water ha ha ha ha ha ha Astragalus australis var olympicus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Cotton's Milk-Vetch 1 occ 1 occ Speyeria zerene bremnerii Valley Silverspot Butterfly Vascular Plants 1 occ Parnassius smintheus olympianus Smintheus Parnassian G5T 1 occ Euphydryas chalcedona perdiccas 1 occ 1 occ 53 1 614 282 18 136 Abundance b Icaricia icarioides blackmorei T3 T3 GRank a Chalcedon Checkerspot Strix occidentalis caurina Abundance 11.1 % 8.3 % 7.7 % 6.7 % 9.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 100 % % GAP 4 GRank Boisduval's Blue, Blackmorei Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Mt. Townsend Targets known in this Conservation Area: Mt. Townsend Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 257.4 494.9 494.9 494.9 494.9 12.8 104.0 0.0 11.4 2.3 1.5 2.7 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 0.2 % 1.6 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 3,273 162,155 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 36 % 85 % 100 % 115 % 69 % 111 % 878 166 116 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 181 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 9 ha 23 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 97 % Water 3 % a GRank Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 1 occ Abundance 178 m 3 ha 6 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 3.1 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Myrtle Island RNA Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters - Mafic, Mid Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Mt. Townsend Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 10.0 % d 725.5 6.3 6.4 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 4487.5 Relative Abundance 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 1,330,438 m e 173 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 130 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 182 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 10 occ Ecoregion Goal 19,881 ha 49,106 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 0 % Abundance Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater Queen-Of-The-Forest Filipendula occidentalis Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Vascular Plants Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T3 14 occ 1 occ 27 occ 2 occ 4 occ Birds 1 occ Plethodon dunni ha ha ha ha ha Rhyacotriton kezeri 25 4147 2541 10572 2351 Abundance b Dunn's Salamander G4 GRank a 48.3 % 0.1 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 6.3 % 1.2 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 11 % GAP 4 89 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Nacelle River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nacelle River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 202.0 0.7 11.1 0.9 206.1 14.4 0.1 7.7 2.7 4.9 2.6 Relative Abundance 56.0 % 0.2 % 3.1 % 0.2 % 57.1 % 4.0 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.7 % 1.4 % 0.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 11 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 25 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 112 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 586 % 188 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 89 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 183 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Willapa Hills small rivers - sandstone, low elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Lampetra tridentata Pacific Lamprey 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 139918 m 1 occ Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU G5 105220 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 59902 m 131046 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nacelle River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 3.3 % 5.3 % 33.3 % 4.1 % 3.0 % 3.3 % 2.7 % 2.5 % % of Total Known 279.8 457.8 2517.0 346.3 280.9 229.1 208.8 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 18.2 % 100.0 % 13.8 % % 11.2 % 9.1 % 8.3 % Contribution to Goal 9 occ 11 occ 1 occ 1,017,511 m occ 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 184 of 328 133 % 100 % 100 % 137 % % 129 % 117 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 40,934 ha 101,107 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 1 % Accipiter gentilis Lagopus leucurus White-Tailed Ptarmigan Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Brachyramphus marmoratus Freshwater a G5 GRank Northern Goshawk Abundance occ occ ha ha ha occ ha ha ha 67009 m 1 occ 1 occ 2611 ha 3 9 1 5506 1 3 23191 1377 8483 Abundance b 10.9 % 2.8 % 1.9 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 6.1 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 0.9 % 0.4 % 0.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % % GAP 3 GAP 4 100 % GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Species Birds North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Nanaimo River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nanaimo River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 443.0 6.5 8.8 1.5 58.4 131.4 0.5 5.9 0.0 58.4 5.2 3.2 4.6 Relative Abundance 36.3 % 3.7 % 5.0 % 0.9 % 33.3 % 75.0 % 0.3 % 3.4 % 0.0 % 33.3 % 3.0 % 1.8 % 2.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e % of Goal Captured by Portfolio occ occ ha ha ha occ ha ha ha 184,827 m 27 occ 20 occ 302,959 ha 9 12 332 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % Page 185 of 328 154 % 100 % 105 % 108 % 2956 650 230 166 127 1067 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio Indigenous: % Private 100 % NGO % Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Ge First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology 1539.1 3370.6 152.7 67.7 2341.4 322.6 235.6 1471.2 235.2 299.0 25.5 63.9 25.2 % 55.2 % 2.5 % 0.6 % 95.8 % 5.3 % 1.9 % 24.1 % 3.8 % 12.2 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 33.9 % 21.3 % 5.2 % 14661 m 1101 m 6551 m 2918 m 7572 m 59069 m 9917 m 416 m 173 m 237 m 7153 m 614 m 468 m 22532 m 316.3 519.8 828.4 79.0 13080 m 91.7 342.8 144.2 0.6 % 8.4 % 3.5 % 24626 m 66710 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island 284.6 88.6 141.2 32.8 Relative Abundance 1.5 % 52075 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island 11.6 % 3.6 % 3.5 % 0.8 % % of Total Known 3000 m 35769 m Salvelinus malma Dolly Varden, East Island Freshwater Macrohabitats 27407 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, East Island G5 Oncorhynchus kisutch 4479 m 63733 m Oncorhynchus keta Abundance Coho Salmon, East Island GRank Chum Salmon, East Island Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nanaimo River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 25.9 % 42.5 % 67.8 % 5.2 % 2.1 % 24.5 % 19.3 % 120.4 % 19.3 % 26.4 % 191.6 % 5.5 % 12.5 % 275.8 % 126.0 % 6.5 % 7.5 % 28.1 % 11.8 % 23.3 % 7.3 % 11.6 % 2.7 % Contribution to Goal 87,042 m 1,100 m 906 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 706 m 2,163 m 8,237 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 1,523 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 5,315 m 10,385 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 237,775 m 441,335 m 153,568 m 377,832 m 551,718 m 166,896 m Ecoregion Goal Page 186 of 328 187 % 128 % 78 % 433 % 211 % 97 % 379 % 415 % 448 % 269 % 200 % 459 % 264 % 394 % 301 % 457 % 283 % 125 % 133 % 123 % 69 % 122 % 78 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nanaimo River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1469.0 304.8 1228.9 9.8 1564.0 82.1 58.6 4.0 122.3 1588.3 71.9 18.4 772.6 67.4 788.4 410.3 23.8 51.2 670.2 24.0 % 5.0 % 20.1 % 0.1 % 64.0 % 1.3 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 3.0 % 26.0 % 1.2 % 59.8 % 42.0 % 0.5 % 31.6 % 1.1 % 32.3 % 16.8 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 11.0 % 9145 m 752 m 6035 m 1600 m 1442 m 559 m 5296 m 128 m 28740 m 4009 m 11710 m 3788 m 4847 m 3701 m 417 m 10652 m 3149 m 192 m 299 m 198 m 5302 m 2568.7 1462.1 71.9 0.6 % Relative Abundance 48162 m Abundance % of Total Known 54.8 % 4.2 % 1.9 % 33.6 % 64.5 % 5.5 % 63.2 % 1.5 % 210.2 % 119.6 % 5.9 % 130.0 % 10.0 % 0.3 % 4.8 % 6.7 % 128.0 % 0.8 % 100.6 % 24.9 % 120.2 % 5.9 % Contribution to Goal 9,667 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 572 m 4,880 m 193,048 m 660 m 246,148 m 2,306 m 3,166 m 199,007 m 3,084 m 287,102 m 39,552 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 1,127 m 199,816 m 6,001 m 3,014 m 7,607 m 818,034 m Ecoregion Goal Page 187 of 328 278 % 239 % 211 % 196 % 200 % 265 % 200 % 186 % 211 % 135 % 240 % 434 % 162 % 297 % 407 % 331 % 128 % 680 % 276 % 488 % 332 % 586 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nanaimo River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1924.2 31.5 % 4.0 % 4765 m 19026 m 245.3 128.9 2.1 % Relative Abundance 13608 m Abundance % of Total Known 20.1 % 157.5 % 10.6 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 3,026 m 128,956 m Ecoregion Goal Page 188 of 328 220 % 499 % 253 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 31,765 ha 78,460 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 7 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 91 % Water 1 % ha ha ha ha ha ha 2 occ G5 Strix occidentalis caurina Progne subis Purple Martin 1 occ Speyeria zerene hippolyta Oregon Silverspot Butterfly Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Prophysaon coeruleum Blue-Gray Taildropper T1 2 occ T3 Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl 1 occ 1 occ Invertebrates 1 occ Ardea herodias 4 occ 33 12535 3958 11086 48 65 Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus T4 GRank a Great-Blue Heron Rana aurora aurora Abundance 12.5 % 0.6 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 4.1 % 0.0 % 1.9 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 11 % GAP 3 64 % GAP 4 25 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Nestucca River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nestucca River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9.0 17.4 25.1 0.9 0.5 25.1 0.3 129.0 0.0 14.5 2.6 3.2 0.0 0.4 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 7.7 % 11.1 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 11.1 % 0.1 % 57.1 % 0.0 % 6.4 % 1.1 % 1.4 % 0.0 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 70 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 2 Local: 3 Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 13 occ 9 occ 503 occ 880 occ 9 occ 839 occ 7 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 28 % 454 % 367 % 111 % 116 % 144 % 90 % 671 % 166 127 116 126 236 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 25 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 189 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1 occ G3 g2 Sidalcea hendersonii Sidalcea nelsoniana Henderson Sidalcea Nelson's Checker-Mallow Mineral Spring 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Double-Crested Cormorant Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Shorebird Concentration Area Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Boulder (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Low Intertidal High Salinity Silty Saltmarsh Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) 1 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Brandt's Cormorant Plant Communities 1 occ Haematopus bachmani ha occ ha m ha ha ha m occ 4 ha 1 1 259 13059 16 73 7 3204 3 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ Branta canadensis leucopareia Black Oystercatcher 1 occ Aleutian Canada Goose Species Birds Marine 4 occ 3 occ Sidalcea hirtipes Plant Communities 3 occ Erythronium elegans 6 occ Abundance Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa GRank Coast Range Fawn-Lily Vascular Plants Warty Jumping-Slug Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nestucca River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.9 % 0.0 % 100.0 % 2.5 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 4.4 % 4.3 % 1.1 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 2.8 % 2.0 % 1.0 % 0.3 % 11.1 % 1.6 % 9.1 % 50.0 % 20.0 % 33.3 % 8.7 % % of Total Known 8.2 0.0 82.6 6.7 2.4 0.1 1.8 2.8 1.6 11.3 5.2 2.8 0.7 0.9 7.5 5.5 2.7 0.8 27.5 11.3 301.0 17.4 27.1 27.1 104.2 Relative Abundance 9.9 % 0.0 % 100.0 % 8.2 % 3.0 % 0.2 % 2.2 % 3.4 % 1.9 % 13.6 % 6.3 % 3.3 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 9.1 % 6.7 % 3.2 % 0.9 % 33.3 % 5.0 % 133.3 % 7.7 % 12.0 % 12.0 % 46.2 % Contribution to Goal ha occ ha m ha ha ha m occ 40 ha 5,844 1 3,169 442,357 9,868 3,384 198 169,841 22 16 occ 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 15 occ 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 20 occ 3 occ 13 occ 25 occ 25 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % Page 190 of 328 283 % 105 100 238 228 294 330 258 224 250 119 % 190 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 200 % 168 % 159 % 133 % 150 % 267 % 15 % 48 % 36 % 200 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 33890 m 110253 m 94390 m 22285 m 106393 m 46861 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Ridge Headwaters - Intrusive Geology Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1 occ 1 occ 3546 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 38072 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 231 210 9678 265 667 2475 526 558 2745 229 1961 2918 3045 34 327 37 113 5 Abundance Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nestucca River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 25.0 % 4.5 % 0.6 % 1.3 % 0.5 % 2.1 % 1.2 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 1.6 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 2.0 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 2.5 % 1.0 % 0.1 % 4.9 % 2.3 % 2.0 % 11.5 % 1.1 % 3.6 % 1.8 % 0.1 % 1.1 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 1576.9 225.3 29.7 67.5 26.4 111.9 38.7 11.9 7.7 83.1 3.9 0.4 5.5 0.1 1.8 6.9 2.8 0.4 13.4 6.4 5.6 31.7 3.1 9.9 4.9 0.4 3.0 0.2 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 14.3 % 1.9 % 4.3 % 1.7 % 7.1 % 2.5 % 0.8 % 0.5 % 5.3 % 4.7 % 0.5 % 6.7 % 0.1 % 2.2 % 8.4 % 3.3 % 0.5 % 16.2 % 7.7 % 6.7 % 38.3 % 3.8 % 12.0 % 6.0 % 0.5 % 3.7 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 7 occ 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 722,295 m 4,933 45,204 144,777 239,478 30,025 29,625 15,799 116,959 16,915 2,963 29,156 7,615 80,427 279 5,499 7,977 3,069 2,550 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 191 of 328 200 % 129 % 164 % 164 % 173 % 173 % 100 % 100 % 150 % 150 % 278 218 215 223 194 198 247 119 247 231 255 309 122 116 206 239 224 256 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nestucca River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ Abundance 1.7 % % of Total Known 87.6 Relative Abundance 5.6 % Contribution to Goal 18 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 192 of 328 106 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 21,324 ha 52,669 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 17 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 78 % Water 1 % ha occ ha ha ha 1 occ 5 occ 10 occ Gilia millefoliata Phacelia argentea Lilium occidentale Seaside Gilia Silvery Phacelia Western Lily Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities 1 occ Cryptantha leiocarpa Seaside Cryptantha 2 occ 1 occ 107 21 3 16849 7 Abundance b 2 occ G4 GRank a Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca Haliaeetus leucocephalus Plethodon elongatus Abundance 55.6 % 29.4 % 33.3 % 50.0 % 20.0 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 0.0 % 8.6 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 4 % GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 95 % GRank Large-Flowered Goldfields Vascular Plants Bald Eagle Birds Del Norte Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site New River Targets known in this Conservation Area: New River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 134.5 129.3 25.9 48.0 26.9 0.8 25.9 0.2 1176.9 0.0 7.3 0.1 Relative Abundance d 40.0 % 38.5 % 7.7 % 14.3 % 8.0 % 0.2 % 7.7 % 0.1 % 350.0 % 0.0 % 2.2 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 2 % National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 2 % Local: % Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha ha 25 occ 13 occ 13 occ 7 occ 25 occ 839 occ 13 occ 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 72 % 123 % 23 % 29 % 40 % 90 % 138 % 127 3850 116 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 95 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 193 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1 occ 3 occ Cepphus columba Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Pigeon Guillemot Western Snowy Plover Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Saltmarsh (ha) Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Pelagic Cormorant m m m m m m m m m m 113093 m 412 524 2365 3863 1903 361 516 7117 7330 16230 92 ha 61 ha 0 ha 43 ha 1 occ Plant Communities 2 occ Phalacroscorax auritus 1.3 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 3.9 % 19.3 % 0.3 % 15.2 % 7.3 % 28.9 % 6.1 % 0.5 % 20.1 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 21.4 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 2.0 % 0.6 % 59.1 1.1 0.4 1.2 15.8 79.0 1.3 62.4 30.0 118.5 24.8 2.1 82.8 0.0 1.7 33.6 1.1 1.3 8.2 2.3 560.4 336.3 83.3 % 33.3 % 5 occ 3 occ Haematopus bachmani 112.1 Relative Abundance 14.3 % % of Total Known 1 occ Abundance Double-Crested Cormorant GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Salhoo Malfus / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Vaculi / Desces Carobn) Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / Darcal / Sphagn) Ledgla / darcal / sphagn Targets known in this Conservation Area: New River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.5 % 0.9 % 0.4 % 1.0 % 12.9 % 64.2 % 1.1 % 50.7 % 24.4 % 96.3 % 20.2 % 1.7 % 67.3 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 27.3 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 6.7 % 1.9 % 166.7 % 100.0 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m 4,496,878 m 45,204 144,777 239,478 30,025 2,963 33,330 1,017 29,156 7,615 80,427 5,499 ha 91 ha 5,844 ha 3,169 ha 11 occ 116 occ 95 occ 15 occ 108 occ 3 occ 3 occ 3 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % Page 194 of 328 100 % 218 215 223 194 231 119 311 255 309 122 206 % 121 % 105 % 238 % 100 % 171 % 163 % 200 % 159 % 167 % 233 % 133 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Alluvium 4 occ Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 26480 m 105551 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: New River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 80.0 % 1.3 % 0.6 % % of Total Known 4699.0 99.7 46.8 Relative Abundance 200.0 % 4.2 % 2.0 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m Ecoregion Goal Page 195 of 328 200 % 164 % 173 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 126,260 ha 311,862 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 4 % a Brachyramphus marmoratus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Haliaeetus leucocephalus GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Abundance occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha occ 19165 ha 49 occ 2 32 12 6 323 57 21 12182 300 13 1 10104 12538 73994 452 6 Abundance b 6.5 % 2.6 % 11.8 % 8.5 % 3.1 % 4.1 % 19.4 % 0.2 % 14.9 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 7.6 % 25.0 % 0.4 % 3.3 % 4.6 % 1.2 % 7.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 14 % GAP 3 83 % GAP 4 3 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species Boreal Fen Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Tidal Salt Marsh North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Nimpkish-Tahsish Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 7.4 3.3 12.6 151.4 75.7 28.4 55.2 1.0 40.2 4.3 0.1 82.0 6.3 0.7 9.3 13.0 3.4 28.4 Relative Abundance 13.0 % 5.8 % 22.2 % 266.7 % 133.3 % 50.0 % 97.2 % 1.8 % 70.8 % 7.5 % 0.2 % 144.4 % 11.1 % 1.3 % 16.4 % 22.8 % 6.0 % 50.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 97 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha occ 147,425 ha 839 occ 9 12 9 12 332 3,273 29 162,155 195,305 9 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 110 % 90 % 167 1833 2956 650 230 878 407 166 127 1067 44 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 2 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 196 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Valley Silverspot Butterfly Draba lonchocarpa var vestita Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Sand and Gravel Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Shore Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Marine Lance-Fruited Draba Vascular Plants Speyeria zerene bremnerii Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Invertebrates Brachyramphus marmoratus Northern Pygmy-Owl, Swarthi Subspecies G5 GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: m m m m ha m m m ha m ha m m m 305 941 904 1671 271 25305 2070 271 m m m m m m m m 36 ha 289 ha 68 ha 36625 66198 6695 7594 112 4343 12129 385 29 16994 150 35744 23430 320 2 occ 1 occ 6 occ 34205 ha Abundance 0.3 % 6.4 % 40.1 % 6.4 % 2.5 % 3.2 % 1.7 % 1.5 % 0.2 % 40.4 % 0.7 % 9.8 % 2.1 % 3.2 % 1.3 % 7.6 % 0.8 % 1.9 % 1.5 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 1.4 % 2.4 % 4.3 % 0.0 % 40.0 % 8.3 % 37.5 % 5.6 % % of Total Known 0.2 4.4 27.8 4.5 1.7 2.2 1.2 1.0 0.1 28.0 0.5 6.8 1.5 2.2 0.9 5.2 0.5 1.3 1.1 0.1 0.8 1.0 1.7 3.0 0.0 8.7 4.4 18.9 6.4 Relative Abundance 0.9 % 21.3 % 133.8 % 21.4 % 8.3 % 10.6 % 5.6 % 4.9 % 0.7 % 134.6 % 2.2 % 32.5 % 7.0 % 10.7 % 4.3 % 25.3 % 2.6 % 6.5 % 5.1 % 0.5 % 3.8 % 4.7 % 8.1 % 14.3 % 0.1 % 15.4 % 7.7 % 33.3 % 11.3 % Contribution to Goal m m m m ha m m m ha m ha m m m 32,500 4,409 676 7,802 3,276 239,478 36,906 5,487 m m m m m m m m 5,499 ha 215 ha 3,069 ha 112,601 939,089 62,438 176,736 443 169,841 187,323 7,567 5,844 445,946 3,169 442,357 164,143 363,205 13 occ 13 occ 18 occ 302,959 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 197 of 328 106 124 333 72 118 223 137 160 206 % 185 % 224 % 179 119 224 109 120 224 146 214 105 142 238 228 118 131 38 % 85 % 89 % 108 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 27488 m 19022 m 9355 m 26091 m 103747 m 44968 m 63841 m 1655 m 7213 m 23988 m 22064 m 23857 m 31633 m 56315 m 23663 m 37920 m G5 G5 G5 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Salvelinus malma Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Chinook Salmon, West Island Chum Salmon, East Island Chum Salmon, North Island Chum Salmon, West Island Coho Salmon, East Island Coho Salmon, North Island Coho Salmon, West Island Cutthroat Trout, East Island Cutthroat Trout, North Island Cutthroat Trout, West Island Dolly Varden, East Island Dolly Varden, North Island Dolly Varden, West Island Pink Salmon, East Island Pink Salmon, North Island Pink Salmon, West Island Sockeye Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, West Island Steelhead Salmon, North Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 774 m 31678 m 5389 m 660 m 51492 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha m m m m m m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 1393 19296 791 911 10819 1376 6510 5124 11958 1097 1515 2556 Abundance Chinook Salmon, North Island GRank Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 27.8 % 3.2 % 19.4 % 8.3 % 15.4 % 7.8 % 15.4 % 65.5 % 0.2 % 3.1 % 9.4 % 0.2 % 2.8 % 11.6 % 5.6 % 2.9 % 6.0 % 3.4 % 3.0 % 29.0 % 8.4 % 8.3 % 3.0 % 1.3 % 0.2 % 1.4 % 4.0 % 3.4 % 9.1 % 5.8 % 3.5 % 2.6 % 2.9 % % of Total Known 367.5 42.6 256.7 109.8 203.1 102.8 122.4 519.0 1.7 24.8 74.8 1.7 37.5 152.8 74.5 37.8 79.7 45.2 39.3 230.0 110.4 5.8 2.1 0.9 0.2 1.0 2.8 2.3 6.3 4.0 2.4 1.8 2.0 Relative Abundance 92.8 % 10.8 % 64.8 % 27.7 % 51.3 % 25.9 % 30.9 % 131.0 % 0.4 % 6.3 % 18.9 % 0.4 % 9.5 % 38.6 % 18.8 % 9.5 % 20.1 % 11.4 % 9.9 % 58.1 % 27.9 % 27.7 % 10.0 % 4.2 % 0.8 % 4.8 % 13.4 % 11.2 % 30.4 % 19.4 % 11.7 % 8.6 % 9.7 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m 40,876 m 220,095 m 86,896 m 114,095 m 46,536 m 85,030 m 102,560 m 4,114 m 153,568 m 382,902 m 38,200 m 377,832 m 673,874 m 116,598 m 551,718 m 273,258 m 46,478 m 166,896 m 276,806 m 1,334 m 184,827 m 5,027 193,399 18,758 116,959 226,193 10,283 58,215 16,881 61,723 9,335 17,529 26,382 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 198 of 328 273 % 191 % 177 % 160 % 207 % 56 % 148 % 196 % 123 % 102 % 101 % 69 % 155 % 192 % 122 % 144 % 162 % 78 % 176 % 96 % 154 % 117 88 216 119 102 243 98 144 94 278 230 139 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Ge First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology 145.1 791.7 97.7 85.7 115.4 34.8 320.4 244.3 61.9 1771.6 53.2 264.3 186.8 22.4 197.9 3.7 % 13.8 % 4.4 % 100.0 % 4.9 % 10.8 % 5.8 % 1.8 % 16.2 % 6.2 % 3.1 % 89.4 % 2.7 % 13.3 % 4.7 % 2.8 % 25.0 % 4.7 % 46371 m 27508 m 168012 m 791 m 666 m 265 m 19079 m 4637 m 7123 m 72902 m 2056 m 12776 m 22693 m 19135 m 144494 m 212 m 353 m 8144 m 93.3 174.8 272.7 1650.3 32.0 86.5 Relative Abundance 83.3 % 2.4 % 6.5 % % of Total Known 21266 m 49194 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Freshwater Macrohabitats 96334 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Abundance Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island GRank Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 23.6 % 50.0 % 5.7 % 47.2 % 66.7 % 13.4 % 447.2 % 15.6 % 61.7 % 80.9 % 8.8 % 29.1 % 21.6 % 24.7 % 199.8 % 44.1 % 68.8 % 36.6 % 416.6 % 8.1 % 21.8 % Contribution to Goal 34,571 m 706 m 3,746 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 168,906 m 2,857 m 13,157 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 52,799 m 65,517 m 1,224 m 2,703 m 396 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 126,642 m 5,105 m 609,198 m 441,335 m Ecoregion Goal Page 199 of 328 341 % 97 % 130 % 448 % 269 % 119 % 500 % 399 % 459 % 264 % 132 % 354 % 174 % 330 % 200 % 457 % 283 % 294 % 500 % 168 % 133 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Fourth Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Fourth Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 50.7 174.0 53.7 107.4 69.7 1980.9 280.6 72.3 209.0 792.7 359.8 42.1 132.5 109.6 192.8 95.9 62.5 209.6 764.1 2.6 % 4.4 % 6.8 % 13.6 % 3.5 % 100.0 % 7.1 % 3.7 % 5.3 % 100.0 % 18.2 % 11.8 % 4.6 % 2.1 % 6.7 % 5.5 % 4.9 % 12.1 % 3.2 % 26.4 % 38.6 % 1453 m 60101 m 288 m 298 m 4384 m 29317 m 174128 m 15892 m 431469 m 1829 m 9919 m 3547 m 91833 m 436 m 14073 m 2302 m 53771 m 159 m 1917 m 369 m 43873 m 182.1 234.1 131.9 6.7 % Relative Abundance 14330 m Abundance % of Total Known 192.9 % 52.9 % 15.8 % 24.2 % 48.7 % 27.7 % 33.4 % 10.6 % 46.0 % 59.1 % 90.8 % 200.1 % 52.7 % 18.3 % 70.8 % 500.0 % 17.6 % 27.1 % 13.6 % 43.9 % 12.8 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal 22,746 m 698 m 12,156 m 657 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 42,081 m 4,099 m 199,816 m 6,001 m 10,922 m 914 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 5,863 m 24,918 m 1,100 m 2,122 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 43,046 m Ecoregion Goal Page 200 of 328 255 % 88 % 396 % 148 % 407 % 331 % 141 % 436 % 680 % 276 % 211 % 200 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 500 % 385 % 128 % 95 % 433 % 211 % 162 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Fourth Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 253.6 56.4 791.7 58.9 82.1 61.4 793.6 68.0 172.4 74.9 68.6 40.7 142.3 57.4 122.8 75.9 7.8 49.5 37.2 12.8 % 2.8 % 100.0 % 3.0 % 4.1 % 4.7 % 100.0 % 3.4 % 8.7 % 3.8 % 3.5 % 21.0 % 5.0 % 2.1 % 7.2 % 2.9 % 6.2 % 3.8 % 0.4 % 2.5 % 1.9 % 1769 m 5631 m 1795 m 5425 m 3176 m 44508 m 513 m 4443 m 4115 m 37601 m 5382 m 3865 m 40734 m 551 m 20232 m 1779 m 59843 m 2944 m 93 m 1899 m 12094 m 65.6 416.0 811.9 41.0 % Relative Abundance 4222 m Abundance % of Total Known 9.4 % 12.5 % 2.0 % 19.2 % 31.0 % 14.5 % 35.9 % 10.3 % 16.5 % 105.0 % 17.3 % 18.9 % 43.5 % 17.2 % 200.3 % 15.5 % 20.7 % 14.9 % 199.8 % 14.2 % 64.0 % 204.9 % Contribution to Goal 128,956 m 15,189 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 193,048 m 12,283 m 56,327 m 5,369 m 246,148 m 3,681 m 31,071 m 199,007 m 9,455 m 25,878 m 256 m 287,102 m 15,320 m 36,520 m 898 m 39,552 m 2,763 m 2,060 m Ecoregion Goal Page 201 of 328 253 % 295 % 239 % 211 % 265 % 125 % 151 % 317 % 186 % 299 % 163 % 240 % 116 % 114 % 200 % 162 % 145 % 129 % 200 % 297 % 162 % 205 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Tahsish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 52.6 22.6 2.7 % 1.1 % 5415 m Relative Abundance 879 m Abundance % of Total Known 5.7 % 13.3 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 6,618 m Ecoregion Goal Page 202 of 328 220 % 255 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 33,546 ha 82,859 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 98 % Water 2 % Abundance Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Wolverine (Vancouverensis) Gulo gulo vancouverensis T1 Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Northern Pygmy-Owl, Swarthi Subspecies 1 occ 1 occ 5989 ha 10534 ha occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 8 7 1 15 18 5469 2 3 2222 6143 17289 2 Brachyramphus marmoratus Mammals b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) G5 GRank a 33.3 % 6.3 % 1.7 % 2.0 % 2.1 % 1.8 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 13.0 % 1.0 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 0.1 % 1.6 % 1.1 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 99 % % GAP 4 GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Species Birds Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Nimpkish-Zeballos Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Zeballos Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 16.4 11.9 7.4 8.7 142.5 166.2 0.4 1.0 132.0 7.2 0.0 71.2 0.6 17.2 11.4 0.1 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 5.6 % 3.5 % 4.1 % 66.7 % 77.8 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 61.8 % 3.4 % 0.0 % 33.3 % 0.3 % 8.0 % 5.3 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 100 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 13 occ 18 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 12 9 332 3,273 29 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 % 89 % 108 % 110 % 1833 2956 230 878 407 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 203 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 2 occ Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology 125.5 200.2 97.0 4.8 17.7 158.7 129.5 2.6 10.4 % 1.7 % 1.3 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 1.7 % 0.0 % 254 m 5512 m 15873 m 856 m 538 m 340 m 32615 m 3002 m 74 m 309.9 172.1 1.2 % 31.6 43961 m 0.6 % 7.2 109.1 Oncorhynchus mykiss Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island 0.1 % 36.8 1.5 % 12904 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island 0.7 % 28.5 2925 m 2145 m Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon, East Island 0.6 % 36.1 2.0 2145 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island 0.7 % 52.0 5.6 32.9 16.4 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 12879 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, East Island 1.0 % 0.1 % 25.0 % 20.0 % % of Total Known 168 m 13346 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chinook Salmon, West Island Freshwater Macrohabitats 693 m 9655 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater 1 occ Draba lonchocarpa var vestita Abundance Smooth Douglasia GRank Lance-Fruited Draba Vascular Plants Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Zeballos Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.2 % 8.7 % 10.6 % 1.2 % 0.3 % 6.5 % 13.4 % 8.4 % 20.8 % 11.5 % 7.3 % 0.1 % 2.1 % 0.5 % 2.5 % 1.9 % 2.4 % 3.5 % 0.4 % 15.4 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal 43,046 m 34,571 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 168,906 m 13,157 m 118,230 m 65,517 m 1,224 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 126,642 m 609,198 m 441,335 m 86,896 m 673,874 m 551,718 m 276,806 m 184,827 m 13 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 204 of 328 162 % 341 % 448 % 269 % 119 % 399 % 459 % 354 % 174 % 457 % 283 % 294 % 168 % 133 % 177 % 155 % 122 % 176 % 154 % 62 % 38 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nimpkish-Zeballos Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 97.1 89.2 193.2 115.2 248.5 475.2 116.5 324.1 648.8 139.9 30.2 138.0 150.7 102.7 0.1 0.7 % 1.2 % 2.6 % 0.8 % 3.3 % 3.2 % 1.6 % 4.3 % 4.4 % 0.9 % 0.4 % 2.0 % 2.4 % 1.9 % 3.0 % 1.4 % 0.0 % 8913 m 1491 m 3624 m 18997 m 14506 m 260677 m 854 m 1304 m 86946 m 10363 m 246 m 3909 m 23299 m 18421 m 24881 m 13299 m 13 m 121.0 147.4 3.5 0.0 % Relative Abundance 27 m Abundance % of Total Known 0.0 % 6.9 % 10.1 % 9.3 % 8.1 % 9.9 % 2.0 % 9.4 % 43.5 % 21.7 % 7.8 % 31.9 % 16.7 % 7.7 % 13.0 % 6.0 % 6.5 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal 128,956 m 193,048 m 246,148 m 199,007 m 287,102 m 39,552 m 12,156 m 110,483 m 199,816 m 6,001 m 10,922 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 27,967 m 24,918 m 136,816 m 11,357 m Ecoregion Goal Page 205 of 328 253 % 265 % 186 % 240 % 162 % 297 % 396 % 407 % 680 % 276 % 211 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 386 % 385 % 433 % 211 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 93,396 ha 230,689 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 5 % Abundance occ occ ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha occ 29042 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Accipiter gentilis Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Northern Goshawk 1 occ 13164 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 19 occ 6 3 12 15 14400 152 6 1 3456 2080 64614 276 2 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) G5 GRank a 1.9 % 4.8 % 4.5 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 2.0 % 0.7 % 10.7 % 2.7 % 0.0 % 3.5 % 25.0 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 4.0 % 0.7 % 2.6 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 38 % GAP 3 43 % GAP 4 19 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Tidal Salt Marsh North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 3.8 7.4 6.9 1.7 51.2 19.2 2.7 39.1 6.8 0.1 51.2 8.5 0.3 2.1 15.3 2.8 12.8 Relative Abundance 5.0 % 9.6 % 8.9 % 2.3 % 66.7 % 25.0 % 3.5 % 50.9 % 8.9 % 0.1 % 66.7 % 11.1 % 0.4 % 2.7 % 19.9 % 3.7 % 16.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 81 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha occ 20 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 9 12 332 29 162,155 195,305 9 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % 105 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 2956 650 230 407 166 127 1067 44 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio 1 % 18 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 206 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Freshwater Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities 2349 2786 882 1659 302 350 282 285 2691 84 420 532 843 2833 2448 1798 350 319 27 133 235 5234 2061 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha m m m 1 occ Sparganium fluctuans Marine Water Bur-Reed 2 occ 1 occ G1 Abundance Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Marmota vancouverensis GRank Pink Sandverbena Vascular Plants Vancouver Island Marmot Mammals Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.5 % 0.3 % 15.0 % 0.5 % 8.5 % 2.1 % 2.4 % 0.3 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 2.4 % 28.6 % 2.9 % 2.3 % 3.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 0.7 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 16.7 % 10.0 % 33.3 % % of Total Known 0.5 0.3 14.0 0.5 7.9 2.0 2.3 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.7 2.3 26.7 2.7 2.1 2.9 0.1 0.0 1.7 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.4 5.9 3.3 8.5 Relative Abundance 1.6 % 1.2 % 49.9 % 1.7 % 28.3 % 7.0 % 8.0 % 1.0 % 2.8 % 0.0 % 2.5 % 8.1 % 95.2 % 9.7 % 7.6 % 10.3 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 6.1 % 2.3 % 0.1 % 1.2 % 1.3 % 7.7 % 4.3 % 11.1 % Contribution to Goal 144,777 239,478 1,767 96,940 1,067 5,027 3,518 29,625 96,577 226,193 16,915 6,602 886 29,156 32,087 17,529 112,601 939,089 443 5,844 445,946 442,357 164,143 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha m m m 13 occ 23 occ 18 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 207 of 328 215 223 293 112 155 117 186 198 110 102 247 153 221 255 121 230 179 119 120 105 142 228 118 38 % 30 % 28 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 12854 m 17910 m 160441 m Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Sockeye Salmon, West Island Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 56680 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, West Island 124.1 185.4 563.9 705.2 119.8 26.3 183.4 4.6 % 3.5 % 21.1 % 65.8 % 4.5 % 1.0 % 3.4 % 40.0 % 5.4 % 7.0 % 9262 m 131833 m 2846 m 1612 m 11814 m 433 m 40483 m 346 m 46027 m 10111 m 188.8 145.9 428.4 319.6 141.0 40.3 15.6 137.9 42.0 64.9 12.2 52.8 17.2 129.1 14.3 156.1 133.5 2.8 Relative Abundance 6.0 % 7.9 % 2.3 % 0.9 % 7.7 % 2.4 % 6.1 % 1.1 % 4.9 % 1.6 % 7.2 % 0.8 % 8.7 % 7.5 % 0.2 % % of Total Known 75571 m 8957 m 12424 m 3494 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, West Island G5 37784 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, East Island G5 12140 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island Salvelinus malma 162388 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, East Island Salvelinus malma 14762 m Oncorhynchus keta Chum Salmon, West Island Dolly Varden, East Island 79658 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Dolly Varden, West Island 961 m 68980 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Chinook Salmon, West Island GRank Chinook Salmon, East Island Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 35.2 % 27.2 % 80.0 % 34.2 % 4.9 % 22.4 % 131.7 % 105.3 % 34.6 % 23.2 % 59.7 % 26.3 % 7.5 % 2.9 % 25.8 % 7.9 % 12.1 % 2.3 % 9.9 % 3.2 % 24.1 % 2.7 % 29.2 % 24.9 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal 28,683 m 168,906 m 433 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 52,799 m 1,224 m 2,703 m 380,781 m 39,958 m 126,642 m 609,198 m 237,775 m 441,335 m 220,095 m 114,095 m 102,560 m 153,568 m 382,902 m 377,832 m 673,874 m 551,718 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 184,827 m Ecoregion Goal Page 208 of 328 269 % 119 % 152 % 459 % 264 % 132 % 174 % 330 % 457 % 283 % 294 % 168 % 125 % 133 % 191 % 160 % 148 % 123 % 102 % 69 % 155 % 122 % 144 % 176 % 154 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Ge First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 62.6 120.8 162.9 25.2 151.2 100.2 269.6 231.8 145.3 130.4 375.5 128.6 3.0 5.5 111.6 370.2 32.2 36.9 77.1 2.3 % 11.3 % 6.1 % 0.9 % 2.8 % 9.4 % 5.0 % 8.7 % 2.7 % 4.9 % 14.0 % 2.6 % 2.7 % 2.4 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 4.2 % 13.8 % 1.8 % 1.4 % 2.9 % 253 m 159 m 13093 m 535 m 38633 m 206 m 123770 m 37666 m 221989 m 1853 m 4208 m 5421 m 1124 m 26520 m 15 m 403 m 7609 m 10590 m 17248 m 1783 m 1361 m 72.3 69.0 206.6 3.9 % Relative Abundance 118168 m Abundance % of Total Known 14.4 % 6.9 % 6.0 % 69.1 % 20.8 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 24.0 % 13.5 % 12.9 % 70.1 % 24.4 % 27.1 % 43.3 % 50.3 % 18.7 % 28.2 % 4.7 % 30.4 % 22.5 % 11.7 % 38.6 % Contribution to Goal 9,455 m 25,878 m 287,102 m 15,320 m 36,520 m 39,552 m 2,763 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 42,081 m 6,001 m 7,607 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 1,100 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 43,046 m 706 m 2,163 m 306,396 m Ecoregion Goal Page 209 of 328 116 % 114 % 162 % 145 % 129 % 297 % 162 % 407 % 331 % 141 % 276 % 332 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 128 % 433 % 211 % 162 % 97 % 379 % 448 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Nitinat-Carmanah-Walbran Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 195.5 130.9 72.6 83.2 457.0 56.8 302.3 118.3 208.7 41.2 1016.1 888.5 30.8 191.1 971.0 7.3 % 4.9 % 4.1 % 3.1 % 17.1 % 2.1 % 28.2 % 11.0 % 19.5 % 1.5 % 94.9 % 1.9 % 51.9 % 33.2 % 1.1 % 7.1 % 36.3 % 3.0 % 11342 m 900 m 33361 m 8747 m 10481 m 20492 m 256 m 802 m 223 m 1183 m 840 m 447 m 39385 m 16038 m 7410 m 2361 m 5486 m 14427 m 81.5 1388.7 50.6 61.6 2.3 % Relative Abundance 22891 m Abundance % of Total Known 15.2 % 181.3 % 35.7 % 5.7 % 165.9 % 259.3 % 9.4 % 189.7 % 7.7 % 39.0 % 22.1 % 56.5 % 10.6 % 85.3 % 15.5 % 13.6 % 24.4 % 36.5 % 11.5 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 3,026 m 6,618 m 128,956 m 9,667 m 15,189 m 4,738 m 443 m 15,371 m 572 m 3,629 m 454 m 193,048 m 12,283 m 56,327 m 246,148 m 3,681 m 31,071 m 199,007 m Ecoregion Goal Page 210 of 328 220 % 499 % 255 % 253 % 278 % 295 % 239 % 190 % 211 % 196 % 150 % 126 % 265 % 125 % 151 % 186 % 299 % 163 % 240 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 126 ha 310 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water 4117 m 3877 m 1 occ 1 occ 55 ha 70 ha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 T3 GRank a Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Megomphix hemphilli Strix occidentalis caurina Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Birds Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site North Fork Coquille River ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: North Fork Coquille River ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 621.2 364.9 4387.7 113.4 9.0 5.2 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 0.1 % 7.7 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 13 occ 503 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m e 164 % 100 % 323 % 111 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 211 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 21,475 ha 53,043 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance 55491 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 84383 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU 3 occ Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fishes Species Freshwater Queen-Of-The-Forest Filipendula occidentalis 1 occ Vascular Plants 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 8 576 1973 17922 1 255 1 Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a 1.3 % 0.9 % 10.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.7 % 1.2 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 8 % GAP 4 92 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Oak Woodland North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site North Fork Siletz River Targets known in this Conservation Area: North Fork Siletz River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 97.3 43.8 40.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.9 7.7 19.1 0.3 2.7 Relative Abundance 4.2 % 1.9 % 12.0 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.6 % 2.3 % 5.7 % 0.1 % 0.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 11 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 503 occ 880 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 22 324,193 177 f Ecoregion Goal 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m e % % % % % % % 173 % 100 % 112 % 111 % 116 % 878 127 116 126 305 236 60 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 89 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 212 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 75741 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU 762 ha 1,883 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water Arctostaphylos hispidula a Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 219 m 1 occ 177 ha 176 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 3.6 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 25.0 % 0.9 % 22.4 % 5.3 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Hairy Manzanita Species Vascular Plants North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site North Fork/Hunter Creek ACEC Coastal Ridge Headwaters - Intrusive Geology 1 occ 54575 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 30 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 13016 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 30 Abundance Summer Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Summer Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: North Fork Siletz River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 100.0 % 3.0 % 74.8 % 17.8 % d 103.2 723.6 2.1 43.7 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 7.7 % 0.0 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 2332.5 71.0 1743.9 415.8 Relative Abundance e 139,717 m 13 occ 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 157 % 92 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 200 % 164 % 140 % 140 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 213 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 1 occ 2,487,321 m 73,008 m 73,008 m Ecoregion Goal 8,078 ha 19,953 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % % Developed Undeveloped 97 % % Water Abundance 5 occ G4 G3 Plethodon dunni Plethodon vandykei Dunn's Salamander Van Dyke's Salamander T3 Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Species Freshwater 1 occ Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk 32567 m 305 m 2 occ 1 occ G5 Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Birds 3 occ Dicamptodon copei 2 occ 9 occ Rhyacotriton kezeri 4361 ha 3541 ha Abundance b Cope's Giant Salamander GRank a 0.7 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 1.9 % 0.1 % 4.5 % 7.8 % 3.4 % 11.0 % 0.4 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 17 % GAP 4 83 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site North River Headwaters Targets known in this Conservation Area: North River Headwaters Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 140.1 2.6 3.5 44.4 1.0 88.8 634.0 204.8 319.5 11.2 4.1 Relative Abundance 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 5.0 % 0.1 % 10.0 % 71.4 % 23.1 % 36.0 % 1.3 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 17 Local: Relative Abundance 722,295 m 503 occ 20 occ 880 occ 20 occ 7 occ 13 occ 25 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 1,440,012 m e 117 % 150 % 111 % 105 % 116 % 175 % 586 % 415 % 188 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 83 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 214 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient 1 occ 32339 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 15663 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU GRank Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: North River Headwaters Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.6 % 1.0 % 0.5 % % of Total Known 563.1 196.9 102.9 Relative Abundance 9.1 % 3.2 % 1.7 % Contribution to Goal 11 occ 1,017,511 m 943,067 m Ecoregion Goal Page 215 of 328 100 % 137 % 129 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 420,223 ha 1,037,951 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 1 % Abundance occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha 54 occ 12 occ Dicamptodon copei Rhyacotriton olympicus Plethodon vandykei Olympic Torrent Salamander Van Dyke's Salamander Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 20 occ Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck 135 occ 10 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle Birds 32 occ Rana cascadae 3 occ 21 19283 44 17670 68124 65516 1 121458 121218 Abundance b Cope's Giant Salamander G3 GRank a 7.7 % 35.7 % 0.5 % 27.3 % 69.2 % 36.4 % 75.0 % 91.3 % 58.9 % 0.0 % 2.7 % 5.9 % 2.5 % 2.3 % 31.8 % 7.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 92 % GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 7 % GAP 4 1 % GRank Cascades Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Coastal Herbaceous Bald And Bluff North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Olympic National Park Targets known in this Conservation Area: Olympic National Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 2.6 68.3 0.2 10.2 36.9 42.0 3.9 119.4 100.5 0.0 1.5 3.4 1.4 1.9 27.1 6.4 Relative Abundance 15.3 % 400.0 % 1.2 % 60.0 % 216.0 % 246.2 % 23.1 % 700.0 % 589.1 % 0.0 % 9.0 % 19.7 % 8.4 % 11.1 % 159.0 % 37.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 97 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 2 Local: Relative Abundance e occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha 880 occ 5 occ 839 occ 20 occ 25 occ 13 occ 13 occ 3 3,273 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 9 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % 116 % 580 % 90 % 175 % 256 % 415 % 31 % 700 878 166 127 116 126 100 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 1 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 216 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal T3 Strix occidentalis caurina Chaetura vauxi Vaux's Swift 1 occ 4 occ 1 occ G5T Oeneis chryxus valerata Incisalia mossii mossii Parnassius smintheus olympianus Speyeria zerene bremnerii Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Chryxus Arctic Moss' Elfin, Mossii Subspecies Smintheus Parnassian Valley Silverspot Butterfly Warty Jumping-Slug 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 2 occ Synthyris pinnatifida var lanugino Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Astragalus microcystis Cimicifuga elata Saxifraga tischii Cut-Leaf Synthyris Frigid Shootingstar Least Bladdery Milk-Vetch Tall Bugbane Tisch's Saxifrage 38477 m 25237 m 236651 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 163373 m G3 Salvelinus confluentus Bull Trout Salmon, Coastal and Puget Sound ESU 38835 m 76803 m G3 Salvelinus confluentus Bull Trout Salmon, Coastal and Puget Sound ESU Species Fishes 21422 m 19 occ Astragalus australis var olympicus Cotton's Milk-Vetch Freshwater 8 occ Pellaea breweri T2 2 occ Plantago macrocarpa Brewer's Cliff-Brake 1 occ 11 occ Alaska Plantain g4 9 occ G4T Euphydryas chalcedona perdiccas Chalcedon Checkerspot Vascular Plants 12 occ T3 Icaricia icarioides blackmorei 6 occ G5 Plebejus acmon spangelatus Boisduval's Blue, Blackmorei 2 occ 1 occ 126 occ 7 occ Abundance Acmon Blue Invertebrates G5 Accipiter gentilis Northern Spotted Owl GRank Northern Goshawk Targets known in this Conservation Area: Olympic National Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 7.5 % 12.6 % 5.7 % 8.7 % 1.6 % 56.8 % 15.8 % 100.0 % 2.0 % 100.0 % 33.3 % 100.0 % 88.9 % 100.0 % 12.5 % 1.4 % 33.3 % 84.6 % 25.0 % 90.0 % 80.0 % 54.5 % 100.0 % 20.0 % 12.5 % 13.2 % % of Total Known 29.9 30.0 22.8 34.7 6.4 135.3 37.7 1.4 2.4 2.6 0.7 13.0 5.5 11.4 1.3 1.3 5.3 14.4 1.3 11.8 15.8 7.9 2.6 3.4 4.3 6.0 Relative Abundance 25.1 % 25.2 % 19.2 % 29.1 % 5.4 % 113.6 % 31.7 % 8.0 % 14.3 % 15.4 % 4.0 % 76.0 % 32.0 % 66.7 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 30.8 % 84.6 % 7.7 % 69.2 % 92.3 % 46.2 % 15.4 % 20.0 % 25.0 % 35.0 % Contribution to Goal 943,067 m 99,955 m 200,804 m 560,551 m 722,295 m 67,612 m 67,612 m 25 occ 7 occ 13 occ 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 3 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 5 occ 503 occ 20 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 217 of 328 129 % 38 % 39 % 109 % 150 % 166 % 166 % 8 % 257 % 15 % 12 % 76 % 36 % 67 % 62 % 200 % 85 % 100 % 15 % 77 % 115 % 69 % 15 % 40 % 111 % 105 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 208545 m 46363 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Juan De Fuca Coastal Streams - Sandstone , Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Olympics - Sandstones, High Elevation, High Gradient Olympics - Sandstones, Mid Elevation, High Gradient Olympics Headwaters - Sandstone, Mid To High Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Olympics Headwaters - Sandstone, Mid To High Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters - Mafic, Mid Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Northern Olympics rivers - sandstone, mid to low elevation, mixed gradient Straight of Juan de Fuca small rivers - predominantly sandstone, low elevation, variable gradient 7.3 % 2.5 % 3.6 % 100.0 % 50.0 % 58.3 % 37.5 % 12.5 % 18.8 % 6.7 % 12 occ 15 occ 14 occ 9 occ 1 occ 6 occ 2 occ 40.0 % 33.3 % 10.7 % 18.3 % 26.9 % 27.4 % 96.5 % 100.0 % 24.6 % % of Total Known 3 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 130680 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 285924 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 81091 m 1 occ 29870 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon, Quinault Lake ESU G5 Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Prosopium coulteri Abundance Summer Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pygmy Whitefish GRank Pink Salmon, Odd-year ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Olympic National Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 26.5 59.5 71.4 153.1 357.2 198.5 238.0 29.8 9.9 14.9 119.0 119.0 42.3 72.7 106.6 108.9 114.9 17.0 97.5 Relative Abundance 22.2 % 50.0 % 60.0 % 128.6 % 300.0 % 166.7 % 200.0 % 25.0 % 8.3 % 12.5 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 35.5 % 61.0 % 89.5 % 91.5 % 96.5 % 14.3 % 82.0 % Contribution to Goal 9 occ 2 occ 10 occ 7 occ 4 occ 9 occ 7 occ 12 occ 12 occ 8 occ 2 occ 1 occ 130,417 m 341,699 m 145,936 m 312,652 m 84,075 m 7 occ 36,446 m Ecoregion Goal Page 218 of 328 133 % 100 % 130 % 329 % 300 % 211 % 329 % 133 % 133 % 50 % 150 % 100 % 59 % 123 % 144 % 187 % 100 % 14 % 114 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank 34,399 ha 84,966 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 90 % Water 10 % Histrionicus histrionicus Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Harlequin Duck Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Warty Jumping-Slug Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lycaena mariposa charlottensis Makah (Queen Charlotte) Copper T5 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Bald Eagle Wintering Area Invertebrates 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 1 occ 1 occ 9 occ 32 occ 6 occ 42 occ Falco peregrinus anatum T3 ha ha ha ha 1 occ 25664 1631 3326 5 Abundance b Bald Eagle Dicamptodon copei GRank a 1.4 % 33.3 % 0.9 % 1.8 % 1.8 % 7.1 % 2.2 % 33.3 % 1.1 % 3.9 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 41 % % GAP 2 GAP 3 11 % GAP 4 48 % Abundance American Peregrine Falcon Birds Cope's Giant Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Olympic National Park-Coastal Unit/Ozette Lake Targets known in this Conservation Area: Olympic National Park-Coastal Unit/Ozette Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 16.0 16.0 3.7 7.6 41.7 14.9 10.4 73.6 16.0 27.4 1.0 0.9 0.0 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 7.7 % 1.8 % 3.6 % 20.0 % 7.1 % 5.0 % 35.3 % 7.7 % 13.1 % 0.5 % 0.4 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 42 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 11 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 5 occ 14 occ 839 occ 17 occ 13 occ 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 200 % 15 % 111 % 116 % 580 % 29 % 90 % 65 % 415 % 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 48 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 219 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Sparganium fluctuans Water Bur-Reed Mineral Spring 4 occ 3 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Smelt spawn Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Shoreline Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates m m ha ha ha m ha m 10 ha 40 ha 35678 15401 89 248 70 14855 5 25826 38008 m 10636 m 8 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Fishes 3 occ 2 occ Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant 11 occ Haematopus bachmani Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine 1 occ 2 occ Carex pluriflora Plant Communities 2 occ Plantago macrocarpa 7 occ Abundance Several-Flowered Sedge g4 GRank Alaska Plantain Vascular Plants Targets known in this Conservation Area: Olympic National Park-Coastal Unit/Ozette Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1.1 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 2.6 % 7.9 % 10.7 % 6.6 % 1.0 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 3.4 % 25.1 % 3.2 % 1.0 % 2.7 0.6 2.9 6.6 20.2 27.3 16.7 2.5 0.1 5.4 8.6 63.9 7.6 2.6 6.4 7.6 10.2 2.5 % 7.8 3.0 % 4.0 % 10.4 32.1 59.6 112.2 Relative Abundance 3.1 % 1.6 % 33.3 % 50.0 % 87.5 % % of Total Known 3.6 % 0.7 % 3.8 % 8.7 % 26.5 % 35.8 % 21.9 % 3.3 % 0.1 % 7.1 % 11.3 % 83.7 % 10.0 % 3.4 % 8.4 % 10.0 % 13.3 % 10.2 % 5.0 % 15.4 % 28.6 % 53.8 % Contribution to Goal m m ha ha ha m ha m 279 ha 5,499 ha 939,089 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 3,169 363,205 337,346 m 12,705 m 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 30 occ 15 occ 108 occ 20 occ 13 occ 7 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % Page 220 of 328 116 % 206 % 119 109 168 162 169 142 238 131 132 % 140 % 190 % 171 % 163 % 187 % 200 % 159 % 150 % 38 % 57 % 62 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 3303 m 44732 m G3 G5 Novumbra hubbsi Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Olympic Mudminnow Pacific Lamprey Sockeye Salmon, Ozette Lake ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Coastal Small Rivers - Outwash, Low Elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 20050 m 4 occ 1 occ 30339 m 2 occ 3 occ 57711 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha m m m m m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? 1519 198 3867 4878 8768 8337 1277 782 656 1599 7911 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Olympic National Park-Coastal Unit/Ozette Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 9.8 % 33.3 % 3.9 % 0.3 % 88.2 % 6.1 % 13.6 % 0.6 % 3.1 % 0.3 % 6.2 % 3.9 % 2.3 % 4.8 % 2.6 % 2.3 % 3.6 % 2.9 % 1.5 % 11.6 % % of Total Known 484.9 1454.7 190.4 15.4 1282.9 396.7 30.9 149.8 0.8 15.7 9.8 5.7 12.3 6.6 5.8 9.0 7.5 3.8 29.6 Relative Abundance 33.3 % 100.0 % 13.1 % 1.1 % 88.2 % % 27.3 % 2.1 % 10.3 % 1.0 % 20.6 % 12.9 % 7.5 % 16.1 % 8.6 % 7.5 % 11.8 % 9.8 % 5.0 % 38.8 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m 12 occ 1 occ 341,699 m 312,652 m 34,400 m occ 11 occ 943,067 m 560,551 m 144,777 960 30,025 64,871 54,295 96,577 16,915 6,602 6,697 32,087 20,374 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % Page 221 of 328 133 % 100 % 123 % 187 % 88 % % 109 % 129 % 109 % 215 96 194 114 137 110 247 153 79 121 125 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 163 ha 402 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 28 % Water 55 % Abundance 1 occ Phacelia argentea Silvery Phacelia 17 occ 13 occ 3 occ 2 occ 38 occ 47 occ Haematopus bachmani Phalacrocorax penicillatus Phalacroscorax auritus Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Black Oystercatcher Brandt's Cormorant Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 35 occ Branta canadensis leucopareia Aleutian Canada Goose Species Birds 2 occ 1 occ Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca Marine 1 occ Microseris bigelovii 9 ha Abundance b Large-Flowered Goldfields GRank a 5.6 % 12.2 % 6528.0 6444.6 2929.4 6981.7 3222.3 5221.4 5370.5 3386.7 1761.1 3386.7 0.5 8835.4 12.0 % d Relative Abundance 12.9 % 6.0 % c 40.5 % 40.0 % 18.2 % 43.3 % 20.0 % 54.8 % 32.4 % 33.3 % 7.7 % 4.0 % 7.7 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 93 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 6 Local: Relative Abundance 16.8 % 9.8 % 11.1 % 5.9 % 10.0 % 100.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 GAP 4 0 % GRank Coast Microseris Species Vascular Plants North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Oregon Islands NWR Targets known in this Conservation Area: Oregon Islands NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e 116 occ 95 occ 11 occ 30 occ 15 occ 31 occ 108 occ 6 occ 13 occ 25 occ 13 occ 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 171 % 163 % 200 % 187 % 200 % 168 % 159 % 133 % 123 % 40 % 8 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 222 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds (ha) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Plant Communities Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Eumetopias jubatus 1514 1569 4623 2173 211 2406 895 2084 51 16174 7751 9594 158 1889 4333 1 0 5 0 5 1 688 21147 2 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m ha 11 occ 10 occ 9 occ Fratercula cirrhata Mammals 1 occ Cerorhinca monocerata Abundance Tufted Puffin GRank Rhinoceros Auklet Targets known in this Conservation Area: Oregon Islands NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 13.8 % 9.5 % 9.5 % 46.5 % 1.2 % 0.4 % 8.3 % 18.2 % 5.0 % 4.1 % 9.6 % 8.6 % 3.7 % 2.9 % 1.6 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.6 % 0.0 % 3.5 % 1.4 % 0.0 % 26.8 % 29.4 % 9.6 % 6.3 % % of Total Known 7424.2 5123.1 5109.4 24989.8 620.6 200.4 4480.4 9772.4 2699.7 2228.1 5180.7 4637.5 1976.7 1564.3 868.1 224.1 130.4 13.7 1.8 836.4 3.6 1898.0 764.0 9.3 3632.9 3426.3 4833.5 3222.3 Relative Abundance 46.1 % 31.8 % 31.7 % 155.1 % 3.9 % 1.2 % 27.8 % 60.7 % 16.8 % 13.8 % 32.2 % 28.8 % 12.3 % 9.7 % 5.4 % 1.4 % 0.8 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 5.2 % 0.0 % 11.8 % 4.7 % 0.1 % 84.6 % 83.3 % 30.0 % 20.0 % Contribution to Goal 3,285 4,933 14,577 1,401 5,487 193,399 3,219 3,436 304 116,959 24,105 33,330 1,289 19,455 80,427 55 60 5,499 3,069 91 3,384 5,844 445,946 3,169 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m ha 13 occ 12 occ 30 occ 5 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 223 of 328 158 278 89 263 160 88 124 132 334 119 129 119 140 89 122 282 332 206 224 121 330 105 142 238 223 % 217 % 190 % 180 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 800 ha 1,976 ac 1 occ 2 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Mussels and barnacles Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities 492 m 2490 m 492 m 2490 m 2490 m 492 m 2 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Pelagic Cormorant Invertebrates 2 occ 2 occ 2 occ Abundance b Haematopus bachmani GRank a 0.2 % 2.5 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.3 % 0.6 % 2.0 % 4.0 % 0.6 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Abundance Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Point Grenville - Grenville Bay (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Point Grenville - Grenville Bay (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 16.7 273.9 1.7 46.2 49.8 4.8 218.7 28.3 69.1 218.7 437.3 60.7 Relative Abundance 0.5 % 8.4 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 6.7 % 0.9 % 2.1 % 6.7 % 13.3 % 1.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 96,577 m 29,817 m 939,089 m 176,736 m 164,143 m 337,346 m 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 30 occ 15 occ 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 110 % 64 % 119 % 109 % 118 % 132 % 190 % 171 % 163 % 187 % 200 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 224 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 800 ha 1,976 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % op a GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Surfgrass Shore Abundance ha m m ha m m ha ha ha occ 16 ha 16 ha 1403 m 2712 m 16 1403 2247 16 1403 466 11 26 11 1 1438 m Abundance b 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 2.8 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 1.0 % 8.3 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass (Ha) Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Moderate salinity high marsh Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Species Invertebrates Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Pysht River (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Pysht River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9.8 17.1 10.4 24.5 16.0 40.9 7.8 305.7 73.7 8.6 104.9 121.7 114.6 1093.3 14.0 Relative Abundance 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 0.5 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 9.3 % 2.2 % 0.3 % 3.2 % 3.7 % 3.5 % 33.3 % 0.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha m m ha m m ha ha ha occ 5,499 ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 363,205 m 3,384 112,601 939,089 177 62,438 176,736 336 692 320 3 337,346 m f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % 206 % 238 % 228 % 131 % 330 179 119 333 224 109 168 162 169 400 132 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 225 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Shoreline Targets known in this Conservation Area: Pysht River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1403 m 809 m 466 m Abundance 0.2 % 3.7 % 0.5 % % of Total Known 19.2 401.8 57.9 Relative Abundance 0.6 % 12.2 % 1.8 % Contribution to Goal 239,478 m 6,602 m 26,382 m Ecoregion Goal Page 226 of 328 223 % 153 % 139 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 5,371 ha 13,266 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 1 % Abundance 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl 1 occ Oeneis chryxus valerata Parnassius smintheus olympianus Chryxus Arctic Smintheus Parnassian Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater 1 occ Euphydryas chalcedona perdiccas Chalcedon Checkerspot G5T 2 occ Icaricia icarioides blackmorei Boisduval's Blue, Blackmorei 1 occ 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet T3 1 occ Invertebrates 5 occ Ardea herodias ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 174 3560 698 93 636 Abundance b Great-Blue Heron T3 GRank a 7.7 % 10.0 % 13.3 % 9.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 74 % GAP 4 26 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Quilcene River-Dabob Bay Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quilcene River-Dabob Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 102.7 102.7 205.4 102.7 2.7 1.5 148.3 8.0 71.1 13.7 1.2 1.6 2.6 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 7.7 % 15.4 % 7.7 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 11.1 % 0.6 % 5.3 % 1.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 65 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 9 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 9 occ 839 occ 3,273 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 100 % 77 % 115 % 69 % 111 % 116 % 144 % 90 % 878 116 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 26 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 227 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 3678 m 417 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Puget lowland headwaters west - glacial drift, low elevation, low to moderate gradient 9 occ 1458 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1458 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Abundance Chum Salmon, Puget Sound/Strait ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Hood Canal Summer Run ESU Species Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quilcene River-Dabob Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 22.0 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.9 % % of Total Known 6983.7 29.8 170.6 198.8 176.1 Relative Abundance 75.0 % 0.3 % 1.8 % 2.1 % 1.9 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 130,417 m 200,804 m 68,298 m 77,120 m Ecoregion Goal Page 228 of 328 125 % 59 % 39 % 18 % 15 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 80 ha 197 ac 11 occ 6 occ 1 occ 4 occ Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Fork-Tailed Storm Petral Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Tufted Puffin Smelt spawn Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion Mammals Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Eumetopias jubatus 1 occ 1 occ Phalacroscorax auritus Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Fishes 1 occ Ptychoramphus aleuticus Cassin's Auklet 1 occ 1 occ 16750 m 2609 m 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus 11 occ Abundance b Haematopus bachmani GRank a 2.4 % 2.9 % 1.5 % 6.2 % 4.3 % 6.3 % 1.6 % 2529.8 2740.6 1632.9 6754.3 4385.0 6577.5 1701.1 3808.0 8221.8 2989.8 5481.2 1060.9 3349.6 7.1 % 2.8 % 3.5 % d Relative Abundance 1096.2 4385.0 c 7.7 % 8.3 % 5.0 % 20.5 % 13.3 % 20.0 % 5.2 % 11.6 % 25.0 % 9.1 % 3.3 % 13.3 % 16.7 % 3.2 % 10.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 1.0 % 4.0 % 5.6 % 1.0 % 3.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Abundance Brandt's Cormorant Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 94 % Water 4 % GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Quillayute Needles NWR Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quillayute Needles NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e 13 occ 12 occ 337,346 m 12,705 m 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 95 occ 4 occ 11 occ 30 occ 15 occ 6 occ 31 occ 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 223 % 217 % 132 % 140 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 163 % 175 % 200 % 187 % 200 % 150 % 168 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 229 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Estuary Marine Ecological Systems Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quillayute Needles NWR Portfolio Site Summary, continued: m m ha ha ha m m 719 758 51 3918 2260 3541 101 1351 m m m m m m m m 8 ha 13324 4643 8 56 11 3292 6980 Abundance 22.5 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 1.2 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 6.1 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 0.7 % 2.4 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 0.6 % % of Total Known 24636.0 830.7 17.4 1986.5 1368.7 1205.8 195.8 6634.4 49.9 466.6 864.0 810.5 2664.0 1155.4 242.8 632.0 Relative Abundance 74.9 % 2.5 % 0.1 % 6.0 % 4.2 % 3.7 % 0.6 % 20.2 % 0.2 % 1.4 % 2.6 % 2.5 % 8.1 % 3.5 % 0.7 % 1.9 % Contribution to Goal m m ha ha ha m m 960 30,025 96,940 64,871 54,295 96,577 16,915 6,697 m m m m m m m m 5,499 ha 939,089 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 363,205 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 230 of 328 96 194 112 114 137 110 247 79 206 % 119 109 168 162 169 142 131 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 6,754 ha 16,683 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 5 % Abundance 1 occ G5 T3 Accipiter gentilis Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Goshawk Northern Spotted Owl 19414 m 25599 m Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Sockeye Salmon, Lake Pleasant ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Summer Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 28978 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU 6107 m 31800 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Species Fishes Freshwater 4 occ 1 occ 2 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 3347 586 2090 421 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet GRank a 5.3 % 1.9 % 100.0 % 0.9 % 1.7 % 0.1 % 1.9 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 56 % GAP 4 44 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Quillayute-Sol Duc River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quillayute-Sol Duc River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1299.6 460.0 7408.4 227.6 420.3 2.1 53.1 4.8 2.5 18.2 1.8 2.9 1.4 Relative Abundance 17.5 % 6.2 % 100.0 % 3.1 % 5.7 % 0.2 % 5.0 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 1.7 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 23 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 33 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 145,936 m 312,652 m 6,107 m 943,067 m 560,551 m 503 occ 20 occ 880 occ 839 occ 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 144 % 187 % 100 % 129 % 109 % 111 % 105 % 116 % 90 % 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 44 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 231 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quillayute-Sol Duc River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2 occ 26481 m Abundance 5.0 % 2.3 % % of Total Known 1234.8 574.2 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 341,699 m Ecoregion Goal Page 232 of 328 133 % 123 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 12,482 ha 30,830 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 1 % ha ha ha ha ha 3 occ 5 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl 5 occ Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Warty Jumping-Slug Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Freshwater 6 occ Hemphillia burringtoni Burrington Jumping-Slug Invertebrates 2 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus 1 occ 16 5999 344 2977 2915 Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus T3 GRank a Marbled Murrelet Dicamptodon copei Abundance 7.2 % 14.3 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 1.1 % 0.0 % 0.9 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 54 % GAP 4 46 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Cope's Giant Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Quinault River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quinault River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 220.9 265.1 5.7 2.0 1.4 44.2 2.8 17.6 0.6 2.2 5.2 Relative Abundance 38.5 % 46.2 % 1.0 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 7.7 % 0.5 % 3.1 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 78 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 1 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 13 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 200 % 115 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 415 % 878 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 21 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 233 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal G3 G5 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Novumbra hubbsi Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Olympic Mudminnow Pacific Lamprey Sockeye Salmon, Quinault Lake ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Glacial Till, Low Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Olympics Small Rivers - Sandstone, Low To Mid Elevation, Low To Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 10904 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? 3 occ 1 occ 66 m 2985 m 1 occ 1 occ 12049 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 1683 m Abundance Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Quinault River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 7.3 % 14.3 % 0.0 % 3.5 % 3.0 % 4.5 % 0.3 % 0.6 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 1002.3 2004.5 0.9 142.3 364.5 46.4 86.2 9.3 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 50.0 % 0.0 % 3.5 % % 9.1 % 1.2 % 2.1 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 2 occ 312,652 m 84,075 m occ 11 occ 943,067 m 560,551 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 234 of 328 133 % 100 % 187 % 100 % % 109 % 129 % 109 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 7,414 ha 18,313 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % 4626 m 2225 m 1098 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1070 ha 5469 ha 870 ha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 b Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 T3 GRank a Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Bensoniella oregana Prophysaon coeruleum Strix occidentalis caurina Abundance 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 3.3 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 3 % GAP 3 32 % GAP 4 65 % GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Bensonia Vascular Plants Blue-Gray Taildropper Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Birds Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Rock Creek (Coquille) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Rock Creek (Coquille) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 3.0 11.3 7.0 74.4 74.4 3.8 3.0 6.8 22.2 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 2.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 35 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 37,848 ha f Ecoregion Goal 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m e 164 % 173 % 100 % 69 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 126 % 140 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 65 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 235 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 24 ha 59 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 78 % Water 22 % 1 occ Abundance GRank a 10 ha Abundance b 0.0 % % of Total Known 14.3 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Rocky Creek State Wayside Coastal Ridge - Sediment Targets known in this Conservation Area: Rock Creek (Coquille) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 50.0 % d 15.9 Relative Abundance 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: 3378.7 Relative Abundance e 195,305 ha f Ecoregion Goal 127 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 236 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 2 occ Ecoregion Goal 16,870 ha 41,668 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 99 % Water 0 % Abundance 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ Cardamine pattersonii Saxifraga hitchcockiana Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus Delphinium oreganum Saddle Mt. Bittercress Saddle Mt. Saxifrage Wandering Daisy Willamette Valley Larkspur Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater 1 occ Sidalcea hirtipes Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow 1 occ 1 occ Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Frigid Shootingstar Vascular Plants 1 occ Encalypta brevipes ha ha ha ha ha Radula brunnea 2 9034 265 7066 477 Abundance b Moss (Encalypta) T2 GRank a 25.0 % 33.3 % 33.3 % 100.0 % 6.7 % 33.3 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 7 % GAP 3 3 % GAP 4 90 % GRank Liverwort (Radula) Species Nonvascular Plants North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Saddle Mountain Targets known in this Conservation Area: Saddle Mountain Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 32.7 32.7 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 32.7 60.7 0.0 19.7 0.3 3.9 0.6 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 7.7 % 4.0 % 4.0 % 4.0 % 4.0 % 7.7 % 14.3 % 0.0 % 4.6 % 0.1 % 0.9 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 10 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 13 occ 7 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 8 % 23 % 12 % 4 % 48 % 12 % 8 % 14 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 90 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 237 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 2018 m 673 m 955 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Columbia Estuary Tributaries - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 950 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 2 occ 15940 m 17479 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 1060 m Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Saddle Mountain Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 11.1 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.3 % % of Total Known 1187.9 46.5 1.1 1.5 22.5 0.6 36.0 18.5 Relative Abundance 40.0 % 1.6 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 1.2 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ 1,017,511 m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 266,114 m 4,496,878 m 1,440,012 m 170,194 m Ecoregion Goal Page 238 of 328 160 % 137 % 164 % 173 % 86 % 100 % 117 % 133 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 45,965 ha 113,534 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 1 % Abundance Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ 2610 ha 3 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha ha occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 1 21 13 6 42 231 2763 3102 2 4 1612 11166 25491 15 4 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet GRank a 0.9 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 5.9 % 5.6 % 3.4 % 4.1 % 2.6 % 0.7 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 1.2 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 2.9 % 1.6 % 0.0 % 5.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 20 % GAP 3 79 % GAP 4 1 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species Boreal Fen Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Salmon River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 2.8 0.2 0.6 17.3 273.0 225.3 78.0 20.0 11.0 2.7 2.5 34.7 0.0 0.3 22.8 12.3 0.3 52.0 Relative Abundance 1.8 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 11.1 % 175.0 % 144.4 % 50.0 % 12.8 % 7.1 % 1.7 % 1.6 % 22.2 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 14.6 % 7.9 % 0.2 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 99 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha ha occ 147,425 ha 880 occ 839 occ 9 12 9 12 332 3,273 162,155 195,305 9 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 110 % 116 % 90 % 167 1833 2956 650 230 878 166 127 1067 116 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 1 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 239 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Accipiter gentilis Lagopus leucurus White-Tailed Ptarmigan 1 occ Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa 5956 m 6515 m 13507 m 40149 m 19113 m Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Cutthroat Trout, East Island Dolly Varden, East Island Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pink Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, East Island Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 38227 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? 477.9 55.4 78.1 22.0 % 0.5 % 0.7 % 0.6 % 5.2 % 17.2 % 719 m 6442 m 27321 m 305 m 3218 m 2331 m 938.4 282.9 32.0 34.7 60.9 99.0 169.2 1.3 21.3 46.2 17.2 74.2 110.7 14.5 21.9 19.7 12.0 12.0 5.8 7.8 2.3 Relative Abundance 1.6 % 1.7 % 2.7 % 4.7 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 2.1 % 0.8 % 2.0 % 3.1 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 0.5 % 1.4 % 2.4 % 2.8 % 1.9 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 112 m 103 m 18493 m 56142 m Oncorhynchus kisutch 9619 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Coho Salmon, East Island 3351 m Oncorhynchus keta Chum Salmon, East Island Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU 3351 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chinook Salmon, East Island Fishes Species Freshwater 1 occ Hemphillia burringtoni 1 occ 1 occ 4499 ha Warty Jumping-Slug G5 G5 Abundance Burrington Jumping-Slug Invertebrates Brachyramphus marmoratus Northern Goshawk GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 86.2 % 26.0 % 2.9 % 7.2 % 43.9 % 5.1 % 3.2 % 5.6 % 9.1 % 15.5 % 0.1 % 2.0 % 4.2 % 1.6 % 6.8 % 10.2 % 1.3 % 2.0 % 1.8 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 3.7 % 5.0 % 1.5 % Contribution to Goal 2,703 m 12,380 m 10,385 m 380,781 m 1,638 m 126,642 m 3,508 m 341,699 m 441,335 m 86,896 m 85,030 m 943,067 m 153,568 m 377,832 m 560,551 m 551,718 m 722,295 m 166,896 m 184,827 m 13 occ 13 occ 27 occ 20 occ 302,959 ha Ecoregion Goal Page 240 of 328 330 % 279 % 301 % 457 % 102 % 294 % 181 % 123 % 133 % 177 % 56 % 129 % 123 % 69 % 109 % 122 % 150 % 78 % 154 % 200 % 115 % 100 % 105 % 108 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 689.4 5.6 332.8 135.5 4.5 656.0 1145.4 186.8 58.0 3.8 103.1 1022.6 139.9 63.4 161.8 119.3 69.1 23.3 823.3 31.6 % 0.1 % 6.1 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 30.2 % 52.6 % 3.4 % 2.7 % 0.1 % 1.9 % 1.3 % 3.2 % 47.0 % 2.6 % 2.9 % 3.0 % 1.1 % 1.3 % 0.4 % 37.8 % 272 m 273 m 2694 m 14722 m 26 m 628 m 1164 m 2258 m 95 m 593 m 2716 m 40114 m 1929 m 3520 m 4445 m 276 m 1689 m 14997 m 221 m 227 m 1605 m 174.5 142.5 76.0 1.4 % Relative Abundance 4575 m Abundance % of Total Known 75.7 % 2.1 % 6.3 % 11.0 % 14.9 % 5.8 % 12.9 % 94.0 % 16.0 % 13.1 % 9.5 % 0.4 % 5.3 % 17.2 % 105.3 % 60.3 % 0.4 % 12.5 % 30.6 % 0.5 % 63.4 % 7.0 % Contribution to Goal 2,122 m 10,630 m 3,481 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 4,733 m 34,571 m 3,746 m 12,035 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 168,906 m 1,785 m 13,157 m 1,106 m 1,042 m 6,354 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 52,799 m 430 m 65,517 m Ecoregion Goal Page 241 of 328 95 % 331 % 301 % 433 % 211 % 151 % 341 % 130 % 267 % 448 % 269 % 119 % 165 % 399 % 121 % 96 % 258 % 459 % 264 % 132 % 200 % 354 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Fourth Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2180.5 282.3 30.9 20.3 206.3 466.0 1664.2 584.5 2057.9 21.7 106.1 239.3 2.7 118.7 144.7 174.3 146.1 151.6 555.2 100.0 % 5.2 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 1.9 % 8.6 % 76.5 % 5.4 % 37.8 % 0.4 % 1.0 % 23.6 % 51.8 % 4.4 % 0.0 % 2.2 % 2.7 % 3.2 % 4.0 % 2.8 % 10.2 % 501 m 7256 m 6992 m 1621 m 155064 m 8399 m 5070 m 107325 m 15293 m 166 m 10771 m 915 m 680 m 2673 m 56 m 4315 m 4857 m 2453 m 38553 m 27731 m 1878 m 1126.9 513.9 118.3 2.2 % Relative Abundance 2709 m Abundance % of Total Known 51.0 % 13.9 % 13.4 % 16.0 % 13.3 % 10.9 % 0.2 % 22.0 % 103.6 % 47.2 % 9.7 % 2.0 % 189.1 % 53.7 % 152.9 % 42.8 % 19.0 % 1.9 % 2.8 % 25.9 % 200.4 % 10.9 % Contribution to Goal 3,681 m 199,007 m 287,102 m 15,320 m 36,520 m 39,552 m 22,746 m 12,156 m 657 m 1,937 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 8,087 m 199,816 m 3,315 m 19,612 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 245,882 m 27,967 m 250 m 24,918 m Ecoregion Goal Page 242 of 328 299 % 240 % 162 % 145 % 129 % 297 % 255 % 396 % 148 % 155 % 407 % 331 % 339 % 680 % 153 % 257 % 586 % 187 % 329 % 386 % 200 % 385 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 3.1 2.6 12.5 0.9 18.5 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 43 m 11 m 1481 m 5 m 1612 m 90.7 131.6 2.4 % 23352 m 2.5 % 10.3 0.2 % 532 m 1 occ 52.8 1.5 % Relative Abundance 11939 m Abundance % of Total Known 8.3 % 1.7 % 0.1 % 1.1 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 12.1 % 0.9 % 4.9 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 94,768 m 6,618 m 128,956 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 193,048 m 56,327 m 246,148 m Ecoregion Goal Page 243 of 328 133 % 220 % 255 % 253 % 239 % 211 % 265 % 151 % 186 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 6,921 ha 17,095 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Lamprey Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 a G5 GRank Brachyramphus marmoratus Abundance ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 2421 m 1 occ 11163 m 1 occ 1 568 184 1053 1460 Abundance b 2.5 % 0.2 % 3.0 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 35 % GAP 4 65 % GRank Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Marbled Murrelet Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Salmon River (Queets) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River (Queets) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 602.5 51.2 144.0 1.2 0.4 3.0 0.6 1.4 4.7 Relative Abundance 8.3 % 0.7 % % 2.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 82 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 18 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 12 occ 341,699 m occ 560,551 m 880 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 133 % 123 % % 109 % 116 % 878 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 244 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 4,800 ha 11,856 ac Abundance GRank a ha m ha m m 621 22107 2966 134 5931 497 m m m m m m 114 ha 65 ha 154 13862 179 22107 1511 1 occ Abundance b 4.2 % 2.8 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.8 % 1.5 % 0.6 % 0.6 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 1.7 % 1.5 % 0.3 % 0.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Cepphus columba Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities Pigeon Guillemot Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Marine Site Salmon River plus (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River plus (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 77.0 50.5 8.4 3.9 14.3 26.4 11.3 11.6 14.4 17.0 30.9 27.3 5.0 4.7 Relative Abundance 14.1 % 9.2 % 1.5 % 0.7 % 2.6 % 4.8 % 2.1 % 2.1 % 2.6 % 3.1 % 5.7 % 5.0 % 0.9 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha m ha m m 4,409 239,478 193,399 18,758 226,193 10,283 m m m m m m 5,499 ha 3,069 ha 5,844 445,946 3,169 442,357 164,143 116 occ f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 124 223 88 216 102 243 % % % % % % 206 % 224 % 105 142 238 228 118 171 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 245 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Salmon River plus (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1717 122 1073 416 m m m m Abundance 0.9 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 16.1 3.9 9.5 13.0 Relative Abundance 3.0 % 0.7 % 1.7 % 2.4 % Contribution to Goal 58,215 16,881 61,723 17,529 m m m m Ecoregion Goal % % % % Page 246 of 328 98 144 94 230 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 12,270 ha 30,308 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 4 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 0 % Abundance 1 occ 63952 m 38820 m 16634 m 63948 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Lamprey Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Summer Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 84496 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU 1 occ 56114 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus ha ha ha ha Histrionicus histrionicus 1 44 5247 6355 Abundance b Marbled Murrelet G5 GRank a 1.9 % 3.4 % 3.7 % 3.0 % 2.0 % 1.8 % 2.3 % 0.1 % 1.8 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 100 % GRank Harlequin Duck Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Satsop Watershed Targets known in this Conservation Area: Satsop Watershed Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 256.3 464.8 506.4 276.5 239.3 316.8 0.7 116.9 0.0 0.1 8.9 4.8 Relative Abundance 6.3 % 11.4 % 12.4 % % 6.8 % 5.9 % 7.8 % 0.1 % 20.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.5 % 0.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha 722,295 m 880 occ 5 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal 1,017,511 m 145,936 m 312,652 m occ 943,067 m 1,440,012 m e % of Goal Captured by Portfolio % % % % Page 247 of 328 137 % 144 % 187 % % 129 % 117 % 150 % 116 % 580 % 166 127 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio Indigenous: % Private 100 % NGO % Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Targets known in this Conservation Area: Satsop Watershed Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ 1 occ Abundance 2.5 % 2.6 % % of Total Known 339.8 370.7 Relative Abundance 8.3 % 9.1 % Contribution to Goal 12 occ 11 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 248 of 328 133 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 15,226 ha 37,607 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 3 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 0 % Abundance 16835 m 11308 m 24211 m 16810 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 24343 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU 3 occ Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Megomphix hemphilli 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Invertebrates 2 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 4 ha 8279 ha 6130 ha Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a 3.8 % 5.4 % 2.1 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 2.9 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 15 % GAP 4 85 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Scappoose Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Scappoose Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 246.9 355.6 139.8 38.5 55.6 108.7 0.9 1.1 0.0 11.3 3.7 Relative Abundance 7.5 % 10.8 % 4.2 % 1.2 % 1.7 % 23.1 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 2.4 % 0.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 15 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 13 occ 503 occ 839 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 224,010 m 224,010 m 266,114 m 1,440,012 m 1,440,012 m e 46 % 46 % 86 % 117 % 117 % 323 % 111 % 90 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 85 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 249 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1,600 ha 3,952 ac 3 occ 3 occ 2 occ 2 occ 3 occ 3 occ 1 occ 3 occ Ptychoramphus aleuticus Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Cassin's Auklet Common Murre Fork-Tailed Storm Petral Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Stellar's Sea Lion rookery 3 occ 1 occ Mammals 3 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Abundance b Haematopus bachmani GRank a 75.0 % 3.2 % 6.3 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 3.0 % 14.3 % 5.6 % 16.7 % 1.0 % 0.8 % % of Total Known 4.0 % 4.0 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 1 occ 1 occ Abundance Brandt's Cormorant Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Marine Site Scott Islands (Marine) Lower Columbia Tributaries - Volcanics, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Lower Columbia Tributaries - Volcanics, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Targets known in this Conservation Area: Scappoose Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 12.5 % 12.5 % d 4920.0 164.0 328.0 42.4 51.8 164.0 820.0 298.2 820.0 52.9 45.6 Relative Abundance 300.0 % 10.0 % 20.0 % 2.6 % 3.2 % 10.0 % 50.0 % 18.2 % 50.0 % 3.2 % 2.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 411.3 411.2 Relative Abundance e 1 occ 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 95 occ 30 occ 4 occ 11 occ 6 occ 31 occ 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 300 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 163 % 187 % 175 % 200 % 150 % 168 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 88 % 88 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 250 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 8 occ 8 occ Ecoregion Goal 400 ha 988 ac 2 occ 1 occ Cepphus columba Fratercula cirrhata Pigeon Guillemot Tufted Puffin Mussels and barnacles Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Marine Ecological Systems Algal Beds Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities m ha ha ha m m 601 m 772 m 1142 m 1914 27 46 22 772 2266 1021 m 1 occ Invertebrates 1 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Abundance b Phalacroscorax auritus GRank a 0.5 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 2.4 % 2.0 % 2.1 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 1.1 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 2.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Abundance Pelagic Cormorant Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank Double-Crested Cormorant Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Seal and Sail Rocks (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Seal and Sail Rocks (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 106.7 78.0 77.6 13.4 530.7 432.5 458.5 11.4 40.9 19.8 218.7 113.1 69.1 437.3 Relative Abundance 1.6 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 8.1 % 6.6 % 7.0 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 3.3 % 1.7 % 1.1 % 6.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e m ha ha ha m m 36,906 m 64,871 m 96,577 m 939,089 336 692 320 445,946 363,205 337,346 m 30 occ 116 occ 95 occ 15 occ f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 137 % 114 % 110 % 119 168 162 169 142 131 132 % 190 % 171 % 163 % 200 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 251 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 4,839 ha 11,952 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 97 % Water 0 % Haliaeetus leucocephalus Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl ha ha ha ha ha Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters 1 occ Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 857 m 1746 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? 1 occ 13 occ 1 occ 3 3210 1130 350 3 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU T3 b Abundance Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Species Fishes Freshwater a GRank Marbled Murrelet Abundance 12.5 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 65 % GAP 4 35 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Sequim Bay Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sequim Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 5167.7 138.4 44.1 2.9 21.9 1.8 1.3 13.8 2.2 1.6 0.1 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 1.3 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.9 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 39 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 26 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 2 occ 130,417 m 200,804 m 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 3,273 345,702 775,920 324,193 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 100 % 59 % 39 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 878 116 126 236 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 35 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 252 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Puget lowland headwaters north - glacial drift, low elevation, low to moderate gradient Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sequim Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 3 occ Abundance 8.8 % % of Total Known 3100.6 Relative Abundance 30.0 % Contribution to Goal 10 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 253 of 328 40 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 4,201 ha 10,376 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 2 % Abundance Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters - Mafic, Mid Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient 1 occ 2855 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 870 m Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Chum Salmon, Puget Sound/Strait ESU Species Fishes 1096 m 1 occ Freshwater 1 occ Sialia mexicana ha ha occ ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 4 668 6 25 Abundance b Western Bluebird G5 GRank a 3.1 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 50.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 13.6 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 2 % GAP 4 98 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Shelton-South Sound Targets known in this Conservation Area: Shelton-South Sound Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 1191.2 260.8 51.6 191.2 189.6 2.0 0.0 1.5 1137.9 1.1 Relative Abundance d 10.0 % 2.2 % 0.4 % 1.6 % 11.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 66.7 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership % National National Other: % National USFS: % State/Provin 2 % Local: % Relative Abundance e ha ha occ ha 10 occ 130,417 m 200,804 m 68,298 m 9 occ 839 occ 345,702 775,920 9 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 130 % 59 % 39 % 18 % 11 % 90 % 116 126 100 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 98 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 254 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 202 ha 499 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 98 % Water 2 % a GRank Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Haliaeetus leucocephalus 2 occ Abundance 53 m 1 occ 178 ha 2 ha 21 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 4.9 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Shipwreck Point NAP Puget lowland headwaters west - glacial drift, low elevation, low to moderate gradient Targets known in this Conservation Area: Shelton-South Sound Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 16.7 % d 23.4 42.3 32.4 0.2 0.9 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: 1985.3 Relative Abundance e 560,551 m 839 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 109 % 90 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 125 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 255 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 12 occ Ecoregion Goal 10,363 ha 25,597 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 4 % Abundance G5 Progne subis Pacific Fisher Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Mineral Spring Plant Communities 2 occ 1 occ 3 occ Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Warty Jumping-Slug Martes pennanti pacifica 1 occ Pterostichus rothi Roth's Blind Ground Beetle Mammals 2 occ Prophysaon coeruleum Blue-Gray Taildropper T2 5 occ T3 Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Purple Martin Invertebrates 2 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus 1 occ 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus 4478 ha 1228 ha 3992 ha Abundance b Marbled Murrelet GRank a 3.3 % 33.3 % 4.3 % 33.3 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 65 % GAP 4 31 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Siletz Bay-Drift Creek Targets known in this Conservation Area: Siletz Bay-Drift Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 69.2 230.6 159.7 53.2 106.4 76.9 6.9 1.6 0.8 15.9 2.5 3.6 Relative Abundance 10.0 % 33.3 % 23.1 % 7.7 % 15.4 % 11.1 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 0.4 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 65 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 20 occ 3 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 9 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 150 % 100 % 200 % 23 % 454 % 367 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 31 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 256 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Freshwater Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Flat (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Bedrock (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Plant Communities Shorebird Concentration Area Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Siletz Bay-Drift Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: ha ha ha m occ 3955 22153 3977 930 667 2104 259 1040 1895 4523 1 1 17 27 497 10 125 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 315 ha 29388 m 23 ha 158 8 0 16791 10 1 occ Abundance 2.6 % 4.6 % 4.0 % 7.9 % 5.8 % 2.1 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 7.5 % 1.7 % 22.2 38.7 33.5 66.9 49.1 18.0 2.0 9.0 63.0 14.2 8.6 4.8 15.7 0.8 22.9 0.3 10.3 25.2 16.8 0.6 3.0 % 2.0 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 1.9 % 0.1 % 2.7 % 0.0 % 1.2 % 11.8 9.9 6.3 25.0 115.1 15.8 Relative Abundance 1.4 % 1.2 % 0.8 % 3.0 % 14.7 % 4.3 % % of Total Known 8.7 % 15.3 % 13.2 % 26.4 % 19.4 % 7.1 % 0.8 % 3.6 % 24.9 % 5.6 % 3.4 % 1.9 % 6.2 % 0.3 % 9.0 % 0.1 % 4.1 % 9.9 % 6.6 % 0.2 % 4.7 % 3.9 % 2.5 % 9.9 % 45.5 % 6.3 % Contribution to Goal ha ha ha m occ 45,204 144,777 30,025 3,518 3,436 29,625 33,330 29,156 7,615 80,427 40 55 279 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 3,384 198 20 169,841 22 16 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 257 of 328 218 215 194 186 132 198 119 255 309 122 283 282 116 287 206 239 224 238 % 228 % 294 % 330 258 210 224 250 119 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 34426 m 65395 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 30 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Summer Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Volcanic Inland Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Coastal Rivers - Volcanic To Granite, Low To Mid Elevation, Mixed Gradient 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 68792 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 67769 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 6135 m Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Siletz Bay-Drift Creek Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 16.7 % 1.7 % 20.0 % 0.8 % 14.1 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.3 % % of Total Known 2417.2 268.6 2417.2 127.1 2279.6 250.0 72.9 41.1 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 5.6 % 50.0 % 2.6 % 47.2 % 5.2 % 1.5 % 0.8 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 18 occ 2 occ 2,487,321 m 73,008 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 258 of 328 250 % 106 % 100 % 164 % 140 % 173 % 100 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 157,099 ha 388,034 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 1 % a G3 T4 G3 Aneides ferreus Rana aurora aurora Rhyacotriton variegatus Ascaphus truei Southern Torrent Salamander Tailed Frog GRank Northern Red-Legged Frog T3 Strix occidentalis caurina Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites G5 Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle Birds Abundance ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 107 occ 1 occ 102 occ 3 occ 2 occ 10 occ 21 occ 2 occ 704 5 981 10 38586 106843 60 44 Abundance b 10.6 % 1.9 % 5.8 % 0.2 % 3.9 % 23.8 % 21.6 % 12.5 % 20.2 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 4.1 % 3.3 % 4.1 % 0.0 % 2.5 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 61 % GAP 4 39 % GRank Clouded Salamander Species Amphibians Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Siuslaw River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Siuslaw River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9.7 2.3 5.3 0.2 13.0 35.1 136.9 13.0 92.3 0.1 0.2 76.1 5.1 6.3 0.1 11.3 Relative Abundance 21.3 % 5.0 % 11.6 % 0.4 % 28.6 % 76.9 % 300.0 % 28.6 % 202.3 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 166.7 % 11.2 % 13.8 % 0.2 % 24.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 55 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 5 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 503 occ 20 occ 880 occ 839 occ 7 occ 13 occ 7 occ 7 occ 348 3,273 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 37,848 177 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % 111 % 105 % 116 % 90 % 343 % 192 % 671 % 86 % 500 878 127 3850 116 126 140 60 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 39 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 259 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Red Tree Vole Cimicifuga elata Tall Bugbane Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Cobble/Gravel (ha) Flat (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Carlyn freshwater Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Carlyn Freshwater) Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Plant Communities Shorebird Concentration Area Species Birds Marine Mineral Spring Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn)Ledgla / carobn / sphagn Plant Communities Sidalcea hendersonii Henderson Sidalcea Vascular Plants Arborimus longicaudus G3 ha ha m occ 0 5 32 265 18 10 58 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 194 ha 29828 m 68 ha 1 occ 1 2 23646 1 1 occ 3 occ 1 occ 13 occ 1 occ 2 occ 26 occ Mammals 24 occ Megomphix hemphilli 1 occ Prophysaon coeruleum G3 G5 Abundance Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Progne subis GRank Blue-Gray Taildropper Invertebrates Purple Martin Targets known in this Conservation Area: Siuslaw River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.2 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 1.8 % 2.0 % 0.2 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 4.2 % 1.5 % 4.3 % 4.9 % 8.3 % 26.0 % 50.0 % 1.3 % 25.5 % 14.2 % 1.2 % % of Total Known 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.1 16.7 0.0 0.2 2.3 0.8 1.0 6.8 7.6 84.8 3.5 7.0 91.3 84.3 5.1 Relative Abundance 0.7 % 1.9 % 0.4 % 4.8 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 4.6 % 6.1 % 6.7 % 0.7 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 1.0 % 13.9 % 4.5 % 6.3 % 15.0 % 16.7 % 185.7 % 7.7 % 15.4 % 200.0 % 184.6 % 11.1 % Contribution to Goal ha ha m occ 55 279 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 1 occ 3,384 198 169,841 22 16 occ 20 occ 6 occ 7 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 9 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % Page 260 of 328 282 116 287 206 239 224 246 238 % 228 % 294 % 100 % 330 258 224 250 119 % 150 % 117 % 257 % 15 % 308 % 323 % 454 % 367 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 170489 m 533278 m 329693 m 82847 m 326934 m 162374 m 120456 m 313995 m 507060 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment Inland Headwaters - Sediment Inland Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Inland Coastal Headwaters Streams - Granitic, Low Elevation, High Gradient 1 occ 5 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 34676 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 104232 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 m m m m m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 7531 20843 2214 1323 38 11 ha Abundance Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Species Freshwater Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Shoreline Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Siuslaw River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1.7 % 8.5 % 1.7 % 9.1 % 20.0 % 6.1 % 3.8 % 1.5 % 3.7 % 7.4 % 1.9 % 3.7 % 5.9 % 1.9 % 1.4 % 4.3 % 5.0 % 4.3 % 0.3 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 17.7 88.6 17.7 91.1 159.5 65.0 40.3 15.4 38.9 78.4 19.9 23.4 37.8 12.1 15.3 46.0 2.8 2.4 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.1 Relative Abundance 5.6 % 27.8 % 5.6 % 28.6 % 50.0 % 20.4 % 12.6 % 4.8 % 12.2 % 24.6 % 6.2 % 7.3 % 11.9 % 3.8 % 4.8 % 14.4 % 16.7 % 14.4 % 0.9 % 4.5 % 0.2 % 0.4 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m 18 occ 18 occ 18 occ 7 occ 2 occ 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 1,330,438 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 722,295 m 45,204 144,777 239,478 29,625 16,915 2,550 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 261 of 328 106 % 106 % 106 % 129 % 100 % 164 % 164 % 164 % 173 % 173 % 173 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 150 % 150 % 218 215 223 198 247 256 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 8,214 ha 20,290 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 5 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 93 % Water 0 % Abundance G3 Plethodon vandykei Van Dyke's Salamander Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet 1 occ 9683 m 12319 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 7546 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU 11 occ Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Fishes Species Freshwater Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle 3 occ 1 occ Birds 2 occ G4 Plethodon dunni ha ha ha ha Rhyacotriton kezeri 388 3211 4069 5 Abundance b Dunn's Salamander GRank a 2.3 % 0.2 % 2.2 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 6.8 % 1.6 % 2.4 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 38 % GAP 4 62 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Skamokowa Targets known in this Conservation Area: Skamokowa Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 282.1 41.0 270.2 10.9 1.0 130.9 124.7 69.8 1.7 8.1 4.6 0.0 Relative Abundance 4.6 % 0.7 % 4.4 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 15.0 % 14.3 % 8.0 % 0.2 % 0.9 % 0.5 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 38 Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha 170,194 m 880 occ 839 occ 20 occ 7 occ 25 occ 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal 266,114 m 1,440,012 m e % % % % 86 % 117 % 133 % 116 % 90 % 175 % 586 % 188 % 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 62 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 262 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Lower Columbia Tributaries- Sedimentary, Moderate Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Skamokowa Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ 20345 m Abundance 6.3 % 0.6 % % of Total Known 1218.8 121.8 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 2.0 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ 1,017,511 m Ecoregion Goal Page 263 of 328 100 % 137 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 7,058 ha 17,434 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 76 % Water 23 % Abundance Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater Moss' Elfin, Mossii Subspecies G4T 1 occ 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Incisalia mossii mossii 1 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Invertebrates 1 occ Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck T3 3 occ Birds 2 occ Plethodon vandykei ha ha ha ha occ ha ha Dicamptodon copei 128 3 2256 1564 1 162 1198 Abundance b Van Dyke's Salamander G3 GRank a 25.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 1.8 % 6.8 % 2.3 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 0.0 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 59 % GAP 4 41 % GRank Cope's Giant Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Skokomish River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Skokomish River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 78.1 2.0 1.2 203.2 152.4 156.3 39.7 0.0 6.6 2.0 112.9 2.2 3.8 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 20.0 % 15.0 % 15.4 % 3.9 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 0.2 % 11.1 % 0.2 % 0.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 46 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 12 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha occ ha ha 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 5 occ 20 occ 13 occ 3,273 162,155 345,702 775,920 9 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % 15 % 111 % 116 % 580 % 175 % 415 % 878 166 116 126 100 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 41 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 264 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Salvelinus confluentus G3 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Olympics Rainshadow Coastal Headwaters - Mafic, Mid Elevation, Moderate To High Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 East Olympics small rivers - predominantly mafic, low to mid elevation, low to moderate gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 Bull Trout Salmon, Coastal and Puget Sound ESU Species Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Skokomish River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2 occ 1 occ 14178 m Abundance 6.3 % 33.3 % 10.5 % % of Total Known 1417.0 7085.2 1485.7 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 100.0 % 21.0 % Contribution to Goal 10 occ 1 occ 67,612 m Ecoregion Goal Page 265 of 328 130 % 100 % 166 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 46,253 ha 114,245 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Red Tree Vole Arborimus longicaudus 281016 m 2 occ 4 occ Megomphix hemphilli Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Mammals 5 occ Prophysaon coeruleum Blue-Gray Taildropper G3 28 occ Invertebrates 17 occ Strix occidentalis caurina ha ha ha ha ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 338 1 19896 24918 3 Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a 3.1 % 1.3 % 3.9 % 3.0 % 2.8 % 1.0 % 9.7 % 0.0 % 1.7 % 1.0 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 3 % GAP 3 63 % GAP 4 34 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Species Birds Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Smith River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Smith River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 67.7 23.8 47.7 59.6 8.6 3.0 150.4 0.0 8.9 5.0 2.8 Relative Abundance 6.2 % 15.4 % 30.8 % 38.5 % 5.6 % 1.9 % 97.0 % 0.0 % 5.8 % 3.2 % 1.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 66 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 348 3,273 345,702 775,920 177 f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e % % % % % 100 % 308 % 323 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 500 878 116 126 60 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 34 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 266 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Tributaries - Sediment 1 occ Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 93817 m 315772 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Smith River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 6.3 % 3.8 % 2.1 % % of Total Known 216.7 137.5 76.4 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 12.7 % 7.1 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m Ecoregion Goal Page 267 of 328 20 % 164 % 173 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 6,384 ha 15,768 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 4 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 91 % Water 0 % Thelypteris nevadensis a GRank Brachyramphus marmoratus Abundance occ ha ha ha ha 2879 m 142 ha 2158 m 1 occ 0 ha 2 1 937 2 4164 Abundance b 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 100.0 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 8 % % GAP 3 GAP 4 92 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Shore Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities Marine Sierra Wood Fern Vascular Plants Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Species Birds North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Sooke Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sooke Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c Contribution to Goal 1.3 10.0 5.4 160.5 0.0 249.6 48.8 6.5 0.0 6.0 Relative Abundance d 0.3 % 2.4 % 1.3 % 14.3 % 0.0 % 22.2 % 4.3 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.5 % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership % National National Other: 8 % National USFS: % % State/Provin Local: % Relative Abundance e occ ha ha ha ha 939,089 m 5,844 ha 164,143 m 7 occ 302,959 ha 9 29 162,155 195,305 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 119 % 105 % 118 % 14 % 108 % 2956 407 166 127 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 92 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 268 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology 14.9 92.9 201.3 5858.8 83.0 63.0 13.1 0.0 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 37.4 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 2003 m 7872 m 1928 m 456 m 1100 m 1366 m 345.0 142.0 225 m 194.9 110.0 0.9 % 0.4 % 151.3 2325 m 8549 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island 0.6 % 204.6 0.2 % 4250 m Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon, West Island 1.3 % 159.4 6900 m 9998 m Oncorhynchus clarki Cutthroat Trout, West Island 0.6 % 205.8 176.8 820.6 68.2 37.1 1.0 13.9 34.3 21.4 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 13709 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, West Island 0.8 % 0.7 % 59.9 % 5.0 % 2.7 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 2.5 % 1.6 % % of Total Known 3150 m 7178 m Freshwater Macrohabitats 6247 m Oncorhynchus keta m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 1350 1294 564 459 1966 1740 3210 Abundance Chum Salmon, West Island GRank Chinook Salmon, West Island Fishes Species Freshwater Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sooke Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.2 % 0.8 % 1.1 % 74.8 % 2.6 % 1.2 % 0.2 % 4.4 % 1.8 % 2.5 % 1.4 % 1.9 % 2.6 % 2.0 % 2.6 % 2.3 % 199.6 % 16.6 % 9.0 % 0.2 % 3.4 % 8.4 % 5.2 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m 818,034 m 136,816 m 43,046 m 2,578 m 306,396 m 168,906 m 118,230 m 52,799 m 380,781 m 126,642 m 609,198 m 220,095 m 382,902 m 673,874 m 273,258 m 276,806 m 676 7,802 6,248 193,399 58,215 20,837 61,723 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % Page 269 of 328 586 % 433 % 162 % 90 % 448 % 119 % 459 % 132 % 457 % 294 % 168 % 191 % 102 % 155 % 144 % 176 % 333 72 9 88 98 57 94 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sooke Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 12.1 19.9 59.7 3.8 0.4 1.8 873.0 295.6 3439.6 742.5 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 2.2 % 0.8 % 8.8 % 1.9 % 66 m 1516 m 15 m 12 m 43 m 1713 m 4866 m 2905 m 8980 m Relative Abundance 442 m Abundance % of Total Known 9.5 % 43.9 % 3.8 % 11.1 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 6,618 m 128,956 m 15,371 m 193,048 m 246,148 m 31,071 m 199,007 m 25,878 m 287,102 m Ecoregion Goal Page 270 of 328 220 % 255 % 253 % 211 % 265 % 186 % 163 % 240 % 114 % 162 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 573 ha 1,415 ac Abundance GRank a 626 55 1291 117 m m m m 1 occ 132 ha Abundance b 5.5 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Pigeon Guillemot Birds Species Marine Cepphus columba Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 7 % Developed 38 % Undeveloped 31 % Water 1 % North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site South Beach State Park Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Beach State Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 834.7 7.6 73.5 18.0 39.5 8.5 Relative Abundance 18.2 % 0.2 % 1.6 % 0.4 % 0.9 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: Relative Abundance e 3,436 33,330 80,427 29,817 m m m m 116 occ 195,305 ha f Ecoregion Goal 132 119 122 64 % % % % 171 % 127 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 271 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 25,384 ha 62,697 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % % Water ha ha ha ha ha ha G3 Arborimus longicaudus Red Tree Vole Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater T2 Martes pennanti pacifica Pacific Fisher 5 occ 1 occ 3 occ Mammals 7 occ Megomphix hemphilli 26 occ 7 14 46 16354 8127 682 Abundance b Prophysaon coeruleum T3 GRank a Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Strix occidentalis caurina Abundance 3.3 % 33.3 % 2.9 % 4.1 % 2.6 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 0.3 % 0.4 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 30 % GAP 4 69 % GRank Blue-Gray Taildropper Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Species Birds Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site South Fork Coos River Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Fork Coos River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 108.6 94.2 65.2 152.1 14.6 6.1 1.2 0.1 13.4 3.0 5.1 Relative Abundance 38.5 % 33.3 % 23.1 % 53.8 % 5.2 % 2.1 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 4.7 % 1.0 % 1.8 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 31 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 3 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 348 3,273 162,155 345,702 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 308 % 100 % 323 % 454 % 111 % 500 878 166 116 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 69 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 272 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 96065 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 3 occ 1 occ 54108 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 95521 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Fork Coos River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5.1 % 4.5 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 1.1 % % of Total Known 329.0 282.0 76.2 80.3 41.9 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 14.3 % 3.9 % 4.1 % 2.1 % Contribution to Goal 18 occ 7 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m Ecoregion Goal Page 273 of 328 106 % 129 % 164 % 173 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 26,463 ha 65,364 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Rana boylii Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Abundance ha ha ha ha 1 occ Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 8 occ Sidalcea malviflora ssp patula 9 occ Bensoniella oregana G3 Coast Checker Bloom Arborimus longicaudus 2 occ Bensonia Vascular Plants Red Tree Vole Mammals Blue-Gray Taildropper Prophysaon coeruleum 21 occ Strix occidentalis caurina Invertebrates 12 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus 1 occ 1 occ 61 96 15087 7029 Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 G4 GRank a 12.5 % 26.7 % 6.0 % 1.2 % 2.1 % 0.7 % 9.1 % 1.4 % 1.8 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 3.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 1 % GAP 2 2 % GAP 3 76 % GAP 4 21 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Plethodon elongatus Del Norte Salamander Species Amphibians Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site South Fork Coquille River Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Fork Coquille River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 20.8 166.7 187.6 41.7 11.3 3.7 38.7 20.8 47.5 0.1 5.3 50.3 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 61.5 % 69.2 % 15.4 % 4.2 % 1.4 % 14.3 % 7.7 % 17.5 % 0.0 % 1.9 % 18.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 79 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 7 occ 13 occ 348 345,702 775,920 37,848 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 46 % 69 % 308 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 86 % 138 % 500 116 126 140 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 21 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 274 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 37585 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Ridge - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 2 occ 1 occ 26882 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 40483 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 2 occ Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Triteleia hendersonii var leachiae GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Leach's Brodiaea Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Fork Coquille River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 28.6 % 4.5 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.5 % 5.4 % % of Total Known 1893.2 270.5 28.6 38.3 17.0 41.7 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 14.3 % 1.5 % 2.0 % 0.9 % 15.4 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 7 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 13 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 275 of 328 150 % 129 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 23 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 9,446 ha 23,332 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 7 % % Developed Undeveloped 93 % Water 0 % Fender's Blue Butterfly Cimicifuga elata Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Species Fishes Freshwater Mineral Spring Plant Communities Tall Bugbane Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine T2 T1 G3 Rhyacotriton variegatus Icaricia icarioides fenderi T4 Rana aurora aurora Vascular Plants a GRank Southern Torrent Salamander Invertebrates Abundance 1 occ 1 occ 3 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 4496 ha 4343 ha Abundance b 1.6 % 2.0 % 11.1 % 9.1 % 2.4 % 1.0 % 0.4 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 14 % GAP 4 86 % GRank Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site South Yamhill River Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Yamhill River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 38.0 108.4 175.2 58.4 58.4 108.4 9.9 4.2 Relative Abundance 5.0 % 14.3 % 23.1 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 14.3 % 1.3 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 14 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 20 occ 7 occ 13 occ 13 occ 13 occ 7 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 150 % 257 % 77 % 23 % 192 % 671 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 86 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 276 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range Tributaries - Shales, Mid Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: South Yamhill River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2 occ 2564 m Abundance 18.2 % 0.4 % % of Total Known 3535.2 69.9 Relative Abundance 66.7 % 1.3 % Contribution to Goal 3 occ 194,575 m Ecoregion Goal Page 277 of 328 67 % 54 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 320,854 ha 792,508 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 95 % Water 3 % Abundance occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha occ 22538 ha 49986 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) 15 occ 11 60 113 24 85 6696 41 24030 781 21 27388 66812 119345 287 8 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) GRank a 8.2 % 7.6 % 0.8 % 64.7 % 16.0 % 29.5 % 16.3 % 5.1 % 20.5 % 29.3 % 4.4 % 0.1 % 12.3 % 1.1 % 17.5 % 7.4 % 0.8 % 10.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 78 % GAP 3 10 % GAP 4 12 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species Boreal Fen Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Strathcona Targets known in this Conservation Area: Strathcona Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 3.7 3.4 0.4 27.3 111.7 280.6 44.7 5.7 45.7 31.2 3.3 0.1 52.1 0.8 19.6 8.2 0.8 14.9 Relative Abundance 16.5 % 15.3 % 1.8 % 122.2 % 500.0 % 1255.6 % 200.0 % 25.5 % 204.6 % 139.7 % 14.8 % 0.4 % 233.3 % 3.5 % 87.5 % 36.8 % 3.8 % 66.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 88 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 9 12 9 12 332 3,273 29 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 108 % 110 % 90 % 167 1833 2956 650 230 878 407 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 12 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 278 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Vancouver Island Marmot 1 occ Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Smooth Douglasia 1054 m 41503 m 53623 m 106357 m 66788 m 20216 m 37404 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Chum Salmon, East Island Chum Salmon, West Island Coho Salmon, East Island Coho Salmon, West Island Cutthroat Trout, East Island Cutthroat Trout, West Island Dolly Varden, East Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 736 m 47427 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chinook Salmon, West Island 6436 m 150 m Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Shoreline Marine Ecological Systems Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Plant Communities G5 1 occ Erysimum arenicola var torulosum Sand-Dwelling Wallflower m m ha m m 3 occ Erigeron salishii Salish Daisy 6436 150 33 6436 6436 2 occ Aster paucicapitatus Marine 2 occ Draba lonchocarpa var vestita 1 occ Olympic Mountain Aster G1 14 occ 2 occ Abundance Lance-Fruited Draba Vascular Plants G5 GRank Marmota vancouverensis Lagopus leucurus White-Tailed Ptarmigan Mammals Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Targets known in this Conservation Area: Strathcona Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 12.2 % 2.6 % 8.8 % 4.7 % 2.9 % 4.6 % 0.2 % 5.1 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 1.7 % 0.0 % 2.2 % 1.1 % 0.4 % 12.5 % 25.0 % 75.0 % 40.0 % 40.0 % 16.7 % 38.9 % 3.8 % % of Total Known 38.0 8.2 27.6 24.6 15.2 23.7 1.0 26.7 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 1.7 0.9 2.7 1.8 3.4 1.2 11.6 2.2 Relative Abundance 24.4 % 5.3 % 17.7 % 15.8 % 9.7 % 15.2 % 0.6 % 17.1 % 0.4 % 2.7 % 0.1 % 5.7 % 0.0 % 7.4 % 3.8 % 1.5 % 7.7 % 4.0 % 12.0 % 8.0 % 15.4 % 5.6 % 51.9 % 10.0 % Contribution to Goal m m ha m m 153,568 m 382,902 m 377,832 m 673,874 m 551,718 m 273,258 m 166,896 m 276,806 m 184,827 m 239,478 m 226,193 m 112,601 939,089 443 169,841 442,357 13 occ 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 13 occ 18 occ 27 occ 20 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 279 of 328 123 % 102 % 69 % 155 % 122 % 144 % 78 % 176 % 154 % 223 % 102 % 179 119 120 224 228 62 % 16 % 16 % 20 % 38 % 28 % 100 % 105 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology 208.6 104.0 10.2 19.2 311.8 359.9 165.6 311.6 184.2 9.6 147.7 54.4 26.8 % 6.7 % 1.3 % 2.5 % 100.0 % 46.2 % 53.1 % 99.9 % 59.0 % 1.2 % 18.9 % 3.5 % 35.7 % 12661 m 254005 m 809 m 1830 m 7702 m 151230 m 1081 m 408 m 508 m 3244 m 3587 m 41225 m 310 m 111.5 2.2 0.1 % 312.2 42.2 1790 m 8.1 % 7.7 250.5 164888 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island 1.5 % 16.6 39.8 80.4 % 11743 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island 3.2 % 7.7 % 5638 m 46907 m Oncorhynchus mykiss Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island 38.1 5.2 28.7 Relative Abundance 100.0 % 56146 m Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon, West Island 7.3 % 1.0 % 9.2 % % of Total Known 669 m 27888 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon, West Island Freshwater Macrohabitats 2860 m 18882 m Oncorhynchus gorbuscha G5 Salvelinus malma Abundance Pink Salmon, East Island GRank Dolly Varden, West Island Targets known in this Conservation Area: Strathcona Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 71.5 % 34.9 % 94.7 % 6.1 % 118.1 % 199.9 % 106.2 % 230.8 % 200.0 % 12.3 % 6.5 % 66.7 % 133.8 % 1.4 % 160.7 % 200.3 % 27.1 % 4.9 % 10.6 % 25.5 % 24.4 % 3.4 % 18.4 % Contribution to Goal 433 m 118,230 m 3,786 m 52,799 m 430 m 204 m 1,018 m 65,517 m 3,851 m 14,882 m 12,380 m 380,781 m 9,461 m 126,642 m 3,508 m 334 m 609,198 m 237,775 m 441,335 m 220,095 m 114,095 m 85,030 m 102,560 m Ecoregion Goal Page 280 of 328 152 % 459 % 328 % 132 % 200 % 200 % 200 % 354 % 200 % 233 % 279 % 457 % 387 % 294 % 181 % 200 % 168 % 125 % 133 % 191 % 160 % 56 % 148 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geo First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Strathcona Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 482.4 311.5 212.2 237.4 67.0 19.9 0.9 311.9 346.1 311.8 219.2 87.3 9.5 312.0 416.4 311.8 404.5 4.5 440.2 61.9 % 100.0 % 68.1 % 30.5 % 4.3 % 2.6 % 0.1 % 100.0 % 44.4 % 100.0 % 70.3 % 0.7 % 15.7 % 5.6 % 3.1 % 100.0 % 53.4 % 100.0 % 51.9 % 0.6 % 56.5 % 40710 m 1483 m 2429 m 8157 m 131608 m 1536 m 17 m 2961 m 76759 m 886 m 6653 m 1494 m 7205 m 76574 m 67 m 2753 m 66555 m 904 m 72558 m 2540 m 119315 m 122.5 5.4 311.3 100.0 % Relative Abundance 607 m Abundance % of Total Known 282.4 % 2.9 % 259.4 % 200.0 % 267.1 % 200.1 % 6.1 % 56.0 % 78.6 % 3.5 % 140.6 % 200.0 % 222.0 % 200.1 % 0.6 % 12.8 % 43.0 % 152.3 % 136.1 % 199.8 % 309.4 % 199.7 % Contribution to Goal 42,252 m 87,042 m 27,967 m 452 m 24,918 m 1,376 m 1,100 m 136,816 m 9,167 m 43,046 m 4,733 m 443 m 34,571 m 1,480 m 3,072 m 12,035 m 306,396 m 5,356 m 1,785 m 742 m 13,157 m 304 m Ecoregion Goal Page 281 of 328 408 % 187 % 386 % 200 % 385 % 200 % 128 % 433 % 360 % 162 % 151 % 200 % 341 % 200 % 277 % 267 % 448 % 313 % 165 % 200 % 399 % 200 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Fourth Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Strathcona Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.6 9.9 102.2 38.7 779.5 507.0 135.3 311.8 259.4 0.6 80.5 31.8 312.0 452.7 93.8 311.9 248.1 71.9 779.4 1.1 % 1.3 % 13.1 % 5.0 % 100.0 % 32.5 % 17.4 % 100.0 % 83.2 % 0.1 % 10.3 % 4.7 % 0.3 % 10.2 % 100.0 % 58.1 % 12.0 % 100.0 % 31.8 % 23.1 % 100.0 % 1081 m 1881 m 1977 m 1491 m 70771 m 649788 m 7020 m 852 m 4076 m 163 m 4018 m 51806 m 82 m 134 m 1853 m 35297 m 13691 m 1454 m 62946 m 1851 m 11649 m 2.2 73.1 202.6 13.0 % Relative Abundance 1063246 m Abundance % of Total Known 499.9 % 46.1 % 159.1 % 200.1 % 60.2 % 290.4 % 200.1 % 20.4 % 1.4 % 46.9 % 51.7 % 0.4 % 166.4 % 200.0 % 86.8 % 325.2 % 500.0 % 24.9 % 65.6 % 6.3 % 5.5 % 130.0 % Contribution to Goal 2,330 m 4,013 m 39,552 m 727 m 22,746 m 12,156 m 926 m 657 m 5,945 m 110,483 m 7,778 m 42,081 m 2,450 m 426 m 8,087 m 199,816 m 14,154 m 6,001 m 3,014 m 29,693 m 19,612 m 818,034 m Ecoregion Goal Page 282 of 328 500 % 197 % 297 % 200 % 255 % 396 % 200 % 148 % 307 % 407 % 347 % 141 % 166 % 200 % 339 % 680 % 500 % 276 % 488 % 303 % 257 % 586 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Strathcona Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 134.0 779.5 135.2 239.8 345.3 56.7 262.5 300.4 311.8 279.2 87.2 58.2 83.4 311.7 95.0 311.9 52.2 43.0 % 100.0 % 17.3 % 76.9 % 44.3 % 10.9 % 84.2 % 38.5 % 100.0 % 89.6 % 11.2 % 77.5 % 3.7 % 7.5 % 10.7 % 100.0 % 12.2 % 100.0 % 6.7 % 1470 m 21641 m 172529 m 1723 m 5886 m 89521 m 5924 m 10344 m 1378 m 4786 m 107981 m 3522 m 33 m 5741 m 2534 m 1590 m 78606 m 3129 m 31733 m 11.4 241.6 62.4 12.0 % Relative Abundance 114827 m Abundance % of Total Known 33.5 % 200.0 % 61.0 % 200.0 % 53.5 % 37.3 % 7.3 % 154.9 % 55.9 % 179.1 % 200.0 % 192.7 % 168.4 % 36.4 % 221.5 % 153.8 % 86.7 % 500.0 % 86.0 % 40.0 % Contribution to Goal 94,768 m 1,564 m 128,956 m 795 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 454 m 2,273 m 193,048 m 2,672 m 689 m 5,369 m 3,518 m 246,148 m 2,657 m 1,120 m 199,007 m 4,328 m 1,710 m 287,102 m Ecoregion Goal Page 283 of 328 220 % 200 % 253 % 200 % 239 % 211 % 126 % 155 % 265 % 189 % 200 % 317 % 185 % 186 % 269 % 154 % 240 % 500 % 95 % 162 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 5,799 ha 14,323 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 4 % Undeveloped 86 % Water 6 % ha occ ha ha 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 3 occ 1 occ Leioderma sorediatum Bryoria pseudocapillaris Pannaria rubiginosa Campylopus schmidii Limbella fryei Lichen Treepelt (Leioderma) Lichen (Bryoria) Lichen (Pannaria) Moss (Campylopus) Moss (Limbella) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities 2 occ Erioderma sorediatum Lichen Treepelt (Erioderma) Nonvascular Plants 5 occ Strix occidentalis caurina 1 occ 1650 9 587 2379 Abundance b Brachyramphus marmoratus T3 T4 GRank a Northern Spotted Owl Rana aurora aurora Abundance 100.0 % 60.0 % 66.7 % 50.0 % 50.0 % 33.3 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 1.0 % 0.3 % 3.7 % 0.1 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 1 % GAP 3 58 % GAP 4 38 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Sutton Lake Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sutton Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 49.5 529.9 353.3 176.6 95.1 206.1 4.9 7.0 176.6 10.4 1854.8 2.1 3.8 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 42.9 % 28.6 % 14.3 % 7.7 % 16.7 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 14.3 % 0.8 % 150.0 % 0.2 % 0.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 59 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha 25 occ 7 occ 7 occ 7 occ 13 occ 12 occ 503 occ 880 occ 7 occ 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 4 % 57 % 29 % 29 % 15 % 42 % 111 % 116 % 671 % 127 3850 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 38 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 284 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment 1 occ 27725 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 23120 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 4133 m 15 ha 3 ha 6.3 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 7.1 % 1727.9 96.3 44.4 23.3 1.2 6.6 41.1 206.1 824.3 412.2 12.5 % 50.0 % 11.1 % 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 412.2 Relative Abundance 14.3 % % of Total Known 1 occ Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Aquatic Bed (ha) Plant Communities Western Snowy Plover Species Birds Marine Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Salhoo Malfus / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Pinconc / Carobn) Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / Darcal / Sphagn) Ledgla / darcal / sphagn Targets known in this Conservation Area: Sutton Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 20.0 % 1.1 % 0.5 % 5.1 % 0.3 % 1.5 % 9.1 % 16.7 % 66.7 % 33.3 % 33.3 % Contribution to Goal 5 occ 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m 80,427 m 5,499 ha 198 ha 11 occ 6 occ 3 occ 3 occ 3 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 285 of 328 220 % 164 % 100 % 122 % 206 % 258 % 100 % 117 % 100 % 233 % 133 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 32,851 ha 81,142 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 86 % Water 7 % Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Blue-Gray Taildropper Hydrocotyle verticillata Campylopus schmidii Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities Whorled Marsh Pennywort Vascular Plants Moss (Campylopus) Nonvascular Plants Prophysaon coeruleum Haliaeetus leucocephalus Invertebrates a T3 GRank Marbled Murrelet Abundance ha ha occ ha ha 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 5 occ 12 occ 2 occ 1 4314 49 2079 20094 Abundance b 20.0 % 20.0 % 1.2 % 0.5 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.7 % 20.0 % 0.2 % 0.8 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 5 % GAP 3 36 % GAP 4 58 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Tahkenitch-Siltcoos Lakes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tahkenitch-Siltcoos Lakes Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 31.2 31.2 33.6 2.2 3.0 0.5 0.0 4.8 1782.5 1.3 5.7 Relative Abundance 14.3 % 14.3 % 15.4 % 1.0 % 1.4 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 2.2 % 816.7 % 0.6 % 2.6 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 41 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha occ ha ha 7 occ 7 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 3,273 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 71 % 57 % 454 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 878 127 3850 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 58 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 286 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 45904 m 80312 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coast Range small rivers - sedimentary, low to mid elevation Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Sediment Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment Inland Headwaters - Sediment Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 82028 m Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 56861 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 m m m m m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 760 321 191 1942 3129 23 ha 10 ha 8 ha 2 occ 3 occ Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Plant Communities Western Snowy Plover Species Birds Marine Mineral Spring Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tahkenitch-Siltcoos Lakes Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.3 % 6.3 % 1.7 % 4.5 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.8 % 0.7 % 38.4 % 0.1 % 3.2 % 0.1 % 14.3 % 4.9 % % of Total Known 381.3 305.1 84.7 217.9 49.3 28.1 27.8 19.3 0.3 2.7 2.0 1.9 102.2 0.3 8.7 0.2 14.5 32.7 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 20.0 % 5.6 % 14.3 % 3.2 % 1.8 % 1.8 % 1.3 % 0.3 % 3.4 % 2.5 % 2.4 % 128.0 % 0.4 % 10.9 % 0.2 % 18.2 % 15.0 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m 4 occ 5 occ 18 occ 7 occ 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 239,478 9,335 7,615 80,427 2,445 5,499 ha 91 ha 3,169 ha 11 occ 20 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 287 of 328 200 % 220 % 106 % 129 % 164 % 164 % 100 % 100 % 223 278 309 122 333 206 % 121 % 238 % 100 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 25,012 ha 61,781 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 84 % Water 4 % a T4 Rana aurora aurora ha occ ha ha 8 occ Strix occidentalis caurina 1 occ 1 occ Leioderma sorediatum Bryoria pseudocapillaris Lichen Treepelt (Leioderma) Lichen (Bryoria) 4 occ Hydrocotyle verticillata Whorled Marsh Pennywort Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 1 occ Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Pink Sandverbena Vascular Plants 1 occ Erioderma sorediatum Lichen Treepelt (Erioderma) Nonvascular Plants 3 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Northern Spotted Owl 1 occ 3 occ 1367 52 2232 16983 Abundance b Bald Eagle T3 G4 Plethodon dunni GRank Northern Red-Legged Frog Birds Abundance 80.0 % 10.0 % 50.0 % 50.0 % 16.7 % 0.8 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 4.7 % 0.2 % 21.2 % 0.2 % 0.7 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 7 % GAP 3 43 % GAP 4 49 % GRank Dunn's Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Tenmile Lake Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tenmile Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 163.8 12.5 41.0 22.1 23.9 4.6 1.0 41.0 122.9 2.0 2484.5 1.9 6.3 Relative Abundance 57.1 % 4.3 % 14.3 % 7.7 % 8.3 % 1.6 % 0.4 % 14.3 % 42.9 % 0.7 % 866.7 % 0.6 % 2.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 14 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 36 Local: Relative Abundance e ha occ ha ha 7 occ 23 occ 7 occ 13 occ 12 occ 503 occ 839 occ 7 occ 7 occ 195,305 6 345,702 775,920 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 71 % 30 % 29 % 15 % 42 % 111 % 90 % 671 % 586 % 127 3850 116 126 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 49 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 288 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Headwaters - Sediment Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Sediment 1 occ 1 occ 80490 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 89896 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 5977 m 3272 m 1 occ 1 occ Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Shorebird Concentration Area Western Snowy Plover Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tenmile Lake Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 8.3 % 6.3 % 1.0 % 1.0 % 5.6 % 1.2 % 4.3 % 7.1 % % of Total Known 500.8 400.6 64.8 40.0 19.5 4.3 6.6 9.5 Relative Abundance 25.0 % 20.0 % 3.2 % 2.0 % 18.6 % 4.1 % 6.3 % 9.1 % Contribution to Goal 4 occ 5 occ 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m 32,087 m 80,427 m 16 occ 11 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 289 of 328 200 % 220 % 164 % 100 % 121 % 122 % 119 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 30,007 ha 74,118 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 14 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 73 % Water 11 % ha ha ha ha ha 2 occ G5 Strix occidentalis caurina Progne subis Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow Vascular Plants Sidalcea hirtipes 5 occ T3 Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl 3 occ 2 occ 1 occ Purple Martin 3 occ Ardea herodias 10 occ 4 8289 4655 9357 67 Abundance b Haliaeetus leucocephalus GRank a Great-Blue Heron Rhyacotriton kezeri Abundance 20.0 % 2.4 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 1.4 % 0.2 % 12.2 % 0.0 % 1.3 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 56 % GAP 4 32 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Tillamook Bay-Kilchis River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tillamook Bay-Kilchis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 28.7 53.1 1.0 1.4 26.6 0.9 95.6 0.3 10.1 3.2 2.9 0.0 Relative Abundance 12.0 % 22.2 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 11.1 % 0.4 % 40.0 % 0.1 % 4.2 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 4 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 51 Local: 1 Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 9 occ 503 occ 880 occ 9 occ 839 occ 25 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 48 % 367 % 111 % 116 % 144 % 90 % 188 % 878 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 32 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 290 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Shell (ha) Wood Debris/Organic (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Bedrock (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Plant Communities ha ha ha m occ 4061 3255 21123 56328 12598 37 8 60 170 203 784 235 183 691 1210 3 0 m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 564 ha 62902 m 617 ha 121 80 0 14064 7 2 occ 3 occ Cepphus columba Shorebird Concentration Area 2 occ Haematopus bachmani 1 occ Abundance Pigeon Guillemot GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Mineral Spring Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tillamook Bay-Kilchis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 6.2 % 3.0 % 14.0 % 11.7 % 1.6 % 20.5 % 4.2 % 6.4 % 33.0 % 0.7 % 4.3 % 0.9 % 1.8 % 16.6 % 14.2 % 16.8 % 1.6 % 5.3 % 4.3 % 1.9 % 1.1 % 12.2 % 0.4 % 2.5 % 10.3 % 8.7 % 0.8 % 0.6 % 1.6 % % of Total Known 18.2 8.8 40.9 34.0 4.6 59.6 12.2 18.8 96.1 1.9 12.5 2.6 5.2 48.3 41.5 50.0 4.4 15.6 12.4 5.5 3.1 35.5 1.1 7.2 27.8 10.9 2.3 1.6 11.9 Relative Abundance 20.8 % 10.0 % 46.7 % 38.9 % 5.3 % 68.1 % 14.0 % 21.5 % 109.9 % 2.2 % 14.3 % 2.9 % 6.0 % 55.3 % 47.5 % 57.2 % 5.1 % 17.8 % 14.2 % 6.3 % 3.6 % 40.6 % 1.3 % 8.3 % 31.8 % 12.5 % 2.6 % 1.9 % 5.0 % Contribution to Goal ha ha ha m occ 19,507 32,500 45,204 144,777 239,478 55 60 279 155 9,168 5,499 7,977 3,069 1,250 2,550 5 8 m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 3,384 198 20 169,841 22 16 occ 116 occ 108 occ 20 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 291 of 328 226 106 218 215 223 282 332 116 244 287 206 239 224 246 256 60 163 238 % 228 % 294 % 330 258 210 224 250 119 % 171 % 159 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio m m m m m m m m 110569 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Volcanic Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Coastal Rivers - Volcanic To Granite, Low To Mid Elevation, Mixed Gradient 1 occ 1 occ 132436 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 139030 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 55587 m 1505 840 13506 701 3677 2964 2290 5231 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tillamook Bay-Kilchis River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 11.1 % 20.0 % 1.3 % 3.0 % 1.5 % 2.3 % 1.5 % 23.5 % 13.7 % 1.3 % 6.5 % 2.7 % 2.4 % 2.0 % % of Total Known 556.5 834.8 74.2 166.2 51.6 128.5 4.4 68.4 39.9 3.9 19.0 7.8 6.9 5.7 Relative Abundance 33.3 % 50.0 % 4.4 % 10.0 % 3.1 % 7.7 % 5.0 % 78.2 % 45.6 % 4.4 % 21.7 % 8.9 % 7.9 % 6.5 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m 3 occ 2 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 30,025 1,075 29,625 15,799 16,915 33,330 29,156 80,427 Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % Page 292 of 328 67 % 100 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % 194 264 198 247 247 119 255 122 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 11,997 ha 29,633 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 11 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 88 % Water 0 % g2 Sidalcea nelsoniana Nelson's Checker-Mallow T3 T1 T3 T4 T2 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Freshwater a GRank Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii Clemmys marmorata marmorata Icaricia icarioides fenderi Strix occidentalis caurina Rana aurora aurora Abundance 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 1 occ 5541 ha 5746 ha 6 ha Abundance b 2.3 % 7.4 % 1.3 % 9.1 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 40 % GAP 4 60 % GRank Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Reptiles Fender's Blue Butterfly Invertebrates Northern Spotted Owl Birds Northern Red-Legged Frog Amphibians Species North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Trask Mountain Targets known in this Conservation Area: Trask Mountain Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 199.2 91.9 66.4 46.0 2.4 85.4 9.6 4.4 0.0 Relative Abundance 33.3 % 15.4 % 11.1 % 7.7 % 0.4 % 14.3 % 1.6 % 0.7 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 25 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 15 Relative Abundance e 3 occ 13 occ 9 occ 13 occ 503 occ 7 occ 345,702 ha 775,920 ha 324,193 ha f Ecoregion Goal 267 % 77 % 122 % 23 % 111 % 671 % 116 % 126 % 236 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 60 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 293 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coast Range Headwaters - Sedimentary, Mid Elevation Coast Range Headwaters - Volcanics, Mid Elevation Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Species Fishes Targets known in this Conservation Area: Trask Mountain Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 1 occ 1 occ 26481 m Abundance 3.2 % 7.7 % 4.1 % % of Total Known 463.9 1043.8 568.2 Relative Abundance 11.1 % 25.0 % 13.6 % Contribution to Goal 9 occ 4 occ 194,575 m Ecoregion Goal Page 294 of 328 67 % 100 % 54 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 79,892 ha 197,334 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 4 % Undeveloped 91 % Water 4 % a Sorex palustris brooksi Ardea herodias Brachyramphus marmoratus Great-Blue Heron Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Haliaeetus leucocephalus T2 GRank Common Water Shrew, Brooksi Subspecies Abundance occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 1626 ha 1 occ 4 occ 11 occ 1 4 8 5 76 180 2 7127 244 5 33778 6293 12613 93 Abundance b 0.6 % 1.4 % 100.0 % 0.6 % 5.9 % 1.1 % 2.1 % 3.4 % 4.6 % 0.5 % 1.2 % 1.3 % 0.0 % 2.9 % 1.3 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 2 % GAP 3 8 % GAP 4 90 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Boreal Fen Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 1.0 10.0 14.4 1.2 10.0 29.9 79.8 37.4 20.5 4.9 5.0 3.9 0.1 49.9 3.9 7.4 3.5 1.1 Relative Abundance 1.1 % 11.1 % 16.0 % 1.3 % 11.1 % 33.3 % 88.9 % 41.7 % 22.9 % 5.5 % 5.6 % 4.4 % 0.1 % 55.6 % 4.4 % 8.2 % 3.9 % 1.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 10 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha 147,425 ha 9 occ 25 occ 839 occ 9 12 9 12 332 3,273 29 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 110 % 144 % 16 % 90 % 167 1833 2956 650 230 878 407 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 90 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 295 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Accipiter gentilis Lagopus leucurus White-Tailed Ptarmigan Ermine, Anguinae Subspecies 32325 m 107421 m 77729 m 48515 m 69664 m 20816 m 14262 m 24017 m 40420 m 72323 m 62667 m 87524 m G5 G5 Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Chum Salmon, East Island Coho Salmon, East Island Coho Salmon, West Island Cutthroat Trout, East Island Cutthroat Trout, West Island Dolly Varden, East Island Dolly Varden, West Island Pink Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, West Island Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Freshwater Macrohabitats 57700 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 314.4 155.9 2.5 % 94840 m 90.0 165.0 102.6 115.0 173.0 105.0 277.2 84.9 113.9 80.4 72.2 121.9 121.3 130.5 125.7 3.6 10.0 13.8 6.9 16.6 4.5 1.1 Relative Abundance 10.0 % 4.3 % 7.9 % 4.9 % 5.5 % 8.3 % 5.0 % 22.1 % 6.8 % 9.1 % 6.4 % 3.5 % 5.8 % 5.8 % 6.3 % 6.0 % 25.0 % 100.0 % 16.7 % 9.1 % 13.9 % 1.9 % 0.6 % % of Total Known 20064 m 45400 m 37093 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 1 occ 2 occ 2 occ 1 occ 5 occ 1 occ 3859 ha Chinook Salmon, West Island Erysimum arenicola var torulosum T3 T3 G5 Abundance Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater Sand-Dwelling Wallflower Vascular Plants Mustela erminea anguinae Speyeria zerene bremnerii Valley Silverspot Butterfly Mammals Icaricia icarioides blackmorei Boisduval's Blue, Blackmorei Invertebrates Brachyramphus marmoratus Northern Goshawk GRank Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 24.9 % 50.2 % 14.4 % 26.4 % 16.4 % 18.4 % 27.6 % 16.8 % 44.3 % 13.6 % 18.2 % 12.8 % 11.5 % 19.5 % 19.4 % 20.8 % 20.1 % 4.0 % 11.1 % 15.4 % 7.7 % 18.5 % 5.0 % 1.3 % Contribution to Goal 380,781 m 39,958 m 609,198 m 237,775 m 441,335 m 220,095 m 86,896 m 85,030 m 102,560 m 153,568 m 382,902 m 377,832 m 673,874 m 551,718 m 166,896 m 276,806 m 184,827 m 25 occ 18 occ 13 occ 13 occ 27 occ 20 occ 302,959 ha Ecoregion Goal Page 296 of 328 457 % 283 % 168 % 125 % 133 % 191 % 177 % 56 % 148 % 123 % 102 % 69 % 155 % 122 % 78 % 176 % 154 % 16 % 11 % 85 % 69 % 100 % 105 % 108 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 67.7 79.4 132.3 52.5 239.5 86.5 279.0 118.9 69.5 284.5 143.4 292.6 168.9 66.8 68.0 278.1 210.0 179.6 281.6 2.2 % 2.5 % 2.1 % 4.2 % 7.7 % 2.8 % 8.9 % 1.9 % 2.2 % 9.1 % 11.4 % 4.6 % 1.8 % 9.3 % 2.7 % 5.3 % 2.2 % 8.9 % 16.8 % 5.7 % 22.5 % 7080 m 1117 m 24977 m 128 m 3166 m 1818 m 12780 m 58171 m 914 m 2699 m 858 m 7969 m 172 m 5307 m 36907 m 97 m 1154 m 4743 m 369 m 7148 m 218 m 22.8 144.3 391.3 12.5 % Relative Abundance 1690 m Abundance % of Total Known 45.0 % 28.7 % 33.5 % 44.4 % 10.9 % 10.7 % 27.0 % 46.7 % 3.6 % 23.1 % 22.9 % 45.4 % 11.1 % 19.0 % 44.6 % 13.8 % 38.3 % 8.4 % 21.1 % 12.7 % 10.8 % 62.5 % Contribution to Goal 484 m 24,918 m 1,100 m 10,676 m 10,630 m 906 m 136,816 m 11,357 m 4,733 m 34,571 m 3,746 m 5,941 m 8,237 m 306,396 m 28,683 m 13,157 m 8,276 m 1,523 m 118,230 m 8,808 m 65,517 m 2,703 m Ecoregion Goal Page 297 of 328 200 % 385 % 128 % 95 % 331 % 78 % 433 % 211 % 151 % 341 % 130 % 45 % 415 % 448 % 269 % 399 % 39 % 200 % 459 % 264 % 354 % 330 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Water Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 99.4 129.9 399.4 170.0 87.5 277.6 125.2 348.8 336.5 489.6 125.1 885.6 73.6 52.6 220.1 138.3 377.5 25.0 108.6 3.2 % 2.1 % 12.8 % 5.4 % 1.4 % 8.9 % 2.0 % 27.9 % 10.7 % 39.1 % 4.0 % 8.3 % 0.1 % 70.7 % 2.4 % 2.5 % 7.0 % 4.4 % 12.1 % 1.2 % 3.5 % 13824 m 169780 m 1922 m 2966 m 27922 m 3691 m 22101 m 1079 m 6807 m 443 m 2430 m 458 m 133 m 5676 m 1800 m 24142 m 3324 m 43972 m 2219 m 9833 m 1329 m 2.1 104.1 7.4 0.2 % Relative Abundance 332 m Abundance % of Total Known 17.3 % 4.0 % 60.3 % 22.1 % 35.2 % 8.4 % 11.8 % 141.4 % 0.3 % 16.6 % 20.0 % 78.2 % 53.7 % 55.7 % 20.0 % 44.3 % 14.0 % 27.2 % 63.8 % 20.8 % 15.9 % 1.2 % Contribution to Goal 7,664 m 246,148 m 3,681 m 199,007 m 9,455 m 287,102 m 15,320 m 4,013 m 39,552 m 2,753 m 12,156 m 566 m 12,665 m 1,937 m 110,483 m 8,325 m 199,816 m 10,922 m 3,014 m 818,034 m 87,042 m 27,967 m Ecoregion Goal Page 298 of 328 19 % 186 % 299 % 240 % 116 % 162 % 145 % 197 % 297 % 17 % 396 % 107 % 54 % 155 % 407 % 331 % 680 % 211 % 488 % 586 % 187 % 386 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Douglas Fir Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsable-Stamp-Qualicum Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 32.4 78.3 804.6 775.2 119.3 193.3 289.3 171.4 824.4 1005.6 161.0 930.1 1.0 % 2.5 % 25.7 % 61.9 % 3.8 % 6.2 % 9.2 % 5.5 % 26.3 % 32.1 % 5.1 % 29.7 % 24132 m 25499 m 708 m 2930 m 1463 m 4466 m 35303 m 10043 m 4860 m 24376 m 11211 m Relative Abundance 635 m Abundance % of Total Known 148.5 % 25.7 % 160.6 % 131.7 % 27.4 % 46.2 % 30.9 % 19.1 % 123.8 % 128.5 % 12.5 % 5.2 % Contribution to Goal 7,547 m 94,768 m 3,026 m 7,627 m 128,956 m 9,667 m 4,738 m 15,371 m 572 m 19,841 m 193,048 m 12,283 m Ecoregion Goal Page 299 of 328 231 % 220 % 499 % 189 % 253 % 278 % 239 % 211 % 196 % 129 % 265 % 125 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 46,389 ha 114,581 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 99 % Water 1 % Abundance occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha occ 12319 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Northern Pygmy-Owl, Swarthi Subspecies 3 occ 6183 ha Brachyramphus marmoratus 9 occ 29 10 6 24 206 3466 42 5 1955 13043 22596 43 1 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites b Abundance Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) G5 GRank a 18.8 % 2.0 % 2.1 % 0.5 % 7.7 % 2.6 % 4.1 % 1.4 % 0.6 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 2.9 % 0.1 % 3.4 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 1.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 13 % GAP 3 86 % % GAP 4 GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds Boreal Wet Meadow North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: British Columbia Integrated Site Tsitika-Nimpkish Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsitika-Nimpkish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 25.8 6.3 6.5 1.7 373.5 171.7 77.3 11.0 9.7 3.3 0.0 85.9 0.4 26.4 10.8 0.9 12.9 Relative Abundance 16.7 % 4.1 % 4.2 % 1.1 % 241.7 % 111.1 % 50.0 % 7.1 % 6.3 % 2.1 % 0.0 % 55.6 % 0.3 % 17.1 % 7.0 % 0.6 % 8.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: 100 National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e occ occ occ ha ha ha ha occ ha ha ha ha occ 18 occ 302,959 ha 147,425 ha 839 occ 12 9 12 332 3,273 162,155 195,305 9 775,920 76,367 324,193 7,569 12 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % 89 % 108 % 110 % 90 % 1833 2956 650 230 878 166 127 1067 126 375 236 262 267 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 300 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 15619 m 10357 m 6814 m 6826 m 38929 m Oncorhynchus clarki Salvelinus malma Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus mykiss Cutthroat Trout, East Island Dolly Varden, East Island Pink Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, East Island Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology 303 m 55809 m Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon, East Island Freshwater Macrohabitats 6814 m G5 6826 m Oncorhynchus keta m m m m m m m m m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 544 6342 1399 143 170 2266 413 1570 757 2865 m 6342 m 7101 m 1 occ Abundance Chum Salmon, East Island Lagopus leucurus GRank Chinook Salmon, East Island Species Fishes Freshwater Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp Shore Saltmarsh Estuary Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Species Invertebrates Marine White-Tailed Ptarmigan Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsitika-Nimpkish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 4.3 % 2.6 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 3.4 % 2.1 % 3.0 % 1.2 % 1.1 % 3.7 % 0.8 % 0.2 % 3.3 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 2.8 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.6 % 2.8 % % of Total Known 93.0 95.1 84.7 86.4 72.7 44.6 109.1 44.0 39.8 7.0 1.5 0.4 6.2 0.5 0.6 0.4 5.3 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.2 5.7 Relative Abundance 8.6 % 8.8 % 7.9 % 8.0 % 6.7 % 4.1 % 10.1 % 4.1 % 3.7 % 12.3 % 2.6 % 0.7 % 11.0 % 0.9 % 1.0 % 0.7 % 9.3 % 1.2 % 0.6 % 1.4 % 2.1 % 3.7 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m 3,508 m 441,335 m 86,896 m 85,030 m 153,568 m 377,832 m 551,718 m 166,896 m 184,827 m 4,409 239,478 193,399 1,300 18,758 226,193 58,215 16,881 61,723 445,946 m 442,357 m 337,346 m 27 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % Page 301 of 328 181 % 133 % 177 % 56 % 123 % 69 % 122 % 78 % 154 % 124 223 88 131 216 102 98 144 94 142 % 228 % 132 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Second Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsitika-Nimpkish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 418.5 202.9 95.7 66.0 38.5 127.3 184.1 96.8 99.1 290.2 445.6 168.6 190.9 72.9 111.2 57.4 51.6 80.7 18.6 7.8 % 9.4 % 0.9 % 1.2 % 1.8 % 1.2 % 3.4 % 0.9 % 1.8 % 5.4 % 4.1 % 8.3 % 0.9 % 3.1 % 3.5 % 2.0 % 2.1 % 1.6 % 1.0 % 1.5 % 0.9 % 25427 m 81 m 10493 m 805 m 64 m 36162 m 5902 m 12286 m 2290 m 7526 m 338049 m 166699 m 10446 m 1901 m 7004 m 19398 m 20521 m 13095 m 257 m 14446 m 8 m 102.0 899.6 169.7 1.6 % Relative Abundance 59942 m Abundance % of Total Known 1.7 % 7.5 % 4.8 % 5.3 % 10.3 % 6.8 % 17.7 % 15.6 % 9.5 % 83.4 % 41.3 % 26.9 % 9.2 % 9.0 % 17.1 % 11.8 % 3.6 % 6.1 % 8.9 % 18.8 % 38.8 % 15.7 % Contribution to Goal 454 m 193,048 m 5,369 m 246,148 m 199,007 m 287,102 m 39,552 m 12,156 m 110,483 m 199,816 m 818,034 m 27,967 m 24,918 m 136,816 m 34,571 m 306,396 m 1,785 m 13,157 m 118,230 m 430 m 65,517 m 380,781 m Ecoregion Goal Page 302 of 328 126 % 265 % 317 % 186 % 240 % 162 % 297 % 396 % 407 % 680 % 586 % 386 % 385 % 433 % 341 % 448 % 165 % 399 % 459 % 200 % 354 % 457 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 400 ha 988 ac 1 occ 2 occ 2 occ Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Common Murre Pelagic Cormorant Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline 389 m 2225 m 1 occ Pigeon Guillemot 2 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus Abundance b Haematopus bachmani GRank a c 117.7 2.2 % 10345 m 0.1 % 0.8 % 21.8 181.5 113.1 218.7 138.1 1.0 % 0.6 % 121.5 211.6 0.5 % d Relative Abundance 1.0 % 0.6 % % of Total Known 89.5 1.7 % 10709 m 10.9 % 8.3 % 27.1 % 21.8 % 0.3 % 2.8 % 1.7 % 3.3 % 2.1 % 3.2 % 1.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 292.1 5.4 % 1284 m GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 235.4 Relative Abundance 4.4 % % of Total Known 3356 m Abundance Brandt's Cormorant Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Marine Site Twin Rocks (Marine) Third Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Medium Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of No Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Third Order Stream Of Very Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology Targets known in this Conservation Area: Tsitika-Nimpkish Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e 116,959 m 80,427 m 116 occ 30 occ 95 occ 31 occ 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 119 % 122 % 171 % 187 % 163 % 168 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 220 % 253 % 239 % 211 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 303 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 94,768 m 128,956 m 4,738 m 15,371 m Ecoregion Goal 65 ha 161 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 3 % Abundance GRank a 53 ha 3 ha 12 ha Abundance b 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Umpqua Lighthouse State Park Targets known in this Conservation Area: Umpqua Lighthouse State Park Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 29.7 0.9 1.7 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 100 Local: Relative Abundance e 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 304 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 16,432 ha 40,587 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % % Developed Undeveloped 99 % % Water T4 G3 Rana aurora aurora Rhyacotriton variegatus Southern Torrent Salamander Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl G3 G5 Arborimus longicaudus Myotis yumanensis Red Tree Vole Yuma Myotis Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites G5 Myotis volans Long-legged Myotis Volans T3 G3 Aneides ferreus Mammals a GRank Northern Red-Legged Frog Birds Abundance ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 11 occ 1 occ 21 occ 2 occ 2 occ 3 occ 1 occ 118 36 7340 6674 1911 15 Abundance b 25.0 % 7.3 % 9.1 % 2.1 % 0.1 % 4.8 % 3.1 % 6.3 % 3.4 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 1.0 % 0.9 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 54 % GAP 4 46 % GRank Clouded Salamander Species Amphibians Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Umpqua River tributaries Targets known in this Conservation Area: Umpqua River tributaries Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 87.3 369.2 87.3 18.2 1.0 67.1 187.0 62.3 147.7 0.1 9.3 3.8 22.0 37.3 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 84.6 % 20.0 % 4.2 % 0.2 % 15.4 % 42.9 % 14.3 % 33.9 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.9 % 5.0 % 8.5 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 54 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 5 occ 13 occ 5 occ 503 occ 880 occ 13 occ 7 occ 7 occ 348 162,155 345,702 775,920 37,848 177 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 20 % 308 % 20 % 111 % 116 % 192 % 671 % 86 % 500 166 116 126 140 60 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 46 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 305 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 48506 m 35694 m 69024 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 29220 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Umpqua River tributaries Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.8 % 0.4 % 0.5 % 0.3 % % of Total Known 84.6 43.8 32.9 19.8 Relative Abundance 2.8 % 1.4 % 1.1 % 0.6 % Contribution to Goal 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m Ecoregion Goal Page 306 of 328 164 % 164 % 100 % 100 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 56,150 ha 138,690 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 2 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 98 % Water 0 % Strix occidentalis caurina Oregon Megomphix (Snail) T2 Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus Wandering Daisy Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Plant Communities G4 Senecio flettii T3 Flett Groundsel Vascular Plants Megomphix hemphilli Brachyramphus marmoratus Invertebrates a GRank Northern Spotted Owl Rhyacotriton kezeri Abundance ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 13 occ 2 occ 1 occ 15 10 8926 10137 34419 282 Abundance b 33.3 % 33.3 % 1.0 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 1.2 % 0.4 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 0.9 % 1.3 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 64 % GAP 4 36 % GRank Marbled Murrelet Birds Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Upper Nehalem River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Upper Nehalem River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 9.8 5.1 9.8 3.3 0.3 5.1 5.5 0.0 5.8 3.7 5.7 0.1 Relative Abundance 7.7 % 4.0 % 7.7 % 2.6 % 0.2 % 4.0 % 4.3 % 0.0 % 4.6 % 2.9 % 4.4 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 64 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha 13 occ 25 occ 13 occ 503 occ 880 occ 25 occ 348 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % 23 % 12 % 323 % 111 % 116 % 188 % 500 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 36 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 307 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 92572 m 146909 m 20638 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Willapa Hills Small Rivers - Sandstone, Low Elevation Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Inland Headwaters - Willapa Hills Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 4 occ 1 occ 44811 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 249701 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 3 occ Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Mineral Spring Targets known in this Conservation Area: Upper Nehalem River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 36.4 % 100.0 % 0.2 % 1.8 % 2.1 % 0.5 % 2.8 % 4.9 % % of Total Known 1189.7 7.4 52.7 62.1 8.9 49.5 19.2 Relative Abundance 133.3 % % 0.8 % 5.9 % 7.0 % 1.0 % 5.6 % 15.0 % Contribution to Goal 3 occ occ 2,487,321 m 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 4,496,878 m 20 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 308 of 328 133 % % 164 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 100 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 1,600 ha 3,952 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a 1006 1112 260 1249 1096 1079 1020 10256 5066 61 116 56 7501 4637 m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha m m 4377 m Abundance b 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 2.0 % 0.3 % 0.5 % 1.2 % 0.3 % 0.9 % 5.5 % 5.0 % 5.3 % 0.5 % 0.4 % 0.4 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Species Invertebrates Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Waadah Island - Neah Bay (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Waadah Island - Neah Bay (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 17.0 9.4 7.8 109.2 18.6 28.7 63.4 17.9 47.0 298.9 274.4 287.1 27.6 20.9 21.3 Relative Abundance 1.0 % 0.6 % 0.5 % 6.7 % 1.1 % 1.7 % 3.9 % 1.1 % 2.9 % 18.2 % 16.7 % 17.5 % 1.7 % 1.3 % 1.3 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 96,940 193,399 54,295 18,758 96,577 61,723 26,382 939,089 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 363,205 m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha m m 337,346 m f Ecoregion Goal 112 88 137 216 110 94 139 119 109 168 162 169 142 131 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 132 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 309 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 1,600 ha 3,952 ac Haematopus bachmani Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a 4472 5740 10325 39 130 72 2756 107 5740 3856 m m m ha ha ha m ha m m 5537 m 96 m 1 occ Abundance b 0.1 % 2.8 % 1.8 % 3.5 % 5.6 % 6.8 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 0.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Smelt spawn Fishes Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Waatch Point - Waatch River (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Waatch Point - Waatch River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 7.8 150.8 95.8 192.4 308.8 369.1 10.1 55.5 21.3 17.4 26.9 12.4 15.2 Relative Abundance 0.5 % 9.2 % 5.8 % 11.7 % 18.8 % 22.5 % 0.6 % 3.4 % 1.3 % 1.1 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 939,089 62,438 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 3,169 442,357 363,205 m m m ha ha ha m ha m m 337,346 m 12,705 m 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 119 224 109 168 162 169 142 238 228 131 % % % % % % % % % % 132 % 140 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 310 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Waatch Point - Waatch River (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 5740 375 1747 1315 5184 m m m m m 6 ha 133 ha Abundance 1.2 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.4 % 7.6 % 0.6 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 65.0 9.5 52.8 22.3 417.3 35.2 39.8 Relative Abundance 4.0 % 0.6 % 3.2 % 1.4 % 25.4 % 2.1 % 2.4 % Contribution to Goal 144,777 64,871 54,295 96,577 20,374 m m m m m 279 ha 5,499 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % Page 311 of 328 215 114 137 110 125 116 % 206 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 800 ha 1,976 ac Abundance GRank a 3092 368 2533 792 7425 2653 95 33 37 6170 2979 m m m m m m ha ha ha m m 6186 m 1 occ Abundance b 1.0 % 0.2 % 1.4 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 8.5 % 1.4 % 3.5 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 0.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Haematopus bachmani Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Algal Beds Shore Dune grass Shore Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Surfgrass Shore Plant Communities Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Black Oystercatcher Species Birds Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site West Koitiah Point (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: West Koitiah Point (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 104.6 18.6 153.0 26.9 25.9 49.2 927.8 154.9 378.9 45.4 26.9 60.1 30.4 Relative Abundance 3.2 % 0.6 % 4.7 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 1.5 % 28.3 % 4.7 % 11.6 % 1.4 % 0.8 % 1.8 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 96,940 64,871 54,295 96,577 939,089 176,736 336 692 320 445,946 363,205 m m m m m m ha ha ha m m 337,346 m 108 occ f Ecoregion Goal 112 114 137 110 119 109 168 162 169 142 131 % % % % % % % % % % % 132 % 159 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 312 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 400 ha 988 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % Abundance GRank a 683 m 1932 m 1267 m 683 m Abundance b 22.2 % 2.8 % 0.2 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Marine Ecological Systems Dune grass Shore Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Whale Creek (Marine) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Whale Creek (Marine) Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 4855.4 622.0 47.0 27.3 Relative Abundance 74.0 % 9.5 % 0.7 % 0.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 923 m 20,374 m 176,736 m 164,143 m f Ecoregion Goal 89 % 125 % 109 % 118 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 313 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 48,453 ha 119,679 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 40 % Water 58 % Abundance 1 occ Chaetura vauxi Vaux's Swift Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Invertebrates 1 occ Eremophila alpestris strigata Streaked Horned Lark 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina 30 occ Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet 1 occ Ardea herodias Great-Blue Heron Northern Spotted Owl 7 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T3 G3 Plethodon vandykei Van Dyke's Salamander 5 occ 1 occ Birds 3 occ G4 Plethodon dunni ha ha ha ha ha Rhyacotriton kezeri 97 2902 3028 4349 713 Abundance b Dunn's Salamander GRank a 20.0 % 7.7 % 0.1 % 1.7 % 1.4 % 0.4 % 11.4 % 1.6 % 3.7 % 0.0 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status GAP 1 0 % GAP 2 11 % GAP 3 9 % GAP 4 16 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Willapa Bay Targets known in this Conservation Area: Willapa Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 29.6 16.4 0.3 5.0 16.4 1.2 37.0 21.1 17.8 0.1 2.2 1.3 0.8 0.3 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 11.1 % 0.2 % 3.4 % 11.1 % 0.8 % 25.0 % 14.3 % 12.0 % 0.1 % 1.5 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 8 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 13 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 5 occ 9 occ 503 occ 880 occ 9 occ 839 occ 20 occ 7 occ 25 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 40 % 67 % 111 % 116 % 144 % 90 % 175 % 586 % 188 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 16 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 314 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal Mineral Spring Calamagrostis nutkaensis argentina egedii - juncus balticu op Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Seagrass (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Sandy, low salinity, low marsh Pacific Reedgrass - Pacific Silverweed - Baltic Rush 14640 ha 1402 ha 284111 m 4 occ 2 occ 3 occ op 2 occ Moderate salinity high marsh Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op ha m ha m m m occ Low salinity high marsh op Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds Estuary Dune grass (Ha) Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Eelgrass Estuary Silty, low salinity, low marsh op Mixed-Fine And Mud: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Mesohaline 10474 54355 493 47607 1122 95435 7 4 occ Plant Communities 3 occ Zalophus californianus G5 Mirounga angustirostris 24879 m 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ Sea Lion (California) Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Sterna caspia Northern Elephant Seal Mammals Herring Spawning High Cover Fishes Shorebird Concentration Area Western Snowy Plover Caspian Tern Species Birds Marine 2 occ 1 occ Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Plant Communities 1 occ Hemphillia burringtoni Abundance Warty Jumping-Slug GRank Burrington Jumping-Slug Targets known in this Conservation Area: Willapa Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 37.5 % 44.5 % 13.3 % 19.3 % 50.0 % 100.0 % 25.0 % 18.2 % 92.8 % 14.5 % 83.7 % 22.9 % 0.2 % 16.9 % 53.8 % 80.0 % 80.3 24.0 34.8 216.6 108.3 54.2 27.1 167.6 26.1 150.9 41.3 0.3 30.4 94.8 54.2 16.0 3.4 4.9 8.9 % 108.3 4.3 % 7.1 % 14.8 11.4 11.4 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 3.3 % 1.4 % 2.4 % % of Total Known 148.4 % 44.2 % 64.2 % 400.0 % 200.0 % 100.0 % 50.0 % 309.5 % 48.3 % 278.7 % 76.2 % 0.6 % 56.2 % 175.0 % % 100.0 % 29.5 % 6.3 % 9.1 % 200.0 % 10.0 % 7.7 % 7.7 % Contribution to Goal ha m ha m m m occ 9,868 ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 1 occ 1 occ 3 occ 4 occ 3,384 112,601 177 62,438 176,736 169,841 4 occ 3 occ 84,336 m 16 occ 11 occ 1 occ 20 occ 13 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % Page 315 of 328 294 % 238 % 228 % 800 % 200 % 400 % 225 % 330 179 333 224 109 224 325 % 233 % 169 % 119 % 100 % 400 % 150 % 200 % 115 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 106750 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Coastal Upland - Alluvium-Colluvium, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 1 occ 3 occ 126612 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 134751 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 82255 m 2355 241929 3526 460 24431 4322 4443 13798 5020 3017 11703 1259 1122 3672 12342 ha 1402 ha 2451 ha Abundance Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Targets known in this Conservation Area: Willapa Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 2.5 % 27.3 % 3.1 % 4.0 % 2.8 % 3.4 % 12.0 % 30.3 % 3.5 % 2.7 % 46.4 % 12.6 % 7.9 % 44.3 % 61.6 % 4.4 % 20.0 % 32.0 % 1.1 % 92.4 % 40.4 % 7.7 % 24.0 % % of Total Known 86.1 1032.8 108.3 138.7 96.6 117.6 21.6 54.7 6.4 5.0 83.7 22.8 14.3 80.0 111.2 8.0 36.2 57.7 2.0 166.8 72.9 13.8 43.2 Relative Abundance 8.3 % 100.0 % 10.5 % 13.4 % 9.4 % 11.4 % 40.0 % 101.0 % 11.7 % 9.2 % 154.6 % 42.0 % 26.3 % 147.8 % 205.3 % 14.8 % 66.8 % 106.6 % 3.8 % 308.0 % 134.6 % 25.5 % 79.9 % Contribution to Goal m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 12 occ 3 occ 1,017,511 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m 5,894 239,478 30,025 5,027 15,799 10,283 16,881 9,335 2,445 20,374 17,529 1,181 29,817 1,192 9,168 ha 5,499 ha 3,069 ha Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Page 316 of 328 133 % 100 % 137 % 129 % 117 % 150 % 224 223 194 117 247 243 144 278 333 125 230 272 64 333 287 % 206 % 224 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 21,731 ha 53,677 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 6 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 92 % Water 0 % Abundance 6 occ 1 occ Ascaphus truei Plethodon vandykei Tailed Frog Van Dyke's Salamander Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Queen-Of-The-Forest Filipendula occidentalis Brachyramphus marmoratus Marbled Murrelet Vascular Plants Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T3 5 occ 1 occ 10 occ 1 occ 6 occ Plethodon dunni Dunn's Salamander Birds 2 occ G3 8 occ Dicamptodon copei ha ha ha ha ha Rhyacotriton kezeri 124 464 6161 12563 708 Abundance b Cope's Giant Salamander G4 GRank a 17.2 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 11.8 % 9.4 % 2.3 % 9.8 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 0 % GAP 3 36 % GAP 4 64 % GRank Columbia Torrent Salamander Species Amphibians North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Willapa Hills Targets known in this Conservation Area: Willapa Hills Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 66.0 0.7 3.7 0.4 16.5 282.8 282.8 50.8 105.6 0.3 0.8 5.9 5.3 0.7 Relative Abundance 20.0 % 0.2 % 1.1 % 0.1 % 5.0 % 85.7 % 85.7 % 15.4 % 32.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 1.8 % 1.6 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 36 Local: Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha 25 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 20 occ 7 occ 7 occ 13 occ 25 occ 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % 112 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 175 % 343 % 586 % 415 % 188 % 166 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 64 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 317 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 14423 m 66888 m 75335 m 36689 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Lampetra tridentata Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Pacific Lamprey Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Upland - Sandstones, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradient Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 16669 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 2.5 % 2.6 % 2.6 % 1 occ 1.1 % 2.2 % 3.0 % 2.1 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 3.1 % 1.6 % 0.1 % % of Total Known 1 occ 1 occ 1 occ 147338 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU 1288 m 38298 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Abundance Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU G5 GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Targets known in this Conservation Area: Willapa Hills Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 209.3 192.0 209.4 83.0 170.6 163.4 35.2 26.7 235.7 122.1 4.1 Relative Abundance 9.1 % 8.3 % 9.1 % 3.6 % 7.4 % % 7.1 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 10.2 % 5.3 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal 11 occ 12 occ 11 occ 1,017,511 m 1,017,511 m occ 943,067 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m 722,295 m Ecoregion Goal Page 318 of 328 100 % 133 % 100 % 137 % 137 % % 129 % 129 % 117 % 117 % 150 % 150 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 12,097 ha 29,879 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture % % Developed Undeveloped 100 % Water 0 % Abundance Saxifraga hitchcockiana Saddle Mt. Saxifrage Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Fishes Species Freshwater 1 occ Senecio flettii Flett Groundsel 38925 m 5191 m 1 occ 2 occ Erythronium elegans Coast Range Fawn-Lily G4 1 occ Vascular Plants 1 occ Strix occidentalis caurina ha ha ha ha ha Haliaeetus leucocephalus 4 681 2874 7980 548 Abundance b Northern Spotted Owl T3 GRank a 0.4 % 0.2 % 33.3 % 33.3 % 22.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 83 % GAP 4 17 % GRank Bald Eagle Species Birds North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Wilson River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Wilson River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 35.8 29.8 23.7 23.7 47.4 1.2 0.7 0.7 2.1 4.9 6.1 1.0 Relative Abundance 0.9 % 0.7 % 4.0 % 4.0 % 8.0 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.8 % 1.0 % 0.2 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 8 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 75 Local: Relative Abundance ha ha ha ha ha 722,295 m 25 occ 25 occ 25 occ 503 occ 839 occ 3,273 195,305 345,702 775,920 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal 4,496,878 m e % % % % % 100 % 150 % 12 % 12 % 36 % 111 % 90 % 878 127 116 126 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 17 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 319 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 400 ha 988 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 0 % Developed 0 % Undeveloped 0 % Water 100 % GRank a 134 m 2184 m 2184 m 2317 m Abundance b 4.3 % 2.2 % 0.4 % 0.4 % % of Total Known 20.0 % 11.1 % 0.4 % 0.6 % % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 % GAP 3 % GAP 4 Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Organics/fines Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Dune grass Shore Saltmarsh Shore Plant Communities Marine Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Marine Site Wreck Creek (Marine) Coastal Ridge Headwaters - Volcanic Inland Headwaters - Volcanic 1 occ 1 occ 36081 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 25040 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Abundance Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Targets known in this Conservation Area: Wilson River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c 50.0 % 33.3 % 1.5 % 1.9 % d 949.8 480.4 81.1 92.6 Relative Abundance 14.5 % 7.3 % 1.2 % 1.4 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 2070.8 1380.5 60.1 77.9 Relative Abundance e 923 m 29,817 m 176,736 m 164,143 m f Ecoregion Goal 89 % 64 % 109 % 118 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % 50 % 67 % 164 % 173 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 320 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO 2 occ 3 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m Ecoregion Goal 30,804 ha 76,086 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 5 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 92 % Water 1 % Abundance 3 occ 1 occ Rhyacotriton olympicus Plethodon vandykei Olympic Torrent Salamander Van Dyke's Salamander 2 occ 4 occ 2 occ Histrionicus histrionicus Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Harlequin Duck Marbled Murrelet Northern Spotted Owl Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Invertebrates 1 occ Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T3 1 occ Birds 1 occ Dicamptodon copei ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Rana cascadae 85 9 1673 8596 14888 1040 2378 Abundance b Cope's Giant Salamander G3 GRank a 0.2 % 0.2 % 3.6 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 3.8 % 1.1 % 25.0 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 0.7 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 0.1 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 30 % GAP 4 70 % GRank Cascades Frog Species Amphibians North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Washington Integrated Site Wynoochee River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Wynoochee River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 0.9 1.1 93.1 0.3 11.6 27.9 17.9 17.9 6.1 0.0 2.0 5.8 4.5 3.2 1.7 Relative Abundance 0.4 % 0.5 % 40.0 % 0.1 % 5.0 % 12.0 % 7.7 % 7.7 % 2.6 % 0.0 % 0.9 % 2.5 % 1.9 % 1.4 % 0.7 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 29 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: 1 Relative Abundance e ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 503 occ 880 occ 5 occ 839 occ 20 occ 25 occ 13 occ 13 occ 3,273 162,155 195,305 345,702 775,920 76,367 324,193 f Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % 111 % 116 % 580 % 90 % 175 % 256 % 415 % 31 % 878 166 127 116 126 375 236 % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 70 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 321 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 4 occ Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa 190873 m 17887 m 196799 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Willapa Headwaters - Mid Elevations, High Gradients Willapa Headwaters - Sandstones, Low To Mid Elevation, Moderate/Low Gradient Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Chehalis Tributary Small Rivers - Volcanic/Outwash, Low To Mid Elevation Coast Tributaries - Outwash, Low Elevation, Moderate Gradients 2 occ 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ 245585 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 153052 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater 2 occ Hemphillia burringtoni Abundance Warty Jumping-Slug GRank Burrington Jumping-Slug Targets known in this Conservation Area: Wynoochee River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 6.7 % 2.6 % 25.0 % 6.1 % 5.8 % 1.7 % 6.1 % 5.1 % 6.4 % 5.8 % 4.8 % % of Total Known 361.0 147.7 1624.5 324.9 314.2 92.9 328.8 277.0 344.2 71.6 35.8 Relative Abundance 22.2 % 9.1 % 100.0 % 20.0 % 19.3 % 5.7 % 20.2 % 17.1 % 21.2 % 30.8 % 15.4 % Contribution to Goal 9 occ 11 occ 1 occ 10 occ 1,017,511 m 312,652 m 943,067 m 1,440,012 m 722,295 m 13 occ 13 occ Ecoregion Goal Page 322 of 328 133 % 100 % 100 % 120 % 137 % 187 % 129 % 117 % 150 % 200 % 115 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 11,464 ha 28,316 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 1 % Developed 2 % Undeveloped 96 % Water 0 % Brachyramphus marmoratus Strix occidentalis caurina Northern Spotted Owl Bog Anemone Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Marine Ecological Systems Saltmarsh (ha) Plant Communities Marine Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Plant Communities Anemone oregana var felix Haliaeetus leucocephalus Vascular Plants a T2 T3 GRank Marbled Murrelet Abundance 8 ha 1 occ 1 occ 7 occ 26 occ 1 occ 3484 ha 801 ha 6691 ha Abundance b 0.1 % 12.5 % 20.0 % 0.7 % 1.5 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 0.3 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 81 % GAP 4 19 % GRank Bald Eagle Birds Species North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Yachats River Targets known in this Conservation Area: Yachats River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 0.5 104.2 25.0 8.7 18.5 0.7 11.2 1.4 5.4 Relative Abundance 0.2 % 16.7 % 4.0 % 1.4 % 3.0 % 0.1 % 1.8 % 0.2 % 0.9 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 80 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin 1 Local: Relative Abundance e 3,169 ha 6 occ 25 occ 503 occ 880 occ 839 occ 195,305 ha 345,702 ha 775,920 ha f Ecoregion Goal 238 % 117 % 20 % 111 % 116 % 90 % 127 % 116 % 126 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 19 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 323 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 66217 m Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Coastal Range Ocean Tributaries - Volcanic Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 1 Inland Coastal Headwaters Streams - Granitic, Low Elevation, High Gradient 1 occ 1 occ 17880 m Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Freshwater Ecological Systems - Class 2 72046 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 2040 m 8 ha 1 ha Abundance Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Estuary Targets known in this Conservation Area: Yachats River Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 16.7 % 20.0 % 0.8 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.0 % 0.4 % % of Total Known 2185.1 2185.1 116.3 58.7 70.0 5.8 0.3 3.2 Relative Abundance 50.0 % 50.0 % 2.7 % 1.3 % 1.6 % 2.5 % 0.1 % 1.4 % Contribution to Goal 2 occ 2 occ 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 80,427 m 5,499 ha 91 ha Ecoregion Goal Page 324 of 328 250 % 100 % 164 % 173 % 100 % 122 % 206 % 121 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 1,620 ha 4,001 ac Abundance Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) G5 GRank a ha ha m occ 13 ha 1 ha 99 ha 8893 m 2 ha 0 1 6937 6 1 occ 1 occ Abundance b 73.4 5.4 50.6 32.6 0.4 221.3 491.8 0.9 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 0.1 % d Relative Abundance 0.2 4.4 66.2 441.7 c 4.5 % 0.3 % 3.1 % 2.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.3 % 4.1 % 27.3 % 5.0 % 11.1 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.1 % 1.2 % 8.8 % 1.6 % 1.2 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 % GAP 2 GAP 3 0 % GAP 4 86 % GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Estuary Marine Ecological Systems Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Seagrass (ha) Progne subis Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 7 % Developed 1 % Undeveloped 49 % Water 43 % Algal Beds (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Eelgrass Estuary Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Plant Communities Marine Mineral Spring Plant Communities Purple Martin Species Birds Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Yaquina Bay Targets known in this Conservation Area: Yaquina Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: e ha ha m occ 279 ha 155 ha 3,169 ha 442,357 m 9,868 ha 3,384 198 169,841 22 20 occ 9 occ f Ecoregion Goal % % % % 116 % 244 % 238 % 228 % 294 % 330 258 224 250 150 % 367 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % 86 % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 325 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal 62490 m 47338 m 47618 m Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites 32117 m Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 30 m 6927 m 1922 m 102 ha 2 ha Abundance Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU GRank Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Species Fishes Freshwater Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Shoreline Organics/fines (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Yaquina Bay Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 0.6 % 1.1 % 0.7 % 1.3 % 0.0 % 1.4 % 1.9 % 0.6 % 0.0 % % of Total Known 592.1 1100.4 429.8 1375.1 1.1 77.5 103.7 30.1 2.4 Relative Abundance 1.9 % 3.6 % 1.4 % 4.4 % 0.1 % 4.8 % 6.4 % 1.9 % 0.1 % Contribution to Goal 2,487,321 m 1,330,438 m 4,496,878 m 722,295 m 45,204 m 144,777 m 30,025 m 5,499 ha 1,250 ha Ecoregion Goal Page 326 of 328 164 % 173 % 100 % 150 % 218 % 215 % 194 % 206 % 246 % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio 41 ha 100 ac Land Use/Land Cover Agriculture 12 % Developed 33 % Undeveloped 32 % Water 20 % Abundance 1 occ 1 occ 2 occ Pelecanus occidentalis Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Fratercula cirrhata Brown Pelican Common Murre Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Tufted Puffin Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Marine Ecological Systems Shoreline Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp Shore Plant Communities 6 occ Phalacrocorax penicillatus 3 ha 1911 m 12 occ 8 occ 8 occ 7 occ Haematopus bachmani 22 ha Abundance b Brandt's Cormorant G4 GRank a 0.0 % 0.1 % 2.1 % 6.3 % 3.1 % 7.9 % 2.5 % 14.3 % 5.9 % 2.0 % 0.0 % % of Total Known % of Total Known GAP Management Status % GAP 1 GAP 2 100 % % GAP 3 % GAP 4 GRank Black Oystercatcher Birds Species Marine North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Terrestrial Targets known in this Conservation Area: Area: Oregon Integrated Site Yaquina Head ONA/ACEC Targets known in this Conservation Area: Yaquina Head ONA/ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: c d 28.3 277.4 4314.6 2943.8 6695.1 7258.4 5450.0 2526.3 4194.7 20.0 Relative Abundance 0.0 % 0.4 % 6.7 % 20.0 % 10.3 % 26.7 % 8.4 % % 19.4 % 6.5 % 0.0 % Contribution to Goal % % % % % Contribution to Goal Land Ownership National 100 National Other: National USFS: State/Provin Local: Relative Abundance e 5,844 ha 445,946 m 30 occ 5 occ 116 occ 30 occ 95 occ occ 31 occ 108 occ 195,305 ha f Ecoregion Goal 105 % 142 % 190 % 180 % 171 % 187 % 163 % % 168 % 159 % 127 % % of Goal g Captured by Portfolio % % % % of Goal Captured by Portfolio Page 327 of 328 Indigenous: Private NGO Ecoregion Goal GRank Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summaries of Portfolio Sites Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Targets known in this Conservation Area: Yaquina Head ONA/ACEC Portfolio Site Summary, continued: 388 392 298 64 1987 618 319 1768 m m m m m m m m Abundance 0.8 % 3.6 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 2.5 % 0.6 % 7.4 % 0.7 % % of Total Known 1722.0 7872.8 165.2 18.4 5335.3 1200.9 6002.5 1422.4 Relative Abundance 2.7 % 12.2 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 8.2 % 1.9 % 24.7 % 2.2 % Contribution to Goal 14,577 3,219 116,959 226,193 24,105 33,330 1,289 80,427 m m m m m m m m Ecoregion Goal % % % % % % % % Page 328 of 328 89 124 119 102 129 119 140 122 % of Goal Captured by Portfolio a) Geographic Section: also known as the ecoregional section or ecosection in which the conservation goal is stated for the conservation target. Sections were described separately for terrestrial targets (ecosections), freshwater targets (Ecological Drainage Units), and marine targets (marine ecoregions). A target that occurs in more than one section will have a conservation goal for each section. b) Amount Known: the amount of the conservation target known within the stated section in abundance units that were used in the analysis (e.g. occurrences, hectares, meters). c) Captured in Portfolio: the amount of the conservation target captured within portfolio sites in the stated section. d) Conservation Goal: the conservation goal for the target within the stated section. e) % of Goal Captured: percent of the conservation goal captured in all portfolio sites within the stated section. 100% denotes that the conservation goal was fully met for the target within the section. Column Notes: December 2006 Appendix 8E: Conservation Targets and Goals Summary Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Boreal Fen Boreal Fen Boreal Fen Boreal Wet Meadow Boreal Wet Meadow Boreal Wet Meadow Boreal Wet Meadow Klamath-Siskiyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland Klamath-Siskiyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest And Woodland North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Avalanche Chute And Talus Shrubland North Pacific Coastal Herbaceous Bald And Bluff North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Coniferous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Deciduous Swamp North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry And Mesic Alpine Dwarf-Shrubland And Meadow North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Dry Douglas-Fir And Madrone Forest And Woodland North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Red Cedar-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest Terrestrial Terrrestrial Ecological Systems Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Geographic Section 11 2 4 87 1 241 46 2 10 3,421 59 143 92 148 23 71 16 26 34 606 620 435 86 7,422 1,868 22,746 178 422 73 63 3 192 113,011 107,316 53,739 113 1,512 264,631 177,567 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Amount Known b c 9 2 4 58 1 125 36 2 5 1,700 40 107 46 113 21 43 11 13 11 201 324 238 43 6,666 1,164 20,427 103 328 56 60 2 116 37,891 72,483 29,365 52 363 128,543 79,572 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Captured in Porfolio 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 342 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 121 124 87 9 742 187 2,275 18 42 15 13 1 58 33,903 32,195 16,122 34 454 79,389 53,270 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 1 of 32 300 67 133 1933 33 4167 1200 67 167 497 667 3567 1533 3767 700 1433 367 433 367 166 261 274 478 898 622 898 572 781 373 462 200 200 112 225 182 153 80 162 149 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest And Shrubland North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Coastal Sand Dune North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Tidal Salt Marsh North Pacific Maritime Tidal Salt Marsh North Pacific Maritime Tidal Salt Marsh North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Maritime Wet-Mesic Doug Fir-Western Hemlock Forest North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland North Pacific Montane Riparian Woodland And Shrubland North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Mountain Hemlock Forest North Pacific Oak Woodland North Pacific Oak Woodland North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Silver Fir Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest North Pacific Western Hemlock-Yellow Cedar Forest Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Geographic Section 3,331 1,448 782 295,591 163,535 8,768 46 42 83 244 1 478,405 195,960 477,975 1 1 2 1,205,299 498,781 54,843 241,837 581,407 4,234 3 25 91,965 125 114,140 125,003 19 50,581 25 83 4,121 306,124 109,976 253,610 196,810 12,748 737,576 1,216 14,364 581 21,683 ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Amount Known b c 1,499 935 485 94,810 66,063 4,064 26 21 49 230 1 163,532 96,559 142,287 1 1 2 510,426 137,799 35,536 103,237 191,519 1,041 3 6 61,929 74 63,743 123,109 19 37,157 5 62 1,308 133,097 36,603 116,121 143,113 8,811 324,940 514 8,070 294 10,919 ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Captured in Porfolio 999 434 235 88,677 49,060 2,630 3 3 3 3 3 143,522 58,788 143,392 3 3 3 361,590 149,634 16,453 72,551 174,422 1,270 3 3 18,393 25 22,828 25,001 4 10,116 5 17 824 61,225 21,995 50,722 39,362 2,550 147,515 243 2,873 116 4,337 ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 2 of 32 150 215 206 107 135 155 867 700 1633 7667 33 114 164 99 33 33 67 141 92 216 142 110 82 100 200 337 296 279 492 475 367 100 365 159 217 166 229 364 346 220 212 281 253 252 % of Goal Captured Bald Eagle Wintering Area American Peregrine Falcon American Peregrine Falcon American Peregrine Falcon Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Bald Eagle Wintering Area Birds Cascades Frog Clouded Salamander Columbia Torrent Salamander Columbia Torrent Salamander Cope's Giant Salamander Cope's Giant Salamander Del Norte Salamander Dunn's Salamander Dunn's Salamander Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Northern Red-Legged Frog Olympic Torrent Salamander Olympic Torrent Salamander Southern Torrent Salamander Tailed Frog Tailed Frog Van Dyke's Salamander Van Dyke's Salamander Amphibians a Wind Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Haliaeetus leucocephalus Willapa Hills Section Plethodon vandykei Olympic Section Olympic Section Plethodon vandykei Haliaeetus leucocephalus Willapa Hills Section Ascaphus truei North Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Ascaphus truei Haliaeetus leucocephalus Coast Ranges Section Rhyacotriton variegatus Nahwitti Lowlands Section Willapa Hills Section Rhyacotriton olympicus Haliaeetus leucocephalus Olympic Section Rhyacotriton olympicus Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Rana aurora aurora Haliaeetus leucocephalus Coast Ranges Section Rana boylii Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Plethodon dunni Haliaeetus leucocephalus Coast Ranges Section Plethodon dunni Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Plethodon elongatus Haliaeetus leucocephalus Willapa Hills Section Dicamptodon copei Falco peregrinus anatum Olympic Section Dicamptodon copei Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Rhyacotriton kezeri Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Rhyacotriton kezeri Falco peregrinus anatum Coast Ranges Section Falco peregrinus anatum Olympic Section Aneides ferreus Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Geographic Section Rana cascadae Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Species Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Northern California Mixed Evergreen Forest Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine Woodland Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ 2 occ 5 11 2 71 139 277 73 244 176 903 3 4 16 19 63 51 37 72 12 52 11 94 76 2 42 27 24 20 24 186,256 3 2,979 1,757 11 11 27 12 28 Amount Known b c occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ 1 occ 3 7 1 38 23 122 39 92 67 373 1 4 6 10 37 39 15 18 10 31 6 47 62 2 25 12 12 16 19 53,044 3 62 103 3 3 7 5 17 Captured in Porfolio occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ 2 occ 6 6 5 30 70 138 36 67 46 452 3 13 7 10 15 7 6 13 3 4 7 4 24 1 13 4 3 9 11 37,251 1 596 176 1 3 3 3 3 Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 3 of 32 50 % 50 117 20 127 33 88 108 137 146 83 33 31 86 100 247 557 250 138 333 775 86 1175 258 200 192 300 400 178 173 142 300 10 59 300 100 233 167 567 % of Goal Captured Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section North Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Nahwitti Lowlands Section North Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Wind Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Willapa Hills Section Lee Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Sorex palustris brooksi Ardea herodias Ardea herodias Ardea herodias Ardea herodias Ardea herodias Histrionicus histrionicus Histrionicus histrionicus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Brachyramphus marmoratus Accipiter gentilis Accipiter gentilis Accipiter gentilis Accipiter gentilis Accipiter gentilis Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Strix occidentalis caurina Strix occidentalis caurina Strix occidentalis caurina Progne subis Progne subis Progne subis Eremophila alpestris strigata Eremophila alpestris strigata Melanitta perspicillata Chaetura vauxi Chaetura vauxi Sialia mexicana Lagopus leucurus Lagopus leucurus occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 2 occ Wind Isle Mountains Section 2 4 5 37 4 21 4 53 3 824 676 259 13,406 6,321 47,346 227,778 65,350 99,379 107,472 333,715 2 28 16 2 5 16 724 238 43 37 2 41 4 9 6 2 3 2 25 4 7 occ Willapa Hills Section Amount Known Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Haliaeetus leucocephalus wintering area Gavia immer a Geographic Section Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Common Loon Common Water Shrew, Brooksi Subspecies Great-Blue Heron Great-Blue Heron Great-Blue Heron Great-Blue Heron Great-Blue Heron Harlequin Duck Harlequin Duck Marbled Murrelet Marbled Murrelet Marbled Murrelet Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Marbled Murrelet (CAP1) Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Marbled Murrelet (CAP2) Northern Goshawk Northern Goshawk Northern Goshawk Northern Goshawk Northern Goshawk Northern Pygmy-Owl, Swarthi Subspecies Northern Spotted Owl Northern Spotted Owl Northern Spotted Owl Purple Martin Purple Martin Purple Martin Streaked Horned Lark Streaked Horned Lark Surf Scoter Vaux's Swift Vaux's Swift Western Bluebird White-Tailed Ptarmigan White-Tailed Ptarmigan Bald Eagle Wintering Area Bald Eagle Wintering Area Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary b c 1 4 3 1 1 6 2 28 1 459 389 169 6,923 4,426 25,080 125,344 35,764 51,359 58,551 182,348 1 8 9 1 2 16 365 161 33 10 1 22 1 5 4 1 1 1 20 2 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 1 occ 1 occ Captured in Porfolio 5 25 1 2 2 3 1 4 1 412 338 130 6,703 3,160 23,673 113,889 32,675 49,690 53,736 166,858 1 3 9 5 2 18 362 119 22 4 1 3 4 5 2 2 3 9 15 2 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 2 occ 7 occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 4 of 32 20 16 300 50 50 200 200 700 100 111 115 130 103 140 106 110 109 103 109 109 100 267 100 20 100 89 101 135 150 250 100 733 25 100 200 50 33 11 133 100 50 % 14 % % of Goal Captured Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Rhyacophila haddocki Plebejus saepiolus littoralis Lycaena mariposa charlottensis Lycaena mariposa charlottensis Hemphillia malonei Incisalia mossii mossii Incisalia mossii mossii Megomphix hemphilli Megomphix hemphilli Speyeria zerene hippolyta Speyeria zerene hippolyta Monadenia fidelis Cryptomastix devia Pterostichus rothi Hochbergellus hirsutus Parnassius smintheus olympianus Coenonympha tullia insulana Speyeria zerene bremnerii Speyeria zerene bremnerii Speyeria zerene bremnerii Speyeria zerene bremnerii Speyeria zerene bremnerii Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Hemphillia glandulosa glandulosa Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Derephysia foliacea Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Icaricia icarioides fenderi Myotis volans Olympic Section Oeneis chryxus valerata Lee Isle Mountains Section Olympic Section Euphydryas chalcedona perdiccas Myotis keenii Willapa Hills Section Hemphillia burringtoni Mustela erminea anguinae Olympic Section Hemphillia burringtoni Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Icaricia icarioides blackmorei Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Icaricia icarioides blackmorei Odocoileus virginianus leucurus Coast Ranges Section Prophysaon coeruleum Martes americana Olympic Section Plebejus acmon spangelatus Wind Isle Mountains Section Lagopus leucurus a Geographic Section Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals American Marten Columbia White-Tailed Deer Ermine, Anguinae Subspecies Keen's Myotis Long-legged Myotis Volans Mammals Acmon Blue Blue-Gray Taildropper Boisduval's Blue, Blackmorei Boisduval's Blue, Blackmorei Burrington Jumping-Slug Burrington Jumping-Slug Chalcedon Checkerspot Chryxus Arctic Fender's Blue Butterfly Foliaceous Lace Bug Haddock's Rhyacophilan Cad Insular Blue Butterfly Makah (Queen Charlotte) Copper Makah (Queen Charlotte) Copper Malone Jumping-Slug Moss' Elfin, Mossii Subspecies Moss' Elfin, Mossii Subspecies Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Oregon Megomphix (Snail) Oregon Silverspot Butterfly Oregon Silverspot Butterfly Pacific Sideband(Ssp. Canyonville) Puget Oregonian Roth's Blind Ground Beetle Sisters Hesperian Smintheus Parnassian Subspecies Of Ringlet Only Valley Silverspot Butterfly Valley Silverspot Butterfly Valley Silverspot Butterfly Valley Silverspot Butterfly Valley Silverspot Butterfly Warty Jumping-Slug Warty Jumping-Slug Warty Jumping-Slug Invertebrates White-Tailed Ptarmigan Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 10 17 2 1 10 2 169 2 8 34 8 15 10 11 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 90 12 4 4 5 3 3 1 13 3 1 2 1 6 2 24 35 9 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 7 occ Amount Known b c 4 12 2 1 1 2 59 1 8 10 5 15 10 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 38 4 4 3 3 1 3 1 13 1 1 2 1 5 2 12 9 5 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 5 occ Captured in Porfolio 3 17 18 4 4 13 13 3 8 6 7 13 13 13 13 13 7 7 6 13 6 7 7 6 13 12 5 8 13 13 13 2 3 2 2 4 2 5 4 4 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 10 occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 5 of 32 133 71 11 25 25 15 454 33 100 167 71 115 77 23 15 8 14 14 17 8 17 29 543 67 31 25 60 13 23 8 100 50 33 100 50 125 100 240 225 125 50 % % of Goal Captured Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Encalypta brevipes Limbella fryei Pohlia sphagnicola Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Olympic Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Plantago macrocarpa Bensoniella oregana Anemone oregana var felix Pellaea breweri Silene douglasii var oraria Silene douglasii var oraria Castilleja chambersii Sidalcea malviflora ssp patula Microseris bigelovii Erythronium elegans Artemisia pycnocephala Astragalus australis var olympicus Synthyris pinnatifida var lanugino Trillium ovatum var hibbersonii Senecio flettii Senecio flettii Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Dodecatheon austrofrigidum Lasthenia maritima Arctostaphylos hispidula Sidalcea hirtipes Sidalcea hirtipes Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Campylopus schmidii Clemmys marmorata marmorata Coast Ranges Section Radula brunnea Coast Ranges Section Myotis yumanensis Coast Ranges Section North Isle Mountains Section Gulo gulo vancouverensis Pannaria rubiginosa Wind Isle Mountains Section Marmota vancouverensis Bryoria pseudocapillaris Lee Isle Mountains Section Marmota vancouverensis Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Arborimus longicaudus Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii Leioderma sorediatum Coast Ranges Section Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii Erioderma sorediatum Coast Ranges Section Martes pennanti pacifica a Geographic Section Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Alaska Plantain Bensonia Bog Anemone Brewer's Cliff-Brake Cascade Head Catchfly Cascade Head Catchfly Chamber's Paintbrush Coast Checker Bloom Coast Microseris Coast Range Fawn-Lily Coastal Sagewort Cotton's Milk-Vetch Cut-Leaf Synthyris Dwarf Trillium Flett Groundsel Flett Groundsel Frigid Shootingstar Frigid Shootingstar Hairy Goldfields Hairy Manzanita Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow Hairy-Stemmed Checker-Mallow Vascular Plants Northwestern Pond Turtle Reptiles Lichen Treepelt (Erioderma) Lichen Treepelt (Leioderma) Lichen (Bryoria) Lichen (Pannaria) Liverwort (Radula) Moss (Campylopus) Moss (Encalypta) Moss (Limbella) Moss (Pohlia) Nonvascular Plants Pacific Fisher Pacific Western Big-Eared Bat Pacific Western Big-Eared Bat Red Tree Vole Vancouver Island Marmot Vancouver Island Marmot Wolverine (Vancouverensis) Yuma Myotis Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 8 30 5 2 2 3 3 8 1 9 1 9 19 4 2 1 1 2 2 28 11 4 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 76 occ 6 2 2 3 1 5 1 1 1 3 4 1 151 4 2 2 4 Amount Known b c occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 8 9 5 2 2 3 3 6 1 9 1 9 19 4 2 1 1 2 2 12 9 3 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 11 occ 5 2 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 1 40 3 2 1 1 Captured in Porfolio occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 13 13 25 3 6 7 25 13 13 25 13 25 25 25 13 12 13 12 13 13 13 12 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 8 occ 12 13 7 7 7 7 13 25 7 3 4 1 13 9 9 7 5 Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 6 of 32 62 69 20 67 33 43 12 46 8 36 8 36 76 16 15 8 8 17 15 92 69 25 138 % 42 15 29 29 14 57 8 4 14 100 25 100 308 33 22 14 20 % of Goal Captured Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section North Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Lee Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section North Isle Mountains Section Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Olympic Section Willapa Hills Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Sidalcea hendersonii Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii Lupinus sulphureus var kincaidii Draba lonchocarpa var vestita Draba lonchocarpa var vestita Lasthenia macrantha ssp prisca Triteleia hendersonii var leachiae Astragalus microcystis Sidalcea nelsoniana Sidalcea nelsoniana Aster paucicapitatus Aster paucicapitatus Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Abronia umbellata ssp breviflora Filipendula occidentalis Filipendula occidentalis Cardamine pattersonii Saxifraga hitchcockiana Saxifraga hitchcockiana Erigeron salishii Erigeron salishii Cordylanthus maritimus ssp palustris Poa unilateralis Poa unilateralis Erysimum arenicola var torulosum Erysimum arenicola var torulosum Cochlearia officinalis Cryptantha leiocarpa Gilia millefoliata Carex pluriflora Carex pluriflora Thelypteris nevadensis Phacelia argentea Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Douglasia laevigata var ciliolata Cimicifuga elata Cimicifuga elata Cimicifuga elata Lathyrus holochlorus Saxifraga tischii Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus Erigeron peregrinus ssp peregrinus a Geographic Section Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals San Francisco Bluegrass San Francisco Bluegrass Sand-Dwelling Wallflower Sand-Dwelling Wallflower Scurvygrass Seaside Cryptantha Seaside Gilia Several-Flowered Sedge Several-Flowered Sedge Sierra Wood Fern Silvery Phacelia Smooth Douglasia Smooth Douglasia Smooth Douglasia Tall Bugbane Tall Bugbane Tall Bugbane Thin-Leaved Peavine Tisch's Saxifrage Wandering Daisy Wandering Daisy Henderson Sidalcea Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine Kincaid's Sulfur Lupine Lance-Fruited Draba Lance-Fruited Draba Large-Flowered Goldfields Leach's Brodiaea Least Bladdery Milk-Vetch Nelson's Checker-Mallow Nelson's Checker-Mallow Olympic Mountain Aster Olympic Mountain Aster Pink Sandverbena Pink Sandverbena Queen-Of-The-Forest Queen-Of-The-Forest Saddle Mt. Bittercress Saddle Mt. Saxifrage Saddle Mt. Saxifrage Salish Daisy Salish Daisy Salt-Marsh Bird's-Beak Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 2 4 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 17 1 1 6 40 1 9 1 2 1 2 2 24 3 4 1 10 37 2 42 2 2 3 8 1 3 26 1 1 2 3 1 20 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Amount Known b c 2 4 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 16 1 1 6 14 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 7 3 4 1 10 3 2 7 1 2 3 6 1 3 25 1 1 2 3 1 15 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Captured in Porfolio 3 4 13 12 6 7 13 4 3 7 13 4 3 6 4 1 2 1 25 6 7 13 7 6 7 6 25 13 13 2 1 12 13 8 7 6 19 25 13 12 13 12 25 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 7 of 32 67 100 15 17 17 29 23 75 33 14 123 25 33 100 350 100 150 100 8 17 29 15 100 50 57 17 40 23 15 350 100 17 23 75 14 50 132 4 8 17 23 8 60 % of Goal Captured Wind Isle Mountains Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Sparganium fluctuans Lilium occidentale Hydrocotyle verticillata Delphinium oreganum Oenothera wolfii Aleutian Canada Goose Aleutian Canada Goose Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Black Oystercatcher Brandt's Cormorant Brandt's Cormorant Brandt's Cormorant Brandt's Cormorant Birds Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Branta canadensis leucopareia Haematopus bachmani Haematopus bachmani Haematopus bachmani Haematopus bachmani Haematopus bachmani Haematopus bachmani Phalacrocorax penicillatus Phalacrocorax penicillatus Phalacrocorax penicillatus Phalacrocorax penicillatus Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Olympic Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Willapa Hills Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Coast Ranges Section Branta canadensis leucopareia Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Marine Species Olympic Section Sparganium fluctuans Coast Ranges Section Lee Isle Mountains Section Sparganium fluctuans a Geographic Section Scientific Name Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Calnut) Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Salhoo Malfus / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Vaculi / Desces Carobn) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Picsit / Carobn Lysame) Lowland Coniferous Forested Wetlands (Pinconc / Carobn) Mineral Spring Mineral Spring Mineral Spring Caraqud / compal Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Caraqud / Compal) Caraqud Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Caraqud) Carobn / sphagn Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Carobn / Sphagn) Ledgla / carobn / sphagn Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn) Ledgla / carobn / sphagn Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Ledgla / Carobn / Sphagn) Ledgla / darcal / sphagn Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / Darcal / Sphagn) Ledgla / sanoff / sphagn Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Ledgla / sanoff / sphagn) Vaccae / sanoff Sphagnum Bogs and Poor Fens (Vaccae / Sanoff) Xerten- sanoff - sphagn Sphagnum Bogs And Poor Fens (Xerten- Sanoff - Sphagn) Plant Communities Water Bur-Reed Water Bur-Reed Water Bur-Reed Western Lily Whorled Marsh Pennywort Willamette Valley Larkspur Wolf's Evening-Primrose Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 5 13 118 119 5 47 3 63 53 40 2 5 1 7 6 6 2 4 39 2 19 1 1 1 10 2 9 2 1 2 3 2 1 18 5 1 7 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Amount Known b c 3 5 61 52 2 28 3 26 29 19 1 2 1 4 5 6 1 3 22 1 7 1 1 1 6 1 7 2 1 2 2 2 1 18 5 1 5 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Captured in Porfolio 2 4 35 36 2 14 1 19 16 12 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 12 1 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 5 25 7 7 25 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 8 of 32 150 125 174 144 100 200 300 137 181 158 100 100 33 133 167 200 33 100 183 100 117 33 33 33 200 33 233 100 33 67 50 50 20 72 71 14 20 % of Goal Captured Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Ptychoramphus aleuticus Ptychoramphus aleuticus Ptychoramphus aleuticus Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Phalacroscorax auritus Phalacroscorax auritus Phalacroscorax auritus Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Oceanodroma leucorhoa Oceanodroma leucorhoa Oceanodroma leucorhoa Phalacrocorax pelagicus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Phalacrocorax pelagicus Cepphus columba Cepphus columba Cepphus columba Cepphus columba Cepphus columba Cepphus columba Cepphus columba Cerorhinca monocerata Cerorhinca monocerata Cerorhinca monocerata Cerorhinca monocerata Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Fratercula cirrhata Fratercula cirrhata Fratercula cirrhata Fratercula cirrhata Fratercula cirrhata Fratercula cirrhata Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Oceanodroma leucorhoa VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Phalacroscorax auritus VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Sterna caspia a Geographic Section Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Caspian Tern Cassin's Auklet Cassin's Auklet Cassin's Auklet Common Murre Common Murre Common Murre Common Murre Common Murre Double-Crested Cormorant Double-Crested Cormorant Double-Crested Cormorant Double-Crested Cormorant Fork-Tailed Storm Petral Fork-Tailed Storm Petral Leach's Storm-Petrel Leach's Storm-Petrel Leach's Storm-Petrel Leach's Storm-Petrel Pelagic Cormorant Pelagic Cormorant Pelagic Cormorant Pelagic Cormorant Pelagic Cormorant Pelagic Cormorant Pigeon Guillemot Pigeon Guillemot Pigeon Guillemot Pigeon Guillemot Pigeon Guillemot Pigeon Guillemot Pigeon Guillemot Rhinoceros Auklet Rhinoceros Auklet Rhinoceros Auklet Rhinoceros Auklet Shorebird Concentration Area Shorebird Concentration Area Tufted Puffin Tufted Puffin Tufted Puffin Tufted Puffin Tufted Puffin Tufted Puffin Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 3 2 6 7 42 35 15 2 6 20 12 14 3 4 7 5 13 4 10 101 117 4 42 3 47 170 140 4 22 5 4 40 4 2 3 4 16 1 33 25 2 19 2 13 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Amount Known b c 3 2 3 4 26 15 8 2 4 9 10 7 3 3 3 4 10 1 6 51 56 3 25 3 17 90 65 3 13 5 1 20 2 2 2 2 14 1 18 15 2 12 2 8 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Captured in Porfolio 1 1 2 2 13 10 4 1 2 6 4 4 1 1 2 2 4 1 3 30 35 1 13 1 14 51 42 1 7 2 1 12 1 1 1 1 4 11 10 8 1 6 1 4 occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 9 of 32 300 200 150 200 200 150 200 200 200 150 250 175 300 300 150 200 250 100 200 170 160 300 192 300 121 176 155 300 186 250 100 167 200 200 200 200 350 9 180 188 200 200 200 200 % of Goal Captured Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Eumetopias jubatus Eumetopias jubatus Eumetopias jubatus Desmarestia tortuosa Pt Grenville South Marine Section Mirounga angustirostris Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Mirounga angustirostris VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus a Geographic Section Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds (ha) Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Plant Communities Marine Algae (Desmarestia) Nonvascular Plants Northern Elephant Seal Northern Elephant Seal Stellar's Sea Lion Stellar's Sea Lion Stellar's Sea Lion Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion haulout Stellar's Sea Lion rookery Mammals Mussels and barnacles Mussels and barnacles Mussels and barnacles Mussels and barnacles Mussels and barnacles Mussels and barnacles Mussels and barnacles Invertebrates Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning High Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover Herring Spawning Low Cover Smelt spawn Smelt spawn Smelt spawn Fishes Western Snowy Plover Western Snowy Plover Western Snowy Plover Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 735 56 16 10,475 4,307 3,979 ha ha ha ha m m 1 occ 1 7 13 12 1 9 12 3 9 7 3 45,839 23,474 141,551 8,248 11,400 949 893,026 71,820 2,622 206,678 45,426 706,297 6,202 33,066 3,079 8 occ 3 occ 3 occ Amount Known b c occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 606 56 16 10,475 2,325 3,858 ha ha ha ha m m 1 occ 1 7 9 9 1 7 10 3 6 2 2 28,104 10,346 78,845 7,758 9,148 949 310,786 71,820 2,622 68,348 41,684 286,609 3,265 13,567 898 6 occ 3 occ 2 occ Captured in Porfolio occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 220 17 5 3,142 1,292 1,194 ha ha ha ha m m 1 occ 1 2 4 4 4 3 4 1 3 2 1 13,752 7,042 42,465 2,474 3,420 285 267,908 21,546 787 62,003 13,628 211,889 1,861 9,920 924 3 occ 2 occ 6 occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 10 of 32 275 329 320 333 180 323 100 % 100 350 225 225 25 233 250 300 200 100 200 204 147 186 314 267 333 116 333 333 110 306 135 175 137 97 200 % 150 % 33 % % of Goal Captured a Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Salvir - disspi - trimar - (jaucar) Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Desces - junbal tidal VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Fesrub dune Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Geographic Section Salhoc-myrcal Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Estuary Algal Beds Shore Algal Beds Shore Algal Beds Shore Algal Beds Shore Algal Beds Shore Algal Beds Shore Aquatic Bed (ha) Aquatic Bed (ha) Bedrock (ha) Coast Willow Deflation Plain Wetland Coastal Sand Dunes Dune grass (Ha) Dune grass (Ha) Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Estuary Dune grass Shore Dune grass Shore Dune grass Shore Dune grass Shore Dune grass Shore Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass (Ha) Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Estuary Eelgrass Shore Eelgrass Shore Eelgrass Shore Eelgrass Shore Intertidal Salt Marshes (Desces Junbal Tidal) Intertidal Salt Marshes (Salvir Disspi Trimar) Kelp Estuary Kelp Estuary Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 74,167 1,427 28,545 262,913 107,024 23,788 134,814 11,172 150,485 2,704,162 646 12 65 1 1 16 573 8,138 6,571 101,734 1,659 90,023 25,970 80,716 100,137 1,692 380,602 27 29 1,419 220,321 2,841 986 109,939 6,153 225,897 12,146 3,325 5,451 603,490 8 68 425 2,441 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha occ occ ha ha m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha m m m m m m m m m m occ occ m m Amount Known b c 74,167 1,427 26,808 93,294 48,691 11,926 71,041 5,105 75,505 904,403 498 12 42 1 1 16 573 7,952 5,740 88,067 1,659 36,605 14,312 31,833 18,944 1,459 126,141 27 24 482 157,186 2,841 986 106,869 5,153 107,327 4,410 2,781 3,396 263,451 2 55 425 1,125 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha occ occ ha ha m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha m m m m m m m m m m occ occ m m Captured in Porfolio 22,250 428 8,563 78,874 32,107 7,136 40,444 3,352 45,146 810,904 194 4 20 1 1 5 172 2,442 1,971 30,520 498 27,007 7,791 24,215 30,041 508 114,181 8 9 426 66,096 852 296 32,982 1,846 67,769 3,644 997 1,635 181,047 2 22 127 732 m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha occ occ ha ha m m m m m m m m m m ha ha ha m m m m m m m m m m occ occ m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 11 of 32 333 333 313 118 152 167 176 152 167 112 257 300 210 100 100 320 333 326 291 289 333 136 184 131 63 287 110 338 267 113 238 333 333 324 279 158 121 279 208 146 100 250 335 154 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Transition zone wetland op Low salinity high marsh op Moderate salinity high marsh op Moderate salinity high marsh op Calamagrostis nutkaensis argentina egedii - juncus balticu Fesrub dune grassland Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Picsit/corser tideland swamp Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Red Fescue Stabilized Sand Dunes Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Mixed-Fine And Mud: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Mesohaline Old-Growth Sitka Spruce/Creek Dogwood Tideland Swamp Organic, Sand, Mixed-Fine Or Mud: Partly Enclosed, Backshore Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Organic: Partly Enclosed, Backshore, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Pacific Reedgrass - Pacific Silverweed - Baltic Rush a QC Sound Marine Section Geographic Section op Silty, low salinity, low marsh op Kelp Estuary Kelp Estuary Kelp Estuary Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp habitat (OR, BC) Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp high persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp low persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp medium persistence (WA) Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Kelp Shore Low Intertidal Brackish Saltmarsh On Sands To Silts Low Intertidal High Salinity Sandy Saltmarsh Low Intertidal High Salinity Silty Saltmarsh Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Carlyn Freshwater) Carlyn freshwater Corser - salix (salhoo - salsit) Lowland Freshwater Wetlands (Mineral Soils Corser Salix) Lowland Floodplain-Low Terrace Riparian Forests And ShrublandsPopbalt / corser / impcap Mid Intertidal Brackish Fine Substrate Saltmarsh Silty, moderate salinity, low marsh Mixed Fine: Partly Enclosed Eulittoral, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary occ occ occ occ occ occ occ m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m m m m m m m m occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 1 occ 6,614 ha 229 ha 13 3 1 9 1 11 2 1,181 2,769 18,409 262 2,078 862 645 1,586 3,241 10,807 784 336 1,222 1,087 696 369 34,888 90,628 421 101,697 47,780 36,913 84,997 1,019,547 1 1 1 1 5 8 1 1 Amount Known b c occ occ occ occ occ occ occ m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m m m m m m m m occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 1 occ 4,606 ha 212 ha 13 3 1 9 1 11 2 1,181 2,033 11,444 95 824 294 265 647 649 3,372 320 244 573 546 333 208 16,714 41,708 421 45,310 25,907 20,743 43,830 405,300 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 Captured in Porfolio occ occ occ occ occ occ occ m m m ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha m m m m m m m m occ occ occ occ occ occ occ occ 1 occ 1,984 ha 69 ha 4 1 1 3 1 2 1 354 831 5,523 79 623 259 193 476 972 3,242 235 101 366 326 209 111 10,466 27,188 126 30,509 14,334 11,074 25,499 305,864 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 12 of 32 100 % 232 % 307 % 325 300 100 300 100 550 200 334 245 207 120 132 114 137 136 67 104 136 242 157 167 159 187 160 153 334 149 181 187 172 133 100 100 100 100 400 100 100 100 % of Goal Captured a Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Sandy, moderate salinity, low marsh op Cape Arago South Marine Section Pincon/carobn Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Lupinus littoralis (dune community) Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Sandy, low salinity, low marsh op VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Geographic Section Sandy, high salinity, low marsh op Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Boulder (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel (ha) Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Marine Ecological Systems Estuary Seagrass (ha) Seagrass (ha) Seagrass (ha) Seashore Lupine Dunes Shorepine/Slough Sedge Surfgrass Estuary Surfgrass Estuary Surfgrass Shore Surfgrass Shore Surfgrass Shore Surfgrass Shore Surfgrass Shore Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh (ha) Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Estuary Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Saltmarsh Shore Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Euhaline (Marsh) Op Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Mesohaline (Marsh) Op Sand: Partly Enclosed, Eulittoral, Polyhaline (Marsh) Op Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 133 126 57 10 2,266 5 30,622 7 2 2,796 20,198 61,074 87,325 43,857 4,333 1,014,092 17 247 135 2,835 482 532,253 32,305 13,372 47,682 10,515 493,111 2,180 21,821 321,283 1,062 4,823 11,897 683 15,735 1,692 24,922 486,331 1 8 2 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m occ occ occ Amount Known b c 112 98 57 10 1,579 5 27,404 2 1 1,615 13,192 24,490 48,385 24,144 3,247 376,886 17 179 112 2,159 265 354,180 32,305 13,186 37,718 5,740 399,074 2,180 20,820 144,850 1,041 4,219 6,509 683 5,354 1,459 15,744 158,371 1 8 2 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m occ occ occ Captured in Porfolio 40 38 17 3 680 1 9,187 1 1 839 6,059 18,322 26,198 13,157 1,300 304,228 5 74 41 851 145 159,676 9,692 4,012 14,305 3,154 147,933 654 6,546 96,385 318 1,447 3,569 205 4,720 508 7,477 145,899 2 1 1 ha ha ha ha ha ha ha occ occ m m m m m m m ha ha ha ha ha m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m occ occ occ Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 13 of 32 280 258 335 333 232 500 298 200 100 192 218 134 185 184 250 124 340 242 273 254 183 222 333 329 264 182 270 333 318 150 327 292 182 333 113 287 211 109 50 800 200 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Channel Protected (Outer Coast) Shoreline Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Rocky intertidal habitat (Embayment) Intertidal Habitat Cobble/Gravel Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Flat (ha) Mud (ha) Mud (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Mud Flat (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Organics/fines (ha) Rock (ha) Sand (ha) Sand (ha) Sand (ha) Sand and Gravel Flat (ha) Sand and Gravel Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand Flat (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Sand/Mud Flat (ha) Shell (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Unconsolidated (ha) Wood Debris/Organic (ha) Wood Debris/Organic (ha) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Geographic Section ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 10,705 m 2,796 m 526 m 14,119 m 189 861 8 45 17 506 11 1,384 27,705 1,472 14,162 416 32 119 269 3,146 180 70 26,568 17 6 245 471 5,791 12 128 2,997 1,302 4,123 44 8,458 44 17 194 110 22 4 Amount Known b c ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 2,880 m 1,615 m 441 m 8,820 m 189 291 8 16 8 367 11 536 24,473 1,313 8,323 373 32 114 182 2,184 96 70 19,040 17 6 212 186 3,510 12 65 2,997 293 3,025 44 6,485 44 3 31 79 9 4 Captured in Porfolio ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 3,212 m 839 m 158 m 4,236 m 57 258 2 14 5 152 3 415 8,311 442 4,249 125 10 36 81 944 54 21 7,970 5 2 74 141 1,737 4 38 899 391 1,237 13 2,537 13 5 58 33 7 1 Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 14 of 32 90 % 192 % 279 % 208 % 332 113 400 114 160 241 367 129 294 297 196 298 320 317 225 231 178 333 239 340 300 286 132 202 300 171 333 75 245 338 256 338 60 53 239 129 400 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Gravel Beach (Embayment) Gravel Beach (Embayment) Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) High Tide Lagoon Exposed (Outer Coast) High Tide lagoon Protected (Embayment) High Tide Lagoon protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Exposed (Embayment) Mud Flat Exposed (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Embayment) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a Johnstone Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Geographic Section 5,656 467 1,008 1,770 8,173 24,929 40,092 168 1,618 839 4,858 99,001 394 480 13,632 194 10,238 6,206 17,477 31,113 1,020 821 1,288 3,382 4,103 1,057 5,819 1,350 904 3,623 1,136 1,041 20,208 444 1,194 7,915 564 2,775 139 61 12,500 447 6,640 683 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 5,656 467 242 1,514 3,425 13,485 30,662 168 256 283 4,516 28,701 394 291 4,591 194 7,504 6,206 5,376 7,586 1,020 821 1,288 2,401 779 1,057 2,236 1,350 904 1,294 630 1,041 2,651 444 1,194 5,382 564 2,194 139 61 8,087 447 4,637 668 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 1,697 140 302 531 2,452 7,479 12,028 51 485 252 1,457 29,700 118 144 4,089 58 3,071 1,862 5,243 9,334 306 246 386 1,015 1,231 317 1,746 405 271 1,087 341 312 6,062 133 358 2,375 169 832 42 18 3,750 134 1,992 205 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 15 of 32 333 334 80 285 140 180 255 329 53 112 310 97 334 202 112 334 244 333 103 81 333 334 334 237 63 333 128 333 334 119 185 334 44 334 334 227 334 264 331 339 216 334 233 326 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Mud Flat Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines (Embayment) Organics/fines (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Embayment) Organics/fines Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Exposed (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Embayment) Organics/fines Very Protected (Outer Coast) Organics/fines Very Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform (Embayment) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Embayment) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Exposed (Outer Coast) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Geographic Section 533 9,703 9,378 95,053 412 55,212 49,005 454,866 17,288 711 7,258 2,470 1,989 1,209 73,147 5,218 4,375 43,691 404,386 2,180 16,124 249,139 739 1,548 3,291 117,438 69,765 3,863 10,783 15,674 2,079 998 449 5,177 1,102 119,406 1,104 1,527 2,802 71 28,439 6,936 5,903 281,785 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 533 2,666 9,378 61,335 412 36,722 5,001 290,523 9,813 580 7,258 2,470 917 1,209 33,378 4,124 4,189 35,516 327,384 2,180 16,021 112,184 601 957 1,954 47,128 38,987 3,863 4,625 10,630 683 134 449 4,846 1,102 18,529 1,029 882 2,802 71 13,676 3,246 5,337 86,368 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 160 2,911 2,813 28,516 124 16,564 14,702 136,460 5,186 213 2,177 741 597 363 21,944 1,565 1,313 13,107 121,316 654 4,837 74,742 222 465 987 35,232 20,929 1,159 3,235 4,702 624 299 135 1,553 330 35,822 331 458 841 21 8,532 2,081 1,771 84,535 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 16 of 32 333 92 333 215 332 222 34 213 189 272 333 333 154 333 152 264 319 271 270 333 331 150 271 206 198 134 186 333 143 226 109 45 333 312 334 52 311 193 333 338 160 156 301 102 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Protected (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock Platform Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Gravel Beach (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock With Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand And Gravel Beach (Embayment) Rock with Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Geographic Section 1,010 211 708 3,254 13,109 19,174 3,533 2,019 365 103,610 182 1,664 1,709 20,170 16,638 3,984 10,910 164,535 350 1,500 460 14,447 320 2,626 2,139 35,809 8,410 595,356 4,376 6,355 1,427 1,755 96,365 339 10,429 1,317 282 848 9,281 18,469 28,959 1,779 2,818 955 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 843 211 271 1,975 5,492 5,150 1,782 860 365 34,785 182 723 744 3,752 12,980 2,685 2,331 52,402 350 760 460 4,303 320 2,406 1,572 13,009 4,599 148,266 2,664 1,335 1,427 1,755 17,353 339 5,973 1,317 282 848 4,113 8,625 14,728 1,290 2,447 955 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 303 63 212 976 3,933 5,752 1,060 606 110 31,083 55 499 513 6,051 4,991 1,195 3,273 49,361 105 450 138 4,334 96 788 642 10,743 2,523 178,607 1,313 1,906 428 526 28,909 102 3,129 395 85 254 2,784 5,541 8,688 534 845 286 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 17 of 32 278 335 128 202 140 90 168 142 332 112 331 145 145 62 260 225 71 106 333 169 333 99 333 305 245 121 182 83 203 70 333 334 60 332 191 333 332 334 148 156 170 242 290 334 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Rock with Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock With Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Rock With Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rock with Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky intertidal habitat (Outer Coast) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Protected (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky Shore/Cliff Very Exposed (Embayment) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Protected (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Rocky/Cliff Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Embayment) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Geographic Section 128,005 143 4,191 1,249 1,246 2,628 57,404 572 11,066 385 45,250 39,563 897,371 2,791 792 90,823 3,500 285 924 526 2,695 16,573 25,672 10,417 786 227 25,323 45,578 967 317,997 20,674 47,362 3,532 20,025 230,329 156 97 390 56,914 23,664 672,756 50,690 29,659 377 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 46,457 143 1,555 1,249 303 1,992 36,996 572 4,407 134 25,359 10,947 325,593 2,049 792 53,204 3,500 285 924 441 889 10,058 25,672 3,339 786 227 14,479 19,430 967 104,520 8,276 23,027 1,849 2,983 70,287 156 97 84 24,381 12,086 194,077 19,640 11,363 377 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 38,401 43 1,257 375 374 788 17,221 172 3,320 116 13,575 11,869 269,211 837 238 27,247 1,050 85 277 158 808 4,972 7,702 3,125 236 68 7,597 13,673 290 95,399 6,202 14,208 1,060 6,008 69,099 47 29 117 17,074 7,099 201,827 15,207 8,898 113 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 18 of 32 121 333 124 333 81 253 215 333 133 116 187 92 121 245 333 195 333 335 334 279 110 202 333 107 333 334 191 142 333 110 133 162 174 50 102 332 334 72 143 170 96 129 128 334 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Sand and Gravel Beach (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Beach Very Protected (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Geographic Section 1,340 876 303 34,976 43,138 5,740 5,117 1,378 1,014 464 6,379 782 4,426 3,540 6,414 612 663 7,373 380 842 24,403 4,379 12,341 4,087 172,846 7,871 2,007 50,486 60,614 3,227 684 3,614 18,745 1,740 67,718 907 1,188 855 2,236 8,587 266 11,232 4,357 4,443 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 1,340 170 303 5,821 28,490 5,740 5,117 1,378 1,014 47 809 782 2,457 2,875 3,153 204 497 7,373 380 842 15,692 1,966 5,836 1,587 47,792 4,839 2,007 17,621 22,075 2,216 684 1,120 9,738 1,740 10,187 255 856 843 351 2,007 266 2,901 3,946 4,443 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 402 263 91 10,493 12,941 1,722 1,535 413 304 139 1,914 235 1,328 1,062 1,924 184 199 2,212 114 253 7,321 1,314 3,702 1,226 51,854 2,361 602 15,146 18,184 968 205 1,084 5,624 522 20,315 272 357 257 671 2,576 80 3,370 1,307 1,333 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 19 of 32 333 65 333 55 220 333 333 334 334 34 42 333 185 271 164 111 250 333 333 333 214 150 158 129 92 205 333 116 121 229 334 103 173 333 50 94 240 328 52 78 333 86 302 333 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand And Gravel Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand and Gravel Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Embayment) Sand Beach (Embayment) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Sand Beach (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Sand Beach Very Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat (Embayment) Sand Flat (Embayment) Sand Flat (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Exposed (Embayment) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary a VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section QC Sound Marine Section Geographic Section 373 3,629 43,467 6,708 17,099 21,307 160,628 2,875 516 9,997 2,857 51,997 60,008 9,242 2,347 4,765 1,631 19,194 12,658 7,179 6,627 9,955 70,537 2,699 1,722 19,540 7,158 688 1,980 36,240 17,946 7,437 204,790 63,301 3,129 5,020 793 2,590 7,851 1,519 155 1,852 10,849 4,240 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 373 1,910 13,587 5,580 6,454 10,840 35,427 2,643 516 2,936 1,889 12,455 45,451 9,242 1,716 4,765 1,631 11,404 5,977 4,915 2,441 4,145 21,433 1,210 1,097 19,337 4,296 562 1,697 9,913 16,165 7,330 69,676 28,308 3,129 5,020 793 2,049 1,954 1,519 155 1,852 9,009 1,075 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 112 1,089 13,040 2,013 5,130 6,392 48,188 862 155 2,999 857 15,599 18,002 2,773 704 1,430 489 5,758 3,797 2,154 1,988 2,987 21,161 810 516 5,862 2,147 207 594 10,872 5,384 2,231 61,437 18,990 939 1,506 238 777 2,355 456 47 556 3,255 1,272 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 20 of 32 333 175 104 277 126 170 74 307 333 98 220 80 252 333 244 333 334 198 157 228 123 139 101 149 213 330 200 271 286 91 300 329 113 149 333 333 333 264 83 333 330 333 277 85 % of Goal Captured a Olympic-Chehalis EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Lower Columbia EDU Vancouver Island EDU Puget Sound EDU Vancouver Island EDU Oregon Coast EDU Puget Sound EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Lower Columbia EDU Vancouver Island EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Oregon Coast EDU Puget Sound EDU Oregon Coast EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus keta pop 3 Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus keta pop 4 Oncorhynchus keta pop ? Oncorhynchus keta Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 1 Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 3 Oncorhynchus kisutch pop ? Oncorhynchus kisutch pop 2 Oncorhynchus kisutch Oncorhynchus clarki Oncorhynchus clarki Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Cape Arago North Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section QC Strait Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Johnstone Strait Marine Section JdF Strait Marine Section Cape Arago South Marine Section VI Shelf Marine Section Pt Grenville South Marine Section Pt Grenville North Marine Section Geographic Section Salvelinus confluentus Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals Bull Trout Salmon, Coastal and Puget Sound ESU Chinook Salmon, East Island Chinook Salmon, North Island Chinook Salmon, West Island Chum Salmon, Columbia River ESU Chum Salmon, East Island Chum Salmon, Hood Canal Summer Run ESU Chum Salmon, North Island Chum Salmon, Pacific Coast ESU Chum Salmon, Puget Sound/Strait ESU Chum Salmon, West Island Coho Salmon, East Island Coho Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Coho Salmon, North Island Coho Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Coho Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Coho Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Coho Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Coho Salmon, West Island Cutthroat Trout, East Island Cutthroat Trout, North Island Fishes Freshwater Species Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Protected (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Exposed (Outer Coast) Sand Flat Very Protected (Embayment) Sand Flat Very Protected (Embayment) Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 135,223 616,091 2,668 922,688 340,387 556,321 154,240 154,925 2,407,651 227,660 910,859 1,839,060 4,800,039 388,661 1,868,503 8,993,755 669,348 206,515 2,246,248 755,664 76,400 52,537 3,017 9,644 387 1,798 2,643 17,333 3,638 32,633 4,222 519 6,580 76,616 3,938 117 99,273 300 3,672 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Amount Known b c 112,402 285,202 1,280 486,070 227,043 130,412 11,441 75,489 1,081,245 12,537 394,040 670,781 1,679,528 224,423 610,462 4,474,992 78,744 98,123 1,044,817 259,760 38,564 15,224 3,017 7,128 387 1,798 854 16,565 3,638 17,141 1,486 519 5,439 29,240 3,211 117 18,944 300 3,672 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Captured in Porfolio 67,612 184,827 1,334 276,806 170,194 166,896 77,120 46,478 722,295 68,298 273,258 551,718 1,440,012 116,598 560,551 4,496,878 200,804 103,258 673,874 377,832 38,200 15,761 905 2,893 116 539 793 5,200 1,091 9,790 1,267 156 1,974 22,985 1,181 35 29,782 90 1,102 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 21 of 32 166 154 96 176 133 78 15 162 150 18 144 122 117 192 109 100 39 95 155 69 101 97 333 246 334 334 108 319 333 175 117 333 276 127 272 334 64 333 333 % of Goal Captured Puget Sound EDU Oregon Coast EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Puget Sound EDU Vancouver Island EDU Puget Sound EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Vancouver Island EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Vancouver Island EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Vancouver Island EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Vancouver Island EDU Oregon Coast EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Oregon Coast EDU Lower Columbia EDU Olympic-Chehalis EDU Oregon Coast EDU Puget Sound EDU Oregon Coast EDU Willamette EDU Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Novumbra hubbsi Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Prosopium coulteri Lampetra ayresi Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus nerka Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 30 Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop 31 Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Oncorhynchus mykiss pop ? Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals 3,276 m Oregon Coast EDU Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Vancouver Island EDU Lower Columbia EDU Oncorhynchus tshawytscha 7,016 m Vancouver Island EDU Salvelinus malma m m m m m m m m m occ m m m m occ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Salvelinus malma 765,803 307,136 8,228 205,121 532,228 4,434,793 199,910 253,207 3,143,558 22 283,434 155,119 121,488 380,317 1 3,567 289,655 6,107 86,701 34,400 84,075 733,650 1,042,175 136,255 486,454 1,471,118 243,359 792,583 2,030,659 465,722 448,021 1,138,997 8,291,070 434,722 3,391,702 648,582 669 m Vancouver Island EDU Salvelinus malma Amount Known Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Oncorhynchus clarki a Geographic Section Scientific Name First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone Freshwater Macrohabitats Cutthroat Trout, West Island Dolly Varden, East Island Dolly Varden, North Island Dolly Varden, West Island Fall Chinook Salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, S Oregon/N California ESU Fall Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Olympic Mudminnow Pink Salmon, East Island Pink Salmon, North Island Pink Salmon, Odd-year ESU Pink Salmon, West Island Pygmy Whitefish River Lamprey Sockeye Salmon, East Island Sockeye Salmon, Lake Pleasant ESU Sockeye Salmon, North Island Sockeye Salmon, Ozette Lake ESU Sockeye Salmon, Quinault Lake ESU Sockeye Salmon, West Island Spring Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Steelhead Salmon, North Island Summer Chinook Salmon, Washington Coast ESU Summer Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Summer Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, East Island Winter Run Steelhead Salmon, West Island Winter Steelhead Salmon, Klamath Mountains Province ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Lower Columbia ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Olympic Peninsula ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Oregon Coast ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Puget Sound ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Southwest Washington ESU Winter Steelhead Salmon, Upper Willamette River ESU Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary b c m m m m m m m m m occ m m m m occ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 1,673 m 6,359 m 669 m 391,194 188,525 8,046 151,920 227,561 2,306,336 38,182 68,948 1,216,815 12 47,940 96,464 41,582 182,790 1 3,567 154,229 6,107 85,977 30,339 84,075 420,053 584,405 111,623 209,787 587,937 102,017 296,807 1,025,829 219,216 104,039 420,987 4,086,186 77,279 1,389,619 105,974 Captured in Porfolio m m m m m m m m m occ m m m m occ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 1,638 m 3,508 m 334 m 382,902 153,568 4,114 102,560 266,114 1,330,438 99,955 75,962 943,067 11 85,030 46,536 36,446 114,095 7 1,070 86,896 6,107 26,010 34,400 84,075 220,095 312,652 40,876 145,936 441,335 73,008 237,775 609,198 139,717 224,010 341,699 2,487,321 130,417 1,017,511 194,575 Conservation Goal d % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % e Page 22 of 32 102 % 181 % 200 % 102 123 196 148 86 173 38 91 129 109 56 207 114 160 14 333 177 100 331 88 100 191 187 273 144 133 140 125 168 157 46 123 164 59 137 54 % of Goal Captured Scientific Name Pacific Northwest Coast Ecoregional Assessment - Summary of Conservation Targets and Goals First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Slate Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Ultramafic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Basaltic-Mafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of High Gradient In The Mountain Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Alpine Zone On Granitic-Silicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On BasalticMafic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On BasalticMafic-Extrusive-Volcanic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Carbonate-Limestone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Erodable Volcanics Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On GraniticSilicic Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Sandstone Geology First Order Stream Of Low Gradient In The Coastal Hemlock Zone On Siltstone Geology Level of Biological Organization Taxon Common Name Habitat Type Targets and Goals Summary 1,266,425 m 199,789 m 47,304 m 3,807,811 m 51,925 m 61,902 m 74,408 m 26,574 m 791 m 13,516 m 2,449 m 7,702 m 327,584 m 2,037 m 408 m 861 m 10,092 m 263,995 m 44,039 m 18,930 m 1,182,304 m 5,591 m 31,772 m Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Vancouver Island EDU Amount Known 25,527 m a Vancouver Island EDU Geographic Section b c 16,403 m 3,539 m 543,250 m 12,430 m 23,245 m 69,530 m 6,241 m 861 m 408 m 2,037 m 232,217 m 7,702 m 2,131 m 8,908 m 791 m 20,929 m 34,705 m 34,529 m 31,210 m 1,739,935 m 36,588 m 112,956 m 372,577 m 25,527 m Captured in Porfolio 6,354 m 2,796 m 118,230 m 3,786 m 8,808 m 52,799 m 2,018 m 430 m 204 m 1,018 m 65,517 m 3,851 m 1,224 m 2,703 m 396 m 5,315 m 14,882 m 12,380 m 10,385 m 380,781 m 9,461 m 39,958 m 126,642 m 5,105 m Conservation Goal d e Page 23 of 32 258 % 127 % 459 % 328 % 264 % 132 % 309 % 200 % 200 % 200 % 354 % 200 % 174 % 330 % 200 % 394 % 233 % 279 % 301 % 457 % 387 % 283 % 294 % 500 % % of Goal Capt
