Marc Buchner
The IPPR started six years ago as a very worthwhile, if slightly ad‐hoc, student‐ lead journal. While it has certainly seen year on year development and growth, this year it has been transformed into a genuinely important and unique forum for the discussion and analysis of international public policy. It has been a great privilege to steer the International Public Policy Review, and to help it undergo such a transition. I have had the fortune to work with an outstanding team, and have received support from a very dedicated and generous faculty. As well as introducing our new issue, I’d like to take this opportunity to highlight some of these changes.
Firstly, our new website is now online and offers a modern and coherent way to access the journal. It will also offer an opportunity to keep abreast of various contemporary debates in the field in different ways – we will shortly be adding various new features which will serve to make it a thought provoking and interactive home for the IPPR, and we welcome your contributions and
comments.
Secondly, the inaugural IPPR Forum, ‘The MDGs: A Mission Impossible?’ saw a fascinating debate with contributions from influential academics and practitioners alike. We were delighted to co‐host the event with the Overseas
Development Institute, and to hear impressions from our keynote speakers –
Justin Byworth, David Stuckler, Caroline Hurford and Rebecca Holmes, as well as the various esteemed members of our floor who posed some searching questions. If you missed the forum, it can be found online here http://www.odi.org.uk/events/details.asp?id=2395&title=millennium‐ development‐goals‐mission‐impossible#audio‐video – and is essential viewing before our next issue to be released in January 2011, in which you’ll be able to
see commentaries from those same speakers, six months on.
Thirdly, the journal itself – the IPPR seeks to place itself firmly where theory meets policy, and to provide a forum for applied and practicable theories to be both established, and tested. International public policy is by its very nature interdisciplinary, and the IPPR embraces this. Though we do not necessarily require each article to draw on several fields, we approach issues uniquely, encouraging diversity of perspective and soliciting contributions from sister disciplines and related practitioners. Our articles of new research in this issue show an intriguing range and a global reach. Each one loosely considers the idea of world order, or issues closely relating to it, but from very different angles,
again emphasising our perspectival, thematic and methodological plurality.
Perhaps the most representative change in the IPPR this year is the calibre of the contributions. The commentary section is an opportunity for distinguished scholars to freely apply their expertise to new areas, to discuss nascent ideas in their research, or to define long‐term beliefs that may not have previously been put to paper. This issue sees Lord Hannay draw on his sophisticated experience at the operational end of international relations and initially consider ‘An
Alternative to New World Disorder’. It is compelling to see this piece tackled in very different ways ‐ the hard economist Paul Ormerod places his considered, technical stance alongside the qualitative, sociological approach of the great communitarian Amitai Etzioni. Andrew Hurrell similarly assesses the international political system, but with classic IR sensibilities, and considers the current position of global liberalism. We are delighted to have been able to facilitate the interaction of such influential and potent scholars of global issues, and we hope you find this issue articulate, powerful and challenging.
Finally, I’d like to introduce and welcome our new steering committee chaired by
Dr. David Hudson (to see the complete list follow the ‘About Us’ links on our website). They are a fitting representation of the breadth of our field, and our approach and we are thrilled that so many brilliant minds have shown so much faith in our production. We are very grateful to be benefitting from their support
and the hugely diverse experience they bring.
All that’s left is to say thank you to each member of the team who worked so hard this year to make the IPPR the fantastic project it undoubtedly is. I would also like to thank everyone who contributed their time, energy and advice, and to the partners of the IPPR who have contributed their resources and experience.
On behalf of all of us, we hope that, as well as engaging with the current issue, we will see you at the next forum, and find you contributing to the online life of the project. It is the collaboration of many that we hope will continue to keep us asking the right questions, and creating original, important and insightful dialogues that would find no home elsewhere. We welcome your future contributions and readership.