2.094 F E A

advertisement
2.094
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SOLIDS AND FLUIDS
SPRING 2008
Homework 1 - Solution
Instructor:
Assigned:
Due:
Prof. K. J. Bathe
02/07/2008
02/14/2008
Problem 1 (10 points):
In this problem, the principle of virtual work reduces to
𝒕
𝒕
𝒕𝑽
x2
π‰πŸπŸ π’•π’†πŸπŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑽 =
𝒕𝑺
π’–πŸ
(a)
π’‡π’™πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇
𝒇
x2
x1
𝑺𝒇 𝒕
x2
x1
(b)
x1
(c)
configuration at time “t”
virtual displacement
Figure 1. Three simple independent virtual displacement patterns.
(a) a simple tension in the x 1 direction; (b) a simple tension in the x2 direction; (c) a simple shear
Page 1 of 5
𝒕
(a) A simple extension in π’™πŸ direction; π’–πŸ =
π’™πŸ − 𝟏 and π’–πŸ = 𝟎
π’•π’†πŸπŸ
𝒕
𝑺
π’–πŸ 𝒇
=𝟎
=𝟎
Therefore,
𝒕
π‰πŸπŸ π’•π’†πŸπŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑽 = 𝟎
𝒕𝑽
𝒕
𝒕𝑺
π’–πŸ
𝑺𝒇 𝒕
π’‡π’™πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇 = 𝟎
𝒇
Check!
𝒕
(b) A simple extension in π’™πŸ direction; π’–πŸ = 𝟎 and π’–πŸ =
𝒕
π’–πŸ
𝑺𝒇
π’•π’†πŸπŸ
π’™πŸ + 𝟏
=𝟏
𝒕
= πŸ’ (on the top surface) and π’–πŸ
𝑺𝒇
= 𝟎 (on the bottom surface)
Therefore,
𝒕
𝒕𝑽
𝒕
𝒕𝑺
π’–πŸ
π‰πŸπŸ π’•π’†πŸπŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑽 =
𝟐𝟎 × πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑽 = 𝟐𝟎 ×
𝒕𝑽
𝑺𝒇 𝒕
π’‡π’™πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇 =
𝒕𝑺
𝒇
πŸ’ × πŸπŸŽ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇 = πŸ–πŸŽ ×
𝒕
𝑽 = πŸ–πŸŽ
𝒕
𝑺𝒇 = πŸ–πŸŽ
𝒇
Check!
(c) A simple shear; π’–πŸ = 𝟎 and π’–πŸ = 𝟏 − π’•π’™πŸ
𝒕
π’–πŸ
π’•π’†πŸπŸ
𝑺𝒇
=𝟎
= 𝟏 − π’•π’™πŸ
Therefore,
𝒕
𝒕𝑽
𝒕
𝒕𝑺
π’–πŸ
𝒇
𝑺𝒇 𝒕
π’‡π’™πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇 =
𝒕𝑺
π‰πŸπŸ π’•π’†πŸπŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑽 = 𝟎
𝟐𝟎 × πŸ − π’•π’™πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇 +
π’‡πŸ
𝟏
𝟏
= 𝟐𝟎
𝟎
𝟏 − π’•π’™πŸ 𝒅 π’•π’™πŸ − 𝟐𝟎
(on the top surface)
Check!
Page 2 of 5
𝟏
𝟎
𝒕𝑺
−𝟐𝟎 × πŸ − π’•π’™πŸ 𝒅 𝒕𝑺𝒇
π’‡πŸ
𝟏 − π’•π’™πŸ 𝒅 π’•π’™πŸ = 𝟎
(on the bottom surface)
𝟐
Problem 2 (20 points):
A
B
C
D
Figure 2. Plate with a hole in tension
In this solution, the horizontal symmetry line corresponds to the line CD and the vertical symmetry line
corresponds to the line AB. The distance of the horizontal line is measured from the point C and the distance of
the vertical line is measured from the point A. (See Figure 2.)
The stresses are shown through Figures 3 and 6. We can see that the solutions obtained with 9-node elements
are better than those obtained with 4-node elements. One possible way, in general, to check calculated
solutions is to see whether the stress boundary conditions are satisfied. Here, we know that we should have
𝝉𝒛𝒛 𝑨 = πŸπŸ“ due to the applied traction and 𝝉𝒛𝒛 𝑩 = π‰π’šπ’š = π‰π’šπ’š = 𝟎 because no tractions are applied at the
π‘ͺ
𝑫
points B,C, and D. The solutions obtained with 9-node elements are closer to these exact values than those
obtained with 4-node elements. In this problem we also have the analytical solutions for the 𝝉𝒛𝒛 at point C and D,
see reference 1. The solutions are compared in Figure 7.
[1] Timoshenko, S.P. and Goodier, J.N., Theory of Elasticity, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1970, pp. 94-95.
C
D
Figure 3. Stresses on the horizontal symmetry line solved using 4-node elements
Page 3 of 5
C
D
Figure 4. Stresses on the horizontal symmetry line solved using 9-node elements
A
B
Figure 5. Stresses on the vertical symmetry line solved using 4-node elements
A
B
Figure 6. Stresses on the vertical symmetry line solved using 9-node elements
Page 4 of 5
110
STRESS-ZZ along the horizontal symmetry line
4.3 P
4-node elements
9-node elements
Analytical solution
100
90
80

70
zz 60
50
40
30
20
10
-1
0.75 P
0
1
2
3
DISTANCE
4
Figure 7. 𝜏𝐳𝐳 on the horizontal symmetry line
Page 5 of 5
5
6
MIT OpenCourseWare
http://ocw.mit.edu
2.094 Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Fluids II
Spring 2011
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
Download