Insurance Coverage MAY 2003 Vote to be Held on Proposed Scheme of Arrangement for United Standard Insurance Company INTRODUCTION In April 2003, the Joint Provisional Liquidators (“Liquidators”) for United Standard Insurance Company (“United Standard” or the “Company”)— an insolvent London insurer—sent notice of a proposed Scheme of Arrangement (the “Scheme”) to all of United Standard’s known Creditors, including policyholders. The Liquidators have scheduled a meeting of United Standard’s Creditors on May 27, 2003, in the United Kingdom, at which time the Creditors will consider and vote on the proposed Scheme. Creditors who do not plan on attending the meeting may vote on the proposed Scheme by submitting Proxies and Voting Forms. The Liquidators have requested that Creditors submit Proxies and Voting Forms by 4:00 p.m. (U.K. Time) on May 21, 2003. The Liquidators have proposed a “staged payment” Scheme for United Standard. As discussed below, under this approach, the Scheme Administrators will establish at least two Claims Opportunity Deadlines. Policyholders must decide when to file their claims, based on the nature and relative maturity of their claims. The particular circumstances of a policyholder’s claims (or potential claims) will influence whether it is in the policyholder’s interest to vote to approve the Scheme. The advantage of the proposed Scheme is that it allows policyholders with fixed claims to file and receive a payment (based on the payment percentage established by the Scheme Administrators) early in the Scheme, but allows policyholders with contingent or IBNR claims to wait to file until their claims mature. BACKGROUND ON UNITED STANDARD’S OPERATIONS United Standard originally issued casualty insurance and reinsurance in the United States from the 1940s until 1966, with some policies expiring as late as 1970. In 1964, the Company began issuing motor, property and casualty insurance in the United Kingdom. The Company continued to issue property insurance in the London market until 1976, and motor, property and casualty insurance in the United Kingdom until 1987. After the Company ceased issuing certain types of insurance, it began to run-off claims on those types of policies using existing reserves. In the 1980s and 1990s, however, a large number of new claims on liability insurance and reinsurance issued in the London Market—mostly asbestos and pollution claims made in the United States—led to the Company’s insolvency in 1996. At that time, the Company ceased paying claims. THE CREDITORS’ MEETING AND APPROVAL OF THE SCHEME During the meeting scheduled for May 27, the Creditors will consider and vote on the proposed Scheme between United Standard and its Creditors. Pursuant to a March 27, 2003 Order, the Liquidators sent the following information to known Creditors of United Standard: a summary of the main features of the Scheme; the Notice of the Creditors’ Meeting; the March 27, 2003 Order setting the Creditors’ Meeting; the Proxy Form for voting at the Creditors’ Meeting; and the Scheme Claim Form Pack. The Company’s website— www.unitedstandard.co.uk—contains downloadable versions of these documents, as well Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP as additional information and documentation relating to the Scheme and the submission of claims (including the Scheme document and guidance notes). Creditors who do not attend the May 27 meeting may also vote on the proposed Scheme. The Liquidators have requested that Creditors submit Proxies and Voting Forms by 4:00 p.m. (U.K. Time) on May 21, 2003. It is not clear whether submissions will be accepted after that time. Faxed copies of the forms are acceptable. VOTING CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO THE MECHANICS OF THE PROPOSED SCHEME As stated above, the particular circumstances of a policyholder’s claims (or potential claims) will influence whether the policyholder should vote to approve the proposed “staged payment” Scheme. Under the proposed Scheme, the Scheme Administrators will establish at least two (and potentially more) Claims Opportunity Deadlines. Creditors must decide whether to submit their claims prior to the first Claims Opportunity Deadline or to wait for future deadlines. The first Claims Opportunity Deadline will be 91 days after the Scheme becomes effective. The Scheme Administrators will notify Creditors of subsequent deadlines during the course of the Scheme. After the Scheme Administrators have reviewed and approved all of the claims submitted for a particular Claims Opportunity, they will make a payment to those Creditors whose agreed claims were submitted pursuant to that deadline. The Scheme Administrators will pay to each such Creditor a certain percentage of their claim. If no agreement can be reached between a Creditor and the Scheme Administrators on a particular claim, the Scheme Administrators will refer the claim to the Scheme Adjudicator for independent adjudication. The Scheme Administrators will retain funds during the course of the Scheme to ensure that all Creditors receive an equal distribution of the Company’s assets and to provide for the costs of administering the Scheme. Prior to closing the Scheme, the Scheme Administrators will invite Creditors who have not already submitted their claims to do so prior to the Final Claims Opportunity Deadline. If the Scheme Administrators determine that sufficient funds will exist after paying out claims, they will declare a Retention Distribution to be paid pro rata to all Creditors who have received, or are to receive, a distribution under the Scheme. Creditors may only submit their claims once, and they must submit their own estimate of IBNR claims. The proposed “staged payment” Scheme is intended to incorporate the caution of a “reserving” scheme and the early payment of funds inherent in an “estimation” scheme. Like an “estimation” scheme, a policyholder that files a claim during the first Claims Opportunity may receive a significant Scheme payment relatively early in the life of the Scheme. Like a “reserving” scheme, however, policyholders who file claims during the first Claims Opportunity will nevertheless have to wait several years to receive a final Retention Distribution (if any) from United Standard. Because the Scheme Administrators must reserve funds to pay Creditors who wait to file claims until later Claims Opportunities, they likely will set a conservative payment percentage after the first Claims Opportunity. Creditors, moreover, should be aware that it might be disadvantageous to file a claim during the first Claims Opportunity, particularly if all claims (fixed and contingent or IBNR) must be submitted at the same time. The Scheme documentation does not state whether Creditors with both fixed claims and contingent or IBNR claims will be able to file different types of claims separately under the Scheme. If the Scheme does require policyholders to submit all of their claims at one time, Creditors with immature contingent or IBNR claims may benefit from waiting to file all claims during a subsequent Claims Opportunity, in order to allow more time for such contingent or IBNR claims to mature. CONCLUSION In sum, known Creditors should carefully review the available information to decide whether to exercise their right to vote on the proposed Scheme. To ensure that the Proxy and Voting Forms are accepted, they should be submitted by May 21, 2003. If the Scheme is approved, policyholders in general should determine whether they have claims against United Standard and, if so, consider the circumstances of their particular claims and whether it is in their Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP 2 interest to file a claim during the first Claims Opportunity. For various business reasons, or to avoid conflicts with reporting requirements, a policyholder may not be in a position to estimate its future contingent liabilities or share its internal projections for such liabilities and, thus, may choose to wait to file its claims until the second Claims Opportunity. GREGORY S. WRIGHT* 202.778.9250 gwright@kl.com JON M. TALOTTA* 202.778.9439 jtalotta@kl.com * Gregory S. Wright is a partner and Jon M. Talotta is an associate in the Washington, DC office of the law firm of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP. They regularly counsel policyholders with respect to a wide variety of insurance coverage claims, including claims against insolvent London market insurers. The views expressed in this piece are not necessarily those of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP or of its clients. The Insurance Coverage practice group at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP is one of the nation’s largest policyholder-oriented practices. Its attorneys have authored Policyholder’s Guide to the Law of Insurance Coverage and edited the Journal of Insurance Coverage. For additional information concerning this topic or Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP’s insurance coverage practice, please consult the Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP office contacts listed below: National Peter J. Kalis 412.355.6562 pkalis@kl.com Boston John M. Edwards 617.261.3123 jedwards@kl.com Dallas Robert Everett Wolin 214.939.4909 rwolin@kl.com Harrisburg Carleton O. Strouss 717.231.4503 cstrouss@kl.com Los Angeles David P. Schack 310.552.5061 dschack@kl.com Miami Daniel A. Casey 305.539.3324 dcasey@kl.com Newark Anthony La Rocco 973.848.4014 alarocco@kl.com NewYork Peter J. Kalis 212.536.4828 pkalis@kl.com Pittsburgh Thomas Reiter 412.355.8274 treiter@kl.com San Francisco Edward Sangster 415.249.1028 esangster@kl.com Washington Matthew L. Jacobs Gregory S. Wright 202.778.9393 202.778.9250 mjacobs@kl.com gwright@kl.com ® Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP Challenge us. ® www.kl.com BOSTON DALLAS HARRISBURG LOS ANGELES MIAMI NEWARK NEW YORK PITTSBURGH SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON ......................................................................................................................................................... This publication/newsletter is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer. © 2003 KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.