.
e
Fish & Wildlife
o
1980
SHRIMP
FISHERY
I98OOREGON
OREGON
SHRIMP
FISHERY
o
byy
b
O
L.
Mark
M o r kSaelens
Soelens
Betsy
BetsyHunt
Hunt
Jim
J i mGolden
Golden
INFORMATIOI,IAL
INFORMATIONAL
REPORT 8l-l
81-I
REPORT
a
o
o
a
L
Oregon
6t W
Wildlife
O r e g o nDDepartment
e p o r t m e n toof
ish &
ildlife
f FFish
o
I
A P RI L 1981
APRIL
198I
a
1
1980
OREGON
SHRIMP FISHERY
1980
OREGON
SHRII4P
FISHERY
OREGON
OREGON
0I
r d o i ) landings
e a n d a l u sj o
p ' i n kshrimp
i n 1980
million
jordani)
t o t a l l e d 30.2
3 0 . 2million
Oregon
O r e g o npink
s h r i m p ((Panclalus
l a n d i n g sin
1 9 8 0totalled
( 1 3 , 4 2 0mt)
p o u n d s(13,420
p
o u n d s(13,677
( 1 3 , 6 7 7m
landed
m t ) landed
pounds
mt),
only
2%%more
2 9 . 6 million
n p r e than
t h a n the
m i l l ' i o n pounds
t), o
nly 2
t h e 29.6
( B r u n e a u1979),
, 9 7 9 ) ,b
p l a c e the
in
but
enough
onn
i n 1979
ut e
t h i r d highest
h ' i g h e s to
L 9 7 9(Bruneau,
n o u g hto
1 9 8 0total
t o t a l as
a s third
1
t o place
t h e 1980
(F i g u re1).
pr oductionover
1979
incr easein
in production
Astoria
r e c o r d (Figure
and Coos
Bayhad
ov er 1979
record
1 ). A
sto ri a and
CoosBay
had an
an increase
( t a O t e1).
p o u n d srespectively
ncluded
w i t h landings
l a n d i n g sof
1 ) . IIncluded
with
o f 9.2
9 . 2 and
1 0 . 5 million
m i l l i o n pounds
r e s p e c t i v e l y(Table
a n d10.5
(
9
a
p o u n d s(94 mt)
Alaska
i n Oregon's
o f f Alaska
0 r e g o n ' slandings
0 8 thousand
s h r i m pcaught
in
were
208
m t ) of
o f shrimp
l a n d i n g sw
e r e2
t h o u s a n dpounds
c a u g h toff
( 3 , 7 5 1mt)
((primarily
p r i m a r i l y Pandalus
p o u n d s(3,751
Washington
million
m t ) caught
P a n d a l u sbborealis),
o r e a l i s ) , 88.3
.3 m
i l l i o n pounds
c a u g h off
to f f Washington
(3 8 5mt)
p o u n d s(385
and
a n d 849
8 4 9 thousand
water s.
th o u sa n dpounds
mt) taken
takenfrom
fr omCalifornia
Califor nia waters.
Table
T a b l e1.
1.
p o r t s 1977-80
1 9 7 7 - 8 in
0i n
Annual
l a n d i n g sat
a t Oregon
0 r e g o nports
A n n u a shrimp
ls h r i m plandings
o u n d'I.
sr/.
tthousands
h o u s a n d of
so f p
pounds
Port
Port
Astoria
Astori a
Garibaldi
Garibaldi
Newport
Newpo
rt
Winchester
W i n c h e s t eBay
B
r ay
Coos
Bay
C oo sBay
Po rt Orford
Port
Orfo rd
1980
1980
1978
I97B
1979
L979
11,6972/
rr,6972
/
7,414
7,4L4
7,647
7,647
9,225/
9,225,
5,7392/
5
3,166
3 ,1 6 6
r1,473
,473
1,116
1,116
20,5952/
20,5952
/
7,124
7
,L24
6,311
6,311
821
82r
690
690
1977
L977
,7392/
15,361
15
,361
1,9212/
L
, 9 2 P/
1,084
1,084
9,131
9
,131
12,056
12,056
17,4762/
L7,4767
1,011
1, 0 1 1
529
529
22
22
-
42
42
Gold
G old Beach
B e a ch
-
Brookings
B
rook'ings
795
795
Total
T o ta l
'I
48,580
48,5Bo
6,7242/
6 ,7242/
3,327
3,327
56,9972/
5 6 , 9 9 7 2/
29,587
29,597
10,466
10,466
64
64
2,28O/
2,29 0\
30,152
3
0, 1 5 2
I/
port, n
o u n d a glanded
ot
a c hport,
lea n d e dat
at e
Figures
only
poundage
each
not
h r i m pp
n l y tthe
h e sshrimp
F
i g u r e srrepresent
e p r e s e n to
ports).
(
S
o
m
e
was
o t h e r ports).
p r o c e s s e d . '(Some w
p o u n d a gthat
t r a n s s h i p p e to
dt o other
a stransshipped
the
w a sprocessed.
t h i poundage
teh a t was
2/
T
3/
T
Record
annual
n n u a llanding
1a n d ing
R
e co rda
4/
18
o u n d scaught
S t a t e Area
A r e a18
Includes
67.6
pounds
off State
s o u t ho
I n c l u d e s6
7 . 6 tthousand
c a u g h tsouth
h o u s a n dp
'7
/
'I
SI
o u n d sccaught
laska
s o u t h - e a s tA
f f south-east
Includes
pounds
off
Alaska
a u g h to
I n c l u d e s207.9
2 0 7 . gtthousand
h o u s a n dp
' in Oregon
82
incr €as eof
of 82
in 1979,
an increase
A
L979,an
Or egonin
landedshrimp
shr impin
A total
o f 284
2 8 4 vessels
ve sse l s landed
to ta l of
0
regon
5
7
This
increase
was
comprised
of
57
additional
Oregon
o
f
a
d
d
'
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
w
a
s
c
o
m
p
r
i
s
e
d
T
h
i
s
vessels
over
the
1979
total.
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
1
9
7
9
t
o
t
a
l
.
vessels
(
f
i
g
u
r
e
2
).
2
,
T
a
b
e
'
l
v
e
s
s
e
l
s
vessels,
12
Washington
vessels,
and
12
California
vessels
(Figure
2,
Table
2).
a
n
d
1
2
C
a
l
'
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
l
.
J
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
v
n
e
s
s
e
l
s
,
vessels,12
SI
SI
-2-2-
0
60
55
55
50
50
45
45
.
U'
U)
o
0
z,
z
3
o
o..
40
40
35
35
L
o
0
(r,
30
30
C',
z
0
I
i
J-J
255
?
?o
20
t5
'5
tI0o
5
5
|958
1958
1960
1960
tg6z
1962
1970
1968 1970
t966 1968
1966
1964
1964
1972
AR
YE
YEAR
l.
FIGURE I.
FIGURE
londings'
ehrimp
Annual
Oregon
shrimp
landings.
Oregon
Annuol
1974
t976
1976
1980
1978 1980
1978
-3-3-
.1
250
200
S I N G L ER I GV E S S E L S
DOUBLE
RIGVESSELS
SI
@
-J
w
d'u
U)
v,
U)
U'
lrf
w
>
SI
l.L
o
E
w too
H 'o
3
SI
z
z.
50
Si
SI
1958
1958
r962 1964
1960
r960 1962
t9#
1966
r 9 6 6 1968
t972
1968 1970
1970 1972
1974
t974
1978
1978 1980
'980
1976
1976
YEAR
Y
EAR
FIGURE2.
FIGURE
?,
A n n u o lnumber
n u mberof
Annual
vessels.
of shrimp
shrimp
vessels.
SI
SI
o
-4-4-
2.
Table
TabIe 2.
NUMBER
VESSELS
oF VESSELS
DELIVERING
SHRIMP
NUMBER OF
DELIVERING
SHRIMP
BY
BY PORT,
PoRT,1979-80.
1979-80.
o
HOME PORT
PORT
HOME
1 9 7 9 1980
1980
1979
PORT
PORT
o
o
a
o
45
29
29
39
39
10
10
Garibaldi
Garibaldi
18
18
1
199
2
2
4
Newport
Newport
37
5
599
14
9
9
8
8
7
7
6
6
13
13
Ll
4
C
o o s Bay
Bay
Coos
5
544
59
69
2E
28
36
36
22
22
Bandon
Bandon
-
-
-
Port
Orford
Port Orford
-
Brookings
2
20A
W
i n c h e s t e r Bay
Ba;Winchester
22
22
-
165
165
722
222
out -of- st ate
Out-of-state
Cali fornia
California
Washington
Washington
53
33
5
5
45
45
t17
7
203
203
284
284
I/
a
1
T
c t a l Oregon
Total
Oregon
t
o
1
979 1
9
1979
1980
28
28
T
o t a l Vessels
Vessels
Total
d e i i v e r i - n g to
delivering
to
Oregon ports
ports
Oregon
a
OUT-OF-STATE
OUT-OF-STATE
Astoria
Astoria
G
oId Beach
GoldBeach
I
oREGoN
TRANSIENT!'
rmxsrrNrV
OREGON
1979
1979
1980
1A
t+
8
8
67
67
92
92
1
1
-
21
21
23
23
55
6
6
5
566
74
74
2
2
18
18
22
22
,
28
28
1
0 4 133
133
104
-- 1
3
3
3
3
13
13
13
13
2
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
I
1980
1979
1979
-
4
4
-
15
15
19
19
-
J1
3
48
48
22
o r e g o n vessels
v e s s e l s which
w h i c h delivered
d e l i v e r e d to
p o r t s other
t o ports
o t h e r than
Oregon
t h a n their
t h e i r home
h o m e ports.
ports.
Note:
Note:
O r e g o n double-rig
d o u b l e - r i g count
f o r 1980.
1980.
c o u n t is
Oregon
i s 143
1 4 J for
1
7
5
544
-5-5-
,,
.
(4 7 %)of
C o o sBa
a cco mmo d a te
1 3d3(47%)
of the
the total
total fleet,
f l e e t , and
Coos
Bayy accommodated
133
a n dalso
a l s o had
h a dthe
t h e largest
largest
iincrease
n c r e a s ein
( 2 9 vessels).
i n fleet
s ' i z e(29
f l e e t size
vessels). A
g r e a t e s tincrease
s t o r i a experienced
e x p e r i e n c ethe
d
increase
t h e greatest
Astoria
iin
n h
p o r t fleet
( 1 7 vessels).
o m eport
f l e e t (17
home
vessels).
T h e number
p ro ce sso rsin
n u mb e o
r f processors
in 1980
of
1980decreased
decr easedby
by one
for aa total
one for
total of
of 25.
25 . As
As
' i n 1 9The
7
9
eeler m
th e re w
e re 87
87 p
in 1979 there
were
peeler
machines;
however, ,Aitor
Astoria
achines;however
ia showed
showedaa decr
eas eof
of two
tw o
decrease
m a c h i n ew
s h i l e Newport
N e w p o rincreased
itn c r e a s e dby
b y two
t w omachines.
machines
while
m a c h i n e s . The
T h enumber
n u m b eof
or f buying
b u y i n gstations2!
stat'ion*J
c o n t i n u edto
to decrease
d e cre a sefrom
fro m 12
1 2 in
in 1979
1979to
continued
to only
only 99 in
in 1980.
1980.
ri ce for
T
h e eex-vessel
x-ve sse l p
fo r shr
impwas
The
price
shrimp
was 52
52 cents
per pound
pound fr
from
April
through
May,
cents per
i' l thr
om Apr
oughM
ay ,
w
i t h some
p r o c e s s o r paying
sp a y i n gfrom
s o n eprocessors
f r o m30
3 0to
4 8 cents
g r a d eshrimp.
' s h r i m p .In
t o 48
f o r smaller
s m a l l e rgrade
with
c e n t sfor
in
p r i ce ranged
J u n eprice
ra n g e dupwards
u p w a rd to
sto 58
58 cents
por t to
por t. By
centsfrom
fr omport
pr oc es s or s
June
to port.
By August
all processors
August all
u y ersw
p a yi n g greater
a
n d bbuyers
e re paying
g re a ter than
than 57
and
were
57 cents.
Septem ber
cents. September
0ctober15
found
thr ougi October
15found
through
tthe
he a
v e r a g eeex-vessel
p r i c e stabilized
x - v e s s e lprice
s t a b i l i z e d at
p a i d aa seasonal
average
a t 60
6 0 cents.
cents. S
k i p p e r swere
w e r epaid
seasonal
Skippers
a v e r a g eof
p e r pound,
p o u n d,up
of 55
5 5 cents
ce n ts per
up from
fr oman
an average
average
aver aqeof
of 33
in 1979.
33cents
lg7g.
centsin
cOA.sT
PACIFIC COAST
ucrFJ-c
P a c i f i c coast
p ' i n kshrimp
c o a s t landings
l a n d i n g sof
o f pink
p o u n d(45,900
s( 4 5 , 9 0 0
s h r i m pexceeded
e x c e e d e101
d
i 0 1 million
n r i l l i o npounds
Pacific
mt)
mt)
i n 1980
1 9 8 0w
h i c hw
a sonly
g r e a t e r than
? %greater
( 4 4 , 9 6 2mt)
o n l y 2%
p o u n d s(44,962
t h a n the
m i l l i o n pounds
in
which
was
t h e 99
9 9 million
m t ) landed
landed
(Tab1e
iin
n 1979
1 9 7 9(Table
3).
A t 30.2
p o u n d (13,677
s( n , A l l mt)
3 ) . At
3 0 . 2 million
m tl l j o n pounds
m t ) Oregon
' 0 r e g o 1980
n ' 1 9 8landings
were
l0a n d i n g swere
e
x c e e d e only
od n l y by
b y Alaska
A l a s k awhere
w h e r eshrimpers
s h r i m p e r sdelivered
p o u n d s t(24,000
lQ a , 0 0 0mt).
d e l i v e r e d52.9
5 2 . 9million
exceeded
m i l i i o n pounds']
m t ).
A
l a s k a ' s seasonal
s e a s o n a ttotal
lotal e
x c e e d e the
tdh e combined
Alaska's
exceeded
c o m b i n e dtotals
t o t a l s of
o f all
o t h e r west
w e i t coast
a l l other
coast
St a t e s and
a n dProvinces.
P ro vi n ce s.
States
W
a sh i n g to reported
( 5,715 mt)
n e p o rte d12.6
pounds(5,715
1 2 .6 m'
illion pounds
mt) or
or 4%
mor ethan
4%more
than the
L979
Washington
million
the 1979
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
i
a
n
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
1
9
8
0
w
e
r
e
t h e second
s e c o n dhighest
h i g h e s t on
o n record
r e c o r dfor
Washington landings in 1980 were the
f o r the
the
( T a b l e3).
S t a t e (Table
3 ) . Washington
W a s h i n g t oclosed
State
cnl o s e dits
i t s shrimp
s h r i m pseason
s e a s o nfrom
i r o m Pt.
G r e n v i l l e north
P t . Grenville
north
o
n
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
5
t
h
p e r c e n t a gof
e
d
u
e
t
o
h
i g h percentage
t h e high
on November 15th due to the
o f small
s m a l lshrimp
s h r i m pin
i n landings.
l a n d i n g s . This
This
c l o s u r eremained
r e m a i n e in
d
i n effect
e f f e c t until
closure
u n t i l March
M a r c h31,
3 1 , 1981.
1981.
total..
total.
C a li f o r n i a ' s shrimp
s h r im plandings
swere
( t,gg0 m
l a n d ' i n gw
p o u n d s(1,996
e r e4
. 4 million
m i lI i o n pounds
California's
4.4
mt),
t ), down
d o w n11%
II%
(T a b l e3).
f r o m 1979
1 9 7 9(Table
from
3 ). T
h e se
a s onran
r an from
fr om April
Apr il 16
16 to
The
season
11 with
lo November
Novem ber
with in-season
in-s eas on
( C a l i f o r n i a sstatistical
c l o s u r e sooff
ff E
u r e k a(California
t a t r ' s t i c a l ' area
a r e aA
rom
f r o m June
uly 1 a
closures
Eureka
A)) from
and
J u n e11 to
t o JJuly
n d ffrom
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
5
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
August 25 through the
t h e end
e n dof
o f the
s e a s o n . California's
t h e season.
C a l i f o r n i a ' s closure
net
c r i t e r i a were
w e r emet
c l o s u r ecriteria
p e r unit
w h e ncatch
c a t ch per
e ffo rt fell
per hour
u n i t effort
fe l l below
below350
poundsper
per c entage
when
350pounds
hour and
whenthe
andwhen
the percentage
y
e
a
r
o
n
e
o
f
o 1 dshrimp
s h r i m pexceeded
( a r e aC)
of one year old
e x c e e d e70%.
d 0 % . 0ff
7
O f f southern
s o u t h e r nCalifornia
season
C a l i f o r n j a (area
t h e season
C ) the
r e m a i n e dopen
o p e nuntil
['l o ve mb19th.
e19th.
r
remained
u n ti I November
W
a s h i n g t o nOregon
, 0 r e g oand
ann d California
C a l i f o r n i a combined
c o m b i n eaverage
ad v e r a g eCPUE
C P U dropped
E
Washington,
d r o p p e dto
t o aa record
record
o u n d sper
. p eh
r o u r (single-rig
iow o
( s i n g l e - r i g eequivalents)
02p
low
off 2
202
pounds
hour
while
effort
q u i v a ' l e n t sw
) h ' i l efishing
fishing e
f f o r t reached
reached
( F i g u r e s33 and
a l l time
a n all
t i n n high
h i g h (Figures
an
a n d4).
4 ) . Combined
C o m b i n ecatch
f o r the
cda t c hfor
s t a t e s has
t h e three
has
t h r e e states
s t e a d yfor
h e l d steady
( F i g u r e5).
y e a r s(Figure
a s t tlo
f o r tthe
h e llast
held
w oyears
5).
'I
AREASUMMARIES
SUMMARIES
AREA
I^IASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
0 r e g o n - l a n d ' i nvessels
pounds
vge s s e l sfishing
f i s h i n g off
o f f Washington
W a s h i n g t olanded
lna n d e d8.3
m i l l i o n pounds
Oregon-landing
8 . 3million
((3,751
3 , 7 5 1m
p r e v i o u srecord
t ), up
3 %from
f r o m the
p o u n d(3,629
s( g , 0 Z gmt)
u p 3%
t h e previous
mt),
r e c o r dof
o f 8.0
8 . 0 million
m i l l i o n pounds
mt)
lr
1/
I2!
P i n k shrimp
s h r i m pcaught
predominantly
Alaskawaters
c a u g hin
t ' i nAlaska
watersare
Pink
Pccndalus
anepredominantly
boreali.s.
eutdalusborealis.
p r o c e s s o r sthat
E
x c lu d i n g processors
t h a t buy
b u y on
o n location.
location.
Excluding
.1
o
-6-
a
p r o v i n c e ,a
T
a b l e3.
Table
3 . Annual
A n n u a ll landings
a n d i n g soof
f sshrimp
h r i m pbby
y sState,
t a t e , Province,
and
n d eentire
ntire
P a c i f i c coast
c o a s1968-1980
t 1 9 6 8 - 1 9 8((in
0i n thousands
p o u n d s ;p
Pacific
rimarily
t h o u s a n dof
os f pounds;
primarily
Pandnlussp.
Pcindalus
sp.)) source
source PMFC
PMFC crab
& shrimp
Crab &
Shrimpnita
Data seribs
Series and
and
PMFC
Annual
PMFC
Report for 1980.
Annual Report
1980.
o
o
o
o
o
a
a
o
o
I
Year
Year
A
l a st(a_
Alaska
1968
19
68
42,023
42,023
1,566
1,566
1
,1 6 4
1,164
10,976
10,976
2,270
2,270
57,999
57,999
1969
1969
4 7 ,9 5 7
47,851
2 ,L 1 ,9
2,119
r,425
1,425
10,505
10,505
2,949
2,948
64,U9
64,848
t970
1970
74,256
74,256
1
1,538
,539
926
926
13,735
1
3, 7 3 5
4,049
4,048
94,503
94,503
1971
L97t
9 4, 8 91
94,891
735
7s5
678
678
9,29L
9,291
3,081
3,081
108 ,676
108,676
L972
1972
83,830
83,830
794
794
I1,582
,582
20,861
20,861
2,434
2,434
109,501
109,501
L973
1973
1
19,964
119,964
r1,729
,729
5,271
5,271
24,5r7
24,517
I,240
1,240
I52,720
152,720
1974
1974
r09,275
108,275
2,644
2,644
9,325
9,325
19,969
19,968
2,338
2,338
I42,550
142,550
98,535
98,535
7
1,728
,728
70,767
10,167
23 , 8 9 3
23,893
4,993
4,993
139,316
139,316
9
,26r
9,261
25,392
25,392
3,400
3,400
r74,797
174,787
1975
7975
B
r. Columbia
C o lu mbai
Br.
lr
lashington Oregon
Washington
California
Total
1976
1976
l29,}IL
129,011
7
,723
7,723
1977
1977
1 1 6, g g1
116,891
6,176
6,176
11,803
1 1, 8 03
48,580
48,580
15,640
15,640
199,090
199,090
1978
T9
7B
73,397
73,397
2,969
2,969
13,987
L3,987
56,997
56,997
L3..167
13,167
1979
t979
5 0, 9 1 6
50,916
1,578
1
,579
12,135
12,I35
29,597
29,587
4,922
4,922
160,517
160,517
g
g,138
99,138
1980
1980
52,865
52,865
1,175
1,175
12,600
1
2,600
30,152
3
0,152
4,400
4,400
101,192
101,192
I9O
-7-
per hour, 1958-1980.
Fishing effort adjusted to single-rig equivalent hours.
:.
I
ctr
'a
@
att
Ct't
L
catch
L
@.
o- vt
L
S
1975
o
F -
C'O
P.c
G'
C)+t
Washington, Oregon, and California pink shrin
1970
o
tot
YEAR
(t
.!zq.,
|+
r.r
-Gtl
-
FED
L
'(tl
ELEl
|o| .s-
1965
.F
U7
Gt()
(J +'
'(''g
gG,
Gt +)
tn
.:t
C,..1
oi('
Ct tEl
c,
L {-t
OL
o
Ets
Q(u
ur ctf
Fs
at ,n
Ftgure 3,
1960
Gl'r
= lr-
tY)
c,
tr-
200
00
500
600
o
o
I---
10
U)
(soNnodf{r}
0-..
700
+
I
U
I4
U
Lu
>
z
0
U
Lu
Lu
I
U)
z
Lu
0
tL
I U O J J 3 g N I H S I J JO UnOHO3I.U3ANO3U3d H3rv3
I-
IJ
!f
t7)
S
c
P(u
EF
'Gf
L>
Er
.tn -
o
S
- 8-
by US, vessels coastwlde
.
'o
E,
t,
ts
l
aJ
UI
.tt
1980
io
@
o
o
C'
.
I
vl
F
G,
UI
v,
9
t
'a
v)
a
=
\
.
o
-o-
)
1975
gl
4. Converted fishing effort (in
hours) for ocean pink shrin
and by state in adjacent waters.
P
E
5t
t\
tE
UI
S
o
A.
f
CL
E
.
o
YEAR
au
o,
C'
ct
rLo
1970
P
c tr,
L
L
=.
Ovr
-cL
oJ
c+,
.r tEl
o
S
\../ =
+t +r
Lg
oc,
rF(J
lF rtt
o,'D
T'
(') ttt
=
z.
S
o
?=
()
F
0
z
J
=
F
o
j-
.
o
frJ
E
s
z
h
:F
IF
tL
=
L>
g.a
gT'
o(J
I
oc
(JG
tl
:l
(it
.l
il
L.
=
ctf
150,000
o
o
o
o
g
100,000
>
0
U
gNrHSfJ O3IU3ANO3
'U
U.
U-
(sunoHNtl
U-z
0
I-
F.
luoJJ3
3
X0
(l)X
o
N
8
-
6
I
g
IL
0(V)
.
o
q,
{J
.E
'ct +,
a{,
+t
Figure
0
a
zqr
oo
(!t
s?
YEAR
g.
sF
Pink shrimp landings by state, 1952-1980.
-
66
68
-
70
72
-
74
-
76
78
-
80
-9-
o1
I
c\l
tr)
Ol
F{
(u
+)
ro
+i
an
F
(9
z
o
(,
f
=
CI'
trJ
CE
3
o
()
E
z,o
z
(r
o
tL
!
a
r-sl
N
g
tl
tl
o-
Figure 5.
E
E
I
a
ct)
z.
o
.
-o
ro
(u
L
5
ct)
.
I0
30
20
o
(o
40
70
80
lJ-
D
0
o_of z,a(n
p
(Jrr
!
5-_-r..-oz.a
o
.
- 10-10-
,
o
ccaught
a u g h tin
i n 1977
1 97 7and
a n d up
( Figur e6,
up 6
fro m the
th e 1979
1979catch
6%%from
catch (Figure
6, Table
Table4).
4) . The
Thetotal
total
o f f Washington
W a sh i n g towas
n
ccatch
a t c h off
w a s27%
2 7 %of
o f Oregon's
0r egon' stotal
total landings.
landings. The
Destr uctionIsland
The Destruction
Is l and
g r o u n d s(State
i e l d e d .aa record
A r e a32)
( l t g t e Area
3 2 ) yyielded
p 6 u n d(1,804
s( 1 , 8 0 4mt)
r e i o r d 4.0
4 . 0 million
m i l l i o n pounds
grounds
m t ) in
i n 1980.
1990.
o u n d s(1,875
(t,g7Sm
A
.1 m
illion p
t ) tthe
i e l d e d nearly
he G
r a y sH
a r b o rb
e d '(Area
( A r e a3
At. t 4
4.1
million
pounds
mt)
Grays
Harbor
bed
30)
0 ) yyielded
nearly
tthe
h e same
s a n eamount
pt ro d u ce d
a mo u nproduced
( 7i mt)
in
i n 1979.
1 9 7 9. Only
pounds(71
0n1y 157
prod- uc ed
157 thousand
thousandpounds
mt) were
wer e produced
n o r t h of
o f the
t h e Columbia
C o l u m b iRiver
a
R i v e rin
i n Area
A r e a29.
north
29.
o
Av e r a geseasonal
se a so n a lcatch
p e r unit
( CpUf)by
ca tch per
unit effor
t (CPUE)
by double
doublerig
r ig vessels
Average
effort
vesse' lsin Area
Ar ea
p o u n d sper
3
2
w
a
p e r hour.
3 4 4 pounds
32 wass 344
h o u r. T
h i s was
highest seasonal
seasonalaverage
the highest
This
was the
of
aver ageCPUE
CPUE
of the
t he
( f a n t e 4).
t h r e e .Washington
W a s h i n g t oareas
anr e a s(Table
p o u n d sper
p e r hour
three
4). A
2 1 5 pounds
h o u r average
a v e r a g eseasonal
Att 215
s e a s o n aCPUE
l PUE
C
i n g l e rig
ffor
o r ssingle
r i g vessels
v e s s e l sw
a salso
a l s o highest
h i g h e s tin
was
i n Area
A r e a32.
32.
o
0
M
a r k e t_
sa n p ldata
goodgrade
dea ta indicated
i n d i ca te d a
gr ade through
per c entthr oughJune
Junedue
Market
sample
a good
due to aa high
high percent( 1 9 7 8year
a g eo
a g e II
i I shrimp
s h r i m p(1978
y e a r class)
i n -the
t h e catch.
c l a s i ) in
F r o mJuly
age
off age
t h r o u g hOctober,
-October,
c a t c h . - From
J u l y through
g r a d ew
poor w
t h e grade
a s poor
i th an
a n average
per pound
poundof
the
was
with
a ve rageheads-on
heads- oncount
of 150
150ranging
r angingfrom
f r om141
count per
14L
p e r pound
t o - 160
i 6 0 shrimp
s h r i m pper
p o u n d(Table
(T a b l e5).
to
5 ). This
This was
per centage
wasdue
to the
the increase
incr easein
dueto
in percentage
o f age
a g e II shrimp
s h r i mpin
i n the
th e catch
ca tch from
fro m10%
I0%in
in April
Apr il to
of
by
to 80%
by October.
0ctober .
B0%
NORTHERN
AND
CENTRAL
NORTHERN
AND CENTRAL
OREGON
OREGON
I
o
S
h r i m plandings
l a n d i n g sfrom
f r o m south
s o u t h of
o f the
r i v e r in
in A
2 8 totalled
Shrimp
t h e Columbia
C o l u m b i river
a
Area
r e a 28
t o t a l l e d 834
834
p o u n d s(378
( 3 7 8mt),
t h o u s a n dpounds
p r o d u c ein
di n 1979
( f i g u r e 6).
m t ) , more
m o r €than
t h a n 55 times
t i n e s that
thousand
t h a t produced
L 9 7 9(Figure
6).
A r c a s26
2 6 and
2 4 also
a n d24
a l s o had
p r r d u c t i o nover
h a d increased
i n c r e a s e dproduction
o v e r 1979
1 9 7 9with
w i t h 33 and
Areas
a n d22 million
million
p
o
u
n
d
s
(
1
,
3
64
a
n
d
9
3
0
mt)
ta
ke
n
eacharea,
pounds (1,364 and 930 mt) taken from
from each
ar ea, respectively.
r espectively. CPUE
for
CPUE was
was low
low for
t h e s e areas
a r e a s however,
h o w e ve r,Area
A re a 26
2 6 having
h a vingthe
the lowest
lowestdouble-rig
poundsper
double- r igCPUE
these
at
221 pounds
CPUE
at221
per
( T a b l e4).
h
o u r (Table
4 ) . Single-rig
S i n g l e - r i g CPUE
hour
C P U for
E
f o r these
t h e s e areas
a r e a swas
w a salso
a l s o lowest
l o w e s t of
o f all
a l l areas
areas'
w i t h the
t h e exception
e x c e p ti o nof
with
o f Area
A re a29.
29.
M
a r k e tsa
mp 'l eiindicated
sn d i ca te d th
ade was
ogr essivelyimproved
at the
the gr
Market
samples
that
grade
was good
good and
progressively
and pr
impr ov ed
tthroughout
h r o u g h o u tthe
(fa U te6).
se a so n(Table
t h e season
0 ). Age
AgeII shrimp
shr impcontributed
62/"of
shrimp
contr ibuted62%
of the
1980'
s hr i m p
the 1980
c o u n t ffor
o r these
t h e se areas
a re a s w
( fante 6).
i th Age
A g eII
II shrimp
shr ir npmaking
m akingup
count
with
for
(Table
30%
for the
the season
up 30%
season
0) .
o
COOS
BAY
COOS BAY
c
a
g r e a te st sh
ro d u ctionoff
T
h e greatest
ri mp p
Or egonoccurred
occur r edfrom
fr om Cape
CapePerpetua
Per petuatto
The
shrimp
production
off Oregon
o
g l a n _ c(State
o
g q p qBlanco
yieided 45%
A re a s21
2 1 and
Cape
a nd 22).
2 2) . Together
these areas
ar easyielded
Together, ,these
45%of
O r egon's
of Oregon's
{ S ta te Areas
19
8 0ttotal
o t a l sshrimp
h ri mplandings.
1980
year Area
( Blanc obed)
l a n d i n g s. F
o r the
Ar ea21
consecutiveyear
21 (Blanco
For
the second
second consecutive
bed)
l a n d i n g sw
e r e the
t h e highest
p o u n d(3,542
s( S , S q Z
h i g h e s tfor
f o r the
t h e season
s e a s o nat
landings
were
mt)
a t 7.8
7 . 8 million
m i l l i o n pounds
m t ) or
or
( Figur e6).
92 %of
o f the
( CoosBay
t h e 1979
1 9 7 9area
a re a total
92%
to ta l landings
l a n d i ngs(Figure
6) . Area
Ar ea22
22 (Coos
Bayand
Mudhol e)
andMudhole)
y i e l d e d 5.7
5 . 7 million
p o u n d (2,578
s( 2 , 5 7 8mt)
m i l l i o n pounds
o r 93%
93%
o f the
yielded
m t ) or
of
t h etotal
t o t a l for
f o r that
t h a t area
a r e aini n 1979.
1979.
T h elevels
l e v e l s of
o f effort
e ffo rt remained
re ma i n e d
h i g h through
to heavy
The
high
thr oughJune
Junedue
dueto
heavyfishing
fishing by
byOregon
0r eg on
vvessels,
essels, a
nd b
a n influx
and
byy an
i n fl u x of
o f out-of-state
o u t-of- state vessels.
vessels. About
35%of
of Newport
About 35%
Newporshrimp
tshri m p
'f
andingscame
camefrom
from Areas
27 and
landings
Areas21
and22.
22.
A v e r a geCPUE
CPUE
fo r both
b o th single
si n g l e and
r ig vessels
in Ar
Average
for
double-rig
Area
21 wer
weree the
and doublevessels in
ea 21
the
h i g h e s t reported
r e p o r t e din
p o u n d per
sp e r hour
( t a b l e4).
i n the
s t a t e at
2 7 Land
t h e state
a t 271
4 1 4pounds
highest
a n d414
h o u rrespectively
r e s p e c t i v e l y(Table
4).
Ca t c hrates
rates d
e cl i n e d in
in b
o th areas
a re as after
fir st month
Catch
declined
both
month of
season, exce
except
after the first
of the
the season,
pt
s i n g l e - r i g vessels
f o r single-rig
v e s s e l sin
i n Area
A r e a22
2 ? that
for
t h a t had
h a dincreasing
i n c r e a s i n gCPUE
C P Uthrough
E
t h r o u g hJune.
June.
0
o
poorgrade
C o m b i n ema
d rke tsamples
sa n p l e sfor
21 and
22 indicated
gr adethrough
fo r Areas
Ar eas21
and22
indicatedaa poor
Combined
market
thr ough
JJune
u n ew
ith a
e r ppound
ve ra g eco
oundrranging
u n t pper
anging fr
om 138
im pper
with
ann a
average
count
from
to 175
shrimp
per pound
pound
138 to
175 shr
(r a u t e 7).
a r class
(AgeI)
(Table
Z ) . Th
pr edominant
1 9 7 9ye
I) was
gr oupwhich
cl a ss (Age
wasthe
Thee 1979
year
age
the predominant
agegroup
which
.1
q
$
{lr
STATE
STATE
STATISTICAL
STATISTICAL
AREA
AREA
B.C.
B.C.
t980
$980
$979
f979
-J
//
o-l
o
iq \
b" s
r9
34
o
32
3,356.0
3 , 3 56 . 0
3,976.9
3,975.9 i
30
30
4,196.9
4
, t9 6.9
4,134.7
4
,134.7
?9
29
254.0
254.O
|I 57.4
57.4
2R
28
sr0 .z.3
r5
g
83 4.4
WASH.
WASH.
''Willapa
Boy
illopoBay
26
26
2,852.1
2,852.l
3,008.0
3,008.o
o
''sColumbia
Rivef
Columbio
River
Cape
C
o p e c61
Falcon
Folcon
Cascade
Head
Coscode
Heod
24
?4
795.1
79 5.1
2,050.7
2
,050.7
Cape
Cose
ORE.
ORE.
Perpetua
Perpetuo
22
22
6,132.2
6,'|32.2
I
SI
5,684.5
5,684.5
Coos
C o o sBay
Boy
21
2l
8,513.7
8,5t3.7
7,807.8
7,8O7.8
Cape
C o p eBlanco
Blonco
SI
20
20
839.4
8
39.4
r$50.6
50.6
r9
19
1,011.6
|,01 1.6
1,290.7
l,2go.7
lB
t8
t1,315.6
,3 t5.6
780.8
780.8
FIGURE
6.
FIGURE
6.
poundsl
sf pounds,
1 9 7 9and
Iandings,in
Oregon
o n d $980
l 9 8 Oshrimp
shrimp
l o n d i n g s , i lthousands
nh o u s o n doof
0 r e g o n$979
o r e obased
bosed
by
b yarea
cqtch
s t o t i s t i c oarea.
ol r e o .of
o fcatch.
by
b y state
c o t c h$979
.1 9 7 9catch
s t o t estatistical
pounds.
pounds.
preliminorylanding
thousond
29,417thousand
on
londingestimates
estimotesof
of 29,417
on preliminary
R
o g u eRiver
Rogue
River
CAL.
SI
o
--12L?-
T a b l e 4.
4.
Table
o
State
State
Area
3 2 cC 1 ,
32
^ r^ L/
L
l E1;,
C/E1
C/nr:L
C/E2-
O
3 0 cC
30
^lr
r-l hI
C/E1
c/Ez
C/E2
o
O
O
,
o
a
2sc
29
C
C/Et
C/E1
C/Ez
C/E2
May
June
June
89.2
89.2
1
29.2
129.2
550.5
350.5
2
39.1
239.1
1
0 9 .4
109.4
225.6
225.6
6
33.5
633.5
0
0
242.5
242.5
1253.5
1253.5
24L.7
241.1
439.0
439.0
104.0
104.0
9
5. 8
95.8
334.8
334.8
439.L
439.1
I144.9
44.9
263.8
263.8
1 1 0 3. 6
1103.6
1 5 6. 5
156.5
3
3I.7
331.7
JuIy
July
August
Sept.
Sept.
Oct.
Oct.
Total
Total
808.0
808.0
272.2
272.2
382.2
382.2
829.4
829.4
191.1
191.1
357.0
357.0
I24.I
124.1
4I3.6
413.6
3976.8
3976.8
2L4.9
214.9
344.2
344.2
899.0
899.0
6
1.9
61.9
272.9
272.9
967.9
967.9
t 4 7. 6
147.6
281.6
281.6
523.0
523.0
392.6
392.6
277.4
277.4
98.0
98.0
0
0
2
L
4.6
214.6
4L34.6
4134.6
153.8
153.8
2 8 7. 7
287.7
24.8
24.8
19.4
19.4
r 5 7. 4
157.4
95.2
95.2
246.7
246.7
0
0
n
0.
2L.9
21.9
6
.3
6.3
4.9
4.9
L24.9
124.9
0.
0
0..
3
3.4
33.4
17.0
17.0
2
82.I
282.1
73.4
73.4
1
6 8 .I
168.1
2
3
0.8
230.8
0.
0.
0,
0.
24L.6
241.6
452.4
452.4
2 8 CC
28
C/Et
C/E1
C/E;
C/E2
8
.6
8.6
0
0..
5 8 4 .8
584.8
5
5 6 .1
356.1
1 4 0 .0
140.0
484.4
484.4
L
78.2
178.2
9s.7
95.7
208.4
208.4
6
1.0
61.0
0
0..
2
L
2.8
212.8
L
70.4
170.4
150.5
150.5
3 2 7. 2
327.2
15.3
15.3
1 0 9 .B
109.8
94.6
94.6
44.7
44.7
248.4
248.4
834.3
834.3
LI2.L
112.1
304.8
304.8
2
266 CC
C
/Et
C/E1
C/Ez
C/E2
68L.2
681.2
24I.2
241.2
3 7 3. 4
373.4
3 0 4. 4
304.4
1
04.0
104.0
2r3.8
213.8
5
10.0
510.0
1A''
a
laa.L
242.2
I199.2
99.2
311.0
311.0
2
53.L
253.1
239.8
239.8
582.4
582.4
L 4 7. 9
147.9
202.4
202.4
420.7
420.7
I02.6
102.6
202.8
202.8
198.3
198.3
88.I
88.1
114.5
114.5
5 0 0 8. 0
3008.0
L48.4
148.4
22L.L
221.1
2 4 Cc
24
cC/E1
/Et
cC/E2
/Ez
372.5
372.5
2
IL.B
211.8
3
44.5
344.5
483.9
483.9
1
69.9
169.9
246.6
246.6
1
6 6 .9
166.9
2L3.3
213.3
240.1
240.1
2 7 7. 7
277.7
TLs.4
113.4
258.0
258.0
382.3
382.3
L40.2
140.2
1 8 2. 0
182.0
264.6
264.6
81.1
81.1
r 5 8 .B
158.8
103.0
103.0
8
4.I
84.1
L72.4
172.4
2050.9
2 0 s 0 .9
138.5
138.3
224.6
224.6
z22
zLC
1
035.6
1033.6
2TL.4
211.4
2
67.9
267.9
r1358.7
3sB.7
c/E;
C/E2
876.3
876.3
162.9
162.9
323.7
323.7
2
44.9
244.9
256.9
256.9
928.7
928.7
1
91.8
191.8
2
35.9
235.9
384.3
384.3
115.8
115.8
200.r
200.1
1
003.3
1003.3
118.3
118.3
262.7
262.7
99.7
99.7
94.4
94.4
L50.2
150.2
5684.6
5 6 8 4 .6
180.0
180.0
2 5 8. 5
258.5
2TC
21
C
C/Et
C/E1
cC/E2
/Ez
1829.9
1829.9
4 3 1. 5
431.5
6 8 4 .8
684.8
23L5.4
2315.4
3
15.0
315.0
472.6
472.6
2
050.6
2050.6
248.6
248.6
5 6 8 .9
368.9
6 0 0 .1
600.1
2 L 7. 7
217.7
289.9
289.9
543.2
543.2
184.6
184.6
260.8
260.8
369.4
369.4
217.L
217.1
246.6
246.6
99.2
99.2
151.9
131.9
23L.2
231.2
7 8 0 7. 8
7807.8
2
70.8
270.8
413.6
413.6
2
200Cc
0.
0.
0
0..
0.
0.
LI4.4
114.4
L
123.6
23.6
90.7
90.7
I27 .3
127.3
228.0
228.0
376.2
376.2
0
.3
0.3
0.
0.
62.4
62.4
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.3
6.3
108.7
108.7
76.8
76.8
2.3
2.3
r50.6
150.6
r59.2
159.2
292.4
292.4
173.2
173.2
2L1.4
211.4
4 0 7. r
407.1
5 7 1.,4
571.4
228.2
228.2
3
58.8
358.8
119.5
119.5
1 5 8. 8
158.8
2
63.9
263.9
l 6 B .I
168.1
181.4
181.4
4
32.4
432.4
76.s
76.5
L27.2
127.2
238.6
238.6
140.1
140.1
r 9 7. 7
197.7
L99.7
199.7
2L4.6
214.6
1290.7
1290.7
195.3
195.3
518.4
318.4
4 3 9 .L
439.1
333.4
333.4
906.7
906.7
76.4
76.4
I07 .2
107.2
457.3
457.3
5.7
5.7
4
56.0
456.0
0.
0.
2
s6.I
256.1
2
6
4.8
264.8
569.8
569.8
34.7
34.7
79.8
79.8
32L.6
321.6
11.6
11.6
82.4
82.4
252.8
252.8
25.7
25.7
255.4
255.4
115.5
115.3
849.3
849.3
242.7
242.7
6L6.2
616.2
5 8 4 0 . 1 6254.0
5840.1
6254.0
24I.6
241.6
2
33.5
233.5
324.9
324.9
2
87.0
287.0
4789.0
4789.0
203.7
203.7
304.6
304.6
4023.2
4023.2
L57.2
157.2
257.6
257.6
3 6 0 8. 5
3608.5
1 5 2 .B
152.8
254.3
254.3
8s6.2
856.2
1
08.9
108.9
184.8
184.8
29944.0
29944.0
2L0.5
210.3
298.7
298.7
0.
0.
C/Et
C/E1
t19
9 cC
C/E,
C/E1
c/E;
C/E2
1 8 CC
18
C
lEt
CIE1
c/Ez
C/E2
O t o t r l Cc
Total
C
/Et
C/E1
clE2
C/E2
o
April
April
0.1
0.1
cC/E1
/Et
C/ E z
C/E2
o
OREGON
1980 MONTHLY
OREGON
1980
SHRIMPCATCH
CATCHIN THOUSANDS
THOUSANDS
MONTHLY SHRIMP
OF
AND CATCHOF POUNDS
POUNDSAND
CATCHPER-EFFORT
BY STATISTICAL
PER-EFFORT BY
STATISTICAL AREA
FOR
SINGLE AND
AREA FOR SINGLE
AND DOUBLE-RIGGED
DOUBLE-RIGGED
VESSELS
VESSELS
4
s73.L
4573.1
308.2
308.2
44I.6
441.6
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
I32.4
132.4
41.9
4r.9
0.
0.
1/
L/
C/Et
C/E1
Average catch
Average
catch in
in pounds
pounds per hour effort
effort for
for single-rig
single-rig
vessels.
vessels.
.rl
.2/
l
C/Ez
C/E2
Average catch
catch in
in pounds
pounds per
per hour effort
effort for
for double-rig
double-rig vessels.
vessels.
--1313T a b l e5.
5.
Table
p e r pound
p o u n dand
c o u n t per
Count
a n dage
a g ecomposition
c o m p o s i t i oby
n
b y number
n u m b eof
or f
shrimp
s h r i m pccaught
a u g h toff
o f f the
t h e Washington
W a s h i n g t ocoast.
cno a s l .
' in
y n number
composi
Age composition
ti on in
°% by
M on th
Month
Numberr
led
Sampled
r'rmp
Shrimp
pound
r pound
per
A
p r i1 rl
April'!
877
877
1
19
119
10
10
72
72
18
18
Mayl
May'/
727
727
720
120
15
15
6q
59
?
266
Junez/
June2!
408
408
t22
122
29
29
51
51
20
20
July3/
July3!
1, 3 9 9
1,399
160
160
64
64
32
32
4
4
Au guts3 /
August3/
1,151
1,151
14T
141
70'
70
2B
28
2
2
Se pte mb e rV
September'/
7
2r
721
r42
142
75
75
22
22
3
3
0 c to b er3 l
October3!
105
105
154
154
80
80
20
20
0
0
'I
T
2/
T
T
T
I
II
III
III
Area
Area 30
30 a
n d 32
nly
32 o
and
only
SI
Area
Area 30
30 o
nly
only
Area
only
Area 32
32 only
,'
T a b l e6
Table
6..
per p
o u n dand
C o u n tper
Count
a n d age
pound
a g e composition
compositionby
by number
num berof
of
sshrimp
h r i m pin
i n Areas
( n o r t h e r nOregon).
A r e a s 24,
2 4 , 26
2 6 and
2 8 (northern
a n d28
Or egon
).
Itlonth
Month
Numberr
Samp
Sampled
I ed
rr mp
Shrimp
p e r pound
pound
per
A p r i1 !
April'!
2,932
2,932
May
May
JJune
une
i ti on in
compos
Age composition
n k%D by
v n number
I
T
T
II
II
122
122
5B
58
30
30
12
T2
508
508
i116
16
39
39
47
47
T4
14
I,367
1,367
i13
113
62
62
to
26
12
12
III
III
Julyf
July1!
681
681
109
109
6
666
31
3i
3
3
Au gutsI /
August'!
958
958
98
9B
72
72
24
24
4
4
September
September
458
458
86
86
69
69
30
30
1
0ctobe
r
October
524
524
99
99
7
777
19
19
4
4
I'I
.
A r e a24
2 4 and
a n d26
2 6 only
Area
only
1
S
S
S
S
.
- i4-14T a b l e7.
7.
Table
M
onth
Month
A
p r i1
April
per p
c o u n tper
o u n dand
Count
a n dage
pound
a g e composition
c o m p o s i t i o by
n
by n
u m b eof
number
or f
sh
ri
mp
i n Areas
A reas21
shrimp in
per petu a) .
2L and
( bapeBlanco
and22
22 (Cape
Br ancoto
to Cape
capePerpetua).
Number
Surptua
Sampled
1
,965
1,965
Shrimp
p
u r pound
p
per
Age composition
in % by number
I
II
II
III
III
1,42
142
69
69
23
23
750
750
175
175
B9
89
B
8
3
June
June
1, 4 0 1
1,401
138
138
BO
80
T6
16
4
4
JJuly
uly
1,094
1,084
118
118
78
78
17
17
5
A
ugustl/
August1!
1
,006
1,006
108
108
B3
83
1
133
4
4
Sep
tembe
r
September
628
628
92
92
76
76
22
22
2
0ctoberJ
October2!
903
903
100
100
72
72
2I
21
7
lrlay
May
8
8
3
2
7
t 1 AA trace
trace of
of zero-age
zero-ageshrimp
sh ri m pwer
foundin
in Area
Ar ea21,
21, which
weree found
to
whichamounted
am ounted
to
p e r c e n tfor
0 . 1 percent
f o r the
0.1
t h e combined
co mbined
ar
ea.
area.
'I
2/
T
A
t ra ce o
ze ro -a q eshrimp
A trace
off zero-age
shrimp were
found in
in Area
ZZ, which
were found
Area 22,
to
which amounted
amounted
to
p e rce n tfor
0 . 4 percent
fo r the
tfi e combined
0.4
co mbinedar
ea.
area.
ave r a g e d77%
7 7 %throughout
th ro u g h o u tthe
averaged
th e se
a son. The
season.
The 1978
1978year
( AgeII)
class (Age
year class
II) contributed
contr ibuted
18%of
the total
18%
of the
total 1980
1980shrimp
shrimp counts
counts for
for these
these areas.
ir=a,
SOUTHERN OREGON AND NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
s h r i m plandings
l a n d i n g sfrom
fro m the
Shrimp
th e Port
P o rt^01for
( state Area
gr ounds(State
Ar ea20)
20) totalled
Orford ! grounds
totalled only
onl y
(o s mt),
151 thousand pounds (68
18%
mt),
L
B
%
of
fir
e
egd
pdur
aiissr
lr
,or
r
u,ia
of
the
839
thousand
pounds
(381
mt)
landed
,tl
tanded
in
in
lll^
t
n
o
^
y
:
a
n
d
-p
o
u
n
d
i
Lvl e . M
1979.
a yand
a nd June
Ju n ew
e re the
May
were
th e most
pr oductivemonths
mo stproductive
r nonthsbut
blt the
ilr e fishing
ir ' ir r tng'remained
r .r iinea
sscratchy
c r a t c h y and
a n d little
effort
l i ti l e e
ffo rt w
a se
xpended
was
expended
in
in this
this ar
ea.
area.
T h eBrookings
B r o o k i n g sarea
_ a r e(State
(aS t a t eArea
The
i e l d e d .1.3
A r e a19)
1 9 ) yyielded
1.3 m
( 5 B 7mt),
i l l i o n ppounds
o u n d s(587
million
m-tu,ia) , 22%
z z-%
h
i g h e r than
t h a n the
t he 1979
higher
1 9 7 9catch.
ca tch . Shrimp
sh ri mpcaught
( siii.lr .uie)18) and
.ur g"ntoii-California
cuti for niu-(State
off
Area
la n d e din
in O
r eg o ntotalled
landed
Oregon
to ta l l e d 849
8 4 9 th
o uiandflounds,
down40%
40%from
thousand
pounds, down
fr om the
the 1979
1979catch.
catch.
0 f the
t h e three
t h re e areas
Of
a re a s mentioned
me n ti o n e dArea
Ar ea 18
18 had
hadthe
the highest
highestoverall
over all catch
per unit
catch per
uni t
e
f
f
o
r
t
.
a
v
e
r
a
g i n g243
2 4 3and
a n d616
p o u n d sper
effort averaging
6 1 6pounds
p e r hour
r r o u rfor
r o r single
s t n l t u and
u n odouble-rig
' o o u o t . - i i gvessels
u
i
i
i
e
i
;
res p e c t iv e 1 y .
respectively.
T h eheads..on
h e a d s*o nco
er p
u n t pper
o u n dranged
The
count
pound
rangedfrom
fr om 80-85
80- 85shrimp
per pound
shr impper
poundduring
dur ing the
t he
la t t e r half
h a l f of
latter
o f the
th e se
a so n ,indicating
i h d i ca ting"ia very
gr ade of
u.r v gooa
season,
good grade
of shrimp
from
shr
imp
fr
om
the
the
B
ro o k i n g sarea
(A re a19).
a r ea (Area
Brookings
1 9 ). Although
A l th o u ghmarket
ilar kei samples
r uilpi.r - indicated
indicated that
that Age
AgeII shrimp
shr imp
d
o
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
t
h
e
c a t c h , the
t h e low
dominated the catch,
l o w count
e r pound
counlp
p o u n dreflected
r b f l e c t e d tthe
per
of
h e influence
i n f l u e n c eo
'
f
o
]der
older
sshrimp
h r i m pa
e l l as
ass w
well
excellent
as e
xceilent g
r o w t hb
t h " - one-year
o n . - y " u " olds
growth
oft the
o i J r -(Table
( i u o i . 88).
i.'--
--1515,
T
a b l eB
Table
per p
o u n dand
8. .
C o u n tper
Count
and age
age composition
pound
com positionby
by number
numberof
of
s h r i m pin
i n Area
(Brookings).
shrimp
A r e a19
1 9 (Brookings).
Mon
th
Month
N
umber
Number
led
Sampled
Ap r i1
April
557
557
B6
86
I7
17
56
56
27
27
May
May
406
406
i03
103
53
53
4
433
4
4
June
June
404
404
141
141
92
92
6
6
2
2
JJuly
uly
3
56
356
7
777
84
a
14
14
2
Au guts
August
305
305
BO
80
64
64
30
30
6
6
Sep
tembe
r
September
6
38
638
B5
85
79
79
1R
18
3
0 c t o b er1 l
October'!
s77
517
85
85
77
77
16
16
2
2
I'-I
rr mp
Shrimp
pound
perr pound
composi
t o n in
] n % by number
Age composition
I
II
II
III
III
2
Z e ro -a g eshrimp
sh ri mpaccounted
a cco unted
per centof
for five
Zero-age
for
five percent
of the
the age
agecomposition.
com positi on.
.1
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
IIf
f tthe
y e a r class
h e 1979
L 9 7 9year
c l a s s is
i s strong
s t r o n g in
i n terms
t e r m sof
a b s o l u t ea
o f absolute
b u n d a n c eit
i t, should
should
abundance,
c o n t r i b u t esignificantly
s ' i g n i f i c a n t l y to
t o the
contribute
t h e harvest
h a r v e s tin
i n 1981
e a r old
1 9 8 1as
a s two
t w o yyear
o l d shrimp.
s h r i m p . Samples
Samp'les
ttaken
a k e n towards
t o w a rd sthe
th e e
n d of
end
o f the
seasonas
th e season
as well
well as
as during
dur ing the
the winter
winter by
by the
S tatb of
tir e State
of
i
n
d
i
c
g
t
q
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a l for
a
Washington
indicate
a
potential
another
for a
n o t h e rstrong
6 u . class
s t r o n s yyear
y e i r class).
i t u t i (1980
year
Tlt!:ngton
iiiirj.
i
r
g
a
o
A
r i t i n g _1981
Atl this
writing
1 9 8 1market
m a r k e tsamples
. s a m p i eindicate
i nsd i c a t e that
t h a t -this
t - h i sis
i s true
t r u e 'and
a n dthat
t - h a talong
along
,thisw
t
t
o
V
e
a
r
o
l
d
with
two-year
old
shrimp,"pinheads"
s
h
r
i
m
p
,
"
p
i
n
h
e
a
d
s
"r o
o
n e - y e a rolds
o l d s will
w i l l be
or
one-year
b e abundant
a b u n d a nduring
dt u r i n gthe
Yl!!
the
S
1 9 8 1season.
1981
season.
N e a r ' l yall
a l l state
s t a t e statistical
Nearly
statistical a
r e a shave
h a v eshown
s h o w naa decreasing
decreasing
areas
trend
t r e n d in
i n catch
catch
p
e
r
g ) . Increasing
u
n
i
t
e
f
f
o
r
t
p a s t 33 years
o
v
e
r
y e a r s (Table
( f a o t e 9).
t
h
per unit effort over thee past
I n c r e a s i n geffort
e i f o r t has
h a s had
h a dthe
the
e f f e c t of
o f distributing
d i s t r i b u t i n g the
effect
t h e available
a v a i l a b l e resource
r e s o u r c eamong
a m o nincreasing
g
i n c r e a s i n gnumbers
pariin u m b e rof
os f partic i p a n t s in
i n the
cipants
th e fishery.
fi sfre ry. The
T h etrend
tr end towards
towar dsharvesting
youngershrimp
"sr r r imcan
p be
har vestingyounger
be
can
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
a
s
a
r
e
s u l t of
o f full
expected as a result
f u l l exploitation
e x p l o i t a t i o n at
a t high
h i g h levels
l e v e i s of
o i effort.
e f f o r t . ' Whether
Whether
tthese
h e s e ttrends
r e n d sw
i l l continue
c o n t i n u eand
will
whether
a n dw
h e t h e ro
o t they
m a yhave
t i e y may
h a v eaa significant
orr n
not
s i g n i f i c a n t impact
impact
o
n
s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
tt o c k production
p r o d u c t i o nis
s
on subsequent stock
i s unknown.
unknown.
LI
.
9w
th
u
s)c)
L9 oO 9 ) N
(o
.o
r{
r{
656.0
-
|
r{
0
158
-
0.6
25.6
18.8
132
0
0.9
r
N q ---o
eo6.f
i
6
lb oo
jj
F{Fr
N@
(\tg)
eue
|
Ocgooo)
+ c a 6' C6 i 6
di
99cvro.-r
cDotro(o
O.rrroc\t
s+,osf c)
losf roo
F\Nt(or.-,
F{
C\l
i{
NJ
388
69
! @
cr)
-
810
@oO
-i-ic.roo
l,.,sf H6.;
c\t
cv (o
a-a6ai
F{
-
0
727
677
@(O
14.8
14.8
187.0
0
975
0
879
2.1
58
Fl
cf)Ft
ol
\f,O
- El o:
..'db
or
rj-) |
754.1
246.5
654
1,500
O
oc,a
251.8
41.6
213
633
\f
O@
[oc\t
Loc\t
rr\c)
1,038.2
392.3
565
1,261
r-l
c\,@
ro
1,550.4
1,228
^+)
r- tn
F
1,302.7
1,087
20
(t
1,344.9
Fl
0
-
(IJ
L
(g
r
f\
1,454.6
-
0
341
472
0
576.0
-
(O
Looorrc\r
(ill
r-o,
NO
| {q-
171
\f,o5.
Lii-t:
(o
=t
or
u)N
F{[rl
Fr
CD
c)
692
(O
lFo\ < -> gt {r l
|
rr)
sl-
O
N<9
("1 9lo
46.7
168.0
740
141.9
15.0
157
19
(o
O
F{cD
st=lF{ <'
c\l
\oF@-cg
802.3
89.1
549
FIN
(OO
Or
2,240.7
38.8
1,098
2,589
HLc,
443
895
c\t @
O
-
(9O9 .q+
N
(go.f
i+
St' r
-
O
.A<=t - L o
140.4
551
281.2
F-{ t.()
@Ol
!
o8
sf
C\.1
307.2
554
18
Annual 0*gon shrimpandings in'l,OOO's of pounds
and catch-per effort by statistical area for
single and double-rigged
-----i-
4
.
o
+J
o
-\l
I
-\l
--l
a
t-{
or
!oo
9 t(o
o
!56
V
cf)o " r
c.t
L o !e
*qo^Co
r]o ci c,.t t
r\c{(oN
-ioci.oco
3383
.icri-,6
33Rg
sf
F-t
t\
g
ro c\J
Ot rC,
Ft
cr,
355
563
-
5,661.5
2,888.2
cD
=f
r{
757
808
c)cr)
s*No@
cr)c_{c|rC
N(CL669
an,,n
EL
f5
FO
o
.g
(J
L
F(u
.o
6(J
(-) +t
rg
C(J
-(' t l
(uN
EUJ
5\
()
C\J OI
T\
Si-
r+ ro c\l N
\O OO tO (O
O
N
&SNB
"_d"-ii&t
r{
-O
(u50)
R
ESS
qqXl
(\J
34
r0
CY)@C\j@
F.F
ur (6 (o
(u(IJ
931
B
SBB
Riiiilit
' cF > L s c
5 +r+,
€-o
'r.r
(u.|Ca'<<
t
oss
0t
ol
,{r-{
| r\
c'r
C)
L
c
fIJ .e.r
A'E
orqcJc,cJ
c\l L) o-t'E
55
Q:(f-C
rc(uuct(J
.t'-O+,
g c
(na
II
<+rl
NI C\J
(O.F
Q
L
d .u ,O
tfJ Qa
N\l- !
<c)(J<<
V
C/Ei
C/E2
,5,1
c{ \-\.
(J () (J (J
1975 C
C2
C/E1
C/E2
.,i'il
c!\-\
(-) (J (J L)
C2
C/Ei
C/E2
C2
C/E1
C/E2
C2
fi,.}
" . rc_l
: . { .ci
c_l c_l
= =
{J
2/
3/
C/El3!
C/E2
o . Jdrl
>>
O d-o-(J-
1974 C
Ol
nJ tU
L +){J
(d.o
-cg)t
(7t.r
(t.1 ! r(J
5 Lo I ctKrc\J
!(,gc\c\l
O(o(J
OOe
1973 C
FI;=3EEE3
it! S
.. N'>\.
e d L)-(i
o)c,gt
rd ).r
5
!o>,!!
-\l
1972 C
Ot
1971 C
C22!
(-) (J
@orc)aNoDsr,.c,
lO(ONt\r<t\f\t\
Or
Lrr
\C/E
(-) (J
1970 C
Year
CJ (-)
1969 C
1968 C
C/E
!,r
.6
F
rlJ
\.
C/E
Table
-o
N(,
ort CO
aq?\sf
@@@nr
]u
(u
-an
(u(U
cD !/r >
.p-o
rl
893.2
838.6
872
1,248
(\t
r{
.6
ln
.6(IJ
tt,
t
-C
753
|
<f,ro
722
356
|
-
oo
-
-rg1
0
0
ord,roc\t
746
1,182
(y) r{
cr) <+
C\l
259.9
218.8
556
NJ
2,526.3
1,983.1
1,829.3
84.4
1.9
\Fo{ ro. o, !<ro-+!"oN!9\r
9.8
775
@ Ol
416
552
-
-;C
475.2
166.4
692
-
rn) E
0
32
OE
O)r
(\l
2,630.4
2,224.9
827
(\
592
726
(+ ctl
o<rNF-r
cr)c\Jc\lo.)
ro c\t co ol
5
<J-
T\
Lo <f :-r) F-{
CD .-r rl) r:
1.9
1.9
r-t
FI
c) sl
(or-{c\t(o
c'lr\orc\t
or c\l tr) r\
2,936.0
2,271.4
702
crt oJ
c")re!?N
;ntpSd
co i(
113.9
35.8
383
902
r: ]. 9
Q>qN
qO
+ -i + o,
461.5
190.2
497
No)
@cq
r\ u)
r€, r\
cr)\o!?cr)
rriSq:ro
ij 6 o, c..r
1,553.6
606.7
933
1,253
^ l G - ^ 6 a
to c\t
787.1
539
sf,
Nct
Lcor
c) to
1,067.4
690
25.2
494
30
Er-
c\l
lr)sf
c\Jor
qir
F{
C\J
97
al
-
-1/
-\l
1,350.1
142.0
551
717
642.5
359.6
624
677
\,
dl
-1/
*\l
11
-1/
-1/
-1/
29
al
r{O
Fl
'rl
!CJ
o
5
F (. )
crc
{rn
Cr)
590
Osf
..ooror\o
C\tr\CDr+
(O<+(OA
LO(O
'6 qt
(t)
G
-o)
O-'r
O(o
L
I
(u
g
.F
aa
ct(,
s(lJ
AD
4,936.9
3,891.7
608
r+
*;
(u
'r)
-(J
orr\
(or{c€rF\
734.0
40.3
489
1,061
LO Cr1
orff)
looorFr
O s f- C O ( O
=
+5
105.9
+
362
671
1,001
r
-
14.0
0
469
926
O
\foor
i-,'c|
550
720
5,575.9
1,762.1
465
560
430.2
337.0
368
r-{
601.3
497
rl
Oo)
(O<+
gg ro
Ft
c\l
9335 HSHR
846
c\to
ghcoro
6g,2rOii
.f,c.rdd
O
ocv
(\t(O
c\lr.O
gtt r+
5,366.6
3,607.4
cD
(o
.{(\.,|
r\Ol
t\N
r-{
(o<f
(or\c\tO
626.0
479.4
639
ro
795
c\l
-r=-=
ot@
rrlNNtrl
8,665.9
5,947.8
617
cf)
ooc}
9,295.8
4,381.0
N>
cDFr
oNroO
3^u E_3 s3 !D.qsN
&388 ex;n
c\l
f6
=.n
2,915.8
635
PA
(t
@
Laa
2,780.4
2,076.6
603
813
J\I
617.3
{ l
O \() Cr) Cr)
ooNcrF{
f\Or€|cD
4/
-
)r
*\l
s I
4/
(o
4/
-
or\
\J
<+ (o
\-
4/
NU)
r{
^ i 6 ; 6 6 6 6 c a
28
o(o
2,207.6
675
24
oo
Ol
oo Fr
-l
O@
(O
LocD
3,852.1
567
bb6
NJ <if
1,220.0
662
(L^
vessels, 1968-1980.
o3.
tr',! ! ?
lr)
2,660.8
5
FIO
1,771.6
792
UI
-o
[l)r.O
^i
26
(d
Area of Catch
1J
51.1
430
ot
(J
Ctl
.F
E
325.9
556
^€.
(u
o
(J
v(o
(u
an
ta
*-t}ti't}]-)
4/
/
I
632
1,213
o-
9,502.4
6,048.1
731
1,180
<- Fr
10,757.4
3,228.6
627
778
,.c) c\t
7,011.3
400.4
<r (o
0
co .cF
--idqln?
.r - c,- J
oV,o6g
357
(u
<+
NP
t 9 :o?
f
r.9
c9.?
)t a_a at o ' 6 , . +
22
L
or
4,686.9
.i
(u
1,534.4
3,666.9
431
@
q-
565
4,062.8
580
ob
q-
.n
Areas 30 and 29 combined through 1973
C2 is landed catch by double-rig vessels; included
in C, all columns
C/E1 = catch per hour by
single-rig vessels; C/E2 = catch per hour by double-rig vessels
Area 24 included with Area 26 data
Area 21 included with Area 22 data
F-.1 <d:
CD
r\ CD CD C\t
GI(Oc)lf)
Or <+ CD or)
-5/
F{
5/
C\J (O
o
+)
OO
EX \\
5/
-
21
3E 33
927.0
463.0
903
1,352
t\
=f
5/
+)
an
159.4
398
238.9
636
(tt
199.7
494
,d
413.6
r+
Fi
F-{
tl)
Cf)
(O
rr,rr)@<t6 oo co crt
--{FioJ
300.8
!eOLr)!e
@F-orcO
(c' OO (O CO
c\r@oOO
cOsOor
N l--.+
<J-
OO(OO
LoLo
F-{ r-l
cD
<fr\C\tLo
cDFr-ci
OO @ -t C.)
F-lr{
C)Cr)
<+LO
78.4
70.5
O@
254.0
225.8
r{<-
+OsF@
Cf)!Or.r)@
.-r6Jc..r
<*
<<r- =f
Nl
(\t
<+
154
(\
Cf)
C4
F-{
Fl
r-.1
(\l
CD
S
.
s-
(+-
+,
215
344
551
594
n 6 G 6 6
3,976.9
3,844.6
(o s+ Lc, <d.
t-- sF -t <+
Or OO CV c.r
434
413
Ot(o
(o cD <if co
Lr) C\t CD r{
Ce c\t lif <f
562
691
Ocr)
cD <+ c\I F{
t.c) Lt) (O Ot
Cf) .{ L/) (O
1,045
1,170
@C)
1,396.6
1,196.5
(Orr)
(o to Lo (f
Ot Or r+ f..
CD .+ O t-.t
108.8
92.2
@c\t
r{
.tJ
(F
q)
oO Nl F-{ <+
O Or L.c) Or
r-{
Ll) rt)
=
o
-o
(u
a
ro
o
288
225
325
922
1,052
r-t
lJ., |.l.)
569
585
5,822.4
5,239.9
702
745
i G - 4 6 6 6 a ^
95
(OOL(.)LJ)
O)roNC\J
.-toNca
246
[oOOrLO
c\tOt(o@
cDOr.-oro
C\JOrC\Ic\t
NCv)CVLO
@c!oro
4,134.7
4,060.3
t*\co
181
212
orlo
248
@o
173
<+ol
465
751
f\c|.)Lr)(O
rO<!Or.+
r{ r{
C\t
544
542
q+Lt)-{C\J
Ll)CVCO.{
C\J c\J r{ C\J
3,356.0 4,196.9
3,223.3 4,050.6
157.1
149.4
!
@OC.r@
l\Nt\*$
F{ Nl
F-l r-l
E
o-
Nf\tJ)Fi
N@(c|Lr)
co ro sj- l--
@@NLO
N!QOs*
F\Cf)r\N
ro
S
112
!
305
834.4
817.3
300
6
150.3
150.3
490
782.5
748.2
408
695
886
(+ Cr)
2,353.8 2,325.8
2,154.0 2,090.0
827.0
(d
rl)r!)Sl(\l
LO(O=rsJot t.o Lo r.f)
sf o
E
(u
587.3
730
628
986.7
727.3
O(O@-{
6 r- .+ cV
cD C\t F-.1 Nt
1,728.4
1,358.0
955.1
665.1
na
cf) c{
148
221
!Qr-oOE>
QNN!n
Or N (Ct N
311
cD cn
182
t!., Nl
360
C\J cr)
751
c\r c\t
3,686.2
2,870.3
c! Nt
N Cr)
a
(lJ
+,
@
E
(>t
CC@
Lr) <f,
(o
C\I
S
2,852.1
2,756.1
2,478.4
2,027.8
r{rt
<f @
C\J(OC\lFt
rfl O CO .+
@ f\ F-{ cD
r\
E
<f
P
a
qJ
COF\C)F{
l-- c! (O !O
+ O Cf) r+
a 6 h 6 a 6 a 6
o
S
257
Lr)Or(}|t\
oi -r oo |.c)
r-r-Jcrj
Orr,(OO
LO Crt U) Cr.t
cDcoc{+
5
F
185.5
138.3
224.6
f\
205.1
N
180.0
258.5
lr)
-tOtN'-r
<f <+ CO r.)
(O (O Lr) N
\QOr!?OO
cA tr, cr) Lf,)
C\l <f sf (O
Catch and catch per unit effort based on preliminary landing estimates of 29.4 million
pounds.
292.4
150.6
114.9
159.2
7,807.8
5,643.6
270.8
t.c} r+
5,684.5
4,425.8
r{ @
CV F-{
260
419
sf r.,O@
ooNcorr)
(^o + .-.r c\i
515
927
C\t<l-OOr
cfror(o-r
F{ ot c\l =f
(\,
5,641.1
4,649.2
433
658
tl) CO O rt)
l.l)
C\f O
189
.{Nl
790
@F{
437
(\
374
582
cr) c\
f\
\OsfLr)N
(\c\tF{\J
c) o Lo cD
C\l
(OO)NCr
Cf, cf) cf, crt
@(o<j-N
OO r.Cr
795.1
719.7
F{
O
r-l(D<f N
--r qD N CO
cf)@cDr-o
r\cac}cr)
OsJ-N-l
@LOC\tsf
r+ OO
256
420
2,836.0
2,639.1
rl
F{
N.l
r{
F-{
cDNc)c'
F{cD@Or
Lc,ct|C\j+
350.2
325.7
786
6 a . a - 6 6
O (O
oJd
@(O@(O
280
490
1,120
1,526
17,208.7
12,601.1
595
800
OO.{\eN
oo@cf)
(\l \o l\ (v
1,232
724
875
6,752.1
4,491.3
7,236.8 3,311.7
6,459.1 2,899.1
.{
8,513.7
6,937.9
@ \f
t'\Ch
6,132.2
4,994.0
F{
1,085
F-{rrc\tLo
(\C\t@@
crrc)F-o
782
tr)sf
O(o
cf)<+C\JSJ
+oo-{tl.)
21,026.4 20,321.0
18.024.8 16,021.0
:f,@<+r.o
l--c')N>
(oLor\cxi
1,674.0
538.5
OO
N
i{
292
565
769
507
1,424
1,920
690
963
8,435.1
4,844.4
a
E
Fl
r{<-
C\lFl|l-rO
!oororQ
Fr <if to oo
839.5
650.7
O sf, Or c\l
r_O ...{ Lr) Ol
F-t F{ F-{ (v
353.0
306.8
(OOtC\r+
(tr O C\t to
cr, to O,t (c)
oo \o c\l ro
1,755.1
571.0
U)t\
cr) \c) N Ot
rr) O O (c)
cf) ao u) lt\
704.9
c|CO
L() r-{ sl- O
!c) F\ C\J CV
N Lo s+ ctt
-{
S
795.1
195.3
318.4
1,290.7
477
285
1,011.6
608.0
F
F{O
r{
I
780.8
537.2
242.7
616.2
635
305
447
684
r{
CD
K)
!-.+
Q cO
I Lr) Or \O
|-\ Nl (o or
254.8
20
21
22
24
26
1,112
r-l
O|CO
N
Area of Catch
5,875.0
3,213.0
383
829
811.9
307.0
1,585
1,424
c)Lr)Tr)OO
o.tor}orr-t
C\N-tCr)
81.7
NF{CD<.
-{col'rrf\
r-{O@f-Or.OCrt.+
105.5
19
889.4
4,012
1,838
526
993
361.6
1
(OO
Lf)cf)<tNt
f.\r{@F{
@CVtO.+
(O <i-
28
r-{
c)O
r{ (r)
29
F-t
FrNLO<JiQCON
@Cf)L11.+
C)r.f)
30
F{
aa
ctto
r{
32
ONC\J(O
cO co <- r+
Nloc\|(o
Lf):1 !?o)
OcOQqq!
F{
CD@
6 - 6 6
Cr)
:t
s(u
r{
i{
-
-
-
tttt
-
-
lttl
-
lttl
-
Lf)
-
I
Fl
Ot
+t
o
-o
.o
O
or
o|
N
o.l
F{
u
td
c.l--\.\
(J(JO(J'
1980 C
C2
1979a/C
1978 C
r-{
LLt td
N.\\\
(JCJ(J(J
o
+)
(o
(J
a!
d'\l
bJ UJ
N\\\\
O(JC)CJ
C/E1
C/E2
@
LrJ
C2
C/E1
C/E2
C/E2
r\
t\r:f\orr,6
or
C2
(O
1977 C
td
N-\\\
C)O(J(J
C2
LrJ ttl
-\\( J-( J! .(.J1( - )
1976 C
Year
rg
F
C2
C/E1
d(\dNdNdNflN
C/Ei
C/E2
C/Ei
C/E2
(I,
rol
.
Table 9.
r-{
-
sf,Fl<+OO
(J
ro
(o
-
[r)rc)
-
1,462
1,394
F-l
-
(ooNJsr
ro c\t (o (tt
e-l
CD
-
o
34
NJ
565
1,466.2
1,120.3
o-
P
5.1
5.1
Continued
@clNcv
Tr)Lc,Tf)Lr)
r{ sf o cf,
CDoCD(o
Ir)N
Ft
E
\oo
G 6 6
r{
si-
855
c\crrNt-r)
Lr) cc) <+ Lo
O@<r@
1,052.6
(osf
ro(o(\l@
ro c\t -{ cY)
HF+OCO
155.0
126.1
orl
227.1
(9d
F{r'\(o(f)
!Q C\l NJ Or
G)C\tLr)Ol
1,315.6
1,045.0
1L
-I7-