Social Networking and Workflows in Research David De Roure The social process of Science 2.0 1.0 Virtual Learning Environment Undergraduate Students Next Generation Researchers Digital Libraries scientists Graduate Students Reprints PeerReviewed Journal & Conference Papers Technical Preprints Reports & Metadata Repositories experimentation Local Web Certified Experimental Results & Analyses Data, Metadata, Provenance, Scripts, Workflows, Services, Ontologies, Blogs, ... “Facebook for Scientists” ...but different to Facebook! A repository of research methods A community social network of people and things A Virtual Research Environment Open source (BSD) Ruby on Rails application with HTML, REST and SPARQL interfaces Project started March 2007 Closed beta July 2007 Open beta November 2007 myExperiment currently has 1800 registered users, 150 groups, 700 workflows, 200 files and 60 packs. Go to www.myexperiment.org to access publicly available content or create an account. Distinctives myExperiment Features User Profiles Groups Friends Sharing Tags Workflows Developer interface Credits and Attributions Fine control over privacy Packs Federation Enactment Bringing myExperiment to the user iGoogle Taverna Facebook Windows 7 New Instances Sharing pieces of process http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/ http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/tc/trident.mspx http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/page/code/EXPLAN001 Reuse, Recycling, Repurposing Paul writes workflows for identifying biological pathways implicated in resistance to Trypanosomiasis in cattle Paul meets Jo. Jo is investigating Whipworm in mouse. Jo reuses one of Paul’s workflow without change. Jo identifies the biological pathways involved in sex dependence in the mouse model, believed to be involved in the ability of mice to expel the parasite. Previously a manual two year study by Jo had failed to do this. QTL Workflow 16 Paul’s Pack Results produces Included in Published in Included in Feeds into Logs produces Included in Included in Metadata Slides produces Common pathways Workflow 13 Paper Published in Results Exporting packs The Seven Rs of Research Objects Research Objects enable research to be: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Replayable – go back and see what happened Repeatable – run the experiment again Reproducible – new expt to reproduce results Reusable – use as part of new experiments Repurposeable – reuse the pieces in new expt Replicatable – run more of the same Robust – unbiased systematic science at speed Phase 22 Phase • • • • • • • • • • • • Notifications Taverna 2 support Support for expert curators Controlled vocabularies Faceted browsing New contribution types (scripts, Meandre, Kepler, e-books) Biocatalogue integration Relationships between items (in and between packs) Indexing of packs Further blog / wiki integration Repository integration (EPrints, Fedora) Recommendations Curation Self by Service Providers refine validate seed Experts refine validate seed Workflows and Services refine validate seed Social by User Community seed refine validate Automated e-Laboratory Evolution 1st Generation Current practice of early adoptors of e-Labs tools 2nd Generation such as Taverna, ELNs, LIMS. Designing and delivering on experience Characterised by researchers using now, tools based within their 3rd Generation with Taverna, myExperiment andofLablogs. particular problem area,The with some- re-use tools, vision the e-Labs we'll be delivering in 5 years data and methods within the discipline. Key characteristic is re-use - of science the increasing poolsource of illustrated by open and open science. data and methods, across areas & disciplines. Traditional tools, publishing isCharacterised supplemented byglobal publication by reuse of tools, data and of some digital items like workflows andrecombinant, linksdiscipline, to data. and surfacing the methods across any Contain some freestanding, of complexity for the researcher. reproducible Research Objects. Provenance is recordedright but levels not shared and re-used. characteristic is radical analytics plays a role. Science is Provenance accelerated Key and practice beginning to sharing Research data driven - plundering the shift to emphasise in silico work. is significantly Expert curation supplemented by community backlog of data, results and methods. curation. Research Objects supersede papers. New scientific practices are established and Increasing automation and decision-support for the opportunities arise for completely new scientific researcher - the e-Laboratory becomes assistive. investigations. Provenance assists design. Curation is autonomic and social. Entirely new research outcomes are obtained. Summary • Understand the Web 2 generation of researchers and the changing nature of research practice • Success of agile development methods and the “perpetual beta” • Co-operate don’t control • The paper is an archaic human-readable form of a Research Object – “Could I have a copy of your Research Object please?” Contact David De Roure dder@ecs.soton.ac.uk Carole Goble carole.goble@manchester.ac.uk Visit wiki.myexperiment.org