Victor Valley College Instructional PRAISE Report (Type in Discipline Name Here) Instructions: Do not change the content or layout of the template. Fill in your text in the field boxes. They will expand as you type, and you can edit in them. You may also insert tables/graphs by pasting directly into the document (but not into a text field). Name your file the following way: Program title (see column A on Program List)_PRAISE_submission year. For example: BIOL_PRAISE_2014 Please submit your file as a Word file Use underscores instead of spaces in the name. Delete these instructions when you have completed your report. Program: Type in your program (discipline) name and your TOPS code(s) Program Review Team (PRT) Members (Note: hand signatures page required; your division dean’s office can help scan and create a file of the document after signing): Handbook definition of PRT: The PRT will be comprised of the following members: Department chair, director, facilitator and/or discipline expert One or more area/subject experts Other faculty and staff as deemed necessary All faculty and staff within a program are encouraged to participate in the program review process. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Submission Year: This is the year the PRAISE is due (not necessarily the date you are actually submitting the report) Budget Development Year: Click here to enter text. 1 The mission of Victor Valley College is to cultivate intellectual growth, social responsibility, environmental stewardship, cultural enrichment, and economic development. create exceptional and accessible lifelong learning opportunities that afford students within our expanding communities the attainment of knowledge and skills necessary for success in the global economy. embrace difference in our communities by integrating their wealth of multicultural knowledge and wisdom into a cohesive and resourceful learning environment for all. inspire innovative teaching and service with imaginative uses of collaboration and technology, fostering vibrant programs that are measurably effective in addressing student learning and community needs. empower each student to learn by modeling academic integrity, democratic citizenship, and meaningful contribution to society. The Vision of Victor Valley College: Victor Valley Community College uplifts the diverse communities we teach and serve by promoting educational excellence, enhancing local prosperity, and ensuring environmental leadership. The goals of Victor Valley Community College are as follows: Fiscal Stability. The College’s financial resources will remain sufficient to support quality programs and services, and the ongoing improvement of all college operations. Student Success. The College’s courses, programs, and support services advance student success. Accreditation Recommendations. All recommendations from the ACCJC will be fully addressed to reaffirm and maintain the College’s accreditation status. Image. The College’s reputation among High Desert residents will be that of a quality institution of higher education. The Institutional Learning Outcomes for Victor Valley College are as follows: Communication: Read and write analytically including evaluation, synthesis, and research; deliver focused and coherent Student Enrollment dataentations. Computation: Apply complex problem-solving skills using technology, computer proficiency, decision analysis (synthesis and evaluation), applications of mathematical concepts and reasoning, and the analysis and use of numerical data. 2 Creative, Critical and Analytical Thinking: Apply procedures for sound reasoning in the exercise of judgment and decision making; demonstrate intellectual curiosity and a respect for learning; solve problems through analysis, synthesis, evaluation and creativity; identify, evaluate and appropriate use of multiple sources of information. Social and Personal Responsibility: Evaluate the relationship between natural, social and economic systems and the significance of sustainability; demonstrate responsible attitudes toward cultural diversity, citizenship, personal contribution to local and international communities, and the effect of human actions on the environment. Information Competency: Students demonstrate information competency and critical thinking skills through their ability to effectively locate, retrieve, evaluate and utilize use library and information resources within the guidelines of academic standards to meet collegiate and personal information needs. 3 Program Mission: This is your program mission statement Program Learning Outcomes (for programs that offer degrees and/or certificates): Insert your PLOs II. The Components of the Instructional Program Review PRAISE report A. Section 1: The Program Overview The Program Overview should be brief (2-3 pages) and reflect the consensus of the members within the program. It is meant to provide a broad understanding of the program and its relations to the overall mission of the college. Describe how the program’s mission serves to meet the overall mission and/or vision of Victor Valley College (refer to the college mission and vision on page 2). Click here to enter text. Describe how the program’s mission is aligned with the ILO’s of the college (refer to the college ILOs on page 2). Click here to enter text. Describe the current trends related to the program’s mission. Click here to enter text. Describe the characteristics of the program. Click here to enter text. List the short-term and long-term goals for the program. Indicate with which of the District goals (Fiscal Stability, Student Success, Accreditation and/or Image) the program goal is aligned. Click here to enter text. How has analysis of SLO/PLO data and the Student Enrollment data for the program contributed to the identification of these goals? Click here to enter text. How can each of the goals above be achieved? Click here to enter text. Enter any additional information here. Click here to enter text. 4 B. Section 2: Program Assessment The Program Assessment provides a concise assessment of the program and includes the following subsections: Faculty and Staff What is the management, faculty, and classified staffing structure of the program? Click here to enter text. What is the full-time to part-time ratio of faculty within the program? (Determine the ratio of sections taught by full-time faculty to part-time faculty.). Click here to enter text. How does the current staffing structure/ratio affect, positively or negatively, the program’s ability to fulfill its mission, goals, and student success? Click here to enter text. What changes in management, faculty, and staff are needed to make this program more effective and focused on student success? Click here to enter text. 5 Curriculum and Instruction Which educational paths do your course offerings provide in terms of degree, certificate, transfer, certification, or employment? Click here to enter text. How do these offerings contribute to or affect the overall program’s mission and Victor Valley College’s mission and vision (refer to college mission on page 2)? Click here to enter text. Have course outlines of record been updated within the past three years? And what changes, if any, were made? If not, when is the next curriculum review scheduled for the program? Click here to enter text. What methods are used for evaluating the relevance, need, currency and variety of the program’s offerings? Click here to enter text. What are the program’s strengths and weaknesses in the areas of curriculum and instruction? Click here to enter text. What changes in the areas of curriculum and instruction are needed to make this program more effective? Click here to enter text. What instructional strategic methods (such as in technology, distance education, etc) have been used to improve instruction within the program? Click here to enter text. 6 Program Effectiveness and Student Success NOTE: the information regarding student enrollment data and assessment below will be used to populate the public assessment report for the college. DO NOT include personal information such as employee names, student names/IDs, Faculty IDs, phone numbers, SSNs, etc). Describe the trends in Retention, Success, Headcount, and FTES for this program for the past three years (refer to the Student Enrollment data). Identify strengths and weaknesses in each of these categories. Click here to enter text. Paste data tables or graphs that you wish to include here. Delete this instruction when you have finished. What changes are needed to make the program more effective in the student retention, student success, headcount, and FTES categories? Click here to enter text. What has the program done to establish and maintain links with support services (such as counseling, DSPS, EOPS, Early Alert, library support, and tutoring services) for students? Click here to enter text. How do the program’s goals integrate with educational master planning? Based on this and previous discussions, identify resources necessary to fulfill this integration. Click here to enter text. Have courses been assessed and recorded in TracDat according to the program’s 6-Year Assessment Plan? Were changes made to the 6-Year Assessment Plan? If so, describe them. Click here to enter text. Course-Level Student Learning Outcomes (all programs complete this section) Identify the courses that were assessed on the course level (SLO) within the most recent year (spring through fall). Click here to enter text. Refer to the previous year’s assessments, as well as those in the past two Annual Updates, for the following: Click here to enter text. 7 Discuss the types of assessment tools that were utilized in the assessments for the various courses (i.e. quizzes, projects, portfolios, assignments). How do these types of assessment tools provide meaningful data/feedback to the instructors? Click here to enter text. Discuss the results of the data collected from course level SLOs for courses assessed. In which courses did the data indicate areas for improvement for the SLOs assessed? In which courses did the data indicate that students have been successful in the SLOs assessed? Click here to enter text. Give examples of courses in which the instructor(s) made a change for improvement based on the results of an assessment. What type of change was made? How and when will the change be implemented? Click here to enter text. Give examples of courses in which loops of assessment have already been closed. Did the outcome of the change implemented in the classroom improve student learning? Click here to enter text. Describe how assessment results of courses assessed led to identification of new/continuing/increased allocation of resources for the course. Click here to enter text. Enter any information that the above questions do not address. Click here to enter text. Program-Level Program Learning Outcomes (If applicable per the definition of programs) List the PLOs for the program: Click here to enter text. Describe how the SLOs for courses offered within the program align with the PLOs identified. Is this alignment evident through mapping of the SLOs to the PLOs? Click here to enter text. 8 Refer to the previous year’s assessments, as well as those in the past two Annual Updates, for the following: Describe the unique (authentic) PLO assessment(s) that the program implemented in the past three years. What type of tool was used and how will the results provide the program with meaningful information about student success? Click here to enter text. If no unique (authentic) PLO assessment(s) were implemented in the past three years, describe the assessments that are planned, or may have been implemented in the current semester. Click here to enter text. Course and program-level outcomes are mapped in TracDat to show the relationship between them. Has the mapping been evaluated in the past three years? Describe changes that have been made to improve the relationship between course and program-level outcomes. Click here to enter text. How has the result of unique (authentic) PLO assessment led to identification of resources needed to improve and/or maintain the success of the program? Click here to enter text. Discuss how the program engages in discussion of SLO and PLO data for program improvement. Is there a dedicated meeting and discussion time (such as in department meetings, etc.)? Where are meeting minutes and related documents located? Click here to enter text. Enter any information that the above questions do not address. Click here to enter text. 9 Facilities, Technical Infrastructure, and Resources How do the size, type, and/or quality of the program’s current facilities and infrastructure affect the program’s ability to fulfill its mission and support its current offerings? What changes can be made to support growth or improvement? Click here to enter text. How do the quantity, type, and/or quality of information technology and infrastructure available to the program affect the program’s ability to fulfill its mission and support its current offerings? What changes can be made to support growth or improvement? Click here to enter text. How do the quantity, type, and/or quality of other resources and infrastructure available to the program affect its ability to fulfill its mission and support its current offerings? What changes can be made to support growth or improvement? Click here to enter text. Referring to the discussions above, specify the program’s projected needs for facilities, technology, and/or other resources. Shared Governance committees will use this information for institutional planning recommendations. Click here to enter text. 10 Optional: Service, Community Outreach, and Economic Development Note: Include this section only if this area is a part of the program’s mission or goals. Faculty and staff in the program may or may not be tasked with community service, which can include outreach, consulting or technical assistance, service-based instruction, or economic development. How is the program’s academic and professional expertise extended to the public in the surrounding communities? Click here to enter text. How are faculty, student, or staff skills linked to challenges, issues, or concerns within the community the program serves? Click here to enter text. In what types of service, community outreach, or economic development activities does the program engage? Click here to enter text. How are vocational advisory committees’ recommendations used by the program? Click here to enter text. What are the program’s strengths or weaknesses in the area of service, community outreach, and economic development? Click here to enter text. What changes in service, community outreach, and economic development are needed to make the program more effective? Click here to enter text. 11 C. Section 3: Needs Assessment How has the augmentation the program received last year, or the lack of augmentation, effected the program? Click here to enter text. In the following table, list: o the needed augmentation o the current status in relation to the needed augmentation o the page number of the report where the justification(s) for the needed augmentation can be found. Examples of justification includes assessment and Student Enrollment data The table will expand as content is entered. Below are, but not limited to, areas that should be considered for augmentation: o Human Resources o Facilities o Instructional/Service o Marketing and Outreach o Research o Other o Technical, Equipment and Other Resources Augmentation by Priority 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Current Status 12 Page # of PRAISE for justification Checklist for Attachments: Program Review Team Member Signature Page (your division dean’s office can help scan and create a file of the document after signing) Budget Development Worksheet Five-Year Staffing Profile (Appendix G of Handbook) Student Enrollment data sets (data from Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Research) 13