Complexity DTC Mini-project Proposal: Modelling disease spread on partially observed networks

advertisement

Complexity DTC Mini-project Proposal:

Modelling disease spread on partially observed networks

Offered by: Michael Tildesley, Ellen Brooks Pollock and Marleen Werkman

Complexity Science Centre and Warwick Mathematics Institute

Background

Figure 1: A pictorial representation of a section of the cattle movement network in the UK from 1 week in 2004, from Robinson and Christley (4)

Mathematical models of infectious diseases are being increasingly used to inform policy decisions. The advantages of such models are that multiple control options can be rapidly tested and compared, without the risks and costs associated with field experiments. However, for such models to be practically useful tools generally requires detailed data, both in terms of populations and epidemiology.

In early 2001, an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease occurred in the United

Kingdom for the first time in over thirty years (1). Mathematical modellers were consulted at an early stage during the outbreak and provided policy advice to help control the epidemic (2-3). The ability of such models to make accurate predictions was facilitated by the availability of highly resolved demographic and infection data.

In the UK, an annual livestock census records the location and species composition of all livestock farms in the UK whilst individual cattle movements are recorded via the Cattle Tracing System (CTS). This allows mathematical modellers to construct networks to simulate the risk of disease spread between farms via livestock movements (4).

However, in many countries around the world, detailed demographic data on livestock farms and animal movements is generally lacking. In particular, in countries such as the USA, only a fraction of the livestock network is known, requiring mathematical modellers to “scale up” the available data to understand network behaviour at the national scale.

Project

This project will involve investigating disease transmission in complex networks with varying levels of information. The first stage will be to explore epidemics using a network model, characterizing network properties such as the degree distribution, giant strongly connected component, neighbourhood size and epidemic outcomes such as final size and time to peak. The aim will then be to thin the network (via deletion of edges or nodes) to simulate the problems faced by policy makers where only partial network data are available. Once the network has been thinned, the network properties will again be determined and the full network will then be reconstructed based upon these partial observations. Simple models of disease spread can then be simulated upon the full network and the reconstructed network to determine whether it is possible to provide accurate policy advice when only partial information regarding network structure is available.

Outcomes

This 3-month project is highly complementary with other on-going research at

Warwick, both in Complexity and Mathematics and Life Sciences. During the 3 months, the student will gain a thorough understanding of network epidemic models while tackling a novel question. It is anticipated that the student will be able to investigate the effect of partial information on epidemic dynamics; the broader question of how to adjust and account for information loss has the potential for extension in a number of different directions.

References

1. Anderson I (2002). Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned Enquiry.

The Stationary Office, London.

2. Keeling MJ, Woolhouse MEJ, Shaw DJ, Matthews L, Chase-Topping ME et al.

(2001). Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science 294: 813-817.

3. Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM (2001a). Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature

413: 542-548.

4. Robinson and Christley (2007) Exploring the role of auction markets in cattle movements within Great Britain, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 81: 21–37

Download