This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2009
Kansas Performance Tests with
Soybean Varieties
Report of Progress 1022
Kansas State University
Agricultural Experiment Station
and Cooperative Extension Service
standard dryland irrigted double cropped conventional This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Test Objectives and Procedures.....................................................................................................................1
Data Interpretation.........................................................................................................................................1
Variety or Brand Selection ............................................................................................................................1
Summary of Entrants and Originators, Table 1.............................................................................................2
PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS
Emmett, Pottawatomie County (dryland), Table 2........................................................................................3
Topeka, Shawnee County (dryland), Table 3................................................................................................4
Topeka, Shawnee County (irrigated), Table 4...............................................................................................5
Ottawa, Franklin County (dryland), Table 5 .................................................................................................7
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 6...........................................................8
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 7............................................................9
Pittsburg, No-Till, Double-Cropped Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 8..........................................9
Pittsburg, No-Till, Double-Cropped Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 9.........................................10
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 10 ..................................................10
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 11 ...................................................11
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 12 ............................................................11
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 13 ............................................................12
Scandia, Republic County (irrigated), Table 14 ..........................................................................................13
Belleville, Republic County (dryland), Table 15 .........................................................................................14
Hesston, Harvey County (dryland), Table 16...............................................................................................15
Hutchinson, Reno County (irrigated), Table 17 ...........................................................................................16
Colby, Thomas County (irrigated), Table 18 ...............................................................................................17
Garden City, Finney County (irrigated), Table 19 .......................................................................................18
Ottawa, Franklin County (dryland/conventional), Table 20 ........................................................................19
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland/conventional), Table 21...................................19
Scandia, Republic County (irrigated/conventional), Table 22 .....................................................................20
YIELD SUMMARY
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests, Table 23...............21
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Conventional Soybean Tests, Table 24 .......................26
APPENDIX
Descriptions of Roundup-Resistant Entries, Table 25.................................................................................27
Description of Conventional Entries, Table 26 ...........................................................................................31
Electronic Access, University Research Policy, and Duplication Policy.......................................back cover
Contribution no. 10-167-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
-i-
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2009 KANSAS SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS
good drying weather after maturing is needed before
soybeans are ready to harvest.
TEST OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES
Soybean performance tests are conducted each year to
provide information on the relative performance of new
and established varieties and brands at several locations in
Kansas.
Lodging is rated at maturity by the following scores:
1.
2.
3.
Seeds for tests are from private seed companies, certified
growers, and agricultural experiment stations (Table 1).
Seed quality, including factors such as purity and
germination, can be important in determining the
performance of a variety. Soybean seed used for private
and public entries in the Kansas Crop Performance Tests
is prepared professionally and usually meets or exceeds
Kansas Crop Improvement Certification standards.
Relative performance of a given variety comparable to
that obtained in these tests is best assured under similar
environmental conditions and cultural practices and with
the use of certified or professionally prepared seed. All
companies known to be developing and marketing
soybean varieties or brands are invited to submit test seed;
interested companies enter on a voluntary, fee-entry basis.
4.
5.
Almost all plants erect
All plants slightly leaning or a few plants down
All plants leaning moderately (45%) or 25 to
50% of plants down
All plants leaning considerably or 50 to 80%
plants down
Almost all plants down
Height is the average length from the soil surface to the
top of the main stem of mature plants.
VARIETY OR BRAND SELECTION
Performance of soybean varieties or brands varies from
year to year and from location to location depending on
factors such as weather, management practices, and
variety adaptation. When selecting varieties or brands,
producers should carefully analyze variety performance
for two or more years across locations. Performance
averaged over several environments will provide a better
estimate of genetic potential and stability than
performance based on a few environments.
Companies were invited to enter Roundup-resistant
varieties in either the Roundup trials or in the
conventional trials at Scandia, Ottawa, or Parsons.
Entries were planted in four-row plots with rows 30
inches apart and were replicated three or four times each.
Seeding rate ranged from 7 to 12 seeds per foot of row.
The center two rows of each plot were harvested for yield.
Harvested row lengths ranged from 11 to 33 feet
depending on location. Cultural practices and rainfall for
each test location are presented with each table. Results
from this year's tests are presented in Tables 2 through 22.
Relative yields of each entry from all locations are shown
on Tables 23 and 24. Test results also can be found online
at: www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt
Small differences in yield between any two varieties or
brands usually are not important. Within maturity groups
at each location, an LSD (least significant difference) was
calculated. The significance level used to calculate the
LSD was 10%. Unless two varieties differ in yield by
more than the LSD, genetic yield potential of one entry
cannot be considered superior to that of another.
The coefficient of variability (CV) represents an estimate
of the precision in the replicated yield trials. A CV of less
than 10% indicates a good test with a high level of
reliability. CVs ranging from 10 to 15% are usually
acceptable for performance comparisons. CVs greater
than 15% generally lack sufficient precision to provide
any more than a rough guide to cultivar performance. For
tests in which the precision was insufficient to statistically
compare performance among the entries, the LSD value
has been replaced with the designation NS, indicating that
seed yields were not significantly different.
DATA INTERPRETATION
Yields are recorded as bushels per acre (60 lb/bushel)
adjusted to 13% moisture content when moisture data are
available. Seed yield also is expressed as a percentage of
the test average to assist in identifying entries that
consistently produce better than the average yield.
Maturity is the date on which 95% of the pods have
ripened (browned). Delayed leaf drop and green stems are
not considered when assigning maturity. About 1 week of
-1-
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 1. Entrants in the 2009 Kansas Soybean Performance Tests
Illinois Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
and USDA-ARS
Champaign-Urbana, IL
217-265-4062
aces.uiuc.edu
G2 Genetics
NuTech Seed, LLC
Forest City, IA
641-581-3350
sales@yieldleader.com
Phillips
Phillips Seed Farms, Inc.
Hope, KS
785-949-2204
phillipsseed.com
Iowa State University
Ames, IA
515-292-3497
Kruger
Kruger Seed Co.
Dike, IA
800-772-2721
krugerseed.com
Pioneer
Pioneer Hi-Bred, Intl., Inc.
Lincoln, NE
800-258-5604
pioneer.com
Kansas Ag. Exp. Stn (AES)
Manhattan, KS
785-532-7242
Lewis
Lewis Hybrids, Inc.
Ursa, IL
800-252-7851
lewishybrids.com
Progeny
Progeny Ag Products
Wynne, AR
870-238-2079
Nebraska Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
and USDA
Foundation Seed Division
Lincoln, NE
877-229-1363
Midland
Midland Genetics Group
Ottawa, KS
785-242-3598
info@midlandgenetics.com
Renze
RenPro, Inc.
Carroll, IA
800-634-2676
renproseed.com
Tennessee Ag. Exp. Stn.(AES)
Knoxville, TN
865-974-8801
Morsoy
MFA Incorporated
Columbia, MO
573-876-5363
morsoy.com
Super Soy
Midwest Premium Genetics
Concordia, MO
660-463-7333
Channel
Channel Bio Corp.
Huxley, IA
515-597-5903
www.midwestseed.com
M-Pride
Midwest Premium Genetics
Concordia, MO
660-463-7333
Sylvester
Sylvester Ranch Inc.
Ottawa, KS
785-272-3598
info@sylvesterseed.com
Drussel Seed
Drussel Seed, Inc.
Garden City, KS
620-275-2359
NK
Polansky Seed
Belleville, KS
785-527-2271
polanskyseed.com
Taylor
Taylor Seed Farms, Inc
White Cloud, KS
800-742-7473
taylorseedfarms.com
Dyna-Gro
UAP-Pueblo
Kearny, NE
308-627-4439
uap.com
NuTech
NuTech Seed, LLC
Forest City, IA
641-581-3350
sales@yieldleader.com
Willcross
NeCo Seed Farms, Inc.
Garden City, MO
816-862-8203
willcross.com
Fontanelle
Fontanelle Seeds
Fremont, NE
402-721-1410
fontanelle.com
Ohlde
Ohlde Seed Farms, Inc.
Palmer, KS
785-692-4555
Willcross
Willcross Seed
King City, MO
800-411-5957
-2-
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lance Rezac Farm, Emmett, Pottawatomie County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist, 785-532-7242
Wabash silty clay, pH 6.9, % OM; P test: M, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
4.1
0.8
6.7
5.6
3.8
6.0
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good.
26.9
Planted 5/12/2009 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/13/2009; 15 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Two applications of 1.25 pt glyphosate
postemergence.
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
CHANNEL
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
LEWIS
LEWIS
LEWIS
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
3600R2
78N18
80N29
9789 NRR
K2-3401
K2-3601
K2-3801
K2-3901
K2X41A9
K-375RR/SCN
360R2
3780
3909
Exp 362R
Exp 372R
Exp 392R
Exp 421RS
O-3632
O-3727
O-3732
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4270NR2
4289NRS
9A385NRS
378RR
Exp 371-2R
Exp 381-2R
2379N
2399N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
----111
70.2
----110
69.1
57.7
----91
61.8
37.1
-49.5
-98
65.6
----104
65.7
----104
----107
67.8
61.8
----98
64.1
----102
59.5
----94
65.0
----103
59.9
----95
64.9
37.5
-51.2
-103
61.0
----97
65.9
----104
65.0
----103
56.3
----89
62.5
----99
53.8
42.1
54.8
48.0
50.2
85
60.0
40.7
-50.4
-95
58.7
----93
61.0
39.2
58.2
50.1
52.8
97
64.0
----101
57.3
----91
64.0
----101
64.1
----102
64.8
----103
65.2
----103
----108
67.9
63.8
----101
63.0
----100
62.9
----100
57.7
----91
63.9
----101
63.2
43.8
-53.5
-100
65.1
----103
65.4
----104
----109
68.8
62.2
----99
63.1
38.6
54.3
5.2
8.7
5.8
3.6
4.0
3.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-3-
---96
--------97
-----109
105
-102
------------113
-----
------------------101
--107
------------------
Mat
9/26
9/27
10/1
9/27
9/23
9/25
9/27
10/1
9/29
9/27
9/26
9/27
9/28
9/27
9/26
9/26
9/30
9/26
9/28
9/26
9/27
9/30
9/29
9/24
9/26
9/25
9/26
9/26
9/28
9/27
9/28
9/30
10/1
9/28
9/26
9/26
9/27
9/28
9/26
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
46
43
44
40
43
45
42
45
43
37
45
34
43
38
46
41
35
36
36
40
39
38
37
38
40
42
43
46
42
37
38
39
38
39
44
47
42
40
39
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
J.D. Hanna, Erma Harden Farm, Topeka, Shawnee County; Larry Maddux, agronomist, 785-354-7236
Reading silty clay loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: , K test: -0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
6.6
2.3
7.2
7.0
6.0
4.3
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good.
33.4
Planted 5/22/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/19/2009; 27.5 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 24 oz Touchdown Total, 7 oz Select, 7 oz
Resource postermergence.
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
3800R2
3852R
4000R2
32C38
32X39
35G38 *RR check
37P37
39RY34
78N18
80N29
9789 NRR
7383
7391
7392
7401
KS3406RR
K2-3801
K2X41A9
K2X42A9
K2X43A9
K2X43B9
K2X43C9
K-375RR/SCN
K-428RR/SCN
K-439RR/SCN
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4157NRS
4270NR2 *RR check
4289NRS
4329NRR
4580R2
9A385NRS
3909SRN
4444+RN
7349
7379
7386
7416S
7417
7443
Exp 421RS
360NRY
380RY
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
67.3
73.2
66.8
67.0
72.5
70.0
68.7
65.9
72.0
63.3
70.7
66.0
51.9
56.5
61.7
60.6
67.3
67.8
64.7
65.3
66.2
67.3
71.9
65.0
68.4
73.3
72.9
67.3
67.7
71.2
70.4
69.4
66.8
66.3
67.0
65.2
65.0
62.8
73.2
63.3
72.6
75.5
70.1
59.6
71.2
61.3
64.2
70.7
56.7
71.0
68.3
60.7
-42.3
-40.8
39.2
35.7
----35.6
-41.5
--36.9
-----------36.4
----41.2
-36.0
39.9
-42.3
33.3
42.7
--41.4
--46.9
---40.5
-41.9
-4 -
-----34.3
---------34.4
-----------31.3
----34.3
----29.1
33.2
28.2
---------30.1
-26.7
-57.8
-53.9
55.9
52.9
----53.2
-46.7
--48.8
-----------51.9
----54.0
-51.5
52.6
-52.6
53.3
53.0
--55.8
--54.1
---55.8
-51.3
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
Mat
-----46.7
---------44.0
-----------45.0
----47.4
----44.7
46.6
44.7
---------47.2
-43.1
101
109
100
100
108
105
103
99
108
95
106
99
78
84
92
91
101
101
97
98
99
101
107
97
102
110
109
101
101
106
105
104
100
99
100
97
97
94
109
95
109
113
105
89
106
92
96
106
85
106
102
91
9/29
9/28
9/30
9/28
9/27
9/28
9/27
9/25
9/29
9/30
9/28
9/28
9/11
9/27
9/29
9/23
9/29
9/30
9/30
10/2
10/2
10/2
9/28
9/30
10/1
9/27
9/27
9/27
9/28
9/29
9/29
9/27
10/2
9/30
10/1
10/2
10/2
9/29
9/29
10/4
9/27
9/27
9/28
10/1
10/1
10/4
10/1
9/27
9/28
9/29
9/29
9/30
-107
-103
99
90
----90
-105
--93
-----------92
----104
-91
101
-107
84
108
--105
--119
---103
-106
-----117
---------117
-----------106
----117
----99
113
96
---------102
-91
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.7
1.3
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
43
41
50
43
43
45
47
41
44
50
47
49
35
46
50
41
46
48
43
53
47
47
43
48
42
42
45
46
49
47
42
43
45
44
44
48
47
43
45
51
43
42
43
42
42
52
42
49
49
42
41
41
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 3 continued. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
Exp 371-2R
Exp 381-2R
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
56.4
----84
----104
69.3
60.5
42.3
-51.4
-90
66.3
-30.8
--99
45.3
34.1
59.4
50.9 110
73.4
64.4
----96
----111
74.4
66.7
----100
66.9
39.5
29.4
7.6
9.8
12.4
6.8
5.2
4.9
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--107
-115
----
---105
116
----
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.7
1.3
50
41
44
44
46
45
49
44
10/1
10/1
10/3
9/29
10/3
10/1
9/26
9/28
Kansas River Valley Experiment Field, Topeka, Shawnee County; Larry Maddux, agronomist, 785-354-7236
Eudora silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: , K test: -0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good.
July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
3.7
1.9
6.0
5.7
3.8
2.6 23.7
Irrigation:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
Planted 5/22/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/19/2009; 27.5 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: na
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
3800R2
3951R
4000R2
78N18
80N29
7373
7383
7392
7401
7439S
K2-3801
K2X41A9
K2X42A9
K2X43A9
K2X43B9
K2X43C9
K-375RR/SCN
K-384RR/SCN
K-410RR/SCN
K-428RR/SCN
K-439RR/SCN
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4289NRS
9A385NRS
3909SRN
7349
7386
7399
75.9
69.7
67.5
78.0
73.4
66.5
70.4
79.5
67.1
80.6
76.3
67.5
64.9
55.8
59.9
70.8
77.5
73.5
71.1
61.6
71.6
74.1
80.4
72.2
69.9
73.3
74.3
57.7
69.3
69.9
65.9
73.3
81.2
68.5
-52.2
----59.1
----------50.5
50.5
--45.3
------58.3
48.7
55.4
-57.8
--
-5-
-70.2
---------------74.3
69.0
----------77.5
84.6
----
-61.0
----64.8
----------62.0
60.8
--59.7
------63.8
59.3
60.7
-69.5
--
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
Mat
-64.0
---------------66.1
63.5
----------65.4
68.6
----
108
99
96
111
105
95
100
113
96
115
109
96
92
79
85
101
110
105
101
88
102
106
115
103
100
104
106
82
99
100
94
104
116
98
-101
----114
----------98
98
--88
------113
94
107
-112
--
9/29
9/27
9/29
9/28
10/1
9/25
9/27
9/29
9/26
9/29
9/28
9/28
9/27
9/30
9/29
10/1
9/25
9/29
9/29
9/28
10/1
9/25
9/27
9/25
9/28
9/28
9/26
9/27
9/29
9/29
9/26
9/27
9/28
9/26
-99
---------------104
97
----------109
119
----
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.7
1.0
1.7
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.0
2.7
3.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
2.0
1.7
2.0
1.0
1.3
48
46
53
50
53
47
51
54
50
46
48
49
47
54
51
48
43
48
48
48
46
46
46
48
52
47
44
43
43
45
44
43
43
47
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 4 continued. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
7416S
7417
Exp 421RS
O-3727
3600R2Y
360NRY
380RY
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
Exp 381-2R
Exp 391-2R
RR2397N
RR2398N
RR2446N
RR2470NSTS
RR2477NSTS
RR2484N
RR2878NSTS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
3-Yr.
AVG.
----109
76.6
66.8
----95
67.9
----97
50.7
76.3
63.8
67.9 109
76.8
62.9
----90
66.4
----95
----101
70.6
58.1
80.5
65.4
70.4 104
72.7
----105
73.8
68.0
51.7
79.1
59.9
66.3
97
56.3
----80
64.4
----92
61.1
49.7
-55.4
-87
57.3
----82
-70.5
--106
74.4
62.8
----89
----104
73.0
68.8
----98
55.8
-66.6
-110
77.3
----102
71.7
65.4
----93
51.0
-63.0
-107
75.0
68.3
53.0
-60.7
-97
----103
72.1
----105
73.8
51.7
71.2
70.2
12.4
8.9
8.9
11.8
6.2
8.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---98
---112
-100
--96
-----108
--99
103
---
---107
---113
-111
----99
-----------
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.3
1.0
1.7
2.0
1.3
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.3
2.3
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
2.7
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.0
2.0
1.3
44
45
45
45
47
53
52
46
43
44
51
46
48
50
48
44
47
46
50
45
53
51
47
49
56
9/29
10/1
9/29
9/28
9/23
9/27
9/27
9/26
9/26
9/29
9/30
10/1
10/1
9/27
10/2
9/30
9/29
9/27
9/30
9/28
10/3
10/2
10/2
10/1
10/3
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist; James Kimball, technician
Woodson silt loam, pH 6.9, % OM na; P test: M, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
6.9
2.7
7.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
4.6
6.9
10.9
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good. High wind storm in early July resulted
in some plant damage during flowering.
39.1
Planted 5/19/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/6/2009; 33 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.3 pt Dual preplant, .75 lb ae glyphosate
postemergence.
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
3852R
4000R2
4551R
XPR43-09
XPR45-09
32C38
33A40
35G38 *RR check
37P37
38C42
460 NRRSTS
478 NRR STS
80N29
EXP 84N
7383
7392
7401
51.2
49.2
50.9
53.1
56.9
57.3
44.9
50.9
44.7
51.8
51.8
59.3
50.7
51.8
46.5
50.9
47.9
43.3
----44.2
---44.5
-45.4
--39.9
---
-6-
--24.2
--26.8
23.2
18.1
-27.8
--------
47.3
----50.8
---48.2
-52.4
--43.2
---
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
Mat
-----42.8
---41.4
--------
97
93
97
101
108
109
85
97
85
98
98
113
96
98
88
97
91
9/30
10/3
10/7
10/6
10/6
9/30
10/3
9/28
9/28
10/5
10/7
10/9
10/4
10/7
9/28
9/28
9/29
101
----103
---103
-106
--93
---
--97
--108
93
73
-112
--------
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
31
35
35
36
34
32
32
34
33
33
33
37
35
34
34
35
34
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 5 continued. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
KANSAS AES
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
KS3406RR
K2-3801
K2X41A9
K2X42A9
K2X43A9
K2X43B9
K2X43C9
K-375RR/SCN
K-428RR/SCN
K-439RR/SCN
3738NRR
3850NR2
3920NRS
4157NRS
4270NR2 *RR check
4329NRR
4477NRR
4506NRR
4580R2
4768NRR
4770NRR
4839NRS
RT 4485N
MPG3908NRR/STS
MPG4509NRR/STS
MPG4689NRR/STS
3909SRN
4444+RN
7386
7416S
7417
7443
7475
Exp 421RS
O-4595
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
486NRS
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
445RR
487RRS
Exp 461-2R
RR2397N
RR2398N
RR2446N
RR2470NSTS
RR2477NSTS
RR2484N
RR2878NSTS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
56.4
37.0
20.9
46.7
38.1 107
54.7
----104
51.5
----98
56.6
----107
50.3
----95
47.7
----91
----112
58.9
----120
63.4
46.7
----89
48.9
----93
50.3
38.1
24.7
44.2
37.7
95
54.0
----102
53.3
----101
48.7
42.5
26.6
45.6
39.3
92
55.5
----105
58.2
43.2
-50.7
-110
54.5
43.8
23.2
49.2
40.5 103
58.2
42.9
22.8
50.6
41.3 110
54.5
----103
52.9
49.9
24.0
51.4
42.3 100
53.9
----102
50.9
----97
43.2
26.3
52.3
43.6 117
61.4
50.1
39.7
-44.9
-95
50.1
46.9
-48.5
-95
42.9
----81
51.4
41.9
-46.7
-98
58.1
48.5
-53.3
-110
54.6
----104
52.0
----99
53.2
----101
57.1
----108
50.4
----96
55.1
----105
55.1
45.1
24.6
50.1
41.6 105
51.5
----98
53.4
-24.3
--101
53.9
----102
52.3
----99
49.2
----93
53.5
----102
51.2
----97
51.5
-23.4
--98
54.3
----103
50.7
47.7
25.1
49.2
41.2
96
58.4
45.9
31.1
52.2
45.1 111
----116
61.2
49.0
41.5
26.5
45.3
39.0
93
49.1
----93
55.1
-25.8
--105
53.4
46.3
-49.9
-101
51.7
44.7
-48.2
-98
50.8
-23.4
--96
53.3
----101
52.7
43.0
24.9
7.5
9.9
11.5
4.5
5.0
3.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-7-
86
---------89
--99
-100
102
100
-116
--100
92
109
-97
113
------105
---------111
107
-97
--108
104
---
84
---------99
--107
--93
92
-96
--106
-----------99
-98
-----94
-101
125
-106
-104
--94
--
Mat
9/24
9/28
10/1
10/3
10/6
10/4
10/5
9/30
10/3
10/1
9/28
9/30
9/29
10/4
10/4
10/7
10/4
10/5
10/6
10/8
10/8
10/9
10/8
10/2
10/2
10/6
9/30
10/7
9/29
10/5
10/5
10/7
10/9
10/3
10/6
9/29
10/4
10/2
10/3
10/7
10/9
9/30
10/4
10/3
10/6
10/8
10/7
9/29
9/29
10/7
10/7
10/7
10/9
10/6
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.5
1.3
1.8
1.0
2.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
32
33
37
33
39
37
35
31
33
31
35
33
33
34
34
35
35
39
35
38
34
36
36
31
31
35
32
38
32
33
32
39
31
32
39
31
34
37
32
35
37
32
31
32
37
37
34
37
33
36
34
29
35
37
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; James Long, agronomist, 620-421-4826
Parsons silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: M, K test: M
18-46-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
4.9
6.2
4.7
7.4
5.6
12.6
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good.
41.4
Planted 6/5/2009 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/4/2009; 17 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.33 Pint Dual II Magnum, 3 oz Canopy XL preemergence.
Table . Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Group IV-V, 2007-2009.
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
PIONEER
4551R
XPR43-09
XPR45-09
XPR46-09
33A40
35G38 *RR check
36C44
37A44
38C42
460 NRRSTS
478 NRR STS
EXP 84N
KS3406RR
4270NR2 *RR check
4329NRR
4477NRR
4506NRR
4580R2
4768NRR
4770NRR
RT 4707N
MPG4509NRR/STS
MPG4689NRR/STS
94Y70
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
57.6
-30.6
--98
53.7
----91
----108
63.9
----105
62.2
55.1
49.4
33.2
52.3
45.9
93
50.8
-19.8
--86
57.3
49.3
-53.3
-97
48.7
33.1
55.9
48.3 107
63.1
57.2
47.2
25.1
52.2
43.2
97
----104
61.3
55.6
-59.2
-106
62.8
----107
63.2
48.7
-17.2
--83
56.7
----96
59.1
----100
58.9
50.2
28.2
54.6
45.8 100
50.9
28.5
57.1
47.5 107
63.2
----105
61.7
49.3
34.4
55.6
48.5 105
61.8
59.3
----101
51.2
-57.3
-107
63.3
58.4
50.5
-54.5
-99
53.7
----91
----106
62.4
59.0
50.7
28.0
4.0
6.5
15.8
2.8
3.9
5.2
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-8-
----97
-97
96
93
-110
----99
100
-97
-101
100
---
109
---119
71
-118
90
---61
--101
102
-123
------
Mat
10/7
10/1
10/4
10/5
9/29
9/26
10/2
10/10
10/2
10/8
10/15
10/1
9/24
9/30
10/6
10/2
10/7
10/2
10/11
10/8
10/12
10/1
10/4
10/7
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
38
37
31
31
34
31
30
38
28
33
38
31
29
29
32
34
39
30
35
37
34
29
36
39
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; James Long, agronomist, 620-421-4826
Parsons silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: M, K test: M
18-46-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
4.9
May June
6.2
4.7
July Aug. Sept. Total
7.4
5.6
12.6
41.4
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good. Cool temperatures and freezes in late
October adversely effected mid-goup V and later entries which had only
partially completed seed fill.
Planted 6/5/2009 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/4/2009; 17 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.33 Pint Dual II Magnum, 3 oz Canopy XL preemergence.
Table . Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-2009.
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2007-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
5051R
5351R
KS5507NRR
4839NRS
5197NRS
RT 5154N
RTS 4824
MPG4907NRR/STS
MPG5505NRR/STS
94Y80
95Y01
95Y40
4807RR
4906RR
4949RR
5115RR
5218RR
487RRS
495RRS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
58.4
----101
57.4
46.3
37.6
51.9
47.1
99
48.0
49.3
37.7
48.7
45.0
83
55.8
----96
54.8
50.7
39.8
52.8
48.4
95
61.1
48.2
32.1
54.7
47.1 106
49.7
29.6
57.0
47.8 111
64.2
58.3
44.1
-51.2
-101
56.1
53.7
34.9
54.9
48.2
97
----106
61.6
60.6
----105
53.0
51.5
-52.3
-92
----107
62.1
60.1
----104
56.1
----97
57.3
----99
51.3
----89
----106
61.6
47.0
-54.5
-107
61.9
57.9
47.2
35.2
4.1
8.3
13.3
2.7
4.6
5.5
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-98
104
-107
102
105
93
114
--109
------100
-107
107
-113
91
84
-99
-----------
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.8
3.0
3.8
1.0
3.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
3.0
1.8
1.8
3.5
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
4.8
1.0
1.0
38
43
35
38
41
40
38
38
39
38
34
37
38
35
36
39
36
37
33
10/17
10/24
10/26
10/15
10/24
10/17
10/16
10/17
10/24
10/14
10/19
10/23
10/18
10/14
10/15
10/18
10/24
10/15
10/15
Dale Roberds Farm, Pittsburg, Cherokee County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist, 785-532-7242
Parsons silt loam, pH 7.0, % OM na; P test: VH, K test: VH
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
4.9
6.2
4.7
7.4
5.6
12.6
Double-cropped following wheat and planted into heavy residue.
41.4
Planted 6/23/2009 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 11/12/2009; 15 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: One application of 1.25 pt glyphosate
postemergence.
Table 8. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Crop Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-20
Table 8. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Cropped Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 20072009
BRAND
NAME
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
PIONEER
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
36C44
37A44
94Y70
R4230SRcn
R4530SRcn
R4730SRcn
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
48.5
-45.4
-106
42.3
36.7
38.9
43.3
37.8
39.6
92
----106
42.2
----101
40.4
37.3
----93
----101
40.3
40.4
42.3
39.9
10.4
10.1
5.3
4.8
4.9
2.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-9-
120
96
-----
-102
-----
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
-------
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
29
35
32
29
32
30
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Dale Roberds Farm, Pittsburg, Cherokee County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist, 785-532-7242
Parsons silt loam, pH 7.0, % OM na; P test: VH, K test: VH
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
Double-cropped following wheat and planted into heavy residue. Fair
stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below normal.
Weed control was good. Cool temperatures and freezes in late October
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
adversely effected mid-goup V and later entries which had only partially
Rainfall:
4.9
6.2
4.7
7.4
5.6 12.6 41.4
completed seed-fill.
Planted 6/23/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/12/2009; 15 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: One application of 1.25 pt glyphosate
postemergence.
Table 9. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Crop Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2007-20
Table 9. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Cropped Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 20072009
BRAND
NAME
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
33B52
33C59
33X55
36Y48
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4839NRS
5197NRS
94Y80
95Y01
95Y40
RR2490NSTS
RR2498NSTS
RR2507NSTS
RR2544NSTS
RR2878NSTS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
24.6
----73
19.4
----57
23.5
----69
41.6
-41.6
-123
41.6
----123
41.6
29.6
46.3
45.5
38.0
40.5
87
----130
43.9
35.5
----105
36.1
----106
35.3
----104
47.0
-43.0
-115
38.9
30.2
----89
----127
43.1
37.6
----111
33.4
----99
28.3
----83
33.9
41.6
43.5
13.8
6.7
5.5
5.4
3.3
2.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---100
-111
----113
------
-----105
-----------
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
-----------------
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
35
34
39
34
39
38
34
38
32
31
34
31
34
34
32
33
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist, 785-532-7242
Cherokee silt loam, pH 6.0, % OM na; P test: VH, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good.
Rainfall:
7.4
5.3
4.3
5.6
6.4 10.2 39.2
Planted 6/23/2009 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 12/3/2009; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 6 oz Blanket and .6 oz First Rate preemergence.
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-2009.
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
RENZE
4551R
XPR46-09
32C38
33A40
35G38 *RR check
37P37
38C42
460 NRRSTS
478 NRR STS
EXP 84N
KS3406RR
4270NR2 *RR check
4580R2
4768NRR
4770NRR
94Y70
R4230SRcn
53.4
57.9
51.5
51.9
57.1
51.4
54.1
54.9
59.8
57.7
48.5
56.8
59.5
58.1
54.4
54.2
54.6
---32.4
----37.4
----41.4
----
43.4
-40.2
42.4
40.8
-----36.3
-------
- 10 -
---42.2
----48.6
----49.8
----
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
---42.2
--------------
97
105
93
94
103
93
98
99
108
105
88
103
108
105
99
98
99
---86
----99
----110
----
107
-99
105
101
-----90
-------
Mat
10/15
10/13
10/9
10/10
10/10
10/8
10/11
10/16
10/16
10/13
10/7
10/11
10/13
10/16
10/16
10/15
10/15
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
2.8
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.0
2.3
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
3.0
1.8
1.5
38
36
32
33
32
31
31
36
38
34
29
33
33
38
37
39
31
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 10 continued. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
RENZE
RENZE
TAYLOR
R4530SRcn
R4730SRcn
Exp 461-2R
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
54.0
----98
56.7
----103
58.2
----105
55.2
37.6
40.5
2.7
5.7
4.9
1.8
2.5
2.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
----
----
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.3
1.0
1.8
35
32
26
10/12
10/18
10/13
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist, 785-532-7242
Cherokee silt loam, pH 6.0, % OM na; P test: VH, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good. Cool temperatures and freezes in late
October adversely effected mid-goup V and later entries, which had only
partially completed seed fill.
7.4
5.3
4.3
5.6
6.4 10.2 39.2
Rainfall:
Planted 6/23/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 12/3/2009; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 6 oz Blanket and .6 oz First Rate preemergence.
Table 11. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2007-2009.
Table 11. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
5051R
5351R
KS5507NRR
4839NRS
5197NRS
94Y80
95Y01
95Y40
4807RR
4906RR
4949RR
5115RR
5218RR
495RRS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
48.4
----104
44.0
37.8
-40.9
-94
35.6
35.4
37.5
35.5
36.2
76
49.6
----106
38.3
40.8
-39.6
-82
----111
51.7
----109
51.1
41.8
42.1
-42.0
-90
----115
53.8
----112
52.1
49.6
----106
48.6
----104
35.2
----75
42.1
-47.8
-115
53.5
46.7
38.2
40.1
5.8
9.2
3.7
3.1
4.1
1.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-99
93
-107
--110
-----110
--94
------------
Mat
10/18
10/22
10/23
10/17
10/23
10/17
10/20
10/23
10/19
10/17
10/16
10/20
10/23
10/18
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
2.5
2.0
3.0
2.8
3.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
1.0
1.3
2.3
1.8
4.5
1.0
39
39
39
39
42
39
37
38
38
36
39
40
43
37
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; James Long, agronomist, 620-421-4826
Lanton silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: H, K test: H
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good.
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
8.4
4.8
9.5
5.0
6.9 11.8 46.4
Planted 6/4/2009 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 11/5/2009; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.33 Pint Dual II Magnum, 3 oz Canopy XL preemergence.
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, -2009.
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2008-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
4551R
XPR46-09
KS3406RR
4270NR2 *RR check
4329NRR
4580R2
4768NRR
4770NRR
50.0
63.6
40.9
58.1
55.6
64.2
58.9
57.1
----56.1
-53.8
--
- 11 -
---------
----55.9
-56.4
--
3-Yr.
AVG.
---------
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
89
113
72
103
98
114
104
101
----109
-104
--
---------
Mat
10/14
10/17
9/30
10/12
10/16
10/12
10/18
10/17
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
2.3
3.0
2.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.5
3.0
40
38
31
35
35
36
39
39
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 12 continued. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, -2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
TAYLOR
R4230SRcn
R4530SRcn
R4730SRcn
Exp 461-2R
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
56.3
----100
55.3
----98
56.8
----101
----108
61.1
56.5
51.5
-8.3
8.3
-5.0
5.0
-Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-----
-----
Mat
10/12
10/13
10/20
10/15
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.5
1.0
2.3
32
37
32
36
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; James Long, agronomist, 620-421-4826
Lanton silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: H, K test: H
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
Rainfall:
April
8.4
May June
4.8
9.5
July Aug. Sept. Total
5.0
6.9 11.8 46.4
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good. Cool temperatures and freezes in late
October adversely effected mid-goup V and later entries which had only
partially completed seed fill.
Planted 6/4/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/5/2009; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.33 Pint Dual II Magnum, 3 oz Canopy XL preemergence.
Table 13. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, -2009.
Table 13. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2008-2009
BRAND
NAME
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
5051R
5351R
KS5507NRR
4839NRS
4807RR
4906RR
4949RR
5115RR
5218RR
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
47.5
----96
47.7
50.1
-48.9
-97
43.5
32.0
-37.8
-88
53.1
----108
----117
57.6
51.8
----105
48.2
----98
46.0
----93
48.5
----98
49.3
43.6
-7.3
8.0
-4.2
4.1
-Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 12 -
-115
73
-------
----------
Mat
10/21
10/27
10/31
10/21
10/21
10/21
10/19
10/23
10/30
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
3.3
4.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.3
3.3
3.8
4.5
42
41
31
43
38
41
40
45
38
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
North Central Experiment Field, Scandia, Republic County; Barney Gordon, agronomist, 785-335-2836
Crete silt loam, pH 6.8, % OM na; P test: M, K test: VH
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Very dry winter and spring. Above-normal rainfall in summer. Cooler
than normal throughout the growing season.
Rainfall:
1.8
0.6
4.5
5.1
3.1
1.9 16.9
Irrigation:
3.0
3.0
6
Planted 5/18/2009 at 12 seeds/ft; harvested 10/21/2009; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Dual, .25 lb/a Scncon., 1 qt/a Roundup Ultra
at planting.
Table . Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2006-2009.
Table 14. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2006-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2007
2006
AVG.
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
NK
NK
NK
NK
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
RENZE
32C38
32X39
35G38 *RR check
37P37
38R33
39RY34
78N18
80N29
9789 NRR
7333
7373
7383
7392
K04-2203RR
K04-3234RR
K05-2270RR
K05-2730RR
K05-4184RR
KS3406RR
K2-3401
K2-3601
K2-3801
K2-3901
K2X41A9
K-348RR/SCN
K-375RR/SCN
K-384RR/SCN
K-410RR/SCN
S33-K5
S36-B6
S37-P5
S39-A3
7349
7386
7399
7416S
Exp 322R
Exp 332R
Exp 362R
Exp 392R
O-3632
325NRR
360NRY
380RY
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
R3797RRcn
76.7
78.8
77.9
78.7
76.9
75.8
77.3
75.7
78.5
76.8
76.6
78.0
75.3
81.7
79.9
73.2
83.6
83.8
77.6
78.6
74.9
78.4
76.8
76.7
76.2
78.9
74.3
76.2
84.8
86.5
80.4
88.2
77.1
76.0
75.2
79.9
85.3
80.1
78.1
82.2
78.5
77.6
78.4
76.9
77.1
80.3
82.1
76.0
79.9
77.6
76.3
67.8
-68.3
---------------74.5
--------67.3
----------------------69.7
67.8
-68.3
---------------74.5
--------67.3
----------------------69.7
- 13 -
72.3
-73.1
---------------76.1
--------71.8
----------------------73.0
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2007
2006
Mat
70.8
-71.5
---------------75.5
--------70.3
----------------------71.9
98
100
99
100
98
97
98
96
100
98
98
99
96
104
102
93
107
107
99
100
95
100
98
98
97
101
95
97
108
110
102
112
98
97
96
102
109
102
99
105
100
99
100
98
98
102
105
97
102
99
97
10/1
10/1
10/2
10/3
10/5
10/5
10/4
10/4
10/5
10/2
10/3
10/4
10/5
10/5
10/3
10/6
10/5
10/5
10/2
10/1
10/3
10/4
10/4
10/6
10/2
10/3
10/4
10/6
10/1
10/3
10/3
10/5
10/2
10/4
10/4
10/5
10/1
10/2
10/4
10/5
10/3
10/1
10/3
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/6
10/5
10/6
10/6
10/4
98
-99
---------------108
--------97
----------------------101
98
-99
---------------108
--------97
----------------------101
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.7
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.7
40
42
40
43
41
42
44
43
43
43
42
46
47
41
47
39
39
42
38
42
45
42
46
44
41
39
44
43
42
41
41
41
43
39
44
40
40
40
43
41
43
43
46
46
41
41
40
47
41
44
41
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 14 continued. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2006-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2007
2006
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
RENZE
RENZE
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
3249NRR
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
9A385NRS
Exp 381-2R
Exp 391-2R
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2007
2006
75.6
----96
76.4
----97
78.0
----99
81.9
----104
81.3
----104
79.3
----101
73.0
----93
79.0
----101
80.1
----102
75.7
----96
76.7
----98
80.5
----103
76.6
----98
78.5
69.3
69.3
3.7
3.6
3.6
4.0
3.3
3.3
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--------------
--------------
Mat
10/5
10/6
10/1
10/1
10/3
10/3
10/4
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/5
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.3
1.0
2.3
1.7
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
39
38
44
39
42
42
46
43
40
37
40
44
40
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Barney Gordon, agronomist, 785-335-2836
Very dry winter and early spring gave way to above-normal rainfall
throughout the summer season. Wet fall conditions delayed harvest.
Crete silt loam, pH 7.0, 2.2% OM; P test: H, K test: VH
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
2.3
1.2
5.8
July Aug. Sept. Total
4.0
3.9
2.3
19.6
Planted 5/19/2009 at 10 seeds/ft; harvested 10/19/2009; 22 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Dual, .25 lb/a Scncon., 1 qt/a Roundup Ultra
at planting.
Table 14. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 15. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
KANSAS AES
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
NK
NK
NK
NK
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
32C38
32X39
35G38 *RR check
37P37
38R33
39RY34
KS3406RR
K2-3401
K2-3601
K2-3801
K2-3901
K2X41A9
K-375RR/SCN
S33-K5
S36-B6
S37-P5
S39-A3
3909SRN
7349
7369S
7379
7386
Exp 332R
Exp 372R
O-3632
O-3732
325NRR
360NRY
380RY
61.9
55.1
65.5
56.4
60.1
52.3
67.9
59.8
58.4
56.5
57.2
60.9
62.8
69.4
67.6
67.4
69.2
57.2
55.4
54.9
58.8
59.3
70.2
57.8
62.1
59.0
54.3
60.5
54.0
-53.5
--53.4
-57.4
-------68.8
70.5
59.0
--------62.6
----
--52.3
---49.8
-------51.6
52.5
51.0
47.9
------------
- 14 -
-54.3
--56.8
-62.7
-------68.2
69.0
64.1
--------60.8
----
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
Mat
------58.4
-------62.7
63.5
59.7
-------------
104
92
110
94
101
87
114
100
98
94
96
102
105
116
113
113
116
96
93
92
98
99
117
97
104
99
91
101
90
10/1
10/1
10/2
10/3
10/2
10/5
10/1
10/2
10/3
10/4
10/5
10/5
10/4
10/1
10/2
10/2
10/5
10/4
10/2
10/2
10/3
10/4
10/2
10/4
10/4
10/3
10/1
10/3
10/4
-92
--92
-99
-------119
122
102
--------108
----
--105
---100
-------104
106
103
97
------------
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
35
38
36
40
37
37
31
36
37
35
41
37
35
40
37
35
31
39
38
37
34
36
40
41
40
41
39
41
39
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 15 continued. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
3249NRR
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4157NRS
4270NR2
9A385NRS
Exp 371-2R
Exp 381-2R
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
60.0
----100
----115
69.0
50.8
----85
49.4
----83
58.4
----98
58.8
----98
61.2
----102
59.7
-47.8
--100
----106
63.2
54.2
58.0
-56.1
-91
62.9
56.5
-59.7
-105
----106
63.6
55.2
----92
56.1
57.7
-56.9
-94
58.7
----98
56.9
----95
61.5
----103
57.7
----96
57.3
-60.7
-107
64.1
59.6
----100
55.8
----93
59.8
----100
59.5
----100
59.8
57.9
49.6
8.8
5.0
4.1
7.2
3.9
2.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---------100
98
--100
----99
-----
-------96
----------------
Mat
10/4
10/5
10/6
10/6
10/6
10/4
10/4
10/6
10/5
9/30
10/2
10/3
10/3
10/4
10/3
10/3
10/4
10/5
10/6
10/5
10/4
10/3
10/4
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
32
35
35
44
33
47
39
35
35
35
32
36
38
38
36
39
37
32
35
37
37
43
35
Harvey County Experiment Field, Hesston, Harvey County; Mark Claassen, agronomist, 620-327-2547
Ladysmith silty clay loam, pH 6.3, 2.4% OM na; P test: , K test:-- Seeds planted into moist seedbed. Emerged in 5 days. Stands were
good. Favorable rainfall. Below-normal temperatures. Drought stress
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
was minimal.
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
5.8
3.1
5.3
5.3
2.0
4.3 25.8
Rainfall:
Planted 6/25/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/4/2009; 30 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Preplant: 1 qt/a Cornerstone Plus, 1% AMSU
broadcast 6/23/2009 Postemergence: 22 oz/a Roundup WeatherMax, 1% AMSU 7/23/2009.
Table 15. Hesston, Harvey County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 16. Hesston, Harvey County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
3800R2
3852R
4000R2
32C38
32X39
35G38 *RR check
37P37
38C42
7383
7391
7392
7401
7419
7479
KS3406RR
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3960NR2
59.1
52.3
56.1
59.2
53.7
57.0
54.2
53.8
54.2
39.6
55.1
56.6
54.6
50.7
55.0
55.4
58.1
60.9
54.1
---62.8
58.0
65.2
-62.4
------57.2
64.7
----
---34.5
35.4
23.9
-30.4
------40.8
41.1
----
- 15 -
---61.0
55.9
61.1
-58.1
------56.1
60.1
----
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
Mat
---52.2
49.0
48.7
-48.9
------51.0
53.7
----
107
94
101
107
97
103
98
97
98
71
99
102
99
92
99
100
105
110
98
---102
94
106
-101
------93
105
----
10/20
10/20
10/20
10/20
10/20
10/20
10/21
10/22
10/20
9/29
10/20
10/23
10/21
10/23
10/17
10/20
10/17
10/20
10/19
---107
110
74
-94
------126
127
----
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.1
1.0
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
30
26
30
30
30
29
30
28
34
24
32
30
30
35
28
33
32
29
27
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 16 continued. Hesston, Harvey County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
4270NR2 *RR check
4289NRS
4329NRR
4419NRS
4506NRR
4549NRS
4580R2
4850NRS
9A385NRS
3909SRN
7386
7416S
7417
7417
7443
7475
Exp 392R
Exp 421RS
O-3732
O-4595
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
429NRS
439NRS
486NRS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
----105
58.2
54.9
65.2
-60.1
-99
50.7
63.3
-57.0
-92
50.9
61.7
-56.3
-92
60.4
24.6
59.2
47.7 105
58.0
54.3
60.2
-57.3
-98
----105
57.9
54.4
----98
64.8
30.6
62.2
51.6 107
59.5
56.6
59.8
-58.2
-102
57.5
65.7
-61.6
-104
----105
58.3
56.0
----101
54.3
----98
59.0
-58.9
-106
58.7
53.6
62.3
-58.0
-97
----111
61.5
54.7
----99
57.1
60.6
-58.9
-103
-26.4
--105
57.9
56.7
64.5
22.8
60.6
48.0 102
----105
58.3
54.4
66.8
31.1
60.6
50.8
98
53.9
----97
50.4
52.0
-51.2
-91
53.4
----96
55.4
61.8
32.3
6.0
6.3
11.9
3.9
4.5
4.5
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-106
102
100
98
97
--105
97
106
---95
101
--98
-104
-108
-84
--
----76
---95
----------82
71
-96
----
Mat
10/23
10/23
10/23
10/22
10/22
10/22
10/23
10/27
10/21
10/20
10/20
10/22
10/20
10/23
10/23
10/28
10/20
10/24
10/20
10/22
10/22
10/20
10/23
10/24
10/22
10/27
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
28
28
28
27
34
29
27
27
28
27
27
29
28
27
37
28
30
26
32
34
28
27
30
27
30
32
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-----------------
Richard Seck Farm, Hutchinson, Reno County; Bill Heer, agronomist, 620-662-9021
Punkin-Taver complex, pH na, % OM na; P test: , K test: -0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
4.8
3.2
3.9
2.1
3.2
8.2 25.4
Irrigation: na
Planted 5/29/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/23/2009; 30 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: na
Table 16. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 17. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
3800R2
3852R
3951R
4000R2
32X39
35G38 *RR check
37A44
37P37
38C42
460 NRRSTS
78N18
80N29
9680 NRR
EXP 84N
7373
7383
73.4
78.5
74.7
78.9
70.8
70.7
73.3
69.9
73.4
66.7
76.7
75.1
68.7
69.7
69.7
72.9
-68.4
62.3
-61.8
-63.6
-62.4
---64.0
----
--58.6
-52.5
51.2
54.4
-59.2
---57.3
----
- 16 -
-73.5
68.5
-66.3
-68.5
-67.9
---66.4
----
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
--65.2
-61.7
-63.8
-65.0
---63.3
----
100
107
102
108
97
97
100
95
100
91
105
103
94
95
95
100
-108
98
-97
-100
-98
---101
----
--107
-96
94
100
-108
---105
----
Mat
10/3
10/3
10/2
10/3
10/3
10/3
10/7
9/27
10/10
10/12
10/2
10/8
10/1
10/9
9/25
9/30
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 17 continued. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
7392
7401
7439S
KS3406RR
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3960NR2
4270NR2 *RR check
4289NRS
4329NRR
4419NRS
4506NRR
4549NRS
4580R2
4850NRS
9A385NRS
3909SRN
7386
7399
7416S
7417
7417
7475
Exp 392R
Exp 421RS
O-3632
O-3727
O-4232
O-4595
3600R2Y
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
429NRS
439NRS
486NRS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
72.9
----100
----103
75.5
73.4
----100
70.6
59.8
51.4
65.2
60.6
96
54.8
53.6
66.0
61.9 105
77.2
73.6
----101
----110
80.5
----103
75.1
----108
78.7
67.2
-71.8
-104
76.3
71.5
63.4
-67.5
-98
65.5
65.6
-65.6
-89
72.4
63.5
56.1
68.0
64.0
99
70.5
60.7
-65.6
-96
73.5
----100
----103
75.3
74.6
62.6
61.1
68.6
66.1 102
58.9
-69.9
-111
80.9
74.7
72.1
-73.4
-102
67.2
----92
71.4
----98
71.3
67.1
-69.2
-97
67.8
----93
73.3
----100
----112
82.0
73.1
----100
68.7
----94
69.0
60.1
73.2
68.8 106
77.3
73.4
67.6
-70.5
-100
68.9
66.7
56.4
67.8
64.0
94
70.0
----96
65.4
58.2
73.0
68.0 110
80.5
73.0
----100
74.0
63.6
54.5
68.8
64.0 101
70.5
----96
71.0
64.4
-67.7
-97
70.3
70.5
-70.4
-96
73.2
63.4
54.6
8.3
6.5
11.5
7.1
4.8
7.3
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---94
86
----106
100
103
100
96
--99
93
114
--106
-----109
107
105
-103
-100
-102
111
---94
98
-------103
---112
----------110
-103
-107
-100
----
Mat
9/30
10/3
10/8
9/25
10/1
9/28
10/4
10/2
10/8
10/8
10/10
9/29
10/9
10/10
10/11
10/10
10/4
10/3
10/5
10/7
10/6
9/30
10/5
10/10
10/4
10/8
9/30
9/29
10/12
10/9
9/28
10/5
9/30
10/10
10/8
10/10
10/11
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
--------------------------------------
Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby, Thomas County; Pat Evans, agronomist, 785-462-6281
Keith silt loam, pH 7.8, 1.3% OM na; P test: , K test: -0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Hail on June 11 stripped some leaves. Otherwise, very good growing
conditions existed throughout the summer with above-average rainfall
and below-average temperatures.
3.4
5.5
3.7
3.8
3.3
1.5 21.2
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
5.0
3.9
1.0
9.9
Planted 5/15/2009 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/7/2009; 20 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 2.50 pt glyphosate.
Table 17. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 18. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
KS3406RR
3439NRR
3610NRR
3738NRR
9A385NRS
71.2
74.4
67.2
73.9
69.4
72.5
75.9
-76.9
68.2
74.0
---82.3
- 17 -
71.9
75.2
-75.4
68.8
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
Mat
72.6
---73.3
103
107
97
106
100
97
102
-103
92
9/29
10/1
10/2
10/5
10/6
98
---109
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
2.5
1.8
2.0
31
33
34
35
33
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 18 continued. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
----99
68.9
----103
71.7
62.8
----90
65.6
----95
----99
68.6
74.4
75.8
69.4
7.2
10.5
7.5
6.1
9.2
6.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
------
------
Mat
10/4
10/4
10/5
10/6
10/7
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.5
1.0
1.8
3.0
1.8
35
32
33
39
32
Southwest Research-Extension Center, Garden City, Finney County; Monty Spangler, agronomist, 620-276-8286
Keith silt loam, pH 7.6, 2.10% OM; P test: , K test: -0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Dry winter through March. Wet April through summer. Temperature was milder
than average druing summer months. Hail storm on Sept. 7 caused 10%
leaf loss or plant damage across study.
4.4
1.8
3.7
3.2
2.2
1.6 16.9
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
0.6
2.1
3.8
2.0
8.5
Planted 6/3/2009 at 10 seeds/ft; harvested 10/20/2009; 21 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Glystar Plus 6/19/2009, Pursuit Plus, glyphosate,
spreader 90 6/25/2009.
Table 18. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009.
Table 19. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2007-2009
BRAND
NAME
DRUSSEL SEED
DRUSSEL SEED
DRUSSEL SEED
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
DSS 3606R2Y
DSS 3810R2Y
DSS 3824R2Y
KS3406RR
3439NRR
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3960NR2
4270NR2 *RR check
4289NRS
4329NRR
4419NRS
4506NRR
4580R2
9A385NRS
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
486NRS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
45.4
----108
46.5
----110
35.2
----84
37.6
21.4
51.1
29.5
36.7
89
34.2
27.0
-30.6
-81
45.7
31.9
64.4
38.8
47.3 109
----123
51.9
41.2
----98
44.3
----105
41.0
----97
42.3
23.6
-33.0
-100
27.7
-40.1
-125
52.5
38.5
25.2
-31.9
-91
41.6
33.2
61.6
37.4
45.5
99
34.6
----82
37.8
27.9
58.0
32.9
41.2
90
-58.9
--115
48.6
41.4
----98
36.6
23.3
61.1
30.0
40.3
87
----119
50.2
41.6
----99
26.6
----63
42.1
26.7
57.8
8.9
13.5
11.2
5.2
4.2
7.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 18 -
---80
101
119
----88
104
94
124
-104
--87
----
---88
-111
-------107
-100
102
-106
----
Mat
10/3
10/12
10/10
10/3
10/3
10/7
10/3
10/12
10/6
10/15
10/10
10/15
10/10
10/16
10/17
10/10
10/8
10/6
10/14
10/12
10/15
10/17
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.0
2.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.3
31
29
26
27
26
30
31
29
26
28
27
30
27
36
29
27
26
27
28
32
27
34
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist; James Kimball, technician
Woodson silt loam, pH 6.9, % OM na; P test: M, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
6.9
May June
2.7
7.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
4.6
6.9
10.9
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good. High wind storm in early July resulted
in some plant damage during flowering.
39.1
Planted 5/19/2009 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/6/2009; 33 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.3 pt Dual preplant.
Table . Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, -2009.
Table 20. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2009
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
AVG.
BRAND
NAME
DYNA-GRO
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
NEBRASKA AES
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
SUPER SOY
SUPER SOY
SUPER SOY
35G38 *RR check
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA3023
IA3024
IA4004
K05-4624
KS3406RR *RR check
KS4607
4270NR2 *RR check
U98-311442
3369L
3399L
3418L
SS-09L.42
SS-09L.47N
SS-10L.39N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
45.1
----101
40.2
----90
44.2
----99
38.2
----85
39.2
----88
46.8
----104
43.7
----98
42.8
----96
38.3
----85
----117
52.4
44.1
----98
45.5
----102
46.8
----104
----113
50.5
----113
50.5
48.6
----108
44.7
----100
44.8
--4.9
--2.6
--Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
------------------
------------------
Mat
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
33
34
31
30
31
31
33
31
32
31
31
34
31
36
35
39
31
10/1
10/5
10/2
9/24
9/20
9/24
10/6
9/26
10/6
10/5
10/2
9/30
10/4
10/6
10/5
10/5
10/5
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; James Long, agronomist, 620-421-4826
Parsons silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: M, K test: M
18-46-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
4.9
May June
6.2
4.7
July Aug. Sept. Total
7.4
5.6
12.6
41.4
Good stands obtained. Rainfall above normal, temperatures below
normal. Weed control was good. Cool temperatures and freezes in late
October adversely effected mid-goup V and later entries which had only
partially completed seed fill.
Planted 6/5/2009 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/4/2009; 17 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.33 Pint Dual II Magnum, 3 oz Canopy XL preemergence.
Table . Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2007-2009
Table 21. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
2008
2007
AVG.
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MORSOY
PIONEER
SUPER SOY
SUPER SOY
SUPER SOY
SUPER SOY
TENN AES
TENN AES
K05-3457
K05-4626
KS5004N
KS5502N
KS5507NRR *RR check
LL 4998N
94Y70 *RR check
SS-09L.47N
SS-09L.49N
SS-10L.49N
SS-10L.51N
5002T
5601T
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
49.5
50.0
50.0
45.4
46.2
56.3
56.4
53.8
57.6
51.8
53.8
52.0
50.5
51.8
5.2
3.2
-----------------
-----------------
- 19 -
--------------
3-Yr.
AVG.
--------------
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
2008
2007
96
97
97
88
89
109
109
104
111
100
104
100
97
--------------
--------------
Mat
10/18
10/21
10/21
10/26
10/26
10/22
10/11
10/10
10/22
10/20
10/22
10/18
10/25
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
3.3
3.3
3.0
4.0
3.5
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.0
1.3
2.5
3.0
2.8
35
27
37
33
34
37
38
36
37
37
31
32
40
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Barney Gordon, agronomist, 785-335-2836
Crete silt loam, pH na, % OM na; P test: M, K test: VH
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Very dry winter and spring. Above-normal summer precipitation.
Cooler than normal throughout the growing season. Wet conditions in
October delayed harvest.
1.8
0.6
4.5
5.1
3.1
1.9 16.9
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
3.0
3.0
6
Planted 5/18/2009 at 12 seeds/ft; harvested 10/22/2009; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Dual/a, .25 lb/a Sccon, 1qt/a Roundup
Ultra at planting.
Table 2. Scandia, Republlic County Irrigated Conventional Soybean Performance Test, -2009.
Table 22. Scandia, Republlic County Irrigated Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2009
BRAND
NAME
DYNA-GRO
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
NEBRASKA AES
OHLDE
35G38 *RR check
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA3023
IA3024
IA4004
K03-3825
K05-4624
KS3406RR *RR check
KS4607
4270NR2 *RR check
U98-311442
4040
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-Yr.
2009
AVG.
3-Yr.
AVG.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2009
79.9
----102
----115
89.7
69.9
----89
77.8
----99
73.7
----94
81.0
----104
76.3
----98
82.7
----106
76.9
----98
80.5
----103
76.0
----97
68.5
----88
83.6
----107
78.2
--2.8
--3.0
--Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 20 -
--------------
--------------
Mat
10/3
9/30
10/2
9/30
9/30
10/6
10/5
10/7
10/2
10/6
10/6
10/1
10/6
2009
Lodge
score
Ht
(in)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
41
43
38
39
43
42
42
44
38
43
40
41
43
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
McCune
Pittsburg
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa MG4 DMG 4 MG 5 DMG 5
MG 4 MG 5
CHANNEL
3600R2
3800R2
3852R
3951R
4000R2
4551R
5051R
5351R
XPR43-09
XPR45-09
XPR46-09
----------97
--- 104
-94
----105
--
111
-----------
-101
109
-100
-------
-108
-99
96
-------
--97
-93
97
--101
108
--
------------
DRUSSEL SEED
DSS 3606R2Y
DSS 3810R2Y
DSS 3824R2Y
----
----
----
----
----
DYNA-GRO
32C38
32X39
33A40
33B52
33C59
33X55
35G38 *RR check
36C44
36Y48
37A44
37P37
38C42
38R33
39RY34
---------------
100
108
----105
---103
--99
---------------
109
-85
---97
---85
98
---
FONTANELLE
460 NRRSTS
478 NRR STS
78N18
80N29
9680 NRR
9789 NRR
EXP 84N
--110
91
-98
--
--108
95
-106
--
--111
105
----
98
113
-96
--98
--------
G2 GENETICS
7333
7373
7383
7391
7392
7401
7419
7439S
7479
----------
--99
78
84
92
----
-95
100
-113
96
-115
--
--88
-97
91
----
----------
----------98
--- 101
-99
91
-108
-105
--
------------
Erie
BelleHutchGarden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Hesston inson Colby City AVG
-----89
----113
------96
97
----
------------
------------
-107
94
-101
-------
-100
107
102
108
-------
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
-----93
-------86
106
97
--92 107
--97
------
---------------
---73
57
69
--123
------
93
-94
---103
---93
98
---
---------------
---------------
---------------
98 104
100 92
--------99 110
------100 94
--98 101
97 87
104
106
----107
--------
--------
99
108
----105
--------
--------
--------
--98
96
-100
--
--------
--------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
98
98
99
-96
-----
----------
--98
71
99
102
99
-92
- 21 -
107
-97
97
--------103
97
------ 100
98
95
97 100
-----
------------
------------
111
104
102
101
100
95
100
97
96
108
108
-- 108 108
-- 110 110
-- 84
84
---------------
---------------
102
99
91
73
57
69
100
102
123
100
96
98
99
94
91
-105
103
94
-95
--------
--------
98
109
106
98
94
101
101
-95
100
-100
103
-100
--
----------
----------
98
96
97
75
98
97
99
108
92
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Pittsburg
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa MG4 DMG 4 MG 5 DMG 5
KANSAS AES
K04-2203RR
K04-3083RR
K04-3234RR
K05-2270RR
K05-2730RR
K05-4184RR
KS3406RR
KS5507NRR
---------
------91
--
---------
------107
--
---------
------83
--
KRUGER
K2-3401
K2-3601
K2-3801
K2-3901
K2X41A9
K2X42A9
K2X43A9
K2X43B9
K2X43C9
K-348RR/SCN
K-375RR/SCN
K-384RR/SCN
K-410RR/SCN
K-428RR/SCN
K-439RR/SCN
104
104
107
98
102
-----94
-----
--101
-101
97
98
99
101
-107
--97
102
--109
-96
92
79
85
101
-110
105
101
88
102
--104
-98
107
95
91
112
-120
--89
93
----------------
LEWIS
360R2
3780
3909
103
95
103
----
----
----
------------------------
-110
109
101
101
106
105
104
100
99
100
97
----97
-----94
106
115
103
-100
104
106
82
--99
-----------100
---95
-102
101
-92
105
-110
-103
110
-103
100
102
97
----
MIDLAND
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4157NRS
4270NR2 *RR che
4289NRS
4329NRR
4419NRS
4477NRR
4506NRR
4549NRS
4580R2
4768NRR
4770NRR
4839NRS
4850NRS
5197NRS
9A385NRS
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutchGarden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Hesston inson Colby City AVG
---- 123
----------83
87
------88
--
-------76
------72
--
-------88
104 ---102 -93 -107 -107 -99 114
---
------99
--
------------96 103
---
------89
--
104
123
102
93
107
107
95
85
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
100 100
95 98
100 94
98 96
98 102
--------97 -101 105
95 -97 ------
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
101
99
102
97
99
99
91
92
104
97
106
100
99
91
99
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
103
95
103
------------------------
---------96
-100
-100
107
-105
105
101
-----
------------------103
---98
---------114
-104
-101
--- 108
-------
------------------------
------------------------
---100
105
110
-98
-105
99
92
92
-105
98
105
---98
-107
--------------------------------------96 130
--95 105
---
- 22 -
------------------103
-------------108
-105
-99
--- 106
---82
---
-- 107 81
98
-97 -- 107
---- 106
105 106 109 103
101
-- 123 106
110
-- 98 105
---- 104
103
-- 105
98
---96
108
-- 97 103
104
-- 100 101
-- 125 103
98
89
-- 91
91
---- 102
99
-- 99 104
96
--97
100
-- 82 102
---- 104
---- 101
---- 107
103
--- 101
---94
99
102 100 90
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Pittsburg
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa MG4 DMG 4 MG 5 DMG 5
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutchGarden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Hesston inson Colby City AVG
MORSOY
RT 4485N
RT 4707N
RT 5154N
RTS 4824
-----
-----
-----
117
----
-----
--107
--- 106
-- 111
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
117
107
106
111
M-PRIDE
MP3908NRRSTS
MP4509NRRSTS
MP4689NRRSTS
MP4907NRRSTS
MP5505NRRSTS
------
------
------
95
95
81
---
------
--99
-91
--- 101
-97
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
95
97
86
101
97
NK
S33-K5
S36-B6
S37-P5
S39-A3
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
108
110
102
112
116
113
113
116
-----
-----
-----
-----
112
112
108
114
NUTECH
3909SRN
4444+RN
7349
7369S
7379
7386
7399
7416S
7417
7417
7443
7475
-------------
109
95
109
-113
105
-89
-106
92
--
94
-104
--116
98
109
-95
---
98
110
---104
-99
-101
108
96
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
--98
--97
96
102
-----
96
-93
92
98
99
-------
102 111
--------104 102
-92
105
98
101
97
98
93
106
-97 100
-------------
-------------
102
102
101
92
106
104
95
100
99
99
102
98
--97
104
103
89
99
85
95
---
-----96
------
-----97
-109
----
-----105
----105
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
109 -102 117
99 --- 97
105 ---100 104
---- 99
-----
----111
99
--103
-105
------------
------------
109
110
98
101
108
98
99
100
99
100
101
OHLDE
Exp 322R
Exp 332R
Exp 362R
Exp 372R
Exp 392R
Exp 421RS
O-3632
O-3727
O-3732
O-4232
O-4595
- 23 -
----112
100
94
106
-100
94
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Pittsburg
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa MG4 DMG 4 MG 5 DMG 5
PHILLIPS
325NRR
3600R2Y
360NRY
380RY
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
486NRS
------------
--106
85
106
102
91
84
104
90
--
-90
95
101
104
105
97
80
92
87
--
-----98
101
102
99
93
102
PIONEER
94Y70
94Y80
95Y01
95Y40
-----
-----
-----
-----
PROGENY
4807RR
4906RR
4949RR
5115RR
5218RR
------
------
------
------
------
RENZE
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
R4530SRcn
R4730SRcn
93
97
101
---
99
110
96
---
82
106
89
---
97
98
103
---
SYLVESTER
3249NRR
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4157NRS
4270NR2
4289NRS
9A385NRS
-91
101
102
103
103
108
101
100
-100
91
101
--------------
--------------
--------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
106 106
----- 106 106
--- 105 104
--92 115
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
------------
Erie
BelleHutchGarden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Hesston inson Colby City AVG
------------
------------
------------
98
--- 111
-- 109
-90
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
105
108
106
99
------
------
------
------
------
------
113
107
100
99
87
97 102
96 100
97 106
-----
------
------
------
------
95
101
99
96
101
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
95
100
104
98
98
98
101
102
98
107
100
91
97
-- 107
-- 104
-97
-99
-89
------
------
115
112
106
104
75
------
117
105
98
93
98
--101
93
101
------
------
------
--99
98
103
------
--100
98
101
------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
- 24 -
99 91
--100 101
98 90
98 100
102 115
105 85
97 83
102 98
99 98
---
99
104
104
101
-93
101
102
96
---98
91
105
106
92
94
98
95
103
96
107
100
-93
----95
-96
--93
----- 100
----93
102 110
99 115 104
105 100 103 98 103
98 101
90 87
95
--95 119
94
97
96
99 99
98
91
97
--94
96
96
-- 63
89
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
McCune
Pittsburg
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa MG4 DMG 4 MG 5 DMG 5
MG 4 MG 5
TAYLOR
378RR
445RR
487RRS
495RRS
Exp 371-2R
Exp 381-2R
Exp 391-2R
Exp 461-2R
100
---103
104
---
----111
100
---
-----104
98
--
-96
111
----116
---------
------ 106
-- 107
---------
-------- 115
------105
--
WILLCROSS
2379N
2399N
RR2397N
RR2398N
RR2446N
RR2470NSTS
RR2477NSTS
RR2484N
RR2490NSTS
RR2498NSTS
RR2507NSTS
RR2544NSTS
RR2878NSTS
109
99
------------
--------------
--110
102
93
107
97
103
----105
--93
93
105
101
98
96
----101
--------------
--------------
--------------
---------
--------89
127
111
99
83
- 25 -
--------------
--------------
Erie
BelleHutchGarden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Hesston inson Colby City AVG
-------108
---------
--------------
--------------
---------- 100
103 100
98 ----
--------------
--------------
---------
---------
---------
---------
100
96
109
111
105
102
98
110
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
109
99
102
98
99
104
98
100
89
127
111
99
97
"
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 24. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2009 Conventional Soybean Tests
BRAND/NAME
Ottawa
ILLINOIS AES
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
90
99
---
115
89
102
94
85
88
104
----
99
94
104
92
91
104
KANSAS AES
K03-3825
K05-3457
K05-4624
K05-4626
KS4607
KS5004N
KS5502N
--98
-85
---
-96
-97
-97
88
98
-106
-103
---
98
96
102
97
94
97
88
MORSOY
LL 4998N
--
109
--
109
NEBRASKA AES
U98-311442
98
--
88
93
102
104
113
----
----
102
104
113
--
--
107
107
113
108
-100
---
-104
111
-100
104
-------
113
106
111
100
100
104
---
100
97
---
100
97
IOWA AES
IA3023
IA3024
IA4004
NUTECH
3369L
3399L
3418L
OHLDE
4040
SUPER SOY
SS-09L.42
SS-09L.47N
SS-09L.49N
SS-10L.39N
SS-10L.49N
SS-10L.51N
TENN AES
5002T
5601T
Parsons MG 5
Scandia
AVG
- 26 -
"
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 25. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2009 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
DRUSSEL SEED
DRUSSEL SEED
DRUSSEL SEED
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
DYNA-GRO
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
3600R2
3800R2
3852R
3951R
4000R2
4551R
5051R
5351R
XPR43-09
XPR45-09
XPR46-09
DSS 3606R2Y
DSS 3810R2Y
DSS 3824R2Y
32C38
32X39
33A40
33B52
33C59
33X55
35G38 *RR check
36C44
36Y48
37A44
37J34
37P37
38C42
38R33
39RY34
460 NRRSTS
478 NRR STS
78N18
80N29
9680 NRR
9789 NRR
EXP 84N
7333
7373
7383
7391
7392
7401
7419
7439S
7479
K04-2203RR
K04-3083RR
K04-3234RR
K05-2270RR
K05-2730RR
K05-4184RR
KS3406RR
KS5507NRR
K2-3401
K2-3601
K2-3801
K2-3901
K2X41A9
K2X42A9
K2X43A9
K2X43B9
K2X43C9
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
3.0
3.0
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.6
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
5.2
5.9
5.5
3.8
4.4
4.8
4.4
3.4
3.7
4.2
3.3
3.4
-4.7
--3.8
3.8
-3.4
3.8
3.8
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.7
3.9
4.8
4.2
4.0
3.8
4.4
3.4
5.2
3.4
3.5
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
P
P
W
W
W
W
W
W
---P
P
W
W
P
P
W
W
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
W
P
--P
--P
W
-P
P
W
W
-----------P
P
P
P
P
W
P
P
P
P
P
Ib
Br
Bl
Bf
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
---Ib
Br
Bl
Br
Bl
Bl
BF
BF
BL
Bl
Bl
Br
Br
Bl
IB
Bl
Bl
--Bl
--IB
Bf
-Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
-----------Br
IB
IB
M
BR
BL
BL
M
BL
BL
BL
- 27 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- MR -- MR
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
S R S MR
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- MR -- --- -- -- --- -- -- -R R -- R
-- R -- --- -- -- -R R R -R R R -R R R -R R R --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- S -- -R R R R
-- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- S -- --
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
----PI88788
--PI88788
--PI88788
-----PI88788
--PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
------------PI437654
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
--
S
S
Rps1c
Rps1c
S
Rps1a
S
susc
------Rps1c
Rps1c
--Rps1c
-----Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
--S
--Rps1k
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
-------------Rps1c
S
Rps1c
S
Rps1k
Rps1k
S
Rps1a
Rps1c
Tolerance
2.2
2.2
2.2
4.0
2.5
3.0
1.9
2.0
---1.7
2.2
2.2
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
------5.0
-5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
-----------------------
STS
-----STS
-STS
--------STS
----STS
STS
---STS
------------------------------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 25 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2009 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
LEWIS
LEWIS
LEWIS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
M-PRIDE
NK
NK
NK
NK
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
K-348RR/SCN
K-375RR/SCN
K-384RR/SCN
K-410RR/SCN
K-428RR/SCN
K-439RR/SCN
360R2
3780
3909
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4157NRS
4230RS2
4270NR2 *RR check
4289NRS
4329NRR
4419NRS
4477NRR
4506NRR
4511NRS
4580R2
4768NRR
4770NRR
4839NRS
5197NRS
9A385NRS
RT 4485N
RT 4707N
RT 5154N
RTS 4824
MP3908NRRSTS
MP4509NRRSTS
MP4689NRRSTS
MP4907NRRSTS
MP5505NRRSTS
S33-K5
S36-B6
S37-P5
S39-A3
3909SRN
4444+RN
7349
7369S
7379
7386
7399
7416S
7417
7417
7443
7475
Exp 322R
Exp 332R
Exp 362R
Exp 372R
Exp 392R
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
3.4
3.8
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.3
3.6
3.7
3.9
3.4
--3.7
----4.1
--4.2
4.3
-4.4
4.5
--4.7
--5.1
3.8
4.4
4.7
5.1
4.8
3.9
4.5
4.6
4.9
5.5
3.3
3.6
3.7
3.9
3.9
4.4
3.4
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.4
-------
R
W
W
P
P
P
P
W
W
----------------------W
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
W
W
P
W
W
W
P
---W
P
--P
--------
Bl
BF
Bf
Bl
BL
BL
IB
BF
Bf
----------------------Bf
Br
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
IB
Bf
BL
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bf
Br
---Bf
Bl
--Bl
--------
- 28 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
------S
S
----------------------------------S
-------R
R
--R
R
-------
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
----PI88788
--PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
--PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
---Pi88788
Pi88788
88.788
88.788
---PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
PI88788
-------
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
-S
S
S
Rps1c
Rps1c
---Rps1c
--------------Rps1c
---Rps1c
-Rps1c
-Rps1a
-----Rps1a
Rps1a
S
S
Rps1c
----Rps1c
Rps1c
--S
--------
R
R
R
R
MR
R
R
R
R
R
--MR
----R
--R
--MR
R
--R
--R
R
R
R
R
-R
-R
R
MR
-Si
R
R
R
R
---R
R
--R
R
-------
------R
R
----------------------------------S
-------R
R
--R
R
-------
------MR
MR
-MR
--MR
----MR
--MR
MR
--MR
-------MR
MR
MR
---R
R
--S
R
R
R
R
---R
R
--R
R
-------
Tolerance
--7.0
---2.0
2.0
2.0
1.8
--3.0
----4.0
--2.0
2.2
-4.0
4.0
--4.0
--3.0
3.8
4.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
------------------
STS
-STS
-STS
STS
STS
-STS
---------STS
--STS
---STS
-----STS
STS
---STS
STS
STS
STS
STS
STS
----STS
-----------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 25 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2009 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
RENZE
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
SYLVESTER
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
Exp 421RS
O-3632
O-3727
O-3732
O-4232
O-4595
325NRR
3600R2Y
360NRY
380RY
385NRS
399NRS
417 NRSE
420NRY
429NRS
439NRS
486NRS
94Y70
94Y80
95Y01
95Y40
4807RR
4906RR
4949RR
5115RR
5218RR
R3797RRcn
R4038SRcn
R4230SRcn
R4530SRcn
R4730SRcn
3249NRR
3439NRR
3610NRR
3630R2
3738NRR
3740NR2
3850NR2
3920NRS
3960NR2
4157NRS
4270NR2
4289NRS
9A385NRS
378RR
445RR
487RRS
495RRS
Exp 371-2R
Exp 381-2R
Exp 391-2R
Exp 461-2R
2379N
2399N
RR2397N
RR2398N
RR2446N
RR2470NSTS
RR2477NSTS
RR2484N
RR2490NSTS
RR2498NSTS
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
--3.7
--4.5
3.2
-3.6
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.8
4.7
4.8
5.0
5.4
4.8
4.9
4.9
5.1
5.2
3.7
4.0
4.2
4.5
4.7
3.2
3.4
--3.7
----4.1
-4.2
-3.7
4.4
4.8
4.9
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.5
3.7
3.8
3.9
-4.4
4.7
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.9
--W
--P
P
-P
P
W
W
W
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
W
P
P
W
P
P
P
W
P
P
M
---------------------W
W
--P
W
M
W
P
P
--IB
--Br
IB
-Bl
B
Bf
Bf
B
Bl
Bl
Bl
B
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
IB
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
---------------------IB
Bf
--Br
Bl
Bl
-IB
IB
- 29 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
--S
--S
------R
----MR
MR
MR
MR
-----S
S
S
S
S
--------------S
-----------------
--PI88788
--PI88788
-----------PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-----PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
----PI88788
-PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
--PI88788
---
--Rps1c
-----RG1c
NG22
Rcl.7
Rps1c
----Rps1a
---Rps1k
-Rps1a
--------Rps1a
---Rps1c
--------Rps1a
Rps1a
Rps1a
Rps1k
Rps1a
Rps1a
Rps1a
Rps1a
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
-NG
------
--MR
--R
----------MR
MR
MR
MR
R
R
--R
MR
R
R
R
MR
R
R
R
--R
----R
-R
-R
MR
MR
R
R
R
R
MR
R
R
R
-R
R
-R
R
R
--MR
--S
-----------MR
MR
MR
S
-----MR
------------------S
-----------------
--MR
--MR
------MR
---MS
MR
MR
MR
R
-----MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
--MR
----MR
-MR
-MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
R
R
MR
-R
MR
-R
MR
MR
Tolerance
--2.0
--2.0
1.9
-2.4
2.9
1.7
2.7
1.6
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.8
5.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
-----3.0
3.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
-1.8
--2.0
----1.9
-2.0
-1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
1.7
1.8
2.6
-3.0
--2.2
---
STS
--STS
------------------------STS
STS
STS
STS
---------STS
-STS
---STS
------STS
---STS
STS
-STS
STS
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 25 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2009 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
RR2507NSTS
RR2544NSTS
RR2547N
RR2878NSTS
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
5.0
5.4
5.4
--
P
W
W
--
IB
Bf
Bl
--
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
-----
-PI88788
---
-----
R
R
R
--
-- MR
-- R
-- R
-- --
Tolerance
-4.0
---
STS
STS
STS
---
Flower color: P = purple, W = white, M = mixed
Hilum color: Bl = black, Ib = imperfect black, Br = brown, Bf = buff, G = grey, Y = yellow, M = mixed
SCN Resistance: R1, R3, R4, and R14 = Race 1, 3, 4, and 14, respectively, S = susceptible, R = resistant, MR = moderately resistant
Phytophthora root rot: RR = race resistance (major genes), H = heterogeneous; Tolerance = field tolerance score, 1 = excellent to 9 = poor
STS = sulfonylurea herbicide tolerant
All information supplied by entrant.
- 30 -
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 26. Description of Conventional Entries in 2009 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
SCN Resistance
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
Phytophthora
RR
Tolerance
STS
ILLINOIS AES
LD00-2817P
4.1
P
Ib
-- R -- -788/654
---ILLINOIS AES
LD00-3309
3.9
P
Bl
-- R -- -PI88788
---IOWA AES
IA3023
3.0
P
Y
S S S S
-S
--IOWA AES
IA3024
3.0
W
Bl
S S S S
-S
--IOWA AES
IA4004
4.0
P
Ib
S S S S
-R
--KANSAS AES
K03-3825
4.6
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K05-3457
5.0
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K05-4624
4.5
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K05-4626
4.8
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
KS4607
4.6
P
Bl
S S S S
-S
--KANSAS AES
KS5004N
5.0
W
IB
R R -- -PEKING
---KANSAS AES
KS5502N
5.2
P
IB
R R R R PI437654
S
--MORSOY
LL 4998N
4.9
P
Ib
-- R -- MR PI88788
Rps1k
3.0
-NEBRASKA AES
U98-311442
3.9
W
Ib
-- R -- -PI88788
S
--NUTECH
3369L
3.6
---- -- -- -----NUTECH
3399L
3.9
---- -- -- -----NUTECH
3418L
4.1
---- -- -- -----OHLDE
4040
----- -- -- -----SUPER SOY
SS-09L.42
4.2
P
Bl
-- -- -- ---1.9
-SUPER SOY
SS-09L.47N
4.7
P
Ib
-- R -- ---2.3
-SUPER SOY
SS-09L.49N
4.9
P
Bf
-- R -- --Rps1k
2.2
-SUPER SOY
SS-10L.39N
3.9
W
Bl
-- R -- ---1.7
-SUPER SOY
SS-10L.49N
4.9
P
Bf
-- R -- ---1.8
-SUPER SOY
SS-10L.51N
5.1
W
Bl
-- R -- ---1.8
-TENN AES
5002T
5.0
W
Ib
S S S S
-S
--TENN AES
5601T
5.6
W
Bf
S S S S
-S
--Flower color: P = purple, W = white, M = mixed
Hilum color: Bl = black, Ib = imperfect black, Br = brown, Bf = buff, G = grey, Y = yellow, M = mixed
SCN Resistance: R1, R3, R4, and R14 = Race 1, 3, 4, and 14, respectively, S = susceptible, R = resistant, MR = moderately resistant
Phytophthora root rot: RR = race resistance (major genes), H = heterogeneous; Tolerance = field tolerance score, 1 = excellent to 9 = poor
STS = sulfonylurea herbicide tolerant
All information supplied by entrant.
- 31 -
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
To access crop performance testing information electronically, visit our Web site. The information contained in this publication, plus more, is available for viewing or downloading at:
www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt
Excerpts from the
University Research Policy Agreement with Cooperating Seed Companies
Permission is hereby given to Kansas State University (KSU) to test varieties and/or hybrids designated on the attached entry
forms in the manner indicated in the test announcements. I certify that seed submitted for testing is a true sample of the seed
being offered for sale.
I understand that all results from Kansas Crop Performance Tests belong to the University and the public and shall be controlled by the University so as to produce the greatest benefit to the public. Performance data may be used in the following
ways: 1) Tables may be reproduced in their entirety provided the source is referenced and data are not manipulated or
reinterpreted; 2) Advertising statements by an individual company about the performance of its entries may be made as long
as they are accurate statements about the data as published, with no reference to other companies’ names or cultivars. In
both cases, the following must be included with the reprint or ad citing the appropriate publication number and title:
“See the official Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service Report of Progress 1022, ‘2009 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties,’ or the Kansas Crop Performance Test Web site,
www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt, for details. Endorsement or recommendation by Kansas State University is not implied.”
Contributors
Main Station, Manhattan
William T. Schapaugh, Jr., Professor (Senior Author)
Jane Lingenfelser, Assistant Agronomist
Research Centers
Patrick Evans, Colby
James Long, Columbus
Monty Spangler, Garden City
Dean Stites, Crawford County Extension
Experiment Fields
Mark Claassen, Hesston
W. Barney Gordon, Belleville and Scandia
William Heer, Hutchinson
James Kimball, Ottawa
Larry Maddux, Topeka
Copyright 2009 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this
publicaiton may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case, give credit to the
author(s), 2009 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties, Kansas State University, December 2009. Contribution
no. 10-167-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is
criticism implied of similar products not mentioned.
Publications from Kansas State University are available on the World Wide Web at:
www.ksre.ksu.edu
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
SRP 1022 K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
December 2009
3,800