1/14 Forced reconnection studies in the MAST spherical tokamak M P Gryaznevich1, A Sykes1, K G McClements1 T Yamada2, Y Hayashi2, R Imazawa2, Y Ono2 Reported by K G McClements with acknowledgements to A Thyagaraja1 & C G Gimblett1 1 EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, UK 2 University of Tokyo, Japan Workshop on MHD waves & reconnection, University of Warwick, November 18-19 2010 CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority 2/14 Introduction Magnetic reconnection can be studied in laboratory experiments under conditions approximating those of space plasmas including solar corona Dedicated experiments include TS-3/4 at Tokyo University1 & MRX at Princeton2 Reconnection can also be studied in magnetic fusion experiments, such as Mega Ampère Spherical Tokamak (MAST) at Culham → higher magnetic field, stronger heating & more detailed diagnostics than those available in dedicated experiments Reconnection can occur spontaneously in tokamak plasmas due to MHD instabilities, leading to sawtooth oscillations & magnetic island formation I will present experimental signatures of forced reconnection that occurs in MAST during one particular method of plasma start-up: → merging-compression 1 Ono et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3328 (1996) 2 Hsu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3859 (2000) CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority 3/14 MAST spherical tokamak (ST) R a Unlike conventional tokamaks, aspect ratio R/a ~ 1 in STs In MAST R 0.85 m, a 0.65 m Current in centre rod & external coils produces toroidal B field 5 kG Current in plasma (produced by combination of inductive & noninductive methods) ≤ 1.45 MA poloidal B at plasma edge ≤ 4 kG Electron & ion temperatures in plasma core ~ 106 - 107 K ( 0.1-1 keV) Particle density (~1018 – 51019 m-3) >> solar coronal values, but ~ 0.01 is comparable Ions mostly deuterium (mi = 2mp, mi /me = 3675) CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Merging/compression start-up in MAST P3 t=2.0 ms t=3.0 ms t=3.4 ms t=6.6 ms 4/14 MAST shot #15929: two plasma rings, inductively formed around P3 in-vessel coils (t=2.0ms), merge (t=3.0ms), & eventually produce plasma current of up to 0.45 MA (t=6.6ms) Right-hand frames show same images but with closed poloidal magnetic flux contours superposed reconnection of poloidal flux occurs in midplane accompanied by rapid heating of ions & electrons, with some evidence of ion acceleration toroidal (guide) field unaffected by reconnection CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Reconnection in TS-3, TS-4 1 5/14 Rise in ion temperature found to increase approximately as B2 where B is initial magnetic field conversion of field energy to thermal energy In these cases toroidal field reverses at X-line → no strong guide field No electron temperature measurements 1 Ono et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3328 (1996) CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Temperature evolution in MAST 6/14 Ti (keV) Te (keV) Ip (MA) No evidence of super-thermal electrons, from either Thomson scattering or hard X-ray diagnostics Imazawa et al. to be submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. Te increases from ~105 K to around 5106 K while Ti rises to 1.3 107 K in ~10ms (caveat: Ti measurements based on neutral particle analyser data, which may have been affected by fast ions) In another merging-compression shot Te > 107 K was measured CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority 2D Te profiles in MAST Hollow case Peaked case Yag @ 8 ms 7/14 Te (eV) 200 Yag @ 9 ms Yag @ 10 ms z (m) Yag @ 11 ms 0 R (m) 2D Thomson scattering maps of Te show centrally peaked & hollow profiles; in latter cases central peak may also be present CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority f (kHz) High-frequency instabilities in MAST 8/14 Instabilities in Alfvén frequency range A ~ cA/R ~ 2102 kHz present during & after reconnection → cf. Alfvén eigenmodes excited by superAlfvénic beam ions in tokamaks - but, no beam injection occurs during merging-compression in MAST Frequency-sweeping modes also observed; seen in MAST only when fast ions are present evidence that reconnection is accelerating ions to E ~ 102 keV in this case Alfvénic instabilities could be producing fast ions rather than vice versa Instabilities in lower hybrid range ~ (ie)1/2 ~ 2200 MHz also observed during reconnection CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Filaments in MAST 4.9 ms 9/14 Filamentary structures can be seen during merging compression in backgroundsubtracted optical images These are observed following spikes in line-integrated density, implying radial ejection of plasma following reconnection evidence of turbulence in postreconnection plasma? 5.0 ms 5.1 ms minimum subtracted average subtracted CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Reconnection length & time scales (1) Both electrons & ions strongly heated during merging compression in MAST, but at unequal rates; generally ions are heated more rapidly results cannot be explained by MHD alone Some estimates of length & time scales: Alfvén timescale A ~ 2/A ~ 1s Thickness of current sheet (based on 2D Te profiles) ~ 2 cm Identifying this as reconnection length scale, assuming Spitzer resistivity & setting Te equal to pre-reconnection values ~105 K ( ~ 410-5 ohm m) resistive timescale r ~ 10s ~ 10A Ion skin depth c/pi ~ 14 cm, electron skin depth c/pe ~ 2 mm, ion Larmor radius ~ 1 mm, electron Larmor radius ~ 0.01 mm electron inertia & finite Larmor radius effects negligible, but Hall term cannot be neglected in induction equation η 2 B j v B B t ne μ0 two-fluid or kinetic analysis of reconnection process is necessary CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority 10/14 Reconnection length & time scales (2) 11/14 Based on rate at which plasma rings approach each other, assuming Spitzer resistivity with Te~105 K, magnetic Reynolds number is of order μ LU Rm 0 ~ 10 η (NB Rm << Lundquist number since inflow velocity << Alfvén speed) highly dissipative plasma Post-reconnection electron-ion collisional energy equilibration time E ~ tens of ms >> r , but comparable to actual equilibration time (E >> r also found by Hsu et al. in MRX, in which there is no guide field) CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Ion & electron heating 12/14 Neglecting radiative losses, electron & ion energy equations are dT 3me nk 3 Ti Te ηj 2 nk e pe v e qe Pe : v e 2 dt mi τ e 3me nk 3 dT Te Ti nk i pi v i qi Pi : v i 2 dt mi τ e q – heat flux; P – stress tensor; e – electron collision time Temperature evolution cannot be explained by Ohmic term (j2) since this only heats electrons (measurements indicate that ions heat up first) If mechanism were found for heating ions alone, rise in Te could be largely accounted for by equilibration term ( Ti -Te) Possible ion heating mechanisms: damping of turbulent ion flows associated with magnetic fluctuations – proposed by Haas & Thyagaraja1 & Gimblett2 as explanations of Ti >Te in reverse field pinches 1 Haas 2 & Thyagaraja Culham Report CLM-P 606 (1980) Gimblett Europhys. Lett. 11, 541 (1990) CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Buneman instability 13/14 3rd possibility: heating due to turbulence driven by two-stream (Buneman) instability1 Ampère’s law in reconnecting region Bθ μ0 j φ μ0 ne v i v e φ Z , - toroidal & poloidal components B-field mainly toroidal, so electron-ion drift parallel to B is vi ve jφ 1 Bθ 107 ms 1 μ0 ne Z ne using B 1 kG, n 51018 m-3, Z 0.01 m (from 2D Te profiles) Threshold drift for instability is (kTe /me)1/2 106 ms-1 if Te = 105 K Conditions for Buneman instability may exist in pre-reconnection plasma Maximum growth rate at frequencies comparable to that of observed wave activity in lower hybrid range Instability saturates when (kTe/me)1/2 initial drift Te,sat 6106 K, which is close to measured values However, Buneman instability expected to heat mainly electrons – cannot explain why rise in Ti precedes that in Te 1 Lampe et al. Phys. Fluids 17, 428 (1974) CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Summary 14/14 Merging-compression method of start-up in MAST spherical tokamak provides opportunity to study reconnection in high temperature plasma with strong guide field Information available on Ti, Te, bulk plasma motions & fast particles Reconnection associated with rapid heating of ions & (on slightly longer timescale) electrons; Te often has hollow profile High frequency instabilities & filamentary structures observed during & following reconnection, suggesting presence of fast ions & turbulence Detailed theoretical model of reconnection during merging-compression in MAST yet to be worked out; any such model would need to include two-fluid (& possibly kinetic) effects Preliminary analysis suggests that ion & electron heating could be due to turbulence &/or streaming instabilities, but there any many unresolved issues, e.g. origin of hollow Te profiles, filaments & ion acceleration Is this telling us anything useful about reconnection in solar flares? CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority