ID Number 2007-95 Fuels Treatment Projects Application NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Applicant Applicant/Organization: Walker Range Forest Protective Association (WRPA) Type of Applicant: L (Nonprofit Organization) Email: emurray@odf.state.or.us Phone: 541-433-2451 FAX: 541-433-2215 Please Call Ahead for FAX: Off Please Call Ahead for FAX: Off Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): P.O. Box 665 Gilchrist, OR 97737 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Ms. Echo Murray, Dispatch / Education Coordinator Organization/Jurisdiction: Walker Range Forest Protective Association (WRPA) Email: emurray@odf.state.or.us Phone: 541-433-2451 FAX: 541-433-2215 Project Information Project Title: Wagon Trail Ranch (WTR) Project Location: Walker Range District County: Klamath Congressional District: 5 Latitude: 43.30759 Longitude: 121.886 State the desired outcome in relation to NFP Goals and the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Project Objectives: This project would provide a financial incentive/assistance for private landowners in targeted areas so they become more involved in fire and forest health issues by collaborating with neighbors and agencies in fuel reduction efforts while treating fuels to reduce the risk of fire spread and improve public safety by establishing evacuation routes. Our plan is to continue fuel treatment strategies in high priority areas that have been identified in the Walker Range Community Wildfire Protection Plan. This grant would cover costs to rebate the private landowner a flat rate per acre and/or provide the funding to hire local contractors to complete the identified reduction work. This project will become an expansion of our past and current community fuel reduction grants. Landowners would be encouraged to plan their work with agency fire experts, so that a better understanding of fire issues is realized. All values at risk will realize higher levels of protection as a result. Name of CWPP: Walker Range Community Protection Plan Name of Communit(y/ies) at Risk: Wagon Trail Rnach Subdivision Proposed Project Start Date: 06/01/2007 Proposed Project End Date: 12/31/2009 Federal Funding Request: $95,491.00 Total Project Cost: $99,491.00 Are you submitting multiple projects? Yes If YES indicate the relationship of the projects to one another: If YES, please list the titles of projects by priority and briefly explain their relationship. #4: This is number four priority withint the grant request for Walker Range. Name of Federal, State or Tribal contact with whom you coordinated this proposal: Organization/Jurisdiction: 1) Lisa Clark Bureau Land Managment - COFMS Phone 541-416-6864 Email lmclark@or.blm.gov 2) Phone Email 3) Phone Email S (Sequential) Project Planning Information Name of Local Coordinating Group: Central Oregon Fire Leadership Council For this project, explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning, through a "Local Coordination Group." If you have not worked with a local coordination group, why not? The level of coordination has been high with individuals, county, state and federal agencies List federal lands that are adjacent to the project and proximity. Deschutes National Forest and Bureau Land Management A) Is there a current hazardous fuels treatment or one that is planned in the next three years on federal land that is adjacent to this project? Yes B) Specifically is this project adjacent to a current prescribed burn project or one that is planned in the next three years on Forest Service lands? Yes Please indicate planned treatments and associated acres: Treatment Thinning Acres 50 Treatment Acres Treatment Acres Treatment Acres Acres 30 Treatment Acres 0 If you have a treatment type other than standard types above: Treatment Roadside Brushing Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding must include narrative responses that address the following criteria. Be sure you address every one briefly, yet thoroughly. 1. Reducing Hazardous Fuels (40 points) A. Describe the community infrastructure that will be protected. This should include how this project implements all or part of the CWPP strategy. (15 points) Response: Fuels treatments implemented in the project areas will help to protect approximately 173 structures with a cumulative value of over $ 11+ million. In general, the communities in the CWPP plan area are small, rural, and isolated. All are surrounded by either public forestland or private industrial forestland. The breakdown comprises the Wagon Trail Ranch Subdivision. Project will create fuel breaks within the communities and reduce hazardous fuel along roadways and structures. Also develop and obtain easements for evacuation routes. B. Explain how the proposal reduces fire behavior in high hazard areas by describing the fuels to be disposed or removed, the techniques and timing of the treatments, and the treatment location relative to the values to be protected. (15 points) Response: This proposal will modify fire behavior in wildland urban interface areas by removing small diameter trees, down woody material and underbrush. The specific techniques and timing of the treatments will be applied in accordance with the Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The primary strategy will be to reduce crown fire potential, the intensity of future fires and avoid stand-replacment fires that move into neighborhoods and destroy lives and property. C. Explain how the project is designed to reduce smoke production impacts that affect public health. (10 points) Response: A biomass facility is currently being developed locally, and material generated from project could be utilized off site. In addition, where possible, small diameter wood could be available to provide for low income, senior and disable residents. This area is in the voluntary smoke management zone. Any burning of piles,if necessary will be completed on days that comply with smoke management requirements to ensure smoke dispersal and reduce the impacts on public health. 2. Increasing Local Capacity (20 points) A. How would the implementation of the proposed project improve or lead to the improvement of the local economy in terms of jobs and sustainable economic activity assuming that these grant funds would be used as "seed monies" for future projects. i.e. How many community supported jobs would be created and for how long would they expect to last? (10 points) Response: Greater fire protection from treatment within the wildland urban interface will have the longer term impact of stabilizing the community by ensuring a safe, stable, and uninterrupted business climate that will encourage entrepreneurs to locate businesses and homes in the community. The landowners themselves may cooperate in the implimentation of the work project. However, it is anticipated that this grant will provide work for local contractors. B. Will biomass that is produced by the project be utilized; if so, in what manner and how much? (10 points) Response: Home defensible space work has generated very little thinned material to be utilized off site, mainly due to the species and scattered nature of the work. We will remain open to the potential to use biomass as new businesses and programs are developed. Currently a biomass facility is being proposed locally. We plan that 25% to 50% of the material from the project sites to be utilized by the landowners for fencing poles, posts, firewood, or chipped onsite for landscaping material. 3. Demonstrating Community and Intergovernmental Collaboration (20 Points) A. Describe how this project has been collaborated and coordinated with adjacent landowners, local/state/Tribal/federal agencies, and community groups such as neighborhood associations. (10 points) Response: The neighborhood that will directly beneift from this project particpated in the development of the Walker Range Community Wildfire Protection Plan (WRPA CWPP) This project will directly implement the strategies defined within the plan. In addition, fuel reduction projects will support ongoing and out-year projects being implemented by Federal partners. The work is located entirely within the rural residential subdivisions. Agencey colloration ocurred during the development of the WRPA CWPP. B. Describe the communities/partners contributions to this project such as: cash or in-kind contributions, cost share agreements, equipment, or labor (including volunteer work). (10 points) Response: Agency reps provided in-kind planning. This project will provide a defensible space rebate for private landowners. All participants in the rebate program will be required to create defensible space around structures/buildings, in compliance with SB 360 prior to treating additional acres. Landowner rebate approval is sugject to inspection by WRPA. 4. Managing Cost Efficiency (20 points) Discuss the process you used to arrive at your cost structure for the main Project Budget areas such as personnel, equipment, supplies and other (i.e. overhead). In your response please justify: cost per acre, purchase of equipment, percent of overhead, percent of partner or matching funds, and portion of administration cost. (20 points) Response: Based upon WRPA 20+ years of experience, this type of treatment typically costs approximately $800.00/acre. This includes thinning and slash treatment. When working with homesite treatments, a homesite is defined as the one acre surrounding the liveable structure on the property. The average cost for the incentive/rebate per homesite is $400.00. The other costs associated with this project are for the personnel to maintain and promote the project, other personnel expenses such as travel expenses to and from the individual project sites, and miscellaneous operating expenses, such as mailing supplies and forms. A condition of landowner incentive/rebate would be an agreement to maintain the fuel treatment area in the future. WRPA Admin costs are at $ 20.00/hr @ 20 hours/month for 6 months = $ 2400.00 Chipper Operator is figured on $ 19.00/hr x 8 hrs/day for 33 days = $ 5016.00 Chipper Costs are at $ 25.00/day for 8 hours/day for 33 days = $ 6600.00 Chipper Vehicle at $.85/mi x 100 mi/day for 33 days = $ 2,805.00 Chipper recondition/maintenace is @ $ 1200.00 for project. Wagon Trail Personnel @ $ 15.00/hr x 6 hours/day x 60 days = $ 5400.00 Project Work Form Tasks Time Frame Responsible Party Consult with cooperators regarding location of current and planned work spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range and cooperators Consult with cooperators to identify landowners to be targeted for participation spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range, BLM, USFS, Industrial landowners and Wagon Trail Homeowners Association On site consultation to generate site plan, and cost share agreements spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range, landowers and RFPD Complpetion of individual projects spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range, cooperators, landowners and contractors Final inspection of completed work for approval spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range Rebate payments to Wagon Trail Homeowners Association who will pay landowner's spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range Prepare required status and/or financial reports spring 2007 through 2009 Walker Range and Wagon Trail Homeowners Association Prepare final project reports winter 2009 Walker Range Project Budget Wagon Trail Associat Cost Category Description Federal Agency Applicant Partner 1 Partner 2 Partner 3 Total Personnel WTR $15x6hrs/dayx60day $5,400.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,400.00 Chipper Op $19/hrx8hrsx33 $5,016.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,016.00 $10,416.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,416.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 WRPA Fire Planner Vehicle $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 Chipper Vehicle $2,805.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,805.00 $3,805.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,805.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $70.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $70.00 $1,070.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,070.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $40,000.00 $6,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,600.00 $46,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $46,600.00 $2,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 $32,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,400.00 $95,491.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $99,491.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Subtotal Fringe Benefits Subtotal Travel Subtotal Equipment Chipper Recondition/Maint Subtotal Supplies Office/mailings/postal Chipper Blades $70/set Subtotal Contractual 50 acres @ $ 800/acre Chipper $25/hrx8hrsx33day Subtotal Other WR Admin $20hrx20mthx6 Incentive @ $400/ac Subtotal Total Costs Project (Program) Income 1 (using deductive alternative) Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency. 1