2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Reports Full-time Undergraduate Faculty California State University-Fresno comparison group 1: comparison group 2: Public 4yr Colleges Public/Private Universities and Public 4yr Colleges 1.1 2010-11 HERI FacultySurvey CIRP Construct Reports Table of Contents 1. CIRP Construct Mean Reports How to Read the CIRP Construct Mean Reports a. Student-Centered Pedagogy b. Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development c. Scholarly Productivity d. Civic Minded Practice e. Civic Minded Values f. Job Satisfaction: Workplace g. Job Satisfaction: Compensation h. Career Related Stress i. Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity j. Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement k. Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige l. Social Agency H1 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 1G 1H 1I 1J 1K 1L 2. CIRP Construct Percentage Reports How to Read the CIRP Construct Percentage Reports a. Student-Centered Pedagogy b. Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development c. Scholarly Productivity d. Civic Minded Practice e. Civic Minded Values f. Job Satisfaction: Workplace g. Job Satisfaction: Compensation h. Career Related Stress i. Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity j. Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement k. Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige l. Social Agency H2 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G 2H 2I 2J 2K 2L How to Read the CIRP Construct Mean Reports Total Men Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Total (n) 1,367 5,029 Mean 51.6 50.1 Standard Deviation 7.92 7.86 Sample University Women Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 14,906 506 1,603 50.3 53.8 51.8 7.84 8.49 8.29 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 5,572 861 3,426 9,334 51.7 50.3 49.2 49.5 8.22 7.25 7.51 7.50 Significance - *** *** - *** *** - *** ** Effect Size - 0.19 0.16 - 0.24 0.26 - 0.14 0.10 25th percentile 45.4 45.1 45.4 48.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 44.3 45.0 75th percentile 57.6 55.0 55.0 58.3 58.3 58.3 55.0 54.4 54.4 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Total Men 75.3 Women 75.3 57.6 55.0 51.6 55.0 50.3 50.1 45.4 45.1 45.4 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 35.4 75.3 58.3 53.8 48.4 58.3 51.8 51.7 45.4 45.4 Comp 1 Comp 2 35.4 Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students: * Help students develop personal values (4.92) 58.3 UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Mean Statistical Significance – Uses t-test to examine the difference between the mean construct score for your institution and the comparison group. Constructs with mean differences that are larger than would be expected by chance are noted with one, two, or three stars, which correspond to the three standard levels of significance (*p< .05, **p< .01, and ***p< .001). Statistical significance measures the extent to which a difference is occurring by chance, not the extent to which a difference is important. Large sample sizes (like those in the comparison groups) tend to generate statistical significance even though the magnitude of the difference may be small and not practically significant. In order to provide additional context to statistical significance, effect sizes are provided. Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is as central goal for undergraduate education. UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Mean Standard Deviation – Measures the variability around the mean. A small standard deviation indicates that the responses for the construct tend to be very close to the mean, whereas a large standard deviation indicates that the responses are spread over a larger range of response options. UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Mean CIRP Construct Definition – Summarizes the theoretical rationale for creating the construct. CIRP Constructs are designed to capture the experiences and outcomes institutions are often interested in understanding, but that present a measurement challenge because of their complex and multifaceted nature. To measure these broad underlying areas more precisely, we use Item Response Theory (IRT) to combine individual survey items into global measures that capture these areas. CIRP Constructs are more than a summation of related items; IRT uses response patterns to derive construct score estimates while simultaneously giving greater weight in the estimation process to survey items that tap into the construct more directly. This results in more accurate construct scores. Constructs are particularly useful for benchmarking. They allow you to determine if the experiences and outcomes for your students differ from your comparison groups. Two sets of reports are generated for CIRP Constructs. The Mean Report shows comparative information based on the mean score of a construct. The Percentage Report shows comparative information based on the percentage of students who score in the high, average, and low score group of a construct. We suggest you use the report that best fits your needs as an institution. 55.0 54.4 50.3 54.4 49.5 49.2 45.4 44.3 45.0 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 35.4 For more information about IRT and the CIRP Construct development process, see the CIRP Constructs Technical Report at www.heri.ucla.edu * Provide for students' emotional development (2.91) * Develop moral character (2.87) * Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65) Survey Items and Estimation "Weights" – The survey items used in the creation of the CIRP Construct are presented in the order in which they contribute to the construct along with the estimation weights generated in IRT. Items that tap into a trait more effectively are given greater weight in the estimation process. Charts – Provide a visual display of relevant construct scores for your institution and two comparison groups. The Y axis is defined by the highest and lowest possible construct score. Mean scores are represented by circles. The numbers at the top and bottom of the vertical line are values for the 75th and 25th percentile. Comp 1 – The first comparison group is based on your institution's type and control. Comp 2 – The second comparison group is based on a similar grouping of institution type and control. Mean – The arithmetic mean is computed for each CIRP Construct. The HERI Faculty Survey Constructs have been scaled to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Effect Size – Determines the practical significance of the mean difference between your institution and the comparison group. It is calculated by dividing the mean difference by the standard deviation of the comparison group. Generally, an effect size of .2 is considered small, .5 medium, and .8 large. A positive sign indicates that your institution’s mean is greater than the mean of the comparison group; a negative sign indicates your mean is smaller than the mean of the comparison group. Note that a negative effect size is sometimes preferred (e.g., a negative effect size on the "Career Related Stress" CIRP Construct suggests your faculty score lower than comparison schools). H1 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Student-Centered Pedagogy Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Student-Centered Pedagogy – Measures the extent to which faculty use student-centered teaching and evaluation methods in their course instruction. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 49.5 8.77 43.5 55.5 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Total -0.03 43.9 55.2 Comp 2 13,028 48.5 8.99 * 0.12 42.4 54.3 Your Inst 203 48.7 8.66 42.6 54.1 49.8 49.5 43.9 48.5 42.4 54.1 53.7 48.7 42.6 52.4 48.2 42.6 46.8 41.1 24.8 24.8 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Student-Centered Pedagogy Mean 54.3 Your Inst 136 50.7 8.82 45.3 56.6 Comp 2 5,762 51.1 8.63 -0.10 45.9 57.1 -0.04 45.1 56.6 74.2 Student-Centered Pedagogy Mean 55.2 43.5 0.05 42.6 53.7 Comp 2 7,266 46.8 8.80 ** 0.22 41.1 52.4 Women Comp 1 2,394 51.6 8.49 Women 74.2 55.5 Men Comp 1 2,566 48.2 8.42 Men 74.2 Student-Centered Pedagogy Mean Total Comp 1 4,960 49.8 8.62 57.1 56.6 56.6 51.6 50.7 51.1 45.3 45.9 45.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 24.8 Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': In how many of the courses that you teach do you use each of the following? * Cooperative learning (small groups) (2.30) * Student presentations (1.85) * Group projects (1.82) * Class discussions (1.70) * Student evaluations of each others’ work (1.53) Comp 1 Comp 2 * Reflective writing/journaling (1.37) * Experiential learning/Field studies (1.30) * Using student inquiry to drive learning (1.26) * Student-selected topics for course content (1.21) 1A 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is a central goal for undergraduate education. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 337 48.6 8.72 42.0 55.2 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 55.2 62.3 55.2 53.5 48.7 48.6 42.0 Your Inst 202 48.0 8.72 41.0 55.2 42.3 47.4 40.8 62.3 55.2 54.3 48.0 41.0 Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 7,165 46.3 8.62 ** 0.19 40.8 51.6 Your Inst 135 49.4 8.68 43.0 55.8 Women Comp 1 2,380 49.8 8.47 Comp 2 5,663 48.9 8.81 -0.04 43.0 55.8 0.05 42.8 55.3 Women 51.6 47.8 41.0 46.3 40.8 55.8 55.8 55.3 49.8 49.4 48.9 43.0 43.0 42.8 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 26.2 26.2 26.2 Your Inst 0.02 41.0 54.3 Men UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Mean UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Mean 62.3 -0.02 42.3 55.2 Comp 2 12,828 47.4 8.79 * 0.14 40.8 53.5 Men Comp 1 2,554 47.8 8.49 UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,934 48.7 8.54 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students: * Help students develop personal values (4.92) * Provide for students' emotional development (2.91) * Develop moral character (2.87) * Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65) 1B 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Scholarly Productivity Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Scholarly Productivity – A unified measure of the scholarly activity of faculty. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 50.7 7.36 46.6 55.4 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 60.2 55.4 54.6 50.7 46.6 Your Inst 53.8 49.3 43.4 Comp 1 46.6 Comp 2 38.1 Comp 2 7,265 55.3 9.32 *** -0.36 49.1 61.6 Your Inst 136 48.8 6.64 43.4 53.4 Women Comp 1 2,395 48.0 6.84 0.11 43.2 53.2 Comp 2 5,769 51.5 8.57 *** -0.32 46.2 57.7 Women 83.9 83.9 Scholarly Productivity Mean Scholarly Productivity Mean Your Inst 203 51.9 7.57 46.6 57.0 Men 83.9 38.1 Comp 2 13,034 53.8 9.22 *** -0.34 46.6 60.2 Men Comp 1 2,565 50.4 7.48 ** 0.20 46.2 55.4 61.6 57.0 55.4 51.9 55.3 50.4 46.6 46.2 Your Inst Comp 1 49.1 Scholarly Productivity Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,960 49.3 7.30 ** 0.18 43.4 54.6 38.1 Comp 2 53.4 57.7 53.2 48.8 51.5 48.0 43.4 43.2 Your Inst Comp 1 46.2 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': How many of the following have you published? * Articles in academic and professional journals (3.09) * How many of your professional writings have been published or accepted for publication in the last two years (2.53) * Chapters in edited volumes (2.11) 1C 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Civic Minded Practice Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Civic Minded Practice – A unified measure of faculty involvement in civic activities. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 54.6 7.46 49.0 60.7 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Your Inst 203 54.4 7.67 48.7 60.7 Men 75.2 60.7 57.3 54.6 55.3 51.4 49.9 49.0 38.3 Your Inst 44.5 43.5 Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 7,269 49.2 7.69 *** 0.67 43.5 55.0 Your Inst 136 54.9 7.17 50.9 60.0 Women Comp 1 2,395 52.0 7.67 *** 0.38 46.9 57.9 Comp 2 5,771 50.9 8.13 *** 0.49 43.8 57.3 Women 75.2 75.2 Civic Minded Practice Mean Civic Minded Practice Mean Comp 2 13,040 49.9 7.91 *** 0.59 43.5 55.3 Men Comp 1 2,567 50.9 7.89 *** 0.44 44.3 57.3 60.7 57.3 54.4 55.0 50.9 49.2 48.7 38.3 Your Inst 44.3 43.5 Comp 1 Comp 2 Civic Minded Practice Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,962 51.4 7.81 *** 0.41 44.5 57.3 60.0 57.9 54.9 57.3 52.0 50.9 50.9 46.9 38.3 Your Inst Comp 1 43.8 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': * Collaborated with the local community in research/teaching (1.87) * Do you use your scholarship to address local community needs? (1.78) * Community service as part of coursework (1.64) * Engaged in public service/professional consulting without pay? (1.51) * Community or public service (1.35) * Advised student groups involved in service/volunteer work (1.33) 1D 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Civic Minded Values Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Civic Minded Values – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty believe civic engagement is a central part of the college mission. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 50.1 8.34 44.3 55.6 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Your Inst 203 49.4 8.61 44.1 55.2 50.1 44.3 54.9 49.8 44.3 48.6 42.8 Civic Minded Values Mean 56.2 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst 136 51.1 7.83 44.5 56.5 Comp 2 5,770 51.3 8.64 -0.08 46.4 57.8 -0.02 45.9 57.4 68.7 55.2 54.2 49.4 44.1 52.7 48.2 42.0 46.9 41.2 20.8 20.8 Comp 2 7,269 46.9 9.17 *** 0.28 41.2 52.7 Women Comp 1 2,394 51.8 8.31 Women 68.7 55.6 0.14 42.0 54.2 Men 68.7 Civic Minded Values Mean 0.03 44.3 56.2 Comp 2 13,039 48.6 9.23 ** 0.16 42.8 54.9 Men Comp 1 2,567 48.2 8.96 Civic Minded Values Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,961 49.8 8.85 57.8 56.5 51.8 51.1 44.5 57.4 51.3 46.4 45.9 Comp 1 Comp 2 20.8 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': * Encourage students to become agents of social change (2.37) * Colleges should encourage students to be involved in community service activities (2.22) * Instill in students a commitment to community service (2.15) * Colleges should be actively involved in solving social problems (1.75) * Colleges have a responsibility to work with their surrounding communities to address local issues (1.64) * Influencing social values (1.31) 1E 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Job Satisfaction: Workplace Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Job Satisfaction: Workplace – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their working environment. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 47.6 8.49 41.6 53.3 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 41.6 49.6 49.0 47.6 65.4 55.9 55.5 53.3 Your Inst 203 48.2 8.87 42.1 55.1 43.9 44.0 49.6 49.1 48.2 42.1 Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job? * Professional relationships with other faculty (2.55) * Competency of colleagues (1.92) * Autonomy and independence (1.57) Your Inst 136 46.6 7.81 40.8 51.5 65.4 55.9 55.5 55.1 Comp 2 7,264 49.6 8.52 * -0.16 44.0 55.9 Women Comp 1 2,395 49.0 8.46 ** -0.28 44.0 55.1 Comp 2 5,768 49.7 8.71 *** -0.35 44.0 56.1 Women 44.0 43.6 14.1 14.1 Your Inst -0.11 43.6 55.5 Men Job Satisfaction: Workplace Mean Job Satisfaction: Workplace Mean 65.4 Comp 2 13,032 49.6 8.59 *** -0.24 44.0 55.9 Men Comp 1 2,565 49.1 8.36 Job Satisfaction: Workplace Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,960 49.0 8.40 ** -0.17 43.9 55.5 56.1 55.1 51.5 40.8 49.7 49.0 46.6 44.0 44.0 Comp 1 Comp 2 14.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst * Departmental leadership (1.51) * Course assignments (1.33) 1F 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Job Satisfaction: Compensation Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Job Satisfaction: Compensation – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their compensation packages. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 48.0 7.53 42.7 52.8 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Your Inst 203 48.7 7.91 43.1 53.7 42.7 51.9 49.7 48.0 44.2 45.8 Job Satisfaction: Compensation Mean 56.3 54.4 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job? * Opportunity for scholarly pursuits (2.18) * Retirement benefits (1.48) * Salary (1.40) Comp 2 5,768 50.7 8.17 *** -0.45 44.9 55.9 74.4 57.9 55.8 53.7 43.1 52.6 50.2 48.7 46.5 44.8 16.9 16.9 Your Inst 136 47.1 6.85 42.2 51.7 Women Comp 1 2,395 49.1 7.49 ** -0.27 43.7 53.7 Women 74.4 52.8 Comp 2 7,264 52.6 8.59 *** -0.45 46.5 57.9 Men 74.4 Job Satisfaction: Compensation Mean Comp 2 13,032 51.9 8.47 *** -0.45 45.8 56.3 Men Comp 1 2,565 50.2 7.81 ** -0.20 44.8 55.8 Job Satisfaction: Compensation Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,960 49.7 7.69 *** -0.21 44.2 54.4 55.9 53.7 51.7 50.7 49.1 47.1 42.2 43.7 44.9 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 16.9 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 * Teaching load (1.27) * Job security (1.26) * Prospects for career advancement (1.25) 1G 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Career Related Stress Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Career Related Stress – Measures the amount of stress faculty experience related to their career. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 52.8 7.90 47.6 58.9 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Your Inst 203 51.9 7.76 46.9 58.0 52.8 56.6 51.9 46.8 51.2 46.1 8.2 Career Related Stress Mean 57.1 47.6 Comp 1 Comp 2 0.17 47.3 58.1 Comp 2 5,766 52.6 7.70 * 0.21 47.2 57.8 76.1 58.0 56.6 51.9 46.9 55.8 51.2 46.3 50.4 44.9 59.6 58.1 54.1 57.8 52.8 52.6 49.1 47.3 47.2 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 8.2 8.2 Your Inst 0.10 46.3 56.6 Your Inst 136 54.1 7.96 49.1 59.6 Women Comp 1 2,394 52.8 7.92 Women 76.1 58.9 Comp 2 7,257 50.4 7.70 ** 0.21 44.9 55.8 Men 76.1 Career Related Stress Mean Comp 2 13,023 51.2 7.78 *** 0.21 46.1 56.6 Men Comp 1 2,562 51.2 7.79 Career Related Stress Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,956 51.9 7.89 * 0.12 46.8 57.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years: * Lack of personal time (1.52) * Colleagues (1.14) * Teaching load (1.38) * Research or publishing demands (1.13) * Committee work (1.25) * Self-imposed high expectations (1.09) * Institutional procedures/red tape (1.17) * Students (1.08) 1H 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to creating a diverse multicultural campus environment. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 337 50.1 8.41 44.8 56.1 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 0.07 44.8 55.4 0.05 44.8 56.1 Your Inst 202 49.7 8.15 44.8 55.4 50.1 49.7 49.5 44.8 44.8 Inst Priority: Commitment to Diversity Mean 56.1 55.4 44.8 -0.02 44.8 57.0 Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 5,728 49.3 9.28 0.13 43.1 55.6 0.14 43.1 55.4 71.3 55.4 57.0 55.4 49.7 49.9 49.5 44.8 44.8 44.8 30.6 30.6 Your Inst 0.02 44.8 55.4 Your Inst 135 50.6 8.80 44.8 57.0 Women Comp 1 2,381 49.4 9.24 Women 71.3 56.1 Comp 2 7,221 49.9 8.58 Men 71.3 Inst Priority: Commitment to Diversity Mean Comp 2 12,949 49.7 8.87 Men Comp 1 2,553 49.5 8.87 Inst Priority: Commitment to Diversity Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,934 49.5 9.04 57.0 55.6 50.6 44.8 55.4 49.4 49.3 43.1 43.1 Comp 1 Comp 2 30.6 Your Inst Comp 1 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university: * To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment (3.21) * To increase the representation of minorities in the faculty and administration (3.05) * To develop an appreciation for multiculturalism (2.79) Comp 2 Your Inst * To recruit more minority students (2.41) * To increase the representation of women in the faculty and administration (1.76) 1I 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to facilitating civic engagement among students and faculty. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 337 53.8 7.85 48.4 57.6 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Your Inst 202 54.2 7.72 48.4 57.6 Men 69.6 57.6 56.1 53.8 48.4 55.6 50.0 45.1 48.8 42.2 33.9 Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst 135 53.3 8.04 46.6 57.6 Comp 2 5,730 49.4 8.81 *** 0.44 43.3 56.1 69.6 57.6 56.1 54.5 54.2 49.3 48.3 48.4 43.4 42.1 57.6 57.6 53.3 56.1 50.7 46.6 45.4 Your Inst Comp 1 49.4 43.3 33.9 33.9 Your Inst Comp 2 7,221 48.3 8.33 *** 0.70 42.1 54.5 Women Comp 1 2,381 50.7 8.63 *** 0.30 45.4 57.6 Women 69.6 Inst Priority: Civic Engagement Mean Inst Priority: Civic Engagement Mean Comp 2 12,951 48.8 8.54 *** 0.59 42.2 55.6 Men Comp 1 2,554 49.3 8.16 *** 0.59 43.4 56.1 Inst Priority: Civic Engagement Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,935 50.0 8.40 *** 0.46 45.1 56.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university: * To provide resources for faculty to engage in community-based teaching or research (4.27) * To create and sustain partnerships with surrounding communities (2.50) * To facilitate student involvement in community service (1.29) 1J 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to increasing its prestige. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 336 47.8 7.84 42.3 52.5 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 47.8 52.4 47.0 46.3 40.5 31.2 Inst Priority: Increase Prestige Mean Inst Priority: Increase Prestige Mean 52.5 Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst 134 47.2 8.28 41.5 52.5 -0.02 41.0 52.5 65.0 60.3 52.5 51.0 48.1 52.2 46.7 46.3 42.3 40.5 Comp 2 5,730 52.6 9.01 *** -0.60 46.3 60.3 60.3 52.5 52.5 52.6 47.4 47.2 46.3 41.5 41.0 Your Inst Comp 1 31.2 31.2 Your Inst Comp 2 7,227 52.2 8.81 *** -0.46 46.3 60.3 Women Comp 1 2,380 47.4 8.47 Women 65.0 60.3 42.3 0.09 40.5 52.5 Your Inst 202 48.1 7.53 42.3 52.5 Men 65.0 52.5 Comp 2 12,957 52.4 8.89 *** -0.52 46.3 60.3 Men Comp 1 2,555 46.7 8.27 * 0.18 40.5 51.0 Inst Priority: Increase Prestige Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,935 47.0 8.37 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university: * To increase or maintain institutional prestige (3.54) * To enhance the institution's national image (3.43) * To hire faculty "stars" (1.47) 1K 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Mean Report Social Agency Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Social Agency – Measures the extent to which faculty value political and social involvement as a personal goal. California State University-Fresno Total (n) Mean Standard Deviation Significance Effect Size 25th percentile 75th percentile Your Inst 339 51.0 8.50 45.1 57.0 Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Your Inst 203 50.5 8.41 45.1 56.0 51.0 45.1 54.7 50.3 44.3 49.1 Social Agency Mean 56.0 56.0 54.9 50.5 53.5 49.5 43.7 48.0 41.9 27.1 27.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate the importance to you personally of each of the following: * Participating in a community action program (2.32) * Becoming a community leader (1.84) * Influencing social values (1.49) Your Inst 136 51.9 8.59 45.7 57.2 Comp 2 5,766 50.8 8.45 0.08 45.1 57.0 0.13 45.1 55.9 72.5 45.1 43.4 Comp 2 7,268 48.0 8.64 *** 0.29 41.9 53.5 Women Comp 1 2,392 51.2 8.47 Women 72.5 57.0 0.11 43.7 54.9 Men 72.5 Social Agency Mean 0.09 44.3 56.0 Comp 2 13,034 49.1 8.67 *** 0.22 43.4 54.7 Men Comp 1 2,566 49.5 8.88 Social Agency Mean Total Total Comp 1 4,958 50.3 8.74 57.2 57.0 51.9 55.9 51.2 50.8 45.7 45.1 45.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 27.1 Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 * Helping to promote racial understanding (1.40) * Keeping up to date with political affairs (1.06) 1L How to Read the CIRP Construct Percentage Reports CIRP Constructs are designed to capture the experiences and outcomes institutions are often interested in understanding, but that present a measurement challenge because of their complex and multifaceted nature. To measure these broad underlying areas more precisely, we use Item Response Theory (IRT) to combine individual survey items into global measures that capture these areas. CIRP Constructs are more than a summation of related items; IRT uses response patterns to derive construct score estimates while simultaneously giving greater weight in the estimation process to survey items that tap into the construct more directly. This results in more accurate construct scores. Constructs are particularly useful for benchmarking. They allow you to determine if the experiences and outcomes for your students differ from your comparison groups. Two sets of reports are generated for CIRP Constructs. The Mean Report shows comparative information based on the mean score of a construct. The Percentage Report shows comparative information based on the percentage of students who score in the high, average, and low score group of a construct. We suggest you use the report that best fits your needs as an institution. Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is as central goal for undergraduate education. Your Inst 1,361 43.6% 30.3% 26.1% - Sample University Total (n) High UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Average UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Low UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Significance (based on High score group) Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 43.6% 33.2% 30.3% 30.3% 80% 43.0% 36.7% 40% 32.8% 29.8% Comp 1 Comp 2 0% 31.6% 39.1% 20% 25.4% 24.2% 16.9% Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students: * Help students develop personal values (4.92) Your Inst 858 34.3% 34.3% 31.5% - Women Comp 1 3,410 28.7% 35.0% 36.2% Comp 2 9,308 26.5% 40.4% 33.1% ** 28.7% 26.5% 35.0% 40.4% 31.5% 36.2% 33.1% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 34.3% Comp 1 Comp 2 34.3% 40% 20% 0% 0% Your Inst 80% 60% 39.9% 23.5% 26.1% Comp 2 5,527 36.7% 39.1% 24.2% *** Women 60% 33.9% Men Comp 1 1,586 43.0% 31.6% 25.4% *** 100% 59.6% 60% 20% Your Inst 503 59.6% 23.5% 16.9% - 100% 100% 40% Comp 2 14,835 30.3% 39.9% 29.8% *** Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,996 33.2% 33.9% 32.8% *** For more information about IRT and the CIRP Construct development process, see the CIRP Constructs Technical Report at www.heri.ucla.edu * Provide for students' emotional development (2.91) * Develop moral character (2.87) * Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65) Survey Items and Estimation "Weights" – The survey items used in the creation of the CIRP Construct are presented in the order in which they contribute to the construct along with the estimation weights generated in IRT. Items that tap into a trait more effectively are given greater weight in the estimation process. CIRP Construct Definition – Summarizes the theoretical rationale for creating the construct. Comp 1 – The first comparison group is based on your institution's type and control. Comp 2 – The second comparison group is based on a similar grouping of institution type and control. Statistical Significance – Uses a proportional difference test to examine the difference between the percentage of students in the high group for your institution and the percentage of students in the high group in the comparison group. Differences larger than what would be expected by chance are noted with one, two, or three stars, which correspond to the three standard levels of significance (*p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001). Statistical significance measures the extent to which a difference is occurring by chance, not the extent to which a difference is practically important. Large sample sizes (like those in the comparison groups) tend to generate statistical significance even though the magnitude of the difference might be small and not practically important. Charts – Provide a visual display of construct group percentages for your institution and two comparison groups. The HERI Faculty Survey Constructs have been scaled to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. “Low” represents faculty who scored one-half of a standard deviation below the mean (less than 45). “Average” represents faculty who scored within one-half of a standard deviation of the mean (45 to 55). “High” represents faculty who scored one-half standard deviation or more above mean (higher than 55). H2 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Student-Centered Pedagogy Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Student-Centered Pedagogy – Measures the extent to which faculty use student-centered teaching and evaluation methods in their course instruction. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Student-Centered Pedagogy Average Student-Centered Pedagogy Low Student-Centered Pedagogy Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 27.4% 40.4% 32.2% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 27.4% 26.7% 25.6% 40.4% 43.9% 42.3% 80% 60% 21.7% 19.7% 39.9% 42.7% 19.3% 32.2% 29.4% 32.1% 0% 40.6% Comp 1 Your Inst 136 36.0% 41.2% 22.8% - 20% 38.4% Comp 2 Comp 2 5,762 33.7% 44.4% 21.9% 40.1% 37.6% 36.0% 34.2% 33.7% 41.2% 45.1% 44.4% 22.8% 20.7% 21.9% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 60% 40% 0% Your Inst Comp 2 7,266 19.3% 40.6% 40.1% 100% 80% 40% 40% 20% Your Inst 203 21.7% 39.9% 38.4% - Women Comp 1 2,394 34.2% 45.1% 20.7% Women 100% 100% 60% Comp 2 13,028 25.6% 42.3% 32.1% Men Comp 1 2,566 19.7% 42.7% 37.6% Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,960 26.7% 43.9% 29.4% 20% 0% Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': In how many of the courses that you teach do you use each of the following? * Cooperative learning (small groups) (2.30) * Student presentations (1.85) * Group projects (1.82) * Class discussions (1.70) * Student evaluations of each others’ work (1.53) Comp 1 Comp 2 * Reflective writing/journaling (1.37) * Experiential learning/Field studies (1.30) * Using student inquiry to drive learning (1.26) * Student-selected topics for course content (1.21) 2A 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is a central goal for undergraduate education. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Average UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Low UG Ed Goal: Personal Development Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 337 27.3% 36.5% 36.2% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 27.3% 26.0% 26.9% 36.5% 37.2% 37.1% 36.2% 36.8% 35.9% 0% 80% 60% 20% Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst 135 30.4% 38.5% 31.1% - Comp 2 5,663 32.1% 37.7% 30.3% 100% 25.2% 22.1% 22.9% 35.1% 36.3% 36.7% 80% 60% 30.4% 30.3% 32.1% 38.5% 38.1% 37.7% 31.1% 31.7% 30.3% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 40% 39.6% 41.6% 40.4% 0% Your Inst Comp 2 7,165 22.9% 36.7% 40.4% Women Comp 1 2,380 30.3% 38.1% 31.7% Women 40% 40% 20% Your Inst 202 25.2% 35.1% 39.6% - 100% 100% 60% Comp 2 12,828 26.9% 37.1% 35.9% Men Comp 1 2,554 22.1% 36.3% 41.6% Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,934 26.0% 37.2% 36.8% 20% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students: * Help students develop personal values (4.92) * Provide for students' emotional development (2.91) * Develop moral character (2.87) * Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65) 2B 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Scholarly Productivity Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Scholarly Productivity – A unified measure of the scholarly activity of faculty. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Scholarly Productivity Average Scholarly Productivity Low Scholarly Productivity Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 26.3% 53.7% 20.1% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 26.3% 25.1% 53.7% 52.0% 41.3% 20% 20.1% Your Inst 41.7% 22.9% Comp 1 Comp 2 7,265 48.6% 37.7% 13.7% ** 80% 100% 31.0% 30.7% 40% 50.3% 48.6% 15.8% 19.1% Your Inst Comp 1 37.7% 20% 16.9% Comp 2 0% Comp 2 5,769 32.1% 46.8% 21.0% Comp 2 19.1% 54.4% 53.9% 26.5% 27.0% 21.0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 40% 20% 13.7% 19.1% 80% 60% 53.2% Your Inst 136 19.1% 54.4% 26.5% - Women Comp 1 2,395 19.1% 53.9% 27.0% Women 60% 60% 0% Your Inst 203 31.0% 53.2% 15.8% - 100% 100% 40% Comp 2 13,034 41.3% 41.7% 16.9% ** Men Comp 1 2,565 30.7% 50.3% 19.1% Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,960 25.1% 52.0% 22.9% 32.1% 46.8% 0% Survey items and estimation 'weights': How many of the following have you published? * Articles in academic and professional journals (3.09) * How many of your professional writings have been published or accepted for publication in the last two years (2.53) * Chapters in edited volumes (2.11) 2C 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Civic Minded Practice Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Civic Minded Practice – A unified measure of faculty involvement in civic activities. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Civic Minded Practice Average Civic Minded Practice Low Civic Minded Practice Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 48.4% 38.6% 13.0% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 48.4% 34.6% 30.1% 41.5% 42.4% 38.6% 20% 13.0% Your Inst 23.9% 27.5% Comp 2 Your Inst 136 50.0% 39.0% 11.0% - Comp 2 5,771 34.2% 41.7% 24.2% ** 100% 80% 47.3% 26.8% 32.1% 43.0% 42.3% 40% 20% 14.3% Your Inst 80% 30.2% 25.6% Comp 2 37.4% 34.2% 40.7% 41.7% 22.0% 24.2% Comp 1 Comp 2 39.0% 20% 0% Comp 1 50.0% 60% 40% 38.4% 0% Comp 1 Comp 2 7,269 26.8% 43.0% 30.2% *** Women Comp 1 2,395 37.4% 40.7% 22.0% * Women 60% 60% 0% Your Inst 203 47.3% 38.4% 14.3% - 100% 100% 40% Comp 2 13,040 30.1% 42.4% 27.5% *** Men Comp 1 2,567 32.1% 42.3% 25.6% ** Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,962 34.6% 41.5% 23.9% *** 11.0% Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': * Collaborated with the local community in research/teaching (1.87) * Do you use your scholarship to address local community needs? (1.78) * Community service as part of coursework (1.64) * Engaged in public service/professional consulting without pay? (1.51) * Community or public service (1.35) * Advised student groups involved in service/volunteer work (1.33) 2D 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Civic Minded Values Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Civic Minded Values – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty believe civic engagement is a central part of the college mission. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Civic Minded Values Average Civic Minded Values Low Civic Minded Values Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 28.0% 41.3% 30.7% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Total Comp 1 4,961 26.6% 41.8% 31.5% 28.0% 26.6% 26.6% 41.3% 41.8% 40.5% 80% 60% 30.7% 31.5% 32.9% 0% 20% 25.6% 41.9% 20.2% 80% 39.6% 41.6% Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 5,770 34.8% 41.5% 23.7% 32.5% 40.2% 38.7% 31.6% 34.0% 34.8% 40.4% 42.1% 41.5% 27.9% 23.9% 23.7% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 60% 40% 0% Your Inst Your Inst 136 31.6% 40.4% 27.9% - 100% 19.7% 40% 40% 20% Comp 2 7,269 20.2% 39.6% 40.2% Women Comp 1 2,394 34.0% 42.1% 23.9% Women 100% 100% 60% Your Inst 203 25.6% 41.9% 32.5% - Men Total 80% Comp 2 13,039 26.6% 40.5% 32.9% Men Comp 1 2,567 19.7% 41.6% 38.7% 20% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': * Encourage students to become agents of social change (2.37) * Colleges should encourage students to be involved in community service activities (2.22) * Instill in students a commitment to community service (2.15) * Colleges should be actively involved in solving social problems (1.75) * Colleges have a responsibility to work with their surrounding communities to address local issues (1.64) * Influencing social values (1.31) 2E 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Job Satisfaction: Workplace Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Job Satisfaction: Workplace – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their working environment. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Job Satisfaction: Workplace Average Job Satisfaction: Workplace Low Job Satisfaction: Workplace Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 21.2% 43.1% 35.7% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 21.2% 43.1% 27.9% 28.2% 43.0% 43.1% 35.7% 29.1% 80% 60% 40% 20% Your Inst 203 25.6% 38.9% 35.5% - 28.6% 0% 100% 25.6% 27.7% 28.7% 38.9% 42.5% 43.3% 40% 20% 35.5% 29.8% 28.0% Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job? * Professional relationships with other faculty (2.55) * Competency of colleagues (1.92) * Autonomy and independence (1.57) 14.7% 80% 60% 0% Your Inst Comp 2 7,264 28.7% 43.3% 28.0% Your Inst 136 14.7% 49.3% 36.0% - Women Comp 1 2,395 28.2% 43.5% 28.3% Comp 2 5,768 27.6% 43.0% 29.4% Women 100% 100% 60% Comp 2 13,032 28.2% 43.1% 28.6% Men Comp 1 2,565 27.7% 42.5% 29.8% Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,960 27.9% 43.0% 29.1% 49.3% 28.2% 27.6% 43.5% 43.0% 28.3% 29.4% Comp 1 Comp 2 40% 20% 36.0% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst * Departmental leadership (1.51) * Course assignments (1.33) 2F 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Job Satisfaction: Compensation Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Job Satisfaction: Compensation – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their compensation packages. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Job Satisfaction: Compensation Average Job Satisfaction: Compensation Low Job Satisfaction: Compensation Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 18.0% 42.5% 39.5% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 18.0% 80% 60% 42.5% 39.5% Your Inst 203 21.7% 42.4% 36.0% - 22.0% 49.0% 29.0% 30.3% 80% 60% 45.9% 23.8% 0% 100% 21.7% 42.4% 24.9% 34.3% 48.3% 44.3% 40% 20% 36.0% Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job? * Opportunity for scholarly pursuits (2.18) * Retirement benefits (1.48) * Salary (1.40) Your Inst 136 12.5% 42.6% 44.9% - 26.8% 21.4% 12.5% 19.0% 80% 60% 0% Your Inst Comp 2 7,264 34.3% 44.3% 21.4% Women Comp 1 2,395 19.0% 49.6% 31.4% Comp 2 5,768 25.2% 47.9% 27.0% Women 100% 40% 20% Comp 2 13,032 30.3% 45.9% 23.8% * Men Comp 1 2,565 24.9% 48.3% 26.8% Men Total 100% Total Comp 1 4,960 22.0% 49.0% 29.0% 42.6% 49.6% 25.2% 47.9% 40% 20% 44.9% 31.4% 27.0% Comp 1 Comp 2 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Your Inst * Teaching load (1.27) * Job security (1.26) * Prospects for career advancement (1.25) 2G 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Career Related Stress Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Career Related Stress - Measures the amount of stress faculty experience related to their career. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Career Related Stress Average Career Related Stress Low Career Related Stress Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 39.5% 41.6% 18.9% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 39.5% 36.0% 32.6% 41.6% 45.0% 20% Comp 2 7,257 27.9% 46.7% 25.4% 80% 46.2% 18.9% 18.9% 21.2% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 40% Your Inst 136 46.3% 36.8% 16.9% - Women Comp 1 2,394 41.6% 44.1% 14.3% Comp 2 5,766 38.6% 45.6% 15.8% Women 100% 30.8% 27.9% 44.8% 45.9% 46.7% 20.2% 23.3% 35.0% 60% 60% 0% Your Inst 203 35.0% 44.8% 20.2% - 100% 100% 40% Comp 2 13,023 32.6% 46.2% 21.2% Men Comp 1 2,562 30.8% 45.9% 23.3% Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,956 36.0% 45.0% 18.9% 80% 46.3% 41.6% 38.6% 36.8% 44.1% 45.6% 16.9% 14.3% 15.8% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 60% 20% 25.4% 0% 40% 20% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years: * Lack of personal time (1.52) * Colleagues (1.14) * Teaching load (1.38) * Research or publishing demands (1.13) * Committee work (1.25) * Self-imposed high expectations (1.09) * Institutional procedures/red tape (1.17) * Students (1.08) 2H 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to creating a diverse multicultural campus environment. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity Average Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity Low Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 337 27.9% 38.0% 34.1% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Total Comp 1 4,934 27.2% 38.2% 34.6% 27.9% 27.2% 27.0% 38.0% 38.2% 36.3% 80% 60% 34.1% 34.6% 36.7% 0% 20% 27.2% 26.6% 26.6% 37.6% 39.2% 37.2% Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 5,728 27.5% 35.1% 37.3% 80% 60% 28.9% 27.8% 27.5% 38.5% 37.1% 35.1% 32.6% 35.2% 37.3% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 40% 35.1% 36.2% 34.2% 0% Your Inst Your Inst 135 28.9% 38.5% 32.6% - 100% 40% 40% 20% Comp 2 7,221 26.6% 37.2% 36.2% Women Comp 1 2,381 27.8% 37.1% 35.2% Women 100% 100% 60% Your Inst 202 27.2% 37.6% 35.1% - Men Total 80% Comp 2 12,949 27.0% 36.3% 36.7% Men Comp 1 2,553 26.6% 39.2% 34.2% 20% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university: * To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment (3.21) * To increase the representation of minorities in the faculty and administration (3.05) * To develop an appreciation for multiculturalism (2.79) Comp 2 * To recruit more minority students (2.41) * To increase the representation of women in the faculty and administration (1.76) 2I 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to facilitating civic engagement among students and faculty. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement Average Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement Low Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 337 48.7% 40.4% 11.0% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 48.7% 32.0% 28.9% 44.8% 44.3% 40.4% 20% 11.0% Your Inst 23.2% 80% 50.0% 30.3% 26.8% Comp 2 46.2% 40% 20% 0% Comp 1 Comp 2 7,221 26.6% 45.6% 27.8% *** Your Inst 135 46.7% 40.7% 12.6% - Women Comp 1 2,381 33.8% 43.3% 22.9% * Comp 2 5,730 31.8% 42.8% 25.4% * Women 100% 60% 60% 0% Your Inst 202 50.0% 40.1% 9.9% - 100% 100% 40% Comp 2 12,951 28.9% 44.3% 26.8% *** Men Comp 1 2,554 30.3% 46.2% 23.5% *** Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,935 32.0% 44.8% 23.2% *** 26.6% 45.6% 9.9% Your Inst 27.8% Comp 2 33.8% 31.8% 43.3% 42.8% 22.9% 25.4% Comp 1 Comp 2 40.7% 20% 0% Comp 1 46.7% 60% 40% 40.1% 23.5% 80% 12.6% Your Inst Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university: * To provide resources for faculty to engage in community-based teaching or research (4.27) * To create and sustain partnerships with surrounding communities (2.50) * To facilitate student involvement in community service (1.29) 2J 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to increasing its prestige. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige Average Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige Low Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 336 17.9% 42.3% 39.9% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Total Comp 1 4,935 18.0% 37.8% 44.2% 17.9% 18.0% 80% 60% 42.3% 20% 100% 31.8% 37.8% 39.9% 44.2% 29.5% 0% 17.8% 16.7% 80% 60% 38.7% 40% Your Inst 202 17.8% 42.1% 40.1% - 42.1% 20% 100% 30.2% 37.2% Comp 1 Comp 2 17.9% 19.5% 42.5% 38.5% 80% 60% 39.9% 40% Your Inst 134 17.9% 42.5% 39.6% - 46.1% Comp 2 5,730 33.8% 37.1% 29.1% 29.8% 20% 33.8% 37.1% 40% 40.1% Women Comp 1 2,380 19.5% 38.5% 42.1% Women 0% Your Inst Comp 2 7,227 30.2% 39.9% 29.8% Men Total 100% Comp 2 12,957 31.8% 38.7% 29.5% * Men Comp 1 2,555 16.7% 37.2% 46.1% 39.6% 42.1% Your Inst Comp 1 29.1% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university: * To increase or maintain institutional prestige (3.54) * To enhance the institution's national image (3.43) * To hire faculty "stars" (1.47) 2K 2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey CIRP Construct Percentage Report Social Agency Full-time Undergraduate Faculty Social Agency – Measures the extent to which faculty value political and social involvement as a personal goal. California State University-Fresno Total (n) High Social Agency Average Social Agency Low Social Agency Significance (based on High score group) Your Inst 339 30.4% 46.9% 22.7% - Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 30.4% 27.1% 25.8% 46.9% 45.9% 45.8% 22.7% 27.0% 28.3% 60% 20% Your Inst 203 28.6% 48.3% 23.2% - 80% 20% 28.6% 48.3% 23.2% 22.1% 21.6% 47.3% 45.5% Comp 2 Survey items and estimation 'weights': Indicate the importance to you personally of each of the following: * Participating in a community action program (2.32) * Becoming a community leader (1.84) * Influencing social values (1.49) 80% Comp 2 5,766 31.1% 46.3% 22.7% 32.8% 30.7% 33.1% 32.5% 31.1% 44.9% 44.5% 46.3% 22.1% 23.0% 22.7% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 60% 40% 0% Comp 1 Your Inst 136 33.1% 44.9% 22.1% - 100% 60% 40% 0% Your Inst Comp 2 7,268 21.6% 45.5% 32.8% Women Comp 1 2,392 32.5% 44.5% 23.0% Women 100% 100% 40% Comp 2 13,034 25.8% 45.8% 28.3% Men Comp 1 2,566 22.1% 47.3% 30.7% Men Total 80% Total Comp 1 4,958 27.1% 45.9% 27.0% 20% 0% Your Inst Comp 1 Comp 2 * Helping to promote racial understanding (1.40) * Keeping up to date with political affairs (1.06) 2L