2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Reports
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
California State University-Fresno
comparison group 1:
comparison group 2:
Public 4yr Colleges
Public/Private Universities and Public 4yr Colleges
1.1
2010-11 HERI FacultySurvey
CIRP Construct Reports
Table of Contents
1. CIRP Construct Mean Reports
How to Read the CIRP Construct Mean Reports
a. Student-Centered Pedagogy
b. Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development
c. Scholarly Productivity
d. Civic Minded Practice
e. Civic Minded Values
f. Job Satisfaction: Workplace
g. Job Satisfaction: Compensation
h. Career Related Stress
i. Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
j. Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
k. Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
l. Social Agency
H1
1A
1B
1C
1D
1E
1F
1G
1H
1I
1J
1K
1L
2. CIRP Construct Percentage Reports
How to Read the CIRP Construct Percentage Reports
a. Student-Centered Pedagogy
b. Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development
c. Scholarly Productivity
d. Civic Minded Practice
e. Civic Minded Values
f. Job Satisfaction: Workplace
g. Job Satisfaction: Compensation
h. Career Related Stress
i. Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
j. Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
k. Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
l. Social Agency
H2
2A
2B
2C
2D
2E
2F
2G
2H
2I
2J
2K
2L
How to Read the CIRP Construct Mean Reports
Total
Men
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Total (n)
1,367
5,029
Mean
51.6
50.1
Standard Deviation
7.92
7.86
Sample University
Women
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
14,906
506
1,603
50.3
53.8
51.8
7.84
8.49
8.29
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
5,572
861
3,426
9,334
51.7
50.3
49.2
49.5
8.22
7.25
7.51
7.50
Significance
-
***
***
-
***
***
-
***
**
Effect Size
-
0.19
0.16
-
0.24
0.26
-
0.14
0.10
25th percentile
45.4
45.1
45.4
48.4
45.4
45.4
45.4
44.3
45.0
75th percentile
57.6
55.0
55.0
58.3
58.3
58.3
55.0
54.4
54.4
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Total
Men
75.3
Women
75.3
57.6
55.0
51.6
55.0
50.3
50.1
45.4
45.1
45.4
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
35.4
75.3
58.3
53.8
48.4
58.3
51.8
51.7
45.4
45.4
Comp 1
Comp 2
35.4
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students:
* Help students develop personal values (4.92)
58.3
UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Mean
Statistical Significance –
Uses t-test to examine the
difference between the mean
construct score for your
institution and the comparison
group. Constructs with mean
differences that are larger than
would be expected by chance
are noted with one, two, or
three stars, which correspond
to the three standard levels of
significance (*p< .05, **p< .01,
and ***p< .001). Statistical
significance measures the
extent to which a difference is
occurring by chance, not the
extent to which a difference is
important. Large sample sizes
(like those in the comparison
groups) tend to generate
statistical significance even
though the magnitude of the
difference may be small and
not practically significant. In
order to provide additional
context to statistical
significance, effect sizes are
provided.
Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is as central goal for undergraduate education.
UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Mean
Standard Deviation –
Measures the variability around
the mean. A small standard
deviation indicates that the
responses for the construct
tend to be very close to the
mean, whereas a large
standard deviation indicates
that the responses are spread
over a larger range of response
options.
UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Mean
CIRP Construct Definition –
Summarizes the theoretical
rationale for creating the
construct.
CIRP Constructs are designed to capture the experiences and outcomes institutions are often interested in understanding, but that present a measurement challenge because of their
complex and multifaceted nature. To measure these broad underlying areas more precisely, we use Item Response Theory (IRT) to combine individual survey items into global measures
that capture these areas. CIRP Constructs are more than a summation of related items; IRT uses response patterns to derive construct score estimates while simultaneously giving greater
weight in the estimation process to survey items that tap into the construct more directly. This results in more accurate construct scores. Constructs are particularly useful for
benchmarking. They allow you to determine if the experiences and outcomes for your students differ from your comparison groups. Two sets of reports are generated for CIRP Constructs.
The Mean Report shows comparative information based on the mean score of a construct. The Percentage Report shows comparative information based on the percentage of students
who score in the high, average, and low score group of a construct. We suggest you use the report that best fits your needs as an institution.
55.0
54.4
50.3
54.4
49.5
49.2
45.4
44.3
45.0
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
35.4
For more information about IRT and the CIRP Construct
development process, see the CIRP Constructs Technical
Report at www.heri.ucla.edu
* Provide for students' emotional development (2.91)
* Develop moral character (2.87)
* Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65)
Survey Items and Estimation "Weights" – The survey items used
in the creation of the CIRP Construct are presented in the order in
which they contribute to the construct along with the estimation
weights generated in IRT. Items that tap into a trait more effectively
are given greater weight in the estimation process.
Charts – Provide a visual display of relevant construct scores for your institution and two comparison groups. The
Y axis is defined by the highest and lowest possible construct score. Mean scores are represented by circles. The
numbers at the top and bottom of the vertical line are values for the 75th and 25th percentile.
Comp 1 – The first
comparison group is based
on your institution's type and
control.
Comp 2 – The second
comparison group is based
on a similar grouping of
institution type and control.
Mean – The arithmetic mean
is computed for each CIRP
Construct. The HERI Faculty
Survey Constructs have
been scaled to a mean of 50
and a standard deviation of
10.
Effect Size – Determines the
practical significance of the
mean difference between
your institution and the
comparison group. It is
calculated by dividing the
mean difference by the
standard deviation of the
comparison group.
Generally, an effect size of .2
is considered small, .5
medium, and .8 large. A
positive sign indicates that
your institution’s mean is
greater than the mean of the
comparison group; a
negative sign indicates your
mean is smaller
than the mean of the
comparison group. Note that
a negative effect size is
sometimes preferred (e.g., a
negative effect size on the
"Career Related Stress"
CIRP Construct suggests
your faculty score lower than
comparison schools).
H1
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Student-Centered Pedagogy
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Student-Centered Pedagogy – Measures the extent to which faculty use student-centered teaching and evaluation methods in their course instruction.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
49.5
8.77
43.5
55.5
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Total
-0.03
43.9
55.2
Comp 2
13,028
48.5
8.99
*
0.12
42.4
54.3
Your Inst
203
48.7
8.66
42.6
54.1
49.8
49.5
43.9
48.5
42.4
54.1
53.7
48.7
42.6
52.4
48.2
42.6
46.8
41.1
24.8
24.8
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Student-Centered Pedagogy
Mean
54.3
Your Inst
136
50.7
8.82
45.3
56.6
Comp 2
5,762
51.1
8.63
-0.10
45.9
57.1
-0.04
45.1
56.6
74.2
Student-Centered Pedagogy
Mean
55.2
43.5
0.05
42.6
53.7
Comp 2
7,266
46.8
8.80
**
0.22
41.1
52.4
Women
Comp 1
2,394
51.6
8.49
Women
74.2
55.5
Men
Comp 1
2,566
48.2
8.42
Men
74.2
Student-Centered Pedagogy
Mean
Total
Comp 1
4,960
49.8
8.62
57.1
56.6
56.6
51.6
50.7
51.1
45.3
45.9
45.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
24.8
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
In how many of the courses that you teach do you use each of the following?
* Cooperative learning (small groups) (2.30)
* Student presentations (1.85)
* Group projects (1.82)
* Class discussions (1.70)
* Student evaluations of each others’ work (1.53)
Comp 1
Comp 2
* Reflective writing/journaling (1.37)
* Experiential learning/Field studies (1.30)
* Using student inquiry to drive learning (1.26)
* Student-selected topics for course content (1.21)
1A
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is a central goal for undergraduate education.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
337
48.6
8.72
42.0
55.2
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
55.2
62.3
55.2
53.5
48.7
48.6
42.0
Your Inst
202
48.0
8.72
41.0
55.2
42.3
47.4
40.8
62.3
55.2
54.3
48.0
41.0
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
7,165
46.3
8.62
**
0.19
40.8
51.6
Your Inst
135
49.4
8.68
43.0
55.8
Women
Comp 1
2,380
49.8
8.47
Comp 2
5,663
48.9
8.81
-0.04
43.0
55.8
0.05
42.8
55.3
Women
51.6
47.8
41.0
46.3
40.8
55.8
55.8
55.3
49.8
49.4
48.9
43.0
43.0
42.8
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
26.2
26.2
26.2
Your Inst
0.02
41.0
54.3
Men
UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Mean
UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Mean
62.3
-0.02
42.3
55.2
Comp 2
12,828
47.4
8.79
*
0.14
40.8
53.5
Men
Comp 1
2,554
47.8
8.49
UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,934
48.7
8.54
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students:
* Help students develop personal values (4.92)
* Provide for students' emotional development (2.91)
* Develop moral character (2.87)
* Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65)
1B
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Scholarly Productivity
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Scholarly Productivity – A unified measure of the scholarly activity of faculty.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
50.7
7.36
46.6
55.4
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
60.2
55.4
54.6
50.7
46.6
Your Inst
53.8
49.3
43.4
Comp 1
46.6
Comp 2
38.1
Comp 2
7,265
55.3
9.32
***
-0.36
49.1
61.6
Your Inst
136
48.8
6.64
43.4
53.4
Women
Comp 1
2,395
48.0
6.84
0.11
43.2
53.2
Comp 2
5,769
51.5
8.57
***
-0.32
46.2
57.7
Women
83.9
83.9
Scholarly Productivity
Mean
Scholarly Productivity
Mean
Your Inst
203
51.9
7.57
46.6
57.0
Men
83.9
38.1
Comp 2
13,034
53.8
9.22
***
-0.34
46.6
60.2
Men
Comp 1
2,565
50.4
7.48
**
0.20
46.2
55.4
61.6
57.0
55.4
51.9
55.3
50.4
46.6
46.2
Your Inst
Comp 1
49.1
Scholarly Productivity
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,960
49.3
7.30
**
0.18
43.4
54.6
38.1
Comp 2
53.4
57.7
53.2
48.8
51.5
48.0
43.4
43.2
Your Inst
Comp 1
46.2
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
How many of the following have you published?
* Articles in academic and professional journals (3.09)
* How many of your professional writings have been published or accepted for publication in the last two years (2.53)
* Chapters in edited volumes (2.11)
1C
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Civic Minded Practice
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Civic Minded Practice – A unified measure of faculty involvement in civic activities.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
54.6
7.46
49.0
60.7
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Your Inst
203
54.4
7.67
48.7
60.7
Men
75.2
60.7
57.3
54.6
55.3
51.4
49.9
49.0
38.3
Your Inst
44.5
43.5
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
7,269
49.2
7.69
***
0.67
43.5
55.0
Your Inst
136
54.9
7.17
50.9
60.0
Women
Comp 1
2,395
52.0
7.67
***
0.38
46.9
57.9
Comp 2
5,771
50.9
8.13
***
0.49
43.8
57.3
Women
75.2
75.2
Civic Minded Practice
Mean
Civic Minded Practice
Mean
Comp 2
13,040
49.9
7.91
***
0.59
43.5
55.3
Men
Comp 1
2,567
50.9
7.89
***
0.44
44.3
57.3
60.7
57.3
54.4
55.0
50.9
49.2
48.7
38.3
Your Inst
44.3
43.5
Comp 1
Comp 2
Civic Minded Practice
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,962
51.4
7.81
***
0.41
44.5
57.3
60.0
57.9
54.9
57.3
52.0
50.9
50.9
46.9
38.3
Your Inst
Comp 1
43.8
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
* Collaborated with the local community in research/teaching (1.87)
* Do you use your scholarship to address local community needs? (1.78)
* Community service as part of coursework (1.64)
* Engaged in public service/professional consulting without pay? (1.51)
* Community or public service (1.35)
* Advised student groups involved in service/volunteer work (1.33)
1D
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Civic Minded Values
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Civic Minded Values – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty believe civic engagement is a central part of the college mission.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
50.1
8.34
44.3
55.6
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Your Inst
203
49.4
8.61
44.1
55.2
50.1
44.3
54.9
49.8
44.3
48.6
42.8
Civic Minded Values
Mean
56.2
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
136
51.1
7.83
44.5
56.5
Comp 2
5,770
51.3
8.64
-0.08
46.4
57.8
-0.02
45.9
57.4
68.7
55.2
54.2
49.4
44.1
52.7
48.2
42.0
46.9
41.2
20.8
20.8
Comp 2
7,269
46.9
9.17
***
0.28
41.2
52.7
Women
Comp 1
2,394
51.8
8.31
Women
68.7
55.6
0.14
42.0
54.2
Men
68.7
Civic Minded Values
Mean
0.03
44.3
56.2
Comp 2
13,039
48.6
9.23
**
0.16
42.8
54.9
Men
Comp 1
2,567
48.2
8.96
Civic Minded Values
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,961
49.8
8.85
57.8
56.5
51.8
51.1
44.5
57.4
51.3
46.4
45.9
Comp 1
Comp 2
20.8
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
* Encourage students to become agents of social change (2.37)
* Colleges should encourage students to be involved in community service activities (2.22)
* Instill in students a commitment to community service (2.15)
* Colleges should be actively involved in solving social problems (1.75)
* Colleges have a responsibility to work with their surrounding communities to address
local issues (1.64)
* Influencing social values (1.31)
1E
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Job Satisfaction: Workplace – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their working environment.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
47.6
8.49
41.6
53.3
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
41.6
49.6
49.0
47.6
65.4
55.9
55.5
53.3
Your Inst
203
48.2
8.87
42.1
55.1
43.9
44.0
49.6
49.1
48.2
42.1
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job?
* Professional relationships with other faculty (2.55)
* Competency of colleagues (1.92)
* Autonomy and independence (1.57)
Your Inst
136
46.6
7.81
40.8
51.5
65.4
55.9
55.5
55.1
Comp 2
7,264
49.6
8.52
*
-0.16
44.0
55.9
Women
Comp 1
2,395
49.0
8.46
**
-0.28
44.0
55.1
Comp 2
5,768
49.7
8.71
***
-0.35
44.0
56.1
Women
44.0
43.6
14.1
14.1
Your Inst
-0.11
43.6
55.5
Men
Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Mean
Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Mean
65.4
Comp 2
13,032
49.6
8.59
***
-0.24
44.0
55.9
Men
Comp 1
2,565
49.1
8.36
Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,960
49.0
8.40
**
-0.17
43.9
55.5
56.1
55.1
51.5
40.8
49.7
49.0
46.6
44.0
44.0
Comp 1
Comp 2
14.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
* Departmental leadership (1.51)
* Course assignments (1.33)
1F
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Job Satisfaction: Compensation – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their compensation packages.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
48.0
7.53
42.7
52.8
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Your Inst
203
48.7
7.91
43.1
53.7
42.7
51.9
49.7
48.0
44.2
45.8
Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Mean
56.3
54.4
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job?
* Opportunity for scholarly pursuits (2.18)
* Retirement benefits (1.48)
* Salary (1.40)
Comp 2
5,768
50.7
8.17
***
-0.45
44.9
55.9
74.4
57.9
55.8
53.7
43.1
52.6
50.2
48.7
46.5
44.8
16.9
16.9
Your Inst
136
47.1
6.85
42.2
51.7
Women
Comp 1
2,395
49.1
7.49
**
-0.27
43.7
53.7
Women
74.4
52.8
Comp 2
7,264
52.6
8.59
***
-0.45
46.5
57.9
Men
74.4
Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Mean
Comp 2
13,032
51.9
8.47
***
-0.45
45.8
56.3
Men
Comp 1
2,565
50.2
7.81
**
-0.20
44.8
55.8
Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,960
49.7
7.69
***
-0.21
44.2
54.4
55.9
53.7
51.7
50.7
49.1
47.1
42.2
43.7
44.9
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
16.9
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
* Teaching load (1.27)
* Job security (1.26)
* Prospects for career advancement (1.25)
1G
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Career Related Stress
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Career Related Stress – Measures the amount of stress faculty experience related to their career.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
52.8
7.90
47.6
58.9
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Your Inst
203
51.9
7.76
46.9
58.0
52.8
56.6
51.9
46.8
51.2
46.1
8.2
Career Related Stress
Mean
57.1
47.6
Comp 1
Comp 2
0.17
47.3
58.1
Comp 2
5,766
52.6
7.70
*
0.21
47.2
57.8
76.1
58.0
56.6
51.9
46.9
55.8
51.2
46.3
50.4
44.9
59.6
58.1
54.1
57.8
52.8
52.6
49.1
47.3
47.2
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
8.2
8.2
Your Inst
0.10
46.3
56.6
Your Inst
136
54.1
7.96
49.1
59.6
Women
Comp 1
2,394
52.8
7.92
Women
76.1
58.9
Comp 2
7,257
50.4
7.70
**
0.21
44.9
55.8
Men
76.1
Career Related Stress
Mean
Comp 2
13,023
51.2
7.78
***
0.21
46.1
56.6
Men
Comp 1
2,562
51.2
7.79
Career Related Stress
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,956
51.9
7.89
*
0.12
46.8
57.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years:
* Lack of personal time (1.52)
* Colleagues (1.14)
* Teaching load (1.38)
* Research or publishing demands (1.13)
* Committee work (1.25)
* Self-imposed high expectations (1.09)
* Institutional procedures/red tape (1.17)
* Students (1.08)
1H
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to creating a diverse multicultural campus environment.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
337
50.1
8.41
44.8
56.1
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
0.07
44.8
55.4
0.05
44.8
56.1
Your Inst
202
49.7
8.15
44.8
55.4
50.1
49.7
49.5
44.8
44.8
Inst Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Mean
56.1
55.4
44.8
-0.02
44.8
57.0
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
5,728
49.3
9.28
0.13
43.1
55.6
0.14
43.1
55.4
71.3
55.4
57.0
55.4
49.7
49.9
49.5
44.8
44.8
44.8
30.6
30.6
Your Inst
0.02
44.8
55.4
Your Inst
135
50.6
8.80
44.8
57.0
Women
Comp 1
2,381
49.4
9.24
Women
71.3
56.1
Comp 2
7,221
49.9
8.58
Men
71.3
Inst Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Mean
Comp 2
12,949
49.7
8.87
Men
Comp 1
2,553
49.5
8.87
Inst Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,934
49.5
9.04
57.0
55.6
50.6
44.8
55.4
49.4
49.3
43.1
43.1
Comp 1
Comp 2
30.6
Your Inst
Comp 1
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university:
* To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment (3.21)
* To increase the representation of minorities in the faculty and administration (3.05)
* To develop an appreciation for multiculturalism (2.79)
Comp 2
Your Inst
* To recruit more minority students (2.41)
* To increase the representation of women in the faculty and administration (1.76)
1I
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to facilitating civic engagement among students and faculty.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
337
53.8
7.85
48.4
57.6
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Your Inst
202
54.2
7.72
48.4
57.6
Men
69.6
57.6
56.1
53.8
48.4
55.6
50.0
45.1
48.8
42.2
33.9
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
135
53.3
8.04
46.6
57.6
Comp 2
5,730
49.4
8.81
***
0.44
43.3
56.1
69.6
57.6
56.1
54.5
54.2
49.3
48.3
48.4
43.4
42.1
57.6
57.6
53.3
56.1
50.7
46.6
45.4
Your Inst
Comp 1
49.4
43.3
33.9
33.9
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,221
48.3
8.33
***
0.70
42.1
54.5
Women
Comp 1
2,381
50.7
8.63
***
0.30
45.4
57.6
Women
69.6
Inst Priority: Civic Engagement
Mean
Inst Priority: Civic Engagement
Mean
Comp 2
12,951
48.8
8.54
***
0.59
42.2
55.6
Men
Comp 1
2,554
49.3
8.16
***
0.59
43.4
56.1
Inst Priority: Civic Engagement
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,935
50.0
8.40
***
0.46
45.1
56.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university:
* To provide resources for faculty to engage in community-based teaching or research (4.27)
* To create and sustain partnerships with surrounding communities (2.50)
* To facilitate student involvement in community service (1.29)
1J
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to increasing its prestige.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
336
47.8
7.84
42.3
52.5
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
47.8
52.4
47.0
46.3
40.5
31.2
Inst Priority: Increase Prestige
Mean
Inst Priority: Increase Prestige
Mean
52.5
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
134
47.2
8.28
41.5
52.5
-0.02
41.0
52.5
65.0
60.3
52.5
51.0
48.1
52.2
46.7
46.3
42.3
40.5
Comp 2
5,730
52.6
9.01
***
-0.60
46.3
60.3
60.3
52.5
52.5
52.6
47.4
47.2
46.3
41.5
41.0
Your Inst
Comp 1
31.2
31.2
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,227
52.2
8.81
***
-0.46
46.3
60.3
Women
Comp 1
2,380
47.4
8.47
Women
65.0
60.3
42.3
0.09
40.5
52.5
Your Inst
202
48.1
7.53
42.3
52.5
Men
65.0
52.5
Comp 2
12,957
52.4
8.89
***
-0.52
46.3
60.3
Men
Comp 1
2,555
46.7
8.27
*
0.18
40.5
51.0
Inst Priority: Increase Prestige
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,935
47.0
8.37
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university:
* To increase or maintain institutional prestige (3.54)
* To enhance the institution's national image (3.43)
* To hire faculty "stars" (1.47)
1K
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Mean Report
Social Agency
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Social Agency – Measures the extent to which faculty value political and social involvement as a personal goal.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
Mean
Standard Deviation
Significance
Effect Size
25th percentile
75th percentile
Your Inst
339
51.0
8.50
45.1
57.0
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Your Inst
203
50.5
8.41
45.1
56.0
51.0
45.1
54.7
50.3
44.3
49.1
Social Agency
Mean
56.0
56.0
54.9
50.5
53.5
49.5
43.7
48.0
41.9
27.1
27.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate the importance to you personally of each of the following:
* Participating in a community action program (2.32)
* Becoming a community leader (1.84)
* Influencing social values (1.49)
Your Inst
136
51.9
8.59
45.7
57.2
Comp 2
5,766
50.8
8.45
0.08
45.1
57.0
0.13
45.1
55.9
72.5
45.1
43.4
Comp 2
7,268
48.0
8.64
***
0.29
41.9
53.5
Women
Comp 1
2,392
51.2
8.47
Women
72.5
57.0
0.11
43.7
54.9
Men
72.5
Social Agency
Mean
0.09
44.3
56.0
Comp 2
13,034
49.1
8.67
***
0.22
43.4
54.7
Men
Comp 1
2,566
49.5
8.88
Social Agency
Mean
Total
Total
Comp 1
4,958
50.3
8.74
57.2
57.0
51.9
55.9
51.2
50.8
45.7
45.1
45.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
27.1
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
* Helping to promote racial understanding (1.40)
* Keeping up to date with political affairs (1.06)
1L
How to Read the CIRP Construct Percentage Reports
CIRP Constructs are designed to capture the experiences and outcomes institutions are often interested in understanding, but that present a measurement challenge because of their
complex and multifaceted nature. To measure these broad underlying areas more precisely, we use Item Response Theory (IRT) to combine individual survey items into global
measures that capture these areas. CIRP Constructs are more than a summation of related items; IRT uses response patterns to derive construct score estimates while simultaneously
giving greater weight in the estimation process to survey items that tap into the construct more directly. This results in more accurate construct scores. Constructs are particularly useful
for benchmarking. They allow you to determine if the experiences and outcomes for your students differ from your comparison groups. Two sets of reports are generated for CIRP
Constructs. The Mean Report shows comparative information based on the mean score of a construct. The Percentage Report shows comparative information based on the percentage
of students who score in the high, average, and low score group of a construct. We suggest you use the report that best fits your needs as an institution.
Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is as central goal for undergraduate education.
Your Inst
1,361
43.6%
30.3%
26.1%
-
Sample University
Total (n)
High UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Average UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Low UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Significance (based on High score group)
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
43.6%
33.2%
30.3%
30.3%
80%
43.0%
36.7%
40%
32.8%
29.8%
Comp 1
Comp 2
0%
31.6%
39.1%
20%
25.4%
24.2%
16.9%
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students:
* Help students develop personal values (4.92)
Your Inst
858
34.3%
34.3%
31.5%
-
Women
Comp 1
3,410
28.7%
35.0%
36.2%
Comp 2
9,308
26.5%
40.4%
33.1%
**
28.7%
26.5%
35.0%
40.4%
31.5%
36.2%
33.1%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
34.3%
Comp 1
Comp 2
34.3%
40%
20%
0%
0%
Your Inst
80%
60%
39.9%
23.5%
26.1%
Comp 2
5,527
36.7%
39.1%
24.2%
***
Women
60%
33.9%
Men
Comp 1
1,586
43.0%
31.6%
25.4%
***
100%
59.6%
60%
20%
Your Inst
503
59.6%
23.5%
16.9%
-
100%
100%
40%
Comp 2
14,835
30.3%
39.9%
29.8%
***
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,996
33.2%
33.9%
32.8%
***
For more information about IRT and the CIRP Construct
development process, see the CIRP Constructs Technical
Report at www.heri.ucla.edu
* Provide for students' emotional development (2.91)
* Develop moral character (2.87)
* Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65)
Survey Items and Estimation "Weights" – The survey items used
in the creation of the CIRP Construct are presented in the order in
which they contribute to the construct along with the estimation
weights generated in IRT. Items that tap into a trait more effectively
are given greater weight in the estimation process.
CIRP Construct Definition –
Summarizes the theoretical
rationale for creating the
construct.
Comp 1 – The first comparison
group is based on your
institution's type and control.
Comp 2 – The second
comparison group is based on
a similar grouping of institution
type and control.
Statistical Significance –
Uses a proportional difference
test to examine the difference
between the percentage of
students in the high group for
your institution and the
percentage of students in the
high group in the comparison
group. Differences larger than
what would be expected by
chance are noted with one,
two, or three stars, which
correspond to the three
standard levels of significance
(*p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001).
Statistical significance
measures the extent to which
a difference is occurring by
chance, not the extent to which
a difference is practically
important. Large sample sizes
(like those in the comparison
groups) tend to generate
statistical significance even
though the magnitude of the
difference might be small and
not practically important.
Charts – Provide a visual display of construct group percentages for your institution and two comparison groups.
The HERI Faculty Survey Constructs have been scaled to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. “Low”
represents faculty who scored one-half of a standard deviation below the mean (less than 45). “Average”
represents faculty who scored within one-half of a standard deviation of the mean (45 to 55). “High” represents
faculty who scored one-half standard deviation or more above mean (higher than 55).
H2
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Student-Centered Pedagogy
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Student-Centered Pedagogy – Measures the extent to which faculty use student-centered teaching and evaluation methods in their course instruction.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Student-Centered Pedagogy
Average Student-Centered Pedagogy
Low Student-Centered Pedagogy
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
27.4%
40.4%
32.2%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
27.4%
26.7%
25.6%
40.4%
43.9%
42.3%
80%
60%
21.7%
19.7%
39.9%
42.7%
19.3%
32.2%
29.4%
32.1%
0%
40.6%
Comp 1
Your Inst
136
36.0%
41.2%
22.8%
-
20%
38.4%
Comp 2
Comp 2
5,762
33.7%
44.4%
21.9%
40.1%
37.6%
36.0%
34.2%
33.7%
41.2%
45.1%
44.4%
22.8%
20.7%
21.9%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
60%
40%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,266
19.3%
40.6%
40.1%
100%
80%
40%
40%
20%
Your Inst
203
21.7%
39.9%
38.4%
-
Women
Comp 1
2,394
34.2%
45.1%
20.7%
Women
100%
100%
60%
Comp 2
13,028
25.6%
42.3%
32.1%
Men
Comp 1
2,566
19.7%
42.7%
37.6%
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,960
26.7%
43.9%
29.4%
20%
0%
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
In how many of the courses that you teach do you use each of the following?
* Cooperative learning (small groups) (2.30)
* Student presentations (1.85)
* Group projects (1.82)
* Class discussions (1.70)
* Student evaluations of each others’ work (1.53)
Comp 1
Comp 2
* Reflective writing/journaling (1.37)
* Experiential learning/Field studies (1.30)
* Using student inquiry to drive learning (1.26)
* Student-selected topics for course content (1.21)
2A
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Undergraduate Education Goal: Personal Development – Measures the extent to which faculty believe that personal development is a central goal for undergraduate education.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Average UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Low UG Ed Goal: Personal Development
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
337
27.3%
36.5%
36.2%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
27.3%
26.0%
26.9%
36.5%
37.2%
37.1%
36.2%
36.8%
35.9%
0%
80%
60%
20%
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
135
30.4%
38.5%
31.1%
-
Comp 2
5,663
32.1%
37.7%
30.3%
100%
25.2%
22.1%
22.9%
35.1%
36.3%
36.7%
80%
60%
30.4%
30.3%
32.1%
38.5%
38.1%
37.7%
31.1%
31.7%
30.3%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
40%
39.6%
41.6%
40.4%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,165
22.9%
36.7%
40.4%
Women
Comp 1
2,380
30.3%
38.1%
31.7%
Women
40%
40%
20%
Your Inst
202
25.2%
35.1%
39.6%
-
100%
100%
60%
Comp 2
12,828
26.9%
37.1%
35.9%
Men
Comp 1
2,554
22.1%
36.3%
41.6%
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,934
26.0%
37.2%
36.8%
20%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate the importance to you of each of the following education goals for undergraduate students:
* Help students develop personal values (4.92)
* Provide for students' emotional development (2.91)
* Develop moral character (2.87)
* Enhance students' self-understanding (2.65)
2B
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Scholarly Productivity
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Scholarly Productivity – A unified measure of the scholarly activity of faculty.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Scholarly Productivity
Average Scholarly Productivity
Low Scholarly Productivity
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
26.3%
53.7%
20.1%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
26.3%
25.1%
53.7%
52.0%
41.3%
20%
20.1%
Your Inst
41.7%
22.9%
Comp 1
Comp 2
7,265
48.6%
37.7%
13.7%
**
80%
100%
31.0%
30.7%
40%
50.3%
48.6%
15.8%
19.1%
Your Inst
Comp 1
37.7%
20%
16.9%
Comp 2
0%
Comp 2
5,769
32.1%
46.8%
21.0%
Comp 2
19.1%
54.4%
53.9%
26.5%
27.0%
21.0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
40%
20%
13.7%
19.1%
80%
60%
53.2%
Your Inst
136
19.1%
54.4%
26.5%
-
Women
Comp 1
2,395
19.1%
53.9%
27.0%
Women
60%
60%
0%
Your Inst
203
31.0%
53.2%
15.8%
-
100%
100%
40%
Comp 2
13,034
41.3%
41.7%
16.9%
**
Men
Comp 1
2,565
30.7%
50.3%
19.1%
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,960
25.1%
52.0%
22.9%
32.1%
46.8%
0%
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
How many of the following have you published?
* Articles in academic and professional journals (3.09)
* How many of your professional writings have been published or accepted for publication in the last two years (2.53)
* Chapters in edited volumes (2.11)
2C
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Civic Minded Practice
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Civic Minded Practice – A unified measure of faculty involvement in civic activities.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Civic Minded Practice
Average Civic Minded Practice
Low Civic Minded Practice
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
48.4%
38.6%
13.0%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
48.4%
34.6%
30.1%
41.5%
42.4%
38.6%
20%
13.0%
Your Inst
23.9%
27.5%
Comp 2
Your Inst
136
50.0%
39.0%
11.0%
-
Comp 2
5,771
34.2%
41.7%
24.2%
**
100%
80%
47.3%
26.8%
32.1%
43.0%
42.3%
40%
20%
14.3%
Your Inst
80%
30.2%
25.6%
Comp 2
37.4%
34.2%
40.7%
41.7%
22.0%
24.2%
Comp 1
Comp 2
39.0%
20%
0%
Comp 1
50.0%
60%
40%
38.4%
0%
Comp 1
Comp 2
7,269
26.8%
43.0%
30.2%
***
Women
Comp 1
2,395
37.4%
40.7%
22.0%
*
Women
60%
60%
0%
Your Inst
203
47.3%
38.4%
14.3%
-
100%
100%
40%
Comp 2
13,040
30.1%
42.4%
27.5%
***
Men
Comp 1
2,567
32.1%
42.3%
25.6%
**
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,962
34.6%
41.5%
23.9%
***
11.0%
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
* Collaborated with the local community in research/teaching (1.87)
* Do you use your scholarship to address local community needs? (1.78)
* Community service as part of coursework (1.64)
* Engaged in public service/professional consulting without pay? (1.51)
* Community or public service (1.35)
* Advised student groups involved in service/volunteer work (1.33)
2D
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Civic Minded Values
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Civic Minded Values – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty believe civic engagement is a central part of the college mission.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Civic Minded Values
Average Civic Minded Values
Low Civic Minded Values
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
28.0%
41.3%
30.7%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Total
Comp 1
4,961
26.6%
41.8%
31.5%
28.0%
26.6%
26.6%
41.3%
41.8%
40.5%
80%
60%
30.7%
31.5%
32.9%
0%
20%
25.6%
41.9%
20.2%
80%
39.6%
41.6%
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
5,770
34.8%
41.5%
23.7%
32.5%
40.2%
38.7%
31.6%
34.0%
34.8%
40.4%
42.1%
41.5%
27.9%
23.9%
23.7%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
60%
40%
0%
Your Inst
Your Inst
136
31.6%
40.4%
27.9%
-
100%
19.7%
40%
40%
20%
Comp 2
7,269
20.2%
39.6%
40.2%
Women
Comp 1
2,394
34.0%
42.1%
23.9%
Women
100%
100%
60%
Your Inst
203
25.6%
41.9%
32.5%
-
Men
Total
80%
Comp 2
13,039
26.6%
40.5%
32.9%
Men
Comp 1
2,567
19.7%
41.6%
38.7%
20%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
* Encourage students to become agents of social change (2.37)
* Colleges should encourage students to be involved in community service activities (2.22)
* Instill in students a commitment to community service (2.15)
* Colleges should be actively involved in solving social problems (1.75)
* Colleges have a responsibility to work with their surrounding communities to address
local issues (1.64)
* Influencing social values (1.31)
2E
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Job Satisfaction: Workplace – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their working environment.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Average Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Low Job Satisfaction: Workplace
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
21.2%
43.1%
35.7%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
21.2%
43.1%
27.9%
28.2%
43.0%
43.1%
35.7%
29.1%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Your Inst
203
25.6%
38.9%
35.5%
-
28.6%
0%
100%
25.6%
27.7%
28.7%
38.9%
42.5%
43.3%
40%
20%
35.5%
29.8%
28.0%
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job?
* Professional relationships with other faculty (2.55)
* Competency of colleagues (1.92)
* Autonomy and independence (1.57)
14.7%
80%
60%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,264
28.7%
43.3%
28.0%
Your Inst
136
14.7%
49.3%
36.0%
-
Women
Comp 1
2,395
28.2%
43.5%
28.3%
Comp 2
5,768
27.6%
43.0%
29.4%
Women
100%
100%
60%
Comp 2
13,032
28.2%
43.1%
28.6%
Men
Comp 1
2,565
27.7%
42.5%
29.8%
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,960
27.9%
43.0%
29.1%
49.3%
28.2%
27.6%
43.5%
43.0%
28.3%
29.4%
Comp 1
Comp 2
40%
20%
36.0%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
* Departmental leadership (1.51)
* Course assignments (1.33)
2F
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Job Satisfaction: Compensation – A unified measure of the extent to which faculty are satisfied with their compensation packages.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Average Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Low Job Satisfaction: Compensation
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
18.0%
42.5%
39.5%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
18.0%
80%
60%
42.5%
39.5%
Your Inst
203
21.7%
42.4%
36.0%
-
22.0%
49.0%
29.0%
30.3%
80%
60%
45.9%
23.8%
0%
100%
21.7%
42.4%
24.9%
34.3%
48.3%
44.3%
40%
20%
36.0%
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
How satisfied are you with the following aspects of your job?
* Opportunity for scholarly pursuits (2.18)
* Retirement benefits (1.48)
* Salary (1.40)
Your Inst
136
12.5%
42.6%
44.9%
-
26.8%
21.4%
12.5%
19.0%
80%
60%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,264
34.3%
44.3%
21.4%
Women
Comp 1
2,395
19.0%
49.6%
31.4%
Comp 2
5,768
25.2%
47.9%
27.0%
Women
100%
40%
20%
Comp 2
13,032
30.3%
45.9%
23.8%
*
Men
Comp 1
2,565
24.9%
48.3%
26.8%
Men
Total
100%
Total
Comp 1
4,960
22.0%
49.0%
29.0%
42.6%
49.6%
25.2%
47.9%
40%
20%
44.9%
31.4%
27.0%
Comp 1
Comp 2
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Your Inst
* Teaching load (1.27)
* Job security (1.26)
* Prospects for career advancement (1.25)
2G
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Career Related Stress
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Career Related Stress - Measures the amount of stress faculty experience related to their career.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Career Related Stress
Average Career Related Stress
Low Career Related Stress
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
39.5%
41.6%
18.9%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
39.5%
36.0%
32.6%
41.6%
45.0%
20%
Comp 2
7,257
27.9%
46.7%
25.4%
80%
46.2%
18.9%
18.9%
21.2%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
40%
Your Inst
136
46.3%
36.8%
16.9%
-
Women
Comp 1
2,394
41.6%
44.1%
14.3%
Comp 2
5,766
38.6%
45.6%
15.8%
Women
100%
30.8%
27.9%
44.8%
45.9%
46.7%
20.2%
23.3%
35.0%
60%
60%
0%
Your Inst
203
35.0%
44.8%
20.2%
-
100%
100%
40%
Comp 2
13,023
32.6%
46.2%
21.2%
Men
Comp 1
2,562
30.8%
45.9%
23.3%
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,956
36.0%
45.0%
18.9%
80%
46.3%
41.6%
38.6%
36.8%
44.1%
45.6%
16.9%
14.3%
15.8%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
60%
20%
25.4%
0%
40%
20%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years:
* Lack of personal time (1.52)
* Colleagues (1.14)
* Teaching load (1.38)
* Research or publishing demands (1.13)
* Committee work (1.25)
* Self-imposed high expectations (1.09)
* Institutional procedures/red tape (1.17)
* Students (1.08)
2H
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to creating a diverse multicultural campus environment.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Average Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Low Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
337
27.9%
38.0%
34.1%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Total
Comp 1
4,934
27.2%
38.2%
34.6%
27.9%
27.2%
27.0%
38.0%
38.2%
36.3%
80%
60%
34.1%
34.6%
36.7%
0%
20%
27.2%
26.6%
26.6%
37.6%
39.2%
37.2%
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
5,728
27.5%
35.1%
37.3%
80%
60%
28.9%
27.8%
27.5%
38.5%
37.1%
35.1%
32.6%
35.2%
37.3%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
40%
35.1%
36.2%
34.2%
0%
Your Inst
Your Inst
135
28.9%
38.5%
32.6%
-
100%
40%
40%
20%
Comp 2
7,221
26.6%
37.2%
36.2%
Women
Comp 1
2,381
27.8%
37.1%
35.2%
Women
100%
100%
60%
Your Inst
202
27.2%
37.6%
35.1%
-
Men
Total
80%
Comp 2
12,949
27.0%
36.3%
36.7%
Men
Comp 1
2,553
26.6%
39.2%
34.2%
20%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university:
* To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment (3.21)
* To increase the representation of minorities in the faculty and administration (3.05)
* To develop an appreciation for multiculturalism (2.79)
Comp 2
* To recruit more minority students (2.41)
* To increase the representation of women in the faculty and administration (1.76)
2I
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to facilitating civic engagement among students and faculty.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
Average Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
Low Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
337
48.7%
40.4%
11.0%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
48.7%
32.0%
28.9%
44.8%
44.3%
40.4%
20%
11.0%
Your Inst
23.2%
80%
50.0%
30.3%
26.8%
Comp 2
46.2%
40%
20%
0%
Comp 1
Comp 2
7,221
26.6%
45.6%
27.8%
***
Your Inst
135
46.7%
40.7%
12.6%
-
Women
Comp 1
2,381
33.8%
43.3%
22.9%
*
Comp 2
5,730
31.8%
42.8%
25.4%
*
Women
100%
60%
60%
0%
Your Inst
202
50.0%
40.1%
9.9%
-
100%
100%
40%
Comp 2
12,951
28.9%
44.3%
26.8%
***
Men
Comp 1
2,554
30.3%
46.2%
23.5%
***
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,935
32.0%
44.8%
23.2%
***
26.6%
45.6%
9.9%
Your Inst
27.8%
Comp 2
33.8%
31.8%
43.3%
42.8%
22.9%
25.4%
Comp 1
Comp 2
40.7%
20%
0%
Comp 1
46.7%
60%
40%
40.1%
23.5%
80%
12.6%
Your Inst
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university:
* To provide resources for faculty to engage in community-based teaching or research (4.27)
* To create and sustain partnerships with surrounding communities (2.50)
* To facilitate student involvement in community service (1.29)
2J
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige – Measures the extent to which faculty believe their institution is committed to increasing its prestige.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
Average Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
Low Institutional Priority: Increase Prestige
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
336
17.9%
42.3%
39.9%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
Total
Comp 1
4,935
18.0%
37.8%
44.2%
17.9%
18.0%
80%
60%
42.3%
20%
100%
31.8%
37.8%
39.9%
44.2%
29.5%
0%
17.8%
16.7%
80%
60%
38.7%
40%
Your Inst
202
17.8%
42.1%
40.1%
-
42.1%
20%
100%
30.2%
37.2%
Comp 1
Comp 2
17.9%
19.5%
42.5%
38.5%
80%
60%
39.9%
40%
Your Inst
134
17.9%
42.5%
39.6%
-
46.1%
Comp 2
5,730
33.8%
37.1%
29.1%
29.8%
20%
33.8%
37.1%
40%
40.1%
Women
Comp 1
2,380
19.5%
38.5%
42.1%
Women
0%
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,227
30.2%
39.9%
29.8%
Men
Total
100%
Comp 2
12,957
31.8%
38.7%
29.5%
*
Men
Comp 1
2,555
16.7%
37.2%
46.1%
39.6%
42.1%
Your Inst
Comp 1
29.1%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at your college or university:
* To increase or maintain institutional prestige (3.54)
* To enhance the institution's national image (3.43)
* To hire faculty "stars" (1.47)
2K
2010-11 HERI Faculty Survey
CIRP Construct Percentage Report
Social Agency
Full-time Undergraduate Faculty
Social Agency – Measures the extent to which faculty value political and social involvement as a personal goal.
California State University-Fresno
Total (n)
High Social Agency
Average Social Agency
Low Social Agency
Significance (based on High score group)
Your Inst
339
30.4%
46.9%
22.7%
-
Note: Significance * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001
30.4%
27.1%
25.8%
46.9%
45.9%
45.8%
22.7%
27.0%
28.3%
60%
20%
Your Inst
203
28.6%
48.3%
23.2%
-
80%
20%
28.6%
48.3%
23.2%
22.1%
21.6%
47.3%
45.5%
Comp 2
Survey items and estimation 'weights':
Indicate the importance to you personally of each of the following:
* Participating in a community action program (2.32)
* Becoming a community leader (1.84)
* Influencing social values (1.49)
80%
Comp 2
5,766
31.1%
46.3%
22.7%
32.8%
30.7%
33.1%
32.5%
31.1%
44.9%
44.5%
46.3%
22.1%
23.0%
22.7%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
60%
40%
0%
Comp 1
Your Inst
136
33.1%
44.9%
22.1%
-
100%
60%
40%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 2
7,268
21.6%
45.5%
32.8%
Women
Comp 1
2,392
32.5%
44.5%
23.0%
Women
100%
100%
40%
Comp 2
13,034
25.8%
45.8%
28.3%
Men
Comp 1
2,566
22.1%
47.3%
30.7%
Men
Total
80%
Total
Comp 1
4,958
27.1%
45.9%
27.0%
20%
0%
Your Inst
Comp 1
Comp 2
* Helping to promote racial understanding (1.40)
* Keeping up to date with political affairs (1.06)
2L