Academic Writing Lecture 2 Nahid Shahmehri ** Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University ** Slides borrowed from Magnus Merkel Outline Last time Objective & structure Text types: general-to-specific, summaries, critiques Overview: Research paper Language issues Proofing and revision Citations and references Plagiarism and how to avoid it The seminar assignments 2013-09-18 Sid 2 Linköpings universitet Repetition: Steps to write a summary 2013-09-18 1. Skim the text and divide the text into sections (possibly by the use of subheadings) 2. What is the purpose of the summary? Inclusion in a research paper? Show your teacher that you have understood a particular area? The answers to such questions may help you to select the relevant sections to focus on. 3. Read the text thoroughly, and take notes of the most relevant and important information. 4. Write in your own words the main message of each section. Try to write a one-sentence summary (topic sentence) for each section. 5. Write down the main supporting points for the major topic (no details) 6. Go through the process again, and revise. Sid 3 Linköpings universitet Repatition: Writing critiques Critique means critical assessment (could be positive or negative, or both) Common types of critiques: book reviews, film reviews. Common structure: 1. short summary, 2. evaluation. Critiques are used in academic circumstances as 2013-09-18 1. An attempt to develop analytical reading 2. A way to train students to integrate new knowledge with previous knowledge 3. A way to provide students with a better picture of what is expected in their research field. 4. An attempt to ensure that students do reading assignments 5. An assessment of understanding Sid 4 Linköpings universitet Summaries vs. Critiques Summaries should provide an accurate account of the content of the source material. Critiques should contain evaluations within their “field’s accepted standards of judgment”. Critiques should be fair, i.e. don’t apply evaluation criteria from other fields, keep it to the specific tradition. Different emphases on critiques in different fields: Humanities: “interesting” arguments Social sciences: the methodology Natural science and engineering: the results and their implications. 2013-09-18 Sid 5 Linköpings universitet Research paper structure -- (verify this! ) -- (helps even reading papers) Title Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgements References 2013-09-18 Sid 7 Linköpings universitet Overview of a Research Paper (RP) Verify this! General Introduction (I) Specific Methods and Materials (M) Results (R) Discussion (D) Specific General 2013-09-18 Sid 8 Linköpings universitet Language issues American or British English? Be consistent. Synonyms not often a good idea… Passive or active voice? Tense usage? Learn “connectives” that can make your text cohesive. Use proofing tools and other people for reviewing your text. 2013-09-18 Sid 19 Linköpings universitet Proofing tools Spell checkers Grammar tools Hyphenation Many false alarms Improved considerably the last fifteen years! Use them! An automatically grammar checked text is far from being a good text. But… best “proofing tool” is probably a colleague. 2013-09-18 Sid 20 Linköpings universitet Academic writing tradition full of contradictions: Show that you know your field Make your own significant contribution Appeal to experts and authorities Improve, analyse or disagree with experts and authorities Improve your English by mimicking what you hear and read Use your own words, your own voice Present your own ideas and thoughts clearly Give credit where credit is due Reports as examination Scientific writing – building your work on the writings of somebody else. Examination – convincing your assessor that you understand what you're writing about. Reports as examination Potential problems Collaboration when not permitted Plagiarism Charges of cheating are brought before the Disciplinary Board and may result in suspension. Reports as examination How? Give credit where credit is due! Be clear about sources, use citations when quoting, paraphrasing or borrowing ideas. Collaborative writing or not? Managing your sources Using citations (Ragnemalm, 2007), (Ragnemalm 2007) or [1] and references: Ragnemalm, Eva L. Talk given at Linköping University on the 15th of october 2007. [1] Ragnemalm, Eva L. Talk given at Linköping University on the 15th of october 2007. What if you have a reference from www? Keep a copy of the text, write a date of visit!. Distinguish between Quotations & Citations When you use another's exact words. Quotation marks ”indicate exactly what words were written or said”. The citation (Ragnemalm, 2005) or [12] indicates from where. To use another's exact words without indicating is plagiarism. Use quotations sparingly. Paraphrases When you rewrite a piece of text using your own words but retaining the general message. Paraphrasing is plagiarism if the citation is left out OR if the wording is too close to the original. Make sure you keep the message of the original text! Paraphrasing examples Original text (from Lu, 1997): Descartes introduces the possibility that the world is controlled by a malicious demon who has employed all his energies to deceive him. Paraphrase: Descartes suggests that the world is controlled by an evil demon who may be using his energies to deceive him (Lu, 1997). Plagiarism even though the citation is provided, the sentence still has exact wording (italicized). Paraphrasing examples, cont'd Original text (from Lu, 1997): Descartes introduces the possibility that the world is controlled by a malicious demon who has employed all his energies to deceive him. Paraphrase: Descartes suggests that the evil power who rules the world may be attempting to mislead him (Lu, 1997). Comment: Not plagiarism, the language is fully rewritten, and a citation is provided. What if the citation was missing? Paraphrasing examples, cont'd Original text (from Lu, 1997): Descartes introduces the possibility that the world is controlled by a malicious demon who has employed all his energies to deceive him. Combination of paraphrase and quotation: Descartes suggests that the evil power who rules the world may be using “all his energies to deceive him” (Lu, 1997). Comment: Not plagiarism, the paraphrased portion is fully rewritten, the exact language is quoted, and a citation is provided. Borrowed ideas Somebody else's new concept Somebody else's observations Somebody else's general idea Somebody else's chain of reasoning Somebody else's diagram Somebody else's table Somebody else's figure etc. When not to cite? Your own ideas Your own conclusions Your own reflections Your own analysis Your own experience Your own observations etc. When using ”common knowledge” Choosing when to cite, exercises Do you have to give credit? If so, how? If not, why? Situations: ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ You are reporting new insights about your own experiences. You are using an editorial from your school's newspaper with which you disagree. You use some information from a source without ever quoting it directly. You have no other way of expressing the exact meaning of a text without using the original source verbatim. Choosing when to cite, exercises Situations: ➢ You are reporting new insights about your own experiences. NO ➢ You are using an editorial from your school's newspaper with which you disagree. YES (quotes or citations) ➢ You use some information from a source without ever quoting it directly. YES (you are borrowing ideas) ➢ You have no other way of expressing the exact meaning of a text without using the original source verbatim. YES, quote Urkund – discovering plagiarism Urkund is a service provided for Swedish universities. • Reports are submitted to Urkund • Comparisons with database and the web • Teacher is informed of similar documents Academic writing Give credit where credit is due. Assignment 2 Write up a critical reflection on 4 papers Similar conditions as previous assignment 2013-09-18 Sid 39 Linköpings universitet Hope you learn much by working on your assignments! 2013-09-18 Sid 40 Linköpings universitet