Integrating natural history collections and mechanistic studies to forecast

advertisement

Integrating natural history collections and mechanistic studies to forecast species distributions and ecosystem function

Natural

History

Collections

Integration Modeling Ecoforecasting

Mechanistic

Studies

Natural

History

Collections

Historic fish species occurrences

Fish occurrence data from 1885 – present

KU museum, KS Heritage Prgm, KDWP, …

Various methodologies, collectors, etc.

good ‘presence’ data

3,862 samples,

133 species

Natural

History

Collections

Contemporary fish species relative abundances

KDWP stream surveys, 1995-2006

-standardized methodology, GPS

Fish collections with fewer than 20 individuals were excluded, rare species (< 5 occurrences) excluded

Kansas River basin: 392 samples, 53 species

Natural

History

Collections

Stream network structure, soils and land cover/use GIS layers

Attributes for 29,000+ segments (1 st order streams excluded) calculated using a GIS

Stream size/position (Natl. Hydrography Dataset; USGS 1997)

Geology and soils (STATSGO database; NRCS 1994)

Land use (National Land Cover Dataset; USGS 1992)

Stream network structure

28% row crop

15% row crop

18% row crop

Soils, land use

Mechanistic

Studies

Quantitative fish life-history traits

Species list generated from natural history collections (1885 – present)

Species traits quantified based on published literature

• Age at maturity

• Size at maturity

• Maximum size

• Longevity

• Maximum clutch

• Mean clutch

• Mean ovum diameter

• Ovum diameter range

• Spawning season duration

• Number of bouts per year

• Parental care

• Time to hatching*

• Larval growth*

• YOY growth

• Adult growth

• Relative anadromy

Notes on diet, primary habitat, reproductive behaviors

Mechanistic

Studies

Ecosystem function

Effects of species/functional groups on stream ecosystem function

- experimental stream facility KSU

- field experiments, surveys

Integration

Fish species responses to 100 years of environmental change in Kansas streams

1880 1900 1930 1948 1963 1977

450

400

350

300

600

550

500

Thomas

“Dust bowl”

Wallace

Regional droughts

Greeley

2003

1880 1900 1930 1948 1963

Drought Drought

1977

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Other row

Pasture/Rangeland

 

  crop

Fallow

Wheat/Corn

Irrigated

1860 1880 1900 1920 1935 1950 1964 1987 2005

Year

2003

1880 1900

Siltation

1930 1948 1963 1977

Drought Drought

Terracing

Irrigation

Intensification

14

12

10

Arkansas basin

8

6

4

Smoky Hill basin

2

0

Eastern KS basins

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000

Year

2003

1880 1900

Siltation

1930 1948 1963 1977

Drought Drought

Terracing

Irrigation

Intensification

2003

Smoky   Hill

Arkansas

Eastern

1880 1900

Siltation

200

150

1930 1948 1963 1977

Drought Drought

Terracing

Irrigation

Intensification

Reservoir

Construction

  1963

(regression   tree   analysis)

Prior   mean   =   49   cfs

New   mean   =   7   cfs

100

50

0

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

Smoky Hill @ Elkader

2003

Dominant influences on stream habitat

Streamflow regime shift

1948 1963 1977 1880 1900 1930 2003

Siltation

Small impoundments

Drought Drought

Terracing

Irrigation intensification

Reservoir construction

Species introductions

Habitat and network fragmentation

Increase in species introductions

Native, extirpated and introduced species

Eastern Basins Reservoirs

97 native spp.

93 present

4 extirpated

29 introduced spp. (1 translocated)

Smoky Hill Basin

Reservoirs & groundwater extraction

40 native spp.

20 present (1 at risk)

20 extirpated

21 introduced spp. (2 translocated)

Arkansas Basin

Groundwater extraction

48 native spp.

35 present (2 at risk)

13 extirpated

32 introduced spp. (4 translocated)

Stream habitat alteration and life-history theory

Trade-offs in key life-history characteristics among species should confer differential population responses to environmental conditions

Applications for conservation, invasion biology and ecoforecasting – traits related to probability of extirpation, introduction

How do life-history traits vary among fish species in prairie streams?

- natives vs. non-natives?

- extirpated, declining or increasing?

How have different species responded to prairie stream habitat alteration?

- do responses correspond with life-history traits?

Datasets used

• Fish occurrence data from 1885 – present

• 14 life-history traits quantified for 102 species (18 families)

Analyses

• Monte Carlo iterative resampling, logit regression

• Relationships among key demographic trade-offs were plotted and examined using planar regression

• Dimensionality of life-history traits was reduced using PCA

• PC scores of native, extirpated, and introduced species were compared (MANOVA) for three Kansas basins with different patterns of anthropogenic impact

• PC scores of species identified as declining and expanding for each basin were compared using MANOVA

Reproductive trade-offs and life-history strategies

Periodic

Opportunistic

Planar regression

R 2 = 0.97

P < 0.001

Equilibrium

PCA of life-history traits approx. 90% variance in life-history traits explained by PC1 and PC2

Bouts/Yr

Spawning season

1.0

-1.0

Parental care

Relative anadromy

Range ovum diam.

Ovum diameter

Mean clutch

Max clutch

1.5

Maturation age

Growth adult

Growth YOY

Longevity

Maturation size

Max size

-2.0

PCA of life-history traits

Life-history traits differed among taxonomic families (MANOVA: P < 0.001)

Spawning season

Bouts/Yr

Parental care

-1.5

Relative anadromy

Ovum diameter

Clutch size

Maturation size

Growth, Longevity

Acipenseridae

Polyodontidae

Atherinidae

Clupeidae

Catostomidae

Cyprinidae

Fundulidae

Poeciliidae

Esocidae

Lepisosteidae

Hiodontidae

Centrarchidae

Cottidae

Moronidae

Percidae

Sciaenidae

Petromyzontidae

Ictaluridae

Life-history traits and habitat associations

Species life-history traits differed among habitats (MANOVA: P < 0.001)

-1.5

small cold water small cold/warm small warm water warm streams/rivers river channels rivers/lakes lakes/reservoirs lakes/estuaries

Life-history traits and trophic group

Life-history traits differed among trophic groups (MANOVA: P < 0.001)

Spawning season

Bouts/Yr

Relative anadromy

Algivore/Detritivore

Omnivore

Invertivore

Invertivore/Piscivore

Piscivore

Clutch size

Maturation size

Growth, Longevity

Parental care

Ovum diameter

Life-history traits of native, extirpated and introduced species

Eastern Basins

Reservoirs

Life-history traits distinguish classes on PC1 (ANOVA: P < 0.001)

Native and Introduced species differed

Extirpated

Native

Introduced

Life-history traits of native, extirpated and introduced species

Smoky Hill Basin

Reservoirs & water extraction

Life-history traits distinguish classes on PC1 (ANOVA: P = 0.032)

Extirpated

Native and Introduced species differed

Native

At Risk

Introduced

Translocated

Life-history traits of native, extirpated and introduced species Arkansas Basin

Groundwater extraction

Life-history traits distinguish classes on PC1 (ANOVA: P = 0.028)

Native and Introduced species differed

Extirpated

Native

Introduced

Translocated

Species increasing and decreasing

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

HYBPLA Hybognathus placitus (Plains Minnow)

Art by JosephTomelleri

LEPCYA Lepomis cyanellus (Green Sunfish)

Walks et al. In Review

Increasers and decreasers

Eastern

30 4

Smoky Hill

15 3

Arkansas

14 6

% All species

% Centrarchids

% Cyprinids

20

10

0

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

0

60

50

40

30

60

50

40

30

20

10

Increase

Decrease

Decreasing

Increasing

Stable

Eastern Basins

Reservoirs

Smoky Hill Basin

Reservoirs & groundwater extraction

Arkansas Basin

Groundwater extraction

Summary

Species composition:

- extirpations, introductions,

- generally more increasing than declining

- differed among basins with different hydrologic impacts

Life-history traits:

- differed among taxonomic and trophic groups, habitat assoc.

Extirpations and introductions:

- life-history traits of extirpated species differed among basins

- introductions were generally similar across basins

Increasers and decliners:

- life-history traits of decreasing species differed among basins

- increasing species were somewhat different in the Eastern basins

Applications

Identify critical habitat alterations that may result in species extirpations or facilitate establishment of introduced species

- e.g. excessive groundwater mining, impoundment

Prioritize conservation initiatives – proactive

- characteristics of extinction prone species

- characteristics of invaders

Mechanism - forecast species / community responses to different scenarios of environmental degradation or restoration

Integration

Modeling fish species distributions, nutrient concentrations and stream ecosystem function

Nutrient loading and fish

DATA

KDWP stream surveys 1995-2006

Environmental attributes for 29,000+ segments (1 st order streams excluded) calculated using a GIS

ANALYSES

Correlation matrix, redundant environ. variables excluded

Remaining environmental variables (n=16) and stream surveys (392 samples, 53 species) were used to generate classification trees for each species leave one out cross-validation, estimate of fit

Common   shiner,   Luxilus   cornutus

Flathead   catfish,   Pylodictis   olivaris

Predicted Proportional Abundance of Grazers

Multiple regression – KDWP abundance data, environmental

Predict proportional abundance for each segment

Predicted Total P (mg/L)

Predict nutrient concentrations from relationship with land use

Dodds & Oakes 2004

A = High nutrient, high grazer density

B = High nutrient, low grazer density

C = Low nutrient, high grazer density

D = Low nutrient, low grazer density

NSF proposal submitted by Gido et al.

Thanks!

Download