Human Services Instructional Plan “Teach this triple truth to all: a generous heart, kind speech, and a life of service and compassion are things which renew Humanity” --The Buddha Background, Evaluation and Analysis Program Description The Human Services Program (HSERV) is designed to meet the needs of career-oriented students preparing to enter the field of Social Work and other related professions. We provide training and update skills for paraprofessionals and volunteers currently working in the field and we serve as an introduction to social work, social welfare, addiction treatment, criminal justice, counseling and other helping professions for students planning advanced degrees within these fields. The degree and certificates prepare students for General practice in a variety of social work arenas. A second track prepares students for statewide certification in Alcohol and Drug Counseling. Human Services is a component of the Health, Athletics, Wellness and Kinesiology Division (HAWK). It was initially developed at the request of a consortium of local providers including the Santa Cruz County Human Services Department and not-for-profit Human Service agencies throughout the community. These stakeholders cited a need for competent, well-trained entrylevel employees from our community. Over its ten year existence the program has become a major player in the Human Services delivery system in our community providing many qualified employees in counseling, social work, alcohol and drug treatment, family life education, Headstart, after-school programs, domestic abuse assistance, mental health services, homeless services, veteran’s services, and services to older people; in agency management and administration, community organizing and policy development. The Program’s Service Learning component--the largest at Cabrillo-provides more than 4,000 hours of volunteer assistance each semester to community agencies. The HSERV Alcohol and Drug Studies component is the only program in the Santa Cruz and Monterey Bay area that prepares students for State Certification as Drug and Alcohol counselors. It is currently being considered for accreditation by the California Association of Alcohol and Drug Educators (CAADE) having passed the first assessment and review. HSERV contributes to the overall College Mission helping students excel in developing communication and management skills, critical thinking and diagnostic abilities. We foster and encourage students to develop a critical awareness of social justice issues on community, state, national and global levels and to further their personal and professional development. Local Human Service employers report widespread appreciation of the high caliber of professionalism and competence they see in our students. They recognize the important roles our alumni play in promoting the health and well being of our community. The program has one contract faculty, Patrick Meyer, LCSW and two active adjunct faculty, Gail West, MFT and Jan Tice, MA who either teach or help supervise and coordinate Service Learning. 1 Relationships The core of Human Services focuses on building relationships and developing resources. Cabrillo’s Human Services program is well connected with other academic programs and student services on campus and with scores of community and governmental agencies providing care to those in need in the Monterey Bay area. Our very active Advisory Committee is composed of leaders from CSUMB’s Institute for Collaborative Studies in Health and Human Services, CSUMB’s new Masters in Social Work Program, the Division Director of the Employment and Benefit Services for the County of Santa Cruz (SC County), the Program Manager and staff members from the SC County Human Services Staff Development and Training Program, the Director of the Mental Health Services Act Workforce Education and Training Program for SC County, the Director of the SC County Drug and Alcohol Services Program and Executive Directors of a number of important nongovernmental organizations from our community. (See Appendix 1 for full list) Social Work curriculum in the US and abroad draws from psychological theory, sociology, communications, health sciences, human development and biology to name a few. An important aspect of HSERV is the inclusion of curriculum based on current theories and well founded research related to positive psychology and a “strengths based” approach to working with clients. In developing the program a concerted effort was made to incorporate existing Cabrillo courses from Psychology, Sociology and Communications into the core HSERV curriculum. This money saving measure supported our multidisciplinary approach and boosted needed enrollment at a time when the College was under-enrolled. The HSERV program has developed close relationships with faculty and collaborated with each of these departments both on the curricular level and in developing strategies to support student success, comparing SLO’s and discussing ways to increase student understanding of critical differential diagnosis issues and clinical psychology. We have worked together to intervene with students who are having academic and/or personal challenges. Service Learning is an important part of the Human Services curriculum. Of all the programs participating in Service Learning at Cabrillo, HSERV has the largest number of students working in our community providing many needed services on a voluntary basis while learning on-the-job skills. Students lead parenting classes, volunteer for the Suicide Prevention Crisis line, develop sobriety groups at homeless shelters, provide emotional and programmatic support at day treatment centers for the mentally ill, conduct coat drives, deliver meals, help teens develop alcohol and drug abuse prevention programs, teach migrant workers how to help with their children’s homework, find housing for families, provide outreach and peer counseling to substance abusing mothers and get them into treatment. Given the estimated dollar value of volunteer time in 2010 was $21.36/hour (U.S. Dept of Labor) our students contribute more than $70,000 in volunteer labor to our community each semester! In the last semester (F11) 18 (eighteen) of 45 HSERV Service Learning students were hired by their respective internship sites. This means that 40% of the Service Learning students found jobs even before they graduated. This pattern has repeated itself with greater success each consecutive semester since the program began. HSERV’s collaborative relationships with the Greater Santa Cruz community are extensive as noted in Appendix 2. An excellent example of our community collaboration was the cosponsorship and development (with Janus Treatment Center) of a conference at Cabrillo in fall, 2 2011 on Cultural Focused Behavioral Treatment in the drug and alcohol field. At this conference several HSERV students presented their research papers on this subject. Local providers eventually hired them. The strength of this collaboration has led to many more Human Services students being hired or being selected for internships at Janus. **Please see Appendix 2 for a complete listing of collaborative relationships both on and off campus. Labor Market Information Despite the current economic downturn, data made available from the Department of Labor, the California Labor Market Information Department and the Economic Modeling Specialists, Inc. (emsi) and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) suggests the need for employment in the Human Services and Social Work sector will continue to grow at a pace “much faster than the average for all occupations.” “Job Opportunities should be excellent, particularly for applicants with appropriate post-secondary education…” (Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010-11 edition) Indications from a number of sources are that demand for social workers in the aggregate is likely to increase over the next decade or more. (NASW, 2004) There are several reasons for this increased growth. Many people in the Social Work field are aging and will be retiring. At the same time the aging baby boomer cohort will be needing more professional health and human services. The projected 54% growth in the number of older adults in the U.S. between 2000 and 2020 is likely to be a primary driver of increased demand for social work services in coming decades (Center for Health Workforce Studies, 2005). Local employers on our Advisory Board report a high level of burnout amongst entry-level employees who have not been trained or educated in the field. They also indicate they are hiring entry-level workers in positions funded by grants for new initiatives. A good example of this is the new bilingual perinatal treatment program at Janus, a local drug treatment center funded by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. HSERV students have been hired to conduct bilingual outreach identifying substance abusing pregnant mothers in the Latino community and bringing them in to treatment. The Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) predicts a 23% increase in this job sector with the most jobs occurring in state and local government, followed by individual and family services, Vocational Rehabilitation services and residential facilities. Regional information from emsi sees a 9% increase in employment in the “Child, family and school social workers” field between 2002 and 2020 and a nationwide increase of 25%. The HSERV program uses a “Generalist” approach within our curriculum, building student competencies in a wide variety of areas, serving many populations and many social needs. Nationally, the OOH predicts a 21% increase in job openings between 2008 and 2018 for substance abuse counselors. Emsi predicts a 28% increase in jobs locally in this field between 2002 and 2020. This figure is supported by anecdotal evidence gathered from the County of Santa Cruz Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services and from the directors of local Substance Abuse Treatment Centers. In F 11 at least 6 (six) HSERV students were hired by local Substance Abuse Treatment Centers. “In recent years, the change in State law that now requires alcohol and drug counselors to meet educational standards for certification has greatly increased the demand for new counselors who are certified. As the only counselor certification program in the area, Cabrillo’s Drug and Alcohol studies program has been very successful in training new counselors and helping them find entry 3 level positions in the field.” Bill Manov, Director of Drug and Alcohol Programs, County of Santa Cruz. With statewide Substance Abuse Counselor certification mandated in 2005 there has been a growing need for programs to meet the educational competencies required to achieve such certification. Cabrillo Human Services is the lone provider of this education in the Monterey Bay Area. “Realignment,” is the term used to describe the process whereby California’s prison population will be reduced by returning inmates to their communities. Cabrillo HSERV is involved with the local planning process. It appears that there will be more jobs opening for our students. A number of the most successful HSERV students in the last two years were formerly incarcerated. Today they exemplify the ideal: returning to their communities, remaining drug-free, going to school to develop a new career helping others, volunteering with some of the most difficult atrisk client populations and devoting their efforts to creating new models for post-incarceration treatment and rehabilitation incorporating best practices gleaned from research. CTE Completer Leaver surveys for 2010 report that 70% of HSERV student completers were employed. Of that group 43% reported being employed in the Human Services field. This much lower than what anecdotal evidence indicates. The survey reports that on the average, those who were employed in the field experienced a 21% increase in wages after completing the Cabrillo HSERV certificate or degree. The survey may be undercounting HSERV completers in the research because the multidisciplinary approach of the program makes it difficult to identify HSERV majors in the data mining process. This is being looked into. Costs As a newer program, the number of students involved with Human Services has grown gradually over time. This growth has led to an increase in HSERV’s cost effectiveness. In like manner, the efforts and interventions of HSERV faculty have contributed to its growing success. Using data derived from the 2010 College Fact Book, the 2010/2011 Program Planning Data Tables and the Program Planning Expenditure table (Figure 1) one can see the Human Services Program’s steady growth toward becoming more cost-effective. Base expenditures are gradually going down. The Income/Expense ratio is gradually moving closer to the ideal 1:1 with 2010/11 showing the ratio at .85. (See Figure 1 below) Figure 1 shows a jump in expenses in 2007/08 and 2008/09. This reflects the addition of the Drug and Alcohol studies courses and the hiring of HSERV’s new (and only) contract faculty position. During this period the entry level classes (HSERV 50 & 51) were drawing so many students that we opened a second section of each. But enrollment leveled at numbers far enough below the cap to increase program expense without the needed FTE. Program faculty decided to return to offering a single entry level class each semester and to increase all HSERV Courses (with the exception of HSERV 53, Introduction to Group Counseling) to 40 students. This creates a pedagogical challenge as HSERV courses rely on many interactive and breakout activities. Having no dedicated room for HSERV leaves the program dependent on available rooms that—at times--have not been conducive to these teaching strategies. 4 Figure 1 Figure 2 (below) reflects the program load for HSERV with college average. On this table the drop in load during the 2007/08 and 2008/09 academic years is evident. The lower load for 2007/8 and 2008/9 years reflects the period when Santa Cruz County Human Services Department experienced the first wave of budget cuts. The Department was no longer allowed to grant “release time” for employees to take HSERV courses or have on-the-job study sessions making it extremely difficult for employees to attend class and manage their job and family responsibilities. County employees withdrew. The slow steady growth of the program experienced a hiccup of sorts. In 2007 HSERV opened the first section of HSERV 70, Introduction to Human Aging responding to employer and Cabrillo Health & Wellness program recommendations. This was offered again in the subsequent two semesters but enrollment remained small and under cap in spite of a rigorous advertising and outreach campaign. This is a common challenge according to other community college faculty who have offered similar courses. Under enrollment in HSERV 70 contributed to the increased program expense to the college in 2007/08 and 2008/09. Enrollment has rebounded since that time in HSERV classes with a mix of students coming to HSERV from community-based organizations (CBO’s), alcohol and drug treatment centers, County Mental Health (who received training and education funds from the Mental Health Services Act) and from local high schools particularly in South Santa Cruz County where focused outreach was conducted. Today only core courses leading to certificates and degrees are offered. Due to budgetary constraints we are not offering the Introduction to Human Aging course nor any of the courses specifically addressing Mental Health, Disability issues or Community Health. 5 While the overall College load has decreased since 2009, the HSERV load is increasing and holding steady as seen below. Load: WSCH/FTEF 700 600 500 400 300 College 200 HSERV 100 0 Figure 2 The recent increase in efficiency also reflects HSERV Program outreach to a much broader population base and the development of the Drug and Alcohol curriculum. With the passage of Proposition 36 Drug and Alcohol counselors in the State are required to attend classes and continuing education in order to maintain their certification. Cabrillo HSERV was also actively involved in the planning and implementation process for the Mental Health Services Act in Santa Cruz County. This process built new bridges with many Federal, State and local mental health and social service providers who, in turn, have become referral resources to HSERV. The Mental Health Services Act Workforce Education & Training Taskforce Final Report and Recommendations summary of County-wide Focus group comments about Cabrillo illustrates the success of our outreach and student recruitment activities: Clients and families: When discussing Cabrillo as a resource there was universal appreciation of the classes offered and the quality of the instructional staff. There has been generally good feedback from clients who have attended Cabrillo. Some clients need financial assistance with fees and books. County Staff: The participants’ experiences with Cabrillo College have been consistently positive. Agencies encourage staff to upgrade their skills by attending classes in the Human Services Division. Of equal importance, Cabrillo programming offers clients, when they’re ready, a positive learning and social experience. Community Based Organizations: CBOs currently use Cabrillo College as a major resource for both staff and client education. CBOs were excited about the possibility of Cabrillo expanding its’ programming for their clients. They were also very interested in learning about the efforts being made to create a Human Services and Mental Health educational track at Cabrillo College. As of 2011 PRO reported the Human Services program had 125 department majors. This represents a 45% increase in the number of HSERV majors over the last 4 years. 6 Student Success Success rates for the Human Services program have increased in fits and spurts over the last five years (see Figure 3) after a steady increase in the previous five Success is a difficult measure in this program since the introductory courses (HSERV 50 and 51 and 160 and 161) are designed to weed out students who are either not ready or inappropriate for the field. A higher level of failure/drops/withdrawals is expected. At this time there is no other selection process for entry into HSERV. Human Services Degrees & Certificates College-Wide Degrees and Certificates Figure 3 Note: These charts represent the academic years 2006/07 (top row) through 2010/11 (bottom row) Success rates in the 2006/07 were initially above the college total for fall (68.9% HSERV as compared to the college total of 66.7%.) then dipped in the spring. In 2007/08 the trend continued, well above the college average. In both 2008/09 and 2009/10 it did the opposite. Overall, with the exception of Sp 10, the success rates were below the college average. This lowered success rate is related to the “appropriateness of fit” for the incoming student population in those years. Successful students show potential and promise for success in the field. Completion rates have continued to grow at rates above the College totals in the fall semesters with spring 10 showing a slowing of the increased completion trend. What caused this slowing is a bit of a mystery and may be attributed to this particular group of students—especially because all indications are that the success and completion rates have been increasing since then. As the data indicates HSERV students tend to be older than the college average. Almost half of the HSERV students are over 30. Given the balancing act most of our students juggle with family, work and school it takes longer for them to earn certificates and degrees as shown in the “time” column in Figure 3 above. In 2010/11 the success and completion rates increased dramatically. We believe is directly related to HSERV faculty paying increased attention to supporting students in the areas of study skills, student study/support groups, and in improving student grammar and composition skills in every class and with every assignment. (See the list of interventions below) 7 In spring 09 HSERV faculty met to discuss the disturbing trend in student scholarship, success and completion. An online survey of HSERV students was conducted and an exercise creating and facilitating focus groups (that explored student stressors, challenges and developing strategies for student success) was conducted in HSERV 51, 53, 161 and 163. With the data drawn from these assessments and discussions the HSERV faculty and our Advisory Committee met to develop interventions to better support our students and improve scholarship. We concluded that a large part of our HSERV student body needed assistance in balancing the demands of work, family and school. They lacked access to computers. Buying books was difficult. Transportation was an issue. Childcare—especially during the flu season was dicey. For “older” students (those 40and over) who comprise approximately 36% of HSERV students returning to school involved acquiring new, challenging skills and new technologies. The biggest hurdle (regardless of age) appeared to be financial support. For those who had dealt with Substance Abuse issues in the past (a majority of the student group seeking Drug and Alcohol Counselor Certification) success involved attending school clean and sober for the first time in many years. It involved addressing family issues ahead of any problems arising (e.g. changing availability to family because of school commitments.) It involved developing supports in novel ways and transforming old “drug user” strategies into taking responsibility for their development as students and as clean and sober adults. For the large sub-group within the HSERV program of individuals released from incarceration for drug or gang-related offenses, success involved recognizing their own talents and achieving academic excellence in a less structured environment, developing emotional regulation skills, supporting personal growth, and promoting understanding and critical analysis of social justice within our community and our country. The interventions faculty and advisors developed to enhance student success included: 1) Introducing study skills and time management modules at the beginning of each course. 2) Inclusion of College Student Assistance resources (psychological and academic counseling, financial aid, library, Learning Skills, EOPS, DSPS, etc.) in every course syllabus and at every first class meeting 3) Developing study groups in class and supporting the development of study groups outside the classroom. 4) Infusing curriculum with values clarification and other exercises to promote adult development and maturation. 5) Creating instructional modules for specific types of assignments e.g., reaction papers, research papers, process recordings, presentations, etc. 6) Referring students to Cabrillo Writing Center website and OWL (Online Writing Lab). 7) Providing links to other college writing resources. 8) Introduction and review of criteria and expectations (rubrics) for each assignment. 9) Embedding vignettes highlighting the challenges of balancing family, work and school into the curriculum. 10) Supporting the development of and attendance at an on-campus 12-step support group and other support groups provided on-campus and in the community. 11) Bringing HSERV alumni into HSERV classes to share their stories of success. 12) Creating incentives for students to attend Professional Development /Clinical Trainings and Workshops provided by the County of Santa Cruz’ Workforce Education and Training Task Force. (Note: involvement of HSERV Faculty in this project led to making these trainings available at no cost.) Anecdotal reports and statistical evidence over the last 4 semesters indicates student success and completion rates continue to rise. We believe this is directly related to the hard work and strategies our faculty--with the support of our Advisory committee--has introduced. (See Figure 8 4a and 4b below) These tables show the increased rates of HSERV course success and completion from 2006 to 2011(4a) and compare them to the college average (4b). Figure 4a Figure 4 b Student Survey The Student Survey conducted in fall 10 reveals a profile consistent with subjective observations and surveys conducted by faculty within the program. 73 students responded to the survey. Results reveal HSERV is primarily composed of a slightly older student population, primarily— but not exclusively—women who are focused on getting both their degree and a job helping people in their community. 76% of the students surveyed had only a high school diploma or the equivalent (compared to +/-58% of the general Cabrillo population.) They are enthusiastic about the program and about their career futures. However it takes longer for them to complete degrees and certificates. The demographics of HSERV students reveal three large age-related groups: those under 25 (31%), those 26 to 40 (32%), and those over 40 (36%). 68% of HSERV students are over age 30! (Source: PRO Demographic Report, 4/2012). Cabrillo College demographic studies report approximately 30.9% of the entire student body is aged 30+ while 46.5% of the HSERV population is over 30. (Source: Cabrillo College Fact Book, 2011) Anecdotal evidence indicates the majority of the younger HSERV student group is Latino and female. These students are often single parents who are enrolled in HSERV because they are “committed to making [their] community a better place to live in.” (Source: 15 HSERV 51 student oral reports, 2/8/12) The older HSERV student group appears to be more mixed by gender and ethnicity. They are also parents either coming to college for the first time or returning to college to pursue a second career. Both groups rely heavily on family support and jobs with flexible schedules to aid in their success. They struggle with finances and finding “quiet time to study.” They report that balancing family and work with school is the primary reason why they (58%) take less than 8 units per semester (PRO Student Survey, 2010). Figure 5 shows the unduplicated student ethnic profile for fall, 2010 and spring, 2011 conducted by PRO. These percentages reflect the headcount by ethnicity for the program since its inception. 9 Figure 5 Gender differences of students in the HSERV program reflect national trends with a majority (73%) being women. However our program has slightly more male representation (27%) than compared with the national average (19%) (NASW, 2004.) Nearly three quarters of those taking HSERV courses are Human Services majors. The remaining quarter is composed primarily of students majoring in Psychology, Sociology, Communications Studies or other transfer-related majors that will eventually lead to a Masters Degree in Social Work, Counseling or Psychology. At this time HSERV does not have a transfer component, although many students have expressed interest in a Social Work/Human Services transfer program at Cabrillo. The remaining students include those who are undecided and those currently on the waiting list for the Nursing Program. 80% of students surveyed report having career plans in the Human Services Field; 11% are undecided. 85% report that they plan on taking more HSERV courses (Source: PRO/HSERV Student Survey, 2010.) Human Services students are enthusiastic about the program. 96% of students indicated they would recommend classes in this department to other students. Open-ended written comments indicate some of these students are taking the courses to explore the field, while others intend to eventually pursue graduate degrees. HSERV students “love” their internships (many self-reports) and credit their own success in the program with the ability to integrate theories, concepts and newly acquired skills from the classroom with hands-on experience in their Service Learning internships. Field supervisors in turn report a high degree of satisfaction with our students in their Service Learning program evaluations. Each semester students are hired by their placements. Employers on our Advisory Committee routinely report how impressed they are with our students. They value the knowledge, skills and professionalism exhibited by HSERV students. The strengths of the program (as identified by the students) include the knowledgeable faculty (“that really care,”) student relationships and involvement in the community, their internships and their fellow students. Their suggestions for improving the program include integrating more guest speakers into the curriculum, offering more (and smaller) classes each semester in larger classrooms that accommodate breakout and small group exercises. They requested classrooms with better ventilation. Lastly, HSERV students requested more night and weekend classes to accommodate work and family demands. 10 Student Learning Outcomes Since the last Program Planning Process the Assessment of Degree, Certificate and Course SLO’s has become much more clearly defined. The HSERV faculty have been actively developing and revising SLO’s, creating assessments, devising rubrics and reassessing goals, focus and content for the AS degree, for each certificate and for every course currently being offered. Faculty (all 3 of us) have met each semester to discuss student success and to review the progress assessing SLO’s for the certificates and classes. Students often remark at how well coordinated the curriculum is not just within the department, but with the Psychology, Communications and Sociology courses included in the HSERV degree. The HSERV program focuses on social justice and developing technical skills to assist client systems. HSERV faculty are dedicated to helping students improve their written and oral communication skills and their proficiency in project management. Because so many of our students are Second Language learners or reentry students extra attention is paid to grammar, spelling and punctuation in class and with their assignments. In our analysis of the HSERV curriculum, students are meeting the Student learning Outcome assessed for most courses, all the certificates and for the AS degree. There are a few areas where both structural and curricular changes will improve the success of our students. These include: 1) Spending more time explaining assignments and providing in-class exercises to prepare students for them to help reduce anxiety and promote the focus on critical analysis. (Most courses) 2) Developing a major assignment for HSERV 50 that assesses students’ understanding and analysis of the impact of historical events and perspectives that influence service delivery today. 3) Increased infusion of diagnostic strategies to help students understand clinical assessment and differential diagnosis of substance abuse and co-occurring disorders need to be addressed in HSERV 160 and 161. 4) Developing better HSERV course articulation or creating a transfer track for HSERV students intending to transfer to local colleges and universities. All courses, certificates and the AS degree have updated SLOs, objectives, content, methods of evaluation, and textbooks. A table showing upcoming dates for SLO evaluation is also included. (See appendix 4 & 5) Relationship to other College Plans As previously noted, HSERV faculty work closely with the faculty of other programs teaching courses included in the HSERV degree. These include Communications, Sociology and Psychology. SLO’s are compared for congruency and alignment with the mission and focus of the Human Services Program and the HSERV degree Learning Outcomes. New Directions The Human Services field is expected to grow at a fairly rapid pace in the next 10 years in spite of current budget struggles on the Federal, State and Local fronts. Given research and 11 information from national professional organizations and our Advisory Committee future challenges include keeping the Social Work workforce and students abreast of technological innovations and advancements in the field, addressing the industry need for graduates and job seekers with excellent oral and written communication skills, and encouraging creative and novel solutions to emerging social issues and existing community problems. The HSERV Advisory Board specifically recommends: Encourage students to build technological skills and proficiencies to meet the emerging changes in the field. This includes use of computers, e-mail, word processing, graphs and graphics, power point presentations, research tools and the uses of social media. Provide better access to computing resources to working parents unable to use computer resources during times when the campus is open. Work closely with CSUMB to develop a transfer program. Develop and offer a Certificate of Achievement in Drug and Alcohol Studies. Build a strong alliance with California Association of Alcohol and Drug Educators (CAADE) the program-accrediting agency. Research existing Cabrillo courses in Management for potential use as a management course for Human Services Managers. If needed, develop a course in Human Services Management. Continue joint sponsorship of Human Services Training conferences. Contact the Santa Cruz Sentinel to create an article on the hiring successes of HSERV students in the community. Given the high caliber of students interested in the Human Services our program remains committed to supporting innovation, creativity and understanding within our students. Their commitment to solving problems related to gangs, poverty, substance abuse, domestic abuse, child endangerment and so many other community ills is strong but needs the guidance of an effective academic program with high expectations for academic and professional growth and success. They are our hope for a better future. Goals and Recommendations 1) Move to a permanent smart classroom for the Human Services Program flexible enough to accommodate small group work, lectures, flexible desk arrangement, acoustic needs, etc. As noted in our SLO assessments students and faculty believe the space is not adequate. In collaboration with the Office of Instruction and the Facilities, Planning & Development Office identify a classroom space to optimize student learning and classroom comfort and meet the growing needs of the HSERV Program. If cost prohibitive in this financial climate work with the Cabrillo Foundation to conduct a capital campaign. Cost: Dependent upon the amount of remodeling needed. Per Facilities & Planning a rough estimate of completely renovating a classroom: $35-50,000 depending on the amount of work—electrical, carpet, etc. needing to be done. 2) Develop a Certificate of Achievement in Drug and Alcohol Studies that acknowledges the skills and expertise of our students in this field. Completion of all Alcohol and Drug 12 Studies courses (the 160’s) and the HSERV Skills Certificate meet the requirements of the State for counselor certification. Collectively the SLO’s for these courses reflect a level of competence that employers look for. Our Advisory Committee enthusiastically approved this proposal this year. Complete application to the Chancellor’s Office Cost: None expected 3) Develop a Human Services management course to meet Social Work and Human Service employer’s needs with succession planning. The SLO’s for HSERV 50 & 51 focus on introductory Human Services skills. There is no place currently in the curriculum to integrate this material at the level required for the course. Cost: None expected 4) Have lead faculty attend training on teaching strategies to develop competence in differential diagnosis of Substance Abuse and other co-morbid disorders. Per SLO analysis of HSERV 160, 161 and 162 more emphasis on differential diagnosis need to be integrated into the curriculum. Cost: Workshop: None—Fees paid by Perkins’ funds. 5) Identify resources to assist students in finding low-cost laptop computers and Internet providers. Cost: None Expected 13 Appendix 1 Human Services Program Advisory Committee David Bianchi, Executive Director, Family Services Association Theresa Carillo, Careerworks Maria Chang, Supervisor, Careerworks Carolyn Coleman, Executive Director, Santa Cruz Community Counseling Center Terri German, Human Services/Child Protective Services, County of Santa Cruz Evelyn Hengeveld-Bidmon, Program Manager, Staff Development County of SC Human Services Shawn Henson, Headstart Carmen Hilldale, Human Services Student Lyn Hood, Coordinator, Student Employment, Cabrillo College Terry Jimenez, Coordinator, 'Family/ Community Services, Headstart Clay Kempf, Executive Director, Seniors Council Catherine LaChance, CEED/FTTW Project Manager, Cabrillo College Rod Libbey, Executive Director, Janus of Santa Cruz Bill Manov, Director Alcohol and Substance Abuse Programs, County of Santa Cruz Sean McAdam, Trainer, Staff Development, County of Santa Cruz Human Services Jaime Molina, MHSA W.E.T. Coordinator, County of Santa Cruz Francie Newfield, Director Adult and Long Term Care Services, County of Santa Cruz Rock Pfotenhauer, 'Dean, Career Education and Economic Development Desiree Sanchez, Executive Director, Families in Transition Patricia Sapone, Deputy Chief, Santa Cruz Police Department Laura Segura Gallardo, Executive Director, 'Women's Crisis Support/Defensa de las Mujeres Will O’Sullivan, Director, Community Recovery Services, Santa Cruz Community Counseling Center Zettie Page, Executive Director, Salud Para La Gente Jennifer Ramirez, Chair, Human Care Alliance Leslie Read, Cabrillo College College Work Experience Program, Joy Rubey, CSUMB, Health, Human Services and Public Policy Department Jenny Sarmiento, CEO, Pajaro Valley Prevention and Student Assistance Susan True, Executive Director, First Five: Santa Cruz County and Board Member, Cabrillo College Board Jan Tice, Health Services Agency Alcohol and Drug Programs Kathleen Welch, Dean, HAWK Division, Cabrillo College Gail West, Cabrillo Human Services 14 Appendix 2 Listing of Additional On and Off-Campus Collaborative Relationships The Human Services Program has developed Other Collaborative Relationships On Campus include: Working closely with Health Science faculty, obtaining a Faculty Grant to fund the research and the successful development of a Community Health Worker curriculum. Working with the STARS program to develop, produce and offer HSERV 59S, “Introduction to Careers in the Human Services.” Co-coordinating the Campus Health and Wellness efforts. Collaboration with Health Science faculty and Santa Cruz County Office of education to develop and implement a pilot course introductory Human Services course for students through the Workforce Investment Act’s Suenos Program Working with a grant from the Foster and Kinship Care Program and Santa Cruz County First Five to develop and produce HSERV 174, Fundamentals of Children’s Mental Health. Working closely with the Writing Center, Disabled Students Programs and Services, Student Employment Services, Student Health Services, (Academic) Counseling Services, Fast Track to Work and other on campus Student Services to actively support HSERV Student Success. Working with the Student Health Services to provide an on-campus support group for Survivors of Domestic Abuse (peer led by HSERV students). Supporting student led chairing of an on-campus sobriety support self-help group every semester. Working closely with Library personnel (Topsy Smalley and Georg Romero) to teach HSERV students about the Social Science research resources available in our library and to update Library collections—especially DVD’s—in Social Science A/V resources. The lone contract faculty person for HSERV sits on the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention Committee and the FLEX week committee. Working with Student Services and faculty from Communications, ACE and the Campus Psychological Counselor three HSERV faculty produced FLEX Week workshops to help faculty and staff identify and assist students struggling with alcohol and drug abuse issues, mental health issues and issues related to gang involvement. Two HSERV Faculty have participated in the Digital Bridge/ACE Program’s Faculty Experiential Learning Institute (“FELI”). Providing consultation and training to the Digital Bridge/ACE Program’s faculty on group facilitation and working with complex student issues. Participation in the campus CTE Council. HSERV faculty (contract and adjunct) involvement in the development and production of the annual Social Justice Conference. 15 Other Collaborative relationships Off-Campus include: Meeting with CSUMB program faculty for the Institute for Collaborative Health and Human Services to coordinate curriculum and develop a transfer program for HSERV students. Working with the California Association for Alcohol/Drug Educators (CAADE) to receive accreditation as a certified Alcohol and Drug Certificate Program. Working with the Santa Cruz County Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services and the County Personnel Department to recognize the value of HSERV degrees and certificates and assign a first-ever point value for this work when assessing potential job applicants. This means that our HSERV Degrees and Certificates will allow HSERV students to be evaluated at a preferential level in comparison to non-student applicants. With Janus Alcohol and Drug Treatment Services developing, co-sponsoring and co-coordinating “Culturally Focused Drug Abuse Treatment: Serving our Diverse Community,” a conference at Cabrillo for practitioners and students on providing culturally competent services. This conference included a section featuring Human Services Students presenting their research papers on the issue. Working with the Veteran’s Service Center of Santa Cruz and 21st Century Vet to create a Veteran Peer Mentoring and Support Team composed of Human Services students who are veterans. These veteran students will conduct assessments, provide resources and facilitate support groups for other veterans. Working with the Santa Cruz County Office of Education, the Workforce Investment Board, the Community Action Board to develop and produce a “Health & Human Services Academy” course for Latino youth in Watsonville exposing them to career opportunities in Health and Human Services. The success of this collaborative model resulted in the presentation of a popular workshop at the California Workforce Association’s annual conference in January of 2011. Meeting with the “Caregiver Action Group,” a collaborative effort by 12 Senior Health and Human Service organizations to develop and produce a “Caregiver Training Series” through Cabrillo Extension for paid and family caregivers of elders. This highly successful series is continuing into its third year. Some participants have gone on to become Human Services majors. Meeting quarterly with the Greater Bay Area Mental Health & Education Workforce Collaborative to support public mental health workforce development in the community college system. This includes Program Chairs from 10 Northern California Human Services Programs. Working collaboratively with the Health Improvement Project (HIP), the Health Careers Partnership (HCP), the Stroke Center and representatives from other local non-profits to develop funding for the Community Health Worker Certificate program, a joint effort by the Human Services and Health Sciences faculty. Involvement with the community wide effort to develop a Workforce Education and Training Program to meet the requirements of Proposition 63, the Mental 16 Health Services Act. As a result, HSERV students are able to attend many Health and Human Services professional workshops and trainings developed by this group at no cost throughout the year. This promotes both professional development and networking with potential employers. Annual representation at local high schools in Santa Cruz and Watsonville to discuss career ladders and trajectories for the Social Sciences and Human Services. Working with the Human Care Alliance, a unique collaboration of over 50 nonprofit Health and Human Service Agencies serving Santa Cruz County, to develop internships, generate interest in the program and develop employment opportunities. Attendance at the Monterey Bay Geriatric Resource Center Annual Conference to further develop an “Aging Studies” component of the HSERV Program. 17 Appendix 3 Human Services Program Goals and Budget Requests Rank Goal or Recommendation 1. Identify and secure a permanent smart classroom for the Human Services Program flexible enough to accommodate small group work, lectures, flexible desk arrangements, acoustic needs, etc. 2. Develop Certificate of Achievement in Drug and Alcohol Studies that acknowledges the skills and expertise of our students in this field. Completion of all Alcohol and Drug Studies courses (the 160’s) and the HSERV Skills Certificate meet the requirements of the State for counselor certification Develop a Human Services management course to meet Social Work and Human Service employer’s needs with succession planning. The SLO’s for HSERV 50 & 51 focus on introductory Human Services skills—not management. Explore feasibility of using DMCP 110. Have 1 faculty person attend training on teaching strategies to develop competence in differential diagnosis of Substance Abuse and other comorbid disorders consistent with the needs of State AOD Counselor Certification 3. 4. Projected Cost Dependent on amount of renovation (if any) that is needed. Per Facilities & Planning a rough estimate of completely renovating a classroom: $35-50,000 depending on the amount of work—electrical, carpet, etc. needing to be done. If unfeasible in this budget climate, work with the Cabrillo Foundation to conduct a small capital campaign for HSERV. No Cost Evidence of need (SLO Assessment, etc.) SLO assessments for HSERV 50, 51, 53, evaluation. Student surveys and faculty feedback report Discomfort with the crowded classroom space and lack of permanent “home” for charts, A/V materials, etc. Faculty, Advisory Committee, employer and student feedback. No Cost Repeated Advisory Committee and Employer recommendations— particularly from the Human Services department at the County. Workshop cost: None—Perkins funds will most likely pay for this. Per SLO analysis of HSERV 160, 161 and 162 18 5. Identify resources to assist students in finding low-cost laptop computers and internet providers. None Student surveys indicate that it is difficult for some students—especially parents to use oncampus resources due to child care issues SLO’s for HSERV 50,51, 52, 161 19 Appendix 4—SLO Assessment Process Documents Occupational Program Assessment Plan Human Services Program Use the form below to describe your assessment plan and to analyze the results of it. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and describe the plan in the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Program Outcomes Program Outcomes (List the student learning outcomes of each degree and certificate your program offers. Attach another sheet if necessary) 1) Degree Outcomes Human Services Degree Outcomes 1) Demonstrate competency in client engagement, counseling and problem-solving and case management, including multicultural awareness, for employment in the Human Services, Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Fields. 2) Analyzing Social Science Research assess the impact of poverty, discrimination, social injustice, addiction and mental illness on human functioning. 3) Facilitate groups, meetings, classes and community organizing efforts utilizing group process theory. 4) Plan, manage and complete projects utilizing effective oral, written and project management skills. 20 Assessment of Program SLOs Describe the Assessment Process your program will use to evaluate the outcomes. Include the assessment tool used and the rubric or criteria used to evaluate success Assessment Process: Process Recording: Students will conduct two 15-20 minute counseling interviews supporting and assisting someone in a problem solving process. Students will record in writing the narrative of the encounter, the student’s assessment and description of emotional affect (both client and student-counselor), assessment and description of client behavior, identify what interviewing skills were used by the student-counselor and analyze why they used these interviewing skills. Students will attach a 1-2 page discussion analyzing both the content and the process of the interview demonstrating a basic understanding of the dynamics of a counseling interview and of their strategies and motivations for using specific responses and interventions. Please see attached Process recording Form and Rubric Assessment Evaluation Assessment Evaluation Describe the process the department uses to evaluate assessment results. Include: On February 4, 2010 Patrick Meyer, the Program Chair for HSERV met with Gail West and Jan Tice, our two adjunct faculty to assess the HSERV Degree SLO #1 using the Process Recording exercise from HSERV 52, Introduction to Counseling and Case Management. A similar meeting was conducted during Spring 10 FLEX week. What meetings will be held? In the meetings we discussed the competence of HSERV students graduating from our program with counseling 21 When? Who will be involved? What will be discussed? How will you record the results? skills and reports from area Human Services employers about their perceptions of our students. We reviewed the Process Recording exercise, Rubric and grades for the exercise in relation to the Degree SLO #1. Based upon the discussion the HSERV team believes this exercise is an excellent “capstone” project for students showcasing not only their knowledge of the techniques of counseling, but for displaying their understanding of the underlying dynamics and awareness of their own processes and issues which may come into the session. Looking at the grades for the Process recording exercises given in HSERV 52 in the Spring of 2009. Students in this class performed reasonably well in their first Process with a majority scoring 10 or 11 out of 12 points possible. The professor produced a sample process for them to discuss as a group. Their second Process Recordings also scored quite high with 48% of the class scoring 18 points or higher (out of 20), 36% scoring in the mid-teens and 3 students (12%) scoring 10 or lower. One student failed to turn the assignment in. The students who scored under 18 points were fairly successful in identifying counseling techniques but lost points in their analysis—especially of their own reactions to client statements and feelings. This may have been due to a lack of self-awareness or in two cases, extreme emotional exhaustion in dealing with personal issues. In our February 11, 2011 meeting the same staff attended the meeting and reviewed the results from the same exercise given in Sp10. This time students did reasonably well on their first process Recording scoring an average of 7.9 out of 10 available points. Areas of concern included using the template correctly and the tendency to reduce focus on their own internal processes. Their second process recordings were dramatically better with 72% of the class receiving the full 18 points for the exercise and analysis. Another 20 % received a grade of 14 points or higher. The analyses were significantly more self reflective and showed a sense of confidence in their work. This was after having students share each other’s recordings and discuss methods and rationale for their entries on the template. The professor again produced a sample Process Recording with more focus on selfanalysis as an example. Per our faculty discussion the year before several self-awareness assessments were introduced over the course of the semester to prompt students to reflect on their feelings and their value systems. 22 The remaining 8% scored below 10 points with 6 students failing to turn in the assignment. Follow-up revealed 1) that students were extremely anxious using the template; or 2) that some students did not understand the assignment. In retrospect the differences between the 2 cohorts undoubtedly had an impact on the results. The former (Sp09) class on the whole was older and more mature than the later. As a result of our meeting, faculty recommended that we do more to explain the process by doing more practice exercises with it to help students get more comfortable with the assignment. They also recommended that the class spend more time reviewing the actual techniques and grow more comfortable with the terms—especially for Second language learners. 23 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis Human Services Program Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Meeting Date February 4, 2010 & February 11, 2011 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Three: 1 Contract and 2 Adjunct Faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Three Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Process Recording: Students will conduct two 15-20 minute counseling interviews supporting and assisting someone in a problem solving process. Students will record in writing the narrative of the encounter, the student’s assessment and description of emotional affect (both client and student-counselor), assessment and description of client behavior, identify what interviewing skills were used by the student-counselor and analyze why they used these interviewing skills. Students will attach a 1-2 page discussion analyzing both the content and the process of the interview demonstrating a basic understanding of the dynamics of a counseling interview and of their strategies and motivations for using specific responses and interventions. 5) Demonstrate competency in client engagement, counseling and problem-solving and case management, including multicultural awareness, for employment in the Human Services, Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Fields. Please see attached Process recording Form and Rubric 24 Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) On February 4, 2010 Patrick Meyer, the Program Chair for HSERV met with Gail West and Jan Tice, our two adjunct faculty to assess the HSERV Degree SLO #1 using the Process Recording exercise from HSERV 52, Introduction to Counseling and Case Management. A similar meeting was conducted during Spring 10 FLEX week. In the meetings we discussed the competence of HSERV students graduating from our program with counseling skills and reports from area Human Services employers about their perceptions of our students. We reviewed the Process Recording exercise, Rubric and grades for the exercise in relation to the Degree SLO #1. Based upon the discussion the HSERV team believes this exercise is an excellent “capstone” project for students showcasing not only their knowledge of the techniques of counseling, but for displaying their understanding of the underlying dynamics and awareness of their own processes and issues which may come into the session. Looking at the grades for the Process recording exercises given in HSERV 52 in the Spring of 2009. Students in this class performed reasonably well in their first Process with a majority scoring 10 or 11 out of 12 points possible. The professor produced a sample process for them to discuss as a group. Their second Process Recordings also scored quite high with 48% of the class scoring 18 points or higher (out of 20), 36% scoring in the mid-teens and 3 students (12%) scoring 10 or lower. One student failed to turn the assignment in. The students who scored under 18 points were fairly successful in identifying counseling techniques but lost points in their analysis—especially of their own reactions to client statements and feelings. This may have been due to a lack of selfawareness or in two cases, extreme emotional exhaustion in dealing with personal issues. In our February 11, 2011 meeting the same staff attended the meeting and reviewed the results from the same exercise given in Sp10. This time students did reasonably well on their first process Recording scoring an average of 7.9 out of 10 available points. Areas of concern included using the template correctly and the tendency to reduce focus on their own internal processes. Their second process recordings were 25 dramatically better with 72% of the class receiving the full 18 points for the exercise and analysis. Another 20 % received a grade of 14 points or higher. The analyses were significantly more self -reflective and showed a sense of confidence in their work. This was after having students share each other’s recordings and discuss methods and rationale for their entries on the template. The professor again produced a sample Process Recording with more focus on selfanalysis as an example. Per our faculty discussion the year before several self-awareness assessments were introduced over the course of the semester to prompt students to reflect on their feelings and their value systems. The remaining 8% scored below 10 points with 6 students failing to turn in the assignment. Follow-up revealed 1) that students were extremely anxious using the template; or 2) that some students did not understand the assignment. In retrospect the differences between the 2 cohorts undoubtedly had an impact on the results. The former (Sp09) class on the whole was older and more mature than the later. As a result of our meeting, faculty recommended that we do more to explain the process by doing more practice exercises with it to help students get more comfortable with the assignment. They also recommended that the class spend more time reviewing the actual techniques and grow more comfortable with the terms—especially for Second language learners. Next Step in the Classroom o to Improve Student Learning o (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) o o o o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase in-class discussions and activities Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Increase guidance for students on assignments Use methods of questions that encourage competency 26 Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Create bibliography of resource material o Find a larger room to conduct small group activities to encourage peer support and evaluation of Process Recordings o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Create bibliography of resource material o Find a larger room to conduct small group activities to encourage peer support and evaluation of Process Recordings Implementation F 12 when course is offered again (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) For Fall 12 HSERV 52 course: o o o o o o Timeline for Implementation State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase in-class discussions and activities Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Increase guidance for students on assignments Use methods of questions that encourage competency Implementation, Fall 12 Discussion, Sp 13 Departmental Meeting (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 27 2 Process Recordings—28 points (First Recording =10 points; Second Recording = 18 points) Students will conduct two 15-20 minute counseling interviews supporting/assisting someone in a problem solving process over the semester. Keep it simple—the scope of practice here is not psychotherapy, but simply a supportive interaction with someone! These interviews should not be with a family member. You may record the interview with the written permission of the interviewee. In doing the process recording, care should be taken to disguise identifying information (in accordance with HIPPA regulations). This is particularly important when material is used in class assignments or discussions. Upon completion of interview #1 students will complete a cover sheet and a 3 page process analysis identifying and exploring responses (both verbal and non-verbal) and interventions used in five minutes of the interview. Here is an example: PROCESS RECORDING OUTLINE Student's Name:_____________________________Client's Initials:_______________________ InterviewDate:___/___/____ Clients Age:__________________________________ Date Submitted:___/___/___ Clients Ethnicity:______________________________ I. PURPOSE OF THE SESSION: (Clearly state the goals and objectives you had in meeting with this client this session.) _______________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ II. Interview Log: INTERVIEW DESCRIBE CONTENT-CLIENT’S DIALOG FEELINGS/AFFECT (The actual words spoken by both the counselor and the client.) CLIENT BEHAVIOR - i.e. What non-verbal communication did you observe? DESCRIBE YOUR FEELINGS/ AFFECT WHAT INTERVIEWIN G SKILLS DID YOU USE DURING THIS INTERACTION? DESCRIBE WHY YOU USED THESE SKILLS Upon completion of interview #2 students will a) complete a cover sheet and write a 5 page process recording identifying and exploring responses and interventions used in five minutes of a second interview using the format above and b) include a discussion analyzing both the content and the process of the interview demonstrating a basic understanding of the dynamics and the responses. A process-recording guide will be distributed to assist you in this assignment. 28 Name______________________________ Date____________________ Grade______________________________ Faculty___________________ Process Recording The process recording consists of verbatim documentation of an actual 10-15 minutes of conversation with another person. The process recording must include identification of all techniques of communication used by the author, as well as an analysis of the effectiveness of the communication process. Grading Rubric for Process Recording Standards Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Identify therapeutic communication techniques Correctly identifies each therapeutic communication technique used throughout entire interaction Correctly identifies ¾ of the therapeutic communication techniques used throughout the interaction Incorrectly identifies communication techniques Distinguish between therapeutic and nontherapeutic communication techniques Correctly distinguishes between therapeutic and non-therapeutic communication techniques used throughout the entire interaction Correctly distinguishes between the therapeutic and non-therapeutic techniques ¾ of the time Incorrectly distinguishes between therapeutic and non-therapeutic communication techniques used throughout the interaction Explain the rationale for the communication techniques used Provides detail rationale for all techniques used Provides detail rationale for ¾ of the techniques used Unable to provide rationale for the techniques used Analyze barriers created by the use of nontherapeutic communication techniques Identifies and analyzes barriers created by nontherapeutic communication techniques. Recommends alternative techniques to prevent barriers Identifies and analyzes barriers created by nontherapeutic communication techniques Unable to identify and analyze barriers created by non-therapeutic communication techniques Describe the impact of nonverbal cues on the communication process Identifies non-verbal cues and describes the impact on the communication process. Modifies communication strategies to facilitate the process Identifies non-verbal cues and describes impact on the communication process Unable to identify nonverbal cues Presentation of Paper/Format No errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation. Consistent, accurate use of terminology. Precise language. Legible print, black ink Minimal errors (<5) in spelling, grammar, punctuation. Fairly consistent us of appropriate terminology. Clear language. Legible print. Black ink. Multiple errors (>5) in spelling, grammar, punctuation. Inconsistent use of terminology. Unclear language, illegible 29 Rev 8/04 30 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis Generalist Skills Certificate Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Meeting Date 4/15/11 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) 3: 1 Contract + 2 adjunct faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured 1 Human Services Generalist Skills Certificate SLO #2: Assess client systems using the strengths-based approach. Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) HSERV 51: Conduct 3 Family Development Plans (assessment and problem solving strategy) and write a short essay discussing your experience of using the tool and critiquing the experience. In reviewing student performance with this assignment in 2008, 09 and 10 students have consistently received high marks (excellent) with approximately 1% scoring at a satisfactory level on a 5 point Likert scale. In each of the classes three students did not complete the reflection. Follow-up with the students revealed they either “forgot” to do the assignment or had personal or family issues that prevented them from completing the assignment. Faculty agreed that these students were clearly suffering fatigue at that point in the semester. Next Step in the Classroom o to Improve Student State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly 31 Learning (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) o o o o o o Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) Revise content of assignment/activities Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Increase guidance for students on assignments Use methods of questions that encourage competency State criteria for grading more explicitly o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Other (please describe) Change the point value of the assignment to reflect the value of the exercise and arrange to have it due earlier in the semester. o o o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly highlighting the importance of students’ analyses of their processes and the tool. Increase guidance for students on assignments Use methods of questions that encourage competency earlier in the process since students conduct 3 Family Development Plans before the reflection. Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Spring 2012 in HSERV 51. 32 Timeline for Implementation Conduct assignment with the above suggestions to be reviewed with faculty at the end of the semester, May 2012 (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 33 Occupational Program Assessment Plan Human Services Generalist Practice Certificate of Achievement Use the form below to describe your assessment plan and to analyze the results of it. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and describe the plan in the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Program Outcomes (List the student learning outcomes of each degree and certificate your program offers. Attach another sheet if necessary) Certificate of Achievement—Generalist Practice 1) Synthesize information about the psychological, biological and environmental forces that influence individual, family and agency behavior. 2) Evaluate the influences of one’s family of origin on current functioning in relationships. 3) Illustrate the use of bio/psycho/social theories of human behavior in client assessment and service delivery. 4) Demonstrate high and efficient qualities of selfmanagement, communication and self-awareness in the Human Services workplace responsibility and productivity. 34 Assessment of Program SLOs Describe the Assessment Process your program will use to evaluate the outcomes. Include the assessment tool used and the rubric or criteria used to evaluate success Using the Journal writing process in HSERV 52 students will demonstrate high and efficient qualities of self-management, communication and self-awareness in the Human Services workplace responsibility and productivity. Assignment: Four times during the course, students will turn in journal entries which are expected to be selfreflective in nature and written at the conclusion of each week’s class. Each journal entry should be no more than 1.5 pages, typed, double spaced using 1”margins. Each student is asked to reflect on their understanding and their reactions to the material and to their experiences in the roles of counselor and client in role-play exercises. In addition, students will use this written format to ponder questions and explore their developing role as a counselor. Keeping a journal is a useful way to reflect on class readings and discussions, and to relate these to your own experiences. Assessment Evaluation Describe the process the department uses to evaluate assessment results. Include: In department meetings we will discuss the use of the journal writing process as a constructive tool for increasing self-awareness as a Human Services provider interacting with a variety of clients and issues. We will review the rubric and student responses and scores for the exercise. What meetings will be held? When? Meeting 1: Combined discussion with HSERV and Health Sciences faculty using the journal writing process. 6/15/10 Meeting 2: Meet with HSERV faculty to discuss the relevance of the exercise and student growth. Fall FLEX Meeting 2011 35 Who will be involved? What will be discussed? Health Science Faculty and HSERV Faculty, meeting 1 and HSERV Faculty, Gail, Jan and Patrick in meeting 2 Effectiveness of journal writing to encourage personal and professional growth and awareness Notes How will you record the results? 36 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis Human Services Generalist Practice Certificate of Achievement Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Meeting Date 9/1/11 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Three: 1 Contract 2 Adjunct Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured One Contract Faculty teaching HSERV 52 Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) #4) Demonstrate high and efficient qualities of self-management, communication and selfawareness in the Human Services workplace responsibility and productivity. Journal Writing exercise. Four times during the course, students will turn in journal entries, which are expected to be selfreflective in nature and written at the conclusion of each week’s class. Each journal entry should be no more than 1.5 pages, typed, double spaced using 1”margins. Each student is asked to reflect on their understanding and their reactions to the material and to their experiences in the roles of counselor and client in role-play exercises. In addition, students will use this written format to ponder questions and explore their developing role as a counselor. Keeping a journal is a useful way to reflect on class readings and discussions, and to relate these to your own experiences. 37 Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) Overall the journal writing process was extremely successful. For some students initially there was some confusion about what to write. They had never done a journal entry. Some students were initially hesitant to disclose more personal awareness about their process as a counselor in training, but with samples of student writing and encouraging notations by their teacher they began to open up. Overall 85-90% of students showed a score of 80 or above on the second set of journals. They scored 90-95% on the third and fourth sets of journals. Next Step in the Classroom o to Improve Student Learning o Nothing; assessment indicates no improvement necessary (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Create bibliography of resource material 1) Provide more samples of student journal writing. 2) Hold discussions and interactive exercises between students in a classroom that has better acoustics. 38 Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation 1) Approach Instructional Planning Process with clearly stated goal advocating for a permanent classroom that meets the needs of interactive classes and groups. 2) Continue interdisciplinary discussions about journal writing exercises with other faculty 1) March, 2012 2) Ongoing (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 39 Rubric for Journal Writing Criteria Retelling of Experience Reflections/ Personal Response Relevance to Classroom Concepts or Personal Experience Analysis of Experience Effort on Assignment weight HSERV 52 Journal Writing Exercise Exemplary Yes Accomplished Yes, but Developing No, but Beginning No 20% Detailed explanation of experience Specific descriptors of observations during experience Writing is highly organized with logical sequence Clear explanation of experience Objective observation of experience Organization is clear and easy to follow Somewhat clear explanation of experience Somewhat objective observation of experience Minimal organization Vague explanation of experience Non-objective observation of experience No organization evident; confusing Reflects well on own work Provides many examples Reflects on own work Provides examples Some reflection on own work Provides few examples Little reflection on own work Provides very few or no examples Student listens well in different contexts; relates observations to classroom concepts and/or personal experiences Student listens in class; relates some observations to classroom concepts and/or personal experiences Makes minimal reference to what is heard in class or to personal experience Makes no reference to what is heard in class or personal experiences Makes many inferences Comprehends deeper meanings High level of critical thinking expressed Makes inferences most of the time Usually comprehends deeper meanings Some critical thinking expressed Some inferences are made Comprehends surface level meaning Minimal critical thinking expressed Few or no inferences are made No comprehension or reflection on assignment Little or no evidence of critical thinking Obvious, detailed effort on assignment Neat, legible handwriting Acceptable effort on all parts of the assignment Legible handwriting Some effort on assignment Readable handwriting Little or no effort on assignment Illegible handwriting 20% 20% 20% 20% Assignment Score ______________ ________________ + Bonus ______________ = Final Score 40 Occupational Program Assessment Plan Alcohol & Drug Studies Skills Certificate Use the form below to describe your assessment plan and to analyze the results of it. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and describe the plan in the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Program Outcomes (List the student learning outcomes of each degree and certificate your program offers. Attach another sheet if necessary) Human Services Skills Certificate: Human Services Drug and Alcohol Studies 1) Analyze the history, & evolution of alcohol and drug treatment in human development and interrelationship of the fields of Human Services. 2) Demonstrate basic skills in client engagement, counseling and problem-solving and case management including multicultural awareness for entry level employment in the drug and alcohol treatment field Assessment of Program SLOs Describe the Assessment Process your program will use to evaluate the outcomes. Include the assessment tool used and the rubric or criteria used to evaluate success SLO #2: Demonstrate basic skills in client engagement, counseling and problem-solving and case management including multicultural awareness for entry-level employment in the drug and alcohol tx field. The tool we will use is an exercise in HSERV 164 wherein students will select an ethical dilemma germane to their area of interest (Child Welfare, Addiction, etc.) and develop a course of action using the Ethical Decision Making Model. Students will write a paper analyzing the pros and cons of issue, discuss process for making decision, address issue in relation to their profession’s code of ethics and relevant laws. They will come to some conclusion and decision about an ethical course of action and discuss how this process has helped them in their decision-making. If it has not been helpful, they will discuss why. 5-page maximum. APA Citations when appropriate. Bibliography Required. 41 Assessment Evaluation Describe the process the department uses to evaluate assessment results. Include: The HSERV Department will meet and review several student papers, the grading and corrections made and the degree of success students achieved in relation to the assignment and the rubric for the assignment. What meetings will be held? FLEX week department meeting When? Sp 12 Who will be involved? Gail West, Jan Tice and Patrick Meyer What will be discussed? The degree of success students achieved in relation to the assignment and the rubric for the assignment. How will you record the results? Written notes and use of these forms 42 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis Skills Certificate: Human Services Drug and Alcohol Studies Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date 2/3/12 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Three: 1 Contract 2 Adjunct Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Same as above Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) HSERV 164, Ethics in the Human Services Select an ethical issue relevant to your field of practice. Using the steps presented in the text (pages 21, 22 and 23), analyze pros and cons of issue, discuss process for making decision, address issue in relation to the profession’s code of ethics and relevant laws. Come to some conclusion and decision about an ethical course of action. Discuss how this process has helped you in your decisionmaking. If it has not been helpful. Discuss why. Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) 96% of the students in Fall 11 scored 18 or higher out of 20. This was significantly higher than the previous year where 85% of students scored 18 points or higher. SLO #2: Demonstrate basic skills in client engagement, counseling and problem-solving and case management including multicultural awareness for entry level employment in the drug and alcohol tx field This appears to be directly related to making the objectives for the assignment clearer when Introducing the assignment. It is also due to the instructor introducing more opportunities throughout the class to use the Ethical Decision 43 Making model in response to televised vignettes highlighting ethical dilemmas. This was done individually and in small groups. It is difficult to conduct small groups in the present classroom due to class size and sound problems. The audio/visual equipment is very poor and untrustworthy. During the day the glare on the screen prevents one from really seeing the images. Next Step in the Classroom o to Improve Student Learning o (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase in-class discussions and activities Increase student collaboration and/or peer review o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods with Ethics. o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Provide a larger classroom to facilitate small group discussions of vignettes. o Provide a larger classroom to facilitate small group discussions of vignettes. o Provide a classroom with better audio-visual equipment to adequately project clips of the vignettes onto a screen. Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation ASAP Hopefully Fall, 2012 (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 44 45 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 50 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Meeting Date February 3, 2012 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Two: 1 Contract Faculty 1 Adjunct faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Two Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Human Services Agency Presentation Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) For HSERV 50: # 2 Analyze and evaluate a local Human Services Agency Using an outline that highlights key points to address students will prepare a written and oral presentation of a Human Services Program. Overall, the majority of students performed well on this assessment. Most students used their Human Services Service Learning placement as the agency they were evaluating. For some students their written reports were outstanding, they had difficulty with the oral presentation part of the assessment (or didn’t “show up” on the day their oral presentation was scheduled.) When too many oral presentations were scheduled for one class period, class attention wandered and may have contributed to poorer oral performance. The classroom size and configuration at times also contributes to poorer class focus and attention. For some students, the difficulty was more with their ability to turn in a well-written 46 document. Several students stated they didn’t have access to a computer and turned in a “hand written” assignment. Many students expressed surprise at learning about the variety of other programs within their agency and about the interrelationships between agencies in Santa Cruz County. About ½ of students presented an extremely thorough evaluation covering most of the points in the outline. In particular, many students were able to understand their agency’s challenges in providing services from ‘strengthbased perspective (an important aspect of their HSERV 50 curriculum). The rest of the students either had difficulty in one or more of the following areas: understanding the complex streams of funding their agencies relied on; being able to analyze inter-relationships and hierarchies that exist in their agency or fully discussing the problems and needs of their agencies. While understandably “lack of funding” stands out as the highest need students were sometimes unable to think past this issue to what else got in the way of agencies successful delivery of services. Next Step in the Classroom to Improve Student o Learning (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) o o o o o Revise the requirement of the oral presentation to allow students the option to present in teams to deal with student apprehension about public speaking. Distribute the amount of oral presentations across the semester to allow for enough time for each student to present and maintain class interest. Refer to students to the Writing Center Purchase loaner laptops In class-brainstorm increased access to computer resources Increase in-class discussions and activities to help students more fully understand funding streams for Human Services Programs. o Invite guest speakers who are agency leaders to help students gain perspective on current issues facing Human Services. Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning o Develop an additional assignment to assess students’ understanding of the historical underpinnings of the Human Services field, including an analysis of the events and perspectives that influence current patterns in 47 (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) service delivery Create an HSERV Program event that features a range of Human Services in our community and offers panel presentation on current issues in the field. Include former HSERV alumni to provide “role models.” Can also be used as a method for students to chose their Service Learning Placements Priorities to Improve Student Learning HSERV Program Event (see above) (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) Assignment to assess students’ understanding of the historical context of the field of Human Services. Possibility of securing funding for purchase of one or more laptops reserved for Human Services student use. Implementation Fall, 2012 pending meeting in Sp12 to plan. (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation Fall 2012 (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 48 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis— HSERV 51 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Meeting Date February 3, 2012 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Two: 1 Contract Faculty 1 Adjunct Faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Two Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Family Development Plan: Student practices the use of a specific tool (The Family Development Plan) for helping individuals or families set and achieve goals. Student schedules 3 meetings with an individual or family over several weeks to help them set a short-term goal and develop action steps to complete it. Student then analyses the results of the Family Development Plan and reflects on their development of the knowledge and skills they developed as they practiced using this tool. Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) 2) Analyze Methods of Human Services Delivery The majority of students were able to successfully complete 3 Family Development Plans and analyze the outcome of the plan for the family or individual they worked with. A small percentage of students (16%) were confused about the assignment directions and completed 3 Family Development Plans with 3 different individuals (one of the points of the assignment is to observe the progress of the person or family over time) For some students helping someone come up with a specific short term goal was difficult. The real challenge in this assignment was students’ 49 difficulty analyzing their process during the activity and reflecting on their own ability to help empower the family or individual to set their own goal. Next Step in the Classroom o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity to Improve Student more explicitly :emphasis need to work with Learning one individual over time Offer examples from previous semesters of well (list all the items faculty done assignment felt would help them Revise activities leading up to assignment: improve student learning) To include in class role plays helping students set short term goals o Increase in-class discussions and activities during the time frame the assignment is being conducted so students can give and get feedback from their peers and instructor about progress. o Conduct Values clarification exercises to help broaden students’ awareness of themselves. o Develop a Student Analysis Form with prompts to help students more fully reflect on their experience, feelings, understanding as well as, the skills the student developed using the tool o Provide more guidance in developing goals and objectives Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Use methods of questions that encourage competency o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods. Research the possibility of Human services faculty attending an On Course workshop to strengthen skills in student composition, analysis and reflection. o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Priorities to Improve Student Learning o (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o Increase in-class discussions and activities during the time frame the assignment is being conducted so students can give and get feedback from their peers and instructor about progress. Conduct Values clarification exercises to help broaden students’ awareness of themselves. 50 o Develop a Student Analysis Form with prompts to help students more fully reflect on their experience, feelings, understanding as well as, the skills the student developed using the tool o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods. Research the possibility of Human services faculty attending an On Course workshop to strengthen skills in student composition, analysis and reflection. Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) SP 12—the next time the course and assignment are offered. Integrate suggestions into curriculum of HSERV 51 being taught Sp 12. Timeline for Implementation (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities Occupational Program Assessment Analysis 51 HSERV 52 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department Human Services Meeting Date December 14, 2011 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Three: One Contract Faculty and Two Adjunct Faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured One HSERV 52 SLO # 1 Critically assess skills necessary for the effective delivery of Human Service interviews, assessments, paraprofessional counseling, and case management. Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Professional Helper paper: Students will conduct an informational interview of a professional helper. This can be a counselor, social worker, intake worker, etc.—anyone in the Human Services whose job includes interviewing and counseling techniques. The purpose of the interview is to gain knowledge and understanding of what contributes to a successful helping relationship and to being a professional helper. Analyze these concepts and discoveries in relation to yourself. What types of engagement skills and behaviors work and what don’t? We will generate a set of questions to help with your interview. Students will write a 3-5-page paper discussing their findings. Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) Looking at 3 years of data, there has been a gradual increase in success in this course assignment. The total point value was 16. In 2009 special attention was paid to generating questions for the interview in class. 56% of students scored 14 points or higher with 12% scoring 13, 20% scoring 12 and 12% scoring 10 points. In general 52 students were able to gather good data from their interviews but lost points primarily due to errors in spelling and grammar. Clearly the exercise generating questions helped! In 2010 attention was given to discussing common writing errors, but this wasn’t enough. Students generally did well in gathering and analyzing data but again lost points due to spelling and grammar errors. 55% scored 14 points or higher with 7% scoring 13, 7% scoring 12, 7% scoring 11, 3% scoring 10, and 11% scoring 8 points. Two students did not complete the assignment. 3 students turned in hand-written papers citing lack of access to a computer. In 2011 more effort was placed on assisting students with writing skills on this assignment. Focus included structure, grammar (especially run-on sentences), spelling and proofreading. Writing samples were reviewed and discussed. Again, students data gathering and analysis was good—attributed to discussion generating interviewing questions. Grammar and spelling were much better showing an increase in scores. 72% of students scored 14 points or higher. Next Step in the Classroom o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly to Improve Student o Revise activities leading up to assignment Learning o Increase in-class discussions and activities o Increase student collaboration and/or peer review (list all the items faculty o Ask a colleague to critique assignment felt would help them o Find way for department to buy two or three improve student learning) laptops to loan to students. Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods o Consult teaching and learning experts about teaching methods o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Visit classrooms to provide feedback (mentoring) o o o o Purchase three laptops to loan to students Increase in-class discussions and activities about professional writing and communication skills Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Provide and critique writing samples 53 Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) We already have begun this process as evidenced by the improvement in writing skills. Timeline for Implementation Review next Autumn in FLEX Dept Meeting. (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 54 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 53 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date October 14, 2010 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Three: 1 Contract 2 Adjunct Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Two Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Group Exercise Presentation Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) 1. Investigate and critically assess skills for working in small and large groups in social service, school, substance abuse treatment facilities, and other human service settings. Locate a group activity/exercise you would use in any group format. The activity could be (but not limited to) an icebreaker, a process activity used during one stage of the group process, or a termination exercise. Come prepared to lead this activity in a small group of your peers, as well as provide a 1-page handout that gives directions for the activity, recommendations for populations, and an explanation of what group stage that the activity would be most appropriate. The purpose of this activity is to provide students with future resources for potential implementation in-group work. HSERV 53 Students loved this exercise! There was some initial confusion that subsided after the teacher provided an experiential example. The challenge was having enough flexible space to conduct small group or teamwork exercises. 100% of the students performed this exercise at a better than satisfactory or excellent level. 55 A year later former students refer to this as one of the most useful exercises in the class. They incorporate the lessons learned with this exercise in their individual practices now. Next Step in the Classroom o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly to Improve Student o Use methods of questions that encourage Learning competency o (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o Nothing; assessments indicate no improvements necessary o Request a larger room with movable furniture to facilitate group exercises in. Advocate for a larger room that can accommodate mixed classroom formats. Per feedback from accrediting organization increase the unit load for this class to 3 units. Implementation Program Plan Recommendations (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation Program Plan Approval Process (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 56 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 160 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date 12/15/11 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Two: 1 HSERV Contract Faculty 1 HSERV Adjunct faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Two Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) 3) Critically assess the impact of drug and alcohol abuse on individuals, families, and the community. Over the last half of the semester students will be assigned to small groups. Each group will focus on a specific population (Women, Adolescents, Partners, Children, Latinos, African Americans, Asian Americans, Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender populations, Veterans, Post Incarcerated populations, Homeless, etc.) and explore the impact of chemical dependency on this population. Students will be graded on both the group presentation and on each individual’s participation, their outline and their bibliography (using APA citation format) Students completed the exercise with 80% success. Some students were not as involved in the process as others reportedly due to illnesses, family crises (death of relative), homelessness, and time available to contribute to the group process. Assessment of individual group members (and themselves) allowed for students to evaluate participation. The quality of presentations was uneven. Some students used scholarly research but others relied on past class assignments to inform their individual presentations. Some students had difficulty understanding and 57 applying the prompt questions listed in the assignment. Next Step in the Classroom o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly to Improve Student o Revise content of assignment/activities to be more Learning explicit in guiding the groups to develop a unified set of themes related to their selected population. (list all the items faculty o Revise activities leading up to assignment felt would help them including reviewing presentation skills improve student learning) o Increase student collaboration and/or peer review o Provide more frequent feedback on student progress o Increase guidance for students on assignments Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency 1) Discuss presentation skills curriculum with faculty in other disciplines 2) Revise content of assignment/activities to be more explicit in guiding the groups to develop a unified set of themes related to their selected population. 3) Develop intervention to foster group cohesiveness in each presentation group Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities The course will be offered in Fall, 2012. We will implement the plans then. Research presentation curriculum in other disciplines: Spring and Summer, 2012. Discuss at Fall2012 FLEX Departmental Meeting. Implementation: Fall 2012 when the course is offered again. 58 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 161 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date FLEX week, Sp 11 2/3/11 Two: 1 HSERV Contract Faculty 1 HSERV Adjunct faculty Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Two 4.) Investigate and critically assess various treatment orientations and modalities. Research Paper In the third week a list of topics will be presented to the class. Students will write a 10-15 page research paper exploring treatment orientations and modalities. Students are expected to use library and Internet resources when writing their papers. Documentation of sources used should be included at the end of your paper in the bibliography. Cited articles must be obtained from peer reviewed and professional journals. Internet websites should be scholarly in nature. Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) Overall students produced high quality papers worthy of presentation to professional peers. Newer students needed additional assistance in research techniques and composition skills. 59 Next Step in the Classroom o o to Improve Student o Learning (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning o o Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase in-class discussions and activities Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Increase guidance for students on assignments Use methods of questions that encourage competency o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about treatment methods and o Consult teaching and learning experts about teaching methods o (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly: Create a handout outlining the steps that need to be taken to complete this assignment. Review composition skills and expectations for the paper. Revise content of assignment/activities: With more emphasis on using the Ethical DecisionMaking Model (EDM). Revise activities leading up to assignment: Increase in-class discussions and activities Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation 1) Request larger room with better computer and screening capabilities to show research processes using search tools 2) Request larger room for small group break-out sessions to discuss progress on research 3) Incorporate above recommendations into course curriculum and syllabus Fall, 2013 (Program Plan recommendation) and Fall, 2014, review (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 60 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 162 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date February 5, 2010 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Two: 1 Contract Faculty 1 Adjunct Faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Two Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Current Pharmacology Research Paper and Panel Presentation Students choose an area within the pharmacology of drugs studies that interest them and find a journal article or some published research that presents new information or understanding in their chosen topic area. They are to write a 1-2 page abstract of the article giving an overview of what was studied or reported, the significant findings or conclusions reached, and a detailed interpretation of why they felt this information was important and how it can be applied to the substance abuse treatment field. Present their information orally as a part of a panel discussion and answer relevant questions from the class Overall, the majority of students performed very well. 82% scored “A’s”, 10% earned “B’s”, and 8% earned “C’s”. The lowest grades came from students who did not follow the rubric for grading Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) #1 Analyze the physiological and pharmacological (bio/psycho/social) impacts of alcohol and other drug use, abuse, addiction, and recovery. Many students revealed in their writing that they are experiencing significant levels of personal stress in 61 their lives. 100% of students received full-credit on this assignment. Students demonstrated an ability to use library and online resources to find current research. A majority of the students were able to articulate clearly the research goals, methods and conclusions. Approximately 20% of students struggled with meeting all components of the paper. For the most part, these students were not able to identify or articulate clear inferences or applications for the information gathered. Some students did not follow instructions and chose articles that were from less than reliable sources—on-line or magazine articles without a scientific reference or peer review. Next Step in the Classroom o to Improve Student o Learning (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) o o o o o o Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning o (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) o Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o o o o o o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly Revise the amount of writing, oral, visual, clinical or similar work Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase in-class discussions and activities Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Increase guidance for students on assignments Use methods of questions that encourage competency Use larger room for break-out activities for peer review Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods Consult teaching and learning experts about teaching methods Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency Other (please describe) Find a big enough room for the class. Increase in-class discussions and activities Increase student collaboration and/or peer review Use methods of questions that encourage competency Identify and secure a larger room Implementation Discuss Findings at FLEX Departmental Meeting, 62 Fall, 2012 (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation Fall, 2012 (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 63 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 163 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date 3/9/2011 Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Two: 1 HSERV Contract Faculty 1 HSERV Adjunct faculty Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Two Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) On the second day of the class students will be assigned to groups. Using the Logic Model students will identify an aspect of Drug and Alcohol problems in their community and develop a Prevention Plan using the Logic Model. Construct programs designed to best meet the drug/alcohol prevention needs of the community Students will be graded for their participation, input and final presentation. Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) Overall students were quite successful with this assignment. Every student participating received a passing grade. 88% received a grade of Very Good to Excellent. The 12%receiving a grade of Good primarily struggled with understanding the Logic Model and applying its format to the problem at hand. These students had a difficult time comprehending/processing the information about the Logic Model and its uses. 64 Next Step in the Classroom o to Improve Student o Learning (list all the items faculty felt would help them improve student learning) o o o o Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly Revise content of assignment/activities Revise activities leading up to assignment Increase in-class discussions and activities Provide more frequent feedback on student progress Increase guidance for students on assignments o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods o Consult teaching and learning experts about teaching methods o Encourage faculty to share activities that foster competency o Other (please describe) Provide more information to students on the Logic Model—perhaps an article or handout that better explains the process. o o o o Revise activities leading up to assignment— building competence with using the Logic Model Research and identify a good resource that explains and clarifies use of the Logic Model Provide more frequent feedback on student progress Increase guidance for students on assignments Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) Timeline for Implementation 1) Research and find better introductory reading material geared to first year college students. 2) Provide reading material to students before the course this spring, 2012. 3) Implement a more interactive classroom process in the Sp 12 course that provides more feedback to students as they move through the planning model. Research: Fall 11 Implementation: Sp 12 Discussion: Fall 12 (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 65 Occupational Program Assessment Analysis HSERV 164 Use the form below to summarize the results of the department meeting in which you discussed the results of your program’s assessment process. Include this form in your Instructional Plan and incorporate the results into the narrative of your instructional plan. Department HSERV Meeting Date FLEX week, Sp 11 2/3/11 Two: 1 HSERV Contract Faculty 1 HSERV Adjunct faculty Number of Faculty in Attendance (% of full time and adjunct plus total) Number of Faculty sharing Assessment Results – if applicable (% of full time and adjunct plus total) SLO(s) Competency Measured Assessment Tool (Briefly describe assessment tool) Two 2.) Evaluate and synthesize the special challenges and needs of Alcohol and Drug Counselors and Human Services Providers. Select an ethical issue relevant to your field of practice. Using the steps presented in the text (pages 21, 22 and 23), analyze the pros and cons of issue, discuss process for making decision, address issue in relation to your profession’s code of ethics and relevant laws. Come to some conclusion and decision about an ethical course of action. Discuss how this process has helped you in your decision-making. If it has not been helpful. Discuss why. 5-page maximum. APA Citations when appropriate. Bibliography Required. Assessment Results (Summarize the overall results of your department including any students needs and issues that emerged) 81% of students scored a passing grade of 20 points or higher. Students appear to underutilize the Ethical Decision Making Model in their analysis of an ethical issue in their particular HSERV concentration. There were some grammatical errors that brought the point value down. Students had a difficult time finding a good example of an ethical dilemma in their profession. Problems with the projection of clinical vignettes for discussion in Room 831 led to less use of valuable 66 clinical material. Problems with enough flexible space in the classroom and climate conditions led to difficulties breaking the group down into small groups to analyze the issues and use the EDM. Next Step in the Classroom o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly to Improve Student o Revise content of assignment/activities Learning o Revise activities leading up to assignment o Increase in-class discussions and activities (list all the items faculty o Increase student collaboration and/or peer review felt would help them o Increase guidance for students on assignments improve student learning) o Use methods of questions that encourage competency Next Step in the Department to Improve Student Learning (check all that the department felt would help them improve student learning) Priorities to Improve Student Learning o Offer/encourage attendance at seminars, workshops or discussion groups about teaching methods with Ethics. o Consult teaching and learning experts about teaching methods o (List the top 3-6 things faculty felt would most improve student learning) o o o State goals or objectives of assignment/activity more explicitly: Create a handout outlining the steps that need to be taken to complete this assignment. Review composition skills and expectations for the paper. Revise content of assignment/activities: With more emphasis on using the Ethical DecisionMaking Model (EDM). Revise activities leading up to assignment: Incorporating more experiential exercises using the (EDM) model. Increase in-class discussions and activities using the (EDM) model. Implementation (List the departmental plans to implement these priorities) 4) Request larger room with better computer and screening capabilities to show clinical vignettes highlighting an ethical dilemma. 5) Request larger room for small group breakout sessions to discuss and move through the EDM. 6) Incorporate above recommendations into course curriculum and syllabus 67 Timeline for Implementation Fall, 2011, Sp 2012 (Program Plan recommendation) and Fall, 2012, review (Make a timeline for implementation of your top priorities 68 Appendix 5: Timelines for the Revolving Wheel 69