Criterion 1: Efficiency
CTE Programs
Income / Expense Ratio
2.00
1.50
Income
1.00 equals Expenses.
0.50
0.00
1-Fiscal
4
3
2
32 1.64
29.3 1.51
26.7 1.38
24 1.25
21.3 1.11
18.7 0.98
16 0.85
count of programs
1
0
13.3 0.71
0
10.7 0.58
0
1
2
0
0
% FTES / % Expenses
40 >1.91
1
2
37.3 1.91
2
34.7 1.78
2
8 0.45
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2.7 <0.31
Count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
2.50
5.3 0.31
Total program FTES (Income)
as a percent of the total
college FTES.
-- DIVIDED BY -Total program costs as a
percent of the college
instructional expenses.
1.11
1.04
0.53
0.06
2.21
20
% FTES / % Expenses
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
Points
Possible Points = 40
Mean
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: Datatel GLBA report, prepared by the Office of Instruction.
Same datasets as used in Program Planning.
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 1: Efficiency
CTE Programs
Fill Rate
100%
88.2%
90.5%
10.9%
61.5%
99.9%
20
80%
Fill Rate
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
60%
40%
20%
0%
1-Fill
6
3
3
3
3
2
75%
77%
80%
83%
85%
88%
91%
94%
96%
99%
2.7
3.3
4
4.7
5.3
6
6.7
7.3
8
0
0
0
0
10 >105%
0
105%
0
9.3
0
2
1
72%
1
1
2
102%
2
8.7
4
1.3
Count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
5
5
count of programs
0.7 <72%
0
Fill Rate
Points
Mean
Possible Points = 10
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: Datatel (section caps) XFTE reports (enrollments). Compiled by PRO.
Excludes non-credit, special studies, work experience sections, Language Lab and Engl-100L co-requisites, TA variable unit performance sections,
Art 50L (Gallery viewing), all open entry (except ATH which uses section caps), with cross-listed sections combined for maximum enrollments.
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 2: Core Mission
CTE Programs
% TUs utilized in Core Courses
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2 programs 0%
% TUs utilized in Core Courses (points)
10
8
4
Points
6
2
0
Possible Points = 10
Core courses: required for the A.S. degree or Certificates of Achievement
Core Courses: Curricunet, compiled by Office of Instruction.
Source for TUs: Datatel XFAS (Faculty Assignments). Compiled by PRO.
Academic years 2009-10 through 2010-11; 2 years of data.
Points calculation = percentage applied to possible points.
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 2: Core Mission
CTE Programs
Job Placement (Program Completers)
51.6%
50.9%
21.0%
0.0%
91.1%
20
100%
Job Placment rate
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2-jobPlaced
1
0
14.7 67%
12 57%
10.7 52%
9.3 46%
8 41%
6.7 36%
5.3 31%
0
4 25%
2.7 20%
0
2
count of programs
Job Placement
1
0
18.7 83%
1
16 73%
1
2
13.3 62%
1
3
17.3 78%
2
3
20 >83%
3
1.3 <20%
Count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Points
Mean
Possible Points = 20
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: CEED Completer/Leaver survey.
Same datasets as used in Program Planning.
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 2: Core Mission
CTE Programs
Awards (AA & Cert.of Achieve) per FTEF
7.0
2.54
2.03
1.89
0.00
6.38
20
Awards per FTEF
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
2-Awards
4
3
3
2
3
2
count of 2
1
1.6
2.1
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.4
4.9
5.4
4
4.7
5.3
6
6.7
7.3
8
8.7
9.3
Awards 10 >5.4
1.1
0
3.3
0
0.7
0
2.7
0
0.2
0
2
0
-0.3
0
1.3
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.7 <-0.3
Count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
Points
Possible Points = 10
Mean
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: Datatel Acad.Progs. and XFAS (Faculty Assignments) reports. Compiled by PRO.
Same datasets as used in Program Planning.
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 3: Student Success
CTE Programs
Course Success
100.0%
73.0%
72.2%
12.2%
47.7%
97.5%
20
90.0%
Course Success
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
3-CourseSuccess
8
7
7
6
5
count of programs
Course Success
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18.7 91%
1
17.3 88%
1
1
16 85%
2
3
20 >91%
4
4
3
14.7 82%
Count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: Data warehouse. Compiled by PRO.
Same datasets as used in Program Planning; although with all terms included.
13.3 79%
12 76%
10.7 73%
9.3 70%
8 67%
6.7 64%
5.3 61%
4 58%
2.7 55%
Possible Points = 20
1.3 <55%
0
Points
Mean
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 3: Student Success
CTE Programs
Course Completion (Retention)
100%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
3-CourseCompletion
6
5
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.3 95%
1
8.7 93%
1
Count of programs
2
2
2
1
3
8 92%
3
7.3 90%
Count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
90%
6.7 89%
86.1%
85.9%
5.7%
77.0%
98.7%
20
Course completion rate
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
Possible Points = 10
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: Data warehouse. Compiled by PRO.
Same datasets as used in Program Planning; although with all terms included.
10 >95%
6 88%
5.3 86%
4.7 85%
4 83%
3.3 82%
2.7 80%
2 79%
1.3 78%
0.7 <78%
0
Course completion
Points
Mean
Nov.10.2011
Criterion 3: Student Success
CTE Programs
Course SLOs percent complete
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Percent
Points
0
5
10
SLOs
Count of programs in point group
0%
1%
100%
15
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
count of programs
4
2
0
Possible Points = 10
Course SLOs completed/not, prepared by the Office of Instruction.
Source for active courses: Datatel CRSE. Compiled by PRO.
0
5
10
Points
Nov.10.2011
Criterion #4: Access
CTE Programs
Under-represented minority - participation (enrollments)
Mean
Median
Standard Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Count
70%
37.7%
35.5%
10.9%
19.1%
62.3%
20
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
4-URM Participation
3.5
3
3
3
count of programs
Points score bands are
establishd at each one-quarter
standard deviation, working
outward from the mean.
2.5
2
2
2
2
2
1.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0
0
0
0
*15 62%
14 >54%
12 54%
10 51%
8 49%
6 46%
4 43%
2 40%
0 38%
0 35%
0 32%
0 30%
0 27%
0 24%
0 21%
0 <21%
0
Possible Points = 15
count of programs
1
Under‐represented
Points
Mean
* single outlier awarded maximum points
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years.
Source: Data warehouse. Compiled by PRO.
Same datasets as used in Program Planning; although with all terms included.
Under-represented includes American Indian, African American, Filipino, Hispanic/Latino, Pacific Islander, Multiple ethnicities
Nov.10.2011
Criterion #5: Community financial support
CTE Programs
Number of Program Donations
Amount of Program Donations
$450,000
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
Number
Points
0
1
25
50
75
100
25
20
15
10
5
0
7 programs had no donations
0
1
2
3
4
5
Program Donations (points)
5
4
3
Points
0
1
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
30
0
1
2
3
4
5
2
Points
Amount
35
1
0
Possible Points = 5
Nov.10.2011
Points scores are calculated for number of donations, then for amount of donations - the final score is the maximum of the two.
Source: Cabrillo College Foundation; funds which are associated with specific department(s).
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years of contributions to these funds.
When a fund is associated with multiple departments, amounts (but not the number of donors) are divided among the departments.
Criterion #5: Community financial support
CTE Programs
Revenue Generated (Ancillary Accounts)
>$200,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Revenue Generated
Points
0
1
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
0
1
2
3
4
5
Count of programs in point Amount
15
13
10
count of programs
3
5
1
3
0
0
3
4
0
0
1
2
5
Points
Possible Points = 10
Nov.10.2011
Source: Business Office. Trust & Agency Fund 79 (ancillary) funds associated with department cost center.
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11.
The three departments that operate business, CAHM, DM and HORT, are each awarded maximum points.
Criterion #5: Community financial support
CTE Programs
Amount of Scholarship Donations
Number of Scholarship Donations
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$0
Number
Points
0
1
25
50
75
100
Amount
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
17 programs had no donations
0
1
2
3
4
5
Scholarship Donations (points)
5
4
3
Points
0
1
2
3
4
5
2
Points
0
1
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
1
0
Possible Points = 5
Nov.10.2011
Points scores are calculated for number of donations, then for amount of donations - the final score is the maximum of the two.
Source: Cabrillo College Foundation; funds which are associated with specific department(s).
Academic years 2006-07 through 2010-11; 5 years of contributions to these funds.
When a fund is associated with multiple departments, amounts (but not the number of donors) are divided among the departments.