CfE Management Board – 26 March 2014 – Paper 3.2 CfE Management Board: Process over coming months There are a few specific areas in which we believe Management Board can play a useful role in the coming months: reflecting on this session’s experience in implementing the new qualifications, and identifying useful messages for the system feeding in to the updated CfE Implementation Plan for 2014/15 considering areas the Board should focus on in the medium-term, based on its understanding of current issues This paper makes a number of proposals for work in these areas, for discussion, and asks Management Board: To consider the proposal to establish a short life working group, to reflect on the experience of this session, and what the make-up of such a group might be. To note and comment on the proposal to establish 2 sub-groups, one for each of a) assessment within CfE; and b) the implementation of Wood. Management Board Secretariat March 2014 CfE Management Board – 26 March 2014 – Paper 3.2 CfE Management Board: Process over coming months Reflecting on experiences this session An important element of Management Board’s role is to maintain an overview of the implementation process, and provide a means for stakeholder views and concerns to be highlighted and explored. For the most part this is done by considering and discussing the reports to the Board from the Implementation Group, and feeding views and proposals back into the implementation process. As we approach the completion of the first session of the new CfE qualifications, we suggest it would be timely for Management Board to set in train a short process of reflection and discussion on the experience of this session, to report back to the Management Board’s next meeting, in June. This could be carried out by a small working group, which could meet perhaps twice as a group (and also meet the Implementation Group around its next meeting in May). This group could present to the Board a set of key messages it considers would be helpful to the system and to delivery partners as preparations are made for the next session. (Such an approach would mirror that the taken by the Working Group on Tackling Bureaucracy, the output of which was generally welcomed by partners.) The evidence base for this work could include inspection evidence, key findings from CfE leadership events etc. The key messages would relate to the most effective approaches to implementation at school, local and national agency level. Management Board is invited to consider this proposal, and what the make-up of such a group might be. Updated CfE Implementation Plan If agreed by Management Board in June, the messages of the above group could supplement the detailed information which will be set out in the Implementation Plan for 2014/15. This is currently in preparation, with the intention of it being published by the end of April. (This is to allow authorities and schools to make use of the Plan in finalising their own plans for 2014/15.) Management Board will be invited to comment on a draft plan in the course of April. Medium-term focus It may be helpful for Management Board also now to consider where its mediumterm focus might lie – and how it can best express that. Previous discussions at Management Board have highlighted assessment as an issue for ongoing attention. This has arisen both in the context of the broad general education, where issues have been identified around the approaches to assessment being taken (or expected to be taken) by teachers. Similarly, it is likely that internal assessment towards the new national qualifications will be among the issues the sub-group above would want to address. There is a sense that this is an aspect of CfE Management Board – 26 March 2014 – Paper 3.2 ‘the CfE approach’ to learning and teaching that is still in a process of development, and on which a particular focus from Management Board may be useful. Another key dimension over the medium term is likely to be the implementation of the recommendations of the Wood Commission. The Government will be responding to the Commission’s final report in the summer, but it is clear that there is a strong desire on the part of Government to move forward with the recommendations. There will be specific discussion on these issues later in this meeting. We suggest that Management Board should consider in that context how it can ensure it has a proper focus on these developments. We propose that Management Board should plan to consider at its next meeting establishing 2 sub-groups, one for each of a) assessment within CfE; and b) the implementation of Wood. The assessment group could be informed by the work of the short-life working group. A more detailed paper will be presented to that meeting, for discussion. Management Board is invited to note and comment on this proposal.