MEASUREMENT – THIRD LEVEL Significant Aspect of Learning Use knowledge and understanding of measurement and its application. Learning Statements Relationships between measurements; Formulae; Degree of accuracy; Interpret questions; Select and communicate processes and solutions; Justify choice of strategy used. Experiences & Outcomes MNU 3-11a: I can solve practical problems by applying my knowledge of measure, choosing the appropriate units and degree of accuracy for the task and using a formula to calculate area or volume when required. MTH 3-11b: Having investigated different routes to a solution, I can find the area of compound 2D shapes and the volume of compound 3D objects, applying my knowledge to solve practical problems. MNU 3-03a: I can use a variety of methods to solve number problems in familiar contexts, clearly communicating my processes and solutions. MNU 3-07a: I can solve problems by carrying out calculations with a wide range of fractions, decimal fractions and percentages, using my answers to make comparisons and informed choices for real-life situations. Learning Intention Through investigation, we are learning how to apply our knowledge of measurement to solve real-life problems. Success Criteria I can calculate the perimeter and area of a 2D shape. I can calculate the volume of a 3D object. I can use formula appropriately. I can convert between measurements. I can interpret the problem and solve appropriate calculations accurately. ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE The learner first of all worked out all possible areas of the enclosure (in whole metres) and then realised that there was a more efficient method. Learner Conversation: “I halved 82, which is 41. Working in whole metres, I then multiplied the highest length by the smallest breadth, that is 40m by 1m, to give an area of 40 square metres. I then took 5 from the length and added 5 to the breadth and I realised that the area had increased to 210m². So I kept doing that and I realised that the answer was around 20m by 21m. I then narrowed down my working and took 0.5m from the length and added 0.5m to the breadth. A square of side 20.5m gives the maximum area.” Learner Conversation: “Since the existing wall was 50m long, I decided to make the opposite side 50m long too. I took 50 away from the 82m of fencing and divided the answer by 2, which is 16. A rectangular enclosure 50m by 16m gives an area of 800m². To see if the area could be bigger or smaller, I took 1m from the length. An enclosure 49m by 16.5m gives an area of 808.5m², which is bigger. I kept going until 41m by 20.5m gave me the biggest area. After that, the area got smaller.” Teacher’s Reflections: Our learner coped very well with this problem, immediately recognising the value of translating the given information into a diagram. However, the difficulties encountered by the rest of the class, caused by the deliberate limiting of information, highlighted the need, in future, for more exposure to realistic problems which have to be tackled from scratch. Learner Conversation: “I drew a diagram of the paddock using the information provided and split it into a triangle and rectangle. Using two formulae, I worked out the areas of the triangle and the rectangle and added them together. I multiplied the result by 15, which gave us the amount of seed needed in grams. I then converted my answer to kilograms.” Learner Conversation: “To start with, I split the floor plan into two rectangles. I then worked out the volumes of the cuboids that sit on these rectangles using the formula. I then added them together to give me the overall volume of the barn in cubic metres.” The learner also used an alternative strategy for calculating the volume of the barn. He calculated the volume of the barn as if it was a cuboid and then subtracted the volume of the part that was ‘missing’. Many learners immediately divided the volume of the barn by the volume of a hay bale. After class discussion, the pupils then realised that this would just give a high estimate to the number of hay bales that could be put in the barn. For simplicity, we decided to stack the hay bales in columns in a particular way (length 110cm x breadth 45cm x height 35cm). However, it was noted that hay bales would not be stacked in this way in real-life for safety reasons (stability) and this would again just give us an estimate. On reflection, we could have further challenged our learner by asking him to investigate how many bales could be stored using different stacking methods to improve stability, eg. joints staggered as in a brick wall. Learner Conversation: “I took the volume of the old tank away from the volume of the new tank. This told me that there would be 2620 litres of milk in the old tank after it was filled the second time. I changed this volume into cubic centimetres and also changed the length and breadth of the old tank into cm. I then substituted into the formula for the volume of a cuboid, which gave me an equation to solve to find the missing height.” The learner also used an alternative strategy to find the height of the milk in the old tank when it was filled the second time. Learner Conversation: “I used the formula to find the volume of the old tank. I changed this into cubic centimetres and then into litres. To find out how many times the milk from the new tank would fill the old tank, I divided the volume of the new tank by the volume of the old tank, which gave me 1.90972. So I knew that the milk would fill the old tank once and about nine tenths of the tank the second time. To find the height of the milk the second time the old tank is filled, I changed 2m to 200cm and found 0.90972 of 200, which gave me 181.944. So the milk would be about 182cm high.” On completion of the investigation, pupils were put into groups to discuss how they approached the tasks, strategies used and their conclusions. These discussions were observed by the teacher. I really thought that there was not enough information in the paddock question. I thought that too, but once we drew a diagram the problem was much clearer. The milk tank problem was interesting. I thought that you were heading in the wrong direction because you used a different method to me. I was surprised when our answers were the same. I then tried your method so that I could understand it. And it worked!