Lie Groups Contents Chapter 0: Topological Groups .......................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1: Manifolds ........................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: Lie Groups ......................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 3: Lie Algebras ..................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 4: Tangent Space ................................................................................................................. 16 Chapter 5: The Lie Algebra of a Lie Group .................................................................................... 22 Chapter 6: Integrating Vector Fields and the Exponential Map .................................................. 27 Chapter 7: Lie Subgroups ................................................................................................................. 34 Chapter 8: Continuity implies Smoothness .................................................................................... 42 Chapter 0: Topological Groups Topological Group A Topological Group is a set with group structure and a topology. We write the group ) structure as maps with ( and with ( ) and require these maps to be continuous. Usually we require that the topology be nice, for example Hausdorff. Lemma 0.1 If is a topological group then ( ) defined by is a homeomorphism for each . Proof ( ) is continuous since ( ) and map ( ) ( ). Now, ( that is . Therefore )( ) , so for any has continuous inverse Notation If are subsets let define { ( is invertible with inverse and thus a homeomorphism. } i.e. { | | etc and ( )) ( } ). Then we can recursively ( ) so ( ) Lemma 0.2 a. If then ) b. ( ( ) c. If and generated by . , then ⋃ is a subgroup of , known as the subgroup Proof a. Take any element then and as by definition, ( ) b. ( for . Then . ) ( ) . c. We need to check that if then and then ⋃ ⋃ ⋃ . ⋃ As and are products of elements of , clearly is a product of elements of . If ⋃ and Lemma 0.3 If is a topological group with and Proof Clearly so so ( ) ( ) . As inverse map so open implies we have ⋃ open and then . Moreover, is continuous, open. . ⋃ is an open set with ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) as is a self- Theorem 0.4 i. ii. If If is a topological group and is connected then ⋃ is open and then ⋃ is open. Proof i. (By induction) is a homeomorphism and is open we ( ) and as ⋃ have open. As is open, by the principle of induction ⋃ is open. By Lemma 0.3, is an open set with and therefore by Lemma 0.2 is a subgroup of and by part i. is open. ⋃ ( ) Consider the cosets is open for all and . Therefore is the disjoint union of open sets hence disconnected, unless for all ; that is . Clearly ii. Examples 1. Any group with the discrete topology is a topological group. ) 2. with the usual topology is a group under addition; ( 3. { } is a topological group under multiplication ( ) 4. 5. The set of 6. The set of rule. ( ( ) ) ( ) is a topological subgroup. are all similar. invertible real matrices is a topological group. invertible real matrices is also a topological group using Cramer’s Chapter 1: Manifolds Definition 1.1 ) on a topological space of dimension A chart ( a homeomorphism of into an open set in . is a non-empty open set with Examples ) is a chart of dimension 1. Similarly, taking 1. Take then ( and ( ) gives a chart of dimension on or where is a nonempty open set and the inclusion map . In these cases all the charts are known as the ‘standard’ or ‘canonical’ charts. {( } ) | 2. The Circle Charts can be defined in a number of ways, including using angle variables, stereographic projection, orthogonal projection etc. Definition 1.2 Two charts ( ) and ( ) of dimension are compatible of class (for ( ) ) if either or and ( ) is a map between two open sets of which is along with its inverse (that is a -diffeomorphism). Example Take a chart given by stereographic projection and work out or take two stereographic projections and check compatibility: { } then Suppose which is ( ) ( ) ( ( ) and explicitly ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) . Definition 1.3 An atlas of class and dimension on a topological space is a collection of charts on of dimension which are pairwise compatible of class such that the open sets cover . Maximal Atlas An atlas is maximal if every charts compatible with all the charts of the atlas is already in the atlas. Every Atlas extends to a unique maximal atlas. Definition 1.4 A manifold structure (or a smooth) structure on a topological space of class dimension is a choice of maximal atlas of class and dimension . and A smooth manifold of dimension is a topological space with a manifold structure of class and dimension . Usually we assume the topology is Hausdorff and paracompact (partition of unity). From the remark before Definition 1.4, we can specify a manifold by giving a topological space and an atlas. For many spaces we have a standard topology and a standard atlas. Example ) For the standard topology is the Euclidean topology and the atlas contains ( For give it the subspace topology and charts compatible with stereographic, angle variable and projections onto axes. Examples The following are all examples of smooth manifolds. If no atlas is given, it is the canonical atlas. 1. 2. { }( ) { ( ) From this we define charts ( ) respective maps ( } { ) } ( ( ) { } and ) Note that each chart is homeomorphic with and there is an explicit formula for ( ) which is easily seen to be )( )} is a on . {( atlas of dimension . ( ) to be an 3. Let be a map and then we would like dimensional manifold. We say that is a regular value on if for every which satisfies the equation ( ) the derivative of at (denoted ) is surjective. ( ) is -dimensional. To verify this we apply: I.e. Theorem (Implicit Function Theorem) ( ) with the subspace If is a regular value of a map then (relative) topology is a manifold of dimension with a covering of open sets . , define ( For ) to be ( ) ( ) ( ( )) where ( ) are the Euclidean coordinates for (Solutions defined locally therefore we use these to construct charts which are automatically smoothly compatible.) Examples: 1. For defined as ( , take ( )( ) ( ( ) . Then )| )| ) ) ( ). Therefore by the Regular Then observe that ( when ( )( ( ) is a 1 dimensional Value Theorem, manifold for . ( ) 2. More generally Take defined by ( ) | | then . Applying the Regular value theorem we observe that is an -dimensional smooth manifold. The charts given by this theorem are obviously compatible with stereographic charts. Definition 1.5 A continuous map ) a chart on pair ( 1. 2. between two smooth manifolds is said to be smooth if for any ) a chart on either: and ( ( ) ( ) ( )), the composition and on ( between open sets in Euclidean Space. is as a map We say that is a diffeomorphism if is a homeomorphism and both and are smooth. Two manifolds are diffeomorphic if there exists a diffeomorphism between them. Remark For a function on ( ). , is smooth if for every chart ( ) on , Denote by ( )( ) ( ) the set of smooth functions on ( ) ( ) and ( )( ) Moreover, ( )( ) ( ) is a ring using addition and pointwise multiplication ( ) ( ) with identity the constant function ( ) . Note that ( ) for all is a function ( ) is a vector space: and . . To get every ingredient for the definition of a Lie group, we need the notion of a product of two manifolds. Definition 1.6 ) with Let and be smooth manifolds of dimension and . A chart on is a pair ( ) for open and . Likewise a chart on is a pair ( open and . Then is open in and is a homeomorphism ( ) which is open in ) is a chart on onto ( ) . Hence ( of dimension . This construction respects compatibility of charts. So an atlas on and an atlas on give rise to an atlas on which we call the product manifold. It has dimension . Example ⏟ , the torus of dimensions is a smooth product manifold. Chapter 2: Lie Groups For a group , it has two associated maps taking ( ) taking ( ) and Definition 2.1 A Lie group is a set with two structures: ) 1. A group structure with maps , where ( and ( ) 2. A manifold structure with a 2nd countable Hausdorff topology such that the maps and are smooth maps of manifolds. Note that it is sufficient to require that the map ̃ ( ) is smooth. Examples: 1. Any finite or countable group with zero dimensional manifold Structure is a Lie Group. ) ( ) 2. under addition and inverses given by negatives ( for . { } under | | 3. can be viewed as a subset of the complex numbers ) complex multiplication and the inverse ( 4. If and are Lie groups then so is with the product manifold structure. 5. is a Lie group of dimension . This is compact. { } under multiplication ( { } ) under multiplication 6. under complex multiplication ( ), the general linear group which is the group of invertible real 7. matrices. ( ( ) ( ) since we have a polynomial map ( ( ) is an open set in ) ( and ( ) then ( ) ) has a chart given by the inclusion map ( ) . In this case ). ( ) is ) a quadratic polynomial as a map so restricts to ( ( ) ( ) as a map. ( ) is given by a matrix whose entries are polynomials divided by Lie Group of dimension 8. Similarly we can define and . ( which is open in 9. Denote . Then then ̅ ( invertible in and is on ) to be the set of ( ) therefore ( ) is a invertible complex matrixes with ) ̅ | | then ̅ | | . This implies that if . Then we have | | then is | || |. The quaternions are an associative, non-commutative skew-field or division algebra. }. This is a group under multiplication and | | Define ( ) { ̅. is a quadratic polynomial map and ( ) ̅ which are obviously smooth functions on . Moreover, | | so ( ) is the unit sphere in (as vector spaces) and is a regular value of ( ) hence ( ) is a smooth manifold and so a Lie group. As a manifold, ( ) is so and both have group structures making them into Lie Groups. Although not proved here, these are the only spheres with smooth group multiplication. ) to be the invertible 10. Similarly to Example 7 and 8, define ( quaternion ( ) matrices. As before, this is an open set in and during matrix multiplication the real components of the quaternion entries are smooth functions so is smooth. is smooth by writing quaternion matrices of twice the size in terms of complex numbers in a way that respects multiplication. (See the Pauli-Spin matrices) ). It follows that ( ) is a Lie group of and then use inverses defined in ( dimension . ∑ 11. Define ( ), the orthogonal group have an inner product in if ( ) and ( ) then define ( ) { ( ) ( ) ( ) }. Rewrite the product of matrices where are column vectors and is transpose. ( ) Since ( ) , we have ( ) ( ) so . That is } ( ) { ( ) ( ) First this implies that ( ) is a group; ( ) ( ) so ( ). As ( ) we have ( ) ( ). ( ) ( ) by ( ) Define ; we need to prove that is a regular value. ( ) ( ) ( ) First note that if ( ) then so }. ( ) { ( ) Take ( ) and compute ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) can we find Given Then ( ) ( ) so that ( Try ( ) ( ) ) so the map . is surjective. Therefore ( ) has a manifold structure by the implicit function theorem, of dimension of ( ) { ) As ( In particular ( ) ( ) and ( ) ( ) ( ( ) ) ( ) which is the dimension }. are smooth maps it follows that ( ) is a Lie Group. ( ) ( ) ( ) { } ( ) 12. We denote by the special linear group in dimensions. This is the set { }. Clearly this is a subgroup of ( ) ( ). To show ( ) is a ( ) manifold, we need to prove that 1 is a regular value of the map : )( ) ( ( ) ( ( ( )) ) Therefore ( )( ) is surjective since given a real value we can find a matrix ( ) so that the sum of that matrix’s eigenvalues is . } ( ) { ( ) ( ) ( ) is called the special 13. orthogonal group. ( ) { } If ( ( ) then ( ) )( ) ( ) with . We have to solve a set of simultaneous equations. In particular as we note that ( ) ( ) are unit vectors which are perpendicular in has basis (– ) so ( ) ( ) ( ( ( ) but ) where and . The line perpendicular ) . Therefore ( . Observe ) so we conclude the following: ( ) ) {( ( ) {( } ) } Therefore we conclude that ( ) is as a manifold and as a group structure. ( ) is a disjoint union of 2 circles as a manifold and ( ) is the connected component of ( ) containing the identity . Definition 2.2 If is a Lie Group then the connected component of which contains (as a topological space) is also a Lie group of the same dimension, denoted . This Lie subgroup is sometimes called the component of the identity. Example Example 13 above proves that ( ) More generally, ( ) by induction on : ( ) ( ( )( ( ) . ( ) so they have the same dimension. This can be proved ) as a row of column vectors in ) ( ). Then if . Therefore ( ) so we have { The idea is then to rotate to line up with the standard vector ( ) and apply these to give a matrix of the form ( rotations to ( ) ( ) component belongs in ( ( ). two components and ( ) ( ) in turn gives Taking each column of ). Moreover the ). Then an induction shows ( ) has vectors in of unit length in and hence get a map ( ) whose image is a closed and bounded set since it is defined by polynomial equations for . ( ) is homeomorphic to this image set so it is compact. ( ) is an open subgroup of ( ) so closed and hence compact and connected. { } and . Then define ) and ( ) as follows, for 14. Now we define ( ( ) ∑ ∑ For , define ( ( ) ( ) ( ) { We want to first rewrite this definition so it does not involve ) ( ) ( ⏟ } and . ) ( ) ( ) { ( ) So From here, the argument can proceed analogously to ( ): ( ) ( ) by ( ) Define and now prove that } is a regular ) is a manifold of the same dimension as ( ) which is ( value. So . ( ) . We need to check that ( ) is a group. Multiplication and inverses are smooth (( ) ) So ( ) is a Lie Group of dimension ) ) ( We define ( ( ( ) . ) Examples Consider the case ( . Then for ( ) ( )( ) ( ) we have ) ( ) is a non-zero vector. As we have ( ) so for some ( ) In particular if ( ) Now ( ) ) is perpendicular to ( ) this implies that ( ) ( ) ( ) }. We can now find a unique ) ) {( )( ) so ) as a manifold is two copies of Observe that ( we have ( ( ). As ( ( ) ) {( so ) so we can rewrite ( ( ( so that and } ( { ) }). ( ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ) ) So ( ) is a homomorphism of groups from map given by ( ) ( function on ( ). Hence if ( ( ) ( to ) ). It has an inverse ( ) is a smooth ). Definition 2.3 A homomorphism from a Lie Group to a Lie Group is a map which is both a group homomorphism and a smooth map of manifolds. is an isomorphism if it is a bijection and is a homomorphism of Lie Groups. In particular then is a diffeomorphism. So the above explanation shows that ( and ) are isomorphic as Lie Groups. ( ) We now briefly consider the case . Then ( ) preserves which is the basis of special relativity. ( ) is called the Lorentz Group. ( ) ( ) ( ) has two components and ( ) is the subgroup preserving time orientations. In particular, it is clear that ( ) ( ) ( ) and ( ) ( ). ) the Symplectic Group in 15. In this example we consider ( dimensions. It is the group which preserves a non-degenerate antisymmetric bilinear form on . ( Take where Define ( ) ( ). Observe that ) ( . Observe that { ( ) ( ) ) . Then take ( ( )( ) ( } ) { ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ). ( ) so ) ( ) can be written as ( ). for some ( ) is surjective for ( ) and so is a regular ) has a manifold structure of dimension ( ) Check that every ( ) Therefore value. Therefore ( ( ) ) ) ). }. Observe that and so is invertible and ( ( ) ( ) . Therefore ( ) ( ) Put ( ) . Then ( ) ( ) ( ) is . Differentiating we get ( ( ( ) ( ) ) is dimensional, the same dimension as ( ) In particular ( 16. There are complex matrix versions of the previous few examples and are denoted ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) similarly as in ( 17. On For we can define a sesquilinear form as follows: , the inner product 〈 〉 ( ) { ( ) 〈 〉 〈 It is easy to see that ( ) is a group. ∑ 〉 . Then define } { ( ) } Put ( ) then ( ) ( ) so maps to the complex matrices such that . These are known as Hermitian or Self-Adjoint Matrices. Let ( ) denote the set of self-adjoint matrices. ( ) is a real vector space of ( ) ( ) ( ) we need a regular dimension . As a map ( ) we need to check if ( ) ( ) is surjective as a value, so for each linear map. ( ) ( ), choose If ( so )| ; that is ( ) is surjective . Therefore so is a regular value so ( ) has manifold structure with charts given by choosing some of the real and imaginary parts of the matrix entries. Hence ( ) has ( ) ( ) dimension . [ ( ) as a row of columns: Write 〈 So 〉 〈 〉 ] 〉 〈 [ 〈 〉 〈 if 〈 〉 then the vectors Writing the vector ] then where requirements 〈 〉 form an orthonormal basis of 〈 〉 | | | | so ( ) Similarly, ( ) ( . which identifies the . Hence ( ) is a to a closed subset of compact Lie Group of dimension ] then 〉 . This gives a map ( ) ( ) [ . ) is called the special unitary group. For any ( ), | | so we already have a real ( ) condition on . Then setting imposes one further condition on any ( ) so we drop one dimension. Hence . If necessary, one can look at ( ) Case ( ) . { } as a Lie Group. In particular, ( ) { }. Case Take ( ( | | ( ) for some ) | | | | | | ) ( . Then ( ) so | | | | The vector ( ) so ( ) is a complex multiple of ( and | | Therefore . | | | | so | | . )( | | ) ( | | and ) i.e. there exists ) . so that ( (| | ) | | ) so ( ) ) | | {( | | } as a manifold, while ( ) as a manifold is diffeomorphic to ( ) . Is it an isomorphism of Lie Groups? No. } } so the | | The centre of ( ) is the set { . The centre of ( ) is { centre of ( ) is connected, but the centre of ( ) has two components. ( ) are diffeomorphic but not isomorphic. Therefore ( ) and ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) mapping ( ) (There is a homomorphism of Lie Groups but is not injective.) We have shown that and are Lie Groups. No other spheres are Lie Groups. Both and ( ) are Lie Groups diffeomorphic to . 18. Similarly, we can define ( ) and 〈 ( 〉 We can write it in matrix form as 〈 ( ) ) using the form ∑ ∑ 〉 where ( ). It ) { ( ) 〈 〉 〈 〉 follows analogously that ( ) is a Lie Group of dimension ( ) . and that ( ( ) then | | ) is a Lie Group of dimension ( If and so ( . } ) In particular, ( ) is of dimension and used by Roger Penrose in “twister theory” to convert some zero-mass field equations in Relativity into CauchyRiemann Equations. This group is closely related to ( ) (the conformal group) which is locally isomorphic to ( ). ) are the quaternion versions of the unitary groups: 19. ( ) ( ( ) ( { ( ) } ) ( ) { These are both Lie Groups, of dimensions ( These matrix groups exceptional Lie Groups } ). etc are called classical Lie Groups. There are 5 . Chapter 3: Lie Algebras Definition 3.1 A vector space with a bilinear map [ we have: 1. [ 2. [[ ] ] [ ] ] [[ In this course, usually ] ] [[ ] is called a Lie Algebra if for all ] ] (Jacobi Identity) will be a real vector space of finite dimension. Examples: ] 1. Any vector space with the bracket [ is a Lie Algebra (Usually called the Trivial Lie Algebra). ] 2. Take any associative Algebra and define [ (The Commutator ] bracket). If is commutative, then [ so we get the trivial bracket. It is easy to check that [ ] satisfies the properties above, making into a Lie Algebra. Special Example: { } using composition of maps, denoted by ( ). For Let ( ) ] 3. If is a Lie Algebra and is a subspace we call a Lie Subalgebra if [ for all . is itself then a Lie Algebra. Special Example: ( ) where is a commutative associative Algebra, If we take the Lie Algebra ( ) of derivations ( ) defined by ( ) then the subspace of { ( ) ( ) ( )} can be shown to be a Lie ( ). Subalgebra of Important Example: ( ) for a manifold . Then ( ) is the set of linear maps Take ( ) ( ) satisfying ( ) ( ) ( ). We can show that ( ) is a ( ). Lie-Subalgebra of ( ) ( ) is a linear map with ( ) In the case that , suppose ( ) ( ). We want to find all such maps: ( ) ( ) We first show that ( ) for all constant functions : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) . Then by -linearity, ( ) . Now use Taylor’s Formula: For ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) for some ( ) as a function of . ( ) ( ) (( ) ) then Then ( ) (( ) ) ( ) ( ) (( ) ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) then In particular, ( )( ) . If we define ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) so is of the form where ( ). Remark In the important example, we can show for ( ) For ∑ ( ) if [ ( with ]( ) and ) and ( ) has the form ( ). then ( ( )) ( So that any derivation of ( ( )) ( ) ( ) becomes a Lie Algebra with Bracket [ ) ( ( ) ) ] ( ) Chapter 4: Tangent Space Assume in ( each ( is a smooth map ) ) we have a tangent vector from some open interval ( ) . Then at . If we have a curve in a manifold can we make sense of its derivative and have it lie in a vector space? We can use charts to transport the curve to and differentiate it there. ( ) ( ) So suppose is a smooth map and so ( ) . Take a chart ( ) with ( ) . Then ( ( )) is a curve in defined on an open interval around ( ( )) | We can then form Taking a second chart ( . ) also with ( ) ( ( ))| . ( ( ( ))| we can form )( ( ))| ( . ) ( ( ( )))| Then by chain rule: ( ( )) ( Call ( ) ( ) ( Space of ( at . ( ( ))| ( ( )) ( ) ) by then we have a relation defined on the triples ( ) if ) . Clearly is an equivalence relation. ( )( Definition 4.1 Using the equivalence relation { ) ) defined above, let ( ) }. Then is called the Tangent ) with We make into a vector space by picking a chart ( and defining the sum )( ). of two classes by addition of the vectors when the representatives are ( ] ] ) with respect to If the class of ( is denoted by [ then [ [ ] [ ] and [ ] [ ] for . Since the maps choice of chart. ( )( ) are linear isomorphisms this notion is independent of the Definition 4.2 If ( ) also write is a smooth curve then we define ( ) or ̇ ( ) for ( ) ( ( ))] [ ( ) ( ) as [ ( ( )) ] ( ) . We may ( ) Theorem 4.3 For a manifold of dimension and a point , is a vector space of dimension . If is a smooth map then there is a corresponding linear map ( ) called the derivative of at which satisfies the chain rule: if is another smooth map then ) ( ) is smooth and ( . In particular, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). This is a special case of the chain rule thinking of as a smooth map between two manifolds. Proof ] ) with Given a point we pick a chart ( then each [ so [ ] is a linear map which is a bijection hence a linear isomorphism. We [ ] by picking ( ) around ( ) then define is a map between open [ ] [ ( )( )] ( ) . sets in Euclidean Spaces and set ) and ( ). Then Observe that the equivalence class is independent of the choice of ( ) ) ( )) ( )( ( ) (( ) ) ( )( ( ( )) ( This gives the Chain Rule for ( ) . Examples: ) so we can use this to make an 1. Take ; this has standard chart ( identification between and as a vector space: [ ] ( ) ) Under this identification, if we have a curve ( then the abstract tangent ( vector is [ In 2. If ( ) as a vector valued function. ( ) we can write down a curve which has tangent vector at for any fixed ; namely the straight line . ) is a chart with is a manifold, and ( . Then take then [ ] for some ) and we get a curve in on some interval ( containing [ )] ( ) by setting ( ) | ] ( ( ) [ ] ) then ( ) [ ( ( ))| ] . Definition 4.4 ( ) and Let . We define ( ) as a directional derivative at by choosing [ ] and taking ) with a chart ( , transporting to ( ) as , writing the directional derivative of a function of variables at ( ) in the direction ; that is ( ) ( ( ( ) ))| Remark This expression of ( ) is independent of the choice of chart. Proposition 4.5 1. 2. 3. ( ( ) is linear as a map ( ) is linear as a map ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Proof All these statements are easy consequences of the directional derivatives of functions on open sets in . Remark This can be used to give another definition of tangent space at ( ) to satisfying the product rule ( ) ( ) from form a vector space with a linear subspace. In these particular identifications, ( ) ; namely all linear maps ( ). They clearly ( ( )); the derivative of a real-valued function of 1 variable. Examples 1. Let be an open set in a real vector space . We can get a chart on by identifying with where and defining a map from as follows: ( ) ∑ Pick a basis for and let ( if for )( ) )( . Then ( . It is clear that changing the basis gives a ) is a chart on compatible chart since they are related by invertible linear maps of which are ∑ diffeomorphisms. We can identify with by [ ( ) ] and check that this does not depend on the choice of basis. Given and we denote the corresponding tangent vector by [ Then if ( ), ( ) ( ( ( ) ] ))| ; ∑ ( )( ) with ( ) . ( ) for a regular value of . If 2. For a smooth map let ) and let ( ) be a curve ( with ( ) . Then ( ) means ( ( )) for all . Differentiating this expression with respect to ; then put to get ( ( )) so ( ) ( ) ( ( )) This gives a map subspace of . E.g. Take ( ) so orthogonal to . Lie Group Examples: which allows us to identify ( ) with ( ) as { . Then }. That is with a , the set of vectors ( 1. ) is an open set in ( ), For ( ( ( ( ) so ( ) ( ) )| ( ) so ( ) ( ) ( ) so ( ) ( ) 3. Similarly, ( ) ( ) where ( ) 4. is a smooth map. We showed ∑ ( ). We can introduce the function for any ( ) ( ) ( ) ∑ ( ) ( ) by . Observe that ( ) ( ) so by Jordan Normal Form ( ) ( ) and for ( ) Therefore , } ( ) { ( ) ( ) Therefore } ) we can have ( ) { ( ) ( ) 5. Similarly, for ( }. Let ( ) { ( ) ( ) ( ) by ( ) 6. then 2. Similarly, ) is an open set in ) is an open set in )( ) ( { Therefore ( )( ( ) ( } ( ) ( ) and so ( ( )) ( ) { ( ) { } we can see { } } ( ) 8. In particular, is a smooth map, we have defined ( ) for some curve ( ) with ( ) , then if and ( ( ))( ) ( ( ))| ( ) then ( )( ) ( ) then ( we think of as a directional derivative on ( ): if ( ) then take a curve a directional derivative on ( ) . Then ( )( )( ) ( )( ( ))( ) ( )( That is, we get If ( ( )) ( )) 7. Using the same method as above, for ( ) Remarks If )| ( ( ) ( )( ) ) ( ) )( )( ) ( ) (( Proposition 4.8 For a Lie Group , the functions Proof By definition of , the multiplication map Therefore by fixing one of these entries, ( ) ( ) is smooth. )( ) can be computed as so that ( ) and )( ))| is a Lie group, the left and right translations are defined by . If ( ) ( and )( )| ( ) are smooth and satisfy ) defined by ( ( ) is smooth and is smooth. ( ) Observe that for any we have ( ( )) ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Corollary 4.9 For any , and ( ) are diffeomorphisms of ( ) ( with ) Lemma 4.10 ( ) ( ) Definition 4.11 A vector field on a smooth manifold The tangent vector at is defined by is the choice of a tangent vector to at each point. Definition 4.12 ( ) is smooth for all smooth functions A vector field is said to be smooth if ( ). Then we set ( )( ) ( ) for all . ( ) ( ) which is a linear map. A A smooth vector field defines a map ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) tangent vector at satisfies ( ) ( ) ( ) ; that is smooth vector fields are derivations of Hence ( ( ). We denote the set of smooth vector fields on by ( ). This is a vector space and has a Lie Algebra bracket given by the commutator: [ ]( ) ( ( )) ( ( )) which is called the Lie Bracket of Vector Fields. Definition 4.13 Let be a smooth map, then two vector fields ( ) -related if ( ) for all ( ) and ( ) are said to be then . Then Examples: 1. If is constant ( ) for all for fixed related to if and only if vanishes at . 2. Suppose is a diffeomorphism of onto . Then ( to ( ) so ( ) ( ( ) ) and is - is a linear isomorphism from ) ( ( ) ) so and determine each other completely. 3. If is not surjective then outside ( ), the closure of the image, the values of unknown. are Theorem 4.14 If and [ ]. ( ) is -related to Proof ( ) then for ( ) we have ( First, take related to then the LHS becomes ( ) ( ) so ( ( ) )( ) Therefore ( ) ( ). Now suppose [ ]( ( ( ))( ( )) ( ). That is is -related to ) ( ( ( )( ( ( )) So by the above condition, we have [ ( ) ( ( ( )) ] is -related to ( ) ( ( ) and if is - )) iff ( ) ( ) for all ( ) then using the above condition; and ( ))( ) ( is -related to for )) then [ ( ) for )) ( ( ) ([ ] is -related to [ ]( )) ]. ) ( ( ) ) Chapter 5: The Lie Algebra of a Lie Group Definition 5.1 A Vector Field all is said to be left-invariant if ( on a Lie Group ) ( ) for . (There is a similar notion of Right-Invariance using Remark is left-invariant means that Lemma 5.2 If is left-invariant, then is ). -related to itself for all . is smooth. Proof ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ) )( ) ( ). Then note that ( )( ) ( )( ) is jointly smooth in and and differentiates . Therefore ( )( ), being the derivative of a smooth map, is smooth as a function of so is smooth by definition. Theorem 5.4 The Lie Bracket of two invariant vector fields is again left-invariant. Left-invariant vector fields form a linear subspace of ( ) and the evaluation map from ( ) is a linear isomorphism on the subspace of Left-invariant vector fields. Hence the left-invariant vector fields on form a finite dimensional Lie subalgebra of ( ) whose dimension is the same as the dimension of as a manifold. Proof If and are left-invariant then is -related to and is -related to for all . ] is -related to [ ] by Theorem 4.14 so [ ] is left-invariant. Therefore [ The fact that left-invariant vector fields form a subspace of ( ) is a consequence of the defining equation ( ) map. The evaluation map fields. If is involving the derivative of , which is a linear is a linear map by the definition of addition of vector ( ) for some left-invariant vector field then taking so gives for all is injective. To see the map is surjective, take a tangent vector at the identity of ( ) . Then ( ( So ) ( ) )( ) )( ( ( is left-invariant and hence smooth. Evaluating at ( )( ) Hence the map defined by evaluation at ( )( . Then set ) is surjective. )) ( gives: ( ) ) that Summarising, the evaluation map is a linear isomorphism from left-invariant vector fields to . is a vector space of the same dimension as . Definition 5.5 Let then we denote by ̃ the left-invariant vector field on That is, ̃ whose value at is . ( ). ̃ is called the left-invariant extension of . Definition 5.6 If is a Lie Group then its Lie Algebra is the vector space with bracket [ ] [ ̃ ̃] . [ ]) is denoted by the lower case fraktur letter . As a vectorspace, The pair ( . Remark 5.7 We could use right-invariant vector fields as each result above has a right-invariant ]. counterpart. The resulting bracket on is [ Corollary 5.8 If is a Lie Group and Abelian as a group, then [ ] for all . Examples 1. is a Lie Group under addition and is abelian, so its Lie Algebra is with zero bracket. The same holds for any finite dimensional real vector space and for , so and have the same Lie Algebra, with the zero bracket. is also an -dimensional abelian Lie Group. We will show later that these account for all connected Abelian Lie Groups. ( ) ( ) is an open set so its tangent space at any ( ) is just ( ) 2. ( ) and ( ) with tangent vectors being directional derivatives: if ( then we define except for a 1 in entry ( Then for ( ( ( )| ) then the curve )), ) which we can call These give a basis for By taking ( ) . In particular if we take ( ( ) to have all zeroes only adds to the ( ( ) so as )th entry of . varies we get a vector field on . ) at every point. In fact, then Claim This means that at each point ( ) the corresponding | are linearly independent. Proof Suppose ∑ Then | . Then apply this expression to the function . ∑ This holds for all If so all ( is any vector field on are zero. ) then ∑ ( ) ( ). As varies then we get functions on ( ( ), so if is a smooth vector field, then all are ∑ | for some coefficients ). In particular, ( ) functions. Furthermore, . ( ) If ̃( ), let ̃ be the left-invariant extension. Then ( )| ( ) )( ( ) ( ( Since ( ))| )| )( ( )| of a matrix is a linear map so: ̃( )| ( ( ) ))| ) so ̃ ( ( This is true for all Moreover, if ̃ ( ∑ ( ) ) ∑ (∑ and hence ̃ ∑ )( ) ∑ . then [ ̃ ̃ ]( ) (̃̃ Finally we get a Lie Algebra called ] Commutator Bracket [ ̃ ̃ )( ( ( ̃ ) )( ) ) which is the vector space ( ) with 3. All the other Matrix Lie Groups: ) is a smooth map say which identifies ( ( )) as The inclusion of ( ) in ( ( ) namely ( ) ( ) and if ( ) then we can a subspace of ) so we get two left-invariant extensions ̃ ( ) and extend it to ( ) or to ( ̃ [̃ ( ) ( ) ̃ which are -related. Hence ( ) ] is -related to [ ̃ ( ) ̃ ( ) so [ ̃ ( ) ̃ ( ) ]| ( ̃ ( ) ) ( ( ̃ ] ) | ) ( ) and . So the Lie Algebra of ( ) is ( ) with Commutator bracket. It is denoted by ( ). [Note that this argument used no information about ( ) and works for any matrix ( ) ( ) ( ) all have respective Lie Lie Group. For example ( ) ) ( ) ( ), which are the Tangent Spaces at the Algebras ( ) ( Identity equipped with the Commutator Bracket. Definition 5.10 A homomorphism of Lie Algebras and is a linear map preserving brackets: ([ ] ) [ ( ) ( )] If is a homomorphism of Lie Groups then a homomorphism implies ( ) and so the differential of at sends to . Denote this linear map by ; that is . Theorem 5.11 If is a homomorphism of Lie Groups then is a homomorphism of Lie Algebras. Proof If then ( ) ( ) . and we can find the left-invariant extension ̃ and ̃ Claim ̃ and ̃ ( ) are -related. Proof Since ̃ is left-invariant by definition, ( ̃ (̃ )( ) ( ( (̃ ) ( ) ( )) then [ ̃ ([ ] ) ([ ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ( )) ⏞ ) )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )( Hence, for we have ( )( ) ( ) ([ ̃ ( )( ̃ ( ) ( )) ̃ ] is -related to [ ̃ ] ) ⏞ ̃ ]. Evaluating at ̃ ] ) [̃ ̃ ] and ( [ ( ) ) ( )] If and are homomorphisms of Lie Groups then this induces homomorphisms of Lie Algebras The Chain rule implies that ) has derivative at and ( that is compositions are preserved. Corollary 5.12 Isomorphic Lie Groups have Isomorphic Lie Algebras. Proof If Therefore is an isomorphism, then and differentiating this gives: is an isomorphism and ( ) is a homomorphism and ( and ) However, the converse to this is not true. It is possible to have a homomorphism is an isomorphism: so that Examples ( ). ( ) has two connected components, while is the inclusion map ( ) ( ) is connected, so is certainly not an isomorphism. However the tangent space ( ) ( ) ( ). More generally, at the identity is the same: , not connected. Therefore only gives information about . 2. It can happen that for and not connected, can be a homomorphism but not an isomorphism, while is an isomorphism. (In particular, any two Abelian Lie Groups have isomorphic Lie Algebras if they have the same dimension such as ( ) ( ). We know For an example of a non-trivial Lie Algebra consider ( ) 1. ( ) ( ). Computing Centres: ( ( )) }. Meanwhile, ( ) has centre { ( ) and ( ) ( ). and thus ( ) ( ) ( ) is ( ) and However, ( ) [ ] [ ] where [ ] { { ( ) So has basis ( ) } } ( } so ( ( ) . ) {( { ) ( ( )) ( )) { } ( ) has basis } ( ) and [ [ ] [ ] therefore identifying isomorphism between ( ) and ( ). [There is a homomorphism inducing this called the spin covering.] ] gives an Chapter 6: Integrating Vector Fields and the Exponential Map Definition 6.1 Let be a smooth vector field on the manifold. A smooth curve integral curve of the vector field through at time if ( ) ( ( ) is called an and ( ) ( ) for all ). Theorem 6.2 (Existence and Uniqueness of Integral Curves) ( ), ) ( ) and a If and there exists an interval ( with ) smooth curve ( which is an integral curve of passing through at time . Moreover, if we have two integral curves of passing through at time then they agree on the intersection of their domains. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) for ( ) ( ) Note That we have a “larger” solution on ( Sketch of Proof ) and Take a chart around , say ( vector valued function on ( ). For ( ( )) ) ( ) and transfer the problem to . becomes a , [ ( ( ))] and we look for so that ( ( ( ))) ( ( )) ( ) Then we solve the above first order autonomous linear ODE. The existence and uniqueness Theorem for ODEs guarantees a solution: We find ( ) satisfying ( ( )) and ( ) ( ) then set ( ) ( ( )) Example Take ( ( ) , ( ) ) ( ) ( ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ) with Take or ( { } and [ ]( ( ) ) where ( ). The ODE we solve is so the integral curve through ( ) at time is ). then the integral curve through ( ) at is ( ) with ). Definition 6.3 An integral curve is called maximal if any integral curve through one of the points on at the same time is the restriction of to a subinterval. A vector field is called complete if ). Otherwise, is called incomplete. every maximal integral curve is defined on ( Theorem 6.4 If is a Lie Group and is a left-invariant vector field on then is complete. Lemma 6.5 ) If is a smooth vector field on a manifold and ( ( ) is an integral curve on ( for any then ̅ ( ) is an integral curve of ). then Proof Since the ODE is autonomous. Lemma 6.6 ) If is a left-invariant vector field on a Lie Group and ( ( ) for all ( ) is an integral curve. for any , ( ) is an integral curve then Proof ( ) ( ) ( ( )) ( )( )( ( )) ( ( ) ) ( ) ⏞ ( ) ( ) So ( ) is an integral curve. Remark These two Lemmas tell us that a left-invariant vector field on a Lie Group has essentially one integral curve from which all others can be obtained. Let be the maximal integral ( ) in the maximal integral curve curve for passing through at . Then passing through at . So all maximal integral curves are defined on the interval around . Lemma 6.7 Let be a left-invariant vector field on the Lie Group and its maximal integral curve ( ) for all with ( ) then ( ) ( ) and ( ) is defined for all . Proof Let be such that they are all in the interval where is defined. Fix and let vary ( ) ( ) and ( ) which are both in some open neighbourhood and consider integral curves of as a consequence of Lemmas 6.6 and 6.5. Then the uniqueness of Theorem 6.2 says that they agree for all where defined. We claim this formula allows us to extend arbitrarily: ) with If were only defined on some interval ( finite then ( ) ( ) as a ) but ( ) is defined on ( ). Taking function on is defined on ( positive contradicts the minimality of and taking negative contradicts the maximality of . Hence are infinite so ( ) ( ). Proof of Theorem 6.4 The Three Lemmas 6.5, 6.6, 6.7 together prove 6.4. The property Groups. ( ) ( ) ( ) says the map is a homomorphism of Lie Definition 6.8 A Lie Group homomorphism of or 1-PSG. with a Lie Group is called a 1-parameter subgroup Remark A 1-PSG is a smooth curve in which is defined for all and a homomorphism of groups. By the observation above, a maximal integral curve is also a 1-PSG. Theorem 6.9 There are natural bijection between the following sets: 1. The set of 1-PSG of 2. The set of maximal integral curves of left invariant vector fields on 3. The Lie Algebra Proof [ ] Given a 1-PSG ( ). Then let [ ] Take the Left-Invariant Extension ̃ [ ] Take the integral curve ( )| ̃ ̃( and observe that ̃ ( ) ( )| ( ) ̃( Example For , suppose ( ) then is a 1-PSG so ( ) ( ) for ( ( ) if for all Note that ) . Moreover ( ( ) ( ) therefore ( ) then that is ( ): ( )| ( )( ( )) ( )( ( ) Then by uniqueness of integral curves we have ( ) ) is an integral curve of ̃, then use uniqueness of integral This can be seen by checking that curves: ( ) . ( ) . ) ) ( ) for all . ( ). Then an induction shows ( ) so ( ) ( ( ). Then for ) is dense in ( ) for all and we have . If ( ) is continuous therefore ( ) is a straight line through . ( ), so this gives the Lie Algebra of Definition 6.10 If is the Lie Algebra of the Lie Group map by setting ̃( ) we get a map Proposition 6.11 is a smooth map of manifolds. as . called the exponential ) Proof ̃ is a family of solutions to a family of ODEs parameterised by . Smoothness depends on the families version of existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs Proposition 6.12 Let then for ( ) Proof Consider the map ̃( ̃( ) with ) fixed which is a 1-PSG so ) ̃( ) ) ) ̃ (( Therefore the map above is the integral curve ̃( Hence ̃( ̃( ) ̃( ( ) for some )| ) for all . Putting Corollary 6.13 ( ) is a 1-PSG; that is ̃ ̃( )| ̃( ) yields ( ) ( and ̃( ) ( ) ) Proof By Theorem 6.12 and Lemma 6.7, using the fact that the integral curves of left-invariant vector fields are defined on ; ( ) ) ( ) ( ) ̃( ̃( ) ̃( ) Corollary 6.14 The integral curve of ̃ through at time ( is ) . Examples ( ) 1. ( ) for 1-PSG of tells us that is the identity map. { } under multiplication. If 2. then ̃ ̃( ) so ( ̃( That is ( ) If 3. )| ) ( ( then ) so ̃ is the solution of ̃( )| ) ̃( ) and . ( ) ( ) then satisfies ̃ ̃( ) ̃( ) with ̃( ) the solution is ̃( Therefore ( . For ) ) ∑ ∑ ( ( ) ) 4. Same for all our matrix groups (but need to check that Theorem 6.13 Let be a homomorphism of Lie Groups and for the derivative at then and ( ) ( ) Proof we compare 1-PSG ( ( )) tangent vectors at ( ̃ ( )) and ( ) ̃ ( )( ) are 1-PSG and have the same . Example ( ) The determinant map polynomial map hence smooth and given by the trace so is a homomorphism of Lie Groups (it is a ( ) ( ) ( ) we have ( ) ( ) . Therefore by Theorem 6.13, is smooth so has derivative and in particular . Since we have ⏟ Theorem 6.14 under the identifications and . Proof If it defines a tangent vector at 0 as the tangent to the cuve since ̃( ) ( ) ( ( Corollary 6.15 There is a neighbourhood of diffeomorphism of with . )| ) ⏞ ( in and a neighbourhood at )| of . Therefore ̃( in )| such that is a Proof Apply inverse function theorem after picking a basis of to identify it with for some ) on with and a chart ( . Then becomes a map and ( ) ( (∑ )) if is a basis for . Then is an isomorphism of with itself, so by IFT we have a diffeomorphism near . Corollary 6.16 has an atlas where the open sets are translates of obtained in the previous Corollary, and the chart maps are a left-translation to bring it into a neighbourhood of followed by followed by picking a basis for to get to . These charts are compatible. Remark Such charts are called canonical and the atlas also canonical. Corollary 6.17 If is connected, every element of is a finite product of exponentials of elements of . Proof For a connected Group, any open set containing from Corollary 6.15 Proposition 6.18 If is connected and then . Proof If generates the group so we can take is a homomorphism of Lie Groups for and then by the previous corollary it is a product of exponentials ( ) ( ) ( ) so ( ) ( ( )) ( ( ( ( )) ( ) ( ( )) ( ( ) ( )) )) ( ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ) ( )) ( ) Remark Notice the strength of this condition: is one derivative of a homomorphism at one point; by the Theorem above this completely determines on . General smooth maps do not have this property. Proposition 6.19 Let be a connected Lie Group then only if is abelian. is a homomorphism of Lie Groups if and Proof If is a homomorphism then Therefore ( ) ( ) connected implies every element is a product of exponentials so for any ∏ If is abelian, then ( )∏ ∏ ( ) ( ) ( )∏ is a 1-PSG therefore ( ) ( ) Lemma 6.20 { ( ) Let be a Lie Group. Then integer span of a finite set of linearly independent vectors in . Theorem 6.21 Let be a connected Abelian Lie Group. Then Proof By Corollary 6.17 above, } is either 0 or an is the product of tori and Euclidean Space. is surjective since is connected and abelian. By the Lemma { } or the integer span of is a discrete set and so either , : linearly independent in . In the first case, by the first isomorphism theorem we have { } . The consider ⏟ { . In the second case let and Group as . Hence can see homomorphism) and so diffeomorphism. and is a bijection from } and . Since to be a supplement so so identifies so we can make with into a Lie is in bijection with ( is a surjective using the group structure and the map is a Chapter 7: Lie Subgroups There are “bad” subgroups which ought to be Lie Groups but are not embedded submanifolds. Example Take , then with the zero bracket so every subspace of is a Lie subalgebra; so the subspaces are { } and lines through the origin. These exponentiate to subgroups of the form ( ) if ( ) is a non-zero vector in . These can either be closed curves in in (The condition for a circle is lines with irrational slope in (so embedded circles) or copies of (assuming )). Copies of which are dense are projections of . Definition 7.1 1. A smooth map is an immersion if ( ) is injective for all . 2. A smooth map is called a submersion if ( ) is surjective for all . 3. A smooth map is a diffeomorphism if it is a bijection and both an immersion and a submersion. Examples The inclusion is an immersion. The exponential map an immersion. The projection is a submersion. are diffeomorphisms is an immersion and a submersion but not a diffeomorphism. Definition 7.2 A submanifold of a manifold is a pair ( which is injective and immersive. Definition 7.3 We say a submanifold the subspace topology. Example is ) where is embedded if is a manifold with a smooth map is a homeomorphism from ( ) with 1. is embedded 2. Lines of irrational slope on a torus are not embedded, but are immersed. Definition 7.4 If is a Lie Group, a Lie Subgroup is a submanifold where is a Lie Group and ) is an immersed submanifold with a homomorphism of groups. the pair ( This implies: 1. is a homomorphsm of Groups and is smooth so is a homomorphism of Lie Groups 2. is injective and a homomorphism of groups, so is an isomorphism onto its image, which is a subgroup of 3. is an immersion, so , ( ) is injective and in particular at is injective and a homomorphism of Lie Algebras and hence is an isomorphism of with a Lie subalgebra of . Examples ( 1. ) defined by ( ) ( ) is a Lie Subgroup. The image is ( ) ( ) ( ) is a Lie Subgroup and any matrix group defined earlier are Lie ) or ( ) or ( ) for some . Subgroups of ( 3. defined by ( ) ( are independent over is a Lie ) where Subgroup. 2. Proposition 7.6 A Lie Subgroup of a Lie Group both injective. Proof Suppose ( )( ̃ ) is a Lie Group with a homomorphism )( ̃ ) where is a Lie Subgroup, then consider ( ( )( ( Therefore So in particular, ⏟ ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) )( ) ( ) ( ( )( )( ) with . ⏞ ( ( ) )( ) ( )) ⏟ so By definition , since is a Lie Subgroup, is an injective immersion so and injective for all . But from the above this occurs if and only if is injective. is Often we have either the image subgroup ( ) (just as a group) or the image subspace ( ) as a Lie Subalgebra. We want, when it is possible, to find the Lie Group structure of . Theorem 7.7 If is a Lie subgroup then ( ) { ( ) Proof If put ( ) ( )} ( ) then ( ) } is a homomorphism of Lie Groups, so for all by Theorem 6.13. Then ( ) For the other inclusion, we start with ( . Then we have a curve ( ) for Step 1 We will prove that ( ) and consider ( ) ( ) ) ( ( ( )) for all ) for some ( ). ( ) ; that is . Then , mapping ( ) We want to show that the derivative Take ( is smooth. Proof Pick a subspace so supplementing ( ) is a manifold of the same dimension as . Pick ( ( ) for all such that ) such that { is an invertible linear map: then ( ) ) ( )| ( )( ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )| ) ( ) Therefore ( ) is an isomorphism so by the Inverse ) in Function Theorem is a diffeomorphism of a neighbourhood of ( ( ). Then let to a neighbourhood of in , say on (where So is projection onto the first component, which is smooth). is smooth near Step 2 We finish the proof; Take ( ) Proof . , and ( arbitrary implies ( ) is smooth on ( ) and set ( ) ( ) ( ( )) ). . Want to show ( ) ( ( ) ( ) ( ( ))) ( )( ( ( )) ( ) ( ( ) ( )( ( )) ( ) ) ) ( From the above, we note finally that ( ) ⏞ ( )( ( ( )) ( ( )) ) ( ( ) ( ( ) ( ) ) ( ( )) ) )( ( ( ))) ( ( ) ( )) . Proposition 7.8 Let be a Lie Group, a subgroup (in the usual algebraic sense) and a subspace (not necessarily a Lie Subalgebra). Suppose there is a neighbourhood of in and of ( ) in such that is a diffeomorphism with . Then with the relative topology has an atlas formed by left-translates around of the chart on constructed by inverting and picking a basis for . Proof Left translates of by elements of are open sets in the relative topology and the charts constructed as in the statement of the proposition are restrictions of canonical charts of , hence compatible and so given an atlas. are restrictions of hence smooth. Therefore is a Lie Group with this atlas and the inclusion map is smooth and an immersion, so is a Lie Subgroup of with . Note We didn’t need to know that is a Lie Subalgebra of . Lemma 7.9 Let be a Lie Group and ] ( )) and ( smooth in with [ function ( ) defined near then there is a and bounded. [In fact, ( ) ( )] Proof Pick with for some and with a diffeomorphism. Then ( ) and | | . For | | put ( ) ( )) for | | and apply Taylor’s Theorem on ( ( ) then ( ) around : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) with ( ) bounded as ( ) ( ( ) ( )) ( ) Then by Theorem 6.14 ( ) . Then ( Corollary 7.10 Take ( ) . Then ( ) ( ) ) ( ) Proof Pick as in the proof of 7.9. Take large enough so that ( . Then ( )) Therefore ( And ( ) Therefore ) ( )) ( ( ) ( ) (⏟ ) ( ) ( ( ( )) ) Theorem 7.11 (Closed Subgroup Theorem) Let be a closed subgroup of a Lie Group. Then has a unique structure as a Lie Group with the relative topology making the inclusion map into a Lie subgroup. Proof Uniqueness follows from Proposition 7.8, since there will be an atlas of charts formed by intersecting exponential charts of with . The main idea of the proof is to build a Lie Algebra inside and show it is of the correct { }. We need to show that is form. Guided by Theorem 7.7, set a vector space, and closed under brackets: 1. Since 2. If 3. If so ( , and then then ) it is clear that . since ( ( )) for all ( ) ( ( ) ) but for all . By Corollary 7.10, ( ( ); since is closed, the limit is in , so ( Since for all , the above argument shows that Therefore . , for all . so and ) converges in ) ( to . ) for all . Hence is a subspace of . We will show is a Lie Algebra of a Lie Group structure on by using Proposition 7.8. We need to find with and with such that is a ( ) ( ) we look at open subsets in diffeomorphism and . Since with on which is a diffeomorphism onto its image and ( ) ( ) We argue by contradiction; suppose there is no open subset around 0 which satisfies the last equation and on which is a diffeomorphism. Fix a Euclidean Structure on and look at balls around of smaller and smaller radius. Using Corollary 6.15, fix some open set balls inside of radius for is a diffeomorphism on and hence is a diffeomorphism, and consider sufficiently large for the ball By hypothesis, there must be an element Since on which ( )) ( , ( ) . ( and not in ( ) so with ( ) ). in at . Claim ( ) Proof If ( ) ( and ( ( ) then is bijective on ( ) ( ) with so but . Hence ( ) ). But this is a contradiction, since ( ). Therefore ( Therefore we have a sequence ( )) with and so was chosen so that ). ( and ) and as . Pick a supplement for in so and consider the map mapping ( ) . Then has derivative at ( ) given by the identification of with so in particular, this identification is an isomorphism (from the choice of ) so by the inverse function theorem, is a diffeomorphism near ( ). That is, there exist open sets in and respectively with and and is a diffeomorphism onto its image in . Claim We can shrink { }. so that Proof Suppose not. Then we can find a sequence for all , but with so that || . In the Euclidean norm on , put || so is a sequence in the unit sphere in the metric on . Compactness of the sphere gives a convergent subsequence which (for convenience) we relabel as Take and put ( ) so ( ) . Now . ( ) || as therefore . ( ) ⌊ ⌋, the integer part. Then || so . Let ( ) as and ( ) ( ( ) for all and . Therefore by definition of , Therefore closed implies for all ) ( . ( ) but ) { } (it is the limit point of a sequence in the unit sphere on But a contradiction ( by definition of ). Therefore we can shrink and implies ) so we have { }. so that So the sequence in and . Therefore eventually, ( ), since this is an open set in containing . Therefore for large , for some and . Note , since otherwise which contradicts the first claim. But then, Claim, so (⏟ ) therefore { } so . Contradiction. Therefore there has to be an open set in with and Proposition 7.8, we have a Lie Subgroup structure for topology. Corollary 7.12 If is a closed subgroup of a Lie Group { Moreover, . . By the Previous ( with ) . By having the subspace then its Lie Algebra is } Proof From the proof of Theorem 7.11, we showed then is a 1-PSG of so therefore derivatives at gives . { Theorem 7.13 If is a homomorphism of Lie Groups then hence a Lie Subgroup with Lie Algebra . }. Furthermore if for some and taking is a closed subgroup of , Proof { }. is continuous and By definition, are Hausdorff so { } is closed and thus is closed in . is a subgroup of and so a closed subgroup of . Therefore is a Lie { }. Therefore Subgroup and its Lie Algebra by Corollary 7.12 is ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) so . But ( ) So is the kernel of . Example ( ) ) as its kernel. Therefore we have a The determinant map has ( ) is a Lie Group and has Lie Algebra the kernel of different proof that ( ( ) Similarly, we can apply the same result to . . Theorem 7.14 If is an automorphism of Lie Groups; that is an isomorphism from to itself, then { } is a Lie Subgroup with Lie Algebra ( ) the fixed point set { } ( ) Proof closed in , since a given a convergent sequence of fixed points, its limit is a fixed point because is continuous. Moreover, is a subgroup of so it is a closed subgroup. By Theorem 7.11, is a Lie Subgroup and by Corollary 7.12, the Lie Algebra of is the }. But set { ( ) ( ) ( ) Examples 1. 2. ( ) is the set ( ) with ( ) which is a fixed point condition for the map ( ) ( ) (this is an automorphism) and . Hence ( ) ( ) so it is a Lie Subgroup and ( ) therefore its Lie Algebra is } ( ) { ( ) is the fixed points of 3. Let [ ] then ( ) ( ) ( ) given by ( ) is an automorphism of ( ) ( ) and the fixed }. Therefore the fixed point set is a Lie Group ( ) points are { { }. The Lie Group obtained is the centraliser of ( ) with Lie Algebra ) , which is isomorphic to ( ) given by ( ) ( ) . Then the fixed 4. Let be the automorphism of ( ( ) with ( ) ( ) points are all Chapter 8: Continuity implies Smoothness The Motivating Idea behind this chapter is the following: ) If is a continuous map and ( ( ) ( ) homomorphism then ( ) . Then ( continuity and ) ( ) so ( ) ( ) which implies ( ) ( ) is a smooth function of so Lemma 8.1 If is a Lie Group and closed subgroup of . ( ) ( ) for all and it is a continuous ( ) for all ( ) for all so ( ) ( ) for all using is smooth. is a subgroup then the closure ̅ in the topology of Proof Obviously ̅ is closed. We need to prove it is a subgroup. For ( and with . Then as is smooth, ( ) ̅ ( ) is a ̅ take sequences ) ( ) ̅ . Similarly, Lemma 8.2 If is a continuous 1-PSG of a Lie Group (That is is continuous and ( ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ( ) ( )) then ( ) is a closed connected abelian subgroup of . ) Proof ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ( ) is a closed subgroup already by the previous Lemma. ( ) is the continuous image of ( ) is connected, and by the previous argument, for any a connected set, hence ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ) ) ( ) and so ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ( ) is a closed And ( , ( so for all connected abelian subgroup of . Corollary 8.3 ( ) is a Lie Group Let be a continuous homomorphism into a Lie Group . Then ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ( ) is a continuous homomorphism. and is connected, abelian and Theorem 8.4 If is a continuous homomorphism into a Lie Group then it is smooth, hence a 1PSG so ( ) for . Proof We only need to prove . is smooth. Theorem 6.9 then shows that ( ) for some By Corollary 8.3, we only need consider the case is a homomorphism which is continuous and is a connected, abelian Lie Group. We know all connected Abelian Lie Groups of dimension are isomorphic to for some and so a homomorphism is given by a pair of homomorphisms and . Moreover, is continuous precisely when and are continuous. ( ) We already know that is smooth since it has the form Therefore it is left to study continuous homomorphism decomposes as homomorphisms and only if all are continuous. Given ) for , and ( ) ) ) ( ( ) ) . so is continuous if and it satisfies ( a continuous homomorphism, then we view ( ) ( ). It follows that ( ( for some ⏟ ( ( )) and ( ) ( ) . Then we need to take a th root. To do so we use the following theorem: { } is continuous, there exists a continuous If is a simply connected domain and function with . Then ( ) ( ) ( ( ( ) ) ( ) ( )) ) ( ) ( ) ( ) for ( ) Therefore ( and the LHS is continuous implies that ( ) is constant. Since is connected, setting implies ( ) for ) ( ) ( ) and is continuous. Therefore ( ) ( ) and so is all so ( smooth. Therefore is smooth and so is smooth. Remark This means that the Lie Algebra of is bijective with the set of continuous homomorphisms of with . (Hence only one Lie Group structure). There is a Theorem due to Mostow and others which says all continuous Lie Groups are smooth Lie Groups. Theorem 8.5 If is a continuous homomorphism between Lie Groups then of Lie Groups. Proof It is enough to show that If then ( ) As varies in is smooth on some open set will be an open set containing ( ( then ( ))) ( )( ( ( ) varies in =V and containing and if ( ))) is a homomorphism then ( ( ) is smooth on ( so on )) ( ) is ( ) which is a composition of three smooth maps so smooth. Thus has an open covering by open sets on which is smooth. Therefore To find such a , we pick a basis for . Consider ) continuous 1-PSG of and hence smooth so ( Consider ( derivative ( the basis { )⏞( ) }. Hence )( ) ( ( is smooth. ) which is a for some . ) mapping from . has which is the identification of using has an invertible derivative at the origin so by the Inverse ) ( ) for some Function Theorem, is a diffeomorphism of ( ) is a canonical chart and open set containing . ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ( Which is smooth in hence is smooth on . End of Course onto an )