Career Services Corporate Advisory Board
June 25, 2013
2002-2020 female UG student actual and goal
35.0%
35.0%
2500
33.6%
32.2%
30.7%
29.3%
2000
27.9%
24.6%
24.0% 23.8%
22.5%
1418
21.9%
22.6%
1372
1284
1228
1275
25.2% 25.4% 25.0%
23.1% 23.4%
1349
1410
1464 1441 1455
30.0%
1923
1837
26.5%
1500
2012
1751
1665
25.0%
1579
1493
1407
20.0%
U-Grad Female
Percent U-graduate Female
15.0%
1000
10.0%
500
5.0%
0.0%
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Enrollment Goals
2012
Undergraduate
2013
2014
2015
2016
5,631
5,700
5,750
5,750
5,750
26.3
26.6
26.8
27
27.1
Graduate
1,353
1,415
1,480
1,545
1,625
Total
6,984
7,115
7,230
7,295
7,375
Incoming Freshmen
ACT Composite
Applications
7000
6000
5000
2004
2005
2006
4000
2007
2008
2009
3000
2010
2011
2012
2013
2000
1000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
Confirmations
1800
1600
1400
2004
1200
2005
2006
1000
2007
2008
2009
800
2010
2011
2012
600
2013
400
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
10 year female admits
1400
1200
1000
2005 Accepts
2006 Accepts
800
2007 Accepts
2008 Accepts
2009 Accepts
2010 Accepts
600
2011 Accepts
2012 Accepts
2013 Accepts
400
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
450
10 year female confirmations
400
350
2004 Deposits
300
2005 Deposits
2006 Deposits
250
2007 Deposits
2008 Deposits
2009 Deposits
200
2010 Deposits
2011 Deposits
2012 Deposits
150
2013 Deposits
100
50
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
700
COE female admits
600
500
2004 Accepts
2005 Accepts
2006 Accepts
400
2007 Accepts
2008 Accepts
2009 Accepts
300
2010 Accepts
2011 Accepts
2012 Accepts
2013 Accepts
200
100
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
250
10 year female COE confirmations
200
2004 Deposits
2005 Deposits
150
2006 Deposits
2007 Deposits
2008 Deposits
2009 Deposits
2010 Deposits
100
2011 Deposits
2012 Deposits
2013 Deposits
50
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
New UG females COE and Biological Sciences
300
42
250
37
28
35
39
31
29
45
36
37
21
1
2
24
6
8
6
14
12
31
38
19
1
2
16
4
6
12
3
1
33
36
15
37
12
3
1
11
10
4
18
20
16
4
3
16
37
25
24
14
10
10
19
8
2
17
3
3
32
22
20
11
4
1
19
33
29
23
18
5
12
19
24
2
3
36
27
8
4
14
3
7
10
4
22
32
34
33
27
31
33
37
38
37
26
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
150
General Engineering
Environmental Engineering
17
Electrical Engineering
7
8
Computer Engineering
13
100
50
2013
Civil Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
43
55
2012
Mechanical Engineering
Geological Engineering
0
2004
Biological Sciences
Materials Science and Engrg
24
19
19
13
6
33
20
200
10 year URM Admits
700
600
500
2004 Accepts
2005 Accepts
2006 Accepts
400
2007 Accepts
2008 Accepts
2009 Accepts
300
2010 Accepts
2011 Accepts
2012 Accepts
2013 Accepts
200
100
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
10 year URM Confirmations
180
160
140
2004 Deposits
120
2005 Deposits
2006 Deposits
100
2007 Deposits
2008 Deposits
2009 Deposits
80
2010 Deposits
2011 Deposits
2012 Deposits
60
2013 Deposits
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
Underrepresented minority new UG students
140
7
120
9
9
Software Engineering
100
Computer Science
Biological Sciences
29
9
1
6
2
1
6
3
2
13
4
19
1
2
5
5
6
7
5
1
5
2004
1
5
2005
1
7
3
4
12
1
0
3
3
5
1
6
1
3
6
7
5
4
2
1
2006
6
12
3
2
4
12
10
7
8
2
9
4
10
2
5
2
4
3
14
4
16
8
1
5
6
3
4
12
80
6
4
3
20
18
14
8
3
9
9
9
8
5
5
6
10
8
9
6
6
5
3
6
4
3
7
9
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
9
12
40
Geological Engineering
General Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
20
0
2013
Materials Science and Engrg
Computer Engineering
13
4
2012
60
4
8
6
Mechanical Engineering
Axis Title
1
4
Freshmen ACT Composite score comparison
28
27
26.0 26.1
26
Act Composite Score
25
25.5 25.4 25.4
25.3 25.3
26.4 26.3
26.7
25.6 25.6
25.1 25.2
Michigan Tech ACT Composite
24
National ACT Composite
23
22
21
21
21
21
21.1 21.2 21.1 21.1 21
20.8 20.8 20.9
21.1 21.1 21.1
20
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
First-Year Student Enrollment in College of Engineering by University
1400
1200
1000
Michigan Tech
Enrollment
Michigan State
800
University of Michigan
University of Michigan-Dearborn
MSOE
600
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Marquette University
400
200
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
20
Career goals
66%
62%
To have work/life balance
57%
57%
To be secure or stable in my job
42%
To be dedicated to a cause or to feel that I am serving a
greater good
49%
37%
34%
To be competitively or intellectually challenged
23%
26%
To be a leader or manager of people
To be a technical or functional expert
20%
9%
20%
23%
To be entrepreneurial or creative/innovative
To have an international career
To be autonomous or independent
12%
17%
11%
12%
• Below is a list of nine possible career goals. Which are most important to you? Please select a maximum of three alternatives.
Michigan Technological University
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
21
Students’ top 10 preferences
Michigan Technological University
All universities
emp 1. Secure employment
for it 1. Respect for its people
amic 2. A creative and dynamic work environment
emp 2. Secure employment
for it 3. Respect for its people
amic 3. A creative and dynamic work environment
ngin 4. Challenging work
ning a 4. Professional training and development
ork e 5. A friendly work environment
ork e 5. A friendly work environment
ovat 6. Innovation
uppo 6. Leaders who will support my development
f ass 7. Variety of assignments
ure e 7. High future earnings
ning
p op 8. Leadership opportunities
8. Professional training and development
l stan 9. Ethical standards
l stan 9. Ethical standards
uppo 10. Leaders who will support my development
for ad10. Clear path for advancement
Employer Reputation & Image
Job Characteristics
People & Culture
Remuneration & Advancement Opportunities
• How would you rate the relative importance of these aspects when choosing your Ideal Employer? Please divide 100 points between
the alternatives in accordance with importance.
• Which attributes do you perceive as the most attractive? Please select a maximum of three alternatives.
• This table shows the most attractive of the 40 attributes,
taking into account the overall importance of the driver
categories to the students. This analysis gives a
summarized 360 degree view of what influences
employer attractiveness.
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
22
Students’ top 10 preferences
Michigan Technological University
All universities
emp 1. Secure employment
for it 1. Respect for its people
amic 2. A creative and dynamic work environment
emp 2. Secure employment
for it 3. Respect for its people
amic 3. A creative and dynamic work environment
ngin 4. Challenging work
ning a 4. Professional training and development
ork e 5. A friendly work environment
ork e 5. A friendly work environment
ovat 6. Innovation
uppo 6. Leaders who will support my development
f ass 7. Variety of assignments
ure e 7. High future earnings
ning
p op 8. Leadership opportunities
8. Professional training and development
l stan 9. Ethical standards
l stan 9. Ethical standards
uppo 10. Leaders who will support my development
for ad10. Clear path for advancement
Employer Reputation & Image
Job Characteristics
People & Culture
Remuneration & Advancement Opportunities
• How would you rate the relative importance of these aspects when choosing your Ideal Employer? Please divide 100 points between
the alternatives in accordance with importance.
• Which attributes do you perceive as the most attractive? Please select a maximum of three alternatives.
• This table shows the most attractive of the 40 attributes,
taking into account the overall importance of the driver
categories to the students. This analysis gives a
summarized 360 degree view of what influences
employer attractiveness.
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
23
Attractive attributes | Job Characteristics
50%
50%
Secure employment
41%
Challenging work
32%
Professional training and
development
38%
42%
36%
Variety of assignments
27%
27%
28%
Flexible working conditions
24%
24%
High level of responsibility
Opportunities for international
travel/relocation
Team-oriented work
Control over my number of working
hours
Client interaction
22%
29%
22%
23%
14%
15%
11%
17%
Michigan Technological University
All universities
• Which attributes do you perceive as the most attractive? Please select a maximum of three alternatives.
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
24
Actual communication channels | Top 10
47%
Employer websites
42%
44%
Career fairs
27%
29%
TV advertisements
Employer presentations on campus
33%
21%
16%
21%
19%
Career guidance websites
20%
Social networks/communities
Job boards
Career guides/books
Professional networks/communities
Outdoor/billboard advertisements
33%
18%
16%
17%
16%
17%
24%
Michigan Technological University
16%
20%
• Through which channels have you learned about these employers? Please select as many alternatives as applicable.
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
25
Actual communication channels | Top 10
47%
Employer websites
42%
44%
Career fairs
27%
29%
TV advertisements
Employer presentations on campus
33%
21%
16%
21%
19%
Career guidance websites
20%
Social networks/communities
Job boards
Career guides/books
Professional networks/communities
Outdoor/billboard advertisements
33%
18%
16%
17%
16%
17%
24%
Michigan Technological University
16%
20%
• Through which channels have you learned about these employers? Please select as many alternatives as applicable.
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
26
Attractive attributes | Remuneration & Advancement Opportunities
38%
37%
Clear path for advancement
38%
43%
Leadership opportunities
36%
Competitive base salary
27%
35%
Competitive benefits
27%
34%
39%
Good reference for future career
34%
38%
High future earnings
31%
29%
Sponsorship of future education
Overtime pay/compensation
Performance-related bonus
Rapid promotion
13%
13%
12%
17%
9%
10%
Michigan Technological University
All universities
• Which attributes do you perceive as the most attractive? Please select a maximum of three alternatives.
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
27
Career Services | Feedback
Average satisfaction:
34%
Michigan Technological University
28%
8.1
21%
19%
19%
All universities
17%
15%
15%
7.7
9%
7%
6%
3%
0% 0%
1% 1%
1
2
1%
3
Michigan Technological University
3%
1%
4
5
6
POOR
• How would you rate the career services offered at your college or university?
7
8
9
10
EXCELLENT
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
28
Career Services | Importance
Michigan Technological University
Career / job / internship fairs
83%
Company database with job and internship postings
49%
General help with job/internship search and CV/interview
preparation
46%
Workshops (eg. resume writing, interviewing)
27%
Employer presentations
25%
Help with my career exploration and goals
23%
Personality or skills testing to better understand my career
direction
Online career advising
Virtual career fairs/meet-ups with employers
• Which of these career services are most important to you?
17%
9%
7%
Online
On campus events
Personal counselling
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
29
Factors affecting university choice
Prospects for future employment
66%
43%
Prestige/reputation
Offered a specific program or field of study
60%
49%
Learning environment and educational facilities
48%
Offered me a scholarship or financial aid
47%
55%
53%
40%
35%
Social environment and recreational activities
28%
Costs (e.g. tuition, living expenses, accommodation, etc.)
58%
26%
24%
Advice from current students and/or alumni
19%
Proximity to home/family
47%
19%
24%
Advice from family
9%
Opportunities for international travel and study abroad
Other
64%
45%
4%
4%
• Which of the following were the most integral factors in choosing your college or university?
24%
Michigan Technological University
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
30
Most attractive university attributes
High employment among graduates
49%
Good reputation among employers
45%
Provides the skills and knowledge for which
employers are looking
27%
31%
20%
17%
Practical curriculum
14%
Interesting courses
11%
Inspiring professors/lecturers
24%
24%
11%
13%
Appropriate ratio of students per professor/lecturer
8%
9%
Top quality of service facilities (e.g. libraries, dorms,
fitness facilities)
6%
Opportunities for international study/experience
5%
• Which attributes do you perceive as the most attractive?
66%
54%
47%
Good contacts with the employers in my field
Organizes a variety of social activities for students
69%
13%
Michigan Technological University
16%
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
31
Associated attributes with Michigan Technological University
Good reputation among employers
97%
High employment among graduates
91%
Provides the skills and knowledge for which employers are
looking
89%
Practical curriculum
73%
Good contacts with the employers in my field
73%
Interesting courses
72%
Appropriate ratio of students per professor/lecturer
68%
Organizes a variety of social activities for students
68%
Opportunities for international study/experience
Top quality of service facilities (e.g. libraries, dorms, fitness
facilities)
Inspiring professors/lecturers
• Which of the following attributes do you associate with each college or university?
61%
52%
47%
Current students
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
32
University recommendations
41%
36%
Average score:
Michigan Technological University
8.7
21%20%
21%
19%
All universities
8.4
12%
10%
5%
3%
1% 0%
1% 0%
1% 0%
1% 1%
1
2
3
4
VERY
UNLIKELY
2%
5
Michigan Technological University
3%
6
7
8
9
10
VERY
LIKELY
• Based on your experiences, how likely would you be to recommend your college or university to a friend or family member?
All universities
2013 | US | Students | All undergraduate students
33
Attractive attributes | People & Culture
A creative and dynamic work
environment
51%
46%
Respect for its people
48%
50%
47%
41%
A friendly work environment
Leaders who will support my
development
40%
41%
Recognizing performance
(meritocracy)
34%
30%
Enabling me to integrate personal
interests in my schedule
26%
22%
20%
19%
Recruiting only the best talent
11%
14%
Support for gender equality
Interaction with international clients
and colleagues
Acceptance towards minorities
8%
16%
Michigan Technological University
5%
12%
All universities
• Which attributes do you perceive as the most attractive? Please select a maximum of three alternatives.
Rank College/University
Michigan Technological Univ (MI)
Admitted
2,801
Confirmed
1,289
Yield
46.0%
Avg Position
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
University of Michigan - Ann Arbor (MI)
Michigan State University (MI)
Northern Michigan University (MI)
Western Michigan University (MI)
Grand Valley State University (MI)
Kettering University (MI)
Central Michigan University (MI)
Ferris State University (MI)
578
581
234
293
293
201
190
159
159
155
95
94
79
64
52
49
27.5%
26.7%
40.6%
32.1%
27.0%
31.8%
27.4%
30.8%
2.69
2.78
3.24
3.49
3.28
3.09
3.93
3.89
9
10
11
12
Lawrence Technological University (MI)
Oakland University (MI)
Wayne State University (MI)
Saginaw Valley State Univ (MI)
113
138
156
93
40
37
34
34
35.4%
26.8%
21.8%
36.6%
3.61
3.49
4.24
3.70
13
14
15
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (MN)
Lake Superior State University (MI)
Purdue University (IN)
157
90
123
33
33
32
21.0%
36.7%
26.0%
3.18
3.93
3.87
16
University of Wisconsin-Madison (WI)
129
27
20.9%
3.16
17
Milwaukee School of Engineering (WI)
121
25
20.7%
2.92
18
19
20
Rose Hulman Institute of Technology (IN)
Delta College (MI)
Gogebic Community College (MI)
92
44
39
24
23
22
26.1%
52.3%
56.4%
4.29
3.84
2.62
21
Grand Rapids Community College (MI)
50
21
42.0%
4.00
22
23
24
University of Wisconsin-Platteville (WI)
Finlandia University (MI)
Marquette University (WI)
81
40
110
19
19
18
23.5%
47.5%
16.4%
2.49
3.08
3.82
25
Massachusetts Inst of Technology (MA)
66
18
27.3%
3.53