ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
D I R E C T O R A T E O F P R O S E C U T I O N
H I M A C H A L P R A D E S H
WORKING OF DIRECTORATE
Historical background
Before the enactment of Criminal Procedure Code, 1974, Prosecution Agency of the
State was part of Police organization in Himachal Pradesh. The officials who were law graduates and manning the agency were appointed as Assistant Police
Prosecutors/Prosecuting Inspectors/Prosecuting Sub Inspectors. The Police Prosecutors were under the administrative control of the Superintendent of Police at District Level but over-all control rested with the Inspector General of Police of the State.
Prosecution agency after separation from Police was placed at the disposal of the
Law Department in the year 1974 and Cadre of Police Prosecutors was abolished. Regular cadre of prosecutors exists since 1974 and initially consisted of Deputy Director, District
Attorney-cum-Public Prosecutor, Assistant District Attorney-cum-Public Prosecutor and
Asstt. Public Prosecutor. Later on Asstt. Distt. Attorney was designated as District
Attorney and APP as Asstt. Distt. Attorney-cum-Public Prosecutor.
The Directorate of Prosecution came into existence in the year 1974 and Secretary
(Law)-cum-Legal Remembrancer was given the charge of post of Director (Prosecution) who used to supervise the working of prosecution agency throughout the State. Administrative control of the Director (Prosecution) was transferred from Law Department to the Home
Department in the year, 1996.
1

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Chapter-II
ESTABLISHMENT OF DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION
2.1.
ESTABLISHMENT OF DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION
Directorate was established on 1.4.1974 and at present it has the cadre strength of 167 Prosecutors which consists of one post of Director (prosecution), 3 of Joint Directors, 15 District Attorneys,
34 Deputy District Attorneys, 85 Assistant District Attorneys respectively. 4 Joint Directors, 11
District Attorneys, 9 Deputy District Attorneys and 5 Assistant District Attorneys are posted in other departments.
2.2.
REGULAR CADRE OF PROSECUTING OFFICERS
There exists a regular statutory cadre of Prosecuting Officers in the State of Himachal
Pradesh and the relevant provisions as contained in section 24 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 are reproduced as under:-
1. “Regular cadre of Prosecuting Officers” means a cadre of Prosecuting Officers which includes therein the post of a Public Prosecutor, by whatever name called and which provides for promotion of Assistant Public Prosecutors, by whatever name called to that post.
2.
'Prosecuting Officer' means a person, by whatever name called, appointed to perform the functions of a Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor or an Assistant Public
Prosecutor.
2.3.
PUBLIC PROSECUTORS.
(A) Classes of Public Prosecutors:
There are following categories of Prosecutors:
2

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
(1) Public Prosecutors/Addl. Public Prosecutors appointed for the High Courts in terms of section 24(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Criminal
Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 2005.
(2) Public Prosecutor appointed for the District in terms of section 24(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure 1973 and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act,
2005.
(3) Public Prosecutor/Addl. Public Prosecutor appointed for every district may also be designated as Public Prosecutors or as Addl. Public Prosecutors as the case may be, for another district in terms of section 24(3) of amended CrPC Act, 2005.
(4) Special Public Prosecutors: Appointed in terms of section 24(8) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 for the purpose of any particular case or class of case.
(5) Asstt. Public Prosecutors for conducting prosecution in the courts of
Magistrates/Executive Magistrates in terms of section 25(1) of code of Criminal
Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005.
2.4.
APPOINTMENT OF ASSTT. DISTT. ATTORNEY:
Appointment of Asstt. Distt. Attorneys are made by the Himachal Pradesh Government through Public Service Commission. They are eligible to be promoted as Deputy Distt.
Attorneys/public Prosecutors and Distt. Attorneys –cum-Public Prosecutors and Joint Director
–cum-Public Prosecutors and Director Prosecution. There exists a regular cadre of Prosecuting officers. Assistant District Attorneys are required to qualify departmental examination for the purpose of promotion as per the R & P Rules notified in this behalf. Departmental
Examination is conducted by Himachal Pradesh Institute of Public Administration, Shimla.
2.5.
APPEARANCE BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
(1) The Prosecutors detailed in para 2.3 may appear and plead without any written authority before any court in which that case is under inquiry, trial or appeal as also provided in section 301 of the Code.
(2) If in any such case any private person instructs a pleader to prosecute any person in any court, the public prosecutors or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of the case shall act under the directions of the Public Prosecutor or Additional/Assistant Public Prosecutor and may with the permission of the court, submit written arguments after the evidence is closed in the case.
3

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
(3) Any Magistrate under section 302 of the Code of Criminal Procedure inquiring into or trying a case may permit the Prosecution to be conducted by any person other than a public officer not below the rank of Inspector but no person, other than the Advocate
General or a Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor shall be entitled to do so without such permission.
(4) Provided that no police officer shall be permitted to conduct the prosecution if he has taken part in the investigation into the offence with respect to which the accused is being prosecuted.
(5) Any person conducting the prosecution may do so personally or by a pleader.
Note: It is only when a private advocate is entrusted with an independent charge of case, permission is necessary under section 302 of Code.
2.6.
DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION:
Newly amended section 25A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 provides for the appointment of the Director Prosecution and establishment of directorate of prosecution set out as under:
(2) The State Government may establish a Directorate of Prosecution consisting of Director of
Prosecution and as many Deputy Directors of Prosecution as it thinks fit.
(3) A person shall be eligible to be appointed as a Director of Prosecution or a Deputy
Director of Prosecution, only if he has been in practice as an advocate for not less than ten years and such appointment shall be made with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the
High Court.
(4) The Head of the Directorate of Prosecution shall be the Director of Prosecution, who shall function under the administrative control of the Head of the Home Department in the State.
(5) Every Deputy Director of Prosecution shall be subordinate to the Director of Prosecution.
(6) Every Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor and Special Public Prosecutor appointed by the State Government under sub-section (1), or as the case may be, subsection(8), of section 24 to conduct cases in the High Court shall be subordinate to the
Director of Prosecution.
4

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
(7) Every Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor and Special Public Prosecutor appointed by the State Government under sub-section (3), or as the case may be, subsections (8), of section 24 to conduct cases in District Courts and every Assistant Prosecutor appointed under sub-section (1) of section 25 shall be subordinate to the Deputy Director of
Prosecution.
(8) The powers and functions of the Director of Prosecution and the Deputy Directors of
Prosecution and the areas for which each of the Deputy Directors of Prosecution have been appointed shall be such as the State Government may, by notification, specify.
(9) The provisions of this section shall not apply to the Advocate General for the State while performing the functions of Public Prosecutor.
2.7.
FUNCTIONS OF THE PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT
(i) Prosecution of criminal cases in the court of Sessions Judge and Judicial
Magistrate.
(ii) Institution and defence of suits or proceedings filed by or against the Government in the court of Distt. Judge, subordinate courts, State Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum and before Presiding Officer
Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rent Controller etc.
(iii) Drafting/vetting of plaints/written statements/replies including notices under section 80 CPC on behalf of the State Government and Public servants.
(iv) To conduct revenue cases before the FC/Divisional Commissioner/Settlement
Collectors.
(v) Opinion to government departments in legal, and service matters.
(vi) Planning, budgeting, human resource management and infrastructure, management of the Prosecution Department.
(vii) Scrutiny of police challans and legal opinion to investigating agency.
5

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
(viii) Drafting/vetting/filing of civil, criminal and revenue appeals and revisions etc.
2.8.
POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION):
States Govt. vide notification has notified the powers and functions of the Director of
Prosecution which are summarized as under:-
1.
Director (Prosecution) heads Prosecution agency of the State and exercise the control over Prosecution Department in the matters relating to planning, budget, human resource management and infrastructure management and shall be the Head of the
2.
3.
4.
Prosecution Department, while exercising the financial powers under the Himachal
Pradesh Financial Rules.
Appointing and Disciplinary Authority under provisions of Central Civil Service
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 and Central Civil Service Conduct
Rules, 1964 in respect of Class III and IV employees of Prosecution Department shall also rest with the Director Prosecution
Director shall be the reviewing authority in the case of Class-I(Gazetted Officers ) and accepting authority in the case of Class III employees posted in the Prosecution
Department for the purpose of Annual Confidential Reports.
The Director of Prosecution is also vested with the powers to,- i) Render necessary guidance advice and clarifications to all the prosecuting officers of the Department from time to time in relation to legal, financial and service matters in accordance with the orders and instructions issued by the
Government. ii) Review working of all the Prosecutors/Government Pleaders at the
Directorate level besides supervising the Prosecution and to keep liaison with the State Government and its Departments and to tender legal opinion on various matters.
6

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 iii) Ensure compliance on the instructions, which are issued by the State government from time to time, from the prosecutors for effective conduct of government cases. iv) Advise Home Department on all matters relating to Prosecution of offences. v) Coordinate with Police Department to ensure adequate synergy between investigation and prosecution. vi) Conduct inspections of the subordinate offices of the Prosecution Department in the State and issue necessary guidelines to the officers and officials as deemed necessary. vii) Sanction earned leave of the Gazetted Officers of the Prosecution Department as per powers delegated and. contained in letter No. Home (Prose.)B (2)1/02 dt. 26.2.07.
2.9.
JOINT DIRECTORS (PROSECUTION)
In the Prosecution Department, 3 posts of Joint Director (Prosecution) are sanctioned out of which one post of Joint Director (Prosecution) is in North Zone, Dharamshala. Two Joint
Director (Prosecution) are working in the Directorate of Prosecution, Hqrs to aid and assist the Director (Prosecution) in the day to day functioning of the Directorate and the Joint
Director (Prosecution) North Zone, Dharamshala is supervising the prosecution work of the
District Kangra, Chamba, Hamirpur, Una and also conducting inspection of the same.
The Joint Directors (Prosecution) have been designated as Prosecutors vide Government notification dt. 28.8.1988 who are also required to conduct trial and appear in the courts with in the State of Himachal Pradesh in important cases as and when ordered by the State
Government/Director (Prosecution).
2.10.
ESTABLISHMENT OF DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION:
The Directorate of Prosecution consists of following sections:
7

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
1.
Administrative Branch
2.
Litigation (I) Branch
3.
Litigation Cell
4.
Accounts Branch.
1.
ADMINISTRATIVE BRANCH: Main function of the establishment branch of the
Directorate is to deal with the matters relating to maintenance of service record/transfers/posting of the Class III and IV employees of the Prosecution Department, planning, budgeting, human resource management and infrastructure management and also to issue necessary instructions/guidelines to the sub-ordinate offices which are received from the Government from time to time. This section also deals with conducting refresher course for the law officers in the National Institute of Criminology &
Forensic Science, Delhi, SVP National Police Academy, Hyderabad and Himachal Pradesh Institute of Public Administration (HIPPA).This branch works under the supervision of Superintendent Grade
I.
2.
LITIGATION BRANCH (I): This branch deals with the maintenance of data of criminal and civil cases, scrutinizing of monthly diaries of the cases received from all districts, issuance/forwarding of directions/instruction of Government from time to time to all the sub-ordinate office in Himachal Pradesh and to monitor conviction rate and keeping record of the inspection of the prosecution agency. This branch also keeps record of the opinion tendered by the officers of the Directorate to other departments and reviews all criminal cases pending in the courts and preparation of Annual Administration Reports.This branch also deals with all the payment pertaining to Supreme Court matters. Litigation branch (i) works under the supervision of the Joint Director (Prosecution) Hqrs of the
Directorate.
8

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
3.
LITIGATION CELL (FOR FILING APPEALS ETC.):
Recently State of Himachal Pradesh has sanctioned six posts of various categories i.e. one District Attorney, one Dy. District Attorney, one senior assistant, one Jr. S Stenographer and two clerks for Litigation Cell in the Directorate of Prosecution for the examination of judgments passed by various courts. In this section the copies of judgment received from Home Department are examined, analyzed and recommended for filing appeal/revision before the high Court. This branch shall also function under the supervision of Joint Director (Prosecution) H Qtr.of this Directorate.
4.
ACCOUNTS BRANCH: This branch deals with the accounts matter, processing of medical claims/reimbursement senior officials including pensioners/retirees, store and purchase of the Directorate, preparation and maintenance of pay bills, cash books etc.
2.11
WORKING OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY (REVENUE) H.P:
The Distt. Attorney (Revenue) conducts the revenue cases in the courts of Financial
Commissioner (Appeal)/(Revenue)/Divisional Commissioner/State Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission and Settlement Commissioner at Shimla and circuit court of FC and
Divisional Commissioner. The aforesaid officer after examining the judgments of these courts submits the record alongwith his opinion and drafts for appeal/REVISION to the department concerned. Distt. Attorney (Revenue) shall also perform any other duty assigned by the Director (Prosecution).
2.12
WORKING OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY (FOREST)
The Distt. Attorney (Forest) conducts the Forest cases before the Special Judge (Forest) in which forest produce is involved. He is also the Office-in-Charge and Drawing and
Disbursing Officer and looks after the establishment and accounts section of the office. In addition to this he also does the scrutiny of police challans and examines all cases of
9

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 acquittal, discharge and inadequate sentence and sends cases for appeal/revision to the
Home Department through District Magistrate. Distt. Attorney (Forest) shall also perform any other duty assigned by the Director (Prosecution).
2.13
ORKING OF DISTT. ATTORNEY, LEGAL CELL AT NEW DELHI.
The District attorney posted at H.P. Legal Cell, New Delhi is functioning as liaison officer between the State Govt. and the Counsels engaged in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the State cases. All the SLPs/appeals/cases which are to be filed by the State Govt. in the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India are sent to the Distt. Attorney, Legal Cell for further action in the matter. He is also the Office-In-Charge and functions as Drawing and disbursing
Officer. All type of payments including the counsel fee bills are paid through him to the concerned counsels engaged by the State of HP for their appearance in the Hon’ble
Supreme court of India. Distt. Attorney shall also perform any other duty assigned by the
Director (Prosecution).
10

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Chapter-III
District Prosecution Agency
3.1
District Magistrate: District Magistrate is the head of the district prosecution agency and this affords him a further opportunity of keeping in touch with the work of all courts. It is easy for him to arrange monthly coordination meetings with the Superintendent of Police and Public
Prosecutors to watch the progress and results of criminal cases in the courts as per the instructions.
3.2
DISTRICT ATTORNEY : The District Attorneys while functioning as Public Prosecutor /Govt.
Pleader works as under :-
(A) Functions and duties i) The District Attorney is over all incharge of district prosecution agency and responsible for conducting of state cases including civil, criminal and other miscellaneous matters through out the district and tender opinion on legal matter to the government department, scrutinize and monitor the challans prepare , proposal for filing appeals in civil/criminal matters etc. ii) Distt. Attorney shall also perform any duty assigned by the Director
(Prosecution). iii) District Attorney conducts criminal/civil/revenue/MACT/reference consumer cases pending before the court of District & Sessions Judge.
(B) SUPERVISION & CONTROL : i) District Attorney is the controlling officer of all the Law officers of his District and the Ministerial staff in his office and competent to sanction casual leave to the officers and such staff. Except for law officers District Attorney is the competent authority for sanctioning earned up to one month to the ministerial
11

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 staff. District Attorney shall also be controlling officer of Dy. Distt. Attorney,
Fast Track Courts (FTC). ii) District Attorney is also required to review and supervise the working of
Deputy Distt. Attorneys Asstt. Distt. Attorneys and give proper guidance to these Law Officers for effective conduct of cases.
(C) COURT WORK & LEGAL OPINION i) The Distt. Attorney conducts Criminal/ civil/ revenue/ appeals/ revision/ reference/ MACT/Consumer cases and other Misc. work in the court of Distt.
& Session judge & District Consumer Redressal Forum as the case may be on behalf of the State of HP. ii) The State Govt. may also direct the District Attorney to conduct any particular case of public importance in any court with in the District.. iii) District Attorney also tenders legal opinion on various matters to the Deputy
Commissioner, Superintendent of Police and to different departments in the
District. iv) District. Attorney in each State case decided by of District & Sessions Judge, examines feasibility of filing appeal/revision etc. on the receipt of certified copies and submits his recommendation to the State Govt. through Distt.
Magistrates accompanying prescribed proformas; and in civil cases after the decision, the cases are examined and the same are sent to the concerned department along with complete record of the case for filing appeal/revision etc. as the case may be.
D) SCRUTINY: i) The Distt. Attorneys also scrutinizes police challan relating to Sessions Court and give final opinion in all other sessions trial pertaining to court of Addl.
12

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Sessions Judge/special Judge and fast Track Courts which are submitted to him by the Deputy District Attorneys from time to time. ii) District attorney gives final opinion in all the specially reported cases (SRC) in the District and devolves process to monitor the same effectively. iii) District Attorney also takes steps for monitoring the Police challan duly scrutinized by the prosecutors, who are posted in the Sub-divisions and are sent, for trial in the Sub-divisional Courts.
E) QUARTERLY MEETINGS : i) Quarterly meeting of all the Prosecutors posted in the District are held in the
District headquarter by the District Attorney to apprise the Prosecutors about all the important legal issues/judgments/amendments/orders/rules/drafting skill/proposals etc. with which each and every Prosecutor in the State is required to be well equipped.
F) CO-ORDINATION & LIAISON: i) District Attorney keeps close liaison with District Magistrate and
Superintendent of Police in the District and apprise them about every sensitive and important case pending in the various Courts so that State govt. could also have update knowledge about such important cases. ii) Monthly co-ordination meeting with District magistrate and Superintendent of
Police are held regulsarly and attended by the District Attorneys.
3.3
WORKING OF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS i) Deputy Distt. Attorneys works under the over all control and supervision of the
Distt. Attorney. ii) Deputy Distt. Attorney’s drafts plaint/written statements/replies and affidavits relating to his court and matters assigned to him by the Distt. Attorney.
13

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 iii) Deputy Distt. Attorney conducts Civil Criminal, Revenue and other misc. work in the Courts of Addl. Distt. & Session Judge. He also looks after the work, which is assigned to him by the Distt. Attorneys and during the leave period of
Distt. Attorneys, he attends the court work of Distt. & Sessions Judge and other
Administrative and miscellaneous work in addition to his own duties. He also examines decided cases relating to his court on the receipt of certified copies and submits proposal of appeals/revisions etc. and also does scrutiny of police challans assigned to him by the District Attorney and also renders legal opinion on different matters and submits his opinion to the District Attorney concerned.
3.4
WORKING OF DEPUTY DISTT. ATTORNEY IN FAST TRACK COURTS
State Govt. has recently created nine post of Dy. Distt. Attorneys on secondment in the newly created Fast Track Courts at Dharamshala, Una, Chamba, Hamirpur, Ghumarwin,
Solan, Kullu and Mandi and they are conducting sessions trials/cr. Appeals etc. before the
Presiding Officers of the Fast Track Courts and they also examine the decided cases on the receipt of certified copies. After examining the judgment of the court, the officer prefers appeals/revisions and submits papers to the District Attorney for further action. Dy. Distt.
Attorney (Fast Track Courts) works under the direct control and supervision of the District
Attorney and also attends/conducts other court matter and tenders legal opinion on the matters as may be assigned to him by the District Attorneys. He shall draft plaint/written statements/replies and affidavits relating to his court and matters assigned to him by the
Distt. Attorney.
3.5
WORKING OF ASSTT. DISTT. ATTORNEYS AT DISTT. HQRS.
The Asstt. Distt. Attorney works under the over all supervision of Distt. Attorney in the district and conducts cases in the courts of Chief Judicial Magistrates and other judicial
Magistrates. He also examines judgments of acquittals, discharge and cases of inadequate
14

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 sentence and submits its opinion/reports to the Districts Attorney for taking further action.
The aforesaid officer at the Distt. HQ. Conducts Govt. cases in Revenue/Executive courts and takes further action for appeals/revision after decision. Scrutiny of the police challan relating to his court or as marked to him by the District Attorney before its submission to the concerned courts is also carried out by him and also looks after the additional work, which is assigned to him by the Distt. Attorney. He shall draft plaint/written statements/replies and affidavits relating to his court and matters assigned to him by the
Distt. Attorney.
3.6
WORKING OF ASSTT DISTT. ATTORNEY AT SUB -DIVISION LEVEL:
The Asstt. Distt. Attorneys is Assistant Public prosecutor for the purpose of section 24 of Cr
PC are also posted at the Sub -Divisional level. A.P.P.s conducts the cases in the courts of
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrates and other judicial magistrates posted in the sub-division.
He looks after the state cases and conducts civil, criminal cases etc. and give his opinion on each decided cases ending in acquittal, conviction, discharge etc. and submit the judgment alongwith legal opinion to the Distt. Attorney concerned for taking further action.. The aforesaid officer also appears in the revenue courts/executive courts on behalf of State of
HP. He also does the scrutiny of police challans before forwarding the same to the concerned courts. The Asstt. Distt. Attorney is the officer-in-charge of the Prosecution
Department at Sub -Division level and also exercises the powers of Drawing and Disbursing
Officer. He also looks after the Establishment and account work of the office at Subdivision level. He shall draft plaint/written statements/replies and affidavits relating to his court and matters assigned to him by the Distt. Attorney.
15

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
3.7 District Attorney (Litigation Cell) Shimla:
Recently Govt. has established litigation cell in the Directorate for examination of certified copies and legality of judgements in Special Reported
Cases & other cases, in-adequacy of senctence and proposal for filing appeal etc. For this purpose one post of Distt.Attorney, one post of Deputy District
Attorney,one post of Sr.Asstt.,one post of Jr.Scale Stenographer and two posts of
Clerks have been created.This Cell will start functioning in the month of
April,2007.Hence, progress for the year 2006-07 is nil.
***
16

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Chapter-IV
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
Establishment & Vacant Post.
1
2
3
4
10
11
12
13
6
7
8
9
14
15
16
17
1
2
3
4
5
1. Directorate of Prosecution: Total Sanctioned and Vacant posts.
Demand No.3(Non-
Pnan )
1. 2.
Sr.No. Post
3.
Sanctioned post
4. 5. 6.
Filled up Vacant Remarsks.
Diurector(Perosecution)
Joint Director(Prosecution
Distt.Attorneys
Dy.Distt.Attorneys
Asstt.Distt.Attorneys
)
1
3
14
24
83
1
3
14
17
52
0
0
0
7
31
Supdt. Grade-I
Supdt. Grade-II
Persosnal Assistant
Senior Assistants
Librarian
Junior Scale Stenographer
Steno Typist
Clerks
Drivers
Peons
Chowkidars
Sweeper
Total
Dy.Distt.Attorney
Clerks
Peons
Total
1
1
1
17
1
13
3
78
3
71
3
1
318
Demand No.3(Plan)
9
9
9
27
1
1
1
16
0
9
0
68
3
57
3
1
244
6
7
8
21
0
0
0
1
1
4
3
10
0
14
0
0
74
3
2
1
6
Distt.Attorneys
Dy.Distt.Attorneys
Asstt.Distt.Attorneys
Senior Assistants
Junior Scale Stenographer
Clerks
Peons
Chowidar
Total
Demand No.31(NON
PLAN)
1
1
2
3
1
13
1
1
3
2
1
11
1
-
2
1
1
3
-
1
-
-
-
-
1
-
2
17

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Detail of sanctioned strength of daily wages staff (Dwemand No. 3)
1
2
3
Peon
Sweeper
Chowkidar
Total
4
6
1
11
2
6
1
9
2
-
-
2
Total 318+27+13+11 = 369
10. Law Officer under Prosecution Department who are working in other departments:
1 .
State Vigilance
1. Sh. Balbir Singh Thakur, Joint Director (Prosecution), Shimla.
2. Sh. Jawahar Sharma, Joint Director (Prosecution), Shimla.
3. Sh. S.S. Bhatti, Distt. Attorney, South Zone.
4. Sh. A.K. Pattarwal, Distt. Attorney, North Zone.
5. Sh. R.L.Saini, Distt. Attorney, Central Zone.
6. Sh. M.R. Sharma, District Attorney, Hqrs.
7. Sh. N.S.Verma, Deputy District Attorney,
8. Distt. Attorney, Hqrs. (Vacant),
9. Sh. Kulvir Chauhan, Asstt.Distt.Attorney, S.Z. Shimla.
10. Smt.Gulab Negi, Asstt. Distt. Attorney, S.Z. Shimla.
2. EDUCATION DEPARTMENT :
11. Sh.C.B.Acharya, Distt. Attorney, (Secondary),
12. Sh. R.P.Kashav, Distt. Attorney, (Primary)
3 . POLICE TRAINING COLLEGE, DAROH ( PALAMPUR
13. Sh. A.S. Rana, Joint Director (Prosecution).
):
14. Sh. R.R. Mastana, Distt. Attorney
15. Dy. Distt. Attorney, (vacant).
4 . HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, HP, SHIMLA -
16. Sh. J.S. Rana, Dy.Distt. Attorney.
5 . RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATI RAJ, SHIMLA 9 :
17. Sh. Mohinder Chauhan, Asstt. Distt. Attorney
9 .
18

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
6 . EXC :
18. Sh. P.R.Patiyal ,Distt Attorney.
7 . :
19. Sh. Purinder Sharma,Dy. Distt. Attorney, Shimla.
20. Sh. Ashok Sugyan,Dy. Distt. Attorney, PWD NZ, D/Shala.
21. Dy .Distt. Attorney, PWD Mandi (Vacant).
8 . TOWN :
22. Sh. Giri Raj Singh, Asstt. Distt. Attorney.
9 . HP PRISON DEPARTMENT, .
23. Sh. Chander Mohan, Asstt. Distt. Attorney,
10 . POLICE HEADQUARTER :
24. Sh. H.S. Rana, Joint Director (Prosecution), Police Hqrs
11 . INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM .
25. Sh. T.C. Kainthla, Deputy Distt. Attorney, Shimla.
26. Sh. Hardayal Singh, Deputy District Attorney, Shimla.
12 . Beas Bhakra Management Board, Nangal .
27. Sh. Tara Chand, District Attorney.
At the end of the year 2005-06, 69 posts under different categories were vacant, wherein 1 post of District Attorney, 2 posts of Dy.Distt. Attorneys, 26 posts of Asstt. Distt. Attorneys, 2 posts of Senior Assistant, 3 posts of Junior Scale
Stenographer, 3 posts of Steno typists, one post of Librarian 14 posts of Clerks and
17 posts of Peons were lying vacant.
Out of aforesaid vacant posts during the year 2006-07, 1 post of District
Attorney, 17 posts of Assistant District Attorneys, 4 posts of Clerks, 5 posts of
19

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 peons have been filled up. At the end of the year 2006-07 following posts are lying vacant:
1.
Deputy Distt. Attorney
2.
Asstt. Distt. Attorney
3.
4.
Senior Assistants.
Junior Scale Stenographer
5.
6.
Steno-Typist
Librarian
7.
8.
Clerks(Regular)
Clerks(Contract basis)
9.
Peon(Regular 14, Contract 1 & daily 2)
10
31
1
4
3
1
10
2
17
The posts of Librarian, Junior Scale Stenographers, Steno-typist and
Clerks are to be filled-up by direct recruitment as per the Govt. instructions. These posts cannot be filled without the prior approval of the Finance Department which is still awaited. However, requisition has been sent to the H.P. Subordinate Services
Selection Board, Hamirpur, for filling up the posts Junior Scale Stenographer and steno typist, but so far no name has been sponsored.
20

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Chapter-V
1. CRIMINAL CASES:
During the year 2006 07 in the beginning as on 1.4.2006
there were
38021 cases under Indian Penal Code and Special/other laws in various courts in the
State of H.P., were pending. 165 new cases were instituted during the year
2006-07 and in 217 6 cases accused were convicted and in 73 87 cases accused were acquitted . 28 Cases were withdrawn.In 34 5 cases proceedings have been abated /stopped due to the death of the accused persons and declaration of accused as proclaimed offender. 45 22 Cases were transferred to different courts.
39 Cases were discharged and 12 73 cases were compromised. Hence, at the end of the year 2006-07 as on 31.3.2007, 3843 1 cases were pending in the different courts.
The rate of conviction during the year 2006-07 is 23 Detailed statement of criminal cases is given in annexure A .
2 DETAIL RELATING TO CRIMINAL APPEALS/REVISIONS :
During the year, 2006 07 in the beginning there were 803 Criminal appeals/ revision pending in different courts of the State. 8 01 Criminal
Appeals/revisions were instituted during the year 2006-07. 196 Cr.
Appeals/revisions were decided against the State and 183 Cr.Appeals/revisions conviction of the accused persons were maintained and as such they were decided in favour of the State. 1 Cases of appeals/revisions were transferred to other courts.
1 4 Cases were compromised and as such percentage of success to the State during the year 2006 07 is 48 % . Thus the number of appeals/revisions at the end of the year 2006 is 10 19 . Detailed statement of Criminal Appeals/revisions is attached as Annexure 2
3 JUDICIAL WORK OF CIVIL CASES
During the year, 2006 07 in the beginning as on 1.4.2006
, there were
38 65 civil cases pending in various courts of the State 1531 cases were instituted during the year, 2006-07, 98 cases were decided in favour of the State. 138 casess were decided against the State and 30 cases were compromised. 58 Cases were withdrawn from the courts. 369 cases were transferred to other courts.
Hence, at the close of the year as on 31.3.2007
number of cases pending is 3821 .
The percentage of success in civil cases during the year under reference is 88 % which is quite encouraging. The detailed statement of civil cases during the year under reference is given in Annexure A -
21

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
HP LEGAL CELL, NEW DELHI (SUPREME COURT CASES )
(a) CIVIL MATTERS :
There were 148 cases pending in the beginning of the year, 2006 07 . 46 civil cases were instituted during the year 2006-07. 24 cases were decided in favour of the State and 15 cases were decided against the State. Hence at the end of the year 2006-07, 155 cases remained pending.
(b) CRIMINAL & OTHER MATTERS :
In beginning of the year 2006-07, 77 cases were pending in the
Hon’ ble Supreme Court of India and 33 cases were presented in the year 2006-
07. 7 cases were decided in favour of State and 20 were decided against the State.
Hence 83 cases remained pending at the end of the year 2006 07
5.... PROCEEDINGS UNDER PREVENTIVE SECTIONS OF CR.P.C.
At the beginning of the year 2006 07 , 38 87 cases under the preventive sections of Cr.PC were pending. 3 217 cases were instituted during the year 2006-07 in the courts of different Executive Magistrates. 15 Cases persons were bound down after furnishing security and 3056 cases were discharged, 83 cases were compromised and 104 cases were transferred. Hence, at the end of the year 2006 -
07 , 3 846 cases were pending in different preventive sections of Cr.PC. Detailed
Statement of security cases is attached as Annexure A -4 . Proceedings under sections 107/109/145 Cr.PC were instituted directly by the Police before the
Executive Magistrates as preventive measure to maintain the law and order.
6 . REVENUE CASES
At the beginning of the year 2006 07 , 556 cases were pending. 299 cases were instituted during the year, 2006-07. 292 cases were decided in favour of the State and 27 cases were decided against the State. 17 cases were transferred.
Hence, at the end of year 2006-07, 519 cases were pending.
7.
At the beginning of the year, 2006 07 , 15 cases were pending before the Special Judge (Forest) Shimla. No case was instituted during the year. One case was convicted and 8 Cases were acquitted and in 3 cases untraced report was prepared. Hence , cases were pending at the close of the year 2006 0 7.
22

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
1.
Chapter-VI
TRAINING PROGRAMME :
In addition to this, various courses on financial administration, service matters, Court procedure on CrPC, revenue laws, Course on human rights, Good
Governance and E-mail/internet, Protection of Consumer Rights Act, Civil
Misconduct were attended by the Officers of this department at HIPA. During the year many law officers were also sent for for refresher courses on criminal law in the Institute of Criminology and Forensic Science at New Delhi.
2
During the year 2005-06 there was no para pending with Public
Accounts Committee pertaining to this Department. At the end of the year 2005-06 there were 24 reports and 48 paras pending for compliance. Out of the aforesaid pending reports/paras during the year 2006-07 , 2 reports and 7 new paras /audit notes of the department and were made. During the year 2006 07 , 4 paras / audit test notes have been settled. Hence, at the end of the year 2006 only 26 reports and 51 paras/Audt Test Notes remained pending for settlement. During the year
2006 the steps were taken by the department for the settlement of the paras stated in the audit reports.
3 . REGARDING RULES AND REGULATIONS :
The recruitment and promotion rules for all the categories of employees have been finalised.
4. MEETING OF DEAPRTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE :
During the year 2006-07, 5 meetings of departmental promotion committee were held, 2 for giving benefits of Assured Career Progression
Scheme to eleigible Class III/IV employees, 3 for promotion of Senior Assistant and
Clerks.
5.
SENIORITY LISTS :
This department has released the seniority lists of all the Class III and
IV employees.
23

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
6.
CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS :
The confidential reports for the year 2005-06 of Class III employees of this department have been completed.
7. USE OF HINDI
Almost all the work of this department except legal work is being done in Hindi. However, some legal work was also done in Hindi .
8. BUDGET
The detail of the amount, which is received from the Government on different sub Heads for the year 2005-06 under demand No. 3 and 31 is attached as
Annexure A 5 for perusal. Under this department, expcept Directorate other 39 offices are included under demand No. 3 and 31 offices fall under the demand No.
31.
During the year 2006-07 under the sub head Office Expenses less amount was allotted and the amount allotted was not sufficient to cope up with the pending bills of this Directorate. It is, therefore necessary that sufficient funds be provided under the above mentioned sub head for the smooth functioining of this
Directorate.
9 . DIFFICULTIES :
This department is not having sufficient ministerial staff to cope up with the day to day work. At the Head quarter level only one Asstt. 2 Clerks, one Junior
Scale Stenographer, 2 peons are posted with the Distt. Attorneys whereas at
Dharamshala, Chamba, Hamirpur, Una, Bilaspur, Solan, Nahan, Shimla, Kullu and
Mandi, the number of Law Officers are more than 5 and 6 and require more supporting staff. Thus the Law Officers are facing great hardship and work of the department is also suffereing. The private advocates always have sufficient staff to assist them, but as compared to the private advocates the law officers of this department have no sufficient manpower to assist them. In this deprtment one post of junior scale stenographer had been sanctioned for each district head quarter level.
However, at the sub divisional level there is no post of stenographer and as such the work of this department is also suffering at sub divisional level in the absence of stenos. The post of steno is very much essential for the smooth and effective functioning of the offices at the sub divisional level.
It is, therefore, necessary that for the proper functioning of the work of this department, one post of clerk with each law officer at District Level and one post of Steno at each Sub Divisional level should be sanctioned.
24

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
At the District HQ level the Distt. Attorney is the office-in-charge. He looks after the work of establishment/financial matters etc. In addition to legal works and mostly remains busy in the courts. Hence, the post of Superintendent, Grade II is very essential for the smooth working of office of District Attorneys at the Distt.
Level. At the Distt. level, law officers have been attached with the judicial courts and they remained busy in the judicial work for whole day and as such the cases before the Revenue courts/Executive Magistrate are not attended to. It is essential that in each district HQ and sub divisional level additional post of Asstt. Distt. Attorney is created so that work may not suffer. This department has taken steps for the creation of above posts in the past, many times with the Government and is still under conisderation with the Govt.
In addition to this, it is pointed out that presently law officers/officials at the District level/sub divisional level have not been provided suitable official/residential accommodation. This matter also requires urgent attention.
10.
In the current financial year 3 posts of Deputy District Attorney & 7 posts of Assistant District Attorneys has been created in the office District
Superintendent of Police to scrutinze the cases/legal advise etc. 5 posts of Deputy
District has also been created in prosecution department for scrutinizing the cases,legal advise and to give opinion in cases.During the year under reference one post of District Attorney, one post of Deputy District Attorney, one post of Senior
Assistant, one post of Junior Scale Stenographer and two posts of clerks have also been created in the prosecution department for litigation cell. This Department has provided computers at Distt. Hqrs and Sub Divisional Level which will help in monitoring of court cases and will increase the efficiency of Law Officers as the computers have become most indispensable accesory in the modern office working.
PROSPECTIVE PLAN OF THE DEPA RTMENT .
The Department is considering providing Law Officers in the office of
Supdt. of Police to tender legal advice at the stage of investigation which will improve the quality of investigation and increase the rate of conviction in criminal cases.
In order to protect the state interest in revenue cases pending before the revenue courts, the Department has also sent a proporsal to the Govt. to provide
Law Officers exclusively for these courts which will facilitate the early disposal of revenue cases and the property of the state worth crores of rupees will be protected. In addition to this, since there are large number of court cases of the
Department of Education and Health, pending adjudication in the courts & additional
Law officers are required to process and lookafter these cases, for this the
Department is considering to provide additional staff to deal with the court cases and
25

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007 to protect the interest of State. Efforts are afoot to increase the rate of conviction by applying latest technology i.e. Forensic science etc., in the prosecution of criminla cases.
12 INSPECTION :
Periodic inspections of the offices of District Prosecution agency and sub divisional level prosecution agency are carried out by the Director (Prosecution)
& Joint Director (Prosecution). The heads of the District Prosecution Agency have been instructed to inspect the office of Prosecution agencies in the Sub Division level within their jurisdiction.
13 RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
During the year 2006 -07 no application under the Right to Information
Act has been received in the department. Hence, report in the matter is Nil.
14. Conviction Rate
2.13.1.1
IN TRIAL COURTS:
Conviction rate in criminal cases conducted before different Trial Courts in
H.P. w.e.f. 1.4.2006 to 28.2.2007 figured at 23%. For the corresponding period during last preceding year it was at 16 %. Therefore, there is marked improvement in conviction rate and further steps are being taken to enhance the same by issuing directions to the prosecutors of this Directorate to increase their performance and efficiency accordingly.
2.13.1.2
In Appellate Courts
In criminal appeals/revisions preferred/instituted by the State of H.P. before the different appelatte Courts of Ld. Sessions Judge/Additional Sessions
Judge/Fast Track Courts respectively against the judgment of acquittals/orders passed by the Judicial Magistrates, the success rate of acceptance of appeal/revision in favour of State of H.P., comes to 48 % which is quite encouraging and shows the effective performance by the Prosecution agency.
26

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
15 GENERAL
On the whole, the work of the prosecution agency in the State during the year
2006-07 has been found satisfactory. Efforts are being made to streamline the functioning of the Prosecution Department with a view to achieve a higher level of conviction rate so that
HP becomes number one state in the field.
Joint Director (Prosecution),
Himachal Pradesh.
27

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
Sr.
No.
1.
1.
2.
3.
Distt. Attorneys
4.
Dy. Distt. Attorneys
5.
Asstt. Distt. Attorneys
6.
Supdt. Grade I
7.
Supdt. Grade II
8.
Personal Asstt.
9.
Senior Asstts.
10.
Librarian
11.
Junior Scale Stenographers
12.
Steno typists
13.
Clerks
14.
Drivers
15.
Peons
16.
Chowkidars
17.
Sweeper
Sr.
No.
1.
1
DETAIL OF SANCTIONED STRENGTH OF STAFF ANNEXURE- A
DEMAND NO. 3(NON PLAN)
Category of post of Remarks Number sanctioned posts
Number of posts filled up
Number of vacant posts
2.
Director Prosecution
Joint Director Prosecution
Total
Category of post
2.
Dy.Distt. Attorney
2 Clerks
3 Peons
Total
3.
1
3
14
24
83
1
1
1
17
1
13
3
78
3
71
9
9
27
4.
1
3
14
17
52
1
1
1
16
0
9
0
66
3
54
3
1
3
1
318
DEMAND NO. 3(PLAN)
Number sanctioned of
239
Number posts of filled posts up
3.
9
4.
6
7
9
22
5.
0
0
0
7
31
0
0
0
1
1
4
3
12
0
17
0
0
79
Number of vacant posts
5.
3
2
-
5
6.
6.
Remarks
Sr.
No.
Category of post
1. 2.
1 Distt. Attorneys
2 Dy. Distt. Attorneys
3 Asstt. Distt. Attorneys
4 Senior Asstts.
5 Junior Scale Stenographers
6 Clerks
7 Peons
8 Chowkidar
Total
DEMAND NO. 31(NON PLAN)
Number of Number of sanctioned posts
3. posts filled up
4.
1
1
2
1
-
2
1
1
3
3
1
13
1
1
3
2
1
11
28
Number of vacant posts
5.
-
1
-
-
-
-
1
-
2
Remarks
6.

ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT 2006-2007
DETAIL OF SANCTIONED STRENGTH OF DAILY WAGES STAFF (DEMAND NO. 3)
1. Peon 4 2 2
2.
3.
Sweeper
Chowkidar
Total
6
1
11
6
1
9
-
2
29

Sr
No
8
9
4
5
6
7.
1.
1
2
3
10
11
12
ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-2007 STATEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES (1.4.2006 TO 31.3.2007)
Name Of
The Court
2.
Bilaspur
Chamba
Hamirpur
Kangra
Kinnaur
Pending at theBeginnin g of the
Year(1.4.06)
3.
4034
2612
2041
9146
443
No. of
Cases Insti- tuted
4.
1099
675
791
4004
147
Convi cted
5.
54
105
138
330
14
Acqui tted
6.
461
454
622
1779
45
Discharge d.
Comprom ised.
Transfe rred.
Proceed ing
Dropped
Withdr awn.
7.
0
0
2
6
0
8.
61
76
104
243
14
9.
114
75
80
198
0
4
10.
20
41
29
126
4
11
33
2
14
28
5
PO
12.
0
2
0
0
15
Others. Total Disp osal
13.
0
0
0
15
1
14
743
755
989
4507
102
Kullu 1473 852 264 460 0 68 157 24 47 2 1 1023
Lahul &Spiti
Mandi
128
5336
93
2185
3
278
13
949
0
3
81
143
2
393
1
18
2
34
0
10
0
0
102
1828
Shimla
Sirmour
Solan
Una
TOTAL
3227
1420
3750
4411
38021
2529
939
1949
1262
16525
249
69
446
221
2171
891
379
14
640
678 9
7371 39
1
4
116 894 19
25
265
139
571
5
9
60 110 48
1256 4519 344
38
3
53
22
281
30
0
46
0
0
0
7 0
112 17
2251
621
2034
1155
16110
8643
488
1302
110
5693
3505
1738
3665
4518
38436
Balance at the end of Year
(31.3.07)
16
4390
Rate
Of
Conv iction
17
11%
2532
1843
19%
18%
16%
24%
36%
19%
23%
22%
15%
41%
25%
23%
30

Sr
No
8
9
4
5
6
7.
1.
1
2
3
10
11
12
Name Of
The Court
2.
Bilaspur
Chamba
Hamirpur
Kangra
Kinnaur
Pending at theBeginnin g of the
Year(1.4.06)
3.
4034
No. of
Cases Insti- tuted
4.
1099
Convi cted
5.
54
2612
2041
9146
443
675
791
4004
147
105
138
330
14
STATEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES FOR THE YEAR 2006-07.
PO Acqui tted
6.
461
Discharge d.
Comprom ised.
Transfe rred.
Proceed ing
Dropped
Withdr awn.
7.
0
8.
61
9.
114
10.
20
11
33
12.
0
Others. Total Disp osal
13.
0
454
622
1779
45
0
2
6
0
76
104
243
14
75
80
198
0
4
41
29
126
4
2
14
28
5
2
0
0
15
0
0
15
1
14
743
755
989
4507
102
1473 852 264 460 0 68 157 24 47 2 1 1023 Kullu
Lahul &Spiti 128
Mandi 5336
93
2185
3
278
13
949
0
3
81
143
2
393
1
18
2
34
0
10
0
0
102
1828
Shimla 3227 2529 249 116 894 19 38 30 0 2251
Sirmour
Solan
Una
TOTAL
1420
3750
4411
38021
939
1949
1262
16525
69
446
221
2171
891
379
14
640
678 9
7371 39
1
4
25
265
139
571
5
9
60 110 48
1256 4519 344
3
53
22
281
0
46
7
112
0
0
0
17
621
2034
1155
16110
8643
488
1302
110
5693
3505
1738
3665
4518
38436
Balance at the end of Year
(31.3.07)
16
4390
Rate
Of
Conv iction
17
11%
2532
1843
19%
18%
16%
24%
36%
19%
23%
22%
15%
41%
25%
23%
31

Sr.
No.
STATEMENT REGARDING CRIMINAL APPEALS/REVISIONS FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 .
District
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
1
2
3
4
5
2
Distt. Bilaspur
Distt. Chamba
Distt. Hamirpur
Distt. Kangra
Distt. Kinnaur at Rampur
Distt. Kullu
Distt. Shimla
Distt. Mandi
Distt. Sirmaur
Distt. Solan
Distt. Una
Total
3
59
24
23
214
7
12
181
91
48
79
65
803
Pending at begining of the Year
1.4.05
Instituted
During the
Year 2005-06
In
Favour
Of the
State
Against
The
State
Comp romised
Transfer Ors. Total
Disposal
Pending
At the
Close of
The
Year
Percentage of
Success
4
35
21
96
182
14
44
117
155
21
61
55
801
5
10
29
24
5
45
9
183
3
9
22
25
2
6
9
20
24
2
31
16
196
35
12
6
40
1
7
-
-
3
3
-
-
14
-
4
4
-
-
8
1
71
9
0
37
0
179
20
0
10
31
0
9
-
-
6
1
2
-
13
1
2
-
1
-
10 11 12
59
27
42
97
3
35
18
77
299
18
8%
43%
79%
38%
67%
20
120
66
11
115
25
585
36
178
180
58
25
95
1019
53%
59%
50%
71%
59%
36%
48%
JOINT DIRECTOR PROSECUTION,
HIMACHAL PRADESH.
32

ANNEXURE A-3.
DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2005-2006
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-9 STATEMENT REGARDING CIVIL CASES W.E.F. 1.4.2006 TO 31.3.2007
Sr. Name of Pending at Instituted No. of Cases Decided Comp- Trans Withdr Total Pending Percentage
No. The court the begin- ing of the year. during the year
2006-2007 decided in favour of the State against the
State romised -fer awl. Disp
-osed
At the
Close
Of the Year
(31.3.07) of success during the year
(1.4.2006)
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
1.
2.
3.
Distt.Bilaspur
Distt.Chamba
Distt.Hamirpur
383
88
552
117
52
126
120
34
155
3
6
13
3
0
3
3
4
11
6
5
0
135
49
182
365
91
496
98%
85%
92%
4.
5.
6.
7.
Distt Kullu
Distt.Kinnaur
Distt.Kangra
Distt.L & S
172
58
627
8
145
25
169
2
23
6
118
1
6
3
23
0
4
0
0
0
86
1
69
0
0
0
13
0
119
10
223
1
198
73
573
9
79%
67%
84%
100%
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Distt Mandi
Distt.Shimla
Distt.Sirmaur
Distt.Solan
Distt.Una
Total
381
478
170
442
506
3865
195
340
92
175
93
1531
126
130
54
128
85
980
22
13
11
23
15
138
0
13
1
6
0
30
17
66
81
31
0
369
14
16
0
4
0
58
179
238
147
192
100
397
580
115
425
499
1575 3821
85%
91%
83%
85%
85%
88%
JOINT DIRECTOR PROSECUTION,
HIMACHAL PRADESH
33

Annexure A-4.
DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-2007
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-9 STATEMENT REGARDING CASES U/s 107/109/110/145 Cr PC
Sr. No. Name of the court
2.
District Bilaspur
District Chamba
Pending at the beginning of the year
1.4.2006
3.
142
24
No. of cases instituted during the year
4.
101
74
No. of cases bound down
5.
-
3
Discha
-rged
6.
161
46
Tran sferd
7.
-
-
Comprom ised
8.
-
24
No. of cases pending at the close of the year 31.3.07
9.
82
25
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
District Hamirpur
District Kullu
District Kinnaur
District Kangra
District Shimla
District Mandi
District Sirmaur
District Solan
District L&S
District Una
358
94
170
1004
547
700
350
304
1
193
358
68
41
651
252
853
349
163
2
305
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
10
-
-
351
59
131
545
198
822
278
159
1
305
-
-
-
1
21
-
-
82
-
-
-
-
5
11
22
-
-
12
-
9
365
103
75
1098
558
729
421
204
2
184
TOTAL 3887 3217 15 3056 104 83 3846
JOINT DIRECTOR PROSECUTION,
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIML
34

DEMAND NO. 3
. Annexure-A-5.
STATEMENT SHOWING THE SANCTIONED BUDGET AND ACTUAL EXPENDITURE (EXCESS & SURRENDER) UNDER MAJOR HEAD
2014-ADMN. OF JUSTICE, 114-LEGAL ADVISORS AND COUNSELS, 02-OTHER LAW OFFICERS (NON PLAN) FOR THE YEAR
2006-07 PERTAINING TO THE DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
Sr.
No.
SOE Sanctioned budget
Supplementar y
/additionality
Total Actual expenditure
Upto
31.3. 2006
Excess
(+)
Surrender
(-)
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
SALARY
WAGES
TE
LIVERY
OE
MR
RRT
PUBLICATION
PP & SS
OTHERS
MV
TTE
Total
3
37485000
755000
371000
25000
1730000
478000
111000
1000
1526000
1000
314000
40000
4,28,37,000
4
3500000
0
0
0
640000
422000
87000
9000
0
0
325000
74000
50,57,000
5
40985000
755000
371000
25000
2370000
900000
198000
10000
1526000
1000
639000
6
44581844
571438
363490
25000
2199673
921715
193381
9032
1526000
0
638956
7.
3596844
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21715
0
114000 115990 1980
4,78,94,000 5,11,46,519 36,20,539
8.
0
183562
7510
0
170327
0
4619
968
0
1000
44
0
3,68,030
35

Annesure A-5.
DEMAND NO. 3
.
STATEMENT SHOWING THE SANCTIONED BUDGET AND ACTUAL EXPENDITURE UNDER MAJOR HEAD 2014-ADMN. OF JUSTICE, 114-
LEGAL ADVISORS AND COUNSELS, 02-OTHER LAW OFFICERS (PLAN) FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 PERTAINING TO THE DIRECTORATE OF
PROSECUTION, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
Sr.
No.
1
1
2
SOE
2
SALARY
WAGES
Sanctioned budget
2600000
1200000
Supplementary
/additionality
4
-
-
Total
5
2600000
1200000
Actual expenditure
Upto 31.12.05
6
2511543
921855
Excess
7
-
-
Surrender
8
88457
278145
3
4
TE
LIVERY
30000
45000
-
-
30000
45000
41011
10000
11011
-
5
6
7
OE
MR
R.R.T.
500000
40000
300000
-
-
-
500000
40000
300000
462866
31971
26145
-
-
-
8
9
Publication
OTHER
CHARGES
TTE
10000
20000
-
-
10000
20000
0
0
-
-
10 20000 - 20000 8092
4013483
-
Total 4765000 - 4765000
Director (Prosecution),
Himachal Pradesh.
11011
0
35000
37134
8029
273855
10000
20000
11908
762528
36

Annexure A-5.
DEMAND NO. 31
STATEMENT SHOWING THE SANCTIONED BUDGET AND ACTUAL EXPENDITURE (EXCESS & SURRENDER)
UNDER MAJOR HEAD 2014-ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE,(796)-TRIBAL AREA SUB PLAN-03- EXPENDITURE
ON OTHER LAW OFFICERS (Non Plan) FOR T HE YEAR 2006-07 PERTAINING T O THE DIRECTORATE OF
PROSECUTION, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
Sr.
No.
SOE Sanctioned budget
Additionality Total Expenditure Excess
(+)
Surrender
(-)
1. 2.
1. SALARY
3.
1576000
4.
-
5.
1576000
6.
1517401
7.
-
2.
3.
Wages
TE
33000
26000
-
-
33000
26000
30283
14871
-
-
8.
58599
2717
11129
4. OE 66000 50000 116000 121930
5.
6.
MR
TTE
Total:-
11000
3000
1715000
60000
-
110000
71000
3000
1825000
44239
2931
1731655
5930
-
-
0
26761
69
5930 99275
Director (Prosecution)
Himachal Pradesh.
37

Annexure A-4
Directorate of Prosecution, ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-2007.
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-9 STATEMENT REGARDING CASES U/s 107/109/110/145 Cr PC
Sr.
No.
1.
Name of the court
2.
Pending at The beginning Of the year
1.4.2006
3.
No. of cases
Instituted
During the
Year
4.
No. of cases
Bound down
.5.
Discharged
6.
Transferr ed
7.
Compro mised
8.
1.
1.
2.
DISTRICT BILASPUR
SDM BLP
SDMGhumarwin
33
109
74
27
-
-
39
122
-
-
-
-
No. of cases pending at the close of the year 31.3.2007
9.
68
14
101 - 161 - - 82
2.
1.
2.
Total 142
DISTRICT CHAMBA
SDM Chamba
SDM Dalhausie
15
9
24
69
5
74
3.
1.
Total
DISTRICT HAMIRPUR
SDM HMR
3
0
3
44
2
46
-
-
-
22
2
24
15
10
25
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
SDM Naduan
SDM Badsar
T EHSILDAR
Tehs. Nadaun
Tehs. Sujanpur
Tehs. Bhorang
Tehs. Badsar
Total
HMR
139
4
34
85
26
18
30
22
358
75
52
52
70
20
34
50
5
358
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
124
27
30
67
22
22
33
26
351
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
90
29
56
88
24
30
47
1
365
4.
1.
2.
3.
5.
1.
DISTRICT KULLU
SDM KLU
SDM MNL
SDM Anni
Total
DISTRICT
SDM Kalpa
KINAUR
62
8
24
94
170
38
16
14
68
41
-
-
-
-
-
31
20
8
59
131
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
69
4
30
103
75
38

9.
1.
2.
3.
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
7.
1.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DISTRICT KANGRA
SDM D/SHALA
SDM Dehra
SDM Kangra
SDM Palampur
SDM Nurpur
SDM Baijnath
SDM Jawali
Total
DISTRICT SHIMLA
SDM(U) SML
SDM Theog
SDM Rohru
SDM Chopal
SDM Rampur
Total
DISTRICT MANDI
SDM MND Sadar
SDM S/NGR
SDM J/NGR
SDM S/GHAT
SDM Karsog
SDM Gohar
Total
DISTRICT SIRMAUR AT NAHAN
SDM Nahan 150
SDM Poanta
SDM Rajgarh
Total
DISTRICT SOLAN
SDM Solan
151
49
350
71
191
369
122
124
113
38
47
1004
233
45
215
100
42
65
700
174
26
198
48
101
547
254
12
111
69
60
129
16
651
125
37
84
6
0
252
296
175
95
170
26
91
853
160
136
53
349
44
236
24
23
93
39
82
48
545
50
16
120
12
0
198
335
169
61
171
10
76
822
170
50
58
278
44
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
-
3
9
6
-
6
-
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
12
8
0
0
11
0
0
0
3
9
6
-
7
-
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
209
357
210
97
125
85
15
1098
231
35
162
29
101
558
194
49
249
99
58
80
729
140
237
44
421
46

1.
12.
1.
2.
2.
3.
4.
11.
SDM K/GHAT
SDM Arki
SDM Nalagarh
44
78
111
Total 304
DISTRICT LAHUL & SPITI AT
KULLU
1 SDM L& S
DISTRICT UNA
SDM Una
SDM Amb
Total
109
84
193
16
93
10
163
2
185
120
305
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
14
86
15
159
1
143
162
305
33
46
0
82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
9
-
9
13
39
106
204
2
142
42
184
40

Annexure A-4
STATEMENT REGARDING CASES U/s 107/109/110/145 CrPC FOR THE YEAR 2006-07.
9.
10.
11.
12.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.
District Bilaspur
District Chamba
District Hamirpur
District Kullu
District Kinnaur
District Kangra
District Shimla
District Mandi
District Sirmaur
District Solan
District L & S
District Una
TOTAL
547
700
350
304
1
193
3887
3.
142
24
358
94
170
1004
252
853
349
163
2
305
3217
4.
101
74
358
68
41
651
5.
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
10
-
-
15
6.
161
46
351
59
131
545
198
822
278
159
1
305
3056
21
-
-
82
-
-
104
-
-
-
1
7.
-
-
22
-
-
12
-
9
83
8.
-
24
-
-
5
11
558
729
421
204
2
184
3846
9.
82
25
365
103
75
1098
DIRECTOR PROSECUTION,
HIMACHAL PRADEH
41

5.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-2007 Annexure A-3.
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-9 STATEMENT REGARDING CIVIL CASES W.E.F. 1.4.2006 TO 31.3.2007
Sr.
No.
1.
1.
4
5
2.
1.
2.
3.
Name of
The court
2.
DISTRICT BILASPUR
Distt. Judge BLP
ASJ-FTC,BLP
SSJ BLP
Sub Judge BLP
Sub Judge,Ghumarwin
S.J.Ghumarwin-II
Total
.-I
DISTRICT CHAMBA
Pending
At the
Beginning
Of the year
(1.4.2006)
3.
56
20
54
68
113
72
383
Instituted
During
The year
2006-2007
4.
23
10
13
13
26
32
117
No. of
Cases
Decided in
Favour
Of the
State
5.
18
5
10
27
34
26
120
Decided
Against the
State
6.
2
0
0
1
-
-
3
Comp romis ed
7.
-
1
1
1
-
-
3
Tran sfer.
8.
3
-
-
-
-
-
3
Withdr awl.
9.
-
-
-
-
4
2
6
Total
Dispo sal
10.
23
6
10
28
39
29
135
Distt. Judge Chamba
ASJ-FTC.
Sr. Sub Judge
Sub Judge
Sub judge,
Total
Dalhouise.
DISTRICT HAMIRPUR
Distt. Judge HMR
ADJ(FTC)
3
4
30
36
15
88
42
37
5
5
14
19
9
52
22
4
1
2
17
8
6
34
35
3
0
1
3
1
1
6
8
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
1
1
4
5
-
-
-
1
2
2
5
-
-
3
3
21
12
10
49
48
4
Pendi ng
At the
Close
Of the
Year
11.
56
24
57
53
100
75
365
5
6
23
43
14
91
16
37
42
100%
67%
85%
89%
86%
85%
81%
75%
Perce
-ntage of success during the year
12.
90%
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
98%

5.
1.
2.
6.
13
14
15
16
9
10
11
12
17
18
5
6
7
8
1.
2.
3.
4
1.
2.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
4.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sr. Sub Judge HMR
Sub Judge I HMR
Sub Judge II HMR
Sub Judge III HMR
Sub Judge ,Barsar
Sub Judge Nadaun
Total
DISTRICT KULLU
Distt. Judge KLU
ADJ-FTC, Kullu.
Sr. Sub Judge KLU
Sub Judge KLU
Sub Judge, Anni
Sub Judge, Manali.
Total
DISTRICT KINNAUR
Distt. Judge KNR
Sr. Sub Judge KNR
Total
DISTRICT KANGRA
Distt. Judge D/Sala
Addl. Distt. Judge I
Addl. Distt. Judge II
Addl. Distt.Judge(FTC)
Sr. Sub Judge D/sala
Sub judge (I) D/Sala
Sub judge(II)D/Sala
Sub Judge I PLP
Sub Judge II, PLP
Sub Judge (I) NPR
Sub Judge (II) NPR
Sub Judge Baijnath
Sub Judge (I) Dehra
Sub Judge (II) Dehra
Sub Judge (I) KNG
Sub Judge (II)KNG
Sub Judge Jawali
SJ Indora
Total
3
140
8
13
5
3
172
73
113
87
89
26
85
552
44
14
58
18
22
27
33
39
24
48
18
41
15
22
31
22
64
29
92
57
25
627
65
32
11
19
3
15
145
15
18
12
10
20
25
126
22
3
25
8
8
9
4
12
8
5
7
17
9
2
10
24
14
9
0
11
12
169
2
1
0
8
4
8
23
35
28
6
20
15
13
155
5
1
6
6
4
6
6
11
2
4
7
11
4
0
19
13
5
3
4
8
5
118
43
-
-
4
-
0
4
-
-
2
3
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
1
6
2
0
0
3
3
0
1
-
-
-
13
3
0
3
1
2
0
0
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
4
0
2
1
2
2
23
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
1
4
2
1
1
-
-
2
-
-
1
-
13
10
66
4
5
1
0
86
-
3
-
3
-
-
11
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
1
6
-
0
-
5
1
0
54
-
-
69
14
67
8
16
5
9
119
38
31
8
23
15
15
182
9
1
10
7
7
6
6
13
3
8
14
19
6
1
21
22
8
5
59
11
7
223
19
23
30
31
38
29
45
11
39
18
23
20
24
70
33
33
57
30
573
54
105
11
16
3
9
198
50
100
91
76
31
95
496
57
16
73
90%
84%
80%
80%
78%
86%
67%
100%
76%
100%
60%
80%
100%
80%
-
100%
80%
71%
84%
92%
100%
86%
100%
100%
100%
92%
50%
100%
50%
73%
100%
89%
79%
63%
100%
67%

7.
1
8.
13
14
9.
9.
10
11
12
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
9.
10
11.
12
13.
14.
15.
5
6
7.
8
1.
2.
3.
4.
16.
17.
DISTRICT LAHUL & SPITI AT KULLU
Sr. Sub Judge L&S At
Kullu
8
8
DISTRICT MANDI
Distt. Judge MND
Addl. Distt. Judge
ADJ-FTC-MND
Sr. Sub Judge.
Sub Judge (I) MND
Sub Judge (II) MND
Sub Judge (III) MND
Sub Judge-(IV)MND
Sub Judge ,SNR-1
Sub Judge SNR-II
Sub Judge-J/Ngr.
Sub Judge S/.Ghat
Sub Judge Karsog
Sub judge, Gohar
Total
DISTRICT SHIMLA
28
34
17
21
23
25
21
17
88
0
46
40
3
18
381
Distt. Judge SML
Distt. Judge (Forest)
Addl.Distt.Judge
,SML
ADJ(FTC)
Sr. Sub Judge SMl
Sub judge (I) SMl
Sub Judge (II)SML
Sub Judge (III)
Sub Judge (IV)
Sub Judge (V)
Sun Judge (VI)
Sub Judge Theog
Sub Judge (I)Rohru
Sub Judge (II) Rogru
Sub Judge Chopal
Sub judge, Rampur
Sub Judge Jubbal
Sub Judg eJubbal atTheog
Total
10
12
3
9
29
30
0
26
18
18
83
101
44
25
28
29
10
3
478
2
2
29
19
18
39
7
6
195
11
8
9
5
23
9
6
6
20
34
9
13
6
2
33
31
16
18
2
3
29
6
30
73
6
9
340
1
1
18
0
14
13
4
8
126
6
8
5
7
18
9
9
7
7
8
4
6
4
3
4
11
9
7
7
4
10
6
16
17
3
4
130
44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
3
2
-
-
-
2
3
1
-
-
-
13
-
-
1
0
0
3
0
2
22
0
1
0
0
10
3
1
1
2
1
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
3
-
4
-
-
-
13
-
-
14
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
2
-
-
2
2
-
2
2
2
-
1
-
-
-
16
-
16
-
-
1
-
-
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11
2
0
1
0
0
1
3
5
0
2
0
6
0
35
0
0
0
66
9
6
35
8
15
28
29
28
35
24
15
56
157
44
36
17
26
13
8
580
9
68
19
50
62
6
14
397
28
24
25
15
23
31
13
19
1
1
49
0
14
17
4
10
179
6
9
5
7
28
12
10
8
24
11
4
7
7
3
5
22
16
7
13
6
23
9
57
17
3
4
238
100%
100%
64%
75%
90%
88%
100%
89%
100%
100%
95%
-
100%
81%
100%
80%
85%
77%
100%
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
79%
78%
89%
100%
100%
100%
100%
91%

10.
5
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
11.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
9.
10.
12
DISTRICT SIRMAUR AT NAHAN
Distt. Judge
Add. Distt. Judge
Sr. Sub Judge NHN
Sub Judge NHN
Sub Judge Poanta I
Sub Judge Poanta II
Sub Judge Rajgarh
Total
DISTRICT SOLAN
33
54
20
9
10
18
26
170
Distt. Judge, SLN
Addl. Distt. Judge
ADJ-FTC-SLN
Sr. Sub Judge, SLN
Sub Judbe SLN
Sub Judge K/ghat
Sub judge N/garh
Sub judge Arki
Sub Judge
Sub Judge
Total
Kasauli(SD)
Kasauli(JD)
DISTRICT UNA
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
9.
Distt. Judge, Una
Addl. Distt. Judge
Addl.Distt.
Sr. Sub Judge,Una
Sub Judge (I) Una
Sub Judge (II) Una
Sub Judge(III)Una
Sub Judge (I)Amb
Sub Judge (II) Amb
Total
Judge(FTC)
83
37
73
54
13
23
0
73
86
0
442
77
62
56
34
36
55
80
65
41
506
0
12
23
29
19
8
10
0
32
42
175
10
3
10
92
12
6
23
28
5
3
8
11
24
8
5
12
17
93
3
2
0
4
2
2
0
1
1
15
6
1
1
3
3
5
0
0
4
0
23
-
-
-
11
4
2
3
2
6
17
23
13
12
13
2
20
15
7
128
8
3
9
54
8
6
11
9
15
11
4
5
16
11
3
14
6
85
2
0
-
-
-
1
0
-
1
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25
45
-
-
-
-
11
81
-
0
-
-
5
-
0
0
26
-
31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
1
0
0
-
-
3
2
6
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
13
4
9
18
13
3
15
7
100
14
18
24
17
20
19
2
20
49
9
192
37
53
14
11
9
3
20
147
64
52
60
36
42
50
82
62
51
499
8
7
29
26
11
18
16
115
69
31
72
66
12
12
8
53
69
33
425
80%
72%
100%
100%
50%
94%
95%
81%
79%
100%
85%
67%
75%
79%
82%
100%
100%
100%
83%
89%
85%
100%
93%
83%
85%
100%
56%
86%
85%
45

Statement of Civil Cases for the year 2006-07(w.e.f. 1.4.06 to 31.3.2007) Annexure A-3.
1
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
11
12
9
10
2.
Distt
Bilaspur
Distt.
Chamba
Distt.
Hamirpur
Distt.
Kullu
Distt.
Kinnaur
Distt.
Kangra
Distt.
L & S
Distt.
Mandi
Distt.
Shimla
Distt.
Sirmaur
Distt.
Solan
Distt.
Una
Total
3.
383
88
552
172
58
627
8
381
478
170
442
506
3865
4.
117
52
126
145
25
169
2
195
340
92
175
93
1531
5.
120
34
155
23
6
118
1
126
130
54
128
85
980
6.
3
6
13
6
3
23
0
22
13
11
23
15
138
7.
3
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
13
1
6
0
30
8.
3
4
11
86
1
69
0
17
66
81
31
0
369
9.
6
5
0
0
0
13
0
14
16
0
4
0
58
10.
135
49
182
119
10
223
1
179
238
147
192
100
1575
11.
365
91
496
198
73
573
9
397
580
115
425
499
3821
12.
98%
85%
92%
79%
67%
84%
100%
85%
91%
83%
85%
85%
88%
DIRECTOR PROSECUTION,
Himachal Pradesh.
46

Annexure A-2
DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-9 STATEMENT REGARDING CRIMINAL APPEALS/REVISIONS FOR THE YEAR 2006-07
Sr.
No.
Name of the court
Pending at beginning
Of the
Year
(1.4.2006)
3
Instituted during the
Year 2006-
2007
4
In favour of the
State
Against the
State
Compromised Transfer Ors. Total
Disposal
Pending at the
Close of the
Year
Percentage of
Success
1 2
1. DISTRICT BILASPUR
1. Session Judge BLP
2. FTC Ghumarwin
Total
2. DISTRICT CHAMBA
1.
2.
Session Judge Chb
FTC Chamba
Total
49
10
59
8
16
24
20
15
35
14
7
21
5
1
2
3
4
5
9
6
28
7
35
5
7
12
7
-
-
-
1
3
4
8
17
3
20
-
-
-
9
-
1
1
-
2
2
10
46
13
59
10
17
27
11
23
12
35
12
16
18
12
3%
22%
8%
44%
42%
43%
3.
1.
2.
4. DISTRICT KANGRA
1. Session Judge KNG
2. ASJ -I KNG
3.
DISTRICT HAMIRPUR
Session Judge HMR
ASJ-FTC
Total
ASJ- II KNG
4. ASJ- FTC
7
16
23
38
69
31
76
71
25
96
94
19
53
16
16
6
22
10
5
7
3
3
3
6
22
6
10
2
4
-
4
-
-
-
-
10
-
10
26
3
2
0
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
33
9
42
58
14
20
5
45
32
77
74
74
64
87
84%
67%
79%
31%
45%
41%
60%
Total 214 182
5. DISTRICT KINNAUR AT RAMPUR
1. Session Judge RMP 7 14
6. DISTRICT KULLU
1. Session Judge KLU
2. ASJ-FTC
Total
12
0
12
30
14
44
25
2
7
3
10
40
1
7
2
9
-
-
-
-
-
31
-
1
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
97
3
15
5
20
299 38%
18
27
9
36
67%
50%
60%
53%
47

7. DISTRICT SHIMLA
1. Session Judge SML
2. ASJ SML
3. ADJ(FTC)
Total
8. DISTRICT MANDI
1. Session Judge
MND
2.
3.
ASJ MND
ASJ(FTC)
Total
44
24
91
9. DISTRICT SIRMAUR AT NAHAN
1. Session 19
2.
Judge NHN
ASJ NHN 29
Total
10. DISTRICT SOLAN
48
79
8
155
7
14
21
1. Session,Judge SLN
2.
3.
ASJ SLN
ASJ (FTC)
Total
11. DISTRICT UNA
1. Session JudgeUna
2. ASJ Una
3. ASJ-FTC
Total
77
64
40
181
23
17
56
6
79
14
16
35
65
42
44
31
117
68
41
15
5
61
25
26
4
55
2
45
4
3
2
9
3
5
18
27
-
17
12
0
29
10
8
6
24
20
9
10
9
1
9
6
24
1
31
1
2
13
16
1
2
15
9
7
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
71
6
39
32
0
0
3
9
-
-
-
-
-
0
3
3
6
-
66
53
1
120
28
20
18
66
6
53
55
70
178
63
103
14
180
20
63%
57%
0%
59%
53%
47%
50%
50%
67%
-
-
14
23
-
1
1
2
-
-
5
11
49
59
7
38
58
9
12
4
75%
71%
54%
75%
0%
37
-
-
2
-
-
115
5
5
25
34
37
59%
80%
60%
-
-
-
-
15
25
24
95
13%
36%
48

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Annexure A-2
STATEMENT REGARDING CRIMINAL APPEALS/REVISIONS FOR THE YEAR 2006-07.
2.
Distt. Bilaspur
Distt. Chamba
Distt. Hamirpur
Distt. Kangra
Distt. Kinnaur at
Rampur
Distt. Kullu
Distt. Shimla
Distt. Mandi
Distt. Sirmaur
Distt. Solan
Distt. Una
Total
3.
59
24
23
214
7
4.
35
21
96
182
14
5.
3
9
22
25
2
6.
35
12
6
40
1
7
-
4
4
-
-
8.
20
0
10
31
0
9.
1
2
-
1
-
10.
59
27
42
97
3
11.
35
18
77
299
18
12.
8%
43%
79%
38%
67%
12
181
91
48
79
65
803
44
117
155
21
61
55
801
10
29
24
5
45
9
183
9
20
24
2
31
16
196
-
-
3
1
71
9
3
-
0
37
- 0
14 179
-
-
6
1
2
-
13
20
120
66
11
115
25
585
36
178
180
58
25
95
1019
53%
59%
50%
71%
59%
36%
48%
DIRECTOR PROSECUTION,
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-9.
49

Annexure A-I
STATEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES W.E.F. 1.4.2006 TO 31.03.2007 SHOWING RATE OF CONVICTION & PERFORMANCE OF LAW OFFICERS
Sr
No
1
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
2. DISTRICT CHAMBA HP
1. Session J RD Sharma DA
2.
Name of the court
Name of the Law
Officer
2
DISTRICT BILASPUR HP
Session judge
CJM
3
AK Patterwal DA
NC Ghai DDA
No. of cases pending at the beginning of month
4
96
JMIC Blp CS Bhatia ADA
1034
1465
838 ACJM
Gwin
Vinod Bhardwaj
ADA
JMIC Gwin Vinod Bhardwaj
ADA
ASJ FTC
Gwin
Anil Sood DDA
Total
592
9
4034
CJM
50
756
3. JMIC
Rajesh
ADA
Rajesh ADA
4.
735
1046
5.
SDJM
Dalhouise.
FTC
Bhuvnesh, ADA
Total
Harwinder Singh
DDA
25
2612
Instituted during month
5
45
452
192
261
107
42
1099
50
254
139
193
39
675
Convicted during month
6
2
34
2
10
5
1
54
5
17
12
47
24
105
Acquitted during month
7
19
135
148
53
104
2
461
31
176
116
115
16
454
Discharg ed during month
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comprom ised during month
9
0
21
23
7
10
0
61
0
47
21
8
0
76
Transferr ed during the month
Proceeding s dropped withdraw n
10 11 12
39
35
17
9
10
4
114
37
19
7
12
0
75
0
8
6
1
5
0
20
1
9
10
21
0
41
0
12
8
5
6
2
33
0
1
1
0
0
2
PO Others.
13 14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total dispos al
15
60
245
204
85
140
9
743
74
269
167
204
41
755
Cases pending at the close of month
16
81
1241
1453
1014
559
42
4390
26
741
707
1035
23
2532
Rate
of convi ct ion
17
10%
20%
1%
16%
5%
33%
11%
14%
9%
9%
29%
60%
19%
50

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
3. DISTRICT HAMIRPUR
1.
2,
Sessions J Vinod Kumar
Chaudharty DA
FTC GC Rana DDA
CJM
JMIC I
JMIC II
JMIC III
JMIC
Badsar
JMIC
Nadaun
Total
AK Nadda,
ADA
AK Nadda ADA
Eklabya,
ADA
D.S.Parmar,
ADA
Rajesh Verma,
ADA
Deepak
Aggarwal, ADA
18
1
373
417
280
411
98
443
2041
4. DISTRICT KANGRA AT DHARAMSHALA
1. Sessions J NK Sharma DA 61
2. ASJ I KK Sharma DDA 95
3.
4.
5.
6.
ASJ II
CJM
JMIC I
JMIC II
BK Marwah DDA
Sanjeev Katoch,
ADA
Sandeep
ADA
Do
49
171
122
107
110
26
33
137
195
7. 675
5
239
8.
9.
ACJM
Palampur
JMIC
Palampur
ACJM
Nurpur
SS Pathania,
ADA
Kuldeep Sen,
ADA.
Ashok
Kumar,ADA
426
621
113
674
135
115
111
145
30
14
168
73
791
12
28
7
17
4
1
58
11
138
50
38
0
52
9
4
0
13
8
118
102
77
84
16
6
87
132
622
69
73
1
104
39
18
14
94
138
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
51
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
17
20
13
7
0
0
42
5
104
9
13
1
46
0
0
0
30
8
8
10
56
76
79
42
1
6
555
10
7
6
9
19
0
11
18
80
1
15
3
1
8
1
0
0
29
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
5
24
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
0
2
4
2
2
4
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
127
64
15
136
137
58
284
157
736
162
174
106
120
40
7
209
171
253
352
103
468
8
8
332
319
989 1843 18%
9%
22%
8%
17%
20%
14%
40%
8%
172
180
54
630
44
57
67
382
559
19%
18%
0%
42%
34%
0%
33%
12%
5%

10. JMIC
Nurpur
11. ACJM
Dehra
12. JMIC
Dehra
13. ACJM
Kangra
14. JMIC
Kangra
15. ACJM
Baijnath
16. ACJM
Jawali
17. JMIC
Indora
18. FTC
Total
Ashok Kumar
ADA
RD Chaudhary,
ADA
RD Chaudhary
ADA
JC Chandel,
ADA
RK Kaushal
ADA
Bhuvnesh
Awasthi,ADA
Bhishm Jwal
ADA
Vijay Rehalia,
ADA
PK Haziri DDA
5. DISTRICT KINNAUR
1.
2.
Session judge
CJM KNR at Peo
Amar Prakash,
Distt. Attorney
HS Negi, Asstt.
Distt. Attorney
Total
2.
3.
6
5.
6. DISTRICT KULLU
1. Session J BS Pathania DA
RP Kashav DDA FTC
CJM
ACJM
JMIC
Mahesh Sen
DDA
Ajit Thakur DDA
Arvind Malhotra
83
360
443
54
26
487
714
97
872
466
385
848
859
94
1116
2149
30
9146
77
51
287
93
222
117
175
177
50
1254
190
202
158
149
4004
60
135
195
0
0
21
39
2
0
31
31
12
18
0
243
13
27
16
20
18
12
48
1
76
14
7
1092
7
10
17
9
7
1
3
1
1980
21
32
1
126
3
9
7
11
7
1
0
7
7
0
5
5
3
10
13
0
0
0
28
4
6
0
4
1
0
0
2
8
14
0
0
0
8
39
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
18
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
1131
189
139
214
200
104
995
467
448
792
808
107
4
4
0
462
314
40
829
2012
40
5%
2%
37%
15 4507 8643 16%
4%
18%
20%
9%
29%
14%
73
40
264
376
227
7
148
155
136
347
0%
25%
483 24%
58
37
510
431
92
24%
16%
32%
29%
53%

6.
Manali
JMIC Ani
Total
ADA
Umesh Sharma,AD A 95
1473
122
852
7. DISTRICT LAHOUL & SPITI AT KULLU
1. CJM L & S at Kullu.
Ajit Thakur DDA
8. DISTRICT MANDI
1.
2.
Sessions J RP Raina DA
ASJ VK Behl DDA
128
73
3. FTC
100
65
4.
JK Lakhanpal
DDA
RC Bakshi DDA 419
5.
CJM
Mandi
JMIC I VK Sharma ADA
6. JMIC II
415
447
7.
8.
JMIC III
JMIC IV
Sharad Lagwal
ADA
Sanjeev Rana
ADA
Do
534
Monika Malhotra
DDA
396
1166 9.
10. JMI-II,
SNR
11. JMIC
Karsog
12 JMIC
Gohar
13
JMIC-I
Sunder
Ngr
14
JMIC
Sarkaghat
JMIC
Joginder
-Do-
Mukta Kashyap
ADA
R.K. Bharwal
DDA
KK Sharma DDA
NS Chauhan
ADA
0
109
304
727
581
93
91
37
22
172
101
106
114
21
331
458
130
172
223
207
11
264
03
5
6
14
25
16
19
14
13
65
9
12
10
0
70
14
460
13
3
85
97
91
134
12
10
24
93
62
82
86
44
126
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
53
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
6
68
81
4
10
27
16
26
0
0
0
12
2
3
11
6
26
1
11
8
8
9
53
0
0
9
0
0
3
58
233
11
157
2
0
2
0
0
2
0
1
2
4
0
24
1
0
47
2
0
0
0
3
4
1
0
0
5
0
2
1
1
- -
0
0
0
1
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
3
0
0
2
9
10
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43 174 44%
1023 1302 36%
16
115
148
150
198
102 119 19%
84
26
37
184
74
99
120
112
465
80
111
50
407
442
454
528
305
1032
61%
58%
35%
41%
13%
13%
10%
0%
36%
442
124
328
800
590
63%
7%
13%
22%
11%

Ngr
Total
5
6
7
8.
9. DISTRICT SHIMLA
1.
2.
3.
4.
Session J Roop Lal
Saini.DA
ASJ SS Kaushal DDA
SJ Forest K.S.Thakur,
ADA
CJM Atma Ram, ADA
JMIC I
JMIC II
JMIC III
JMIC IV
9. JMIC V
10. JMIC VI
11. Juvenile
Court
12. JMIC-I
Rohru.
13. JMIC
Rohru
14. JMIC
Theog
15. JMIC
Chopal
16. JMIC
Jubbal
17. JMIC
Jubbal at
Theog
18 SDJM
Jagdsih Kanwar
ADA
R.S.Parmar,
ADA
Gulab Devi,
ADA
AnoopSharma/Ms
.Sheetal,ADA
Ritu Malik,
ADA.
Sudeep,
ADA
Jagdish
Kanwar.ADA
Suresh Hetta
ADA
Do
Anup Sharma,
ADA
Rajeshwar Dutt,
ADA.
H.S.Negi,
ADA.
-do- ADA
LS Negi,DDA.
5336
276
345
310
263
304
0
167
81
25
53
12
258
79
356
49
98
46
498
2185 278 949 3 143 393 18 34 10 0 1828 5693 23%
4
18
14
11
5
6
2
26
29
7
6
20
30
18
2
14
7
105
129
231
81
47
28
3
138
214
238
78
181
258
156
110
57
3
456 27
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
44
84
81
55
14
7
2
88
17
20
24
33
55
130
14
51
38
131 0
54
4
0
12
2
0
0
0
5
2
4
5
3
21
12
3
3
0
2
2
0
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
0
0
0
13
131
115
78
34
4
0
55
160
24
4
79
143
0
2
2
0
40 49 0
3
7
2
4
3
0
0
0
3
0
1
3
0
0
5
0
0
7
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
2
0
2
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
58
17
4
178
217
59
39
139
72
241
233
152
257
174
26
70
45
14
64
11
218
309
233
308
192
301
179
206
123
80
338
133
85
4
63%
26%
20%
35%
8%
18%
15%
17%
26%
46%
50%
23%
32%
12%
13%
22%
16%
9 0 263 691 17%

Rampur
19. FTC-SML Ajmer Singh DD 07
Total 3227
10. DISTRICT SIRMAUR AT NAHAN
1.
2.
3.
Session J Rajender
Sharma, DA
ASJ CB Acharya
DDA
CJM S.P.Garg, ADA
63
31
4. Do
188
98
5.
6.
7.
JMIC I
Nahan
JMIC
Paonta
JMIC II
Paonta
ACJM
Rajgarh
Total
Umesh Mohan
ADA
Kulbhushan,
ADA
M.K. Sharma
ADA
375
552
113
1420
11. DISTRIC SOLAN
1. Sessions J MR Sharma DA
2.
3.
4.
ASJ
ASJ FTC
CJM
NL Sen ADA &
P.Thakyr DDA
Ashwani Dhiman
Dy.DA
PC Thakur DDA
30
42
21
5.
6.
7.
8.
JMIC PCThakur,DDA
/L.S.Negi,ADA
ACJM
KASAULI
MK Sharma & &
NL Sen,ADA
JMIC KSL KapilSharma
ACJM
ADA
Surinder Negi
505
551
896
0
323
51
22
21
482
51
233
413
63
21
24
164
151
474
22
83
939
16
2529
03
249
2
2
11
6
41
1
6
69
10
11
1
106
15
50
1
15
03
891
11
4
107
69
110
13
65
379
102
102
7
18
16
19
81
103
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
55
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
9
5
1
0
0
0
18
21
8
7
4
3
-
0
3
25
0
116
1
894
21
0
62
3
12
0
41
139
1
414
42
27
21
0
21
3
0
19
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
5
2
0
1
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
5
0
0
7
1
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
38
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
16
4
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
48
20
232
146
591
55
160
07 16 50%
2251 3505 22%
34
7
185
85
173
21
50
48
167
164
676
553
15%
33%
8%
8%
27%
7%
116 80 8%
621 1738 15%
25
16
22
755
456
538
358
226
35%
41%
5%
57%
13%
33%
13%
12%

9
10
KANDAGHA
T
ACJM
ARKI
SDJM
NALAGARH
Total
ADA
BN Shandil ADA
Sanjay Chauhan
& S.Attri, ADA
12. DISTRICT UNA
6.
7.
8.
1. Sessions J Raghuvir Singh
DA
ASJ GS Rathore,DDA 2.
3. ASJ FTC
CJM 4.
35. ACJM I
KS Verma DDA
JS Rana ADA
SK Bharwal ADA
JMIC II
JMIC III
JS Rana ADA
SK Bharwal ADA
PMJJ UNA SK Bharwal ADA
9. ACJM
AMB
10. JMIC II
Amb
Total
CS Bhatia,ADA
-do- ADA
419
963
3750
198
415
1949
20
217
446
95
97
640
1
1
4
33
23
24
918
806
1091
598
314
370
234
4411
20
17
12
236
177
204
225
81
156
134
1262
1
7
7
89
22
28
23
7
26
11
7
3
20
168
47
107
107
28
85
106
221 678
0
0
6
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
9
60
151
265
18
24
571
1
3
9
0
0
0
8
12
15
5
12
2
6
60
0
2
0
45
24
20
3
0
12
4
110
0
8
8
1
0
14
14
0
2
1
48
16
15
53
1
6
7
0
0
2
0
3
3
0
22
1
6
46
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
212
514
405
864
17%
69%
2034 3665 41%
9
13
27
326
126
192
156
50
127
129
44
27
9
828
857
1103
667
345
399
239
13%
70%
26%
32%
21%
18%
20%
23%
9%
1155 4518 25%
56

8.
9.
10
11
12
5.
6.
7.
1
1.
2.
3.
4.
Sr
No court
Annexure A-1
STATEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES (COURT AND LAW OFFICER WISE) FOR THE PERIOD WEF 1.4.06 to 31.03.2007.
Name of the Name of the Distt.
Attorney.
2
Bilaspur
Chamba
Hamirpur
3
AK
Patterwal
RD
Sharma
Vinod K.
Chaudhary
NK Kangra
Kinnaur
Sharma
Vacant
Kullu BS
Pathania
Lahul &Spiti Ajit Thakur
DDA
Mandi RP Raina
Shimla
Sirmour
Solan
Una
TOTAL
Roop Lal
Saini.
Rajender
Sharma.
M.R.
Sharma.
Raghubir
Singh
No. of cases pending at the beginning of month
4
4034
2612
2041
9146
443
1473
128
5336
3227
1420
3750
4411
38021
Institute d during month
5.
1099
675
791
4004
195
852
93
2185
2529
939
1949
1262
16573
Convict ed during month
6.
54
105
138
330
19
264
3
278
249
69
446
221
2176
Acquitte d during month
7.
461
454
622
1779
61
460
13
949
891
379
640
678
7387
Dischar ged during month
8.
0
0
2
6
0
0
0
3
14
1
4
9
39
Compr omised during month
9.
61
76
104
243
31
68
81
143
116
25
265
60
1273
Transfe rred during the month
10.
114
75
80
1980
7
157
2
393
894
139
571
110
4522
Proceedi ngs dropped
11.
20
41
29
126
5
24
1
18
19
5
9
48
345 withdra wn
12.
33
2
14
28
13
47
2
34
38
3
53
22
289
57
PO
10
30
0
46
7
19
2
0
116
13
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
16
Oth ers.
Total dispo sal
Cases pendin g at the close of month
Rate
of convi- ction
14. 15. 16. 17.
0 743 4390 11%
0
0
15
755
989
4507
2532
1843
8643
19%
155
1023
102
1828
2251
621
2034
1155
483
1302
119
5693
3505
1738
3665
4518
24%
36%
19%
23%
22%
15%
41%
25%
16163 38431 23%

58