Copyright © 1999, 2004 by American Forest & Paper Association, Inc., Washington, D.C.
1.
Alpin, E.N. Factors affectingthestiffness and
strength of metal plate
connector
joints.
Information Report OP-X-57. Ottawa, Ontario:
Department of Environment, Canadian Forestry
Service, Eastern Forest Products Laboratory;
1973.
2.
AmericanAssociationof
State Highway and
Transportation Officials. Standard specifications
for highwaybridges. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials;1983.
3.
American Institute of Steel Construction. Manual ofsteel construction: allowablestressdesign.
Chicago, IL: American Institute ofSteel Construction; 1989.
10.
ADS Commentary
AmericanSociety ofCivilEngineers.Minimum
design loads for buildings and other structures.
ASCE7-88(formerlyANSIA58.1-1982).New
York, Ny: American Society of Civil Engineers;
1988.
11. American Plywood Association. Plywood design
specification and supplements. Tacoma, WA:
AmericanPlywoodAssociation;1985.
12.
American
Plywood
Association.
APA
desigdconstruction guide: residential & commercial. FormNo. E30. Tacoma, WA:American
PlywoodAssociation;1988.
13.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Tentative methods for establishing structural
grades of lumber.ASTM D 245-49T.Philadelphia,PA:AmericanSociety
for Testingand
Materials;1949.
14.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Tentative methods for establishing
structural
grades for visuallygradedlumber.ASTM
D
245-68T.
Philadelphia,
PA:
American
Society
for Testing and Materials; 1968.
4.
American Institute of Timber Construction.
Timber construction manual. New York, NY:
John Wiley;1985.
5.
American Institute of Timber Construction.
Standard specifications for hardwood glued
laminated timber. AITC 119.Vancouver,WA:
American Institute of Timber Construction; 1985.
6.
American Institute of Timber Construction.
Standard specifications for structural glued
laminated timber of softwood
species.
AITC
117. Vancouver,
WA:
American
Institute of
Timber Construction; 1987.
15.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard methods oftestingsmallclearspecimens of timber.
ASTM
D
143-83.
Philadelphia,PA:AmericanSociety
for Testingand
Materials;1983.
7.
American Institute of Timber Construction. Use
of a volume effect factor in the design of glued
laminated timber
beams.
Technical
Note 21.
Vancouver,WA:American
Institute of Timber
Construction; 1991.
16.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard method for establishing design stresses
for round timber
piles.
ASTM
2899-86.
D
Philadelphia, P A AmericanSociety for testing
and Materials; 1986.
8.
American Iron and Steel Institute. Specification
for the designofcold-formedsteel
structural
members.New York: N Y : American Iron and
Steel Institute; 1968.
9.
American National Standards Institute. American national standard for wood products structural gluedlaminatedtimber.ANSUAITC
A190.1-83.New York, NY: American National
Standards Institute; 1983.
Society
for Testing and Materials.
17. American
Standard specification for pressuretreatment of
timberproducts.ASTM
D 1760-86a.Philadelphia,PA:AmericanSociety
for Testingand
Materials; 1986.
18.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard practice for establishing
structural
grades and related
allowable
properties
for
visually
graded
lumber. ASTM
245-88.
D
Philadelphia,PA:AmericanSociety
for Testing
and Materials; 1988.
ADS Comentary
19.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard test methods for mechanical properties
of lumber and wood-base structural material.
ASTM D 4761-88. Philadelphia, PA:American
Society for Testing and Materials; 1988.
20.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard test methods for establishing
clear
wood strength values.
ASTM
D 2555-88.
Philadelphia, PA:AmericanSociety for Testing
and Materials; 1988.
21.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard practice for evaluating allowable properties for grades of structural lumber. ASTM D
2915-90. Philadelphia, PA:
American
Society
for Testing and Materials; 1990.
22.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard specification for round timberpiles.
ASTM D 25-91. Philadelphia, PA:
American
Society for Testing and Materials; 1991.
23.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard practice for establishing
allowable
properties for visually-gradeddimensionlumber
from in-grade
tests
full-size
of specimens.
ASTM D 1990-91. Philadelphia, PA:American
Society for Testing and Materials; 1991.
29.
Barrett, J.D. and R.O. Foschi. Shear strength
of uniformly loaded dimension lumber. Ottawa,
Ontario: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering.
Vol. 4, NO.1: 86-95;1977.
30.
Barrett, J.D., R.O.Foschi and S.P. Fox. Perpendicular-to-grain
strength
of Douglas-fir.
Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Journal of
Civil
Engineering.Vol.
2, No. 1: 50-57;1975.
31.
Bendsten,B.A. and W.L. Galligan.Meanand
tolerancelimitstresses and stressmodeling for
compression perpendicular to grain in hardwood
and softwood species. Research Paper FPL 337.
Madison, WI: U.S.Department ofAgriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1979.
32.
Bendsten,B.A. and W.L.Galligan.Modeling
thestress-compressionrelationships inwoodin
compressionperpendiculartograin.Madison,
WI: Forest Products ResearchSociety,Forest
Products Journal. Vol. 29, No.2: 42-48;1979.
33.
Bohannan, B. Effect of size on bending strength
ofwoodmembers.Research
Paper FPL 56.
Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1966.
24.
American
Society
for Testing and Materials.
Standard test method for establishing stresses for
structural glued
laminated
timber
(glulam).
ASTM D 3737-91. Philadelphia, PA:American
Society for Testing and Materials; 1991.
34.
Bonnicksen,L.W. and S.K. Suddarth. Structural
reliability analysis of wood load-sharing system.
Paper No. 82. Philadelphia,
PA:
American
Society for Testing and Materials,FifthPacific
Area National Meeting; 1965.
25.
American Wood-Preservers Association. Book of
standards. Stevensville, MD: AmericanWoodPreservers’Association; 1990.
35.
26.
American Wood-Preservers Association. Book of
standards. Stevensville, MD: American WoodPreservers’Association; 1991.
Borkenhagen, E.H. and H.J. Kuelling.Clinching
ofnailsin
container construction. Report No.
R1777. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest
Products
Laboratory; 1948.
36.
Brassell, T.E.
Recommended
reduction
in
allowable axial tension stresses for glued laminated timber. Whittier, CA: International conferenceofBuildingOfficials,Building
Standards
Monthly.(November-December): 236-237;1976.
37.
Buchanan, A.H. Strength
model
and design
methods for bending and axial load interaction
intimbermembers.Thesis.Vancouver,British
Columbia:
University
British
of Columbia,
Department of CivilEngineering; 1984.
27.
28.
162
Auune, P. and M. Patton-Mallory. Lateral
load-bearing capacityofnailed joints based on
the yield theory:
theoretical
development.
Research Paper FPL 469. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1986.
Auune, P. and M. Patton-Mallory. Lateral
load-bearing capacity ofnailed joints based on
the yield theory:
experimental
verification.
Research Paper FPL 470. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1986.
Refimnces
ADS Commentary
38.
Building Officials & Code Administrators International. National buildingcode.Homewood,
IL: BuildingOfficials
& Code Administrators
International; 1990.
39.
Caldwell, R.M., B.K. Douglas and D.G. Pollock.
Load duration factor for wind and earthquake.
Portland, OR:
Wood
Products Information
Center. Wood DesignFocus:Vol. 2, No. 2:13-
48.
Doyle,D.V.Performance
of joints withlight
boltsinlaminatedDouglas-fir.ResearchPaper
FPL 10. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department
of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1964.
49.
Doyle,
D.V.
and L.J. Markwardt. Tension
parallel-to-grain
properties
of southern pine
dimension
lumber.
Research
Paper FPL 84.
Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
14.1991.
40.
Call, R.D. and R. Bjorhawde.Woodconnections withheavy bolts and steelplates.New
York, N Y : American Society of Civil Engineers,
Journal of Structural Engineering. Vol. 116, No.
1967.
50.
Doyle,D.V. and J.A.Scholten.Performance of
bolted joints in
Douglas-fir.
Research
Paper
FPL 2. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department
of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1963.
51.
Eickner,
H.W.
Fire-retardant-treated wood.
Philadelphia,PA:AmericanSociety
for Testing
and Materials, Journal of Materials. Vol. 1,
NO. 3: 625-644;
1966.
52.
Ellingwood,B.R., E.M. Hendrickson and J.F.
Murphy.Load
duration and probabilitybased
designofwood
structural members.Madison,
WI: Society of WoodScience and Technology,
Wood and Fiber Science.Vol. 20, No. 2:250-
11; 1990.
41.
42.
43.
Canadian Standards Association.
Engineering
design
wood
in
(working
stress
design).
CAN/CSA-086-M89,Rexdale, Ontario: CanadianStandards Association; 1989.
Cline, M. and A.L.Heim.
Tests of structural
108. Washington, DC: U.S.
timbers.
Bulletin
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 1912.
Cline,M. and J.B. Knapp. Properties and uses
ofDouglas-fir.Bulletin
88. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service;
1911.
44.
Clouser,
W.S.
Creep
of
small
wood
beams
under constant bending load. Report No. 2150.
Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
265;1988.
53.
Erickson,E.C.O. and K.M. Romstad. Distribution of wheel loads on timber bridges. Research
Paper FPL 44. Madison, WI: U.S.Department
ofAgriculture, Forest Service,ForestProducts
Laboratory; 1965.
54.
Ethington, R.L., W.L. Galligan, H.M. Montrey
and A.D. Freas. Evolution ofallowablestresses
in shear for lumber.GeneralTechnical
Report
FPL 23. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1979.
55.
Fairchild, I.J. Holdingpowerofwoodscrews.
Technologic Papers of the Bureau of Standards
Department
of
No. 319. Washington, DC:
commerce,Bureauof Standards; 1926.
56.
Forest Products Laboratory. Nail holding power
American
of
woods.
Technical
Note 236.
Washington, DC: US.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1959.
45
Commission
of
the European Communities.
Eurocode No. 5: Common
unified
rules
for
timber structures. Report EUR 9887. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, Office for OfficialPublications; 1988.
46.
Cramer, C.O. Load distribution in multiple-bolt
tension joints. New York, N Y : Proceedings of
the American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal
of the Structural Division.Vol.
94, No. STS:
1101-1117;1968.
47.
Criswell,M.E.Newdesign
equations for taperedcolumns. Portland, OR:Wood Products
Information Center, Wood
Design
Focus:
Components. vol. 2, No.3: 4-7;
1991.
1931.
N 9 S Commentary
57.
Forest Products Laboratory. Wood handbook.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1935.
66.
Forest Products Laboratory. Wood handbook.
Agriculture Handbook No. 72. Washington,
D.C: U.S. Department of Agriculture,Forest
Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1987.
58.
Forest Products Laboratory. Communication of
August13,1935 to National Lumber Manufacturers Association. Madison, WI: U.S. Department
of
Agriculture,
Forest Service, Forest
Products Laboratory; 1935.
67.
Foschi, R.O. and S.P. Fox. Radial stresses in
curved
timber
beams.
New
York, N Y : Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division. Vol.
96, NO. ST10: 1997-2008;1970.
59.
Forest Products Laboratory. Generalobservations on thenailingofwood.Technical
Note
243. Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;1940.
68.
Freas, A.D. and M.L. Selbo. Fabrication and
design
glued
of laminated
wood
structural
members.TechnicalBulletin
No. 1069.Washington, DC: U.S. Department ofAgriculture,
Forest Service;1954.
60.
Forest Products Laboratory. Recommendations
for basicstresses.
Report No. R1715,Supplement No. 2 to U.S. Department ofAgriculture
Miscellaneous Publication 185,
Guide
to
the
grading of structural timbers and the determination of workingstresses.
Madison, WI: U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1948.
69.
Gebremedhin, K G . , M.C. Joprgensen and C.B.
Woelfel.Load-slipcharacteristics ofmetalplate
connectedwood
joints testedintensionand
shear. Madison, WI: SocietyofWoodScience
and Technology,Wood and Fiber Science. Vol.
25, NO. 2:118-132;1992.
70.
GeneralServices Administration. Nails, brads,
staples and spikes:
wire
cut
and wrought.
FederalSpecification FF-N-1OSB. Washington,
DC:GeneralServices
Adminstration; 1977.
71.
Gerhards, C.C.
Effect
of
fire-retardant treatmentonbending
strength ofwood.Research
Paper FPL 145. Madison, WI: U.S. Department
of
Agriculture,
Forest Service,
Forest
Products Laboratory; 1970.
72.
Gerhards, C.C.Effectofmoisturecontentand
temperature on the mechanical
properties
of
wood: an analysis of immediateeffects.Madison, WI: Society of Wood Science and Technology,Wood and Fiber. Vol.14, No. 1:
4-36;
1982.
73.
Gerhards, C.C.Time-dependentbendingdeflectionsof Douglas-fir 2 by4’s.
Madison, WI:
Forest Products ResearchSociety, Forest Products Journal. Vol.35, No. 4:18-26;1985.
74.
Gerhards, C.C. High-temperature drying of
southern pine2 by4’s: Effects on strength and
load duration in
bending.
New
York, T W :
Springer-Verlag, Wood Science and Technology.
Vol. 20:
349-360;
1986.
61.
62.
Forest Products Laboratory. Designofwood
aircraft structures. ANC-18Bulletin.Washington, D.C.: Subcommittee on AirForce-NavyCivil Aircraft Design Criteria, Aircraft Committee, Munitions Board;1951.
Forest Products Laboratory. Wood handbook.
Agriculture Handbook No. 72. Washington,
D.C: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1955.
63.
Forest Products Laboratory. Forest Products
Laboratory policy on basic stresses and working
stresses. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1960.
64.
Forest Products Laboratoy. Nail-withdrawal
resistance of American woods. Research Note
FPL-093. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1965.
65.
Forest Products Laboratory. Wood handbook.
Agriculture Handbook No. 72. Washington,
D.C: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest
Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1974.
NDS Commentary
I
75.
Gerhards, C.C. Effectof grade on load durationof Douglas-fir lumber inbending.Madison, WI: Society of Wood Science and Technol20, No.1:
ogy,Wood and Fiber Science.Vol.
144-161;1988.
76.
Gerhards, C.C. and C.L. Link.Acumulative
damage model to predict load duration characteristicsof lumber. Madison, WI: Society
of
Wood Science and Technology, Wood and Fiber
Science.Vol.
19, No. 2:
147-164;
1987.
77.
78.
79.
80.
Goodman, J.R. and J. Bodig. Orthotropic
strength of wood in compression. Madison, WI:
Forest Products Research Society, Wood Science.
Vol. 4, NO. 2:83-94;1971.
Goodman, J.R. and J. Bodig. Contribution of
plywood sheathing to buckling
stiffness
of
residential roof truss chord members. Report
and Supplemental Report to National Forest
Products Association. Fort Collins,CO:Colorado State University, Department Civil
of
Engineering; 1977.
Goodman, J.R. and M.E. Criswell. Contribution
ofplywood
sheathing to bucklingstiffnessof
residential roof truss chord members.Supplemental Report to National Forest Products
Association. Fort Collins,CO: Colorado State
University, Department of
Civil
Engineering;
1980.
Gopu, V.K.A., J.R. Goodman, M.D. Vanderbilt,
E.G. Thompson and J. Bodig.Behavior
and
design
of
double-tapered pitched and curved
glulambeams. Structural Research Report No.
16. Fort Collins,CO: Colorado State University, CivilEngineering Department; 1976.
81.
Graham,R.D.
Strength of
small
Douglas-fir
beams treated withfire retardants. Stevensville,
MD: American
Wood-Preservers’
Association
Proceedings.Vol.
60:172-177;1964.
82.
Grenoble, H.S. Bearing strength of bolts
in
wood. Project 1-228-7. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1923.
83.
Gurfinkel, G. Woodengineering.NewOrleans,
LA: Southern Forest Products Association;
1973.
84.
Hankinson, R.L.
Investigation of crushing
strengthofspruce
at varyingangles of grain.
Material Section Paper No. 130. McCook Field,
NE:United States ArmyEngineeringDivision,
U.S.AirService Information Circular. Vol. 111,
No. 257;1921.
85.
Hooley, R.F. and R.H. Duval. Lateral buckling
of
simply
supported glued
laminated
beams.
Report to Laminated Timber Institute of Canada. Vancouver,BritishColumbia:University
of
British Columbia, Department of Civil Engineering; 1972.
86.
Hooley, R.F. and B. Madsen. Lateral stability
of
glued
laminated
beams.
New
York, Ny:
ProceedingsoftheAmericanSocietyofCivil
Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division.
Vol. 90, ST31 201-218;1964.
8 7.
Hoyle, R.J., Jr., M.C. Griffith and R.Y. Itani.
Primary creep in Douglas-fir beams of comrnercia1size and quality. Madison, WI: Societyof
Wood Science and Technology, Wood and Fiber
Science.Vol.
17, No. 3: 300-314;
1985.
88.
Hunt, G.M. and G.A. Garratt. Woodpreservation.2nded.New
York, N Y : McGrawHill;
1953.
89.
Hyer, O.C. Study of temperature inwood parts
of homes througout the United States. Research
Note FPL-012. Madison, WI: U.S.Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1963.
90.
In-Grade Testing Program Technical Committee.
In-grade testing of structural lumber, Proceedings
47363. Madison, WI: Forest Products Research
Society; 1989.
91.
International ConferenceofBuildingOfficials.
Uniform buildingcode. Whittier, CA: InternationalConference ofBuildingOfficials; 1991.
92.
Isyumov, N.
Load distribution multiple
in
shear-plate joints timber.
in Departmental
Publication No. 1203. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Forestry and Rural Development,
Forestry Branch; 1967.
93.
Johansen, K.W.Theory of timberconnections.
Zurich, Switzerland: Publications of InternationalAssociation for Bridge and Structural Engi9:
249-262;
1949.
neering.
Vol.
Refennces
.~
16 5
NDS Commentary
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
166
104.
Larsen, H.J. The yieldofbolted
and nailed
joints. South Africa: International Union of
of
Forest ResearchOrganizations,Proceedings
Divsion 5 Conference. 646-654;1973.
105.
LeVan, S. and M.Collet.Choosing
and applying fire-retardant-treated plywood and lumber for
roofdesigns.GeneralTechnical
Report FPLGTR-62. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department
of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1989.
106.
Loferski,
J.R.
and T.E. McLain. Static and
impact flexural properties of common wire nails.
Philadelphia,PA:AmericanSociety
for Testing
and Materials, Journal ofTesting and Evaluation. Vol. 19, No. 4: 297-304;1991.
107.
Longworth,J.Behavior
of shearplateconnecWI:
tionsinslopinggrainsurfaces.Madison,
Forest Products ResearchSociety,ForestProducts Journal. Vol. 17, No. 7:49-63;1967.
108.
Kolberk, A. and M.
Birnbaum.
Transverse
strength screws
of wood.
in
Ithaca, N Y :
CornellUniversity, The CornellCivilEngineer.
Vol. 22, NO. 2: 31-41;1913.
Lyons,B.E. Nails in doubleshear.Laboratory
Report
No.
94. Tacoma, WA: Douglas Fir
Plywood Association (American Plywood Association); 1962.
109.
Kuenzi, E.W. Theoreticaldesignofanailed
or
bolted joint. ReportNo. D1951. Madison, WI:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1955.
Malhotra, S.K. A rational approach to
the
designofsolidtimbercolumns.Study
No. 7,
Applications Solid
of Mechanics.
Waterloo,
Ontario: UniversityofWaterloo;
1972.
110.
Malhotra, S.K. and A.P. Sukumar. A simplified
procedure for built-up wood compression members.St.John’s,Newfoundland:Annualconference,CanadianSociety for CivilEngineering.
(June): 1-18;1989.
111.
Malhotra, S.K. and D.B.VanDyer.
Rational
approach to thedesignofbuilt-uptimbercolumns.Madison, WI: Forest Products Research
Society,WoodScience.Vol.
9, No. 4:174-186;
1977.
112.
Markwardt, L.J. and T.R.C. Wilson.Strength
and relatedproperties ofwoodsgrowninthe
United
States.
Technical
Bulletin
No. 479.
Washington,DC:U.S.
Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service; 1935.
113.
McLain, T.E. Influenceofmetalsideplateson
the strength ofboltedwood joints. Blacksburg,
VA:
Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State
University, Department of Forest Products; 1981.
Johns, K.C.and A.H.Buchanan.Strengthof
timber members in combined bending
and axial
loading.Boras,Sweden:
International Union of
Forest Research
Organizations,
Proceedings
IUFRO Wood Engineering Group S5.02. 343368;1982.
Johnson, J.W.Bendingstrength
for small joists
of Douglas-fir
treated
with
fire
retardants.
Report T-23. Corvallis,
OR:
Oregon
State
University, School of Forestry, Forest Research
Laboratory; 1967.
Karacabeyli, E. Duration ofloadresearch
for
lumber
in
North America.
Madison.
WI:
Forest Products Research Society, Proceedings of
the 1988 International ConferenceonTimber
Engineering. 1988.
Khushefati, W. andR.N. White.Performance
of bolted joints comprisedofglued-laminated
membersconnectedwithlargediameter
(1-1/4
inch) bolts for National Forest Products Association. Ithaca, N Y : CornellUniversity,School of
Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering; 1985.
Kunesh, R.H.and J.W. Johnson. Strength of
multiple-bolt joints: influence of spacing and
other variables. Report T-24. Corvallis,
OR:
Oregon State University,School
of Forestry,
Forest Research Laboratory; 1968.
LaminatedTimber Institute of Canada. Timber
design manual. Ottawa, Ontario: Laminated
Timber Institute of Canada; 1980.
Lane, W.W. A study of the effects of lag screw
spacing on thestrength oftimber joints. BuildingResearc
LaboratoryReportNo.
BR 4-1.
Columbus,OH:Ohio
State University,EngineeringExperiment Station; 1963.
Lantos, G.
Load
distribution row
in
a
of
fasteners
subjected
to lateral load. Madison,
WI: Forest Products Researchsociety,Wood
Science.Vol.
1, No. 3:
129-136;
1969.
Refinnces
ADS Commentary
114.
McLain, T.E. Strength of lag screw connections.
Blacksburg, V A VirginiaPolytechnic Institute
and State University, Department of Wood
Science and Forest Products. 1991.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
124.
McLain, T.E. and J.D. Carroll. Combined load
capacity of threaded fastener-wood connections.
New York, Ny: American
Society
of
Civil
Engineers, Journal of Structural Engineering.
Vol. 116, NO. 9:2419-2432;1990.
National Forest Products Association. Incorporation of new compression perpendicular to grain
property information in
ASTM
D 2555 and
ASTMD 245. Recommendation ofTechnical
Advisory
Committee.
Washington,
DC:
NationalForest Products Association; 1980.
125.
McLain, T.E. and S. Thangjithan. Bolted woodjoint yieldmodel.New
York, Ny: American
Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Structural
Engineering.Vol.
109, No.8: 1820-1835;
1983.
National Forest Products Association. Alternate
designprocedure for wood joist floor systems.
NFPA System 1. Washington,
DC:
National
Forest Products Association; 1988.
126.
National Forest Products Association.Manual
for wood frame construction - wood construction
DC:
National Forest
data 1. Washington,
Products Association; 1988.
127.
National
(National
structural
National
1934,1939.
128.
National Lumber Manufacturers Association
(National Forest Products Association). National designspecification for stress-gradelumber
and itsfastenings.Washington,DC:
National
Lumber Manufacturers Association; 1944.
129.
National Lumber Manufacturers Association
(National Forest Products Association). Nationaldesignspecification
for stress-gradelumber
and itsfastenings.Washington,DC:
National
Lumber Manufacturers Association; 1962.
McLain, T.E., P.
Pellicane,
L.
Soltis,
T.L.
Wilkinson and J. Zahn. Comparison of EYMpredicted yield loads and current ASD loads for
nails, bolts and screws.
Washington,
DC:
National Forest Products Association; 1990.
Moody, R.C., R.H. Falk and T.G. Williamson.
- volumeeffects.
Strength of
glulam
beams
Tokyo, Japan: Proceedings ofthe 1990 International Timber engineeringconference.Vol.
l:
176- 182; 1990.
Murphy, J.F.
Using fracture mechanics
to
predict fracture innotchedwoodbeams.Vancouver,
British
Columbia:
Forintek Canada
Corporation, Western Forest Products Laboratory, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Wood Fracture; 1978.
Lumber Manufacturers Association
Forest Products Association).Wood
design data.
Washington,
DC:
Lumber Manufacturers Association;
120.
Murphy, J.F. Strength and stiffness reduction of
large notchedbeams.New
York, Ny: American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Structural Engineering.Vol. 112, No. 9:1989-1999;
1986.
130.
Neubauer, L.W.
Full-size
stud tests
confirm
superiorstrength of square-endwoodcolumns.
AnnualMeeting Paper No. 70-408. St. Joseph,
Michigan:
American
Society
Agricultural
of
Engineers; 1970.
121.
Murphy, J.F., B.R. Ellingwood and E.M.
Hendrickson. Damage accumulation
in
wood
structural members under stochasticliveloads.
Madison, WI: Society of WoodScience and
Technology,Wood and Fiber Science.Vol. 19,
NO. 4: 453-463;1987.
131.
Newlin,
J.A.
Unit stresses
in
timber.
Paper
No. 1633. New York, Ny: AmericanSociety
of Civil Engineers, Transactions, Unit Stresses in
Structural Materials:
A
Symposium.
Vol. 91:
400-407,440;1927.
132.
122.
National Forest Products Association.Evaluation of effect of size on lumber tensile strength.
Washington, DC: National Forest Products
Association; 1976.
Newlin, J.A. Formulas for columnswithside
loads and eccentricity.
Los
Angeles,
CA:
Pacific Coast Building
Officials
Conference,
Building Standards Monthly. Vol. IX, No. 12:
5-7;1940.
123.
National Forest Products Association. National
design
specification
for wood construction.
Washington, DC: National Forest Products
Association; 1977.
NDS Commentmy
133. Newlin, J.A. and J.M. Gahagan. Tests of large
timbercolumns and presentation of the Forest
Products Laboratory column formula. Technical
Bulletin No. 167. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1930.
134. Newlin, J.A. and J.M. Gahagan. Lag-screw
joints: their
behavior
and design.
Technical
Bulletin No. 597. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1938.
135. Newlin, J.A. and G.W. Trayer. Stresses
in
woodmemberssubjected
to combinedcolumn
and beam action. National Advisory Committee
for Aeronautics Report 188 (Forest Products
1311). Madison, WI:
Laboratory ReportNo.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1924.
136.- Newlin, J.A. and G.W. Trayer. Form factors of
beams
subjected
to transverse
loading
only.
Report No. 1310. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest
Products Laboratory; 1941. (Also Report 181 of
the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1924.)
137. Newlin, J.A. and T.R.C. Wilson.
Mechanical
properties of woods grown in the United States.
U.S. Department of AgricultureBulletin 556.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1917.
138. Newlin, J.A., G.E. Heck and H.W. March.
Wood-beam design method promises economies.
New York, N Y : Engineering
News
Service.
(May 11): 594-596; 1933.
139. Newlin, J.A., G.E. Heck and H.W. March.
New method of calculating longitudinal shear in
checked
wooden
beams.
New
York, N Y :
American Society for Mechanical Engineers, 1934
Transactions of the AmericanSociety for Mechanical Engineers, Applied Mechanics. 730-744;
1934.
140. Newton, D.A. The design
solid
of timber
columns.Meeting Paper No. 19. Madison, WI:
International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Working Group on Structural Utilization; 1971.
--c
141. Norris, C.B. The "two-beam"theory as applied
to solidsawn and laminatedwoodbeams.PE191. Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1960.
142. Onysko, D.M. Serviceability criteria for residential floors based on a fieldstudy of consumer
response. Ottawa, Canada: Forintek Canada
Corporation, EasternDivision; 1985.
143. Parker, J.E. A study of thestrength of short
and intermediate wood columns by experimental
and analyticalmethods.Research
Note FPL028. Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1964.
144. Patton-Mallory, distance
End
M.effects
comparing
tensile
and compression
loads
on
bolted
wood
connections.
Seattle,
WA:
Proceedings of the 1988 International Conference on
TimberEngineering.Vol.
2: 3 13-324; 1988.
145. Perkins,N.S.Plywood:properties,designand
construction. Tacoma, WA: Douglas fir
PlywoodAssociation(AmericanPlywoodAssociation); 1962.
-
146. Perkins, N.S., P. Landsem and G.W.Trayer.
Modern
connectors
in timber
construction.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Commerce, National Committee on Wood Utilization
and U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest
Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1933.
147. Perkins, R.H. Procedure for calculatingdistributed load deflectioninlogbeams.Madison,
WI: Forest Products ResearchSociety,Forest
Products Journal. Vol. 32, No. 8: 41-43; 1982.
148. Polensek,A. and G.H. Atherton. Compressionbendingstrength
and stiffnessofwallsmade
withutility grade studs. Madison, WI: Forest
Products Research
Society,
Forest Products
Journal. Vol. 26, No. 11: 17-25; 1976.
149. Popov, Mechanics
E.P.
of materials.
EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1976.
150. Radcliffe,B.F. and A.Sliker.Effect
of variables on performance oftrussedrafters.Research Report 21. EastLansing,MI:Michigan
State University, Agricultural Experiment Station;
1964.
-.
NDS Commentary
151.
152.
Rahman, M.V., Y.J. Chiang and R.E. Rowlands.
Stress and failure analysis of double-boltedjoints
in Douglas- fir and Sitka spruce. Madison, WI:
Society of Wood Science and Technology, Wood
23, No. 4:
567-589;
and Fiber Science.
Vol.
1991.
Rosowsky, D. and B. Ellingwood.Reliabilityof
wood
systems
subjected
to
stochastic
loads.
Madison, W I : Societyof
Wood Science and
Technology, Wood and Fiber Science.Vol. 24,
NO. 1: 47-59;
1992.
162.
Snodgrass, J.D. and W.W.Gleaves.Effectof
end-distanceonstrengthofsingle-boltjoints.
Corvallis,OR:Oregon State University,Oregon
Forest ResearchCeneter; 1960.
163.
Soltis, L.A. European yield
model
for wood
connections.New York, N Y : AmericanSociety
ofCivilEngineers,ProceedingsofStructures
Congress '91, Indianapolis, Indiana. 60-63;1991.
164.
Soltis, L.A. and T.D. Gerhardt. Shear design of
woodbeams: state ofthe art. GeneralTechnical Report FPL-GTR-56. Madison:WI U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest
Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1988.
153.
Salmon,C.G.
and J.E. Johnson.Steel
structures:design
and behavior.New
York, N Y :
Harper & Roe; 1980.
165.
154.
Schniewind,A. and D.E. Lyon. Further experiments on creep-rupture life under cyclic environmental
conditions.
Madison,
WE Society
of
Wood Science and Technology, Wood and Fiber.
Vol. 4, NO. 4: 334-341;1973.
Soltis,L.A. and S. Hanson.Strength
of lightgaugesteelnailedconnections.Madison,
WI:
Forest Products ResearchSociety,Forest Products Journal. Vol. 41, No. 5:57-60;1991.
166.
Schniewind,A.P. and D.E. Lyon. A fracture
mechanics approach to the
tensile
strength
perpendicular to grain of
dimension
lumber.
New York, Ny: Springer-Verlag, Wood Science
and Technology.Vol.
7:
45-49;
1973.
Soltis, L.A. and T.L.Wilkinson.Boltedconnection
design.
General
Research
Report FPLWI: U.S.Department of
GRT-54.
Madison,
Agriculture,
Forest
Service,
Forest
Products
Laboratory; 1987.
167.
Soltis,L.A. and T.L. Wilkinson.Timberbolted
connectiondesign.New
York, Ny: American
Society of Civil Engineers, Proceedings of StructuralCongress '87, Orlando, Florida. 205-220;
1987.
168.
Soltis, L.A., W.Nelson and J.L. Hills.Creepof
structural lumber.New
York, N Y : American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, Proceedings of
3rd Joint ASCE/ASMEMechanicsConference,
San Diego. 216-221;1989.
155.
156.
Scholten,J.A.Built-upwoodcolumnsconserve
lumber.
New
York, Ny: Engineering
News
Record. Vol. 107, No. 9;1931.
157.
Scholten,J.A.Testsofbuilt-upwoodcolumns.
Project L-273-154. Madison, WI: U.S. Department
of
Agriculture,
Forest Service, Forest
Products Laboratory; 1931.
158.
Scholten, J.A. Rounding notches makes stronger
joist. Chicago,
IL:
Pacific
Logging
Congress,
AmericanLumberman.
Vol. 46;1935.
169.
Scholten, J.A. Timber-connector joints, their
strength and design. Technical Bulletin No. 865.
Washington, D.C.: U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1944.
Southern Building Code Congress International.
Standard Building
Code.
Birmingham,
AL:
Southern Building Code Congress International;
1991.
170.
Stamm,A.J.Wood
and cellulosescience.New
York, Ny: Ronald Press; 1964.
171.
Stern, G.E. Load
transmission
by
nails
in
double
shear.
Special
Report
No.
55.
Blacksburg, VA:VirginiaPolytechnicInstitute
and State University, Wood Research Laboratory; 1964.
172.
Stieda,C.K.A.Stressconcentrations
innotched
timberbeams. Contribution No. P-49. Vancouver,Britishcolumbia:Department
of Forestry
of Canada, Vancouver Laboratory, Forest ProductsResearchBranch; 1964.
159.
160.
Scholten,J.A. and E.G. Molander.Strength of
nailed joints in
frame
walls.
Madison,
WI:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1950.
161.
Seeley,
F.B.
and J.O.
Smith.
Resistance
of
materials.
4th
ed.
New
York, Ny:
Wiley; 1957.
John
Rehmnces
169
173.
Suddarth, S.K. Testperformance of 1-1/2 inch
bolts inglulam
- roweffects and effectof
subsequent drying.
Portland, OR:
Wood
Products Information Center,
Wood
Design
Focus: Components. Vol. 1, No.1; 1990.
184.
Trayer, G.W. and H.W. March. Elastic instability
of
members
having
sections
common
in
aircraft construction. Report No. 382. Washington, DC: National AdvisoryCommittee for
Aeronautics; 1931.
174.
Suddarth, S.K., D.H. Percival and Q.B.Comus.
Testing and analysis of 4x2 parallel-chord metalplate connectedtrusses.Reserch
Report 8 1-1.
Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois,
Small Homes Council - Building
Research
Council; 1981.
185.
Truss Plate Institute. Commentary and recommendations for bracingwoodtrusses.
BWT-76.
Madison, WI: Truss Plate Institute; 1976.
186.
Truss Plate Institute. Designspecification for
metal
plate
connected
parallel
chord
wood
trusses. Madison, WI: Truss Plate Institute;
1980.
187.
Truss Plate Institute. Designspecificationfor
metalplateconnectedwoodtrusses.Madison,
WI: Truss Plate Institute; 1985.
188.
U.S. Department Commerce.
of
Lumber.
R16-39.
Simplified
Practice
Recommendation
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureauof Standards; 1940.
189.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Structural glued
laminated
timber.
Commercial
Standard CS
253-63. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Commerce, National Bureau of Standards; 1963.
175.
176.
Tiemann, H.D.
testing upon the
standardization of
PA:
Proceedings
Testing Materials.
I'he effectofthe
speed of
strength of
wood
and the
tests for speed. Philadelphia,
of the AmericanSociety for
Vol. 8: 541-557;
1908.
I
Tiemann, H.D. Someresults
of dead load
bending tests by means of a recording deflectometer. Philadelphia, PA:
Proceedings
of the
AmericanSociety for TestingMaterials.Vol. 9:
534-548;1909.
177.
Tiemann, H.D. Wood technology.
3rd
ed.
New York, N Y : Pitman Publishing; 1951.
178.
Timber Engineering Company. Design manual
for TECO timber-connector construction.
Washington, DC: National Lumber ManufacturersAssociation,TimberEngineeringCompany;
1955.
179.
Timber EngineeringCompany.Timberdesign
and construction handbook. New York, N Y :
F.W. Dodge; 1956.
180.
Tissell, J.R. Horizontal plywood diaphragm
tests. Laboratory report NO. 106. Tacoma,
WA.AmericanPlywoodAssociation;
1967.
181.
Tissell, J.R. Plywood diaphragms. Research
Report 138. Tacoma, W A AmericanPlywood
Association; 1990.
182.
Tissell, J.R.
Structural panel
shear
walls.
Research Report 154. Tacoma, WA:American
PlywoodAssociation; 1990.
183.
Trayer, G.W. The bearing strength of wood
under bolts.
Technical
Bulletin
No. 332.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1932.
190.
U.S. Department of Commerce.
American
softwood lumber standard. NBS
Voluntary
Product Standard PS 20-70. Washington,DC:
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau
of Standards; 1970.
191.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Structural glued
laminatedtimber.Voluntary
Product Standard
PS 56-73. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
ofCommerce, National Bureauof
Standards;
1973.
192.
Vanderbilt, M.D., J.R. Goodman and J. Bodig.
A rational analysis and designprocedure for
wood joist floor systems. Final Report tothe
National Science Foundation for Grant GK30853. Fort Collins,
CO:
Colorado State
University, Department of
Civil
Engineering;
1974.
193.
Wangaard, F.F. The mechanicalproperties of
wood.New
York, N Y : John Wiley; 1950.
194.
War Production Board. National emergency
specifications for the
design,
fabrication and
erection of stress grade lumber and its fastenings
for buildings.Directive
No. 29. Washington,
DC:
War Production Board, Conservation
Division; 1943.
-
-
-
NDS Commentary
195. Wilkinson,
T.L.
Moisture
cycling
of
trussed
rafterjoints.ResearchPaper
FPL 67. Madison, WI: U.S. Department
Agriculture,
of
Forest Service,
Forest
Products
Laboratory;
1966.
20 5. Williamson, T.G. and B. Hill.Waiver of metal
hanger torsional restraint requirements. CommunicationtoICBOEvaluationService.Vancouver,WA:AmericanInstituteofTimberConstruction.
(November);
1989.
196. Wilkinson,T.L.Strengthevaluation
of round
timberpiles.ResearchPaper
FPL 101.Madison, WI:
US. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1968.
206.
Williamson, T.G.,R. GreggandH.Brooks.
Wood
design:
A
commentary
on
the
performance
of
deep
and narrow
re-sawn
glulam
purlins.LosAngles,CA:StructuralEngineers
Association of Southern California, From Experience.
(June);
1990.
207.
Wilson, T.R.C. Guidetothegradingofstructuraltimbers and thedetermination ofworking
stresses. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous
Publication
185.
Washington,
DC:
U.S. DepartmentofAgriculture; 1934.
208.
Wilson, T.R.C. Gluedlaminatedwoodenarch.
TechnicalBulletin No. 691. Washington,DC:
U.S. Department of Agriculture,ForestService;
1939.
209.
Wilson, T.R.C. and W.S.Cottingham.Testsof
gluedlaminatedwoodbeams
and columnsand
development
of
principles
of
design.
Report
WI: U.S. Department of
R1687.
Madison,
Agriculture,
Forest
Service,
Forest
Products
Laboratory; 1947.
210.
Winandy, J.E. Effects of treatment and redrying
of wood.Madison,
onmechanicalproperties
WI: ForestProductsResearchSociety,Proceedings47358of
Conference on WoodProtection
Techniques and the Use of TreatedWood in
Construction. 54-62;
1988.
197. Wilkinson, T.L. Formulas for workingstresses
for timberpiles.Madison,
WI: U.S. Department
of
Agriculture,
Forest Service,
Forest
Products Laboratory; 1969.
198. Wilkinson, T.L. Analysesofnailed joints with
dissimilarmembers.New York, N Y : American
Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the StructuralDivision.Vol.98,
No. ST9: 2005-2013;
1972.
199. Wilkinson,T.L.Elasticbearingconstants
for
sheathingmaterials.ResearchPaper
FPL 192.
Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1974.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
Wilkinson, T.L. Strengthofboltedwood
joints
withvarious ratios of memberthickness.Research Paper FPL 314. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest
Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1978.
Wilkinson, T.L. Assessment
of
modification
factors for a row of bolts in timber connections.
Research Paper FPL 376. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest
Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1980.
Wilkinson,
T.L.
Bolted
connection
allowable
loads based on the European yield model.
Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1991.
Wilkinson, T.L.
Dowel
bearing
strength.
Research Paper FPL-RP-505.
Madison,
WI:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1991.
Wilkinson, T.L. and T.R. Laatsch.Lateral and
withdrawal resistance of tapping screws in three
densitiesofwood.Madison,
WI: Forest ProductsResearchSociety,ForestProducts
Journal.
Vol. 20, NO.7:35-41;1971.
21 1. Winandy,J.E.CCApreservativetreatmentand
redryingeffects on thebendingpropertiesof2
by southern
4
pine.
Madison,
WI: Forest
Products
Research
Society,
Forest
Products
Journal. Vol. 39, No. 9:
14-21;
1989.
212.
Winandy,
J.E.
ACA
and CCA
preservative
treatment and redrying effects on bending propertiesofDouglas-fir.Stevensville,MD:AmericanWood-Preservers’AssociationProceedings.
Vol. 85:106-118;1989.
213.
Winandy,J.E. and H.M. Barnes.Influenceof
initial kiln-drying temperature on CCA-treatment
effects on strength.Stevensville,MD:American
Wood-Preservers’AssociationProceedings.
Vol
87;1991.
NDS Commentary
214.
21 5.
Winandy, J.E. and R.S. Boone. The effectsof
CCA preservative treatment and redrying on the
bending
properties
of 2 X 6 southern pine
lumber. Madison, WI: Society of WoodScience and Technology, Wood and Fiber Science.
V01.20, No.3: 350-364;1988.
Winandy, J.E., R.S. Boone and B.A.Bendsten.
Interaction of CCA preservativetreatment and
redrying:effect on themechanicalproperties of
southern pine. Madison, WI: Forest Products
ResearchSociety, Forest Products Journal. Vol.
35, NO. 10: 62-68;1985.
21 6.
Withey, M.O. and J. Aston. Johnson’s materials
of construction. New York, N Y : John Wiley;
1939.
217.
Wolfe, R.W. Researchdealingwitheffects
of
bearinglength on compressionperpendicular to
the grain. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1983.
218.
219.
220.
221
*
222.
223.
172
Wolfe, R.W. Allowablestresses for theupsidedown
timber
industry. Madison, WI: U.S.
Department Agriculture,
of
Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1989.
Wolfe, R.W. Performance of light-frame redundant assemblies. Tokyo, Japan: Proceedings of
the 1990 International Timber
Engineering
1: 124-131;
1990.
conference.
Vol.
Wolfe, R.W. andT.
LaBissoniere. Structural
performance of light-frameroofassemblies.
11.
Conventional truss assemblies.Research
Paper
FPL-RP-499. Madison, WI: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1991.
224.
Wood, L.W. Relation of strength ofwood to
duration of load. Report No. 1916, Madison,
WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest
Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 1951,
revised 1960.
225.
Wood, L.W. and L.A. Soltis.
Stiffness
and
shrinkage of
green
and dry joists. Research
Paper FPL 15. Madison, WI: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1964.
226.
Ylinen, A. A method of determiningthebucklingstress and therequiredcross-sectionalarea
for centrallyloaded straight columns inelastic
and inelasticrange. Zurich, Switzerland:Publications of International Association for Bridge
and Structural Engineering.
Vol.
16:
529-550;
1956.
227.
Zahn, J.J. Strength ofmultiple-memberstructures.Research Paper FPL 139. Madison, WI:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1970.
228.
Zahn, J.J. Strength of lumber undercombined
bending and compression.ResearchPaper FPL
391. Madison, WI: U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Labora-
229.
Designofwoodmembersunder
load. New York, N Y : American
y of Civil Engineers, Journal of Structural
eering.Vol. 112, No. 9:2109-2126;1986.
230.
Combined-load stability criterion for
-columns.New
York, N Y : Ameriof Civil Engineers, Journal of Strucring.Vol. 114, No. 11: 2612-2618;
Wood, L.W. Behavior of wood under continued
News
loading. New York, N Y : Engineering
108-111;
1947.
Record. Vol. 139, No. 24:
23 1.
Wood, L.W. Variation of strength properties in
woods used for structural purposes. Report No.
R1780. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products
Laboratory; 1950.
232.
Wood, L.W. Formulas for columnswithside
loads and eccentricity. Report No. R1782.
Madison, W I : U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory;
1950.
Rehnnces
, J.J.Proposeddesignformula
for wood
columns. Paper No. 87-4002. Baltimore,
Proceedings of
American
Society
of
NFPA on column
233.
inwoodcolumns
and beams. Madison, WI:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1990.
NDS Commentary
234.
Zahn, J.J. Design equation for multiple-fastener
woodconnections. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest
Products Laboratory; 1991.
235.
Strength
of
Foliente, G.C. and T.E. McLain.
end-notched woodbeams:acriticalfillet
hoop
stress approach. Madison, WI: Society of Wood
Science and Technology,Wood and Fiber Science.Vol.24,
No.2 168-180;1992.
236.
Lam, F. and Morris, P.Effectofdouble-density incising on bending strength of
lumber.
Madison, WI: Forest Products Research Society,
Forest Products Journal. Vol.41, No. 9:4347;1991.
237.
LeVann, S.L., R.J. Ross and J.E. Winandy.
Effectsoffire retardant chemicals on the bending properties of wood at elevated temperatures.
Research Paper FPL-RP-498. Madison, WI:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory; 1990.
238.
National Forest Products Association.Design of
wood frame structures for permanence - wood
construction data 6. Washington, DC: National
Forest Products Association; 1988.
NDS Commentary
THISPAGELEFTBLANKINTENTIONALLY