APPEDIX B
Assessment and Transformation
Program Review Yearly Update Report
Review Coordinator
Review Team Members
Year Reviewed
A. Outcomes Assessment Plan Report
Outcome
Assessment
Method (Indicate
the assessment
methodology to
be used, or was
used, such as
focus group or
exit interview.)
To Whom?
By Whom?
Administered
When?
Use of Results
Assessment
Status/
Findings
(Indicate when
the data will be
available for
analysis or the
result of the
analysis. In the
next year,
indicate the
results of a
second
assessment cycle
Transformations
(Indicate what
transformations were
implemented as a result
of assessments.)
Intended
Follow-up
B. Department Goals Report
Division Strategic
Direction
Division Goal
Department
Goal
FY2007-08
Action Plan
Status of each
action item
Collaboration
Partners
Resources eeded /
Reallocated
Completed
In Progress
Staff
Staff Time
Completed
In Progress
New Money
Reallocated $
Space
Equipment
Other:
C. Improvements or Rationale for Action: (Provide a brief summary of the major
accomplishments and achievements of your department during the past year.)
Vice President’s Recommendation
Comments:
______________________________________________________ _____/_____/_____
Vice President’s Signature
Date
Institutional Effectiveness Committee’s Comments
Comments:
______________________________________________________ _____/_____/_____
Chair, Institutional Effectiveness Committee
Date
APPEDIX C
Program Title_________________________________________________________
Date and Time of the program review______________________________________
The PRC will provide the program with an external perspective concerning the
administrative and educational aspects of the program. This perspective includes a
judgment of program quality and an assessment of the effectiveness of the program.
Evaluation
1.
Does the program have mission and goals statements in place?
Yes
2.
Are program goals and objectives consistent with the college’s mission?
No
3.
Has there been progress in implementing the last program review's
recommendations for program improvement?
Yes
No
4.
Has the program identified program and/or student learning outcomes that are
relevant to its mission?
Yes
No
5.
Are appropriate instruments used to assess program and/or student learning
outcomes?
Yes
No
6.
Are results of assessments used to improve the program?
7.
Are program strengths clearly articulated?
Yes
No
8.
Are program challenges clearly articulated?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Comments or suggestions to strengthen the program and/or the Program Review: