5/29/2016 C A ADVISING M ANNUAL PLANNING P UPDATE U S 2 5/29/2016 Student Services Area: Academic Advising Center Academic Year: 2009-2010 We certify that this program review document represents the plans, goals, and critical analysis of this instructional program. Please enter name and signature Author(s): Jennifer Bailey Date: 10/01/09 Department Administrator: Cheryl Tucker Date: 10/01/09 V. P.: Dr. Keith Snow-Flamer Validation: _________ 1. Report on goals and improvements: (Provide a brief summary of the major accomplishments and achievements of your department during the past year.) Please note some goals that you want to accomplish this year. The Academic Advising department hired five new Student Development advisors beginning January 13th, 2009. With additional staff advising should increase retention rates, allow our department to improve on outreach functions and assist students in a more effective and timely manner and will be collecting throughout the 2009-2010 academic year. In addition to the newly hired Student Development advisors, one advisor was appointed to distance education only. With the addition of advisors, the Advising department moved to the Academic Support Center. The Counselors remain in the Counseling department. With that division, we also divided the work load. Counselors are considered specialists as advisors are considered generalists. In addition to the move, student services reorganization took place in terms of classified staff and administrators. The work flow at the ASC is more collaborative in terms of what the ASC provides and Advising provides. For the fall 2009 semester Advising implemented a number of learning cohorts. Cohorts include stand alone (general education) courses, linked courses, and freshmen seminar courses. With each section we have embedded an advisor in efforts to support student success in the classroom. Advisors are expected to visit the assigned course(s) as their schedule allows. Advisors will have weekly contact with the students and the instructor(s). By embedding advisors into these particular courses, this will assist in building our retention rates and promote student success in the classroom. We have begun the collection process as of August 24, 2009. Not only would the department like to explore retention and persistence rates for those students enrolled in the cohorts but those who are not enrolled in the learning cohorts. The department improved its services with the E-Advising suite purchase. Eadvising is a program within Datatel that links to Web Advisor. With the program, 3 5/29/2016 advisors and counselors can create student education plans, run degree audits, and students can communicate with his/her advisor via this online medium. This will create less repetitive and more accurate work for the advisor, counselor and the student. Within the next 12 months, Advising would like to have the Student Development Advisors fully trained in all advising aspects as well as in outreach activities. With the fully trained advisors, the department should increase retention rates, especially with the cohorts. Advising would like to increase student education plans for all students not just select groups. Since the increase in Student Development Advisors, we will have the ability to participate in more outreach activities. This data will be collected for the 20092010 academic year. . Assign advisors to high schools and define enrollment targets based on historic enrollment numbers Work with HSU to collaborate on high school visits Create recruiting materials and presentations (in English and Spanish) Concentrate recruitment efforts on locations where specific targeted groups of students (honors, Hispanic Latino, Indian) can be found and contacted effectively. Train all counselors and advisors in outreach activities Offer and identify alternative visit opportunities so that those families can attend with the student. Saturday visits, evening programs, etc. Families will be informed about the CR application and enrollment process Host Spring on campus counselor meeting Host fall and spring on campus program for prospective students (provide intentional parent program covering financial aid, academics, etc) Meet with high school counselors to determine “optimal” summer course schedule Use entering student data in advisor caseloads to determine which block of students should be monitored and assisted Develop an advising process that has advising immediately following testing Examine and improve advising system for continuing students to include drop in advising Assess the content, delivery, and timing of all programs that lead to the fist day of class (i.e. Redwoods days, orientation, testing, campus visits) Retention will become a recurring theme in the planning and delivery of orientation activities Implement “caseload management” system for academic advising Implement process for advisors to track and make weekly contact with advisees in their caseload. Research “best practice” in supporting academic needs of high risk/basic skills students Assign athletics to “regular” advisors as part of their caseload Give advisors responsibility for transcript evaluation and SEPs Work with Campus Life to revise orientation program along the HOP model. 4 5/29/2016 Goal Assign advisors to high schools and define enrollment targets based on historic enrollment numbers Expected Completion Summer 2009 Rational Best practices Work with HSU to collaborate on high school visits Ongoing Best practices Create recruiting materials and presentations (in English and Spanish) Spring 2010 Best practices Train all counselors and advisors in outreach activities Spring 2010 Offer and identify alternative visit opportunities so that those families can attend with the student. Saturday visits, evening programs, etc. Spring 2010 The more informed the advisors and counselors are the more informed the students and parents Best practices Families will be informed about the CR application and enrollment process Fall 2009 Host Spring on campus counselor meeting Done Host fall and spring on campus program for prospective students (provide intentional parent program covering financial aid, academics, Fall 2009 We will be hosting a Instant Admissions Day within our local high school outreach area in November so that CR can become the number one college choice Keep local high school counselors and communities agencies well informed to build more knowledge and better relationships We will be hosting a Instant Admissions Day within our local high school outreach area in November so that CR can become the number one 5 5/29/2016 college choice etc) Meet with high school counselors to determine “optimal” summer course schedule Spring 2010 Best practices Use entering student data in advisor caseloads to determine which block of students should be monitored and assisted Fall 2009 Best practices Develop an advising process that has advising immediately following testing Ongoing Examine and improve advising system for continuing students to include drop in advising Fall 2009 The Advising Office has relocated to the ASC to administer math and English assessment testing and to advise the student immediately Best practices Assess the content, delivery, and timing of all programs that lead to the fist day of class (i.e. Redwoods days, orientation, testing, campus visits) Ongoing Retention will become a recurring theme in the planning and delivery of orientation activities Ongoing Implement “caseload management” system for academic advising Fall 2009 Implement process for advisors to track and Fall 2009 Students need to be informed at CR can be there choice of schools and that they have a better opportunity to transfer to top notch schools as transfer students receive higher priority than incoming freshmen Best practices By utilizing the caseload approach we plan to increase our retention rates significantly. We are currently working with IR on this project. We plan to use a “score card” to tracking device 6 5/29/2016 make weekly contact with advisees in their caseload. Research “best practice” in supporting academic needs of high risk/basic skills students Ongoing Assign athletics to “regular” advisors as part of their caseload Fall 2009 Give advisors responsibility for transcript evaluation and SEPs Fall 2009 Work with Campus Life to Fall 2009 revise orientation program along the HOP model. for students within the cohorts on a week by week basis between the advisor and the student Best practices should be a models used in assisting at risk/basic skills students. We would like to put our athletes on a two-year track in order to enable them to transfer to universities and have the ability to play at the university level The more informed and knowledgeable the advisors the better informed the students in order to meet their educational goals Best practices 7 5/29/2016 2. Report on 2008-2009 Assessment Plan for Student Services Area: Academic Advising Center (Please provide a 1 page historical reference of last year’s outcomes) Mission Statement: As partners in education, we are committed to student success. We provide information, support, and guidance to assist each student in the developmental process of becoming responsible, self-directed, self-sufficient learners. Objective 1. Improve orientation services to reduce barriers to persistence Student Learning Outcome (SLO) or Program Learning Outcome (PLO) Linked to Student Service Goal/Strategic Plan Orientation students will be able to identify and utilize student support resources that will assist in their educational goals. Ensure student access Enable student attainment of educational goals Assessment Criteria (Specify Target Performance Level) Assessment Measure Completion (or anticipate completion)/ Findings Collect Datamart matriculation baseline data Datamart and SARS matriculation data More than 70% of students will be satisfied with advising services Spring 2007 Student Satisfaction Survey 4295 students received matriculation services in 2008-2009 academic year according to Datamart. In 2008-2009: Total SARS contacts from 8/1/08 - 7/31/09 49,052 broken down as follows: 4,382 - ACADFOLLOWUP 17,850 - ADVISING 1,620 - CAREER CENTER 5,470 - EOPS 1,523 ORIENTATION 2,130 - SEP 6,468 - TRANSFER 2,617 - DSPS 918 - CALWORKS + Other odds & ends. These 49,052 contacts served ~ 8566 students Improvement Recommendat ions (next step) Maintain 70% satisifaction level from Advising Services Satisfaction Survey 4295 students received matriculation services and maintain for 20092010 academic year 8 5/29/2016 70.7% of 2007 survey participants (students) were satisfied with advising and counseling services. 2. Enable degree and certificate completion in a timely manner Students will be able to identify degrees and certificates available at CR Students will identify an SEP from degree and certificate review Educational Master Plan Goal #1: Enable student to attainment of educational goals Student Services Goal # 2: Improve student retention Student Services Goal # 4: Provide counseling support services to achieve vocational training or transfer success Students will develop an SEP Number of students receiving matriculation services Student Satisfaction Survey will show increase in satisfaction of knowledge of academic programs Student Satisfaction Survey will show increase in satisfaction of knowledge in transfer Datamart/SARS SEP data Datamart matriculation data 2007 Student Satisfaction Survey IR reported that 2,130 degrees and/or certificates were awarded for the 20082009 academic year Advising should brainstorm ideas in SARS regarding SEPs. Datamart reported a total of 548 SEPS for the 08-09 academic year SARS noted a total of 2130 duplicated SARS SEPs contacts in the 0809 academic year According to the 2007 student satisfaction survey: 69.8% of students were satisfied with the advisors knowledge of programs 65.7% of students were satisfied with advisors knowledge of transferring The student satisfaction survey is a bi-annual survey and will be administered in Fall 2009. For 2009-2010 improve advising statisfaiction levels in regards to levels of knowledge of transfer and knowledge of academic programs to 70% for 2009-2010. 9 5/29/2016 3. 2009-2010 Assessment Plan for Student Services Area: Academic Advising Center Report on up to three outcomes from your service area. Please detail findings and improvement recommendations on following page. Mission Statement: As partners in education, we are committed to student success. We provide information, support, and guidance to assist each student in the developmental process of becoming responsible, self-directed, self-sufficient learners. Objective Student Learning Outcome (SLO) or Program Learning Outcome (PLO) Linked to Student Service Goal/Strategic Plan Assessment Criteria (Specify Target Performance Level) Assessment Measure (Measurement tool) Completion (or anticipate completion)/ Findings* Improvement Recommendations (next step)* 10 5/29/2016 2. Implement a Student Development Advisor training program in Fall 2009 1 1 Advisors participating in the training program will integrate comprehensive academic advising strategies into prior advising skill and knowledge set Educational Master Plan Goal #5: Ensure student success Educational Master Plan Goal # 3: Build a culture of assessment Student Service Goal # 4: Provide counseling support services to achieve vocational training or transfer success Set baseline data for advisors and direct supervisors. To be evaluated in 2010 Support and assist learning cohorts with student support services Cohort students will be able to identify and utilize student support services that will assist in their educational goals Educational Master Plan Goal # 5: Ensure student success Student Services Goal # 2: Improve student retention Set baselines for all performance levels Cohort students will recognize the connections, value and assistance received as a cohort participant Cohort students will utilize student support services more than comparable non-cohort students. A majority students enrolled in the learning cohorts persist to the next semester Pre and post advisor evaluation completed by advisors and direct supervisors to assess advisor knowledge skills and performance before and after training Anticipate advisors that receive training will provide comprehensive student support services to students and feel more confident about expertise Revise training program based on advisor feedback Scorecard of students support services to cohort students Anticipate cohort students will use more services than comparable noncohort students Review and revise cohort program based on cohort experiences Datatelattrition rates of cohort and Focus group with cohort students Improve effectiveness of high school recruitment efforts High school students participating in onsite advisor visits will identify educational goals at CR Educational Master Plan #2 Contribute to the economic, cultural, and social well-being of the North Coast Community Students who participate in advisor visits will apply and register at CR at higher rates than nonparticipating students. Establish base line data Isolate elements of cohort student success Use cohort students to refine program Use cohorts for brainstorming student support groups and peer mentoring Anticipate cohort students will use group dynamic as academic success support Students identify the impact the cohort program had on their academic success 3. Anticipate students in cohorts will have higher persistence rates than comparable non-cohort students. Create evaluation tool to assess students satisfaction with advising services High school visit sign in sheets compared with following semester enrollments Anticipate students who had advising visits will be more likely to persist Survey with high school students to improve high school recruitment efforts. 11 5/29/2016 * Detail on following page 12 5/29/2016 2009 Assessment Plan Findings/Data Analysis & Improvement Recommendations SLO/PAO #1: PLO: Orientation students will be able to identify and utilize student support resources that will assist in their educational goals. Findings/Data Analysis: 4295 students received matriculation services in 2008-2009 academic year according to Datamart. In 2008-2009: Total SARS contacts from 8/1/08 - 7/31/09 - 49,052 broken down as follows: 4,382 - ACAD-FOLLOWUP 17,850 - ADVISING 1,620 - CAREER CENTER 5,470 - EOPS 1,523 - ORIENTATION 2,130 - SEP 6,468 - TRANSFER 2,617 - DSPS 918 - CALWORKS + Other odds & ends. These 49,052 contacts served ~ 8566 students 70.7% of 2007 survey participants (students) were satisfied with advising and counseling services. Improvement Recommendations: Maintain 70% satisfaction level from Advising Services Satisfaction Survey 4295 students received matriculation services and maintain for 2009-2010 academic year SLO/PAO #2: Findings/Data Analysis: Improvement Recommendations: 13 5/29/2016 4. Resource Needs Does the staffing structure meet the unit’s needs? If your answer is “no,” please consider the following in framing your answer: a. Has the workload of your unit increased in recent years? Do you anticipate the workload will increase, decrease or remain constant in the upcoming one to three years? Is this a temporary situation? b. Has technology made it possible to do more work with the same staff? Or, has technology increased your work load (adding web features which need updating for example)? c. Does the workload have significant peaks and valleys during the fiscal year? If so, describe. d. If your workload is increasing and resources will not allow for increased staffing, how do you anticipate being able to ameliorate the negative consequences of too much work and maintain a positive atmosphere in your unit? 14 5/29/2016 Unit Name: _________________________________________ a. Staff Needs NEW OR REPLACEMENT STAFF (Administrative or Classified) List Staff Positions Needed for Academic Year: 2009-2010 Please be as specific and as brief as possible when offering a reason. Place titles on list in order (rank) or importance. 1. Manager or Assistant Director of the Academic Advising Department Reason: Staff supervision on daily basis Administrative person to do program review/annual planning Employee evaluations Daily tasks to be done at the administrative level can only Starting salary: 40 hours a week at $37,011 2.IT Support Staff Reason: The College wants to go with 95% of our course offerings online therefore we need additional staff members(s) to support that growth of College. Starting salary for 3 full time members 40 hours a week: $116,310 3. Transcript Evaluator Reason: We need to decrease the errors (reflected in the Student Satisfaction Survey) and be consistent with the information we give students and so all the advisors are consistent as well. Starting salary: $27,033 4. Reason: 5. Reason: 15 5/29/2016 6. Reason: * TCP = “Total Cost of Position” for one year is the cost of an average salary plus benefits for an individual. New positions (not replacement positions) also require space and equipment. Please speak with your campus Business Officer to obtain accurate cost estimates. Please be sure to add related office space, equipment and other needs for new positions to the appropriate form and mention the link to the position. 16 5/29/2016 Unit Name: _________________________________________ b. Equipment (excluding technology) Needs Not Covered by Current Budget List Equipment or Equipment Repair Needed for Academic Year 2009-2010 Please list/summarize the needs of your unit on your campus below. Please be as specific and as brief as possible. Place items on list in order (rank) or importance. 1. 8 chairs to create a waiting area for the advising center Reason: Create a waiting area for students waiting to see an advisor as we do not have one now so students feel comfortable and welcome not just to the Advising Office but to CR as well. 2. Table for waiting area Reason: Create a waiting area for students waiting to see an advisor as we do not have one now so students feel comfortable and welcome not just to the Advising Office but to CR as well. 3. Office panel walls Reason: We have advisors in spaces where confidential information is shared among the student and the advisor. A panel wall will provide more privacy for the student. Cost per item Number Requested Total Cost of Request 7 $635.71 1 $170 3 $189.00 each $650 4. Reason: 5. Reason: 6. Reason: 17 5/29/2016 * TCO = “Total Cost of Ownership” for one year is the cost of an average cost for one year. Please speak with your campus Business Officer to obtain accurate cost estimates. Please be sure to check with your department chair to clarify what you current budget allotment are. If equipment needs are linked to a position please be sure to mention that linkage. 18 5/29/2016 Unit Name: _________________________________________ c. Technology++ Needs Not Covered by Current Budget: NOTE: Technology; excludes software, network infrastructure, furniture, and consumables (toner, cartridges, etc) Submitted by: Jennifer Bailey Title: Student Development Advising Coordinator Phone: 4267 * Priority 1. Usage / Justification EQUIPMENT REQUESTED New (N) or Replacem ent (R)? Program: New (N) or Continuing (C) ? 3. Usage / Justification Is there existing Infrastructure ? How many users served? Has it been repaired frequently? Dept No 15 N/A Cost per item Number Requested Total Cost of Request 1 $5,200 Xerox Copy Machine which can double as a fax machine-we do not have one and must walk across campus to get copies/faxes N 2. Usage / Justification Location (i.e Office, Classroom , etc.) Multi-line phone-need: one for the front counter so phones can be answered in a timely manner Paper shredder: we work with confidential information on a daily basis (i.e. transcripts, personal information, etc) therefore confidential paperwork will be 1 N N/A Dept Yes N/A N N Dept Yes 15 N/A $500 $200 19 5/29/2016 shredded immediately. 4. Usage / Justification More licenses of for Web Advisor $2,040 3 $6,120 5. License to change website Usage / $55 2 Justification $110 TCO = “Total Cost of Ownership” for one year is the cost of an average cost for one year. Please speak with your campus Business Officer to obtain accurate cost estimates. Please be sure to check with your department chair to clarify what you current budget allotment are. If equipment needs are linked to a position please be sure to mention that linkage. ++Technology is (1) equipment that attaches to a computer, or (2) a computer is needed to drive the equipment. 20 5/29/2016 Unit Name: _________________________________________ d. Facilities Needs Not Covered by Current Building or Remodeling Projects* List Facility Needs for Academic Year___________________ (Remodels, Renovations or added new facilities) Place items on list in order (rank) or importance. Total Cost of Request 1. Reason: 2. Reason: 3. Reason: 4. Reason: 5. Reason: 6. Reason: *Please speak with your campus Business Officer to obtain accurate cost estimates and to learn if the facilities you need are already in the planning stages. 21 5/29/2016 Unit Name: _________________________________________ e. Professional or Organizational Development Needs Not Covered by Current Budget* List Professional Development Needs for Academic Year 2009-2010 Reasons might include in response to AUO assessment findings or the need to update skills. Please be as specific and as brief as possible. Some items may not have a cost per se, but reflect the need to spend current staff time differently. Place items on list in order (rank) or importance. 1. NACADA conferences Reason: National Academic Advising Association for professional development. The more advisors have the professional opportunities to advance this vastly growing career, the more knowledge and professionalism will be brought to the field of academic advising. Cost per item $650 included is $300 airfare Number Requested Total Cost of Request 7 $4,500 2. Reason: 3. Reason: 4. Reason: 5. Reason: 6. Reason: 22 5/29/2016 *It is recommended that you speak with Human Resources or the Management Association to see if your request can be met with current budget. 23 5/29/2016 Unit Name: _________________________________________ f. OTHER NEEDS not covered by current budget List Other Needs for Academic Year___________________ Please list/summarize the needs of your unit on your campus below. Please be as specific and as brief as possible. Not all needs will have a cost, but may require a reallocation of current staff time. Place items on list in order (rank) or importance. Cost per item Number Requested Total Cost of Request 1. Reason: 2. Reason: 3. Reason: 4. Reason: 5. Reason: 6. Reason: 24 5/29/2016 25