Instructional Program Review Update 2012/13 (fields will expand as you type) Section 1 ‐ Program Information 1.0 Name of Program: Health, Physical Education and Athletics Date: January 10, 2013 1.1 Program Review Authors: Doug Oliveira, Maggie White, Susie Diemer, Mike Cox, Tino Romero, Bob Brown, Mike Woychak, Robert Ekholdt, Marla Gleave 1.2 Dean’s Signature: Joe Hash Date: January 18, 2013 1.3 Individual Program Information # of Degrees # of Certificates # of Courses # of GE Courses NA NA 34 2 The shaded cells below are to be populated by the Program Review Committee as needed. # of Full Time Faculty 2010‐2011 2011‐12 # of Part Time Faculty 2010‐2011 # of Staff FTE 2011‐12 2010‐2011 2011‐12 Personnel Budget 2010‐2011 2011‐12 Discretionary Budget 2010‐2011 2011‐12 1.3.1 State briefly how the program functions support the college mission: Our health, physical education and athletic programs help students achieve a complete and unique education through practical implementation of life‐long wellness. Our programs promote diversity and the application of collaborative learning, problem solving, critical thinking and transfer education. All of our courses contribute to the vitality and life‐long wellness of the community. Our department is fully engaged in documenting assessment for all courses and collaborating on continual course improvements. 1.3.2 Program highlights/accomplishments: Some of the previous year’s highlights include: ‐ Community outreach through CPR certification, health seminar at local businesses, recruitment of local high school students, assist with literacy programs at local schools and hosting youth activity wellness events. ‐ Academics/curricular within the college: academic progress reports, new tutorial sessions, wellness assessments that show measurable fitness level improvements and 25% of student athletes on fall 2012 honor roll. 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 1 Section 2 ‐ Data Analysis 2.1 Enrollment & Fill Rate Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Enrollments & fill rates Comment if checked: Heath Ed enrollment increased, Physical Education activity courses remained stable with the exception Enrollment x of PE 12A which showed a decline. The suspension of two intercollegiate teams has also adversely affected Physical Education enrollments. Comment if checked: Heath Ed fill rates consistently high at 80%. Physical Ed did see a decline. PE fill rates are affected by Fill Rate x high cap numbers for intercollegiate courses. We are assessing each intercollegiate course individually to determine if cap adjustments are necessary. 2.2 Success & Retention Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Success & Retention Success x Comment if checked: Success rates for both Health Ed and Physical Education are above district averages. Retention x Comment if checked: Retention rates for both Health Ed and Physical Education are above district averages. 2.3 Persistence Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Persistence ☐ Comment: 2.4 Completions Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Completions & Transfers ☐ Comment: 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 2 Student Equity Group Data 2.5 Enrollments Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to Enrollments & fill rates Comment: Enrollment of female students has declined due to the discontinuation of certain activity courses such as dance, pilates, yoga, aerobics, etc. Enrollment of African‐American students in HPE courses is significantly higher than the district average. 2.6 Success & Retention Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to success & retention Comment: Success numbers for all Student Equity Groups in HPE courses is approximately 10% above districts averages. Retention numbers for HPE courses matches or exceeds district averages. 2.7 Persistence Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to persistence Comment: Data not provided Additional Indicators 2.8 Faculty Information Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_ _Select.asp Select your program and click on: Faculty (FT/PT) & FTES/FTEF Comment: Historically FTEF for HPE has exceeded the district average by around 5 FTE. 2011‐12 the FTEF declined to match the district average. 2.9 Labor Market Data (CTE/Occupational programs only) Refer to the California Employment Development Division: http://www.edd.ca.gov/ www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov
Provide a narrative that addresses the following: a. Documentation of labor market demand 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 3 b. Non‐duplication of other training programs in the region c. Effectiveness as measured by student employment and program completions. Narrative: Overall, what has been the impact of the change in indicators on student achievement and learning: Provide narrative on the factors that may have contributed to the improvement or decline in the identified population: Section 3 – Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities Curriculum & Assessment Data Are all courses on track for complete assessment of all outcomes in two years? Y/N What courses, if any, are not on track with regard to assessment? Explain. # of PLOs Assessed and Reported during the 2011‐2012 academic year. % of Course Outlines of Record updated If there is no plan for updating outdated curriculum, when will you inactivate? View curriculum status: click here or go to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Curriculum Status Assessment Reporting completed? Y/N Program Advisory Committee Met? Y/N Yes N/A N/A 100% PE 21A is still listed as an active course but is inactivated. Yes N/A 3.0 How has assessment of course level SLO’s led to improvement in student learning (top three): 1. Increased collaboration of faculty to revise and update curriculum. 2. Increased collaboration has lead to improvements in teaching modalities. 3. Repeated assessment of health education SLO showed an increase in student success. 3.1 How has assessment of program level outcomes led to degree/certificate improvement (top three): N/A 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 4 3.2 (Optional) Describe unusual assessment findings/observations that may require further research or institutional support: Institutional support is necessary for wellness testing equipment / lab space. Current wellness testing equipment and fitness equipment is outdated, inadequate and not sufficiently maintained. Section – 4 Evaluation of Previous Plans 4.1 Describe plans/actions identified in the last program review and their current status. What measurable outcomes were achieved due to actions completed. Actions Current Status Outcomes Revise curricular assessment from a five year Five year completed and since changed to a two plan to a two year plan. year plan. Update several course outlines. Mount projectors in PE 200 and PE 201
100% updated. Course offerings are current. Not completed. Board of Trustees approved via integrated planning process, currently on hold awaiting change in accreditation status Initial engineering/architectural plans have been submitted Not approved. Resubmitting All facility related Measure Q projects Physical Education Instructor/Intercollegiate Coach 4.2 (If applicable) Describe how funds provided in support of the plan(s) contributed to program improvement: Section – 5 Planning 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 5 5.0 Program Plans (2012/2013) Based on data analysis, student learning outcomes and program indicators, assessment and review, and your critical reflections, describe the program’s Action Plan for the 2012/13 academic year. If more than one plan, add rows. Include necessary resources. (Only a list of resources is needed here. Provide detailed line item budgets, supporting data or other justifications in the Resource Request). 5.1 Program Plans Relationship to Institutional Plans Correlates to the Follow‐through with Board of Trustee approved fields / physical facilities master plan, safety and education & health complex Measure Q projects. modernization initiatives supporting instruction as outlined in Measure Q. Relationship to Assessment Leads to improved wellness testing equipment and facility for both activity and lecture courses. Skill assessments will be considerably improved. Expected Impact on Program/Student Learning Enrollment increases and enhanced learning environment for students. Re‐activation of several activity courses. To meet increased enrollment demands and diversity. Gender diversity and wellness opportunities for students. Increased wellness opportunities for students. Wellness testing equipment acquisitions. Assessment effectiveness and increased safety for students Increases availability of updated assessment tools. Enhanced student value and expectation of personal wellness goals and outcomes. Action to be taken: Resources Needed Follow‐through with Board of Trustee approved fields / physical education & health complex Measure Q projects. Follow‐through with the board approved fields / physical education & health complex Measure Q projects. Resources from integrated planning process. 5.2 Provide any additional information, brief definitions, descriptions, comments, or explanations, if necessary. The approved integrated planning process followed last year ranked physical education and health upgrade projects as follows: 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 6 ‐Stadium and field upgrades 2nd out of 32 ‐baseball field upgrades 3rd out of 32 ‐physical education complex 5th out of 32 ‐softball field upgrades 12th out of 32 This complete district planning process was approved by the board and then subsequently put on hold due to accreditation status. Once accreditation status allows for re‐activation it is critical that the district follows through with these board approved projects to reach our program plans for current and future years. Section 6 ‐ Resource Requests 6.0 Planning Related, Operational, and Personnel Resource Requests. Requests must be submitted with rationale, plan linkage and estimated costs. If requesting full‐time staff, or tenure‐track faculty, submit the appropriate form available at inside.redwoods.edu/ProgramReview Requests will follow the appropriate processes. Check One Amount Recurring Rationale Request $ Cost Y/N Linkage Planning Operational Personnel 3 Electronic SKinfold Calipers x 3 x $400 = N Strategic Plan 1.2, 1.3, $1200 1.4, 1.6, 3.5, 3.6, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5 3 Hand Held Body Fat Analyzers x 3 x$75= $225 N Strategic Plan 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 3.5, 3.6, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5 3 Spin Bikes x 3 x$1000 = N Strategic Plan 1.2, 1.3, $3000 1.4, 1.6, 3.5, 3.6, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5 3 Weight benches x 3 x$650= N Strategic Plan 1.2, 1.3, $1950 1.4, 1.6, 3.5, 3.6, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5 Health, Physical Education Instructor and X $50,000 + Y See attached request intercollegiate sport coach benefits form Section 7‐ Program Review Committee Response Do not type in this section. To be completed by the Program Review Committee following evaluation. 7.0 The response will be forwarded to the author and the supervising Director and Vice President: 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 7 S.1. Program Information: Noted that no degrees or certificates are currently offered, but CR offers all coursework that would be needed. S.2. Data Analysis: Good and concise evaluation of data. Narrative is consistent and includes anecdotal information. Satisfactory. S.3. Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities: All active courses are included in the two‐year assessment plan. Assessments in progress and will be completed in spring (PE 21 and 25). Assessment activities have increased collaboration of faculty to revise and update curriculum and improved teaching modalities. PRC suggests, regarding item 3.0.3, it would be helpful to indicate why health ed SLO assessment led to an increase in student success. Satisfactory S.4. Evaluation of Previous Plans: Previous plans were evaluated and outcomes included. S.5. Planning: Good alignment and connection to institutional plans. Additional narrative supplementing this was helpful, as well. S.6. Resource Requests: Previous plan request for a coach was resubmitted in this year’s review. Resource requests are a model example of rational linkage. Satisfactory. Well done program review. 11. cHealth,PE,Athletics Program Review final.docx 4/5/2013 Page 8